3. Accounting Standards

There have been no changes in the expected dates of adoption or estimated effects on the Company’s consolidated financial statements of recently issued accounting pronouncements from those disclosed in the Company’s Transition Report on Form 10-K for the six months ended January 27, 2018, filed with the SEC on March 2, 2018. Further, there have been no additional accounting standards issued as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that are applicable to the consolidated financial statements of the Company. Accounting standards adopted during the six months ended July 28, 2018 are covered in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Recently Adopted Accounting Standards

Revenue Recognition. In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) (“ASU 2014-09”). ASU No. 2014-09 and related updates are referred to herein as “ASU 2014-09”. ASU 2014-09 replaces numerous requirements in GAAP, including industry-specific requirements, and provides companies with a single revenue recognition model for recognizing revenue from contracts with customers. The core principle of the new standard is that a company should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The two permitted transition methods under the new standard are the full retrospective method and the modified retrospective method. Under the full retrospective method, the standard would be applied to each prior reporting period presented and the cumulative effect of applying the standard would be recognized at the earliest period shown. Under the modified retrospective method, the cumulative effect of applying the standard would be recognized at the date of initial application. Effective January 28, 2018, the Company adopted the requirements of ASU 2014-09 using the modified retrospective method. As a practical expedient, the Company adopted the new standard only for existing contracts as of January 28, 2018, the date of adoption. Any contracts that had expired prior to January 28, 2018 were not evaluated against the new standard. The Company believes its application of the new standard to only those contracts existing as of January 28, 2018 did not have a material impact on adoption.

As of January 28, 2018, the date of adoption, the Company reclassified $311.7 million of unbilled receivables from contract assets (historically referred to as Costs and Estimated Earnings in Excess of Billings) to accounts receivable, net in accordance with the guidance under ASU 2014-09. As a result of the reclassification, accounts receivable, net and contract assets were $630.4 million and $57.8 million, respectively, as of January 28, 2018. As of July 28, 2018, the disclosure of the impact of adoption on the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheet is as follows (dollars in thousands):



	July 28, 2018
	As reported		Balances Without Adoption of ASU 2014-09		Effect of Change
Assets
Accounts receivable, net	$	684,862	$	342,891	$	341,971
Contract assets	$	169,931	$	511,902	$	(341,971	)

The adoption of ASU 2014-09 resulted in balance sheet classification changes for amounts that have not been invoiced to customers but for which the Company has satisfied the performance obligation and has an unconditional right to receive payment. Prior to the adoption of ASU 2014-09, amounts not yet invoiced to customers were included in the Company’s contract assets regardless of rights to payment. These amounts represent unbilled accounts receivable for which the Company has an unconditional right to receive payment although invoicing is subject to the completion of certain process or other requirements. Such requirements may include the passage of time, completion of other items within a statement of work, or other billing requirements within contract terms.

The standard did not have an impact to opening retained earnings or the Company’s condensed consolidated statement of operations as there was no change in timing or amount of revenue recognized under contracts with customers, as compared to the Company’s historical revenue recognition practices.

Restricted Cash. In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash (“ASU 2016-18”). ASU 2016-18 is intended to reduce the diversity in practice regarding the classification and presentation of changes in restricted cash within the statement of cash flows. The amendments in this update require that amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. The Company adopted ASU 2016-18 effective January 28, 2018, the first day of fiscal 2019, and applied this change of presentation retrospectively to the Company’s condensed consolidated statement of cash flows for the six months ended July 29, 2017. As a result of the retrospective adoption, the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts have been restated to include restricted cash of $5.4 million, $5.4 million, and $6.2 million as of January 28, 2017, July 29, 2017, and January 27, 2018, respectively. Restricted cash primarily relates to funding provisions of the Company’s insurance program.

Statement of Cash Flows. In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (“ASU 2016-15”). In an effort to reduce diversity in practice regarding the classification of certain transactions within the statement of cash flows, ASU 2016-15 addresses eight specific cash flow issues including, among other things, the classification of debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs. Historically, the Company has classified certain cash flows related to debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs as operating activities. Upon adoption of ASU 2016-15, the Company is required to classify such cash flows as financing activities. The adoption of ASU 2016-15 as it relates to any of the other seven cash flow issues specified does not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated statement of cash flows. The Company adopted ASU 2016-15 effective January 28, 2018, the first day of fiscal 2019, on a retrospective basis as required. There was no impact to the Company’s condensed consolidated statement of cash flows for the six months ended July 28, 2018 or July 29, 2017 as a result of the adoption.

The Company also adopted the following Accounting Standards Updates during the six months ended July 28, 2018, neither of which had a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements:



ASU		Adoption Date
2016-16	Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory	January 28, 2018
2017-01	Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business	January 28, 2018

Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted

Leases. In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (“ASU 2016-02”). ASU No. 2016-02 and related updates are referred to herein as “ASU 2016-02”. ASU 2016-02 substantially retains the classification for leasing transactions as finance or operating leases and establishes a right-of-use model that requires a lessee to record a right-of-use asset and a lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms greater than 12 months. Leases will be classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the income statement. For finance leases the lessee would recognize interest expense and amortization of the right-of-use asset and for operating leases the lessee would recognize total lease expense on a straight-line basis. ASU 2016-02 is required to be adopted using a modified retrospective approach and provides an option to recognize the cumulative-effect adjustment at the beginning of either the earliest period presented or the period of adoption. The new guidance will be effective for the Company for the fiscal year ended January 25, 2020 and interim reporting periods within that year.

The Company continues to evaluate the effect of ASU 2016-02 on its consolidated financial statements, which involves an evaluation of existing lease obligations under the new standard and historical accounting practices. Based on the results of the reviews performed to date, it is expected that the Company's operating leases with terms greater than twelve months will be recognized as lease assets and lease liabilities on its consolidated balance sheet. ASU 2016-02 is not expected to have a material effect on the amount of expense recognized in connection with the Company’s current lease contracts as compared to current practice.