XML 61 R11.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Goodwill, Customer Relationships and Other Intangible Assets
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2013
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]  
Goodwill, Customer Relationships and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill, Customer Relationships and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill, customer relationships and other intangible assets consisted of the following:
 
 
 
Successor
 
Weighted
Average of
Remaining Lives
 
December 31, 2013
 
December 31, 2012
 
 
 
(Dollars in millions)
Goodwill
N/A
 
$
9,354

 
9,354

Customer relationships, less accumulated amortization of $2,012 and $1,320
7.3 years
 
3,687

 
4,379

Other intangible assets subject to amortization Capitalized software, less accumulated amortization of $994 and $704
3.0 years
 
1,008

 
1,212


As of the successor date of December 31, 2013, the gross carrying amounts of goodwill, customer relationships and other intangible assets were $17.055 billion.
Total amortization expense for intangible assets was as follows:
 
Successor
 
 
Predecessor
 
Year Ended December 31, 2013
 
Year Ended December 31, 2012
 
Nine Months Ended December 31, 2011
 
 
Three Months Ended March 31,
2011
 
(Dollars in millions)
Amortization expense for intangible assets
$
1,029

 
1,115

 
952

 
 
58


We amortize customer relationships primarily over an estimated life of ten years, using either the sum-of-the-years-digits or the straight-line methods, depending on the type of customer. We amortize capitalized software using the straight-line method over estimated lives ranging up to seven years. The estimated future amortization expense for intangible assets is as follows:
 
(Dollars in millions)
Year ending December 31,
 
2014
$
894

2015
821

2016
743

2017
667

2018
581

2019 and thereafter
989


We annually review the estimated lives and methods used to amortize our other intangible assets. The actual amounts of amortization expense may differ materially from our estimates, depending on the results of our annual reviews.
We have accounted for CenturyLink's acquisition of us under the acquisition method of accounting, which resulted in the assignment of the aggregate consideration to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their acquisition date fair values. The fair value of the aggregate consideration transferred exceeded the acquisition date fair value of the recorded tangible and intangible assets, and assumed liabilities by $9.354 billion, which has been recognized as goodwill. The impairment assessment is done at the reporting unit level; in reviewing the criteria for reporting units when assigning the goodwill resulting from our acquisition by CenturyLink, we have determined that we are one reporting unit. We are required to assess goodwill recorded in business combinations for impairment at least annually, or more frequently, if events or circumstances indicate there may be impairment. Our annual goodwill impairment assessment date was September 30. We are required to write-down the value of goodwill only in periods in which the recorded amount of goodwill exceeds the fair value.
We compare Qwest’s estimated fair value to the carrying value of equity. If the estimated fair value of Qwest is greater than the carrying value, we conclude that no impairment exists. If the estimated fair value of Qwest is less than the carrying value, a second calculation is required in which the implied fair value of goodwill is compared to the carrying value of goodwill. If the implied fair value of goodwill is less than its carrying value of goodwill, goodwill must be written down to its implied fair value.
At September 30, 2013, as a result of changes in our forecasted cash flows since our previous quantitative assessment, we did not have a baseline valuation upon which to perform a qualitative assessment. Therefore, we estimated the fair value of Qwest by considering both a market approach method and a discounted cash flow method, which resulted in a Level 3 fair value measurement. The market approach method includes the use of comparable multiples of publicly traded companies whose services are comparable to ours. The discounted cash flow method is based on the present value of projected cash flows and a terminal value, which represents the expected normalized cash flows beyond the cash flows from the discrete projection period. We discounted the estimated cash flows using a rate that represents a market participant's weighted average cost of capital, which we determined to be approximately 6.0% as of the assessment date (which was comprised of an after-tax cost of debt of 3.4% and a cost of equity of 8.3%). Based on our assessment performed with respect to our reporting unit described above, we concluded that our goodwill was not impaired.