10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the period ended September 27, 2008
|
|
|
or
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
Commission file
number: 1-7221
MOTOROLA, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
DELAWARE
|
|
36-1115800
|
(State of
Incorporation)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification
No.)
|
|
|
|
1303 E. Algonquin Road
Schaumburg, Illinois
|
|
60196
|
(Address of principal
executive offices)
|
|
(Zip
Code)
|
Registrant’s telephone
number, including area code:
(847) 576-5000
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
“large accelerated filer”, “accelerated
filer” and “smaller reporting company” in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
Large accelerated
filer þ
|
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
Non-accelerated
filer o (Do
not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller reporting
company o
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
The number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s
classes of common stock as of the close of business on
September 27, 2008:
|
|
|
Class
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
Common Stock; $3 Par Value
|
|
2,266,343,683
|
Part I—Financial
Information
Motorola,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
(In millions, except per share
amounts)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
7,480
|
|
|
$
|
8,811
|
|
|
$
|
23,010
|
|
|
$
|
26,976
|
|
Costs of sales
|
|
|
5,677
|
|
|
|
6,306
|
|
|
|
16,737
|
|
|
|
19,564
|
|
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
1,803
|
|
|
|
2,505
|
|
|
|
6,273
|
|
|
|
7,412
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
1,044
|
|
|
|
1,210
|
|
|
|
3,342
|
|
|
|
3,819
|
|
Research and development expenditures
|
|
|
999
|
|
|
|
1,100
|
|
|
|
3,101
|
|
|
|
3,332
|
|
Other charges
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
546
|
|
|
|
795
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(452
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(716
|
)
|
|
|
(534
|
)
|
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income, net
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
Gains on sales of investments and businesses, net
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(173
|
)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(267
|
)
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense)
|
|
|
(148
|
)
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
(196
|
)
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
(600
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(912
|
)
|
|
|
(423
|
)
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
(203
|
)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(325
|
)
|
|
|
(207
|
)
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
(397
|
)
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
(587
|
)
|
|
|
(216
|
)
|
Earnings from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss)
|
|
$
|
(397
|
)
|
|
$
|
60
|
|
|
$
|
(587
|
)
|
|
$
|
(149
|
)
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(0.18
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
$
|
(0.26
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.18
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|
$
|
(0.26
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(0.18
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
$
|
(0.26
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.18
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|
$
|
(0.26
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
2,265.9
|
|
|
|
2,290.2
|
|
|
|
2,262.1
|
|
|
|
2,322.7
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
2,265.9
|
|
|
|
2,318.4
|
|
|
|
2,262.1
|
|
|
|
2,322.7
|
|
Dividends paid per share
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial
statements (unaudited).
1
Motorola,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
(In millions, except per share
amounts)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
2,974
|
|
|
$
|
2,752
|
|
Sigma Fund
|
|
|
3,427
|
|
|
|
5,242
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
735
|
|
|
|
612
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
4,330
|
|
|
|
5,324
|
|
Inventories, net
|
|
|
2,649
|
|
|
|
2,836
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
1,954
|
|
|
|
1,891
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
3,799
|
|
|
|
3,565
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
19,868
|
|
|
|
22,222
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
2,505
|
|
|
|
2,480
|
|
Sigma Fund
|
|
|
483
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
715
|
|
|
|
837
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
3,060
|
|
|
|
2,454
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
4,351
|
|
|
|
4,499
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
2,137
|
|
|
|
2,320
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
33,119
|
|
|
$
|
34,812
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
Notes payable and current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
189
|
|
|
$
|
332
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
3,834
|
|
|
|
4,167
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
7,850
|
|
|
|
8,001
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
11,873
|
|
|
|
12,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
3,988
|
|
|
|
3,991
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
2,599
|
|
|
|
2,874
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders’ Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $100 par value
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Common stock, $3 par value
|
|
|
6,800
|
|
|
|
6,792
|
|
Issued shares: 09/27/08—2,266.8; 12/31/07—2,264.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding shares: 09/27/08—2,266.3; 12/31/07—2,263.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
926
|
|
|
|
782
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
7,649
|
|
|
|
8,579
|
|
Non-owner changes to equity
|
|
|
(716
|
)
|
|
|
(706
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders’ equity
|
|
|
14,659
|
|
|
|
15,447
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
|
$
|
33,119
|
|
|
$
|
34,812
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial
statements (unaudited).
2
Motorola,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Owner Changes to Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Adjustment
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock and
|
|
|
to Available
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
Retirement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
for Sale
|
|
|
Translation
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
Securities,
|
|
|
Adjustments,
|
|
|
Adjustments,
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
(In millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Net of Tax
|
|
|
Net of Tax
|
|
|
Net of Tax
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at December 31, 2007 (as reported)
|
|
|
2,264.0
|
|
|
$
|
7,574
|
|
|
$
|
(59
|
)
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
(663
|
)
|
|
$
|
8,579
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect — Postretirement Insurance Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at January 1, 2008
|
|
|
2,264.0
|
|
|
|
7,574
|
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
(704
|
)
|
|
|
8,575
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(587
|
)
|
|
$
|
(587
|
)
|
Net unrealized loss on securities (net of
tax of $19)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments (net of tax of $5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Amortization of retirement benefit adjustments (net of tax of
$16)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
Issuance of common stock and stock options exercised
|
|
|
11.8
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share repurchase program
|
|
|
(9.0
|
)
|
|
|
(138
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock option and employee stock purchase plan expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared ($0.15 per share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(339
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at September 27, 2008
|
|
|
2,266.8
|
|
|
$
|
7,726
|
|
|
$
|
(91
|
)
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
$
|
(652
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,649
|
|
|
$
|
(556
|
)
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial
statements (unaudited).
3
Motorola,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(587
|
)
|
|
$
|
(149
|
)
|
Less: Earnings from discontinued operations
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
(587
|
)
|
|
|
(216
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile the loss from continuing operations to
net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
624
|
|
|
|
682
|
|
Non-cash other charges
|
|
|
596
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
237
|
|
Gains on sales of investments and businesses, net
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(497
|
)
|
|
|
(552
|
)
|
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects of
acquisitions and dispositions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
1,044
|
|
|
|
2,754
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
456
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
(194
|
)
|
|
|
(367
|
)
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
(524
|
)
|
|
|
(3,108
|
)
|
Other assets and liabilities
|
|
|
(530
|
)
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities from continuing
operations
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
315
|
|
|
|
Investing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions and investments, net
|
|
|
(180
|
)
|
|
|
(4,483
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of investments and businesses
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
Distributions from investments
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(387
|
)
|
|
|
(393
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
Proceeds from sales of Sigma Fund investments, net
|
|
|
1,122
|
|
|
|
7,154
|
|
Purchases of short-term investments, net
|
|
|
(123
|
)
|
|
|
(443
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by investing activities from continuing
operations
|
|
|
748
|
|
|
|
2,033
|
|
|
|
Financing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of commercial paper and short-term borrowings
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
(162
|
)
|
Repayment of debt
|
|
|
(114
|
)
|
|
|
(167
|
)
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
289
|
|
Purchase of common stock
|
|
|
(138
|
)
|
|
|
(2,478
|
)
|
Payment of dividends
|
|
|
(340
|
)
|
|
|
(354
|
)
|
Distribution to discontinued operations
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used for financing activities from continuing operations
|
|
|
(568
|
)
|
|
|
(2,909
|
)
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
from continuing operations
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
222
|
|
|
|
(501
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
2,752
|
|
|
|
2,816
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
$
|
2,974
|
|
|
$
|
2,315
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest, net
|
|
$
|
147
|
|
|
$
|
203
|
|
Income taxes, net of refunds
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
|
363
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial
statements (unaudited).
4
Motorola,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in millions, except as noted)
1. Basis
of Presentation
The condensed consolidated financial statements as of
September 27, 2008 and for the three and nine months ended
September 27, 2008 and September 29, 2007, include, in
the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal
recurring adjustments and reclassifications) necessary to
present fairly the Company’s consolidated financial
position, results of operations and cash flows for all periods
presented.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included
in financial statements prepared in accordance with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
(“U.S. GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted.
These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read
in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and
notes thereto included in the Company’s
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2007. The results of
operations for the three and nine months ended
September 27, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of the
operating results to be expected for the full year. Certain
amounts in prior period financial statements and related notes
have been reclassified to conform to the 2008 presentation.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
U.S. GAAP requires management to make certain estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts
of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual
results could differ from those estimates.
2. Other
Financial Data
Statements
of Operations Information
Other
Charges
Other charges included in Operating loss consist of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Other charges (income):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset impairments
|
|
$
|
128
|
|
|
$
|
57
|
|
|
$
|
128
|
|
|
$
|
57
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
244
|
|
|
|
281
|
|
Reorganization of businesses
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
221
|
|
Separation-related transaction costs
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Gain on sale of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
Legal settlements
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
In-process research and development charges
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
212
|
|
|
$
|
205
|
|
|
$
|
546
|
|
|
$
|
795
|
|
|
|
5
Other
Income (Expense)
Interest income (expense), net, and Other both included in Other
income (expense) consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income, net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
70
|
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
210
|
|
|
$
|
348
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
|
(93
|
)
|
|
|
(204
|
)
|
|
|
(268
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment impairments
|
|
$
|
(150
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5
|
)
|
|
$
|
(288
|
)
|
|
$
|
(36
|
)
|
Foreign currency gain (loss)
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
68
|
|
Gain on interest rate swaps
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(173
|
)
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
(267
|
)
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
|
During the three months ended September 27, 2008, the
Company recorded investment impairment charges of
$150 million, of which $141 million of charges were
attributed to other-than-temporary declines in certain Sigma
Fund investments, resulting from our positions in Lehman
Brothers Holdings Inc., Washington Mutual, Inc. and Sigma
Finance Corporation (“SFC”), a special investment
vehicle managed by United Kingdom based Gordian Knot Limited.
During the nine months ended September 27, 2008, the
Company recorded investment impairment charges of
$288 million, of which $145 million of charges were
attributed to other-than-temporary declines in certain Sigma
Fund investments and $83 million of charges attributed to
an equity security held by the Company as a strategic
investment. During the three and nine months ended
September 29, 2007, the Company recorded investment
impairment charges of $5 million and $36 million,
respectively, representing other-than-temporary declines in the
value of its investment portfolio.
During the three months ended December 31, 2007,
concurrently with the issuance of debt, the Company entered into
several interest rate swaps to convert the fixed rate interest
cost of the debt to a floating rate. At the time of entering
into these interest rate swaps, the swaps were designated as
fair value hedges and qualified for hedge accounting treatment.
The swaps were originally designated as fair value hedges of the
underlying debt, including the Company’s credit spread.
During the three months ended March 29, 2008, the swaps
were no longer considered effective hedges because of the
volatility in the price of the Company’s fixed-rate
domestic term debt and the swaps were dedesignated. In the same
period, the Company was able to redesignate the same interest
rate swaps as fair value hedges of the underlying debt,
exclusive of the Company’s credit spread. For the period of
time that the swaps were deemed ineffective hedges, the Company
recognized a gain of $24 million, representing the increase
in the fair value of the swaps.
6
Earnings
(Loss) Per Common Share
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common share from both
continuing operations and net earnings (loss), which includes
discontinued operations is computed as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing Operations
|
|
|
Net Earnings (Loss)
|
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss)
|
|
$
|
(397
|
)
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
|
$
|
(397
|
)
|
|
$
|
60
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
2,265.9
|
|
|
|
2,290.2
|
|
|
|
2,265.9
|
|
|
|
2,290.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share amount
|
|
$
|
(0.18
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
$
|
(0.18
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss)
|
|
$
|
(397
|
)
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
|
$
|
(397
|
)
|
|
$
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
2,265.9
|
|
|
|
2,290.2
|
|
|
|
2,265.9
|
|
|
|
2,290.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add effect of dilutive securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based awards and other
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
28.2
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
28.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
2,265.9
|
|
|
|
2,318.4
|
|
|
|
2,265.9
|
|
|
|
2,318.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share amount
|
|
$
|
(0.18
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
$
|
(0.18
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing Operations
|
|
|
Net Loss
|
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Basic loss per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
$
|
(587
|
)
|
|
$
|
(216
|
)
|
|
$
|
(587
|
)
|
|
$
|
(149
|
)
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
2,262.1
|
|
|
|
2,322.7
|
|
|
|
2,262.1
|
|
|
|
2,322.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share amount
|
|
$
|
(0.26
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.26
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted loss per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
$
|
(587
|
)
|
|
$
|
(216
|
)
|
|
$
|
(587
|
)
|
|
$
|
(149
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
2,262.1
|
|
|
|
2,322.7
|
|
|
|
2,262.1
|
|
|
|
2,322.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
2,262.1
|
|
|
|
2,322.7
|
|
|
|
2,262.1
|
|
|
|
2,322.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share amount
|
|
$
|
(0.26
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.26
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
|
In the computation of diluted earnings per common share from
both continuing operations and on a net earnings basis for the
three months ended September 29, 2007, 117.9 million
out-of-the-money stock options were excluded because their
inclusion would have been antidilutive. For the three months
ended September 27, 2008 and the nine months ended
September 27, 2008 and September 29, 2007, the Company
was in a net loss position, and accordingly, the basic and
diluted weighted average shares outstanding are equal because
any increase to the basic shares would be antidilutive. In the
computation of diluted loss per common share from both
continuing operations and on a net loss basis for the three
months ended September 27, 2008 and the nine months ended
September 27, 2008 and September 29, 2007, the assumed
exercise of 209.0 million, 193.7 million, and
108.2 million stock options, respectively, were excluded
because their inclusion would have been antidilutive.
7
Balance
Sheet Information
Sigma
Fund and Investments
Sigma Fund and Investments consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recorded Value
|
|
|
Less
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sigma Fund
|
|
|
Sigma Fund
|
|
|
Short-term
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
September 27,
2008
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Non-current
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Basis
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
$
|
61
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
735
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
796
|
|
Available-for-sale securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial paper
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
Government and agencies
|
|
|
1,110
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,136
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
1,739
|
|
|
|
374
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(104
|
)
|
|
|
2,223
|
|
Asset-backed securities
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
241
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
153
|
|
Common stock and equivalents
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
281
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
306
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,427
|
|
|
|
483
|
|
|
|
735
|
|
|
|
315
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
(155
|
)
|
|
|
5,105
|
|
Other securities, at cost
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
345
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
345
|
|
Equity method investments
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,427
|
|
|
$
|
483
|
|
|
$
|
735
|
|
|
$
|
715
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
(155
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,505
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recorded Value
|
|
|
Less
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sigma Fund
|
|
|
Short-term
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
December 31,
2007
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Basis
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
589
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
745
|
|
Available-for-sales securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial paper
|
|
|
1,282
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,282
|
|
Government and agencies
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
3,125
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
3,173
|
|
Asset-backed securities
|
|
|
420
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
425
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
214
|
|
Common stock and equivalents
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
333
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
(79
|
)
|
|
|
372
|
|
Other
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,242
|
|
|
|
612
|
|
|
|
333
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
(137
|
)
|
|
|
6,283
|
|
Other securities, at cost
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
414
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
414
|
|
Equity method investments
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,242
|
|
|
$
|
612
|
|
|
$
|
837
|
|
|
$
|
41
|
|
|
$
|
(137
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,787
|
|
|
|
As of September 27, 2008, the fair market value of the
Sigma Fund was $3.9 billion, of which $3.4 billion has
been classified as current and $483 million has been
classified as non-current, compared to a fair market value of
$5.2 billion at December 31, 2007, all classified as
current. During the three and nine months ended
September 27, 2008, the Company recorded a net unrealized
loss of $26 million and $63 million, respectively, in
the available-for-sale securities held in the Sigma Fund. The
total net unrealized loss on the Sigma Fund portfolio at the end
of September 27, 2008 was $120 million, of which
$42 million relates to securities classified as current and
$78 million relates to securities classified as
non-current. As of December 31, 2007, the net unrealized
loss on the Sigma Fund portfolio was $57 million, all
classified as current. The unrealized losses have been reflected
as a reduction in Non-owner changes to equity.
As of September 27, 2008, $483 million of Sigma Fund
investments have been classified as non-current because they
have maturities greater than 12 months, the market values
are below cost and the Company plans to hold the securities
until they recover to cost or until maturity. The Company
believes this decline is temporary, primarily due to the ongoing
disruptions in the capital markets. The weighted average
maturity of the Sigma Fund investments classified as non-current
(excluding other-than-temporarily impaired securities) was
17 months. Substantially all of these securities (excluding
other-than-temporarily impaired securities) have investment
grade ratings and, accordingly, the Company believes it is
8
probable that it will be able to collect all amounts it is owed
under these securities according to their contractual terms,
which may be at maturity. If it becomes probable that the
Company will not collect the amounts in accordance with the
contractual terms of the security, the Company would consider
the decline other-than-temporary. During the three and nine
months ended September 27, 2008, the Company recorded
$141 million and $145 million, respectively, of
other-than-temporary declines in certain Sigma Fund investments
as investment impairment charges in the condensed consolidated
statements of operations.
Subsequent to September 27, 2008, there has been a further
decline in the fair value of the Sigma Fund’s SFC
securities, which the Company considers
other-than-temporary,
and will be recorded as an investment impairment in the fourth
quarter of 2008. The impairment will be no greater than
$43 million, which represents the remaining cost basis of
these securities as of September 27, 2008.
Accounts
Receivable
Accounts receivable, net, consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
$
|
4,503
|
|
|
$
|
5,508
|
|
Less allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(173
|
)
|
|
|
(184
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,330
|
|
|
$
|
5,324
|
|
|
|
Inventories
Inventories, net, consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
$
|
1,634
|
|
|
$
|
1,737
|
|
Work-in-process
and production materials
|
|
|
1,724
|
|
|
|
1,470
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,358
|
|
|
|
3,207
|
|
Less inventory reserves
|
|
|
(709
|
)
|
|
|
(371
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,649
|
|
|
$
|
2,836
|
|
|
|
During the three months ended September 27, 2008, the
Company recorded a charge of $291 million for excess
inventory due to a decision to consolidate software and silicon
platforms in the Mobile Devices segment.
Other
Current Assets
Other current assets consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and earnings in excess of billings
|
|
$
|
1,250
|
|
|
$
|
995
|
|
Contract-related deferred costs
|
|
|
979
|
|
|
|
763
|
|
Contractor receivables
|
|
|
673
|
|
|
|
960
|
|
Value-added tax refunds receivable
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
321
|
|
Other
|
|
|
649
|
|
|
|
526
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,799
|
|
|
$
|
3,565
|
|
|
|
9
Property,
Plant, and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment, net, consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
$
|
150
|
|
|
$
|
134
|
|
Building
|
|
|
1,934
|
|
|
|
1,934
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
5,811
|
|
|
|
5,745
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,895
|
|
|
|
7,813
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(5,390
|
)
|
|
|
(5,333
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,505
|
|
|
$
|
2,480
|
|
|
|
During the three months ended September 27, 2008 and
September 29, 2007, depreciation expense was
$127 million and $147 million, respectively. During
the nine months ended September 27, 2008 and
September 29, 2007, depreciation expense was
$378 million and $404 million, respectively.
Other
Assets
Other assets consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $1,022 and
$819
|
|
$
|
923
|
|
|
$
|
1,260
|
|
Prepaid royalty license arrangements
|
|
|
375
|
|
|
|
364
|
|
Contract-related deferred costs
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
Value-added tax refunds receivable
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Long-term receivables, net of allowances of $6 and $5
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
Other
|
|
|
489
|
|
|
|
448
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,137
|
|
|
$
|
2,320
|
|
|
|
Accrued
Liabilities
Accrued liabilities consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
$
|
1,621
|
|
|
$
|
1,235
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
804
|
|
|
|
772
|
|
Customer reserves
|
|
|
730
|
|
|
|
972
|
|
Customer downpayments
|
|
|
594
|
|
|
|
509
|
|
Contractor payables
|
|
|
573
|
|
|
|
875
|
|
Tax liabilities
|
|
|
386
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
Warranty reserves
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
|
416
|
|
Other
|
|
|
2,816
|
|
|
|
2,988
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,850
|
|
|
$
|
8,001
|
|
|
|
10
Other
Liabilities
Other liabilities consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized tax benefits
|
|
$
|
736
|
|
|
$
|
933
|
|
Defined benefit plan obligations
|
|
|
441
|
|
|
|
562
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
413
|
|
|
|
393
|
|
Royalty license arrangement
|
|
|
298
|
|
|
|
282
|
|
Postretirement health care benefit plans
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
Other
|
|
|
578
|
|
|
|
560
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,599
|
|
|
$
|
2,874
|
|
|
|
Stockholders’
Equity Information
Share
Repurchase Program
During the nine months ended September 27, 2008 and
September 29, 2007, the Company paid an aggregate of
$138 million and $2.5 billion, respectively, including
transaction costs, to repurchase 9 million and
138 million shares at an average price of $15.32 and
$18.02, respectively. The Company did not repurchase any of its
shares during the three months ended September 27, 2008.
During the three months ended September 29, 2007, the
Company paid an aggregate of $118 million, including
transaction costs, to repurchase 7 million shares at an
average price of $16.90.
Since the inception of its share repurchase program in May 2005,
the Company has repurchased a total of 394 million common
shares for an aggregate cost of $7.9 billion. All
repurchased shares have been retired. As of September 27,
2008, the Company remained authorized to purchase an aggregate
amount of up to $3.6 billion of additional shares under the
current stock repurchase program. The timing and amount of
future purchases will be based on market and other conditions.
3. Income
Taxes
The Company had unrecognized tax benefits of $1.2 billion
and $1.4 billion at September 27, 2008 and
December 31, 2007, respectively. Included in these balances
were potential benefits of approximately $850 million and
$590 million, respectively, that, if recognized, would
affect the effective tax rate. During the three months ended
September 27, 2008, the Company recorded $46 million
in net tax benefits, representing a net reduction in
unrecognized tax benefits relating to facts that now indicate
the extent to which certain tax positions are
more-likely-than-not of being sustained positions, which have
become effectively settled or the statute of limitations has
expired. During the three months ended September 27, 2008,
the Company also recorded a reduction of interest expense of
$29 million, relating to the recognition of previously
unrecognized tax benefits.
Based on the potential outcome of the Company’s global tax
examinations, or as a result of the expiration of the statute of
limitations for specific jurisdictions, it is reasonably
possible that the unrecognized tax benefits will decrease within
the next 12 months. The associated net tax benefits, which
would favorably impact the effective tax rate, are estimated to
be in the range of $250 million to $350 million and
are not expected to result in any significant net cash payments
by the Company.
The Company is currently contesting significant tax adjustments
related to transfer pricing for the 1996 through 2003 tax years
at the appellate level of the Internal Revenue Service
(“IRS”). The Company disagrees with all of these
proposed transfer pricing-related adjustments and intends to
vigorously dispute them through applicable IRS and judicial
procedures, as appropriate. However, if the IRS were to
ultimately prevail on these matters, it could result in: (i)
additional taxable income for the years 1996 through 2000 of
approximately $1.4 billion, which could result in
additional income tax liability for the Company of approximately
$500 million, and (ii) additional taxable income for the
years 2001 and 2002 of approximately $800 million, which
could result in additional income tax liability for the Company
of approximately $300 million. The IRS is currently
reviewing a claim for additional research tax credits for the
years 1996-2003. The IRS completed its field examination of the
Company’s 2004 and 2005 tax returns in July 2008, and
there are no significant unagreed issues. The Company also has
several other Non-U.S. income tax audits pending.
11
Although the final resolution of the Company’s global tax
disputes is uncertain, based on current information, in the
opinion of the Company’s management, the ultimate
disposition of these matters will not have a material adverse
effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position,
liquidity or results of operations. However, an unfavorable
resolution of the Company’s global tax disputes could have
a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated
financial position, liquidity or results of operations in the
periods in which the matters are ultimately resolved.
4. Retirement
Benefits
Defined
Benefit Plans
The net periodic pension cost for the Regular Pension Plan,
Officers’ Plan, the Motorola Supplemental Pension Plan
(“MSPP”), and
Non-U.S. plans
was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 27, 2008
|
|
|
September 29, 2007
|
|
|
|
Regular
|
|
|
Officers’
|
|
|
Non
|
|
|
Regular
|
|
|
Officers’
|
|
|
Non
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
and MSPP
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
and MSPP
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(85
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
Amortization of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized net loss
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Unrecognized prior service cost
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Settlement/curtailment loss
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension cost
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 27, 2008
|
|
|
September 29, 2007
|
|
|
|
Regular
|
|
|
Officers’
|
|
|
Non
|
|
|
Regular
|
|
|
Officers’
|
|
|
Non
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
and MSPP
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
and MSPP
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
74
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
87
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
30
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
242
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
232
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(294
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
(255
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
Amortization of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized net loss
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Unrecognized prior service cost
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Settlement/curtailment loss
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension cost
|
|
$
|
38
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
|
$
|
130
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
55
|
|
|
|
During the three and nine months ended September 27, 2008,
aggregate contributions of $11 million and
$37 million, respectively, were made to the Company’s
Non-U.S. plans.
The Company contributed $60 million and $180 million
to its Regular Pension Plan for the three and nine months ended
September 27, 2008, respectively.
12
Postretirement
Health Care and Other Benefit Plans
Net postretirement health care expenses consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
Amortization of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized net loss
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Unrecognized prior service cost
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net postretirement health care expense
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
|
During the three and nine months ended September 27, 2008,
aggregate contributions of $4 million and $14 million,
respectively, were made to the Company’s postretirement
healthcare fund.
The Company maintains a number of endorsement split-dollar life
insurance policies that were taken out on now-retired officers
under a plan that was frozen prior to December 31, 2004.
The Company had purchased the life insurance policies to insure
the lives of employees and then entered into a separate
agreement with the employees that split the policy benefits
between the Company and the employee. Motorola owns the
policies, controls all rights of ownership, and may terminate
the insurance policies. To effect the split-dollar arrangement,
Motorola endorsed a portion of the death benefits to the
employee and upon the death of the employee, the employee’s
beneficiary typically receives the designated portion of the
death benefits directly from the insurance company and the
Company receives the remainder of the death benefits.
The Company adopted the provisions of
EITF 06-4,
“Accounting for Deferred Compensation and Postretirement
Benefit Aspects of Endorsement Split-Dollar Life Insurance
Arrangements”
(“EITF 06-4”)
as of January 1, 2008.
EITF 06-4
requires that a liability for the benefit obligation be recorded
because the promise of postretirement benefit had not been
settled through the purchase of an endorsement split-dollar life
insurance arrangement. As a result of the adoption of
EITF 06-4,
the Company recorded a liability representing the actuarial
present value of the future death benefits as of the
employees’ expected retirement date of $45 million
with the offset reflected as a cumulative-effect adjustment to
January 1, 2008 Retained earnings and Non-owner changes to
equity in the amounts of $4 million and $41 million,
respectively, in the Company’s condensed consolidated
statement of stockholders’ equity. It is currently expected
that no further cash payments are required to fund these
policies.
5. Share-Based
Compensation Plans
A summary of share-based compensation expense related to
restricted stock, restricted stock units (“RSUs”),
employee stock options and employee stock purchases was as
follows (in millions, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation expense included in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs of sales
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
Research and development expenditures
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation expense included in Operating loss
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
239
|
|
Tax benefit
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(68
|
)
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation expense, net of tax
|
|
$
|
38
|
|
|
$
|
55
|
|
|
$
|
152
|
|
|
$
|
169
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended September 27, 2008, the Company
granted 5.4 million RSUs, net of forfeitures, and
20.4 million stock options. The total compensation expense
related to the RSUs is $48 million, net of forfeitures. The
13
total compensation expense related to stock options is
$84 million, net of estimated forfeitures. The expense for
both RSUs and stock options will be recognized over a weighted
average vesting period of three years.
For the nine months ended September 27, 2008, the Company
has granted 21.1 million RSUs, net of forfeitures, and 27.6
million stock options. The total compensation expense related to
the RSUs is $197 million, net of forfeitures. The total
compensation expense related to stock options is
$106 million, net of estimated forfeitures. The expense for
RSUs will be recognized over a weighted average vesting period
of four years. The expense for stock options will be recognized
over a weighted average vesting period of three years.
6. Fair
Value Measurements
The Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board
(“FASB”) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(“SFAS”) No. 157, “Fair Value
Measurements” (“SFAS 157”) on
January 1, 2008 for all financial assets and liabilities
and non-financial assets and liabilities that are recognized or
disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a
recurring basis. SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a
consistent framework for measuring fair value and expands
disclosure requirements about fair value measurements.
SFAS 157 does not change the accounting for those
instruments that were, under previous GAAP, accounted for at
cost or contract value. In February 2008, the FASB issued staff
position
No. 157-2
(“FSP 157-2”),
which delays the effective date of SFAS 157 one year for
all non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except
those recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial
statements on a recurring basis. The Company has no
non-financial assets and liabilities that are required to be
measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of
September 27, 2008. Under
FSP 157-2,
the Company will apply the measurement of criteria of
SFAS 157 to the remaining assets and liabilities no later
than the first quarter of 2009.
The Company holds certain fixed income securities, equity
securities and derivatives, which must be measured using the
SFAS 157 prescribed fair value hierarchy and related
valuation methodologies. SFAS 157 specifies a hierarchy of
valuation techniques based on whether the inputs to each
measurement are observable or unobservable. Observable inputs
reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while
unobservable inputs reflect the Company’s assumptions about
current market conditions. The prescribed fair value hierarchy
and related valuation methodologies are as follows:
Level 1—Quoted prices for identical instruments
in active markets.
Level 2—Quoted prices for similar instruments
in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar
instruments in markets that are not active and model-derived
valuations, in which all significant inputs are observable in
active markets.
Level 3—Valuations derived from valuation
techniques, in which one or more significant inputs are
unobservable.
The levels of the Company’s financial assets and
liabilities that are carried at fair value were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 27,
2008
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial paper
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
250
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
250
|
|
Government and agencies
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,136
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,136
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,042
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
2,120
|
|
Asset-backed securities
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
Common stock and equivalents
|
|
|
281
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
281
|
|
Derivative assets
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative liabilities
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
14
The following table summarizes the changes in fair value of our
Level 3 assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
|
|
|
Nine
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
Months
|
|
September 27,
2008
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
43
|
|
|
$
|
35
|
|
Transfers to Level 3
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
Unrealized losses included in Non-owner changes to equity
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
Loss recognized as Investment impairment in Other income
(expense)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
78
|
|
|
$
|
78
|
|
|
|
Valuation
Methodologies
Quoted market prices in active markets are available for
investments in common stock and equivalents and, as such, these
investments are classified within Level 1.
The available-for-sale securities classified above as
Level 2 are primarily those that are professionally managed
within the Sigma Fund. The pricing methodology applied includes
a number of standard inputs to the valuation model including
benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes where
the party is standing ready and able to transact, issuer
spreads, benchmark securities, bids, offers and other reference
data. The valuation model may prioritize these inputs
differently at each balance sheet date for any given security,
based on the market conditions. Not all of the standard inputs
listed will be used each time in the valuation models. For each
asset class, quantifiable inputs related to perceived market
movements and sector news may be considered in addition to the
standard inputs.
In determining the fair value of the Company’s interest
rate swap derivatives, the Company uses the present value of
expected cash flows based on market observable interest rate
yield curves commensurate with the term of each instrument and
the credit default swap market to reflect the credit risk of
either the Company or the counterparty. For foreign currency
derivatives, the Company’s approach is to use forward
contract and option valuation models employing market observable
inputs, such as spot currency rates, time value and option
volatilities. Since the Company primarily uses observable inputs
in its valuation of its derivative assets and liabilities, they
are considered Level 2.
Level 3 fixed income securities are debt securities that do
not have actively traded quotes on the date the Company presents
its condensed consolidated balance sheets and require the use of
unobservable inputs, such as indicative quotes from dealers and
qualitative input from investment advisors, to value these
securities.
At September 27, 2008, the Company has $640 million of
investments in money market mutual funds classified as Cash and
cash equivalents in its condensed consolidated balance sheets.
The money market funds have quoted market prices that are
generally equivalent to par.
7. Long-term
Customer Financing and Sales of Receivables
Long-term
Customer Financing
Long-term receivables consist of trade receivables with payment
terms greater than twelve months, long-term loans and lease
receivables under sales-type leases. Long-term receivables
consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term receivables
|
|
$
|
121
|
|
|
$
|
123
|
|
Less allowance for losses
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
Less current portion
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current long-term receivables, net
|
|
$
|
49
|
|
|
$
|
68
|
|
|
|
The current portion of long-term receivables is included in
Accounts receivable and the non-current portion of long-term
receivables is included in Other assets in the Company’s
condensed consolidated balance sheets.
15
Certain purchasers of the Company’s infrastructure
equipment continue to request that suppliers provide long-term
financing, defined as financing with terms greater than one
year, in connection with equipment purchases. These requests may
include all or a portion of the purchase price of the equipment.
However, the Company’s obligation to provide long-term
financing is often conditioned on the issuance of a letter of
credit in favor of the Company by a reputable bank to support
the purchaser’s credit or a pre-existing commitment from a
reputable bank to purchase the long-term receivables from the
Company. The Company had outstanding commitments to provide
long-term financing to third parties totaling $373 million
and $610 million at September 27, 2008 and
December 31, 2007, respectively. Of these amounts,
$276 million and $454 million were supported by
letters of credit or by bank commitments to purchase long-term
receivables at September 27, 2008 and December 31,
2007, respectively.
In addition to providing direct financing to certain equipment
customers, the Company also assists customers in obtaining
financing directly from banks and other sources to fund
equipment purchases. The Company had committed to provide
financial guarantees relating to customer financing totaling
$35 million and $42 million at September 27, 2008
and December 31, 2007, respectively (including
$23 million at both September 27, 2008 and
December 31, 2007 relating to the sale of short-term
receivables). Customer financing guarantees outstanding were
$3 million at both September 27, 2008 and
December 31, 2007 (including $1 million and
$0 million at September 27, 2008 and December 31,
2007, respectively, relating to the sale of short-term
receivables).
Sales
of Receivables
The Company sells accounts receivables and long-term receivables
to third parties in transactions that qualify as
“true-sales.” Certain of these accounts receivables
and long-term receivables are sold to third parties on a
one-time, non-recourse basis, while others are sold to third
parties under committed facilities that involve contractual
commitments from these parties to purchase qualifying
receivables up to an outstanding monetary limit. Committed
facilities may be revolving in nature and, typically, must be
renewed on an annual basis. The Company may or may not retain
the obligation to service the sold accounts receivable and
long-term receivables.
In the aggregate, at September 27, 2008, these committed
facilities provided for up to $1.1 billion to be
outstanding with the third parties at any time, as compared to
up to $1.4 billion provided at December 31, 2007. As
of September 27, 2008, $568 million of the
Company’s committed facilities were utilized, compared to
$497 million that were utilized at December 31, 2007.
Certain events could cause a $400 million committed
facility to terminate. In addition, before receivables can be
sold under certain of the committed facilities, they may need to
meet contractual requirements, such as credit quality or
insurability.
Total accounts receivables and long-term receivables sold by the
Company were $875 million and $1.1 billion for the
three months ended September 27, 2008 and
September 29, 2007, respectively, and $2.5 billion and
$3.9 billion for the nine months ended September 27,
2008 and September 29, 2007, respectively. As of
September 27, 2008, there were $883 million of
receivables outstanding under these programs for which the
Company retained servicing obligations (including
$513 million of accounts receivable), compared to
$978 million outstanding at December 31, 2007
(including $587 million of accounts receivable).
Under certain receivables programs, the value of the receivables
sold is covered by credit insurance obtained from independent
insurance companies, less deductibles or self-insurance
requirements under the policies (with the Company retaining
credit exposure for the remaining portion). The Company’s
total credit exposure to outstanding short-term receivables that
have been sold was $23 million at both September 27,
2008 and December 31, 2007. Reserves of $2 million and
$1 million were recorded for potential losses at
September 27, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively.
8. Commitments
and Contingencies
Legal
Iridium Program: The Company has been named as
one of several defendants in putative class action securities
lawsuits arising out of alleged misrepresentations or omissions
regarding the Iridium satellite communications business which,
on March 15, 2001, were consolidated in the federal
district court in the District of Columbia under
Freeland v. Iridium World Communications, Inc., et al.,
originally filed on April 22, 1999. In April 2008, the
parties reached an agreement in principle, subject to court
approval, to settle all claims against Motorola in exchange for
Motorola’s payment of $20 million. During the three
months ended March 29, 2008, the Company recorded a charge
associated with this
16
settlement. On October 23, 2008, the court granted final
approval of the settlement and dismissed the claims with
prejudice.
The Company was sued by the Official Committee of the Unsecured
Creditors of Iridium (the “Committee”) in the United
States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York
(the “Iridium Bankruptcy Court”) on July 19,
2001. In re Iridium Operating LLC, et al. v. Motorola
asserted claims for breach of contract, warranty and
fiduciary duty and fraudulent transfer and preferences, and
sought in excess of $4 billion in damages. On May 20,
2008, the Bankruptcy Court approved a settlement in which
Motorola is not required to pay anything, but released its
administrative, priority and unsecured claims against the
Iridium estate and withdrew its objection to the 2001 settlement
between the unsecured creditors of the Iridium Debtors and the
Iridium Debtors’ pre-petition secured lenders. This
settlement, and its approval by the Bankruptcy Court,
extinguished Motorola’s financial exposure and concluded
Motorola’s involvement in the Iridium bankruptcy
proceedings.
Telsim Class Action Securities: In April
2007, the Company entered into a settlement agreement in regards
to In re Motorola Securities Litigation, a class action
lawsuit relating to the Company’s disclosure of its
relationship with Telsim Mobil Telekomunikasyon Hizmetleri A.S.
Pursuant to the settlement, Motorola paid $190 million to
the class and all claims against Motorola by the class have been
dismissed and released.
During the three months ended March 31, 2007, the Company
recorded a charge of $190 million for the legal settlement,
partially offset by $75 million of estimated insurance
recoveries, of which $50 million had been tendered by
certain insurance carriers. During the three months ended
June 30, 2007, the Company commenced actions against the
non-tendering insurance carriers. In response to these actions,
each insurance carrier who has responded denied coverage citing
various policy provisions. As a result of this denial of
coverage and related actions, the Company recorded a reserve of
$25 million in the three months ended June 30, 2007
against the receivable from insurance carriers. During the three
months ended September 27, 2008, the Company received the
$50 million tendered by the insurance carriers.
Other: The Company is a defendant in various
other suits, claims and investigations that arise in the normal
course of business. In the opinion of management, the ultimate
disposition of these matters will not have a material adverse
effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position,
liquidity or results of operations.
Other
The Company is also a party to a variety of agreements pursuant
to which it is obligated to indemnify the other party with
respect to certain matters. Some of these obligations arise as a
result of divestitures of the Company’s assets or
businesses and require the Company to hold the other party
harmless against losses arising from the settlement of these
pending obligations. The total amount of indemnification under
these types of provisions is $149 million, of which the
Company accrued $124 million as of September 27, 2008
for potential claims under these provisions.
In addition, the Company may provide indemnifications for losses
that result from the breach of general warranties contained in
certain commercial and intellectual property. Historically, the
Company has not made significant payments under these
agreements. However, there is an increasing risk in relation to
patent indemnities given the current legal climate.
In indemnification cases, payment by the Company is conditioned
on the other party making a claim pursuant to the procedures
specified in the particular contract, which procedures typically
allow the Company to challenge the other party’s claims.
Further, the Company’s obligations under these agreements
for indemnification based on breach of representations and
warranties are generally limited in terms of duration, and for
amounts not in excess of the contract value, and, in some
instances, the Company may have recourse against third parties
for certain payments made by the Company.
During the three months ended September 27, 2008, the
Company recorded a $150 million charge for a settlement of
the Freescale Semiconductor purchase commitment.
17
9. Segment
Information
Business segment Net sales and Operating earnings (loss) from
continuing operations for the three and nine months ended
September 27, 2008 and September 29, 2007 are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Net Sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mobile Devices
|
|
$
|
3,116
|
|
|
$
|
4,496
|
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
%
|
|
$
|
9,749
|
|
|
$
|
14,177
|
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
%
|
Home and Networks Mobility
|
|
|
2,369
|
|
|
|
2,389
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
7,490
|
|
|
|
7,290
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
Enterprise Mobility Solutions
|
|
|
2,030
|
|
|
|
1,954
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
5,878
|
|
|
|
5,591
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,515
|
|
|
|
8,839
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,117
|
|
|
|
27,058
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other and Eliminations
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(107
|
)
|
|
|
(82
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,480
|
|
|
$
|
8,811
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
23,010
|
|
|
$
|
26,976
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
% of
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
% of
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
% of
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
Segment Operating Earnings (Loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mobile Devices
|
|
$
|
(840
|
)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
%
|
|
$
|
(248
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
%
|
|
$
|
(1,604
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
%
|
|
$
|
(813
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
%
|
Home and Networks Mobility
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
661
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
517
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
Enterprise Mobility Solutions
|
|
|
403
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
328
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
1,030
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
762
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(174
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
466
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other and Eliminations
|
|
|
(278
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(249
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(803
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(452
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
(716
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
(534
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
Total other income (expense)
|
|
|
(148
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(196
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
$
|
(600
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(912
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(423
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Operating loss in Other and Eliminations consists of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Impairment of intangible assets
|
|
$
|
121
|
|
|
|
$53
|
|
|
|
$
|
121
|
|
|
|
$53
|
|
|
Corporate expenses(1)
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
|
366
|
|
|
|
403
|
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
244
|
|
|
|
281
|
|
|
Separation-related transaction costs
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Reorganization of business charges
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
Gain on sale of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Legal settlements
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
In-process research and development charges
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
278
|
|
|
|
$249
|
|
|
|
$
|
803
|
|
|
|
$1,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Primarily comprised of: (i) general corporate-related
expenses, including restricted stock, restricted stock units,
stock option and employee stock purchase plan expenses,
(ii) various corporate programs, representing developmental
businesses and research and development projects, which are not
included in any reporting segment, and (iii) the
Company’s wholly-owned finance subsidiary. |
10. Reorganization
of Businesses
The Company maintains a formal Involuntary Severance Plan (the
“Severance Plan”), which permits the Company to offer
eligible employees severance benefits based on years of service
and employment grade level in the event that
18
employment is involuntarily terminated as a result of a
reduction-in-force
or restructuring. Each separate
reduction-in-force
has qualified for severance benefits under the Severance Plan.
The Company recognizes termination benefits based on formulas
per the Severance Plan at the point in time that future
settlement is probable and can be reasonably estimated based on
estimates prepared at the time a restructuring plan is approved
by management. Exit costs consist of future minimum lease
payments on vacated facilities and other contractual
terminations. At each reporting date, the Company evaluates its
accruals for exit costs and employee separation costs to ensure
the accruals are still appropriate. In certain circumstances,
accruals are no longer required because of efficiencies in
carrying out the plans or because employees previously
identified for separation resigned from the Company and did not
receive severance or were redeployed due to circumstances not
foreseen when the original plans were initiated. The Company
reverses accruals through the income statement line item where
the original charges were recorded when it is determined they
are no longer required.
2008
Charges
During the nine months ended September 27, 2008, the
Company committed to implement various productivity improvement
plans aimed at achieving long-term, sustainable profitability by
driving efficiencies and reducing operating costs.
During the three months ended September 27, 2008, the
Company recorded net reorganization of business charges of
$36 million, including $5 million of charges in Costs
of sales and $31 million of charges under Other charges in
the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of
operations. Included in the aggregate $36 million are
charges of $38 million for employee separation costs and
$15 million for exit costs, partially offset by
$17 million of reversals for accruals no longer needed.
During the nine months ended September 27, 2008, the
Company recorded net reorganization of business charges of
$165 million, including $41 million of charges in
Costs of sales and $124 million of charges under Other
charges in the Company’s condensed consolidated statements
of operations. Included in the aggregate $165 million are
charges of $192 million for employee separation costs and
$20 million for exit costs, partially offset by
$47 million of reversals for accruals no longer needed.
The following table displays the net charges incurred by
business segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
Segment
|
|
September 27,
2008
|
|
|
September 27,
2008
|
|
|
|
|
Mobile Devices
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
97
|
|
Home and Networks Mobility
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
Enterprise Mobility Solutions
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
36
|
|
|
$
|
165
|
|
|
|
The following table displays a rollforward of the reorganization
of businesses accruals established for exit costs and employee
separation costs from January 1, 2008 to September 27,
2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accruals at
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Accruals at
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
2008(1)
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Charges
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Used
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
Exit costs
|
|
$
|
42
|
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13
|
)
|
|
$
|
48
|
|
Employee separation costs
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
(234
|
)
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
235
|
|
|
$
|
212
|
|
|
$
|
(40
|
)
|
|
$
|
(247
|
)
|
|
$
|
160
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes translation adjustments. |
Exit
Costs
At January 1, 2008, the Company had an accrual of
$42 million for exit costs attributable to lease
terminations. The 2008 additional charges of $20 million
are primarily related to the exit of leased facilities in the UK
by the Mobile
19
Devices segment. The adjustments of $1 million reflect
$3 million of reversals of accruals no longer needed,
partially offset by $2 million of translation adjustments.
The $13 million used in 2008 reflects cash payments. The
remaining accrual of $48 million, which is included in
Accrued liabilities in the Company’s condensed consolidated
balance sheets at September 27, 2008, represents future
cash payments, primarily for lease termination obligations.
Employee
Separation Costs
At January 1, 2008, the Company had an accrual of
$193 million for employee separation costs, representing
the severance costs for approximately 2,800 employees. The
2008 additional charges of $192 million represent severance
costs for approximately an additional 3,900 employees, of
which 2,000 are direct employees and 1,900 are indirect
employees.
The adjustments of $39 million reflect $44 million of
reversals of accruals no longer needed, partially offset by
$5 million of translation adjustments. The $44 million
of reversals represent previously accrued costs for
approximately 300 employees.
During the nine months ended September 27, 2008,
approximately 4,800 employees, of which 2,500 were
direct employees and 2,300 were indirect employees, were
separated from the Company. The $234 million used in 2008
reflects cash payments to these separated employees. The
remaining accrual of $112 million, which is included in
Accrued liabilities in the Company’s condensed consolidated
balance sheets at September 27, 2008, is expected to be
paid to approximately 1,600 employees.
2007
Charges
During 2007, the Company committed to implement various
productivity improvement plans aimed at achieving long-term,
sustainable profitability by driving efficiencies and reducing
operating costs. All three of the Company’s business
segments, as well as corporate functions, were impacted by these
plans. The majority of the employees affected were located in
North America and Europe.
For the three months ended September 29, 2007, the Company
recorded net reorganization of business charges of
$122 million, including $64 million of charges in
Costs of sales and $58 million of charges under Other
charges (income) in the Company’s condensed consolidated
statements of operations. Included in the aggregate
$122 million are charges of $87 million for employee
separation costs, $39 million for fixed asset impairment
charges and $5 million for exit costs, partially offset by
reversals for accruals no longer needed.
For the nine months ended September 29, 2007, the Company
recorded net reorganization of business charges of
$301 million, including $80 million of charges in
Costs of sales and $221 million of charges under Other
charges (income) in the Company’s condensed consolidated
statements of operations. Included in the aggregate
$301 million are charges of $311 million for employee
separation costs, $39 million for fixed asset impairment
charges and $10 million for exit costs, partially offset by
reversals for accruals no longer needed.
The following table displays the net charges incurred by segment
for the three and nine months ended September 29, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
Segment
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Mobile Devices
|
|
$
|
106
|
|
|
$
|
203
|
|
Home and Networks Mobility
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
Enterprise Mobility Solutions
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
274
|
|
General Corporate
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
122
|
|
|
$
|
301
|
|
|
|
20
The following table displays a rollforward of the reorganization
of businesses accruals established for exit costs and employee
separation costs from January 1, 2007 to September 29,
2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accruals at
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Accruals at
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
2007(1)(2)
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Charges
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Used
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Exit costs
|
|
$
|
54
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
(28
|
)
|
|
$
|
38
|
|
Employee separation costs
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
311
|
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
(195
|
)
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
158
|
|
|
$
|
321
|
|
|
$
|
(53
|
)
|
|
$
|
(223
|
)
|
|
$
|
203
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes translation adjustments. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes accruals established through purchase accounting for
businesses acquired of $6 million covering approximately
200 employees. |
Exit
Costs—Lease Terminations
At January 1, 2007, the Company had an accrual of
$54 million for exit costs attributable to lease
terminations. The 2007 additional charges of $10 million
were primarily related to the planned exit of certain activities
in Ireland by the Home and Networks Mobility segment. The 2007
adjustments of $2 million represented accruals for exit
costs established through purchase accounting for businesses
acquired. The $28 million used in 2007 reflected cash
payments. The remaining accrual of $38 million, which is
included in Accrued liabilities in the Company’s condensed
consolidated balance sheet at September 29, 2007,
represented future cash payments for lease termination
obligations.
Employee
Separation Costs
At January 1, 2007, the Company had an accrual of
$104 million for employee separation costs, representing
the severance costs for approximately 2,300 employees. The
2007 additional charges of $311 million represented
severance costs for approximately 5,100 employees, of which
1,800 were direct employees and 3,300 were indirect employees.
The adjustments of $55 million reflect $59 million of
reversals of accruals no longer needed, partially offset by
$4 million of accruals for severance plans established
through purchase accounting for businesses acquired. The
$59 million of reversals represented previously accrued
costs for 1,100 employees, and primarily related to a
strategic change regarding a plant closure and specific
employees previously identified for separation who resigned from
the Company and did not receive severance or who were redeployed
due to circumstances not foreseen when the original plans were
approved. The $4 million of accruals represented severance
plans for 200 employees established through purchase
accounting for businesses acquired.
During the first nine months of 2007, approximately
4,200 employees, of which 1,300 were direct employees and
2,900 were indirect employees, were separated from the Company.
The $195 million used in 2007 reflects cash payments to
these separated employees. The remaining accrual of
$165 million, which is included in Accrued liabilities in
the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheet at
September 29, 2007, was expected to be paid to
approximately 2,300 separated employees. Since that time,
$131 million has been paid to approximately 2,000 separated
employees and $28 million has been reversed.
21
11. Acquisition-related
Intangibles
Amortized intangible assets, excluding goodwill, were comprised
of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 27, 2008
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
Amount(1)
|
|
|
Amortization(1)
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Completed technology
|
|
$
|
1,108
|
|
|
$
|
588
|
|
|
$
|
1,234
|
|
|
$
|
484
|
|
Patents
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
292
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
Customer related
|
|
|
267
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
264
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
Licensed technology
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
Other intangibles
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,945
|
|
|
$
|
1,022
|
|
|
$
|
2,079
|
|
|
$
|
819
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes translation adjustments. |
Amortization expense on intangible assets, which is presented in
Other and Eliminations, was $80 million and
$91 million for the three months ended September 27,
2008 and September 29, 2007, respectively, and
$244 million and $281 million for the nine months
ended September 27, 2008 and September 29, 2007,
respectively. As of September 27, 2008 amortization expense
is estimated to be $318 million for 2008, $272 million
in 2009, $253 million in 2010, $240 million in 2011,
and $47 million in 2012.
Amortized intangible assets, excluding goodwill by business
segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 27, 2008
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
Segment
|
|
Amount(1)
|
|
|
Amortization(1)
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
|
|
Mobile Devices
|
|
$
|
46
|
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
|
$
|
36
|
|
|
$
|
36
|
|
Home and Networks Mobility
|
|
|
722
|
|
|
|
506
|
|
|
|
712
|
|
|
|
455
|
|
Enterprise Mobility Solutions
|
|
|
1,177
|
|
|
|
479
|
|
|
|
1,331
|
|
|
|
328
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,945
|
|
|
$
|
1,022
|
|
|
$
|
2,079
|
|
|
$
|
819
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes translation adjustments. |
During the three months ended September 27, 2008, due to a
change in a technology platform strategy, the Company recorded
an impairment of intangible assets of $121 million,
primarily relating to completed technology and other
intangibles, in the Enterprise Mobility Solutions segment.
During the three months ended September 29, 2007, due to a
change in software platform strategy, the Company recorded an
impairment of intangible assets of $53 million, primarily
relating to completed technology and other intangibles, in the
Mobile Devices segment.
The following table displays a rollforward of the carrying
amount of goodwill from January 1, 2008 to
September 27, 2008, by business segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
Segment
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Acquired
|
|
|
Adjustments(1)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
Mobile Devices
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
Home and Networks Mobility
|
|
|
1,576
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(167
|
)
|
|
|
1,413
|
|
Enterprise Mobility Solutions
|
|
|
2,904
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2,905
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,499
|
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
$
|
(166
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,351
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes translation adjustments. |
During the three months ended June 28, 2008, the Home and
Networks Mobility segment finalized its assessment of the
Internal Revenue Code Section 382 Limitations (“IRC
Section 382”) relating to the pre-acquisition tax loss
carry-forwards of its 2007 acquisitions. As a result of the IRC
Section 382 studies, the company recorded additional
deferred tax assets and a corresponding reduction in goodwill,
which is reflected in the adjustment column above.
22
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Item 2:
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations
This commentary should be read in conjunction with the
Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements for
the three and nine months ended September 27, 2008 and
September 29, 2007, as well as the Company’s
consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto and
management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition
and results of operations in the Company’s
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Executive
Overview
Our
Business
We report financial results for the following business segments:
|
|
|
|
•
|
The Mobile Devices segment designs, manufactures, sells
and services wireless handsets with integrated software and
accessory products, and licenses intellectual property. In the
third quarter of 2008, the segment’s net sales represented
42% of the Company’s consolidated net sales.
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
The Home and Networks Mobility segment designs,
manufactures, sells, installs and services: (i) digital
video, Internet Protocol (“IP”) video and broadcast
network interactive set-tops (“digital entertainment
devices”), end-to-end video delivery solutions, broadband
access infrastructure systems, and associated data and voice
customer premise equipment (“broadband gateways”) to
cable television and telecom service providers (collectively,
referred to as the “home business”), and
(ii) wireless access systems (“wireless
networks”), including cellular infrastructure systems and
wireless broadband systems, to wireless service providers. In
the third quarter of 2008, the segment’s net sales
represented 32% of the Company’s consolidated net sales.
|
|
|
•
|
The Enterprise Mobility Solutions segment designs,
manufactures, sells, installs and services analog and digital
two-way radio, voice and data communications products and
systems for private networks, wireless broadband systems and
end-to-end enterprise mobility solutions to a wide range of
enterprise markets, including government and public safety
agencies (which, together with all sales to distributors of
two-way communication products, are referred to as the
“government and public safety market”), as well as
retail, utility, transportation, manufacturing, health care and
other commercial customers (which, collectively, are referred to
as the “commercial enterprise market”). In the third
quarter of 2008, the segment’s net sales represented 27% of
the Company’s consolidated net sales.
|
Third-Quarter
Summary
|
|
|
|
•
|
Net Sales were $7.5 Billion: Our net sales
were $7.5 billion in the third quarter of 2008, down 15%
compared to net sales of $8.8 billion in the third quarter
of 2007. Net sales decreased 31% in the Mobile Devices segment,
decreased 1% in the Home and Networks Mobility segment and
increased 4% in the Enterprise Mobility Solutions segment.
|
|
|
•
|
Operating Loss was $452 Million: We
incurred an operating loss of $452 million in the third
quarter of 2008, compared to an operating loss of
$10 million in the third quarter of 2007. Contributing to
the operating loss were: (i) excess inventory and other
related charges of $370 million due to a decision to
consolidate software and silicon platforms in the Mobile Devices
segment, (ii) a $150 million charge related to
settlement of the Freescale Semiconductor purchase commitment,
(iii) $128 million of asset impairment charges, and
(iv) $57 million of net charges for other
reorganization and separation-related transaction costs.
|
|
|
•
|
Loss from Continuing Operations was $397 Million, or
$0.18 per Share: We incurred a loss from
continuing operations of $397 million, or $0.18 per diluted
common share, in the third quarter of 2008, compared to earnings
from continuing operations of $40 million, or $0.02 per
diluted common share, in the third quarter of 2007.
|
|
|
* |
When discussing the net sales of each of our three segments, we
express the segment’s net sales as a percentage of the
Company’s consolidated net sales. However, certain of our
segments sell products to other Motorola businesses and
intracompany sales are eliminated as part of the consolidation
process. Therefore, the percentages of consolidated net sales
for our business segments do not always sum to 100%.
|
23
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
•
|
Handset Shipments were 25.4 Million Units: We
shipped 25.4 million handsets in the third quarter of 2008,
a 32% decrease compared to shipments of 37.2 million
handsets in the third quarter of 2007 and a 10% decrease
sequentially compared to shipments of 28.1 million handsets
in the second quarter of 2008.
|
|
|
•
|
Global Handset Market Share Estimated at 8.4%:
We estimate our share of the global handset
market in the third quarter of 2008 to be 8.4%, a decrease of
approximately 5 percentage points versus the third quarter
of 2007 and a sequential decrease of approximately
1 percentage point versus the second quarter of 2008.
|
|
|
•
|
Digital Entertainment Device Shipments were
4.1 million: We shipped
4.1 million digital entertainment devices in the third
quarter of 2008, an increase of 52% compared to shipments of
2.7 million units in the third quarter of 2007 and a 20%
decrease sequentially compared to shipments of 5.1 million
units in the second quarter of 2008.
|
|
|
•
|
Operating Cash Flow was $180 Million: We
generated $180 million of operating cash flow in the third
quarter of 2008, compared to $342 million of operating cash
flow in the third quarter of 2007.
|
Net sales for each of our business segments were as follows:
|
|
|
|
•
|
In Mobile Devices: Net sales were
$3.1 billion in the third quarter of 2008, a decrease of
$1.4 billion, or 31%, compared to the third quarter of
2007, primarily driven by a 32% decrease in unit shipments. The
decrease in unit shipments resulted primarily from product
portfolio gaps in critical market segments, especially 3G,
including smartphones, and very low-tier products.
|
|
|
•
|
In Home and Networks Mobility: Net sales were
$2.4 billion in the third quarter of 2008, a decrease of
$20 million, or 1%, compared to the third quarter of 2007.
This decrease reflects lower net sales of wireless networks,
partially offset by higher net sales of digital entertainment
devices, driven by a 52% increase in unit shipments, partially
offset by lower ASP due to a shift in product mix and pricing
pressure.
|
|
|
•
|
In Enterprise Mobility Solutions: Net sales
were $2.0 billion in the third quarter of 2008, an increase
of $76 million, or 4%, compared to the third quarter of
2007, reflecting a 9% increase in net sales to the government
and public safety market, primarily driven by:
(i) increased net sales outside of North America, and
(ii) the net sales generated by Vertex Standard Co., Ltd.
(“Vertex Standard”), a business the Company acquired a
controlling interest of in January 2008, partially offset by an
8% decrease in net sales to the commercial enterprise market.
|
Looking
Forward
Earlier in the year, the Company announced that it was pursuing
the creation of two independent, publicly traded companies: one
comprised of our Mobile Devices business and the other comprised
of our Home and Networks Mobility and Enterprise Mobility
Solutions businesses. The Company remains committed to the
separation of the businesses. However, due to the weakened
global economic environment and dislocation in the financial
markets, as well as changes underway in the Mobile Devices
business, the Company is no longer targeting the third quarter
of 2009 for the separation of our businesses. The Company has
made progress on various elements of the separation plan and
will continue efforts to prepare for a potential transaction. We
will continue to assess market and business conditions to
determine the appropriate timeframe for separation that serves
the best interests of the Company and its shareholders.
Given the macroeconomic environment, the Company will also take
additional actions to reduce its cost structure. These actions
will be global in nature and impact all of our businesses, as
well as our supply chain organization and corporate functions.
For more information on specific actions taken, see the
discussion under “Cost-Reduction Initiatives Announced on
October 30, 2008” later herein. We will continue to
take the necessary strategic actions and invest in product
innovation as we position Motorola to take advantage of
opportunities for future growth and profitability.
In our Mobile Devices business, we expect the overall global
handset market to remain intensely competitive with slowing
demand. Our primary focus is on enhancing our product portfolio,
especially in 3G and the low tier. In addition, we will further
simplify our platforms and focus on key markets, including North
America, Latin America and certain markets in Asia. These
actions are expected to lower our cost structure and result in a
more focused, consumer-driven portfolio, reflecting trends in
converged devices, the mobile Internet, navigation and
messaging. We expect our product portfolio enhancement efforts
to demonstrate progress in 2009 and better position Mobile
Devices for improved financial results.
24
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
In our Home and Networks Mobility business, we are focused on
delivering personalized media experiences to consumers at home
and on-the-go and enabling service providers to operate their
networks more efficiently and profitably. As the market leader
in digital video, including digital entertainment devices and
end-to-end network solutions, we are positioned to capitalize on
demand for high-definition TV and
video-on-demand
services, as well as the convergence of services and
applications across delivery platforms. However, due to the
impact that economic conditions, especially in the U.S., may
have on demand for services provided by our customers, demand is
likely to slow in the home business. In wireless broadband, we
will continue our efforts to position ourselves as a leading
infrastructure provider of next-generation technologies,
including WiMAX and LTE. In wireless cellular networks, we
expect the market environment to continue to be highly
competitive and challenging.
In our Enterprise Mobility Solutions business, our key objective
is profitable growth in enterprise markets around the world. We
are the market leader in mission-critical communications
solutions and continue to develop next-generation products and
solutions for our government and public safety customers. We
also utilize our market leadership positions and innovations in
mobile computing and scanning to meet customers’ needs in
retail, transportation and logistics, utility, manufacturing,
healthcare and other commercial industries globally. These
business-critical enterprise products and solutions allow our
customers to reduce costs, increase worker mobility and
productivity, and enhance their customers’ experiences. Our
enterprise and government customers are facing uncertain and
volatile economic conditions that will likely slow demand in our
enterprise, government and public safety businesses. However, we
believe that our comprehensive portfolio of products and
solutions, market leadership and global distribution network
make our Enterprise Mobility Solutions segment well positioned
to meet these challenges.
We conduct our business in highly competitive markets. These
markets are characterized by rapidly changing technologies,
frequent new product introductions, changing consumer trends,
short product life cycles and evolving industry standards.
Market disruptions, caused by changing macroeconomic conditions,
new technologies, the entry of new competitors and
consolidations among our customers and competitors, can
introduce volatility into our operating performance and cash
flow from operations. Meeting all of these challenges requires
consistent operational planning and execution and investment in
technology, resulting in innovative products that meet the needs
of our customers around the world. As we execute on meeting
these objectives, we remain focused on designing and delivering
differentiated products, unique experiences and powerful
networks, along with a full complement of support services that
will advance the way the world connects by simplifying and
personalizing communications, enhancing mobility, and enabling
consumers to connect to people, information, and entertainment.
25
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Results
of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
(Dollars in millions,
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
% of
|
|
except per share amounts)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
7,480
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,811
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
23,010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
26,976
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs of sales
|
|
|
5,677
|
|
|
|
75.9
|
%
|
|
|
6,306
|
|
|
|
71.6
|
%
|
|
|
16,737
|
|
|
|
72.7
|
%
|
|
|
19,564
|
|
|
|
72.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
1,803
|
|
|
|
24.1
|
%
|
|
|
2,505
|
|
|
|
28.4
|
%
|
|
|
6,273
|
|
|
|
27.3
|
%
|
|
|
7,412
|
|
|
|
27.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
1,044
|
|
|
|
14.0
|
%
|
|
|
1,210
|
|
|
|
13.7
|
%
|
|
|
3,342
|
|
|
|
14.5
|
%
|
|
|
3,819
|
|
|
|
14.2
|
%
|
Research and development expenditures
|
|
|
999
|
|
|
|
13.4
|
%
|
|
|
1,100
|
|
|
|
12.5
|
%
|
|
|
3,101
|
|
|
|
13.5
|
%
|
|
|
3,332
|
|
|
|
12.4
|
%
|
Other charges
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
|
546
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
|
795
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(452
|
)
|
|
|
(6.0
|
)%
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)%
|
|
|
(716
|
)
|
|
|
(3.1
|
)%
|
|
|
(534
|
)
|
|
|
(2.0
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income, net
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
Gains on sales of investments and businesses, net
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
(173
|
)
|
|
|
(2.3
|
)%
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
(267
|
)
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)%
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense)
|
|
|
(148
|
)
|
|
|
(2.0
|
)%
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
(196
|
)
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)%
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
(600
|
)
|
|
|
(8.0
|
)%
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
(912
|
)
|
|
|
(4.0
|
)%
|
|
|
(423
|
)
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)%
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
(203
|
)
|
|
|
(2.7
|
)%
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)%
|
|
|
(325
|
)
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)%
|
|
|
(207
|
)
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
(397
|
)
|
|
|
(5.3
|
)%
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
(587
|
)
|
|
|
(2.6
|
)%
|
|
|
(216
|
)
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)%
|
Earnings from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss)
|
|
$
|
(397
|
)
|
|
|
(5.3
|
)%
|
|
$
|
60
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
(587
|
)
|
|
|
(2.6
|
)%
|
|
$
|
(149
|
)
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per diluted common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(0.18
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.26
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.18
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.26
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Results
of Operations—Three months ended September 27, 2008
compared to three months ended September 29, 2007
Net
Sales
Net sales were $7.5 billion in the third quarter of 2008,
down 15% compared to net sales of $8.8 billion in the third
quarter of 2007. The decrease in net sales reflects: (i) a
$1.4 billion, or 31%, decrease in net sales in the Mobile
Devices segment, and (ii) a $20 million, or 1%,
decrease in net sales in the Home and Networks Mobility segment,
partially offset by a $76 million, or 4%, increase in net
sales in the Enterprise Mobility Solutions segment. The decrease
in net sales in the Mobile Devices segment was primarily driven
by a 32% decrease in unit shipments. The decrease in net sales
in the Home and Networks Mobility segment reflects lower net
sales of wireless networks, partially offset by higher net sales
of digital entertainment devices, driven by a 52% increase in
unit shipments, partially offset by lower ASP due to a shift in
product mix and pricing pressure. The increase in net sales in
the Enterprise Mobility Solutions segment reflects a 9% increase
in net sales to the government and public safety market,
primarily driven by: (i) increased net sales outside of
North America, and (ii) the net sales generated by Vertex
Standard Co., Ltd. (“Vertex Standard”), a business the
Company acquired a controlling interest of in January 2008,
partially offset by a 8% decrease in net sales to the commercial
enterprise market.
26
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Gross
Margin
Gross margin was $1.8 billion, or 24.1% of net sales, in
the third quarter of 2008, compared to $2.5 billion, or
28.4% of net sales, in the third quarter of 2007. The decrease
in gross margin reflects lower gross margin in the Mobile
Devices and Home and Networks Mobility segments, partially
offset by increased gross margin in the Enterprise Mobility
Solutions segment. The decrease in gross margin in the Mobile
Devices segment was primarily driven by: (i) excess inventory
and other related charges of $370 million due to a decision
to consolidate software and silicon platforms, (ii) the 31%
decrease in net sales, and (iii) a $150 million charge
related to settlement of the Freescale Semiconductor purchase
commitment, partially offset by savings from cost-reduction
activities. The decrease in gross margin in the Home and
Networks Mobility segment was primarily due to lower gross
margin in the wireless networks business, partially offset by
higher gross margin in the home business. The increase in gross
margin in the Enterprise Mobility Solutions segment was
primarily driven by the 4% increase in net sales and a favorable
product mix.
The decrease in gross margin as a percentage of net sales in the
third quarter of 2008 compared to the third quarter of 2007 was
driven by decreases in the Mobile Devices and Home and Networks
Mobility segments, partially offset by an increase in the
Enterprise Mobility Solutions segment. The Company’s
overall gross margin as a percentage of net sales can be
impacted by the proportion of overall net sales generated by its
various businesses.
Selling,
General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”)
expenses decreased 14% to $1.0 billion, or 14.0% of net
sales, in the third quarter of 2008, compared to
$1.2 billion, or 13.7% of net sales, in the third quarter
of 2007. The decrease in SG&A expenses reflects lower
SG&A expenses in all segments. The decrease in the Mobile
Devices segment was primarily driven by lower marketing expenses
and savings from cost-reduction initiatives. The decreases in
the Home and Networks Mobility and Enterprise Mobility Solutions
segments were primarily due to savings from cost-reduction
initiatives. SG&A expenses as a percentage of net sales
increased in the Mobile Devices segment and decreased in the
Home and Networks Mobility and Enterprise Mobility Solutions
segments.
Research
and Development Expenditures
Research and development (“R&D”) expenditures
decreased 9% to $999 million, or 13.4% of net sales, in the
third quarter of 2008, compared to $1.1 billion, or 12.5%
of net sales, in the third quarter of 2007. The decrease in
R&D expenditures was primarily driven by lower R&D
expenditures in the Mobile Devices and Home and Networks
Mobility segments, partially offset by higher R&D
expenditures in the Enterprise Mobility Solutions segment. The
decreases in the Mobile Devices and Home and Networks Mobility
segments were primarily due to savings from cost-reduction
initiatives. The increase in the Enterprise Mobility Solutions
segment was primarily due to developmental engineering
expenditures for new product development and investment in
next-generation technologies. R&D expenditures as a
percentage of net sales increased in the Mobile Devices segment
and decreased in the Home and Networks Mobility and Enterprise
Mobility Solutions segments. The Company participates in very
competitive industries with constant changes in technology and,
accordingly, the Company continues to believe that a strong
commitment to R&D is required to drive long-term growth.
However, the Company continues to focus on aligning our R&D
expenditures with our strategic plans and opportunities for
future growth.
Other
Charges
The Company recorded net charges of $212 million in Other
charges in the third quarter of 2008, compared to net charges of
$205 million in the third quarter of 2007. The net charges
in the third quarter of 2008 include: (i) $128 million
of asset impairment charges, (ii) $80 million of
charges relating to the amortization of intangible assets,
(iii) $31 million of net reorganization of business
charges included in Other charges, and
(iv) $21 million of transaction costs related to the
proposed separation of the Company into two independent,
publicly traded companies, partially offset by a
$48 million gain on sale of property, plant and equipment.
The net charges in the third quarter of 2007 included:
(i) $91 million of charges relating to the
amortization of intangible assets, (ii) $58 million of
net reorganization of business charges included in Other
charges, and (iii) $57 million of asset impairment
charges.
27
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Net
Interest Income
Net interest income was $18 million in the third quarter of
2008, compared to net interest income of $7 million in the
third quarter of 2007. Net interest income in the third quarter
of 2008 included interest income of $70 million, partially
offset by interest expense of $52 million. Net interest
income in the third quarter of 2007 included interest income of
$100 million, partially offset by interest expense of
$93 million. The increase in net interest income in the
third quarter of 2008 was primarily attributed to a
$29 million decrease in interest expense related to the
recognition of previously unrecognized tax benefits, offset by
lower interest income due to the decrease in average cash, cash
equivalents and Sigma Fund balances during the third quarter of
2008 compared to the third quarter of 2007, and the significant
decrease in short-term interest rates.
Gains on
Sales of Investments and Businesses
Gains on sales of investments and businesses were
$7 million in the third quarter of 2008, compared to
$5 million in the third quarter of 2007. The net gains
relate to the sale of several small investments in the third
quarters of both 2008 and 2007.
Other
Net charges classified as Other, as presented in Other income
(expense), were $173 million in the third quarter of 2008,
compared to net income of $6 million in the third quarter
of 2007. The net charges in the third quarter of 2008 were
primarily comprised of: (i) $141 million of charges
attributed to other-than-temporary declines in Sigma Fund
investments resulting from our positions in Lehman Brothers
Holdings Inc. (“Lehman”), Washington Mutual, Inc.
(“WaMu”), and Sigma Finance Corporation
(“SFC”), a special investment vehicle managed by
United Kingdom based Gordian Knot Limited, and
(ii) $48 million of foreign currency losses. The net
income in the third quarter of 2007 was primarily comprised of
$21 million of foreign currency gains, partially offset by
$5 million of investment impairment charges.
Effective
Tax Rate
The Company recorded $203 million of net tax benefits in
the third quarter of 2008, compared to $32 million of net
tax benefits in the third quarter of 2007. During the third
quarter of 2008, the Company’s net tax benefit was
favorably impacted by: (i) a net reduction in unrecognized
tax benefits, and (ii) tax benefits on charges, including
charges for: a software and silicon platform consolidation, a
settlement relating to a purchase commitment, asset impairment
charges, investment impairments and reorganization of business
charges. The Company’s net tax benefit was unfavorably
impacted by: (i) a gain on sale of property, plant and
equipment, (ii) transactions costs for which the Company
recorded no tax benefit, and (iii) tax on the reduction of
interest expense related to the recognition of previously
unrecognized tax benefits. The Company’s ongoing effective
tax rate, excluding these items, was 34%. The Company’s net
tax benefit excludes a benefit for the U.S. R&D tax credit,
which was not reenacted until after the end of the
Company’s third quarter. The Company will include a full
year tax benefit for the U.S. R&D tax credit in the fourth
quarter of 2008.
The Company’s net tax benefit of $32 million for the
third quarter of 2007 was favorably impacted by a relative
increase in tax credits and a reduction in losses in countries
where tax benefits could not be recognized. The Company’s
net tax benefit was also favorably impacted by nonrecurring
items, including the reversal of deferred tax valuation
allowances, and unfavorably impacted by nonrecurring items,
including deferred tax adjustments for enacted tax rate
decreases. The Company’s effective tax rate for the third
quarter of 2007, excluding the nonrecurring items and tax impact
of restructuring charges and asset impairment charges, was 21%.
Earnings
(Loss) from Continuing Operations
The Company incurred a loss from continuing operations before
income taxes of $600 million in the third quarter of 2008,
compared with earnings from continuing operations before income
taxes of $8 million in the third quarter of 2007. After
taxes, the Company had a loss from continuing operations of
$397 million, or $0.18 per diluted share, in the third
quarter of 2008, compared to earnings from continuing operations
of $40 million, or $0.02 per diluted share, in the third
quarter of 2007.
28
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The loss from continuing operations before income taxes in the
third quarter of 2008 compared to earnings from continuing
operations before income taxes in the third quarter of 2007 is
primarily attributed to: (i) a $702 million decrease
in gross margin, and (ii) a $179 million increase in
charges classified as Other, as presented in Other income
(expense). These factors were partially offset by: (i) a
$166 million decrease in SG&A expenses, (ii) a
$101 million decrease in R&D expenditures, and
(iii) an $11 million increase in net interest income.
Results
of Operations—Nine months ended September 27, 2008
compared to nine months ended September 29, 2007
Net
Sales
Net sales were $23.0 billion in the first nine months of
2008, down 15% compared to net sales of $27.0 billion in
the first nine months of 2007. The decrease in net sales
reflects a $4.4 billion, or 31%, decrease in net sales in
the Mobile Devices segment, partially offset by: (i) a
$287 million, or 5%, increase in net sales in the
Enterprise Mobility Solutions segment, and (ii) a
$200 million, or 3%, increase in net sales in the Home and
Networks Mobility segment. The decrease in net sales in the
Mobile Devices segment was primarily driven by a 32% decrease in
unit shipments. The increase in net sales in the Enterprise
Mobility Solutions segment reflects: (i) a 7% increase in
net sales to the government and public safety market, primarily
due to increased net sales outside of North America and the net
sales generated by Vertex Standard, partially offset by lower
net sales in North America, and (ii) a 2% increase in net
sales to the commercial enterprise market. The increase in net
sales in the Home and Networks Mobility segment was primarily
driven by higher net sales of digital entertainment devices,
reflecting: (i) higher ASP due to a favorable shift in product
mix, and (ii) a 14% increase in unit shipments, partially offset
by lower net sales of wireless networks.
Gross
Margin
Gross margin was $6.3 billion, or 27.3% of net sales, in
the first nine months of 2008, compared to $7.4 billion, or
27.5% of net sales, in the first nine months of 2007. The
decrease in gross margin reflects lower gross margin in the
Mobile Devices and Home and Networks Mobility segments,
partially offset by increased gross margin in the Enterprise
Mobility Solutions segment. The decrease in gross margin in the
Mobile Devices segment was primarily driven by: (i) the 31%
decrease in net sales, (ii) excess inventory and other related
charges of $370 million due to a decision to consolidate
software and silicon platforms, and (iii) a
$150 million charge related to settlement of the Freescale
Semiconductor purchase commitment, partially offset by savings
from cost-reduction activities. The decrease in gross margin in
the Home and Networks Mobility segment was primarily due to
lower gross margin in the wireless networks business, partially
offset by higher gross margin in the home business. The increase
in gross margin in the Enterprise Mobility Solutions segment was
primarily driven by: (i) the 5% increase in net sales,
(ii) favorable product mix, and (iii) an
inventory-related charge in connection with the acquisition of
Symbol Technologies, Inc. during the first quarter of 2007.
The decrease in gross margin as a percentage of net sales in the
first nine months of 2008 compared to the first nine months of
2007 was driven by a decrease in gross margin percentage in the
Mobile Devices and Home and Networks Mobility segments,
partially offset by an increase in gross margin percentage in
the Enterprise Mobility Solutions segment.
Selling,
General and Administrative Expenses
SG&A expenses decreased 13% to $3.3 billion, or 14.5%
of net sales, in the first nine months of 2008, compared to
$3.8 billion, or 14.2% of net sales, in the first nine
months of 2007. The decrease in SG&A expenses was primarily
driven by lower SG&A expenses in the Mobile Devices and
Home and Networks Mobility segments, partially offset by higher
SG&A expenses in the Enterprise Mobility Solutions segment.
The decrease in the Mobile Devices segment was primarily driven
by lower marketing expenses and savings from cost-reduction
initiatives. The decrease in the Home and Networks Mobility
segment was primarily due to savings from cost-reduction
initiatives. The increase in the Enterprise Mobility Solutions
segment was primarily driven by higher selling and marketing
expenses related to the increase in net sales. SG&A
expenses as a percentage of net sales increased in the Mobile
Devices segment and decreased in the Home and Networks Mobility
and Enterprise Mobility Solutions segments.
29
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Research
and Development Expenditures
R&D expenditures decreased 7% to $3.1 billion, or
13.5% of net sales, in the first nine months of 2008, compared
to $3.3 billion, or 12.4% of net sales, in the first nine
months of 2007. The decrease in R&D expenditures was
primarily driven by lower R&D expenditures in the Mobile
Devices and Home and Networks Mobility segments, partially
offset by higher R&D expenditures in the Enterprise
Mobility Solutions segment. The decreases in the Mobile Devices
and Home and Networks Mobility segments were primarily due to
savings from cost-reduction initiatives. The increase in the
Enterprise Mobility Solutions segment was primarily due to
developmental engineering expenditures for new product
development and investment in next-generation technologies.
R&D expenditures as a percentage of net sales increased in
the Mobile Devices and Enterprise Mobility Solutions segments
and decreased in the Home and Networks Mobility segment.
Other
Charges
The Company recorded net charges of $546 million in Other
charges in the first nine months of 2008, compared to net
charges of $795 million in the first nine months of 2007.
The net charges in the first nine months of 2008 include:
(i) $244 million of charges relating to the
amortization of intangible assets, (ii) $128 million
of asset impairment charges, (iii) $124 million of net
reorganization of business charges included in Other charges,
(iv) $57 million of charges related to legal
settlements, and (v) $41 million of transaction costs
related to the proposed separation of the Company into two
independent, publicly traded companies, partially offset by a
$48 million gain on sale of property, plant and equipment.
The net charges in the first nine months of 2007 included:
(i) $281 million of charges relating to the
amortization of intangible assets, (ii) $221 million
of net reorganization of business charges included in Other
charges, (iii) $140 million for legal settlements and
related insurance reserves, (iv) $96 million of
in-process research and development charges
(“IPR&D”) relating to 2007 acquisitions, and
(v) $57 million of asset impairment charges.
Net
Interest Income
Net interest income was $6 million in the first nine months
of 2008, compared to net interest income of $80 million in
the first nine months of 2007. Net interest income in the first
nine months of 2008 includes interest income of
$210 million, partially offset by interest expense of
$204 million. Net interest income in the first nine months
of 2007 included interest income of $348 million, partially
offset by interest expense of $268 million. The decrease in
interest income is primarily attributed to the lower average
cash, cash equivalents and Sigma Fund balances in the first nine
months of 2008, as compared to average balances during the first
nine months of 2007, and the significant decrease in short-term
interest rates.
Gains on
Sales of Investments and Businesses
Gains on sales of investments and businesses were
$65 million in the first nine months of 2008, compared to
$9 million in the first nine months of 2007. In the first
nine months of 2008, the net gain primarily relates to sales of
a number of the Company’s equity investments, of which
$29 million of gain was attributed to a single investment.
In the first nine months of 2007, the net gain relates to the
sale of a number of small investments.
Other
Net charges classified as Other, as presented in Other income
(expense), were $267 million in the first nine months of
2008, compared to net income of $22 million in the first
nine months of 2007. The net charges in the first nine months of
2008 were primarily comprised of: (i) $288 million of
investment impairment charges, of which $145 million of
charges were attributed to other-than-temporary declines in
Sigma Fund investments resulting from our positions in Lehman,
WaMu and SFC, and $83 million of charges were attributed to
the impairment of a single strategic investment, and
(ii) $34 million of foreign currency losses, partially
offset by $24 million of gains relating to several interest
rate swaps not designated as hedges. The net income in the first
nine months of 2007 was primarily comprised of $68 million
of foreign currency gains, partially offset by $36 million
of investment impairment charges representing
other-than-temporary declines in the value of its investment
portfolio.
Effective
Tax Rate
The Company recorded $325 million of net tax benefits in
the first nine months of 2008, compared to $207 million of
net tax benefits in the first nine months of 2007. During the
first nine months of 2008, the Company’s net tax benefit
30
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
was favorably impacted by: (i) a net reduction in
unrecognized tax benefits, and (ii) tax benefits on
charges, including charges for: a software and silicon platform
consolidation, a settlement related to a purchase commitment,
asset impairment charges, reorganization of business charges,
investment impairments and a legal settlement. The
Company’s net tax benefit was unfavorably impacted by:
(i) a gain on sale of an investment, (ii) a tax charge
on derivative gains, (iii) a gain on a sale of property,
plant and equipment, (iv) investment impairment charges for
which the Company recorded no tax benefit, (v) transactions
costs for which the Company recorded no tax benefit, and
(vi) tax on the reduction of interest expense related to
the recognition of previously unrecognized tax benefits. The
Company’s ongoing effective tax rate, excluding these
items, was 34%. The Company’s net tax benefit excludes a
benefit for the U.S. R&D tax credit, which was not
reenacted until after the end of the Company’s third
quarter. The Company will include a full year tax benefit for
the U.S. R&D tax credit in the fourth quarter of 2008.
The Company’s net tax benefit of $207 million for the
first nine months of 2007 was favorably impacted by an increase
in tax credits. The Company’s net tax benefit was also
favorably impacted by nonrecurring items, including the
settlement of tax positions, tax incentives received and the
reversal of deferred tax valuation allowances, and unfavorably
impacted by nonrecurring items, including adjustments to
deferred taxes in
non-U.S. locations
due to enacted tax rate changes, an increase in unrecognized tax
benefits and a non-deductible IPR&D charge. The
Company’s effective tax rate for the first nine months of
2007, excluding the nonrecurring items and tax impact of
restructuring charges and asset impairment charges, was 26%.
Loss from
Continuing Operations
The Company incurred a net loss from continuing operations
before income taxes of $912 million in the first nine
months of 2008, compared with a net loss from continuing
operations before income taxes of $423 million in the first
nine months of 2007. After taxes, the Company incurred a net
loss from continuing operations of $587 million, or
$0.26 per diluted share, in the first nine months of 2008,
compared to a net loss from continuing operations of
$216 million, or $0.09 per diluted share, in the first nine
months of 2007.
The larger loss from continuing operations before income taxes
in the first nine months of 2008 compared to the first nine
months of 2007 is primarily attributed to: (i) a
$1.1 billion decrease in gross margin, (ii) a
$289 million increase in charges classified as Other, as
presented in Other income (expense), and (iii) a
$74 million decrease in net interest income. These factors
were partially offset by: (i) a $477 million decrease
in SG&A expenses, (ii) a $249 million decrease in
Other charges, (iii) a $231 million decrease in
R&D expenditures, and (iv) a $56 million increase
in gains on the sale of investments and businesses.
Reorganization
of Businesses
The Company maintains a formal Involuntary Severance Plan (the
“Severance Plan”), which permits the Company to offer
eligible employees severance benefits based on years of service
and employment grade level in the event that employment is
involuntarily terminated as a result of a
reduction-in-force
or restructuring. Each separate
reduction-in-force
has qualified for severance benefits under the Severance Plan.
The Company recognizes termination benefits based on formulas
per the Severance Plan at the point in time that future
settlement is probable and can be reasonably estimated based on
estimates prepared at the time a restructuring plan is approved
by management. Exit costs consist of future minimum lease
payments on vacated facilities and other contractual
terminations. At each reporting date, the Company evaluates its
accruals for exit costs and employee separation costs to ensure
the accruals are still appropriate. In certain circumstances,
accruals are no longer required because of efficiencies in
carrying out the plans or because employees previously
identified for separation resigned from the Company and did not
receive severance or were redeployed due to circumstances not
foreseen when the original plans were initiated. The Company
reverses accruals through the income statement line item where
the original charges were recorded when it is determined they
are no longer required.
The Company expects to realize cost-saving benefits of
approximately $52 million during the remaining three months
of 2008 from the plans that were initiated during the first nine
months of 2008, representing $9 million of savings in Costs
of sales, $34 million of savings in R&D expenditures
and $9 million of savings in SG&A expenses. Beyond
2008, the Company expects the reorganization plans initiated
during the first nine months of 2008 to provide annualized cost
savings of approximately $248 million, representing
$69 million of savings in Costs of sales, $142 million
of savings in R&D expenditures and $37 million of
savings in SG&A expenses.
31
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
2008
Charges
During the first nine months of 2008, the Company committed to
implement various productivity improvement plans aimed at
achieving long-term, sustainable profitability by driving
efficiencies and reducing operating costs.
During the third quarter of 2008, the Company recorded net
reorganization of business charges of $36 million,
including $5 million of charges in Costs of sales and
$31 million of charges under Other charges in the
Company’s condensed consolidated statements of operations.
Included in the aggregate $36 million are charges of
$38 million for employee separation costs and
$15 million for exit costs, partially offset by
$17 million of reversals for accruals no longer needed.
During the first nine months of 2008, the Company recorded net
reorganization of business charges of $165 million,
including $41 million of charges in Costs of sales and
$124 million of charges under Other charges in the
Company’s condensed consolidated statements of operations.
Included in the aggregate $165 million are charges of
$192 million for employee separation costs and
$20 million for exit costs, partially offset by
$47 million of reversals for accruals no longer needed.
The following table displays the net charges incurred by
business segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
Segment
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
Mobile Devices
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
97
|
|
Home and Networks Mobility
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
Enterprise Mobility Solutions
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
36
|
|
|
$
|
165
|
|
|
|
The following table displays a rollforward of the reorganization
of businesses accruals established for exit costs and employee
separation costs from January 1, 2008 to September 27,
2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accruals at
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Accruals at
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
2008(1)
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Charges
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Used
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
Exit costs
|
|
$
|
42
|
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13
|
)
|
|
$
|
48
|
|
Employee separation costs
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
(234
|
)
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
235
|
|
|
$
|
212
|
|
|
$
|
(40
|
)
|
|
$
|
(247
|
)
|
|
$
|
160
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes translation adjustments. |
Exit
Costs
At January 1, 2008, the Company had an accrual of
$42 million for exit costs attributable to lease
terminations. The 2008 additional charges of $20 million
are primarily related to the exit of leased facilities in the UK
by the Mobile Devices segment. The adjustments of
$1 million reflect $3 million of reversals of accruals
no longer needed, partially offset by $2 million of
translation adjustments. The $13 million used in 2008
reflects cash payments. The remaining accrual of
$48 million, which is included in Accrued liabilities in
the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets at
September 27, 2008, represents future cash payments,
primarily for lease termination obligations.
Employee
Separation Costs
At January 1, 2008, the Company had an accrual of
$193 million for employee separation costs, representing
the severance costs for approximately 2,800 employees. The
2008 additional charges of $192 million represent severance
costs for approximately an additional 3,900 employees, of
which 2,000 are direct employees and 1,900 are indirect
employees.
32
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The adjustments of $39 million reflect $44 million of
reversals of accruals no longer needed, partially offset by
$5 million of translation adjustments. The $44 million
of reversals represent previously accrued costs for
approximately 300 employees.
During the nine months ended September 27, 2008,
approximately 4,800 employees, of which 2,500 were direct
employees and 2,300 were indirect employees, were separated from
the Company. The $234 million used in 2008 reflects cash
payments to these separated employees. The remaining accrual of
$112 million, which is included in Accrued liabilities in
the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets at
September 27, 2008, is expected to be paid to approximately
1,600 employees.
2007
Charges
During 2007, the Company committed to implement various
productivity improvement plans aimed at achieving long-term,
sustainable profitability by driving efficiencies and reducing
operating costs. All three of the Company’s business
segments, as well as corporate functions, were impacted by these
plans. The majority of the employees affected were located in
North America and Europe.
For the three months ended September 29, 2007, the Company
recorded net reorganization of business charges of
$122 million, including $64 million of charges in
Costs of sales and $58 million of charges under Other
charges (income) in the Company’s condensed consolidated
statements of operations. Included in the aggregate
$122 million are charges of $87 million for employee
separation costs, $39 million for fixed asset impairment
charges and $5 million for exit costs, partially offset by
reversals for accruals no longer needed.
For the nine months ended September 29, 2007, the Company
recorded net reorganization of business charges of
$301 million, including $80 million of charges in
Costs of sales and $221 million of charges under Other
charges (income) in the Company’s condensed consolidated
statements of operations. Included in the aggregate
$301 million are charges of $311 million for employee
separation costs, $39 million for fixed asset impairment
charges and $10 million for exit costs, partially offset by
reversals for accruals no longer needed.
The following table displays the net charges incurred by segment
for the three and nine months ended September 29, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
Segment
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Mobile Devices
|
|
$
|
106
|
|
|
$
|
203
|
|
Home and Networks Mobility
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
Enterprise Mobility Solutions
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
274
|
|
General Corporate
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
122
|
|
|
$
|
301
|
|
|
|
The following table displays a rollforward of the reorganization
of businesses accruals established for exit costs and employee
separation costs from January 1, 2007 to September 29,
2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accruals at
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Accruals at
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
2007(1)(2)
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Charges
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Used
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Exit costs
|
|
$
|
54
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
(28
|
)
|
|
$
|
38
|
|
Employee separation costs
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
311
|
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
(195
|
)
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
158
|
|
|
$
|
321
|
|
|
$
|
(53
|
)
|
|
$
|
(223
|
)
|
|
$
|
203
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes translation adjustments. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes accruals established through purchase accounting for
businesses acquired of $6 million covering approximately
200 employees. |
33
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Exit
Costs—Lease Terminations
At January 1, 2007, the Company had an accrual of
$54 million for exit costs attributable to lease
terminations. The 2007 additional charges of $10 million
were primarily related to the planned exit of certain activities
in Ireland by the Home and Networks Mobility segment. The 2007
adjustments of $2 million represented accruals for exit
costs established through purchase accounting for businesses
acquired. The $28 million used in 2007 reflected cash
payments. The remaining accrual of $38 million, which is
included in Accrued liabilities in the Company’s condensed
consolidated balance sheet at September 29, 2007,
represented future cash payments for lease termination
obligations.
Employee
Separation Costs
At January 1, 2007, the Company had an accrual of
$104 million for employee separation costs, representing
the severance costs for approximately 2,300 employees. The
2007 additional charges of $311 million represented
severance costs for approximately 5,100 employees, of which
1,800 were direct employees and 3,300 were indirect employees.
The adjustments of $55 million reflected $59 million
of reversals of accruals no longer needed, partially offset by
$4 million of accruals for severance plans established
through purchase accounting for businesses acquired. The
$59 million of reversals represented previously accrued
costs for 1,100 employees, and primarily related to a
strategic change regarding a plant closure and specific
employees previously identified for separation who resigned from
the Company and did not receive severance or who were redeployed
due to circumstances not foreseen when the original plans were
approved. The $4 million of accruals represented severance
plans for 200 employees established through purchase
accounting for businesses acquired.
During the first nine months of 2007, approximately
4,200 employees, of which 1,300 were direct employees and
2,900 were indirect employees, were separated from the Company.
The $195 million used in 2007 reflects cash payments to
these separated employees. The remaining accrual of
$165 million, which is included in Accrued liabilities in
the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheet at
September 29, 2007, was expected to be paid to
approximately 2,300 separated employees. Since that time,
$131 million has been paid to approximately 2,000 separated
employees and $28 million has been reversed.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
As highlighted in the condensed consolidated statements of cash
flows, the Company’s liquidity and available capital
resources are impacted by four key components: (i) current
cash and cash equivalents, (ii) operating activities,
(iii) investing activities, and (iv) financing
activities.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
At September 27, 2008, the Company’s cash and cash
equivalents (which are highly-liquid investments with an
original maturity of three months or less) aggregated
$3.0 billion, an increase of $222 million compared to
$2.8 billion at December 31, 2007. At
September 27, 2008, $197 million of this amount was
held in the U.S. and $2.8 billion was held by the
Company or its subsidiaries in other countries. While the
Company regularly repatriates funds and a significant portion of
the funds currently offshore can be repatriated quickly and with
minimal adverse financial impact, repatriation of some of these
funds could be subject to delay and could have potential adverse
tax consequences. The Company continues to analyze and review
various repatriation strategies to continue to efficiently
repatriate funds. At September 27, 2008, restricted cash
was $177 million (including $111 million held outside
of the U.S.), compared to $158 million (including
$91 million held outside of the U.S.) as of
December 31, 2007.
Operating
Activities
In the first nine months of 2008, the net cash provided by
operating activities from continuing operations was
$41 million, compared to $315 million in the first
nine months of 2007. The primary contributors to cash flow from
operations were: (i) a $1.0 billion decrease in
accounts receivable, and (ii) earnings from continuing
operations (adjusted for non-cash items) of $291 million.
These positive contributors to operating cash flow were
partially offset by: (i) a $524 million decrease in
accounts payable and accrued liabilities, (ii) a $530
million cash outflow due to changes in other assets and
liabilities, (iii) a $194 million increase in other
current assets, and (iv) a $46 million increase in
inventories.
34
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Accounts Receivable: The Company’s net
accounts receivable were $4.3 billion at September 27,
2008, compared to $5.3 billion at December 31, 2007.
The Company’s days sales outstanding (“DSO”),
including net long-term receivables, were 53 days at
September 27, 2008, compared to 50 days at
December 31, 2007 and 53 days at September 29,
2007. The Company’s businesses sell their products in a
variety of markets throughout the world and payment terms can
vary by market type and geographic location. Accordingly, the
Company’s levels of net accounts receivable and DSO can be
impacted by the timing and level of sales that are made by its
various businesses and by the geographic locations in which
those sales are made. In addition, from time to time, the
Company elects to sell accounts receivable to third parties. The
Company’s levels of net accounts receivable and DSO can be
impacted by the timing and amount of such sales, which can vary
by period and can be impacted by numerous factors.
Inventory: The Company’s net inventory
was $2.6 billion at September 27, 2008, compared to
$2.8 billion at December 31, 2007. The decrease in net
inventory from December 31, 2007 was primarily due to a
charge of $291 million for excess inventory due to a
decision to consolidate software and silicon platforms in the
Mobile Devices segment. The Company’s inventory turns were
7.3 (excluding the excess inventory charge in the Mobile Devices
segment) at September 27, 2008, compared to 10.0 at
December 31, 2007 and 8.4 at September 29, 2007. The
decline in inventory turns reflects lower turns in all three of
the Company’s businesses. Inventory turns were calculated
using an annualized rolling three months of costs of sales
method. The Company’s days sales in inventory
(“DSI”) were 49 days (excluding the excess
inventory charge in the Mobile Devices segment) at
September 27, 2008, compared to 36 days at
December 31, 2007 and 42 days at September 29,
2007. DSI is calculated by dividing net inventory by the average
daily costs of sales. Inventory management continues to be an
area of focus as the Company balances the need to maintain
strategic inventory levels to ensure competitive delivery
performance to its customers against the risk of inventory
excess and obsolescence due to rapidly changing technology and
customer spending requirements.
Accounts Payable: The Company’s accounts
payable were $3.8 billion at September 27, 2008,
compared to $4.2 billion at December 31, 2007. The
Company’s days payable outstanding (“DPO”) were
64 days (excluding the excess inventory charge in the
Mobile Devices segment) at September 27, 2008, compared to
53 days at December 31, 2007 and 52 days at
September 29, 2007. The improvement in DPO reflects
continuing benefits from the Company’s efforts to extend
its contractuals payment terms with suppliers. DPO is calculated
by dividing accounts payable by the average daily costs of
sales. The Company buys products in a variety of markets
throughout the world and payment terms can vary by market type
and geographic location. Accordingly, the Company’s levels
of accounts payable and DPO can be impacted by the timing and
level of purchases made by its various businesses and by the
geographic locations in which those purchases are made.
Cash Conversion Cycle: The Company’s cash
conversion cycle (“CCC”) was 38 days (excluding the
excess inventory charge in the Mobile Devices segment) at
September 27, 2008, compared to 33 days at
December 31, 2007 and 43 days at September 29,
2007. CCC is calculated by adding DSO and DSI and subtracting
DPO. The increase in CCC at September 27, 2008 compared to
December 31, 2007 reflects higher DSI, partially offset by
higher DPO. CCC was higher in the Mobile Devices and Enterprise
Mobility segments and lower in the Home and Networks Mobility
segment.
Reorganization of Businesses: The Company has
implemented reorganization of businesses plans. Cash payments
for exit costs and employee separations in connection with a
number of these plans were $247 million in the first nine
months of 2008, as compared to $223 million in the first
nine months of 2007. Of the $160 million reorganization of
businesses accrual at September 27, 2008, $112 million
relates to employee separation costs and is expected to be paid
in 2008. The remaining $48 million relates to lease
termination obligations that are expected to be paid over a
number of years.
Defined Benefit Plan Contributions: The
Company expects to make cash contributions of approximately
$240 million to its U.S. pension plans and
approximately $50 million to its
Non-U.S. pension
plans during 2008. The Company also expects to make cash
contributions totaling approximately $20 million to its
postretirement healthcare plan during 2008. During the first
nine months of 2008, the Company contributed $180 million
and $37 million to its U.S. Regular and
Non-U.S. pension
plans, respectively, and $14 million to its postretirement
healthcare plan.
There has been a negative return on the plans’ assets
through September 27, 2008 which could ultimately affect
the funded status of the plans. Recent market conditions have
resulted in an unusually high degree of volatility and increased
the risks and illiquidity associated with certain investments
held by the pension plans, which could impact the value of
investments after the date of this filing. The ultimate impact
on the funded status will be determined based upon market
conditions in effect when the annual valuation for the year
ending December 31, 2008 is performed.
35
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Investing
Activities
The most significant components of the Company’s investing
activities during the first nine months of 2008 include:
(i) net proceeds from sales of Sigma Fund investments,
(ii) capital expenditures, (iii) proceeds from the
sales of investments and businesses, and (iv) strategic
acquisitions of, or investments in, other companies.
Net cash provided by investing activities was $748 million
in the first nine months of 2008, as compared to net cash
provided of $2.0 billion in the first nine months of 2007.
The $1.3 billion decrease in cash provided by investing
activities, was primarily due to: (i) a $6.0 billion
decrease in cash received from the sale of Sigma Fund
investments, partially offset by: (i) a $4.3 billion
decrease in cash used for acquisitions and investments,
(ii) a $320 million decrease in purchases of
short-term investments, and (iii) a $120 million
increase in proceeds from the sales of investments and
businesses.
Sigma Fund: The Company and its wholly-owned
subsidiaries invest most of their U.S. dollar-denominated
cash in a fund (the “Sigma Fund”) that is designed to
perform similar to a money market fund. The Company received
$1.1 billion in net proceeds from sales of Sigma Fund
investments in the first nine months of 2008, compared to
$7.2 billion in net proceeds in the first nine months of
2007. The Sigma Fund aggregate balances were $3.9 billion
at September 27, 2008, compared to $5.2 billion at
December 31, 2007. At September 27, 2008,
$480 million of the Sigma Fund investments were held in the
U.S. and $3.4 billion were held by the Company or its
subsidiaries in other countries. While the Company regularly
repatriates funds and a significant portion of the funds
currently offshore can be repatriated quickly and with minimal
adverse financial impact, repatriation of some of these funds
could be subject to delay and could have potential adverse tax
consequences. The Company continues to analyze and review
various repatriation strategies to continue to efficiently
repatriate funds.
The Sigma Fund portfolio is managed by four premier independent
investment management firms. Investments purchased must be in
high-quality, investment grade (rated at least
A/A-1 by
Standard & Poor’s or
A2/P-1 by
Moody’s Investors Service), U.S. dollar-denominated
debt obligations, including certificates of deposit, commercial
paper, government bonds, corporate bonds and asset- and
mortgage-backed securities. Under the Sigma Fund’s
investment policies, except for debt obligations of the U.S.
treasury and U.S. agencies, no more than 5% of the Sigma Fund
portfolio is to consist of debt obligations of any one issuer.
The Sigma Fund’s investment policies further require that
floating rate investments must have a maturity at purchase date
that does not exceed thirty-six months with an interest rate
reset at least annually. The average interest rate reset of the
investments held by the funds must be 120 days or less. The
actual average interest rate reset of the portfolio (excluding
other-than-temporarily impaired securities) was 35 days and
40 days at September 27, 2008 and December 31,
2007, respectively.
The Company primarily relies on valuation pricing models and
broker quotes to determine the fair value of investments in the
Sigma Fund. The models are developed and maintained primarily by
third-party pricing providers. The valuation methodologies
applied use a number of standard inputs, including benchmark
yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes where the party is
standing ready and able to transact, issuer spreads, benchmark
securities, bids, offers and other reference data. The valuation
methodologies may prioritize these inputs differently at each
balance sheet date for any given security, based on market
conditions. Not all of the standard inputs listed will be used
each time in the valuation methodologies. For each asset class,
quantifiable inputs related to perceived market movements and
sector news may be considered in addition to the standard inputs.
As of September 27, 2008, the fair market value of the
Sigma Fund was $3.9 billion, of which $3.4 billion has
been classified as current and $483 million has been
classified as non-current, compared to a fair market value of
$5.2 billion at December 31, 2007, all classified as
current. During the third quarter and first nine months of 2008,
the Company recorded a net unrealized loss of $26 million
and $63 million, respectively, in the available-for-sale
securities held in the Sigma Fund. The total unrealized loss on
the Sigma Fund portfolio at the end of September 27, 2008
is $120 million, of which $42 million relates to the
securities classified as current and $78 million relates to
securities classified as non-current. As of December 31,
2007, the unrealized loss on the Sigma Fund portfolio was
$57 million, all classified as current. The unrealized
losses have been reflected as a reduction in Non-owner changes
to equity.
As of September 27, 2008, $483 million of Sigma Fund
investments have been classified as non-current because they
have maturities greater than 12 months, the market values
are below cost and the Company plans to hold the securities
until they recover to cost or until maturity. The Company
believes this decline is temporary, primarily due to the ongoing
disruptions in the capital markets. The weighted average
maturity of the Sigma Fund investments classified as non-current
(excluding other-than-temporarily impaired securities) was
17 months. Substantially all of these securities (excluding
other-than-temporary impaired securities) have investment grade
ratings and, accordingly, the Company believes it is
36
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
probable that it will be able to collect all amounts it is owed
under these securities according to their contractual terms,
which may be at maturity. If it becomes probable that the
Company will not collect the amounts in accordance with the
contractual terms of the security, the Company would consider
the decline other-than-temporary. The Company continuously
assesses its cash needs and continues to believe that the
balance of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments and
investments in the Sigma Fund classified as current are more
than adequate to meet its current operating requirements over
the next twelve months. Therefore, the Company believes it is
prudent to hold the $483 million of securities classified
as non-current to maturity (or until they recover to cost), at
which time we anticipate the securities will liquidate at cost.
During the third quarter and first nine months of 2008, the
Company recorded $141 million and $145 million,
respectively, of other-than-temporary declines in the Sigma Fund
investments as investment impairment charges in the condensed
consolidated statements of operations, resulting primarily from
our positions in Lehman, WaMu and SFC.
Subsequent to September 27, 2008, there has been a further
decline in the fair value of the Sigma Fund’s SFC
securities, which the Company considers
other-than-temporary,
and will be recorded as an investment impairment in the fourth
quarter of 2008. The impairment will be no greater than
$43 million, which represents the cost basis of these
securities as of September 27, 2008.
Strategic Acquisitions and Investments: The
Company used cash for acquisitions and new investment activities
of $180 million in the first nine months of 2008, compared
to $4.5 billion in the first nine months of 2007. During
the first nine months of 2008, the Company: (i) acquired a
controlling interest of Vertex Standard Co. Ltd. (part of the
Enterprise Mobility Solutions segment), (ii) acquired the
assets related to digital cable set-top products of Zhejiang
Dahua Digital Technology Co., LTD. and Hangzhou Image Silicon,
known collectively as Dahua Digital (part of the Home and
Networks Mobility segment), and (iii) completed the
acquisition of Soundbuzz Pte. Ltd. (part of the Mobile Devices
segment). During the first nine months of 2007, the Company
completed seven strategic acquisitions for an aggregate of
approximately $4.5 billion in net cash, including the
acquisitions of: (i) Symbol Technologies, Inc. (part of the
Enterprise Mobility Solutions segment) in January 2007 for
approximately $3.5 billion, (ii) Good Technology, Inc.
(part of the Enterprise Mobility Solutions segment) in January
2007 for approximately $438 million, (iii) Netopia,
Inc. (part of the Home and Networks Mobility segment) in
February 2007 for approximately $183 million,
(iv) Terayon Communications System (part of the Home and
Network Mobility segment) in July 2007 for approximately
$137 million, (v) Tut Systems, Inc. (part of the Home
and Networks Mobility segment) in March 2007, (vi) Modulus
Video, Inc. (part of the Home and Networks Mobility segment) in
June 2007, and (vii) Leapstone Systems, Inc. (part of the
Home and Networks Mobility segment) in August 2007.
Capital Expenditures: Capital expenditures in
the first nine months of 2008 were $387 million, compared
to $393 million in the first nine months of 2007. The
Company’s emphasis in making capital expenditures is to
focus on strategic investments driven by customer demand and new
design capability.
Sales of Investments and Businesses: The
Company received $83 million in proceeds from the sales of
investments and businesses in the first nine months of 2008,
compared to proceeds of $75 million in the first nine
months of 2007. The $83 million in proceeds in the first
nine months of 2008 was primarily comprised of net proceeds
received in connection with the sales of certain of the
Company’s equity investments. The $75 million in
proceeds in the first nine months of 2007 was comprised of
$39 million of net proceeds received in connection with the
prior sale of the automotive electronics business upon the
satisfaction of certain closing conditions and proceeds received
in connection with the sales of certain of the Company’s
equity investments.
Short-Term Investments: At September 27,
2008, the Company had $735 million in short-term
investments (which are highly-liquid fixed-income investments
with an original maturity greater than three months but less
than one year), compared to $612 million of short-term
investments at December 31, 2007.
Investment Securities: In addition to
available cash and cash equivalents, the Sigma Fund portfolio
and available-for-sale equity securities, the Company views its
investment securities as an additional source of liquidity. The
majority of these securities represent investments in technology
companies and, accordingly, the fair market values of these
securities are subject to substantial price volatility. In
addition, the realizable value of these securities is subject to
market and other conditions. At September 27, 2008, the
Company’s available-for-sale equity securities portfolio
had an approximate fair market value of $281 million, which
represented a cost basis of $306 million and a net
unrealized loss of $25 million. At December 31, 2007,
the Company’s available-for-sale securities portfolio had
an approximate fair market value of $333 million, which
represented a cost basis of $372 million and a net
unrealized loss of $39 million.
37
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Financing
Activities
The most significant components of the Company’s financing
activities are: (i) payment of dividends,
(ii) purchases of the Company’s common stock under its
share repurchase program, (iii) repayment of debt,
(iv) issuance of common stock, and (v) net proceeds
from, or repayment of, commercial paper and short-term
borrowings.
Net cash used for financing activities was $568 million in
the first nine months of 2008, compared to $2.9 billion
used in the first nine months of 2007. Cash used for financing
activities in the first nine months of 2008 was primarily:
(i) $340 million of cash used to pay dividends,
(ii) $138 million of cash used to purchase
approximately 9.0 million shares of the Company’s
common stock under the share repurchase program, all during the
first quarter of 2008, (iii) $114 million of cash used
for the repayment of maturing long-term debt,
(iv) $37 million of net cash used for the repayment of
short-term borrowings, and (v) $26 million in
distributions to discontinued operations, partially offset by
$86 million of net cash received from the issuance of
common stock in connection with the Company’s employee
stock option plans and employee stock purchase plan.
Cash used for financing activities in the first nine months of
2007 was primarily: (i) $2.5 billion of cash used for
the purchase of the Company’s common stock under the share
repurchase program, (ii) $354 million of cash used to
pay dividends, (iii) $167 million of cash used for the
repayment of debt, (iv) $162 million of net cash used
for the repayment of commercial paper and short-term borrowings,
and (v) $62 million in distributions to discontinued
operations, partially offset by proceeds
of $289 million received from the issuance of common
stock in connection with the Company’s employee stock
option plans and employee stock purchase plan.
Commercial Paper and Other Short-Term Debt: At
September 27, 2008, the Company’s outstanding notes
payable and current portion of long-term debt was
$189 million, compared to $332 million at
December 31, 2007. During the first quarter of 2008, the
Company repaid, at maturity, the entire $114 million
outstanding of 6.50% Senior Notes due March 1, 2008.
Subsequent to the end of the third quarter of 2008, the Company
repaid, at maturity, the entire $84 million outstanding of
5.80% Notes due October 15, 2008.
Net cash used for the repayment of commercial paper and
short-term borrowings was $37 million in the first nine
months of 2008, compared to $162 million of net cash used
in the first nine months of 2007. At September 27, 2008 and
December 31, 2007, the Company had no commercial paper
outstanding. Currently the capital markets are experiencing a
period of significant volatility and reduced liquidity. Routine
access to the commercial paper market has been limited for
issuers like Motorola. If the Company were to issue commercial
paper under the current market conditions, the funding costs the
Company would have to pay to issue commercial paper would be
elevated compared to historical levels. The Company may issue
commercial paper when it believes it is prudent to do so in
light of prevailing market conditions and other factors.
Long-Term Debt: The Company had outstanding
long-term debt of $4.0 billion at both September 27,
2008 and December 31, 2007. Although we believe that we
will be able to maintain sufficient access to the capital
markets, the current volatility and reduced liquidity in the
financial markets may result in periods of time when access to
the capital markets is limited for all issuers or issuers with
credit ratings similar to the Company’s credit ratings.
The Company may from time to time seek to opportunistically
retire certain of its outstanding debt through open market cash
purchases, privately-negotiated transactions or otherwise. Such
repurchases, if any, will depend on prevailing market
conditions, the Company’s liquidity requirements,
contractual restrictions and other factors.
Share Repurchase Program: During the first
nine months of 2008, the Company paid an aggregate of
$138 million, including transaction costs, to repurchase
9.0 million shares at an average price of $15.32. The
Company did not repurchase any of its shares during the second
or third quarters of 2008.
Through actions taken in July 2006 and March 2007, the Board of
Directors authorized the Company to repurchase an aggregate
amount of up to $7.5 billion of its outstanding shares of
common stock over a period ending in June 2009. The timing and
amount of future repurchases will be based on market and other
conditions. As of September 27, 2008, the Company remained
authorized to purchase an aggregate amount of up to
$3.6 billion of additional shares under the current stock
repurchase program.
Credit Ratings: Three independent credit
rating agencies, Fitch Ratings (“Fitch”), Moody’s
Investors Service (“Moody’s”), and
Standard & Poor’s (“S&P”), assign
ratings to the Company’s short-term and long-term debt. The
following chart reflects the current ratings assigned to the
Company’s senior unsecured non-credit enhanced long-term
debt and the Company’s commercial paper by each of these
agencies.
38
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of
|
|
Long-Term
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
Rating Agency
|
|
Debt Rating
|
|
Paper Rating
|
|
Date and Recent Actions Taken
|
|
|
Fitch
|
|
|
BBB
|
|
|
|
F-2
|
|
|
February 1, 2008 (placed all debt
on rating watch negative);
January 24, 2008 (downgraded
long-term debt to BBB (negative outlook) from BBB+ (negative
outlook))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moody’s
|
|
|
Baa2
|
|
|
|
P-2
|
|
|
May 14, 2008 (downgraded long-term
debt to Baa2 (negative outlook) from Baa1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S&P
|
|
|
BBB
|
|
|
|
A-2
|
|
|
January 25, 2008 (downgraded
long-term debt to BBB (credit watch negative) from A−
(negative outlook); placed A-2 commercial paper on credit watch
negative)
|
|
|
The Company’s debt ratings are considered “investment
grade.” If the Company’s senior long-term debt were
rated lower than “BBB−” by S&P or Fitch or
“Baa3” by Moody’s (which would be a decline of
two levels from current ratings), the Company’s long-term
debt would no longer be considered “investment grade.”
If this were to occur, the terms on which the Company could
borrow money would become more onerous. The Company would also
have to pay higher fees related to its domestic revolving credit
facility.
As further described under “Sales of Receivables”
below, for many years the Company has utilized a number of
receivables programs to sell a broadly-diversified group of
accounts receivables to third parties. Certain of the accounts
receivables are sold to a multi-seller commercial paper conduit.
This program provides for up to $400 million of accounts
receivables to be outstanding with the conduit at any time. The
obligations of the conduit to continue to purchase receivables
under this accounts receivables program could be terminated if
the Company’s long-term debt was rated lower than
“BB+” by S&P or “Ba1” by Moody’s
(which would be a decline of three levels from the current
ratings). If this accounts receivables program were terminated,
the Company would no longer be able to sell its accounts
receivables to the conduit in this manner, but it would not have
to repurchase previously-sold receivables.
Credit
Facilities
At September 27, 2008, the Company’s total domestic
and
non-U.S. credit
facilities totaled $4.3 billion, of which $219 million
was utilized. These facilities are principally comprised of:
(i) a $2.0 billion five-year domestic syndicated
revolving credit facility maturing in December 2011 (as amended,
the
“5-Year
Credit Facility”), which is not utilized, and
(ii) $2.3 billion of uncommitted
non-U.S. credit
facilities (of which $219 million was considered utilized
at September 27, 2008). Unused availability under the
existing credit facilities, together with available cash, cash
equivalents, Sigma Fund balances (both current and non-current)
and other sources of liquidity are, among other things,
generally available to support outstanding commercial paper.
In order to borrow funds under the
5-Year
Credit Facility, the Company must be in compliance with various
conditions, covenants and representations contained in the
agreements. The Company was in compliance with the terms of the
5-Year
Credit Facility at September 27, 2008. The Company has
never borrowed under its domestic revolving credit facilities.
Utilization of the
non-U.S. credit
facilities may also be dependent on the Company’s ability
to meet certain conditions at the time a borrowing is requested.
Long-term
Customer Financing Commitments
Outstanding Commitments: Certain purchasers of
the Company’s infrastructure equipment continue to request
that suppliers provide long-term financing, defined as financing
with terms greater than one year, in connection with equipment
purchases. These requests may include all or a portion of the
purchase price of the equipment. Periodically, the Company makes
commitments to provide financing to purchasers in connection
with such requests. However, the Company’s obligation to
provide long-term financing is often conditioned on the issuance
of a letter of credit in favor of the Company by a reputable
bank to support the purchaser’s credit or a pre-existing
commitment from a reputable bank to purchase the long-term
receivables from the Company. The Company had outstanding
commitments to provide long-term financing to third parties
totaling $373 million and $610 million at
September 27, 2008 and December 31, 2007,
respectively. Of these amounts, $276 million and
$454 million were supported by letters of credit or by bank
commitments to purchase long-term receivables at
September 27, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively.
Guarantees of Third-Party Debt: In addition to
providing direct financing to certain equipment customers, the
Company also assists customers in obtaining financing directly
from banks and other sources to fund equipment
39
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
purchases. The Company had committed to provide financial
guarantees relating to customer financing totaling
$35 million and $42 million at September 27, 2008
and December 31, 2007, respectively (including
$23 million at both September 27, 2008 and
December 31, 2007, relating to the sale of short-term
receivables). Customer financing guarantees outstanding were
$3 million at both September 27, 2008 and
December 31, 2007 (including $1 million and
$0 million at September 27, 2008 and December 31,
2007, respectively, relating to the sale of short-term
receivables).
Outstanding Long-Term Receivables: The Company
had net long-term receivables, less allowance for losses, of
$115 million and $118 million at September 27,
2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively (net of allowances
for losses of $6 million and $5 million at
September 27, 2008 and December 31, 2007,
respectively). These long-term receivables are generally
interest bearing, with interest rates ranging from 3% to 14%.
Sales
of Receivables
The Company sells accounts receivables and long-term receivables
to third parties in transactions that qualify as
“true-sales.” Certain of these accounts receivables
and long-term receivables are sold to third parties on a
one-time, non-recourse basis, while others are sold to third
parties under committed facilities that involve contractual
commitments from these parties to purchase qualifying
receivables up to an outstanding monetary limit. Committed
facilities may be revolving in nature and, typically, must be
renewed on an annual basis. The Company may or may not retain
the obligation to service the sold accounts receivable and
long-term receivables.
In the aggregate, at September 27, 2008, these committed
facilities provided for up to $1.1 billion to be
outstanding with the third parties at any time, as compared to
up to $1.4 billion provided at December 31, 2007. As
of September 27, 2008, $568 million of the
Company’s committed facilities were utilized, compared to
$497 million that were utilized at December 31, 2007.
As described above under “Credit Ratings”, certain
events could cause a $400 million committed facility to
terminate. In addition, before receivables can be sold under
certain of the committed facilities, they may need to meet
contractual requirements, such as credit quality or insurability.
Total accounts receivables and long-term receivables sold by the
Company were $875 million and $1.1 billion for the
three months ended September 27, 2008 and
September 29, 2007, respectively, and $2.5 billion and
$3.9 billion for the nine months ended September 27,
2008 and September 29, 2007, respectively. As of
September 27, 2008, there were $883 million of
receivables outstanding under these programs for which the
Company retained servicing obligations (including
$513 million of accounts receivable), compared to
$978 million outstanding at December 31, 2007
(including $587 million of accounts receivable).
Under certain receivables programs, the value of the receivables
sold is covered by credit insurance obtained from independent
insurance companies, less deductibles or self-insurance
requirements under the policies (with the Company retaining
credit exposure for the remaining portion). The Company’s
total credit exposure to outstanding short-term receivables that
have been sold was $23 million at both September 27,
2008 and December 31, 2007. Reserves of $2 million and
$1 million were recorded for potential losses at
September 27, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively.
Other
Contingencies
Potential Contractual Damage Claims in Excess of Underlying
Contract Value: In certain circumstances, our
businesses may enter into contracts with customers pursuant to
which the damages that could be claimed by the other party for
failed performance might exceed the revenue the Company receives
from the contract. Contracts with these sorts of uncapped damage
provisions are fairly rare, but individual contracts could still
represent meaningful risk. There is a possibility that a damage
claim by a counterparty to one of these contracts could result
in expenses to the Company that are far in excess of the revenue
received from the counterparty in connection with the contract.
Indemnification Provisions: In addition, the
Company may provide indemnifications for losses that result from
the breach of general warranties contained in certain
commercial, intellectual property and divestiture agreements.
Historically, the Company has not made significant payments
under these agreements, nor have there been significant claims
asserted against the Company. However, there is an increasing
risk in relation to intellectual property indemnities given the
current legal climate. In indemnification cases, payment by the
Company is conditioned on the other party making a claim
pursuant to the procedures specified in the particular contract,
which procedures typically allow the Company to challenge the
other party’s claims. Further, the Company’s
obligations under these agreements for indemnification based on
breach of representations and warranties are generally limited
in terms of duration, typically not
40
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
more than 24 months, and for amounts not in excess of the
contract value, and in some instances, the Company may have
recourse against third parties for certain payments made by the
Company.
Legal Matters: The Company is a defendant in
various lawsuits, claims and actions, which arise in the normal
course of business. These include actions relating to products,
contracts and securities, as well as matters initiated by third
parties or Motorola relating to infringements of patents,
violations of licensing arrangements and other intellectual
property-related matters. In the opinion of management, the
ultimate disposition of these matters will not have a material
adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial
position, liquidity or results of operations.
Segment
Information
The following commentary should be read in conjunction with the
financial results of each reporting segment for the three and
nine months ended September 27, 2008 and September 29,
2007 as detailed in Note 9, “Segment
Information,” of the Company’s condensed consolidated
financial statements.
Mobile
Devices Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
|
Segment net sales
|
|
$
|
3,116
|
|
|
$
|
4,496
|
|
|
|
(31
|
)%
|
|
$
|
9,749
|
|
|
$
|
14,177
|
|
|
|
(31
|
)%
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(840
|
)
|
|
|
(248
|
)
|
|
|
239
|
%
|
|
|
(1,604
|
)
|
|
|
(813
|
)
|
|
|
97
|
%
|
|
|
For the third quarter of 2008, the segment’s net sales
represented 42% of the Company’s consolidated net sales,
compared to 51% in the third quarter of 2007. For the first nine
months of 2008, the segment’s net sales represented 42% of
the Company’s consolidated net sales, compared to 53% in
the first nine months of 2007.
Three
months ended September 27, 2008 compared to three months
ended September 29, 2007
In the third quarter of 2008, the segment’s net sales were
$3.1 billion, a decrease of 31% compared to net sales of
$4.5 billion in the third quarter of 2007. The 31% decrease
in net sales was primarily driven by a 32% decrease in unit
shipments. The segment’s product sales continued to be
negatively impacted by product portfolio gaps in critical market
segments, especially 3G, including smartphones, and in very
low-tier products. Improving the segment’s product
portfolio remains a top priority. On a product technology basis,
net sales decreased substantially for GSM and CDMA technologies,
and increased slightly for 3G and iDEN technologies. On a
geographic basis, net sales decreased substantially in North
America, the Europe, Middle East and Africa region
(“EMEA”) and Latin America and, to a lesser extent,
decreased in Asia.
The segment incurred an operating loss of $840 million in
the third quarter of 2008, compared to an operating loss of
$248 million in the third quarter of 2007. The operating
loss was primarily due to the decrease in gross margin, driven
by: (i) excess inventory and other related charges of
$370 million due to a decision to consolidate software and
silicon platforms, (ii) the 31% decrease in net sales, and
(iii) a $150 million charge for a settlement of the
Freescale Semiconductor purchase commitment, partially offset by
savings from cost-reduction activities. The decrease in gross
margin was partially offset by decreases in: (i) selling,
general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses,
primarily due to lower marketing expenses and savings from
cost-reduction initiatives, (ii) research and development
(“R&D”) expenditures related to savings from
cost-reduction initiatives, and (iii) reorganization of
business charges, relating primarily to employee severance
costs. As a percentage of net sales in the third quarter of 2008
as compared to the third quarter of 2007, SG&A and R&D
expenditures increased and gross margin decreased.
Unit shipments in the third quarter of 2008 were
25.4 million units, a 32% decrease compared to shipments of
37.2 million units in the third quarter of 2007 and a 10%
decrease compared to shipments of 28.1 million units in the
second quarter of 2008. The segment estimates its worldwide
market share to be approximately 8.4% in the third quarter of
2008, a decrease of approximately 5 percentage points
versus the third quarter of 2007, reflecting significant
declines in market share in North America and Latin America. The
segment estimates its worldwide market share decreased
approximately 1 percentage point versus the second quarter
of 2008.
41
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
In the third quarter of 2008, ASP was flat compared to the third
quarter of 2007. ASP is impacted by numerous factors, including
product mix, market conditions and competitive product
offerings, and ASP trends often vary over time.
Nine
months ended September 27, 2008 compared to nine months
ended September 29, 2007
In the first nine months of 2008, the segment’s net sales
were $9.7 billion, a decrease of 31% compared to net sales
of $14.2 billion in the first nine months of 2007. The 31%
decrease in net sales was primarily driven by: (i) a 32%
decrease in unit shipments to 80.9 million units in the
first nine months of 2008, compared to 118.1 million units
shipped in the first nine months of 2007, and (ii) a 1%
decrease in ASP. On a product technology basis, net sales
decreased substantially for GSM and CDMA technologies and, to a
lesser extent, decreased for iDEN and 3G technologies. On a
geographic basis, net sales decreased substantially in North
America, EMEA, and Asia and, to a lesser extent, decreased in
Latin America.
The segment incurred an operating loss of $1.6 billion in
the first nine months of 2008, compared to an operating loss of
$813 million in the first nine months of 2007. The
operating loss was primarily due to the decrease in gross
margin, driven by: (i) the 31% decrease in net sales, (ii)
excess inventory and other related charges of $370 million
due to a decision to consolidate software and silicon platforms,
and (iii) a $150 million charge for a settlement of
the Freescale Semiconductor purchase commitment, partially
offset by savings from cost-reduction activities. The decrease
in gross margin was partially offset by decreases in:
(i) SG&A expenses, primarily due to lower marketing
expenses and savings from cost-reduction initiatives,
(ii) R&D expenditures, reflecting savings from
cost-reduction initiatives and (iii) reorganization of
business charges, relating primarily to lower employee severance
costs. As a percentage of net sales in the first nine months of
2008 as compared to the first nine months of 2007, SG&A
expenses and R&D expenditures increased and gross margin
decreased.
Additionally, during the first quarter of 2008, the segment
completed the acquisition of Soundbuzz Pte. Ltd., a leading
pan-Asian music provider.
Home and
Networks Mobility Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
|
Segment net sales
|
|
$
|
2,369
|
|
|
$
|
2,389
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)%
|
|
$
|
7,490
|
|
|
$
|
7,290
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
Operating earnings
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
65
|
%
|
|
|
661
|
|
|
|
517
|
|
|
|
28
|
%
|
|
|
For the third quarter of 2008, the segment’s net sales
represented 32% of the Company’s consolidated net sales,
compared to 27% in the third quarter of 2007. For the first nine
months of 2008, the segment’s net sales represented 33% of
the Company’s consolidated net sales, compared to 27% in
the first nine months of 2007.
Three
months ended September 27, 2008 compared to three months
ended September 29, 2007
In the third quarter of 2008, the segment’s net sales
decreased 1% to $2.4 billion, compared to $2.4 billion
in the third quarter of 2007. The 1% decrease in net sales
primarily reflects a 14% decrease in net sales of wireless
networks, partially offset by a 19% increase in net sales in the
home business. The 14% decrease in net sales of wireless
networks was primarily driven by: (i) the decrease in net
sales by the embedded communication computing group
(“ECC”) that was divested at the end of 2007, and
(ii) lower net sales of iDEN and GSM infrastructure
equipment, partially offset by higher net sales of CDMA
infrastructure equipment. The 19% increase in net sales in the
home business was primarily driven by an 18% increase in net
sales of digital entertainment devices, reflecting a 52%
increase in unit shipments to 4.1 million units, partially
offset by lower ASP due to an unfavorable product mix shift and
pricing pressure.
On a geographic basis, the 1% decrease in net sales reflects
lower net sales in Asia and North America, and higher net sales
in Latin America and EMEA. The decrease in net sales in Asia was
primarily driven by lower net sales of GSM infrastructure
equipment. The decrease in net sales in North America was
primarily driven by lower net sales of iDEN infrastructure
equipment, partially offset by higher net sales in the home
business. The increase in net sales in Latin America was
primarily due to higher net sales in the home business. The
increase in net sales in EMEA was primarily due to higher net
sales of GSM infrastructure equipment. Net sales in North
America continue to comprise a significant
42
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
portion of the segment’s business, accounting for
approximately 48% of the segment’s total net sales in the
third quarter of 2008, compared to approximately 49% of the
segment’s total net sales in the third quarter of 2007.
The segment reported operating earnings of $263 million in
the third quarter of 2008, compared to operating earnings of
$159 million in the third quarter of 2007. The increase in
operating earnings was primarily due to decreases in both
R&D and SG&A expenses, primarily related to savings
from cost-reduction initiatives. These factors were partially
offset by a decrease in gross margin, primarily due to lower net
sales of iDEN infrastructure equipment and the absence of net
sales by ECC, partially offset by higher net sales in the home
business. As a percentage of net sales in the third quarter of
2008 as compared to the third quarter of 2007, gross margin,
SG&A expenses and R&D expenditures decreased, and
operating margin increased.
Nine
months ended September 27, 2008 compared to nine months
ended September 29, 2007
In the first nine months of 2008, the segment’s net sales
increased 3% to $7.5 billion, compared to $7.3 billion
in the first nine months of 2007. The 3% increase in net sales
primarily reflects an 18% increase in net sales in the home
business, partially offset by a 9% decrease in net sales of
wireless networks. The 18% increase in net sales in the home
business is primarily driven by a 21% increase in net sales of
digital entertainment devices, reflecting: (i) higher ASP
due to a favorable product mix shift, and (ii) a 14%
increase in unit shipments to 13.3 million units. The 9%
decrease in net sales of wireless networks was primarily driven
by: (i) the decrease in net sales by ECC, and
(ii) lower net sales of iDEN and CDMA infrastructure
equipment, partially offset by higher net sales of GSM and UMTS
infrastructure equipment.
On a geographic basis, the 3% increase in net sales was
primarily driven by higher net sales in EMEA, Latin America and
Asia, partially offset by lower net sales in North America. The
increase in net sales in EMEA was primarily due to higher net
sales of GSM infrastructure equipment. The increase in net sales
in Latin America was primarily due to higher net sales in the
home business. The increase in net sales in Asia was primarily
driven by higher net sales of UMTS and CDMA infrastructure
equipment, partially offset by lower net sales of GSM
infrastructure. The decrease in net sales in North America was
primarily due to lower net sales of iDEN and CDMA infrastructure
equipment, partially offset by higher net sales in the home
business. Net sales in North America accounted for approximately
50% of the segment’s total net sales in the first nine
months of 2008, compared to approximately 55% of the
segment’s total net sales in the first nine months of 2007.
The regional shift in the first nine months of 2008 as compared
to the first nine months of 2007 reflects a 14% aggregate growth
in net sales outside of North America, as well as a 6% decline
in net sales in North America.
The segment reported operating earnings of $661 million in
the first nine months of 2008, compared to operating earnings of
$517 million in the first nine months of 2007. The increase
in operating earnings was primarily due to: (i) the
decreases in both SG&A and R&D expenditures, primarily
related to savings from cost-reduction initiatives, and
(ii) a decrease in reorganization of business charges,
relating primarily to lower employee severance costs. These
factors were partially offset by a decrease in gross margin,
primarily due to lower net sales of iDEN and CDMA infrastructure
equipment and the decrease in net sales by ECC, partially offset
by higher net sales in the home business. As a percentage of net
sales in the first nine months of 2008 as compared to the first
nine months of 2007, gross margin, SG&A expenses and
R&D expenditures all decreased and operating margin
increased.
During the first quarter of 2008, the segment acquired the
assets related to digital cable set-top products of Zhejiang
Dahua Digital Technology Co., LTD and Hangzhou Image Silicon,
(known collectively as Dahua Digital), a developer, manufacturer
and marketer of cable set-tops and related low cost integrated
circuits for the emerging Chinese cable business.
Enterprise
Mobility Solutions Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
|
Segment net sales
|
|
$
|
2,030
|
|
|
$
|
1,954
|
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
$
|
5,878
|
|
|
$
|
5,591
|
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
Operating earnings
|
|
|
403
|
|
|
|
328
|
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
|
|
1,030
|
|
|
|
762
|
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
|
For the third quarter of 2008, the segment’s net sales
represented 27% of the Company’s consolidated net sales,
compared to 22% in the third quarter of 2007. For the first nine
months of 2008, the segment’s net sales represented 25% of
the Company’s consolidated net sales, compared to 21% in
the first nine months of 2007.
43
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Three
months ended September 27, 2008 compared to three months
ended September 29, 2007
In the third quarter of 2008, the segment’s net sales
increased 4% to $2.0 billion, compared to $2.0 billion
in the third quarter of 2007. The 4% increase in net sales
reflects a 9% increase in net sales to the government and public
safety market, primarily due to: (i) increased net sales
outside of North America, and (ii) the net sales generated
by Vertex Standard Co., Ltd. (“Vertex Standard”), a
business the Company acquired a controlling interest of in
January 2008, partially offset by a 8% decrease in net sales to
the commercial enterprise market. On a geographic basis, the
segment’s net sales were higher in EMEA, Asia and Latin
America and lower in North America. Net sales in North America
continue to comprise a significant portion of the segment’s
business, accounting for 56% of the segment’s total net
sales in the third quarter of 2008, compared to 62% in the third
quarter of 2007. The regional shift in the third quarter of 2008
as compared to the third quarter of 2007 reflects 20% growth in
net sales outside of North America, as well as a 6% decline in
net sales in North America.
The segment reported operating earnings of $403 million in
the third quarter of 2008, compared to operating earnings of
$328 million in the third quarter of 2007. The increase in
operating earnings was primarily due to an increase in gross
margin, driven by the 4% increase in net sales and favorable
product mix. The increase in gross margin was partially offset
by increased R&D expenditures, primarily due to
developmental engineering expenditures for new product
development and investment in next-generation technologies. As a
percentage of net sales in the third quarter of 2008 as compared
to the third quarter of 2007, gross margin and operating margin
increased, and SG&A expenses and R&D expenditures
decreased.
Subsequent to the end of the third quarter of 2008, the segment
completed the acquisition of AirDefense Inc., a leading wireless
local area network (WLAN) security provider.
Nine
months ended September 27, 2008 compared to nine months
ended September 29, 2007
In the first nine months of 2008, the segment’s net sales
increased 5% to $5.9 billion, compared to $5.6 billion
in the first nine months of 2007. The 5% increase in net sales
reflects: (i) a 7% increase in net sales to the government
and public safety market, and (ii) a 2% increase in net
sales to the commercial enterprise market. The increase in net
sales to the government and public safety market was primarily
driven by: (i) increased net sales outside of North
America, and (ii) the net sales generated by Vertex
Standard, partially offset by lower net sales in North America.
On a geographic basis, the segment’s net sales were higher
in EMEA, Asia and Latin America and lower in North America. Net
sales in North America accounted for 56% of the segment’s
total net sales in the first nine months of 2008, compared to
62% in the first nine months of 2007. The regional shift in the
first nine months of 2008 as compared to the first nine months
of 2007 reflects a 22% growth in net sales outside of North
America, as well as a 5% decline in net sales in North America.
The segment reported operating earnings of $1.0 billion in
the first nine months of 2008, compared to operating earnings of
$762 million in the first nine months of 2007. The increase
in operating earnings was primarily due to an increase in gross
margin, driven by: (i) the 5% increase in net sales,
(ii) favorable product mix, and (iii) an
inventory-related charge in connection with the acquisition of
Symbol Technologies, Inc. during the first quarter of 2007. The
increase in gross margin was partially offset by:
(i) increased R&D expenditures, primarily due to
developmental engineering expenditures for new product
development and investment in next-generation technologies, and
(ii) increased SG&A expenses, primarily due to selling
and marketing expenses related to the increase in net sales. As
a percentage of net sales in the first nine months of 2008 as
compared to the first nine months of 2007, gross margin,
R&D expenditures and operating margin increased, and
SG&A expenses decreased.
In January 2008, the Company acquired a controlling interest of
Vertex Standard, a global provider of two-way radio
communication solutions. The acquisition provides the Company
with access to Vertex Standard’s global distribution
channel and strengthened the Company’s product portfolio.
Significant
Accounting Policies
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations discusses the Company’s condensed
consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in
accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles. The preparation of these financial statements
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of
revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
44
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical
experience, current economic and industry conditions and on
various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under
the circumstances. This forms the basis for making judgments
about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not
readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ
from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Management believes the following significant accounting
policies require significant judgment and estimates:
— Revenue recognition
— Inventory valuation reserves
— Taxes on income
— Valuation of Sigma Fund, investments and long-lived
assets
— Restructuring activities
— Retirement-related benefits
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
The Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board
(“FASB”) Statement of Financial Accounting Standard
(“SFAS”) No. 157, “Fair Value
Measurements” (“SFAS 157”) on
January 1, 2008 for financial assets and liabilities, and
non-financial assets and liabilities that are recognized or
disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a
recurring basis. SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a
framework for measuring fair value as required by other
accounting pronouncements and expands fair value measurement
disclosures. The provisions of SFAS 157 are applied
prospectively upon adoption and did not have a material impact
on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial
statements. The disclosures required by SFAS 157 are
included in Note 6, “Fair Value Measurements,” to
the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.
In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position
157-2, which
delays the effective date of SFAS 157 for non-financial
assets and liabilities, which are not measured at fair value on
a recurring basis (at least annually) until fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2008. The Company is currently
assessing the impact of adopting SFAS 157 for non-financial
assets and liabilities on the Company’s condensed
consolidated financial statements.
The Company adopted SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value
Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities — Including an Amendment of FASB Statement
No. 115” (“SFAS 159”) as of
January 1, 2008. SFAS 159 permits entities to elect to
measure many financial instruments and certain other items at
fair value. The Company did not elect the fair value option for
any assets or liabilities, which were not previously carried at
fair value. Accordingly, the adoption of SFAS 159 had no
impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial
statements.
The Company adopted
EITF 06-4,
“Accounting for Deferred Compensation and Postretirement
Benefit Aspects of Endorsement Split-Dollar Life Insurance
Arrangements”
(“EITF 06-4”)
as of January 1, 2008.
EITF 06-4
requires that endorsement split-dollar life insurance
arrangements, which provide a benefit to an employee beyond the
postretirement period be recorded in accordance with
SFAS No. 106, “Employer’s Accounting for
Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions” or APB Opinion
No. 12, “Omnibus Opinion — 1967”
(“the Statements”) based on the substance of the
agreement with the employee. Upon adoption of
EITF 06-4,
the Company recognized an increase in Other liabilities of
$45 million with the offset reflected as a
cumulative-effect adjustment to January 1, 2008 Retained
earnings and Non-owner changes to equity in the amounts of
$4 million and $41 million, respectively, in the
Company’s condensed consolidated statement of
stockholders’ equity.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141
(revised 2007) (“SFAS 141R”), a revision of
SFAS 141, “Business Combinations.” SFAS 141R
establishes requirements for the recognition and measurement of
acquired assets, liabilities, goodwill and non-controlling
interests. SFAS 141R also provides disclosure requirements
related to business combinations. SFAS 141R is effective
for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008.
SFAS 141R will be applied prospectively to business
combinations with an acquisition date on or after the effective
date.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160,
“Non-Controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51”
(“SFAS 160”). SFAS 160 establishes new
standards for the accounting for and reporting of
non-controlling interests (formerly minority interests) and for
the loss of control of partially owned and consolidated
subsidiaries. SFAS 160 does not change the criteria for
consolidating a partially owned entity. SFAS 160 is
effective for
45
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The
provisions of SFAS 160 will be applied prospectively upon
adoption except for the presentation and disclosure
requirements, which will be applied retrospectively. The Company
does not expect the adoption of SFAS 160 to have a material
impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial
statements.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161,
“Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities, an amendment of SFAS No. 133”
(“SFAS 161”). SFAS 161 requires enhanced
disclosures about an entity’s derivative and hedging
activities and is effective for fiscal years and interim periods
beginning after November 15, 2008. The Company is currently
evaluating the additional disclosures required by SFAS 161.
Cost-Reduction
Initiatives Announced on October 30, 2008
On October 30, 2008, the Company announced new
cost-reduction initiatives, including planned workforce
reductions. In connection with these initiatives, management
approved specific plans that will result in one-time termination
benefits relating to approximately 1,500 employees,
primarily in the Mobile Devices segment. These plans will result
in pre-tax charges of $104 million. The Company expects to
approve additional plans in the fourth quarter of 2008.
46
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk
Foreign
Currency Risk
The Company uses financial instruments to reduce its overall
exposure to the effects of currency fluctuations on cash flows.
The Company’s policy prohibits speculation in financial
instruments for profit on the exchange rate price fluctuation,
trading in currencies for which there are no underlying
exposures, or entering into transactions for any currency to
intentionally increase the underlying exposure. Instruments that
are designated as part of a hedging relationship must be
effective at reducing the risk associated with the exposure
being hedged and are designated as a part of a hedging
relationship at the inception of the contract. Accordingly,
changes in market values of hedge instruments must be highly
correlated with changes in market values of underlying hedged
items both at the inception of the hedge and over the life of
the hedge contract.
The Company’s strategy related to foreign exchange exposure
management is to offset the gains or losses on the financial
instruments against losses or gains on the underlying
operational cash flows or investments based on the operating
business units’ assessment of risk. The Company enters into
derivative contracts for some of the Company’s
non-functional currency receivables and payables, which are
primarily denominated in major currencies that can be traded on
open markets. The Company uses forward contracts and options to
hedge these currency exposures. In addition, the Company enters
into derivative contracts for some firm commitments and some
forecasted transactions, which are designated as part of a
hedging relationship if it is determined that the transaction
qualifies for hedge accounting under the provisions of
SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities.” A portion of the
Company’s exposure is from currencies that are not traded
in liquid markets and these are addressed, to the extent
reasonably possible, through managing net asset positions,
product pricing and component sourcing.
At September 27, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the
Company had net outstanding foreign exchange contracts totaling
$2.9 billion and $3.0 billion, respectively.
Management believes that these financial instruments should not
subject the Company to undue risk due to foreign exchange
movements because gains and losses on these contracts should
generally offset losses and gains on the underlying assets,
liabilities and transactions, except for the ineffective portion
of the instruments, which are charged to Other within Other
income (expense) in the Company’s condensed consolidated
statements of operations.
The following table shows the five largest net notional amounts
of the positions to buy or sell foreign currency as of
September 27, 2008 and the corresponding positions as of
December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional Amount
|
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Net Buy (Sell) by
Currency
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Chinese Renminbi
|
|
$
|
(874
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,292
|
)
|
Brazilian Real
|
|
|
(413
|
)
|
|
|
(377
|
)
|
Euro
|
|
|
(387
|
)
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
British Pound
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
396
|
|
Japanese Yen
|
|
|
365
|
|
|
|
384
|
|
|
|
The Company is exposed to credit-related losses if
counterparties to financial instruments fail to perform their
obligations. However, the Company does not expect any
counterparties, all of whom presently have investment grade
credit ratings, to fail to meet their obligations.
Interest
Rate Risk
At September 27, 2008, the Company’s short-term debt
consisted primarily of $101 million of short-term variable
rate foreign debt. The Company has $4.1 billion of
long-term debt, including the current portion of long-term debt,
which is primarily priced at long-term, fixed interest rates.
47
As part of its liability management program, the Company has
entered into interest rate swaps to synthetically modify the
characteristics of interest rate payments for certain of its
outstanding long-term debt from fixed-rate payments to
short-term variable rate payments. The following table displays
these outstanding interest rate swaps at September 27, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedged
|
|
|
Underlying Debt
|
Date Executed
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Instrument
|
|
|
October 2007
|
|
$
|
400
|
|
|
|
5.375% notes due 2012
|
|
October 2007
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
6.0% notes due 2017
|
|
September 2003
|
|
|
457
|
|
|
|
7.625% debentures due 2010
|
|
September 2003
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
8.0% notes due 2011
|
|
May 2003
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
5.8% debentures due 2008
|
|
May 2003
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
7.625% debentures due 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted average short-term variable rate payments on each
of the above interest rate swaps was 5.23% for the three months
ended September 27, 2008. The fair value of the above
interest rate swaps on September 27, 2008 and
December 31, 2007, was $39 million and
$36 million, respectively. Except as noted below, the
Company had no outstanding commodity derivatives, currency swaps
or options relating to debt instruments at September 27,
2008 or December 31, 2007.
The Company designated the above interest rate swap agreements
as part of fair value hedging relationships. As such, changes in
the fair value of the hedging instrument, and corresponding
adjustments to the carrying amount of the debt are recognized in
earnings. Interest expense on the debt is adjusted to include
the payments made or received under such hedge agreements. In
the event the underlying debt instrument matures or is redeemed
or repurchased, the Company is likely to terminate the
corresponding interest rate swap contracts.
During the fourth quarter of 2007, concurrently with the
issuance of debt, the Company entered into several interest rate
swaps to convert the fixed rate interest cost of the debt to a
floating rate. At the time of entering into these interest rate
swaps, the swaps were designated as fair value hedges and
qualified for hedge accounting treatment. The swaps were
originally designated as fair value hedges of the underlying
debt, including the Company’s credit spread. During the
first quarter of 2008, the swaps were no longer considered
effective hedges because of the volatility in the price of the
Company’s fixed-rate domestic term debt and the swaps were
dedesignated. In the same period, the Company was able to
redesignate the same interest rate swaps as fair value hedges of
the underlying debt, exclusive of the Company’s credit
spread. For the period of time that the swaps were deemed
ineffective hedges, the Company recognized a gain of
$24 million, representing the increase in the fair value of
swaps.
Additionally, one of the Company’s European subsidiaries
has outstanding interest rate agreements (“Interest
Agreements”) relating to a Euro-denominated loan. The
interest on the Euro-denominated loan is variable. The Interest
Agreements change the characteristics of interest rate payments
from variable to maximum fixed-rate payments. The Interest
Agreements are not accounted for as a part of a hedging
relationship and, accordingly, the changes in the fair value of
the Interest Agreements are included in Other income (expense)
in the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of
operations. The weighted average fixed rate payments on these
Interest Agreements was 5.07%. The fair value of the Interest
Agreements at September 27, 2008 and December 31, 2007
was $4 million and $3 million, respectively.
The Company is exposed to credit loss in the event of
nonperformance by the counterparties to its swap contracts. The
Company minimizes its credit risk concentration on these
transactions by distributing these contracts among several
leading financial institutions, all of whom presently have
investment grade credit ratings, and having collateral
agreements in place. The Company does not anticipate
nonperformance.
Forward-Looking
Statements
Except for historical matters, the matters discussed in this
Form 10-Q
are forward-looking statements that involve risks and
uncertainties. Forward-looking statements include, but are not
limited to, statements included in: (1) the Executive
Summary under “Looking Forward”, (a) about the
creation of two public companies, (b) our business
strategies
48
and expected results, and (c) our market expectations;
(2) “Management’s Discussion and Analysis,”
about: (a) future payments, charges, use of accruals and
expected cost-saving benefits associated with our reorganization
of business programs, (b) the Company’s ability and
cost to repatriate funds, (c) the impact of the timing and
level of sales and the geographic location of such sales,
(d) expectations for the Sigma Fund, (e) future cash
contributions to pension plans or retiree health benefit plans,
(f) issuance of commercial paper, (g) the
Company’s ability and cost to access the capital markets,
(h) the Company’s plans with respect to the level of
outstanding debt, (i) expected payments pursuant to
commitments under long-term agreements, (j) the outcome of
ongoing and future legal proceedings, (k) the completion
and impact of pending acquisitions and divestitures, and
(l) the impact of recent accounting pronouncements on the
Company; (3) “Legal Proceedings,” about the
ultimate disposition of pending legal matters, and
(4) “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about
Market Risk,” about: (a) the impact of foreign
currency exchange risks, (b) future hedging activity and
expectations of the Company, and (c) the ability of
counterparties to financial instruments to perform their
obligations.
Some of the risk factors that affect the Company’s
business and financial results are discussed in
“Item 1A: Risk Factors” herein and on pages 18
through 27 of our 2007 Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
We wish to caution the reader that the risk factors discussed in
each of these documents and those described in our other
Securities and Exchange Commission filings, could cause our
actual results to differ materially from those stated in the
forward-looking statements.
Item 4.
Controls and Procedures
(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and
procedures. Under the supervision and with the
participation of our senior management, including our chief
executive officer and chief financial officer, we conducted an
evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of
our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as of the
end of the period covered by this quarterly report (the
“Evaluation Date”). Based on this evaluation, our
chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded as
of the Evaluation Date that our disclosure controls and
procedures were effective such that the information relating to
Motorola, including our consolidated subsidiaries, required to
be disclosed in our Securities and Exchange Commission
(“SEC”) reports (i) is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC
rules and forms, and (ii) is accumulated and communicated
to Motorola’s management, including our
co-chief
executive officers and chief financial officer, as appropriate
to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
(b) Changes in internal control over financial
reporting. There have been no changes in our
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the quarter ended September 27, 2008 that have materially
affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our
internal control over financial reporting.
Part II—Other
Information
Item 1.
Legal Proceedings
Cases
relating to Wireless Telephone Usage
On April 19, 2001, Farina v. Nokia, Inc., et al.,
was filed in the Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas,
Philadelphia County. Farina claimed that the failure to
incorporate a remote headset into cellular phones rendered the
phones defective by exposing users to biological injury and
health risks and sought compensatory damages and injunctive
relief. In late 2005 and early 2006, plaintiffs in Farina
amended their complaint to add allegations that cellular
telephones sold without headsets are defective because they
present a safety risk when used while driving and to seek
punitive damages. On February 17, 2006, a newly-added
defendant to the Farina case removed the case to federal
court. On September 2, 2008, the U.S. District Court
in Philadelphia dismissed the Farina case finding that
the complaint is preempted by federal law. On September 30,
2008, plaintiffs appealed the decision to the U.S. Court of
Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Iridium-Related
Cases
Class Action
Securities Lawsuit
Motorola has been named as one of several defendants in class
action securities lawsuits arising out of alleged
misrepresentations or omissions regarding the Iridium satellite
communications business, consolidated in the federal
49
district court in the District of Columbia under
Freeland v. Iridium World Communications, Inc., et al.
In April 2008, the parties reached an agreement in
principle, subject to court approval, to settle all claims
against Motorola in exchange for Motorola’s agreement to
pay $20 million. On October 23, 2008, the court
granted final approval of the settlement and dismissed the
claims with prejudice.
Silverman/Williams
Federal Securities Lawsuits and Related Derivative
Matters
A purported class action lawsuit on behalf of the purchasers of
Motorola securities between July 19, 2006 and
January 5, 2007, Silverman v. Motorola, Inc., et
al., was filed against the Company and certain current and
former officers and directors of the Company on August 9,
2007, in the United States District Court for the Northern
District of Illinois. The complaint alleges violations of
Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
SEC
Rule 10b-5
as well as, in the case of the individual defendants, the
control person provisions of the Securities Exchange Act. The
factual assertions in the complaint consist primarily of the
allegation that the defendants knowingly made incorrect
statements concerning Motorola’s projected revenues for the
third and fourth quarter of 2006. The complaint seeks
unspecified damages and other relief relating to the purported
inflation in the price of Motorola shares during the class
period. An amended complaint was filed December 20, 2007
and Motorola moved to dismiss that complaint in February 2008.
On September 24, 2008, the district court granted this
motion in part to dismiss Section 10(b) claims as to two
individuals and certain claims related to forward looking
statements, among other things, and denied the motion in part.
Intellectual
Property Related Cases
Tessera,
Inc. v. Motorola, Inc., et al.
Motorola is a purchaser of semiconductor chips with certain ball
grid array (“BGA”) packaging from suppliers including
Qualcomm, Inc. (“Qualcomm”), Freescale Semiconductor,
Inc. (“Freescale Semiconductor”), ATI Technologies,
Inc. (“ATI”), Spansion Inc. (“Spansion”),
and STMicroelectronics N.V. (“STMicro”). On
April 17, 2007, Tessera, Inc. (“Tessera”) filed
patent infringement legal actions against Qualcomm, Freescale
Semiconductor, ATI, Spansion, STMicro and Motorola in the
U.S. International Trade Commission (the “ITC”)
(In the Matter of Certain Semiconductor Chips with Minimized
Chip Package Size and Products Containing Same, Inv.
No. 337-TA-605)
and the United States District Court, Eastern District of Texas,
Tessera, Inc. v. Motorola, Inc., Qualcomm, Inc.,
Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. and ATI Technologies, Inc.,
alleging that certain BGA packaged semiconductors infringe
patents that Tessera claims to own. Tessera is seeking orders to
ban the importation into the U.S. of certain semiconductor
chips with BGA packaging and certain “downstream”
products that contain them (including Motorola products)
and/or limit
suppliers’ ability to provide certain services and products
or take certain actions in the U.S. relating to the
packaged chips. The patent claims being asserted by Tessera are
subject to reexamination proceedings in the U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office (“PTO”). In the reexamination
proceedings, the PTO has issued rejections of Tessera’s
asserted patent claims. A hearing on the merits took place in
the ITC in July 2008 and we expect the Administrative Law Judge
to issue its recommendation in the case on or before
December 1, 2008.
Motorola is a defendant in various other suits, claims and
investigations that arise in the normal course of business. In
the opinion of management, the ultimate disposition of the
Company’s pending legal proceedings will not have a
material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated
financial position, liquidity or results of operations.
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
The reader should carefully consider, in connection with the
other information in this report, the factors discussed in
Part I, “Item 1A: Risk Factors” on pages 18
through 27 of the Company’s 2007 Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
These factors could cause our actual results to differ
materially from those stated in forward-looking statements
contained in this document and elsewhere. In addition to the
factors included in the
Form 10-K,
the reader should also consider the following risk factors:
We face a number of risks related to the recent financial
crisis and severe tightening in the global credit
markets.
50
The ongoing global financial crisis affecting the banking system
and financial markets has resulted in a severe tightening in the
credit markets, a low level of liquidity in many financial
markets, and extreme volatility in credit and equity markets.
This financial crisis could impact Motorola’s business in a
number of ways, including:
|
|
|
|
•
|
Potential Deferment of Purchases and Orders by Customers:
Uncertainty about current and future global economic conditions
may cause consumers, businesses and governments to defer
purchases in response to tighter credit, decreased cash
availability and declining consumer confidence. Accordingly,
future demand for our products could differ materially from our
current expectations.
|
|
|
•
|
Customers’ Inability to Obtain Financing to Make
Purchases from Motorola
and/or
Maintain Their Business: Some of our customers require
substantial financing in order to fund their operations and make
purchases from Motorola. The inability of these customers to
obtain sufficient credit to finance purchases of our products
and meet their payment obligations to us could adversely impact
our financial results. In addition, if the financial crisis
results in insolvencies for our customers, it could adversely
impact our financial results.
|
|
|
•
|
Negative Impact from Increased Financial Pressures on
Third-Party Dealers, Distributors and Retailers: A number of
our businesses make sales in certain regions through third-party
dealers, distributors and retailers. Although many of these
third parties have significant operations and maintain access to
available credit, others are smaller and more likely to be
impacted by the significant decrease in available credit that
has resulted from the current financial crisis. If credit
pressures or other financial difficulties result in insolvency
for these third parties and Motorola is unable to successfully
transition these end customers to purchase our products from
other third parties, or from us directly, it could adversely
impact our financial results.
|
|
|
•
|
Negative Impact from Increased Financial Pressures on Key
Suppliers: Our ability to meet customers’ demands
depends, in part, on our ability to obtain timely and adequate
delivery of quality materials, parts and components from our
suppliers. Certain of our components are available only from a
single source or limited sources. If certain key suppliers were
to become capacity constrained or insolvent as a result of the
financial crisis, it could result in a reduction or interruption
in supplies or a significant increase in the price of supplies
and adversely impact our financial results. In addition, credit
constraints at key suppliers could result in accelerated payment
of accounts payable by Motorola, impacting our cash flow.
|
|
|
•
|
Increased Requests by Customers for Vendor Financing by
Motorola: Certain of the Company’s customers,
particularly, but not limited to, those who purchase large
infrastructure systems, request that their suppliers provide
financing in connection with equipment purchases. In response to
the recent tightening in the credit markets, these types of
requests continue to increase in volume and scope. Although
Motorola has not increased its commitments to provide financing
in light of these requests, a continuation of the current credit
crisis could force Motorola to choose between increasing its
level of vendor financing or potentially losing sales to these
customers.
|
|
|
•
|
Increased Risk of Losses or Impairment Charges Related to
Debt Securities and Equity and Other Investments Held by
Motorola: The current volatility in the financial markets
and overall economic uncertainty increases the risk that the
actual amounts realized in the future on our debt and equity
investments will differ significantly from the fair values
currently assigned to them. In the last year, Motorola has
recognized $163 million of other-than-temporary impairments
on debt securities held in its Sigma Fund, a fund that is
designed to perform similar to a money market fund and in which
Motorola invests most of its U.S. dollar-denominated cash.
Although the Sigma Fund is a broadly diversified portfolio of
highly rated, short-duration debt securities, there can be no
assurance that the Company will not be required to recognize
additional impairments in the future. Also, many of the
Company’s equity investments are in early-stage technology
companies and, therefore, may be particularly subject to
substantial price volatility and heightened risk from the
tightening in the credit markets.
|
|
|
•
|
Increased Risk of Counterparty Failures Could Negatively
Impact our Financial Position: The Company uses financial
instruments to reduce its overall exposure to the effects of
currency fluctuations on cash flows. In addition, in order to
manage the mix of fixed and floating rates for its outstanding
debt, the Company has entered into interest rate swaps to change
the characteristics of interest rate payments from fixed-rate to
short-term, LIBOR-based variable rate payments. The Company is
exposed to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the
counterparties to these financial instruments. In order to
minimize this risk, the contracts are distributed among several
leading financial institutions, all of whom presently have
investment grade credit ratings. Although the Company has not
experienced and does not anticipate nonperformance by its
counterparties, in light of the ongoing threats to financial
institutions from the global financial crisis, there can be no
assurance of performance by the counterparties to these
financial instruments.
|
51
|
|
|
|
•
|
Impact of Negative Returns on the Investments Held by the
Company’s Pension Plans: The significant decline in
value of many equity and debt securities due to the global
financial crisis has had a negative impact on the value of the
assets in the Company’s pension plans. Although it is still
too early to determine the full extent of this impact for the
full year 2008, this decline in value could trigger requirements
for the Company to make higher than normal contributions to the
pension plans in 2009.
|
|
|
•
|
Potential Impact on Ability to Sell
Receivables: From time to time, the Company sells
accounts receivable and long-term receivables to third parties.
Sales are made both on a one-time, non-recourse basis and under
committed facilities that involve contractual commitments from
third parties to purchase qualifying receivables up to monetary
limits. These sales of receivables provide the Company the
ability to accelerate cash flow when it is prudent to do so. The
ability to sell (or “factor”) receivables,
particularly under committed facilities, is often subject to the
credit quality of the obligor and the Company’s ability to
obtain sufficient levels of credit insurance from independent
insurance companies. Although the Company has not currently been
limited in its ability to sell receivables, the severe
tightening in the credit markets as a result of the current
financial crisis could limit the Company’s ability to sell
receivables in the future, particularly if the creditworthiness
of our customers’ declines. In addition, in certain
circumstances it has become more difficult and more expensive to
obtain and maintain credit insurance.
|
We have deferred tax assets that we may not be able to use
under certain circumstances.
If the Company is unable to generate sufficient future taxable
income in certain jurisdictions, or if there is a significant
change in the actual effective tax rates or the time period
within which the underlying temporary differences become taxable
or deductible, the Company could be required to increase its
valuation allowances against its deferred tax assets resulting
in an increase in its effective tax rate and an adverse impact
on future operating results.
If our goodwill or amortizable intangible assets become
impaired we may be required to record a significant charge to
earnings.
Under generally accepted accounting principles, we review our
amortizable intangible assets for impairment when events or
changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be
recoverable. Goodwill is tested for impairment at least
annually. Factors that may be considered a change in
circumstances, indicating that the carrying value of our
goodwill or amortizable intangible assets may not be
recoverable, include a decline in stock price and market
capitalization, reduced future cash flow estimates, and slower
growth rates in our industry. We may be required to record a
significant charge in our financial statements during the period
in which any impairment of our goodwill or amortizable
intangible assets is determined, negatively impacting our
results of operations.
Item 2.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of
Proceeds.
(c) The following table provides information with respect
to acquisitions by the Company of shares of its common stock
during the quarter ended September 27, 2008.
ISSUER
PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d) Maximum Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) Total Number of
|
|
|
(or Approximate Dollar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased
|
|
|
Value) of Shares that
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
as Part of Publicly
|
|
|
May Yet be Purchased
|
|
|
(a) Total Number
|
|
|
(b) Average Price
|
|
|
Announced Plans or
|
|
|
Under the Plans or
|
Period
|
|
of Shares Purchased
|
|
|
Paid per Share
|
|
|
Programs(1)
|
|
|
Programs(1)
|
|
|
6/29/08 to 7/25/08
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$3,629,062,576
|
7/26/08 to 8/22/08
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$3,629,062,576
|
8/23/08 to 9/27/08
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$3,629,062,576
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Through actions taken on July 24, 2006 and March 21,
2007, the Board of Directors has authorized the Company to
repurchase an aggregate amount of up to $7.5 billion of its
outstanding shares of common stock over a period ending in June
2009. The timing and amount of future repurchases will be based
on market and other conditions. |
52
Item 3.
Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
Not applicable
Item 4.
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
Not applicable
Item 5.
Other Information.
Not applicable
Item 6.
Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Motorola, Inc. Amended and Restated Bylaws as of August 4,
2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to
Motorola’s Report on
Form 8-K
filed on August 4, 2008 (File
No. 1-7221)).
|
|
*10
|
.37
|
|
Motorola Long Range Incentive Plan (LRIP) of 2006 (as amended
and restated on July 28, 2008).
|
|
10
|
.44
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated August 27, 2008, by and between
Motorola, Inc. and Gregory Q. Brown (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.1 to Motorola’s Report on
Form 8-K
filed on August 27, 2008 (File
No. 1-7221)).
|
|
*10
|
.59
|
|
Motorola, Inc. Executive Severance Plan (effective
October 1, 2008).
|
|
*10
|
.60
|
|
Arrangement for directors’ fees (as amended July 29,
2008).
|
|
10
|
.61
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated August 4, 2008, by and between
Motorola, Inc. and Sanjay K. Jha (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to Motorola’s Report on
Form 8-K
filed on August 4, 2008 (File
No. 1-7221)).
|
|
*31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Gregory Q. Brown pursuant to Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
*31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Sanjay K. Jha pursuant to Section 302 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
*31
|
.3
|
|
Certification of Paul J. Liska pursuant to Section 302 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
*32
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Gregory Q. Brown pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
*32
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Sanjay K. Jha pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
*32
|
.3
|
|
Certification of Paul J. Liska pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
53
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed
on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
MOTOROLA, INC.
Laurel Meissner
Senior Vice President,
Chief Accounting Officer
(Duly Authorized Officer and
Chief Accounting Officer of the Registrant)
Date: October 30, 2008
54
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Motorola, Inc. Amended and Restated Bylaws as of August 4,
2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to
Motorola’s Report on
Form 8-K
filed on August 4, 2008 (File
No. 1-7221)).
|
|
*10
|
.37
|
|
Motorola Long Range Incentive Plan (LRIP) of 2006 (as amended
and restated on July 28, 2008).
|
|
10
|
.44
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated August 27, 2008, by and between
Motorola, Inc. and Gregory Q. Brown (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.1 to Motorola’s Report on
Form 8-K
filed on August 27, 2008 (File
No. 1-7221)).
|
|
*10
|
.59
|
|
Motorola, Inc. Executive Severance Plan (effective
October 1, 2008).
|
|
*10
|
.60
|
|
Arrangement for directors’ fees (as amended July 29,
2008).
|
|
10
|
.61
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated August 4, 2008, by and between
Motorola, Inc. and Sanjay K. Jha (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to Motorola’s Report on
Form 8-K
filed on August 4, 2008 (File
No. 1-7221)).
|
|
*31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Gregory Q. Brown pursuant to Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
*31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Dr. Sanjay K. Jha pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
*31
|
.3
|
|
Certification of Paul J. Liska pursuant to Section 302 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
*32
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Gregory Q. Brown pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
*32
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Dr. Sanjay K. Jha pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
*32
|
.3
|
|
Certification of Paul J. Liska pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
55