

As of December 31, 2019
Millions	2020		2021		2022		2023		2024		Thereafter
Capital Purchase Obligations		$292.7	—		—		—		—		—
Easements (a)		$5.0		$5.3		$5.4		$5.5		$5.5		$170.4
PPAs (b)		$113.0		$122.5		$145.5		$145.6		$138.5		$1,386.7
Other Purchase Obligations (c)		$22.8		$9.6	—		—		—			$0.1

Power Purchase and Sales Agreements. Our long-term PPAs have been evaluated under the accounting guidance for variable interest entities. We have determined that either we have no variable interest in the PPAs, or where we do have variable interests, we are not the primary beneficiary; therefore, consolidation is not required. These conclusions are based on the fact that we do not have both control over activities that are most significant to the entity and an obligation to absorb losses or receive benefits from the entity’s performance. Our financial exposure relating to these PPAs is limited to capacity and energy payments.

These agreements have also been evaluated under the accounting guidance for derivatives. We have determined that either these agreements are not derivatives, or if they are derivatives, the agreements qualify for the normal purchases and normal sales exemption to the accounting guidance; therefore, derivative accounting is not required.

Square Butte PPA. Minnesota Power has a PPA with Square Butte that extends through 2026 (Agreement). Minnesota Power is obligated to pay its pro rata share of Square Butte’s costs based on its entitlement to the output of Square Butte’s 455 MW coal‑fired generating unit. Minnesota Power’s output entitlement under the Agreement is 50 percent for the remainder of the Agreement, subject to the provisions of the Minnkota Power PSA described in the following table. Minnesota Power’s payment obligation will be suspended if Square Butte fails to deliver any power, whether produced or purchased, for a period of one year. Square Butte’s costs consist primarily of debt service, operating and maintenance, depreciation and fuel expenses. As of December 31, 2019, Square Butte had total debt outstanding of $280.7 million. Annual debt service for Square Butte is expected to be approximately $48.7 million annually through 2023 and $33.6 million in 2024, of which Minnesota Power’s obligation is 50 percent. Fuel expenses are recoverable through Minnesota Power’s fuel adjustment clause and include the cost of coal purchased from BNI Energy under a long-term contract.

Minnesota Power’s cost of power purchased from Square Butte during 2019 was $82.7 million ($78.0 million in 2018; $75.7 million in 2017). This reflects Minnesota Power’s pro rata share of total Square Butte costs based on the 50 percent output entitlement. Included in this amount was Minnesota Power’s pro rata share of interest expense of $8.3 million in 2019 ($9.1 million in 2018; $9.4 million in 2017). Minnesota Power’s payments to Square Butte are approved as a purchased power expense for ratemaking purposes by both the MPUC and the FERC.



Counterparty	Quantity	Product	Commencement	Expiration	Pricing
PPAs
Calpine Corporation	25 MW	Capacity	June 2019	May 2026	Fixed
Great River Energy
PPA 1	50 MW	Capacity / Energy	June 2016	May 2020	(a)
PPA 2	50 MW	Capacity	June 2016	May 2020	Fixed
PPA 3	50 MW	Capacity	June 2017	May 2020	Fixed
Manitoba Hydro
PPA 1	(b)	Energy	May 2011	April 2022	Forward Market Prices
PPA 2	50 MW	Capacity / Energy	June 2015	May 2020	(c)
PPA 3	50 MW	Capacity	June 2017	May 2020	Fixed
PPA 4 (d)	250 MW	Capacity / Energy	June 2020	May 2035	(e)
PPA 5 (d)	133 MW	Energy	(f)	(f)	Forward Market Prices
Minnkota Power	50 MW	Capacity / Energy	June 2016	May 2020	(g)
Nobles 2 (h)	(h)	Capacity / Energy	(h)	(h)	Fixed
Oliver Wind I	(i)	Energy	December 2006	December 2040	Fixed
Oliver Wind II	(i)	Energy	December 2007	December 2040	Fixed



Counterparty	Quantity	Product	Commencement	Expiration	Pricing
PSAs
Basin
PSA 1	100 MW	Capacity / Energy	May 2010	April 2020	(a)
PSA 2	(b)	Capacity	June 2022	May 2025	Fixed
PSA 3	100 MW	Capacity	June 2025	May 2028	Fixed
Minnkota Power	(c)	Capacity / Energy	June 2014	December 2026	(c)
Oconto Electric Cooperative	25 MW	Capacity / Energy	January 2019	May 2026	Fixed
Silver Bay Power	(d)	Energy	January 2017	December 2031	(e)

Coal, Rail and Shipping Contracts. Minnesota Power has coal supply agreements providing for the purchase of a significant portion of its coal requirements through December 2021. Minnesota Power also has coal transportation agreements in place for the delivery of a significant portion of its coal requirements through December 2021. The costs of fuel and related transportation costs for Minnesota Power’s generation are recoverable from Minnesota Power’s utility customers through the fuel adjustment clause.

Transmission. We continue to make investments in transmission opportunities that strengthen or enhance the transmission grid or take advantage of our geographical location between sources of renewable energy and end users. These include the GNTL, investments to enhance our own transmission facilities, investments in other transmission assets (individually or in combination with others) and our investment in ATC.

Great Northern Transmission Line. As a condition of a 250 MW long-term PPA entered into with Manitoba Hydro, construction of additional transmission capacity is required. As a result, Minnesota Power is constructing the GNTL, an approximately 220‑mile 500-kV transmission line between Manitoba and Minnesota’s Iron Range that was proposed by Minnesota Power and Manitoba Hydro in order to strengthen the electric grid, enhance regional reliability and promote a greater exchange of sustainable energy.

In a 2016 order, the MPUC approved the route permit for the GNTL, and in 2016, the U.S. Department of Energy issued a presidential permit to cross the U.S.-Canadian border, which was the final major regulatory approval needed before construction in the U.S. could begin. Construction activities commenced in the first quarter of 2017, and Minnesota Power expects the GNTL to be complete and in-service by mid-2020. The total project cost in the U.S., including substation work, is estimated to be approximately $700 million, of which Minnesota Power’s portion is expected to be approximately $325 million; the difference will be recovered from a subsidiary of Manitoba Hydro as non-shareholder contributions to capital. Total project costs of $633.3 million have been incurred through December 31, 2019, of which $339.6 million has been recovered from a subsidiary of Manitoba Hydro.

In 2015, Manitoba Hydro submitted the final preferred route and EIS for the MMTP to the Manitoba Conservation and Water Stewardship for siting and environmental approval, which was received on April 4, 2019. In 2016, Manitoba Hydro filed an application with the Canadian National Energy Board (NEB) requesting authorization to construct and operate the MMTP, which was recommended for approval on November 15, 2018. On June 14, 2019, Manitoba Hydro announced Canada’s federal government approved the MMTP project and on August 22, 2019, the NEB granted final pre-construction approvals. Construction on the MMTP commenced in the third quarter of 2019.

The MMTP is subject to legal and regulatory challenges which Minnesota Power is actively monitoring. Manitoba Hydro has informed Minnesota Power that it continues to work towards completing the MMTP on schedule. In order to meet the transmission in‑service requirements in PPAs with Minnesota Power, Manitoba Hydro had indicated that it would need to start construction of the MMTP by September 2019. We are unable to predict the outcome of the Canadian regulatory review process, including the timing thereof or whether any onerous conditions may be imposed, or the timing of the completion of the MMTP, including the impact of any delays that may result in construction schedule adjustments. In the event the MMTP is delayed and not in-service by June 1, 2020, Minnesota Power has construction and related agreements in place with Manitoba Hydro and a Manitoba Hydro subsidiary that will protect Minnesota Power and its customers.

Construction of Manitoba Hydro’s Keeyask hydroelectric generation facility, which will provide the power to be sold under PPAs with Minnesota Power and transmitted on the MMTP and the GNTL, commenced in 2014 and is anticipated to be completely in service by early 2021.

Our businesses are subject to regulation of environmental matters by various federal, state and local authorities. A number of regulatory changes to the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act and various waste management requirements have been promulgated by both the EPA and state authorities over the past several years. Minnesota Power’s facilities are subject to additional requirements under many of these regulations. Minnesota Power is reshaping its generation portfolio, over time, to reduce its reliance on coal, has installed cost-effective emission control technology, and advocates for sound science and policy during rulemaking implementation.

We consider our businesses to be in substantial compliance with currently applicable environmental regulations and believe all necessary permits have been obtained. We anticipate that with many state and federal environmental regulations and requirements finalized, or to be finalized in the near future, potential expenditures for future environmental matters may be material and require significant capital investments. Minnesota Power has evaluated various environmental compliance scenarios using possible outcomes of environmental regulations to project power supply trends and impacts on customers.

We review environmental matters on a quarterly basis. Accruals for environmental matters are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be reasonably estimated based on current law and existing technologies. Accruals are adjusted as assessment and remediation efforts progress, or as additional technical or legal information becomes available. Accruals for environmental liabilities are included in the Consolidated Balance Sheet at undiscounted amounts and exclude claims for recoveries from insurance or other third parties. Costs related to environmental contamination treatment and cleanup are expensed unless recoverable in rates from customers.

Air. The electric utility industry is regulated both at the federal and state level to address air emissions. Minnesota Power’s generating facilities mainly burn low-sulfur western sub-bituminous coal. All of Minnesota Power’s coal-fired generating facilities are equipped with pollution control equipment such as scrubbers, baghouses and low NO_X technologies. Under currently applicable environmental regulations, these facilities are substantially compliant with emission requirements.

Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR). The CSAPR requires certain states in the eastern half of the U.S., including Minnesota, to reduce power plant emissions that contribute to ozone or fine particulate pollution in other states. The CSAPR does not require installation of controls but does require facilities have sufficient allowances to cover their emissions on an annual basis. These allowances are allocated to facilities from each state’s annual budget, and can be bought and sold. Based on our review of the NO_x and SO₂ allowances issued and pending issuance, we currently expect generation levels and emission rates will result in continued compliance with the CSAPR.

National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). The EPA is required to review the NAAQS every five years. If the EPA determines that a state’s air quality is not in compliance with the NAAQS, the state is required to adopt plans describing how it will reduce emissions to attain the NAAQS. None of the compliance costs for proposed or current NAAQS revisions are expected to be material.

Climate Change. The scientific community generally accepts that emissions of GHG are linked to global climate change which creates physical and financial risks. Physical risks could include, but are not limited to: increased or decreased precipitation and water levels in lakes and rivers; increased temperatures; and changes in the intensity and frequency of extreme weather events. These all have the potential to affect the Company’s business and operations. We are addressing climate change by taking the following steps that also ensure reliable and environmentally compliant generation resources to meet our customers’ requirements:

The EPA repealed the Clean Power Plan (CPP), following a determination by the EPA that the CPP exceeded the EPA’s statutory authority under the Clean Air Act (CAA). The primary reason for this was that the CPP attempted to regulate electric generating unit’s carbon emissions through measures outside of the affected unit’s direct control. The CPP was first announced as a proposed rule under Section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act for existing power plants entitled “Carbon Pollution Emission Guidelines for Existing Stationary Sources: Electric Generating Units”.

With the repeal of the CPP, the Affordable Clean Energy Rule was finalized. The rule establishes emissions guidelines for states to use when developing plans to limit carbon dioxide at coal-fired power plants. The rule identifies heat rate improvements made at individual units as the best system of emission reduction. Affected facilities for Minnesota Power include Boswell Units 3 and 4 and Taconite Harbor 1 and 2. Based on our initial review of the rule, many of the candidate heat rate improvements are already installed on Boswell Units 3 and 4.

Additionally, the EPA finalized new regulations for the state implementation of the Affordable Clean Energy Rule and any future emission guidelines issued under CAA Section 111(d). States will have three years to submit State Implementation Plans (SIP), and the EPA has 12 months to review and approve those plans. Since the Affordable Clean Energy Rule allows states considerable flexibility in how to best implement its requirements, Minnesota Power plans to work closely with the MPCA and the Minnesota Department of Commerce, who are currently co-reviewing the rule as the state develops its SIP. If a state does not submit a SIP or submits a SIP that is unacceptable to the EPA, the EPA will develop a Federal Implementation Plan.

Minnesota had already initiated several measures consistent with those called for under the now repealed CPP and finalized Affordable Clean Energy Rule. Minnesota Power continues implementing its EnergyForward strategic plan that provides for significant emission reductions and diversifying its electricity generation mix to include more renewable and natural gas energy. (See Note 4. Regulatory Matters.) We are unable to predict the GHG emission compliance costs we might incur as a result of the Affordable Clean Energy Rule and the resulting SIP; however, the costs could be material. Minnesota Power would seek recovery of additional costs through a rate proceeding.

Water. The Clean Water Act requires NPDES permits be obtained from the EPA (or, when delegated, from individual state pollution control agencies) for any wastewater discharged into navigable waters. We have obtained all necessary NPDES permits, including NPDES storm water permits for applicable facilities, to conduct our operations.

Steam Electric Power Generating Effluent Limitations Guidelines. In 2015, the EPA issued revised federal effluent limitation guidelines (ELG) for steam electric power generating stations under the Clean Water Act. It set effluent limits and prescribed BACT for several wastewater streams, including flue gas desulphurization (FGD) water, bottom ash transport water and coal combustion landfill leachate. In 2017, the EPA announced a two-year postponement of the ELG compliance date of November 1, 2018, to November 1, 2020, while the agency reconsiders the bottom ash transport water and FGD wastewater provisions. On April 12, 2019, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit vacated and remanded back to the EPA portions of the ELG that allowed for continued discharge of legacy wastewater and leachate. On November 22, 2019, the EPA published a draft rulemaking that proposes to allow re-use of bottom ash transport water in FGD scrubber systems with minor discharges related to maintaining system water balance. The proposed rulemaking would also allow future discharge of FGD wastewater discharge provided it meets new BACT standards. A final rulemaking is anticipated in mid to late 2020.

The final ELG's potential impact on Minnesota Power operations is primarily at Boswell. Boswell currently discharges bottom ash contact water through its NPDES permit, and also has a closed-loop FGD system that does not discharge to surface waters, but may do so in the future if additional water treatment measures are implemented. Under the current ELG rule, bottom ash transport water discharge to surface waters must cease no later than December 31, 2023. Bottom ash contact water will either need to be re-used in a closed-loop process, routed to a FGD scrubber, or the bottom ash handling system will need to be converted to a dry process. The ELG rule provision regarding these two waste-streams are being reconsidered and may change prior to November 1, 2020. Efforts have been underway at Boswell to reduce the amount of water discharged and evaluate potential re‑use options in its plant processes. The EPA’s additional reconsideration of legacy wastewater discharge requirements have the potential to reduce timelines for dewatering Boswell’s existing bottom ash pond. The timing of a draft rule addressing legacy wastewater and leachate is currently unknown.

At this time, we cannot estimate what compliance costs we might incur related to these or other potential future water discharge regulations; however, the costs could be material, including costs associated with retrofits for bottom ash handling, pond dewatering, pond closure, and wastewater treatment and re-use. Minnesota Power would seek recovery of additional costs through a rate proceeding.

Solid and Hazardous Waste. The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 regulates the management and disposal of solid and hazardous wastes. We are required to notify the EPA of hazardous waste activity and, consequently, routinely submit reports to the EPA.

Coal Ash Management Facilities. Minnesota Power stores or disposes coal ash at four of its electric generating facilities by the following methods: storing ash in lined onsite impoundments (ash ponds), disposing of dry ash in a lined dry ash landfill, applying ash to land as an approved beneficial use and trucking ash to state permitted landfills.

Coal Combustion Residuals from Electric Utilities (CCR). In 2015, the EPA published the final rule regulating CCR as nonhazardous waste under Subtitle D of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) in the Federal Register. The rule includes requirements for new landfill and impoundment construction, and regulates closure activities for existing impoundments. In 2017, the EPA announced its intention to formally reconsider certain provisions of the CCR rule under Subtitle D of the RCRA and on March 15, 2018, published the first phase of the proposed rule revisions in the Federal Register. In July 2018, the EPA finalized a portion of those proposed revisions that extended certain deadlines by two years, and established alternative groundwater protection standards for certain constituents and the potential for risk‑based management options at facilities based on site characteristics. In August 2018, a U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia decision vacated specific provisions of the CCR rule related to operation of clay-lined impoundments. In response to the August 2018 court decision and outstanding issues from litigation, the EPA proposed additional rule revisions in August and December 2019.

The EPA’s most recent proposed rule revisions are anticipated to be finalized in the first quarter of 2020 and could impact the timing of closure activities for Boswell’s existing clay-lined impoundments. Costs of CCR compliance at Boswell are currently estimated to be between approximately $65 million and $120 million, and are expected to occur primarily over the next 15 years. Compliance costs for CCR at Taconite Harbor and Laskin are not expected to be material given CCR units at these facilities are closed. Minnesota Power continues to work on minimizing costs through evaluation of beneficial re-use and recycling of CCR and CCR‑related waters. Minnesota Power would seek recovery of additional costs through a rate proceeding.

Manufactured Gas Plant Site. We are reviewing and addressing environmental conditions at a former manufactured gas plant site located in Superior, Wisconsin, and formerly operated by SWL&P. SWL&P has been working with the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) in determining the extent and location of contamination at the site and surrounding properties. In June 2019, the WDNR approved the site investigation and authorized SWL&P to transition into the remedial design process. As of December 31, 2019, we have recorded a liability of approximately $7 million for remediation costs at this site (approximately $7 million as of December 31, 2018), and an associated regulatory asset as we expect recovery of these remediation costs to be allowed by the PSCW. We expect to incur these costs over the next four years.

ALLETE Clean Energy. ALLETE Clean Energy’s wind energy facilities have PSAs in place for their entire output and expire in various years between 2020 and 2039. As of December 31, 2019, ALLETE Clean Energy has $64.3 million outstanding in standby letters of credit.

BNI Energy. As of December 31, 2019, BNI Energy had surety bonds outstanding of $67.7 million related to the reclamation liability for closing costs associated with its mine and mine facilities. Although its coal supply agreements obligate the customers to provide for the closing costs, additional assurance is required by federal and state regulations. BNI Energy’s total reclamation liability is currently estimated at $67.3 million. BNI Energy does not believe it is likely that any of these outstanding surety bonds or the letter of credit will be drawn upon.

ALLETE Properties. As of December 31, 2019, ALLETE Properties had surety bonds outstanding and letters of credit to governmental entities totaling $4.8 million primarily related to development and maintenance obligations for various projects. The estimated cost of the remaining development work is $2.3 million. ALLETE Properties does not believe it is likely that any of these outstanding surety bonds or letters of credit will be drawn upon.

Community Development District Obligations. In 2005, the Town Center District issued $26.4 million of tax-exempt, 6.0 percent capital improvement revenue bonds, and in 2006, the Palm Coast Park District issued $31.8 million of tax-exempt, 5.7 percent special assessment bonds. The capital improvement revenue bonds and the special assessment bonds are payable over 31 years (by May 1, 2036 and 2037, respectively) and are secured by special assessments on the benefited land. The bond proceeds were used to pay for the construction of a portion of the major infrastructure improvements in each district and to mitigate traffic and environmental impacts. The assessments were billed to the landowners beginning in 2006 for the Town Center District and 2007 for the Palm Coast Park District. To the extent that ALLETE Properties still owns land at the time of the assessment, it will incur the cost of its portion of these assessments, based upon its ownership of benefited property.

As of December 31, 2019, we owned 53 percent of the assessable land in the Town Center District (68 percent as of December 31, 2018) and none of the assessable land in the Palm Coast Park District (19 percent as of December 31, 2018). As of December 31, 2019, ownership levels, our annual assessments related to capital improvement and special assessment bonds for the ALLETE Properties projects within these districts are $1.4 million for Town Center at Palm Coast. As we sell property at these projects, the obligation to pay special assessments will pass to the new landowners. In accordance with accounting guidance, these bonds are not reflected as debt on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.

We are involved in litigation arising in the normal course of business. Also in the normal course of business, we are involved in tax, regulatory and other governmental audits, inspections, investigations and other proceedings that involve state and federal taxes, safety, and compliance with regulations, rate base and cost of service issues, among other things. We do not expect the outcome of these matters to have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.