XML 39 R15.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.3.1.900
Fair Value Measurements
9 Months Ended
Oct. 31, 2015
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements
7.            Fair Value Measurements

We recognize or disclose the fair value of our financial and non-financial assets and liabilities on a recurring and non-recurring basis. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. When determining the fair value measurements for assets and liabilities which are required to be recorded at fair value, we assume the highest and best use of the asset by market participants in which we would transact and the market-based risk measurements or assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.

We apply the following fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value into three levels, and base the categorization within the hierarchy upon the lowest level of input that is available and significant to the fair value measurement:
Level 1 –
Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
 
 
Level 2 –
Observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in inactive markets, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
 
 
Level 3 –
Inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement reflect our estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.
         

Financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis were as follows (in thousands):
 
October 31, 2015
 
Balance
 
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Instruments
(Level 1)
 
Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
Other assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Securities held in grantor trust for deferred
compensation plans
(a)(b)
$
18,813

 
$
18,813

 
$

 
$

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
January 31, 2015
 
Balance
 
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Instruments
(Level 1)
 
Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
Other assets:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Securities held in grantor trust for deferred
compensation plans
(a)(b)
$
16,654

 
$
16,654

 
$

 
$

 
(a) The liability for the amount due to participants corresponding in value to the securities held in the grantor trust is recorded in other long-term liabilities.
(b) Using the market approach, the fair values of these items represent quoted market prices multiplied by the quantities held. Net gains and losses related to the changes in fair value in the assets and liabilities under the various deferred compensation plans are recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses and were nil for the nine months ended October 31, 2015 and for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2015.


    
Non-financial assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis were as follows (in thousands):
 
October 31, 2015
 
Balance
 
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Instruments
(Level 1)
 
Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Store property, equipment and leasehold improvements (a)
$
3,575

 
$

 
$

 
$
3,575

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
January 31, 2015
 
Balance
 
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Instruments
(Level 1)
 
Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Store property, equipment and leasehold improvements (a)
$
3,343

 
$

 
$

 
$
3,343


(a) In accordance with ASC No. 360-10, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, using an undiscounted cash flow model, we identified certain stores whose cash flow trends indicated that the carrying value of store property, equipment and leasehold improvements may not be fully recoverable and recognized impairment charges to reflect the assets at fair value. We use a discounted cash flow model to determine the fair value of our impaired assets. Key assumptions in determining future cash flows include, among other things, expected future operating performance, including expected closure date or lease term, and changes in economic conditions.

As part of a strategic evaluation of our real estate portfolio, we announced a multi-year plan in 2015 to close stores that we believe do not have the potential to meet our increased sales productivity and profitability standards. We expect to close approximately 90 underperforming stores representing 4% of total sales, with 23 stores closing in 2015 and the majority closing by the end of 2017. As a result, we recognized impairment charges of $8.7 million during the nine months ended October 31, 2015 related to our strategic store closure plan. During 2014, we recognized impairment charges of $0.6 million. Store impairment charges are recorded in cost of sales and related buying, occupancy and distribution expenses.

The fair values of cash and cash equivalents, payables and short-term debt obligations approximate their carrying values due to the short-term nature of these instruments. In addition, we believe that the Revolving Credit Facility approximates fair value since interest rates are adjusted to reflect current rates.