UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION    WASHINGTON, DC 20549

FORM 10-K/A

	ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For Fiscal Year Ended June 2, 2001
Commission File Number 0-5813
Herman Miller, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Michigan
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
38-0837640
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
855 East Main Avenue, PO Box 302, Zeeland, MI 49464-0302
(Address of principal executive offices and Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:	616 654 3000
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:	None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:	Common Stock, $.20 Par Value
	(Title of Class)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes   No   

      Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. 

      The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by “nonaffiliates” of the registrant (for this purpose only, the affiliates of the registrant have been assumed to be the executive officers and directors of the registrant and their associates) as of August 3, 2001, was $1,883,208,669 (based on $25.49 per share which was the closing sale price as reported by NASDAQ).

      The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock, as of August 3, 2001:
Common stock, $.20 par value—75,678,661 shares outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Certain portions of the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on October 1, 2001, are incorporated into Part III of this report.

1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Form of Change in Control Agreement

Change in Control Agreement for Michael A Volkema

Letter Regarding Change in Accounting Principles

Subsidiaries

Consent of Independent Public Accountants

PART 1
BUSINESS

ITEM 1 BUSINESS

(A) GENERAL DEVELOPMENT OF BUSINESS

The company researches, designs, manufactures and distributes interior furnishings and provides related services that support companies all over the world. The company’s products are sold primarily to or through independent contract office furniture dealers. Through research, the company seeks to define and clarify customer needs and problems existing in its markets and to design, through innovation where appropriate and feasible, products, systems, and services as solutions to such problems. Ultimately, the company seeks to assist its customers in creating great places to work.

      Herman Miller, Inc., was incorporated in Michigan in 1905. One of the company’s major plants and its corporate offices are located at 855 East Main Avenue, PO Box 302, Zeeland, Michigan, 49464-0302, and its telephone number is (616) 654-3000. Unless otherwise noted or indicated by the context, the term “company” includes Herman Miller, Inc., its predecessors and subsidiaries.

(B) FINANCIAL INFORMATION ABOUT INDUSTRY SEGMENTS

The company’s operations are in a single industry segment—the design, manufacture, and sale of office furniture systems and furniture, and related products and services. Accordingly, no separate industry segment information is presented.

(C) NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

The company’s principal business consists of the research, design, development, manufacture, and sale of office systems, products and related services. Most of these systems and products are coordinated in design so that they may be used both together and interchangeably.

      The company is a leader in design and development of furniture and furniture systems. This leadership is exemplified by the innovative concepts introduced by the company in its modular systems known as Action Office®, Q™ System, Ethospace®, and Resolve®. Action Office, the company’s series of three freestanding office partition and furnishing systems, is believed to be the first such system to be introduced and nationally marketed and, as such, popularized the “open plan” approach to office space utilization. Ethospace interiors is a system of movable full- and partial-height walls, with panels and individual wall segments that interchangeably attach to wall framework. It includes wall-attached work surfaces and storage/display units, electrical distribution, lighting, organizing tools, and freestanding components. Resolve, the company’s newest product line, is a more flexible systems solution that is based on 120 degree angles around a steel pole and uses fabric screens and canopies for office definition. The company also offers a broad array of seating (including Aeron®, Equa®, Ergon®, Ambi®, and Reaction® office chairs), storage (including Meridian® filing products), wooden casegoods (including Geiger products), and freestanding furniture products (including Passage®).

      The company’s products are marketed worldwide by its own sales staff, its owned dealer network and via the Internet. These sales persons work with dealers, the design and architectural community, as well as directly with end-users. Seeking and strengthening the various distribution channels within the marketplace is a major focus of the company. Independent dealerships concentrate on the sale of Herman Miller products and some complementary product lines of other manufacturers. Approximately 70 percent of the company’s sales in the fiscal year ended June 2, 2001, were made to or through independent dealers. The remaining sales (30

2

percent) were made directly to end-users, including federal, state, and local governments, and several major corporations, by either the company’s own sales staff or its owned dealer network.

      The company is also a recognized leader within its industry for the use, development and integration of customer-centered technologies that enhance the reliability, speed, and efficiency of its operations. This includes proprietary sales tools, interior design and product specification software, order entry and manufacturing scheduling and production systems, and direct connectivity to the company’s suppliers.

      The company’s furniture systems, seating, storage, casegoods and freestanding furniture products, and related services are used in (1) office/institution environments including offices and related conference, lobby and lounge areas, and general public areas including transportation terminals; (2) health/science environments including hospitals and other healthcare facilities; (3) clinical, industrial, and educational laboratories; and (4) residential and other environments.

      New Product and Industry Segment Information During the past 12 months, the company has not made any public announcement of, or otherwise made public information about, a new product or a new industry segment which would require the investment of a material amount of the company’s assets or which would otherwise result in a material cost.

      Raw Materials The company’s manufacturing materials are available from a significant number of sources within the United States, Canada, Europe, and Asia. To date, the company has not experienced any difficulties in obtaining its raw materials. The raw materials used are not unique to the industry nor are they rare.

      Patents, Trademarks, Licenses, Etc.   The company has approximately 138 active United States utility patents on various components used in its products and approximately 100 active United States design patents. Many of the inventions covered by the United States patents also have been patented in a number of foreign countries. Various trademarks, including the name and style “Herman Miller,” and the “Herman Miller Symbol” trademark, are registered in the United States and many foreign countries. The company does not believe that any material part of its business is dependent on the continued availability of any one or all of its patents or trademarks, or that its business would be materially adversely affected by the loss of any thereof, except the “Herman Miller,” “Action Office,” “Aeron,” “Ergon,” “Equa,” “Ethospace,” “Q,” “Resolve,” “SQA,” “Geiger”, and “Herman Miller Symbol” trademarks.

      Working Capital Practices The company does not believe that it or the industry in general has any special practices or special conditions affecting working capital items that are significant for an understanding of the company’s business.

      Customer Base No single dealer accounted for more than 5 percent of the company’s net sales in the fiscal year ended June 2, 2001. For fiscal 2001, the largest single end-user customer accounted for approximately 5 percent of the company’s net sales with the 10 largest of such customers accounting for approximately 12 percent of net sales. The company does not believe that its business is dependent on any single or small number of customers, the loss of which would have a materially adverse effect upon the company.

      Backlog of Orders As of June 2, 2001, the company’s backlog of unfilled orders was $224.0 million. At June 3, 2000, the company’s backlog totaled $283.7 million. It is expected that substantially all the orders forming the backlog at June 2, 2001, will be filled during the current fiscal year. Many orders received by the company are reflected in the backlog for only a short period while other orders specify delayed shipments and are carried in the backlog for up to one year. Accordingly, the amount of the backlog at any particular time is not necessarily indicative of the level of net sales for a particular succeeding period.

3

      Government Contracts Other than standard price reduction and other provisions contained in contracts with the United States government, the company does not believe that any significant portion of its business is subject to material renegotiation of profits or termination of contracts or subcontracts at the election of various government entities.

      Competition All aspects of the company’s business are highly competitive. The principal methods of competition utilized by the company include design, product and service quality, speed of delivery, and product pricing. The company is one of the largest office furniture manufacturers in the world. However, in several of the markets served by the company, it competes with over 400 smaller companies and with several manufacturers that have significantly greater resources and sales. Price competition remained relatively stable from 1997 through 2001.

      Research, Design and Development One of the competitive strengths of the company is its research, design and development programs. Accordingly, the company believes that its research and design activities are of significant importance. Through research, the company seeks to define and clarify customer needs and problems and to design, through innovation where feasible and appropriate, products and services as solutions to these customer needs and problems. The company utilizes both internal and independent research and design resources. Exclusive of royalty payments, approximately $37.2 million, $35.1 million, and $33.4 million was spent by the company on design and research activities in 2001, 2000, and 1999, respectively. Royalties are paid to designers of the company’s products as the products are sold and are not included in research and development costs as they are variable based on product sales.

      Environmental Matters The company does not believe, based on current facts known to management, that existing environmental laws and regulations have had or will have any material effects upon the capital expenditures, earnings, or competitive position of the company. Further, the company continues to rigorously reduce, recycle, and reuse the solid wastes generated by its manufacturing processes. Its accomplishments and these efforts have been widely recognized.

      Human Resources The company considers another of its major competitive strengths to be its human resources. The company stresses individual employee participation and incentives, and believes that this emphasis has helped to attract and retain a capable work force. The company has a human resources group to provide employee recruitment, education and development, and compensation planning and counseling. There have been no work stoppages or labor disputes in the company’s history, and its relations with its employees are considered good. Approximately 589 of the company’s employees are represented by collective bargaining agents, most of whom are employees of its Integrated Metal Technology, Inc., and Herman Miller Limited (U.K.) subsidiaries. As such, these subsidiaries are parties to collective bargaining agreements with these employees.

      As of June 2, 2001, the company employed 9,951 full-time and 314 part-time employees, representing a .8 percent increase in full-time employees and an 18.0 percent decrease in part-time employees compared with June 3, 2000. In addition to its employee work force, the company uses purchased labor to meet uneven demand in its manufacturing operations.

(D) INFORMATION ABOUT INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS

The company’s sales in international markets primarily are made to office/institutional customers. Foreign sales mostly consist of office furniture products such as Ethospace and Action Office systems, seating, and storage products. The company is in the following major markets: Canada, Europe, Latin America, and the Asia/Pacific

4

PROPERTIES
PENDING LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

region. In certain other foreign markets, the company’s products are offered through licensing of foreign manufacturers on a royalty basis.

      At the present time, the company’s products sold in international markets are manufactured by wholly owned subsidiaries in the United States, United Kingdom, and Mexico. Sales are made through wholly owned subsidiaries in Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Mexico, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom. The company’s products are offered in the Middle East, South America, and Asia through dealers.

      In several other countries, the company licenses manufacturing and selling rights. Historically, these licensing arrangements have not required a significant investment of funds or personnel by the company, and, in the aggregate, have not produced material net income for the company.

      Additional information with respect to operations by geographic area appears in the note “Operating Segments” of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements set forth on page 40. Fluctuating exchange rates and factors beyond the control of the company, such as tariff and foreign economic policies, may affect future results of international operations.

ITEM 2 PROPERTIES

The company owns or leases facilities which are located throughout the United States and several foreign countries, including Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Mexico, and the United Kingdom. The location, square footage, and use of the most significant facilities at June 2, 2001, were as follows:

Owned Locations	Square Footage		Use
Spring Lake, Michigan		921,700	Manufacturing, Warehouse, and Office
Holland, Michigan		850,500	Manufacturing, Distribution, Warehouse, and Office
Zeeland, Michigan		749,000	Manufacturing, Warehouse, and Office
Rocklin, California		338,100	Manufacturing and Warehouse
Holland, Michigan		238,300	Design Center and Office
Leased Locations
Holland, Michigan		369,900	Manufacturing, Distribution, and Warehouse
Canton, Georgia		327,800	Manufacturing and Warehouse
Zeeland, Michigan		303,700	Manufacturing, Warehouse, and Office
Fulton, Georgia		176,700	Manufacturing, Warehouse, and Office
England, U.K		168,900	Manufacturing and Warehouse
Atlanta, Georgia		115,000	Warehouse and Distribution
Mexico		68,100	Manufacturing, Warehouse, and Office

      The company also maintains showrooms or sales offices near most major metropolitan areas throughout North America, Europe, the Middle East, Asia/Pacific, and South America. The company considers its existing facilities to be in excellent condition, efficiently utilized, well suited, and adequate for its design, production, distribution, and selling requirements.

ITEM 3 PENDING LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

The company, for a number of years, has sold various products to the United States Government under General Services Administration (GSA) multiple award schedule contracts. The GSA is permitted to audit the company’s compliance with the GSA contracts. At any point in time, a number of GSA audits are either

5

SUBMISSION OF MATTER TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

scheduled or in progress. Management does not expect resolution of the audits to have a material adverse effect on the company’s consolidated financial statements.

      The company is also involved in legal proceedings and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, the outcome of such proceedings and litigation currently pending will not materially affect the company’s consolidated financial statements.

ITEM 4 SUBMISSION OF MATTER TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of the year ended June 2, 2001.

ADDITIONAL ITEM: EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

Certain information relating to Executive Officers of the company is as follows:

Name	Age		Year Elected		Position with the Company
			an Executive
			Officer
James E. Christenson		54		1989	Senior Vice President, Legal Services, and Secretary
Robert Frey		58		1996	President, Herman Miller International
David M. Knibbe		46		1997	Executive Vice President, Sales and Distribution
Gary S. Miller		51		1984	Chief Development Officer
Elizabeth A. Nickels		39		2000	Chief Financial Officer
Gary VanSpronsen		45		1998	Executive Vice President, eBusiness
Michael A. Volkema		45		1995	Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Brian C. Walker		39		1996	President, Herman Miller North America

      Except as discussed in this paragraph, each of the named officers has served the company in an executive capacity for more than five years. Mr. Frey joined Herman Miller, Inc., in November 1996, and prior to 1996 was chairman of the board and chief executive officer of Asian operations and an elected executive vice president at Whirlpool Corporation. Mr. Knibbe was the vice president of sales and distribution for Herman Miller, Inc., from March 1996 to May 1997; president of Workplace Resource, Inc., from March 1995 to April 1996; and vice president of sales and distribution for Meridian, Inc., from April 1990 to March 1995. Ms. Nickels joined Herman Miller, Inc., in February 2000, and prior to 2000 was chief financial officer of Universal Forest Products, Inc., for seven years. Mr. VanSpronsen was the president of Miller SQA from January 1998 to September 1998, and vice president and general manager of Miller SQA from June 1992 to December 1997. Mr. Walker was the Chief Financial Officer of Herman Miller, Inc. from March 1996 to February 2000, and before that he served in various finance roles with the company.

6

PART II
MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS

ITEM 5 MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS

SHARE PRICE, EARNINGS, AND DIVIDENDS SUMMARY

Herman Miller, Inc., common stock is quoted in the NASDAQ-National Market System (NASDAQ-NMS Symbol: MLHR). As of August 3, 2001, there were approximately 24,000 shareholders of record of the company’s common stock.

Per Share and Unaudited	Market Price		Market Price		Market Price		Earnings		Dividends
	High		Low		Close		Per		Per
							Share–Diluted		Share
YEAR ENDED JUNE 2, 2001
First quarter(1)	$	32.813	$	25.875	$	32.000	$	.41	$	.03625
Second quarter		32.250		23.625		24.000		.54		.03625
Third quarter		29.375		22.625		25.938		.43		.03625
Fourth quarter		28.050		23.000		26.900		.43		.03625
Year	$	32.813	$	22.625	$	26.900	$	1.81	$	.14500
YEAR ENDED JUNE 3, 2000
First quarter	$	26.250	$	20.125	$	24.438	$	.43	$	.03625
Second quarter		25.500		20.938		23.250		.41		.03625
Third quarter		24.125		20.125		20.688		.40		.03625
Fourth quarter		29.750		19.875		29.750		.50		.03625
Year	$	29.750	$	19.875	$	29.750	$	1.74	$	.14500

(1)   The first quarter of 2001 includes a pre-tax charge of $5.4 million ($3.5 million after tax, or $.05 per diluted share) for the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle for pensions. Previous to the restatement, diluted earnings per share for the first quarter were $.46.

7

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
REVIEW OF OPERATIONS

ITEM 6 SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
REVIEW OF OPERATIONS

(In Millions, Except Per Share Data)	2001		2000			1999		1998
OPERATING RESULTS
Net Sales(3)	$	2,236.2	$	2,010.2		$	1,828.4	$	1,773.0
Gross Margin(3)		755.7		680.4			641.6		613.0
Selling, General, and Administrative(3)		475.4		404.4			379.3		370.9
Design and Research Expense		44.3		41.3			38.0		33.8
Operating Income		236.0		234.7			224.3		208.3
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes		225.1		221.8			229.9		209.5
Net Income (Loss)		140.6		139.7			141.8		128.3
Cash Flow from Operating Activities		211.8		202.1			205.6		268.7
Depreciation and Amortization		92.6		77.1			62.1		50.7
Capital Expenditures		105.0		135.7			103.4		73.6
Common Stock Repurchased plus
Cash Dividends Paid	$	105.3	$	101.6		$	179.7	$	215.5
KEY RATIOS
Sales Growth(3)		11.2		9.9			3.1		14.8
Gross Margin(1,3)		33.8		33.8			35.1		34.6
Selling, General, and Administrative(1,3)		21.3		20.1			20.7		20.9
Design and Research Expense(1,3)		2.0		2.1			2.1		1.9
Operating Income(1,3)		10.6		11.7			12.3		11.7
Net Income Growth (Decline)		0.6		(1.5	)		10.5		72.4
After-Tax Return on Net Sales(3)		6.3		6.9			7.8		7.2
After-Tax Return on Average Assets		14.5		16.5			18.5		16.7
After-Tax Return on Average Equity		43.5		55.5			64.4		49.5
SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA(2)
Earnings per Share-Diluted	$	1.81	$	1.74		$	1.67	$	1.39
Cash Dividends Declared per Share		.15		.15			.15		.15
Book Value per Share at Year End		4.63		3.76			2.63		2.66
Market Price per Share at Year End	$	26.90	$	29.75		$	20.19	$	27.69
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding-Diluted		77.6		80.5			84.8		92.0
FINANCIAL CONDITION
Total Assets	$	996.5	$	941.2		$	751.5	$	784.3
Working Capital(4)		191.6		99.1			55.5		77.2
Current Ratio		1.5		.9			1.0		1.1
Interest-Bearing Debt		259.3		225.6			147.6		130.7
Shareholders’ Equity		351.5		294.5			209.1		231.0
Total Capital		610.8		520.1			356.7		361.7
EBITDA	$	334.5	$	312.3		$	299.3	$	268.5
Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio		.8		.7			.5		.5
EBITDA-to-Interest Expense Ratio		19.9		23.3			41.0		32.3

(1)   Shown as a percent of net sales. (2) Retroactively adjusted to reflect two-for-one stock splits occurring in 1998 and 1997. (3) Amounts restated to reflect reclassification of certain expenses to conform to 2001 presentation. (4) Calculated using current assets less non-interest bearing current liabilities.

8

1997		1996		1995			1994		1993		1992			1991
$	1,543.8	$	1,325.0	$	1,117.8		$	983.7	$	883.1	$	830.5		$	906.8
	509.5		418.4		362.0			322.9		285.7		265.0			300.9
	335.2		299.5		287.4			230.9		217.4		217.3			219.9
	29.1		27.5		33.7			30.2		24.5		20.7			23.2
	130.7		74.9		9.1			61.8		43.8		2.0			39.2
	125.9		70.1		4.0			63.5		42.4		(1.0	)		33.2
	74.4		45.9		4.3			40.4		22.1		(14.1	)		14.1
	218.2		124.5		29.9			69.8		82.6		77.0			86.4
	48.0		45.0		39.7			33.2		31.6		30.5			32.8
	54.5		54.4		63.4			40.3		43.4		32.0			32.6
$	110.4	$	38.1	$	13.6		$	38.5	$	21.2	$	23.6		$	18.0
	16.5		18.5		13.6			11.4		6.3		(8.4	)		0.3
	33.0		31.6		32.4			32.8		32.4		31.9			33.2
	21.7		22.6		25.7			23.5		24.6		26.2			24.3
	1.9		2.1		3.0			3.1		2.8		2.5			2.6
	8.5		5.7		0.8			6.3		5.0		0.2			4.3
	62.1		967.4		(89.4	)		82.8		256.7		(200.0	)		(69.7	)
	4.8		3.5		0.4			4.1		2.5		(1.7	)		1.6
	10.3		6.8		0.7			7.9		4.6		(2.9	)		2.7
	25.0		15.4		1.5			13.9		7.8		(4.7	)		4.5
$	.77	$	.46	$	.04		$	.40	$	.22	$	(.14	)	$	.14
	.13		.13		.13			.13		.13		.13			.13
	3.12		3.12		2.89			3.01		2.84		2.78			3.08
$	17.88	$	7.72	$	5.42		$	6.22	$	6.41	$	4.75		$	5.03
	96.1		100.5		99.2			101.0		100.0		100.7			102.7
$	755.6	$	694.9	$	659.0		$	533.7	$	484.3	$	471.3		$	492.9
	135.7		151.8		133.7			106.6		87.8		93.4			135.0
	1.4		1.6		1.2			1.3		1.5		1.5			2.1
	127.4		131.7		144.2			70.0		39.9		54.0			75.7
	287.1		308.1		286.9			296.3		283.9		280.1			314.8
	414.5		439.8		431.1			366.3		323.8		334.1			390.5
$	182.7	$	123.0	$	50.1		$	98.5	$	76.0	$	36.4		$	76.2
	.7		1.1		2.9			.7		.5		1.5			1.0
	20.7		15.6		7.9			54.7		38.0		5.3			7.5

9

GRAPHIC REVIEW OF OPERATIONS

10

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

ITEM 7 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

You should read the issues discussed in Management’s Discussion and Analysis in conjunction with the company’s consolidated financial statements and the notes to the consolidated financial statements included in the company’s Form 10-K.

      In the following financial statements and management discussion, all amounts are restated to reflect the following changes related to accounting classification and methods.

      First, to comply with a recent Emerging Issues Task Force ruling, we were required to change the classification for certain shipping and handling costs. This change had the effect of increasing net sales, increasing cost of sales, and decreasing operating expenses. This change is purely a reclassification of expense and does not change net income. Financial statements and referenced amounts throughout this discussion have been restated to reflect this change.

      Second, the company changed the method of accounting for its pension plan. This change resulted in an after-tax charge to income of $3.5 million or $.05 per share, which retroactively affected the first quarter of fiscal 2001. The new method of accounting uses a calculated value method over five years to determine the market-related value of the plan assets. This new method provides for better matching of the value of plan assets and liabilities under our cash balance retirement plan. Additionally, this method is consistent with that being used by many other manufacturing companies.

OVERVIEW

We had another record-setting year at Herman Miller in a number of categories, including sales, orders, and earnings per share. The overall economic downturn split the year into two distinct six-month periods. The first six months saw significant growth, exceeding a 23 percent increase in revenues. This pace was more than double the industry growth level and provided another indication of our ability to gain market share through new strategic initiatives. Some of the gain in revenue was attributable to high levels of orders placed toward the end of fiscal 2000. As the general economy weakened, the office furniture industry began to rapidly experience an overall delay in capital goods purchasing, leading to an abrupt slowdown in orders. Our ability to respond to the resulting business climate through cost structure changes, variable incentive programs, and focused spending, enabled us to meet the difficult challenge of balancing short- and long-term objectives.

      When order levels fell sharply during the third quarter, we moved to manage production labor, accelerate efficiency gains in production facilities, and improve material usage. Despite the continuing slowdown in the economy, we continue to believe in our long-term strategic initiatives and are proceeding with a prioritized approach to investments. Industry sales levels in fiscal 2002 are difficult to project. Our plan is to continue adjusting costs and investments while positioning the company for even greater market share gains once the economy recovers.

      We are still confident that our strategy will enable us to attain our long-term growth goals. The foundation of this growth will come from

• our core markets and expansion of our market share

• reaching customers we have not formerly served

• expanding our international presence

• seeking new business opportunities tangential to, but outside of, the office furniture industry

11

      Throughout this discussion we will highlight what we believe are keys to the success of this growth strategy

• innovative products and services

• reliability driven by process excellence

• thought leadership

• a strong distribution network, new market channels, and alliances

      As in the past, we continue to strengthen the commitment to our customers, our suppliers, our business partners, and our employee owners. Financial investments to fulfill our vision require time, persistence, and the dedicated focus of all our stakeholders. We have realized many rewards from our investments, including continued market share improvements, increased ability to rapidly adjust for short-term declines, and significant gains in serving strategically targeted customers. Although our initial plans did not anticipate the challenges of the second half of fiscal 2001 and the upcoming year, our objectives for long-term growth continue on track. We believe the difficult short-term outlook will provide the opportunity to focus and balance those investments that support our value propositions. We define value propositions as comprising large groups of customers, which have common buying needs and attitudes.

KEY MEASUREMENT

At Herman Miller, we use Economic Value Added (EVA) to determine whether we are creating value for our employee-owners and shareholders. We evaluate all our business decisions in this manner to ensure we are investing resources in opportunities that create the highest return for the long term. We also use EVA as the basis for calculating our incentive compensation. Making EVA such an important part of our overall compensation structure has driven a higher level of business literacy and decision-making capabilities throughout our work force.

      EVA generation outpaced last year for the first three quarters of fiscal 2001. Even though we implemented cost-containment programs during the second half, the slowdown in orders proved too heavy a burden, resulting in lower EVA for the full fiscal year. Our compensation programs are tied to achieving EVA growth targets, and because the second half decline in business was so abrupt, we made no variable quarterly compensation payments in the fourth quarter. We continue to believe that EVA is the best method of rewarding our employees in a manner consistent with the rewards we provide to our shareholders, and market research validates this perspective. Our belief in the future potential of our strategic initiatives continues to drive us toward investments that create long-term value, even if EVA results suffer in the short run.

      While EVA has not predicted short-term swings in our stock price, since its implementation our stock price has increased 386.3 percent while EVA grew 637.9 percent since 1996. Therefore, again this year, we have presented a summarized calculation of our EVA for fiscal 2001, 2000, and 1999.

12

Calculation of Economic Value Added

(In Millions)	2001			2000			1999
Operating income	$	236.0		$	234.7		$	224.3
Interest expense on noncapitalized leases(1)		7.6			5.3			4.1
Goodwill amortization		3.6			2.9			3.0
Other		9.2			3.3			4.6
Increase (decrease) in reserves		(6.7	)		1.1			(4.3	)
Capitalized design and research		3.1			4.4			3.7
Adjusted operating profit		252.8			251.7			235.4
Cash taxes(2)		(91.7	)		(91.7	)		(83.6	)
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)		161.1			160.0			151.8
Weighted-average capital employed(3)		818.4			693.3			551.8
Weighted-average cost of capital(4)		10.4	%		10.4	%		11.0	%
Cost of capital		85.1			72.1			60.7
Economic Value Added	$	76.0		$	87.9		$	91.1

(1)   Imputed interest as if the total noncancelable lease payments were capitalized. (2) The reported current tax provision is adjusted for the statutory tax impact of interest expense. (3) Total assets less noninterest-bearing liabilities plus the LIFO, doubtful accounts and notes receivable reserves, warranty reserve, amortized goodwill, deferred taxes, and capitalized design and research expense. Design and research expense is capitalized and amortized over five years. (4) Management’s estimate of the weighted average of the minimum equity and debt returns required by the providers of capital. Reevaluated every year and adjusted when necessary to reflect the current rate environment and capital structure.

      We generated $76.0 million of EVA this year, compared to $87.9 million last year, an $11.9 million or 13.5 percent decrease. The primary driver of this decline was a higher capital charge. Net operating profit after taxes ended $1.1 million higher with flat cash operating taxes. The major components of the increase in capital charges came from investment in technology infrastructure, production facility enhancements, new products, and working capital requirements during the high-growth period.

KEY DRIVERS

Consolidated Net Sales In fiscal 2001, our sales reached a new record totaling $2.2 billion, an increase of 11.2 percent over fiscal 2000. Fiscal 2000 included 53 weeks, so excluding the effect of the extra week our sales grew 13.1 percent. New products and growth from developing value propositions, coupled with new methods to serve our customers, drove the increase of the past year. The current state of the economy, which is fueling delays in many customers’ capital expansion and hiring plans, will undoubtedly place more pressure on achieving revenue growth experienced in recent years.

      As we mentioned above, the year was split into two distinct periods. The first half started with a significant backlog carried over from fiscal 2000, in addition to record numbers of new orders. During the fourth quarter we faced perhaps the most abrupt slowdown in industry history. Working off the backlog built up earlier in the year, we posted respectable sales levels. While the following may not be reflected in current order rates, we are glad to note that customer activity and interest in our products and processes has stayed strong domestically and abroad. The position we are establishing in the marketplace, with continued focused spending on innovative development, will enable us to deliver our growth objectives when the economy recovers.

13

      Domestic Operations Our domestic sales grew 9.6 percent this year, after growing 10.1 percent in 2000, and 4.2 percent in 1999. In fiscal 2000, we acquired Geiger, a wood casegoods manufacturer, to complement our product offerings. Geiger sales accounted for 10.6 percent of the total domestic increase and produced positive EVA growth. Our core domestic growth has been primarily driven by unit volume increases. Growth across our new value propositions produced an 80.9 percent revenue increase over the prior year. Stated another way, the new value propositions represented nearly 20 percent of the company’s total dollar revenue growth. As shown in the graph on page 10, our revenue increases continue to significantly outpace the industry. Exceeding industry growth is yet another indication that our strategic direction is building momentum.

      During 2001, incremental discounts given to customers reduced our net sales by approximately $7.9 million. Changes in discounts reduced net sales in 2000 by $16.5 million and $11.0 million in 1999. Pressures on revenue and margin from discounting are expected to continue. We believe our product and service offering, together with our variable cost structure, will provide a competitive advantage that enables us to maximize and protect our place in the industry.

      The Business and Institutional Furniture Manufacturers Association (BIFMA) reported that U.S. sales grew approximately 1.9 percent in the 12 months ended May 2001, after increasing 4.4 percent in 2000 and 3.1 percent in 1999.

      We believe demand for office furniture in the U.S. is driven by three primary factors in the macro economy: corporate profits, service-sector employment, and nonresidential fixed investments. During the last three fiscal years, each of these factors improved year over year. The economic surge, an increased deployment of technology into work environments, and changing work styles have positively influenced demand in recent years. BIFMA is currently estimating that industry shipments will decline over 4 percent in calendar 2001, but the anticipated turnaround will produce 1.8 percent growth in calendar 2002. Given the current state of the economy, this forecast may be overly optimistic.

      International Operations and Exports from the United States We continue to be pleased with the results of our International operations. Strategic global initiatives have continued to increase our revenue and profitability during the past four years. Positive EVA was produced for the past two years. Significant gains in Europe have provided the funds to strengthen other targeted customer opportunities in Asia and Latin America. Our Asian operations posted large gains and established a great demand for some new product offerings. We continue to streamline our locally based operations while leveraging our domestically based support team.

      For the entire year, International sales levels increased 21.1 percent, surpassing $347 million. International revenue now comprises 15.5 percent of consolidated sales. During the second half of fiscal 2001, our International operations remained strong and continued the record setting pace by again increasing shipments over 21 percent compared to the same period of fiscal 2000. Once again, stable economic environments in the geographic areas where we have a significant presence, especially the United Kingdom and Japan, have helped our International business. However, orders across all regions began to decrease during the latter part of the year. We expect economic factors influencing the U.S. economy to spread globally during the upcoming months.

      International net income for 2001 was $12.5 million, versus $11.8 million last year and $8.1 million in 1999. These positive results are primarily attributable to increased sales growth and cost-containment efforts.

14

      Gross Margin Gross margin, as a percent of net sales, remained even with fiscal 2000 at 33.8 percent. As we mentioned earlier, certain expenses related to shipping and handling costs were reclassified from net revenue and operating expenses. We have restated all years in order for expense classification to be comparative.

      Several factors influenced our ability to hold the line on margins during the second half of the year. Factors negatively influencing margin included a higher level of discounting, lower volume to leverage overhead costs, continued growth in newer products with less production, and incremental compensation payments. Offsetting the negative, we gained on material costs, managed production labor, reduced variable overhead, and re-paced some capital expenditures. Some of the factors are discussed in more detail below. We do want to point out that cost reductions can be stepped in relation to production volumes.

      Our employee-owners’ ability to execute our business model and maintain pressure on continued process improvements prepared Manufacturing operations for the sudden sales decline during the fourth quarter. Although the production associated with newer product lines is typically less efficient during the initial launch period, we realized significant improvements during the second half of the year. Investments in improved production capabilities over the past two years have shown positive effects on our margin. Ongoing implementation of the Herman Miller Production System, which promotes effective manufacturing techniques, added directly to these improvements.

      We initiated programs to extend our efficient manufacturing techniques to our suppliers, providing the basis for strengthened relationships and cost reductions for all parties involved. We continued to utilize the capabilities of our supply base to their fullest extent, providing greater flexibility in selecting new materials and processes in the research, design, and development of new products. Our Purchasing and Manufacturing teams partnered with key suppliers to produce roughly $26 million of incremental price and usage savings. Our Supplier Qualification Program, which ranks suppliers, is providing a sound basis for purchasing more materials from the top performers, leading to improved quality and reliability. We increased the focus and use of Internet-based technology designed to provide continuous and accurate material requirements, so that the most reliable and efficient flow occurs through the entire supply chain. As our customers’ expectations for speed and reliability increase, we feel our investments in this platform are returning great rewards in costs, service, and helping to differentiate our brand.

      Labor costs were managed during the second half, mainly through reductions in temporary labor. We have purposely designed part of our production work force as temporary to assist us in varying the labor force as volume requirements fluctuate. Variable overhead costs were scrutinized and avoided if possible. We continue to analyze our capacity requirements. During the high-volume levels of the first half, our capacity was employed at highly profitable levels. As volume dropped abruptly, we were, and will continue to be, challenged to find new methods of reducing overhead while maintaining a balance for the expected economic recovery.

      As we said, during the first half of our fiscal year, industry demand was very strong. Competition remained at a high level, but discounting appeared consistent with the prior year. As the economy slowed and pressures on revenue targets and capacity utilization heated up, discounting activity rose and placed more pressure on margin during our fourth quarter. As noted above, the increased discounting reduced sales and gross margin $7.9 million, which resulted in a .2 percent decrease in gross margin. We expect this discount pressure to

15

continue into the next year, placing greater emphasis on cost-containment measures. We believe our accomplishments toward increased productivity during the past year and our variable business model and service differentiation will provide a solid defense while we further advance longer-term strategies.

      Going forward, our continued productivity improvements and material cost reductions will be offset, to some degree, by additional discounting and pressure from overhead leveraging in the short run.

      Operating Expenses During the past two years, we continued our investments in two primary areas: technology and new products. We believe that leadership in the office furniture industry will go to those organizations that provide high-speed, seamless, on-demand communications throughout the value chain. Further, these tools must be customized to fit the individual customer’s needs, not “one size fits all.” We have developed four distinct value propositions, which are tailored to groups of customers based on how they perceive value. In each of these value propositions, customization opportunities are available to further enhance the customer experience.

      We place a great deal of importance on understanding a customer’s needs, and we strive to provide easy access to tools that help design the best workplace solution. Our value propositions target specific customer needs by offering the appropriate products and capabilities. However, if needed, all of our capabilities are available. Essentially, customers can identify the means by which they communicate best with us across a spectrum of interaction levels and contact points. These range from placing orders through our on-line store at www.hermanmiller.com, to utilizing custom-designed Web sites, to engaging our design team to fully implement a workplace environment.

      Creating real value for customers also relies heavily on the product offering. Over the years, Herman Miller has continually led the office furniture industry in product and business design innovation. We continued to make targeted investments to further strengthen our products and services. New innovations and market opportunities are in development. Our goal is to continue strengthening our brand position and market share. The short-term challenges of today’s economy will not alter our belief in proven successful strategic initiatives. We will continue to protect and maximize the investments of our stakeholders in the short run; however, full realization of an investment should be viewed over a period of time. We believe the path we are taking will lead us to significant gains as the economy improves.

      Herman Miller built its place in the market through innovation. Our history holds numerous examples of improvements to the workplace through extensive research, while providing revolutionary design changes. Research and design costs, excluding royalty payments, were $37.2 million in 2001, compared to $35.1 million in 2000, and $33.4 million in 1999. Royalty payments made to designers of the company’s products as the products are sold are not included in research and development costs, since they are considered to be a variable cost of the product. As a percentage of net sales, research and development costs were 1.7 percent in 2001, 1.7 percent in 2000, and 1.8 percent in 1999. As discussed earlier, new product design and development has been, and continues to be, a key business strategy. The increased expenditures are directly related to the increased number of new products introduced and currently in development.

      The market responded very well to our new products over the past year. In particular, our award-winning Resolve system has made a significant impact on customers’ perceptions of their work environment’s image, establishing new paradigms in alternative workplaces. We introduced Resolve at the industry’s annual trade

16

show, NeoCon, in June 1999, where it won a Best-of-Show Gold Award. In June 2000, the Resolve system became available for unrestricted order entry. To date we are very pleased with the levels of orders and customer interest in the opportunities Resolve provides for changing the workplace environment. Many international markets have also displayed a high acceptance and demand for Resolve. Several installations were completed during the second half of the year in both Europe and the Pacific Rim. We believe Resolve establishes yet another option across a large market base searching for improved style, space utilization, flexibility, approach to privacy, and cost.

      Overall, operating expenses increased 16.5 percent or $74.0 million. Once again, we restated all years for reclassification of certain expenses to cost of sales. Higher volume in the first half produced EVA sufficient to pay an incremental $9.5 million in compensation incentives. The second half results produced much lower EVA incentive payments. Certain direct-sales costs followed the strong upward revenue growth during the first half. Additional incremental expenses occurred from acquisitions completed during fiscal 2000, startup costs for our RED business unit, increased warranty reserves, bad debts, and depreciation related to prior-period capital purchases. With the exception of the expenses from acquired subsidiaries and depreciation, we do not anticipate the other incremental costs to occur in the near future.

      Our commitment to long-term initiatives, coupled with slowing sales volume, will place greater pressure on the operating expense percentage. Although expense reductions have and will continue to be a priority, the plan to improve this ratio is primarily driven by increasing sales at a higher rate than costs. As sales outpaced our targets during the first half, we saw the opportunity to accelerate many of our strategic initiatives. As the downturn in the economy became deeper with an extended forecast for recovery, we began implementing cost reduction and containment steps. We acted to lower or hold expenses until the volume outlook became clearer. We froze hiring and wages, eliminated our temporary production work force, repaced capital spending, and prioritized the timing of initiative program spending. As the outlook for the upcoming year continues to be soft with expected declines in revenue, we are currently putting contingency plans in place to address further steps to maximize near-term performance with long-term growth and return objectives.

      Our operating expense improvement trend has slowed over the past two years. As we have discussed throughout this report, the deployment of technology and product innovation has been and will continue to be a key focus for us. Historically, capital investments were amortized over an extended period of time. In the new technology-driven business model, however, capital investments impact the income statement much more quickly, driving higher expense levels and greater needs for renewed assets.

      Operating Income Operating income totaled $236.0 million, a slight increase over the prior year. The decline in percentage points to revenue resulted from higher operating expenses and reinvestment into growth initiatives. Dollar increases in operating income expected during the second half of fiscal 2001 were limited by the abrupt downturn in the marketplace. As a percent of sales, operating income declined to 10.6 percent in 2001 from 11.7 percent in 2000 and 12.3 percent in 1999.

      Other Expenses and Income Other expense was $10.9 million in fiscal 2001, while in 2000 we incurred other expense of $12.9 million. The change is primarily attributable to losses on the disposal of nonproductive assets in fiscal 2000, offset in part by higher interest expense in fiscal 2001. To fund future investments, attain capital structure objectives, and provide for financial flexibility, interest-bearing debt has increased through the

17

issuance of our long-term public debt offering executed during the fourth quarter. An expanded explanation of our improved debt structure appears in the Liquidity and Capital Resources section of this report. Interest expense increased to $16.8 million, as compared to $13.4 million last year. At the end of fiscal 2001, interest-bearing debt was $259.3 million, an increase of $33.7 million from fiscal 2000.

      Fiscal 1999 results included gains on the sale of our Grandville, Michigan, and Roswell, Georgia, sites, as well as excess land in Chippenham, U.K. In total, these disposals contributed a net $6.9 million pretax gain.

      Income Taxes Our effective tax rate was 36.0 percent in 2001, compared to 37.0 percent and 38.3 percent in 2000 and 1999, respectively. The lower tax rate is due to lower state taxes, international tax benefits, and other initiatives. We expect the effective tax rate for fiscal 2002 to be approximately equal to the past year.

      Liquidity and Capital Resources The table below shows certain key cash flow and capital highlights:

(In Millions)	2001			2000			1999
Cash and cash equivalents	$	151.8		$	95.8		$	80.0
Cash from operating activities	$	211.8		$	202.1		$	205.6
Capital expenditures	$	105.0		$	135.7		$	103.4
Debt-to-EBITDA ratio		.8			.7			.5
EBITDA-to-interest expense ratio		19.9			23.3			41.0
EVA capital	$	879.8		$	751.8		$	577.1
NOPAT to EVA capital		18.3	%		21.3	%		26.3	%

      Our cash flow from operations increased 4.8 percent in 2001, to $211.8 million, from last year’s $202.1 million. Higher volume and depreciation, offset by increased working capital investment of $26.1 million, drove the change. The change in working capital was caused by a favorable decline in receivables that was more than offset by the combination of lower trade payables and accrued taxes.

      Fiscal 2001 capital expenditures were primarily for investments in our customer-centered selling technology platform, equipment for operational enhancements, and new product commercialization. The $30.7 million dollar decrease in cash outlay resulted from the completion of many projects related to initial sales tool technology, reprioritization or delayed spending, and our ERP implementation. At the end of the fiscal year, $60.1 million of capital was committed for future expenditures to continue strengthening our strategic position.

      We expect capital expenditures to be between $110 million and $130 million in 2002. The largest planned expenditures will be for expanded customer-development tools, manufacturing improvements, and new product manufacturing support.

      During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2001, we completed an initial public debt offering, raising $175 million through 10-year notes with a 7.125 percent coupon rate. There remains $125 million available on the shelf registration filed in May 2000. The proceeds from the debt offering were used primarily to repay borrowings on the $300 million revolving credit facility. Our available credit, combined with our existing cash and expected cash flow, is adequate to fund our day-to-day operations, strategic investments, and share repurchases. Going forward, we will manage our capital structure according to one overriding tenet: We will ensure the financial strength and flexibility necessary to maintain an investment-grade rating on our debt, including the

18

maintenance of a minimum EBITDA-to-interest expense ratio and a maximum debt-to-EBITDA ratio. (EBITDA stands for Earnings Before Interest Expense, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization.)

      During the past year, we increased our owned dealer network through one acquisition and established two alliances that will capitalize on our SQA dealers and contribute to earnings. In 2000, we acquired Geiger, a manufacturer of wood casegood products; this acquisition included a sales office in the United Kingdom. We also acquired a privately owned North American dealer as part of our service strategy. We will continue to investigate acquisitions and alliances to fill strategically identified gaps in our product offering.

      Common Stock Transactions

(In Millions, Except Share and Per Share Data)	2001		2000		1999
Shares acquired		3,322,174		3,734,623		8,379,444
Cost of shares acquired	$	94.2	$	90.1	$	167.5
Weighted average cost per share acquired	$	28.35	$	24.12	$	19.99
Shares issued		1,283,358		2,227,154		958,347
Weighted average cost per share issued	$	17.92	$	21.75	$	16.18
Cash dividends	$	11.1	$	11.5	$	12.0
Dividends per share	$	.15	$	.15	$	.15

      The Board of Directors first authorized the company to repurchase its common stock in 1984 and has periodically renewed its authorization. In fiscal 2001, repurchases of common stock totaled 3.3 million shares for $94.2 million, compared to 3.7 million shares for $90.1 million during fiscal 2000. Management and the Board of Directors believe the share repurchase program is an excellent means of returning value to our shareholders and preventing dilution from employee-ownership programs and shares issued in acquisitions. In September 1999, our Board of Directors approved an additional $50 million, and in July 2000, they approved an additional $100 million for share repurchases. At the end of fiscal 2001, $32.9 million remained on our authorization. In July 2001, our Board authorized a new $100 million share repurchase plan, bringing the total outstanding to $132.9 million.

CONTINGENCIES

The company, for a number of years, has sold various products to the United States Government under General Services Administration (GSA) multiple-award schedule contracts. The GSA is permitted to audit the company’s compliance with the GSA contracts. At any point in time, a number of GSA audits are either scheduled or in progress. Management does not expect resolution of the audits to have a material adverse effect on the company’s consolidated financial statements.

      We are not aware of any other litigation or threatened litigation that would have a material impact on the company’s consolidated financial statements.

CONCLUSION

We are in a period of rapid, fundamental change in the office furniture industry, and we are determined to lead the way. As we have described our strategic intent to you throughout this document, we hope that you have a

19

better understanding of how we are creating new value for our shareholders and employee-owners. Leading the way is always a higher-risk approach than following the pack, but we believe our methodology safeguards the company’s existing value while it also allows us to pursue a higher-return business model. While we did not achieve all of our objectives last year, significant progress was made toward fully realizing our goals. We believe fiscal 2001 allowed us to build a winning platform for successes yet to come. We are more optimistic than ever about our long-term future. While fiscal 2002 will hold many challenges, Herman Miller will continue to lead in design-focused innovation, expanding and establishing new reference points for the industry.

BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The condensed consolidated financial statements included in this report do not conform to financial statement standards under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States largely because they are summaries and omit footnotes to the statements. Audited financial statements, prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, appear in the company’s Form 10-K.

      When considering year-over-year growth statistics, keep in mind that Herman Miller’s fiscal year 2001 contained 52 weeks, compared to 53 weeks in fiscal 2000 and 52 weeks in fiscal 1999.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This discussion and other sections of our Summary Annual Report contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended, that are based on management’s beliefs, assumptions, current expectations, estimates, and projections about the office furniture industry, the economy, and the company itself. Words like “anticipates,” “believes,” “confident,” “estimates,” “expects,” “forecasts,” “likely,” “plans,” “projects,” “should,” variations of such words, and similar expressions identify such forward-looking statements. These statements do not guarantee future performance and involve certain risks, uncertainties, and assumptions that are difficult to predict with regard to timing, extent, likelihood, and degree of occurrence. Therefore, actual results and outcomes may materially differ from what we express or forecast. Furthermore, Herman Miller, Inc., undertakes no obligation to update, amend, or clarify forward-looking statements.

20

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

ITEM 7A QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The company has no material financial exposure to the various financial instrument market risks covered under this item. Foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations related to the company’s international operations did not have a material impact on the financial results of the company during fiscal 2001. The company has no material sensitivity to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. For fixed rate debt, changes in interest rates generally affect the fair market value, but not earnings or cash flows. The company does not have an obligation to prepay fixed rate debt prior to maturity, and as a result, interest rate risk and changes in fair market value should not have a significant impact on such debt until the company would be required to refinance it. For further information, refer to the Fair Value of Financial Instruments and Financial Instruments with Off-Balance-Sheet Risk disclosures in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements filed as part of this report.

ITEM 8 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA

Summary of the quarterly operating results on a consolidated basis:

(In Millions, Except Per Share Data)	1st Quarter		2nd Quarter		3rd Quarter		4th Quarter
JUNE 2, 2001
Net Sales(1)	$	547.9	$	616.3	$	561.0	$	511.0
Gross margin(1)		182.0		210.0		184.8		178.9
Net income(2)		32.5		42.3		33.0		32.8
Earnings per share-diluted(2)	$	.41	$	.54	$	.43	$	.43
JUNE 3, 2000
Net sales(1)	$	490.0	$	481.4	$	497.9	$	540.9
Gross margin(1)		169.7		165.3		162.0		183.4
Net income		35.2		33.0		31.8		39.7
Earnings per share-diluted	$	.43	$	.41	$	.40	$	.50
MAY 29, 1999
Net sales(1)	$	462.9	$	479.8	$	438.1	$	447.6
Gross margin(1)		162.7		169.3		148.1		161.5
Net income		34.0		38.9		29.9		39.0
Earnings per share-diluted	$	.39	$	.45	$	.35	$	.48

(1)   Amounts have been restated as a result of adopting Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 00-10, “Accounting for Shipping and Handling Fees and Costs” (“EITF 00-10”). Adoption of EITF 00-10 took place in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2001 and involved the reclassification to cost of sales of certain shipping and handling related costs which were previously reported as components of net sales and operating expenses. (2) The first quarter of 2001 includes a pre-tax charge of $5.4 million ($3.5 million after tax, or $.05 per diluted share) for the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle for pensions. Previously reported net income and diluted earnings per share for the first quarter were $36.0 million and $.46, respectively.

21

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(In Millions, Except Per Share Data)		June 2, 2001			June 3, 2000			May 29, 1999
Net Sales		$	2,236.2		$	2,010.2		$	1,828.4
Cost of Sales			1,480.5			1,329.8			1,186.8
Gross Margin			755.7			680.4			641.6
Operating Expenses:
	Selling, general, and administrative		475.4			404.4			379.3
	Design and research		44.3			41.3			38.0
Total Operating Expenses			519.7			445.7			417.3
Operating Income			236.0			234.7			224.3
Other Expenses (Income):
	Interest expense		16.8			13.4			7.3
	Interest income		(7.0	)		(6.4	)		(7.1	)
	Other, net		1.1			5.9			(5.8	)
Net Other Expenses (Income)			10.9			12.9			(5.6	)
Income from Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes			225.1			221.8			229.9
Income Taxes on Income from Continuing Operations			81.0			82.1			88.1
Income Before Cumulative Effect of a Change
In Accounting Principle			144.1			139.7			141.8
Cumulative Effect of a Change in Accounting
Principle for Pensions, net of tax of $1.9			3.5			—			—
Net Income		$	140.6		$	139.7		$	141.8
Earnings Per Share—Basic:
Earnings Before Cumulative Effect of a Change
In Accounting Principle		$	1.88		$	1.76		$	1.69
Cumulative Effect of a Change in Accounting
Principle, net of tax			(.05	)		—			—
Earnings Per Share—Basic		$	1.83		$	1.76		$	1.69
Earnings Per Share—Diluted:
Earnings Before Cumulative Effect of a Change
In Accounting Principle		$	1.86		$	1.74		$	1.67
Cumulative Effect of a Change in Accounting
Principle, net of tax			(.05	)		—			—
Earnings Per Share—Diluted		$	1.81		$	1.74		$	1.67
Pro Forma Amounts Assuming Retroactive Application
of a Change in Accounting Principle for Pensions:
Net Income		$	144.1		$	138.1		$	139.9
Earnings Per Share—Basic		$	1.88		$	1.74		$	1.67
Earnings Per Share—Diluted		$	1.86		$	1.71		$	1.65

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

22

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In Millions, Except Share and Per Share Data)		June 2, 2001			June 3, 2000
Assets
Current Assets:
	Cash and cash equivalents	$	151.8		$	95.8
	Accounts receivable, less allowances of $19.1 in 2001, and $17.7 in 2000		212.6			227.2
	Inventories		55.9			53.7
	Prepaid expenses and other		54.5			48.6
	Total Current Assets		474.8			425.3
Property and Equipment:
	Land and improvements		28.8			28.0
	Buildings and improvements		163.2			152.3
	Machinery and equipment		615.6			540.1
	Construction in progress		32.3			50.8
			839.9			771.2
	Less: accumulated depreciation		430.9			372.5
	Net Property and Equipment		409.0			398.7
Notes Receivable, less allowances of $2.6 in 2001, and $4.2 in 2000			13.3			22.6
Other Assets			99.4			94.6
	Total Assets	$	996.5		$	941.2
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
Current Liabilities:
	Unfunded checks	$	21.2		$	26.5
	Current portion of long-term debt		23.3			25.1
	Notes payable		3.1			122.7
	Accounts payable		95.6			114.2
	Accrued liabilities		166.4			185.5
	Total Current Liabilities		309.6			474.0
Long-Term Debt, less current portion above			232.9			77.8
Other Liabilities			102.5			94.9
	Total Liabilities		645.0			646.7
Shareholders’ Equity:
	Preferred stock, no par value (10,000,000 shares authorized, none issued)		—			—
	Common stock, $.20 par value (240,000,000 shares authorized, 76,019,575
	and 78,298,392 shares issued and outstanding in 2001 and 2000)		15.2			15.6
	Additional paid-in capital		—			—
	Retained earnings		365.6			301.5
	Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(17.4	)		(13.5	)
	Key executive stock programs		(11.9	)		(9.1	)
	Total Shareholders’ Equity		351.5			294.5
	Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity	$	996.5		$	941.2

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

23

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(In Millions, Except Share)		Common			Additional			Retained			Accumulated			Key Executive			Total
and Per Share Data)		Stock			Paid-in			Earnings			Other			Stock			Shareholders'
					Capital						Comprehensive			Programs			Equity
											Loss
Balance May 30, 1998		$	17.4		$	—		$	227.5		$	(9.4	)	$	(4.5	)	$	231.0
Net income			—			—			141.8			—			—			141.8
Current year translation adjustment			—			—			—			(1.3	)		—			(1.3	)
	Total comprehensive income																	140.5
Cash dividends ($.145 per share)			—			—			(12.0	)		—			—			(12.0	)
Exercise of stock options			.1			6.7			—			—			—			6.8
Employee stock purchase plan			.1			6.3			—			—			—			6.4
Tax benefit relating to stock options			—			2.0			—			—			—			2.0
Repurchase and retirement of
8,379,444 shares of common stock			(1.7	)		(18.6	)		(147.2	)		—			—			(167.5	)
Directors’ fees			—			.3			—			—			—			.3
Stock grants earned			—			—			—			—			1.2			1.2
Stock grants issued			—			.4			—			—			(.4	)		—
Deferred compensation plan			—			2.9			—			—			(2.9	)		—
Stock purchase assistance plan			—			—			—			—			.4			.4
Balance May 29, 1999		$	15.9		$	—		$	210.1		$	(10.7	)	$	(6.2	)	$	209.1
Net income			—			—			139.7			—			—			139.7
Current year translation adjustment			—			—			—			(2.8	)		—			(2.8	)
	Total comprehensive income																	136.9
Cash dividends ($.145 per share)			—			—			(11.5	)		—			—			(11.5	)
Issuance of 1,312,187 shares of common
stock for Geiger Brickel, Inc., acquisition			.3			32.3			—			—			—			32.6
Exercise of stock options			.1			10.9			—			—			—			11.0
Employee stock purchase plan			—			4.4			—			—			—			4.4
Tax benefit relating to stock options			—			1.5			—			—			—			1.5
Repurchase and retirement of
3,734,623 shares of common stock			(.7	)		(52.6	)		(36.8	)		—			—			(90.1	)
Directors’ fees			—			.1			—			—			—			.1
Stock grants earned			—			—			—			—			.7			.7
Stock grants issued			—			.2			—			—			(.3	)		(.1	)
Deferred compensation plan			—			3.2			—			—			(3.2	)		—
Stock purchase assistance plan			—			—			—			—			(.1	)		(.1	)
Balance June 3, 2000		$	15.6		$	—		$	301.5		$	(13.5	)	$	(9.1	)	$	294.5
Net income			—			—			140.6			—			—			140.6
Current year translation adjustment			—			—			—			(3.9	)		—			(3.9	)
	Total comprehensive income																	136.7
Cash dividends ($.145 per share)			—			—			(11.1	)		—			—			(11.1	)
Exercise of stock options			.3			16.1			—			—			—			16.4
Employee stock purchase plan			—			4.5			—			—			—			4.5
Tax benefit relating to stock options			—			3.6			—			—			—			3.6
Repurchase and retirement of
3,322,174 shares of common stock			(0.7	)		(28.1	)		(65.4	)		—			—			(94.2	)
Directors’ fees			—			.2			—			—			—			.2
Stock grants earned															1.1			1.1
Stock grants issued			—			1.5			—			—			(1.7	)		(.2	)
Deferred compensation plan			—			2.2			—			—			(2.2	)		—
Balance June 2, 2001		$	15.2		$	—		$	365.6		$	(17.4	)	$	(11.9	)	$	351.5

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

24

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In Millions)		June 2, 2001			June 3, 2000			May 29, 1999
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
	Net Income	$	140.6		$	139.7		$	141.8
	Adjustments to reconcile net income
	to net cash provided by operating activities:
	Cumulative effect of a change in accounting
	principle for pensions, net of tax		3.5			—			—
	Other		67.7			62.4			63.8
	Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities		211.8			202.1			205.6
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
	Notes receivable repayments		639.4			486.7			491.0
	Notes receivable issued		(628.4	)		(490.6	)		(486.5	)
	Property and equipment additions		(105.0	)		(135.7	)		(103.4	)
	Proceeds from sales of property and equipment		.1			.4			28.9
	Net cash paid for acquisitions		—			(5.9	)		(4.7	)
	Other, net		(5.5	)		(5.8	)		(15.9	)
	Net Cash Used for Investing Activities		(99.4	)		(150.9	)		(90.6	)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
	Short-term debt borrowings		499.9			782.3			65.6
	Short-term debt repayments		(618.9	)		(710.8	)		(38.6	)
	Long-term debt borrowings		175.0			—			.1
	Long-term debt repayments		(25.0	)		(17.9	)		(10.1	)
	Dividends paid		(11.1	)		(11.5	)		(12.2	)
	Common stock issued		20.9			15.4			13.5
	Common stock repurchased and retired		(94.2	)		(90.1	)		(167.5	)
	Net Cash Used for Financing Activities		(53.4	)		(32.6	)		(149.2	)
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash and Cash Equivalents			(3.0	)		(2.8	)		(1.1	)
	Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and
	Cash Equivalents		56.0			15.8			(35.3	)
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Beginning of Year			95.8			80.0			115.3
Cash and Cash Equivalents, End of Year		$	151.8		$	95.8		$	80.0

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

25

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING AND REPORTING POLICIES

The following is a summary of significant accounting and reporting policies not reflected elsewhere in the accompanying financial statements.

      Principles of Consolidation The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Herman Miller, Inc., and its wholly owned domestic and foreign subsidiaries (the company). All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

      Description of Business The company researches, designs, manufactures and distributes interior furnishings and provides related services that support companies all over the world. The company’s products are sold primarily to or through independent contract office furniture dealers. Accordingly, accounts and notes receivable in the accompanying balance sheets principally are amounts due from the dealers.

      Fiscal Year The company’s fiscal year ends on the Saturday closest to May 31. The year ended June 2, 2001, contained 52 weeks, whereas the year ended June 3, 2000, contained 53 weeks. The year ended May 29, 1999, contained 52 weeks.

      Foreign Currency Translation The functional currency for most foreign subsidiaries is the local currency. The cumulative effects of translating the balance sheet accounts from the functional currency into the United States dollar at current exchange rates and revenue and expense accounts using average exchange rates for the period are included as a separate component of shareholders’ equity. Gains or losses arising from remeasuring all foreign currency transactions into the appropriate currency are included in determining net income.

      Cash Equivalents The company invests in certain debt and equity securities as part of its cash management function. Due to the relative short-term maturities and high liquidity of these securities (consisting primarily of money market investments and time deposits), they are included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as cash equivalents at market value and totaled $117.9 million and $67.5 million as of June 2, 2001, and June 3, 2000, respectively. The company’s cash equivalents are considered “available for sale.” As of June 2, 2001, and June 3, 2000, the market value approximated the securities’ cost. All cash and cash equivalents are high-credit quality financial instruments, and the amount of credit exposure to any one financial institution or instrument is limited.

      Property, Equipment, and Depreciation Property and equipment are stated at cost. The cost is depreciated over the estimated useful lives of the assets, using the straight-line method. Estimated useful lives range from 3 to 10 years for machinery and equipment and do not exceed 40 years for buildings. Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the lesser of the lease term or 10 years.

      The company capitalizes certain external and internal costs incurred in connection with the development, testing, and installation of software for internal use. Software for internal use is included in property and equipment and is depreciated over an estimated useful life of 5 years or less.

      Notes Receivable The notes receivable are primarily from certain independent contract office furniture dealers. The notes are collateralized by the assets of the dealers and bear interest based on the prevailing

26

prime rate. Interest income relating to these notes was $2.2, $1.9, and $3.0 million in 2001, 2000, and 1999, respectively.

      Long-Lived Assets The company assesses the recoverability of its long-lived assets whenever events or circumstances such as current and projected future operating losses or changes in the business climate indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. Assets are grouped and evaluated at the lowest level for which there are independent and identifiable cash flows. The company considers historical performance and future estimated results in its evaluation of potential impairment and then compares the carrying amount of the asset to the estimated future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) expected to result from the use of the asset. If the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the expected future cash flows, the company measures and records an impairment loss for the excess of the carrying value of the asset over its fair value. The estimation of fair value is made by discounting the expected future cash flows at the rate the company uses to evaluate similar potential investments based on the best information available at that time. If the assets being tested for recoverability were acquired in a purchase business combination, the goodwill that arose in that transaction is included in the asset group’s carrying values on a pro-rata basis using the relative fair values.

      In situations where goodwill and intangible balances remain after applying the impairment measurements to business unit asset groupings under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 121, the company assesses the recoverability of the remaining balances at the enterprise level under the provisions of Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion 17. Applying these provisions, when the estimated undiscounted future operating income (before interest and amortization) for individual business units is not sufficient to recover the remaining carrying value over the remaining amortization period, the company recognizes an impairment loss for the excess.

      No significant impairments were provided for in 2001, 2000, or 1999.

      Intangible assets included in other assets consist mainly of goodwill, patents, and other acquired intangibles, and are carried at cost, less applicable amortization of $24.9 and $21.8 million in 2001 and 2000, respectively. These assets are amortized using the straight-line method over periods of 5 to 20 years.

      In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board finalized Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” This statement is effective for the company’s fiscal year beginning June 2, 2002, however; early adoption is permitted if the election is made in the first quarter of fiscal 2002. Upon adoption of this standard, pre-existing goodwill is no longer subject to amortization; however companies will be required to perform an annual fair-value-based analysis to determine whether the value of goodwill has been impaired. The company’s pre-tax goodwill amortization expense in fiscal 2001 totaled $3.6 million. The company is currently evaluating the timing of adoption and its effects on the company’s financial statements.

      Unfunded Checks As a result of maintaining a consolidated cash management system, the company utilizes controlled disbursement bank accounts. These accounts are funded as checks are presented for payment, not when checks are issued. The resulting book overdraft position is included in current liabilities as unfunded checks.

      Self-Insurance The company is partially self-insured for general liability, workers’ compensation, and certain employee health benefits. The general and workers’ compensation liabilities are managed through a wholly owned insurance captive; the related liabilities are included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. The company’s policy is to accrue amounts equal to the actuarially determined liabilities. The

27

actuarial valuations are based on historical information along with certain assumptions about future events. Changes in assumptions for such matters as legal actions, medical costs, and changes in actual experience could cause these estimates to change in the near term.

      Research, Development, Advertising, and Other Related Costs Research, development, advertising materials, preproduction and start-up costs are expensed as incurred. Research and development costs consist of expenditures incurred during the course of planned search and investigation aimed at discovery of new knowledge that will be useful in developing new products or processes, or significantly enhancing existing products or production processes, and the implementation of such through design, testing of product alternatives, or construction of prototypes. Royalty payments made to designers of the company’s products as the products are sold are not included in research and development costs, as they are a variable cost based on product sales. Research and development costs, included in design and research expense in the accompanying statements of income, were $37.2, $35.1, and $33.4 million in 2001, 2000, and 1999, respectively.

      Income Taxes Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities, and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using the enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to reverse.

      Earnings per Share Basic earnings per share (EPS) exclude the dilutive effect of common shares that could potentially be issued, due to the exercise of stock options, and is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of shares outstanding plus all dilutive shares that could potentially be issued.

      Revenue Recognition Revenues are recorded when product is shipped and invoiced and performance of services is complete.

      Comprehensive Income The company’s comprehensive income consists of net income and foreign currency translation adjustments.

      Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

      New Accounting Standards In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“SFAS 133”). The Statement establishes accounting and reporting standards requiring that every derivative instrument (including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts) be recorded in the balance sheet as either an asset or liability, measured at its fair value. The Statement requires that changes in the derivative’s fair value be recognized currently in earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met. SFAS 133, as amended by SFAS Nos. 137 and 138, is effective for the company’s fiscal year 2002. The company adopted this Statement for its fiscal year beginning June 3, 2001. Adoption of this Statement did not have a material impact on the company’s financial statements.

      In September 2000, the Emerging Issues Task Force released its final consensus on Issue No. 00-10, “Accounting for Shipping and Handling Fees and Costs” (“EITF 00-10”). This consensus provides guidance on

28

the classification of revenues and expenses related to shipping and handling activities. The company adopted EITF 00-10 effective with the fourth quarter 2001 and has restated prior periods to reflect the reclassification to cost of sales of certain shipping and handling related costs which were previously reported as components of net sales and operating expenses.

      Reclassifications Certain prior year information has been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

ACQUISITIONS AND DIVESTITURES

The company made several acquisitions during the past three years, all of which were recorded using the purchase method of accounting. Accordingly, the purchase price of these acquisitions has been allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on the estimated fair values at the date of the acquisition. The cost of the acquisitions in excess of net identifiable assets acquired has been recorded as goodwill.

      Effective July 30, 1999, the company acquired Geiger Group, Inc. (“Geiger”), a manufacturer of high-quality wood furnishings for the contract furniture industry, including casegoods, freestanding furniture, and seating. The acquisition was completed for $5.0 million in cash and the issuance of 1,312,187 shares of Herman Miller, Inc., stock to Geiger’s shareholders. The excess of purchase price over the estimated fair market value of net assets acquired of approximately $24.8 million was recorded as goodwill. Additional purchase price may be paid based on Geiger’s operating results over the three-year period ending on July 18, 2002. The operating results of Geiger have been included in the consolidated financial statements of the company since the date of acquisition. If this purchase had been effective May 31, 1998, there would have been no material effect on the company’s results of operations and financial condition for fiscal 2000 or 1999.

      During 2001, 2000 and 1999, the company purchased various privately owned North American dealers. The results of the acquisitions were not material to the company’s consolidated operating results.

INVENTORIES

(In Millions)	2001		2000
Finished products	$	22.5	$	20.5
Work in process		11.1		13.2
Raw materials		22.3		20.0
	$	55.9	$	53.7

      Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market and include material, labor, and overhead. The inventories of certain subsidiaries are valued using the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method. The inventories of all other subsidiaries are valued using the first-in, first-out method. Inventories valued using the LIFO method amounted to $16.7 and $18.0 million at June 2, 2001, and June 3, 2000, respectively.

      If all inventories had been valued using the first-in, first-out method, inventories would have been $12.5 and $12.7 million higher than reported at June 2, 2001, and June 3, 2000, respectively.

29

PREPAID EXPENSES AND OTHER

(In Millions)	2001		2000
Current deferred income taxes	$	21.5	$	21.3
Other		33.0		27.3
	$	54.5	$	48.6

ACCRUED LIABILITIES

(In Millions)	2001		2000
Compensation and employee benefits	$	51.7	$	60.1
Income taxes		33.2		41.7
Unearned revenue		19.1		19.8
Warranty reserves		23.3		23.9
Other		39.1		40.0
	$	166.4	$	185.5

OTHER LIABILITIES

(In Millions)	2001		2000
Pension benefits	$	47.9	$	40.9
Postretirement benefits		9.3		9.3
Other		45.3		44.7
	$	102.5	$	94.9

NOTES PAYABLE

(In Millions)	2001		2000
U.S. dollar currencies	$	—	$	114.0
Non-U.S. dollar currencies		3.1		8.7
	$	3.1	$	122.7

      The following information relates to short-term borrowings in 2001:

(In Millions)	Domestic			Foreign
Weighted-average interest rate at June 2, 2001		N/A			5.9	%
Weighted-average interest rate at June 3, 2000		6.9	%		5.5	%
Weighted-average interest rate during 2001		6.8	%		6.7	%
Unused short-term credit lines	$	200.0		$	—

      The company has available an unsecured revolving credit loan that provides for $200.0 million. The loan permits borrowings in multiple currencies and matures on April 16, 2005. Outstanding borrowings bear interest, at the option of the company, at rates based on the prime rate, certificates of deposit, LIBOR, or negotiated rates. Interest is payable periodically throughout the period a borrowing is outstanding. During 2001 and 2000, the company borrowed at the LIBOR contractual rate or other negotiated rates.

30

      In addition to the company’s formal short-term credit lines shown above, the company has available informal lines of credit totaling $20.0 million.

LONG-TERM DEBT

(In Millions)	2001		2000
Series A senior notes, 6.37%, due March 5, 2006	$	50.0	$	60.0
Series B senior notes, 6.08%, due March 5, 2001		—		15.0
Series C senior notes, 6.52%, due March 5, 2008		15.0		15.0
Debt securities, 7.13%, due March 15, 2011		175.0		—
Other		16.2		12.9
		256.2		102.9
Less current portion		23.3		25.1
	$	232.9	$	77.8

      The company has a private placement of $100.0 million of senior notes with seven insurance companies of which $65.0 million was outstanding at June 2, 2001. The Series C notes have interest-only payments until March 5, 2004.

      Provisions of the senior notes and the unsecured senior revolving credit loan restrict, without prior consent, the company’s borrowings, long-term leases, and sale of certain assets. In addition, the company has agreed to maintain certain financial performance ratios, which are based on earnings before taxes, interest expense, depreciation and amortization. At June 2, 2001, the company was in compliance with all of these provisions.

      On May 5, 2000, the company filed a shelf registration on a form S-3 registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), under file number 333-36442, for the sale of up to $300 million in debt securities. The form S-3 registration statement was declared effective on June 2, 2000. On March 6, 2001, debt securities totaling $175 million, of the $300 million registered, were sold. These Notes mature on March 15, 2011, and bear an annual interest rate of 7.125 percent, with interest payments due semi-annually. The net proceeds from the sale of these securities were used for the repayment of outstanding domestic borrowings under the company’s revolving credit facility and for general corporate purposes.

      Annual maturities of long-term debt for the five years subsequent to June 2, 2001 (in millions), are as follows: 2002–$23.3; 2003–$10.7; 2004–$13.7; 2005–$13.7; 2006–$13.7; thereafter–$181.1.

OPERATING LEASES

The company leases real property and equipment under agreements that expire on various dates. Certain leases contain renewal provisions and generally require the company to pay utilities, insurance, taxes, and other operating expenses.

      Future minimum rental payments required under operating leases that have initial or remaining noncancellable lease terms in excess of one year as of June 2, 2001, are as follows (in millions): 2002–$26.7; 2003–$21.0; 2004–$16.8; 2005–$12.3; 2006–$8.2; thereafter–$1.7.

      Total rental expense charged to operations was $32.4, $28.3, and $17.6 million in 2001, 2000, and 1999, respectively. Substantially all such rental expense represented the minimum rental payments under operating leases.

31

EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

The company maintains plans which provide retirement benefits for substantially all employees.

      Pension Plans The principal domestic plan is a defined-benefit plan with benefits determined by a cash-balance calculation. Benefits under this plan are based upon an employee’s years of service and earnings.

      In addition to the domestic plan and the retiree healthcare and life insurance plan, one of Herman Miller, Inc.’s wholly owned foreign subsidiaries has a defined-benefit pension plan which is based upon an average final pay benefit calculation. The plan has not been amended and is included in the following information.

      During the fourth quarter of 2001, the company changed its method of determining the market-related value of its plan assets from the fair-value method to a calculated-value method, which recognizes the changes in the fair value of the plan assets on a systematic basis over a five-year period. This new method provides for better matching of the value of plan assets and liabilities under the cash balance retirement plan. Additionally, this method is consistent with that being used by many other manufacturing companies. The impact of this change is reported as a change in accounting principle for pensions, with a cumulative, pre-tax charge of $5.4 million, recorded retroactively, to the beginning of fiscal year 2001.

(In Millions)	Pension Benefits						Postretirement Benefits
	2001			2000			2001			2000
Change in benefit obligations
Benefit obligations at beginning of year	$	231.0		$	217.4		$	10.4		$	10.8
Service cost		12.4			10.8			—			—
Interest cost		16.6			15.8			.8			.7
Actuarial (gain) loss		(8.1	)		(2.1	)		1.5			(.1	)
Benefits paid		(11.7	)		(10.9	)		(1.1	)		(1.0	)
Benefit obligations at end of year		240.2			231.0			11.6			10.4
Change in plan assets
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year		288.5			252.1			—			—
Actual return on plan assets		(58.1	)		45.6			—			—
Employer contribution		2.3			1.7			1.1			1.0
Benefits paid		(11.7	)		(10.9	)		(1.1	)		(1.0	)
Fair value of plan assets at end of year		221.0			288.5			—			—
Funded status		(20.6	)		57.5			(11.6	)		(10.4	)
Unrecognized transition amount		(.4	)		(.9	)		—			—
Change in unrecognized net loss from revaluation of market-related value of assets		5.4			—			—			—
Unrecognized net actuarial (gain) loss		5.5			(59.3	)		1.9			.4
Unrecognized prior service cost		(35.2	)		(38.2	)		.6			.7
Accrued benefit cost	$	(45.3	)	$	(40.9	)	$	(9.1	)	$	(9.3	)
Weighted average assumptions
Discount rate		7.25	%		7.75	%		7.25	%		7.75	%
Expected return on plan assets		9.50	%		9.00	%		N/A			N/A
Rate of compensation increase		4.50	%		5.00	%		N/A			N/A

32

      For measurement purposes, a 10.0 percent annual rate of increase in the per capita cost of covered healthcare benefits was assumed for 2001. The rate was assumed to decrease gradually to 5.5 percent by 2010 and remain at that level thereafter.

(In Millions)	Pension Benefits									Postretirement Benefits
	2001			2000			1999			2001		2000		1999
Components of net periodic benefit cost:
Service cost	$	12.4		$	10.8		$	11.5		$	—	$	—	$	—
Interest cost		16.6			15.8			14.3			.8		.7		.7
Expected return on plan assets		(22.9	)		(23.1	)		(20.9	)		—		—		—
Net amortization		(4.4	)		(3.0	)		(4.2	)		.1		.1		.1
Net periodic benefit cost	$	1.7		$	.5		$	.7		$	.9	$	.8	$	.8

      A one-percentage-point increase in assumed healthcare cost trend rates would have increased the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation at June 2, 2001 by $.7 million. A one-percentage-point decrease would have decreased the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation at June 2, 2001 by $.6 million.

      Plan assets consist primarily of listed common stocks, mutual funds, and corporate obligations. Plan assets at both June 2, 2001 and June 3, 2000 included 1,043,619 shares of Herman Miller, Inc., common stock.

      Profit Sharing and 401(k) Plan Domestically, Herman Miller, Inc. has a trusteed profit sharing plan that includes substantially all employees. These employees are eligible to begin participating at the beginning of the quarter following their date of hire. The plan provides for discretionary contributions (payable in the company’s common stock) of not more than 6.0 percent of employees’ wages based on the company’s EVA performance. The cost of the plan charged against operations was $5.4, $5.6, and $14.0 million in 2001, 2000, and 1999, respectively.

      Effective December 1, 1998, the company began to match the employees’ contributions to their 401(k) accounts. The amount matched is equal to half of the employees’ contribution up to the first 6.0 percent of the employees’ pay. The company’s contributions charged against operations were $2.9, $3.2, and $2.9 million in fiscal 2001, 2000, and 1999, respectively.

COMMON STOCK AND PER SHARE INFORMATION

The following table reconciles the numerators and denominators used in the calculations of basic and diluted EPS for each of the last three years:

(In Millions, Except Shares)		2001		2000		1999
Numerators:
	Numerators for both basic and diluted EPS, net income	$	140.6	$	139.7	$	141.8
Denominators:
	Denominators for basic EPS,
	weighted-average common shares outstanding		76,663,746		79,526,026		83,734,707
Potentially dilutive shares resulting from stock option plans			983,565		1,005,257		1,096,375
Denominator for diluted EPS			77,647,311		80,531,283		84,831,082

33

      Certain exercisable stock options were not included in the computations of diluted EPS because the option prices were greater than average quarterly market prices for the periods presented. The number of stock options outstanding at the end of each year presented which were not included in the calculation of diluted EPS and the ranges of exercise prices were: 2,406,140 at $25.81—$32.50 in 2001; 1,368,832 at $26.75—$32.50 in 2000; and 3,346,421 at $19.88—$32.50 in 1999.

STOCK PLANS

Under the terms of the company’s 1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, 4.1 million shares of authorized common stock were reserved for purchase by plan participants at 85.0 percent of the market price. At June 2, 2001, 2,740,062 shares remained available for purchase through the plan, and there were 9,823 employees eligible to participate in the plan, of which 2,880, or 29.3 percent, were participants. During 2001, 2000, and 1999, employees purchased 204,223 shares for the weighted-average fair value of $22.84; 214,307 shares for the weighted-average fair value of $20.51; and 253,076 shares for the weighted-average fair value of $17.37, respectively.

      The company has stock option plans under which options are granted to employees and nonemployee officers and directors at a price not less than the market price of the company’s common stock on the date of grant. All options become exercisable between one year and four years from date of grant and expire 10 years from date of grant. At June 2, 2001, there were 166 employees and 10 nonemployee officers and directors eligible. At June 2, 2001, there were 3,366,863 shares available for future options.

      The company’s Long-Term Incentive Plan, along with the Nonemployee Officer and Director Stock Option Plan, authorizes reload options. Reload options provide for the purchase of shares equal to the number of shares delivered upon exercise of the original options plus the number of shares delivered to satisfy the tax liability incurred in the exercise. The reload options retain the expiration date of the original options; however, the exercise price must equal the fair market value on the date the reload options are granted. During fiscal 2001, 2000, and 1999, 357,517, 260,018, and 252,998 reload options, respectively, were automatically granted.

      A summary of shares subject to options follows:

					2001					2000					1999
					Weighted-					Weighted-					Weighted-
					Average					Average					Average
		2001			Exercise		2000			Exercise		1999			Exercise
		Shares			Prices		Shares			Prices		Shares			Prices
Outstanding at beginning of year:			5,238,504		$	20.89		4,899,767		$	19.67		3,463,814		$	14.19
	Granted		1,910,206		$	26.17		1,344,900		$	23.98		2,174,247		$	26.50
	Exercised		(782,357	)	$	17.95		(685,983	)	$	16.11		(676,584	)	$	13.01
	Terminated		(101,333	)	$	26.10		(320,180	)	$	25.47		(61,710	)	$	25.86
Outstanding at end of year:			6,265,020		$	22.78		5,238,504		$	20.89		4,899,767		$	19.67
Exercisable at end of year:			3,685,579		$	21.11		3,279,665		$	19.35		2,744,960		$	14.33
Weighted-average fair-market
value of options granted					$	9.96				$	8.86				$	8.71

34

A summary of stock options outstanding at June 2, 2001, follows:

	Outstanding Stock Options					Exercisable Stock Options
	Shares		Weighted-	Weighted-			Shares		Weighted-
			Average	Average					Average
			Remaining	Exercise					Exercise
			Contractual	Prices					Prices
			Life
$4.66—$22.50		2,134,160	5.49 years	$	15.17			1,481,660	$	12.02
$23.19—$27.36		2,879,622	8.32 years	$	25.46			962,281	$	24.16
$27.50—$32.50		1,251,238	6.62 years	$	29.61			1,241,638	$	29.61
Total		6,265,020	7.02 years	$	22.78			3,685,579	$	21.11

      The company accounts for its employee stock purchase plan and its stock option plans under APB Opinion 25; therefore, no compensation costs are recognized when employees purchase stock or when stock options are granted or exercised. If compensation costs had been computed under SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” the company’s net income and earnings per share would have been reduced by approximately $12.2 million, or $.16 per share in 2001, $7.5 million, or $.09 per share in 2000, and $12.8 million, or $.15 per share in 1999.

      For purposes of computing compensation costs of stock options granted, the fair value of each stock option grant was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:

	2001			2000			1999
Risk-free interest rates	4.46%—6.26		%	5.50%–6.71		%	4.39%–5.48		%
Expected term of options	3 years			3–4 years			3–5 years
Expected volatility	49%—50		%	46%–50		%	37%–46		%
Dividend yield		.5	%		.5	%		.5	%

      Black-Scholes is a widely accepted stock option pricing model; however, the ultimate value of stock options granted will be determined by the actual lives of options granted and future price levels of the company’s common stock.

KEY EXECUTIVE AND DIRECTOR STOCK PROGRAMS

Restricted Stock Grants The company grants restricted common stock to certain key employees. Shares are awarded in the name of the employee, who has all rights of a shareholder, subject to certain restrictions on transferability and a risk of forfeiture. The forfeiture provisions on the awards expire annually, over a period not to exceed six years, as certain financial goals are achieved. During fiscal 2001, 49,841 shares were granted under the company’s long-term incentive plan, no shares were forfeited, and the forfeiture provisions expired on 18,848 shares. As of June 2, 2001, 41,531 shares remained subject to forfeiture provisions and restrictions on transferability. During fiscal 2000, 10,513 shares were granted, 1,980 shares were forfeited, and the forfeiture provisions expired on 63,894 shares. During fiscal 1999, 8,100 shares were granted, none were forfeited, and the forfeiture provisions expired on 72,174 shares.

      The remaining shares subject to forfeiture provisions have been recorded as unearned stock grant compensation and are included as a separate component of shareholders’ equity under the caption Key Executive Stock Programs. The unearned compensation is being charged to selling, general, and administrative

35

expense over the five-year vesting period and was $1.1, $.7, and $1.2 million in 2001, 2000, and 1999, respectively.

      Key Executive Deferred Compensation Plan The company established the Herman Miller, Inc., Key Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, which allows certain executives to defer receipt of all or a portion of their EVA cash incentive. The company may make a matching contribution of 30 percent of the executive’s contribution up to 50 percent of the deferred EVA cash incentive. The company matching contribution vests at the rate of 33 1/3 percent annually. In accordance with the terms of the plan, the executive deferral and company matching contribution have been placed in a “Rabbi” trust, which invests solely in the company’s common stock. These Rabbi trust arrangements offer the executive a degree of assurance for ultimate payment of benefits without causing constructive receipt for income tax purposes. Distributions to the executive from the Rabbi trust can only be made in the form of the company’s common stock. The assets in the Rabbi trust remain subject to the claims of creditors of the company and are not the property of the executive and are, therefore, included as a separate component of shareholders’ equity under the caption Key Executive Stock Programs.

      Key Executive Stock Purchase Assistance Plan The company adopted a key executive stock purchase assistance plan whereby the company may extend credit to officers and key executives to purchase the company’s stock through the exercise of options or on the open market. These loans are secured by the shares acquired and are repayable under full recourse promissory notes. The sale or transfer of shares is restricted for five years after the loan is fully paid. The plan provides for the key executives to earn repayment of a portion of the notes, including interest, based on meeting annual performance objectives as set forth by the Executive Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. The notes bear interest at 7.0 percent per annum. Interest is payable annually and principal is due on various dates through September 1, 2008. As of June 2, 2001, the notes outstanding relating to the exercise of options were $.1 million. Notes outstanding related to open-market purchases were $2.3 million and are recorded in other assets. Compensation expense related to earned repayment was $.2 million in 2001, $.4 million in 2000, and $1.7 million in 1999.

      Director Fees During fiscal 2000, the Board of Directors approved a plan that allows the Board members to elect to receive their director fees in one or more of the following forms: cash, deferred compensation in the form of shares, unrestricted company stock at the market value at the date of election, or stock options that vest in one year and expire in ten years. The stock options are granted at a price not less than the market price of the company’s common stock on the date of grant. Under the plan, the Board members received 42,150 options, 7,710 unrestricted shares, and 11,243 shares through the deferred compensation program during fiscal 2001. In fiscal 2000, Board members received 20,530 options, 6,144 unrestricted shares, and 55,070 shares through the deferred compensation program.

36

INCOME TAXES

The components of income from continuing operations before income taxes and cumulative effect of change in accounting are as follows:

(In Millions)	2001		2000		1999
Domestic	$	204.8	$	198.7	$	206.0
Foreign		20.3		23.1		23.9
	$	225.1	$	221.8	$	229.9

      The provision for income taxes consisted of the following:

(In Millions)		2001		2000			1999
Current: Domestic—Federal		$	68.0	$	67.6		$	62.5
	Domestic—State		4.5		3.6			4.2
	Foreign		7.2		8.9			7.9
			79.7		80.1			74.6
Deferred: Domestic—Federal			.7		1.9			13.7
	Domestic—State		.3		.2			(.3	)
	Foreign		.3		(.1	)		.1
			1.3		2.0			13.5
Total income tax provision		$	81.0	$	82.1		$	88.1

      The following table represents a reconciliation of income taxes at the United States statutory rate with the effective tax rate as follows:

(In Millions)		2001			2000		1999
Income taxes computed at the United States statutory rate of 35%		$	78.8		$	77.6	$	80.5
Increase (decrease) in taxes resulting from:
	Corporate-owned life insurance		—			—		7.6
	State taxes, net		3.1			2.5		2.5
	Other		(.9	)		2.0		(2.5	)
		$	81.0		$	82.1	$	88.1

37

      The tax effects and types of temporary differences that give rise to significant components of the deferred tax assets and liabilities at June 2, 2001, and June 3, 2000, are presented below:

(In Millions)		2001			2000
Deferred tax assets:
	Foreign net operating loss carryforwards	$	—		$	.8
	Book over tax loss on sale of fixed assets		6.6			6.1
	Compensation-related accruals		12.6			11.6
	Accrued pension and postretirement benefit obligations		20.2			18.6
	Reserves for inventory		3.3			5.0
	Reserves for uncollectible accounts and notes receivable		5.4			3.4
	Other		25.4			29.2
	Valuation allowance		—			(.8	)
		$	73.5		$	73.9
Deferred tax liabilities:
	Book basis in property in excess of tax basis	$	(12.5	)	$	(13.7	)
	Capitalized software costs		(23.0	)		(22.1	)
	Prepaid employee benefits		(3.4	)		(2.9	)
	Other		(9.4	)		(8.7	)
		$	(48.3	)	$	(47.4	)

      The company has not provided for United States income taxes on undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries totaling $65.4 million. Recording of deferred income taxes on these undistributed earnings is not required, since these earnings have been permanently reinvested. These amounts would be subject to possible U.S. taxation only if remitted as dividends. The determination of the hypothetical amount of unrecognized deferred U.S. taxes on undistributed earnings of foreign entities is not practicable.

FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The carrying amount of the company’s financial instruments included in current assets and current liabilities approximates their fair value due to their short-term nature. The fair value of the notes receivable is estimated by discounting expected future cash flows using current interest rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and remaining maturities. As of June 2, 2001, and June 3, 2000, the fair value of the notes receivable approximated the carrying value. The company intends to hold these notes to maturity and has recorded allowances to reflect the terms negotiated for carrying value purposes. As of June 2, 2001, the carrying value of the company’s long-term debt including current maturities was $256.2 million with a corresponding fair market value of $252.2 million. At June 3, 2000, the carrying value and fair market value was $102.9 million and $99.9 million, respectively.

FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS WITH OFF-BALANCE-SHEET RISK

The company utilizes derivative financial instruments to manage its exposure to foreign currency volatility at the transactional level. The majority of these contracts relate to major currencies such as the Japanese yen, the Australian dollar, and the British pound. The exposure to credit risk is minimal, since the counterparties are major financial institutions. The market risk exposure is essentially limited to currency rate movements. The

38

gains or losses arising from these financial instruments are applied to offset exchange gains or losses on related hedged exposures. Realized gains or losses in 2000, 1999, and 1998 were not material to the company’s results of operations. At June 2, 2001, and June 3, 2000, the company had no outstanding derivative financial instruments.

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION

The following table presents the adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

(In Millions)	2001			2000			1999
Depreciation and amortization	$	92.6		$	77.1		$	62.1
Provision for losses on accounts and notes receivable		6.6			3.2			4.4
Loss (gain) on sales of property and equipment		5.4			5.0			(6.9	)
Deferred taxes		1.3			2.0			13.5
Other liabilities		4.9			(5.7	)		4.5
Stock grants earned		1.1			.7			1.2
Changes in current assets and liabilities:
Decrease (increase) in assets:
Accounts receivable		10.6			(24.6	)		5.4
Inventories		(2.0	)		(14.8	)		15.2
Prepaid expenses and other		(5.7	)		(2.3	)		(6.5	)
Increase (decrease) in liabilities:
Accounts payable		(19.3	)		25.4			(11.7	)
Accrued liabilities		(27.8	)		(3.6	)		(17.4	)
Total changes in current assets and liabilities		(44.2	)		(19.9	)		(15.0	)
Total adjustments	$	67.7		$	62.4		$	63.8

      Cash payments for interest and income taxes were as follows:

(In Millions)	2001		2000		1999
Interest paid	$	13.5	$	12.0	$	8.1
Income taxes paid	$	80.1	$	75.8	$	78.7

CONTINGENCIES

The company, for a number of years, has sold various products to the United States Government under General Services Administration (GSA) multiple award schedule contracts. The GSA is permitted to audit the company’s compliance with the GSA contracts. At any point in time, a number of GSA audits are either scheduled or in progress. Management does not expect resolution of the audits to have a material adverse effect on the company’s consolidated financial statements.

      The company is also involved in legal proceedings and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, the outcome of such proceedings and litigation currently pending will not materially affect the company’s consolidated financial statements.

39

OPERATING SEGMENTS

The company is engaged worldwide in the design, manufacture, and sale of office furniture systems, products, and related services through its wholly owned subsidiaries. Throughout the world the product offerings, the production processes, the methods of distribution, and the customers serviced are consistent. The product lines consist primarily of office furniture systems, seating, storage solutions, and casegoods. Management evaluates the company as one operating segment in the office furniture industry.

      Sales to customers are attributed to the geographic areas based on the location of the customer. Long-lived assets consist of property and equipment. Geographic information is as follows:

(In Millions)		2001		2000		1999
Net sales:
	United States	$	1,889.2	$	1,723.6	$	1,565.1
	International		347.0		286.6		263.3
		$	2,236.2	$	2,010.2	$	1,828.4
Long-lived assets:
	United States	$	396.8	$	386.9	$	305.4
	International		12.2		11.8		11.3
		$	409.0	$	398.7	$	316.7

40

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of Herman Miller, Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Herman Miller, Inc., (a Michigan Corporation) and subsidiaries as of June 2, 2001, and June 3, 2000, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 2, 2001. These financial statements are the responsibility of the company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

      We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

      In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Herman Miller, Inc., and subsidiaries as of June 2, 2001 and June 3, 2000, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 2, 2001, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

      As explained in the Employee Benefit Plans note to the consolidated financial statements, effective June 4, 2000, Herman Miller, Inc. changed its method of accounting for pensions.

Arthur Andersen LLP     Grand Rapids, Michigan     June 25, 2001

41

MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DISAGREEMENTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The consolidated financial statements of Herman Miller, Inc., and subsidiaries were prepared by, and are the responsibility of, management. The statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States appropriate in the circumstances and include amounts that are based on management’s best estimates and judgments.

      The company maintains systems of internal accounting controls designed to provide reasonable assurance that all transactions are properly recorded in the company’s books and records, that policies and procedures are adhered to, and that assets are protected from unauthorized use. The systems of internal accounting controls are supported by written policies and guidelines and are complemented by a staff of internal auditors and by the selection, training, and development of professional financial managers.

      The consolidated financial statements have been audited by the independent public accounting firm Arthur Andersen LLP, whose appointment is ratified annually by shareholders at the annual shareholders’ meeting. The independent public accountants conduct a review of internal accounting controls to the extent required by auditing standards generally accepted in the United States and perform such tests and related procedures as they deem necessary to arrive at an opinion on the fairness of the financial statements.

      The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, composed solely of directors from outside the company, regularly meets with the independent public accountants, management, and the internal auditors to satisfy itself that they are properly discharging their responsibilities. The independent public accountants have unrestricted access to the Audit Committee, without management present, to discuss the results of their audit and the quality of financial reporting and internal accounting control.

Michael A. Volkema, Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer     June 25, 2001
Elizabeth A. Nickels, Chief Financial Officer     June 25, 2001

ITEM 9   DISAGREEMENTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

No changes in, or disagreements with, accountants referenced in Item 304 of Regulation S-K occurred during the 24-month period ended June 2, 2001.

42

PART III

DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

ITEM 10   DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

Directors of Registrant Information relating to directors and director nominees of the registrant is contained under the caption “Director and Executive Officer Information,” in the company’s definitive Proxy Statement, dated August 23, 2001, relating to the company’s 2001 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and the information within that section is incorporated by reference. Information relating to Executive Officers of the company is included in Part I hereof entitled “Executive Officers of the Registrant.”

      There are no family relationships between or among the above-named executive officers. There are no arrangements or understandings between any of the above-named officers pursuant to which any of them was named an officer.

ITEM 11   EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Information relating to management remuneration is contained under the tables and discussions on page 15 in the company’s definitive Proxy Statement, dated August 23, 2001, relating to the company’s 2001 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, and the information within those sections is incorporated by reference, however, the information under the captions, “Executive Compensation Committee Report” and the “Shareholder Return Performance Graph” are specifically excluded.

43

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

ITEM 12   SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The sections entitled “Voting Securities and Principal Shareholders” and “Director and Executive Officer Information” in the definitive Proxy Statement, dated August 23, 2001, relating to the company’s 2001 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and the information within those sections is incorporated by reference.

ITEM 13   CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

Information concerning certain relationships and related transactions contained under the captions “Director and Executive Officer Information” and “Compensation of Board Members and Non-Employee Officers” in the definitive Proxy Statement, dated August 23, 2001, relating to the company’s 2001 Annual Meeting of Shareholders is incorporated by reference.

44

PART IV

EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

ITEM 14   EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

(A) 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The following consolidated financial statements of the company are included in this Form 10-K on the pages noted:

22	Consolidated Statements of Income
23	Consolidated Balance Sheets
24	Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity
25	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
26	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
41	Report of Independent Public Accountants
42	Management’s Report on Financial Statements

(A) 2. FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE

The following financial statement schedule and related Report of Independent Public Accountants on the Financial Statement Schedule are included in this Form 10-K on the pages noted:

46	Report of Independent Public Accountants on Financial Statement Schedule
48	Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying
	Accounts and Reserves for the Years Ended June 2, 2001; June 3, 2000; and May 29, 1999

      All other schedules required by Form 10-K Annual Report have been omitted because they were inapplicable, included in the notes to consolidated financial statements, or otherwise not required under instructions contained in Regulation S-X.

(A) 3. EXHIBITS

Reference is made to the Exhibit Index which is included in this Form 10-K Annual Report.

(B) REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

No reports on Form 8-K were filed during the fourth quarter of the year ended June 2, 2001.

45

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS ON FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of Herman Miller, Inc.:

We have audited in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States, the consolidated financial statements of Herman Miller, Inc., and subsidiaries included in this Form 10-K, and have issued our report thereon dated June 25, 2001. Our audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The schedule listed at Item 14(a)2 above is the responsibility of the company’s management and is presented for purposes of complying with the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and is not part of the basic financial statements. This schedule has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audits of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, fairly states in all material respects the financial data required to be set forth therein in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.

/s/  Arthur Andersen LLP

Grand Rapids, Michigan
June 25, 2001

46

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

HERMAN MILLER, INC
/s/	Michael A. Volkema	/s/	Elizabeth A. Nickels
By	Michael A. Volkema (Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer)		Elizabeth A. Nickels (Chief Financial Officer)

Date: August 20, 2001

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below on August 20, 2001, by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant in the capacities indicated. Each Director of the Registrant, whose signature appears below, hereby appoints Michael A. Volkema as his attorney-in-fact, to sign in his name and on his behalf, as a Director of the Registrant, and to file with the Commission any and all amendments to this Report on Form 10-K.

/s/	Michael A. Volkema	/s/	Thomas C. Pratt
	Michael A. Volkema (Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer)		Thomas C. Pratt (Director)
/s/	David O. Ulrich	/s/	E. David Crockett
	David O. Ulrich (Director)		E. David Crockett (Director)
/s/	Dorothy A. Terrell	/s/	Lord Griffiths of Fforestfach
	Dorothy A. Terrell (Director)		Lord Griffiths of Fforestfach (Director)
/s/	J. Harold Chandler	/s/	C. William Pollard
	J. Harold Chandler (Director)		C. William Pollard (Director)
/s/	Mary Vermeer Andringa	/s/	Ruth A. Reister
	Mary Vermeer Andringa (Director)		Ruth A. Reister (Director)

47

SCHEDULE II—VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

HERMAN MILLER, INC., AND SUBSIDIARIES

SCHEDULE II—VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

Column A	Column B		Column C
Description (In Millions)			Additions				Increased
	Balance at		charged to				net
	beginning		costs and		Acquired		operating
	of period		expenses		reserves		losses
Year ended June 2, 2001:
Allowance for possible losses on accounts receivable	$	17.7	$	6.6	$	.1	$	—
Allowance for possible losses on notes receivable	$	4.2	$	—	$	—	$	—
Valuation allowance for deferred tax asset	$	.8	$	—	$	—	$	—
Year ended June 3, 2000:
Allowance for possible losses on accounts receivable	$	14.1	$	3.2	$	.7	$	—
Allowance for possible losses on notes receivable	$	5.5	$	—	$	—	$	—
Valuation allowance for deferred tax asset	$	1.1	$	—	$	—	$	—
Year ended May 29, 1999:
Allowance for possible losses on accounts receivable	$	13.8	$	3.2	$	—	$	—
Allowance for possible losses on notes receivable	$	8.5	$	1.2	$	—	$	—
Valuation allowance for deferred tax asset	$	8.1	$	—	$	—	$	.2

[Additional columns below]

[Continued from above table, first column(s) repeated]

Column A	Column D						Column E
Description (In Millions)	Uncollectible		Deducted
	accounts		from				Balance at
	written		costs and		Losses		end of
	off, net(1)		expenses		utilized(2)		period
Year ended June 2, 2001:
Allowance for possible losses on accounts receivable	$	5.3	$	—	$	—	$	19.1
Allowance for possible losses on notes receivable	$	—	$	1.6	$	—	$	2.6
Valuation allowance for deferred tax asset	$	—	$	—	$	.8	$	—
Year ended June 3, 2000:
Allowance for possible losses on accounts receivable	$	.3	$	—	$	—	$	17.7
Allowance for possible losses on notes receivable	$	—	$	1.3	$	—	$	4.2
Valuation allowance for deferred tax asset	$	—	$	—	$	.3	$	.8
Year ended May 29, 1999:
Allowance for possible losses on accounts receivable	$	2.9	$	—	$	—	$	14.1
Allowance for possible losses on notes receivable	$	4.2	$	—	$	—	$	5.5
Valuation allowance for deferred tax asset	$	—	$	—	$	7.2	$	1.1

(1) Includes effects of foreign currency translation. (2) Includes utilization of capital and net operating losses. In 1999, this includes write-off of net operating loss carryforwards that cannot be utilized.

48

EXHIBIT INDEX

HERMAN MILLER, INC., AND SUBSIDIARIES
EXHIBIT INDEX

(3)	Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws
	(a)	Articles of Incorporation are incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(a) and 3(b) of the Registrant’s 1986 Form 10-K Annual Report.
	(b)	Certificate of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation, dated October 15, 1987, are incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(b) of the Registrant’s 1988 Form 10-K Annual Report.
	(c)	Certificate of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation, dated May 10, 1988, are incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(c) of the Registrant’s 1988 Form 10-K Annual Report.
	(d)	Amended and Restated Bylaws, dated January 6, 1997, are incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(d) of the Registrant’s 1997 Form 10-K Annual Report.
(4)	Instruments Defining the Rights of Security Holders
	(a)	Specimen copy of Herman Miller, Inc., common stock is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(a) of Registrant’s 1981 Form 10-K Annual Report.
	(b)	Note Purchase Agreement dated March 1, 1996, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(b) of the Registrant’s 1996 Form 10-K Annual Report.
	(c)	First Amendment to the Note Purchase Agreement dated February 11, 1999, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(c) of the Registrant’s 1999 Form 10-K Annual Report.
	(d)	Other instruments which define the rights of holders of long-term debt individually represent debt of less than 10% of total assets. In accordance with item 601(b)(4)(iii)(A) of regulation S-K, the Registrant agrees to furnish to the Commission copies of such agreements upon request.
	(e)	Dividend Reinvestment Plan for Shareholders of Herman Miller, Inc., dated January 6, 1997, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(d) of the Registrant’s 1997 Form 10-K Annual Report.
	(f)	Form of indenture for registration of debt securities, incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.1 of the company’s registration statement on form S-3, file number 333-36442.
(10)	Material Contracts
	(a)	Officers’ Supplemental Retirement Income Plan is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(f) of the Registrant’s 1986 Form 10-K Annual Report. *
	(b)	Officers’ Salary Continuation Plan is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(g) of the Registrant’s 1982 Form 10-K Annual Report. *
	(c)	Herman Miller, Inc., Plan for Severance Compensation after Hostile Takeover is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(f) of the Registrant’s 1986 Form 10-K Annual Report. *
	(d)	Amended Herman Miller, Inc., Plan for Severance Compensation after Hostile Takeover, dated January 17, 1990, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(n) of the Registrant’s 1990 Form 10-K Annual Report. *
	(e)	Herman Miller, Inc., 1994 Key Executive Stock Purchase Assistant Plan, dated October 6, 1994, is incorporated by reference to Appendix C of the Registrant’s 1994 Proxy Statement. *
	(f)	First Amendment to the Herman Miller, Inc., 1994 Key Executive Stock Purchase Assistant Plan, dated April 28, 1998, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(g) of the Registrant’s 1998 Form 10-K Annual Report. *

49

(g)	Incentive Share Grant Agreement, dated October 4, 1995, between the company and Michael A. Volkema is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(g) of the Registrant’s 1996 Form 10-K Annual Report. *
(h)	Incentive Share Grant Agreement, dated May 15, 1996, between the company and Michael A. Volkema is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(h) of the Registrant’s 1996 Form 10-K Annual Report. *
(i)	Herman Miller, Inc., Long-Term Incentive Plan, dated October 6, 1994, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4 of the Registrant’s May 22, 1996, Form S-8 Registration No. 33-04369.*
(j)	Herman Miller, Inc., 1994 Nonemployee Officer and Director Stock Option Plan, dated October 6, 1994, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4 of the Registrant’s May 22, 1996, Form S-8 Registration No. 33-04367. *
(k)	First Amendment to Herman Miller, Inc., 1994 Nonemployee Officer and Director Stock Option Plan, dated January 7, 1997, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(m) of the Registrant’s 1998 Form 10-K Annual Report. *
(l)	Herman Miller, Inc., Key Executive Deferred Compensation Plan and form of Deferred Compensation Agreement, dated February 28, 1997, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(l) of the Registrant’s 1997 Form 10-K Annual Report.
(m)	First Amendment to the Herman Miller, Inc., Key Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, dated January 20, 1998, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(o) of the Registrant’s 1998 Form 10-K Annual Report.
(n)	Herman Miller, Inc., Incentive Cash Bonus Plan, dated September 29, 1998, is incorporated by reference to Appendix A of the Registrant’s 1998 Proxy Statement.*
(o)	Credit Agreement dated April 16, 1999, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(o) of the Registrant’s 1999 Form 10-K Annual Report.
(p)	Form of Change in Control Agreement.
(q)	Change in Control Agreement for Michael A. Volkema.

(18) Letter Regarding Change in Accounting Principles.

(21) Subsidiaries.

(23) Consent of Independent Public Accountants

(27) Financial Data Schedule (exhibit available upon request)

* Denotes compensatory plan or arrangement.

50