XML 69 R11.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.1.9
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
12 Months Ended
Jan. 31, 2015
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
NOTE 3 – FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

We recognize or disclose the fair value of our financial and non-financial assets and liabilities on a recurring and non-recurring basis.  Fair value is defined as the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.  When determining the fair value measurements for assets and liabilities which are required to be recorded at fair value, we assume the highest and best use of the asset by market participants in which we would transact and the market-based risk measurements or assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.
We applied the following fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value into three levels, and bases the categorization within the hierarchy upon the lowest level of input that is available and significant to the fair value measurement:
Level 1 -
Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 -
Observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in inactive markets, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
Level 3 -
Inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement reflect our estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.    
Financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis (in thousands):
 
January 31, 2015
 
Balance
 
Quoted Prices in Active
Markets for Identical
Instruments
(Level 1)
 
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Other assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Securities held in grantor trust for deferred compensation plans (a)(b)
$
16,654

 
$
16,654

 
$

 
$


 
February 1, 2014
 
Balance
 
Quoted Prices in Active
Markets for Identical
Instruments
(Level 1)
 
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Other assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Securities held in grantor trust for deferred compensation plans (a)(b)
$
21,023

 
$
21,023

 
$

 
$

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Deferred non-employee director equity compensation plan liability (b)
$
226

 
$
226

 
$

 
$

 
(a) The liability for the amount due to participants corresponding in value to the securities held in the grantor trust is recorded in other long-term liabilities.
(b) Using the market approach, the fair values of these items represent quoted market prices multiplied by the quantities held. Net gains and losses related to the changes in fair value in the assets and liabilities under the various deferred compensation plans are recorded in SG&A expenses and were nil during 2014 and 2013.

    
    
Non-financial assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis (in thousands):
 
January 31, 2015
 
Balance
 
Quoted Prices in Active
Markets for Identical
Instruments
(Level 1)
 
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Store property, equipment and leasehold improvements (a)
$
3,343

 
$

 
$

 
$
3,343

 
 
February 1, 2014
 
Balance
 
Quoted Prices in Active
Markets for Identical
Instruments
(Level 1)
 
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Store property, equipment and leasehold improvements (a)
$
4,562

 
$

 
$

 
$
4,562

 
 
(a) In accordance with ASC No. 360-10, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, using an undiscounted cash flow model, we identified certain stores whose cash flow trends indicated that the carrying value of store property, equipment and leasehold improvements may not be fully recoverable and determined that impairment charges were necessary for 2014.  We use a discounted cash flow model to determine the fair value of our impaired assets. Key assumptions in determining future cash flows include, among other things, expected future operating performance and changes in economic conditions.  Long-lived assets with a carrying amount of $3.9 million in 2014 and $12.6 million in 2013 were written down to their estimated fair value of $3.3 million in 2014 and $4.6 million in 2013, resulting in impairment charges of approximately $0.6 million during 2014 and $8.0 million during 2013. The $8.0 million in 2013 includes approximately $7.3 million of impairment charges for Steele's, which was disposed of subsequent to February 1, 2014. See Note 15 for additional disclosures on the Steele's divestiture.
 
The fair values of cash and cash equivalents, payables and short-term debt obligations approximate their carrying values due to the short-term nature of these instruments. In addition, we believe that the Revolving Credit Facility approximates fair value since interest rates are adjusted to reflect current rates.