10-K

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

_______________

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

þ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended February 3, 2018

or

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ______ to ______

Commission File No. 1-14035

Stage Stores, Inc.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

NEVADA (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)	91-1826900 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
2425 WEST LOOP SOUTH, HOUSTON, TEXAS (Address of Principal Executive Offices)	77027 (Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (800) 579-2302

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class Common Stock ($0.01 par value) Name of each exchange on which registered New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:  None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes o No þ

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. 

Yes o No þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.   Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  

Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 232.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company”, and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer	o		Accelerated filer	þ
Non-accelerated filer	o	(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company	o
			Emerging growth company	o

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.    ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).  Yes o No þ

As of July 28, 2017 (the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second quarter), the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common stock of the registrant held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $52,166,748 (based upon the closing price of the registrant’s common stock as reported by the New York Stock Exchange on July 28, 2017).

As of March 23, 2018, there were 27,633,604 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the definitive proxy statement relating to the registrant’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on June 7, 2018, which will be filed within 120 days of the end of the registrant’s fiscal year ended February 3, 2018 (“Proxy Statement”), are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K to the extent described therein.

2

TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I		Page
Item 1.	Business	4
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	10
Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments	16
Item 2.	Properties	17
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	18
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	18
PART II
Item 5.	Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	19
Item 6.	Selected Financial Data	22
Item 7.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	26
Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	39
Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	40
Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	72
Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures	72
Item 9B.	Other Information	72
PART III
Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	73
Item 11.	Executive Compensation	74
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	74
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	74
Item 14.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	74
PART IV
Item 15.	Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules	75
Item 16.	Form 10-K Summary	79
Signatures		80

3

References to a particular year are to Stage Stores, Inc.’s fiscal year, which is the 52- or 53-week period ending on the Saturday closest to January 31st of the following calendar year.  For example, a reference to “2015” is a reference to the fiscal year ended January 30, 2016, “2016” is a reference to the fiscal year ended January 28, 2017 and “2017” is a reference to the fiscal year ended February 3, 2018.  2015 and 2016 each consisted of 52 weeks, while 2017 consisted of 53 weeks. Similarly, references to a particular quarter are to Stage Stores, Inc.’s fiscal quarters.

PART I

ITEM 1.BUSINESS

Our Business

Stage Stores, Inc. and its subsidiary (“we,” “us” or “our”) is a retailer, which operates specialty department stores and off-price stores. We offer our customers, referred to as “guests,” trend-right, moderately priced, name-brand apparel, accessories, cosmetics, footwear and home goods. As of February 3, 2018, we operated in 42 states through 777 department stores under the BEALLS, GOODY’S, PALAIS ROYAL, PEEBLES and STAGE nameplates and 58 GORDMANS off-price stores. We also operate an e-commerce website for our department store business. Our department stores are predominantly located in small towns and rural communities. Our off-price stores are predominantly located in mid-sized, non-rural Midwest markets.

Our History

Stage Stores, Inc. was formed in 1988 when the management of Palais Royal, together with several venture capital firms, acquired the family-owned Bealls and Palais Royal chains, both of which were originally founded in the 1920s.  At the time of the acquisition, Palais Royal operated primarily larger stores, located in and around the Houston metropolitan area, while Bealls operated primarily smaller stores, principally located in rural Texas towns.  

In 2003, we acquired Peebles Inc. (“Peebles”), a privately held, similarly small-market focused retail company headquartered in South Hill, Virginia. Our Peebles stores are located in the Mid Atlantic, Northeastern, Midwestern and Southeastern states.

In July 2009, we acquired the “Goody’s” name from Goody’s Family Clothing, Inc. through a bankruptcy auction. Our Goody’s stores are primarily located in the Southeastern and Midwestern states.

On April 7, 2017, we acquired select assets of Gordmans Stores, Inc. and its subsidiaries through a bankruptcy auction (“Gordmans Acquisition”). The results of the Gordmans stores that we operated from April 7, 2017 through February 3, 2018 are included in our consolidated statement of operations for fiscal year 2017 (see Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements). Our Gordmans stores are primarily located in the Midwestern states.

Competition

The department store and off-price retail markets are highly competitive and fragmented.  We operate in a challenging macroeconomic and retail environment and have numerous competitors as further described in Item 1A, Risk Factors, of this Form 10-K. We believe the principal differentiating factors which allow us to compete for guests’ patronage include great values on name brand merchandise, assortments that appeal to our target guests, exceptional service in convenient locations, compelling advertising and promotions and an omni-channel shopping experience.  We expect the strategic investments we have made and plan to continue to make will enable us to meet these guest expectations and leave us well positioned to compete in the future.    

4

Stores

Store Openings and Closures.  We added 58 Gordmans off-price stores in 2017 with the Gordmans Acquisition. We plan to open one new Gordmans store in early 2018. As part of a strategic evaluation of our department store portfolio in 2015, we announced a multi-year plan to close stores that we believe do not have the potential to meet our sales productivity and profitability standards. Since then, we have closed 81 stores, including 21 stores during 2017, and we expect to close approximately 30 stores in 2018. We continually review the profitability of each store and will consider closing a store if the expected store performance does not meet our financial standards. The closure of these stores is expected to improve our ability to effectively allocate capital, deliver higher sales productivity and be accretive to earnings.

Expansion, Relocation and Remodeling.  During 2017, we completed 9 store remodels, relocations and expansions. Since 2015, we have updated over 200 stores representing approximately 45% of our sales base. We believe that our investment in these stores improves the store environment and helps us create an inviting and differentiated shopping experience. Our store remodels are designed to create a bright, fun and comfortable environment and include upgrades ranging from improved lighting, flooring, paint, fixtures, fitting rooms, visual merchandising and signage, to more extensive expansion projects.

Store count and selling square footage by nameplate are as follows:

	Number of Stores				Selling Square Footage (in thousands)
	January 28, 2017	2017 Activity Net Changes		February 3, 2018	January 28, 2017	2017 Activity Net Changes		February 3, 2018
Bealls	188	(7	)	181	3,787	(171	)	3,616
Goody's	223	(6	)	217	3,451	(88	)	3,363
Palais Royal	49	(3	)	46	1,063	(73	)	990
Peebles	187	(2	)	185	3,429	(39	)	3,390
Stage	151	(3	)	148	2,858	(80	)	2,778
Gordmans	—	58		58	—	2,825		2,825
Total	798	37		835	14,588	2,374		16,962

Our department stores are predominantly located in small towns and rural communities. Utilizing a ten-mile radius from each store, approximately 61% of our department stores are located in communities with populations below 50,000 people, while an additional 24% of our department stores are located in communities with populations between 50,000 and 150,000 people.  The remaining 15% of our department stores are located in higher-density markets with populations greater than 150,000 people, such as Houston, San Antonio and Lubbock, Texas.

Our Gordmans off-price stores are predominantly located in mid-sized, non-rural Midwest markets.

Omni-channel

In our ongoing effort to enhance the guest experience, we are focused on better connecting our department store and online channels. Below are few examples of how our department store and online channels intersect:

• Our website gives guests the opportunity to preview merchandise online before making a purchase in our stores.

• Stores increase online sales by providing guests with the opportunity to view, touch and/or try on physical merchandise before ordering online.

• Most online purchases can easily be returned in our stores.

• In 2016, we introduced Buy Online, Ship-to-Store, which gives our guests the option to have online purchases shipped for free to a local store.

• In 2017, we introduced Web@POS, which gives our guests access to our expanded online assortments from within our stores.

• Style Circle Rewards^®can be redeemed online or in stores regardless of where they are earned.

• Guests may apply most discounts to both online and in-store purchases.

Providing our guests with the opportunity to engage with us through multiple channels is part of a cohesive business strategy that helps us build our brand loyalty. Guests that shop with us both online and in stores spend, on average, 3 times more than guests that shop only in our stores.

5

Merchandising

We offer a well-edited selection of moderately priced, branded merchandise within distinct merchandise categories of women’s, men’s and children’s apparel, accessories, cosmetics, footwear and home goods that reflect current styles and trends through our department stores, off-price stores and e-commerce website.

The following table sets forth the distribution of net sales among our various merchandise categories:

	Fiscal Year
	2017						2016		2015
Merchandise Category	Department Stores		Off-price Stores		Total Company
Women’s	35	%	29	%	34	%	37	%	38	%
Men’s	17		13		17		17		17
Children's	11		12		11		12		11
Apparel	63	%	54	%	62	%	66	%	66	%
Footwear	14	%	2	%	12	%	13	%	13	%
Accessories	7		9		8		7		7
Cosmetics/Fragrances	11		5		10		10		10
Home/Gifts/Other	5		30		8		4		4
Non-apparel	37	%	46	%	38	%	34	%	34	%
	100	%	100	%	100	%	100	%	100	%

Our merchandise mix in our department stores offers more apparel categories, while our off-price stores carry a larger selection of home goods. Merchandise mix may also vary from store to store to accommodate differing demographic, regional and climate characteristics. Our buying and planning team uses technology tools such as size pack optimization, which allow us to better fulfill guest needs by tailoring size assortments by store.

Approximately 82% of sales in our department stores consist of national brands such as Adidas, Calvin Klein, Carters, Chaps, Clinique, Dockers, Estee Lauder, G by Guess, Izod, Jessica Simpson, Levi’s, Nike, Nine West and Skechers, while the remaining 18% of sales are private label merchandise. Our off-price stores offer national brands purchased opportunistically bringing greater value to our guests.

Our department store private label portfolio brands are developed and sourced through agreements with third party vendors. We believe our private label and exclusive brands offer a compelling mix of style, quality and value.

Merchandise Distribution

We distribute merchandise to our department stores through our distribution centers located in Jacksonville, Texas, and Jeffersonville, Ohio and to our Gordmans off-price stores through our distribution center in Omaha, Nebraska. In December 2017, we closed our South Hill, Virginia, distribution center, as part of our strategy to increase the efficiency of our distribution network. Operations from the Virginia distribution center have been transferred to our distribution centers in Texas and Ohio. E-commerce orders are predominantly filled from our distribution center in Jacksonville, Texas and to a lesser extent, from our distribution center in Jeffersonville, Ohio, select stores and directly from our vendors. We contract with third party carriers to deliver merchandise to our stores and to our guests in the fulfillment of online orders. Guests also have the option to pick up an online order in a local store through our Buy Online, Ship-to-Store program.

6

Marketing

Our marketing strategy is designed to establish and reward brand loyalty. The strategy supports each store’s position as the destination for desirable styles and national brands at an attractive value in a comfortable and welcoming environment. Our marketing strategy leverages (i) insights from brand and guest research, (ii) identified guest purchase history and (iii) emerging technology and trends in retail marketing. We use a multi-media advertising approach, including broadcast media, digital media, mobile media, direct mail, and to a lesser degree, newspaper inserts.

Our department stores and off-price stores are similar in many respects. However, our department stores offer deeper, more curated assortments with sales driven by high-low promotions. Conversely, our Gordmans off-price stores offer every day value in a “treasure hunt” environment with sales driven by holidays, back-to-school, and other calendar events.

We consider our private label credit card program, and our loyalty programs, Style Circle Rewards^® and gRewards^TM, to be vital components of our business because these programs (i) enhance guest loyalty, (ii) allow us to identify and regularly contact our best guests and (iii) create a comprehensive database that enables us to implement targeted and personalized marketing messages. On average, private label credit cardholders and loyalty members visit our stores more frequently, spend more annually, and are less likely to attrite than non-loyalty guests. In our department stores, private label credit card purchases represented 49%, 47% and 44% of our sales in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. In our Gordmans off-price stores, we acquired a historically underpenetrated private label credit card program and implemented best practices developed in our department stores, which we expect to drive future growth. In 2017, we relaunched the value proposition for Style Circle Rewards^® and our private label credit card in conjunction with launching gRewards^TM. We ended 2017 with 7.4 million Style Circle Rewards^® members and 0.8 million gRewards^TM members. These programs allow us to better understand and respond to our guests’ shopping habits and are powerful tools to drive higher transaction value and frequency of visits.

Brand image is an important part of our marketing program. Our principal trademarks, including the BEALLS, GOODY’S, PALAIS ROYAL, PEEBLES, STAGE and GORDMANS, have been registered with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. We have also registered trademarks used in connection with our private label merchandise. We regard our trademarks and their protection as important to our success.

We maintain a connection to the communities we serve and operate a giving campaign in the markets we serve called 30 Days of Giving under our Community Counts program. In 2017, through our Community Counts program and other efforts like our Bears that Care program and Hurricane Harvey relief efforts, we helped raise approximately $3.0 million for our communities.

Guest Service

We strive to provide exceptional guest service. To ensure consistency of execution, each sales associate is evaluated based on the attainment of specific guest service standards, such as offering a friendly greeting, providing prompt assistance, helping open private label credit card accounts, thanking guests and inviting return visits. We also conduct guest satisfaction surveys to measure and monitor attainment of service expectations. The results of guest surveys are used to provide feedback to reinforce and improve store service. Additionally, we have various programs in place to recognize our sales associates for providing outstanding guest service.

7

Information Systems

We support our business by using multiple, highly integrated systems in areas such as merchandising, store operations, distribution, sales promotion, asset protection, personnel management, store design and accounting. Our core merchandising systems assist in planning, ordering, allocating and replenishing merchandise assortments for each store, based on specific characteristics and recent sales trends.  Our replenishment/fulfillment system allows us to maintain planned levels of in-stock positions in basic items such as jeans and undergarments.  In addition, a fully integrated warehouse management system is in place in all three distribution centers.

Our assortment planning system allows us to create guest-centric assortments aligned to sales strategies. The system also facilitates cleaner seasonal transitions and fresher merchandise in stores. We continue to expand the utilization and effectiveness of our merchandise planning system to maximize the generation of sales and gross margin.

We utilize a point-of-sale (“POS”) platform with bar code scanning, electronic credit authorization, instant credit, a returns database and gift card processing in all our stores.  The POS platform allows us to capture guest specific sales data for use in our merchandising, marketing and loss prevention systems, while servicing our guests. The POS platform also manages coupon and deal-based pricing, which streamlines the checkout process and improves store associate adherence to promotional markdown policies.

In 2017, we implemented new systems to facilitate our Web@POS and Buy Online, Ship-to-Store programs as part of our strategy to better connect our department store and online channels. Web@POS provides guests access to our online merchandise assortments from within our department stores. Buy Online, Ship-to-Store provides our guests the ability to buy certain merchandise on our website and have it shipped to a store for pick-up. We also continue to invest in enhancements to improve the performance of our e-commerce website.

Our Employees

At February 3, 2018, we employed approximately 14,500 full-time and part-time employees, referred to as “associates.” Employment levels vary during the year as we traditionally hire additional sales associates and increase the hours of part-time sales associates during peak seasonal selling periods. We offer a broad range of company-paid benefits to our associates. Eligibility for and the level of benefits vary depending on associates' full-time or part-time status, compensation level, date of hire and/or length of service. Company-paid benefits include a 401(k) plan, deferred compensation plans, medical and dental plans, disability insurance, paid vacation, life insurance and merchandise discounts. We consider our relationship with our associates to be good, and there are no collective bargaining agreements in effect with respect to any of our associates.  

Seasonality

Our business, like many other retailers, is subject to seasonal influences with a significant portion of sales and income typically realized during the last quarter of our fiscal year. Working capital requirements fluctuate during the year and generally reach their highest levels during the third and fourth quarters. Because of the seasonality of our business, results from any quarter are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be achieved for a full fiscal year.

8

Available Information

We make available, free of charge, through the “Investor Relations” section of our website (corporate.stage.com)

under the “Financial Reports” caption, our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”) as soon as reasonably practicable after we file such material with, or furnish it to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). In this Form 10-K, we incorporate by reference certain information from parts of our Proxy Statement for our 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (“Proxy Statement”).  

Also in the “Investor Relations” section of our website (corporate.stage.com) under the “Corporate Governance” and “Financial Reports” captions, the following information relating to our corporate governance may be found: Corporate Governance Guidelines; charters of our Board of Directors’ Audit, Compensation, and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committees; Code of Ethics and Business Conduct; Code of Ethics for Senior Officers; Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer certifications related to our SEC filings; and transactions in our securities by our directors and executive officers. The Code of Ethics and Business Conduct applies to all of our directors and employees. The Code of Ethics for Senior Officers applies to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Controller and other individuals performing similar functions, and contains provisions specifically applicable to the individuals serving in those positions. We intend to post amendments to and waivers from, if any, our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct (to the extent applicable to our directors and executive officers) and our Code of Ethics for Senior Officers in the “Investor Relations” section of our website (corporate.stage.com) under the “Corporate Governance” caption. We will provide any of the foregoing information without charge upon written request to our Secretary. The contents of our websites are not part of this report.

9

ITEM 1A.RISK FACTORS

Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Statements for Purposes of the Safe Harbor Provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995

The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“Act”) provides a safe harbor for forward-looking statements to encourage companies to provide prospective information, so long as those statements are identified as forward-looking and are accompanied by meaningful cautionary statements identifying important factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed in the statements. We wish to take advantage of the “safe harbor” provisions of the Act.

Certain statements in this report are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Act, and such statements are intended to qualify for the protection of the safe harbor provided by the Act. The words “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “objective,” “goal,” “project,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “will,” “should,” “may,” “target,” “forecast,” “guidance,” “outlook,” and similar expressions generally identify forward-looking statements. Similarly, descriptions of our objectives, strategies, plans, goals or targets are also forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements relate to the expectations of management as to future occurrences and trends, including statements expressing optimism or pessimism about future operating results or events and projected sales, earnings, capital expenditures and business strategy.

Forward-looking statements are based upon a number of assumptions and factors concerning future conditions that may ultimately prove to be inaccurate and could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements that are made herein and in other reports and releases are not guarantees of future performance and actual results may differ materially from those discussed in such forward-looking statements as a result of various factors. These factors include, but are not limited to, the ability for us to maintain normal trade terms with vendors, the ability for us to comply with the various covenant requirements contained in the Revolving Credit Facility agreement (as defined in “Liquidity and Capital Resources”), the demand for apparel, and other factors. The demand for apparel and sales volume can be affected by significant changes in economic conditions, including an economic downturn, employment levels in our markets, consumer confidence, energy and gasoline prices, the value of the Mexican peso, and other factors influencing discretionary consumer spending. Other factors affecting the demand for apparel and sales volume include unusual weather patterns, an increase in the level of competition, competitors’ marketing strategies, changes in fashion trends, changes in the average cost of merchandise purchased for resale, availability of product on normal payment terms and the failure to achieve the expected results of our merchandising and marketing plans as well as our store opening or relocation plans. Additional assumptions, factors and risks concerning future conditions are discussed in the Risk Factors section of this Form 10-K, and may be discussed from time to time in our other filings with the SEC, including Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K. Most of these factors are difficult to predict accurately and are generally beyond our control.

Forward-looking statements are and will be based upon management’s then-current views and assumptions regarding future events and operating performance, and are applicable only as of the dates of such statements. Although management believes the expectations expressed in forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions within the bounds of our knowledge, forward-looking statements, by their nature, involve risks, uncertainties and other factors, any one or a combination of which could materially affect our business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

Readers should carefully review this Form 10-K in its entirety, including, but not limited to our financial statements and the accompanying notes, and the risks and uncertainties described in this Item 1A. Readers should consider these risks, uncertainties and other factors carefully in evaluating forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date they are made. Forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-K are made as of the date of this Form 10-K.  We undertake no obligation to publicly update forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Readers are advised, however, to consult any further disclosures we make on related subjects in our public announcements and SEC filings.

Our ability to achieve the results contemplated by forward-looking statements is subject to a number of factors, any one, or a combination, of which could materially affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity. Described below are certain risk factors that management believes are applicable to our business and the industry in which we operate.  There may also be additional risks that are presently immaterial or unknown.

10

Competitive and Operational Risks

We face significant competition in the retail apparel industry, which may adversely affect our sales and profitability.  The retail apparel business is highly competitive. We compete with local, regional, national and online retailers, including department, specialty and discount stores, direct-to-consumer businesses and other forms of retail commerce. The Internet and evolving technologies in retail have led to increased competition as there are fewer barriers to entry and consumers are able to quickly and conveniently comparison shop. We compete on many factors, such as merchandise assortment, advertising, price, quality, convenience, guests’ shopping experience, store environment, service, loyalty programs and credit availability. Unanticipated changes in the pricing and other practices of our competitors may create downward pressure on prices and lower demand for our products, which may adversely impact our sales and profitability.

If we are unable to successfully execute our strategies, our operating performance may be significantly impacted. There is a risk that we will be unable to meet our operating performance targets and goals if our strategies and initiatives are unsuccessful. Our ability to develop and execute our strategic plan and to execute the business activities associated with our strategic and operating plans may impact our ability to meet our operating performance targets.

Our failure to anticipate and respond to changing guest preferences in a timely manner may adversely affect our operations.  Our success depends, in part, upon our ability to anticipate and respond to changing consumer preferences and fashion trends in a timely manner.  We attempt to stay abreast of emerging lifestyles and consumer preferences affecting our merchandise.  However, any sustained failure on our part to identify and respond to such trends may have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and cash flows.

Failure to successfully operate our Gordmans stores as an off-price retailer, or to grow the Gordmans off-price business as planned may adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. We operated 58 Gordmans off-price stores during 2017, following the Gordmans Acquisition on April 7, 2017. During 2017, we progressed with converting the Gordmans stores into a true off-price retailer by eliminating promotions and implementing pricing that is competitive with the off-price industry. We view Gordmans as a key growth opportunity for our business. If we are not able to successfully operate the Gordmans stores as an off-price retailer, or grow the Gordmans off-price business as planned, the anticipated scale and profitability may not be realized fully or at all, or may take longer to realize than expected, which may adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Failure to successfully operate our e-commerce website or fulfill guest expectations may adversely impact our business and sales.   Our e-commerce platform provides another channel to generate sales.  We believe that our e-commerce website will drive incremental sales by providing existing guests another opportunity to shop with us and allowing us to reach new guests.  If we do not successfully meet the challenges of operating an e-commerce website or fulfilling guest expectations, our business and sales may be adversely affected.

Our failure to attract, develop and retain qualified employees may negatively impact the results of our operations. We strive to have well-trained and motivated sales associates provide guests with exceptional service.  Our success depends in part upon our ability to attract, develop and retain a sufficient number of qualified employees, including store, service and administrative personnel. Competition for key personnel in the retail industry is intense and our future success will depend on our ability to recruit, train and retain our senior executives and other qualified personnel.

11

Supply Chain and Distribution Risks

Risks associated with our vendors from whom our products are sourced may have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.  Our merchandise is sourced from a variety of domestic and international vendors.  All of our vendors must comply with applicable laws, including our required standards of conduct.  Political or financial instability, trade restrictions, tariffs, currency exchange rates, transport capacity and costs and other factors relating to foreign trade, the ability to access suitable merchandise on acceptable terms and the financial viability of our vendors are beyond our control and may adversely impact our performance.

Risks associated with our carriers, shippers and other providers of merchandise transportation services may have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.  Our vendors rely on shippers, carriers and other merchandise transportation service providers (collectively “Transportation Providers”) to deliver merchandise from their manufacturers, both in the United States and abroad, to the vendors’ distribution centers in the United States.  Transportation Providers are also responsible for transporting merchandise from their vendors’ distribution centers to our distribution centers. We also rely on Transportation Providers to transport merchandise from our distribution centers to our stores and to our guests in the case of online sales.  However, if work slowdowns, stoppages, weather or other disruptions affect the transportation of merchandise between the vendors and their manufacturers, especially those manufacturers outside the United States, between the vendors and us, or between us and our e-commerce guests, our business, financial condition and cash flows may be adversely affected.

Financial and Liquidity Risks

Our dependence upon cash flows and net earnings generated during the fourth quarter, including the holiday season, may have a disproportionate impact on our results of operations. The seasonal nature of the retail industry causes a heavy dependence on earnings in the fourth quarter. A large fluctuation in economic or weather conditions occurring during the fourth quarter may adversely impact our earnings. In preparation for our peak season, we may carry a significant amount of inventory in advance. If, however, we do not manage inventory appropriately or guest preferences change we may need to increase markdowns or promotional sales to dispose of inventory which will negatively impact our financial results.

Failure to obtain merchandise product on normal trade terms may adversely impact our business, financial condition and cash flows.  We are highly dependent on obtaining merchandise product on normal trade terms.  Failure to meet our performance objectives may cause key vendors and factors to become more restrictive in granting trade credit.  The tightening of credit, such as a reduction in our lines of credit or payment terms from the vendor or factor community, may have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and cash flows.  We are also highly dependent on obtaining merchandise at competitive and predictable prices.  If we experience rising prices related to our merchandise, whether due to cost of materials, inflation, transportation costs, or otherwise, our business, financial condition and cash flows may be adversely and materially affected.

There can be no assurance that our liquidity will not be affected by changes in macroeconomic conditions. Due to our operating cash flow and availability under the Revolving Credit Facility, we continue to believe that we have the ability to meet our financing needs for the foreseeable future.  However, there can be no assurance that our liquidity will not be materially and adversely affected by changes in macroeconomic conditions.

12

The Revolving Credit Facility contains covenants that may impose operating restrictions and limits our borrowing capacity to the value of certain of our assets. The Revolving Credit Facility agreement contains covenants which, among other things, restrict (i) the amount of additional debt or capital lease obligations, (ii) the payment of dividends, and (iii) the repurchase of common stock under certain circumstances. A violation of any of these covenants may permit the lenders to restrict our ability to further access loans and letters of credit and may require the immediate repayment of any outstanding loans. Our failure to comply with these covenants may have a material adverse effect on our capital resources, financial condition, results of operations and liquidity. In addition, any material or adverse developments affecting our business may significantly limit our ability to meet our obligations as they become due or to comply with the various covenant requirements contained in the Revolving Credit Facility agreement. In addition, borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility are limited to the availability under a borrowing base that is determined principally on eligible inventory, and our inventory, cash and cash equivalents are pledged as collateral under the Revolving Credit Facility. In the event of any material decrease in the amount of or appraised value of our inventory, our borrowing capacity would decrease, which may adversely impact our business and liquidity. In the event of a default that is not cured or waived, the lenders’ commitment to extend further credit under the Revolving Credit Facility may be terminated, our outstanding obligations may become immediately due and payable, outstanding letters of credit may be required to be cash collateralized, and remedies may be exercised against the collateral. If we are unable to borrow under the Revolving Credit Facility, we may not have the necessary cash resources for our operations and, if any event of default occurs, there is no assurance that we would have the cash resources available to repay such accelerated obligations, refinance such indebtedness on commercially reasonable terms, or at all, or cash collateralize our letters of credit, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and liquidity.

The inability or unwillingness of one or more lenders to fund their commitment under the Revolving Credit Facility may have a material adverse impact on our business and financial condition. We use the Revolving Credit Facility to provide financing for working capital, capital expenditures and other general corporate purposes, as well as to support our outstanding letters of credit requirements.  The lenders under the Revolving Credit Facility are: Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Regions Bank, Bank of America, N.A. and SunTrust Bank. Notwithstanding that we may be in full compliance with all covenants contained in the Revolving Credit Facility, the inability or unwillingness of one or more of those lenders to fund their commitment under the Revolving Credit Facility may have a material adverse impact on our business and financial condition.

Changes in our private label credit card program may adversely affect our sales and/or profitability. Our private label credit card (“PLCC”) program facilitates sales and generates additional revenue under our profit sharing agreement with the unrelated third party which owns the PLCC accounts receivable. PLCC sales represented 49% of total department stores sales in 2017, and PLCC guests spend more on average than non-PLCC guests. We receive a share of the net finance charges, late fees, other cardholder fees, write-offs, and operating expenses generated by the program.  Changes in credit granting standards maintained by the third party, which may be due to macroeconomic trends, could impact our ability to generate new PLCC accounts.  Changes in guest payment patterns could impact profit sharing by impacting fee income, write-offs and operating expense.  If the sales or profit share that we receive from the PLCC decreases due to economic, legal, social, or other factors that we cannot control or predict, our operating results, financial condition and cash flows may be adversely affected.

Unexpected costs may arise from our current insurance program and our financial performance may be affected. Our insurance coverage is subject to deductibles, self-insured retentions, limits of liability and similar provisions that we believe are prudent based on the dispersion of our operations. However, we may incur certain types of losses that we cannot insure or that we believe are not economically reasonable to insure, such as losses due to acts of war, employee and certain other crime and some natural disasters. If we incur these losses and they are material, our business could suffer. Certain material events, including property losses caused by various natural disasters and other types of casualties, may result in sizable losses for the insurance industry and adversely impact the availability of adequate insurance coverage or result in excessive premium increases. To offset negative cost trends in the insurance market, we may elect to self-insure, accept higher deductibles or reduce the amount of coverage in response to these market changes. In addition, we self-insure a portion of expected losses under our workers’ compensation, general liability and group health insurance programs. Unanticipated changes in any applicable actuarial assumptions and management estimates underlying our recorded liabilities for these losses, including potential increases in medical and indemnity costs, could result in materially different amounts of expense than expected under these programs, which may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Although we continue to maintain property insurance for catastrophic events, we are self-insured for losses up to the amount of our deductibles. If we experience a greater number of self-insured or uninsured losses than we anticipate or excessive premium increases, our financial performance may be adversely affected.

13

Economic Conditions, Business Disruption and Other External Risks

An economic downturn or decline in consumer confidence may negatively impact our business and financial condition. Our results of operations are sensitive to changes in general economic and political conditions that impact consumer discretionary spending, such as employment levels, taxes, energy and gasoline prices and other factors influencing consumer confidence. We have extensive operations in the South Central, Southeastern, Midwestern and Mid-Atlantic states. Many stores are located in small towns and rural environments that are substantially dependent upon the local economy. We also have concentrations of stores in areas where the local economy is heavily dependent on the oil and gas industry, particularly in portions of Texas, Louisiana, Oklahoma and New Mexico. A decline in crude oil prices and/or oil or gas exploration may negatively impact employment in those communities, resulting in reduced consumer confidence and discretionary spending. Additionally, approximately 3% of our stores contributing approximately 6% of our 2017 sales are located in cities that either border Mexico or are in close proximity to Mexico. A devaluation of the Mexican peso will reduce the purchasing power of those guests who are citizens of Mexico. In such an event, revenues attributable to these stores could be reduced. In early 2017, 2016 and 2015, we experienced pressure on our business in areas that are heavily dependent on the oil industry and near the Mexican border. If those pressures continue or there is an additional economic downturn or decline in consumer confidence, particularly in the South Central, Southeastern, Midwestern and Mid-Atlantic states and any state from which we derive a significant portion of our net sales (such as Texas or Louisiana), our business, financial condition and cash flows will be negatively impacted and such impact may be material.

We are subject to payment-related risks that may increase our operating costs, expose us to fraud or theft, subject us to potential liability and potentially disrupt our business. We accept payments using a variety of methods, including cash, checks, credit cards, debit cards, and gift cards, and we may offer new payment options over time. Acceptance of these payment options subjects us to rules, regulations, contractual obligations and compliance requirements, including payment network rules and operating guidelines, data security standards and certification requirements and rules governing electronic funds transfers. These requirements may change over time or be reinterpreted, making compliance more difficult or costly. We rely on third parties to provide payment processing services and pay interchange and other fees, which may increase over time and raise our operating costs. On October 1, 2015, the payment cards industry began shifting liability for certain debit and credit card transactions to retailers who do not accept Europay, MasterCard and Visa (“EMV”) chip technology transactions. We have not yet implemented EMV chip technology. Implementation of the EMV chip technology and receipt of final certification is subject to the time availability of third-party service providers and may require upgrades to our systems and hardware. Further, we may experience a decrease in transaction volume if we cannot process transactions for cardholders whose card issuer has migrated entirely from magnetic strip to EMV chip enabled cards. Until we are able to fully implement and certify the EMV chip technology in our stores, we may be liable for chargebacks related to counterfeit transactions generated through EMV chip enabled cards, which could negatively impact our operational results, financial position and cash flows.

Unusual weather patterns or natural disasters may negatively impact our financial condition.  Ourbusiness depends, in part, on normal weather patterns in our markets.  We are susceptible to unseasonable and severe weather conditions, including natural disasters, such as hurricanes and tornadoes.  Any unusual or severe weather, especially in states such as Texas and Louisiana, may have a material and adverse impact on our business, financial condition and cash flows. In addition, our business, financial condition and cash flow may be adversely affected if the businesses of our key vendors or their merchandise manufacturers, shippers, carriers and other merchandise transportation service providers, including those outside of the United States, are disrupted due to severe weather, such as, but not limited to, hurricanes, typhoons, tornadoes, tsunamis or floods.

An event adversely affecting any of our buying, distribution or other corporate facilities may result in reduced revenues. Our buying, distribution and other corporate operations are in highly centralized locations.  Our operations may be materially and adversely affected if a catastrophic event (such as, but not limited to, fire, hurricanes, tornadoes or floods) or other disruption impacts the access or use of these facilities. While we have contingency plans that would be implemented in such an event, there are no assurances that we would be successful in obtaining alternative servicing facilities in a timely manner.

War, acts of terrorism, Mexican border violence, public health issues and natural disasters may create uncertainty and may result in reduced revenues.  We cannot predict, with any degree of certainty, what effect, if any, war, acts of terrorism, Mexican border violence, public health issues and natural disasters, if any, will have on us, our operations, the other risk factors discussed herein and the forward-looking statements we make in this Form 10-K.  However, the consequences of these events may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and cash flows.

14

The price of our common stock as traded on the New York Stock Exchange may be volatile. Our stock price may fluctuate substantially due to factors beyond our control, including but not limited to, general economic and stock market conditions, risks relating to our business and industry as discussed above, strategic actions by us or our competitors, variations in our quarterly operating performance and investor perceptions of the investment opportunity associated with our common stock relative to other investment alternatives.

Legal and Regulatory Risks

Changes in the regulatory or administrative landscape could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. Laws and regulations at the local, state, federal and international levels frequently change, and the ultimate cost of compliance cannot be precisely estimated. In addition, we cannot predict the impact that may result from changes in the regulatory or administrative landscape. Any changes in regulations, the imposition of additional regulations, or the enactment of any new or more stringent legislation that impacts employment and labor, trade, product safety, transportation and logistics, health care, tax, privacy, operations, or environmental issues, among others, could have an adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

Our business may be materially and adversely affected by changes to fiscal and tax policies. A number of factors influence our effective income tax rate, including changes in tax law and related regulations, interpretation of existing laws, and our ability to sustain our reporting positions on examination. Changes in any of those factors could change our effective tax rate, which could adversely affect our results of operations.

We may be subject to periodic litigation and regulatory proceedings which may adversely affect our business and financial performance. From time to time, we are involved in lawsuits and regulatory proceedings. Due to the inherent uncertainties of such matters, we may not be able to accurately determine the impact on us of any future adverse outcome of such matters. The ultimate resolution of these matters may have a material adverse impact on our financial condition, results of operations and liquidity. In addition, regardless of the outcome, these matters may result in substantial cost to us and may require us to devote substantial attention and resources to defend ourselves.

If our trademarks are successfully challenged, the outcome of those disputes may require us to abandon one or more of our trademarks. We regard our trademarks and their protection as important to our success.  However, we cannot be sure that any trademark held by us will provide us a competitive advantage or will not be challenged by third parties.  Although we intend to vigorously protect our trademarks, the cost of litigation to uphold the validity and prevent infringement of trademarks can be substantial and the outcome of those disputes may require us to abandon one or more of our trademarks.

Technology Infrastructure, Data Security and Privacy Risks

A disruption of our information technology systems may have a material adverse impact on our business and financial condition.  We are heavily dependent on our information technology systems for day-to-day business operations, including sales, warehousing, distribution, purchasing, inventory control, merchandise planning and replenishment, and financial systems.  Certain of our information technology support functions are performed by third-parties in overseas locations. While we believe that we are diligent in selecting the vendors that assist us in maintaining the reliability and integrity of our information technology systems, failure by any of these third-parties to implement and/or manage our information systems and infrastructure effectively and securely could result in future disruptions, service outages, service failures or unauthorized intrusions. Despite our precautionary efforts, our information technology systems are vulnerable to damage or interruption from, among other things, natural or man-made disasters, technical malfunctions, inadequate systems capacity, power outages, computer viruses and security breaches, which may require significant investment to fix or replace, and we may suffer loss of critical data and interruptions or delays to our operations in the interim. In addition, as part of our normal course of business, we collect, process and retain sensitive and confidential guest information. Potential risks include, but are not limited to, the following: (i) an intrusion by a hacker, (ii) the introduction of malware (virus, Trojan horse, spyware), (iii) hardware failure, (iv) outages due to software defects and (v) human error.  Although we run anti-virus and anti-spyware software and take other steps to ensure that our information technology systems will not be disabled or otherwise disrupted, there are no assurances that disruptions will not occur. The consequences of a disruption, depending on the severity, may have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition and may expose us to civil, regulatory and industry actions and possible judgments, fees and fines.

15

A security breach that results in unauthorized disclosure of guest, employee, vendor or our company information may adversely impact our business, reputation and financial condition. In the standard course of business, we receive, process and store information about our guests, employees, vendors and our business, some of which is entrusted to third-party service providers and vendors. We also work with third-party service providers and vendors that provide technology, systems and services that we use in connection with the receipt, storage and transmission of this information. Hardware, software or applications obtained from third parties may contain defects in design or manufacture or other problems that could unexpectedly compromise our information security. We rely on commercially available systems, software, tools (including encryption technology) and monitoring to provide security and oversight for processing, transmission, storage and the protection of confidential information. Despite the security measures we have in place, our facilities and systems (and those of our vendors and third-party service providers) may be vulnerable to security breaches, acts of vandalism and theft, computer viruses, misplaced or lost data, programming and/or human errors, or other similar events. Our employees, contractors, vendors or third-party service providers may attempt to circumvent our security measures in order to misappropriate such information, and may purposefully or inadvertently cause a breach involving such information. Additionally, unauthorized parties may attempt to gain access to our systems or facilities through fraud, trickery, or other means of deceit. We have programs in place to detect, contain, respond to and report (internally and externally) data security incidents. However, because the techniques used to obtain unauthorized access, disable or degrade service, or sabotage systems change frequently, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or implement adequate preventive measures to safeguard against or timely disclose all data security breaches or misuses of data. Our management and Board of Directors regularly evaluate the risks associated with information security and our efforts to mitigate those risks. Any security breach involving the misappropriation, loss or other unauthorized disclosure of confidential guest, employee or company information may severely damage our reputation, cause us to incur significant remediation costs, increase our information security protection costs, expose us to the risks of legal proceedings (including fines or other regulatory sanctions in excess of our insurance limits), disrupt our operations, attract a substantial amount of negative media attention, damage our guest and vendor relationships, increase our insurance premiums, damage our competitiveness, and otherwise have a material adverse impact on our reputation, stock price, business, operating results, financial condition and cash flows.

ITEM 1B.UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

Not applicable.

16

ITEM 2.PROPERTIES

Our stores are primarily located in strip shopping centers. We own six of our stores and lease the balance. The majority of leases, which are typically for an initial 10-year term and often with two renewal options of five years each, provide for our payment of base rent plus expenses, such as common area maintenance, utilities, taxes and insurance. Certain leases provide for contingent rents that are not measurable at inception.  These contingent rents are primarily based on a percentage of sales that are in excess of a predetermined level.  Our stores range in size from approximately 5,000 to 73,000 selling square feet, with the average being approximately 18,000 selling square feet for department stores and approximately 49,000 selling square feet for off-price stores. At February 3, 2018, we operated 835 stores, in 42 states located within 5 regions, as follows:

	Number of Stores		Number of Stores
South Central Region		Midwestern Region
Arkansas	23	Illinois	11
Louisiana	50	Indiana	30
Oklahoma	34	Iowa	11
Texas	220	Kansas	13
	327	Michigan	17
Mid-Atlantic & Northeastern Region		Minnesota	2
Delaware	3	Missouri	20
Maryland	6	Nebraska	3
New Jersey	5	North Dakota	4
Pennsylvania	32	Ohio	30
Virginia	35	South Dakota	2
West Virginia	10	Wisconsin	8
Massachusetts	2		151
New Hampshire	1	Northwestern & Southwestern Region
New York	19	Arizona	7
Vermont	4	Colorado	8
	117	Idaho	5
Southeastern Region		Nevada	4
Alabama	27	New Mexico	19
Florida	6	Oregon	4
Georgia	33	Utah	4
Kentucky	34	Wyoming	1
Mississippi	21		52
North Carolina	24
South Carolina	19
Tennessee	24	Total Stores	835
	188

17

We own a distribution center in Jacksonville, Texas and lease distribution centers in Jeffersonville, Ohio and Omaha, Nebraska. The distribution centers in Texas and Ohio support our department store business, and the distribution center in Nebraska supports our off-price store business. Our distribution centers have the following square footages:  

Location	Square Footage
Jacksonville, Texas	437,000
Jeffersonville, Ohio	202,000
Omaha, Nebraska	350,000
	989,000

We also lease a 176,000 square foot facility in Jacksonville, Texas to provide capacity expansion for our growing e-commerce business.

We own a 162,000 square-foot distribution center building located in South Hill, Virginia that is no longer used and is currently held for sale.

We lease our corporate office building located in Houston, Texas.

Our properties are in good condition and are suitable for their intended purpose.

ITEM 3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

No response is required under Item 103 of Regulation S-K.

ITEM 4.MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

18

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Market and Dividend Information

Our common stock trades on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “SSI”.  The following table sets forth the high and low market prices per share of our common stock as reported by the New York Stock Exchange and the amount of cash dividends per common share we paid during each quarter in 2017 and 2016:

	Fiscal Year
	2017						2016
	High		Low		Dividend		High		Low		Dividend
1st Quarter	$	3.00	$	1.80	$	0.15	$	9.00	$	6.60	$	0.15
2nd Quarter	2.94		1.72		0.05		7.57		4.44		0.15
3rd Quarter	2.43		1.45		0.05		6.56		4.97		0.15
4th Quarter	2.22		1.61		0.05		5.88		2.72		0.15

We paid aggregate cash dividends in 2017 and 2016 of $8.5 million and $16.7 million, respectively.The declaration and payment of future quarterly cash dividends remain subject to the review and discretion of our Board of Directors (“Board”). Future determinations to pay dividends will continue to be evaluated in light of our results of operations, cash flow and financial condition, as well as meeting certain criteria under the Revolving Credit Facility (as defined in “Liquidity and Capital Resources”) and other factors deemed relevant by our Board.

Holders

As of the close of trading on the New York Stock Exchange on March 23, 2018 there were approximately 231 holders of record of our common stock.

19

Performance Graph

The annual changes for the five-year period shown in the following graph are based on the assumption that $100 had been invested in each of our common stock, the S&P 500 Index and the S&P 1500 Department Stores Index on February 1, 2013 (the last trading date of 2012), and that all quarterly dividends were reinvested at the closing prices of the dividend payment dates. Subsequent measurement points are the last trading days of 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2017. The total cumulative dollar returns shown on the graph represent the value that such investments would have had on February 2, 2018 (the last trading date of 2017).  The calculations exclude trading commissions and taxes. The stock price performance on the following graph and table is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.

Date	Stage Stores, Inc.	S&P 500 Index	S&P 1500 Department Stores Index
2/1/2013	$100.00	$100.00	$100.00
1/31/2014	87.26	120.30	113.28
1/30/2015	91.55	137.42	141.17
1/29/2016	39.80	136.50	103.65
1/27/2017	14.68	164.99	84.00
2/2/2018	9.96	202.66	98.61

20

Stock Repurchase Program

On March 7, 2011, our Board approved a stock repurchase program (“2011 Stock Repurchase Program”), which authorizes us to repurchase up to $200.0 million of our outstanding common stock. The 2011 Stock Repurchase Program will expire when we have exhausted the authorization, unless terminated earlier by our Board. Through February 3, 2018, we repurchased approximately $141.6 million of our outstanding common stock under the 2011 Stock Repurchase Program. Also in March 2011, our Board authorized us to repurchase shares of our outstanding common stock equal to the amount of the proceeds and related tax benefits from the exercise of stock options, stock appreciation rights (“SARs”) and other equity grants. Purchases of shares of our common stock may be made from time to time, either on the open market or through privately negotiated transactions, and are financed by our existing cash, cash flow and other liquidity sources, as appropriate.

The table below sets forth information regarding our repurchases of our common stock during the fourth quarter of 2017:

ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased (a)	Average Price Paid Per Share (a)		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs	Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (b)
October 29, 2017 to November 25, 2017	10,686	$	1.89	—	$	58,351,202
November 26, 2017 to December 30, 2017	12,056	1.94		—	58,351,202
December 31, 2017 to February 3, 2018	8,089	1.77		—	58,351,202
Total	30,831	$	1.88	—

^(a) Although we did not repurchase any of our common stock during the fourth quarter of 2017 under the 2011 Stock Repurchase Program:

• We reacquired 4,445 shares of our common stock from certain employees to cover tax withholding obligations from the vesting of restricted stock at a weighted average acquisition price of $1.88 per share; and

• The trustee of the grantor trust established by us for the purpose of holding assets under our deferred compensation plan purchased an aggregate of 26,386 shares of our common stock in the open market at a weighted average price of $1.88 in connection with the option to invest in our stock under the deferred compensation plan and reinvestment of dividends paid on our common stock held in trust in the deferred compensation plan.

^(b) Reflects the $200.0 million authorized under the 2011 Stock Purchase Program, less the $141.6 million repurchased as of February 3, 2018 using our existing cash, cash flow and other liquidity sources since March 2011.

21

ITEM 6.SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following sets forth selected consolidated financial data for the periods indicated. Financial results for 2017 are based on a 53-week period. Financial results for 2016, 2015, 2014 and 2013 are based on a 52-week period. The selected consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements included herein.  All amounts are stated in thousands, except for per share data, percentages and number of stores.

	Fiscal Year
	2017			2016			2015			2014			2013
Statement of operations data:
Net sales	$	1,592,275		$	1,442,718		$	1,604,433		$	1,638,569		$	1,609,481
Cost of sales and related buying, occupancy and distribution expenses	1,228,780			1,144,666			1,208,002			1,188,763			1,172,995
Gross profit	363,495			298,052			396,431			449,806			436,486
Selling, general and administrative expenses	406,206			356,064			387,859			386,104			393,126
Interest expense	7,680			5,051			2,977			3,002			2,744
(Loss) income from continuing operations before income tax	(50,391		)	(63,063		)	5,595			60,700			40,616
Income tax (benefit) expense	(13,068		)	(25,166		)	1,815			22,847			15,400
(Loss) income from continuing operations	(37,323		)	(37,897		)	3,780			37,853			25,216
Loss from discontinued operations, net (a)	—			—			—			(7,003		)	(8,574		)
Net (loss) income	$	(37,323	)	$	(37,897	)	$	3,780		$	30,850		$	16,642
Adjusted net (loss) income (non-GAAP) (b)	$	(23,037	)	$	(24,078	)	$	16,182		$	37,853		$	39,986
Basic (loss) earnings per share data:
Continuing operations	$	(1.37	)	$	(1.40	)	$	0.12		$	1.18		$	0.78
Discontinued operations(a)	—			—			—			(0.22		)	(0.27		)
Basic (loss) earnings per share	$	(1.37	)	$	(1.40	)	$	0.12		$	0.96		$	0.51
Basic weighted average shares outstanding	27,510			27,090			31,145			31,675			32,034
Diluted (loss) earnings per share data:
Continuing operations	$	(1.37	)	$	(1.40	)	$	0.12		$	1.18		$	0.77
Discontinued operations (a)	—			—			—			(0.22		)	(0.26		)
Diluted (loss) earnings per share	$	(1.37	)	$	(1.40	)	$	0.12		$	0.96		$	0.51
Adjusted diluted (loss) earnings per share (non-GAAP) (b)	$	(0.85	)	$	(0.89	)	$	0.51		$	1.18		$	1.22
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding	27,510			27,090			31,188			31,763			32,311
Gross profit and SG&A as a percentage of sales:
Gross profit margin	22.8		%	20.7		%	24.7		%	27.5		%	27.1		%
Selling, general and administrative expense rate	25.5		%	24.7		%	24.2		%	23.6		%	24.4		%
Cash flow and other data:
Capital expenditures	$	38,630		$	74,257		$	90,695		$	70,580		$	61,263
Construction allowances from landlords	1,228			7,079			3,444			5,538			4,162
Business acquisition	36,144			—			—			—			—
Stock repurchases	—			—			41,587			2,755			31,367
Cash dividends per share	0.30			0.60			0.58			0.53			0.48

22

	Fiscal Year
	2017			2016			2015			2014			2013
Store data:
Comparable sales (decline) growth (c)	(3.6		)%	(8.8		)%	(2.0		)%	1.4		%	(1.5		)%
Store openings (d)	58			—			3			18			28
Store closings (d)	21			37			23			12			10
Number of stores open at end of period (d)	835			798			834			854			848
Total selling area square footage at end of period (d)	16,962			14,588			15,130			15,409			15,313
	February 3,			January 28,			January 30,			January 31,			February 1,
	2018			2017			2016			2015			2014
Balance sheet data:
Working capital	$	298,616		$	296,091		$	344,880		$	299,279		$	293,995
Total assets	806,406			786,989			848,099			824,677			810,837
Debt obligations	183,335			170,163			165,723			47,388			63,225
Stockholders' equity	344,114			380,160			429,753			475,930			454,444

^(a) Discontinued operations reflect the results of Steele’s, which was divested in 2014.

^(b) See Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures on page 24 for additional information and reconciliation to the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP financial measure.

^(c) Comparable sales for 2017 were measured over the 52-week period and exclude the last week of 2017.

^(d) Fiscal 2017 reflects the addition of Gordmans off-price stores. The fiscal 2016 year-end store count includes one store that was relocated during the year after being temporarily closed in 2015, and was excluded from the 2015 year-end store count. Fiscal 2013 and 2014 exclude Steele’s, which was divested in 2014.

23

Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures

To provide additional transparency, we have disclosed the results of operations for the years presented on a basis in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and on a non-GAAP basis to show earnings excluding certain items presented below. We believe this supplemental financial information enhances an investor’s understanding of our financial performance as it excludes those items which impact comparability of operating trends. The non-GAAP financial information should not be considered in isolation or viewed as a substitute for net income, cash flow from operations, diluted earnings per common share or other measures of performance as defined by GAAP.  Moreover, the inclusion of non-GAAP financial information as used herein is not necessarily comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies due to the potential inconsistencies in the method of presentation and items considered. The following tables set forth the supplemental financial information and the reconciliation of GAAP disclosures to non-GAAP financial measures (in thousands, except diluted earnings per share):

	Fiscal Year
	2017			2016			2015			2014			2013
Net (loss) income (GAAP)	$	(37,323	)	$	(37,897	)	$	3,780		$	30,850		$	16,642
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax benefit of $4,228 and $5,237, respectively (GAAP)(a)	—			—			—			7,003			8,574
(Loss) income from continuing operations (GAAP)	(37,323		)	(37,897		)	3,780			37,853			25,216
Business acquisition costs (pretax)(b)	9,059			—			—			—			—
South Hill distribution center closure (pretax)(c)	828			—			—			—			—
Pension settlement (pretax)(d)	438			—			748			—			—
Store closures, impairments and other strategic initiatives (pretax)(e)	2,608			21,256			12,186			—			—
Severance charges associated with workforce reductions (pretax)(f)	—			1,632			1,885			—			—
Consolidation of corporate headquarters (pretax)(g)	—			110			3,538			—			—
South Hill Consolidation related charges (pretax)(h)	—			—			—			—			23,789
Income tax impact of above adjustments(i)	(4,979		)	(9,179		)	(5,955		)	—			(9,019		)
Valuation allowance on net deferred tax assets(j)	6,077			—			—			—			—
Tax Act(k)	255			—			—			—			—
Adjusted net income (loss) (non-GAAP)	$	(23,037	)	$	(24,078	)	$	16,182		$	37,853		$	39,986
Diluted (loss) earnings per share (GAAP)	$	(1.37	)	$	(1.40	)	$	0.12		$	0.96		$	0.51
Loss from discontinued operations (GAAP)(a)	—			—			—			(0.22		)	(0.26		)
Diluted (loss) earnings per share from continuing operations (GAAP)	(1.37		)	(1.40		)	0.12			1.18			0.77
Business acquisition costs (pretax)(b)	0.33			—			—			—			—
South Hill distribution center closure (pretax)(c)	0.03			—			—			—			—
Pension settlement (pretax)(d)	0.02			—			0.02			—			—
Store closures, impairments and other strategic initiatives (pretax)(e)	0.09			0.78			0.39			—			—
Severance charges associated with workforce reductions (pretax)(f)	—			0.06			0.06			—			—
Consolidation of corporate headquarters (pretax)(g)	—			—			0.11			—			—
South Hill Consolidation related charges (pretax)(h)	—			—			—			—			0.73
Income tax impact of above adjustments(i)	(0.18		)	(0.33		)	(0.19		)	—			(0.28		)
Valuation allowance on net deferred tax assets(j)	0.22			—			—			—			—
Tax Act(k)	0.01			—			—			—			—
Adjusted diluted (loss) earnings per share (non-GAAP)	$	(0.85	)	$	(0.89	)	$	0.51		$	1.18		$	1.22

24

	Fiscal Year
	2017			2016			2015
Net (loss) income (GAAP)	$	(37,323	)	$	(37,897	)	$	3,780
Interest expense	7,680			5,051			2,977
Income tax (benefit) expense	(13,068		)	(25,166		)	1,815
EBIT (Non-GAAP)	(42,711		)	(58,012		)	8,572
Business acquisition costs (pretax)(b)	9,059			—			—
South Hill distribution center closure (pretax)(c)	828			—			—
Pension settlement charge (pretax)(d)	438			—			748
Store closures, impairments and other (pretax)(e)	2,608			21,256			12,186
Severance charges associated with workforce reduction (pretax)(f)	—			1,632			1,885
Consolidation of corporate headquarters (pretax)(g)	—			110			3,538
Adjusted EBIT (non-GAAP)	$	(29,778	)	$	(35,014	)	$	26,929

^(a) Discontinued operations reflect the results of Steele’s, which was divested in 2014.

^(b) Reflects acquisition and integration related costs associated with the Gordmans Acquisition (see Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements).

^(c) Reflects charges associated with the closure of our distribution center in South Hill, Virginia.

^(d) Reflects non-cash charges as a result of pension lump sum distributions exceeding interest cost.

^(e) Charges in 2017 reflect impairment charges and store closure costs. Charges in 2016 reflect impairment charges recognized as a result of deteriorating operating performance of our stores and costs related to our strategic store closure plan and other initiatives announced in 2015. Charges in 2015 reflect our strategic store closure plan, and primarily consist of impairment charges, as well as fixture moving costs and lease termination charges and other strategic initiatives.

^(f) Reflects severance charges associated with workforce reductions.

^(g) Reflects duplicate rent expense and moving related costs associated with the consolidation of our corporate headquarters into a single location, which was completed in February 2016.

^(h) Reflects charges associated with the consolidation of our operations in South Hill, Virginia, into our corporate headquarters. The charges were primarily for transitional payroll and benefits, recruiting and relocation costs, severance, property and equipment impairment and inventory markdowns.

⁽ⁱ⁾ Taxes were allocated based on the annual effective tax rate, excluding the effect of the valuation allowance and Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“Tax Act”).

^(j) In 2017, we recorded a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets. Refer to the Income Taxes discussion within Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Note 14 of the Financial Statements.

^(k) Represents provisional charges for the remeasurement of deferred tax assets related to the Tax Act. Refer to the Income Taxes discussion within Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Note 14 of the Financial Statements.

25

ITEM 7.                    MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Our Business

We are a retailer of trend-right, moderately priced, name-brand apparel, accessories, cosmetics, footwear and home goods.  As of February 3, 2018, we operated in 42 states through 777 specialty department stores under the BEALLS, GOODY’S, PALAIS ROYAL, PEEBLES and STAGE nameplates and 58 GORDMANS off-price stores. We also operate an e-commerce website. Our department stores are predominantly located in small towns and rural communities. Our off-price stores are predominantly located in mid-sized, non-rural Midwest markets.

On April 7, 2017, we acquired select assets of Gordmans Stores, Inc. and its subsidiaries. The results of the Gordmans stores that we operated from April 7, 2017 through February 3, 2018 are included in our consolidated statement of operations for fiscal year 2017 (see Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements).

Results of Operations

Results for 2017 reflect 53 weeks versus 52 weeks in 2016, except that comparable sales were measured over 52 weeks for both years.

Select financial results for 2017 were as follows (comparisons are to 2016):

• Net sales increased $149.6 million, or 10.4%, to $1.6 billion, including $222.2 million in sales from our Gordmans off-price stores.

• Comparable sales decreased 3.6%. Comparable sales consist of store sales after a store has been in operation for 14 full months and e-commerce sales.

• Gross profit increased $65.4 million, or 22.0%.

• Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses increased $50.1 million, or 14.1%, primarily due to the addition of the Gordmans off-price stores.

• Diluted loss per common share was $1.37, compared to diluted loss per common share of $1.40.

• Adjusted (non-GAAP) diluted loss per common share was $0.85, compared to adjusted (non-GAAP) diluted loss per common share of $0.89 (see reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures on page 24).

• Paid cash dividends of $8.5 million, or $0.30 per share.

2017 Strategy and Results

Our department stores sales trend improved as 2017 progressed, and culminated in positive comparable sales in the fourth quarter. Sales benefited from our efforts to inject newness into our merchandise and marketing, better connect our stores and website, and deliver on improved guest service. Macroeconomic trends also contributed to the improved sales trend, particularly in markets that are heavily dependent on the oil and gas industry, which has impacted our stores in Texas, Louisiana, Oklahoma and New Mexico. Store sales in these states represent approximately 51% of our department stores sales.

In the first quarter of 2017, we completed the Gordmans Acquisition, and we operated 58 Gordmans off-price stores during the year. We believe Gordmans provides a growth vehicle for our business.

Our accomplishments in 2017 position us for future growth and improved profitability.

• We progressed with the transition of the Gordmans stores to an off-price concept with our pricing strategy and merchandising.

• We invigorated our merchandise with a more frequent flow of new items and evolved our product assortment to offer more contemporary fashions and brands, adding categories within existing brands and extending existing brands to additional stores.

• We drove sales in trending categories. Non-apparel, led by beauty, outperformed all year. Our Beauty Bar concept was rolled out to 150 stores in 2017 and was well received, particularly among our younger guests. In addition, we added smaller Estee Lauder and Clinique counters to 32 stores. In apparel, active and outdoor delivered strong results.

26

• We increased merchandise margin and raised our average unit retail price by improving promotional disciplines, eliminating overlapping coupons, enhancing seasonal transitions and editing less productive merchandise categories.

• We advanced our efforts to deliver a true omni-channel experience to our guests by better connecting stores and online. In the fourth quarter of 2017, we launched Web@POS, which offers guests access to a significantly larger assortment while they are shopping in our department stores. We also deployed several enhancements to improve the performance of our e-commerce website, and made investments in our supply chain to support continued online growth.

• We focused our marketing efforts on digital and broadcast and moved away from print. As a result of these efforts, traffic trends improved during the course of the year.

• We launched gRewards^TM and relaunched the value proposition for Style Circle Rewards^®. Our loyalty programs, which are available to our guests regardless of the payment method used, complement our private label credit card and enable us to better understand our guests’ shopping habits, offer more personalized promotional offers and provide attractive rewards. In November 2017, we reissued new private label credit cards to more than 2 million cardholders. In 2017, private label credit card purchases represented 49% of our department store sales. In our Gordmans stores, we acquired a historically underpenetrated private label credit card program and implemented best practices developed in our department stores, which we expect to drive future growth. 

• We closed 21 department stores during the year. Since 2015, we have closed 81 department stores as part of our multi-year plan to exit stores that do not meet our sales productivity and profitability standards.

• In December 2017, we closed our South Hill, Virginia distribution center as part of our strategy to increase the efficiency of our distribution network. Operations from the Virginia distribution center have been transferred to our distribution centers in Texas and Ohio

2018 Strategy and Outlook

In 2018, we are focused on achieving the following goals:

• Off-Price Growth - In early 2018, we completed the conversion of our Gordmans stores to an off-price shopping environment. As 2018 progresses, we will continue to refine this business model, and we look to identify additional Gordmans store opening opportunities in 2019 and beyond.

• Differentiation - Highlighting points of differentiation between our stores and our competitors is a key focus for 2018. In our department stores, we will continue to differentiate through beauty as we roll out our Beauty Bar to an additional 350 stores. In Gordmans, we will continue to grow our home category with exciting items at a great value that help set us apart from many of the apparel-focused off-price retailers. Additionally, taking advantage of synergistic relationships between our department stores and Gordmans will allow us to accelerate growth in home for department stores, beauty for Gordmans, and in other trending categories such as athletic, outdoor, and gifts.

• Guest Acquisition and Retention - Our private label credit cards and loyalty programs foster guest loyalty and enable us to better connect with our guests through digital marketing. By focusing our marketing efforts on digital media, we can reach more guests and be more nimble and efficient with our promotional efforts. In 2018, we expect our private label credit card sales penetration to reach 50% in our department stores. In our off-price stores, we have set a long-term goal for our private label credit card sales penetration to reach 25%.

• Guest Experience - Omni-channel will continue to be a focus area in 2018, as we grow our Web@POS and Buy Online, Ship-to-Store programs. In our stores, we will deliver a fun, convenient shopping experience as we re-focus on a service and selling culture, continue to optimize inventory levels, maintain an ongoing flow of new merchandise, and make selective investments in maintaining our store fleet.

In 2018, we expect the recovery in our oil and gas markets to benefit sales in our department stores and we are positioned for growth in our Gordmans off-price stores. We plan to close approximately 30 underperforming department stores in 2018, as part of our strategic store closure plan, and open one Gordmans off-price store in early 2018.

The financial information, discussion and analysis that follow should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying footnotes included in this Form 10-K.

27

2017 Compared to 2016

	Fiscal Year Ended
	February 3, 2018					January 28, 2017					Change
	Amount(a)			% to Sales (b)		Amount(a)			% to Sales (b)		Amount(a)		%
Net sales	$	1,592,275		100.0	%	$	1,442,718		100.0	%	$	149,557	10.4	%
Cost of sales and related buying, occupancy and distribution expenses	1,228,780			77.2	%	1,144,666			79.3	%	84,114		7.3	%
Gross profit	363,495			22.8	%	298,052			20.7	%	65,443		22.0	%
Selling, general and administrative expenses	406,206			25.5	%	356,064			24.7	%	50,142		14.1	%
Interest expense	7,680			0.5	%	5,051			0.4	%	2,629
Loss before income tax	(50,391		)	(3.2	)%	(63,063		)	(4.4	)%	12,672
Income tax benefit	(13,068		)	(0.8	)%	(25,166		)	(1.7	)%	12,098
Net loss	$	(37,323	)	(2.3	)%	$	(37,897	)	(2.6	)%	$	574
(a) Amounts in thousands.
(b) Percentages may not foot due to rounding.

Net Sales

Sales increased $149.6 million, or 10.4%, to $1,592.3 million in 2017 from $1,442.7 million in 2016, primarily due to $222.2 million in sales from our Gordmans off-price stores added in 2017, partially offset by a decrease in our department stores sales. The decrease in our department store sales in 2017 as compared to 2016, was driven by store closures and a 3.6% decrease in comparable sales. Comparable sales reflect a 5.1% decrease in the number of transactions, partially offset by a 1.5% increase in average transaction value. Transactions in 2017 and 2016 were negatively impacted by a decline in guest traffic in our stores. The increase in average transaction value was comprised of a 2.0% increase in average unit retail and a 0.5% decrease in units per transaction.

In 2017, comparable sales for our stores in Texas, Louisiana, Oklahoma and New Mexico, which are generally impacted by the oil and gas industry, outperformed the balance of our chain for the first time since 2013. Comparable sales in these four states were down 2.8%, while comparable sales in the balance of our chain were down 4.5%.

Comparable sales (decrease) increase by quarter is presented below:

	Fiscal Year
	2017		2016
1st Quarter	(9.6	)%	(8.5	)%
2nd Quarter	(3.6	)	(9.8	)
3rd Quarter	(3.9	)	(8.2	)
4th Quarter(a)	1.1		(8.5	)
Total Year(a)	(3.6	)%	(8.8	)%
(a)Comparable sales for the fourth quarter and full year 2017 exclude the 53rd week.

Our non-apparel categories outperformed our comparable sales average and our apparel categories underperformed. Home, gifts, footwear, cosmetics and men’s were our best performing merchandise categories. Our best performing apparel areas were plus sizes, activewear, dresses and handbags. In 2017, we drove sales in trending categories by shifting resources into these categories and injecting a continual flow of new merchandise.

28

Gross Profit

Gross profit in 2017 was $363.5 million, an increase of 22.0% from $298.1 million in 2016.  Gross profit, as a percent of sales, increased 210 basis points to 22.8% in 2017 from 20.7% in 2016. The increase in the gross profit rate reflects an increase in merchandise margin of 130 basis points as a result of a measured approach to markdowns and less clearance sales attributable to effective inventory management, and a decrease in the buying, occupancy and distribution expenses rate of 80 basis points driven by lower store impairment charges, which were $1.7 million in 2017 compared to $19.9 million in 2016.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

SG&A expenses in 2017 increased $50.1 million to $406.2 million from $356.1 million in 2016.  As a percent of sales, SG&A expenses increased to 25.5% in 2017 from 24.7% in 2016 as a result of deleverage from lower department store sales in the current year. The increase in SG&A expenses is primarily attributable to higher store expenses from the addition of the Gordmans stores. SG&A expenses in 2017 also included the Gordmans Acquisition related costs of $9.1 million, or 0.6% of sales. 

Interest Expense

Interest expense was $7.7 million in 2017 and $5.1 million in 2016. Interest expense was primarily comprised of interest on borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility, related letters of credit and commitment fees, amortization of debt issuance costs and interest on finance obligations. The increase in interest expense is primarily due to an increase in average borrowings and interest rate under the Revolving Credit Facility for 2017 as compared with 2016. During 2017, the weighted average interest rate on outstanding borrowings and the average daily borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility were 2.69% and $224.5 million, respectively, as compared to 1.90% and $192.4 million in 2016. The increase in average daily borrowings for 2017 compared to the 2016 includes the Gordmans Acquisition and related costs.

Income Taxes

Our effective tax rate was 25.9% in 2017, resulting in a tax benefit of $13.1 million. This compares to an effective tax rate of 39.9% and an income tax benefit of $25.2 million for 2016. The effective tax rate for 2017 was impacted by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“Tax Act”), enacted on December 22, 2017. Among other provisions, the Tax Act reduces the federal corporate tax rate to 21% from the prior maximum rate of 35%, effective January 1, 2018. We remeasured our deferred tax assets using the new federal rate of 21.0% and recorded provisional charges for the remeasurement of the deferred tax assets of $0.3 million to our income tax expense. While our accounting for the impact of the reduction in the U.S. federal corporate rate is complete, the final impact of the Tax Act may differ, due to, among other things, changes in our interpretations and assumptions, legislative technical corrections, and actions we may take. Most significantly, we are awaiting clarification of new net operating loss carryforward/carryback requirements for fiscal year taxpayers, which impacted our ability to carryback our current year net operating loss and if carried back would have resulted in a current benefit of approximately $3.0 million. We are continuing to monitor tax developments regarding The Act and anticipated regulations. Additionally, we recorded a charge of $6.1 million to our income tax expense for valuation of the net deferred tax assets at February 3, 2018.

29

2016 Compared to 2015

	Fiscal Year Ended
	January 28, 2017					January 30, 2016				Change
	Amount(a)			% to Sales (b)		Amount(a)		% to Sales (b)		Amount(a)			%
Net sales	$	1,442,718		100.0	%	$	1,604,433	100.0	%	$	(161,715	)	(10.1	)%
Cost of sales and related buying, occupancy and distribution expenses	1,144,666			79.3	%	1,208,002		75.3	%	(63,336		)	(5.2	)%
Gross profit	298,052			20.7	%	396,431		24.7	%	(98,379		)	(24.8	)%
Selling, general and administrative expenses	356,064			24.7	%	387,859		24.2	%	(31,795		)	(8.2	)%
Interest expense	5,051			0.4	%	2,977		0.2	%	2,074
(Loss) income before income tax	(63,063		)	(4.4	)%	5,595		0.3	%	(68,658		)
Income tax (benefit) expense	(25,166		)	(1.7	)%	1,815		0.1	%	(26,981		)
Net (loss) income	$	(37,897	)	(2.6	)%	$	3,780	0.2	%	$	(41,677	)
(a) Amounts in thousands.
(b) Percentages may not foot due to rounding.

Net Sales

Sales decreased $161.7 million, or 10.1% to $1,442.7 million in 2016 from $1,604.4 million in 2015, reflecting the impact of a decline in comparable sales and closed stores. Comparable sales decreased by 8.8% in 2016 as compared to 2015, attributable to a decrease of 13.2% in the number of transactions, partially offset by an increase of 5.1% in average transaction value. The increase in average transaction value was comprised of a 1.6% decline in average unit retail and an increase of 6.8% in units per transaction. During 2016 and 2015, we experienced a decline in traffic in our stores and lower consumer demand, especially in our stores in Texas, Louisiana, Oklahoma and New Mexico, which were impacted by depressed oil prices, and in our markets near the Mexican border due to the devaluation of the Mexican peso. Comparable sales in these four states were down 11.1%, while comparable sales in the balance of our chain were down 6.0%.

Comparable sales increase (decrease) by quarter is presented below: 

	Fiscal Year
	2016		2015
1st Quarter	(8.5	)%	(1.1	)%
2nd Quarter	(9.8	)	0.8
3rd Quarter	(8.2	)	(3.5	)
4th Quarter	(8.5	)	(3.4	)
Total Year	(8.8	)%	(2.0	)%

Our home, gifts, cosmetics and men’s categories outperformed our comparable sales average. There was also strong performance in dresses across merchandise categories.

30

Gross Profit

Gross profit in 2016 was $298.1 million, a decrease of 24.8% from $396.4 million in 2015.  Gross profit as a percent of sales decreased 400 basis points to 20.7% in 2016 from 24.7% in 2015. The decrease in the gross profit rate reflects a decrease in merchandise margin of 140 basis points, as a result of additional promotions and markdowns to drive sales and clear inventory, and an increase in the buying, occupancy and distribution expenses rate of 260 basis points due to deleverage from lower sales in 2016 compared to 2015, increased rent and depreciation associated with remodeled stores and store impairment charges. In 2016, we recorded store impairment charges of $19.9 million compared to $10.6 million in 2015.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

SG&A expenses in 2016 decreased $31.8 million to $356.1 million from $387.9 million in 2015.  As a percent of sales, SG&A expenses increased to 24.7% in 2016 from 24.2% in 2015 as a result of deleverage from lower sales in the current year. The decrease in SG&A expenses is primarily due to lower payroll, advertising, incentive compensation and lower charges incurred in 2016 related to our corporate headquarters consolidation and severance costs associated with our workforce reduction compared to 2015.

Interest Expense

Interest expense was $5.1 million in 2016 and $3.0 million in 2015. Interest expense was primarily comprised of interest on borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility, related letters of credit and commitment fees, amortization of debt issuance costs, and interest on finance obligations. The increase in interest expense is primarily due to an increase in average borrowings and interest rate under the Revolving Credit Facility for 2016 compared to 2015. During 2016, the weighted average interest rate on outstanding borrowings and the average daily borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility were 1.90% and $192.4 million, respectively, as compared to 1.53% and $102.5 million in 2015. The increase in average daily borrowings for 2016 compared to the 2015 is primarily due to stock repurchases made in the fourth quarter 2015 and capital expenditures.

Income Taxes

Our effective tax rate was 39.9% in 2016, resulting in tax benefit of $25.2 million. This compares to an effective rate of 32.4% and income tax expense of $1.8 million in 2015. The increase in the 2016 effective tax rate is primarily due to the net loss for the year, which caused permanent book-tax benefits that would normally reduce the effective tax rate, including a $0.7 million benefit associated with the favorable resolution of an uncertain tax position under audit, to be reflected as an increased percentage of the net loss. The 2015 effective income tax rate benefited from permanent book-tax differences, which had an increased impact due to low net income for the year.

Seasonality and Inflation

Our business, like many other retailers, is subject to seasonal influences, with a significant portion of sales and income typically realized during the last quarter of our fiscal year. Working capital requirements fluctuate during the year and generally reach their highest levels during the third and fourth quarters. Because of the seasonality of our business, results from any quarter are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be achieved for a full fiscal year.

We do not believe that inflation has had a material effect on our results of operations. However, there can be no assurance that our business will not be affected by inflation in the future.

31

The following table shows quarterly information (unaudited) (in thousands, except per share amounts):

	Fiscal Year 2017
	Q1			Q2			Q3			Q4 (a) (b)
Net sales	$	308,607		$	377,081		$	357,236		$	549,351
Gross profit	62,218			92,941			71,694			136,642
Net (loss) income	(18,987		)	(6,258		)	(17,722		)	5,644
Basic (loss) earnings per share	$	(0.70	)	$	(0.23	)	$	(0.64	)	$	0.19
Diluted (loss) earnings per share	(0.70		)	(0.23		)	(0.64		)	0.19
Basic weighted average shares	27,268			27,535			27,602			27,628
Diluted weighted average shares	27,268			27,535			27,602			27,628
	Fiscal Year 2016
	Q1			Q2			Q3			Q4 (a) (b)
Net sales	$	332,750		$	338,385		$	317,140		$	454,443
Gross profit	66,987			85,570			56,590			88,905
Net (loss) income	(15,460		)	41			(15,634		)	(6,844		)
Basic (loss) earnings per share	$	(0.57	)	$	—		$	(0.58	)	$	(0.25	)
Diluted (loss) earnings per share	(0.57		)	—			(0.58		)	(0.25		)
Basic weighted average shares	26,932			27,111			27,155			27,163
Diluted weighted average shares	26,932			27,175			27,155			27,163

^(a) The fourth quarter 2017 consisted of 14 weeks compared with 13 weeks in the fourth quarter 2016.

^(b) The fourth quarter 2017 and 2016 included impairment charges recognized in cost of sales and related buying, occupancy and distribution expenses of $1.6 million and $19.4 million, respectively.

32

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our liquidity is currently provided by (i) existing cash balances, (ii) operating cash flows, (iii) trade credit terms from our vendors and their factors and (iv) the Revolving Credit Facility. Our primary cash requirements are for operational needs, including rent and salaries, inventory purchases, and capital investments in our stores, e-commerce and information technology. We also have used our cash flows and other liquidity sources to pay quarterly cash dividends. Our cash requirements for 2017 included the Gordmans Acquisition and additional investments required to support the integration of the Gordmans operations into our infrastructure.

While there can be no assurances, we believe that our sources of liquidity will be sufficient to cover working capital needs, planned capital expenditures and debt service requirements for 2018 and the foreseeable future. 

Key components of our cash flow are summarized below (in thousands):

	Fiscal Year
	2017			2016			2015
Net cash provided by (used in):
Operating activities	$	75,461		$	84,284		$	40,300
Investing activities	(72,361		)	(73,078		)	(90,977		)
Financing activities	4,347			(13,890		)	49,999

Operating Activities

During 2017, we generated $75.5 million in cash from operating activities. Net loss, adjusted for non-cash expenses, provided cash of approximately $37.8 million.  Changes in operating assets and liabilities generated net cash of approximately $36.5 million, which included a $1.4 million decrease in merchandise inventories, an increase in other assets of $8.5 million and an increase in accounts payable and other liabilities of $43.6 million. Additionally, cash flows from operating activities included construction allowances from landlords of $1.2 million, which funded a portion of the capital expenditures related to store leasehold improvements in remodeled and relocated stores.

During 2016, we generated $84.3 million in cash from operating activities.  Net loss, adjusted for non-cash expenses, provided cash of approximately $40.1 million.  Changes in operating assets and liabilities generated net cash of approximately $37.1 million, which included a $26.6 million decrease in merchandise inventories, a decrease in other assets of $0.8 million and an increase in accounts payable and other liabilities of $9.8 million.  Additionally, cash flows from operating activities included construction allowances from landlords of $7.1 million, which funded a portion of the capital expenditures related to store leasehold improvements in new and relocated stores and our new corporate office building.

During 2015, we generated $40.3 million in cash from operating activities. Net income, adjusted for non-cash expenses, provided cash of approximately $94.3 million. Changes in operating assets and liabilities used net cash of approximately $57.4 million, which included a $5.5 million decrease in merchandise inventories, a decrease in other assets of $1.6 million and a decrease in accounts payable and other liabilities of $64.4 million. Additionally, cash flows from operating activities also included construction allowances from landlords of $3.4 million, which funded a portion of the capital expenditures related to store leasehold improvements in new and relocated stores.

33

Investing Activities

The following table summarizes key information about our investing activities for each period presented (in thousands, except number of stores):

	Fiscal Year
	2017		2016		2015
Capital expenditures	$	38,630	$	74,257	$	90,695
Construction allowances received from landlords(a)	1,228		7,079		3,444
Capital expenditures, net of construction allowances	$	37,402	$	67,178	$	87,251
Business acquisition	$	36,144	$	—	$	—
Number of stores remodeled, relocated and expanded	9		86		122
Number of new stores (b)	58		—		3
(a) Construction allowances are reflected in operating activities on the statements of cash flows.
(b) 2017 reflects the addition of Gordmans off-price stores.

Capital expenditures in 2017 were primarily for store remodels, expansions and relocations, and investments in our technology, omni-channel and supply-chain. Construction allowances received from landlords were used to fund a portion of the capital expenditures related to store leasehold improvements in remodeled and relocated stores. In 2016, we also received construction allowances to fund a portion of our new corporate office building. These funds are recorded as deferred rent credits in the balance sheet and are amortized as an offset to rent expense over the lease term commencing with the date the allowances were contractually earned.

During 2017, we paid $36.1 million for the Gordmans Acquisition (see Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements), which was funded with existing cash and availability under the Revolving Credit Facility.

We estimate that capital expenditures in 2018, net of construction allowances from landlords, will be approximately $30.0 million. The expenditures are principally for store remodels, expansions and relocations, new cosmetic counters, and investments in our technology, omni-channel and supply chain.

34

Financing Activities

We have a $400.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility (“Revolving Credit Facility”) with a seasonal increase to $450.0 million and a $25.0 million letter of credit sublimit. 

We use the Revolving Credit Facility to provide financing for working capital and general corporate purposes, as well as to finance capital expenditures and to support our letter of credit requirements. Borrowings are limited to the availability under a borrowing base that is determined principally on eligible inventory as defined by the Revolving Credit Facility agreement. Inventory, cash and cash equivalents are pledged as collateral. The daily interest rates are determined by a prime rate or LIBOR, plus an applicable margin, as set forth in the Revolving Credit Facility agreement. During 2017, the weighted average interest rate on outstanding borrowings and the average daily borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility were 2.69% and $224.5 million, respectively, as compared to 1.90% and $192.4 million in 2016. The increase in average daily borrowings for 2017 compared to the 2016 includes the Gordmans Acquisition and related costs.

Letters of credit issued under the Revolving Credit Facility support certain merchandise purchases and collateralize retained risks and deductibles under various insurance programs. At February 3, 2018, we had outstanding letters of credit totaling approximately $7.1 million. These letters of credit expire within 12 months of issuance. Excess availability under the Revolving Credit Facility at February 3, 2018 was $111.9 million.

The Revolving Credit Facility agreement contains covenants which, among other things, restrict, based on required levels of excess availability, (i) the amount of additional debt or capital lease obligations, (ii) the payment of dividends to $30 million in a fiscal year, and (iii) the repurchase of common stock under certain circumstances. The agreement also contains a fixed charge coverage ratio covenant in the event excess availability is below a defined threshold or an event of default has occurred. At February 3, 2018, we were in compliance with the financial covenants of the Revolving Credit Facility agreement and expect to continue to be in compliance in 2018.

During 2017, we paid $8.5 million in cash dividends. On February 22, 2018, subsequent to year-end, our Board declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.05 per share on our common stock, payable on March 21, 2018, to shareholders of record at the close of business on March 6, 2018.

35

Contractual Obligations

We have contractual commitments for purchases of merchandise inventories, services arising in the ordinary course of business, letters of credit, the Revolving Credit Facility and other debt service and leases. The following table summarizes payments due under our contractual obligations at February 3, 2018 (in thousands).  These items are discussed in further detail in Note 6 and Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements.

			Payment Due by Period
Contractual Obligations(a)	Total		Less Than One Year		1-3 Years		4-5 Years		More than 5 Years
Revolving Credit Facility(b)	$	179,288	$	—	$	—	$	179,288	$	—
Documentary letters of credit (c)	1,093		1,093		—		—		—
Finance obligations:
Principal payments	1,549		995		554		—		—
Interest payments	127		101		26		—		—
Other long-term debt obligations:
Principal payments	2,498		1,990		508		—		—
Interest payments	54		51		3		—		—
Operating lease obligations (d)	540,881		111,260		185,395		131,879		112,347
Purchase obligations (e)	239,482		220,582		15,339		3,456		105
Total contractual obligations	$	964,972	$	336,072	$	201,825	$	314,623	$	112,452

^(a) The disclosure of contractual obligations in this table is based on assumptions and estimates that we believe to be reasonable as of the date of this report. Those assumptions and estimates may prove to be inaccurate; consequently, the amounts provided in the table may differ materially from those amounts that we ultimately incur. Variables that may cause the stated amounts to vary from the amounts actually incurred include, but are not limited to: the timing of termination of a contractual obligation; the acquisition of more or less services or goods under a contractual obligation than are anticipated by us as of the date of this report; fluctuations in third party fees, governmental charges, or market rates that we are obligated to pay under contracts we have with certain vendors; and the exercise of renewal options under, or the automatic renewal of, contracts that provide for the same.

^(b) Includes principal and interest accrued as of February 3, 2018.

^(c) These documentary letters of credit support the importing of private label merchandise. We also had outstanding stand-by letters of credit that totaled approximately $6.0 million at February 3, 2018 required to collateralize retained risks and deductibles under various insurance programs. The estimated liability that will be paid in cash related to stand-by letters of credit supporting insurance programs is reflected in accrued expenses.  If we fail to make payments when due, the beneficiaries of letters of credit could make demand for payment under the letters of credit.

^(d) We have operating leases related to office, property and equipment. Certain operating leases have provisions for step rent or escalation payments. We record rent expense on a straight-line basis, evenly dividing rent expense over the lease term, including the build-out period, if any, and where appropriate, applicable available lease renewal option periods. However, this accounting treatment does not affect the future annual operating lease cash obligations as shown herein. We record construction allowances from landlords as a deferred rent credit when earned. Such deferred rent credit is amortized over the related term of the lease, commencing with the date we contractually earned the construction allowance, as a reduction of rent expense.

Certain leases provide for contingent rents that are not measurable at inception. These contingent rents are primarily based on a percentage of sales that are in excess of a predetermined level. These amounts are excluded from minimum rent and are included in the determination of total rent expense when it is probable that the expense has been incurred and the amount is reasonably estimable.

36

^(e) Purchase obligations include contracts for merchandise, utilities, capital expenditures, software acquisition/license commitments and services. For the purposes of this table, contractual obligations for purchases of goods or services are defined as agreements that are enforceable and legally binding and that specify all significant terms, including: fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased; fixed, minimum or variable price provisions; and the approximate timing of the transaction. Included in purchase obligations are outstanding purchase orders in the ordinary course of business for merchandise of $181.6 million that are typically made up to six months in advance of expected delivery. For non-merchandise purchase obligations that are non-cancelable, the entire value of the contract is also included in the above table. If the obligation is cancelable, and we would incur liquidated damages if canceled, the dollar amount of the liquidated damages is included as a “purchase obligation.” We fully expect to receive the benefits of the goods or services in connection with fulfilling our obligation under these agreements. The expected timing for payment of the obligations discussed above is estimated based on current information. Timing of payments and actual amounts paid may be different depending on the timing of receipt of goods or services or changes to agreed-upon amounts for some obligations

Other long-term liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets consist of deferred rent, deferred compensation, pension liability and deferred revenue (see Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements). Deferred rent of $38.1 million is included as a component of “operating lease obligations” in the contractual obligations table. Deferred compensation and pension liability are not included in the contractual obligations table as the timing of future payments is indeterminable.

Our pension obligation funding policy is to make contributions to maintain the minimum funding requirements in accordance with the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”).  We may elect to contribute additional amounts to maintain a level of funding to minimize the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation premium costs or to cover short-term liquidity needs of our defined benefit plan in order to maintain current invested positions. In 2017, we contributed $0.9 million, and we expect to contribute approximately $1.2 million in 2018.

We had no unrecognized tax benefits at February 3, 2018.

37

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes.  The primary estimates underlying our consolidated financial statements include the valuation of inventory, the impairment analysis on long-lived assets, the valuation of intangible assets, self-insurance reserves and the estimated liability for pension obligations.  We caution that future events rarely develop exactly as forecast, and the best estimates routinely require adjustment.  Therefore, actual results may differ materially from these estimates.  We base our estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions which are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances.  The following critical accounting policies affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.

Inventory Valuation. We value merchandise inventories using the lower of cost or net realizable value with cost determined using the weighted average cost method.  We capitalize distribution center costs associated with preparing inventory for sale, such as distribution payroll, benefits, occupancy, depreciation and other direct operating expenses as part of merchandise inventories. We also include in inventory the cost of freight to our distribution centers and to stores as well as duties and fees related to import purchases.

Vendor Allowances. We receive consideration from our merchandise vendors in the form of allowances and reimbursements.  Given the promotional nature of our business, the allowances are generally intended to offset our costs of handling, promoting, advertising and selling the vendors’ products in our stores. These allowances are recognized in accordance with ASC Subtopic 605-50, Customer Payments and Incentives. Vendor allowances related to the purchase of inventory are recorded as a reduction to the cost of inventory until sold. Vendor allowances are recognized as a reduction of cost of goods sold or the related selling expense when the purpose for which the vendor funds were intended to be used has been fulfilled and amounts have been authorized by vendors. 

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets. Property, plant and equipment and other long-lived assets are reviewed to determine whether any events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable.  For long-lived assets to be held and used, we base our evaluation on impairment indicators such as the nature of the asset’s physical condition, the future economic benefit of the asset, any historical or future profitability measurements and other external market conditions or factors that may be present.  If such impairment indicators are present or other factors exist that indicate the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable, we determine whether impairment has occurred through the use of an undiscounted cash flow analysis of the asset at the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows exist.  If impairment has occurred, we recognize a loss for the difference between the carrying amount and the estimated fair value of the asset. Management’s judgment is necessary to estimate fair value. 

Intangible Assets and Impairment of Intangible Assets. Indefinite life intangible assets are tested for impairment annually or more frequently when indicators of impairment exist. As a part of the acquisition of Peebles, Inc. in 2003 and the Gordmans Acquisition in 2017, we acquired the rights to the PEEBLES and the GORDMANS trade names and trademarks (collectively, the “Trademarks”), which were identified as indefinite life intangibles.  The values of the Trademarks were determined to be $14.9 million and $1.9 million, respectively, at the time of acquisition. We completed our annual impairment testing during the fourth quarter of 2017 and determined that the fair value of the Peebles trademarks exceeded the carrying values by greater than 10%. The carrying value of the Gordmans trademarks approximates their fair value.

Self-Insurance Reserves.  We maintain self-insured retentions with respect to general liability, workers compensation and health benefits for our employees.  We estimate the accruals for the liabilities based on industry development factors and historical claim trend experience.  Although management believes adequate reserves have been provided for expected liabilities arising from our self-insured obligations, projections of future losses are inherently uncertain, and it is reasonably possible that estimates of these liabilities will change over the near term as circumstances develop.

38

Frozen Defined Benefit Plan.  We maintain a frozen defined benefit plan.  The plan’s obligations and related assets are presented in Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements.  The plan’s assets are invested in actively managed and indexed mutual funds of domestic and international equities and investment-grade corporate bonds and U.S. government securities. The plan’s obligations and the annual pension expense are determined by independent actuaries using a number of assumptions. Key assumptions in measuring the plan’s obligations include the discount rate applied to future benefit obligations and the estimated future return on plan assets.  At February 3, 2018, assumptions used were a weighted average discount rate of 3.98% and a weighted average long-term rate of return on the plan assets of 6.5%.

Recent Accounting Standards and Disclosures

For a description of new applicable accounting pronouncements, see Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Form 10-K.

ITEM 7A.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility bear a floating rate of interest.  As of February 3, 2018, the outstanding borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility were $179.3 million.  On future borrowings, an increase in interest rates may have a negative impact on our results of operations and cash flows.  During 2017, we had average daily borrowings of $224.5 million bearing a weighted average interest rate of 2.69%.  A hypothetical 10% change from the weighted average interest rate would have a $0.6 million effect on our 2017 annual results of operations and cash flows.

39

ITEM 8.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of Stage Stores, Inc.

Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Stage Stores, Inc. and subsidiary (the "Company") as of February 3, 2018 and January 28, 2017, the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive (loss) income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended February 3, 2018, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). We also have audited the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of February 3, 2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of February 3, 2018 and January 28, 2017, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended February 3, 2018, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of February 3, 2018, based on the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.

Basis for Opinions

The Company's management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities law and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audits of the financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures to respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

40

Definition of Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Houston, Texas

April 10, 2018

We have served as the Company's auditor since 2001.

41

Stage Stores, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except par value)
	February 3, 2018			January 28, 2017
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	21,250		$	13,803
Merchandise inventories, net	439,735			409,384
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	51,049			41,574
Total current assets	512,034			464,761
Property, equipment and leasehold improvements, net	252,788			284,110
Intangible assets	17,135			15,235
Other non-current assets, net	24,449			22,883
Total assets	$	806,406		$	786,989
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Accounts payable	$	145,991		$	101,985
Income taxes payable	176			326
Current portion of debt obligations	2,985			6,414
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities	64,266			59,945
Total current liabilities	213,418			168,670
Long-term debt obligations	180,350			163,749
Deferred taxes	—			547
Other long-term liabilities	68,524			73,863
Total liabilities	462,292			406,829
Commitments and contingencies (Note 8)
Common stock, par value $0.01, 100,000 shares authorized, 32,806 and 32,340 shares issued, respectively	328			323
Additional paid-in capital	418,658			410,504
Treasury stock, at cost, 5,175 shares, respectively	(43,298		)	(43,286		)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(5,177		)	(5,648		)
(Accumulated deficit) retained earnings	(26,397		)	18,267
Total stockholders' equity	344,114			380,160
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	806,406		$	786,989

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

42

Stage Stores, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive (Loss) Income
(in thousands, except earnings per share)
	Fiscal Year
	2017			2016			2015
Net sales	$	1,592,275		$	1,442,718		$	1,604,433
Cost of sales and related buying, occupancy and distribution expenses	1,228,780			1,144,666			1,208,002
Gross profit	363,495			298,052			396,431
Selling, general and administrative expenses	406,206			356,064			387,859
Interest expense	7,680			5,051			2,977
(Loss) income before income tax	(50,391		)	(63,063		)	5,595
Income tax (benefit) expense	(13,068		)	(25,166		)	1,815
Net (loss) income	$	(37,323	)	$	(37,897	)	$	3,780
Other comprehensive (loss) income:
Employee benefit related adjustment, net of tax of $233, $112 and ($258), respectively	$	733		$	189		$	(431	)
Amortization of employee benefit related costs, net of tax of $192, $381 and $290, respectively	605			516			484
Loss on pension settlement, net of tax of $106, $0 and $280, respectively	332			—			468
Total other comprehensive income	1,670			705			521
Comprehensive (loss) income	$	(35,653	)	$	(37,192	)	$	4,301
Basic (loss) earnings per share data:
Basic (loss) earnings per share	$	(1.37	)	$	(1.40	)	$	0.12
Basic weighted average shares outstanding	27,510			27,090			31,145
Diluted (loss) earnings per share data:
Diluted (loss) earnings per share	$	(1.37	)	$	(1.40	)	$	0.12
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding	27,510			27,090			31,188

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

43

Stage Stores, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)
	Fiscal Year
	2017			2016			2015
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net (loss) income	$	(37,323	)	$	(37,897	)	$	3,780
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation, amortization and impairment of long-lived assets	67,161			91,656			77,599
(Gain) loss on retirements of property, equipment and leasehold improvements	(918		)	296			719
Deferred income taxes	(1,078		)	(20,224		)	(2,330		)
Tax (deficiency) benefit from stock-based compensation	—			(4,565		)	409
Stock-based compensation expense	8,386			9,461			12,394
Amortization of debt issuance costs	289			229			218
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation	—			—			(945		)
Deferred compensation obligation	12			218			881
Amortization of employee benefit related costs and pension settlement charges	1,235			897			1,522
Construction allowances from landlords	1,228			7,079			3,444
Other changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Decrease in merchandise inventories	1,419			26,612			5,456
(Increase) decrease in other assets	(8,532		)	754			1,551
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and other liabilities	43,582			9,768			(64,398		)
Net cash provided by operating activities	75,461			84,284			40,300
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to property, equipment and leasehold improvements	(38,630		)	(74,257		)	(90,695		)
Proceeds from insurance and disposal of assets	2,413			1,179			43
Addition to intangible asset	—			—			(325		)
Business acquisition	(36,144		)	—			—
Net cash used in investing activities	(72,361		)	(73,078		)	(90,977		)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from revolving credit facility borrowings	575,210			512,873			575,570
Payments of revolving credit facility borrowings	(555,624		)	(510,011		)	(460,640		)
Proceeds from long-term debt obligation	—			5,830			—
Payments of long-term debt obligations	(6,414		)	(4,252		)	(1,714		)
Payments of debt issuance costs	(34		)	(815		)	—
Repurchases of common stock	—			—			(41,587		)
Payments for stock related compensation	(251		)	(859		)	(4,465		)
Proceeds from issuance of equity awards	—			—			543
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation	—			—			945
Cash dividends paid	(8,540		)	(16,656		)	(18,653		)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	4,347			(13,890		)	49,999
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	7,447			(2,684		)	(678		)
Cash and cash equivalents:
Beginning of period	13,803			16,487			17,165
End of period	$	21,250		$	13,803		$	16,487
Supplemental disclosures including non-cash investing and financing activities:
Interest paid	$	7,282		$	4,816		$	2,705
Income taxes (refunded) paid	(8,761		)	1,601			15,237
Unpaid liabilities for capital expenditures	2,937			3,943			11,951

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

44

Stage Stores, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
	Common Stock			Additional Paid-in Capital			Treasury Stock					Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss			Retained Earnings (Accumulated Deficit)
	Shares	Amount					Shares		Amount									Total
Balance, January 31, 2015	31,632	$	316	$	395,395		—		$	(600	)	$	(6,874	)	$	87,693		$	475,930
Net income	—	—		—			—		—			—			3,780			3,780
Other comprehensive loss	—	—		—			—		—			521			—			521
Dividends on common stock, $0.58 per share	—	—		—			—		—			—			(18,653		)	(18,653		)
Deferred compensation	—	—		881			—		(881		)	—			—			—
Repurchases of common stock	—	—		—			(5,175	)	(41,587		)	—			—			(41,587		)
Issuance of equity awards, net	398	4		539			—		—			—			—			543
Tax withholdings paid for net settlement of stock awards	—	—		(3,584		)	—		—			—			—			(3,584		)
Stock-based compensation expense	—	—		12,394			—		—			—			—			12,394
Tax benefit from stock-based compensation	—	—		409			—		—			—			—			409
Balance, January 30, 2016	32,030	$	320	$	406,034		(5,175	)	$	(43,068	)	$	(6,353	)	$	72,820		$	429,753
Net loss	—	—		—			—		—			—			(37,897		)	(37,897		)
Other comprehensive income	—	—		—			—		—			705			—			705
Dividends on common stock, $0.60 per share	—	—		—			—		—			—			(16,656		)	(16,656		)
Deferred compensation	—	—		218			—		(218		)	—			—			—
Issuance of equity awards, net	310	3		(3		)	—		—			—			—			—
Tax withholdings paid for net settlement of stock awards	—	—		(641		)	—		—			—			—			(641		)
Stock-based compensation expense	—	—		9,461			—		—			—			—			9,461
Tax deficiency from stock-based compensation	—	—		(4,565		)	—		—			—			—			(4,565		)
Balance, January 28, 2017	32,340	$	323	$	410,504		(5,175	)	$	(43,286	)	$	(5,648	)	$	18,267		$	380,160
Net loss	—	—		—			—		—			—			(37,323		)	(37,323		)
Other comprehensive income	—	—		—			—		—			1,670			—			1,670
Dividends on common stock, $0.30 per share	—	—		—			—		—			—			(8,540		)	(8,540		)
Deferred compensation	—	—		12			—		(12		)	—			—			—
Issuance of equity awards, net	466	5		(5		)	—		—			—			—			—
Tax withholdings paid for net settlement of stock awards	—	—		(239		)	—		—			—			—			(239		)
Stock-based compensation expense	—	—		8,386			—		—			—			—			8,386
Reclassification of tax effects to retained earnings(a)	—	—		—			—		—			(1,199		)	1,199			—
Balance, February 3, 2018	32,806	$	328	$	418,658		(5,175	)	$	(43,298	)	$	(5,177	)	$	(26,397	)	$	344,114

^(a) See Note 14 - Income Taxes.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

45

Stage Stores, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Description of Business.  We are a retailer of trend-right, moderately priced, name-brand apparel, accessories, cosmetics, footwear and home goods. As of February 3, 2018, we operated in 42 states through 777 BEALLS, GOODY’S, PALAIS ROYAL, PEEBLES and STAGE specialty department stores and 58 GORDMANS off-price stores. We also operate an e-commerce website. Our department stores are predominantly located in small towns and rural communities. Our off-price stores are predominantly located in mid-sized, non-rural Midwest markets.

Principles of Consolidation.  The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Stage Stores, Inc. and its subsidiary.  All intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. We report our department stores, off-price stores and e-commerce website in a single operating segment.  Revenues from guests are derived from merchandise sales.  We do not rely on any major guest as a source of revenue.

Fiscal Year. References to a particular year are to our fiscal year, which is the 52- or 53-week period ending on the Saturday closest to January 31st of the following calendar year.  

Fiscal Year	Ended	Weeks
2017	February 3, 2018	53
2016	January 28, 2017	52
2015	January 30, 2016	52

Use of Estimates.  The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes.  On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to inventory, deferred tax assets, intangible assets, long-lived assets, sales returns, gift card breakage, pension obligations, self-insurance and contingent liabilities.  Actual results may differ materially from these estimates.  We base our estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions which are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances.

Cash and Cash Equivalents. Weconsider highly liquid investments with initial maturities of less than three months to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents also includes amounts due from credit card sales transactions.

Concentration of Credit Risk. Financial instruments which potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk are primarily cash.  Our cash management and investment policies restrict investments to low-risk, highly-liquid securities and we perform periodic evaluations of the relative credit standing of the financial institutions with which we deal.

Merchandise Inventories.  We value merchandise inventories using the lower of cost or net realizable value with cost determined using the weighted average cost method.  We capitalize distribution center costs associated with preparing inventory for sale, such as distribution payroll, benefits, occupancy, depreciation and other direct operating expenses as part of merchandise inventories.  We also include in inventory the cost of freight to our distribution centers and to stores as well as duties and fees related to import purchases.

46

Stage Stores, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

Vendor Allowances. We receive consideration from our merchandise vendors in the form of allowances and reimbursements.  Given the promotional nature of our business, the allowances are generally intended to offset our costs of handling, promoting, advertising and selling the vendors’ products in our stores.  These allowances are recognized in accordance with ASC Subtopic 605-50, Customer Payments and Incentives. Vendor allowances related to the purchase of inventory are recorded as a reduction to the cost of inventory until sold.  Vendor allowances are recognized as a reduction of cost of goods sold or the related selling expense when the purpose for which the vendor funds were intended to be used has been fulfilled and amounts have been authorized by vendors. 

Stock-Based Compensation. We recognize as compensation expense an amount equal to the fair value of share-based payments granted to employees and independent directors, net of forfeitures.  That cost is recognized ratably in SG&A expense over the period during which an employee or independent director is required to provide service in exchange for the award.

Property, Equipment and Leasehold Improvements.  Additions to property, equipment and leasehold improvements are recorded at cost and depreciated over their estimated useful lives using the straight-line method.  The estimated useful lives of leasehold improvements do not exceed the term of the related lease, including applicable available renewal options where appropriate.  The estimated useful lives in years are generally as follows:

Buildings & improvements	20
Information systems	3	-	10
Store and office fixtures and equipment	5	-	10
Warehouse equipment	5	-	15
Leasehold improvements - stores	5	-	15
Leasehold improvements - corporate office	10	-	12

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets.  Property, plant and equipment and other long-lived assets are reviewed to determine whether any events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable.  For long-lived assets to be held and used, we base our evaluation on impairment indicators such as the nature of the asset’s physical condition, the future economic benefit of the asset, any historical or future profitability measurements and other external market conditions or factors that may be present.  If such impairment indicators are present or other factors exist that indicate the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable, we determine whether impairment has occurred through the use of an undiscounted cash flows analysis of the asset at the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows exist.  If impairment has occurred, we recognize a loss for the difference between the carrying amount and the estimated fair value of the asset. Management’s judgment is necessary to estimate fair value. 

Insurance Recoveries. We incurred casualty losses during 2017, 2016 and 2015. We received total insurance proceeds of $15.7 million, $3.3 million and $2.5 million during 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and recognized net gains of $4.3 million, $0.7 million and $0.8 million in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, which are included in selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”). Insurance proceeds and net gains realized in 2017 were predominantly related to inventory claims for stores impacted by Hurricane Harvey and other casualty events such as floods and tornadoes.

Intangible Assets and Impairment of Intangible Assets.  Indefinite life intangible assets are tested for impairment annually or more frequently when indicators of impairment exist. As a part of the acquisition of Peebles, Inc. in 2003 and the Gordmans Acquisition in 2017, we acquired the rights to the PEEBLES and the GORDMANS trade names and trademarks (collectively the “Trademarks”), which were identified as indefinite life intangibles.  The values of the Trademarks were determined to be $14.9 million and $1.9 million, respectively, at the time of acquisition.  We completed our annual impairment testing during the fourth quarter of 2017 and determined that the fair value of the Peebles trademarks exceeded the carrying values by greater than 10%. The carrying value of the Gordmans trademarks approximates their fair value.

47

Stage Stores, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

Debt Issuance Costs.  Debt issuance costs are accounted for as a deferred charge and amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the related financing agreement.  The balance of debt issuance costs, net of accumulated amortization of $0.3 million and $0.1 million, is $1.1 million and $1.4 million at February 3, 2018 and January 28, 2017, respectively.

Revenue Recognition.  Our retail stores record revenue at the point of sale.  Sales of merchandise shipped to our guests are recorded based on estimated receipt of merchandise by the guest. Shipping and handling fees charged to guests are included in net sales with the corresponding costs recorded as costs of goods sold. Total revenues do not include sales tax because we are a pass-through conduit for collecting and remitting sales taxes. Revenues are recognized net of expected returns, which we estimate using historical return patterns as a percentage of sales.

We record deferred revenue on our balance sheet for gift cards sales and merchandise credits issued related to guest returns. Upon redemption, we recognize this revenue in net sales.

Gift Card and Merchandise Credit Liability.Unredeemed gift cards and merchandise credits are recorded as a liability. Our gift cards and merchandise credits do not expire. Based on historical redemption rates, a small and relatively stable percentage of gift cards and merchandise credits will never be redeemed, which is referred to as “breakage.” Estimated breakage income is recognized over time in proportion to actual gift card and merchandise credit redemptions. We recognized breakage income of approximately $0.9 million and $3.0 million in net sales in 2017 and 2016, respectively, and approximately $1.6 million as an offset to SG&A expenses in 2015.

Guest Loyalty Program.  Prior to the third quarter of 2016, guests who spent a required amount within a specified time frame using our private label credit card received reward certificates which could be redeemed for merchandise. We estimated the net cost of the rewards and recorded a liability associated with unredeemed certificates and guest spend toward unissued certificates. The cost of the loyalty rewards program was recorded in cost of sales. In the third quarter of 2016, we expanded our loyalty program to enable all guests to earn benefits regardless of how they choose to pay. We record deferred revenue, net of estimated breakage, for the retail value of certificates earned and as guests make purchases towards earning reward certificates.

Self-Insurance Reserves.  We maintain self-insured retentions with respect to general liability, workers compensation and health benefits for our employees.  We estimate the accruals for the liabilities based on industry development factors and historical claim trend experience.  Although management believes adequate reserves have been provided for expected liabilities arising from our self-insured obligations, projections of future losses are inherently uncertain, and it is reasonably possible that estimates of these liabilities will change over the near term as circumstances develop.

Advertising Expenses.  Advertising costs are charged to operations when the related advertising first takes place.  Advertising costs were $83.6 million, $88.7 million and $91.0 million, in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, which are net of advertising allowances received from vendors of $3.1 million, $4.3 million and $4.9 million, respectively.

Rent Expense.  We record rent expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term, including the build out period, and where appropriate, applicable available lease renewal option periods.  The difference between the payment and expense in any period is recorded as deferred rent in other long-term liabilities in the consolidated financial statements.  We record construction allowances from landlords when contractually earned as a deferred rent credit in other long-term liabilities.  Such deferred rent credit is amortized over the related lease term, commencing on the date we contractually earned the construction allowance, as a reduction of rent expense.

Certain leases provide for contingent rents that are not measurable at inception.  These contingent rents are primarily based on a percentage of sales that are in excess of a predetermined level.  These amounts are excluded from minimum rent and are included in the determination of total rent expense when it is probable that the expense has been incurred and the amount is reasonably estimable.

48

Stage Stores, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

Income Taxes.  The provision for income taxes is computed based on the pretax income (loss) included in the consolidated financial statements.  The asset and liability approach is used to recognize deferred tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amounts for financial reporting purposes and the tax basis of assets and liabilities.  A valuation allowance is established if it is more likely than not that some portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized.  See Note 14 for additional disclosures regarding income taxes and deferred income taxes.

Earnings Per Share. Basic earnings per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the measurement period.  Diluted earnings per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares as well as all potentially dilutive common share equivalents outstanding during the measurement period.  

We granted non-vested stock and restricted stock unit awards that contain non-forfeitable dividend rights. Under Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 260-10, Earnings Per Share, non-vested stock awards that contain non-forfeitable dividend or dividend equivalent rights are considered participating securities and are included in the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method.  The two-class method determines earnings per share for each class of common stock and participating securities according to dividends or dividend equivalents and their respective participation rights in undistributed earnings. See Note 2 for additional disclosures regarding earnings per share.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, which modifies several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, classification on the statement of cash flows, and the option to estimate expected forfeitures or recognize forfeitures as they occur. We adopted this standard on a prospective basis in first quarter of 2017. Under the new standard, excess income tax benefits and deficiencies related to awards that vest or settle are recognized in the provision for income taxes as a discrete event in the period in which they occur, which may create significant volatility in the provision for income taxes and earnings. Historically, these amounts were reflected within additional paid-in capital on the balance sheet. In addition, upon adoption excess tax benefits are reflected within operating activities in the statements of cash flows, whereas historically these amounts were reflected as a financing activity. Cash paid to tax authorities on an employee’s behalf for withheld shares continues to be classified as a financing activity in the statement of cash flows. We made a policy election to recognize forfeitures as they occur. For 2017, we recognized excess tax deficiencies of $2.1 million in the provision for income taxes. The adoption of the other requirements of this guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments, which provides guidance on certain specific cash flow issues including proceeds received from the settlement of insurance claims. This guidance requires cash proceeds received from the settlement of insurance claims to be classified on the statement of cash flows on the basis of the related insurance coverage (that is, the nature of the loss). The new standard is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted and is to be applied retrospectively. We adopted this guidance in the first quarter of 2017. The adoption of ASU 2016-15 did not change the presentation of our consolidated statements of cash flows.

In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-02, Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, which allows a reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings for stranded tax effects resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“Tax Act”). In addition, the ASU requires certain disclosures regarding stranded tax effects. ASU 2018-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. We adopted the new standard in the fourth quarter of 2017 and reclassified $1.2 million from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings. See Note 14 of the Financial Statements for additional disclosures regarding the stranded tax effects.

In March 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-05, which amends Income Taxes (Topic 740) byincorporating the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”) Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 (“SAB 118”) issued on December 22, 2017. SAB 118 provides guidance on accounting for the effects of the Tax Act. We recognized the income tax effects of the Tax Act in our 2017 financial statements in accordance with SAB 118. See Note 14 of the Financial Statements for additional disclosures.

49

Stage Stores, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

Recent Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted. In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which supersedes most existing revenue recognition guidance in GAAP. The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects what the entity expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. The guidance establishes a five-step revenue recognition model, which includes (i) identifying the contract with the customer, (ii) identifying the separate performance obligations in the contract, (iii) determining the transaction price, (iv) allocating the transaction price to the separate performance obligations, and (v) recognizing revenue when each performance obligation is satisfied. The guidance also requires additional disclosures to describe the nature, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows from contracts with customers. ASU 2014-09 may be applied retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented, or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying the guidance recognized in retained earnings at the date of adoption. The new guidance is effective for us in the first quarter of fiscal 2018. We have selected the full retrospective method of adoption. In order to determine the impact of the new guidance on our financial statements, we reviewed representative transactions across our revenue streams and compared our historical accounting practices to the new guidance. We do not expect the adoption to have a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. Our 2018 consolidated financial statements will include incremental disclosures regarding our revenue recognition policies and related amounts.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). The guidance in this ASU supersedes the leasing guidance in Topic 840, Leases. The new standard requires lessees to recognize a right-of-use asset and lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. We plan to make a policy election that will keep leases with an initial term of 12 months or less off the balance sheet and will result in recognizing those lease payments in the consolidated statements of operations on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Consistent with current GAAP, the recognition, measurement and presentation of expenses and cash flows arising from a lease by a lessee primarily will depend on its classification as a financing or operating lease. However, unlike current GAAP, which requires only capital leases to be recognized on the balance sheet, ASU 2016-02 will require both types of leases to be recognized on the balance sheet. As a result, lessees will be required to put most leases on their balance sheets while recognizing expense on their income statements in a manner similar to current accounting. In addition, this guidance requires disclosures about the amount, timing and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. ASU 2016-02 specifies a modified retrospective transition approach for leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements and that the new and enhanced disclosures be provided for each period presented (including comparative periods). On March 7, 2018, the FASB affirmed its proposed ASU, Leases (Topic 842): Targeted Improvements, which provides entities with an additional (and optional) transition method to adopt the new lease requirements by allowing entities to initially apply the requirements by recognizing a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption. Consequently, an entity’s reporting for the comparative periods presented in the financial statements in which the entity adopts the new lease requirements would continue to be in accordance with current GAAP, including disclosures. The new standard will be effective for us in the first quarter of fiscal 2019, which begins on February 3, 2019. We continue to evaluate the impact that the adoption of this ASU will have on our consolidated financial statements and disclosures, including the effect of certain optional practical expedients permitted under the transition guidance. Based on our assessment to date, we expect the adoption of ASU 2016-02 will result in a significant increase in lease-related assets and liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets. The ultimate impact of adopting the new standard will depend on our lease portfolio as of the adoption date.

In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-07, Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost, which requires the service cost component of net periodic benefit cost to be presented in the same income statement line item as other employee compensation costs arising from services rendered during the period. If a subtotal for operating income is shown on the income statement, then the other components of the net periodic benefit cost must be presented separately from the line item that includes the service cost and outside of any subtotal of operating income. ASU 2017-07 also requires disclosure of the line item(s) in the income statement that include net periodic benefit costs. Additionally, only the service cost component of the net periodic benefit cost is eligible for capitalization. The new standard is effective for us in the first quarter of fiscal 2018. The change in presentation of service cost must be applied retrospectively, while the capitalization of service cost must be applied on a prospective basis. The pension plan that we sponsor is frozen, and therefore, service costs no longer accrue under the plan. Upon adoption, we will recognize net periodic pension costs in SG&A expenses, consistent with our current presentation, and we will disclose the financial statement line item presentation in the notes to the financial statements.

50

Stage Stores, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

NOTE 2 - EARNINGS PER SHARE

Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the measurement period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares as well as all potentially dilutive common share equivalents outstanding during the measurement period.

The following tables show the computation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share for each period (in thousands, except per share amounts):

	Fiscal Year
	2017			2016			2015
Basic:
Net (loss) income	$	(37,323	)	$	(37,897	)	$	3,780
Less: Allocation of earnings to participating securities	—			—			(48		)
Net (loss) income allocated to common shares	(37,323		)	(37,897		)	3,732
Basic weighted average shares outstanding	27,510			27,090			31,145
Basic (loss) earnings per share	$	(1.37	)	$	(1.40	)	$	0.12
	Fiscal Year
	2017			2016			2015
Diluted:
Net (loss) income	$	(37,323	)	$	(37,897	)	$	3,780
Less: Allocation of earnings to participating securities	—			—			(48		)
Net (loss) income allocated to common shares	(37,323		)	(37,897		)	3,732
Basic weighted average shares outstanding	27,510			27,090			31,145
Add: Dilutive effect of stock awards	—			—			43
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding	27,510			27,090			31,188
Diluted (loss) earnings per share	$	(1.37	)	$	(1.40	)	$	0.12

The number of shares attributable to stock options, stock appreciation rights (“SARs”) and non-vested stock grants that would have been considered dilutive securities, but were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings (loss) per share because the effect was anti-dilutive were as follows (in thousands):

	Fiscal Year
	2017	2016	2015
Number of anti-dilutive shares due to net loss for the period	—	34	—
Number of anti-dilutive stock options, SARs due to exercise price greater than average market price of our common stock	124	192	251

51

Stage Stores, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

NOTE 3 - FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

We recognize or disclose the fair value of our financial and non-financial assets and liabilities on a recurring and non-recurring basis.  Fair value is defined as the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.  When determining the fair value measurements for assets and liabilities which are required to be recorded at fair value, we assume the highest and best use of the asset by market participants in which we would transact and the market-based risk measurements or assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.

We applied the following fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value into three levels, and bases the categorization within the hierarchy upon the lowest level of input that is available and significant to the fair value measurement:

Level 1 - Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 - Observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in inactive markets, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

Level 3 - Inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement reflect our estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.    

52

Stage Stores, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

Financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis were as follows (in thousands):

	February 3, 2018
	Balance		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Instruments (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Other assets:
Securities held in grantor trust for deferred compensation plans (a)(b)	$	20,293	$	20,293	$	—	$	—

	January 28, 2017
	Balance		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Instruments (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Other assets:
Securities held in grantor trust for deferred compensation plans (a)(b)	$	18,094	$	18,094	$	—	$	—

^(a) The liability for the amount due to participants corresponding in value to the securities held in the grantor trust is recorded in other long-term liabilities.

^(b) Using the market approach, the fair values of these securities represent quoted market prices multiplied by the quantities held. Net gains and losses related to the changes in fair value in the assets and liabilities under the various deferred compensation plans are recorded in SG&A expenses and were nil during 2017 and 2016.

53

Stage Stores, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

Non-financial assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis were as follows (in thousands):

	February 3, 2018
	Balance		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Instruments (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets:
Store property, equipment and leasehold improvements (a)	$	778	$	—	$	—	$	778

	January 28, 2017
	Balance		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Instruments (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets:
Store property, equipment and leasehold improvements (a)	$	8,795	$	—	$	—	$	8,795

^(a) Using an undiscounted cash flow model, we evaluate the cash flow trends of our stores at least annually and when events or changes in circumstances, such as a store closure, indicate that property, equipment and leasehold improvements may not be fully recoverable. When a store’s projected undiscounted cash flows indicate its carrying value may not be recoverable, we use a discounted cash flow model, with a 10% discount rate, to estimate the fair value of the underlying long-lived assets. An impairment write-down is recorded if the carrying value of a long-lived asset exceeds its fair value. Key assumptions in estimating future cash flows include, among other things, expected future operating performance, including expected closure date and lease term, and changes in economic conditions. We believe estimated future cash flows are sufficient to support the carrying value of our long-lived assets. Significant changes in the key assumptions used in our cash flow projections may result in additional asset impairments. See Note 4 for additional disclosures on impairments charges.

Due to the short-term nature of cash and cash equivalents, payables and short-term debt obligations, the carrying value approximates the fair value of these instruments. In addition, we believe that the Revolving Credit Facility obligation approximates its fair value because interest rates are adjusted daily based on current market rates.

54

Stage Stores, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

NOTE 4 - PROPERTY, EQUIPMENT AND LEASEHOLD IMPROVEMENTS

The components of property, equipment and leasehold improvements were as follows (in thousands):

	February 3, 2018		January 28, 2017
Land	$	1,544	$	1,842
Buildings and improvements	12,966		15,633
Fixtures and equipment	526,313		548,145
Leasehold improvements	411,753		415,577
Property, equipment and leasehold improvements	952,576		981,197
Less: Accumulated depreciation	699,788		697,087
Property, equipment and leasehold improvements, net	$	252,788	$	284,110

Depreciation expense and impairment charges were as follows for each period presented (in thousands):

	Fiscal Year
	2017		2016		2015
Depreciation expense	$	65,401	$	71,779	$	66,998
Store impairment charges	1,739		19,856		10,580
Total depreciation and impairment	$	67,140	$	91,635	$	77,578

Depreciation expense and store impairment charges included in cost of sales and related buying, occupancy and distribution expense for 2017, 2016 and 2015 were $52.9 million, $77.9 million and $67.9 million, respectively.

55

Stage Stores, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

NOTE 5 - ACCRUED EXPENSES AND OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES

The components of accrued expenses and other current liabilities were as follows (in thousands):

	February 3, 2018		January 28, 2017
Accrued compensation and benefits	$	11,828	$	12,165
Gift card and merchandise credit liability	12,122		10,864
Self-insurance liability	9,994		9,437
Accrued occupancy	6,129		10,259
Other	24,193		17,220
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities	$	64,266	$	59,945

NOTE 6 - DEBT OBLIGATIONS

Debt obligations consisted of the following (in thousands):

	February 3, 2018		January 28, 2017
Revolving Credit Facility	$	179,288	$	159,702
Finance obligations	1,549		2,708
Other financing	2,498		7,753
Total debt obligations	183,335		170,163
Less: Current portion of debt obligations	2,985		6,414
Long-term debt obligations	$	180,350	$	163,749

On December 16, 2016, we entered into an amendment to our senior secured revolving credit facility (“Revolving Credit Facility”) that increased total capacity to $400.0 million with a seasonal increase to $450.0 million and a $25.0 million letter of credit sublimit. The Revolving Credit Facility matures on December 16, 2021.

We use the Revolving Credit Facility to provide financing for working capital and general corporate purposes, as well as to finance capital expenditures and to support our letter of credit requirements. Borrowings are limited to the availability under a borrowing base that is determined principally on eligible inventory as defined by the Revolving Credit Facility agreement. Inventory, cash and cash equivalents are pledged as collateral. The daily interest rates are determined by a prime rate or LIBOR, plus an applicable margin, as set forth in the Revolving Credit Facility agreement. During 2017, the weighted average interest rate on outstanding borrowings and the average daily borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility were 2.69% and $224.5 million, respectively, as compared to 1.90% and $192.4 million in 2016.

Letters of credit issued under the Revolving Credit Facility support certain merchandise purchases and collateralize retained risks and deductibles under various insurance programs. At February 3, 2018, we had outstanding letters of credit totaling approximately $7.1 million. These letters of credit expire within 12 months of issuance. Excess availability under the Revolving Credit Facility at February 3, 2018 was $111.9 million.

The Revolving Credit Facility agreement contains covenants which, among other things, restrict, based on required levels of excess availability, (i) the amount of additional debt or capital lease obligations, (ii) the payment of dividends to $30.0 million in a fiscal year, and (iii) the repurchase of common stock under certain circumstances. The agreement also contains a fixed charge coverage ratio covenant in the event excess availability is below a defined threshold or an event of default has occurred. At February 3, 2018, we were in compliance with the financial covenants of the Revolving Credit Facility agreement and expect to continue to be in compliance in 2018.

56

While infrequent in occurrence, occasionally we are responsible for the construction of leased stores and for paying project costs. ASC 840-40-55, The Effect of Lessee Involvement in Asset Construction, requires us to be considered the owner (for accounting purposes) of this type of project during the construction period. Such leases are accounted for as finance obligations with the amounts received from the landlord being recorded in debt obligations. Interest expense is recognized at a rate that will amortize the finance obligation over the initial term of the lease. Where ASC 840-40-55 was applicable, we have recorded finance obligations with interest rates ranging from 6.1% to 16.9% on our consolidated financial statements related to four store leases as of February 3, 2018. Minimum annual payments required under existing finance obligations as of February 3, 2018 are as follows (in thousands):

Fiscal Year	Minimum Payments		Less: Interest		Principal Payments
2018	$	1,096	$	101	$	995
2019	580		26		554
Total	$	1,676	$	127	$	1,549

At February 3, 2018, $2.5 million remained outstanding under our 2016 secured equipment financing note, of which $2.0 million and $0.5 million will be paid in 2018 and 2019, respectively. The note bears an effective interest rate of 3.2%.

NOTE 7 - OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES

The components of other long-term liabilities were as follows (in thousands):

	February 3, 2018		January 28, 2017
Deferred rent	$	38,109	$	43,382
Deferred compensation	20,293		18,180
Pension liability	7,247		8,801
Deferred revenue under ADS agreement (see Note 10)	2,875		3,500
Other long-term liabilities	$	68,524	$	73,863

NOTE 8 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

We have numerous contractual commitments for purchases of merchandise inventories, services arising in the ordinary course of business, letters of credit, Revolving Credit Facility and other debt service and leases. Contractual obligations for purchase of goods or services are defined as agreements that are enforceable and legally binding and that specify all significant terms, including: fixed or minimum quantities. In the ordinary course of business, we enter into arrangements with vendors to purchase merchandise typically up to six months in advance of expected delivery.

From time to time, we are involved in various legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our business. We do not believe that any pending legal proceedings, either individually or in the aggregate, are material to our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

57

Stage Stores, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

NOTE 9 - STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Our deferred compensation plan covering executives and certain officers provides an investment option that allows participants to elect to purchase shares of our common stock (“Company Stock Investment Option”). We established a grantor trust to facilitate the collection of funds and purchase our shares on the open market at prevailing market prices. All shares purchased through the grantor trust are held in the trust until the participants are eligible to receive the benefits under the terms of the plan. At the time of the participant’s eligibility, the deferred compensation obligation related to the Company Stock Investment Option is settled by the delivery of the fixed number of shares held by the grantor trust on the participant’s behalf. In 2017, 2016 and 2015, participants in our deferred compensation plan elected to invest approximately $0.2 million, $0.3 million and $0.9 million, respectively, of the total amount of deferred compensation withheld, in the Company Stock Investment Option. The purchase of shares made by the grantor trust on behalf of the participants is included in treasury stock and the corresponding deferred compensation obligation is included in additional paid-in capital.

On February 22, 2018, subsequent to year-end, our Board of Directors (“Board”) declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.05 per share on our common stock, payable on March 21, 2018, to shareholders of record at the close of business on March 6, 2018.

On March 7, 2011, our Board approved a stock repurchase program (“2011 Stock Repurchase Program”), which authorizes us to repurchase up to $200.0 million of our outstanding common stock. The 2011 Stock Repurchase Program will expire when we have repurchased $200.0 million of our outstanding common stock, unless terminated earlier by our Board. As of February 3, 2018, we had $58.4 million available under the program. Also in March 2011, our Board authorized us to repurchase shares of our outstanding common stock equal to the amount of the proceeds and related tax benefits from the exercise of stock options, SARs and other equity grants. Purchases of shares of our common stock may be made from time to time, either on the open market or through privately negotiated transactions and are financed by our existing cash, cash flow and other liquidity sources, as appropriate.

NOTE 10 - PRIVATE LABEL CREDIT CARD PROGRAM

On August 8, 2012, we entered into an Amended and Restated Private Label Credit Card Plan Agreement (“Agreement”) with World Financial Network Bank (now Comenity Bank) (“Bank”), an affiliate of Alliance Data Systems Corporation (“ADS”). Under the terms of the Agreement, which expires July 31, 2021, the Bank provides credit card services for our private label credit card program, including account activation, receivables funding, card authorization, private label credit card issuance, statement generation, remittance processing and guest service functions. We are required to perform certain duties, including electronic processing and transmitting of transaction records and marketing and promoting the private label credit card program. As consideration, among other payments set forth in the Agreement, the Bank pays us a monthly net portfolio yield payment and an annual portfolio performance bonus, if earned.

We received certain upfront payments upon execution of the Agreement that are being recognized over the life of the Agreement, and as of February 3, 2018, the remaining amount to be amortized is $4.6 million. We realized $58.9 million, $55.3 million and $54.1 million in income related to our private label credit card program during 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, which have been recorded as a reduction to SG&A expenses.

58

Stage Stores, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

NOTE 11 - OPERATING LEASES

We lease stores, our corporate headquarters, two distribution centers and equipment under operating leases. The majority of store leases, which are typically for an initial 10-year term and often with two renewal options of five years each, require us to pay base rent plus expenses, such as common area maintenance, utilities, taxes and insurance.  Certain store leases provide for contingent rents that are not measurable at inception.  These contingent rents are primarily based on a percentage of sales that are in excess of a predetermined level. A number of store leases provide for escalating minimum rent.

Minimum rental commitments on long-term, non-cancelable operating leases at February 3, 2018, are as follows (in thousands):

Fiscal Year	Commitments		Sublease Income			Net Minimum Lease Commitments
2018	$	111,260	$	(1,447	)	$	109,813
2019	97,401		(1,447		)	95,954
2020	87,994		(1,492		)	86,502
2021	73,229		(1,582		)	71,647
2022	58,650		(1,582		)	57,068
Thereafter	112,347		(1,054		)	111,293
Total	$	540,881	$	(8,604	)	$	532,277

Rental expense for operating leases, net of sublease income, consisted of the following for each period presented (in thousands):

	Fiscal Year
	2017			2016			2015
Minimum rentals	$	104,240		$	85,538		$	84,170
Contingent rentals	2,224			2,365			3,067
Sublease income	(1,474		)	(1,436		)	(5		)
Total	$	104,990		$	86,467		$	87,232

59

Stage Stores, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

NOTE 12 - STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

As approved by our shareholders, we established the Stage Stores, Inc. Amended and Restated 2001 Equity Incentive Plan (“2001 Equity Incentive Plan”), the Stage Stores, Inc. Second Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive Plan (“2008 Equity Incentive Plan”) and the Stage Stores 2017 Long-Term Incentive Plan (“2017 LTIP” and, collectively with the 2001 Equity Incentive Plan and the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan, the “Equity Incentive Plans”) to reward, retain and attract key personnel. The Equity Incentive Plans provide for grants of non-qualified or incentive stock options, SARs, performance shares or units, stock units and stock grants. To fund the 2001 Equity Incentive Plan, the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan and the 2017 LTIP, 12,375,000, 4,484,346 and 1,365,654 shares of our common stock were reserved for issuance upon exercise of awards, respectively. The 2001 Equity Incentive Plan expired in the second quarter of 2014. On June 1, 2017, the 2017 LTIP replaced the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan and no new awards will be granted under the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan.

Stock-based compensation expense by type of grant for each period presented was as follows (in thousands):

	Fiscal Year
	2017			2016			2015
Non-vested stock	$	5,626		$	6,676		$	7,171
Restricted stock units	434			—			—
Performance shares	2,760			2,785			5,193
Stock options and SARs	—			—			30
Total stock-based compensation expense	8,820			9,461			12,394
Related tax benefit	(3,313		)	(3,557		)	(4,660		)
Stock-based compensation expense, net of tax	$	5,507		$	5,904		$	7,734

As of February 3, 2018, we had unrecognized compensation cost of $10.1 million related to stock-based compensation awards granted. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.0 years.

Non-vested Stock

We grant shares of non-vested stock to our employees and non-employee directors. Shares of non-vested stock awarded to employees vest 25% annually over a four-year period from the grant date. Shares of non-vested stock awarded to non-employee directors cliff vest after one year. At the end of the vesting period, shares of non-vested stock convert one for one to common stock. Certain non-vested stock awards have shareholder rights, including the right to vote and to receive dividends. The fair value of non-vested stock awards with dividend rights is based on the closing share price of our common stock on the grant date. The fair value of non-vested stock awards that do not have dividend rights is discounted for the present value of expected dividends during the vesting period. Compensation expense is recognized ratably over the vesting period.

The following table summarizes non-vested stock activity during 2017:

Non-vested Stock	Number of Shares		Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Outstanding at January 28, 2017	1,596,410		$	10.22
Granted	668,371		2.21
Vested	(577,897	)	11.10
Forfeited	(49,847	)	9.30
Outstanding at February 3, 2018	1,637,037		6.67

The aggregate intrinsic value of non-vested stock that vested during 2017, 2016 and 2015 was $1.2 million, $2.7 million and $5.4 million, respectively. The weighted-average grant date fair value for non-vested stock granted in 2017, 2016 and 2015 was $2.21, $6.75 and $18.70, respectively. The payment of the employees’ tax liability for a portion of the non-vested stock that vested during 2017 was satisfied by withholding shares with a fair value equal to the tax liability. As a result, the actual number of shares issued was 465,007.

60

Stage Stores, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”)

We grant RSUs to our employees, which vest 25% annually over a four-year period from the grant date.  Each vested RSU is settled in cash in an amount equal to the fair market value of one share of our common stock on the vesting date, not to exceed five times the per share fair market value of our common stock on the grant date. Unvested RSUs have the right to receive a dividend equivalent payment equal to cash dividends paid on our common stock. RSUs are accounted for as a liability in accordance with accounting guidance for cash settled stock awards. The liability for RSUs is remeasured based on the closing share price of our common stock at each reporting period until the award vests. Compensation expense is recognized ratably over the vesting period and adjusted with changes in the fair value of the liability.

The following table summarizes RSU activity during 2017:

Restricted Stock Units	Number of Units		Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Outstanding at January 28, 2017	—		$	—
Granted	1,321,250		2.14
Forfeited	(37,500	)	2.09
Outstanding at February 3, 2018	1,283,750		2.14

Performance Share Units (“PSUs”)

We grant PSUs as a means of rewarding management for our long-term performance based on total shareholder return relative to a specific group of companies over a three-year performance cycle. PSUs cliff vest following a three-year performance cycle, and if earned, are settled in shares of our common stock. The actual number of shares of our common stock that may be earned ranges from zero to a maximum of twice the number of target units awarded to the recipient. Grant recipients do not have any shareholder rights on unvested or unearned PSUs. The fair value of PSUs is estimated using a Monte Carlo simulation, based on the expected term of the award, a risk-free rate, expected dividends, expected volatility, and share price of our common stock and the specified peer group. The expected term is estimated based on the vesting period of the awards, the risk-free rate is based on the yield on U.S. Treasury securities matching the vesting period, and the volatility is based on the historical volatility over the expected term. Compensation expense is recorded ratably over the corresponding vesting period.

The following table summarizes PSU activity during 2017:

Period Granted	Target PSUs Outstanding at January 28, 2017	Target PSUs Granted	Target PSUs Vested and Earned	Target PSUs Vested and Unearned		Target PSUs Forfeited		Target PSUs Outstanding at February 3, 2018	Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value per Target PSU
2015	158,490	—	—	(154,046	)	(4,444	)	—	$	28.33
2016	330,233	—	—	—		(8,527	)	321,706	8.69
2017	—	600,000	—	—		—		600,000	1.80
Total	488,723	600,000	—	(154,046	)	(12,971	)	921,706	7.65

No PSUs were earned in 2017. The aggregate intrinsic value of PSUs that vested and were earned during 2016 and 2015 was $0.1 million and $4.9 million, respectively.

61

Stage Stores, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

SARs

Prior to 2012, we granted SARs to our employees, which generally vested 25% annually over a four-year period from the grant date. Outstanding SARs will expire, if not exercised or forfeited, within seven years from the grant date. Exercised SARs are settled by the issuance of common stock in an amount equal to the increase in share price of our common stock between the grant date and the exercise date.

The following table summarizes SARs activity during 2017: 

	Number of Outstanding Shares		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (years)	Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in thousands)
Outstanding, vested and exercisable at January 28, 2017	177,900		$	17.69
Forfeited	(80,000	)	16.29
Outstanding, vested and exercisable at February 3, 2018	97,900		$	18.83	0.2	$	—

No SARs were exercised during 2017 or 2016. The aggregate intrinsic value of SARs, defined as the amount by which the market price of the underlying stock on the date of exercise exceeds the exercise price of the award, exercised during 2015 was $0.9 million.

NOTE 13 - BENEFIT PLANS

401(k) Plan.We have a contributory 401(k) savings plan (“401(k) Plan”) generally available to full and part-time employees with 60 days of service, who are age 21 or older.  Under the 401(k) Plan, participants may contribute up to 50% of their qualifying earnings on a pre-tax basis, and up to 10% of their qualifying earnings on a post-tax basis, subject to certain restrictions. We currently match 50% of each participant’s pre-tax contributions, limited up to 6% of each participant’s compensation under the Plan. We may make discretionary matching contributions during the year. Our matching contributions expense for the 401(k) Plan were approximately $1.7 million, $1.4 million and $1.5 million in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Deferred Compensation Plans. We have two nonqualified deferred compensation plans (“DC Plans”) which provide executives and other key employees with the opportunity to participate in unfunded, deferred compensation programs that are not qualified under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, (“Code”). Generally, the Code and ERISA restrict contributions to a 401(k) plan by highly compensated employees. The DC Plans are intended to allow participants to defer income on a pre-tax basis. Under the DC Plans, participants may defer up to 50% of their base salary and up to 100% of their bonus and earn a rate of return based on actual investments chosen by each participant. We have established grantor trusts for the purposes of holding assets to provide benefits to the participants. For the plan covering executives, we will match 100% of each participant’s contributions, up to 10% of the sum of their base salary and bonus. For the plan covering other key employees, we may make a bi-weekly discretionary matching contribution. We currently match 50% of each participant’s contributions, up to 3% of the participant’s compensation. For both DC Plans, our contributions are vested 100%.  In addition, we may, with approval by our Board, make an additional employer contribution in any amount with respect to any participant as is determined in our sole discretion. Our matching contribution expense for the DC Plans was approximately $0.9 million, $1.0 million and $1.1 million for 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

62

Stage Stores, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

Non-Employee Director Equity Compensation Plan.  In 2003, we adopted, and our shareholders approved, and in 2004 we amended and restated, the Stage Stores, Inc. Amended and Restated 2003 Non-Employee Director Equity Compensation Plan. We reserved 225,000 shares of our common stock to fund this plan. Under this plan, non-employee directors have the option to defer all or a portion of their annual compensation fees and to receive such deferred fees in the form of restricted stock or deferred stock units as defined in this plan. At January 28, 2017 and February 3, 2018 there were no participants in or amounts deferred under this plan.

Frozen Defined Benefit Plan. We sponsor a defined benefit plan (“DB Plan”), which covers substantially all employees who had met eligibility requirements and were enrolled prior to June 30, 1998. The DB Plan was frozen effective June 30, 1998.

Benefits for the DB Plan are administered through a trust arrangement, which provides monthly payments or lump sum distributions. Benefits under the DB Plan were based upon a percentage of the participant’s earnings during each year of credited service. Any service after the date the DB Plan was frozen will continue to count toward vesting and eligibility for normal and early retirement for existing participants. The measurement dates used to determine pension benefit obligations were February 3, 2018 and January 28, 2017.

Information regarding the DB Plan is as follows (in thousands):

	Fiscal Year
	2017			2016
Change in benefit obligation:
Benefit obligation at beginning of year	$	34,962		$	35,223
Employer service cost	490			340
Interest cost	1,430			1,598
Actuarial loss	1,835			1,067
Settlements	(1,989		)	—
Plan disbursements	(1,979		)	(3,266		)
Projected benefit obligation at end of year	34,749			34,962
Change in plan assets:
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year	26,161			26,310
Actual return on plan assets	4,456			3,117
Employer contributions	853			—
Settlements	(1,989		)	—
Plan disbursements	(1,979		)	(3,266		)
Fair value of plan assets at end of year	27,502			26,161
Underfunded status	$	(7,247	)	$	(8,801	)
Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheet consist of:
Accrued benefit liability - included in other long-term liabilities	$	(7,247	)	$	(8,801	)
Amount recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss, pre-tax (a)	6,822			9,023

^(a) Consists solely of net actuarial losses as there are no prior service costs.

63

Stage Stores, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

	Fiscal Year
	2017		2016
Weighted-average assumptions:
For determining benefit obligations at year-end:
Discount rate	3.98	%	4.33	%
	Fiscal Year
	2017		2016		2015
For determining net periodic pension cost for year:
Discount rate	4.33	%	4.79	%	3.90	%
Expected return on assets	6.50	%	7.00	%	7.00	%

The discount rate was determined using yields on a hypothetical bond portfolio that matches the approximated cash flows of the DB Plan. We develop our long-term rate of return assumptions using long-term historical actual return data considering the mix of investments that comprise plan assets and input from professional advisors. The DB Plan’s trustees have engaged investment advisors to manage and monitor performance of the investments of the DB Plan’s assets and consult with the DB Plan’s trustees.

The allocations of DB Plan assets by category are as follows:

		Fiscal Year
	2018 Target Allocation	2017	2016
Equity securities	50%	51%	51%
Fixed income securities	50	47	48
Other - primarily cash	—	2	1
Total	100%	100%	100%

We employ a total return investment approach whereby a mix of equities and fixed income investments are used to maximize the long-term return on DB Plan assets for a prudent level of risk. The investment portfolio consists of actively managed and indexed mutual funds of domestic and international equities and investment-grade corporate bonds and U.S. government securities. Investment risk is measured and monitored on an ongoing basis through quarterly investment portfolio reviews and annual liability measurements.

64

Stage Stores, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

The following tables present the DB Plan assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis in the consolidated financial statements (in thousands):

	February 3, 2018
	Balance		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Instruments (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Mutual funds:
Equity securities	$	14,162	$	14,162	$	—	$	—
Fixed income securities	12,833		12,833		—		—
Other - primarily cash	507		507		—		—
Total	$	27,502	$	27,502	$	—	$	—

	January 28, 2017
	Balance		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Instruments (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Mutual funds:
Equity securities	$	13,309	$	13,309	$	—	$	—
Fixed income securities	12,540		12,540		—		—
Other - primarily cash	312		312		—		—
Total	$	26,161	$	26,161	$	—	$	—

The components of net periodic benefit cost for the DB Plan were as follows (in thousands):

	Fiscal Year
	2017			2016			2015
Net periodic pension cost for the fiscal year:
Employer service cost	$	490		$	340		$	350
Interest cost on pension benefit obligation	1,430			1,598			1,566
Expected return on plan assets	(1,654		)	(1,749		)	(2,195		)
Amortization of net loss	797			897			774
Settlement charges(a)	438			—			748
Net periodic pension cost	$	1,501		$	1,086		$	1,243

^(a) Non-cash pension settlement charges were recognized as a result of lump sum distributions exceeding interest cost for the year. Settlement charges are recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses in our consolidated statements of operations.

65

Stage Stores, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

Other changes in DB Plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive loss are as follows (in thousands):

	Fiscal Year
	2017			2016
Amortization of net loss	$	(797	)	$	(897	)
Settlement charges	(438		)	—
Net gain	(966		)	(301		)
Net change recognized in other comprehensive loss, pre-tax	$	(2,201	)	$	(1,198	)

The estimated net loss that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive loss into net periodic benefit cost over the next year is $0.5 million. The amortization of net loss is recorded in SG&A expenses.

Our funding policy is to make contributions to maintain the minimum funding requirements for our pension obligation in accordance with ERISA. We may elect to contribute additional amounts to maintain a level of funding to minimize the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation premium costs or to cover short-term liquidity needs of the DB Plan in order to maintain current invested positions.  We contributed $0.9 million in 2017, and we expect to contribute approximately $1.2 million in 2018.

The following benefit payments are expected to be paid (in thousands):

Fiscal Year	Payments
2018	$	2,201
2019	2,880
2020	2,722
2021	2,988
2022	3,043
Fiscal Years 2023 - 2027	13,067

66

Stage Stores, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

NOTE 14 - INCOME TAXES

On December 22, 2017, the U.S. government enacted the Tax Act, making broad and complex changes to the U.S. tax code that affect our current fiscal year, including, but not limited to, (1) reducing the U.S. federal corporate tax rate, (2) creating a new limitation on deductible interest expense and (3) changing rules related to uses and limitations of net operating losses generated in tax years ending after December 31, 2017.

The Tax Act reduced the federal corporate tax rate from 35.0% to 21.0% effective January 1, 2018. In accordance with Section 15 of the Internal Revenue Code, we have utilized a blended rate of 33.7% for our fiscal 2017 tax year, by applying a prorated percentage of the number of days prior to and after the January 1, 2018 effective date. The Act required the remeasurement of the deferred tax assets at enactment date resulting in an adjustment of $0.3 million to our income tax expense.

Existing accounting guidance required remeasurement for amounts recorded through accumulated other comprehensive income to run through tax expense. This impact is commonly referred to as the “stranded tax effect”. In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-02, Income Statement-Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, to address concerns regarding the “stranded tax effect”. ASU 2018-02 provides entities an election to reclassify the difference between the new and old corporate tax rates resulting from the Tax Act between retained earnings and accumulated other comprehensive income for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. We made an election under ASU 2018-02 to reclassify the income tax rate change effects on items originally recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings in the amount of $1.2 million. Currently, only changes to the minimum pension liability are recorded into accumulated other comprehensive income. The amount of the reclassification was determined based on the amount of the federal tax rate change on the deferred tax liability remaining in accumulated other comprehensive income including the federal tax effect on future state tax benefits at the enactment date. Our current accounting policy related to releasing tax effects from accumulated other comprehensive income for minimum pension liability is on a plan approach.

On December 22, 2017, the SEC issued SAB 118, which provides guidance on accounting for tax effects of the Tax Act. SAB 118 provides a measurement period that should not extend beyond one year from the Tax Act enactment date for entities to complete the accounting under ASC 740. In accordance with SAB 118, an entity must reflect the income tax effects of those aspects of the Tax Act for which the accounting under ASC 740 is complete. To the extent that an entity’s accounting for certain income tax effects of the Tax Act is incomplete, but it is able to determine a reasonable estimate, it must record a provisional estimate to be included in the financial statements. If an entity cannot determine a provisional estimate to be included in the financial statements, it should continue to apply ASC 740 based on the provision of the tax laws that were in effect immediately before the enactment of the Tax Act. Our accounting for the impact of the reduction in U.S. federal corporate rate is complete.

We record valuation allowances when it is more-likely-than-not that some portion or all of our deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of the deferred tax assets depends on the ability to generate sufficient taxable income of the appropriate character and in the appropriate taxing jurisdictions in the future. If we do not meet our expectations with respect to taxable income, we may not realize the full benefit from our deferred tax assets which would require us to record a valuation allowance in our tax provision in future years. Management assesses all available positive and negative evidence to estimate our ability to generate sufficient future taxable income of the appropriate character, and in the appropriate taxing jurisdictions, to permit use of our existing deferred tax assets. In determining the need for valuation allowances, we have considered and made judgments and estimates regarding estimated future taxable income and ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies. These estimates and judgments include some degree of uncertainty and changes in these estimates and assumptions could require us to adjust the valuation allowances for our deferred tax assets. The ultimate realization of the deferred tax assets depends on the generation of sufficient taxable income in the applicable taxing jurisdictions

We believe that the reversal of existing deferred tax liabilities will create taxable income that will allow us to recognize an equal amount of tax assets. In the current year, we have recorded a valuation allowance against net tax assets of $6.1 million. We also generated federal and state net operating losses estimated at $21.0 million which are included in deferred tax assets. Under the Tax Act, the federal losses generated in tax years ending after December 31, 2017, can be carried forward indefinitely; states are still considering conformity with the new law.

67

Stage Stores, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

As of February 3, 2018, we had no unrecognized tax benefits. We file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state and local jurisdictions. We recognize penalty and interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits, if any, as an income tax expense. We are subject to U.S. federal income tax examinations by tax authorities for 2014 forward.  We are also subject to audit by the taxing authorities of 38 states for years generally after 2013 and 3 additional states relating to the Gordmans Acquisition beginning in 2017. The outcome of tax audits cannot be predicted with certainty. If any issues addressed in our tax audits are resolved in a manner not consistent with our expectations, we could be required to adjust our provision for income taxes in the period such resolution occurs.

All of our operations are domestic.  Income tax (benefit) expense consisted of the following (in thousands):

	Fiscal Year
	2017			2016			2015
Federal income tax (benefit) expense:
Current	$	(12,216	)	$	(5,234	)	$	3,380
Deferred	428			(19,052		)	(2,156		)
	(11,788		)	(24,286		)	1,224
State income tax (benefit) expense:
Current	193			292			765
Deferred	(1,473		)	(1,172		)	(174		)
	(1,280		)	(880		)	591
Total income tax (benefit) expense	$	(13,068	)	$	(25,166	)	$	1,815

A reconciliation between the federal income tax (benefit) expense computed at statutory tax rates and the actual income tax (benefit) expense recorded is as follows (in thousands):

	Fiscal Year
	2017			2016			2015
Federal income tax (benefit) expense at the blended statutory rate	$	(16,992	)	$	(22,072	)	$	1,958
State income taxes, net	(1,345		)	(1,084		)	332
Uncertain tax position	—			(743		)	128
Other	1,375			654			474
Tax deficiencies related to share-based payments(a)	1,948			—			—
Tax credits	(4,386		)	(1,921		)	(1,077		)
Valuation allowance on net deferred tax assets	6,077			—			—
Tax Act	255			—			—
Total income tax (benefit) expense	$	(13,068	)	$	(25,166	)	$	1,815

^(a) We recognized tax deficiencies of $2.1 million related to share-based payments in 2017, of which $0.2 million was for state income taxes.

68

Stage Stores, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

Deferred tax assets (liabilities) consisted of the following (in thousands):

	February 3, 2018			January 28, 2017
Gross deferred tax assets:
Net operating loss	$	6,758		$	10,184
Accrued expenses	2,203			2,893
Lease obligations	9,355			16,762
Deferred compensation	7,147			12,048
Deferred income	2,583			3,956
Other	4,650			4,434
	32,696			50,277
Gross deferred tax liabilities:
Inventory	(1,862		)	(4,706		)
Depreciation and amortization	(24,342		)	(45,703		)
	(26,204		)	(50,409		)
Valuation allowance	(6,492		)	(415		)
Net deferred tax liabilities	$	—		$	(547	)

69

Stage Stores, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

NOTE 15- GORDMANS ACQUISITION

On April 7, 2017, we acquired select assets of Gordmans Stores, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Sellers”) through a bankruptcy auction. The terms of the transaction agreement required us to take assignment of a minimum of 50 of the Sellers’ store leases, with rights to take assignment of the leases for an additional seven stores and a distribution center. We also acquired all of the Sellers’ inventory, furniture, fixtures and equipment at the 57 store locations and distribution center, as well as the trademarks and other intellectual property of the Sellers. The Gordmans stores, which we operate as an off-price concept, add scale to our business, while allowing us to leverage strategic synergies and our current infrastructure. The acquisition also brings beneficial geographic and guest diversification.

The purchase price for the inventory and other assets acquired from the Sellers was approximately $36.1 million, all of which was paid by the end of the second quarter 2017 using existing cash and availability under our Revolving Credit Facility. We took assignment of 55 of the 57 store locations and the distribution center, and we renegotiated the terms of many of those leases. We also entered into new leases for three former Gordmans store locations, of which, two were opened in the second quarter 2017 and one opened in the third quarter 2017, for a total of 58 stores.

The estimated fair values of the assets acquired at the acquisition date, were as follows (in thousands): 

	April 7, 2017
Inventory	$	31,770
Property, plant and equipment and other assets	4,374
Total	$	36,144

We recognized $9.1 million of acquisition and integration related costs in selling, general and administrative expenses in 2017.

Net sales included in our consolidated statements of operations from our Gordmans stores that we operated beginning on April 7, 2017, were $222.2 million in 2017.

Pro forma net sales and earnings for 2017 and 2016 are not presented due to the impracticability in substantiating this information as the Gordmans Acquisition was limited to select assets and assignment of leases acquired through a bankruptcy auction. Furthermore, the results of operations may be impacted by the Sellers’ liquidation and may not be indicative of future performance.

70

Stage Stores, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

NOTE 16 - QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (unaudited)

The following table shows quarterly information (in thousands, except per share amounts):

	Fiscal Year 2017
	Q1			Q2			Q3			Q4 (a) (b)
Net sales	$	308,607		$	377,081		$	357,236		$	549,351
Gross profit	62,218			92,941			71,694			136,642
Net (loss) income	(18,987		)	(6,258		)	(17,722		)	5,644
Basic (loss) earnings per share	$	(0.70	)	$	(0.23	)	$	(0.64	)	$	0.19
Diluted (loss) earnings per share	(0.70		)	(0.23		)	(0.64		)	0.19
Basic weighted average shares	27,268			27,535			27,602			27,628
Diluted weighted average shares	27,268			27,535			27,602			27,628
	Fiscal Year 2016
	Q1			Q2			Q3			Q4 (a) (b)
Net sales	$	332,750		$	338,385		$	317,140		$	454,443
Gross profit	66,987			85,570			56,590			88,905
Net (loss) income	(15,460		)	41			(15,634		)	(6,844		)
Basic (loss) earnings per share	$	(0.57	)	$	—		$	(0.58	)	$	(0.25	)
Diluted (loss) earnings per share	(0.57		)	—			(0.58		)	(0.25		)
Basic weighted average shares	26,932			27,111			27,155			27,163
Diluted weighted average shares	26,932			27,175			27,155			27,163

^(a) The fourth quarter 2017 consisted of 14 weeks compared with 13 weeks in the fourth quarter 2016.

^(b) The fourth quarter 2017 and 2016 included impairment charges recognized in cost of sales and related buying, occupancy and distribution expenses of $1.6 million and $19.4 million, respectively.

71

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

Not applicable.

ITEM 9A.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as that term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”), as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have each concluded that such disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act. Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and our directors; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements, and provide reasonable assurance as to the detection of fraud.

Because of its inherent limitations, a system of internal control over financial reporting can provide only reasonable assurance and may not prevent or detect misstatements.  Further, because of changes in conditions, effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting may vary over time.

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures based on the framework and criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013), issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of February 3, 2018.

Our independent registered public accounting firm, Deloitte & Touche LLP, with direct access to our Board of Directors through our Audit Committee, has audited the consolidated financial statements we prepared and issued an attestation report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. The report appears in the Consolidated Financial Statements section of this Form10-K.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the internal control over financial reporting and concluded that no change in our internal control over financial reporting occurred during the fourth quarter ended February 3, 2018 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B.OTHER INFORMATION

Not applicable.

72

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The following information pertains to our executive officers as of March 23, 2018:

Name	Age	Position
Michael L. Glazer	69	President and Chief Executive Officer, Director
William E. Gentner	49	Executive Vice President, Chief Marketing Officer
Amy B. Gray	47	Executive Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer
Steven L. Hunter	47	Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer - Gordmans
Russell A. Lundy, II	55	Executive Vice President, Chief Stores Officer
Chadwick P. Reynolds	44	Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary
Oded Shein	56	Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Thorsten I. Weber	47	Executive Vice President, Chief Merchandising Officer
Steven R. Williams, Jr.	53	Executive Vice President, Chief Information Officer
Richard E. Stasyszen	57	Senior Vice President, Finance and Controller

Mr. Glazer joined us in April 2012 as President and Chief Executive Officer. He has served as a member of our Board since August 2001. Mr. Glazer served as the President and CEO of Mattress Giant Corporation from October 2009 to April 2012.

Mr. Gentner joined us in June 2012 as Senior Vice President, Marketing and was promoted to Executive Vice President, Chief Marketing Officer in June 2014. From June 2007 to June 2012, he served in various marketing positions at J.C. Penney Company, Inc., including Senior Vice President, Strategic Brands and Senior Vice President, Marketing Planning and Promotions.

Ms. Gray joined us in May 1998 as a Corporate Recruiter, was quickly promoted to Manager of Recruitment, and to Director of Staffing and Placement in 2002. She was promoted to Vice President of Recruitment, Placement, Learning and Development in August 2010, to Senior Vice President of Human Resources in April 2014, and to Executive Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer in April 2017.

Mr. Hunter joined us in June 2008 as Senior Vice President, Chief Information Officer and was promoted to Executive Vice President, Chief Information Officer in March 2010, and to Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer - Gordmans in May 2017.  From May 2003 to June 2008, he served as Senior Vice President of Information Technology at Belk, Inc.

Mr. Lundy joined us in November 2003 as Senior Vice President, Stores, was promoted to Executive Vice President, Stores in January 2013, and to Executive Vice President, Chief Stores Officer in October 2014.   Prior to joining us, he spent 27 years with Peebles, Inc.

Mr. Reynolds joined us in August 2014 as Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary, and was promoted to Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary in April 2017. Previously, he spent 16 years with Big Lots, Inc., where he most recently served as Vice President, Deputy General Counsel and Assistant Corporate Secretary from March 2009 to August 2014.

Mr. Shein joined us in January 2011 as Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer.  From July 2004 to January 2011, he served in various financial positions at Belk, Inc., including Vice President, Finance and Vice President and Treasurer. Prior to joining Belk, Inc., Mr. Shein served as the Vice President, Treasurer of Charming Shoppes, Inc.

73

Mr. Weber joined us in July 2013 as Senior Vice President, Planning and Allocation and was promoted to Executive Vice President, Chief Merchandise Officer in September 2016. Most recently, he served as Senior Vice President, Planning and Allocation with Kohl’s Corporation.  Previously, he spent 10 years with J.C. Penney Company, Inc., where he ultimately held the position of Senior Vice President, Planning and Allocation. Prior to joining J.C. Penney Company, Inc., he spent 9 years at the Kaufmann’s Division of May Department Stores Company where he began his career and held buying positions of increasing responsibility.

Mr. Williams joined us in June 2017 as Executive Vice President, Chief Information Officer. Previously, he spent 5 years with Boot Barn Holdings, Inc., where he served as Chief Information Officer. Prior to joining Boot Barn Holdings, Inc., he spent 12 years at Mattress Giant Corporation and served as Senior Vice President, Chief Information Officer.

Mr. Stasyszen joined us in March 1998 as Assistant Controller and was promoted to Vice President and Controller in February 1999.  In July 2001, he was promoted to Senior Vice President, Finance and Controller.

The remaining information called for by this item, including with respect to our directors, shareholder nomination procedures, code of ethics, Audit Committee, audit committee financial experts, and Section 16(a) beneficial ownership reporting compliance, is incorporated herein by reference “Item 1: Election of Directors,” “Governance,” “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” and “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in the Proxy Statement.

ITEM 11.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Information regarding executive compensation, Compensation Committee interlocks and insider participation, director compensation, and the Compensation Committee Report called for by this item is incorporated herein by reference to “Governance,” “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation,” “Executive Compensation,” “Director Compensation” and “Compensation Committee Report” in the Proxy Statement.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Information regarding the security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters called for by this item is incorporated herein by reference to “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” in the Proxy Statement. The remaininginformation called for by this item is incorporated by reference to “Equity Compensation Plan Information”in the Proxy Statement.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Information regarding our review of director independence and transactions with related persons called for by this item is incorporated herein by reference to “Item 1: Election of Directors,” “Governance” and “Transactions with Related Persons” in the Proxy Statement.

ITEM 14.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

Information regarding fees billed to us by our independent registered public accounting firm, Deloitte & Touche LLP, and our Audit Committee’s pre-approval policies and procedures called for by this item is incorporated herein by reference to “Audit Committee Matters” in the Proxy Statement.

74

PART IV

ITEM 15.EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a) Documents filed as part of this report:

1.  Financial Statements:

	Page
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	40
Consolidated Balance Sheets	42
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive (Loss) Income	43
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	44
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity	45
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	46

2.  Financial Statement Schedules:

All schedules are omitted because they are not required or are not applicable or because the information required to be set forth therein either was not material or is included in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.

3.  Exhibits Index:

The following documents are the exhibits to this Form 10-K. Copies of exhibits will be furnished upon written request and payment of our reasonable expenses in furnishing the exhibits.

Exhibit

NumberDescription

3.1	Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Stage Stores, Inc. dated June 7, 2007 are incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on September 12, 2007.
3.2	Amended and Restated Bylaws of Stage Stores, Inc. dated September 15, 2016 are incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on December 8, 2016.
4.1	Form of Common Stock Certificate of Stage Stores, Inc. is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to our Registration Statement on Form 10 filed on October 29, 2001.
10.1	Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated October 6, 2014, among Specialty Retailers, Inc., as borrower, Stage Stores, Inc., as guarantor, and the banks named therein is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 10, 2014. Some schedules to this Exhibit have been omitted. The registrant agrees to furnish supplementally a copy of any of the omitted schedules to this Exhibit to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon its request.
10.2	First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated December 16, 2016, among Specialty Retailers, Inc., as borrower, Stage Stores, Inc., as guarantor, and the banks named therein is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 19, 2016. Some schedules to this Exhibit have been omitted. The registrant agrees to furnish supplementally a copy of any of the omitted schedules to this Exhibit to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon its request.

75

10.3	Second Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement and Amendment to Amended and Restated Security Agreement dated April 21, 2017, among Specialty Retailers, Inc., as borrower, Stages Stores, Inc., as guarantor, and the banks named therein is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on June 8, 2017.
10.4†	Stage Stores, Inc. Amended and Restated 2001 Equity Incentive Plan effective June 3, 2004 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on September 6, 2012.
10.5†	Stage Stores, Inc. Second Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive Plan effective June 9, 2011 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on September 6, 2012.
10.6†	Stage Stores, Inc. Amended and Restated 2003 Non-Employee Director Equity Compensation Plan effective June 10, 2014 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on September 11, 2014.
10.7†	Form of Stock Appreciation Rights Agreement (Employee) under the Stage Stores, Inc. Second Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive Plan is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on September 6, 2012.
10.8†	Form of Performance Based Share Agreement under the Stage Stores, Inc. Second Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive Plan is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on September 6, 2012.
10.9†	Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement (Employee) under the Stage Stores, Inc. Amended and Restated 2001 Equity Incentive Plan (4 year pro rata vesting; SVPs and above) is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on September 6, 2012.
10.10†	Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement (Employee) under the Stage Stores, Inc. Amended and Restated 2001 Equity Incentive Plan (4 year pro rata vesting; below SVP level) is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on September 6, 2012.
10.11†	Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement (Employee) under the Stage Stores, Inc. Amended and Restated 2001 Equity Incentive Plan (4 year pro rata vesting; EVPs and above; with non-compete) is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on September 6, 2012.
10.12†	Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement (Employee) under the Stage Stores, Inc. Second Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive Plan (cliff vesting; all employees) is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on September 6, 2012.
10.13†	Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement (Employee) under the Stage Stores, Inc. Second Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive Plan (4 year pro rata vesting; SVPs and above) is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on September 6, 2012.
10.14†	Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement (Employee) under the Stage Stores, Inc. Second Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive Plan (4 year pro rata vesting; below SVP level) is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on September 6, 2012.
10.15†	Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement (Employee) under the Stage Stores, Inc. Second Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive Plan (4 year pro rata vesting; EVPs and above; with non-compete) is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on September 6, 2012.

76

10.16†	Form of Initial Grant Restricted Stock Award Agreement (Director) under the Stage Stores, Inc. Second Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive Plan is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on September 11, 2014.
10.17†	Form of Reelection Grant Restricted Stock Award Agreement (Director) under the Stage Stores, Inc. Second Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive Plan is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on September 11, 2014.
10.18†	Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (Employee) under the Stage Stores, Inc. Second Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive Plan (4 year pro rata vesting: GVPs and above) is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on June 8, 2017.
10.19†	Form of Shareholder Agreement for restricted stock (Director) under the Stage Stores, Inc. Amended and Restated 2003 Non-Employee Director Equity Compensation Plan is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on September 11, 2014.
10.20†	Stage Stores 2017 Long-Term Incentive Plan is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to our Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on May 19, 2017.
10.21†	Form of Stage Stores Performance Share Unit Award Agreement under the Stage Stores 2017 Long-Term Incentive Plan is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 1, 2017.
10.22†	Form of Stage Stores Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement under the Stage Stores 2017 Long-Term Incentive Plan is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 1, 2017.
10.23†	Form of Stage Stores Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the Stage Stores 2017 Long-Term Incentive Plan is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 1, 2017.
10.24†	Form of Stage Stores Nonemployee Director Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the Stage Stores 2017 Long-Term Incentive Plan is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 1, 2017.
10.25†	Stage Stores Executive Performance Incentive Bonus Plan is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 16, 2015.
10.26†	Stage Stores, Inc. Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan, as Amended and Restated effective June 5, 2008 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to our Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on June 10, 2008.
10.27#	Amended and Restated Private Label Credit Card Plan Agreement Between World Financial Network Bank (now Comenity Bank) and Stage Stores, Inc. and Specialty Retailers, Inc. dated as of August 8, 2012 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A filed on March 7, 2013.
10.28#	Amendment No. One to Amended and Restated Private Label Credit Card Plan Agreement dated as of February 1, 2013, Between World Financial Network Bank (now Comenity Bank) and Stage Stores, Inc. and Specialty Retailers, Inc. is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on April 3, 2013.
10.29#	Amendment No. Two to Amended and Restated Private Label Credit Card Plan Agreement dated as of February 13, 2014, Between Comenity Bank and Stage Stores, Inc. and Specialty Retailers, Inc. is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on June 10, 2014.

77

10.30#	Amendment No. Three to Amended and Restated Private Label Credit Card Plan Agreement dated as of May 4, 2014, Between Comenity Bank and Stage Stores, Inc. and Specialty Retailers, Inc. is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on September 11, 2014.
10.31#	Amendment No. Four to Amended and Restated Private Label Credit Card Plan Agreement dated as of March 28, 2016, Between Comenity Bank and Stage Stores, Inc. and Specialty Retailers, Inc. is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on June 3, 2016.
10.32#	Amendment No. Five to Amended and Restated Private Label Credit Card Plan Agreement dated as of August 11, 2017 between Stage Stores, Inc. and Comenity Bank is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A filed on January 26, 2018.
10.33*	Amendment No. Six to Amended and Restated Private Label Credit Card Plan Agreement dated as of December 12, 2017 between Stage Stores, Inc. and Comenity Bank.
10.34*	Amendment No. Seven to Amended and Restated Private Label Credit Card Plan Agreement dated as of December 22, 2017 between Stage Stores, Inc. and Comenity Bank.
10.35†	Employment Agreement between Oded Shein and Stage Stores, Inc. dated June 16, 2015 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 22, 2015.
10.36†	Employment Agreement between Steven L. Hunter and Stage Stores, Inc. dated May 11, 2017 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on June 8, 2017.
10.37†	Employment Agreement between Michael Glazer and Stage Stores, Inc. dated June 12, 2012 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on September 6, 2012.
10.38†	Employment Agreement between Thorsten I. Weber and Stage Stores, Inc. dated September 29, 2016 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on December 8, 2016.
10.39†	Employment Agreement between Russ Lundy and Stage Stores, Inc. dated August 6, 2010 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on June 13, 2013.
10.40†	Employment Agreement between Bill Gentner and Stage Stores, Inc. dated June 17, 2014 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on September 11, 2014.
10.41†	Employment Agreement between Amy B. Gray and Stage Stores, Inc. dated April 10, 2017 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on June 8, 2017.
10.42†	Employment Agreement between Chadwick P. Reynolds and Stage Stores, Inc. dated April 10, 2017 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on June 8, 2017.
10.43†	Employment Agreement between Steven R. Williams, Jr. and Stage Stores, Inc. dated June 26, 2017 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on September 7, 2017.
10.44†	Form of Indemnity Agreement is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on December 8, 2016.

14	Code of Ethics for Senior Officers dated January 25, 2011 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 14 to our Annual Report to Form 10-K filed on March 30, 2011.
21*	Subsidiaries of Stage Stores, Inc.
23*	Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
24.1*	Power of Attorney: Directors (Form 10-K).
24.2*	Power of Attorney: Section 16 Filers.
31.1*	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2*	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32*	Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

78

101.INS*	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

_________________________________________

* Filed electronically herewith.

† Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

# Certain confidential portions have been omitted pursuant to a confidential treatment request that has been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

ITEM 16.FORM 10-K SUMMARY

An optional summary of the information required by this Form 10-K is not included in this Form 10-K.

79

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

STAGE STORES, INC.
/s/ Michael L. Glazer	April 10, 2018
Michael L. Glazer
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
STAGE STORES, INC.
/s/ Oded Shein	April 10, 2018
Oded Shein
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)
STAGE STORES, INC.
/s/ Richard E. Stasyszen	April 10, 2018
Richard E. Stasyszen
Senior Vice President, Finance and Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

*	Director	April 10, 2018	*		Director	April 10, 2018
Alan J. Barocas			Earl J. Hesterberg
*	Director	April 10, 2018	*		Director	April 10, 2018
Elaine D. Crowley			Lisa R. Kranc
*	Director	April 10, 2018	*		Director	April 10, 2018
Diane M. Ellis			William J. Montgoris
/s/ Michael L. Glazer	Director	April 10, 2018
Michael L. Glazer
			(Constituting a majority of the Board of Directors)
				*By:	/s/ Oded Shein
					Oded Shein
					Attorney-in-Fact

80

EX-10.33

EXHIBIT 10.33

AMENDMENT NO. SIX

TO

AMENDED AND RESTATED

PRIVATE LABEL CREDIT CARD PLAN AGREEMENT

BETWEEN COMENITY BANK

AND

STAGE STORES, INC.

SPECIALTY RETAILERS, INC.

THIS AMENDMENT NO. SIX (“Amendment No. 6”) to that certain AMENDED and RESTATED PRIVATE LABEL CREDIT CARD PLAN AGREEMENT entered into as of the 8^th day of August, 2012 and effective as of the 1^st day of August 2012 (“Agreement”) among Stage Stores, Inc. (“SSI”) and Specialty Retailers, Inc. (“SRI”) (with SSI and SRI hereinafter collectively referred to as “Stage”) and Comenity Bank (formerly known as World Financial Network Bank) (“Bank”), is entered into by and between Bank and Stage on the 12th of December, 2017 (the “Amendment No. 6 Effective Date”).

WHEREAS, Stage and Bank previously entered into the Agreement pursuant to which, among other things, Stage requested Bank to, and Bank agreed to, extend credit to qualifying individuals in the form of private label open-ended credit card accounts for the purchase of Goods and/or Services from Stage through designated Sales Channels and to issue Credit Cards to qualifying individuals under the Stage Nameplates.

WHEREAS, SRI, the wholly owned operating subsidiary of SSI and currently the employer of all Stage employees, signed the Agreement solely for purposes of Section 13.1(a) of the Agreement, thereby agreeing that the Amended and Restated Private Label Credit Card Program Agreement dated March 5, 2004 by and among SSI, SRI and Bank was terminated in its entirety upon the full execution of the Agreement and thereby terminating SRI’s status as a separate party to the Agreement effective August 1, 2012.

WHEREAS, SSI and Bank entered into Amendment No. One to the Agreement effective as of February 1, 2013, Amendment No. Two to the Agreement effective as of February 13, 2014 (no longer in effect), Amendment No. Three to the Agreement effective as of May 4, 2014 (no longer in effect), Amendment No. Four to the Agreement effective as of March 28, 2016, and Amendment No. Five to the Agreement effective as of August 11, 2017.

WHEREAS, Stage and Bank now desire to amend the Agreement as set forth herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms and conditions hereof, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby mutually acknowledged by the parties, Stage and Bank agree as follows:

1. Definitions; References. Capitalized terms not otherwise defined in this Amendment No. 6 are used herein as defined in the Agreement.

2. Section 13.18 Taxes. Section 13.18 is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with a new Section 13.18, as follows:

13.18 Taxes.

13.18.1General. Stage will be responsible for, and agrees to pay, all sales, use, excise, and value-added taxes, or other transaction-based taxes of a similar nature (excluding personal property taxes and taxes based on Bank’s net or gross income, capital, business, general operations, or activities which shall be borne by Bank), which are imposed by the United States,

any state or local government, or other taxing authority, on all goods and/or services provided to Stage by Bank under this Agreement (“Transaction Taxes”).  Provided, however, that if/when Bank seeks payment from Stage with respect to any such taxes, Bank shall deliver an itemized written invoice (or other comparable form of written documentation requesting payment and basis therefor) to Stage in a timely manner relative to when Bank determined (based on Bank's normal accounting reviews and preparation of tax documents (including any documents received from a taxing authority) of which such matter should have been a part) that Stage should pay such amount. Upon receipt of such written invoice, Stage will have no less than 60 days to (i) refute the accuracy of the amount billed; (ii) provide proof of such tax remitted directly to the taxing jurisdiction; or (iii) provide payment in full. The parties agree to cooperate with each other to minimize any applicable sales, use, or similar tax and, in connection therewith, the parties shall provide each other with any relevant tax information as reasonably requested (including resale or exemption certificates, multi-state exemption certificates, information concerning the use of assets and materials, notices of assessments or other similar documents).  Stage and Bank shall each provide and make available to the other information reasonably requested regarding the calculation of Transaction Taxes due, including evidence regarding the jurisdiction to which the goods and/or services are delivered. Bank shall identify and separately state on each invoice the amount of any Transaction Taxes arising with respect to the amounts shown on such invoice (or other comparable form of written documentation requesting payment and basis therefor).Bank confirms that it will report and timely pay the Transaction Taxes collected from Stage to the appropriate taxing authorities. All amounts set forth in this Agreement are expressed and shall be paid in U.S. dollars.

13.18.2Recoverable Sales Tax on Written-Off Accounts. Commencing as of January 1, 2017, Bank shall notify Stage, in writing within sixty (60) days, of any amounts written-off by Bank for federal income tax purposes on Accounts (“Written-Off Accounts”), identified by Account, together with the information specified in 18 Cal. Code Regs. § 1642(e), and Bank shall sign such forms and provide any such other information as reasonably requested by Stage to enable Stage to recover any sales tax charged to any such Written-Off Account (“Recoverable Sales Taxes”). Regardless of whether a jurisdiction permits either Bank or Stage, or only Stage to make a claim for Recoverable Sales Taxes, Stage shall have the right, but not the obligation to claim a deduction on its sales tax returns for the maximum Recoverable Sales Tax amount associated with Bank’s Written-Off Accountsin its own name, or under a power of attorney in the name of Bank, as permitted by Applicable Law. Stage shall provide Bank with documentation of the amount of Recoverable Sales Taxes claimed in each jurisdiction where Stage makes such a claim.  For clarity, Bank shall not file a claim for any Recoverable Sales Taxes with any state. Nonetheless, Bank and Stage agree to maintain adequate and accurate books and records related to Written-Off Accounts for a period of five (5) years from the date of sale (or, as either party advises the other party in writing, such longer period as the statute of limitations is open for assessment, audit, filing of refund claims or the prosecution of administrative or judicial proceedings relating to such sales) and each party shall reasonably cooperate with the other party in connection with any audit conducted by a taxing authority of such party, including by providing any such books and records to the other party or to the taxing authority as are reasonably necessary or appropriate in the context of such audit, refund claim or the prosecution of administrative or judicial proceedings. Any Recoverable Sales Taxes that are claimed by Stage (whether via a deduction on Stage’s tax filings or via a refund request), shall be included as Plan Revenue in the calculation of the Monthly Net Portfolio Yield (Schedule 6.1) in the next month after which the benefit of the claim for Recoverable Sales Taxes is received (either through credit or refund).  In the event Stage is audited or assessed by a state in which Recoverable Sales Taxes have been claimed, Stage shall timely notify Bank of receipt of such notice. Bank shall be permitted to participate with Stage and shall cooperate in any such audit or assessment.  In the event Stage is audited or assessed by a state, and as a result any portion of the Bank’s tax share is repaid to the state, Bank shall repay such amount (including any penalties and interest in respect of such amount) to Stagewithin thirty (30) days of Stage providing written notice thereof.  Reasonable, and mutually agreed upon (such

2

agreement not to be unreasonably withheld by either party), direct out of pocket costs incurred by either party in connection with the defense of an audit or assessment by a state, including third-party tax consulting fees, attorney fees and court costs and such sums (“Recoverable Costs”) shall be included as Operating Expenses in the calculation of the Monthly Net Portfolio Yield (Schedule 6.1) in the month following payment of costs. If Recoverable Sales Taxes are disallowed as a result of Bank’s failure to produce the information specified in 18 Cal. Code Regs. § 1642(e), then Bank will be solely responsible for all Recoverable Costs incurred by either party in connection with the defense of such audit or assessment and the full amount of any Recoverable Sales Tax repaid to the state, including any fines or penalties. Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary, if Stage fails to notify Bank of an audit in which Recoverable Sales Taxes are disallowed by the state, or if Stage refuses to permit Bank to participate in such an audit, then Bank shall not be required to repay any amount of Recoverable Sales Taxes (inclusive of penalties and interest related thereto) repaid to the state. Furthermore, if Stage ceases filing claims, Stage will consider, in good faith, providing Bank with Stage’s applicable vendor license number(s) and documents related to assignments/elections of any rights Stage may have in Recoverable Sales Taxes, necessary for Bank to file claims directly with states that allow such claims, provided that the parties reach a mutual agreement upon the allocation of any such future Recoverable Sales Taxes actually received by Bank.

1. Counterparts; Effectiveness. This Amendment No. 6 may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which when so executed shall be deemed to be an original, but all of such counterparts shall together constitute one and the same instrument.

2. General. This Amendment No. 6 shall not be changed, modified or amended except in writing and signed by both of the parties hereto. Except as specifically amended in this Amendment No. 6, the provisions of the Agreement, as amended, remain unaffected and in full force and effect. The provisions of this Amendment No. 6 shall prevail in the event of any conflict between the provisions hereof and the provisions of the Agreement.

[remainder of page intentionally left blank]

3

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Stage and Bank have executed this Amendment No. 6 in manner and form sufficient to bind them on the Amendment No. 6 Effective Date.

STAGE STORES, INC.	COMENITY BANK (formerly known as WORLD FINANCIAL NETWORK BANK)
By: /s/ Oded Shein__________	By: /s/ John Marion__________________
Oded Shein_________________	John Marion________________________
Printed Name	Printed Name
EVP, CFO__________________	President__________________________
Title	Title

4

EX-10.34

EXHIBIT 10.34

AMENDMENT NO. SEVEN

TO

AMENDED AND RESTATED

PRIVATE LABEL CREDIT CARD PLAN AGREEMENT

BETWEEN COMENITY BANK

AND

STAGE STORES, INC.

SPECIALTY RETAILERS, INC.

THIS AMENDMENT NO. SEVEN ("Amendment No. 7") to that certain AMENDED and RESTATED PRIVATE LABEL CREDIT CARD PLAN AGREEMENT entered into as of the 8th day of August, 2012 and effective as of the 1st day of August 2012 ("Agreement") among Stage Stores, Inc. ("SSI") and Specialty Retailers, Inc. ("SRI") (with SSI and SRI hereinafter collectively referred to as "Stage") and Comenity Bank (formerly known as World Financial Network Bank) ("Bank"), is entered into by and between Bank and SSI on December 22, 2017(“Effective Date”).

WHEREAS, Stage and Bank previously entered into the Agreement pursuant to which, among other things, Stage requested Bank to, and Bank agreed to, extend credit to qualifying individuals in the form of private label open-ended credit card accounts for the purchase of Goods and/or Services from Stage through designated Sales Channels and to issue Credit Cards to qualifying individuals under the Stage Nameplates.

WHEREAS, SRI, the wholly owned operating subsidiary of SSI and currently the employer of all Stage employees, signed the Agreement solely for purposes of Section 13.1(a) of the Agreement, thereby agreeing that the Amended and Restated Private Label Credit Card Program Agreement dated March 5, 2004 by and among SSI, SRI and Bank was terminated in its entirety upon the full execution of the Agreement and thereby terminating SRl's status as a separate party to the Agreement effective August 1, 2012.

WHEREAS, SSI and Bank entered into Amendment No. One to the Agreement effective as of February 1, 2013, Amendment No. Two to the Agreement effective as of February 13, 2014 (no longer in effect), Amendment No. Three to the Agreement effective as of May 4, 2014 (no longer in effect), Amendment No. Four to the Agreement effective as of March 28, 2016, and Amendment No. Five to the Agreement effective as of August 11, 2017.

WHEREAS, Stage and Bank now desire to amend the Agreement as set forth herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms and conditions hereof, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby mutually acknowledged by the parties, Stage and Bank agree as follows:

1

1. Negotiated Late Fees. The parties hereby agree that Section 3 of Schedule 2.3 to the Agreement is deleted and replaced with a new Section 3 as follows:

“3. Late Fee Waiver.Upon request by the Cardholder, Bank will waive the otherwise applicable late fee, in whole or in part based on mutually agreed criteria, one (1) time during any consecutive eighteen (18) month period. Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, neither party shall promote to Customers this commitment made by Bank to Stage.”

2. Call Flow Restriction. The parties hereby agree that Service Level Standard number thirteen (13), of Schedule 3.8(c) to the Agreement (pertaining to call center servicing) is hereby amended by deleting “70%” and replacing it with “50%.”

3. Operating Expense Reduction. The parties hereby agree to modify the cost per statement under that Section D of Schedule 6.1 of the Agreement by adding the following sentence immediately before Section E of Schedule 6.1: “The parties agree that the Operating Expense Amount charged for each billing statement shall be reduced by $0.02 for Measurement Period 6, and such discount shall be carried through the CPI adjustor to future Measurement Periods.”

4. Counterparts; Effectiveness. This Amendment No. 7 may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which when so executed shall be deemed to be an original, but all of such counterparts shall together constitute one and the same instrument.

5. General. This Amendment No. 7 shall not be changed, modified or amended except in writing and signed by both of the Parties hereto. The provisions of this Amendment No. 7 shall be considered a part of the Agreement. Except as specifically amended in this Amendment No. 7, the provisions of the Agreement, as amended, remain unaffected and in full force and effect. The provisions of this Amendment No. 7 shall prevail in the event of any conflict between the provisions hereof and the provisions of the Agreement.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Stage and Bank have executed this Amendment No. 7 in manner and form sufficient to bind them on the Amendment No. 7 Effective Date.

STAGE STORES, INC.	COMENITY BANK (formerly known as WORLD FINANCIAL NETWORK BANK)
By: /s/ Oded Shein__________	By: /s/ John Marion__________________
Oded Shein_________________	John Marion________________________
Printed Name	Printed Name
EVP, CFO__________________	President__________________________
Title	Title

2

EX-21

EXHIBIT 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF STAGE STORES, INC.

Name	Jurisdiction of Incorporation
Specialty Retailers, Inc.	Texas

EX-23

EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-84072, 333-120960, 333-151566, 333-151568, 333-160758, 333-162300, 333-176094, 333-211917 and 333-218109 on Form S-8 of our report dated April 10, 2018, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Stage Stores, Inc. and subsidiary and the effectiveness of Stage Stores, Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting as of February 3, 2018, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Stage Stores, Inc. for the year ended February 3, 2018.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Houston, Texas

April 10, 2018

EX-24.1

EXHIBIT 24.1

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each of the undersigned, being a Director of Stage Stores, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“Company”), hereby constitutes and appoints Michael L. Glazer and Oded Shein, and each of them (with full power to each of them to act alone), the undersigned’s true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution, for the undersigned and in the undersigned’s name, place and stead in any and all capacities, to sign and date, one or more Annual Reports for the Company’s 2017 fiscal year ended February 3, 2018 on Form 10-K under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or such other form as any such attorney-in-fact may deem necessary or desirable, and any amendments thereto, each in such form as they or any one of them may approve, and to file the same with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done so that such Annual Report shall comply with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as to all intents and purposes as he or she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or either of them or their substitute or resubstitute, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has signed this Power of Attorney as of the 20th day of February, 2018.

/s/ Alan J. Barocas	/s/ Earl J. Hesterberg
Alan J. Barocas	Earl J. Hesterberg
/s/ Elaine D. Crowley	/s/ Lisa R. Kranc
Elaine D. Crowley	Lisa R. Kranc
/s/ Diane M. Ellis	/s/ William J. Montgoris
Diane M. Ellis	William J. Montgoris
/s/ Michael L. Glazer
Michael L. Glazer

EX-24.2

EXHIBIT 24.2

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned Director or Executive Officer of Stage Stores, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), in connection with the preparation and filing of reports on Form 3, 4 and 5 (as well as applications for EDGAR filer identification numbers and any other reports required under Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) and Form 144, if required under the Securities Act of 1933, on my behalf including, but not limited to, those cases where time is short or I am unavailable to review the form, hereby constitute and appoint Oded Shein, Richard E. Stasyszen and Chadwick P. Reynolds, and each of them (with full power to each of them to act alone), the undersigned’s true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, for the undersigned and on the undersigned’s behalf and in the undersigned’s name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to prepare, sign, and file with the Securities and Exchange Commission reports on Form 3, 4 and 5 (as well as applications for EDGAR filer identification numbers and any other reports required under Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) and Form 144, if required under the Securities Act of 1933, together with all amendments thereto, with all exhibits and any and all documents required to be filed with respect thereto with the Securities and Exchange Commission and any other regulatory authority granting unto such attorneys-in-fact, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in order to effectuate the same as fully to all intents and purposes as the undersigned might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, might lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed this Power of Attorney as of the 20th day of February, 2018.

DIRECTORS

/s/ Alan J. Barocas	/s/ Earl J. Hesterberg
Alan J. Barocas	Earl J. Hesterberg
/s/ Elaine D. Crowley	/s/ Lisa R. Kranc
Elaine D. Crowley	Lisa R. Kranc
/s/ Diane M. Ellis	/s/ William J. Montgoris
Diane M. Ellis	William J. Montgoris
/s/ Michael L. Glazer
Michael L. Glazer

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

/s/ William E. Gentner	/s/ Oded Shein
William E. Gentner	Oded Shein
/s/ Steven L. Hunter	/s/ Richard E. Stasyszen
Steven L. Hunter	Richard E. Stasyszen
/s/ Russell A. Lundy	/s/ Thorsten I. Weber
Russell A. Lundy	Thorsten I. Weber
/s/ Chadwick P. Reynolds
Chadwick P. Reynolds

EX-31.1

EXHIBIT 31.1 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  

I, Michael L. Glazer, certify that:  

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Stage Stores, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a–15(f) and 15d–15(f)) for the registrant, and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors:

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: April 10, 2018	/s/ Michael L. Glazer
	Michael L. Glazer
	President and Chief Executive Officer

EX-31.2

EXHIBIT 31.2 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  

I, Oded Shein, certify that:  

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Stage Stores, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a–15(f) and 15d–15(f)) for the registrant, and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors:

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: April 10, 2018	/s/ Oded Shein
	Oded Shein
	Executive Vice President,
	Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

EX-32

EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Stage Stores, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended February 3, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Michael L. Glazer and Oded Shein, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: April 10, 2018	/s/ Michael L. Glazer
	Michael L. Glazer
	President and Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Oded Shein

Oded Shein

Executive Vice President,

Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

XML

Document and Entity Information - USD ($)	12 Months Ended
	Feb. 03, 2018	Mar. 23, 2018	Jul. 28, 2017
Document and Entity Information [Abstract]
Entity Registrant Name	STAGE STORES INC
Entity Central Index Key	0000006885
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--02-03
Entity Well-known Seasoned Issuer	No
Entity Voluntary Filers	No
Entity Current Reporting Status	Yes
Entity Filer Category	Accelerated Filer
Entity Public Float			$ 52,166,748
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		27,633,604
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2017
Document Fiscal Period Focus	FY
Document Type	10-K
Amendment Flag	false
Document Period End Date	Feb. 03, 2018

XML

Consolidated Balance Sheets - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Feb. 03, 2018	Jan. 28, 2017
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 21,250	$ 13,803
Merchandise inventories, net	439,735	409,384
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	51,049	41,574
Total current assets	512,034	464,761
Property, equipment and leasehold improvements, net	252,788	284,110
Intangible assets	17,135	15,235
Other non-current assets, net	24,449	22,883
Total assets	806,406	786,989
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Accounts payable	145,991	101,985
Income taxes payable	176	326
Current portion of debt obligations	2,985	6,414
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities	64,266	59,945
Total current liabilities	213,418	168,670
Long-term debt obligations	180,350	163,749
Deferred taxes		547
Other long-term liabilities	68,524	73,863
Total liabilities	462,292	406,829
Commitments and contingencies (Note 8)
Common stock, par value $0.01, 100,000 shares authorized, 32,806 and 32,340 shares issued, respectively	328	323
Additional paid-in capital	418,658	410,504
Treasury stock, at cost, 5,175 shares, respectively	(43,298)	(43,286)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(5,177)	(5,648)
(Accumulated deficit) retained earnings	(26,397)	18,267
Total stockholders' equity	344,114	380,160
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$ 806,406	$ 786,989

XML

Consolidated Balance Sheets (Parenthetical) - $ / shares shares in Thousands	Feb. 03, 2018	Jan. 28, 2017
Common stock, par value (in dollars per share)	$ 0.01	$ 0.01
Common stock, shares authorized (in shares)	100,000	100,000
Common stock, shares issued (in shares)	32,806	32,340
Treasury stock, at cost (in shares)	5,175	5,175

XML

Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive (Loss) Income - USD ($) shares in Thousands, $ in Thousands	12 Months Ended
	Feb. 03, 2018	Jan. 28, 2017	Jan. 30, 2016
Net sales	$ 1,592,275	$ 1,442,718	$ 1,604,433
Cost of sales and related buying, occupancy and distribution expenses	1,228,780	1,144,666	1,208,002
Gross profit	363,495	298,052	396,431
Selling, general and administrative expenses	406,206	356,064	387,859
Interest expense	7,680	5,051	2,977
(Loss) income before income tax	(50,391)	(63,063)	5,595
Income tax (benefit) expense	(13,068)	(25,166)	1,815
Net income (loss)	(37,323)	(37,897)	3,780
Other comprehensive (loss) income:
Employee benefit related adjustment, net of tax of $233, $112 and ($258), respectively	733	189	(431)
Amortization of employee benefit related costs, net of tax of $192, $381 and $290, respectively	605	516	484
Loss on pension settlement, net of tax of $106, $0 and $280, respectively	332		468
Total other comprehensive income (loss)	1,670	705	521
Comprehensive (loss) income	$ (35,653)	$ (37,192)	$ 4,301
Basic (loss) earnings per share data:
Basic (loss) earnings per share	$ (1.37)	$ (1.40)	$ 0.12
Basic weighted average shares outstanding	27,510	27,090	31,145
Diluted (loss) earnings per share data:
Diluted (loss) earnings per share	$ (1.37)	$ (1.40)	$ 0.12
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding	27,510	27,090	31,188

XML

Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive (Loss) Income (Parenthetical) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	12 Months Ended
	Feb. 03, 2018	Jan. 28, 2017	Jan. 30, 2016
Other comprehensive income, tax:
Employee benefit related adjustment, tax	$ 233	$ 112	$ (258)
Amortization of employee benefit related costs, tax	192	$ 381	290
Loss on pension settlement, tax	$ 106		$ 280

XML

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - USD ($) $ in Thousands	12 Months Ended
	Feb. 03, 2018	Jan. 28, 2017	Jan. 30, 2016
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net (loss) income	$ (37,323)	$ (37,897)	$ 3,780
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation, amortization and impairment of long-lived assets	67,161	91,656	77,599
(Gain) loss on retirements of property, equipment and leasehold improvements	(918)	296	719
Deferred income taxes	(1,078)	(20,224)	(2,330)
Tax (deficiency) benefit from stock-based compensation		(4,565)	409
Stock-based compensation expense	8,386	9,461	12,394
Amortization of debt issuance costs	289	229	218
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation			(945)
Deferred compensation obligation	12	218	881
Amortization of employee benefit related costs and pension settlement charges	1,235	897	1,522
Construction allowances from landlords	1,228	7,079	3,444
Other changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Decrease (increase) in merchandise inventories	1,419	26,612	5,456
(Increase) decrease in other assets	(8,532)	754	1,551
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and other liabilities	43,582	9,768	(64,398)
Net cash provided by operating activities	75,461	84,284	40,300
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to property, equipment and leasehold improvements	(38,630)	(74,257)	(90,695)
Proceeds from insurance and disposal of assets	2,413	1,179	43
Addition to intangible assets			(325)
Payments to Acquire Businesses, Gross	(36,144)
Net cash used in investing activities	(72,361)	(73,078)	(90,977)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from revolving credit facility borrowings	575,210	512,873	575,570
Payments of revolving credit facility borrowings	(555,624)	(510,011)	(460,640)
Proceeds from long-term debt obligation		5,830
Payments of long-term debt obligations	(6,414)	(4,252)	(1,714)
Payments of debt issuance costs	(34)	(815)
Repurchases of common stock			(41,587)
Payments for stock related compensation	(251)	(859)	(4,465)
Proceeds from issuance of equity awards			543
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation			945
Cash dividends paid	(8,540)	(16,656)	(18,653)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	4,347	(13,890)	49,999
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	7,447	(2,684)	(678)
Cash and cash equivalents:
Beginning of period	13,803	16,487	17,165
End of period	21,250	13,803	16,487
Supplemental disclosures including non-cash investing and financing activities:
Interest paid	7,282	4,816	2,705
Income taxes (refunded) paid	(8,761)	1,601	15,237
Unpaid liabilities for capital expenditures	$ 2,937	$ 3,943	$ 11,951

XML

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity - USD ($) shares in Thousands, $ in Thousands		Total	Retained Earnings (Accumulated Deficit)	Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss	Treasury Stock	Additional Paid-in Capital	Common Stock
Balance, beginning at Jan. 31, 2015		$ 475,930	$ 87,693	$ (6,874)	$ (600)	$ 395,395	$ 316
Balance, beginning (in shares) at Jan. 31, 2015							31,632
Net (loss) income		3,780	3,780
Other comprehensive income (loss)		521		521
Dividends on common stock, $0.58 per share in 2015, $0.60 per share in 2016 and $0.30 per share in 2017		(18,653)	(18,653)
Deferred compensation					(881)	881
Repurchases of common stock		(41,587)			$ (41,587)
Repurchases of common stock (in shares)					(5,175)
Issuance of equity awards, net		543				539	$ 4
Issuance of equity awards, net (in shares)							398
Tax withholdings paid for net settlement of stock awards		(3,584)				(3,584)
Stock-based compensation expense		12,394				12,394
Tax benefit (deficiency) from stock-based compensation		409				409
Balance, ending at Jan. 30, 2016		429,753	72,820	(6,353)	$ (43,068)	406,034	$ 320
Balance, ending (in shares) at Jan. 30, 2016					5,175		32,030
Net (loss) income		(37,897)	(37,897)
Other comprehensive income (loss)		705		705
Dividends on common stock, $0.58 per share in 2015, $0.60 per share in 2016 and $0.30 per share in 2017		(16,656)	(16,656)
Deferred compensation					$ (218)	218
Issuance of equity awards, net						(3)	$ 3
Issuance of equity awards, net (in shares)							310
Tax withholdings paid for net settlement of stock awards		(641)				(641)
Stock-based compensation expense		9,461				9,461
Tax benefit (deficiency) from stock-based compensation		(4,565)				(4,565)
Balance, ending at Jan. 28, 2017		380,160	18,267	(5,648)	$ (43,286)	410,504	$ 323
Balance, ending (in shares) at Jan. 28, 2017					5,175		32,340
Net (loss) income		(37,323)	(37,323)
Other comprehensive income (loss)		1,670		1,670
Dividends on common stock, $0.58 per share in 2015, $0.60 per share in 2016 and $0.30 per share in 2017		(8,540)	(8,540)
Deferred compensation					$ (12)	12
Issuance of equity awards, net						(5)	$ 5
Issuance of equity awards, net (in shares)							466
Tax withholdings paid for net settlement of stock awards		(239)				(239)
Stock-based compensation expense		8,386				8,386
Reclassification from AOCI, Current Period, Tax	[1]		1,199	(1,199)
Balance, ending at Feb. 03, 2018		$ 344,114	$ (26,397)	$ (5,177)	$ (43,298)	$ 418,658	$ 328
Balance, ending (in shares) at Feb. 03, 2018					5,175		32,806

[1] See Note 14 - Income Taxes.

XML

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity (Parenthetical) - $ / shares	12 Months Ended
	Feb. 03, 2018	Jan. 28, 2017	Jan. 30, 2016
Statement of Stockholders' Equity [Abstract]
Dividends on common stock (in dollars per share)	$ 0.30	$ 0.60	$ 0.58

XML

DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

12 Months Ended

Feb. 03, 2018

Description of Business and Significant Accounting Policies [Abstract]

DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Description of Business.  We are a retailer of trend-right, moderately priced, name-brand apparel, accessories, cosmetics, footwear and home goods. As of February 3, 2018, we operated in 42 states through 777 BEALLS, GOODY’S, PALAIS ROYAL, PEEBLES and STAGE specialty department stores and 58 GORDMANS off-price stores. We also operate an e-commerce website. Our department stores are predominantly located in small towns and rural communities. Our off-price stores are predominantly located in mid-sized, non-rural Midwest markets.

Principles of Consolidation.  The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Stage Stores, Inc. and its subsidiary.  All intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. We report our department stores, off-price stores and e-commerce website in a single operating segment.  Revenues from guests are derived from merchandise sales.  We do not rely on any major guest as a source of revenue.

Fiscal Year. References to a particular year are to our fiscal year, which is the 52- or 53-week period ending on the Saturday closest to January 31st of the following calendar year.  

Fiscal Year	Ended	Weeks
2017	February 3, 2018	53
2016	January 28, 2017	52
2015	January 30, 2016	52

Use of Estimates.  The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes.  On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to inventory, deferred tax assets, intangible assets, long-lived assets, sales returns, gift card breakage, pension obligations, self-insurance and contingent liabilities.  Actual results may differ materially from these estimates.  We base our estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions which are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances.

Cash and Cash Equivalents. Weconsider highly liquid investments with initial maturities of less than three months to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents also includes amounts due from credit card sales transactions.

Concentration of Credit Risk. Financial instruments which potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk are primarily cash.  Our cash management and investment policies restrict investments to low-risk, highly-liquid securities and we perform periodic evaluations of the relative credit standing of the financial institutions with which we deal.

Merchandise Inventories.  We value merchandise inventories using the lower of cost or net realizable value with cost determined using the weighted average cost method.  We capitalize distribution center costs associated with preparing inventory for sale, such as distribution payroll, benefits, occupancy, depreciation and other direct operating expenses as part of merchandise inventories.  We also include in inventory the cost of freight to our distribution centers and to stores as well as duties and fees related to import purchases.

Vendor Allowances. We receive consideration from our merchandise vendors in the form of allowances and reimbursements.  Given the promotional nature of our business, the allowances are generally intended to offset our costs of handling, promoting, advertising and selling the vendors’ products in our stores.  These allowances are recognized in accordance with ASC Subtopic 605-50, Customer Payments and Incentives. Vendor allowances related to the purchase of inventory are recorded as a reduction to the cost of inventory until sold.  Vendor allowances are recognized as a reduction of cost of goods sold or the related selling expense when the purpose for which the vendor funds were intended to be used has been fulfilled and amounts have been authorized by vendors. 

Stock-Based Compensation. We recognize as compensation expense an amount equal to the fair value of share-based payments granted to employees and independent directors, net of forfeitures.  That cost is recognized ratably in SG&A expense over the period during which an employee or independent director is required to provide service in exchange for the award.

Property, Equipment and Leasehold Improvements.  Additions to property, equipment and leasehold improvements are recorded at cost and depreciated over their estimated useful lives using the straight-line method.  The estimated useful lives of leasehold improvements do not exceed the term of the related lease, including applicable available renewal options where appropriate.  The estimated useful lives in years are generally as follows:

Buildings & improvements	20
Information systems	3	-	10
Store and office fixtures and equipment	5	-	10
Warehouse equipment	5	-	15
Leasehold improvements - stores	5	-	15
Leasehold improvements - corporate office	10	-	12

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets.  Property, plant and equipment and other long-lived assets are reviewed to determine whether any events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable.  For long-lived assets to be held and used, we base our evaluation on impairment indicators such as the nature of the asset’s physical condition, the future economic benefit of the asset, any historical or future profitability measurements and other external market conditions or factors that may be present.  If such impairment indicators are present or other factors exist that indicate the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable, we determine whether impairment has occurred through the use of an undiscounted cash flows analysis of the asset at the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows exist.  If impairment has occurred, we recognize a loss for the difference between the carrying amount and the estimated fair value of the asset. Management’s judgment is necessary to estimate fair value. 

Insurance Recoveries. We incurred casualty losses during 2017, 2016 and 2015. We received total insurance proceeds of $15.7 million, $3.3 million and $2.5 million during 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and recognized net gains of $4.3 million, $0.7 million and $0.8 million in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, which are included in selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”). Insurance proceeds and net gains realized in 2017 were predominantly related to inventory claims for stores impacted by Hurricane Harvey and other casualty events such as floods and tornadoes.

Intangible Assets and Impairment of Intangible Assets.  Indefinite life intangible assets are tested for impairment annually or more frequently when indicators of impairment exist. As a part of the acquisition of Peebles, Inc. in 2003 and the Gordmans Acquisition in 2017, we acquired the rights to the PEEBLES and the GORDMANS trade names and trademarks (collectively the “Trademarks”), which were identified as indefinite life intangibles.  The values of the Trademarks were determined to be $14.9 million and $1.9 million, respectively, at the time of acquisition.  We completed our annual impairment testing during the fourth quarter of 2017 and determined that the fair value of the Peebles trademarks exceeded the carrying values by greater than 10%. The carrying value of the Gordmans trademarks approximates their fair value.

Debt Issuance Costs.  Debt issuance costs are accounted for as a deferred charge and amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the related financing agreement.  The balance of debt issuance costs, net of accumulated amortization of $0.3 million and $0.1 million, is $1.1 million and $1.4 million at February 3, 2018 and January 28, 2017, respectively.

Revenue Recognition.  Our retail stores record revenue at the point of sale.  Sales of merchandise shipped to our guests are recorded based on estimated receipt of merchandise by the guest. Shipping and handling fees charged to guests are included in net sales with the corresponding costs recorded as costs of goods sold. Total revenues do not include sales tax because we are a pass-through conduit for collecting and remitting sales taxes. Revenues are recognized net of expected returns, which we estimate using historical return patterns as a percentage of sales.

We record deferred revenue on our balance sheet for gift cards sales and merchandise credits issued related to guest returns. Upon redemption, we recognize this revenue in net sales.

Gift Card and Merchandise Credit Liability.Unredeemed gift cards and merchandise credits are recorded as a liability. Our gift cards and merchandise credits do not expire. Based on historical redemption rates, a small and relatively stable percentage of gift cards and merchandise credits will never be redeemed, which is referred to as “breakage.” Estimated breakage income is recognized over time in proportion to actual gift card and merchandise credit redemptions. We recognized breakage income of approximately $0.9 million and $3.0 million in net sales in 2017 and 2016, respectively, and approximately $1.6 million as an offset to SG&A expenses in 2015.

Guest Loyalty Program.  Prior to the third quarter of 2016, guests who spent a required amount within a specified time frame using our private label credit card received reward certificates which could be redeemed for merchandise. We estimated the net cost of the rewards and recorded a liability associated with unredeemed certificates and guest spend toward unissued certificates. The cost of the loyalty rewards program was recorded in cost of sales. In the third quarter of 2016, we expanded our loyalty program to enable all guests to earn benefits regardless of how they choose to pay. We record deferred revenue, net of estimated breakage, for the retail value of certificates earned and as guests make purchases towards earning reward certificates.

Self-Insurance Reserves.  We maintain self-insured retentions with respect to general liability, workers compensation and health benefits for our employees.  We estimate the accruals for the liabilities based on industry development factors and historical claim trend experience.  Although management believes adequate reserves have been provided for expected liabilities arising from our self-insured obligations, projections of future losses are inherently uncertain, and it is reasonably possible that estimates of these liabilities will change over the near term as circumstances develop.

Advertising Expenses.  Advertising costs are charged to operations when the related advertising first takes place.  Advertising costs were $83.6 million, $88.7 million and $91.0 million, in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, which are net of advertising allowances received from vendors of $3.1 million, $4.3 million and $4.9 million, respectively.

Rent Expense.  We record rent expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term, including the build out period, and where appropriate, applicable available lease renewal option periods.  The difference between the payment and expense in any period is recorded as deferred rent in other long-term liabilities in the consolidated financial statements.  We record construction allowances from landlords when contractually earned as a deferred rent credit in other long-term liabilities.  Such deferred rent credit is amortized over the related lease term, commencing on the date we contractually earned the construction allowance, as a reduction of rent expense.

Certain leases provide for contingent rents that are not measurable at inception.  These contingent rents are primarily based on a percentage of sales that are in excess of a predetermined level.  These amounts are excluded from minimum rent and are included in the determination of total rent expense when it is probable that the expense has been incurred and the amount is reasonably estimable.

Income Taxes.  The provision for income taxes is computed based on the pretax income (loss) included in the consolidated financial statements.  The asset and liability approach is used to recognize deferred tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amounts for financial reporting purposes and the tax basis of assets and liabilities.  A valuation allowance is established if it is more likely than not that some portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized.  See Note 14 for additional disclosures regarding income taxes and deferred income taxes.

Earnings Per Share. Basic earnings per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the measurement period.  Diluted earnings per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares as well as all potentially dilutive common share equivalents outstanding during the measurement period.  

We granted non-vested stock and restricted stock unit awards that contain non-forfeitable dividend rights. Under Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 260-10, Earnings Per Share, non-vested stock awards that contain non-forfeitable dividend or dividend equivalent rights are considered participating securities and are included in the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method.  The two-class method determines earnings per share for each class of common stock and participating securities according to dividends or dividend equivalents and their respective participation rights in undistributed earnings. See Note 2 for additional disclosures regarding earnings per share.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, which modifies several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, classification on the statement of cash flows, and the option to estimate expected forfeitures or recognize forfeitures as they occur. We adopted this standard on a prospective basis in first quarter of 2017. Under the new standard, excess income tax benefits and deficiencies related to awards that vest or settle are recognized in the provision for income taxes as a discrete event in the period in which they occur, which may create significant volatility in the provision for income taxes and earnings. Historically, these amounts were reflected within additional paid-in capital on the balance sheet. In addition, upon adoption excess tax benefits are reflected within operating activities in the statements of cash flows, whereas historically these amounts were reflected as a financing activity. Cash paid to tax authorities on an employee’s behalf for withheld shares continues to be classified as a financing activity in the statement of cash flows. We made a policy election to recognize forfeitures as they occur. For 2017, we recognized excess tax deficiencies of $2.1 million in the provision for income taxes. The adoption of the other requirements of this guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments, which provides guidance on certain specific cash flow issues including proceeds received from the settlement of insurance claims. This guidance requires cash proceeds received from the settlement of insurance claims to be classified on the statement of cash flows on the basis of the related insurance coverage (that is, the nature of the loss). The new standard is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted and is to be applied retrospectively. We adopted this guidance in the first quarter of 2017. The adoption of ASU 2016-15 did not change the presentation of our consolidated statements of cash flows.

In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-02, Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, which allows a reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings for stranded tax effects resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“Tax Act”). In addition, the ASU requires certain disclosures regarding stranded tax effects. ASU 2018-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. We adopted the new standard in the fourth quarter of 2017 and reclassified $1.2 million from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings. See Note 14 of the Financial Statements for additional disclosures regarding the stranded tax effects.

In March 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-05, which amends Income Taxes (Topic 740) byincorporating the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”) Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 (“SAB 118”) issued on December 22, 2017. SAB 118 provides guidance on accounting for the effects of the Tax Act. We recognized the income tax effects of the Tax Act in our 2017 financial statements in accordance with SAB 118. See Note 14 of the Financial Statements for additional disclosures.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted. In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which supersedes most existing revenue recognition guidance in GAAP. The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects what the entity expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. The guidance establishes a five-step revenue recognition model, which includes (i) identifying the contract with the customer, (ii) identifying the separate performance obligations in the contract, (iii) determining the transaction price, (iv) allocating the transaction price to the separate performance obligations, and (v) recognizing revenue when each performance obligation is satisfied. The guidance also requires additional disclosures to describe the nature, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows from contracts with customers. ASU 2014-09 may be applied retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented, or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying the guidance recognized in retained earnings at the date of adoption. The new guidance is effective for us in the first quarter of fiscal 2018. We have selected the full retrospective method of adoption. In order to determine the impact of the new guidance on our financial statements, we reviewed representative transactions across our revenue streams and compared our historical accounting practices to the new guidance. We do not expect the adoption to have a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. Our 2018 consolidated financial statements will include incremental disclosures regarding our revenue recognition policies and related amounts.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). The guidance in this ASU supersedes the leasing guidance in Topic 840, Leases. The new standard requires lessees to recognize a right-of-use asset and lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. We plan to make a policy election that will keep leases with an initial term of 12 months or less off the balance sheet and will result in recognizing those lease payments in the consolidated statements of operations on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Consistent with current GAAP, the recognition, measurement and presentation of expenses and cash flows arising from a lease by a lessee primarily will depend on its classification as a financing or operating lease. However, unlike current GAAP, which requires only capital leases to be recognized on the balance sheet, ASU 2016-02 will require both types of leases to be recognized on the balance sheet. As a result, lessees will be required to put most leases on their balance sheets while recognizing expense on their income statements in a manner similar to current accounting. In addition, this guidance requires disclosures about the amount, timing and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. ASU 2016-02 specifies a modified retrospective transition approach for leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements and that the new and enhanced disclosures be provided for each period presented (including comparative periods). On March 7, 2018, the FASB affirmed its proposed ASU, Leases (Topic 842): Targeted Improvements, which provides entities with an additional (and optional) transition method to adopt the new lease requirements by allowing entities to initially apply the requirements by recognizing a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption. Consequently, an entity’s reporting for the comparative periods presented in the financial statements in which the entity adopts the new lease requirements would continue to be in accordance with current GAAP, including disclosures. The new standard will be effective for us in the first quarter of fiscal 2019, which begins on February 3, 2019. We continue to evaluate the impact that the adoption of this ASU will have on our consolidated financial statements and disclosures, including the effect of certain optional practical expedients permitted under the transition guidance. Based on our assessment to date, we expect the adoption of ASU 2016-02 will result in a significant increase in lease-related assets and liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets. The ultimate impact of adopting the new standard will depend on our lease portfolio as of the adoption date.

In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-07, Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost, which requires the service cost component of net periodic benefit cost to be presented in the same income statement line item as other employee compensation costs arising from services rendered during the period. If a subtotal for operating income is shown on the income statement, then the other components of the net periodic benefit cost must be presented separately from the line item that includes the service cost and outside of any subtotal of operating income. ASU 2017-07 also requires disclosure of the line item(s) in the income statement that include net periodic benefit costs. Additionally, only the service cost component of the net periodic benefit cost is eligible for capitalization. The new standard is effective for us in the first quarter of fiscal 2018. The change in presentation of service cost must be applied retrospectively, while the capitalization of service cost must be applied on a prospective basis. The pension plan that we sponsor is frozen, and therefore, service costs no longer accrue under the plan. Upon adoption, we will recognize net periodic pension costs in SG&A expenses, consistent with our current presentation, and we will disclose the financial statement line item presentation in the notes to the financial statements.

XML

EARNINGS PER SHARE

12 Months Ended

Feb. 03, 2018

Earnings Per Share [Abstract]

Earnings per Share

EARNINGS PER SHARE

Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the measurement period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares as well as all potentially dilutive common share equivalents outstanding during the measurement period.

The following tables show the computation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share for each period (in thousands, except per share amounts):

	Fiscal Year
	2017			2016			2015
Basic:
Net (loss) income	$	(37,323	)	$	(37,897	)	$	3,780
Less: Allocation of earnings to participating securities	—			—			(48		)
Net (loss) income allocated to common shares	(37,323		)	(37,897		)	3,732
Basic weighted average shares outstanding	27,510			27,090			31,145
Basic (loss) earnings per share	$	(1.37	)	$	(1.40	)	$	0.12
	Fiscal Year
	2017			2016			2015
Diluted:
Net (loss) income	$	(37,323	)	$	(37,897	)	$	3,780
Less: Allocation of earnings to participating securities	—			—			(48		)
Net (loss) income allocated to common shares	(37,323		)	(37,897		)	3,732
Basic weighted average shares outstanding	27,510			27,090			31,145
Add: Dilutive effect of stock awards	—			—			43
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding	27,510			27,090			31,188
Diluted (loss) earnings per share	$	(1.37	)	$	(1.40	)	$	0.12

The number of shares attributable to stock options, stock appreciation rights (“SARs”) and non-vested stock grants that would have been considered dilutive securities, but were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings (loss) per share because the effect was anti-dilutive were as follows (in thousands):

	Fiscal Year
	2017	2016	2015
Number of anti-dilutive shares due to net loss for the period	—	34	—
Number of anti-dilutive stock options, SARs due to exercise price greater than average market price of our common stock	124	192	251

XML

FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

12 Months Ended

Feb. 03, 2018

Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]

FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

We recognize or disclose the fair value of our financial and non-financial assets and liabilities on a recurring and non-recurring basis.  Fair value is defined as the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.  When determining the fair value measurements for assets and liabilities which are required to be recorded at fair value, we assume the highest and best use of the asset by market participants in which we would transact and the market-based risk measurements or assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.

We applied the following fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value into three levels, and bases the categorization within the hierarchy upon the lowest level of input that is available and significant to the fair value measurement:

Level 1 - Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 - Observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in inactive markets, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

Level 3 - Inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement reflect our estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.    

Financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis were as follows (in thousands):

	February 3, 2018
	Balance		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Instruments (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Other assets:
Securities held in grantor trust for deferred compensation plans (a)(b)	$	20,293	$	20,293	$	—	$	—

	January 28, 2017
	Balance		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Instruments (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Other assets:
Securities held in grantor trust for deferred compensation plans (a)(b)	$	18,094	$	18,094	$	—	$	—

^(a) The liability for the amount due to participants corresponding in value to the securities held in the grantor trust is recorded in other long-term liabilities.

^(b) Using the market approach, the fair values of these securities represent quoted market prices multiplied by the quantities held. Net gains and losses related to the changes in fair value in the assets and liabilities under the various deferred compensation plans are recorded in SG&A expenses and were nil during 2017 and 2016.

Non-financial assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis were as follows (in thousands):

	February 3, 2018
	Balance		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Instruments (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets:
Store property, equipment and leasehold improvements (a)	$	778	$	—	$	—	$	778

	January 28, 2017
	Balance		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Instruments (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets:
Store property, equipment and leasehold improvements (a)	$	8,795	$	—	$	—	$	8,795

^(a) Using an undiscounted cash flow model, we evaluate the cash flow trends of our stores at least annually and when events or changes in circumstances, such as a store closure, indicate that property, equipment and leasehold improvements may not be fully recoverable. When a store’s projected undiscounted cash flows indicate its carrying value may not be recoverable, we use a discounted cash flow model, with a 10% discount rate, to estimate the fair value of the underlying long-lived assets. An impairment write-down is recorded if the carrying value of a long-lived asset exceeds its fair value. Key assumptions in estimating future cash flows include, among other things, expected future operating performance, including expected closure date and lease term, and changes in economic conditions. We believe estimated future cash flows are sufficient to support the carrying value of our long-lived assets. Significant changes in the key assumptions used in our cash flow projections may result in additional asset impairments. See Note 4 for additional disclosures on impairments charges.

Due to the short-term nature of cash and cash equivalents, payables and short-term debt obligations, the carrying value approximates the fair value of these instruments. In addition, we believe that the Revolving Credit Facility obligation approximates its fair value because interest rates are adjusted daily based on current market rates.

XML

PROPERTY, EQUIPMENT AND LEASEHOLD IMPROVEMENTS

12 Months Ended

Feb. 03, 2018

Property, Plant and Equipment [Abstract]

PROPERTY, EQUIPMENT AND LEASEHOLD IMPROVEMENTS

PROPERTY, EQUIPMENT AND LEASEHOLD IMPROVEMENTS

The components of property, equipment and leasehold improvements were as follows (in thousands):

	February 3, 2018		January 28, 2017
Land	$	1,544	$	1,842
Buildings and improvements	12,966		15,633
Fixtures and equipment	526,313		548,145
Leasehold improvements	411,753		415,577
Property, equipment and leasehold improvements	952,576		981,197
Less: Accumulated depreciation	699,788		697,087
Property, equipment and leasehold improvements, net	$	252,788	$	284,110

Depreciation expense and impairment charges were as follows for each period presented (in thousands):

	Fiscal Year
	2017		2016		2015
Depreciation expense	$	65,401	$	71,779	$	66,998
Store impairment charges	1,739		19,856		10,580
Total depreciation and impairment	$	67,140	$	91,635	$	77,578

Depreciation expense and store impairment charges included in cost of sales and related buying, occupancy and distribution expense for 2017, 2016 and 2015 were $52.9 million, $77.9 million and $67.9 million, respectively.

XML

ACCRUED EXPENSES AND OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES

12 Months Ended

Feb. 03, 2018

Accrued Liabilities and Other Liabilities [Abstract]

ACCRUED EXPENSES AND OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES

ACCRUED EXPENSES AND OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES

The components of accrued expenses and other current liabilities were as follows (in thousands):

	February 3, 2018		January 28, 2017
Accrued compensation and benefits	$	11,828	$	12,165
Gift card and merchandise credit liability	12,122		10,864
Self-insurance liability	9,994		9,437
Accrued occupancy	6,129		10,259
Other	24,193		17,220
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities	$	64,266	$	59,945

XML

DEBT OBLIGATIONS

12 Months Ended

Feb. 03, 2018

Debt Disclosure [Abstract]

DEBT OBLIGATIONS

DEBT OBLIGATIONS

Debt obligations consisted of the following (in thousands):

	February 3, 2018		January 28, 2017
Revolving Credit Facility	$	179,288	$	159,702
Finance obligations	1,549		2,708
Other financing	2,498		7,753
Total debt obligations	183,335		170,163
Less: Current portion of debt obligations	2,985		6,414
Long-term debt obligations	$	180,350	$	163,749

On December 16, 2016, we entered into an amendment to our senior secured revolving credit facility (“Revolving Credit Facility”) that increased total capacity to $400.0 million with a seasonal increase to $450.0 million and a $25.0 million letter of credit sublimit. The Revolving Credit Facility matures on December 16, 2021.

We use the Revolving Credit Facility to provide financing for working capital and general corporate purposes, as well as to finance capital expenditures and to support our letter of credit requirements. Borrowings are limited to the availability under a borrowing base that is determined principally on eligible inventory as defined by the Revolving Credit Facility agreement. Inventory, cash and cash equivalents are pledged as collateral. The daily interest rates are determined by a prime rate or LIBOR, plus an applicable margin, as set forth in the Revolving Credit Facility agreement. During 2017, the weighted average interest rate on outstanding borrowings and the average daily borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility were 2.69% and $224.5 million, respectively, as compared to 1.90% and $192.4 million in 2016.

Letters of credit issued under the Revolving Credit Facility support certain merchandise purchases and collateralize retained risks and deductibles under various insurance programs. At February 3, 2018, we had outstanding letters of credit totaling approximately $7.1 million. These letters of credit expire within 12 months of issuance. Excess availability under the Revolving Credit Facility at February 3, 2018 was $111.9 million.

The Revolving Credit Facility agreement contains covenants which, among other things, restrict, based on required levels of excess availability, (i) the amount of additional debt or capital lease obligations, (ii) the payment of dividends to $30.0 million in a fiscal year, and (iii) the repurchase of common stock under certain circumstances. The agreement also contains a fixed charge coverage ratio covenant in the event excess availability is below a defined threshold or an event of default has occurred. At February 3, 2018, we were in compliance with the financial covenants of the Revolving Credit Facility agreement and expect to continue to be in compliance in 2018.

While infrequent in occurrence, occasionally we are responsible for the construction of leased stores and for paying project costs. ASC 840-40-55, The Effect of Lessee Involvement in Asset Construction, requires us to be considered the owner (for accounting purposes) of this type of project during the construction period. Such leases are accounted for as finance obligations with the amounts received from the landlord being recorded in debt obligations. Interest expense is recognized at a rate that will amortize the finance obligation over the initial term of the lease. Where ASC 840-40-55 was applicable, we have recorded finance obligations with interest rates ranging from 6.1% to 16.9% on our consolidated financial statements related to four store leases as of February 3, 2018. Minimum annual payments required under existing finance obligations as of February 3, 2018 are as follows (in thousands):

Fiscal Year	Minimum Payments		Less: Interest		Principal Payments
2018	$	1,096	$	101	$	995
2019	580		26		554
Total	$	1,676	$	127	$	1,549

At February 3, 2018, $2.5 million remained outstanding under our 2016 secured equipment financing note, of which $2.0 million and $0.5 million will be paid in 2018 and 2019, respectively. The note bears an effective interest rate of 3.2%.

XML

OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES

12 Months Ended

Feb. 03, 2018

Other Liabilities, Noncurrent [Abstract]

OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES

OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES

The components of other long-term liabilities were as follows (in thousands):

	February 3, 2018		January 28, 2017
Deferred rent	$	38,109	$	43,382
Deferred compensation	20,293		18,180
Pension liability	7,247		8,801
Deferred revenue under ADS agreement (see Note 10)	2,875		3,500
Other long-term liabilities	$	68,524	$	73,863

XML

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

12 Months Ended

Feb. 03, 2018

Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

We have numerous contractual commitments for purchases of merchandise inventories, services arising in the ordinary course of business, letters of credit, Revolving Credit Facility and other debt service and leases. Contractual obligations for purchase of goods or services are defined as agreements that are enforceable and legally binding and that specify all significant terms, including: fixed or minimum quantities. In the ordinary course of business, we enter into arrangements with vendors to purchase merchandise typically up to six months in advance of expected delivery.

From time to time, we are involved in various legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our business. We do not believe that any pending legal proceedings, either individually or in the aggregate, are material to our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

XML

STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

12 Months Ended

Feb. 03, 2018

Equity [Abstract]

STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Our deferred compensation plan covering executives and certain officers provides an investment option that allows participants to elect to purchase shares of our common stock (“Company Stock Investment Option”). We established a grantor trust to facilitate the collection of funds and purchase our shares on the open market at prevailing market prices. All shares purchased through the grantor trust are held in the trust until the participants are eligible to receive the benefits under the terms of the plan. At the time of the participant’s eligibility, the deferred compensation obligation related to the Company Stock Investment Option is settled by the delivery of the fixed number of shares held by the grantor trust on the participant’s behalf. In 2017, 2016 and 2015, participants in our deferred compensation plan elected to invest approximately $0.2 million, $0.3 million and $0.9 million, respectively, of the total amount of deferred compensation withheld, in the Company Stock Investment Option. The purchase of shares made by the grantor trust on behalf of the participants is included in treasury stock and the corresponding deferred compensation obligation is included in additional paid-in capital.

On February 22, 2018, subsequent to year-end, our Board of Directors (“Board”) declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.05 per share on our common stock, payable on March 21, 2018, to shareholders of record at the close of business on March 6, 2018.

On March 7, 2011, our Board approved a stock repurchase program (“2011 Stock Repurchase Program”), which authorizes us to repurchase up to $200.0 million of our outstanding common stock. The 2011 Stock Repurchase Program will expire when we have repurchased $200.0 million of our outstanding common stock, unless terminated earlier by our Board. As of February 3, 2018, we had $58.4 million available under the program. Also in March 2011, our Board authorized us to repurchase shares of our outstanding common stock equal to the amount of the proceeds and related tax benefits from the exercise of stock options, SARs and other equity grants. Purchases of shares of our common stock may be made from time to time, either on the open market or through privately negotiated transactions and are financed by our existing cash, cash flow and other liquidity sources, as appropriate.

XML

PRIVATE LABEL CREDIT CARD PORTFOLIO

12 Months Ended

Feb. 03, 2018

PRIVATE LABEL CREDIT CARD PORTFOLIO [Abstract]

PRIVATE LABEL CREDIT CARD PORTFOLIO

PRIVATE LABEL CREDIT CARD PROGRAM

On August 8, 2012, we entered into an Amended and Restated Private Label Credit Card Plan Agreement (“Agreement”) with World Financial Network Bank (now Comenity Bank) (“Bank”), an affiliate of Alliance Data Systems Corporation (“ADS”). Under the terms of the Agreement, which expires July 31, 2021, the Bank provides credit card services for our private label credit card program, including account activation, receivables funding, card authorization, private label credit card issuance, statement generation, remittance processing and guest service functions. We are required to perform certain duties, including electronic processing and transmitting of transaction records and marketing and promoting the private label credit card program. As consideration, among other payments set forth in the Agreement, the Bank pays us a monthly net portfolio yield payment and an annual portfolio performance bonus, if earned.

We received certain upfront payments upon execution of the Agreement that are being recognized over the life of the Agreement, and as of February 3, 2018, the remaining amount to be amortized is $4.6 million. We realized $58.9 million, $55.3 million and $54.1 million in income related to our private label credit card program during 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, which have been recorded as a reduction to SG&A expenses.

XML

OPERATING LEASES

12 Months Ended

Feb. 03, 2018

Leases [Abstract]

OPERATING LEASES

OPERATING LEASES

We lease stores, our corporate headquarters, two distribution centers and equipment under operating leases. The majority of store leases, which are typically for an initial 10-year term and often with two renewal options of five years each, require us to pay base rent plus expenses, such as common area maintenance, utilities, taxes and insurance.  Certain store leases provide for contingent rents that are not measurable at inception.  These contingent rents are primarily based on a percentage of sales that are in excess of a predetermined level. A number of store leases provide for escalating minimum rent.

Minimum rental commitments on long-term, non-cancelable operating leases at February 3, 2018, are as follows (in thousands):

Fiscal Year	Commitments		Sublease Income			Net Minimum Lease Commitments
2018	$	111,260	$	(1,447	)	$	109,813
2019	97,401		(1,447		)	95,954
2020	87,994		(1,492		)	86,502
2021	73,229		(1,582		)	71,647
2022	58,650		(1,582		)	57,068
Thereafter	112,347		(1,054		)	111,293
Total	$	540,881	$	(8,604	)	$	532,277

Rental expense for operating leases, net of sublease income, consisted of the following for each period presented (in thousands):

	Fiscal Year
	2017			2016			2015
Minimum rentals	$	104,240		$	85,538		$	84,170
Contingent rentals	2,224			2,365			3,067
Sublease income	(1,474		)	(1,436		)	(5		)
Total	$	104,990		$	86,467		$	87,232

XML

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

12 Months Ended

Feb. 03, 2018

Disclosure of Compensation Related Costs, Share-based Payments [Abstract]

Stock-Based Compensation

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

As approved by our shareholders, we established the Stage Stores, Inc. Amended and Restated 2001 Equity Incentive Plan (“2001 Equity Incentive Plan”), the Stage Stores, Inc. Second Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive Plan (“2008 Equity Incentive Plan”) and the Stage Stores 2017 Long-Term Incentive Plan (“2017 LTIP” and, collectively with the 2001 Equity Incentive Plan and the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan, the “Equity Incentive Plans”) to reward, retain and attract key personnel. The Equity Incentive Plans provide for grants of non-qualified or incentive stock options, SARs, performance shares or units, stock units and stock grants. To fund the 2001 Equity Incentive Plan, the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan and the 2017 LTIP, 12,375,000, 4,484,346 and 1,365,654 shares of our common stock were reserved for issuance upon exercise of awards, respectively. The 2001 Equity Incentive Plan expired in the second quarter of 2014. On June 1, 2017, the 2017 LTIP replaced the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan and no new awards will be granted under the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan.

Stock-based compensation expense by type of grant for each period presented was as follows (in thousands):

	Fiscal Year
	2017			2016			2015
Non-vested stock	$	5,626		$	6,676		$	7,171
Restricted stock units	434			—			—
Performance shares	2,760			2,785			5,193
Stock options and SARs	—			—			30
Total stock-based compensation expense	8,820			9,461			12,394
Related tax benefit	(3,313		)	(3,557		)	(4,660		)
Stock-based compensation expense, net of tax	$	5,507		$	5,904		$	7,734

As of February 3, 2018, we had unrecognized compensation cost of $10.1 million related to stock-based compensation awards granted. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.0 years.

Non-vested Stock

We grant shares of non-vested stock to our employees and non-employee directors. Shares of non-vested stock awarded to employees vest 25% annually over a four-year period from the grant date. Shares of non-vested stock awarded to non-employee directors cliff vest after one year. At the end of the vesting period, shares of non-vested stock convert one for one to common stock. Certain non-vested stock awards have shareholder rights, including the right to vote and to receive dividends. The fair value of non-vested stock awards with dividend rights is based on the closing share price of our common stock on the grant date. The fair value of non-vested stock awards that do not have dividend rights is discounted for the present value of expected dividends during the vesting period. Compensation expense is recognized ratably over the vesting period.

The following table summarizes non-vested stock activity during 2017:

Non-vested Stock	Number of Shares		Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Outstanding at January 28, 2017	1,596,410		$	10.22
Granted	668,371		2.21
Vested	(577,897	)	11.10
Forfeited	(49,847	)	9.30
Outstanding at February 3, 2018	1,637,037		6.67

The aggregate intrinsic value of non-vested stock that vested during 2017, 2016 and 2015 was $1.2 million, $2.7 million and $5.4 million, respectively. The weighted-average grant date fair value for non-vested stock granted in 2017, 2016 and 2015 was $2.21, $6.75 and $18.70, respectively. The payment of the employees’ tax liability for a portion of the non-vested stock that vested during 2017 was satisfied by withholding shares with a fair value equal to the tax liability. As a result, the actual number of shares issued was 465,007.

Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”)

We grant RSUs to our employees, which vest 25% annually over a four-year period from the grant date.  Each vested RSU is settled in cash in an amount equal to the fair market value of one share of our common stock on the vesting date, not to exceed five times the per share fair market value of our common stock on the grant date. Unvested RSUs have the right to receive a dividend equivalent payment equal to cash dividends paid on our common stock. RSUs are accounted for as a liability in accordance with accounting guidance for cash settled stock awards. The liability for RSUs is remeasured based on the closing share price of our common stock at each reporting period until the award vests. Compensation expense is recognized ratably over the vesting period and adjusted with changes in the fair value of the liability.

The following table summarizes RSU activity during 2017:

Restricted Stock Units	Number of Units		Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Outstanding at January 28, 2017	—		$	—
Granted	1,321,250		2.14
Forfeited	(37,500	)	2.09
Outstanding at February 3, 2018	1,283,750		2.14

Performance Share Units (“PSUs”)

We grant PSUs as a means of rewarding management for our long-term performance based on total shareholder return relative to a specific group of companies over a three-year performance cycle. PSUs cliff vest following a three-year performance cycle, and if earned, are settled in shares of our common stock. The actual number of shares of our common stock that may be earned ranges from zero to a maximum of twice the number of target units awarded to the recipient. Grant recipients do not have any shareholder rights on unvested or unearned PSUs. The fair value of PSUs is estimated using a Monte Carlo simulation, based on the expected term of the award, a risk-free rate, expected dividends, expected volatility, and share price of our common stock and the specified peer group. The expected term is estimated based on the vesting period of the awards, the risk-free rate is based on the yield on U.S. Treasury securities matching the vesting period, and the volatility is based on the historical volatility over the expected term. Compensation expense is recorded ratably over the corresponding vesting period.

The following table summarizes PSU activity during 2017:

Period Granted	Target PSUs Outstanding at January 28, 2017	Target PSUs Granted	Target PSUs Vested and Earned	Target PSUs Vested and Unearned		Target PSUs Forfeited		Target PSUs Outstanding at February 3, 2018	Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value per Target PSU
2015	158,490	—	—	(154,046	)	(4,444	)	—	$	28.33
2016	330,233	—	—	—		(8,527	)	321,706	8.69
2017	—	600,000	—	—		—		600,000	1.80
Total	488,723	600,000	—	(154,046	)	(12,971	)	921,706	7.65

No PSUs were earned in 2017. The aggregate intrinsic value of PSUs that vested and were earned during 2016 and 2015 was $0.1 million and $4.9 million, respectively.

SARs

Prior to 2012, we granted SARs to our employees, which generally vested 25% annually over a four-year period from the grant date. Outstanding SARs will expire, if not exercised or forfeited, within seven years from the grant date. Exercised SARs are settled by the issuance of common stock in an amount equal to the increase in share price of our common stock between the grant date and the exercise date.

The following table summarizes SARs activity during 2017: 

	Number of Outstanding Shares		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (years)	Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in thousands)
Outstanding, vested and exercisable at January 28, 2017	177,900		$	17.69
Forfeited	(80,000	)	16.29
Outstanding, vested and exercisable at February 3, 2018	97,900		$	18.83	0.2	$	—

No SARs were exercised during 2017 or 2016. The aggregate intrinsic value of SARs, defined as the amount by which the market price of the underlying stock on the date of exercise exceeds the exercise price of the award, exercised during 2015 was $0.9 million.

XML

BENEFIT PLANS

12 Months Ended

Feb. 03, 2018

Retirement Benefits [Abstract]

BENEFIT PLANS

BENEFIT PLANS

401(k) Plan.We have a contributory 401(k) savings plan (“401(k) Plan”) generally available to full and part-time employees with 60 days of service, who are age 21 or older.  Under the 401(k) Plan, participants may contribute up to 50% of their qualifying earnings on a pre-tax basis, and up to 10% of their qualifying earnings on a post-tax basis, subject to certain restrictions. We currently match 50% of each participant’s pre-tax contributions, limited up to 6% of each participant’s compensation under the Plan. We may make discretionary matching contributions during the year. Our matching contributions expense for the 401(k) Plan were approximately $1.7 million, $1.4 million and $1.5 million in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Deferred Compensation Plans. We have two nonqualified deferred compensation plans (“DC Plans”) which provide executives and other key employees with the opportunity to participate in unfunded, deferred compensation programs that are not qualified under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, (“Code”). Generally, the Code and ERISA restrict contributions to a 401(k) plan by highly compensated employees. The DC Plans are intended to allow participants to defer income on a pre-tax basis. Under the DC Plans, participants may defer up to 50% of their base salary and up to 100% of their bonus and earn a rate of return based on actual investments chosen by each participant. We have established grantor trusts for the purposes of holding assets to provide benefits to the participants. For the plan covering executives, we will match 100% of each participant’s contributions, up to 10% of the sum of their base salary and bonus. For the plan covering other key employees, we may make a bi-weekly discretionary matching contribution. We currently match 50% of each participant’s contributions, up to 3% of the participant’s compensation. For both DC Plans, our contributions are vested 100%.  In addition, we may, with approval by our Board, make an additional employer contribution in any amount with respect to any participant as is determined in our sole discretion. Our matching contribution expense for the DC Plans was approximately $0.9 million, $1.0 million and $1.1 million for 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Non-Employee Director Equity Compensation Plan.  In 2003, we adopted, and our shareholders approved, and in 2004 we amended and restated, the Stage Stores, Inc. Amended and Restated 2003 Non-Employee Director Equity Compensation Plan. We reserved 225,000 shares of our common stock to fund this plan. Under this plan, non-employee directors have the option to defer all or a portion of their annual compensation fees and to receive such deferred fees in the form of restricted stock or deferred stock units as defined in this plan. At January 28, 2017 and February 3, 2018 there were no participants in or amounts deferred under this plan.

Frozen Defined Benefit Plan. We sponsor a defined benefit plan (“DB Plan”), which covers substantially all employees who had met eligibility requirements and were enrolled prior to June 30, 1998. The DB Plan was frozen effective June 30, 1998.

Benefits for the DB Plan are administered through a trust arrangement, which provides monthly payments or lump sum distributions. Benefits under the DB Plan were based upon a percentage of the participant’s earnings during each year of credited service. Any service after the date the DB Plan was frozen will continue to count toward vesting and eligibility for normal and early retirement for existing participants. The measurement dates used to determine pension benefit obligations were February 3, 2018 and January 28, 2017.

Information regarding the DB Plan is as follows (in thousands):

	Fiscal Year
	2017			2016
Change in benefit obligation:
Benefit obligation at beginning of year	$	34,962		$	35,223
Employer service cost	490			340
Interest cost	1,430			1,598
Actuarial loss	1,835			1,067
Settlements	(1,989		)	—
Plan disbursements	(1,979		)	(3,266		)
Projected benefit obligation at end of year	34,749			34,962
Change in plan assets:
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year	26,161			26,310
Actual return on plan assets	4,456			3,117
Employer contributions	853			—
Settlements	(1,989		)	—
Plan disbursements	(1,979		)	(3,266		)
Fair value of plan assets at end of year	27,502			26,161
Underfunded status	$	(7,247	)	$	(8,801	)
Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheet consist of:
Accrued benefit liability - included in other long-term liabilities	$	(7,247	)	$	(8,801	)
Amount recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss, pre-tax (a)	6,822			9,023

^(a) Consists solely of net actuarial losses as there are no prior service costs.

	Fiscal Year
	2017		2016
Weighted-average assumptions:
For determining benefit obligations at year-end:
Discount rate	3.98	%	4.33	%
	Fiscal Year
	2017		2016		2015
For determining net periodic pension cost for year:
Discount rate	4.33	%	4.79	%	3.90	%
Expected return on assets	6.50	%	7.00	%	7.00	%

The discount rate was determined using yields on a hypothetical bond portfolio that matches the approximated cash flows of the DB Plan. We develop our long-term rate of return assumptions using long-term historical actual return data considering the mix of investments that comprise plan assets and input from professional advisors. The DB Plan’s trustees have engaged investment advisors to manage and monitor performance of the investments of the DB Plan’s assets and consult with the DB Plan’s trustees.

The allocations of DB Plan assets by category are as follows:

		Fiscal Year
	2018 Target Allocation	2017	2016
Equity securities	50%	51%	51%
Fixed income securities	50	47	48
Other - primarily cash	—	2	1
Total	100%	100%	100%

We employ a total return investment approach whereby a mix of equities and fixed income investments are used to maximize the long-term return on DB Plan assets for a prudent level of risk. The investment portfolio consists of actively managed and indexed mutual funds of domestic and international equities and investment-grade corporate bonds and U.S. government securities. Investment risk is measured and monitored on an ongoing basis through quarterly investment portfolio reviews and annual liability measurements.

The following tables present the DB Plan assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis in the consolidated financial statements (in thousands):

	February 3, 2018
	Balance		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Instruments (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Mutual funds:
Equity securities	$	14,162	$	14,162	$	—	$	—
Fixed income securities	12,833		12,833		—		—
Other - primarily cash	507		507		—		—
Total	$	27,502	$	27,502	$	—	$	—

	January 28, 2017
	Balance		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Instruments (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Mutual funds:
Equity securities	$	13,309	$	13,309	$	—	$	—
Fixed income securities	12,540		12,540		—		—
Other - primarily cash	312		312		—		—
Total	$	26,161	$	26,161	$	—	$	—

The components of net periodic benefit cost for the DB Plan were as follows (in thousands):

	Fiscal Year
	2017			2016			2015
Net periodic pension cost for the fiscal year:
Employer service cost	$	490		$	340		$	350
Interest cost on pension benefit obligation	1,430			1,598			1,566
Expected return on plan assets	(1,654		)	(1,749		)	(2,195		)
Amortization of net loss	797			897			774
Settlement charges(a)	438			—			748
Net periodic pension cost	$	1,501		$	1,086		$	1,243

^(a) Non-cash pension settlement charges were recognized as a result of lump sum distributions exceeding interest cost for the year. Settlement charges are recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses in our consolidated statements of operations.

Other changes in DB Plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive loss are as follows (in thousands):

	Fiscal Year
	2017			2016
Amortization of net loss	$	(797	)	$	(897	)
Settlement charges	(438		)	—
Net gain	(966		)	(301		)
Net change recognized in other comprehensive loss, pre-tax	$	(2,201	)	$	(1,198	)

The estimated net loss that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive loss into net periodic benefit cost over the next year is $0.5 million. The amortization of net loss is recorded in SG&A expenses.

Our funding policy is to make contributions to maintain the minimum funding requirements for our pension obligation in accordance with ERISA. We may elect to contribute additional amounts to maintain a level of funding to minimize the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation premium costs or to cover short-term liquidity needs of the DB Plan in order to maintain current invested positions.  We contributed $0.9 million in 2017, and we expect to contribute approximately $1.2 million in 2018.

The following benefit payments are expected to be paid (in thousands):

Fiscal Year	Payments
2018	$	2,201
2019	2,880
2020	2,722
2021	2,988
2022	3,043
Fiscal Years 2023 - 2027	13,067

XML

INCOME TAXES

12 Months Ended

Feb. 03, 2018

Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]

INCOME TAXES

INCOME TAXES

On December 22, 2017, the U.S. government enacted the Tax Act, making broad and complex changes to the U.S. tax code that affect our current fiscal year, including, but not limited to, (1) reducing the U.S. federal corporate tax rate, (2) creating a new limitation on deductible interest expense and (3) changing rules related to uses and limitations of net operating losses generated in tax years ending after December 31, 2017.

The Tax Act reduced the federal corporate tax rate from 35.0% to 21.0% effective January 1, 2018. In accordance with Section 15 of the Internal Revenue Code, we have utilized a blended rate of 33.7% for our fiscal 2017 tax year, by applying a prorated percentage of the number of days prior to and after the January 1, 2018 effective date. The Act required the remeasurement of the deferred tax assets at enactment date resulting in an adjustment of $0.3 million to our income tax expense.

Existing accounting guidance required remeasurement for amounts recorded through accumulated other comprehensive income to run through tax expense. This impact is commonly referred to as the “stranded tax effect”. In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-02, Income Statement-Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, to address concerns regarding the “stranded tax effect”. ASU 2018-02 provides entities an election to reclassify the difference between the new and old corporate tax rates resulting from the Tax Act between retained earnings and accumulated other comprehensive income for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. We made an election under ASU 2018-02 to reclassify the income tax rate change effects on items originally recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings in the amount of $1.2 million. Currently, only changes to the minimum pension liability are recorded into accumulated other comprehensive income. The amount of the reclassification was determined based on the amount of the federal tax rate change on the deferred tax liability remaining in accumulated other comprehensive income including the federal tax effect on future state tax benefits at the enactment date. Our current accounting policy related to releasing tax effects from accumulated other comprehensive income for minimum pension liability is on a plan approach.

On December 22, 2017, the SEC issued SAB 118, which provides guidance on accounting for tax effects of the Tax Act. SAB 118 provides a measurement period that should not extend beyond one year from the Tax Act enactment date for entities to complete the accounting under ASC 740. In accordance with SAB 118, an entity must reflect the income tax effects of those aspects of the Tax Act for which the accounting under ASC 740 is complete. To the extent that an entity’s accounting for certain income tax effects of the Tax Act is incomplete, but it is able to determine a reasonable estimate, it must record a provisional estimate to be included in the financial statements. If an entity cannot determine a provisional estimate to be included in the financial statements, it should continue to apply ASC 740 based on the provision of the tax laws that were in effect immediately before the enactment of the Tax Act. Our accounting for the impact of the reduction in U.S. federal corporate rate is complete.

We record valuation allowances when it is more-likely-than-not that some portion or all of our deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of the deferred tax assets depends on the ability to generate sufficient taxable income of the appropriate character and in the appropriate taxing jurisdictions in the future. If we do not meet our expectations with respect to taxable income, we may not realize the full benefit from our deferred tax assets which would require us to record a valuation allowance in our tax provision in future years. Management assesses all available positive and negative evidence to estimate our ability to generate sufficient future taxable income of the appropriate character, and in the appropriate taxing jurisdictions, to permit use of our existing deferred tax assets. In determining the need for valuation allowances, we have considered and made judgments and estimates regarding estimated future taxable income and ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies. These estimates and judgments include some degree of uncertainty and changes in these estimates and assumptions could require us to adjust the valuation allowances for our deferred tax assets. The ultimate realization of the deferred tax assets depends on the generation of sufficient taxable income in the applicable taxing jurisdictions

We believe that the reversal of existing deferred tax liabilities will create taxable income that will allow us to recognize an equal amount of tax assets. In the current year, we have recorded a valuation allowance against net tax assets of $6.1 million. We also generated federal and state net operating losses estimated at $21.0 million which are included in deferred tax assets. Under the Tax Act, the federal losses generated in tax years ending after December 31, 2017, can be carried forward indefinitely; states are still considering conformity with the new law.

As of February 3, 2018, we had no unrecognized tax benefits. We file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state and local jurisdictions. We recognize penalty and interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits, if any, as an income tax expense. We are subject to U.S. federal income tax examinations by tax authorities for 2014 forward.  We are also subject to audit by the taxing authorities of 38 states for years generally after 2013 and 3 additional states relating to the Gordmans Acquisition beginning in 2017. The outcome of tax audits cannot be predicted with certainty. If any issues addressed in our tax audits are resolved in a manner not consistent with our expectations, we could be required to adjust our provision for income taxes in the period such resolution occurs.

All of our operations are domestic.  Income tax (benefit) expense consisted of the following (in thousands):

	Fiscal Year
	2017			2016			2015
Federal income tax (benefit) expense:
Current	$	(12,216	)	$	(5,234	)	$	3,380
Deferred	428			(19,052		)	(2,156		)
	(11,788		)	(24,286		)	1,224
State income tax (benefit) expense:
Current	193			292			765
Deferred	(1,473		)	(1,172		)	(174		)
	(1,280		)	(880		)	591
Total income tax (benefit) expense	$	(13,068	)	$	(25,166	)	$	1,815

A reconciliation between the federal income tax (benefit) expense computed at statutory tax rates and the actual income tax (benefit) expense recorded is as follows (in thousands):

	Fiscal Year
	2017			2016			2015
Federal income tax (benefit) expense at the blended statutory rate	$	(16,992	)	$	(22,072	)	$	1,958
State income taxes, net	(1,345		)	(1,084		)	332
Uncertain tax position	—			(743		)	128
Other	1,375			654			474
Tax deficiencies related to share-based payments(a)	1,948			—			—
Tax credits	(4,386		)	(1,921		)	(1,077		)
Valuation allowance on net deferred tax assets	6,077			—			—
Tax Act	255			—			—
Total income tax (benefit) expense	$	(13,068	)	$	(25,166	)	$	1,815

^(a) We recognized tax deficiencies of $2.1 million related to share-based payments in 2017, of which $0.2 million was for state income taxes.

Deferred tax assets (liabilities) consisted of the following (in thousands):

	February 3, 2018			January 28, 2017
Gross deferred tax assets:
Net operating loss	$	6,758		$	10,184
Accrued expenses	2,203			2,893
Lease obligations	9,355			16,762
Deferred compensation	7,147			12,048
Deferred income	2,583			3,956
Other	4,650			4,434
	32,696			50,277
Gross deferred tax liabilities:
Inventory	(1,862		)	(4,706		)
Depreciation and amortization	(24,342		)	(45,703		)
	(26,204		)	(50,409		)
Valuation allowance	(6,492		)	(415		)
Net deferred tax liabilities	$	—		$	(547	)

XML

GORDMANS ACQUISITION

12 Months Ended

Feb. 03, 2018

Business Combinations [Abstract]

Business Combination Disclosure [Text Block]

GORDMANS ACQUISITION

On April 7, 2017, we acquired select assets of Gordmans Stores, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Sellers”) through a bankruptcy auction. The terms of the transaction agreement required us to take assignment of a minimum of 50 of the Sellers’ store leases, with rights to take assignment of the leases for an additional seven stores and a distribution center. We also acquired all of the Sellers’ inventory, furniture, fixtures and equipment at the 57 store locations and distribution center, as well as the trademarks and other intellectual property of the Sellers. The Gordmans stores, which we operate as an off-price concept, add scale to our business, while allowing us to leverage strategic synergies and our current infrastructure. The acquisition also brings beneficial geographic and guest diversification.

The purchase price for the inventory and other assets acquired from the Sellers was approximately $36.1 million, all of which was paid by the end of the second quarter 2017 using existing cash and availability under our Revolving Credit Facility. We took assignment of 55 of the 57 store locations and the distribution center, and we renegotiated the terms of many of those leases. We also entered into new leases for three former Gordmans store locations, of which, two were opened in the second quarter 2017 and one opened in the third quarter 2017, for a total of 58 stores.

The estimated fair values of the assets acquired at the acquisition date, were as follows (in thousands): 

	April 7, 2017
Inventory	$	31,770
Property, plant and equipment and other assets	4,374
Total	$	36,144

We recognized $9.1 million of acquisition and integration related costs in selling, general and administrative expenses in 2017.

Net sales included in our consolidated statements of operations from our Gordmans stores that we operated beginning on April 7, 2017, were $222.2 million in 2017.

Pro forma net sales and earnings for 2017 and 2016 are not presented due to the impracticability in substantiating this information as the Gordmans Acquisition was limited to select assets and assignment of leases acquired through a bankruptcy auction. Furthermore, the results of operations may be impacted by the Sellers’ liquidation and may not be indicative of future performance.

XML

QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (unaudited)

12 Months Ended

Feb. 03, 2018

Quarterly Financial Information Disclosure [Abstract]

QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (unaudited)

QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (unaudited)

The following table shows quarterly information (in thousands, except per share amounts):

	Fiscal Year 2017
	Q1			Q2			Q3			Q4 (a) (b)
Net sales	$	308,607		$	377,081		$	357,236		$	549,351
Gross profit	62,218			92,941			71,694			136,642
Net (loss) income	(18,987		)	(6,258		)	(17,722		)	5,644
Basic (loss) earnings per share	$	(0.70	)	$	(0.23	)	$	(0.64	)	$	0.19
Diluted (loss) earnings per share	(0.70		)	(0.23		)	(0.64		)	0.19
Basic weighted average shares	27,268			27,535			27,602			27,628
Diluted weighted average shares	27,268			27,535			27,602			27,628
	Fiscal Year 2016
	Q1			Q2			Q3			Q4 (a) (b)
Net sales	$	332,750		$	338,385		$	317,140		$	454,443
Gross profit	66,987			85,570			56,590			88,905
Net (loss) income	(15,460		)	41			(15,634		)	(6,844		)
Basic (loss) earnings per share	$	(0.57	)	$	—		$	(0.58	)	$	(0.25	)
Diluted (loss) earnings per share	(0.57		)	—			(0.58		)	(0.25		)
Basic weighted average shares	26,932			27,111			27,155			27,163
Diluted weighted average shares	26,932			27,175			27,155			27,163

^(a) The fourth quarter 2017 consisted of 14 weeks compared with 13 weeks in the fourth quarter 2016.

^(b) The fourth quarter 2017 and 2016 included impairment charges recognized in cost of sales and related buying, occupancy and distribution expenses of $1.6 million and $19.4 million, respectively.

XML

DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Policies)

12 Months Ended

Feb. 03, 2018

Description of Business and Significant Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Description of business

Description of Business.  We are a retailer of trend-right, moderately priced, name-brand apparel, accessories, cosmetics, footwear and home goods. As of February 3, 2018, we operated in 42 states through 777 BEALLS, GOODY’S, PALAIS ROYAL, PEEBLES and STAGE specialty department stores and 58 GORDMANS off-price stores. We also operate an e-commerce website. Our department stores are predominantly located in small towns and rural communities. Our off-price stores are predominantly located in mid-sized, non-rural Midwest markets.

Principles of consolidation

Principles of Consolidation.  The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Stage Stores, Inc. and its subsidiary.  All intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. We report our department stores, off-price stores and e-commerce website in a single operating segment.  Revenues from guests are derived from merchandise sales.  We do not rely on any major guest as a source of revenue

Fiscal Year

Fiscal Year. References to a particular year are to our fiscal year, which is the 52- or 53-week period ending on the Saturday closest to January 31st of the following calendar year.  

Fiscal Year	Ended	Weeks
2017	February 3, 2018	53
2016	January 28, 2017	52
2015	January 30, 2016	52

Use of estimates

Use of Estimates.  The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes.  On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to inventory, deferred tax assets, intangible assets, long-lived assets, sales returns, gift card breakage, pension obligations, self-insurance and contingent liabilities.  Actual results may differ materially from these estimates.  We base our estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions which are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances.

Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and Cash Equivalents. Weconsider highly liquid investments with initial maturities of less than three months to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents also includes amounts due from credit card sales transactions.

Concentration of credit risk

Concentration of Credit Risk. Financial instruments which potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk are primarily cash.  Our cash management and investment policies restrict investments to low-risk, highly-liquid securities and we perform periodic evaluations of the relative credit standing of the financial institutions with which we deal.

Merchandise inventories

Merchandise Inventories.  We value merchandise inventories using the lower of cost or net realizable value with cost determined using the weighted average cost method.  We capitalize distribution center costs associated with preparing inventory for sale, such as distribution payroll, benefits, occupancy, depreciation and other direct operating expenses as part of merchandise inventories.  We also include in inventory the cost of freight to our distribution centers and to stores as well as duties and fees related to import purchases.

Vendor allowances

Vendor Allowances. We receive consideration from our merchandise vendors in the form of allowances and reimbursements.  Given the promotional nature of our business, the allowances are generally intended to offset our costs of handling, promoting, advertising and selling the vendors’ products in our stores.  These allowances are recognized in accordance with ASC Subtopic 605-50, Customer Payments and Incentives. Vendor allowances related to the purchase of inventory are recorded as a reduction to the cost of inventory until sold.  Vendor allowances are recognized as a reduction of cost of goods sold or the related selling expense when the purpose for which the vendor funds were intended to be used has been fulfilled and amounts have been authorized by vendors.

Stock-based compensation

Stock-Based Compensation. We recognize as compensation expense an amount equal to the fair value of share-based payments granted to employees and independent directors, net of forfeitures.  That cost is recognized ratably in SG&A expense over the period during which an employee or independent director is required to provide service in exchange for the award.

Stock-based compensation, forfeitures

Forfeitures are recognized as they occur.

Property, equipment and leasehold improvements

Property, Equipment and Leasehold Improvements.  Additions to property, equipment and leasehold improvements are recorded at cost and depreciated over their estimated useful lives using the straight-line method.  The estimated useful lives of leasehold improvements do not exceed the term of the related lease, including applicable available renewal options where appropriate.  The estimated useful lives in years are generally as follows:

Buildings & improvements	20
Information systems	3	-	10
Store and office fixtures and equipment	5	-	10
Warehouse equipment	5	-	15
Leasehold improvements - stores	5	-	15
Leasehold improvements - corporate office	10	-	12

Impairment of long-lived assets

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets.  Property, plant and equipment and other long-lived assets are reviewed to determine whether any events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable.  For long-lived assets to be held and used, we base our evaluation on impairment indicators such as the nature of the asset’s physical condition, the future economic benefit of the asset, any historical or future profitability measurements and other external market conditions or factors that may be present.  If such impairment indicators are present or other factors exist that indicate the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable, we determine whether impairment has occurred through the use of an undiscounted cash flows analysis of the asset at the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows exist.  If impairment has occurred, we recognize a loss for the difference between the carrying amount and the estimated fair value of the asset. Management’s judgment is necessary to estimate fair value.

Insurance Recoveries

Insurance Recoveries. We incurred casualty losses during 2017, 2016 and 2015. We received total insurance proceeds of $15.7 million, $3.3 million and $2.5 million during 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and recognized net gains of $4.3 million, $0.7 million and $0.8 million in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, which are included in selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”).

Intangible asset and impairment of intangible assets

Intangible Assets and Impairment of Intangible Assets.  Indefinite life intangible assets are tested for impairment annually or more frequently when indicators of impairment exist. As a part of the acquisition of Peebles, Inc. in 2003 and the Gordmans Acquisition in 2017, we acquired the rights to the PEEBLES and the GORDMANS trade names and trademarks (collectively the “Trademarks”), which were identified as indefinite life intangibles.  The values of the Trademarks were determined to be $14.9 million and $1.9 million, respectively, at the time of acquisition.  We completed our annual impairment testing during the fourth quarter of 2017 and determined that the fair value of the Peebles trademarks exceeded the carrying values by greater than 10%. The carrying value of the Gordmans trademarks approximates their fair value.

Debt issuance costs

Debt Issuance Costs.  Debt issuance costs are accounted for as a deferred charge and amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the related financing agreement.  The balance of debt issuance costs, net of accumulated amortization of $0.3 million and $0.1 million, is $1.1 million and $1.4 million at February 3, 2018 and January 28, 2017, respectively.

Revenue recognition

Revenue Recognition.  Our retail stores record revenue at the point of sale.  Sales of merchandise shipped to our guests are recorded based on estimated receipt of merchandise by the guest. Shipping and handling fees charged to guests are included in net sales with the corresponding costs recorded as costs of goods sold. Total revenues do not include sales tax because we are a pass-through conduit for collecting and remitting sales taxes. Revenues are recognized net of expected returns, which we estimate using historical return patterns as a percentage of sales.

We record deferred revenue on our balance sheet for gift cards sales and merchandise credits issued related to guest returns. Upon redemption, we recognize this revenue in net sales.

Gift Card and Merchandise Credit Liability

Gift Card and Merchandise Credit Liability.Unredeemed gift cards and merchandise credits are recorded as a liability. Our gift cards and merchandise credits do not expire. Based on historical redemption rates, a small and relatively stable percentage of gift cards and merchandise credits will never be redeemed, which is referred to as “breakage.” Estimated breakage income is recognized over time in proportion to actual gift card and merchandise credit redemptions. We recognized breakage income of approximately $0.9 million and $3.0 million in net sales in 2017 and 2016, respectively, and approximately $1.6 million as an offset to SG&A expenses in 2015.

Guest Loyalty Program

Guest Loyalty Program.  Prior to the third quarter of 2016, guests who spent a required amount within a specified time frame using our private label credit card received reward certificates which could be redeemed for merchandise. We estimated the net cost of the rewards and recorded a liability associated with unredeemed certificates and guest spend toward unissued certificates. The cost of the loyalty rewards program was recorded in cost of sales. In the third quarter of 2016, we expanded our loyalty program to enable all guests to earn benefits regardless of how they choose to pay. We record deferred revenue, net of estimated breakage, for the retail value of certificates earned and as guests make purchases towards earning reward certificates.

Self Insurance Reserves

Self-Insurance Reserves.  We maintain self-insured retentions with respect to general liability, workers compensation and health benefits for our employees.  We estimate the accruals for the liabilities based on industry development factors and historical claim trend experience.  Although management believes adequate reserves have been provided for expected liabilities arising from our self-insured obligations, projections of future losses are inherently uncertain, and it is reasonably possible that estimates of these liabilities will change over the near term as circumstances develop.

Advertising expenses

Advertising Expenses.  Advertising costs are charged to operations when the related advertising first takes place.  Advertising costs were $83.6 million, $88.7 million and $91.0 million, in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, which are net of advertising allowances received from vendors of $3.1 million, $4.3 million and $4.9 million, respectively.

Rent expense

Rent Expense.  We record rent expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term, including the build out period, and where appropriate, applicable available lease renewal option periods.  The difference between the payment and expense in any period is recorded as deferred rent in other long-term liabilities in the consolidated financial statements.  We record construction allowances from landlords when contractually earned as a deferred rent credit in other long-term liabilities.  Such deferred rent credit is amortized over the related lease term, commencing on the date we contractually earned the construction allowance, as a reduction of rent expense.

Certain leases provide for contingent rents that are not measurable at inception.  These contingent rents are primarily based on a percentage of sales that are in excess of a predetermined level.  These amounts are excluded from minimum rent and are included in the determination of total rent expense when it is probable that the expense has been incurred and the amount is reasonably estimable.

Income taxes

Income Taxes.  The provision for income taxes is computed based on the pretax income (loss) included in the consolidated financial statements.  The asset and liability approach is used to recognize deferred tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amounts for financial reporting purposes and the tax basis of assets and liabilities.  A valuation allowance is established if it is more likely than not that some portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized.  See Note 14 for additional disclosures regarding income taxes and deferred income taxes.

Earnings per share

Earnings Per Share. Basic earnings per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the measurement period.  Diluted earnings per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares as well as all potentially dilutive common share equivalents outstanding during the measurement period.  

We granted non-vested stock and restricted stock unit awards that contain non-forfeitable dividend rights. Under Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 260-10, Earnings Per Share, non-vested stock awards that contain non-forfeitable dividend or dividend equivalent rights are considered participating securities and are included in the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method.  The two-class method determines earnings per share for each class of common stock and participating securities according to dividends or dividend equivalents and their respective participation rights in undistributed earnings. See Note 2 for additional disclosures regarding earnings per share.

Recent Accounting Standards

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, which modifies several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, classification on the statement of cash flows, and the option to estimate expected forfeitures or recognize forfeitures as they occur. We adopted this standard on a prospective basis in first quarter of 2017. Under the new standard, excess income tax benefits and deficiencies related to awards that vest or settle are recognized in the provision for income taxes as a discrete event in the period in which they occur, which may create significant volatility in the provision for income taxes and earnings. Historically, these amounts were reflected within additional paid-in capital on the balance sheet. In addition, upon adoption excess tax benefits are reflected within operating activities in the statements of cash flows, whereas historically these amounts were reflected as a financing activity. Cash paid to tax authorities on an employee’s behalf for withheld shares continues to be classified as a financing activity in the statement of cash flows. We made a policy election to recognize forfeitures as they occur. For 2017, we recognized excess tax deficiencies of $2.1 million in the provision for income taxes. The adoption of the other requirements of this guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments, which provides guidance on certain specific cash flow issues including proceeds received from the settlement of insurance claims. This guidance requires cash proceeds received from the settlement of insurance claims to be classified on the statement of cash flows on the basis of the related insurance coverage (that is, the nature of the loss). The new standard is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted and is to be applied retrospectively. We adopted this guidance in the first quarter of 2017. The adoption of ASU 2016-15 did not change the presentation of our consolidated statements of cash flows.

In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-02, Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, which allows a reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings for stranded tax effects resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“Tax Act”). In addition, the ASU requires certain disclosures regarding stranded tax effects. ASU 2018-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. We adopted the new standard in the fourth quarter of 2017 and reclassified $1.2 million from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings. See Note 14 of the Financial Statements for additional disclosures regarding the stranded tax effects.

In March 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-05, which amends Income Taxes (Topic 740) byincorporating the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”) Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 (“SAB 118”) issued on December 22, 2017. SAB 118 provides guidance on accounting for the effects of the Tax Act. We recognized the income tax effects of the Tax Act in our 2017 financial statements in accordance with SAB 118. See Note 14 of the Financial Statements for additional disclosures.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted. In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which supersedes most existing revenue recognition guidance in GAAP. The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects what the entity expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. The guidance establishes a five-step revenue recognition model, which includes (i) identifying the contract with the customer, (ii) identifying the separate performance obligations in the contract, (iii) determining the transaction price, (iv) allocating the transaction price to the separate performance obligations, and (v) recognizing revenue when each performance obligation is satisfied. The guidance also requires additional disclosures to describe the nature, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows from contracts with customers. ASU 2014-09 may be applied retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented, or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying the guidance recognized in retained earnings at the date of adoption. The new guidance is effective for us in the first quarter of fiscal 2018. We have selected the full retrospective method of adoption. In order to determine the impact of the new guidance on our financial statements, we reviewed representative transactions across our revenue streams and compared our historical accounting practices to the new guidance. We do not expect the adoption to have a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. Our 2018 consolidated financial statements will include incremental disclosures regarding our revenue recognition policies and related amounts.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). The guidance in this ASU supersedes the leasing guidance in Topic 840, Leases. The new standard requires lessees to recognize a right-of-use asset and lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. We plan to make a policy election that will keep leases with an initial term of 12 months or less off the balance sheet and will result in recognizing those lease payments in the consolidated statements of operations on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Consistent with current GAAP, the recognition, measurement and presentation of expenses and cash flows arising from a lease by a lessee primarily will depend on its classification as a financing or operating lease. However, unlike current GAAP, which requires only capital leases to be recognized on the balance sheet, ASU 2016-02 will require both types of leases to be recognized on the balance sheet. As a result, lessees will be required to put most leases on their balance sheets while recognizing expense on their income statements in a manner similar to current accounting. In addition, this guidance requires disclosures about the amount, timing and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. ASU 2016-02 specifies a modified retrospective transition approach for leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements and that the new and enhanced disclosures be provided for each period presented (including comparative periods). On March 7, 2018, the FASB affirmed its proposed ASU, Leases (Topic 842): Targeted Improvements, which provides entities with an additional (and optional) transition method to adopt the new lease requirements by allowing entities to initially apply the requirements by recognizing a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption. Consequently, an entity’s reporting for the comparative periods presented in the financial statements in which the entity adopts the new lease requirements would continue to be in accordance with current GAAP, including disclosures. The new standard will be effective for us in the first quarter of fiscal 2019, which begins on February 3, 2019. We continue to evaluate the impact that the adoption of this ASU will have on our consolidated financial statements and disclosures, including the effect of certain optional practical expedients permitted under the transition guidance. Based on our assessment to date, we expect the adoption of ASU 2016-02 will result in a significant increase in lease-related assets and liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets. The ultimate impact of adopting the new standard will depend on our lease portfolio as of the adoption date.

In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-07, Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost, which requires the service cost component of net periodic benefit cost to be presented in the same income statement line item as other employee compensation costs arising from services rendered during the period. If a subtotal for operating income is shown on the income statement, then the other components of the net periodic benefit cost must be presented separately from the line item that includes the service cost and outside of any subtotal of operating income. ASU 2017-07 also requires disclosure of the line item(s) in the income statement that include net periodic benefit costs. Additionally, only the service cost component of the net periodic benefit cost is eligible for capitalization. The new standard is effective for us in the first quarter of fiscal 2018. The change in presentation of service cost must be applied retrospectively, while the capitalization of service cost must be applied on a prospective basis. The pension plan that we sponsor is frozen, and therefore, service costs no longer accrue under the plan. Upon adoption, we will recognize net periodic pension costs in SG&A expenses, consistent with our current presentation, and we will disclose the financial statement line item presentation in the notes to the financial statements.

XML

DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Feb. 03, 2018

Description of Business and Significant Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Schedule Of Fiscal Years [Table Text Block]

Fiscal Year	Ended	Weeks
2017	February 3, 2018	53
2016	January 28, 2017	52
2015	January 30, 2016	52

Schedule of estimated useful lives of property, equipment and leasehold improvements

The estimated useful lives in years are generally as follows:

Buildings & improvements	20
Information systems	3	-	10
Store and office fixtures and equipment	5	-	10
Warehouse equipment	5	-	15
Leasehold improvements - stores	5	-	15
Leasehold improvements - corporate office	10	-	12

XML

EARNINGS PER SHARE (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Feb. 03, 2018

Earnings Per Share [Abstract]

Computation of basic and diluted earnings per share

The following tables show the computation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share for each period (in thousands, except per share amounts):

	Fiscal Year
	2017			2016			2015
Basic:
Net (loss) income	$	(37,323	)	$	(37,897	)	$	3,780
Less: Allocation of earnings to participating securities	—			—			(48		)
Net (loss) income allocated to common shares	(37,323		)	(37,897		)	3,732
Basic weighted average shares outstanding	27,510			27,090			31,145
Basic (loss) earnings per share	$	(1.37	)	$	(1.40	)	$	0.12
	Fiscal Year
	2017			2016			2015
Diluted:
Net (loss) income	$	(37,323	)	$	(37,897	)	$	3,780
Less: Allocation of earnings to participating securities	—			—			(48		)
Net (loss) income allocated to common shares	(37,323		)	(37,897		)	3,732
Basic weighted average shares outstanding	27,510			27,090			31,145
Add: Dilutive effect of stock awards	—			—			43
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding	27,510			27,090			31,188
Diluted (loss) earnings per share	$	(1.37	)	$	(1.40	)	$	0.12

Number of stock options and SARs outstanding excluded from computation of diluted earnings per share

The number of shares attributable to stock options, stock appreciation rights (“SARs”) and non-vested stock grants that would have been considered dilutive securities, but were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings (loss) per share because the effect was anti-dilutive were as follows (in thousands):

	Fiscal Year
	2017	2016	2015
Number of anti-dilutive shares due to net loss for the period	—	34	—
Number of anti-dilutive stock options, SARs due to exercise price greater than average market price of our common stock	124	192	251

XML

FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Feb. 03, 2018

Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis

Financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis were as follows (in thousands):

	February 3, 2018
	Balance		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Instruments (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Other assets:
Securities held in grantor trust for deferred compensation plans (a)(b)	$	20,293	$	20,293	$	—	$	—

	January 28, 2017
	Balance		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Instruments (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Other assets:
Securities held in grantor trust for deferred compensation plans (a)(b)	$	18,094	$	18,094	$	—	$	—

^(a) The liability for the amount due to participants corresponding in value to the securities held in the grantor trust is recorded in other long-term liabilities.

^(b) Using the market approach, the fair values of these securities represent quoted market prices multiplied by the quantities held. Net gains and losses related to the changes in fair value in the assets and liabilities under the various deferred compensation plans are recorded in SG&A expenses and were nil during 2017 and 2016.

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis

Non-financial assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis were as follows (in thousands):

	February 3, 2018
	Balance		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Instruments (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets:
Store property, equipment and leasehold improvements (a)	$	778	$	—	$	—	$	778

	January 28, 2017
	Balance		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Instruments (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets:
Store property, equipment and leasehold improvements (a)	$	8,795	$	—	$	—	$	8,795

^(a) Using an undiscounted cash flow model, we evaluate the cash flow trends of our stores at least annually and when events or changes in circumstances, such as a store closure, indicate that property, equipment and leasehold improvements may not be fully recoverable. When a store’s projected undiscounted cash flows indicate its carrying value may not be recoverable, we use a discounted cash flow model, with a 10% discount rate, to estimate the fair value of the underlying long-lived assets. An impairment write-down is recorded if the carrying value of a long-lived asset exceeds its fair value. Key assumptions in estimating future cash flows include, among other things, expected future operating performance, including expected closure date and lease term, and changes in economic conditions. We believe estimated future cash flows are sufficient to support the carrying value of our long-lived assets. Significant changes in the key assumptions used in our cash flow projections may result in additional asset impairments. See Note 4 for additional disclosures on impairments charges.

XML

PROPERTY, EQUIPMENT AND LEASEHOLD IMPROVEMENTS (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Feb. 03, 2018

Property, Plant and Equipment [Abstract]

Property, Plant and Equipment [Table Text Block]

The components of property, equipment and leasehold improvements were as follows (in thousands):

	February 3, 2018		January 28, 2017
Land	$	1,544	$	1,842
Buildings and improvements	12,966		15,633
Fixtures and equipment	526,313		548,145
Leasehold improvements	411,753		415,577
Property, equipment and leasehold improvements	952,576		981,197
Less: Accumulated depreciation	699,788		697,087
Property, equipment and leasehold improvements, net	$	252,788	$	284,110

Depreciation And Impairment [Table Text Block]

Depreciation expense and impairment charges were as follows for each period presented (in thousands):

	Fiscal Year
	2017		2016		2015
Depreciation expense	$	65,401	$	71,779	$	66,998
Store impairment charges	1,739		19,856		10,580
Total depreciation and impairment	$	67,140	$	91,635	$	77,578

XML

ACCRUED EXPENSES AND OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Feb. 03, 2018

Accrued Liabilities and Other Liabilities [Abstract]

Schedule of Accrued Liabilities [Table Text Block]

The components of accrued expenses and other current liabilities were as follows (in thousands):

	February 3, 2018		January 28, 2017
Accrued compensation and benefits	$	11,828	$	12,165
Gift card and merchandise credit liability	12,122		10,864
Self-insurance liability	9,994		9,437
Accrued occupancy	6,129		10,259
Other	24,193		17,220
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities	$	64,266	$	59,945

XML

DEBT OBLIGATIONS (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Feb. 03, 2018

Debt Disclosure [Abstract]

Debt obligations

Debt obligations consisted of the following (in thousands):

	February 3, 2018		January 28, 2017
Revolving Credit Facility	$	179,288	$	159,702
Finance obligations	1,549		2,708
Other financing	2,498		7,753
Total debt obligations	183,335		170,163
Less: Current portion of debt obligations	2,985		6,414
Long-term debt obligations	$	180,350	$	163,749

Schedule of minimum annual payments of existing finance obligations

Minimum annual payments required under existing finance obligations as of February 3, 2018 are as follows (in thousands):

Fiscal Year	Minimum Payments		Less: Interest		Principal Payments
2018	$	1,096	$	101	$	995
2019	580		26		554
Total	$	1,676	$	127	$	1,549

XML

OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Feb. 03, 2018

Other Liabilities, Noncurrent [Abstract]

Components of other long-term liabilities

The components of other long-term liabilities were as follows (in thousands):

	February 3, 2018		January 28, 2017
Deferred rent	$	38,109	$	43,382
Deferred compensation	20,293		18,180
Pension liability	7,247		8,801
Deferred revenue under ADS agreement (see Note 10)	2,875		3,500
Other long-term liabilities	$	68,524	$	73,863

XML

OPERATING LEASES (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Feb. 03, 2018

Leases [Abstract]

Schedule of Future Minimum Rental Payments for Operating Leases

Minimum rental commitments on long-term, non-cancelable operating leases at February 3, 2018, are as follows (in thousands):

Fiscal Year	Commitments		Sublease Income			Net Minimum Lease Commitments
2018	$	111,260	$	(1,447	)	$	109,813
2019	97,401		(1,447		)	95,954
2020	87,994		(1,492		)	86,502
2021	73,229		(1,582		)	71,647
2022	58,650		(1,582		)	57,068
Thereafter	112,347		(1,054		)	111,293
Total	$	540,881	$	(8,604	)	$	532,277

Schedule of Rent Expense

Rental expense for operating leases, net of sublease income, consisted of the following for each period presented (in thousands):

	Fiscal Year
	2017			2016			2015
Minimum rentals	$	104,240		$	85,538		$	84,170
Contingent rentals	2,224			2,365			3,067
Sublease income	(1,474		)	(1,436		)	(5		)
Total	$	104,990		$	86,467		$	87,232

XML

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Feb. 03, 2018

Disclosure of Compensation Related Costs, Share-based Payments [Abstract]

Stock-based compensation expense by type of grant

Stock-based compensation expense by type of grant for each period presented was as follows (in thousands):

	Fiscal Year
	2017			2016			2015
Non-vested stock	$	5,626		$	6,676		$	7,171
Restricted stock units	434			—			—
Performance shares	2,760			2,785			5,193
Stock options and SARs	—			—			30
Total stock-based compensation expense	8,820			9,461			12,394
Related tax benefit	(3,313		)	(3,557		)	(4,660		)
Stock-based compensation expense, net of tax	$	5,507		$	5,904		$	7,734

Non-vested stock

The following table summarizes non-vested stock activity during 2017:

Non-vested Stock	Number of Shares		Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Outstanding at January 28, 2017	1,596,410		$	10.22
Granted	668,371		2.21
Vested	(577,897	)	11.10
Forfeited	(49,847	)	9.30
Outstanding at February 3, 2018	1,637,037		6.67

Restricted stock units

The following table summarizes RSU activity during 2017:

Restricted Stock Units	Number of Units		Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Outstanding at January 28, 2017	—		$	—
Granted	1,321,250		2.14
Forfeited	(37,500	)	2.09
Outstanding at February 3, 2018	1,283,750		2.14

Performance share units

The following table summarizes PSU activity during 2017:

Period Granted	Target PSUs Outstanding at January 28, 2017	Target PSUs Granted	Target PSUs Vested and Earned	Target PSUs Vested and Unearned		Target PSUs Forfeited		Target PSUs Outstanding at February 3, 2018	Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value per Target PSU
2015	158,490	—	—	(154,046	)	(4,444	)	—	$	28.33
2016	330,233	—	—	—		(8,527	)	321,706	8.69
2017	—	600,000	—	—		—		600,000	1.80
Total	488,723	600,000	—	(154,046	)	(12,971	)	921,706	7.65

Stock appreciation rights

The following table summarizes SARs activity during 2017: 

	Number of Outstanding Shares		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (years)	Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in thousands)
Outstanding, vested and exercisable at January 28, 2017	177,900		$	17.69
Forfeited	(80,000	)	16.29
Outstanding, vested and exercisable at February 3, 2018	97,900		$	18.83	0.2	$	—

XML

BENEFIT PLANS (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Feb. 03, 2018

Retirement Benefits [Abstract]

Schedule of information regarding the Plan

Information regarding the DB Plan is as follows (in thousands):

	Fiscal Year
	2017			2016
Change in benefit obligation:
Benefit obligation at beginning of year	$	34,962		$	35,223
Employer service cost	490			340
Interest cost	1,430			1,598
Actuarial loss	1,835			1,067
Settlements	(1,989		)	—
Plan disbursements	(1,979		)	(3,266		)
Projected benefit obligation at end of year	34,749			34,962
Change in plan assets:
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year	26,161			26,310
Actual return on plan assets	4,456			3,117
Employer contributions	853			—
Settlements	(1,989		)	—
Plan disbursements	(1,979		)	(3,266		)
Fair value of plan assets at end of year	27,502			26,161
Underfunded status	$	(7,247	)	$	(8,801	)
Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheet consist of:
Accrued benefit liability - included in other long-term liabilities	$	(7,247	)	$	(8,801	)
Amount recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss, pre-tax (a)	6,822			9,023

^(a) Consists solely of net actuarial losses as there are no prior service costs.

Schedule of weighted-average assumptions

	Fiscal Year
	2017		2016
Weighted-average assumptions:
For determining benefit obligations at year-end:
Discount rate	3.98	%	4.33	%
	Fiscal Year
	2017		2016		2015
For determining net periodic pension cost for year:
Discount rate	4.33	%	4.79	%	3.90	%
Expected return on assets	6.50	%	7.00	%	7.00	%

Schedule of allocations of Plan's assets by category

The allocations of DB Plan assets by category are as follows:

		Fiscal Year
	2018 Target Allocation	2017	2016
Equity securities	50%	51%	51%
Fixed income securities	50	47	48
Other - primarily cash	—	2	1
Total	100%	100%	100%

Plan assets measured at fair value

The following tables present the DB Plan assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis in the consolidated financial statements (in thousands):

	February 3, 2018
	Balance		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Instruments (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Mutual funds:
Equity securities	$	14,162	$	14,162	$	—	$	—
Fixed income securities	12,833		12,833		—		—
Other - primarily cash	507		507		—		—
Total	$	27,502	$	27,502	$	—	$	—

	January 28, 2017
	Balance		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Instruments (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Mutual funds:
Equity securities	$	13,309	$	13,309	$	—	$	—
Fixed income securities	12,540		12,540		—		—
Other - primarily cash	312		312		—		—
Total	$	26,161	$	26,161	$	—	$	—

Components of net periodic benefit cost

The components of net periodic benefit cost for the DB Plan were as follows (in thousands):

	Fiscal Year
	2017			2016			2015
Net periodic pension cost for the fiscal year:
Employer service cost	$	490		$	340		$	350
Interest cost on pension benefit obligation	1,430			1,598			1,566
Expected return on plan assets	(1,654		)	(1,749		)	(2,195		)
Amortization of net loss	797			897			774
Settlement charges(a)	438			—			748
Net periodic pension cost	$	1,501		$	1,086		$	1,243

^(a) Non-cash pension settlement charges were recognized as a result of lump sum distributions exceeding interest cost for the year. Settlement charges are recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses in our consolidated statements of operations.

Schedule of other changes in Plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive loss

Other changes in DB Plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive loss are as follows (in thousands):

	Fiscal Year
	2017			2016
Amortization of net loss	$	(797	)	$	(897	)
Settlement charges	(438		)	—
Net gain	(966		)	(301		)
Net change recognized in other comprehensive loss, pre-tax	$	(2,201	)	$	(1,198	)

Schedule of expected benefit payments

The following benefit payments are expected to be paid (in thousands):

Fiscal Year	Payments
2018	$	2,201
2019	2,880
2020	2,722
2021	2,988
2022	3,043
Fiscal Years 2023 - 2027	13,067

XML

INCOME TAXES (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Feb. 03, 2018

Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]

Components of Income Tax (Benefit) Expense

All of our operations are domestic.  Income tax (benefit) expense consisted of the following (in thousands):

	Fiscal Year
	2017			2016			2015
Federal income tax (benefit) expense:
Current	$	(12,216	)	$	(5,234	)	$	3,380
Deferred	428			(19,052		)	(2,156		)
	(11,788		)	(24,286		)	1,224
State income tax (benefit) expense:
Current	193			292			765
Deferred	(1,473		)	(1,172		)	(174		)
	(1,280		)	(880		)	591
Total income tax (benefit) expense	$	(13,068	)	$	(25,166	)	$	1,815

Reconciliation between federal income tax (benefit) expense computed at statutory tax rates and actual income tax expense (benefit) recorded

A reconciliation between the federal income tax (benefit) expense computed at statutory tax rates and the actual income tax (benefit) expense recorded is as follows (in thousands):

	Fiscal Year
	2017			2016			2015
Federal income tax (benefit) expense at the blended statutory rate	$	(16,992	)	$	(22,072	)	$	1,958
State income taxes, net	(1,345		)	(1,084		)	332
Uncertain tax position	—			(743		)	128
Other	1,375			654			474
Tax deficiencies related to share-based payments(a)	1,948			—			—
Tax credits	(4,386		)	(1,921		)	(1,077		)
Valuation allowance on net deferred tax assets	6,077			—			—
Tax Act	255			—			—
Total income tax (benefit) expense	$	(13,068	)	$	(25,166	)	$	1,815

^(a) We recognized tax deficiencies of $2.1 million related to share-based payments in 2017, of which $0.2 million was for state income taxes.

Deferred tax assets (liabilities)

Deferred tax assets (liabilities) consisted of the following (in thousands):

	February 3, 2018			January 28, 2017
Gross deferred tax assets:
Net operating loss	$	6,758		$	10,184
Accrued expenses	2,203			2,893
Lease obligations	9,355			16,762
Deferred compensation	7,147			12,048
Deferred income	2,583			3,956
Other	4,650			4,434
	32,696			50,277
Gross deferred tax liabilities:
Inventory	(1,862		)	(4,706		)
Depreciation and amortization	(24,342		)	(45,703		)
	(26,204		)	(50,409		)
Valuation allowance	(6,492		)	(415		)
Net deferred tax liabilities	$	—		$	(547	)

XML

GORDMANS ACQUISITION (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Feb. 03, 2018

Business Combinations [Abstract]

Schedule of Recognized Identified Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed [Table Text Block]

The estimated fair values of the assets acquired at the acquisition date, were as follows (in thousands): 

	April 7, 2017
Inventory	$	31,770
Property, plant and equipment and other assets	4,374
Total	$	36,144

XML

QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (unaudited) (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Feb. 03, 2018

Quarterly Financial Information Disclosure [Abstract]

Schedule of Quarterly Financial Information

The following table shows quarterly information (in thousands, except per share amounts):

	Fiscal Year 2017
	Q1			Q2			Q3			Q4 (a) (b)
Net sales	$	308,607		$	377,081		$	357,236		$	549,351
Gross profit	62,218			92,941			71,694			136,642
Net (loss) income	(18,987		)	(6,258		)	(17,722		)	5,644
Basic (loss) earnings per share	$	(0.70	)	$	(0.23	)	$	(0.64	)	$	0.19
Diluted (loss) earnings per share	(0.70		)	(0.23		)	(0.64		)	0.19
Basic weighted average shares	27,268			27,535			27,602			27,628
Diluted weighted average shares	27,268			27,535			27,602			27,628
	Fiscal Year 2016
	Q1			Q2			Q3			Q4 (a) (b)
Net sales	$	332,750		$	338,385		$	317,140		$	454,443
Gross profit	66,987			85,570			56,590			88,905
Net (loss) income	(15,460		)	41			(15,634		)	(6,844		)
Basic (loss) earnings per share	$	(0.57	)	$	—		$	(0.58	)	$	(0.25	)
Diluted (loss) earnings per share	(0.57		)	—			(0.58		)	(0.25		)
Basic weighted average shares	26,932			27,111			27,155			27,163
Diluted weighted average shares	26,932			27,175			27,155			27,163

^(a) The fourth quarter 2017 consisted of 14 weeks compared with 13 weeks in the fourth quarter 2016.

^(b) The fourth quarter 2017 and 2016 included impairment charges recognized in cost of sales and related buying, occupancy and distribution expenses of $1.6 million and $19.4 million, respectively.

XML

DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Details) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended		12 Months Ended
	Feb. 03, 2018 USD ($) States stores	Jan. 28, 2017 USD ($)	Feb. 03, 2018 USD ($) States stores	Jan. 28, 2017 USD ($)	Jan. 30, 2016 USD ($)
States in which stores located | States	42		42
Fiscal Year [Line Items]
Fiscal Period Duration	98 days	91 days	371 days	364 days	364 days
Insurance Recoveries [Abstract]
Insurance proceeds received			$ 15,700	$ 3,300
Net gains from insurance claims			4,300	700	$ 800
Debt Issuance Costs [Abstract]
Net accumulated amortization of debt issuance costs	$ 300	$ 100	300	100
Debt issuance costs	1,100	1,400	1,100	1,400
Gift Card and Merchandise Credit Liability [Abstract]
Gift cards, breakage income			900	3,000	1,600
Advertising Expense [Abstract]
Advertising costs			83,600	88,700	91,000
Advertising allowances received from vendors			3,100	4,300	$ 4,900
Rent Expenses [Abstract]
Deferred rent credit	$ 38,109	$ 43,382	38,109	$ 43,382
New Accounting Pronouncements and Changes in Accounting Principles [Abstract]
Tax deficiencies related to share-based payments			$ 2,100
Building and Improvements
Summary of estimated useful lives [Abstract]
Estimated useful life			20 years
Information Systems | Minimum
Summary of estimated useful lives [Abstract]
Estimated useful life			3 years
Information Systems | Maximum
Summary of estimated useful lives [Abstract]
Estimated useful life			10 years
Store and Office Fixtures and Equipment | Minimum
Summary of estimated useful lives [Abstract]
Estimated useful life			5 years
Store and Office Fixtures and Equipment | Maximum
Summary of estimated useful lives [Abstract]
Estimated useful life			10 years
Warehouse Equipment | Minimum
Summary of estimated useful lives [Abstract]
Estimated useful life			5 years
Warehouse Equipment | Maximum
Summary of estimated useful lives [Abstract]
Estimated useful life			15 years
Leasehold Improvements - Stores | Minimum
Summary of estimated useful lives [Abstract]
Estimated useful life			5 years
Leasehold Improvements - Stores | Maximum
Summary of estimated useful lives [Abstract]
Estimated useful life			15 years
Leasehold Improvements - Corporate Office | Minimum
Summary of estimated useful lives [Abstract]
Estimated useful life			10 years
Leasehold Improvements - Corporate Office | Maximum
Summary of estimated useful lives [Abstract]
Estimated useful life			12 years
Department Stores
Entity operated stores | stores	777		777
Gordmans
Entity operated stores | stores	58		58
Length of some fiscal years [Member] | Minimum
Fiscal Year [Line Items]
Fiscal Period Duration			364 days
Length of some fiscal years [Member] | Maximum
Fiscal Year [Line Items]
Fiscal Period Duration			371 days
Peebles Trade Name and Trademark
Indefinite-lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Tradename intangible asset	$ 14,900		$ 14,900
Tradename, fair value in exceeds of carrying amount	10.00%		10.00%
Gordmans Trade Name and Trademark
Indefinite-lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Tradename intangible asset	$ 1,900		$ 1,900

XML

EARNINGS PER SHARE (Details) - USD ($) $ / shares in Units, shares in Thousands, $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended								12 Months Ended
	Feb. 03, 2018	Oct. 28, 2017	Jul. 29, 2017	Apr. 29, 2017	Jan. 28, 2017	Oct. 29, 2016	Jul. 30, 2016	Apr. 30, 2016	Feb. 03, 2018	Jan. 28, 2017	Jan. 30, 2016
Basic:
Net (loss) income	$ 5,644	$ (17,722)	$ (6,258)	$ (18,987)	$ (6,844)	$ (15,634)	$ 41	$ (15,460)	$ (37,323)	$ (37,897)	$ 3,780
Less: Allocation of earnings to participating securities											(48)
Net (loss) income allocated to common shares									$ (37,323)	$ (37,897)	$ 3,732
Basic weighted average shares outstanding	27,628	27,602	27,535	27,268	27,163	27,155	27,111	26,932	27,510	27,090	31,145
Basic (loss) earnings per share	$ 0.19	$ (0.64)	$ (0.23)	$ (0.70)	$ (0.25)	$ (0.58)	$ 0.00	$ (0.57)	$ (1.37)	$ (1.40)	$ 0.12
Diluted:
Net (loss) income	$ 5,644	$ (17,722)	$ (6,258)	$ (18,987)	$ (6,844)	$ (15,634)	$ 41	$ (15,460)	$ (37,323)	$ (37,897)	$ 3,780
Less: Allocation of earnings to participating securities											(48)
Net (loss) income allocated to common shares									$ (37,323)	$ (37,897)	$ 3,732
Basic weighted average shares outstanding	27,628	27,602	27,535	27,268	27,163	27,155	27,111	26,932	27,510	27,090	31,145
Add: Dilutive effect of stock awards											43
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding	27,628	27,602	27,535	27,268	27,163	27,155	27,175	26,932	27,510	27,090	31,188
Diluted (loss) earnings per share	$ 0.19	$ (0.64)	$ (0.23)	$ (0.70)	$ (0.25)	$ (0.58)	$ 0.00	$ (0.57)	$ (1.37)	$ (1.40)	$ 0.12
Number of anti-dilutive shares due to net loss for the period | Non-vested Stock
Antidilutive Securities Excluded from Computation of Earnings Per Share [Line Items]
Number of anti-dilutive securities excluded from computation of diluted earnings (loss) per share										34
Number of anti-dilutive securities due to exercise price greater than average market price of our common stock | Stock Appreciation Rights (SARs)
Antidilutive Securities Excluded from Computation of Earnings Per Share [Line Items]
Number of anti-dilutive securities excluded from computation of diluted earnings (loss) per share									124	192
Number of anti-dilutive securities due to exercise price greater than average market price of our common stock | Stock option and SARs
Antidilutive Securities Excluded from Computation of Earnings Per Share [Line Items]
Number of anti-dilutive securities excluded from computation of diluted earnings (loss) per share											251

XML

FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands		12 Months Ended
		Feb. 03, 2018	Jan. 28, 2017
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis [Abstract]
Securities held in grantor trust for deferred compensation plans	[1],[2]	$ 20,293	$ 18,094
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis [Abstract]
Store property, equipment and leasehold improvements	[3]	$ 778	$ 8,795
Fair Value Inputs, Discount Rate		10.00%	0.00%
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Instruments (Level 1) [Member]
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis [Abstract]
Securities held in grantor trust for deferred compensation plans	[1],[2]	$ 20,293	$ 18,094
Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) [Member]
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis [Abstract]
Store property, equipment and leasehold improvements	[3]	$ 778	$ 8,795

[1] The liability for the amount due to participants corresponding in value to the securities held in the grantor trust is recorded in other long-term liabilities.

[2] Using the market approach, the fair values of these securities represent quoted market prices multiplied by the quantities held. Net gains and losses related to the changes in fair value in the assets and liabilities under the various deferred compensation plans are recorded in SG&A expenses and were nil during 2017 and 2016.

[3] Using an undiscounted cash flow model, we evaluate the cash flow trends of our stores at least annually and when events or changes in circumstances, such as a store closure, indicate that property, equipment and leasehold improvements may not be fully recoverable. When a store’s projected undiscounted cash flows indicate its carrying value may not be recoverable, we use a discounted cash flow model, with a 10% discount rate, to estimate the fair value of the underlying long-lived assets. An impairment write-down is recorded if the carrying value of a long-lived asset exceeds its fair value. Key assumptions in estimating future cash flows include, among other things, expected future operating performance, including expected closure date and lease term, and changes in economic conditions. We believe estimated future cash flows are sufficient to support the carrying value of our long-lived assets. Significant changes in the key assumptions used in our cash flow projections may result in additional asset impairments. See Note 4 for additional disclosures on impairments charges.

XML

PROPERTY, EQUIPMENT AND LEASEHOLD IMPROVEMENTS (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended		12 Months Ended
	Feb. 03, 2018	Jan. 28, 2017	Feb. 03, 2018	Jan. 28, 2017	Jan. 30, 2016
Components of property, equipment and leasehold improvements [Abstract]
Property, equipment and leasehold improvements	$ 952,576	$ 981,197	$ 952,576	$ 981,197
Accumulated depreciation	699,788	697,087	699,788	697,087
Property, equipment and leasehold improvements, net	252,788	284,110	252,788	284,110
Depreciation expense			65,401	71,779	$ 66,998
Impairment charges	1,600	19,400	1,739	19,856	10,580
Depreciation And Impairment			67,140	91,635	77,578
Depreciation and impairment charges in cost of sales			52,900	77,900	$ 67,900
Land [Member]
Components of property, equipment and leasehold improvements [Abstract]
Property, equipment and leasehold improvements	1,544	1,842	1,544	1,842
Building and Improvements
Components of property, equipment and leasehold improvements [Abstract]
Property, equipment and leasehold improvements	12,966	15,633	12,966	15,633
Store and Office Fixtures and Equipment
Components of property, equipment and leasehold improvements [Abstract]
Property, equipment and leasehold improvements	526,313	548,145	526,313	548,145
Leasehold Improvements [Member]
Components of property, equipment and leasehold improvements [Abstract]
Property, equipment and leasehold improvements	$ 411,753	$ 415,577	$ 411,753	$ 415,577

XML

ACCRUED EXPENSES AND OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Feb. 03, 2018	Jan. 28, 2017
Components of accrued expenses and other current liabilities [Abstract]
Accrued compensation and benefits	$ 11,828	$ 12,165
Gift card and merchandise credit liability	12,122	10,864
Self-insurance liability	9,994	9,437
Accrued occupancy	6,129	10,259
Other	24,193	17,220
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities	$ 64,266	$ 59,945

XML

DEBT OBLIGATIONS, (Schedule of Debt) (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Feb. 03, 2018	Jan. 28, 2017
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Total debt obligations	$ 183,335	$ 170,163
Current portion of debt obligations	2,985	6,414
Long-term debt obligations	180,350	163,749
Line of Credit [Member] | Revolving Credit Facility [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Total debt obligations	179,288	159,702
Finance Obligations [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Total debt obligations	1,549	2,708
Other financing [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Total debt obligations	$ 2,498	$ 7,753

XML

DEBT OBLIGATIONS DEBT OBLIGATIONS, (Revolving Credit Facility) (Details) $ in Millions	12 Months Ended
	Feb. 03, 2018 USD ($)	Jan. 28, 2017 USD ($)
Finance Obligations [Member]
Revolving Credit Facility [Line Items]
Number of store leases	4
Revolving Credit Facility [Member] | Line of Credit [Member]
Revolving Credit Facility [Line Items]
Revolving credit facility, initiation date	Dec. 16, 2016
Line of Credit Facility, Maximum Borrowing Capacity	$ 400.0
Revolving credit facility, higher borrowing capacity, seasonal increase	$ 450.0
Revolving credit facility, expiration date	Dec. 16, 2021
Revolving credit facility, weighted average interest rate during period	2.69%	1.90%
Revolving credit facility, average daily borrowings	$ 224.5	$ 192.4
Revolving credit facility, excess borrowing availability	111.9
Revolving credit facility, dividend restriction amount	30.0
Letter of Credit [Member] | Line of Credit [Member]
Revolving Credit Facility [Line Items]
Letter of credit subfacility, maximum borrowing capacity	25.0
Letters of credit outstanding, amount	$ 7.1
Line of Credit Facility, Expiration Period	12 months
Minimum | Finance Obligations [Member]
Revolving Credit Facility [Line Items]
Debt Instrument, Interest Rate, Effective Percentage	6.10%
Maximum | Finance Obligations [Member]
Revolving Credit Facility [Line Items]
Debt Instrument, Interest Rate, Effective Percentage	16.90%

XML

DEBT OBLIGATIONS, (Finance Obligations) (Details) $ in Thousands	Feb. 03, 2018 USD ($)	Jan. 28, 2017 USD ($)
Principal Payments [Abstract]
Total debt obligations	$ 183,335	$ 170,163
Finance Obligations [Member]
Future Minimum Payments Due [Abstract]
2018	1,096
2019	580
Total	1,676
Less: Interest [Abstract]
2018	101
2019	26
Total	127
Principal Payments [Abstract]
2018	995
2019	554
Total debt obligations	$ 1,549	$ 2,708
Debt Instrument, Interest Rate, Effective Percentage [Abstract]
Number of store leases	4
Finance Obligations [Member] | Minimum
Debt Instrument, Interest Rate, Effective Percentage [Abstract]
Debt Instrument, Interest Rate, Effective Percentage	6.10%
Finance Obligations [Member] | Maximum
Debt Instrument, Interest Rate, Effective Percentage [Abstract]
Debt Instrument, Interest Rate, Effective Percentage	16.90%

XML

DEBT OBLIGATIONS DEBT OBLIGATIONS, (Other Financing) (Details) - Equipment Financing [Member] $ in Millions	Feb. 03, 2018 USD ($)
Secured Debt [Abstract]
Equipment financing note, carrying value	$ 2.5
Debt Instrument, Interest Rate, Effective Percentage	3.20%
Principal payments, 2018
Secured Debt [Abstract]
Debt Instrument, Annual Principal Payment	$ 2.0
Principal payments, 2019
Secured Debt [Abstract]
Debt Instrument, Annual Principal Payment	$ 0.5

XML

OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Feb. 03, 2018	Jan. 28, 2017
Other long-term liabilities schedule [Abstract]
Deferred rent	$ 38,109	$ 43,382
Deferred compensation	20,293	18,180
Pension liability	7,247	8,801
Deferred revenue under ADS agreement (see Note 10)	2,875	3,500
Other long-term liabilities	$ 68,524	$ 73,863

XML

STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (Details) - USD ($) $ / shares in Units, $ in Millions	1 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Feb. 22, 2018	Feb. 03, 2018	Jan. 28, 2017	Jan. 30, 2016	Mar. 21, 2018
Equity [Abstract]
Deferred compensation plan, amount invested in our stock		$ 0.2	$ 0.3	$ 0.9
Stock repurchase program, maximum authorized amount		200.0
Stock Repurchase Program, Remaining Authorized Repurchase Amount		$ 58.4
Subsequent Event [Member]
Subsequent Event [Line Items]
Dividends Payable, Date Declared	Feb. 22, 2018
Dividends Payable, Amount Per Share (in dollars per share)					$ 0.05
Dividends Payable, Date to be Paid	Mar. 21, 2018
Dividends Payable, Date of Record	Mar. 06, 2018

XML

PRIVATE LABEL CREDIT CARD PORTFOLIO (Details) - USD ($) $ in Millions	12 Months Ended
	Feb. 03, 2018	Jan. 28, 2017	Jan. 30, 2016
Deferred Credits [Line Items]
Credit Income	$ 58.9	$ 55.3	$ 54.1
Upfront payments received upon execution of private label credit card agreement
Deferred Credits [Line Items]
Unamortized upfront payments received upon execution of private label credit card agreement	$ 4.6

XML

OPERATING LEASES (Details) $ in Thousands	12 Months Ended
	Feb. 03, 2018 USD ($)	Jan. 28, 2017 USD ($)	Jan. 30, 2016 USD ($)
Leases [Abstract]
Minimum rentals	$ 104,240	$ 85,538	$ 84,170
Contingent rentals	2,224	2,365	3,067
Sublease income	(1,474)	(1,436)	(5)
Rent expense for operating leases	104,990	$ 86,467	$ 87,232
Minimum rental commitments on long-term, non-cancelable operating leases, net of sub-lease rental income [Abstract]
2018, commitments	111,260
2018, sublease income	(1,447)
2018, net minimum lease commitments	109,813
2019, commitments	97,401
2019, sublease income	(1,447)
2019, net minimum lease commitments	95,954
2020, commitments	87,994
2020, sublease income	(1,492)
2020, net minimum lease commitments	86,502
2021, commitments	73,229
2021, sublease income	(1,582)
2021, net minimum lease commitments	71,647
2022, commitments	58,650
2022, sublease income	(1,582)
2022, net minimum lease commitments	57,068
After 2022, commitments	112,347
After 2022, sublease income	(1,054)
After 2022, net minimum lease commitments	111,293
Total commitments	540,881
Total sublease income	(8,604)
Total minimum lease commitments	$ 532,277
Terms of majority of store leases [Abstract]
Typical length of initial term	10 years
Typical number of renewal options available after initial term	2
Typical length of each renewal option	5 years

XML

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION, (Narrative) (Details)	Feb. 03, 2018 shares
2001 Equity Incentive Plan
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Shares reserved for issuance upon exercise of awards	12,375,000
2008 Equity Incentive Plan
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Shares reserved for issuance upon exercise of awards	4,484,346
2017 Equity Incentive Plan
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Shares reserved for issuance upon exercise of awards	1,365,654

XML

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION, (Stock Compensation Expense) (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	12 Months Ended
	Feb. 03, 2018	Jan. 28, 2017	Jan. 30, 2016
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Stock-based compensation expense	$ 8,820	$ 9,461	$ 12,394
Related tax benefit	(3,313)	(3,557)	(4,660)
Stock-based compensation expense, net of tax	5,507	5,904	7,734
Aggregate unrecognized compensation cost
Unrecognized compensation cost	$ 10,100
Unrecognized compensation cost, period for recognition	2 years 7 days
Restricted Stock Units (RSUs)
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Stock-based compensation expense	$ 434
Non-vested Stock
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Stock-based compensation expense	5,626	6,676	7,171
Performance Share Units (PSUs)
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Stock-based compensation expense	$ 2,760	$ 2,785	5,193
Stock Appreciation Rights (SARs)
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Stock-based compensation expense			$ 30

XML

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION, (Non-vested Stock) (Details) - Non-vested Stock - USD ($) $ / shares in Units, $ in Millions	12 Months Ended
	Feb. 03, 2018	Jan. 28, 2017	Jan. 30, 2016
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Award annual vesting rights, percentage	25.00%
Settlement at the end of vesting period	one for one to common stock
Number of shares issued in period	465,007
Number of shares
Outstanding at January 28, 2017	1,596,410
Granted	668,371
Vested	(577,897)
Forfeited	(49,847)
Outstanding at February 3, 2018	1,637,037	1,596,410
Weighted average grant date fair value (in dollars per share)
Outstanding at January 28, 2017	$ 10.22
Granted	2.21	$ 6.75	$ 18.70
Vested	11.10
Forfeited	9.30
Outstanding at February 3, 2018	$ 6.67	$ 10.22
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Equity Instruments Other than Options, Aggregate Intrinsic Value [Abstract]
Aggregate intrinsic value, vested	$ 1.2	$ 2.7	$ 5.4
Employees
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Award vesting period	4 years
Non-employee directors
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Award vesting period	1 year

XML

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION, (Restricted Stock Units) (Details) - Restricted Stock Units (RSUs)	12 Months Ended
	Feb. 03, 2018 $ / shares shares
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Award annual vesting rights, percentage	25.00%
Award vesting period	4 years
Settlement at the end of vesting period	Each vested RSU is settled in cash in an amount equal to the fair market value of one share of our common stock on the vesting date, not to exceed five times the per share fair market value of our common stock on the grant date
Number of shares
Granted | shares	1,321,250
Forfeited | shares	(37,500)
Outstanding at February 3, 2018 | shares	1,283,750
Weighted average grant date fair value (in dollars per share)
Granted | $ / shares	$ 2.14
Forfeited | $ / shares	2.09
Outstanding at February 3, 2018 | $ / shares	$ 2.14

XML

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION, (Performance Share Units) (Details) $ / shares in Units, $ in Millions	12 Months Ended
	Feb. 03, 2018 shares $ / shares	Jan. 28, 2017 USD ($) shares	Jan. 30, 2016 USD ($)
Performance Share Units (PSUs)
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Performance cycle	3 years
Settlement at the end of vesting period	Converts to common stock ranging from zero to a maximum of twice the number of granted shares outstanding on the vesting date
Number of shares
Outstanding at January 28, 2017	488,723
Granted	600,000
Vested and unearned	(154,046)
Forfeited	(12,971)
Outstanding at February 3, 2018	921,706	488,723
Weighted average grant date fair value (in dollars per share)
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value per Share (in dollars per share) | $ / shares	$ 7.65
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Equity Instruments Other than Options, Aggregate Intrinsic Value [Abstract]
Aggregate intrinsic value, vested | $		$ 0.1	$ 4.9
Performance Share Units (PSUs) | Minimum
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Multiple of the number of granted shares outstanding for issuable shares	0
Performance Share Units (PSUs) | Maximum
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Multiple of the number of granted shares outstanding for issuable shares	2
Performance Share Units Grant 2015
Number of shares
Outstanding at January 28, 2017	158,490
Vested and unearned	(154,046)
Forfeited	(4,444)
Outstanding at February 3, 2018		158,490
Weighted average grant date fair value (in dollars per share)
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value per Share (in dollars per share) | $ / shares	$ 28.33
Performance Share Units Grant 2016
Number of shares
Outstanding at January 28, 2017	330,233
Forfeited	(8,527)
Outstanding at February 3, 2018	321,706	330,233
Weighted average grant date fair value (in dollars per share)
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value per Share (in dollars per share) | $ / shares	$ 8.69
Performance Share Units Grant 2017
Number of shares
Granted	600,000
Outstanding at February 3, 2018	600,000
Weighted average grant date fair value (in dollars per share)
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value per Share (in dollars per share) | $ / shares	$ 1.80

XML

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION, (SARs) (Details) - Stock Appreciation Rights (SARs) - USD ($) $ / shares in Units, $ in Thousands	12 Months Ended
	Feb. 03, 2018	Jan. 30, 2016
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Award vesting period	4 years
Expiration period if not exercised or forfeited	7 years
Settlement at the end of vesting period	issuance of common stock in an amount equal to the increase in share price of our common stock between the grant date and the exercise date
Number of shares
Outstanding, vested and exercisable at January 28, 2017	177,900
Number of shares, forfeited and expired
Forfeited	(80,000)
Outstanding, vested and exercisable at February 3, 2018	97,900
Weighted average exercise price (in dollars per share)
Outstanding, vested and exercisable at January 28, 2017	$ 17.69
Forfeited	16.29
Outstanding, vested and exercisable at February 3, 2018	$ 18.83
Weighted average remaining contractual term
Outstanding, vested and exercisable at February 3, 2018	1 month 30 days
Aggregate intrinsic value
Aggregate intrinsic value, vested and exercisable	$ 0
Aggregate intrinsic value, exercised Options and SARs		$ 900

XML

BENEFIT PLANS (Details) - USD ($)	12 Months Ended
	Feb. 03, 2018	Jan. 28, 2017	Jan. 30, 2016
Nonqualified Plan [Member] | Key employees [Member]
Defined Contribution Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Each participant's compensation under the plan (in hundredths)	3.00%
Pension Plan [Member] | Qualified Plan [Member]
Defined Contribution Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Number of days of service to the entity	60
Minimum required age to be covered under the Plan	21
Maximum percentage of employee contribution on pre-tax basis (in hundredths)	50.00%
Maximum percentage of employee contribution on post-tax basis (in hundredths)	10.00%
Matching pre-tax contribution by employer (in hundredths)	50.00%
Each participant's compensation under the plan (in hundredths)	6.00%
Matching contributions expense	$ 1,700,000	$ 1,400,000	$ 1,500,000
Deferred Compensation Plans [Member] | Nonqualified Plan [Member]
Defined Contribution Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Matching contributions expense	$ 900,000	1,000,000	$ 1,100,000
Number of deferred compensation plans	2
Maximum deferment as percentage of base salary under plan (in hundredths)	50.00%
Maximum deferment as percentage of bonus under plan (in hundredths)	100.00%
Employers contribution vested in percentage (in hundredths)	100.00%
Deferred Compensation Plans [Member] | Nonqualified Plan [Member] | Executives and Officers [Member]
Defined Contribution Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Maximum percentage of employee contribution on pre-tax basis (in hundredths)	10.00%
Matching pre-tax contribution by employer (in hundredths)	100.00%
Deferred Compensation Plans [Member] | Nonqualified Plan [Member] | Key employees [Member]
Defined Contribution Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Matching pre-tax contribution by employer (in hundredths)	50.00%
Non Employee Director Equity Compensation Plan [Member] | Nonqualified Plan [Member]
Defined Contribution Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Entity's stock reserved to fund under this plan (in shares)	225,000
Deferred compensation liability under this plan	$ 0	$ 0

XML

BENEFIT PLANS, (Information regarding the plan) (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands		12 Months Ended
		Feb. 03, 2018	Jan. 28, 2017	Jan. 30, 2016
Change in benefit obligation [Roll Forward]
Benefit obligation at beginning of year		$ 34,962	$ 35,223
Employer service cost		490	340	$ 350
Interest cost		1,430	1,598	1,566
Actuarial (gain) loss		1,835	1,067
Settlement		(1,989)	0
Benefit Obligation, Plan Disbursements		(1,979)	(3,266)
Projected benefit obligation at end of year		34,749	34,962	35,223
Change in plan assets [Roll Forward]
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year		26,161	26,310
Actual return (loss) on plan assets		4,456	3,117
Employer contributions		853	0
Settlement		(1,989)	0
Plan Assets, Plan Disbursements		(1,979)	(3,266)
Fair value of plan assets at end of year		27,502	26,161	$ 26,310
Underfunded status		(7,247)	(8,801)
Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheet consist of [Abstract]
Accrued benefit liability - included in other long-term liabilities		(7,247)	(8,801)
Amount recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss, pre-tax	[1]	$ 6,822	$ 9,023

[1] Consists solely of net actuarial losses as there are no prior service costs.

XML

BENEFIT PLANS, (Weighted-average assumptions) (Details)	12 Months Ended
	Feb. 03, 2018	Jan. 28, 2017	Jan. 30, 2016
For determining benefit obligations at year-end [Abstract]
Discount rate (in hundredths)	3.98%	4.33%
For determining net periodic pension cost for year [Abstract]
Discount rate (in hundredths)	4.33%	4.79%	3.90%
Expected return on assets (in hundredths)	6.50%	7.00%	7.00%

XML

BENEFIT PLANS, (Allocation of plan assets and assets at fair value) (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Feb. 03, 2018	Jan. 28, 2017	Jan. 30, 2016
Schedule of allocations of Plan's assets by category [Abstract]
2018 Target Allocations (in hundredths)	100.00%
Total (in hundredths)		100.00%	100.00%
Schedule of plan assets are measured at fair value on a recurring basis [Abstract]
Fair value on a recurring basis	$ 27,502	$ 26,161	$ 26,310
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Instruments (Level 1) [Member]
Schedule of plan assets are measured at fair value on a recurring basis [Abstract]
Fair value on a recurring basis	$ 27,502	$ 26,161
Equity Securities [Member]
Schedule of allocations of Plan's assets by category [Abstract]
2018 Target Allocations (in hundredths)	50.00%
Total (in hundredths)	51.00%	51.00%
Schedule of plan assets are measured at fair value on a recurring basis [Abstract]
Fair value on a recurring basis	$ 14,162	$ 13,309
Equity Securities [Member] | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Instruments (Level 1) [Member]
Schedule of plan assets are measured at fair value on a recurring basis [Abstract]
Fair value on a recurring basis	$ 14,162	$ 13,309
Fixed Income Securities [Member]
Schedule of allocations of Plan's assets by category [Abstract]
2018 Target Allocations (in hundredths)	50.00%
Total (in hundredths)	47.00%	48.00%
Schedule of plan assets are measured at fair value on a recurring basis [Abstract]
Fair value on a recurring basis	$ 12,833	$ 12,540
Fixed Income Securities [Member] | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Instruments (Level 1) [Member]
Schedule of plan assets are measured at fair value on a recurring basis [Abstract]
Fair value on a recurring basis	$ 12,833	$ 12,540
Other - Primarily Cash [Member]
Schedule of allocations of Plan's assets by category [Abstract]
Total (in hundredths)	2.00%	1.00%
Schedule of plan assets are measured at fair value on a recurring basis [Abstract]
Fair value on a recurring basis	$ 507	$ 312
Other - Primarily Cash [Member] | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Instruments (Level 1) [Member]
Schedule of plan assets are measured at fair value on a recurring basis [Abstract]
Fair value on a recurring basis	$ 507	$ 312

XML

BENEFIT PLANS, (Net periodic benefit cost) (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands		12 Months Ended
		Feb. 03, 2018	Jan. 28, 2017	Jan. 30, 2016
Components of net periodic benefit cost [Abstract]
Employer service cost		$ 490	$ 340	$ 350
Interest cost		1,430	1,598	1,566
Expected return on plan assets		(1,654)	(1,749)	(2,195)
Net loss amortization		797	897	774
Loss on pension settlement	[1]	438		748
Net pension cost		$ 1,501	$ 1,086	$ 1,243

[1] Non-cash pension settlement charges were recognized as a result of lump sum distributions exceeding interest cost for the year. Settlement charges are recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses in our consolidated statements of operations.

XML

BENEFIT PLANS, (Changes in plan assets and benefit obligations) (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	12 Months Ended
	Feb. 03, 2018	Jan. 28, 2017
Summary of other changes in Plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive loss [Abstract]
Amortization of net loss	$ (797)	$ (897)
Loss on pension settlement	(438)	0
Net (gain) loss	(966)	(301)
Net change recognized in other comprehensive loss, pre-tax	(2,201)	(1,198)
Defined Benefit Plan, Expected Amortization, Next Fiscal Year [Abstract]
Estimated net loss that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive loss into net periodic benefit cost over the next year	500
Employer contributions	853	$ 0
Defined Benefit Plan, Expected Future Employer Contributions [Abstract]
Expected employer contributions during 2018	$ 1,200

XML

BENEFIT PLANS, (Benefit plan payments) (Details) $ in Thousands	Feb. 03, 2018 USD ($)
Summary of expected benefit payments [Abstract]
2018	$ 2,201
2019	2,880
2020	2,722
2021	2,988
2022	3,043
Fiscal years 2023 - 2027	$ 13,067

XML

INCOME TAXES (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	12 Months Ended
	Feb. 03, 2018	Jan. 28, 2017	Jan. 30, 2016
Fiscal Year [Line Items]
Valuation allowance on net deferred tax asset, increase (decrease), amount	$ 6,077
Operating Loss Carryforwards	21,000
Jobs and Tax Cuts Act [Abstract]
Income tax expense (benefit), adjustment of deferred tax assets, Tax Act	255
Federal income tax (benefit) expense [Abstract]
Current	(12,216)	$ (5,234)	$ 3,380
Deferred	428	(19,052)	(2,156)
Total	(11,788)	(24,286)	1,224
State income tax (benefit) expense [Abstract]
Current	193	292	765
Deferred	(1,473)	(1,172)	(174)
Total	(1,280)	(880)	591
Total income tax (benefit) expense	(13,068)	$ (25,166)	$ 1,815
Unrecognized Tax Benefits	$ 0
Prior to January 1, 2018
Fiscal Year [Line Items]
Effective Income Tax Rate Reconciliation, at Federal Statutory Income Tax Rate, Percent	35.00%
January 1, 2018 onwards
Fiscal Year [Line Items]
Effective Income Tax Rate Reconciliation, at Federal Statutory Income Tax Rate, Percent	21.00%
Tax Year 2017
Fiscal Year [Line Items]
Effective Income Tax Rate Reconciliation, at Federal Statutory Income Tax Rate, Percent	33.70%

XML

INCOME TAXES, (Tax expense reconciliation) (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	12 Months Ended
	Feb. 03, 2018	Jan. 28, 2017	Jan. 30, 2016
Reconciliation between federal income tax (benefit) expense charged to income before income tax computed at statutory tax rates and actual income tax expense recorded [Abstract]
Federal income tax (benefit) expense at the statutory rate	$ (16,992)	$ (22,072)	$ 1,958
State income taxes, net	(1,345)	(1,084)	332
Uncertain tax position		(743)	128
Other	1,375	654	474
Tax deficiencies related to share-based payments, federal	1,948
Tax credits	(4,386)	(1,921)	(1,077)
Valuation allowance on net deferred tax asset, increase (decrease), amount	6,077
Income tax expense (benefit), adjustment of deferred tax assets, Tax Act	255
Total income tax (benefit) expense	(13,068)	$ (25,166)	$ 1,815
Tax deficiencies related to share-based payments	2,100
Tax deficiencies related to share-based payments, state	$ 200

XML

INCOME TAXES, (Deferred tax assets and liabilities) (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Feb. 03, 2018	Jan. 28, 2017
Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]
Deferred Tax Liabilities, Net		$ (547)
Gross deferred tax assets [Abstract]
Net operating loss, deferred tax assets	$ 6,758	10,184
Accrued expenses	2,203	2,893
Lease obligations	9,355	16,762
Deferred compensation	7,147	12,048
Deferred income	2,583	3,956
Other	4,650	4,434
Total	32,696	50,277
Gross deferred tax liabilities [Abstract]
Inventory	(1,862)	(4,706)
Depreciation and amortization	(24,342)	(45,703)
Total	(26,204)	(50,409)
Valuation allowance	$ (6,492)	$ (415)

XML

INCOME TAXES INCOME TAXES, (Unrecognized Tax Benefit) (Details)	Feb. 03, 2018 States
Department Stores
Number of State Taxing Authorities	38
Gordmans
Number of State Taxing Authorities	3

XML

GORDMANS ACQUISITION (Details) $ in Thousands	12 Months Ended
	Feb. 03, 2018 USD ($) stores	Apr. 07, 2017 USD ($)
Business Combination, Description [Abstract]
Business Acquisition, Effective Date of Acquisition	Apr. 07, 2017
Business Acquisition, Name of Acquired Entity	Gordmans Stores, Inc.
Incremental Number Of Store Locations With Acquisition Rights		7
Business Combination, Reason for Business Combination	The Gordmans stores, which we operate as an off-price concept, add scale to our business, while allowing us to leverage strategic synergies and our current infrastructure. The acquisition also brings beneficial geographic and guest diversification.
Payments to Acquire Businesses, Gross	$ 36,144
Number Of Stores Acquired | stores	55
Number Of Stores Available To Be Acquired	57
Business Combination, Pro Forma Information, Revenue of Acquiree since Acquisition Date, Actual	$ 222,200
Business Combination, Pro Forma Information, Disclosure Impracticable	Pro forma net sales and earnings for 2017 and 2016 are not presented due to the impracticability in substantiating this information as the Gordmans Acquisition was limited to select assets and assignment of leases acquired through a bankruptcy auction. Furthermore, the results of operations may be impacted by the Sellers’ liquidation and may not be indicative of future performance.
New Leases, Former Gordmans Store Locations [Abstract]
New leases, Former Gordmans Store Locations | stores	3
Business Combination, Recognized Identifiable Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed, Assets [Abstract]
Business Combination, Recognized Identifiable Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed, Inventory		$ 31,770
Business Combination, Recognized Identifiable Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed, Property, Plant, Equipment, and Other Assets		4,374
Business Combination, Recognized Identifiable Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed, Assets		$ 36,144
Second Quarter 2017 [Member]
New Leases, Former Gordmans Store Locations [Abstract]
New leases, Former Gordmans Store Locations | stores	2
Third Quarter 2017 [Member]
New Leases, Former Gordmans Store Locations [Abstract]
New leases, Former Gordmans Store Locations | stores	1
Minimum
Business Combination, Description [Abstract]
NumberOfStoreLocationsWithAcquisitionRights		50
Maximum
Business Combination, Description [Abstract]
NumberOfStoreLocationsWithAcquisitionRights		57
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses [Member]
Business Combination, Description [Abstract]
Business Combination, Acquisition Related Costs	$ 9,100

XML

QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (unaudited) (Details) - USD ($) $ / shares in Units, shares in Thousands, $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended								12 Months Ended
	Feb. 03, 2018	Oct. 28, 2017	Jul. 29, 2017	Apr. 29, 2017	Jan. 28, 2017	Oct. 29, 2016	Jul. 30, 2016	Apr. 30, 2016	Feb. 03, 2018	Jan. 28, 2017	Jan. 30, 2016
Quarterly Financial Information [Abstract]
Net sales	$ 549,351	$ 357,236	$ 377,081	$ 308,607	$ 454,443	$ 317,140	$ 338,385	$ 332,750	$ 1,592,275	$ 1,442,718	$ 1,604,433
Gross profit	136,642	71,694	92,941	62,218	88,905	56,590	85,570	66,987	363,495	298,052	396,431
Net (loss) income	$ 5,644	$ (17,722)	$ (6,258)	$ (18,987)	$ (6,844)	$ (15,634)	$ 41	$ (15,460)	$ (37,323)	$ (37,897)	$ 3,780
Basic (loss) earnings per share	$ 0.19	$ (0.64)	$ (0.23)	$ (0.70)	$ (0.25)	$ (0.58)	$ 0.00	$ (0.57)	$ (1.37)	$ (1.40)	$ 0.12
Diluted (loss) earnings per share	$ 0.19	$ (0.64)	$ (0.23)	$ (0.70)	$ (0.25)	$ (0.58)	$ 0.00	$ (0.57)	$ (1.37)	$ (1.40)	$ 0.12
Basic weighted average shares outstanding	27,628	27,602	27,535	27,268	27,163	27,155	27,111	26,932	27,510	27,090	31,145
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding	27,628	27,602	27,535	27,268	27,163	27,155	27,175	26,932	27,510	27,090	31,188
Fiscal Period Duration	98 days				91 days				371 days	364 days	364 days
Impairment charges	$ 1,600				$ 19,400				$ 1,739	$ 19,856	$ 10,580