10-Q 1 mts152661_10q.htm FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 27, 2015

United States

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x	Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the quarterly period ended June 27, 2015

o	Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the transition period from __________ to __________

Commission File Number 0-2382

MTS SYSTEMS CORPORATION

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

MINNESOTA	41-0908057
(State or other jurisdiction of	(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)	Identification No.)

14000 Technology Drive, Eden Prairie, MN 55344

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (952) 937-4000

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

x Yes

o No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§229.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

x Yes

o No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer x Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller Reporting Company o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act):

o Yes

x No

The number of shares outstanding of the issuer’s common stock as of July 30, 2015 was 14,937,570 shares.

MTS SYSTEMS CORPORATION

REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 27, 2015

INDEX


			Page No.
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

	Item 1.	Financial Statements (unaudited)

		Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 27, 2015 and September 27, 2014	2

		Consolidated Statements of Income for the Three and Nine Months Ended June 27, 2015 and June 28, 2014	3

		Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Three and Nine Months Ended June 27, 2015 and June 28, 2014	4

		Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended June 27, 2015 and June 28, 2014	5

		Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	6 - 22

	Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	23 - 39

	Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	40

	Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	40

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

	Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	40 - 41

	Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	41

	Item 6.	Exhibits	42

SIGNATURES			43

Table of Contents

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

MTS SYSTEMS CORPORATION

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(unaudited - in thousands, except per share data)


	June 27,			September 27,
	2015			2014
ASSETS

Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	53,297		$	60,397
Accounts receivable, net of allowances for doubtful accounts of $3,420 and $2,609, respectively		93,547			104,399
Unbilled accounts receivable		68,778			75,762
Inventories		91,972			83,557
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		10,584			13,937
Deferred income taxes		13,168			12,930
Total current assets		331,346			350,982

Property and equipment, net		79,564			81,575
Goodwill		27,484			26,123
Other intangible assets, net		19,967			21,178
Other assets		3,168			3,694
Deferred income taxes		3,057			3,856
Total assets	$	464,586		$	487,408

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Current Liabilities:
Short-term borrowings	$	36,202		$	60,000
Accounts payable		28,182			27,189
Accrued payroll and related costs		26,755			30,009
Advance payments from customers		59,638			52,335
Accrued warranty costs		4,792			4,286
Accrued income taxes		2,004			6,041
Deferred income taxes		1,468			1,641
Accrued dividends		4,392			4,476
Other accrued liabilities		22,560			17,004
Total current liabilities		185,993			202,981

Deferred income taxes		10,514			6,045
Non-current accrued income taxes		4,352			5,990
Defined benefit pension plan obligation		5,544			7,654
Other long-term liabilities		4,234			6,611
Total liabilities		210,637			229,281

Shareholders’ Equity:
Common stock, $0.25 par; 64,000 shares authorized: 14,900 and 15,180 shares issued and outstanding as of June 27, 2015 and September 27, 2014, respectively		3,725			3,795
Additional paid-in capital		1,661			6,112
Retained earnings		251,009			242,396
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income		(2,446	)		5,824
Total shareholders’ equity		253,949			258,127
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	464,586		$	487,408

The accompanying condensed notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

Table of Contents

MTS SYSTEMS CORPORATION

Consolidated Statements of Income

(unaudited - in thousands, except per share data)


	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	June 27,			June 28,			June 27,			June 28,
	2015			2014			2015			2014
Revenue:
Product	$	114,779		$	126,829		$	363,696		$	364,669
Service		19,133			18,642			56,755			56,555
Total revenue		133,912			145,471			420,451			421,224
Cost of sales:
Product		69,205			76,605			220,428			220,610
Service		11,498			11,171			33,441			32,846
Total cost of sales		80,703			87,776			253,869			253,456
Gross profit		53,209			57,695			166,582			167,768

Operating expenses:
Selling and marketing		20,475			22,644			62,033			66,538
General and administrative		11,486			11,384			38,482			38,568
Research and development		5,821			6,269			17,074			18,763
Total operating expenses		37,782			40,297			117,589			123,869


Income from operations		15,427			17,398			48,993			43,899

Interest expense, net		(155	)		(146	)		(595	)		(511	)
Other expense, net		(126	)		(59	)		(1,492	)		(562	)

Income before income taxes		15,146			17,193			46,906			42,826
Provision for income taxes		4,363			3,049			10,631			11,758
Net income	$	10,783		$	14,144		$	36,275		$	31,068

Earnings per share:
Basic-
Earnings per share	$	0.72		$	0.94		$	2.42		$	2.04
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding - basic		14,905			15,117			15,000			15,238

Diluted-
Earnings per share	$	0.72		$	0.92		$	2.39		$	2.01
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding - diluted		15,070			15,294			15,165			15,422

Dividends declared per share	$	0.30		$	0.30		$	0.90		$	0.90

The accompanying condensed notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

Table of Contents

MTS SYSTEMS CORPORATION

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

(unaudited - in thousands)


	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	June 27,			June 28,			June 27,			June 28,
	2015			2014			2015			2014
Net income	$	10,783		$	14,144		$	36,275		$	31,068
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Foreign currency translation adjustments		1,512			173			(9,638	)		104
Derivative instruments:
Unrealized net (loss) gain		(201	)		(94	)		1,796			(188	)
Net (gain) loss reclassified to earnings		(551	)		28			(2,330	)		(390	)
Defined benefit pension plan:
Unrealized net (loss) gain		(485	)		629			802			1,050
Net loss reclassified to earnings		84			81			265			244
Currency exchange rate change		(123	)		13			835			(62	)
Other comprehensive income (loss)		236			830			(8,270	)		758
Comprehensive income	$	11,019		$	14,974		$	28,005		$	31,826

The accompanying condensed notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

Table of Contents

MTS SYSTEMS CORPORATION

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(unaudited - in thousands)


	Nine Months Ended
	June 27,			June 28,
	2015			2014

Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	36,275		$	31,068
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Stock-based compensation		5,681			4,086
Excess tax benefits for stock-based compensation		(603	)		(1,010	)
Net periodic pension benefit cost		748			836
Depreciation and amortization		15,518			13,883
Deferred income taxes		4,548			(829	)
Bad debt provision		965			502

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts and unbilled accounts receivable		9,042			(663	)
Inventories		(9,498	)		(2,729	)
Prepaid expenses		(2,306	)		(657	)
Accounts payable		1,938			(5,068	)
Accrued payroll and related costs		(1,956	)		1,436
Advance payments from customers		6,813			5,131
Accrued warranty costs		541			449
Other assets and liabilities		4,221			2,571
Net cash provided by operating activities		71,927			49,006

Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of property and equipment		(12,676	)		(16,004	)
Purchase of business, net of acquired cash		—			(14,668	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(12,676	)		(30,672	)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Receipts under short-term borrowings		11,202			30,000
Payments under short-term borrowings		(35,026	)		(448	)
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation		603			1,010
Cash dividends		(13,569	)		(13,714	)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options and employee stock purchase plan		3,858			3,616
Payments to purchase and retire common stock		(28,873	)		(30,756	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(61,805	)		(10,292	)

Effect of exchange rate on changes in cash		(4,546	)		230

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents		(7,100	)		8,272

Cash and cash equivalents, at beginning of period		60,397			48,333
Cash and cash equivalents, at end of period	$	53,297		$	56,605

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for -
Interest	$	677		$	388
Income taxes	$	8,377		$	12,821
Non-cash financing activities:
Accrued contingent consideration	$	—		$	2,000
Dividends declared not yet paid	$	4,392		$	4,530

The accompanying condensed notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

Table of Contents

CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited)

1. Basis of Presentation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of MTS Systems Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiaries (the “Company”). All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.

The interim unaudited consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared by the Company, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the United States (“U.S.”) Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The information furnished in these consolidated financial statements includes normal recurring adjustments and reflects all adjustments that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of such financial statements. The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). U.S. GAAP requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions that affect amounts reported. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to SEC rules and regulations. The accompanying consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 27, 2014 filed with the SEC. Interim results of operations for the third quarter ended June 27, 2015 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.

Fiscal Year

The Company’s fiscal year ends on the Saturday closest to September 30. The Company’s fiscal years ended September 27, 2014 and September 28, 2013 consisted of 52 weeks. The Company’s fiscal year ending October 3, 2015 will consist of 53 weeks.

2. Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)”. This update clarifies the principles for revenue recognition in transactions involving contracts with customers. The new revenue recognition guidance provides a five-step analysis to determine when and how revenue is recognized. The new guidance will require revenue recognition to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to a customer in an amount that reflects the consideration a company expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services.

At its July 9, 2015 meeting, the FASB agreed to defer by one year the mandatory effective date of its revenue recognition standard. The standard will be required to be adopted for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within that annual period, which is the Company’s fiscal year 2019. Early application is permitted for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within that annual period, which is the Company’s fiscal year 2018. The Company has not yet evaluated what impact, if any, the adoption of this guidance may have on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or disclosures.

3. Inventories

Inventories consist of material, labor and overhead costs and are stated at the lower of cost or market value, determined under the first-in, first-out accounting method. Inventories as of June 27, 2015 and September 27, 2014 were as follows:


	June 27,		September 27,
	2015		2014
	(in thousands)
Customer projects in various stages of completion	$	24,903	$	22,559
Components, assemblies and parts		67,069		60,998
Total	$	91,972	$	83,557

Table of Contents

4. Warranty Obligations

Sales of the Company’s products and systems are subject to limited warranty obligations that are included in customer contracts. For sales that include installation services, warranty obligations typically extend for a period of twelve to twenty-four months from the date of either shipment or acceptance. Product obligations typically extend for a period of twelve to twenty-four months from the date of purchase. Under the terms of these warranties, the Company is obligated to repair or replace any components or assemblies it deems defective due to workmanship or materials. The Company reserves the right to reject warranty claims where it determines that failure is due to normal wear, customer modifications, improper maintenance, or misuse. The Company records general warranty provisions based on an estimated warranty expense percentage applied to current period revenue. The percentage applied reflects historical warranty claims experience over the preceding twelve-month period. Both the experience percentage and the warranty liability are evaluated on an ongoing basis for adequacy. In addition, warranty provisions are also recognized for certain nonrecurring product claims that are individually significant. Warranty provisions and claims for the three and nine months ended June 27, 2015 and June 28, 2014 were as follows:


		Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
		June 27,			June 28,			June 27,			June 28,
		2015			2014			2015			2014
	(in thousands)
Beginning balance		$	5,325		$	5,120		$	4,286		$	4,694
Warranty provisions			1,323			1,335			4,603			5,299
Warranty claims			(1,976	)		(1,672	)		(4,511	)		(5,065	)
Adjustments to preexisting warranties			108			382			450			220
Currency translation			12			(1	)		(36	)		16
Ending balance		$	4,792		$	5,164		$	4,792		$	5,164

5. Stock-Based Compensation

The Company compensates its officers, directors, and employees with stock-based compensation under the 2011 Stock Incentive Plan (“2011 Plan”) approved by the Company’s shareholders in 2011, and administered under the supervision of the Company’s Board of Directors. During fiscal year 2013, the Company’s shareholders approved a 1.3 million increase in the number of shares that may be issued under the 2011 Plan, bringing the aggregate total to 2.3 million. During the three months ended December 27, 2014 and December 28, 2013, the Company awarded stock options and restricted stock units under the 2011 Plan. At June 27, 2015, a total of 964,821 shares were available for future grant under the 2011 Plan. These shares will be available for issuance under the 2011 Plan until January 31, 2018.

In 2011, the Company’s shareholders approved a 2012 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”) that was effective on January 1, 2012. During the three months ended June 27, 2015 and the three months ended September 27, 2014, the Company issued shares of its common stock to participants under the ESPP. At June 27, 2015, a total of 695,669 shares were available for ESPP share issuances. Shares will be available for issuance under the ESPP until December 31, 2021.

During the three months ended December 27, 2014, the Company granted an award of approximately 162,000 stock options, 41,000 restricted stock units and 16,000 performance restricted stock units to officers and employees of the Company. During the three months ended December 28, 2013, the Company granted an award of approximately 331,000 stock options and 70,000 restricted stock units to officers and employees of the Company. The stock options vest proportionally on the first three anniversaries of the grant date and expire seven years from the grant date. The restricted stock units vest proportionally on the first three anniversaries of the grant date and performance restricted stock units vest based on the attainment of return on invested capital performance targets at the end of the one, two and three year performance periods.

Table of Contents

The stock options were granted at an exercise price equal to the closing market price of the Company’s stock on the date of grant. The fair value of stock options granted has been estimated as of the date of grant using the multiple option form of the Black-Scholes valuation model, based on the grant price and assumptions regarding the expected grant life, stock price volatility, dividends, and risk-free interest rates. Each vesting period of an option award is valued separately, with this value being recognized as expense evenly over the vesting period. The weighted average per share fair value of the stock options granted under the Company-wide award during the three months ended December 27, 2014 and December 28, 2013 was $12.12 and $13.97, respectively. The weighted average assumptions used to determine the fair value of these stock options were as follows:


Expected life (in years)	3.5
Risk-free interest rate	1.1	%
Expected volatility	27.4	%
Dividend yield	1.8	%

The expected life represents the period that the stock option awards are expected to be outstanding and was determined based on historical and anticipated future exercise and expiration patterns.

The risk-free interest rate used is based on the yield of constant maturity U.S. Treasury bonds on the grant date with a remaining term equal to the expected life of the grant. The Company estimates stock price volatility based on a historical weekly price observation. The dividend yield assumption is based on the annualized current dividend divided by the share price on the grant date.

The fair value of the restricted stock units granted under the Company-wide award during the three months ended December 27, 2014 and December 28, 2013 was $64.65 and $64.90, respectively, representing the market value of the Company’s shares at the date of grant minus the present value of estimated foregone dividends over the vesting period. The proportionate value of restricted stock units and performance restricted stock units associated with each vesting period is allocated to expense evenly over the vesting period.

6. Capital Assets

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment as of June 27, 2015 and September 27, 2014 consisted of the following:


		June 27,			September 27,
		2015			2014
	(in thousands)
Land and improvements		$	1,705		$	1,710
Buildings and improvements			52,925			54,271
Machinery and equipment			158,727			150,917
Total			213,357			206,898
Less accumulated depreciation			(133,793	)		(125,323	)
Property and equipment, net		$	79,564		$	81,575

Goodwill

Goodwill as of June 27, 2015 and September 27, 2014 was $27.5 million and $26.1 million, respectively. During the three months ended December 27, 2014, the Company recognized an adjustment of $1.7 million related to a deferred tax liability as part of the provisional allocation of the Roehrig Engineering, Inc. (“REI”) purchase price assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Refer to Note 16 for details regarding this acquisition.

Table of Contents

Other Intangible Assets

Other intangible assets as of June 27, 2015 and September 27, 2014 consisted of the following:


		June 27, 2015
									Weighted
									Average
		Gross Carrying		Accumulated			Net Carrying		Useful Life
		Amount		Amortization			Value		(in Years)
	(dollar amounts in thousands)
Software development costs		$	18,607	$	(13,446	)	$	5,161		6.3
Patents			12,127		(5,085	)		7,042		14.5
Trademarks and trade names			6,293		(1,628	)		4,665		29.4
Customer List			2,562		(548	)		2,014		8.1
Land-use rights			1,256		(171	)		1,085		47.8
Total		$	40,845	$	(20,878	)	$	19,967		13.7


		September 27, 2014
									Weighted
									Average
		Gross Carrying		Accumulated			Net Carrying		Useful Life
		Amount		Amortization			Value		(in Years)
	(dollar amounts in thousands)
Software development costs		$	16,713	$	(11,644	)	$	5,069		5.7
Patents			12,204		(4,453	)		7,751		14.4
Trademarks and trade names			6,349		(1,458	)		4,891		29.3
Customer List			2,485		(134	)		2,351		8.1
Land-use rights			1,269		(153	)		1,116		47.8
Total		$	39,020	$	(17,842	)	$	21,178		13.4

Amortization expense recognized during the three months ended June 27, 2015 and June 28, 2014 was $1.0 million and $0.9 million, respectively. Amortization expense recognized during the nine months ended June 27, 2015 and June 28, 2014 was $3.1 million and $2.8 million, respectively.

Table of Contents

7. Earnings Per Common Share

Basic earnings per share are computed by dividing net earnings by the daily weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the applicable periods. Diluted earnings per share include the potentially dilutive effect of common shares issued in connection with outstanding stock-based compensation awards using the treasury stock method. Under the treasury stock method, shares associated with certain stock options have been excluded from the diluted weighted average shares outstanding calculation because the exercise of those options would lead to a net reduction in common shares outstanding. As a result, stock options to acquire 0.2 million and 0.3 million weighted common shares have been excluded from diluted weighted shares outstanding for each of the three months ended June 27, 2015 and June 28, 2014, respectively. Stock options to acquire 0.1 million and 0.3 million weighted common shares have been excluded from diluted weighted shares outstanding for each of the nine months ended June 27, 2015 and June 28, 2014, respectively. The potentially dilutive effect of common shares issued in connection with outstanding stock options is determined based on net income. A reconciliation of these amounts is as follows:


		Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
		June 27,		June 28,		June 27,		June 28,
		2015		2014		2015		2014
	(in thousands, except per share data)

Net income		$	10,783	$	14,144	$	36,275	$	31,068

Weighted average common shares outstanding			14,905		15,117		15,000		15,238
Dilutive potential common shares			165		177		165		184
Total diluted weighted average shares outstanding			15,070		15,294		15,165		15,422

Earnings per share:
Basic		$	0.72	$	0.94	$	2.42	$	2.04
Diluted		$	0.72	$	0.92	$	2.39	$	2.01

Table of Contents

8. Business Segment Information

The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and management regularly review financial information for the Company’s two operating segments, “Test” and “Sensors.” Test provides testing equipment, systems, and services to the ground vehicles, materials and structures markets. Sensors provides high-performance position sensors for a variety of industrial, mobile hydraulic and liquid level applications.

The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those described in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements found in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 27, 2014. In evaluating each segment’s performance, management focuses on income from operations. This measure excludes interest income and expense, income taxes and other non-operating items. Corporate expenses, including costs associated with various support functions such as human resources, information technology, finance and accounting, and general and administrative costs, are allocated to the reportable segments primarily on the basis of revenue.

Financial information by reportable segment for the three and nine months ended June 27, 2015 and June 28, 2014 was as follows:


		Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
		June 27,		June 28,		June 27,		June 28,
		2015		2014		2015		2014
	(in thousands)
Revenue by Segment:
Test		$	109,484	$	118,194	$	346,306	$	342,602
Sensors			24,428		27,277		74,145		78,622
Total revenue		$	133,912	$	145,471	$	420,451	$	421,224

Income from Operations by Segment:
Test		$	10,139	$	11,769	$	35,256	$	29,351
Sensors			5,288		5,629		13,737		14,548
Total income from operations		$	15,427	$	17,398	$	48,993	$	43,899

Table of Contents

9. Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

The Company uses foreign currency derivatives to hedge against foreign currency exchange risk. Some derivatives are designated as cash flow hedges and qualify as hedging instruments pursuant to Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 815, “Derivatives and Hedging”; others are accounted for and reported under the guidance of ASC 830, “Foreign Currency Matters.” Regardless of the designation for accounting purposes, the Company believes that all of its derivative instruments are hedges of transactional risk exposures. The fair value of the Company’s outstanding designated and undesignated derivative assets and liabilities are reported in the June 27, 2015 and September 27, 2014 Consolidated Balance Sheets as follows:


	June 27, 2015
	Prepaid Expenses
	and Other		Other Accrued
	Current Assets		Liabilities
Designated hedge derivatives:	(in thousands)
Cash flow hedges	$	1,110	$	836
Total designated hedge derivatives		1,110		836

Derivatives not designated as hedges:
Balance sheet derivatives		—		102
Total hedge and other derivatives	$	1,110	$	938


	September 27, 2014
	Prepaid Expenses
	and Other		Other Accrued
	Current Assets		Liabilities
Designated hedge derivatives:	(in thousands)
Cash flow hedges	$	1,750	$	178
Total designated hedge derivatives		1,750		178

Derivatives not designated as hedges:
Balance sheet derivatives		641		—
Total hedge and other derivatives	$	2,391	$	178

Table of Contents

A reconciliation of the net fair value of foreign exchange cash flow hedge assets and liabilities subject to master netting arrangements that are recorded in the June 27, 2015 and September 27, 2014 Consolidated Balance Sheets to the net fair value that could have been reported in the respective Consolidated Balance Sheets is as follows:


June 27, 2015
Assets												Liabilities
				Gross Amounts not Offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheet												Gross Amounts not Offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheet

Gross Amount of Recognized Assets		Gross Liabilities Offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheet		Net Amount of Assets Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheet		Derivatives Subject to Offset		Cash Collateral Received		Net Amount (1)		Gross Amount of Recognized Liabilities		Gross Assets Offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheet		Net Amount of Liabilities Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheet		Derivatives Subject to Offset		Cash Collateral Pledged		Net Amount (2)
(in thousands)
$	1,110	$	—	$	1,110	$	(795)	$	—	$	315	$	836	$	—	$	836	$	(795)	$	—	$	41


September 27, 2014
Assets												Liabilities
				Gross Amounts not Offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheet												Gross Amounts not Offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheet
Gross Amount of Recognized Assets		Gross Liabilities Offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheet		Net Amount of Assets Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheet		Derivatives Subject to Offset		Cash Collateral Received		Net Amount (1)		Gross Amount of Recognized Liabilities		Gross Assets Offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheet		Net Amount of Liabilities Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheet		Derivatives Subject to Offset		Cash Collateral Pledged		Net Amount (2)
(in thousands)
$	1,750	$	—	$	1,750	$	—	$	—	$	1,750	$	178	$	—	$	178	$	—	$	—	$	178

(1)	Net fair value of foreign exchange cash flow hedge assets that could have been reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

(2)	Net fair value of foreign exchange cash flow liabilities that could have been reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Cash Flow Hedging – Currency Risks

Currency exchange contracts utilized to maintain the functional currency value of expected financial transactions denominated in foreign currencies are designated as cash flow hedges. Qualifying gains and losses related to changes in the market value of these contracts are reported as a component of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (“AOCI”) within Shareholders’ Equity on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and reclassified into earnings in the same period during which the underlying hedged transaction affects earnings. The effective portion of the cash flow hedges represents the change in fair value of the hedge that offsets the change in the functional currency value of the hedged item. Each month, the Company assesses whether its currency exchange contracts are effective and, when a contract is determined to be no longer effective as a hedge, the Company discontinues hedge accounting prospectively. Subsequent changes in the market value of ineffective currency exchange contracts are recognized as an increase or decrease in Revenue on the Consolidated Statements of Income, because that is the same line item upon which the underlying hedged transaction is reported.

Table of Contents

As of June 27, 2015 and June 28, 2014, the Company had outstanding cash flow hedge currency exchange contracts with gross notional U.S. dollar equivalent amounts of $56.6 million and $49.4 million, respectively. Upon netting offsetting contracts to sell foreign currencies against contracts to purchase foreign currencies, irrespective of contract maturity dates, the net notional U.S. dollar equivalent amount of contracts outstanding was $48.2 million and $38.9 million as of June 27, 2015 and June 28, 2014, respectively.

As of June 27, 2015, the net market value of the foreign currency exchange contracts was a net asset of $0.3 million, consisting of $1.1 million in assets and $0.8 million in liabilities. As of June 28, 2014, the net market value of the foreign currency exchange contracts was a net liability of $0.1 million, consisting of $0.3 million in liabilities and $0.2 million in assets.

The pretax amounts recognized in AOCI on currency exchange contracts for the three and nine months ended June 27, 2015 and June 28, 2014, including gains (losses) reclassified into earnings in the Consolidated Statements of Income and gains (losses) recognized in other comprehensive income (“OCI”), are as follows:


		Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
		June 27, 2015			June 28, 2014			June 27, 2015			June 28, 2014
	(in thousands)
Beginning unrealized net gain (loss) in AOCI		$	1,752		$	(55	)	$	1,414		$	754
Net (gain) loss reclassified into Revenue (effective portion)			(865	)		46			(3,658	)		(614	)
Net (loss) gain recognized in OCI (effective portion)			(313	)		(148	)		2,818			(297	)
Ending unrealized net gain (loss) in AOCI		$	574		$	(157	)	$	574		$	(157	)

The amount recognized in earnings as a result of the ineffectiveness of cash flow hedges was less than $0.1 million in each of the three and nine months ended June 27, 2015 and June 28, 2014. As of June 27, 2015 and June 28, 2014, the amount projected to be reclassified from AOCI into earnings in the next 12 months was a net gain of $0.6 million and a net loss of $0.2 million, respectively. The maximum remaining maturity of any forward or optional contract as of June 27, 2015 and June 28, 2014 was 2.0 years and 1.2 years, respectively.

Foreign Currency Balance Sheet Derivatives

The Company also uses foreign currency derivative contracts to maintain the functional currency value of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in non-functional foreign currencies. The gains and losses related to the changes in the market value of these derivative contracts are included in other expense, net in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

As of June 27, 2015 and June 28, 2014, the Company had outstanding foreign currency balance sheet derivative contracts with gross notional U.S. dollar equivalent amounts of $77.0 million and $97.8 million, respectively. Upon netting offsetting contracts by counterparty banks to sell foreign currencies against contracts to purchase foreign currencies, irrespective of contract maturity dates, the net notional U.S. dollar equivalent amount of contracts outstanding as of June 27, 2015 and June 28, 2014 was $21.3 million and $24.6 million, respectively. As of June 27, 2015, the net market value of the foreign exchange balance sheet derivative contracts was a net liability of $0.1 million. As of June 28, 2014, the net market value of the foreign exchange balance sheet derivative contracts was a net loss of $0.3 million.

The net gains (losses) recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income on foreign exchange balance sheet derivative contracts for the three and nine months ended June 27, 2015 and June 28, 2014 were as follows:


		Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
		June 27, 2015			June 28, 2014			June 27, 2015		June 28, 2014
	(in thousands)
Net (loss) gain recognized in Other expense, net		$	(544	)	$	(30	)	$	311	$	(253	)

Table of Contents

10. Fair Value Measurements

In determining the fair value of financial assets and liabilities, the Company currently utilizes market data or other assumptions that it believes market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability in the principal or most advantageous market, and adjusts for non-performance and/or other risk associated with the Company as well as counterparties, as appropriate. When considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, the following fair value hierarchy distinguishes between observable and unobservable inputs, which are categorized in one of the following levels:

Level 1 Inputs: Unadjusted quoted prices that are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities accessible to the Company at the measurement date.

Level 2 Inputs: Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.

Level 3 Inputs: Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability used to measure fair value to the extent that observable inputs are not available, thereby allowing for situations in which there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability at the measurement date.

The hierarchy gives the highest priority to Level 1, because this level provides the most reliable measure of fair value, while giving the lowest priority to Level 3.

Financial Instruments Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

As of June 27, 2015 and September 27, 2014, financial assets and liabilities subject to fair value measurements on a recurring basis were as follows:


		June 27, 2015
		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets:	(in thousands)
Currency contracts(1)		$	—	$	1,110	$	—	$	1,110
Total assets		$	—	$	1,110	$	—	$	1,110

Liabilities:
Currency contracts(1)		$	—	$	938	$	—	$	938
Total liabilities		$	—	$	938	$	—	$	938


		September 27, 2014
		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets:	(in thousands)
Currency contracts(1)		$	—	$	2,391	$	—	$	2,391
Total assets		$	—	$	2,391	$	—	$	2,391

Liabilities:
Currency contracts(1)		$	—	$	178	$	—	$	178
Total liabilities		$	—	$	178	$	—	$	178

(1)	Based on observable market transactions of spot currency rates and forward currency rates on equivalently termed instruments.

Table of Contents

Nonfinancial Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

The Company’s goodwill, intangible assets and other long-lived assets are nonfinancial assets that were acquired either as part of a business combination, individually or with a group of other assets. These nonfinancial assets were initially, and are currently, measured and recognized at amounts equal to the fair value determined as of the date of acquisition. Periodically, these nonfinancial assets are tested for impairment, by comparing their respective carrying values to the estimated fair value of the reporting unit or asset group in which they reside. In the event any of these nonfinancial assets were to become impaired, the Company would recognize an impairment loss equal to the amount by which the carrying value of the reporting unit, impaired asset or asset group exceeds its estimated fair value.

Fair value measurements of reporting units are estimated using an income approach involving discounted or undiscounted cash flow models that contain certain Level 3 inputs requiring management judgment, including projections of economic conditions and customer demand, revenue and margins, changes in competition, operating costs, working capital requirements, and new product introductions. Fair value measurements of the reporting units associated with the Company’s goodwill balances are estimated at least annually in the fourth quarter of each fiscal year for purposes of impairment testing. Fair value measurements associated with the Company’s intangible assets and other long-lived assets are estimated when events or changes in circumstances such as market value, asset utilization, physical change, legal factors, or other matters indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable.

Financial Instruments not Measured at Fair Value

Certain of the Company’s financial instruments are not measured at fair value but nevertheless are recorded at carrying amounts approximating fair value, based on their short-term nature or variable interest rate. These financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and short-term borrowings.

Table of Contents

11. Other Comprehensive Income

Other Comprehensive Income, a component of Shareholders’ Equity, consists of foreign currency translation adjustments, gains or losses on derivative instruments, and defined benefit pension plan adjustments.

Income tax expense or benefit allocated to each component of Other Comprehensive Income for the three and nine months ended June 27, 2015 and June 28, 2014 was as follows:


		June 27, 2015
		Three Months Ended											Nine Months Ended
		Pretax Amount			Tax (Expense) or Benefit				Net of Tax Amount				Pretax Amount			Tax (Expense) or Benefit				Net of Tax Amount
	(in thousands)
Foreign currency translation adjustments		$	1,512			$	—			$	1,512		$	(9,638	)		$	—			$	(9,638	)
Derivative instruments:
Unrealized net (loss) gain			(313	)			112				(201	)		2,818				(1,022	)			1,796
Net gain reclassified to earnings			(865	)			314				(551	)		(3,658	)			1,328				(2,330	)
Defined benefit pension plan:
Unrealized net (loss) gain			(694	)			209				(485	)		1,149				(347	)			802
Net loss reclassified to earnings			121				(37	)			84			380				(115	)			265
Currency exchange rate change			(123	)			—				(123	)		835				—				835
Other comprehensive income (loss)		$	(362	)		$	598			$	236		$	(8,114	)		$	(156	)		$	(8,270	)


		June 28, 2014
		Three Months Ended											Nine Months Ended
		Pretax Amount			Tax (Expense) or Benefit				Net of Tax Amount				Pretax Amount			Tax (Expense) or Benefit				Net of Tax Amount
	(in thousands)
Foreign currency translation adjustments		$	173			$	—			$	173		$	104			$	—			$	104
Derivative instruments:
Unrealized net loss			(148	)			54				(94	)		(297	)			109				(188	)
Net loss (gain) reclassified to earnings			46				(18	)			28			(614	)			224				(390	)
Defined benefit pension plan:
Unrealized net gain			900				(271	)			629			1,503				(453	)			1,050
Net loss reclassified to earnings			117				(36	)			81			350				(106	)			244
Currency exchange rate change			13				—				13			(62	)			—				(62	)
Other comprehensive income		$	1,101			$	(271	)		$	830		$	984			$	(226	)		$	758

Table of Contents

The changes in the net-of-tax balances of each component of AOCI during the three and nine months ended June 27, 2015 and June 28, 2014 were as follows:


		June 27, 2015
		Three Months Ended											Nine Months Ended
		Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments		Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Derivative Instruments			Defined Benefit Pension Plan Adjustments			Total			Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments			Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Derivative Instruments			Defined Benefit Pension Plan Adjustments			Total
	(in thousands)
Beginning balance		$	1,070	$	1,116		$	(4,868	)	$	(2,682	)	$	12,220		$	898		$	(7,294	)	$	5,824
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications			1,512		(201	)		(608	)		703			(9,638	)		1,796			1,637			(6,205	)
Amounts reclassified to earnings			—		(551	)		84			(467	)		—			(2,330	)		265			(2,065	)
Other comprehensive income (loss)			1,512		(752	)		(524	)		236			(9,638	)		(534	)		1,902			(8,270	)
Ending balance		$	2,582	$	364		$	(5,392	)	$	(2,446	)	$	2,582		$	364		$	(5,392	)	$	(2,446	)


		June 28, 2014
		Three Months Ended										Nine Months Ended
		Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments		Unrealized Gain (Loss) Derivative Instruments			Defined Benefit Pension Plan Adjustments			Total		Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments		Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Derivative Instruments			Defined Benefit Pension Plan Adjustments			Total
	(in thousands)
Beginning balance		$	17,250	$	(35	)	$	(4,950	)	$	12,265	$	17,319	$	477		$	(5,459	)	$	12,337
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications			173		(94	)		642			721		104		(188	)		988			904
Amounts reclassified to earnings			—		28			81			109		—		(390	)		244			(146	)
Other comprehensive income			173		(66	)		723			830		104		(578	)		1,232			758
Ending balance		$	17,423	$	(101	)	$	(4,227	)	$	13,095	$	17,423	$	(101	)	$	(4,227	)	$	13,095

Table of Contents

The effect on certain line items in the Consolidated Statements of Income of amounts reclassified out of AOCI for the three and nine months ended June 27, 2015 and June 28, 2014 was as follows:


	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended						Affected Line Item in the
	June 27,			June 28,			June 27,			June 28,			Consolidated Statements
	2015			2014			2015			2014			of Income
Derivative instruments:	(in thousands)
Currency exchange contracts	$	865		$	(46	)	$	3,658		$	614		Revenue
Total net gain (loss) included in income before income taxes		865			(46	)		3,658			614
Income tax (expense) benefit		(314	)		18			(1,328	)		(224	)
Total net gain (loss) included in net income		551			(28	)		2,330			390

Defined benefit pension plan:
Actuarial loss		(60	)		(58	)		(207	)		(191	)	Cost of sales
Actuarial loss		(38	)		(37	)		(108	)		(99	)	Selling and marketing
Actuarial loss		(23	)		(22	)		(65	)		(60	)	General and administrative
Total loss included in income before income taxes		(121	)		(117	)		(380	)		(350	)
Income tax benefit		37			36			115			106
Total net loss included in net income		(84	)		(81	)		(265	)		(244	)

Total net-of-tax reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) included in net income	$	467		$	(109	)	$	2,065		$	146

12. Financing

Short-term borrowings as of June 27, 2015 and September 27, 2014 consisted of the following:


		June 27,		September 27,
		2015		2014
	(in thousands)
Bank line of credit, monthly U.S. LIBOR plus 100 basis points, maturing July 2015, with optional month-to-month term renewal and loan repricing until September 2019		$	25,000	$	60,000
Bank line of credit, monthly Euro LIBOR plus 100 basis points, maturing July 2015, with optional month-to-month term renewal and loan repricing until September 2019		$	11,202		—

Total short-term borrowings		$	36,202	$	60,000

The Company’s credit facility provides for up to $200 million for working capital financing, permitted acquisitions, share purchases, or other general corporate purposes and expires in September 2019. As of June 27, 2015 and September 27, 2014, outstanding borrowings under the credit facility were $36.2 million and $60.0 million, respectively. As of June 27, 2015, the interest rate applicable to outstanding U.S. dollar variable rate and outstanding Euro variable rate credit facility borrowings was 1.19% and 1.00%, respectively. As of September 27, 2014, the interest rate applicable to outstanding variable rate credit facility borrowings was 1.15%, the monthly U.S. LIBOR plus 100 basis points. As of June 27, 2015, the Company had outstanding letters of credit drawn from the credit facility totaling $12.6 million, leaving $151.2 million of unused borrowing capacity. As of September 27, 2014, the Company had outstanding letters of credit drawn from the credit facility totaling $9.4 million, leaving approximately $130.6 million of unused borrowing capacity.

Table of Contents

13. Income Taxes

As of June 27, 2015, the Company’s liability for unrecognized tax benefits was $4.4 million, of which $2.3 million would favorably affect the Company’s effective tax rate, if recognized. As of September 27, 2014, the Company’s liability for unrecognized tax benefits was $6.0 million, of which $3.8 million would favorably affect the Company’s effective tax rate, if recognized. The change in unrecognized benefits that would affect the effective tax rate is primarily a result of the favorable resolution of audit matters in connection with the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) examination of the Company’s federal income tax returns for the fiscal tax years ending October 1, 2011 and September 29, 2012. The IRS audit concluded during the three months ended March 28, 2015. As of June 27, 2015, the Company does not expect significant changes in the amount of unrecognized tax benefits during the next twelve months.

On December 19, 2014, the Tax Increase Prevention Act of 2014 was signed into law, which reinstated the United States Research and Development (R&D) tax credit retroactively from January 1, 2014 and extends it through December 31, 2014. As a result of this legislation, the Company recognized a tax benefit of approximately $2.1 million during the three months ended December 27, 2014.

14. Retirement Benefit Plan

One of the Company’s German subsidiaries has a non-contributory, defined benefit retirement plan for eligible employees. This plan provides benefits based on the employee’s years of service and compensation during the years immediately preceding retirement, early retirement, termination, disability, or death, as defined in the plan.

During the fiscal year 2014, the Company initiated workforce reduction actions. These actions resulted in terminations of German employees who are eligible to receive future benefits under the German defined benefit pension plan. See Note 15 in Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding the Company’s cost reduction actions that were initiated during the three months ended December 28, 2013.

The cost of the plan for the three and nine months ended June 27, 2015 and June 28, 2014 included the following components:


		Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
		June 27,			June 28,			June 27,			June 28,
		2015			2014			2015			2014
	(in thousands)
Service cost		$	207		$	203		$	652		$	604
Interest cost			152			211			481			630
Expected return on plan assets			(243	)		(259	)		(765	)		(774	)
Net amortization and deferral			121			117			380			350
Special termination benefits			—			(56	)		—			26
Net periodic benefit cost		$	237		$	216		$	748		$	836

The weighted average expected long-term rate of return on plan assets used to determine the net periodic benefit cost for each of the three and nine months ended June 27, 2015 and June 28, 2014 was 5.5%.

Table of Contents

15. Severance and Related Costs

During fiscal year 2014, the Company initiated workforce and other cost reduction actions at certain of its locations in the U.S. and Europe. As a result of these cost reduction actions, the Company incurred severance and related costs of $1.5 million and $6.3 million for the three and nine months ended June 28, 2014, respectively.

The following table summarizes the severance and related costs included in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and nine months ended June 27, 2015 and June 28, 2014:


		Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
		June 27,		June 28,		June 27,		June 28,
		2015		2014		2015		2014
	(in thousands)

Cost of sales		$	—	$	550	$	—	$	3,507
Selling and marketing			—		866		—		1,805
General and administrative			—		76		—		1,024
Total severance and related costs		$	—	$	1,492	$	—	$	6,336

The following table summarizes the severance and related costs included in the Company’s June 27, 2015 and September 27, 2014 Consolidated Balance Sheets:


		June 27,		September 27,
		2015		2014
	(in thousands)

Accrued payroll and related costs		$	670	$	1,567
Defined benefit pension plan obligation			—		26
Other long-term liabilities			1,058		1,783
Total severance and related costs		$	1,728	$	3,376

Table of Contents

16. Business Acquisition

On June 17, 2014, the Company acquired REI for a total purchase price of $14.8 million. REI is a leader in testing systems utilizing electric and electromagnetic actuation technology and is based in Lexington, North Carolina. The acquisition is part of the Company’s continued investment to expand the Company’s technology base and supplement its organic growth initiatives.

The transaction was accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting and the results of operations of the entity are included in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income as of and since June 17, 2014 and are reported in the Company’s Test segment. The acquisition of REI’s assets and liabilities does not constitute a material business combination, and accordingly, pro forma results have not been included.

During the three months ended December 27, 2014, the Company recognized an adjustment of $1.7 million related to a deferred tax liability as part of the provisional allocation of the purchase price assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed.

The following table summarizes the allocation of the purchase price to the fair values assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition:


(in thousands) :	Amount
Accounts receivable and inventory	$	1,763
Machinery and equipment		477
Deferred tax liability		(1,445	)
Current liabilities		(1,900	)
Identifiable intangible assets		4,709
Net assets acquired		3,604
Goodwill		11,238
Total purchase price	$	14,842

The Company has completed its fair value determinations for all of the elements of the REI acquisition.

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

About MTS Systems Corporation

MTS Systems Corporation’s testing hardware and software solutions help customers accelerate and improve their design, development, and manufacturing processes and are used for determining the mechanical behavior of materials, products, and structures. MTS’ high-performance position sensors provide controls for a variety of industrial and vehicular applications. MTS had 2,180 employees as of September 27, 2014 and revenue of $564 million for the fiscal year ended September 27, 2014.

Terms

When we use the terms “we,” “us,” the “Company,” or “our” in this report, unless the context otherwise requires, we are referring to MTS Systems Corporation.

Company Strategy

Our goal is to grow profitably, generate strong cash flow, and deliver a superior return on invested capital to our shareholders by leveraging our leadership position in the research and development, product development and industrial and mobile equipment global end markets. Our desire is to be the innovation leader in creating test and measurement solutions to enable our customers’ success. Through innovation, we believe we can create value for our customers that will drive our growth. There are four global macro-trends that will help enable this growth: energy scarcity; environmental concerns; globalization and the development of the emerging markets; and global demographics. These macro-trends have significant implications for our customers, such as increasing the demand for new and more innovative products and increasing our customers’ organizational complexity. We believe we have an excellent geographic footprint and are well positioned in both Test and Sensors to take advantage of these macro-trends and deliver significant profitable growth in the years ahead.

We are working toward our goals of sustained double digit growth in annual revenue, margin expansion and mid-to-upper teens for Return on Invested Capital (“ROIC”). Economic conditions and the competitive environment will impact the timing of when the goals are achieved. There are four primary opportunities to enable us to achieve these goals:

●

Expanding research and development requirements;

●

Expanding service offerings in the Test business;

●

Growth in composite materials drives new testing requirements and technologies in the Test materials market; and

●

Development of intelligent machines provides opportunity in the Sensors mobile hydraulics market.

We believe that our business model supports achieving our double digit growth milestone assuming we continue to move aggressively to build our infrastructure, expand our offerings and execute on opportunities with our key customers around the world. In order to accelerate our revenue growth over the next few years, investments in infrastructure, sales support and field service capacity and capabilities are essential. We invested significantly in the fiscal years ended September 28, 2013 and September 27, 2014 and will continue to moderately invest in future years.

Table of Contents

Financial Results

Total Company

Orders and Backlog

The following is a comparison of orders for the three and nine months ended June 27, 2015 and June 28, 2014, separately identifying the estimated impact of currency translation (in millions):


	Three							Three		Nine							Nine
	Months							Months		Months							Months
	Ended		Estimated					Ended		Ended		Estimated					Ended
	June 27,		Business		Currency			June 28,		June 27,		Business		Currency			June 28,
	2015		Change		Translation			2014		2015		Change		Translation			2014
Orders	$	154.0	$	15.0	$	(10.6	)	$	149.6	$	448.0	$	24.4	$	(28.0	)	$	451.6

Orders

Orders for the three months ended June 27, 2015 were $154.0 million, an increase of $4.4 million, or 2.9%, compared to $149.6 million for the three months ended June 28, 2014. Excluding an estimated 7.1% unfavorable impact of currency translation, which affected both the Test segment (“Test”) and the Sensors segment (“Sensors”), orders increased 10.0%. The overall increase in orders was driven by an $8.5 million increase in large orders (equal to or in excess of $5.0 million) in Test and Sensors order growth of 13.1% on a constant currency basis, partially offset by an estimated 7.1% unfavorable impact of currency translation. Test orders were up 3.8%, reflecting product order growth of 4.4% and service order growth of 0.6%. Orders for the three months ended June 27, 2015 included two large custom Test orders totaling $21.2 million. Orders for the three months ended June 28, 2014 included two large custom Test orders totaling $12.7 million.

Orders for the nine months ended June 27, 2015 totaled $448.0 million, a decrease of $3.6 million, or 0.8%, compared to $451.6 million for the nine months ended June 28, 2014. Excluding an estimated 6.2% unfavorable impact of currency translation, orders increased by 5.4%. The overall decrease in orders was driven by the 6.2% unfavorable impact of currency translation, partially offset by a $27.2 million increase in large orders and Sensors order growth of 2.7% on a constant currency basis. Orders for the nine months ended June 27, 2015 included seven large custom Test orders totaling $72.8 million. Orders for the nine months ended June 28, 2014 included six large custom Test orders totaling $45.6 million.

Backlog

Backlog of undelivered orders as of June 27, 2015 was $342.9 million, an increase of 10.7% compared to $309.8 million as of June 28, 2014. We believe backlog is not an absolute indicator of future revenue because a portion of the orders in backlog could be cancelled at the customer’s discretion. While the backlog is subject to orders cancellations, we have not historically experienced a significant number of order cancellations.

Table of Contents

Results of Operations

The following is a comparison of results of operations for the three and nine months ended June 27, 2015 and June 28, 2014, separately identifying the impact of currency translation and prior year severance and related costs (in millions):


	Three									Prior Year			Three			Nine									Prior Year			Nine
	Months									Severance			Months			Months									Severance			Months
	Ended			Estimated						and			Ended			Ended			Estimated						and			Ended
	June 27,			Business			Currency			Related			June 28,			June 27,			Business			Currency			Related			June 28,
	2015			Change			Translation			Costs			2014			2015			Change			Translation			Costs			2014

Revenue	$	133.9		$	(2.8	)	$	(8.8	)	$	—		$	145.5		$	420.5		$	23.0		$	(23.7	)	$	—		$	421.2
Cost of sales		80.7			(1.5	)		(5.0	)		(0.6	)		87.8			253.9			19.7			(15.7	)		(3.5	)		253.4
Gross profit		53.2			(1.3	)		(3.8	)		0.6			57.7			166.6			3.3			(8.0	)		3.5			167.8
		39.7	%											39.7	%		39.6	%											39.8	%
Operating expenses:
Selling and marketing		20.5			0.3			(1.6	)		(0.8	)		22.6			62.0			1.2			(3.9	)		(1.8	)		66.5
General administrative		11.5			0.8			(0.6	)		(0.1	)		11.4			38.5			2.5			(1.6	)		(1.0	)		38.6
Research and development		5.8			(0.3	)		(0.2	)		—			6.3			17.1			(1.3	)		(0.4	)		—			18.8
Total operating expenses		37.8			0.8			(2.4	)		(0.9	)		40.3			117.6			2.4			(5.9	)		(2.8	)		123.9

Income from operations	$	15.4		$	(2.1	)	$	(1.4	)	$	1.5		$	17.4		$	49.0		$	0.9		$	(2.1	)	$	6.3		$	43.9


	Three Months Ended										Nine Months Ended
	June 27, 2015		June 28, 2014		Increased/ (Decreased)			% Variance			June 27, 2015		June 28, 2014		Increased/ (Decreased)			% Variance

Revenue	$	133.9	$	145.5	$	(11.6	)		-8.0	%	$	420.5	$	421.2	$	(0.7	)		-0.2	%

Revenue

The decrease in revenue for the three and nine months ended June 27, 2015 was primarily driven by the negative impact of currency translation and lower Test revenue on a constant currency basis. Excluding the impact of currency translation, revenue decreased by 1.9% for the three months ended June 27, 2015 and increased by 5.5% for the nine months ended June 27, 2015. Test contributed $109.5 million in revenue for the three months ended June 27, 2015, or a 7.4% decline driven by slower backlog conversion as a result of engineering resource constraints and longer lead times required for engineering to design complex solutions for custom products. Test contributed $346.3 million in revenue for the nine months ended June 27, 2015, or 5.5% growth as a result of strong engineer-to-order revenue converted from a higher beginning of period backlog, as well as factory through put driven by productivity improvements, partially offset by the unfavorable impact of currency translation. Sensors contributed $24.4 million and $74.2 million in revenue for the three and nine months ended June 27, 2015, respectively, or 10.6% and 5.6% decline, respectively, as a result of an estimated 13.6% and 10.9% unfavorable impact of currency translation.

Severance and Related Costs

We initiated workforce reductions and other cost reduction actions during the three and nine months ended June 28, 2014. As a result of those cost reduction actions, during the three months ended June 28, 2014, we incurred severance and related costs of $1.5 million, of which $0.6 million, $0.8 million, and $0.1 million were reported in cost of sales, selling and marketing, and general and administrative expense, respectively. During the nine months ended June 28, 2014, we incurred severance and related costs of $6.3 million, of which $3.5 million, $1.8 million, and $1.0 million were reported in cost of sales, selling and marketing, and general and administrative expense, respectively.

Table of Contents


	Three Months Ended													Nine Months Ended
	June 27, 2015			June 28, 2014				Increased/ (Decreased)			% Variance			June 27, 2015			June 28, 2014			Increased/ (Decreased)			% Variance

Gross profit	$	53.2			$	57.7		$	(4.5	)		-7.8	%	$	166.6		$	167.8		$	(1.2	)		-0.7	%
Gross margin		39.7	%			39.7	%								39.6	%		39.8	%

Gross Profit

The decline in gross profit for the three months ended June 27, 2015 compared to the three months ended June 28, 2014 was primarily a result of the unfavorable impact of currency translation and lower revenue on a constant currency basis. The previously mentioned severance and related costs of $0.6 million unfavorably impacted gross profit as a percentage of revenue by 0.4 percentage points for the three months ended June 28, 2014. Excluding these costs, the gross margin rate decreased 0.4 percentage points primarily as a result of unfavorable product mix in the Test business.

The decline in gross profit for the nine months ended June 27, 2015 compared to the nine months ended June 28, 2014 was a result of the negative impact of currency translation, as well as a lower gross margin rate. The previously mentioned severance and related costs of $3.5 million unfavorably impacted gross profit as a percentage of revenue by 0.9 percentage points for the nine months ended June 28, 2014. Excluding these costs, the gross margin rate decreased 1.1 percentage points, primarily due to unfavorable product mix in the Test business, as well as unfavorable product mix in the Sensors business resulting from sales improvement in certain industrial and mobile hydraulic markets that have a lower margin rate.


	Three Months Ended												Nine Months Ended
	June 27, 2015			June 28, 2014			Increased/ (Decreased)			% Variance			June 27, 2015			June 28, 2014			Increased/ (Decreased)			% Variance

Selling and marketing	$	20.5		$	22.6		$	(2.1	)		-9.3	%	$	62.0		$	66.5		$	(4.5	)		-6.8	%
% of Revenue		15.3	%		15.5	%								14.7	%		15.8	%

Selling and Marketing Expense

The decrease in selling and marketing expense for the three months ended June 27, 2015 was driven by an estimated $1.6 million favorable impact of currency translation, $0.9 million in lower external commissions due to revenue timing, and severance and related costs of $0.8 million in the three months ended June 28, 2014, partially offset by merit increases, increased headcount and the timing of selling activities to drive future revenue growth.

The decrease for the nine months ended June 27, 2015 was driven by an estimated $3.9 million favorable impact of currency translation, severance and related costs of $1.8 million in the nine months ended June 28, 2014 and $1.3 million lower external commissions due to revenue timing, partially offset by merit increases and the timing of selling activities to drive future revenue growth.

Table of Contents


	Three Months Ended											Nine Months Ended
	June 27, 2015			June 28, 2014			Increased/ (Decreased)		% Variance			June 27, 2015			June 28, 2014			Increased/ (Decreased)			% Variance

General administrative	$	11.5		$	11.4		$	0.1		0.9	%	$	38.5		$	38.6		$	(0.1	)		-0.3	%
% of Revenue		8.6	%		7.8	%							9.2	%		9.2	%

General and Administrative Expense

The increase in General and administrative expense for the three months ended June 27, 2015 was driven by $0.3 million related to the full quarterly expense in relation to the Roehrig Engineering, Inc. (“REI”) business that was acquired late in the third quarter of fiscal year 2014 and $0.3 million for increased bad debt expense, partially offset by an estimated $0.6 million favorable impact of currency translation for the three months ended June 28, 2014.

The decrease for the nine months ended June 27, 2015 was driven by $1.0 million of severance and related costs in the nine months ended June 28, 2014 and an estimated $1.6 million favorable impact of currency translation. These decreases were partially offset by $1.0 million related to the full nine month expense in relation to the REI business, $1.0 million in increased costs related to professional fees, contract labor, consulting and audit fees and $0.5 million of increased bad debt expense.


	Three Months Ended												Nine Months Ended
	June 27, 2015			June 28, 2014			Increased/ (Decreased)			% Variance			June 27, 2015			June 28, 2014			Increased/ (Decreased)			% Variance

Research and development	$	5.8		$	6.3		$	(0.5	)		-7.9	%	$	17.1		$	18.8		$	(1.7	)		-9.0	%
% of Revenue		4.3	%		4.3	%								4.1	%		4.5	%

Research and Development Expense

The decreases for both the three and nine months ended June 27, 2015 compared to prior periods were primarily driven by research and development costs expended in the development of software that was capitalized to other intangible assets, net in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, lower variable compensation expense, as well as a favorable impact of currency translation.

Table of Contents


	Three Months Ended												Nine Months Ended
	June 27, 2015			June 28, 2014			Increased/ (Decreased)			% Variance			June 27, 2015			June 28, 2014			Increased/ (Decreased)		% Variance

Income from operations	$	15.4		$	17.4		$	(2.0	)		-11.5	%	$	49.0		$	43.9		$	5.1		11.6	%
% of Revenue		11.5	%		12.0	%								11.7	%		10.4	%

Income from Operations

The decrease in income from operations for the three months ended June 27, 2015 compared to income from operations for the three months ended June 28, 2014, was driven by decreased gross profit, partially offset by decreased operating expenses.

The increase in income from operations for the nine months ended June 27, 2015 compared to income from operations for the nine months ended June 28, 2014, was driven by decreased operating expenses, partially offset by decreased gross profit.


	Three Months Ended												Nine Months Ended
	June 27, 2015			June 28, 2014			Increased/ (Decreased)			% Variance			June 27, 2015			June 28, 2014			Increased/ (Decreased)			% Variance

Interest expense, net	$	(0.2	)	$	(0.1	)	$	(0.1	)		-100.0	%	$	(0.6	)	$	(0.5	)	$	(0.1	)		-20.0	%

Interest Expense, net

Interest expense, net was higher in both periods in 2015 due to higher average borrowing on the credit facility.


	Three Months Ended											Nine Months Ended
	June 27, 2015			June 28, 2014			Increased/ (Decreased)		% Variance			June 27, 2015			June 28, 2014			Increased/ (Decreased)			% Variance

Other expense, net	$	(0.1	)	$	(0.1	)	$	—		0.0	%	$	(1.5	)	$	(0.6	)	$	(0.9	)		-150.0	%

Other Expense, net

The increase in other expense, net for the nine months ended June 27, 2015 compared to other expense, net for the nine months ended June 28, 2014 was primarily driven by increased net losses on foreign currency transactions.

Table of Contents


	Three Months Ended											Nine Months Ended
	June 27, 2015			June 28, 2014			Increased/ (Decreased)		% Variance			June 27, 2015			June 28, 2014			Increased/ (Decreased)			% Variance

Income tax provision	$	4.3		$	3.1		$	1.2		38.7	%	$	10.6		$	11.7		$	(1.1	)		-9.4	%
Effective Rate		28.8	%		17.7	%							22.7	%		27.5	%

Provision for Income Taxes

The increased provision for income taxes during the three months ended June 27, 2015 was primarily due to an increase in the effective tax rate partially offset by a decrease in income before income taxes. The increase in the effective tax rate was primarily due to the recognition of additional federal and state research and development credit benefits of $2.6 million during the three months ended June 28, 2014 which related to years prior to the fiscal year ending September 27, 2014. The increase in the effective tax rate was partially offset by $0.3 million of tax benefits related to cash repatriations of foreign earnings during the three months ended June 27, 2015 and a more favorable geographic mix of earnings.

The decreased provision for income taxes during the nine fiscal months ended June 27, 2015 was primarily due to a decrease in the effective tax rate. The decrease in the effective tax rate was primarily due to the enactment of tax legislation during the three months ended December 27, 2014 that retroactively extended the United States research and development tax credit and resulted in a tax benefit of $2.1 million.


	Three Months Ended										Nine Months Ended
	June 27, 2015		June 28, 2014		Increased/ (Decreased)			% Variance			June 27, 2015		June 28, 2014		Increased/ (Decreased)		% Variance

Net income	$	10.8	$	14.1	$	(3.3	)		-23.4	%	$	36.3	$	31.1	$	5.2		16.7	%
Diluted earnings per share	$	0.72	$	0.92	$	(0.20	)		-21.7	%	$	2.39	$	2.01	$	0.38		18.9	%

Net income

The decrease in net income for the three months ended June 27, 2015 was primarily driven by lower income from operations and a higher effective tax rate. The previously mentioned $1.5 million charge for severance and related costs in the three months ended June 28, 2014 negatively impacted earnings per dilutive share by $0.07 which was offset by a favorable impact to earnings per dilutive share of $0.17 as a result of research and development tax credits recognized during the same period.

The increase in net income for the nine months ended June 27, 2015 was primarily driven by higher income from operations and a lower effective tax rate, partially offset by losses on foreign currency transactions. The $6.3 million charge for severance and related costs in the nine months ended June 28, 2014 negatively impacted earnings per diluted share by $0.28 which was partially offset by a favorable impact to earnings per dilutive share of $0.10 as a result of research and development tax credits during the same period.

Table of Contents

Segment Results

Test Segment

Orders and Backlog

The following is a comparison of Test orders for the three and nine months ended June 27, 2015 and June 28, 2014, separately identifying the estimated impact of currency translation (in millions):


	Three							Three		Nine							Nine
	Months							Months		Months							Months
	Ended		Estimated					Ended		Ended		Estimated					Ended
	June 27,		Business		Currency			June 28,		June 27,		Business		Currency			June 28,
	2015		Change		Translation			2014		2015		Change		Translation			2014
Orders	$	127.5	$	11.5	$	(6.8	)	$	122.8	$	373.2	$	22.2	$	(19.2	)	$	370.2

Orders

Orders for the three months ended June 27, 2015 totaled $127.5 million, an increase of $4.7 million, or 3.8%, compared to orders of $122.8 million for the three months ended June 28, 2014. Excluding the impact of currency translation, orders increased 9.4%. Orders for the three months ended June 27, 2015 included two large custom ground vehicle orders in Asia totaling $21.1 million. Both orders were in the ground vehicles market. Orders for the three months ended June 28, 2014 included two large orders in Asia totaling $12.7 million. Test accounted for 82.8% of total Company orders, compared to 82.0% for the three months ended June 28, 2014.

Orders for the nine months ended June 27, 2015 totaled $372.2 million, an increase of $3.0 million, or 0.8%, compared to orders of $370.2 million for the nine months ended June 28, 2014. Excluding the impact of currency translation, orders increased 6.0%. Orders for the nine months ended June 27, 2015 included six large orders in Asia totaling $67.7 million, and one large order in the Americas totaling $5.2 million. Orders for the nine months ended June 28, 2014 included four large orders in Asia totaling $26.6 million and two large Americas orders totaling $19.0 million. Test accounted for 83.3% of total Company orders, compared to 82.1% for nine months ended June 28, 2014.

Backlog

Backlog of undelivered orders as of June 27, 2015 was $327.4 million, an increase of 12.2% compared to backlog of $291.7 million as of June 28, 2014.

Table of Contents

Results of Operations

The following is a comparison of Test results of operations for the three and nine months ended June 27, 2015 and June 28, 2014, separately identifying the impact of currency translation and prior year severance and related costs (in millions):


	Three									Prior Year			Three			Nine									Prior Year			Nine
	Months									Severance			Months			Months									Severance			Months
	Ended			Estimated						and			Ended			Ended			Estimated						and			Ended
	June 27,			Business			Currency			Related			June 28,			June 27,			Business			Currency			Related			June 28,
	2015			Change			Translation			Costs			2014			2015			Change			Translation			Costs			2014

Revenue	$	109.5		$	(3.6	)	$	(5.1	)	$	-		$	118.2		$	346.3		$	18.8		$	(15.1	)	$	—		$	342.6
Cost of sales		69.7			(1.9	)		(3.2	)		(0.6	)		75.4			219.9			17.1			(11.6	)		(3.5	)		217.9
Gross profit		39.8			(1.7	)		(1.9	)		0.6			42.8			126.4			1.7			(3.5	)		3.5			124.7
		36.3	%											36.2	%		36.5	%											36.4	%
Operating expenses:
Selling and marketing		16.2			0.2			(1.0	)		(0.8	)		17.8			48.3			0.7			(2.4	)		(1.8	)		51.8
General administrative		9.1			0.8			(0.3	)		(0.1	)		8.7			30.4			2.2			(0.6	)		(1.0	)		29.8
Research and development		4.4			(0.1	)		—			—			4.5			12.4			(1.4	)		—			—			13.8
Total operating expenses		29.7			0.9			(1.3	)		(0.9	)		31.0			91.1			1.5			(3.0	)		(2.8	)		95.4

Income from operations	$	10.1		$	(2.6	)	$	(0.6	)	$	1.5		$	11.8		$	35.3		$	0.2		$	(0.5	)	$	6.3		$	29.3


	Three Months Ended										Nine Months Ended
	June 27,		June 28,		Increased/			%			June 27,		June 28,		Increased/		%
	2015		2014		(Decreased)			Variance			2015		2014		(Decreased)		Variance

Revenue	$	109.5	$	118.2	$	(8.7	)		-7.4	%	$	346.3	$	342.6	$	3.7		1.1	%

Revenue

The decrease in revenue for the three months ended June 27, 2015 was primarily driven by slower backlog conversion as a result of engineering resource constraints and longer lead times required for engineering to design complex solutions for custom products as well as the unfavorable impact of currency translation. Excluding the impact of currency translation, revenue decreased by 3.0% for the three months ended June 27, 2015 compared to the three months ended June 28, 2014.

The increase in revenue for the nine months ended June 27, 2015 was primarily a result of strong engineer-to-order revenue converted from a higher beginning of period backlog, as well as factory through put driven by productivity improvements, partially offset by the unfavorable impact of currency translation. Excluding the impact of currency translation, revenue increased by 5.5% for the nine months ended June 27, 2015 compared to the nine months ended June 28, 2014.

Table of Contents


	Three Months Ended												Nine Months Ended
	June 27, 2015			June 28, 2014			Increased/ (Decreased)			% Variance			June 27, 2015			June 28, 2014			Increased/ (Decreased)		% Variance

Gross profit	$	39.8		$	42.8		$	(3.0	)		-7.0	%	$	126.4		$	124.7		$	1.7		1.4	%
Gross margin		36.3	%		36.2	%								36.5	%		36.4	%

Gross Profit

The decline in gross profit for the three months ended June 27, 2015 compared to the three months ended June 28, 2014 was a result of lower revenue on a constant currency basis and the unfavorable impact of currency translation. The previously mentioned severance and related costs of $0.6 million unfavorably impacted gross profit as a percentage of revenue by 0.4 percentage points for the three months ended June 28, 2014. Excluding these costs, the gross margin rate decreased 0.3 percentage points primarily as a result of unfavorable product mix resulting from a higher content of custom projects.

The increase in gross profit for the nine months ended June 27, 2015 compared to the nine months ended June 28, 2014 was a result of higher revenue and a slight increase in the gross margin rate. The previously mentioned severance and related costs of $3.5 million unfavorably impacted gross profit as a percentage of revenue by 1.0 percentage points for the nine months ended June 28, 2014. Excluding these costs, the gross margin rate decreased 0.9 percentage points primarily as a result of an unfavorable product mix resulting from a higher content of custom projects.


	Three Months Ended												Nine Months Ended
	June 27,			June 28,			Increased/			%			June 27,			June 28,			Increased/			%
	2015			2014			(Decreased)			Variance			2015			2014			(Decreased)			Variance

Selling and marketing	$	16.2		$	17.8		$	(1.6	)		-9.0	%	$	48.3		$	51.8		$	(3.5	)		-6.8	%
% of Revenue		14.8	%		15.1	%								13.9	%		15.1	%

Selling and Marketing Expense

The decrease for the three months ended June 27, 2015 was driven by an estimated $1.0 million favorable impact of currency translation, $0.8 million in lower external commissions due to revenue timing, and severance and related costs of $0.8 million in the three months ended June 28, 2014, partially offset by merit increases, increased headcount and the timing of selling activities to drive future revenue growth.

The decrease for the nine months ended June 27, 2015 was driven by an estimated $2.4 million favorable impact of currency translation, severance and related costs of $1.8 million in the nine months ended June 28, 2014 and $1.3 million in lower external commissions due to revenue timing, partially offset by merit increases and the timing of selling activities to drive future revenue growth.

Table of Contents


	Three Months Ended											Nine Months Ended
	June 27,			June 28,			Increased/		%			June 27,			June 28,			Increased/		%
	2015			2014			(Decreased)		Variance			2015			2014			(Decreased)		Variance

General administrative	$	9.1		$	8.7		$	0.4		4.6	%	$	30.4		$	29.8		$	0.6		2.0	%
% of Revenue		8.3	%		7.4	%							8.8	%		8.7	%

General and Administrative Expense

The increase in general and administrative expense for the three months ended June 27, 2015 was driven by $0.3 million related to the full quarterly expense in relation to the REI business that was acquired late in the third quarter of fiscal year 2014, $0.3 million for increased bad debt expense, partially offset by an estimated $0.3 million favorable impact of currency translation for the three months ended June 28, 2014.

The decrease in general and administrative expense for the nine months ended June 27, 2015 was driven by $1.0 million related to the full nine month expense in relation to the REI business, $1.0 million in increased costs related to professional fees, contract labor, consulting and audit fees and $0.4 million of increased bad debt expense. These increases were partially offset by $1.0 million of severance and related costs in the nine months ended June 28, 2014 and an estimated $0.6 million favorable impact of currency translation.


	Three Months Ended												Nine Months Ended
	June 27,			June 28,			Increased/			%			June 27,			June 28,			Increased/			%
	2015			2014			(Decreased)			Variance			2015			2014			(Decreased)			Variance

Research and development	$	4.4		$	4.5		$	(0.1	)		-2.2	%	$	12.4		$	13.8		$	(1.4	)		-10.1	%
% of Revenue		4.0	%		3.8	%								3.6	%		4.0	%

Research and Development Expense

The decrease in research and development expense for the three months ended June 27, 2015 compared to the three months ended June 28, 2014 was primarily driven by research and development costs expended in the development of software that was capitalized to other intangible assets, net in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, partially offset by a planned increase in spending.

The decrease in research and development expense for the nine months ended June 27, 2015 compared to the nine months ended June 28, 2014 was primarily driven by research and development costs expended in the development of software that was capitalized to other intangible assets, net in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Table of Contents


	Three Months Ended												Nine Months Ended
	June 27,			June 28,			Increased/			%			June 27,			June 28,			Increased/		%
	2015			2014			(Decreased)			Variance			2015			2014			(Decreased)		Variance

Income from operations	$	10.1		$	11.8		$	(1.7	)		-14.4	%	$	35.3		$	29.3		$	6.0		20.5	%
% of Revenue		9.2	%		10.0	%								10.2	%		8.6	%

Income from Operations

The increase in income from operations for the nine months ended June 27, 2015 compared to income from operations for the nine months ended June 28, 2014, was driven by increased gross profit and decreased operating expenses. Excluding the previously mentioned severance and related costs of $6.3 million, Income from operations decreased 1.1%.

Sensors Segment

Orders and Backlog

The following is a comparison of Sensors orders for the three and nine months ended June 27, 2015 and June 28, 2014, separately identifying the estimated impact of currency translation (in millions):


	Three							Three		Nine							Nine
	Months							Months		Months							Months
	Ended		Estimated					Ended		Ended		Estimated					Ended
	June 27,		Business		Currency			June 28,		June 27,		Business		Currency			June 28,
	2015		Change		Translation			2014		2015		Change		Translation			2014
Orders	$	26.5	$	3.5	$	(3.8	)	$	26.8	$	74.8	$	2.2	$	(8.8	)	$	81.4

Orders

Orders for the three months ended June 27, 2015 were $26.5 million, a decrease of $0.3, or 1.1%, compared to $26.8 million for the three months ended June 28, 2014. Orders in the industrial and mobile hydraulic markets were down 1.0% and 1.9%, respectively, driven by the unfavorable impact of currency translation. Excluding the impact of currency translation, orders increased 13.1% for the same period. Sensors accounted for 17.2% of total Company orders, compared to 17.9% for the three months ended June 28, 2014.

Orders for the nine months ended June 27, 2015 were $74.8 million, a decrease of $6.6 million, or 8.1%, compared to $81.4 million for the nine months ended June 28, 2014. Orders in the industrial and mobile hydraulic markets were down 7.9% and 9.0%, respectively, driven by the unfavorable impact of currency translation and timing of blanket order renewals. Excluding the impact of currency translation, orders increased 2.7%. Sensors accounted for 16.7% of total Company orders, compared to 18.0% for the nine months ended June 28, 2014.

Backlog

Backlog of undelivered orders as of June 27, 2015 was $15.5 million, a decrease of 14.4% compared to backlog of $18.1 million as of June 28, 2014.

Table of Contents

Results of Operations

The following is a comparison of Sensors results of operations for the three and nine months ended June 27, 2015 and June 28, 2014, separately identifying the estimated impact of currency translation (in millions):


	Three									Three			Nine								Nine
	Months									Months			Months								Months
	Ended			Estimated						Ended			Ended			Estimated					Ended
	June 27,			Business			Currency			June 28,			June 27,			Business		Currency			June 28,
	2015			Change			Translation			2014			2015			Change		Translation			2014

Revenue	$	24.4		$	0.8		$	(3.7	)	$	27.3		$	74.2		$	4.2	$	(8.6	)	$	78.6
Cost of sales		11.0			0.4			(1.8	)		12.4			34.0			2.6		(4.1	)		35.5
Gross profit		13.4			0.4			(1.9	)		14.9			40.2			1.6		(4.5	)		43.1
		54.9	%								54.7	%		54.2	%							54.8	%
Operating expenses:
Selling and marketing		4.3			0.1			(0.6	)		4.8			13.7			0.5		(1.5	)		14.7
General administrative		2.4			—			(0.3	)		2.7			8.1			0.3		(1.0	)		8.8
Research and development		1.4			(0.2	)		(0.2	)		1.8			4.7			0.1		(0.4	)		5.0
Total operating expenses		8.1			(0.1	)		(1.1	)		9.3			26.5			0.9		(2.9	)		28.5

Income from operations	$	5.3		$	0.5		$	(0.8	)	$	5.6		$	13.7		$	0.7	$	(1.6	)	$	14.6


	Three Months Ended										Nine Months Ended
	June 27,		June 28,		Increased/			%			June 27,		June 28,		Increased/			%
	2015		2014		(Decreased)			Variance			2015		2014		(Decreased)			Variance

Revenue	$	24.4	$	27.3	$	(2.9	)		-10.6	%	$	74.2	$	78.6	$	(4.4	)		-5.6	%

Revenue

The decrease in revenue for the three and nine months ended June 27, 2015 was primarily driven by the negative impact of currency translation. Excluding the impact of currency translation, Sensors revenue was up 2.9% and 5.3% for the three and nine months ended June 27, 2015, respectively. These increases were a result of a higher beginning of period backlog for the three and nine months ended June 27, 2015.

Table of Contents


	Three Months Ended												Nine Months Ended
	June 27, 2015			June 28, 2014			Increased/ (Decreased)			% Variance			June 27, 2015			June 28, 2014			Increased/ (Decreased)			% Variance

Gross profit	$	13.4		$	14.9		$	(1.5	)		-10.1	%	$	40.2		$	43.1		$	(2.9	)		-6.7	%
Gross margin		54.9	%		54.7	%								54.2	%		54.8	%

Gross Profit

The decrease in gross profit for the three months ended June 27, 2015 was primarily a result of the unfavorable impact of currency translation.

The decrease in gross profit for the nine months ended June 27, 2015 was primarily a result of the unfavorable impact of currency translation and a lower gross margin rate. The lower gross margin rate was primarily driven by an unfavorable product mix resulting from sales improvement in certain industrial and mobile hydraulic markets that have a lower margin rate.


	Three Months Ended												Nine Months Ended
	June 27, 2015			June 28, 2014			Increased/ (Decreased)			% Variance			June 27, 2015			June 28, 2014			Increased/ (Decreased)			% Variance

Selling and marketing	$	4.3		$	4.8		$	(0.5	)		-10.4	%	$	13.7		$	14.7		$	(1.0	)		-6.8	%
% of Revenue		17.6	%		17.6	%								18.5	%		18.7	%

Selling and Marketing Expense

The decrease in selling and marketing expense for both the three and nine months ended June 27, 2015 was primarily driven by the favorable impact of currency translation, partially offset by higher compensation and benefits resulting from increased headcount to support future revenue growth.


	Three Months Ended												Nine Months Ended
	June 27, 2015			June 28, 2014			Increased/ (Decreased)			% Variance			June 27, 2015			June 28, 2014			Increased/ (Decreased)			% Variance

General administrative	$	2.4		$	2.7		$	(0.3	)		-11.1	%	$	8.1		$	8.8		$	(0.7	)		-8.0	%
% of Revenue		9.8	%		9.9	%								10.9	%		11.2	%

General and Administrative Expense

The decrease in general and administrative expense for the three months ended June 27, 2015 was primarily driven by an estimated $0.3 million favorable impact of currency translation.

The decrease in general and administrative expense for the nine months ended June 27, 2015 was primarily driven by an estimated $1.0 million favorable impact of currency translation. This decrease was partially offset by $0.1 million increased bad debt expense.

Table of Contents


	Three Months Ended												Nine Months Ended
	June 27, 2015			June 28, 2014			Increased/ (Decreased)			% Variance			June 27, 2015			June 28, 2014			Increased/ (Decreased)			% Variance

Research and development	$	1.4		$	1.8		$	(0.4	)		-22.2	%	$	4.7		$	5.0		$	(0.3	)		-6.0	%
% of Revenue		5.7	%		6.6	%								6.3	%		6.4	%

Research and Development Expense

The decrease in research and development expense for the three months ended June 27, 2015 was primarily driven by favorable currency translation and $0.1 million in decreased variable compensation expense.

The decrease in research and development expense for the nine months ended June 27, 2015 was primarily driven by the favorable impact of currency translation and $0.2 million in decreased variable compensation, partially offset by higher compensation and benefits resulting from increased headcount.


	Three Months Ended												Nine Months Ended
	June 27, 2015			June 28, 2014			Increased/ (Decreased)			% Variance			June 27, 2015			June 28, 2014			Increased/ (Decreased)			% Variance

Income from operations	$	5.3		$	5.6		$	(0.3	)		-5.4	%	$	13.7		$	14.6		$	(0.9	)		-6.2	%
% of Revenue		21.7	%		20.5	%								18.5	%		18.6	%

Income from Operations

The decrease in income from operations for both the three and nine months ended June 27, 2015 compared to income from operations for the three and nine months ended June 28, 2014, was driven by decreased gross profit, partially offset by decreased operating expenses.

Capital Resources and Liquidity

We had cash and cash equivalents of $53.3 million as of June 27, 2015. Of this amount, $8.1 million was located in North America, $23.6 million in Europe, and $21.6 million in Asia. Of the $45.2 million of cash located outside of the U.S., approximately $23.5 million is not available for use in the U.S. without the incurrence of U.S. federal and state income tax. We believe our cash and cash equivalents, anticipated cash from operations and current and anticipated financing arrangements will be sufficient to meet our liquidity requirements through at least the next 12 months.

The North American balance was primarily invested in bank deposits. In Europe and Asia, the balances were primarily invested in money market funds and bank deposits. In accordance with our investment policy, we place cash equivalent investments with issuers who have high-quality investment credit ratings. In addition, we limit the amount of investment exposure we have with any particular issuer. Our investment objectives are to preserve principal, maintain liquidity, and achieve the best available return consistent with our primary objectives of safety and liquidity. As of June 27, 2015, we held no short-term investments.

Total cash and cash equivalents decreased $7.1 million for the nine months ended June 27, 2015, primarily due to the repayment of short-term borrowings, purchases of our common stock, investment in property and equipment and dividend payments, partially offset by earnings and decreased working capital requirements. Total cash and cash equivalents increased $8.3 million for the nine months ended June 28, 2014, primarily due to earnings and proceeds received from short-term borrowings, partially offset by the acquisition of REI, purchases of our common stock, investment in property and equipment, dividend payments, and increased working capital requirements.

Table of Contents

Cash flows from operating activities provided cash totaling $71.9 million for the nine months ended June 27, 2015, compared to cash provided of $49.0 million for the nine months ended June 28, 2014. Cash provided for the nine months ended June 27, 2015 was primarily due to earnings, $9.0 million in decreased accounts and unbilled receivables resulting from general timing of billing and collections, $6.8 million in increased advance payments received from customers driven by the mix of orders in the quarter, and $1.9 million in increased accounts payable resulting from general timing of purchases and payments, partially offset by $9.5 million in increased inventories to support future revenue.

Cash provided for the nine months ended June 28, 2014 was primarily due to earnings and $5.1 million increased advanced payments received from customers driven by the mix of orders in the quarter, partially offset by $5.1 million decreased accounts payable resulting from general timing of purchases and payments, $2.7 million in increased inventories to support future revenue and $0.7 million in increased accounts and unbilled receivables resulting from general timing of billing and collections.

Cash flows from investing activities required the use of cash totaling $12.7 million for the nine months ended June 27, 2015 which reflects investments in property and equipment, compared to use of cash totaling $30.7 million for the nine months ended June 28, 2014, which reflects $16.0 million investment in property and equipment and $14.7 million in payments associated with the purchase of REI.

Cash flows from financing activities used cash totaling $61.8 million for the nine months ended June 27, 2015, compared to the cash used totaling $10.3 million for the nine months ended June 28, 2014. The cash used for the nine months ended June 27, 2015 was primarily due to the use of $28.9 million to purchase 400,000 shares of our common stock under our share purchase program and approximately 9,000 shares related to stock-based compensation arrangements, $23.8 million net repayments of short-term borrowings, as well as dividend payments of $13.6 million, partially offset by $3.9 million received in connection with stock option exercises. The cash used for the nine months ended June 28, 2014 was primarily due to the use of $30.8 million to purchase approximately 450,000 shares of our common stock, as well as dividend payments of $13.7 million, partially offset by $30.0 million proceeds from short-term borrowings, and $3.6 million received in connection with stock option exercises.

Under the terms of our borrowing agreements, we have agreed to certain financial covenants. As of June 27, 2015, we were in compliance with the terms and conditions of those financial covenants.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of June 27, 2015, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements, as such term is defined in rules promulgated by the SEC, that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to investors.

Critical Accounting Policies

The Consolidated Financial Statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP, which requires us to make estimates and assumptions in certain circumstances that affect amounts reported. In preparing these financial statements, we have made our best estimates and judgments of certain amounts, giving due consideration to materiality. For further information see “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” under Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 27, 2014.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

For further information see Note 2 of the Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements herein.

Other Matters

Our dividend policy is to maintain a payout ratio that allows dividends to increase with the long-term growth of earnings per share, while sustaining dividends through economic cycles. Our dividend practice is to target over time a payout ratio of approximately 25% of net earnings per share.

Table of Contents

Forward-Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains “forward-looking statements” regarding financial projections made pursuant to the safe harbor provision of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, as well as assumptions, that could cause actual results to differ materially from historical results and those presently anticipated or projected. Words such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expects,” “intends,” “projects,” “plans,” “believes,” “estimates,” “targets,” “anticipates,” and similar expressions are used to identify these forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ from those discussed in the forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, those factors described in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” of our 2014 Form 10-K. Such important factors include:

●

We may not achieve our growth plans for the expansion of our business because our long-term success depends on our ability to expand our business through new product development, mergers and acquisitions, geographic expansion, and service offerings, all of which are subject to inherent risks including, but not limited to: market demand; market acceptance of products; and the Company’s ability to advance its technology

●	The changes we are making in our Test segment processes and operating systems may not deliver the results we require for growth of the business

●	Our business operations may be affected by government contracting risks

●

Our business is significantly international in scope, which poses multiple risks including, but not limited to: currency value fluctuations; difficulty enforcing agreements and collecting receivables; trade protection measures and import and export matters; tax rates in certain foreign countries that exceed those in the U.S. and the imposition of withholding requirements on foreign earnings; higher danger of terrorist activity; imposition of tariffs, exchange controls and other restrictions; difficulty in staffing and managing global operations; compliance with a variety of foreign laws and regulations; and changes in general economic and political conditions where we operate, particularly in emerging markets

●	We may be required to recognize impairment charges for long-lived assets

●	Volatility in the global economy and foreign currency could adversely affect results

●	Our business is subject to strong competition

●	We are subject to risks because we design and manufacture first-of-kind products

●	We may experience difficulties obtaining the services of skilled employees

●	We may fail to protect our intellectual property effectively, or may infringe upon the intellectual property of others

●	Our business could be adversely affected by product liability claims and commercial litigation

●	We may experience difficulty obtaining materials or components for our products, or the cost of materials or components may increase

●	Government regulation imposes significant costs and other constraints

●	The backlog, sales, delivery and acceptance cycle for many of our products is irregular and may not develop as anticipated

●	Our customers are in cyclical industries and a downturn in those industries could adversely affect results

●	We have been required to conduct a good faith reasonable country of origin analysis and due diligence on our use of “conflict materials,” which has imposed and may impose additional costs on us and could raise reputational and other risks

●	Interest rate fluctuations could adversely affect results

The performance of our business and our securities may be adversely affected by these factors and by other factors common to other businesses and investments, or to the general economy. Forward-looking statements are qualified by some or all of these risk factors. Therefore, you should consider these risks with caution and form your own critical and independent conclusions about the likely effect of these risks on our future performance. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which such statements are made, and we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which such statement is made to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events or circumstances. Readers should carefully review the disclosures and the risk factors described in this and other documents we file from time to time with the SEC, including our reports on Forms 10-Q and Forms 8-K.

Table of Contents

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Our investment portfolio as of June 27, 2015 included $53.3 million of cash and cash equivalents. The cash equivalent portion of our investment portfolio is invested in money market funds and bank deposits. A hypothetical 1.0 percentage point increase or decrease in market interest rates would have caused interest income to increase or decrease by $0.5 million for the nine months ended June 27, 2015.

We are exposed to market risk from changes in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates. We manage exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates through our regular operating and financing activities and through the use of foreign currency exchange contracts. These contracts are used to manage our overall exposure to exchange rate fluctuations, as the gains and losses on these contracts are intended to offset gains and losses on our assets, liabilities, and cash flows.

A hypothetical 10% appreciation or depreciation in foreign currencies against the U.S. dollar, assuming all other variables were held constant, would have resulted in an estimated increase or decrease of $16.2 million in revenue for the nine months ended June 27, 2015.

As of June 27, 2015, our short-term borrowings outstanding consisted of $36.2 million utilization of the revolving credit facility. This utilization of the credit facility involves interest payments calculated at a floating rate and, therefore, is impacted by the effect of increases or decreases in market interest rates. Because we anticipate the borrowing to be outstanding for only a short period of time, we have elected not to mitigate this risk. A hypothetical 1.0 percentage point increase or decrease in interest rates, assuming all other variables were held constant, would have resulted in an estimated increase or decrease of $0.5 million in interest expense for the nine months ended June 27, 2015.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, have conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)). Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of June 27, 2015, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

There were no changes that occurred during the three months ended June 27, 2015 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

Investigative Matters (Government Investigation)

As previously reported by the Company with disclosures starting in March 2012, the Company investigated certain gift, travel, entertainment and other expenses incurred in connection with some of the Company operations in the Asia-Pacific region. This investigation focused on possible violations of Company policy, corresponding internal control issues and possible violations of applicable law, including the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Substantial investigative work was completed on this matter and the Company took remedial actions, including changes to internal control procedures and removing certain persons formerly employed in the Company’s Korea office. The Company voluntarily disclosed this matter to the Department of Justice and the SEC (the “Agencies”). The Company presented the results of the Company’s investigation and the Company’s corrective actions to representatives of the Agencies on January 16, 2013. The Company also investigated certain business practices in China. The investigation had a similar focus to the prior investigation described above. The Company has updated the Agencies regarding the China investigation and took remedial actions, including changes to internal control procedures and removing certain persons formerly employed by the Company in the China business. The Company cannot predict the outcome of the matters described in this paragraph at this time or whether these matters will have a material adverse impact on the Company’s business prospects, financial condition, operating results or cash flows.

Table of Contents

Litigation

The Company is subject to various claims, legal actions, and complaints arising in the ordinary course of business. Management believes the final resolution of legal matters outstanding as of June 27, 2015 will not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position or results of operations of the Company. The Company expenses legal costs as incurred.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Purchases of Company Equity Securities:


Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased		Average Price Paid per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs		Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
March 29, 2015 -
May 2, 2015		32,018	$	75.27		32,018		731,162
May 3, 2015 -
May 30, 2015		—	$	—		—		731,162
May 31, 2015 -
June 27, 2015		—	$	—		—		731,162

Total		32,018	$	72.54		32,018

We purchase our common stock to mitigate dilution related to new shares created by employee equity compensation such as stock option, restricted stock, restricted stock units, and employee stock purchase plan awards, as well as to return excess capital to shareholders.

During the three months ended June 27, 2015, our share purchases were executed under a 2.0 million share purchase authorization approved by our Board of Directors and announced on February 11, 2011. Authority over pricing and timing under the authorization has been delegated to management. The share purchase authorization has no expiration date.

Table of Contents

Item 6. Exhibits


Exhibit Number	Description

31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).

31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).

32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) (furnished herewith).

32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) (furnished herewith).

101.INS **		XBRL Instance Document (furnished herewith).

101.SCH **		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document (furnished herewith).

101.CAL **		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document (furnished herewith).

101.DEF **		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document (furnished herewith).

101.LAB **		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document (furnished herewith).

101.PRE **		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document (furnished herewith).

** XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) information is furnished and not filed or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


	MTS SYSTEMS CORPORATION

Dated: August 3, 2015	/s/ JEFFREY A. GRAVES
	Jeffrey A. Graves
	President and Chief Executive Officer
	(Principal Executive Officer)

Dated: August 3, 2015	/s/ JEFFREY P. OLDENKAMP
	Jeffrey P. Oldenkamp
	Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
	(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)