XML 47 R14.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Share-Based Compensation
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2012
Share-based Compensation, Allocation and Classification in Financial Statements [Abstract]  
Share-Based Compensation
Share-Based Compensation
The Company accounts for share-based compensation using the modified prospective transition method. Under this method, share-based compensation expense includes compensation expense for all share-based compensation awards granted prior to, but not yet vested as of January 1, 2006, and is based on the estimated grant-date fair value. Share-based compensation expense for all share-based payment awards granted or modified on or after January 1, 2006 is based on the estimated grant-date fair value. The Company recognizes these compensation costs on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award, which is the option vesting term of four or five years for options granted prior to 2008 and four years for options granted subsequent to January 1, 2008, for only those shares expected to vest. The fair value of stock option awards is estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with inputs for grant-date assumptions and weighted-average fair values.
Under its 2005 Equity Participation Plan (the “Plan”), the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors granted performance vesting restricted stock units to the Company’s senior management and key employees as follows:
 
Grant Year
 
2012
 
2011
 
2010
Three-year performance period ending December 31,
2014

 
2013

 
2012

Vesting shares, target (1)
90,500

 
80,000

 
55,000

Vesting shares, maximum (1)
203,625

 
120,000

 
55,000


(1)
2010 grant includes 10,000 shares of restricted stock.
The restricted stock units vest at the end of a three-year performance period beginning with the year of the grant, and then only if, and to the extent that, the Company’s cumulative underwriting income, and with respect to the 2012 grants only, target level of growth in net premiums written, during such three-year period achieves the threshold performance levels established by the Compensation Committee.
The fair value of each restricted share grant is determined based on the market price on the grant date. Compensation cost is recognized based on management’s best estimate that performance goals will be achieved. If such goals are not met, no compensation cost is recognized and any recognized compensation cost would be reversed. For the 2011 and 2010 grants, the achievement of the performance condition set by the Compensation Committee was no longer considered probable, and previously recognized compensation costs were reversed as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.