For further information:
Paula Waters, VP, Investor Relations
Phone 504/576-4380, Fax 504/576-2897
pwater1@entergy.com
|
Table 1: Consolidated Earnings – Reconciliation of GAAP to Non-GAAP Measures
|
||||||
Third Quarter and Year-to-Date 2010 vs. 2009
|
||||||
(Per share in U.S. $)
|
||||||
Third Quarter
|
Year-to-Date
|
|||||
2010
|
2009
|
Change
|
2010
|
2009
|
Change
|
|
As-Reported Earnings
|
2.62
|
2.32
|
0.30
|
5.38
|
4.66
|
0.72
|
Less Special Items
|
(0.14)
|
(0.08)
|
(0.06)
|
(0.40)
|
(0.26)
|
(0.14)
|
Operational Earnings
|
2.76
|
2.40
|
0.36
|
5.78
|
4.92
|
0.86
|
Weather Impact
|
0.29
|
0.03
|
0.26
|
0.55
|
-
|
0.55
|
·
|
Utility’s earnings were higher primarily due to increased net revenue, which was partially offset by an increase in non-fuel operation and maintenance expense.
|
·
|
Entergy Nuclear’s earnings decreased as a result of lower net revenue, resulting from decreased generation output due to increased planned and unplanned outage days, and higher non-fuel operation and maintenance expense.
|
·
|
Parent & Other’s results improved due primarily to lower income tax expense on Parent & Other activities.
|
·
|
Entergy Texas reached an unopposed settlement in its base rate case, subject to approval by the Public Utility Commission of Texas, reflecting a total $68 million rate increase to be fully implemented by May 2011.
|
·
|
The J.A. FitzPatrick plant completed a record-setting “breaker to breaker” run, setting a new all-time record for the number of days of continuous operation within the Entergy fleet and seventh all-time for all boiling water reactors in the United States.
|
·
|
Reports by the New York Independent System Operator and ISO New England point to the criticality of Indian Point and Vermont Yankee to their regions.
|
·
|
For the ninth consecutive year Entergy was named to the Dow Jones Sustainability World Index.
|
I.
|
Consolidated Results
|
Table 2: Consolidated Earnings – Reconciliation of GAAP to Non-GAAP Measures
Third Quarter and Year-to-Date 2010 vs. 2009 (see Appendix D for definitions of certain measures)
|
||||||
(Per share in U.S. $)
|
||||||
Third Quarter
|
Year-to-Date
|
|||||
2010
|
2009
|
Change
|
2010
|
2009
|
Change
|
|
As-Reported
|
||||||
Utility
|
1.78
|
1.50
|
0.28
|
3.68
|
2.80
|
0.88
|
Entergy Nuclear
|
0.71
|
1.02
|
(0.31)
|
1.83
|
2.34
|
(0.51)
|
Parent & Other
|
0.13
|
(0.20)
|
0.33
|
(0.13)
|
(0.48)
|
0.35
|
Consolidated As-Reported Earnings
|
2.62
|
2.32
|
0.30
|
5.38
|
4.66
|
0.72
|
Less Special Items
|
||||||
Utility
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Entergy Nuclear
|
(0.14)
|
(0.05)
|
(0.09)
|
(0.50)
|
(0.17)
|
(0.33)
|
Parent & Other
|
-
|
(0.03)
|
0.03
|
0.10
|
(0.09)
|
0.19
|
Consolidated Special Items
|
(0.14)
|
(0.08)
|
(0.06)
|
(0.40)
|
(0.26)
|
(0.14)
|
Operational
|
||||||
Utility
|
1.78
|
1.50
|
0.28
|
3.68
|
2.80
|
0.88
|
Entergy Nuclear
|
0.85
|
1.07
|
(0.22)
|
2.33
|
2.51
|
(0.18)
|
Parent & Other
|
0.13
|
(0.17)
|
0.30
|
(0.23)
|
(0.39)
|
0.16
|
Consolidated Operational Earnings
|
2.76
|
2.40
|
0.36
|
5.78
|
4.92
|
0.86
|
Weather Impact
|
0.29
|
0.03
|
0.26
|
0.55
|
-
|
0.55
|
·
|
The receipt of $703 million of proceeds associated with storm-related debt issuances from the Louisiana Utilities Restoration Corporation for Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Gulf States Louisiana for hurricanes Gustav and Ike, and
|
·
|
Higher Utility net revenue
|
Table 3: Consolidated Net Cash Flow Provided by Operating Activities
|
||||||
Third Quarter and Year-to-Date 2010 vs. 2009
|
||||||
(U.S. $ in millions)
|
||||||
Third Quarter
|
Year-to-Date
|
|||||
2010
|
2009
|
Change
|
2010
|
2009
|
Change
|
|
Utility
|
1,426
|
642
|
784
|
2,419
|
1,320
|
1,099
|
Entergy Nuclear
|
175
|
337
|
(162)
|
725
|
709
|
16
|
Parent & Other
|
96
|
14
|
82
|
21
|
(20)
|
41
|
Consolidated Net Cash Flow Provided by Operating Activities
|
1,697
|
993
|
704
|
3,165
|
2,009
|
1,156
|
II.
|
Utility
|
·
|
Residential sales in third quarter 2010, on a weather-adjusted basis, increased 0.9 percent compared to third quarter 2009.
|
·
|
Commercial and governmental sales, on a weather-adjusted basis, increased 1.7 percent quarter over quarter.
|
·
|
Industrial sales in the third quarter increased 8.5 percent compared to the same quarter of 2009.
|
Table 4: Utility Operational Performance Measures
|
||||||||
Third Quarter and Year-to-Date 2010 vs. 2009 (see Appendix D for definitions of measures)
|
||||||||
Third Quarter
|
Year-to-Date
|
|||||||
2010
|
2009
|
% Change
|
% Weather Adjusted
|
2010
|
2009
|
% Change
|
% Weather Adjusted
|
|
GWh billed
|
||||||||
Residential
|
12,365
|
11,213
|
10.3%
|
0.9%
|
29,715
|
26,206
|
13.4%
|
2.2%
|
Commercial and governmental
|
9,341
|
8,794
|
6.2%
|
1.7%
|
23,789
|
22,644
|
5.1%
|
2.1%
|
Industrial
|
10,276
|
9,473
|
8.5%
|
8.5%
|
28,871
|
26,402
|
9.4%
|
9.4%
|
Total Retail Sales
|
31,982
|
29,480
|
8.5%
|
3.6%
|
82,375
|
75,252
|
9.5%
|
4.7%
|
Wholesale
|
1,063
|
1,164
|
(8.7)%
|
3,351
|
3,864
|
(13.3)%
|
||
Total Sales
|
33,045
|
30,644
|
7.8%
|
85,726
|
79,116
|
8.4%
|
||
O&M expense per MWh
|
$16.41
|
$15.77
|
4.1%
|
$17.54
|
$18.19
|
(3.6)%
|
||
Number of retail customers
|
||||||||
Residential
|
2,356,216
|
2,335,387
|
0.9%
|
|||||
Commercial and governmental
|
350,808
|
346,574
|
1.2%
|
|||||
Industrial
|
47,622
|
47,647
|
(0.1)%
|
|||||
III.
|
Entergy Nuclear
|
Table 5: Entergy Nuclear Operational Performance Measures
|
||||||
Third Quarter and Year-to-Date 2010 vs. 2009 (see Appendix D for definitions of measures)
|
||||||
Third Quarter
|
Year-to-Date
|
|||||
2010
|
2009
|
% Change
|
2010
|
2009
|
% Change
|
|
Net MW in operation
|
4,998
|
4,998
|
–%
|
4,998
|
4,998
|
–%
|
Average realized price per MWh
|
$61.41
|
$61.70
|
–%
|
$59.27
|
$61.68
|
(4)%
|
Production cost per MWh (a)
|
$27.79
|
$22.57
|
23%
|
$25.28
|
$23.28
|
9%
|
Non-fuel O&M expense/purchased power per MWh (a)
|
$28.77
|
$22.11
|
30%
|
$25.94
|
$23.18
|
12%
|
GWh billed
|
9,888
|
10,876
|
(9)%
|
30,011
|
29,929
|
–%
|
Capacity factor
|
91%
|
100%
|
(9)%
|
92%
|
91%
|
1%
|
Refueling outage days:
|
||||||
FitzPatrick (b)
|
18
|
–
|
18
|
–
|
||
Indian Point 2
|
–
|
–
|
33
|
–
|
||
Indian Point 3
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
36
|
||
Palisades
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
41
|
||
Pilgrim
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
31
|
||
Vermont Yankee
|
–
|
–
|
29
|
–
|
||
(a)
|
Third quarter and year-to-date periods in 2009 and 2010 exclude the effect of the special item for non-utility nuclear spin-off expenses.
|
(b)
|
Table reflects the duration of refueling outages that occurred in third quarter 2010; the FitzPatrick refueling outage continued for 17 days into the fourth quarter 2010.
|
Table 6: Entergy Nuclear’s Capacity and Generation Projected Sold Forward
|
||||||
Third Quarter 2010 through 2015 (see Appendix D for definitions of measures)
|
||||||
Balance of
2010
|
2011
|
2012
|
2013
|
2014
|
2015
|
|
Energy
|
||||||
Planned TWh of generation (c)
|
10
|
41
|
41
|
40
|
41
|
41
|
Percent of planned generation sold forward (d)
|
||||||
Unit-contingent
|
57%
|
78%
|
50%
|
25%
|
14%
|
12%
|
Unit-contingent with availability guarantees
|
33%
|
17%
|
14%
|
6%
|
3%
|
3%
|
Firm LD
|
–%
|
3%
|
14%
|
–%
|
8%
|
–%
|
Offsetting positions
|
–%
|
(3)%
|
(2)%
|
–%
|
–%
|
–%
|
Total Energy Sold Forward (net)
|
90%
|
95%
|
76%
|
31%
|
25%
|
15%
|
Average contract price per MWh (e)
|
$57
|
$53
|
$50
|
$49
|
$51
|
$51
|
.
|
||||||
Capacity
|
||||||
Planned net MW in operation (c)
|
4,998
|
4,998
|
4,998
|
4,998
|
4,998
|
4,998
|
Percent of capacity sold forward
|
||||||
Bundled capacity and energy contracts
|
27%
|
26%
|
18%
|
16%
|
16%
|
16%
|
Capacity contracts
|
57%
|
31%
|
29%
|
26%
|
10%
|
–%
|
Total Capacity Sold Forward
|
84%
|
57%
|
47%
|
42%
|
26%
|
16%
|
Average capacity contract price per kW per month
|
$2.4
|
$3.0
|
$3.0
|
$2.8
|
$2.7
|
$–
|
Blended Capacity and Energy Recap (based on revenues)
|
||||||
Percent of planned energy and capacity sold forward
|
93%
|
95%
|
77%
|
33%
|
26%
|
14%
|
Average contract revenue per MWh (e)
|
$59
|
$55
|
$52
|
$52
|
$53
|
$51
|
|
(c) Assumes successful license renewal at all plants. License renewal applications are in process for four units (with current license expirations noted parenthetically): Vermont Yankee (3/21/2012), Pilgrim (6/8/2012), Indian Point 2 (9/28/2013), and Indian Point 3 (12/15/2015).
|
|
(d) A portion of EN’s total planned generation sold forward through March 2012 is associated with the Vermont Yankee contract, for which pricing may be adjusted.
|
|
(e) Average contract prices exclude payments that may be owed under the value sharing agreement with the New York Power Authority.
|
IV.
|
Parent & Other
|
V.
|
Other Financial Performance Highlights
|
Table 7: 2010 Earnings Per Share Guidance – As-Reported and Operational
|
|||||
(Per share in U.S. $) – Prepared October 2009; As-Reported Updated April 2010 (f)
|
|||||
Segment
|
Description of Drivers
|
2009
Earnings
per Share
|
Expected
Change
|
2010
Guidance
Midpoint
|
2010
Guidance
Range
|
Utility, Parent, &
Other (includes Non-Nuclear Wholesale Assets)
|
2009 Operational Earnings per Share
|
3.22
|
|||
Adjustment to normalize weather
|
0.01
|
||||
Increased net revenue due to sales growth and rate actions
|
0.65
|
||||
Increased non-fuel operation and maintenance expense
|
(0.05)
|
||||
Increased depreciation expense
|
(0.08)
|
||||
Decreased other income
|
(0.15)
|
||||
Increased interest expense
|
(0.05)
|
||||
Non-nuclear wholesale assets contribution
|
(0.20)
|
||||
Accretion / other
|
0.20
|
||||
Subtotal
|
3.22
|
0.33
|
3.55
|
||
Entergy Nuclear
|
2009 Operational Earnings per Share
|
3.45
|
|||
Decreased net revenue due to lower pricing and volume
|
(0.15)
|
||||
Increased non-fuel operation and maintenance expense
|
(0.20)
|
||||
Increased depreciation expense
|
(0.05)
|
||||
Increased other income
|
0.20
|
||||
Accretion / other
|
-
|
||||
Subtotal
|
3.45
|
(0.20)
|
3.25
|
||
Consolidated
Operational
|
2010 Operational Earnings per Share
|
6.67
|
0.13
|
6.80
|
6.40 – 7.20
|
Consolidated
As-Reported
|
2009 As-Reported Earnings per Share
|
||||
Changes detailed above
|
0.13
|
||||
2010 Entergy Nuclear spin-off dis-synergies
|
(0.25)
|
||||
2009 Entergy Nuclear spin-off dis-synergies
|
0.23
|
||||
2009 Non-utility nuclear spin-off expenses for outside services at Parent & Other
|
0.14
|
||||
2010 As-Reported Earnings per Share Guidance Range
|
6.30
|
0.25
|
6.55
|
6.15 – 6.95
|
|
Incremental special items related to the spin-off in connection with the business unwind
|
(0.15) – (0.20)
|
||||
Revised 2010 As-Reported Earnings per Share Guidance Range
|
6.30
|
0.05 – 0.10
|
6.35 – 6.40
|
5.95 – 6.80
|
|
|
(f) Updated in February 2010 to reflect 2009 final results and in April 2010 to reflect the special item for the total potential charge for the business unwind of Enexus Energy Corporation and EquaGen LLC.
|
·
|
Normal weather
|
·
|
Retail sales growth of around 4.5% on a weather adjusted basis; around 3% on a normalized basis excluding the effects of industrial expansion
|
·
|
Increased revenue associated with rate actions, including storm securitization which is offset by increased interest expense as noted below
|
·
|
Increased non-fuel operation and maintenance expense resulting from compensation and benefits expense and increased refueling outage amortization, largely offset by lower customer write-offs and the absence of 2009 storm related items
|
·
|
Increased depreciation associated with capital spending at the Utility
|
·
|
Decreased other income due to lower carrying charges and the absence of the 2009 gain on sale of land at the Utility
|
·
|
Increased interest expense associated with increased debt outstanding at the Utility, including storm securitization, partially offset by lower debt outstanding at the Parent
|
·
|
Break-even operations targeted for the non-nuclear wholesale assets business
|
·
|
Accretion / other is primarily driven by the effect of share repurchases in both 2009 and 2010
|
·
|
40 TWh of total output, reflecting an approximate 92 percent capacity factor, including 30 day refueling outages at Indian Point 2 and Vermont Yankee in Spring 2010 and FitzPatrick and Palisades in Fall 2010
|
·
|
88 percent of energy sold under existing contracts; 12 percent sold into the spot market
|
·
|
$57/MWh average energy contract price; $56/MWh average unsold energy price based on published market prices at the end of September 2009 (market prices have since declined with 2010 now averaging around the mid-$40s per MWh)
|
·
|
Palisades PPA revenue amortization of $46 million in 2010, down from $53 million in 2009
|
·
|
Non-fuel operation and maintenance expense, including refueling outage expense and purchased power, around $25/MWh resulting from increased compensation and benefits expense, higher NRC fees and increased refueling outage amortization
|
·
|
Increased depreciation associated with capital spending
|
·
|
Increased other income due primarily to the absence of 2009 decommissioning trust other than temporary impairments; earnings guidance does not incorporate assumptions for other than temporary impairments as financial market outcomes are outside of Entergy Nuclear’s control and difficult to predict
|
·
|
Offsetting effects of accretion / other are primarily driven by the effect of share repurchases in both 2009 and 2010, largely offset by a higher effective income tax rate in 2010
|
·
|
2010 average fully diluted shares outstanding of approximately 187 million (including effects of share repurchases in both 2009 and 2010)
|
·
|
2010 assumes an overall effective income tax rate of 36 percent
|
·
|
In connection with the business unwind of the internal organizations for Enexus Energy Corporation and EquaGen LLC, the estimated range of a total potential charge of $0.40 to $0.45 per share reflects the write-off of capitalized costs incurred to date and certain other costs in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. This charge will be reported as a special item. The range for this charge also includes the previously identified special items for spin-off dis-synergies and expenses for outside services provided to pursue the spin-off in 2010.
|
·
|
A number of regulatory initiatives (rate actions) under way across the Utility jurisdictions
|
·
|
Timing flexibility for executing the share repurchase program across the year (guidance assumed execution on a ratable basis)
|
·
|
Potential outcomes for projected pension plan discount rate (guidance assumed 6.75%; actual is 6.1– 6.3%)
|
Table 8: 2010 Earnings Sensitivities
|
|||
(Per share in U.S. $) – Prepared October 2009
|
|||
Variable
|
2010 Guidance Assumption
|
Description of Change
|
Estimated
Annual Impact (g)
|
Utility, Parent & Other
|
|||
Sales growth
Residential
Commercial / Governmental
Industrial
|
Around 4.5% total sales growth on a weather adjusted basis
|
1% change in Residential MWh sold
1% change in Comm / Govt MWh sold
1% change in Industrial MWh sold
|
- / + 0.05
- / + 0.04
- / + 0.02
|
Rate base
|
Growing rate base
|
$100 million change in rate base
|
- / + 0.03
|
Return on equity
|
Authorized regulatory ROEs
|
1% change in allowed ROE
|
- / + 0.33
|
Entergy Nuclear
|
|||
Capacity factor
|
92% capacity factor
|
1% change in capacity factor
|
- / + 0.07
|
Energy price
|
12% energy unsold at $56/MWh in 2010
|
$10/MWh change for unsold energy
|
- / + 0.15
|
Non-fuel operation and maintenance expense
|
$25/MWh non-fuel operation and maintenance expense/purchased power
|
$1/MWh change
|
+ / - 0.13
|
Outage (lost revenue only)
|
92% capacity factor, including refueling outages for four nuclear units
|
1,000 MW plant for 10 days at average portfolio energy price of $57/MWh for sold and $56/MWh for unsold volumes in 2010
|
- 0.04 / n/a
|
VI.
|
Appendices
|
·
|
Appendix A includes earnings per share variance analysis and details on special items that relate to the current quarter and year-to-date results.
|
·
|
Appendix B provides information on selected pending local and federal regulatory cases.
|
·
|
Appendix C provides financial metrics for both current and historical periods. In addition, historical financial and operating performance metrics are included for the trailing eight quarters.
|
·
|
Appendix D provides definitions of the operational performance measures and GAAP and non-GAAP financial measures that are used in this release.
|
·
|
Appendix E provides a reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures used in this release.
|
A.
|
Variance Analysis and Special Items
|
Appendix A-1: As-Reported and Operational Earnings Per Share Variance Analysis
|
|||||||||||
Third Quarter 2010 vs. 2009
|
|||||||||||
(Per share in U.S. $, sorted in consolidated operational column, most to least favorable)
|
|||||||||||
Utility
|
Entergy Nuclear
|
Parent & Other
|
Consolidated
|
||||||||
As-
Reported
|
Opera-
tional
|
As-
Reported
|
Opera-
tional
|
As-
Reported
|
Opera-
tional
|
As-
Reported
|
Opera-
tional
|
||||
2009 earnings
|
1.50
|
1.50
|
1.02
|
1.07
|
(0.20)
|
(0.17)
|
2.32
|
2.40
|
|||
Income taxes – other
|
(0.05)
|
(0.05)
|
(h)
|
0.10
|
0.10
|
(i)
|
0.33
|
0.33
|
(j)
|
0.38
|
0.38
|
Net revenue
|
0.46
|
0.46
|
(k)
|
(0.20)
|
(0.20)
|
(l)
|
0.04
|
0.04
|
0.30
|
0.30
|
|
Share repurchase effect
|
0.07
|
0.07
|
(m)
|
0.03
|
0.03
|
0.01
|
0.01
|
0.11
|
0.11
|
||
Depreciation/ amortization expense
|
0.06
|
0.06
|
(n)
|
(0.01)
|
(0.01)
|
-
|
-
|
0.05
|
0.05
|
||
Interest and other charges
|
-
|
-
|
0.04
|
0.03
|
0.01
|
0.01
|
0.05
|
0.04
|
|||
Nuclear refueling outage expense
|
-
|
-
|
(0.01)
|
(0.01)
|
-
|
-
|
(0.01)
|
(0.01)
|
|||
Decommissioning expense
|
-
|
-
|
(0.01)
|
(0.01)
|
-
|
-
|
(0.01)
|
(0.01)
|
|||
Taxes other than income taxes
|
(0.03)
|
(0.03)
|
(0.01)
|
(0.01)
|
0.01
|
0.01
|
(0.03)
|
(0.03)
|
|||
Other income (deductions)
|
(0.05)
|
(0.05)
|
(o)
|
(0.02)
|
(0.02)
|
(0.07)
|
(0.07)
|
(p)
|
(0.14)
|
(0.14)
|
|
Other operation & maintenance expense
|
(0.18)
|
(0.18)
|
(q)
|
(0.22)
|
(0.12)
|
(r)
|
-
|
(0.03)
|
(0.40)
|
(0.33)
|
|
2010 earnings
|
1.78
|
1.78
|
0.71
|
0.85
|
0.13
|
0.13
|
2.62
|
2.76
|
|||
Appendix A-2: As-Reported and Operational Earnings Per Share Variance Analysis
|
|||||||||||
Year-to-Date Third Quarter 2010 vs. 2009
|
|||||||||||
(Per share in U.S. $, sorted in consolidated operational column, most to least favorable)
|
|||||||||||
Utility
|
Entergy Nuclear
|
Parent & Other
|
Consolidated
|
||||||||
As-
Reported
|
Opera-
tional
|
As-
Reported
|
Opera-
tional
|
As-
Reported
|
Opera-
tional
|
As-
Reported
|
Opera-
tional
|
||||
2009 earnings
|
2.80
|
2.80
|
2.34
|
2.51
|
(0.48)
|
(0.39)
|
4.66
|
4.92
|
|||
Net revenue
|
1.15
|
1.15
|
(k)
|
(0.25)
|
(0.25)
|
(l)
|
0.06
|
0.06
|
(s)
|
0.96
|
0.96
|
Other than temporary impairment losses
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.23
|
0.23
|
(t)
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.23
|
0.23
|
||
Share repurchase effect
|
0.14
|
0.14
|
(m)
|
0.07
|
0.07
|
(m)
|
(0.01)
|
(0.01)
|
0.20
|
0.20
|
|
Income taxes – other
|
-
|
-
|
(0.03)
|
(0.03)
|
0.26
|
0.16
|
(j)
|
0.23
|
0.13
|
||
Interest and other charges
|
(0.10)
|
(0.10)
|
(u)
|
(0.02)
|
0.07
|
(v)
|
0.09
|
0.09
|
(w)
|
(0.03)
|
0.06
|
Depreciation/ amortization expense
|
0.05
|
0.05
|
(n)
|
(0.02)
|
(0.02)
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.03
|
0.03
|
||
Decommissioning expense
|
(0.01)
|
(0.01)
|
(0.02)
|
(0.02)
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
(0.03)
|
(0.03)
|
|||
Nuclear refueling outage expense
|
(0.01)
|
(0.01)
|
(0.03)
|
(0.03)
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
(0.04)
|
(0.04)
|
|||
Taxes other than income taxes
|
(0.05)
|
(0.05)
|
(x)
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
(0.05)
|
(0.05)
|
||
Other income (deductions)
|
(0.10)
|
(0.10)
|
(o)
|
0.02
|
0.02
|
(0.11)
|
(0.11)
|
(p)
|
(0.19)
|
(0.19)
|
|
Other operation & maintenance expense
|
(0.19)
|
(0.19)
|
(q)
|
(0.46)
|
(0.22)
|
(r)
|
0.06
|
(0.03)
|
(0.59)
|
(0.44)
|
|
2010 earnings
|
3.68
|
3.68
|
1.83
|
2.33
|
(0.13)
|
(0.23)
|
5.38
|
5.78
|
|||
|
(h)
|
The decrease in the current quarter is due primarily to the unfavorable effect of consolidated income tax adjustments, partially offset by state income tax benefits realized in connection with storm cost financings in Louisiana.
|
|
(i)
|
The increase in the current quarter is due primarily to the favorable effect of consolidated income tax adjustments and the reversal of a tax reserve related to a restructuring of the Entergy Nuclear Power Marketing business.
|
|
(j)
|
The current quarter and year-to-date increases are due primarily to a favorable Tax Court ruling addressing a foreign tax credit computation thus allowing the reversal of a previously established tax reserve on the issue. Also contributing was the favorable effect of consolidated income tax adjustments. Year-to-date is partially offset by decreases in valuation allowances on loss carryovers recorded in the prior year. The as-reported increase reflects tax benefits recorded in connection with the Enexus Energy Corporation and EquaGen LLC business unwind decision resulting from implementation expenses that previously were not deductible for tax purpose.
|
Utility Net Revenue Variance Analysis
2010 vs. 2009
($ EPS)
|
|||
Third Quarter
|
Year-to-Date
|
||
Weather
|
0.26
|
Weather
|
0.55
|
Sales growth/ pricing
|
0.24
|
Sales growth/ pricing
|
0.47
|
Other
|
(0.04)
|
Other
|
0.13
|
Total
|
0.46
|
Total
|
1.15
|
(k)
|
The increases in the current quarter and year-to-date periods are due primarily to increased sales volumes across all customer classes, including favorable weather. Also contributing in both periods was pricing adjustments resulting from operating company rate actions in Arkansas, Texas, and Louisiana, with Mississippi also benefiting on a year-to-date basis. Rate refunds recorded at Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Gulf States Louisiana in the third quarter of 2009 also contributed to the current quarter and year-to-date increase. In addition, the year-to-date variance reflects the absence of a regulatory charge at Entergy Texas associated with a May 2009 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Order.
|
(l)
|
The decrease in the current quarter is due primarily to lower generation resulting from an increase in planned and unplanned outage days. On a year-to-date basis, the decrease is primarily due to lower pricing offset somewhat by slightly higher production due to more refueling outages in 2009 through the first three quarters compared to the current year.
|
(m)
|
The increases in the current quarter and year-to-date periods represent accretion associated with Entergy’s share repurchase programs.
|
(n)
|
The current quarter and year-to-date increases are due primarily to lower depreciation being recorded at Entergy Arkansas in accordance with a rate settlement approved by the Arkansas Public Service Commission.
|
(o)
|
The current quarter and year-to-date decreases are due primarily to lower storm-related carrying charges and the absence of a prior year gain recorded on a land sale, partially offset by an increase in affiliate dividend income with Parent & Other arising out of the use of proceeds from storm cost financings in Louisiana.
|
(p)
|
The decreases in the current quarter and year-to-date are due primarily to eliminations of higher affiliated dividend at the Utility as described in (o).
|
(q)
|
The current quarter and year-to-date decreases are due primarily to higher compensation-related expenses and higher outage costs at generating units.
|
(r)
|
The current quarter and year-to-date decreases are due primarily to higher compensation-related expenses and a write-off of capitalized engineering costs associated with a potential uprate project. Also, incremental costs associated with the remediation of the tritium leak at Vermont Yankee were reflected in the year-to-date period. In addition, as-reported results for the current quarter and year-to-date reflects non-utility nuclear spin-off expenses, including the business unwind of Enexus and EquaGen.
|
(s)
|
The year-to-date increase is due primarily to higher market heat rates for non-nuclear wholesale assets.
|
(t)
|
The increase year-to-date is due to the absence of significant impairments recorded in the prior year associated with decommissioning trust fund investments.
|
(u)
|
The year-to-date decrease is due to higher interest expense on increased debt borrowings.
|
(v)
|
As-reported interest expense drivers include a first quarter 2010 charge for the balance of fees associated with cancellation of the Enexus credit facility. Going forward, no additional fees will be incurred, resulting in lower interest expense in the second and third quarters of 2010. In addition, the year-to-date change on both as-reported and operational bases reflects lower affiliate guarantee fee expenses with Parent & Other.
|
(w)
|
The year-to-date increase is due to lower average revolver rate and lower Parent borrowings including Parent debt redemptions.
|
(x)
|
The decrease year-to-date is due primarily to higher ad valorem taxes and higher franchise taxes.
|
Appendix A-3: Special Items (shown as positive / (negative) impact on earnings)
|
||||||
Third Quarter and Year-to-Date 2010 vs. 2009
|
||||||
(Per share in U.S. $)
|
||||||
Third Quarter
|
Year-to-Date
|
|||||
2010
|
2009
|
Change
|
2010
|
2009
|
Change
|
|
Utility
|
||||||
None
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Entergy Nuclear
|
||||||
Non-utility nuclear spin-off expenses (y)
|
(0.14)
|
(0.05)
|
(0.09)
|
(0.50)
|
(0.17)
|
(0.33)
|
Parent & Other
|
||||||
Non-utility nuclear spin-off expenses (y)
|
-
|
(0.03)
|
0.03
|
0.10
|
(0.09)
|
0.19
|
Total Special Items
|
(0.14)
|
(0.08)
|
(0.06)
|
(0.40)
|
(0.26)
|
(0.14)
|
(U.S. $ in millions)
|
||||||
Third Quarter
|
Year-to-Date
|
|||||
2010
|
2009
|
Change
|
2010
|
2009
|
Change
|
|
Utility
|
||||||
None
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Entergy Nuclear
|
||||||
Non-utility nuclear spin-off expenses (y)
|
(25.2)
|
(10.3)
|
(14.9)
|
(94.0)
|
(32.0)
|
(62.0)
|
Parent & Other
|
||||||
Non-utility nuclear spin-off expenses (y)
|
-
|
(5.2)
|
5.2
|
18.5
|
(17.9)
|
36.4
|
Total Special Items
|
(25.2)
|
(15.5)
|
(9.7)
|
(75.5)
|
(49.9)
|
(25.6)
|
|
(y) Includes non-utility nuclear spin-off dis-synergies and expenses for outside services to pursue the previously planned spin-off in both years and the charge in connection with the business unwind of Enexus Energy Corporation and EquaGen LLC in 2010.
|
B.
|
Regulatory Summary
|
|
Appendix B provides a summary of selected regulatory cases and events that are pending.
|
Appendix B: Regulatory Summary Table
|
|
Company
|
Pending Cases / Events
|
Retail Regulation
|
|
Entergy Arkansas
Authorized ROE: 10.2%
Last Filed
Rate Base:
$4.0 billion
Filed 6/10 based on 6/30/09 test year, with known and measurable changes through 6/30/10
|
Rate Case Recent Activity: In the first billing cycle of July 2010, EAI implemented its $63.7 million rate increase pursuant to the settlement approved by the APSC in June.
Background: In June 2010, the APSC approved a settlement and subsequent compliance tariffs effective for bills rendered for the first billing cycle of July 2010. Key elements of the settlement include a $63.7 million rate increase (after removing $10.1 million for the securitization of ice storm costs) and a 10.2% allowed return on equity.
|
Storm Cost Recovery Recent Activity: In August 2010, Entergy Arkansas Restoration Funding, LLC, a special purpose bankruptcy-remote limited liability company wholly-owned by EAI, issued $124.1 million of storm recovery bonds in a single tranche, with an average life of 5.44 years and a coupon of 2.30%. EAI added the proceeds (net of external issuance costs) to its general funds as reimbursement for previous storm-related expenditures.
Background: EAI incurred approximately $123 million in estimated restoration costs resulting from the severe ice storm that struck in January 2009. Considering the magnitude of the statewide storm damages, the Arkansas legislature passed legislation authorizing storm reserve accounting in March 2009, followed by the enactment of storm securitization legislation in April. Both pieces of legislation are effective for storms occurring on or after January 1, 2009. The Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) approved the establishment of EAI’s storm cost reserve account on April 16, 2010 using the annual amount of $14.449 million previously established. As part of EAI’s September 4, 2009 rate case filing, EAI included the 2009 ice storm restoration costs in cost-of-service, indicating the ice storm restoration costs would be removed from the pending rate case if the APSC approved EAI’s request to securitize the ice storm costs. Since EAI’s analysis demonstrated that retail customers will benefit from lower costs using securitization versus conventional utility financing, EAI removed ice storm recovery from the pending rate case filing in its rebuttal testimony filed on March 24, 2010. In June 2010, the APSC approved EAI’s financing order. The financing order authorized the issuance of storm recovery bonds in an aggregate amount of $126.3 million, consisting of $121.7 million in storm recovery costs (including $11.5 million of carrying costs assuming a September 23, 2010 bond issuance) and upfront financing costs of $4.6 million. The APSC set a cap of 4.4% on the coupon rate of the securitization bonds to ensure customer savings.
|
|
Show Cause Order Regarding System Agreement / Future Operation and Control of EAI’s Transmission Assets Recent Activity: EAI continued to file testimony and participate in the hearing process in the APSC Show Cause proceeding. On August 31, 2010, the APSC directed EAI and all parties to compare all five strategic options at the same time, pursuant to a procedural schedule, as follows: (1) EAI Self-Provide; (2) EAI w/ 3rd party coordination agreements; (3) Successor Arrangements; (4) EAI as a stand-alone member of Southwest Power Pool Regional Transmission Organization (SPP RTO); and (5) EAI as a stand-alone member of Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator (MISO). The procedural schedule calls for EAI to file its assessment and recommendations regarding each strategic option in April 2011, an evidentiary hearing in August 2011 and an APSC order in October 2011. On September 16, 2010, EAI filed an initial draft of the Successor Arrangements. The Successor Arrangements take the form of a draft Commitment, Operations and Dispatch Agreement (CODA). EAI conducted a technical conference to discuss the Successor Arrangement strategic option on September 23, 2010. On September 29, 2010, EAI filed a petition for clarification of the procedural schedule order concerning several issues including the timetable for selecting the most beneficial option for customers. On September 30, 2010, Charles River Associates (CRA) presented its cost-benefit analysis (CBA) of the Entergy and Cleco regions joining the SPP RTO to the Entergy Regional State Committee (E-RSC). CRA is also conducting addendum studies on EAI as a stand-alone member of the SPP RTO and MISO. The SPP RTO stand-alone study is due October 27, 2010, to be followed by the MISO stand-alone study.
Background: On February 11, 2010, the APSC issued a Show Cause order opening an inquiry to conduct an investigation, with the intent to render its decision by the end of 2010, regarding the prudence of EAI’s entering a successor pooling agreement with the other Entergy Operating Companies, as opposed to becoming a stand-alone entity upon exit from the System Agreement in December 2013, and whether EAI, as a stand-alone utility should join the SPP RTO. As a parallel matter, the APSC will also monitor whether Entergy will make any meaningful enhancements to its Independent Coordinator of Transmission (ICT) arrangement in 2010 with filings at FERC. EAI noted in its testimony that it is not reasonable to complete a comprehensive evaluation of strategic options by the end of 2010 and that forcing a decision would place parties in the untenable position of making critical decisions based on insufficient information. EAI’s plan is expected to lead to a decision regarding critical path issues in late 2011, however, EAI anticipates several transition plan elements will move forward in 2010 and require ongoing dialogue. In an attempt to reach understanding of complex issues, EAI proposes to hold a series of technical conferences in the coming months targeting specific subject matter. On May 11, 2010, SPP filed a detailed EAI Stand-Alone CBA project schedule, contingent on certain milestones being reached in the SPP Entergy CBA.
|
Appendix B: Regulatory Summary Table (continued)
|
|
Company
|
Pending Cases / Events
|
Retail Regulation
|
|
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana
Authorized ROE Range: 9.9% - 11.4%
(electric)
10.0% - 11.0%
(gas)
Last Filed
Rate Base:
$2.3 billion
(electric)
Filed 8/10 based on 12/31/09 test year
$0.05 billion
(gas)
Filed 4/10 based on 9/30/09 test year
|
Formula Rate Plan Recent Activity: On August 26, 2010, EGSL made its revised 2009 test year FRP filing. The filing reflected a 10.12% earned ROE which is within the bandwidth resulting in no cost of service adjustment. The filing also reflected two increases outside of the FRP sharing mechanism: (1) an extraordinary cost change associated with decommissioning accruals related to EGSL’s River Bend Station approved by the Commission in July, and (2) $25.2 million for capacity costs. The filing was not contested by the Staff or intervenors, and the rates became effective, beginning with the first billing cycle of September 2010, subject to review and final approval by the LPSC.
Background: At its October 2009 Business and Executive (B&E) session, the LPSC approved an uncontested settlement resolving the 2007 test year FRP filing and extending the FRP regulatory process for an additional three years. The new FRP was adopted for the 2008-2010 test years and retains the 10.65% ROE midpoint with a +/- 75 basis point bandwidth and a recovery mechanism for Commission-approved capacity additions. Earnings outside the bandwidth are allocated prospectively, 60% to customers and 40% to the company. As part of the settlement, EGSL implemented a one-time rate reset to achieve its 10.65% midpoint ROE for the 2008 test year filing, which was filed October 21, 2009. This filing reflected an 8.64% earned ROE and total rate increase of $44.3 million, including a $36.9 million cost of service adjustment, plus $7.4 million net for increased capacity costs and a base rate reclassification. New rates took effect coincident with the November billing cycle and were subject to review and final approval by the LPSC. All parties also committed to work together to attempt to develop a transmission rider for EGSL. Finally, the settlement included a $3.7 million refund commencing with the November billing cycle for the 2007 test year FRP filing. In January, EGSL implemented a further $23.9 million rate increase pursuant to the special rate implementation filing made in December, primarily for incremental capacity costs approved by the LPSC. At its May 19, 2010 B&E session, the LPSC accepted the joint LPSC Staff / EGSL report reflecting resolution of the 2008 test year FRP filing. The report calls for a prospective reduction in EGSL’s rates of $847 thousand beginning with the June billing cycle and a refund of $494 thousand plus judicial interest through the fuel adjustment clause. On May 28, 2010, EGSL made its 2009 test year FRP filing. The filing reflected a 10.25% earned ROE which is within the bandwidth resulting in no cost of service adjustment. The filing also reflected two increases outside of the FRP sharing mechanism: (1) $9.7 million to reflect an extraordinary cost change associated with a required increase in decommissioning accruals related to EGSL’s River Bend Station consistent with an earlier December 2009 filing, and (2) $20.8 million for capacity costs. Further, in response to a depreciation rate complaint filed at FERC by the LPSC, EGSL presented two ancillary FRP filing proposals based on a new depreciation study that increased depreciation rates and related FRP revenues by either $45.3 million (assuming a 40 year River Bend life) or $24.4 million (60 year life). EGSL also noted that LPSC Staff, EGSL and intervenors continue working to design a transmission rider for EGSL. At its July 2010 B&E session, the LPSC granted EGSL a $7.8 million increase effective September 2010 to provide supplemental funding for the decommissioning trust maintained for the LPSC-regulated 70% share of River Bend in response to the NRC notification of a projected shortfall of decommissioning funding assurance. Prior to that, EGSL had no funding in retail rates for decommissioning
|
Entergy Louisiana
Authorized ROE Range: 9.45% - 11.05%
Last Filed
Rate Base:
$3.0 billion
Filed 8/10 based on 12/31/09 test year
|
Formula Rate Plan Recent Activity: On August 26, 2010, ELL made its revised 2009 test year FRP filing. The filing reflected a 10.82% earned ROE which is within the bandwidth resulting in no cost of service adjustment. The filing also reflected two increases outside of the FRP sharing mechanism: (1) an extraordinary cost change associated with decommissioning accruals related to ELL’s Waterford 3 Steam Electric Station approved by the Commission in July, and (2) $2.2 million for capacity costs. The filing was not contested by the Staff or intervenors, and the rates became effective beginning with the first billing cycle of September 2010, subject to review and final approval by the LPSC.
Background: At its October 2009 B&E session, the LPSC approved an uncontested settlement resolving the 2006 and 2007 test year FRP filings and extending the FRP regulatory process for an additional three years. The new FRP was adopted for the 2008-2010 test years and retains the 10.25% ROE midpoint with a +/- 80 basis point bandwidth and a recovery mechanism for Commission-approved capacity additions. Earnings outside the bandwidth are allocated prospectively, 60% to customers and 40% to the company. As part of the settlement, ELL implemented the one-time rate reset to achieve its 10.25% midpoint ROE for the 2008 test year filing, which was filed October 21, 2009. This filing reflected a 9.35% earned ROE and total rate increase of $2.5 million, including a $16.3 million cost of service adjustment, less a $13.8 million net reduction for decreased capacity costs and a base rate reclassification. New rates took effect coincident with the November billing cycle and were subject to review and final approval by the LPSC. All parties also committed to work together to attempt to develop a transmission rider for ELL. Finally, the settlement included a $12.9 million refund commencing with the November billing cycle for the 2006 and 2007 test year FRP filings. At its April 21, 2010 B&E session, the LPSC accepted the joint LPSC Staff / ELL report reflecting resolution of the FRP for the 2008 test year. The report called for a prospective reduction in ELL’s rates of $144.4 thousand beginning with the May billing cycle and to refund $72.2 thousand plus judicial interest through the fuel adjustment clause. Further, ELL will move the recovery of approximately $12.5 million of capacity costs associated with EAI’s Wholesale Baseload Capacity Resource from fuel adjustment clause recovery to base rate recovery. On May 14, 2010, ELL made its 2009 test year FRP filing. The filing reflected a 10.82% earned ROE which is within the bandwidth resulting in no cost of service adjustment. The filing also reflected two adjustments outside of the FRP sharing mechanism: (1) a decrease of $7.4 million to reflect reduced capacity costs, and (2) an increase to reflect an extraordinary cost change associated with a required increase in decommissioning accruals related to ELL’s Waterford 3 Steam Electric Station consistent with an earlier December 2009 filing. Further, in response to a depreciation rate complaint filed at FERC by the LPSC, ELL presented two ancillary FRP filing proposals based on a new depreciation study that increased depreciation rates and related FRP revenues by either $96.4 million (assuming a 40 year Waterford 3 life) or $40.5 million (60 year life). ELL also noted that LPSC Staff, ELL and intervenors continue working to design a transmission rider for ELL. At its July 2010 B&E session, the LPSC granted ELL a $3.482 million increase in retail rates effective September 2010 to provide supplemental funding for the decommissioning trust maintained for the for the LPSC-jurisdictional portion of Waterford 3, in response to the NRC notification of a projected shortfall of decommissioning funding assurance. Prior to that, ELL had $2.3 million in retail rates for decommissioning.
|
Appendix B: Regulatory Summary Table (continued)
|
|
Company
|
Pending Cases/Events
|
Retail Regulation
|
|
Entergy
Louisiana
(continued)
|
Acadia Unit 2 Acquisition Recent Activity: During September 2010, Staff and ELL / EGSL began discussions regarding a possible settlement in this matter. ELL / EGSL requested that pre-hearing deadlines be extended to accommodate settlement discussions. As part of their request, ELL / EGSL did not request any change in the current hearing dates of December 9-10 and 13, 2010. All parties represented that they had no objection to the requested extension and on October 19, 2010, the LPSC modified the procedural schedule to extend the pre-hearing dates. On September 30, 2010, the relevant Hart-Scott-Rodino waiting period expired without action. With this clearance, the power purchase agreement (PPA) was replaced by the original tolling agreement effective October 1, 2010.
Background: In October 2009, ELL signed a purchase and sale agreement to acquire the 580 MW Unit 2 of the Acadia Energy Center for $300 million ($517/kW). ELL proposes to acquire 100 percent of Acadia Unit 2 and a 50 percent ownership interest in the facility’s common assets. Cleco Power will serve as operator for the entire facility. ELL has committed to sell one third of the output to EGSL in accordance with terms and conditions detailed under the existing System Agreement. The purchase is contingent upon, among other things, obtaining necessary approvals, including full cost recovery, from various federal and state regulatory and permitting agencies and the filing of notification under Hart-Scott-Rodino antitrust law. ELL also entered into an interim tolling agreement (ITA) to purchase the capacity and energy output of Acadia Unit 2 expected to commence on May 1, 2010 and to expire at the closing of the acquisition transaction. For the interim period during which federal reviews were pending, ELL entered into an interim PPA with Acadia Power Partners, LLC (APP), which agreement was intended to be replaced by the ITA once federal reviews were completed. ELL initiated its filing at the LPSC on November 13, 2009. Consideration of the application at the January 2011 LPSC B&E Session would accommodate a closing by the March 31, 2011 deadline regarding certain price increases. The Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act filing was made in March 2010. On April 9, 2010, the LPSC approved ELL and EGSL’s uncontested request concerning the limited-term ITA, and on July 28, the LPSC approved the PPA. On June 1, 2010, deliveries commenced under the PPA (while regulatory approval was pending). On June 4, 2010, the FERC concluded that the proposed transaction is consistent with the public interest and issued an order authorizing ELL to acquire Acadia Unit 2 from APP. Closing is expected to occur in early 2011.
|
Little Gypsy Repowering Recent Activity: During the third quarter 2010, testimony was filed in the Little Gypsy proceeding. The modified procedural schedule calls for hearings to begin in November 2010. There currently is pending before the LPSC an appeal by the LPSC Staff of a decision by the ALJ relating to a dispute between the Staff and industrial intervenors relating to positions regarding the allocation of the project costs among customers. The LPSC is expected to review this appeal at its November 10, 2010 B&E session. In an effort to minimize any delay in the hearings due to this dispute, ELL requested a status conference, which was held on October 19, 2010. At the status conference, the ALJ determined that the hearings would begin on the date currently scheduled and that all issues other than cost allocation would be heard during these hearings. If the LPSC reaches a decision on the appeal at the November 10, 2010 B&E session, a status conference will be held on November 12, 2010, to determine the hearing schedule for the cost allocation issue. The record from the original hearing will be held open until the conclusion of the hearing on cost allocation.
Background: On November 8, 2007, the LPSC voted unanimously to approve ELL’s request to repower the 538 MW Little Gypsy unit to utilize CFB technology relying on a dual-fuel approach (petroleum coke and coal), an action that could reduce Louisiana customers’ dependence on natural gas. The approval was subject to a number of conditions, including the development and approval of a construction monitoring plan. The order also included a recovery provision for prudently incurred costs in the event circumstances changed materially. On March 11, 2009, the LPSC issued an order directing ELL to temporarily suspend the Little Gypsy Repowering Project and file a report with the LPSC on the economic viability of the project and develop a recommendation regarding whether to delay the project for an extended time. This action was based upon a number of factors including the recent decline in natural gas prices, as well as environmental concerns, the unknown costs of carbon legislation and changes in the capital / financial markets. In May 2009, the LPSC unanimously accepted and subsequently issued an order finding that ELL’s recommendation to place the Little Gypsy project in longer-term suspension of 3 years or more was in the public interest and prudent, without prejudice to issues of prudence of timing of decisions, project management, whether ELL may recover project costs from retail customers and the manner of that recovery and whether the project should be cancelled or abandoned as opposed to merely suspended. The quarterly monitoring plan was suspended indefinitely, with ELL instead working cooperatively with the LPSC Staff keeping them informed of activities associated with suspending the project and terminating current contracts related to the project. ELL also dismissed its proceeding to recover cash earnings on Construction Work in Progress (CWIP) for the Little Gypsy project. On October 27, 2009, ELL filed an application and testimony seeking LPSC authorization to cancel the Little Gypsy Unit 3 repowering project allowing ELL to cancel permits, eliminating the requirement to monitor the project for potential restart. This approach requires starting over should the decision be made to engage in a similar future project. In addition, ELL sought to recover cost incurred on a levelized five-year recovery basis to be trued up. In the event ELL’s costs exceed the authorized amount, ELL proposed that it be required to justify any additional recovery. Pursuant to the procedural schedule, in January, ELL filed an updated cost estimate of nearly $215 million, including nearly $193 million of costs incurred through December 31, 2009 and $22 million of net cancellation / project termination costs including AFUDC through March 2011. On June 29, 2010, LPSC Staff and intervenors filed testimony. Among others, LPSC Staff (1) agreed it was prudent to move the project from long-term suspension to cancellation, and the timing of the decision to suspend on a longer-term basis was not imprudent; (2) indicated that, except for $819 thousand, costs incurred should be deemed prudent; (3) recommended recovery from customers over ten years and that the LPSC may want to consider 15 years; (4) allowed recovery of carrying costs and earning a return on project costs, but at a reduced rate approximating the cost of debt while acknowledging the LPSC may consider ordering no return; and (5) indicated ELL should be directed to securitize project costs, if legally feasible and in the public interest. HB 1207, creating the Louisiana Electric Investment Recovery Securitization Act, was unanimously passed in the Louisiana legislature and signed by Governor Jindal on July 6, 2010.
|
|
Appendix B: Regulatory Summary Table (continued)
|
|
Company
|
Pending Cases/Events
|
Retail Regulation
|
|
Entergy Mississippi
Authorized
ROE Range: 10.79% -
13.05%
(per FRP filing)
Last Filed
Rate Base:
$1.5 billion
Filed 3/10 based on 12/31/09 test yr
|
Formula Rate Plan Recent Activity: None.
Background: EMI had been operating under a FRP last approved in December 2002. The FRP allowed the company’s earned ROE to increase or decrease within a bandwidth with no change in rates. Rate changes, if any, were effective on a prospective basis. On March 4, 2010, the MPSC approved modifications to EMI’s FRP that (1) aligned EMI’s FRP more closely with the FRPs of the other regulated gas and electric utilities in Mississippi; (2) provided the opportunity to reset the ROE and bandwidth based upon performance ratings; (3) rescored the performance adjustment factors; (4) eliminated the $14.5 million revenue adjustment limit and changed the 2% of revenues limit to a 4% limit, with any adjustment over 2% requiring a hearing; and (5) directed EMI to phase-out the summer / winter rate differential in residential rates over two years. On March 15, 2010, EMI filed its first evaluation report under its new FRP for the 2009 test year. The filing reflected a 10.66% earned ROE and total rate increase of $11.8 million, including an $8.1 million increase to amortize general plant. The calculated 11.92% FRP midpoint ROE included the benefit of a 0.76% performance incentive. The FRP called for new rates to be implemented in the June billing cycle, subject to review and final approval by the MPSC. On June 25, 2010, the MPSC issued an order approving the terms of a joint stipulation agreement between the Mississippi Public Utilities Staff and EMI for the 2009 test year FRP filing. The agreement calls for no increase but permits EMI to create a regulatory asset for Mississippi Attorney General litigation costs (currently $3.8 million). It also directs EMI to file a depreciation study within the next 12 months.
|
Entergy New Orleans
Authorized ROE Range:
10.7% - 11.5%
(electric)
10.25% - 11.25% (gas)
Last Filed
Rate Base:
$0.3 billion
(electric)
$0.08 billion
(gas)
Filed 5/10
based on 12/31/09 test yr
|
Formula Rate Plan Recent Activity: On September 10, 2010, recognizing that ENOI and the City Council of New Orleans’ (CCNO) Advisors were able to reach agreement on some but not all disputed issues, new rates were filed with the CCNO. The new rates reflected an electric rate decrease of $16.504 million and a gas rate increase of $2.287 million effective with the first billing cycle of October 2010. Any additional negotiated rate changes will go before the CCNO for approval prior to implementation. On October 7, 2010, ENOI came to an Agreement in Principle with the CCNO’s Advisors that includes additional black box electric and gas rate changes to reflect a total decrease of $18 million for electric rates and no change to gas rates retroactive to the first billing cycle of October 2010. In addition, ENOI will recognize a $3.0 million regulatory asset to be recovered over 36 months commencing January 1, 2011 outside the gas FRP deadband. The agreement also calls for ENOI to withdraw its application to implement certain corrections to its purchased gas adjustment clause upon final approval of the settlement. The CCNO is expected to consider the settlement at its October 21, 2010 meeting.
Background: A new three year FRP beginning with the 2009 test year was adopted in ENOI’s rate case settled in April 2009. Key provisions include an 11.1% electric ROE and a +/- 40 basis point bandwidth and a 10.75% gas ROE with a
+/- 50 basis point bandwidth. Earnings outside the bandwidth reset to the midpoint ROE, with rates changing on a prospective basis depending on whether ENOI is over or under-earning. The FRP also includes a recovery mechanism for Council-approved capacity additions, plus provisions for extraordinary cost changes and force majeure. The FRP may be extended by the mutual agreement of ENOI and the CCNO. The settlement also implemented energy conservation and demand programs. Effective June 1, 2009, pursuant to its April rate case settlement, ENOI implemented a total electric bill reduction of $35.3 million, including conversion of the $10.6 million voluntary recovery credit to a permanent reduction and complete realignment of Grand Gulf recovery from fuel to base rates, and a $4.95 million gas rate increase. On September 17, 2009, the CCNO approved the Energy Smart Resolution. Energy Smart is the energy efficiency program that was filed pursuant to ENOI’s April 2009 rate case settlement. On May 27, 2010, ENOI filed its FRP for the 2009 test year. The electric filing reflected a 14.46% earned ROE and a rate decrease of $12.9 million. The gas filing reflected a 7.10% earned ROE and a rate increase of $2.4 million.
|
Entergy Texas
Authorized ROE: 10.0%
Last Filed
Rate Base:
$1.6 billion
Filed 12/09 based on 6/30/09 adjusted test year
|
Rate Case Recent Activity: On August 6, 2010, ETI filed a stipulation and settlement agreement with the PUCT. Key elements of the settlement include a $68 million rate increase ($59 million for usage on and after August 15, 2010 and an additional $9 million for bills rendered on and after May 2, 2011, the first billing cycle of the month) and a 10.125% allowed return on equity (up from 10%). The settlement specified that River Bend decommissioning costs will be set at $2.019 million annually. In addition, the settlement stipulated to $464 million of net transmission cost to set the baseline investment and return assumptions necessary to make subsequent filings for recovery under a transmission rider. No formula rate plan (Cost of Service Adjustment) or purchased power recovery riders were adopted. Concurrently, the ALJ issued an interim order approving the implementation of the $59 million rate increase. The settlement did not address the competitive generation service (CGS) tariff proposed by ETI, as required in state legislation initially enacted in 2005 and modified in 2009. On October 4, 2010, the ALJ remanded the unanimous settlement to the PUCT and concurrently issued a Proposal for Decision (PFD) recommending that the CGS tariff be rejected due to the potential for a substantial shift in costs from a limited class of eligible and participating customers to remaining customers thus violating the basic principle of cost-causation. In the PFD, the ALJ recognized that the law is clear that ETI be made whole for program costs and any loss of revenues from participating customers. The PFD and the settlement agreement will be considered at the November 10, 2010 PUCT open meeting. Separately, ETI submitted a petition on September 17, 2010 to the PUCT to initiate a rulemaking for a proposed rule allowing for a purchased power capacity cost rider. In the filing, ETI stated that other non-ERCOT utilities generally support a rule authorizing timely recovery of purchased power capacity costs outside a base rate case.
Background: ETI implemented a $46.7 million base rate increase pursuant to its black box rate case settlement effective January 28, 2009, for usage beginning December 19, 2008. ETI is in need of baseload resources, and in 2009 EAI elected to offer its Wholesale Baseload (WBL) capacity to the Entergy system as a three-year cost based deal beginning January 1, 2010. ETI projected that the purchase could save customers in the range of $9.5 to $16.0 million over three years. Given expected savings, on September 18, 2009, ETI had requested a cost recovery mechanism to recover the annual capacity costs of approximately $26 million through a Purchased Power Recovery Factor (PCRF) until such time as the costs were reflected in rates after a general rate case or the transaction expired, whichever occurred first. On December 30, 2009, ETI filed a rate case requesting a $198.7 million increase reflecting an 11.5% ROE based on an adjusted June 30, 2009 test year. The filing included a proposed cost of service adjustment (COSA) rider with a three year term beginning with the 2010 calendar test year. Key provisions included a +/- 15 basis point bandwidth, with earnings outside the bandwidth reset to the bottom or top of the band and rates changing prospectively depending upon whether ETI is over- or under-earning. The annual change in revenue requirement was limited to a percentage change in
|
Appendix B: Regulatory Summary Table (continued)
|
|
Company/ Proceeding
|
Pending Cases/Events
|
Retail Regulation
|
|
Entergy
Texas
(continued)
|
Consumer Price Index for urban areas, and the FRP included a provision for extraordinary events greater than $10 million per year which would be considered separately. The filing also proposed a purchased power recovery rider, a CGS tariff and established test year baseline values to be used in the transmission cost recovery factor rider authorized for use by ETI in the 2009 legislative session. Finally, the rate case included a $2.8 million revenue requirement to provide supplemental funding for the decommissioning trust maintained for the 70% share of River Bend for which Texas retail customers have responsibility, in response to the NRC notification of a projected shortfall of decommissioning funding assurance. On February 18, 2010, the ALJ issued an order approving a unanimous settlement on interim rates and the procedural schedule reached on February 11, 2010 with the parties in the rate case. The settlement called for an interim rate increase of $17.5 million to begin on May 1, 2010 and the withdrawal of the PCRF docket pertaining to the Arkansas WBL capacity. The procedural schedule called for a final order to be issued November 1, 2010 and permanent rates to be effective relating back to service rendered on / after September 13, 2010.
|
Wholesale Regulation
|
|
System Energy Resources, Inc.
|
Recent Activity: None.
Background: 10.94% ROE approved by July 2001 FERC order.
Last Calculated Rate Base: $1.2 billion calculated for 9/30/10 monthly cost of service
|
System Agreement
|
Recent Activity: The Operating Companies continue to meet with the Commissioners, Staffs and / or advisors of retail regulatory commissions to discuss a proposed framework for Successor Arrangements to the current System Agreement, which is being pursued in parallel with evaluation by the E-RSC of the SPP RTO, MISO, and modified ICT alternatives. An initial draft of the Successor Arrangements, in the form of a draft CODA, was provided to state regulators on September 16, 2010. The intent of the draft arrangements is to allow each participating company to realize the operational benefits of a large, voluntary coordinated bulk power electric system, including energy savings associated with joint commitment and dispatch of a larger system and lower overall reserve margins, while seeking to address key concerns expressed about the historic litigation related to the current agreement.
On August 13, 2010, the FERC reaffirmed its prior decision that refunds were appropriate for a limited fifteen-month period (from 1995 to 1996) due to changes in the treatment of interruptible load in the allocation of costs among the Operating Companies under the System Agreement. Requests for rehearing and clarification of the FERC’s August 13, 2010, order are currently pending before the FERC. Resolution of this proceeding is expected to have implications regarding the question of whether FERC provided sufficient rationale for not ordering refunds in the System Agreement case.
The Operating Companies revised the 2010 bandwidth filing based on 2009 calendar year production costs on September 21, 2010 reflecting a payment of $41.6 million (up from $27.3 million) from EAI collectively to ELL and EMI. The 2010 bandwidth filing has been set for hearing by the FERC.
Background: The System Agreement case addresses the allocation of production costs among the Utility Operating Companies. In 2005, the FERC issued orders that require each Operating Company’s production costs to be within
+ / - 11% of System average production costs and set 2007 as the first possible year of payments among Entergy’s Operating Companies, based on calendar year 2006 actual production costs. Upon appeal, the DC Circuit remanded to the FERC for reconsideration of the FERC's conclusion it did not have the authority to order refunds and the decision to delay the implementation of the bandwidth remedy. The remand is pending at FERC.
Bandwidth filings for production costs required payments from EAI to various other Operating Companies of approximately $252 million, $252 million and $390 million for the 2007, 2008 and 2009 bandwidth filings respectively. FERC set each of these bandwidth filings for hearing following protests from retail regulatory commissions and / or third parties. A final order in the 2007 bandwidth proceeding has been issued by the FERC, and requests for rehearing and clarification have been filed. Bandwidth proceedings based on 2008 and 2009 remain outstanding.
On May 25, 2010, the Utility Operating Companies filed testimony refuting the LPSC’s claims in its April 16, 2010 filing at the FERC alleging that Entergy violated the System Agreement by permitting EAI to make non-requirements sales to non-affiliated third parties rather than making such energy available to the other Utility Operating Companies’ customers. The LPSC filing also stated these non-requirements sales caused harm to the Operating Companies’ customers of $144.4 million over the period 2000-2009, and these customers should be compensated for this harm by Entergy’s shareholders. Hearings were held in the third quarter. The parties are in the process of filing their post-hearing briefs.
The System Agreement has been and continues to be the subject of ongoing litigation. As a result, EAI and EMI submitted their eight year notices to withdraw from the System Agreement effective December 2013 and November 2015, respectively. On November 19, 2009, FERC accepted notices of cancellation and determined EAI and EMI are permitted to withdraw from the System Agreement following the 96 month notice period without payment of a fee or being required to otherwise compensate the remaining Entergy Operating Companies as a result of withdrawal. FERC stated it expected Entergy and all interested parties to move forward and develop details of all needed successor arrangements and encouraged Entergy to file its Section 205 filing for post-2013 arrangements as soon as possible. The LPSC and CCNO have requested rehearing of the FERC’s decision. EAI continues to evaluate alternatives, including stand-alone operation of its generation facilities, EAI participating as a member of the SPP RTO or MISO, potential Successor Arrangements and third party coordination agreements. In early April 2010, Entergy Corporation and the Entergy Operating Companies determined in connection with their decision-making process that it is appropriate to agree and commit that no Entergy Operating Company will enter voluntarily into successor arrangements with the other Entergy Operating Companies if its retail regulator finds successor arrangements are not in the public interest.
|
Appendix B: Regulatory Summary Table (continued)
|
|
Company/ Proceeding
|
Pending Cases/Events
|
Wholesale Regulation
|
|
Independent Coordinator of Transmission
Authorized
ROE: 11.0% (z)
Last Filed
Rate Base:
$2.2 billion (aa)
Filed 5/10
based on 12/31/09 test year
|
Recent Activity: On September 17, 2010, the Operating Companies filed a request for a one year interim extension of the ICT arrangement expiring November 17, 2010. On October 13, 2010, the Utility Operating Companies amended their initial filing to extend the ICT arrangement (with certain modifications) to a maximum of two years from one year. This will help provide sufficient time for analysis and implementation of other alternatives to the current structure. The filing stated that, if approved by the E-RSC during its October 20-21, 2010 meeting, the companies will make a subsequent filing with the FERC to provide the E-RSC authority upon unanimous approval of all E-RSC members to (1) propose modifications to cost allocation methodology for transmission projects and (2) add transmission projects to the Construction Plan.
On September 30, 2010, CRA presented its CBA of the Entergy and Cleco regions joining the SPP RTO. The findings of the CBA indicate that the Entergy region (including entities beyond the Operating Companies) would realize anywhere from a net cost of $(438) million to a net benefit of $387 million, primarily depending upon transmission cost allocation issues.
Background: In November 2006, the Utility Operating Companies installed SPP as their ICT with an initial term of four years unless Entergy files and the FERC approves an extension beyond that four year period. The Operating Companies did not transfer control of the transmission system but rather vested the ICT with responsibility, among others, for granting or denying transmission service, administering the OASIS node, developing a base plan for the transmission system that is used to determine whether costs of transmission upgrades should be rolled into transmission rates or directly assigned to customers requesting or causing the upgrade to be built, serving as reliability coordinator the transmission system and overseeing the Weekly Procurement Process (WPP).
In its November 17, 2009 FERC filing, in anticipation of the expiration of the initial term of the ICT, a process was proposed for the evaluation of modifications to, or the replacement of, the current ICT and WPP arrangements. The process will facilitate review by the FERC, Entergy’s retail regulators, and interested stakeholders of two primary alternatives: 1) the adoption of certain modifications to the current ICT arrangements, or 2) a transition to membership in the SPP RTO. Following the November 17 filing, the Operating Companies also determined it was appropriate to evaluate the MISO as an additional alternative. A critical factor in the Operating Companies’ proposal will be the opinion and recommendation of the E-RSC, formed in the Fall of 2009, which included one representative from each of the Entergy Operating Company retail regulators, to consider several of the issues related to the Entergy transmission system. The Utility Operating Companies expect that the E-RSC will reflect in its evaluation process the cost-benefit analysis underway now by CRA that will compare the current ICT arrangement to joining the SPP RTO and MISO.
In addition, the E-RSC is currently considering potential modifications to the ICT arrangement, including, among others, providing the E-RSC with authority (upon a unanimous vote) to (1) require the Entergy Operating Companies to file with the FERC proposed modifications to the cost allocation policy for transmission upgrades and (2) add projects to the Operating Companies’ transmission construction plan. It is anticipated certain potential modifications to the ICT will be implemented in November 2010, with other potential modifications being considered if the ICT is ultimately determined to be the appropriate longer term option. If one of the RTOs is deemed the preferred alternative, it is anticipated that the implementation process may take at least 12-18 months after a decision is made.
While alternatives are being explored, Entergy has already taken the voluntary step to more closely align its transmission planning criteria with the anticipated modifications to the NERC planning standards. Entergy believes that the current ICT arrangements have produced benefits, and, if modified as a result of this process, can continue to benefit customers and competition. The SPP RTO and MISO alternatives also have the potential to produce benefits. The progress of cost-benefit analysis will be closely monitored, including its treatment of the costs associated with any socialization of transmission upgrades constructed to integrate wind development.
|
(aa) Reflects transmission rate base in Entergy’s FERC OATT filing, for which such amounts are also reflected in the rate base figures for each of the Operating Companies shown above.
|
C.
|
Financial Performance Measures and Historical Performance Measures
|
Appendix C-1: GAAP and Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures
|
||||
Third Quarter 2010 vs. 2009
(see Appendix D for definitions of certain measures)
|
||||
For 12 months ending September 30
|
2010
|
2009
|
Change
|
|
GAAP Measures
|
||||
Return on average invested capital – as-reported
|
8.2%
|
7.1%
|
1.1%
|
|
Return on average common equity – as-reported
|
15.5%
|
13.2%
|
2.3%
|
|
Net margin – as-reported
|
11.7%
|
9.7%
|
2.0%
|
|
Cash flow interest coverage
|
8.0
|
5.5
|
2.5
|
|
Book value per share
|
$48.10
|
$44.91
|
$3.19
|
|
End of period shares outstanding (millions)
|
181.5
|
188.9
|
(7.4)
|
|
Non-GAAP Measures
|
||||
Return on average invested capital – operational
|
8.7%
|
7.5%
|
1.2%
|
|
Return on average common equity – operational
|
16.6%
|
14.1%
|
2.5%
|
|
Net margin – operational
|
12.5%
|
10.3%
|
2.2%
|
|
As of September 30 ($ in millions)
|
2010
|
2009
|
Change
|
|
GAAP Measures
|
||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
1,931
|
1,131
|
800
|
|
Revolver capacity
|
2,216
|
1,647
|
569
|
|
Total debt
|
12,247
|
11,522
|
725
|
|
Securitization debt
|
940
|
301
|
639
|
|
Debt to capital ratio
|
57.5%
|
56.7%
|
0.8%
|
|
Off-balance sheet liabilities:
|
||||
Debt of joint ventures – Entergy’s share
|
108
|
118
|
(10)
|
|
Leases – Entergy’s share
|
530
|
449
|
81
|
|
Total off-balance sheet liabilities
|
638
|
567
|
71
|
|
Non-GAAP Measures
|
||||
Debt to capital ratio, excluding securitization debt
|
55.6%
|
56.1%
|
(0.5)%
|
|
Total gross liquidity
|
4,147
|
2,778
|
1,369
|
|
Net debt to net capital ratio, excluding securitization debt
|
50.9%
|
53.4%
|
(2.5%)
|
|
Net debt to net capital ratio including off-balance sheet liabilities, excluding securitization debt
|
52.5%
|
54.8%
|
(2.3%)
|
|
Appendix C-2: Historical Performance Measures
(see Appendix D for definitions of measures)
|
||||||||||||
4Q08
|
1Q09
|
2Q09
|
3Q09
|
4Q09
|
1Q10
|
2Q10
|
3Q10
|
09YTD
|
10YTD
|
|||
Financial
|
||||||||||||
EPS – as-reported ($)
|
0.89
|
1.20
|
1.14
|
2.32
|
1.64
|
1.12
|
1.65
|
2.62
|
4.66
|
5.38
|
||
Less – special items ($)
|
(0.10)
|
(0.09)
|
(0.09)
|
(0.08)
|
(0.11)
|
(0.21)
|
(0.06)
|
(0.14)
|
(0.26)
|
(0.40)
|
||
EPS – operational ($)
|
0.99
|
1.29
|
1.23
|
2.40
|
1.75
|
1.33
|
1.71
|
2.76
|
4.92
|
5.78
|
||
Trailing Twelve Months
|
||||||||||||
ROIC – as-reported (%)
|
8.1
|
7.6
|
7.5
|
7.1
|
7.7
|
7.6
|
8.1
|
8.2
|
7.1
|
8.2
|
||
ROIC – operational (%)
|
8.4
|
8.0
|
7.8
|
7.5
|
8.1
|
8.0
|
8.5
|
8.7
|
7.5
|
8.7
|
||
ROE – as-reported (%)
|
15.4
|
14.1
|
13.7
|
13.2
|
14.9
|
13.8
|
14.8
|
15.5
|
13.2
|
15.5
|
||
ROE – operational (%)
|
16.1
|
15.0
|
14.6
|
14.1
|
15.7
|
14.9
|
15.8
|
16.6
|
14.1
|
16.6
|
||
Cash flow interest coverage
|
6.5
|
6.5
|
6.7
|
5.5
|
6.1
|
6.3
|
6.6
|
8.0
|
5.5
|
8.0
|
||
Debt to capital ratio (%)
|
59.7
|
57.4
|
55.9
|
56.7
|
57.4
|
57.0
|
56.6
|
57.5
|
56.7
|
57.5
|
||
Debt to capital ratio, excluding securitization debt (%)
|
59.1
|
56.7
|
55.3
|
56.1
|
55.6
|
55.2
|
54.8
|
55.6
|
56.1
|
55.6
|
||
Net debt to net capital ratio, excluding securitization debt (%)
|
54.8
|
52.6
|
52.2
|
53.4
|
51.5
|
51.3
|
51.6
|
50.9
|
53.4
|
50.9
|
||
Utility
|
||||||||||||
GWh billed
|
||||||||||||
Residential
|
6,992
|
7,893
|
7,100
|
11,213
|
7,421
|
9,645
|
7,705
|
12,365
|
26,206
|
29,715
|
||
Commercial & Gov’t
|
6,992
|
6,756
|
7,095
|
8,794
|
7,240
|
7,064
|
7,384
|
9,341
|
22,644
|
23,789
|
||
Industrial
|
8,626
|
8,139
|
8,790
|
9,473
|
9,235
|
8,733
|
9,862
|
10,276
|
26,402
|
28,871
|
||
Wholesale
|
1,240
|
1,387
|
1,313
|
1,164
|
998
|
1,317
|
971
|
1,063
|
3,864
|
3,351
|
||
O&M expense/MWh
|
$23.95
|
$18.51
|
$20.96
|
$15.77
|
$20.18
|
$17.29
|
$19.21
|
$16.41
|
$18.19
|
$17.54
|
||
Reliability
|
||||||||||||
SAIFI
|
1.9
|
1.8
|
1.7
|
1.7
|
1.8
|
1.7
|
1.8
|
1.8
|
1.7
|
1.8
|
||
SAIDI
|
216
|
208
|
194
|
203
|
210
|
213
|
207
|
198
|
203
|
198
|
||
Entergy Nuclear
|
||||||||||||
Net MW in operation
|
4,998
|
4,998
|
4,998
|
4,998
|
4,998
|
4,998
|
4,998
|
4,998
|
4,998
|
4,998
|
||
Avg. realized price per MWh
|
$56.69
|
$63.84
|
$59.22
|
$61.70
|
$59.43
|
$58.72
|
$57.69
|
$61.41
|
$61.68
|
$59.27
|
||
Production cost/MWh (bb)
|
$22.77
|
$23.14
|
$24.30
|
$22.57
|
$23.20
|
$23.70
|
$24.40
|
$27.79
|
$23.28
|
$25.28
|
||
Non-fuel O&M expense/ purchased power per MWh (bb)
|
$23.06
|
$22.44
|
$25.33
|
$22.11
|
$23.60
|
$23.63
|
$25.49
|
$28.77
|
$23.18
|
$25.94
|
||
GWh billed
|
10,489
|
10,074
|
8,980
|
10,876
|
11,052
|
10,255
|
9,868
|
9,888
|
29,929
|
30,011
|
||
Capacity factor (%)
|
94
|
92
|
81
|
100
|
99
|
94
|
90
|
91
|
91
|
92
|
||
|
(bb) 2009 and 2010 excludes the effect of the non-utility nuclear spin-off expenses special item at Entergy Nuclear.
|
D.
|
D.
|
Definitions
|
Appendix D: Definitions of Operational Performance Measures and GAAP and Non-GAAP Financial Measures
|
|
Utility
|
|
GWh billed
|
Total number of GWh billed to all retail and wholesale customers
|
Operation & maintenance expense
|
Operation, maintenance and refueling expenses per MWh of billed sales, excluding fuel
|
SAIFI
|
System average interruption frequency index; average number per customer per year, excluding the impact of major storm activity
|
SAIDI
|
System average interruption duration index; average minutes per customer per year, excluding the impact of major storm activity
|
Number of customers
|
Number of customers at end of period
|
Competitive Businesses
|
|
Planned TWh of generation
|
Amount of output expected to be generated by Entergy Nuclear for nuclear units considering plant operating characteristics, outage schedules, and expected market conditions which impact dispatch, assuming timely renewal of plant operating licenses
|
Percent of planned generation sold
forward
|
Percent of planned generation output sold or purchased forward under contracts, forward physical contracts, forward financial contracts or options (consistent with assumptions used in earnings guidance) that may or may not require regulatory approval
|
Unit-contingent
|
Transaction under which power is supplied from a specific generation asset; if the asset is not operating, seller is generally not liable to buyer for any damages
|
Unit-contingent with availability
guarantees
|
Transaction under which power is supplied from a specific generation asset; if the asset is not operating, seller is generally not liable to buyer for any damages, unless the actual availability over a specified period of time is below an availability threshold specified in the contract
|
Firm LD
|
Transaction that requires receipt or delivery of energy at a specified delivery point (usually at a market hub not associated with a specific asset) or settles financially on notional quantities; if a party fails to deliver or receive energy, defaulting party must compensate the other party as specified in the contract
|
Offsetting positions
|
Transactions for the purchase of energy, generally to offset a Firm LD transaction which was used as a placeholder until a unit contingent transaction could be originated and executed
|
Planned net MW in operation
|
Amount of capacity to be available to generate power considering uprates planned to be completed within the calendar year
|
Bundled energy & capacity contract
|
A contract for the sale of installed capacity and related energy, priced per megawatt-hour sold
|
Capacity contract
|
A contract for the sale of the installed capacity product in regional markets managed by ISO New England and the New York Independent System Operator
|
Average contract price per MWh or per kW per month
|
Price at which generation output and / or capacity is expected to be sold to third parties (including offsetting positions), given existing contract or option exercise prices based on expected dispatch or capacity, excluding the revenue associated with the amortization of the below-market Power Purchase Agreement for Palisades
|
Average contract revenue per MWh
|
Price at which the combination of generation output and capacity are expected to be sold to third parties (including offsetting positions), given existing contract or option exercise prices based on expected dispatch, excluding the revenue associated with the amortization of the below-market PPA for Palisades
|
Entergy Nuclear
|
|
Net MW in operation
|
Installed capacity owned and operated by Entergy Nuclear
|
Average realized price per MWh
|
As-reported revenue per MWh billed for all non-utility nuclear operations, excluding revenue from the amortization of the Palisades below-market PPA
|
Production cost per MWh
|
Fuel and non-fuel operation and maintenance expenses according to accounting standards that directly relate to the production of electricity per MWh
|
Non-fuel O&M expense/purchased power per MWh
|
Operation, maintenance and refueling expenses and purchased power per MWh billed, excluding fuel
|
GWh billed
|
Total number of GWh billed to all customers
|
Capacity factor
|
Normalized percentage of the period that the plants generate power
|
Refueling outage duration
|
Number of days lost for scheduled refueling outage during the period
|
Appendix D: Definitions of Operational Performance Measures and GAAP and Non-GAAP Financial Measures (continued)
|
|
Financial Measures – GAAP
|
|
Return on average invested capital – as-reported
|
12-months rolling net income attributable to Entergy Corporation (Net Income) adjusted to include preferred dividends and tax-effected interest expense divided by average invested capital
|
Return on average common equity – as-reported
|
12-months rolling Net Income divided by average common equity
|
Net margin – as-reported
|
12-months rolling Net Income divided by 12 months rolling revenue
|
Cash flow interest coverage
|
12-months cash flow from operating activities plus 12-months rolling interest paid, divided by interest expense
|
Book value per share
|
Common equity divided by end of period shares outstanding
|
Revolver capacity
|
Amount of undrawn capacity remaining on corporate and subsidiary revolvers
|
Total debt
|
Sum of short-term and long-term debt, notes payable, capital leases, and preferred stock with sinking fund on the balance sheet less non-recourse debt, if any
|
Debt of joint ventures (Entergy’s share)
|
Debt issued by business joint ventures at non-nuclear wholesale assets
|
Leases (Entergy’s share)
|
Operating leases held by subsidiaries capitalized at implicit interest rate
|
Debt to capital
|
Gross debt divided by total capitalization
|
Securitization debt
|
Debt associated with securitization bonds issued to recover storm costs from hurricanes Rita, Ike and Gustav at Entergy Texas and the 2009 ice storm at Entergy Arkansas
|
Financial Measures – Non-GAAP
|
|
Operational earnings
|
As-reported Net Income adjusted to exclude the impact of special items
|
Return on average invested capital – operational
|
12-months rolling operational Net Income adjusted to include preferred dividends and tax-effected interest expense divided by average invested capital
|
Return on average common equity – operational
|
12-months rolling operational Net Income divided by average common equity
|
Net margin – operational
|
12-months rolling operational Net Income divided by 12 months rolling revenue
|
Total gross liquidity
|
Sum of cash and revolver capacity
|
Debt to capital, excluding securitization debt
|
Gross debt divided by total capitalization, excluding securitization debt
|
Net debt to net capital, excluding securitization debt
|
Gross debt less cash and cash equivalents divided by total capitalization less cash and cash equivalents, excluding securitization debt
|
Net debt including off-balance sheet liabilities, excluding securitization debt
|
Sum of gross debt and off-balance sheet debt less cash and cash equivalents divided by sum of total capitalization and off-balance sheet debt less cash and cash equivalent, excluding securitization debt
|
E.
|
GAAP to Non-GAAP Reconciliations
|
Appendix E-1: Reconciliation of GAAP to Non-GAAP Financial Measures – Return on Equity, Return on Invested Capital and Net Margin Metrics
|
||||||||
($ in millions)
|
||||||||
4Q08
|
1Q09
|
2Q09
|
3Q09
|
4Q09
|
1Q10
|
2Q10
|
3Q10
|
|
As-reported Net Income-rolling 12 months (A)
|
1,221
|
1,147
|
1,103
|
1,088
|
1,231
|
1,210
|
1,298
|
1,336
|
Preferred dividends
|
20
|
20
|
20
|
20
|
20
|
20
|
20
|
20
|
Tax effected interest expense
|
374
|
366
|
368
|
361
|
351
|
372
|
368
|
358
|
As-reported Net Income, rolling 12 months including preferred dividends and tax effected interest expense (B)
|
1,615
|
1,533
|
1,491
|
1,469
|
1,602
|
1,602
|
1,686
|
1,714
|
Special items in prior quarters
|
(35)
|
(55)
|
(54)
|
(54)
|
(49)
|
(53)
|
(76)
|
(71)
|
Special items in current quarter
|
||||||||
Nuclear spin-off expenses
|
(20)
|
(17)
|
(17)
|
(15)
|
(21)
|
(40)
|
(10)
|
(25)
|
Total special items (C)
|
(55)
|
(72)
|
(71)
|
(69)
|
(71)
|
(94)
|
(87)
|
(96)
|
Operational earnings, rolling 12 months including preferred dividends and tax effected interest expense (B-C)
|
1,670
|
1,605
|
1,562
|
1,538
|
1,673
|
1,696
|
1,773
|
1,810
|
Operational earnings, rolling 12 months (A-C)
|
1,276
|
1,219
|
1,174
|
1,157
|
1,302
|
1,304
|
1,385
|
1,432
|
Average invested capital (D)
|
19,927
|
20,126
|
19,995
|
20,629
|
20,748
|
21,149
|
20,761
|
20,802
|
Average common equity (E)
|
7,915
|
8,152
|
8,045
|
8,230
|
8,290
|
8,745
|
8,769
|
8,608
|
Operating revenues (F)
|
13,094
|
13,018
|
12,275
|
11,248
|
10,746
|
10,716
|
11,058
|
11,453
|
ROIC – as-reported % (B/D)
|
8.1
|
7.6
|
7.5
|
7.1
|
7.7
|
7.6
|
8.1
|
8.2
|
ROIC – operational % ((B-C)/D)
|
8.4
|
8.0
|
7.8
|
7.5
|
8.1
|
8.0
|
8.5
|
8.7
|
ROE – as-reported % (A/E)
|
15.4
|
14.1
|
13.7
|
13.2
|
14.9
|
13.8
|
14.8
|
15.5
|
ROE – operational % ((A-C)/E)
|
16.1
|
15.0
|
14.6
|
14.1
|
15.7
|
14.9
|
15.8
|
16.6
|
Net margin – as-reported % (A/F)
|
9.3
|
8.8
|
9.0
|
9.7
|
11.5
|
11.3
|
11.7
|
11.7
|
Net margin – operational % ((A-C)/F)
|
9.7
|
9.4
|
9.6
|
10.3
|
12.1
|
12.2
|
12.5
|
12.5
|
Appendix E-2: Reconciliation of GAAP to Non-GAAP Financial Measures – Credit and Liquidity Metrics
|
||||||||
($ in millions)
|
||||||||
4Q08
|
1Q09
|
2Q09
|
3Q09
|
4Q09
|
1Q10
|
2Q10
|
3Q10
|
|
Gross debt (A)
|
12,279
|
12,034
|
11,510
|
11,522
|
12,014
|
12,152
|
11,853
|
12,247
|
Less securitization debt (B)
|
310
|
310
|
301
|
301
|
838
|
838
|
829
|
940
|
Gross debt, excluding securitization debt (C)
|
11,969
|
11,724
|
11,209
|
11,221
|
11,176
|
11,314
|
11,024
|
11,307
|
Less cash and cash equivalents (D)
|
1,920
|
1,803
|
1,281
|
1,131
|
1,710
|
1,657
|
1,336
|
1,931
|
Net debt, excluding securitization debt (E)
|
10,049
|
9,921
|
9,928
|
10,090
|
9,466
|
9,657
|
9,688
|
9,376
|
Total capitalization (F)
|
20,557
|
20,975
|
20,588
|
20,315
|
20,939
|
21,322
|
20,935
|
21,290
|
Less securitization debt (B)
|
310
|
310
|
301
|
301
|
838
|
838
|
829
|
940
|
Total capitalization, excluding securitization debt (G)
|
20,247
|
20,665
|
20,287
|
20,014
|
20,101
|
20,484
|
20,106
|
20,350
|
Less cash and cash equivalents (D)
|
1,920
|
1,803
|
1,281
|
1,131
|
1,710
|
1,657
|
1,336
|
1,931
|
Net capital, excluding securitization debt (H)
|
18,327
|
18,862
|
19,006
|
18,883
|
18,391
|
18,827
|
18,770
|
18,419
|
Debt to capital ratio % (A/F)
|
59.7
|
57.4
|
55.9
|
56.7
|
57.4
|
57.0
|
56.6
|
57.5
|
Debt to capital ratio, excluding securitization debt % (C/G)
|
59.1
|
56.7
|
55.3
|
56.1
|
55.6
|
55.2
|
54.8
|
55.6
|
Net debt to net capital ratio, excluding securitization debt % (E/H)
|
54.8
|
52.6
|
52.2
|
53.4
|
51.5
|
51.3
|
51.6
|
50.9
|
Off-balance sheet liabilities (I)
|
574
|
573
|
569
|
567
|
646
|
644
|
641
|
638
|
Net debt to net capital ratio including off-balance sheet liabilities, excluding securitization debt % ((E+I)/(H+I))
|
56.2
|
54.0
|
53.6
|
54.8
|
53.1
|
52.9
|
53.2
|
52.5
|
Revolver capacity (J)
|
645
|
725
|
1,585
|
1,647
|
1,464
|
1,417
|
1,338
|
2,216
|
Gross liquidity (D+J)
|
2,565
|
2,528
|
2,866
|
2,778
|
3,174
|
3,074
|
2,674
|
4,147
|
VII.
|
Financial Statements
|
Entergy Corporation
|
||||||||||||||||
Consolidating Balance Sheet
|
||||||||||||||||
September 30, 2010
|
||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||||||||||
U.S. Utilities
|
Entergy Nuclear
|
Parent & Other
|
Consolidated
|
|||||||||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||||||||||
CURRENT ASSETS
|
||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents:
|
||||||||||||||||
Cash
|
$ | 77,956 | $ | 1,319 | $ | 8,342 | $ | 87,617 | ||||||||
Temporary cash investments
|
977,462 | 320,752 | 545,088 | 1,843,302 | ||||||||||||
Total cash and cash equivalents
|
1,055,418 | 322,071 | 553,430 | 1,930,919 | ||||||||||||
Securitization recovery trust account
|
36,280 | - | - | 36,280 | ||||||||||||
Notes receivable
|
- | 367,662 | (367,662 | ) | - | |||||||||||
Accounts receivable:
|
||||||||||||||||
Customer
|
590,248 | 149,964 | - | 740,212 | ||||||||||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
(32,793 | ) | - | (202 | ) | (32,995 | ) | |||||||||
Associated companies
|
19,932 | 17,293 | (37,225 | ) | - | |||||||||||
Other
|
142,474 | - | 17,201 | 159,675 | ||||||||||||
Accrued unbilled revenues
|
349,950 | - | 363 | 350,313 | ||||||||||||
Total accounts receivable
|
1,069,811 | 167,257 | (19,863 | ) | 1,217,205 | |||||||||||
Deferred fuel costs
|
66,071 | - | - | 66,071 | ||||||||||||
Accumulated deferred income taxes
|
2,563 | 340 | 1,605 | 4,508 | ||||||||||||
Fuel inventory - at average cost
|
191,320 | - | 2,206 | 193,526 | ||||||||||||
Materials and supplies - at average cost
|
538,831 | 311,268 | 2,093 | 852,192 | ||||||||||||
Deferred nuclear refueling outage costs
|
85,483 | 135,013 | - | 220,496 | ||||||||||||
System agreement cost equalization
|
25,976 | - | - | 25,976 | ||||||||||||
Prepayments and other
|
80,726 | 275,225 | 149,168 | 505,119 | ||||||||||||
TOTAL
|
3,152,479 | 1,578,836 | 320,977 | 5,052,292 | ||||||||||||
OTHER PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS
|
||||||||||||||||
Investment in affiliates - at equity
|
1,147,272 | 1,330,589 | (2,439,803 | ) | 38,058 | |||||||||||
Decommissioning trust funds
|
1,431,356 | 1,990,270 | - | 3,421,626 | ||||||||||||
Non-utility property - at cost (less accumulated depreciation)
|
160,594 | 5,554 | 87,142 | 253,290 | ||||||||||||
Other
|
362,974 | 6,138 | 35,172 | 404,284 | ||||||||||||
TOTAL
|
3,102,196 | 3,332,551 | (2,317,489 | ) | 4,117,258 | |||||||||||
PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT
|
||||||||||||||||
Electric
|
32,771,834 | 3,759,384 | 362,406 | 36,893,624 | ||||||||||||
Property under capital lease
|
793,241 | - | - | 793,241 | ||||||||||||
Natural gas
|
320,654 | - | 440 | 321,094 | ||||||||||||
Construction work in progress
|
1,165,006 | 473,872 | 4,702 | 1,643,580 | ||||||||||||
Nuclear fuel under capital lease
|
- | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
Nuclear fuel
|
681,200 | 586,351 | - | 1,267,551 | ||||||||||||
TOTAL PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
|
35,731,935 | 4,819,607 | 367,548 | 40,919,090 | ||||||||||||
Less - accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
16,543,079 | 655,181 | 150,374 | 17,348,634 | ||||||||||||
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT - NET
|
19,188,856 | 4,164,426 | 217,174 | 23,570,456 | ||||||||||||
DEFERRED DEBITS AND OTHER ASSETS
|
||||||||||||||||
Regulatory assets:
|
||||||||||||||||
Regulatory asset for income taxes - net
|
592,355 | - | - | 592,355 | ||||||||||||
Other regulatory assets
|
3,688,785 | - | - | 3,688,785 | ||||||||||||
Deferred fuel costs
|
172,202 | - | - | 172,202 | ||||||||||||
Goodwill
|
374,099 | 3,073 | - | 377,172 | ||||||||||||
Accumulated deferred income taxes
|
16,338 | - | 58,365 | 74,703 | ||||||||||||
Other
|
215,007 | 823,987 | (4,179 | ) | 1,034,815 | |||||||||||
TOTAL
|
5,058,786 | 827,060 | 54,186 | 5,940,032 | ||||||||||||
- | ||||||||||||||||
TOTAL ASSETS
|
$ | 30,502,317 | $ | 9,902,873 | $ | (1,725,152 | ) | $ | 38,680,038 | |||||||
*Totals may not foot due to rounding.
|
Entergy Corporation
|
||||||||||||||||
Consolidating Balance Sheet
|
||||||||||||||||
September 30, 2010
|
||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||||||||||
U.S. Utilities
|
Entergy Nuclear
|
Parent & Other
|
Consolidated
|
|||||||||||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
||||||||||||||||
CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
||||||||||||||||
Currently maturing long-term debt
|
$ | 334,291 | $ | 28,492 | $ | 226,000 | $ | 588,783 | ||||||||
Notes payable:
|
||||||||||||||||
Associated companies
|
- | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
Other
|
167,915 | - | - | 167,915 | ||||||||||||
Account payable:
|
||||||||||||||||
Associated companies
|
37,400 | 6,105 | (43,505 | ) | - | |||||||||||
Other
|
715,661 | 271,227 | 22,306 | 1,009,194 | ||||||||||||
Customer deposits
|
330,293 | - | - | 330,293 | ||||||||||||
Taxes accrued
|
128,851 | 303,874 | (432,725 | ) | - | |||||||||||
Accumulated deferred income taxes
|
59,402 | 23,577 | 3,583 | 86,562 | ||||||||||||
Interest accrued
|
176,365 | 4,371 | 8,316 | 189,052 | ||||||||||||
Deferred fuel costs
|
93,257 | - | - | 93,257 | ||||||||||||
Obligations under capital leases
|
3,352 | - | - | 3,352 | ||||||||||||
Pension and other postretirement liabilities
|
36,374 | 5,591 | - | 41,965 | ||||||||||||
System agreement cost equalization
|
25,931 | - | - | 25,931 | ||||||||||||
Other
|
105,326 | 274,545 | 2,840 | 382,711 | ||||||||||||
TOTAL
|
2,214,418 | 917,782 | (213,185 | ) | 2,919,015 | |||||||||||
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
||||||||||||||||
Accumulated deferred income taxes and taxes accrued
|
7,005,512 | 1,920,897 | (780,373 | ) | 8,146,036 | |||||||||||
Accumulated deferred investment tax credits
|
296,100 | - | - | 296,100 | ||||||||||||
Obligations under capital leases
|
42,873 | - | - | 42,873 | ||||||||||||
Other regulatory liabilities
|
555,240 | - | - | 555,240 | ||||||||||||
Decommissioning and retirement cost liabilities
|
1,700,383 | 1,393,140 | 1,310 | 3,094,833 | ||||||||||||
Accumulated provisions
|
381,535 | 2,403 | 4,594 | 388,532 | ||||||||||||
Pension and other postretirement liabilities
|
1,648,846 | 462,839 | - | 2,111,685 | ||||||||||||
Long-term debt
|
8,522,303 | 147,697 | 2,774,513 | 11,444,513 | ||||||||||||
Other
|
724,522 | 275,929 | (361,728 | ) | 638,723 | |||||||||||
TOTAL
|
20,877,314 | 4,202,905 | 1,638,316 | 26,718,535 | ||||||||||||
Subsidiaries' preferred stock without sinking fund
|
186,510 | - | 30,226 | 216,736 | ||||||||||||
EQUITY
|
||||||||||||||||
Common Shareholders' Equity:
|
||||||||||||||||
Common stock, $.01 par value, authorized 500,000,000 shares;
|
||||||||||||||||
issued 254,752,788 shares in 2010
|
2,161,268 | 774,274 | (2,932,994 | ) | 2,548 | |||||||||||
Paid-in capital
|
2,416,633 | 541,945 | 2,408,513 | 5,367,091 | ||||||||||||
Retained earnings
|
2,796,816 | 3,262,167 | 2,552,098 | 8,611,081 | ||||||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
(124,642 | ) | 203,800 | (6,592 | ) | 72,566 | ||||||||||
Less - treasury stock, at cost (73,229,902 shares in 2010)
|
120,000 | - | 5,201,534 | 5,321,534 | ||||||||||||
Total common shareholders' equity
|
7,130,075 | 4,782,186 | (3,180,509 | ) | 8,731,752 | |||||||||||
Subsidiaries' preferred stock without sinking fund
|
94,000 | - | - | 94,000 | ||||||||||||
TOTAL
|
7,224,075 | 4,782,186 | (3,180,509 | ) | 8,825,752 | |||||||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
|
$ | 30,502,317 | $ | 9,902,873 | $ | (1,725,152 | ) | $ | 38,680,038 | |||||||
*Totals may not foot due to rounding.
|
||||||||||||||||
Entergy Corporation
|
||||||||||||||||
Consolidating Balance Sheet
|
||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||||||||||
U.S. Utilities
|
Entergy Nuclear
|
Parent & Other
|
Consolidated
|
|||||||||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||||||||||
CURRENT ASSETS
|
||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents:
|
||||||||||||||||
Cash
|
$ | 81,255 | $ | 1,187 | $ | 3,419 | $ | 85,861 | ||||||||
Temporary cash investments
|
1,158,014 | 392,088 | 73,588 | 1,623,690 | ||||||||||||
Total cash and cash equivalents
|
1,239,269 | 393,275 | 77,007 | 1,709,551 | ||||||||||||
Securitization recovery trust account
|
13,098 | - | - | 13,098 | ||||||||||||
Notes receivable
|
- | 1,132,023 | (1,132,023 | ) | - | |||||||||||
Accounts receivable:
|
||||||||||||||||
Customer
|
331,936 | 221,756 | - | 553,692 | ||||||||||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
(27,428 | ) | - | (203 | ) | (27,631 | ) | |||||||||
Associated companies
|
27,783 | 28,940 | (56,723 | ) | - | |||||||||||
Other
|
135,307 | - | 16,996 | 152,303 | ||||||||||||
Accrued unbilled revenues
|
302,293 | - | 170 | 302,463 | ||||||||||||
Total accounts receivable
|
769,891 | 250,696 | (39,760 | ) | 980,827 | |||||||||||
Deferred fuel costs
|
126,798 | - | - | 126,798 | ||||||||||||
Accumulated deferred income taxes
|
- | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
Fuel inventory - at average cost
|
194,826 | 529 | 1,500 | 196,855 | ||||||||||||
Materials and supplies - at average cost
|
526,543 | 297,132 | 2,027 | 825,702 | ||||||||||||
Deferred nuclear refueling outage costs
|
106,428 | 118,862 | - | 225,290 | ||||||||||||
System agreement cost equalization
|
70,000 | - | - | 70,000 | ||||||||||||
Prepayments and other
|
68,406 | 432,968 | (115,334 | ) | 386,040 | |||||||||||
TOTAL
|
3,115,259 | 2,625,485 | (1,206,583 | ) | 4,534,161 | |||||||||||
OTHER PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS
|
||||||||||||||||
Investment in affiliates - at equity
|
734,578 | 1,330,589 | (2,025,587 | ) | 39,580 | |||||||||||
Decommissioning trust funds
|
1,325,863 | 1,885,320 | - | 3,211,183 | ||||||||||||
Non-utility property - at cost (less accumulated depreciation)
|
156,333 | 6,038 | 85,293 | 247,664 | ||||||||||||
Other
|
77,418 | 7,730 | 35,125 | 120,273 | ||||||||||||
TOTAL
|
2,294,192 | 3,229,677 | (1,905,169 | ) | 3,618,700 | |||||||||||
PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT
|
||||||||||||||||
Electric
|
32,426,732 | 3,540,860 | 376,180 | 36,343,772 | ||||||||||||
Property under capital lease
|
783,096 | - | - | 783,096 | ||||||||||||
Natural gas
|
313,817 | - | 439 | 314,256 | ||||||||||||
Construction work in progress
|
1,134,194 | 411,523 | 1,602 | 1,547,319 | ||||||||||||
Nuclear fuel under capital lease
|
527,521 | - | - | 527,521 | ||||||||||||
Nuclear fuel
|
219,317 | 520,510 | - | 739,827 | ||||||||||||
TOTAL PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
|
35,404,677 | 4,472,893 | 378,221 | 40,255,791 | ||||||||||||
Less - accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
16,150,763 | 561,698 | 153,928 | 16,866,389 | ||||||||||||
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT - NET
|
19,253,914 | 3,911,195 | 224,293 | 23,389,402 | ||||||||||||
DEFERRED DEBITS AND OTHER ASSETS
|
||||||||||||||||
Regulatory assets:
|
||||||||||||||||
Regulatory asset for income taxes - net
|
619,500 | - | - | 619,500 | ||||||||||||
Other regulatory assets
|
3,647,154 | - | - | 3,647,154 | ||||||||||||
Deferred fuel costs
|
172,202 | - | - | 172,202 | ||||||||||||
Goodwill
|
374,099 | 3,073 | - | 377,172 | ||||||||||||
Accumulated deferred income taxes
|
- | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
Other
|
231,156 | 821,382 | (46,232 | ) | 1,006,306 | |||||||||||
TOTAL
|
5,044,111 | 824,455 | (46,232 | ) | 5,822,334 | |||||||||||
- | ||||||||||||||||
TOTAL ASSETS
|
$ | 29,707,476 | $ | 10,590,812 | $ | (2,933,691 | ) | $ | 37,364,597 | |||||||
*Totals may not foot due to rounding.
|
Entergy Corporation
|
||||||||||||||||
Consolidating Balance Sheet
|
||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||||||||||
U.S. Utilities
|
Entergy Nuclear
|
Parent & Other
|
Consolidated
|
|||||||||||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
||||||||||||||||
CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
||||||||||||||||
Currently maturing long-term debt
|
$ | 406,016 | $ | 30,941 | $ | 275,000 | $ | 711,957 | ||||||||
Notes payable:
|
||||||||||||||||
Associated companies
|
207,161 | - | (207,161 | ) | - | |||||||||||
Other
|
30,031 | - | - | 30,031 | ||||||||||||
Account payable:
|
||||||||||||||||
Associated companies
|
6,920 | 7,543 | (14,463 | ) | - | |||||||||||
Other
|
758,886 | 231,119 | 8,223 | 998,228 | ||||||||||||
Customer deposits
|
323,092 | 250 | - | 323,342 | ||||||||||||
Taxes accrued
|
12,742 | - | (12,742 | ) | - | |||||||||||
Accumulated deferred income taxes
|
41,125 | - | 7,459 | 48,584 | ||||||||||||
Interest accrued
|
187,154 | 908 | 4,221 | 192,283 | ||||||||||||
Deferred fuel costs
|
219,639 | - | - | 219,639 | ||||||||||||
Obligations under capital leases
|
212,496 | - | - | 212,496 | ||||||||||||
Pension and other postretirement liabilities
|
49,912 | 5,119 | - | 55,031 | ||||||||||||
System agreement cost equalization
|
187,204 | - | - | 187,204 | ||||||||||||
Other
|
48,643 | 163,328 | 3,231 | 215,202 | ||||||||||||
TOTAL
|
2,691,021 | 439,208 | 63,768 | 3,193,997 | ||||||||||||
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
||||||||||||||||
Accumulated deferred income taxes and taxes accrued
|
6,506,974 | 3,052,967 | (2,137,622 | ) | 7,422,319 | |||||||||||
Accumulated deferred investment tax credits
|
308,395 | - | - | 308,395 | ||||||||||||
Obligations under capital leases
|
354,233 | - | - | 354,233 | ||||||||||||
Other regulatory liabilities
|
421,985 | - | - | 421,985 | ||||||||||||
Decommissioning and retirement cost liabilities
|
1,618,844 | 1,319,450 | 1,245 | 2,939,539 | ||||||||||||
Accumulated provisions
|
127,634 | 9,090 | 4,591 | 141,315 | ||||||||||||
Pension and other postretirement liabilities
|
1,771,351 | 469,688 | - | 2,241,039 | ||||||||||||
Long-term debt
|
7,897,032 | 156,556 | 2,652,150 | 10,705,738 | ||||||||||||
Other
|
750,024 | 317,661 | (356,351 | ) | 711,334 | |||||||||||
TOTAL
|
19,756,472 | 5,325,412 | 164,013 | 25,245,897 | ||||||||||||
Subsidiaries' preferred stock without sinking fund
|
186,510 | - | 30,833 | 217,343 | ||||||||||||
EQUITY
|
||||||||||||||||
Common Shareholders' Equity:
|
||||||||||||||||
Common stock, $.01 par value, authorized 500,000,000 shares;
|
||||||||||||||||
issued 254,752,788 shares in 2009
|
2,161,268 | 774,274 | (2,932,994 | ) | 2,548 | |||||||||||
Paid-in capital
|
2,416,633 | 1,027,164 | 1,926,245 | 5,370,042 | ||||||||||||
Retained earnings
|
2,651,629 | 2,965,052 | 2,426,441 | 8,043,122 | ||||||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
(130,057 | ) | 59,702 | (4,830 | ) | (75,185 | ) | |||||||||
Less - treasury stock, at cost (65,634,580 shares in 2009)
|
120,000 | - | 4,607,167 | 4,727,167 | ||||||||||||
Total common shareholders' equity
|
6,979,473 | 4,826,192 | (3,192,305 | ) | 8,613,360 | |||||||||||
Subsidiaries' preferred stock without sinking fund
|
94,000 | - | - | 94,000 | ||||||||||||
TOTAL
|
7,073,473 | 4,826,192 | (3,192,305 | ) | 8,707,360 | |||||||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
|
$ | 29,707,476 | $ | 10,590,812 | $ | (2,933,691 | ) | $ | 37,364,597 | |||||||
*Totals may not foot due to rounding.
|
||||||||||||||||
Entergy Corporation
|
||||||||||||||||
Consolidating Balance Sheet
|
||||||||||||||||
September 30, 2010 vs December 31, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||||||||||
U.S. Utilities
|
Entergy Nuclear
|
Parent & Other
|
Consolidated
|
|||||||||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||||||||||
CURRENT ASSETS
|
||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents:
|
||||||||||||||||
Cash
|
$ | (3,299 | ) | $ | 132 | $ | 4,923 | $ | 1,756 | |||||||
Temporary cash investments
|
(180,552 | ) | (71,336 | ) | 471,500 | 219,612 | ||||||||||
Total cash and cash equivalents
|
(183,851 | ) | (71,204 | ) | 476,423 | 221,368 | ||||||||||
Securitization recovery trust account
|
23,182 | - | - | 23,182 | ||||||||||||
Notes receivable
|
- | (764,361 | ) | 764,361 | - | |||||||||||
Accounts receivable:
|
||||||||||||||||
Customer
|
258,312 | (71,792 | ) | - | 186,520 | |||||||||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
(5,365 | ) | - | 1 | (5,364 | ) | ||||||||||
Associated companies
|
(7,851 | ) | (11,647 | ) | 19,498 | - | ||||||||||
Other
|
7,167 | - | 205 | 7,372 | ||||||||||||
Accrued unbilled revenues
|
47,657 | - | 193 | 47,850 | ||||||||||||
Total accounts receivable
|
299,920 | (83,439 | ) | 19,897 | 236,378 | |||||||||||
Deferred fuel costs
|
(60,727 | ) | - | - | (60,727 | ) | ||||||||||
Accumulated deferred income taxes
|
2,563 | 340 | 1,605 | 4,508 | ||||||||||||
Fuel inventory - at average cost
|
(3,506 | ) | (529 | ) | 706 | (3,329 | ) | |||||||||
Materials and supplies - at average cost
|
12,288 | 14,136 | 66 | 26,490 | ||||||||||||
Deferred nuclear refueling outage costs
|
(20,945 | ) | 16,151 | - | (4,794 | ) | ||||||||||
System agreement cost equalization
|
(44,024 | ) | - | - | (44,024 | ) | ||||||||||
Prepayments and other
|
12,320 | (157,743 | ) | 264,502 | 119,079 | |||||||||||
TOTAL
|
37,220 | (1,046,649 | ) | 1,527,560 | 518,131 | |||||||||||
OTHER PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS
|
||||||||||||||||
Investment in affiliates - at equity
|
412,694 | - | (414,216 | ) | (1,522 | ) | ||||||||||
Decommissioning trust funds
|
105,493 | 104,950 | - | 210,443 | ||||||||||||
Non-utility property - at cost (less accumulated depreciation)
|
4,261 | (484 | ) | 1,849 | 5,626 | |||||||||||
Other
|
285,556 | (1,592 | ) | 47 | 284,011 | |||||||||||
TOTAL
|
808,004 | 102,874 | (412,320 | ) | 498,558 | |||||||||||
PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT
|
||||||||||||||||
Electric
|
345,102 | 218,524 | (13,774 | ) | 549,852 | |||||||||||
Property under capital lease
|
10,145 | - | - | 10,145 | ||||||||||||
Natural gas
|
6,837 | - | 1 | 6,838 | ||||||||||||
Construction work in progress
|
30,812 | 62,349 | 3,100 | 96,261 | ||||||||||||
Nuclear fuel under capital lease
|
(527,521 | ) | - | - | (527,521 | ) | ||||||||||
Nuclear fuel
|
461,883 | 65,841 | - | 527,724 | ||||||||||||
TOTAL PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
|
327,258 | 346,714 | (10,673 | ) | 663,299 | |||||||||||
Less - accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
392,316 | 93,483 | (3,554 | ) | 482,245 | |||||||||||
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT - NET
|
(65,058 | ) | 253,231 | (7,119 | ) | 181,054 | ||||||||||
DEFERRED DEBITS AND OTHER ASSETS
|
||||||||||||||||
Regulatory assets:
|
||||||||||||||||
Regulatory asset for income taxes - net
|
(27,145 | ) | - | - | (27,145 | ) | ||||||||||
Other regulatory assets
|
41,631 | - | - | 41,631 | ||||||||||||
Deferred fuel costs
|
- | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
Goodwill
|
- | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
Accumulated deferred income taxes
|
16,338 | - | 58,365 | 74,703 | ||||||||||||
Other
|
(16,149 | ) | 2,605 | 42,053 | 28,509 | |||||||||||
TOTAL
|
14,675 | 2,605 | 100,418 | 117,698 | ||||||||||||
TOTAL ASSETS
|
$ | 794,841 | $ | (687,939 | ) | $ | 1,208,539 | $ | 1,315,441 | |||||||
*Totals may not foot due to rounding.
|
Entergy Corporation
|
||||||||||||||||
Consolidating Balance Sheet
|
||||||||||||||||
September 30, 2010 vs December 31, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||||||||||
U.S. Utilities
|
Entergy Nuclear
|
Parent & Other
|
Consolidated
|
|||||||||||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
||||||||||||||||
CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
||||||||||||||||
Currently maturing long-term debt
|
$ | (71,725 | ) | $ | (2,449 | ) | $ | (49,000 | ) | $ | (123,174 | ) | ||||
Notes payable:
|
||||||||||||||||
Associated companies
|
(207,161 | ) | - | 207,161 | - | |||||||||||
Other
|
137,884 | - | - | 137,884 | ||||||||||||
Account payable:
|
||||||||||||||||
Associated companies
|
30,480 | (1,438 | ) | (29,042 | ) | - | ||||||||||
Other
|
(43,225 | ) | 40,108 | 14,083 | 10,966 | |||||||||||
Customer deposits
|
7,201 | (250 | ) | - | 6,951 | |||||||||||
Taxes accrued
|
116,109 | 303,874 | (419,983 | ) | - | |||||||||||
Accumulated deferred income taxes
|
18,277 | 23,577 | (3,876 | ) | 37,978 | |||||||||||
Interest accrued
|
(10,789 | ) | 3,463 | 4,095 | (3,231 | ) | ||||||||||
Deferred fuel costs
|
(126,382 | ) | - | - | (126,382 | ) | ||||||||||
Obligations under capital leases
|
(209,144 | ) | - | - | (209,144 | ) | ||||||||||
Pension and other postretirement liabilities
|
(13,538 | ) | 472 | - | (13,066 | ) | ||||||||||
System agreement cost equalization
|
(161,273 | ) | - | - | (161,273 | ) | ||||||||||
Other
|
56,683 | 111,217 | (391 | ) | 167,509 | |||||||||||
TOTAL
|
(476,603 | ) | 478,574 | (276,953 | ) | (274,982 | ) | |||||||||
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
||||||||||||||||
Accumulated deferred income taxes and taxes accrued
|
498,538 | (1,132,070 | ) | 1,357,249 | 723,717 | |||||||||||
Accumulated deferred investment tax credits
|
(12,295 | ) | - | - | (12,295 | ) | ||||||||||
Obligations under capital leases
|
(311,360 | ) | - | - | (311,360 | ) | ||||||||||
Other regulatory liabilities
|
133,255 | - | - | 133,255 | ||||||||||||
Decommissioning and retirement cost liabilities
|
81,539 | 73,690 | 65 | 155,294 | ||||||||||||
Accumulated provisions
|
253,901 | (6,687 | ) | 3 | 247,217 | |||||||||||
Pension and other postretirement liabilities
|
(122,505 | ) | (6,849 | ) | - | (129,354 | ) | |||||||||
Long-term debt
|
625,271 | (8,859 | ) | 122,363 | 738,775 | |||||||||||
Other
|
(25,502 | ) | (41,732 | ) | (5,377 | ) | (72,611 | ) | ||||||||
TOTAL
|
1,120,842 | (1,122,507 | ) | 1,474,303 | 1,472,638 | |||||||||||
Subsidiaries' preferred stock without sinking fund
|
- | - | (607 | ) | (607 | ) | ||||||||||
EQUITY
|
||||||||||||||||
Common Shareholders' Equity:
|
||||||||||||||||
Common stock, $.01 par value, authorized 500,000,000 shares;
|
||||||||||||||||
issued 254,752,788 shares in 2010 and in 2009
|
- | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
Paid-in capital
|
- | (485,219 | ) | 482,268 | (2,951 | ) | ||||||||||
Retained earnings
|
145,187 | 297,115 | 125,657 | 567,959 | ||||||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
5,415 | 144,098 | (1,762 | ) | 147,751 | |||||||||||
Less - treasury stock, at cost
|
- | - | 594,367 | 594,367 | ||||||||||||
Total common shareholders' equity
|
150,602 | (44,006 | ) | 11,796 | 118,392 | |||||||||||
Subsidiaries' preferred stock without sinking fund
|
- | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
TOTAL
|
150,602 | (44,006 | ) | 11,796 | 118,392 | |||||||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
|
$ | 794,841 | $ | (687,939 | ) | $ | 1,208,539 | $ | 1,315,441 | |||||||
*Totals may not foot due to rounding.
|
||||||||||||||||
Entergy Corporation
|
||||||||||||||||
Consolidating Income Statement
|
||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended September 30, 2010
|
||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||||||||||
U.S. Utilities
|
Entergy Nuclear
|
Parent & Other
|
Consolidated
|
|||||||||||||
OPERATING REVENUES
|
||||||||||||||||
Electric
|
$ | 2,639,464 | $ | - | $ | (711 | ) | $ | 2,638,752 | |||||||
Natural gas
|
27,263 | - | - | 27,263 | ||||||||||||
Competitive businesses
|
- | 618,811 | 47,349 | 666,161 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
2,666,727 | 618,811 | 46,638 | 3,332,176 | ||||||||||||
OPERATING EXPENSES
|
||||||||||||||||
Operating and Maintenance:
|
||||||||||||||||
Fuel, fuel related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
|
671,904 | 56,114 | 20,846 | 748,863 | ||||||||||||
Purchased power
|
474,238 | 4,457 | 5,999 | 484,694 | ||||||||||||
Nuclear refueling outage expenses
|
26,819 | 38,066 | - | 64,885 | ||||||||||||
Other operation and maintenance
|
515,613 | 281,984 | 11,090 | 808,688 | ||||||||||||
Decommissioning
|
26,277 | 27,081 | 22 | 53,380 | ||||||||||||
Taxes other than income taxes
|
112,902 | 24,468 | 847 | 138,217 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization
|
221,627 | 38,781 | 4,213 | 264,621 | ||||||||||||
Other regulatory charges (credits) - net
|
(1,814 | ) | - | - | (1,814 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
|
2,047,566 | 470,951 | 43,017 | 2,561,534 | ||||||||||||
OPERATING INCOME
|
619,161 | 147,860 | 3,621 | 770,642 | ||||||||||||
OTHER INCOME (DEDUCTIONS)
|
||||||||||||||||
Allowance for equity funds used during construction
|
15,064 | - | - | 15,064 | ||||||||||||
Interest and dividend income
|
46,364 | 38,936 | (46,388 | ) | 38,911 | |||||||||||
Other than temporary impairment losses
|
- | (206 | ) | - | (206 | ) | ||||||||||
Miscellaneous - net
|
(7,017 | ) | (5,991 | ) | (1,741 | ) | (14,748 | ) | ||||||||
Total
|
54,411 | 32,739 | (48,129 | ) | 39,021 | |||||||||||
INTEREST AND OTHER CHARGES
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest on long-term debt
|
122,909 | (2,826 | ) | 5,995 | 126,078 | |||||||||||
Other interest - net
|
5,080 | 5,433 | (516 | ) | 9,997 | |||||||||||
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction
|
(8,949 | ) | - | - | (8,949 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
|
119,040 | 2,607 | 5,479 | 127,126 | ||||||||||||
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES
|
554,532 | 177,992 | (49,987 | ) | 682,537 | |||||||||||
Income taxes
|
216,591 | 44,129 | (76,084 | ) | 184,636 | |||||||||||
CONSOLIDATED NET INCOME
|
337,941 | 133,863 | 26,097 | 497,901 | ||||||||||||
Preferred dividend requirements of subsidiaries
|
4,332 | - | 683 | 5,015 | ||||||||||||
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO ENTERGY CORPORATION
|
$ | 333,609 | $ | 133,863 | $ | 25,414 | $ | 492,886 | ||||||||
EARNINGS PER AVERAGE COMMON SHARE:
|
||||||||||||||||
BASIC
|
$ | 1.79 | $ | 0.72 | $ | 0.14 | $ | 2.65 | ||||||||
DILUTED
|
$ | 1.78 | $ | 0.71 | $ | 0.13 | $ | 2.62 | ||||||||
AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING:
|
||||||||||||||||
BASIC
|
185,962,431 | |||||||||||||||
DILUTED
|
187,777,172 | |||||||||||||||
*Totals may not foot due to rounding.
|
||||||||||||||||
Entergy Corporation
|
||||||||||||||||
Consolidating Income Statement
|
||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended September 30, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||||||||||
U.S. Utilities
|
Entergy Nuclear
|
Parent & Other
|
Consolidated
|
|||||||||||||
OPERATING REVENUES
|
||||||||||||||||
Electric
|
$ | 2,196,255 | $ | - | $ | (794 | ) | $ | 2,195,461 | |||||||
Natural gas
|
24,030 | - | - | 24,030 | ||||||||||||
Competitive businesses
|
- | 684,214 | 33,390 | 717,604 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
2,220,285 | 684,214 | 32,596 | 2,937,095 | ||||||||||||
OPERATING EXPENSES
|
||||||||||||||||
Operating and Maintenance:
|
||||||||||||||||
Fuel, fuel related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
|
484,173 | 58,560 | 16,396 | 559,129 | ||||||||||||
Purchased power
|
373,747 | 4,108 | 10,453 | 388,308 | ||||||||||||
Nuclear refueling outage expenses
|
26,217 | 35,224 | - | 61,441 | ||||||||||||
Other operation and maintenance
|
457,196 | 211,683 | 12,697 | 681,576 | ||||||||||||
Decommissioning
|
24,837 | 25,211 | 21 | 50,069 | ||||||||||||
Taxes other than income taxes
|
103,929 | 22,412 | 2,510 | 128,851 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization
|
240,844 | 36,049 | 3,748 | 280,641 | ||||||||||||
Other regulatory charges (credits) - net
|
(13,224 | ) | - | - | (13,224 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
|
1,697,719 | 393,247 | 45,825 | 2,136,791 | ||||||||||||
OPERATING INCOME
|
522,566 | 290,967 | (13,229 | ) | 800,304 | |||||||||||
OTHER INCOME (DEDUCTIONS)
|
||||||||||||||||
Allowance for equity funds used during construction
|
14,770 | - | - | 14,770 | ||||||||||||
Interest and dividend income
|
50,386 | 43,878 | (29,534 | ) | 64,730 | |||||||||||
Other than temporary impairment losses
|
- | (457 | ) | - | (457 | ) | ||||||||||
Miscellaneous - net
|
11,156 | (4,859 | ) | (558 | ) | 5,739 | ||||||||||
Total
|
76,312 | 38,562 | (30,092 | ) | 84,782 | |||||||||||
INTEREST AND OTHER CHARGES
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest on long-term debt
|
116,997 | 2,281 | 10,854 | 130,132 | ||||||||||||
Other interest - net
|
10,989 | 12,771 | (1,135 | ) | 22,625 | |||||||||||
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction
|
(8,252 | ) | - | - | (8,252 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
|
119,734 | 15,052 | 9,719 | 144,505 | ||||||||||||
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES
|
479,144 | 314,477 | (53,040 | ) | 740,581 | |||||||||||
Income taxes
|
180,055 | 114,045 | (13,686 | ) | 280,414 | |||||||||||
CONSOLIDATED NET INCOME
|
299,089 | 200,432 | (39,354 | ) | 460,167 | |||||||||||
Preferred dividend requirements of subsidiaries
|
4,332 | - | 666 | 4,998 | ||||||||||||
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO ENTERGY CORPORATION
|
$ | 294,757 | $ | 200,432 | $ | (40,020 | ) | $ | 455,169 | |||||||
EARNINGS PER AVERAGE COMMON SHARE:
|
||||||||||||||||
BASIC
|
$ | 1.52 | $ | 1.04 | $ | (0.21 | ) | $ | 2.35 | |||||||
DILUTED
|
$ | 1.50 | $ | 1.02 | $ | (0.20 | ) | $ | 2.32 | |||||||
AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING:
|
||||||||||||||||
BASIC
|
193,424,904 | |||||||||||||||
DILUTED
|
195,875,241 | |||||||||||||||
*Totals may not foot due to rounding.
|
||||||||||||||||
Entergy Corporation
|
||||||||||||||||
Consolidating Income Statement
|
||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended September 30, 2010 vs. 2009
|
||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||||||||||
U.S. Utilities
|
Entergy Nuclear
|
Parent & Other
|
Consolidated
|
|||||||||||||
OPERATING REVENUES
|
||||||||||||||||
Electric
|
$ | 443,209 | $ | - | $ | 83 | $ | 443,291 | ||||||||
Natural gas
|
3,233 | - | - | 3,233 | ||||||||||||
Competitive businesses
|
- | (65,403 | ) | 13,959 | (51,443 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
|
446,442 | (65,403 | ) | 14,042 | 395,081 | |||||||||||
OPERATING EXPENSES
|
||||||||||||||||
Operating and Maintenance:
|
||||||||||||||||
Fuel, fuel related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
|
187,731 | (2,446 | ) | 4,450 | 189,734 | |||||||||||
Purchased power
|
100,491 | 349 | (4,454 | ) | 96,386 | |||||||||||
Nuclear refueling outage expenses
|
602 | 2,842 | - | 3,444 | ||||||||||||
Other operation and maintenance
|
58,417 | 70,301 | (1,607 | ) | 127,112 | |||||||||||
Decommissioning
|
1,440 | 1,870 | 1 | 3,311 | ||||||||||||
Taxes other than income taxes
|
8,973 | 2,056 | (1,663 | ) | 9,366 | |||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization
|
(19,217 | ) | 2,732 | 465 | (16,020 | ) | ||||||||||
Other regulatory charges (credits )- net
|
11,410 | - | - | 11,410 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
349,847 | 77,704 | (2,808 | ) | 424,743 | |||||||||||
OPERATING INCOME
|
96,595 | (143,107 | ) | 16,850 | (29,662 | ) | ||||||||||
OTHER INCOME (DEDUCTIONS)
|
||||||||||||||||
Allowance for equity funds used during construction
|
294 | - | - | 294 | ||||||||||||
Interest and dividend income
|
(4,022 | ) | (4,942 | ) | (16,854 | ) | (25,819 | ) | ||||||||
Other than temporary impairment losses
|
- | 251 | - | 251 | ||||||||||||
Miscellaneous - net
|
(18,173 | ) | (1,132 | ) | (1,183 | ) | (20,487 | ) | ||||||||
Total
|
(21,901 | ) | (5,823 | ) | (18,037 | ) | (45,761 | ) | ||||||||
INTEREST AND OTHER CHARGES
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest on long-term debt
|
5,912 | (5,107 | ) | (4,859 | ) | (4,054 | ) | |||||||||
Other interest - net
|
(5,909 | ) | (7,338 | ) | 619 | (12,628 | ) | |||||||||
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction
|
(697 | ) | - | - | (697 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
|
(694 | ) | (12,445 | ) | (4,240 | ) | (17,379 | ) | ||||||||
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES
|
75,388 | (136,485 | ) | 3,053 | (58,044 | ) | ||||||||||
Income taxes
|
36,536 | (69,916 | ) | (62,398 | ) | (95,778 | ) | |||||||||
CONSOLIDATED NET INCOME
|
38,852 | (66,569 | ) | 65,451 | 37,734 | |||||||||||
Preferred dividend requirements of subsidiaries
|
- | - | 17 | 17 | ||||||||||||
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO ENTERGY CORPORATION
|
$ | 38,852 | $ | (66,569 | ) | $ | 65,434 | $ | 37,717 | |||||||
EARNINGS PER AVERAGE COMMON SHARE:
|
||||||||||||||||
BASIC
|
$ | 0.27 | $ | (0.32 | ) | $ | 0.35 | $ | 0.30 | |||||||
DILUTED
|
$ | 0.28 | $ | (0.31 | ) | $ | 0.33 | $ | 0.30 | |||||||
*Totals may not foot due to rounding.
|
||||||||||||||||
Entergy Corporation
|
||||||||||||||||
Consolidating Income Statement
|
||||||||||||||||
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010
|
||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||||||||||
U.S. Utilities
|
Entergy Nuclear
|
Parent & Other
|
Consolidated
|
|||||||||||||
OPERATING REVENUES
|
||||||||||||||||
Electric
|
$ | 6,862,237 | $ | - | $ | (2,446 | ) | $ | 6,859,791 | |||||||
Natural gas
|
154,426 | - | - | 154,426 | ||||||||||||
Competitive businesses
|
- | 1,813,438 | 126,818 | 1,940,256 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
7,016,663 | 1,813,438 | 124,372 | 8,954,473 | ||||||||||||
OPERATING EXPENSES
|
||||||||||||||||
Operating and Maintenance:
|
||||||||||||||||
Fuel, fuel related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
|
1,706,461 | 165,738 | 66,878 | 1,939,077 | ||||||||||||
Purchased power
|
1,349,379 | 10,057 | 16,619 | 1,376,055 | ||||||||||||
Nuclear refueling outage expenses
|
81,489 | 109,906 | - | 191,395 | ||||||||||||
Other operation and maintenance
|
1,421,740 | 763,402 | 26,240 | 2,211,382 | ||||||||||||
Decommissioning
|
77,542 | 79,816 | 65 | 157,423 | ||||||||||||
Taxes other than income taxes
|
322,956 | 73,204 | 4,437 | 400,597 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization
|
665,503 | 111,811 | 12,078 | 789,392 | ||||||||||||
Other regulatory charges (credits) - net
|
15,555 | - | - | 15,555 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
5,640,625 | 1,313,934 | 126,317 | 7,080,876 | ||||||||||||
OPERATING INCOME
|
1,376,038 | 499,504 | (1,945 | ) | 1,873,597 | |||||||||||
OTHER INCOME (DEDUCTIONS)
|
||||||||||||||||
Allowance for equity funds used during construction
|
45,990 | - | - | 45,990 | ||||||||||||
Interest and dividend income
|
118,901 | 116,618 | (112,395 | ) | 123,124 | |||||||||||
Other than temporary impairment losses
|
- | (1,255 | ) | - | (1,255 | ) | ||||||||||
Miscellaneous - net
|
(12,019 | ) | (13,469 | ) | (6,562 | ) | (32,050 | ) | ||||||||
Total
|
152,872 | 101,894 | (118,957 | ) | 135,809 | |||||||||||
INTEREST AND OTHER CHARGES
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest on long-term debt
|
369,921 | 34,027 | 16,366 | 420,314 | ||||||||||||
Other interest - net
|
27,570 | 17,964 | (2,394 | ) | 43,140 | |||||||||||
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction
|
(27,274 | ) | - | - | (27,274 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
|
370,217 | 51,991 | 13,972 | 436,180 | ||||||||||||
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES
|
1,158,693 | 549,407 | (134,874 | ) | 1,573,226 | |||||||||||
Income taxes
|
447,608 | 201,818 | (113,199 | ) | 536,227 | |||||||||||
CONSOLIDATED NET INCOME
|
711,085 | 347,589 | (21,675 | ) | 1,036,999 | |||||||||||
Preferred dividend requirements of subsidiaries
|
12,999 | - | 2,049 | 15,048 | ||||||||||||
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO ENTERGY CORPORATION
|
$ | 698,086 | $ | 347,589 | $ | (23,724 | ) | $ | 1,021,951 | |||||||
EARNINGS PER AVERAGE COMMON SHARE:
|
||||||||||||||||
BASIC
|
$ | 3.72 | $ | 1.85 | $ | (0.13 | ) | $ | 5.44 | |||||||
DILUTED
|
$ | 3.68 | $ | 1.83 | $ | (0.13 | ) | $ | 5.38 | |||||||
AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING:
|
||||||||||||||||
BASIC
|
187,968,582 | |||||||||||||||
DILUTED
|
189,914,439 | |||||||||||||||
*Totals may not foot due to rounding.
|
||||||||||||||||
Entergy Corporation
|
||||||||||||||||
Consolidating Income Statement
|
||||||||||||||||
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||||||||||
U.S. Utilities
|
Entergy Nuclear
|
Parent & Other
|
Consolidated
|
|||||||||||||
OPERATING REVENUES
|
||||||||||||||||
Electric
|
$ | 6,143,408 | $ | - | $ | (2,585 | ) | $ | 6,140,823 | |||||||
Natural gas
|
126,914 | - | - | 126,914 | ||||||||||||
Competitive businesses
|
- | 1,885,330 | 93,929 | 1,979,259 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
6,270,322 | 1,885,330 | 91,344 | 8,246,996 | ||||||||||||
OPERATING EXPENSES
|
||||||||||||||||
Operating and Maintenance:
|
||||||||||||||||
Fuel, fuel related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
|
1,721,163 | 157,280 | 49,249 | 1,927,692 | ||||||||||||
Purchased power
|
1,002,645 | 11,763 | 20,075 | 1,034,483 | ||||||||||||
Nuclear refueling outage expenses
|
77,363 | 101,091 | - | 178,454 | ||||||||||||
Other operation and maintenance
|
1,361,683 | 615,246 | 44,533 | 2,021,462 | ||||||||||||
Decommissioning
|
74,411 | 73,647 | 61 | 148,119 | ||||||||||||
Taxes other than income taxes
|
307,660 | 72,282 | 5,707 | 385,649 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization
|
683,123 | 104,713 | 11,347 | 799,183 | ||||||||||||
Other regulatory charges (credits) - net
|
(29,371 | ) | - | - | (29,371 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
|
5,198,677 | 1,136,022 | 130,972 | 6,465,671 | ||||||||||||
OPERATING INCOME
|
1,071,645 | 749,308 | (39,628 | ) | 1,781,325 | |||||||||||
OTHER INCOME (DEDUCTIONS)
|
||||||||||||||||
Allowance for equity funds used during construction
|
47,499 | - | - | 47,499 | ||||||||||||
Interest and dividend income
|
141,915 | 108,935 | (80,843 | ) | 170,007 | |||||||||||
Other than temporary impairment losses
|
- | (85,396 | ) | - | (85,396 | ) | ||||||||||
Miscellaneous - net
|
2,694 | (13,066 | ) | (10,538 | ) | (20,910 | ) | |||||||||
Total
|
192,108 | 10,473 | (91,381 | ) | 111,200 | |||||||||||
INTEREST AND OTHER CHARGES
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest on long-term debt
|
338,674 | 6,639 | 37,942 | 383,255 | ||||||||||||
Other interest - net
|
26,775 | 39,537 | 3,094 | 69,406 | ||||||||||||
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction
|
(26,547 | ) | - | - | (26,547 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
|
338,902 | 46,176 | 41,036 | 426,114 | ||||||||||||
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES
|
924,851 | 713,605 | (172,045 | ) | 1,466,411 | |||||||||||
Income taxes
|
358,217 | 252,081 | (76,197 | ) | 534,101 | |||||||||||
CONSOLIDATED NET INCOME
|
566,634 | 461,524 | (95,848 | ) | 932,310 | |||||||||||
Preferred dividend requirements of subsidiaries
|
12,997 | - | 1,996 | 14,993 | ||||||||||||
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO ENTERGY CORPORATION
|
$ | 553,637 | $ | 461,524 | $ | (97,844 | ) | $ | 917,317 | |||||||
EARNINGS PER AVERAGE COMMON SHARE:
|
||||||||||||||||
BASIC
|
$ | 2.85 | $ | 2.38 | $ | (0.50 | ) | $ | 4.73 | |||||||
DILUTED
|
$ | 2.80 | $ | 2.34 | $ | (0.48 | ) | $ | 4.66 | |||||||
AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING:
|
||||||||||||||||
BASIC
|
194,044,214 | |||||||||||||||
DILUTED
|
197,382,562 | |||||||||||||||
*Totals may not foot due to rounding.
|
||||||||||||||||
Entergy Corporation
|
||||||||||||||||
Consolidating Income Statement
|
||||||||||||||||
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 vs. 2009
|
||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||||||||||
U.S. Utilities
|
Entergy Nuclear
|
Parent & Other
|
Consolidated
|
|||||||||||||
OPERATING REVENUES
|
||||||||||||||||
Electric
|
$ | 718,829 | $ | - | $ | 139 | $ | 718,968 | ||||||||
Natural gas
|
27,512 | - | - | 27,512 | ||||||||||||
Competitive businesses
|
- | (71,892 | ) | 32,889 | (39,003 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
|
746,341 | (71,892 | ) | 33,028 | 707,477 | |||||||||||
OPERATING EXPENSES
|
||||||||||||||||
Operating and Maintenance:
|
||||||||||||||||
Fuel, fuel related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
|
(14,702 | ) | 8,458 | 17,629 | 11,385 | |||||||||||
Purchased power
|
346,734 | (1,706 | ) | (3,456 | ) | 341,572 | ||||||||||
Nuclear refueling outage expenses
|
4,126 | 8,815 | - | 12,941 | ||||||||||||
Other operation and maintenance
|
60,057 | 148,156 | (18,293 | ) | 189,920 | |||||||||||
Decommissioning
|
3,131 | 6,169 | 4 | 9,304 | ||||||||||||
Taxes other than income taxes
|
15,296 | 922 | (1,270 | ) | 14,948 | |||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization
|
(17,620 | ) | 7,098 | 731 | (9,791 | ) | ||||||||||
Other regulatory charges (credits )- net
|
44,926 | - | - | 44,926 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
441,948 | 177,912 | (4,655 | ) | 615,205 | |||||||||||
OPERATING INCOME
|
304,393 | (249,804 | ) | 37,683 | 92,272 | |||||||||||
OTHER INCOME (DEDUCTIONS)
|
||||||||||||||||
Allowance for equity funds used during construction
|
(1,509 | ) | - | - | (1,509 | ) | ||||||||||
Interest and dividend income
|
(23,014 | ) | 7,683 | (31,552 | ) | (46,883 | ) | |||||||||
Other than temporary impairment losses
|
- | 84,141 | - | 84,141 | ||||||||||||
Miscellaneous - net
|
(14,713 | ) | (403 | ) | 3,976 | (11,140 | ) | |||||||||
Total
|
(39,236 | ) | 91,421 | (27,576 | ) | 24,609 | ||||||||||
INTEREST AND OTHER CHARGES
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest on long-term debt
|
31,247 | 27,388 | (21,576 | ) | 37,059 | |||||||||||
Other interest - net
|
795 | (21,573 | ) | (5,488 | ) | (26,266 | ) | |||||||||
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction
|
(727 | ) | - | - | (727 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
|
31,315 | 5,815 | (27,064 | ) | 10,066 | |||||||||||
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES
|
233,842 | (164,198 | ) | 37,171 | 106,815 | |||||||||||
Income taxes
|
89,391 | (50,263 | ) | (37,002 | ) | 2,126 | ||||||||||
CONSOLIDATED NET INCOME
|
144,451 | (113,935 | ) | 74,173 | 104,689 | |||||||||||
Preferred dividend requirements of subsidiaries
|
2 | - | 53 | 55 | ||||||||||||
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO ENTERGY CORPORATION
|
$ | 144,449 | $ | (113,935 | ) | $ | 74,120 | $ | 104,634 | |||||||
EARNINGS PER AVERAGE COMMON SHARE:
|
||||||||||||||||
BASIC
|
$ | 0.87 | $ | (0.53 | ) | $ | 0.37 | $ | 0.71 | |||||||
DILUTED
|
$ | 0.88 | $ | (0.51 | ) | $ | 0.35 | $ | 0.72 | |||||||
*Totals may not foot due to rounding.
|
||||||||||||||||
Entergy Corporation
|
||||||||||||||||
Consolidating Income Statement
|
||||||||||||||||
Twelve Months Ended September 30, 2010
|
||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||||||||||
U.S. Utilities
|
Entergy Nuclear
|
Parent & Other
|
Consolidated
|
|||||||||||||
OPERATING REVENUES
|
||||||||||||||||
Electric
|
$ | 8,601,969 | $ | - | $ | (2,986 | ) | $ | 8,598,983 | |||||||
Natural gas
|
199,725 | - | - | 199,725 | ||||||||||||
Competitive businesses
|
- | 2,483,362 | 171,057 | 2,654,419 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
8,801,694 | 2,483,362 | 168,071 | 11,453,127 | ||||||||||||
OPERATING EXPENSES
|
||||||||||||||||
Operating and Maintenance:
|
||||||||||||||||
Fuel, fuel related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
|
2,012,192 | 224,479 | 84,545 | 2,321,216 | ||||||||||||
Purchased power
|
1,703,152 | 13,934 | 19,690 | 1,736,776 | ||||||||||||
Nuclear refueling outage expenses
|
109,142 | 145,108 | - | 254,250 | ||||||||||||
Other operation and maintenance
|
1,896,564 | 997,077 | 47,089 | 2,940,730 | ||||||||||||
Decommissioning
|
102,815 | 105,467 | 86 | 208,368 | ||||||||||||
Taxes other than income taxes
|
417,795 | 96,988 | 4,025 | 518,808 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization
|
908,619 | 148,546 | 15,819 | 1,072,984 | ||||||||||||
Other regulatory charges (credits) - net
|
23,198 | - | - | 23,198 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
7,173,477 | 1,731,599 | 171,254 | 9,076,330 | ||||||||||||
OPERATING INCOME
|
1,628,217 | 751,763 | (3,183 | ) | 2,376,797 | |||||||||||
OTHER INCOME (DEDUCTIONS)
|
||||||||||||||||
Allowance for equity funds used during construction
|
58,036 | - | - | 58,036 | ||||||||||||
Interest and dividend income
|
157,491 | 177,541 | (145,462 | ) | 189,570 | |||||||||||
Other than temporary impairment losses
|
- | (1,752 | ) | - | (1,752 | ) | ||||||||||
Miscellaneous - net
|
(18,795 | ) | (19,765 | ) | (12,975 | ) | (51,535 | ) | ||||||||
Total
|
196,732 | 156,024 | (158,437 | ) | 194,319 | |||||||||||
INTEREST AND OTHER CHARGES
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest on long-term debt
|
494,735 | 36,654 | 26,387 | 557,776 | ||||||||||||
Other interest - net
|
32,748 | 25,045 | (1,097 | ) | 56,696 | |||||||||||
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction
|
(33,961 | ) | - | - | (33,961 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
|
493,522 | 61,699 | 25,290 | 580,511 | ||||||||||||
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES
|
1,331,427 | 846,088 | (186,910 | ) | 1,990,605 | |||||||||||
Income taxes
|
478,071 | 329,003 | (172,208 | ) | 634,866 | |||||||||||
CONSOLIDATED NET INCOME
|
853,356 | 517,085 | (14,702 | ) | 1,355,739 | |||||||||||
Preferred dividend requirements of subsidiaries
|
17,331 | - | 2,682 | 20,013 | ||||||||||||
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO ENTERGY CORPORATION
|
$ | 836,025 | $ | 517,085 | $ | (17,384 | ) | $ | 1,335,726 | |||||||
EARNINGS PER AVERAGE COMMON SHARE:
|
||||||||||||||||
BASIC
|
$ | 4.44 | $ | 2.75 | $ | (0.09 | ) | $ | 7.10 | |||||||
DILUTED
|
$ | 4.39 | $ | 2.72 | $ | (0.09 | ) | $ | 7.02 | |||||||
AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING:
|
||||||||||||||||
BASIC
|
188,227,792 | |||||||||||||||
DILUTED
|
190,257,734 | |||||||||||||||
*Totals may not foot due to rounding.
|
||||||||||||||||
Entergy Corporation
|
||||||||||||||||
Consolidating Income Statement
|
||||||||||||||||
Twelve Months Ended September 30, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||||||||||
U.S. Utilities
|
Entergy Nuclear
|
Parent & Other
|
Consolidated
|
|||||||||||||
OPERATING REVENUES
|
||||||||||||||||
Electric
|
$ | 8,438,114 | $ | - | $ | (3,582 | ) | $ | 8,434,532 | |||||||
Natural gas
|
183,409 | - | - | 183,409 | ||||||||||||
Competitive businesses
|
- | 2,499,061 | 130,861 | 2,629,922 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
8,621,523 | 2,499,061 | 127,279 | 11,247,863 | ||||||||||||
OPERATING EXPENSES
|
||||||||||||||||
Operating and Maintenance:
|
||||||||||||||||
Fuel, fuel related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
|
2,685,910 | 211,538 | 70,511 | 2,967,959 | ||||||||||||
Purchased power
|
1,355,340 | 14,811 | 22,564 | 1,392,715 | ||||||||||||
Nuclear refueling outage expenses
|
100,985 | 134,051 | - | 235,036 | ||||||||||||
Other operation and maintenance
|
1,909,287 | 821,077 | 75,293 | 2,805,657 | ||||||||||||
Decommissioning
|
99,008 | 98,113 | 80 | 197,201 | ||||||||||||
Taxes other than income taxes
|
404,304 | 96,384 | 6,581 | 507,269 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization
|
919,932 | 138,098 | 15,395 | 1,073,425 | ||||||||||||
Other regulatory charges (credits) - net
|
(69,458 | ) | - | - | (69,458 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
|
7,405,308 | 1,514,072 | 190,424 | 9,109,804 | ||||||||||||
OPERATING INCOME
|
1,216,215 | 984,989 | (63,145 | ) | 2,138,059 | |||||||||||
OTHER INCOME (DEDUCTIONS)
|
||||||||||||||||
Allowance for equity funds used during construction
|
63,239 | - | - | 63,239 | ||||||||||||
Interest and dividend income
|
183,689 | 141,761 | (100,844 | ) | 224,606 | |||||||||||
Other than temporary impairment losses
|
- | (99,859 | ) | - | (99,859 | ) | ||||||||||
Miscellaneous - net
|
(8,552 | ) | (12,665 | ) | (18,664 | ) | (39,881 | ) | ||||||||
Total
|
238,376 | 29,237 | (119,508 | ) | 148,105 | |||||||||||
INTEREST AND OTHER CHARGES
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest on long-term debt
|
449,547 | 6,590 | 56,223 | 512,360 | ||||||||||||
Other interest - net
|
39,293 | 50,709 | 18,897 | 108,899 | ||||||||||||
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction
|
(35,821 | ) | - | - | (35,821 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
|
453,019 | 57,299 | 75,120 | 585,438 | ||||||||||||
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES
|
1,001,572 | 956,927 | (257,773 | ) | 1,700,726 | |||||||||||
Income taxes
|
377,442 | 268,760 | (53,358 | ) | 592,844 | |||||||||||
CONSOLIDATED NET INCOME
|
624,130 | 688,167 | (204,415 | ) | 1,107,882 | |||||||||||
Preferred dividend requirements of subsidiaries
|
17,329 | - | 2,662 | 19,991 | ||||||||||||
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO ENTERGY CORPORATION
|
$ | 606,801 | $ | 688,167 | $ | (207,077 | ) | $ | 1,087,891 | |||||||
EARNINGS PER AVERAGE COMMON SHARE:
|
||||||||||||||||
BASIC
|
$ | 3.15 | $ | 3.57 | $ | (1.08 | ) | $ | 5.64 | |||||||
DILUTED
|
$ | 3.07 | $ | 3.48 | $ | (1.00 | ) | $ | 5.55 | |||||||
AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING:
|
||||||||||||||||
BASIC
|
192,868,552 | |||||||||||||||
DILUTED
|
197,717,203 | |||||||||||||||
*Totals may not foot due to rounding.
|
||||||||||||||||
Entergy Corporation
|
||||||||||||||||
Consolidating Income Statement
|
||||||||||||||||
Twelve Months Ended September 30, 2010 vs. 2009
|
||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||||||||||
U.S. Utilities
|
Entergy Nuclear
|
Parent & Other
|
Consolidated
|
|||||||||||||
OPERATING REVENUES
|
||||||||||||||||
Electric
|
$ | 163,855 | $ | - | $ | 596 | $ | 164,451 | ||||||||
Natural gas
|
16,316 | - | - | 16,316 | ||||||||||||
Competitive businesses
|
- | (15,699 | ) | 40,196 | 24,497 | |||||||||||
Total
|
180,171 | (15,699 | ) | 40,792 | 205,264 | |||||||||||
OPERATING EXPENSES
|
||||||||||||||||
Operating and Maintenance:
|
||||||||||||||||
Fuel, fuel related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
|
(673,718 | ) | 12,941 | 14,034 | (646,743 | ) | ||||||||||
Purchased power
|
347,812 | (877 | ) | (2,874 | ) | 344,061 | ||||||||||
Nuclear refueling outage expenses
|
8,157 | 11,057 | - | 19,214 | ||||||||||||
Other operation and maintenance
|
(12,723 | ) | 176,000 | (28,204 | ) | 135,073 | ||||||||||
Decommissioning
|
3,807 | 7,354 | 6 | 11,167 | ||||||||||||
Taxes other than income taxes
|
13,491 | 604 | (2,556 | ) | 11,539 | |||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization
|
(11,313 | ) | 10,448 | 424 | (441 | ) | ||||||||||
Other regulatory charges (credits )- net
|
92,656 | - | - | 92,656 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
(231,831 | ) | 217,527 | (19,170 | ) | (33,474 | ) | |||||||||
OPERATING INCOME
|
412,002 | (233,226 | ) | 59,962 | 238,738 | |||||||||||
OTHER INCOME (DEDUCTIONS)
|
||||||||||||||||
Allowance for equity funds used during construction
|
(5,203 | ) | - | - | (5,203 | ) | ||||||||||
Interest and dividend income
|
(26,198 | ) | 35,780 | (44,618 | ) | (35,036 | ) | |||||||||
Other than temporary impairment losses
|
- | 98,107 | - | 98,107 | ||||||||||||
Miscellaneous - net
|
(10,243 | ) | (7,100 | ) | 5,689 | (11,654 | ) | |||||||||
Total
|
(41,644 | ) | 126,787 | (38,929 | ) | 46,214 | ||||||||||
INTEREST AND OTHER CHARGES
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest on long-term debt
|
45,188 | 30,064 | (29,836 | ) | 45,416 | |||||||||||
Other interest - net
|
(6,545 | ) | (25,664 | ) | (19,994 | ) | (52,203 | ) | ||||||||
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction
|
1,860 | - | - | 1,860 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
40,503 | 4,400 | (49,830 | ) | (4,927 | ) | ||||||||||
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES
|
329,855 | (110,839 | ) | 70,863 | 289,879 | |||||||||||
Income taxes
|
100,629 | 60,243 | (118,850 | ) | 42,022 | |||||||||||
CONSOLIDATED NET INCOME
|
229,226 | (171,082 | ) | 189,713 | 247,857 | |||||||||||
Preferred dividend requirements of subsidiaries
|
1 | - | 20 | 22 | ||||||||||||
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO ENTERGY CORPORATION
|
$ | 229,225 | $ | (171,082 | ) | $ | 189,693 | $ | 247,835 | |||||||
EARNINGS PER AVERAGE COMMON SHARE:
|
||||||||||||||||
BASIC
|
$ | 1.29 | $ | (0.82 | ) | $ | 0.99 | $ | 1.46 | |||||||
DILUTED
|
$ | 1.32 | $ | (0.76 | ) | $ | 0.91 | $ | 1.47 | |||||||
*Totals may not foot due to rounding.
|
||||||||||||||||
Entergy Corporation
|
||||||||||||
Consolidated Cash Flow Statement
|
||||||||||||
Three Months Ended September 30, 2010 vs. 2009
|
||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands)
|
||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
Variance
|
||||||||||
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||||||
Consolidated net income
|
$ | 497,901 | $ | 460,167 | $ | 37,734 | ||||||
Adjustments to reconcile consolidated net income to net cash flow
|
||||||||||||
provided by operating activities:
|
||||||||||||
Reserve for regulatory adjustments
|
875 | 550 | 325 | |||||||||
Other regulatory charges (credits) - net
|
(1,814 | ) | (13,224 | ) | 11,410 | |||||||
Depreciation, amortization, and decommissioning, including nuclear fuel amortization
|
427,758 | 378,910 | 48,848 | |||||||||
Deferred income taxes, investment tax credits, and non-current taxes accrued
|
181,718 | 263,347 | (81,629 | ) | ||||||||
Changes in working capital:
|
||||||||||||
Receivables
|
(65,881 | ) | 12,968 | (78,849 | ) | |||||||
Fuel inventory
|
(1,674 | ) | 13,793 | (15,467 | ) | |||||||
Accounts payable
|
21,254 | (131,409 | ) | 152,663 | ||||||||
Taxes accrued
|
- | 41,738 | (41,738 | ) | ||||||||
Interest accrued
|
17,833 | 24,867 | (7,034 | ) | ||||||||
Deferred fuel
|
(63,585 | ) | (69,951 | ) | 6,366 | |||||||
Other working capital accounts
|
(366 | ) | 39,421 | (39,787 | ) | |||||||
Provision for estimated losses and reserves
|
289,180 | 8,316 | 280,864 | |||||||||
Changes in other regulatory assets
|
505,663 | 123,030 | 382,633 | |||||||||
Changes in pensions and other postretirement liabilities
|
(68,233 | ) | (7,753 | ) | (60,480 | ) | ||||||
Other
|
(43,374 | ) | (151,788 | ) | 108,414 | |||||||
Net cash flow provided by operating activities
|
1,697,255 | 992,982 | 704,273 | |||||||||
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||||||
Construction/capital expenditures
|
(492,126 | ) | (410,784 | ) | (81,342 | ) | ||||||
Allowance for equity funds used during construction
|
15,064 | 14,770 | 294 | |||||||||
Nuclear fuel purchases
|
(96,951 | ) | (142,153 | ) | 45,202 | |||||||
Proceeds from sale/leaseback of nuclear fuel
|
- | 176,496 | (176,496 | ) | ||||||||
Proceeds from sale of assets and businesses
|
- | 30,401 | (30,401 | ) | ||||||||
Insurance proceeds received for property damages
|
7,894 | 32,914 | (25,020 | ) | ||||||||
Changes in transition charge account
|
(654 | ) | (11,321 | ) | 10,667 | |||||||
Decrease (increase) in other investments
|
(229,605 | ) | 7,192 | (236,797 | ) | |||||||
Proceeds from nuclear decommissioning trust fund sales
|
486,621 | 451,164 | 35,457 | |||||||||
Investment in nuclear decommissioning trust funds
|
(512,086 | ) | (476,859 | ) | (35,227 | ) | ||||||
Net cash flow used in investing activities
|
(821,843 | ) | (328,180 | ) | (493,663 | ) | ||||||
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||||||
Proceeds from the issuance of:
|
||||||||||||
Long-term debt
|
1,746,435 | (1,807 | ) | 1,748,242 | ||||||||
Common stock and treasury stock
|
37,047 | 14,524 | 22,523 | |||||||||
Retirement of long-term debt
|
(1,339,155 | ) | (61,942 | ) | (1,277,213 | ) | ||||||
Repurchase of common stock
|
(527,875 | ) | (613,125 | ) | 85,250 | |||||||
Redemption of preferred stock
|
- | (1,847 | ) | 1,847 | ||||||||
Changes in credit line borrowings - net
|
(36,055 | ) | - | (36,055 | ) | |||||||
Dividends paid:
|
||||||||||||
Common stock
|
(154,887 | ) | (146,019 | ) | (8,868 | ) | ||||||
Preferred stock
|
(5,015 | ) | (4,998 | ) | (17 | ) | ||||||
Net cash flow used in financing activities
|
(279,505 | ) | (815,214 | ) | 535,709 | |||||||
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents
|
(512 | ) | 285 | (797 | ) | |||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
595,395 | (150,127 | ) | 745,522 | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
1,335,524 | 1,280,907 | 54,617 | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ | 1,930,919 | $ | 1,130,780 | $ | 800,139 | ||||||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
|
||||||||||||
Cash paid (received) during the period for:
|
||||||||||||
Interest - net of amount capitalized
|
$ | 117,150 | $ | 121,159 | $ | (4,009 | ) | |||||
Income taxes
|
$ | 6,910 | $ | 22,054 | $ | (15,144 | ) | |||||
Entergy Corporation
|
||||||||||||
Consolidated Cash Flow Statement
|
||||||||||||
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 vs. 2009
|
||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands)
|
||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
Variance
|
||||||||||
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||||||
Consolidated net income
|
$ | 1,036,999 | $ | 932,310 | $ | 104,689 | ||||||
Adjustments to reconcile consolidated net income to net cash flow
|
||||||||||||
provided by operating activities:
|
||||||||||||
Reserve for regulatory adjustments
|
360 | (1,080 | ) | 1,440 | ||||||||
Other regulatory charges (credits) - net
|
15,555 | (29,371 | ) | 44,926 | ||||||||
Depreciation, amortization, and decommissioning, including nuclear fuel amortization
|
1,259,543 | 1,076,115 | 183,428 | |||||||||
Deferred income taxes, investment tax credits, and non-current taxes accrued
|
524,359 | 512,795 | 11,564 | |||||||||
Changes in working capital:
|
||||||||||||
Receivables
|
(243,326 | ) | 14,856 | (258,182 | ) | |||||||
Fuel inventory
|
3,328 | 9,830 | (6,502 | ) | ||||||||
Accounts payable
|
44,348 | (189,586 | ) | 233,934 | ||||||||
Taxes accrued
|
- | 46,931 | (46,931 | ) | ||||||||
Interest accrued
|
(10,982 | ) | (12,176 | ) | 1,194 | |||||||
Deferred fuel
|
(65,655 | ) | 196,111 | (261,766 | ) | |||||||
Other working capital accounts
|
(117,086 | ) | (117,671 | ) | 585 | |||||||
Provision for estimated losses and reserves
|
258,962 | (10,326 | ) | 269,288 | ||||||||
Changes in other regulatory assets
|
482,960 | (332,547 | ) | 815,507 | ||||||||
Changes in pensions and other postretirement liabilities
|
(142,420 | ) | (52,714 | ) | (89,706 | ) | ||||||
Other
|
118,144 | (34,146 | ) | 152,290 | ||||||||
Net cash flow provided by operating activities
|
3,165,089 | 2,009,331 | 1,155,758 | |||||||||
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||||||
Construction/capital expenditures
|
(1,410,708 | ) | (1,342,840 | ) | (67,868 | ) | ||||||
Allowance for equity funds used during construction
|
45,990 | 47,499 | (1,509 | ) | ||||||||
Nuclear fuel purchases
|
(315,780 | ) | (291,721 | ) | (24,059 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from sale/leaseback of nuclear fuel
|
- | 197,706 | (197,706 | ) | ||||||||
Proceeds from sale of assets and businesses
|
9,675 | 39,054 | (29,379 | ) | ||||||||
Insurance proceeds received for property damages
|
7,894 | 32,914 | (25,020 | ) | ||||||||
Changes in transition charge account
|
(23,182 | ) | (8,359 | ) | (14,823 | ) | ||||||
NYPA value sharing payment
|
(72,000 | ) | (72,000 | ) | - | |||||||
Decrease (increase) in other investments
|
(167,280 | ) | 24,305 | (191,585 | ) | |||||||
Proceeds from nuclear decommissioning trust fund sales
|
1,974,008 | 1,733,370 | 240,638 | |||||||||
Investment in nuclear decommissioning trust funds
|
(2,043,361 | ) | (1,807,589 | ) | (235,772 | ) | ||||||
Net cash flow used in investing activities
|
(1,994,744 | ) | (1,447,661 | ) | (547,083 | ) | ||||||
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||||||
Proceeds from the issuance of:
|
||||||||||||
Long-term debt
|
2,272,224 | 781,497 | 1,490,727 | |||||||||
Common stock and treasury stock
|
45,763 | 17,215 | 28,548 | |||||||||
Retirement of long-term debt
|
(2,113,927 | ) | (1,084,732 | ) | (1,029,195 | ) | ||||||
Repurchase of common stock
|
(665,624 | ) | (613,125 | ) | (52,499 | ) | ||||||
Redemption of preferred stock
|
- | (1,847 | ) | 1,847 | ||||||||
Changes in credit line borrowings - net
|
(18,932 | ) | - | (18,932 | ) | |||||||
Dividends paid:
|
||||||||||||
Common stock
|
(453,683 | ) | (435,178 | ) | (18,505 | ) | ||||||
Preferred stock
|
(15,048 | ) | (14,993 | ) | (55 | ) | ||||||
Net cash flow used in financing activities
|
(949,227 | ) | (1,351,163 | ) | 401,936 | |||||||
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents
|
250 | (218 | ) | 468 | ||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
221,368 | (789,711 | ) | 1,011,079 | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
1,709,551 | 1,920,491 | (210,940 | ) | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ | 1,930,919 | $ | 1,130,780 | $ | 800,139 | ||||||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
|
||||||||||||
Cash paid (received) during the period for:
|
||||||||||||
Interest - net of amount capitalized
|
$ | 426,461 | $ | 442,345 | $ | (15,884 | ) | |||||
Income taxes
|
$ | 32,964 | $ | 18,915 | $ | 14,049 | ||||||
Noncash financing activities:
|
||||||||||||
Long-term debt retired (equity unit notes)
|
- | $ | (500,000 | ) | $ | 500,000 | ||||||
Common stock issued in settlement of equity unit purchase contracts
|
- | $ | 500,000 | $ | (500,000 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from long-term debt issued for the purpose
|
||||||||||||
of refunding prior long-term debt
|
$ | 150,000 | - | $ | 150,000 | |||||||
Long-term debt refunded with proceeds from
|
||||||||||||
long-term debt issued in prior period
|
$ | (150,000 | ) | - | $ | (150,000 | ) | |||||
Entergy Corporation
|
||||||||||||
Consolidated Cash Flow Statement
|
||||||||||||
Twelve Months Ended September 30, 2010 vs. 2009
|
||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands)
|
||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
Variance
|
||||||||||
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||||||
Consolidated net income
|
$ | 1,355,739 | $ | 1,107,882 | $ | 247,857 | ||||||
Adjustments to reconcile consolidated net income to net cash flow
|
||||||||||||
provided by operating activities:
|
||||||||||||
Reserve for regulatory adjustments
|
932 | (7,504 | ) | 8,436 | ||||||||
Other regulatory charges (credits) - net
|
23,198 | (69,458 | ) | 92,656 | ||||||||
Depreciation, amortization, and decommissioning, including nuclear fuel amortization
|
1,642,289 | 1,443,682 | 198,607 | |||||||||
Deferred income taxes, investment tax credits, and non-current taxes accrued
|
876,248 | 285,039 | 591,209 | |||||||||
Changes in working capital:
|
||||||||||||
Receivables
|
(141,738 | ) | 358,858 | (500,596 | ) | |||||||
Fuel inventory
|
12,789 | 22,150 | (9,361 | ) | ||||||||
Accounts payable
|
219,683 | (339,476 | ) | 559,159 | ||||||||
Taxes accrued
|
(122,141 | ) | 122,141 | (244,282 | ) | |||||||
Interest accrued
|
6,168 | (4,676 | ) | 10,844 | ||||||||
Deferred fuel
|
(189,452 | ) | 553,229 | (742,681 | ) | |||||||
Other working capital accounts
|
(227,625 | ) | (101,626 | ) | (125,999 | ) | ||||||
Provision for estimated losses and reserves
|
257,258 | (228,698 | ) | 485,956 | ||||||||
Changes in other regulatory assets
|
400,350 | (1,598,383 | ) | 1,998,733 | ||||||||
Changes in pensions and other postretirement liabilities
|
(17,917 | ) | 997,125 | (1,015,042 | ) | |||||||
Other
|
(6,865 | ) | 100,560 | (107,425 | ) | |||||||
Net cash flow provided by operating activities
|
4,088,916 | 2,640,845 | 1,448,071 | |||||||||
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||||||
Construction/capital expenditures
|
(1,999,113 | ) | (2,099,438 | ) | 100,325 | |||||||
Allowance for equity funds used during construction
|
58,036 | 63,239 | (5,203 | ) | ||||||||
Nuclear fuel purchases
|
(549,533 | ) | (388,066 | ) | (161,467 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from sale/leaseback of nuclear fuel
|
87,291 | 244,356 | (157,065 | ) | ||||||||
Proceeds from sale of assets and businesses
|
10,175 | 39,054 | (28,879 | ) | ||||||||
Insurance proceeds received for property damages
|
28,740 | 32,908 | (4,168 | ) | ||||||||
Changes in transition charge account
|
(15,859 | ) | 1,003 | (16,862 | ) | |||||||
NYPA value sharing payment
|
(72,000 | ) | (72,000 | ) | - | |||||||
Decrease (increase) in other investments
|
(97,431 | ) | 179,449 | (276,880 | ) | |||||||
Proceeds from nuclear decommissioning trust fund sales
|
2,811,161 | 2,156,887 | 654,274 | |||||||||
Investment in nuclear decommissioning trust funds
|
(2,902,944 | ) | (2,252,482 | ) | (650,462 | ) | ||||||
Net cash flow used in investing activities
|
(2,641,477 | ) | (2,095,090 | ) | (546,387 | ) | ||||||
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||||||
Proceeds from the issuance of:
|
||||||||||||
Long-term debt
|
3,494,196 | 805,008 | 2,689,188 | |||||||||
Common stock and treasury stock
|
56,746 | 16,149 | 40,597 | |||||||||
Retirement of long-term debt
|
(2,872,364 | ) | (1,567,420 | ) | (1,304,944 | ) | ||||||
Repurchase of common stock
|
(665,624 | ) | (657,397 | ) | (8,227 | ) | ||||||
Redemption of preferred stock
|
- | (1,847 | ) | 1,847 | ||||||||
Changes in credit line borrowings - net
|
(43,932 | ) | 30,000 | (73,932 | ) | |||||||
Dividends paid:
|
||||||||||||
Common stock
|
(595,461 | ) | (577,191 | ) | (18,270 | ) | ||||||
Preferred stock
|
(20,013 | ) | (19,990 | ) | (23 | ) | ||||||
Net cash flow used in financing activities
|
(646,452 | ) | (1,972,688 | ) | 1,326,236 | |||||||
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents
|
(848 | ) | 1,825 | (2,673 | ) | |||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
800,139 | (1,425,108 | ) | 2,225,247 | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
1,130,780 | 2,555,888 | (1,425,108 | ) | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ | 1,930,919 | $ | 1,130,780 | $ | 800,139 | ||||||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
|
||||||||||||
Cash paid (received) during the period for:
|
||||||||||||
Interest - net of amount capitalized
|
$ | 552,533 | $ | 598,842 | $ | (46,309 | ) | |||||
Income taxes
|
$ | 57,106 | $ | 28,196 | $ | 28,910 | ||||||
Noncash financing activities:
|
||||||||||||
Long-term debt retired (equity unit notes)
|
- | $ | (500,000 | ) | $ | 500,000 | ||||||
Common stock issued in settlement of equity unit purchase contracts
|
- | $ | 500,000 | $ | (500,000 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from long-term debt issued for the purpose
|
||||||||||||
of refunding prior long-term debt
|
$ | 150,000 | - | $ | 150,000 | |||||||
Long-term debt refunded with proceeds from
|
||||||||||||
long-term debt issued in prior period
|
$ | (150,000 | ) | - | $ | (150,000 | ) | |||||