-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, TThfC+/X9F0AJ3oXrGU26rjVmAuJr6HSPR2u9hiD0OUhIlhDFbphh4F05pn+0Apn ITJipHJm9jRTYKCxWwOLAQ== 0001104659-10-029007.txt : 20100517 0001104659-10-029007.hdr.sgml : 20100517 20100517140255 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0001104659-10-029007 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 10-Q PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 5 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 20100331 FILED AS OF DATE: 20100517 DATE AS OF CHANGE: 20100517 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: MINES MANAGEMENT INC CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000066649 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: METAL MINING [1000] IRS NUMBER: 910538859 STATE OF INCORPORATION: ID FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 10-Q SEC ACT: 1934 Act SEC FILE NUMBER: 001-32074 FILM NUMBER: 10837425 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 905 W RIVERSIDE AVENUE STREET 2: SUITE 311 CITY: SPOKANE STATE: WA ZIP: 99201 BUSINESS PHONE: 5098386050 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 905 W RIVERSIDE AVENUE STREET 2: SUITE 311 CITY: SPOKANE STATE: WA ZIP: 99201 10-Q 1 a10-5943_110q.htm 10-Q

Table of Contents

 

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

 

FORM 10-Q
 

x

 

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

 

 

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010

 

 

 

OR

 

 

 

o

 

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 001-32074

 

MINES MANAGEMENT, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

 

IDAHO

 

91-0538859

(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

 

905 W. Riverside Avenue, Suite 311
Spokane, Washington

 

99201

(Address Of Principal Executive Offices)

 

(Zip Code)

 

(509) 838-6050

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  x Yes    o No

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o  No  o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer     o

 

Accelerated filer     o

 

 

 

Non-accelerated filer     o

 

Smaller reporting company     x

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes o  No  x

 

At May 14, 2010, 23,100,109 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, were issued and outstanding.

 

 

 



Table of Contents

 

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

Information contained in or incorporated by reference into this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q may contain forward looking statements, as that term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.  The use of any of the words “development”, “anticipate”, “continues”, “estimate”, “expect”, “may”, “project”, “should”, “believe”, or similar expressions are intended to identify such statements.  Forward looking statements included in this report relate to, among other things, comments regarding further exploration and evaluation of the Montanore Project, including planned rehabilitation and extension of the Libby adit, drilling activities, feasibility determinations, engineering studies, environmental and permitting requirements, process and timing; estimates of mineralized material and measured, indicated and inferred resources; financing needs; sources of financing; planned expenditures for the remainder of 2010; potential completion of a bankable feasibility study; the markets for silver and copper; results of the hydrological model and the effects thereof; and the search for potential exploration and development opportunities in the mining industry.  We believe the expectations reflected in those forward looking statements are reasonable.  However, we cannot assure that the expectations will prove to be correct.  Disclosure of important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations, or cautionary statements, are included under the heading “Risk Factors” in this report and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.  Certain cautionary statements are also included elsewhere in this report, including, without limitation, in conjunction with the forward-looking statements.  All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date made.  All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us, or persons acting on our behalf, are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements.  Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement.  Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations include, among others, those factors referenced in the “Risk Factors” section of this report and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 and such things as:

 

·                  Worldwide economic and political events affecting the supply of and demand for silver and copper;

 

·                  Volatility in the market price for silver and copper;

 

·                  Financial market conditions and the availability and cost of financing , or its availability on terms acceptable to us;

 

·                  Uncertainty regarding whether reserves will be established at our Montanore Project;

 

·                  Uncertainties associated with developing new mines;

 

·                  Variations in ore grade and other characteristics affecting mining, crushing, milling and smelting and mineral recoveries;

 

·                  Geological, technical, permitting, mining and processing problems;

 

·                  The availability, terms, conditions and timing of required governmental permits and approvals, and potential opposition to the issuance of significant permits;

 

·                  Uncertainty regarding future changes in applicable laws or implementation of existing laws;

 

·                  The availability of experienced employees;

 

·                  The availability of acquisition and other business opportunities (or the lack thereof) that may be presented and pursued by us, the ability to finance such acquisitions, and success in integrating such acquisitions; and

 

·                  Other factors, many of which are beyond our control.

 




Table of Contents

 

PART I— FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

ITEM 1.                                                     FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

 

Contents

 

 

Page

 

 

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS:

 

 

 

Condensed consolidated balance sheets

1

 

 

Condensed consolidated statements of operations

2

 

 

Condensed consolidated statements of cash flows

3

 

 

Notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

4-10

 

i



Table of Contents

 

Mines Management, Inc. and Subsidiaries

(An Exploration Stage Company)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)

 

 

 

March 31,
2010

 

December 31,
2009

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

CURRENT ASSETS:

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

4,475,631

 

$

6,090,169

 

Interest receivable

 

86,122

 

64,964

 

Prepaid expenses and deposits

 

106,237

 

168,960

 

Certificate of deposit

 

5,000,000

 

5,000,000

 

Total current assets

 

9,667,990

 

11,324,093

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT:

 

 

 

 

 

Buildings and leasehold improvements

 

836,454

 

836,454

 

Equipment

 

6,450,089

 

6,450,089

 

Office equipment

 

326,823

 

320,060

 

 

 

7,613,366

 

7,606,603

 

Less accumulated depreciation

 

2,657,742

 

2,417,921

 

 

 

4,955,624

 

5,188,682

 

OTHER ASSETS:

 

 

 

 

 

Certificates of deposit

 

1,481,307

 

1,481,307

 

Available-for-sale securities

 

1,565,035

 

1,245,897

 

Reclamation deposits

 

1,236,846

 

1,236,846

 

 

 

4,283,188

 

3,964,050

 

 

 

$

18,906,802

 

$

20,476,825

 

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

 

 

 

 

 

CURRENT LIABILITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable

 

$

520,916

 

$

546,030

 

Payroll and payroll taxes payable

 

38,282

 

18,446

 

Warrant derivatives

 

1,303,188

 

1,017,844

 

Total current liabilities

 

1,862,386

 

1,582,320

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LONG-TERM LIABILITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

Asset retirement obligation

 

399,748

 

394,899

 

Total liabilities

 

2,262,134

 

1,977,219

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred stock – no par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized; -0- shares issued and outstanding

 

 

 

Common stock – $0.001 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized; 23,099,335 and 22,944,683 shares issued and outstanding, respectively

 

23,099

 

22,945

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additional paid-in capital

 

68,160,958

 

66,908,698

 

Accumulated deficit

 

(1,117,306

)

(1,117,306

)

Deficit accumulated during the exploration stage

 

(50,160,605

)

(46,734,115

)

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

(261,478

)

(580,616

)

Total stockholders’ equity

 

16,644,668

 

18,499,606

 

 

 

$

18,906,802

 

$

20,476,825

 

 

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

1



Table of Contents

 

Mines Management, Inc. and Subsidiaries

(An Exploration Stage Company)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)

 

 

 

Three Months Ended
March 31,

 

From Inception of
Exploration Stage
August 12, 2002
Through

March 31,

 

 

 

2010

 

2009

 

2010

 

REVENUE:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Royalties

 

$

5,277

 

$

2,093

 

$

88,869

 

OPERATING EXPENSES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

General and administrative

 

1,625,657

 

822,091

 

22,222,658

 

Technical services

 

1,031,963

 

1,564,780

 

21,353,081

 

Depreciation

 

239,822

 

277,843

 

2,661,689

 

Legal, accounting, and consulting

 

263,256

 

119,470

 

3,422,540

 

Fees, filing, and licenses

 

50,638

 

45,863

 

2,088,679

 

Exploration

 

 

 

165,176

 

Impairment of mineral properties

 

 

 

504,492

 

Total operating expenses

 

3,211,336

 

2,830,047

 

52,418,315

 

LOSS FROM OPERATIONS

 

(3,206,059

)

(2,827,954

)

(52,329,446

)

OTHER INCOME (LOSS):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loss from warrant derivatives

 

(285,344

)

(272,217

)

(826,807

)

Interest income, net

 

64,913

 

106,391

 

2,995,648

 

 

 

(220,431

)

(165,826

)

2,168,841

 

NET LOSS

 

$

(3,426,490

)

$

(2,993,780

)

$

(50,160,605

)

NET LOSS PER SHARE (basic and diluted)

 

$

(0.15

)

$

(0.13

)

 

 

WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING (basic and diluted)

 

23,062,502

 

22,756,848

 

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

2



Table of Contents

 

Mines Management, Inc. and Subsidiaries

(An Exploration Stage Company)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)

 

 

 

Three Months Ended
March 31,

 

From Inception of
Exploration Stage
August 12, 2002
Through
March 31,

 

Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

2010

 

2009

 

2010

 

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss

 

$

(3,426,490

)

$

(2,993,780

)

$

(50,160,605

)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock-based compensation

 

1,187,914

 

200,992

 

8,298,634

 

Stock received for services

 

 

 

(11,165

)

Depreciation

 

239,822

 

277,843

 

2,661,689

 

Initial recognition of asset retirement obligation

 

 

 

344,187

 

Accretion of asset retirement obligation

 

4,849

 

4,519

 

55,561

 

Loss from warrant derivatives

 

285,344

 

272,217

 

826,807

 

Impairment of mineral properties

 

 

 

504,492

 

Changes in assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest receivable

 

(21,158

)

(14,967

)

(86,122

)

Prepaid expenses and deposits

 

62,723

 

35,895

 

(166,648

)

Accounts payable

 

(25,114

)

213,004

 

520,752

 

Payroll and payroll taxes payable

 

19,836

 

300

 

35,102

 

Net cash used in operating activities

 

(1,672,274

)

(2,003,977

)

(37,177,316

)

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchase of property and equipment

 

(6,764

)

(79,525

)

(7,650,899

)

Proceeds from disposition of property and equipment

 

 

 

35,423

 

Purchase of certificates of deposit

 

 

(51,880

)

(7,657,241

)

Purchase of available-for-sale securities

 

 

 

(1,815,348

)

Increase in mineral properties

 

 

 

(144,312

)

Net cash used in investing activities

 

(6,764

)

(131,405

)

(17,232,377

)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net proceeds from sale of common stock

 

64,500

 

 

58,837,989

 

NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

 

(1,614,538

)

(2,135,382

)

4,428,296

 

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD

 

6,090,169

 

15,448,159

 

47,335

 

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD

 

$

4,475,631

 

$

13,312,777

 

$

4,475,631

 

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest paid

 

$

 

$

14,904

 

$

65,768

 

 

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

3



Table of Contents

 

NOTE 1  — ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:

 

Organization:

 

Mines Management, Inc. (the Company) is an Idaho corporation incorporated in 1947.  The Company acquires, explores, and develops mineral properties in North America.

 

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:

 

These unaudited interim financial statements have been prepared by the Company in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information, as well as the instructions to Form 10-Q.  Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of the Company’s management, all adjustments (consisting solely of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation of the interim financial statements have been included.

 

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires the use of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities known to exist as of the date the financial statements are published, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Uncertainties with respect to such estimates and assumptions are inherent in the preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements; accordingly, it is possible that the actual results could differ from these estimates and assumptions, which could have a material effect on the reported amounts of the Company’s consolidated financial position and results of operations. Operating results for the three month period ended March 31, 2010, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year ending December 31, 2010.

 

For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.

 

(a)                                  Exploration Stage Enterprise

 

Since the Company is in the exploration stage of operation, the Company’s financial statements are prepared in accordance with the provisions of ASC 915 Development Stage Enterprises, as it devotes substantially all of its efforts to acquiring and exploring mining interests that management believes should eventually provide sufficient net profits to sustain the Company’s existence.  Until such interests are engaged in commercial production, the Company will continue to prepare its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures in accordance with this standard.

 

(b)                                 Mining properties, exploration and development costs

 

All exploration expenditures are expensed as incurred.  Significant property acquisition payments for active exploration properties are capitalized, including payments to acquire mineral rights.  Once a feasibility study has been completed, approved by management, and a decision is made to put the ore body into production, expenditures to develop new mines, to define further mineralization in existing ore bodies, and to expand the capacity of operating mines, are capitalized and amortized on the units of production basis over proven and probable reserves.  The Company charges to operations the allocable portion of capitalized costs attributable to properties sold.  Capitalized costs are allocated to properties sold based on the proportion of claims sold to the claims remaining within the project area.

 

(c)                                  Fair value measurements

 

The Company discloses the inputs used to develop the fair value measurements for the Company’s financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as well as the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements in their entirety fall.  The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:

 

Level 1:  Unadjusted quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that are accessible at the measurement date.

 

4



Table of Contents

 

Level 2:  Quoted prices in inactive markets for identical assets or liabilities, quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, or other observable inputs either directly related to the asset or liability or derived principally from corroborated observable market data.

 

Level 3:  Unobservable inputs due to the fact that there is little or no market activity.

 

(d)                                 Stock compensation

 

The Company measures and records the costs of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award, recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide services in exchange for such award.  Compensation cost is recognized for awards granted and for awards modified, repurchased or cancelled.  At March 31, 2010, the Company had three stock option plans which are described more fully in note 10.

 

(e)                                  Net loss per share

 

Basic earnings or loss per share is computed on the basis of the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the periods.   Diluted earnings or loss per share is calculated on the basis of the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period plus the effect of potential dilutive shares during the period.  Potential dilutive shares include outstanding stock options and warrants.  For periods in which a net loss is reported, potential dilutive shares are excluded because they are antidilutive.  Therefore, basic loss per share is the same as diluted loss per share for the periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.

 

(f)                                    Reclassifications

 

Certain amounts in the prior-period financial statements have been reclassified for comparative purposes to conform to current period presentation with no effect on total assets or net loss as previously reported.

 

(g)                                 Subsequent events

 

The Company evaluated events and transactions subsequent to the balance sheet date of March 31, 2010 for potential recognition or disclosure in the condensed consolidated financial statements.  There were no subsequent events that require recognition or disclosure in these financial statements.

 

(h)                                 New accounting standards

 

In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-06 (ASU 2010-06), an update to ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures”.  This update provides new disclosures on fair value measurements as follows:  (i) the amounts and reasons for significant transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2 fair value measurements, and (ii) the activity in Level 3 fair value measurements, including information about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements on a gross basis rather than as one net number.

 

This update also provides amendments that clarify existing disclosures required in ASC 820 as follows: (1) Fair value measurement disclosures for each class of assets and liabilities.  A class is often a subset of assets or liabilities within a line item in the statement of financial position.  (2) Disclosures about valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements are required for fair value measurements that fall in either Level 2 or Level 3.

 

The new disclosures and clarifications of existing disclosures are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about the activity in Level 3 fair value measurements which are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years.  Adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

 

NOTE 2  — CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT:

 

The Company owns two certificates of deposit for a total of $1,481,307.  These investments mature in August 2011 and bear interest at the rate of 2.57%.  The Company also owns a $5,000,000 certificate of deposit which matures in June 2010 and bears interest at the rate of 1.49%.

 

5



Table of Contents

 

The Company also has a certificate of deposit pledged as security for a Letter of Credit to the Montana Department of Environmental Quality as a reclamation guarantee for the Montanore expansion evaluation program.  This certificate matures on January 3, 2011, bears interest at the rate of 1.64% and automatically renews annually.  This certificate of deposit ($1,175,935 at March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively) is included with reclamation deposits on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

 

NOTE 3  — AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE SECURITIES:

 

Available-for-sale securities are comprised of common stocks which have been valued using quoted market prices in active markets.  The following table summarizes the Company’s available-for-sale securities:

 

 

 

March 31,
2010

 

December 31,
2009

 

Cost

 

$

1,826,513

 

$

1,826,513

 

Unrealized Gains

 

13,169

 

14,080

 

Unrealized Losses

 

(274,647

)

(594,696

)

Fair Market Value

 

$

1,565,035

 

$

1,245,897

 

 

The Company has one investment in a marketable equity security with a fair market value of $1,540,701 and unrealized losses of $274,647 as of March 31, 2010.  The Company has evaluated this investment and does not consider it to be other-than-temporarily impaired.  The fair market value of this investment has fluctuated in response to the effect of the financial crisis on the commodities market and is expected to recover.  The Company has the ability and intent to hold this investment for a reasonable period of time sufficient for a forecasted recovery of fair value.

 

NOTE 4  — FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS:

 

The following table summarizes the Company’s financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2010, and the fair value calculation input hierarchy level determined to apply to each asset and liability category.  Quoted market prices were used to determine the fair value of available-for-sale securities.  See note 1 for further discussion on the fair value measurement technique used to value the warrant derivatives.  The Company has no financial assets or liabilities that are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis.

 

 

 

Balance at
March 31,
 2010

 

Balance at
December 
31, 2009

 

Input
Hierarchy

Level

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Available-for-sale securities

 

$

1,565,035

 

$

1,245,897

 

Level 1

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Warrant derivatives

 

$

1,303,188

 

$

1,017,844

 

Level 3

 

Asset retirement obligation

 

$

399,748

 

$

394,899

 

Level 3

 

 

The following table presents the fair value reconciliation of Level 3 liabilities measured at fair value during the three months ended March 31, 2010:

 

 

 

Warrant
Derivatives

 

Asset Retirement
Obligation

 

Beginning balance

 

$

1,017,844

 

$

394,899

 

Accretion expense

 

 

4,849

 

Loss on derivatives

 

285,344

 

 

Ending balance

 

$

1,303,188

 

$

399,748

 

 

NOTE 5  — ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATION:

 

The Company has an asset retirement obligation (ARO) associated with its underground evaluation program at the Montanore Project.  The ARO resulted from the reclamation and remediation requirements of the Montana Department of Environmental Quality as outlined in the Company’s permit to carry out the evaluation program.

 

Estimated reclamation costs were discounted using a credit adjusted risk-free interest rate of 4.78% from the time the Company expects to pay the retirement obligation to the time it incurred the obligation, which is estimated at 25 years.  The following table summarizes activity in the Company’s ARO.

 

 

 

Three Months
Ended

March 31, 2010

 

Year Ended
December 31,
2009

 

Balance January 1,

 

394,899

 

376,233

 

Accretion expense

 

4,849

 

4,519

 

Balance March 31,

 

399,748

 

380,752

 

Accretion expense

 

 

 

4,625

 

Balance June 30,

 

 

 

385,377

 

Accretion expense

 

 

 

4,732

 

Balance September 30,

 

 

 

390,109

 

Accretion expense

 

 

 

4,790

 

Balance December 31,

 

 

 

394,899

 

 

The Company has a certificate of deposit which is pledged as security for a Letter of Credit to the Montana Department of Environmental Quality as a reclamation guarantee for the Montanore expansion evaluation program which is discussed further in note 2.

 

NOTE 6  — WARRANT DERIVATIVES:

 

Effective January 1, 2009, the Company adopted the provisions of ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging, which applies to any freestanding financial instruments or embedded features that have the characteristics of a derivative and to any freestanding financial instruments that are potentially settled in an entity’s own common stock.  As a result of adopting these new provisions, some of the Company’s issued and outstanding common stock purchase warrants previously treated as equity pursuant to the derivative treatment exemption were no longer afforded equity treatment.  As such, effective January 1, 2009 the Company reclassified the fair value of these common stock purchase warrants, which have exercise

 

6



Table of Contents

 

price reset features, from equity to liability status as if these warrants were treated as a derivative liability since their date of issue.  On January 1, 2009, the Company reclassified from additional paid-in capital, as a cumulative effect adjustment, $476,381 to beginning retained earnings to recognize the fair value of the warrants on that date.  The Company reported losses from the change in fair value of these warrants of $285,344 and $272,217 in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

 

These common stock purchase warrants were initially issued in connection with our issuance of common shares in 2004 and 2005 and were not issued with the intent of effectively hedging any future cash flow, fair value of any asset, liability or any net investment in a foreign operation.  The warrants do not qualify for hedge accounting, and as such, all future changes in the fair value of these warrants will be recognized currently in earnings until such time as the warrants are exercised or expire.  These common stock purchase warrants do not trade in an active securities market, and as such, we estimate the fair value of these warrants using the Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following assumptions:

 

 

 

March 31,
2010

 

March 31,
2009

 

Weighted average risk-free interest rate

 

0.22

%

0.76

%

Weighted average volatility

 

98.62

%

91.80

%

Expected dividend yield

 

 

 

Weighted average expected life (in years)

 

0.5

 

1.4

 

 

Expected volatility is based primarily on historical volatility.  Historical volatility was computed using weekly pricing observations for recent periods that correspond to the last twenty-four months.  We believe this method produces an estimate that is representative of our expectations of future volatility over the expected term of these warrants.  We currently have no reason to believe future volatility over the expected remaining life of these warrants is likely to differ materially from historical volatility.  The expected life is based on the remaining term of the warrants.  The risk-free interest rate is based on three month and six month U.S. Treasury securities.

 

NOTE 7 — COMPREHENSIVE LOSS:

 

For the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, comprehensive loss was $3,107,352 and $2,674,770, respectively.  The difference between net loss and comprehensive loss was due to unrealized gains (losses) on the Company’s marketable securities.

 

NOTE 8 — CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK:

 

The Company maintains its cash and cash equivalents in one financial institution.  FDIC deposit insurance has been temporarily increased to $250,000 through December 31, 2013.  On January 1, 2014, the limit will return to $100,000.  The Company’s total uninsured bank deposit balance totaled approximately $12,270,000 as of March 31, 2010.  To date, the Company has not experienced a material loss or lack of access to its invested cash or cash equivalents; however, no assurance can be provided that access to the Company’s invested cash and cash equivalents will not be impacted by adverse conditions in the financial markets.

 

NOTE 9 — STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:

 

Common Stock:

 

In 2004, the Company sold 1,285,000 common shares for $6,425,000 ($5.00 per share).  The Company paid a cash finder’s fee of 7% of the gross purchase price received in the offering.  In connection with the stock sales, the Company issued warrants to purchase up to 511,000 shares of common stock at $7.25 per share through February 18, 2009, including 3% warrant compensation, or warrants to purchase 192,750 common shares, issued to the finder.  These warrants, which we refer to as the 2004 Warrants, were repriced to $6.00 per share in October 2005, to $5.00 per share in April 2007, and to $4.00 per share in November 2007 in accordance with the terms of the 2004 warrant agreement.  In January of 2009, the Company extended the expiration date of the outstanding warrants to February 10, 2010.  In February of 2010, the Company extended the expiration date of the 2004 Warrants to June 10, 2010 and reduced the exercise price to $2.56 per share.  Cumulative warrants exercised relating to this issue were 148,750 at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009.

 

In 2005, the Company sold 1,016,667 common shares for $6,100,002 ($6.00 per share).  The Company paid a cash finder’s fee of 7% of the gross purchase price received in the offering.  In connection with the stock sales, the Company granted

 

7



Table of Contents

 

warrants to purchase up to 737,084 shares of common stock at $8.25 per share through October 20, 2010, which included 3.75% warrant compensation, or warrants to purchase 228,750 common shares, issued to the finder.  These warrants, which we refer to as the 2005 Warrants, were repriced at $5.00 per share in April 2007, to $4.00 per share in November 2007, and to $2.56 per share in February 2010, in accordance with the anti-dilution provisions of the 2005 warrant agreement.  To date, no warrants relating to this issue have been exercised.

 

In 2005, the Company sold 40,000 common shares for $240,000 ($6.00 per share).

 

On April 20, 2007, the Company completed a public offering of 6,000,000 units at a price of $5.00 per unit, resulting in gross proceeds of $30,000,000 ($28,200,000 net proceeds).  Each unit is comprised of one share of common stock and one-half of one common stock purchase warrant, with each full warrant being exercisable for five years to purchase one share of common stock at a price of $5.75 per share.  The warrants are listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange and are tradable in US dollars under the symbol MGT.WT.U.

 

The underwriters were granted an over-allotment option, exercisable for a period of 30 days following the closing, to acquire up to an additional 900,000 units.   On May 7, 2007, the underwriters exercised the over-allotment option for 836,600 units.  The total offering was therefore 6,836,600 units for gross proceeds to the Company of $34,183,000, or $32,124,697 in net proceeds to the Company, after deducting underwriting commissions but before deducting offering expenses.  To date, no warrants relating to this issue have been exercised.

 

On November 2, 2007, the Company sold 2,500,000 common shares at a price of $4.00 per share, resulting in gross proceeds of $10,000,000.  In connection with the stock sale, the Company entered into a Right of First Refusal agreement (the “ROFR”) which grants a twenty-year right of first proposal and a right to match third-party proposals, to purchase all or any portion of silver mined, produced or recovered by the Company in the State of Montana.  The ROFR does not apply to trade sales and spot sales in the ordinary course of business or forward sales, in each case, for which no upfront payment is received by the Company.

 

On February 9, 2010, the Company extended the expiration date and reduced the price of the 2004 Warrants described above.  Upon adjustment to the exercise price of the 2004 Warrants, the 2005 Warrants were automatically adjusted in accordance with their terms to reduce the exercise price and increase the number of common shares purchasable upon exercise of such warrants.  The following table summarizes exercise prices and expiration dates of the Company’s outstanding common stock purchase warrants as of March 31, 2010.

 

Number of
Warrants

 

Exercise Price

 

Expiration Date

 

362,250

 

$

2.56

 

June 10, 2010

 

2,375,368

 

$

2.56

 

October 20, 2010

 

3,418,300

 

$

5.75

 

April 20, 2012

 

6,155,918

 

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred Stock:

 

The Company has authorized 10,000,000 shares of no par value preferred stock.  Through March 31, 2010, the Company had not issued any preferred stock.

 

NOTE 10 — STOCK OPTIONS:

 

During the year ended December 31, 2003, the stockholders of the Company approved two stock-based compensation plans — the 2003 Stock Option Plan (which includes both qualified and nonqualified options) and the 2003 Consultant Stock Compensation Plan.  Under the 2003 Stock Option Plan, the Company may grant options to purchase up to 1,200,000 shares of common stock.  Under the 2003 Consultant Stock Compensation Plan, the Company could grant options to purchase up to 400,000 shares of common stock.  During 2004, the Company increased the maximum number of common shares available under the 2003 Stock Option Plan and the 2003 Consultant Stock Compensation Plan to 3,000,000 and 700,000 shares, respectively.  The shares are issued from the Company’s authorized and unissued common stock upon exercise.

 

8



Table of Contents

 

Under both 2003 Stock Option Plans, the option exercise price may not be less than 100% of the fair market value per share on the date of grant.  Stock options are exercisable within ten years from the date of the grant of the option.  The schedule for vesting of the options granted under both plans is at the discretion of the Board of Directors.

 

In November 2007, the Board of Directors adopted, subject to shareholder approval obtained in May 2008, the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2007 Plan”), which provides for the issuance of both qualified and nonqualified stock options and restricted shares to directors, employees and consultants of the Company.  Up to 3,000,000 shares of the Company’s authorized but unissued common stock are available for issuance under the 2007 Plan.

 

Repricing of stock options is permitted under the terms of the 2007 Plan as approved by shareholders.  Effective January 1, 2010, the Company terminated its policy of repricing stock options when the market price of the stock was $1.00 below the exercise price of the outstanding option.  The Company may still consider repricing stock options in the event of significant and sustained adverse market conditions or other extraordinary events.   Repriced stock options have the same vesting schedule and expiration date as the original options.  There were no stock options repriced during 2009 or 2010.  During 2008, the Company repriced stock options held by 20 employees, including officers and directors.  As a result of the repricing of stock options, the Company recognized additional compensation expense of $-0- and $50,200 for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

 

A summary of the option activity under the Plans as of March 31, 2010, and changes during the period then ended, is presented below:

 

 

 

Number of
Options

 

Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price

 

Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term

 

Aggregate
Intrinsic Value

 

Outstanding at January 1, 2010

 

1,666,000

 

$

1.39

 

 

 

 

 

Issued

 

693,000

 

$

2.61

 

 

 

 

 

Exercised

 

(220,000

)

$

1.23

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding at March 31, 2010

 

2,139,000

 

$

1.80

 

3.46

 

$

1,808,090

 

Exercisable at March 31, 2010

 

2,049,000

 

$

1.76

 

3.48

 

$

1,782,290

 

 

The fair value for each option award is estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model using the assumptions noted in the following table.   Volatility for the periods presented is based on the historical volatility of the Company’s common stock over the expected life of the option.  The risk-free rate for periods within the expected term of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of the grant.  The Company does not foresee the payment of dividends in the near term.

 

 

 

Three Months Ended
March 31,

 

 

 

2010

 

2009(1)

 

Weighted average risk-free interest rate

 

1.39

%

 

Weighted average volatility

 

98.44

%

 

Expected dividend yield

 

 

 

Weighted average expected life (in years)

 

3.56

 

 

Weighted average grant-date fair value

 

$

1.71

 

 

 


(1) No options were granted during the three months ending March 31, 2009.

 

During the three months ended March 31, 2010, there were 220,000 stock options exercised with a weighted average exercise price of $1.23.  The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the three months ended March 31, 2010 was $284,356.  There were no options exercised during the three months ended March 31, 2009.

 

A summary of the status of the Company’s nonvested options as of March 31, 2010, and changes during the period then ended, is presented below:

 

9



Table of Contents

 

 

 

Number of
Options

 

Weighted-
Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value

 

Nonvested at January 1, 2010

 

90,000

 

$

1.01

 

Granted

 

 

 

Vested

 

 

 

Nonvested at March 31, 2010

 

90,000

 

$

1.01

 

 

As of March 31, 2010, there was $4,904 of unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the Plans.  That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of less than one year.

 

Total compensation costs recognized for stock-based employee compensation awards was $1,187,914 and $200,992 for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.  These costs were included in general and administrative expenses and technical services on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.  Cash received from options exercised under all share-based payment arrangements during the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 was $64,500 and $-0-, respectively.

 

ITEM 2.                         MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as well as with the financial statements and related notes and the other information appearing elsewhere in this report.  As used in this report, unless the context otherwise indicates, references to “we,” “our,” the “Company” and “us” refer to Mines Management, Inc. and its subsidiaries collectively.

 

We are an exploration stage company with a large silver-copper project, the Montanore Project, located in northwestern Montana.  The Montanore Silver-Copper Project continues to be the Company’s sole focus.  In addition to its advanced exploration and delineation drilling program, the Company is continuing its repermitting efforts with federal and state agencies and its engineering optimization review of the Project.

 

Overview

 

In the first quarter of 2010:

 

·                  The U.S. Forest Service (USFS) and the Montana Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) continued compiling responses to comments from the public received on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for the Montanore Project.

 

·                  The Company’s exploration and corporate development team continued to examine additional opportunities in North America and Latin America.

 

·                  The Company maintained a strong cash and investment position at March 31, 2010, with $11.0 million of unrestricted cash and certificates of deposit.

 

·                  Mines Management entered into an agreement with Mine Quarry Engineering Services to begin preparation of a preliminary economic assessment (PEA) and review and update of our 43-101 Canadian Instrument for the Montanore Project in April 2010.

 

·                  The Company continued its program to reduce expenditures and conserve cash pending the completion of permitting.

 

The net decrease in cash and cash equivalents for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 was approximately $1.6 million.   Management has reviewed the near term spending forecast and implemented a plan to diligently conserve cash where prudent. Given our current cash position and certificates of deposit of approximately $11.0 million on March 31, 2010, we expect to require approximately $10.0 million of external financing in 2010 to fund the final phases of the advanced exploration program and delineation drilling program and completion of a bankable feasibility study.  The Company intends to investigate financing opportunities and options from equity and debt financing during the current year.

 

10



Table of Contents

 

Advanced Exploration and Delineation Drilling Program

 

Libby operations in the first quarter of 2010 included continued operations on the Montanore site water treatment system and dewatering of the decline.  Water from the decline is being treated on day shift at a rate of 350 gallons per minute which equates to approximately 72 gallons per minute of water inflow into the decline from the formations.  Monitoring continues to provide data for the hydrological data base that is currently under development through our hydrology contractor.  We expect that the resulting model will affirm our position on the water issues being considered by the agencies in the permitting process.

 

A contract was awarded to Mine Quarry Engineering Services (MQES) in April to provide an update to the NI 43-101 report on mineral resources and to carry out work for a Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA).

 

Engineering and geology work continues using existing information.  Geology work has concentrated on the basic resource model in support of the NI 43-101 review being done by MQES.  Engineering work is concentrated on the gathering and preparation of supporting documents and summarizing information for the MQES PEA study.

 

Permitting and Environmental

 

In the first quarter of 2010, the USFS and the Montana DEQ continued work on addressing comments generated by the public on the DEIS.  This included work sessions with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Army Corps of Engineers (Corps).  In addition, the agencies continued their internal review of the various transmission line alternatives and modifications that could address public comments generated.

 

The Company has been working closely with the agencies on several key elements of the project that involved hydrology, waste characterization, and water balance/chemical loading model.  The hydrology model predicts mine inflow and the Company expects that it is close to consensus with the various agencies on this issue.

 

Hydrologic tests completed in the Libby decline in 2009 were compiled and incorporated into the hydrologic model.  This information provided an important insight to predicted mine inflow, that was previously modeled with historic data generated by Noranada Minerals Corporation.

 

The Company continued to expand the current information on water balances and incorporated an extensive chemical loading model to assist in predicting water quality from various locations of the project.  All supplemental information generated continues to support the DEIS characterization and environmental analyses and were completed to address public comments.

 

While the Company believes a final EIS may still be completed in 2010, it can offer no assurances in respect of the timing of a final EIS because the duration and success of our permitting efforts are contingent upon many variables not within our control.  For example, in the work sessions described above, the EPA submitted comments relating to the Montanore Project’s hydrologic model, waste characterization and water management.  The Company is working diligently with the USFS to address these comments but, despite our best efforts, the USFS may require the DEIS to be supplemented.  Any such supplemented DEIS would be issued for public notice and comment and would likely delay the completion of a final EIS to 2011.

 

Work continued with the Corps for permitting issues related to the 404 Permit, which is required for the tailings impoundment.  The Company completed preliminary wetland mitigation plans that the Corps, along with the EPA, will consider in their overall analysis.  The Corps previously determined that the Poorman tailings facility alternative was its Least Damaging Preferred Alternative (LDPA) and to address public comments the Corps re-analyzed the various alternatives considered previously.  It appears that Corps will continue to select the Poorman tailings site as their LDPA.

 

The EIS contractor continues to develop responses and text edits to the document that addresses public comments.  The Company continues to participate in the process and provide additional technical information when and where needed.

 

Financial and Operating Results

 

Mines Management, Inc. is an exploration stage company with a large silver-copper project, the Montanore Project, located in northwestern Montana.  None of our properties, including our principal property, the Montanore Project, is currently in production.  The Company continues to expense all of its expenditures when incurred, with the exception of equipment

 

11



Table of Contents

 

which is capitalized.  Financial results of operations include primarily interest income, general and administrative expenses, permitting, project advancement and engineering expenses.

 

Quarter Ended March 31, 2010

 

The Company reported a net loss for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 of $3.4 million, or $0.15 per share, compared to a net loss of $3.0 million, or $0.13 per share, for the quarter ended March 31, 2009.  The $0.4 million increase in net loss in the first quarter of 2010 is attributable to increases in general and administrative expenses of $0.8 million over the first quarter of 2009, principally due to the issuance of stock options in January 2010 of $0.9 million offset by merger and acquisition consulting fees in 2009 of $0.1 million. Technical service expenses were $0.5 million less in 2010 due to suspending work by our underground mining contractor, Small Mine Development, for site rehabilitation, sump construction and dewatering in April 2009.  Legal and accounting expenses increased by $0.1 million in the first quarter of 2010 over the comparable 2009 period due to responding to a SEC comment letter, updating the title opinion on the Montanore property and responding to the EPA comments to the draft EIS.

 

Liquidity

 

During the quarter ended March 31, 2010, the net cash used for operating activities was approximately $1.7 million, which consisted largely of permitting and technical expenses associated with activities at the Montanore Project site.  This was offset by $0.1 million received from stock option exercises during the first quarter of 2010.

 

We are taking steps to continue to reduce activity levels, including capital expenditures, until the timing of the Record of Decision becomes more clear.  We anticipate expenditures of approximately $4.5 million for the final three quarters of 2010, which will consist of $0.6 million per quarter for general and administrative expenses and $0.4 million per quarter for ongoing expense for the delineation drilling and mine scoping studies for the Montanore Project, and $0.5 million per quarter for ongoing permitting and environmental expenses to finalize the EIS. Given our current cash position and certificates of deposit of approximately $11.0 million on March 31, 2010, we expect to require approximately $10.0 million of external financing in 2010 to fund the final phases of the advanced exploration program and delineation drilling program and completion of a bankable feasibility study.  The Company intends to investigate financing opportunities and options from equity and debt financing during the current year.

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

At March 31, 2010, we had no existing off-balance sheet arrangements (as defined under SEC rules) that have or are reasonably likely to have a material current or future effect on our financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

 

ITEM 3.                         QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES

 

All of our cash balances are held in U.S. dollars and our long term investment certificates of deposit are denominated in U.S. dollars in local and national banking institutions.  We manage the timing of cash required for review of the permitting and engineering of the Montanore Project and for general corporate purposes utilizing our money market account and we invest funds not immediately required in certificates of deposit with varying maturities and fixed early retirement costs of three months interest.  Our policy is to invest only in government securities rated “investment grade” or better.

 

The market prices of base and precious metals such as silver and copper fluctuate widely and are affected by numerous factors beyond the control of any mining company.  These factors include expectations with regard to the rate of inflation, the exchange rates of the U.S. dollar and other currencies, interest rates, global or regional political, economic or banking crises, and a number of other factors.  If the market price of silver or copper should decrease, the value of the Company’s Montanore Project could decline and the Company might not be able to recover its investment in that project.  Any determination to develop or construct a mine would be made long before the first revenues from production would be received.  Price fluctuations between the time that such decisions are made and the commencement of production could affect the economics of the mine.

 

ITEM 4.                         CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

 

Our management, with the participation of Glenn M. Dobbs, the Company’s President and CEO, and James H. Moore, the Company’s Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, has evaluated the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of

 

12



Table of Contents

 

March 31, 2010.  Based upon this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are designed and were effective as of March 31, 2010 to give reasonable assurances that the information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company’s files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and that such information is also accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

 

As part of our year-end financial close and reporting process for 2009, we reevaluated our controls over the accounting and reporting for property and equipment transactions and redesigned them, which included the development of policies to ensure that the appropriate level of review is performed on all such transactions so that they are reported properly as capitalized assets or expensed as exploration costs.  The changes were made during the quarter ended March 31, 2010.

 

PART II— OTHER INFORMATION

 

ITEM 1.                             LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

 

None.

 

ITEM 1A.                    RISK FACTORS

 

In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in ‘‘Risk Factors’’ in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, which could materially affect our business, financial condition and/or future results.  The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing us.  Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results.

 

ITEM 2.                             UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

 

None.

 

ITEM 3.                             DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

 

None.

 

ITEM 5.                             OTHER INFORMATION

 

None.

 

ITEM 6.                             EXHIBITS

 

Exhibit No.

 

Title of Exhibit

 

 

 

31.1

 

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act

31.2

 

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act

32.1

 

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C., 1350 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act)

32.2

 

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C., 1350 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act)

 

13



Table of Contents

 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on behalf of the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

MINES MANAGEMENT, INC.

 

 

 

 

Date:May 14, 2010

By:

   /s/ Glenn M. Dobbs

 

 

   Glenn M. Dobbs

 

 

   President and Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Date: May 14, 2010

By:

   /s/ James H. Moore

 

 

   James H. Moore

 

 

   Chief Financial Officer

 

14


EX-31.1 2 a10-5943_1ex31d1.htm EX-31.1

EXHIBIT 31.1

 

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Glenn M. Dobbs, certify that:

 

1.        I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Mines Management, Inc.;

 

2.        Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.        Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.        The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

 

a.     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b.     Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 

c.     Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

d.     Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.        The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors:

 

a.       All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b.     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date:  May 14, 2010

 

 

\s\ Glenn M. Dobbs

 

Glenn M. Dobbs

 

President and Chief Executive Officer

 


EX-31.2 3 a10-5943_1ex31d2.htm EX-31.2

EXHIBIT 31.2

 

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, James H. Moore, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Mines Management, Inc.;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.               The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

 

a.       Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b.       Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 

c.       Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

d.       Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.               The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors:

 

a.       All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b.       Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date:  May 14, 2010

 

 

\s\ James H. Moore

 

James H. Moore

 

Chief Financial Officer

 


EX-32.1 4 a10-5943_1ex32d1.htm EX-32.1

EXHIBIT 32.1

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mines Management, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 

\s\ Glenn M. Dobbs

 

Glenn M. Dobbs

 

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

May 14, 2010

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Mines Management, Inc. and will be retained by Mines Management, Inc and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 


EX-32.2 5 a10-5943_1ex32d2.htm EX-32.2

EXHIBIT 32.2

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mines Management, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 

\s\ James H. Moore

 

James H. Moore

 

Chief Financial Officer

 

May 14, 2010

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Mines Management, Inc. and will be retained by Mines Management, Inc and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 


-----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----