XML 104 R14.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Fair Value Measurements
12 Months Ended
Apr. 25, 2014
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements
Fair Value Measurements
The Company follows the authoritative guidance on fair value measurements and disclosures with respect to assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on both a recurring and nonrecurring basis. Under this guidance, fair value is defined as the exit price, or the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants as of the measurement date. The authoritative guidance also establishes a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the most observable inputs be used when available. Observable inputs are inputs market participants would use in valuing the asset or liability, based on market data obtained from sources independent of the Company. Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect the Company’s assumptions about the factors market participants would use in valuing the asset or liability developed based upon the best information available in the circumstances. The categorization of financial assets and financial liabilities within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The hierarchy is broken down into three levels defined as follows:
Level 1 - Inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 - Inputs include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, and inputs (other than quoted prices) that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.
Level 3 - Inputs are unobservable for the asset or liability.
See the section below titled Valuation Techniques for further discussion of how the Company determines fair value for investments.
Assets and Liabilities That Are Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The authoritative guidance is principally applied to financial assets and liabilities such as marketable equity securities and debt and equity securities that are classified and accounted for as trading, available-for-sale, and derivative instruments and contingent consideration associated with acquisitions subsequent to April 24, 2009. Derivatives include cash flow hedges, freestanding derivative forward contracts, and fair value hedges. These items are marked-to-market at each reporting period.
The following tables provide information by level for assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
 
Fair Value
as of
 
Fair Value Measurements
Using Inputs Considered as
(in millions)
April 25, 2014
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
Assets:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Corporate debt securities
$
5,542

 
$

 
$
5,533

 
$
9

Auction rate securities
97

 

 

 
97

Mortgage-backed securities
1,336

 

 
1,336

 

U.S. government and agency securities
3,116

 
1,251

 
1,865

 

Foreign government and agency securities
67

 

 
67

 

Certificates of deposit
54

 

 
54

 

Other asset-backed securities
542

 

 
542

 

Debt funds
2,123

 

 
2,123

 

Marketable equity securities
49

 
49

 

 

Exchange-traded funds
67

 
67

 

 

Derivative assets
175

 
89

 
86

 

Total assets
$
13,168

 
$
1,456

 
$
11,606

 
$
106

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Derivative liabilities
$
127

 
$
116

 
$
11

 
$

Contingent consideration associated with acquisitions subsequent to April 24, 2009
68

 

 

 
68

Total liabilities
$
195

 
$
116

 
$
11

 
$
68


 
Fair Value
as of
 
Fair Value Measurements
Using Inputs Considered as
(in millions) 
April 26, 2013
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
Assets:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Corporate debt securities
$
4,661

 
$

 
$
4,651

 
$
10

Auction rate securities
103

 

 

 
103

Mortgage-backed securities
1,053

 

 
1,039

 
14

U.S. government and agency securities
3,898

 
1,833

 
2,065

 

Foreign government and agency securities
38

 

 
38

 

Certificates of deposit
6

 

 
6

 

Other asset-backed securities
541

 

 
541

 

Marketable equity securities
155

 
155

 

 

Exchange-traded funds
50

 
50

 

 

Derivative assets
394

 
213

 
181

 

Total assets
$
10,899

 
$
2,251

 
$
8,521

 
$
127

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Derivative liabilities
$
58

 
$
40

 
$
18

 
$

Contingent consideration associated with acquisitions subsequent to April 24, 2009
142

 

 

 
142

Total liabilities
$
200

 
$
40

 
$
18

 
$
142


Valuation Techniques
Financial assets that are classified as Level 1 securities include highly liquid government bonds within U.S. government and agency securities, marketable equity securities, and exchange-traded funds for which quoted market prices are available. In addition, the Company has determined that foreign currency forward contracts will be included in Level 1 as these are valued using quoted market prices in active markets which have identical assets or liabilities.
The valuation for most fixed maturity securities are classified as Level 2. Financial assets that are classified as Level 2 include corporate debt securities, U.S. government and agency securities, foreign government and agency securities, certificates of deposit, other asset-backed securities, debt funds, and certain mortgage-backed securities whose value is determined using inputs that are observable in the market or can be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data such as pricing for similar securities, recently executed transactions, cash flow models with yield curves, and benchmark securities. In addition, interest rate swaps are included in Level 2 as the Company uses inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset. The Level 2 derivative instruments are primarily valued using standard calculations and models that use readily observable market data as their basis.
Financial assets are considered Level 3 when their fair values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable. Level 3 financial assets also include certain investment securities for which there is limited market activity such that the determination of fair value requires significant judgment or estimation. Level 3 investment securities include certain corporate debt securities, auction rate securities, and certain mortgage-backed securities. With the exception of auction rate securities, these securities were valued using third-party pricing sources that incorporate transaction details such as contractual terms, maturity, timing, and amount of expected future cash flows, as well as assumptions about liquidity and credit valuation adjustments by market participants. The fair value of auction rate securities is estimated by the Company using a discounted cash flow model, which incorporates significant unobservable inputs. The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the Company’s auction rate securities are years to principal recovery and the illiquidity premium that is incorporated into the discount rate. Significant increases (decreases) in any of those inputs in isolation would result in a significantly lower (higher) fair value of the securities. Additionally, the Company uses Level 3 inputs in the measurement of contingent consideration and related liabilities for all acquisitions subsequent to April 24, 2009. See Note 4 for further information regarding contingent consideration.
The following table represents the range of the unobservable inputs utilized in the fair value measurement of the auction rate securities classified as Level 3 as of April 25, 2014:
 
 
Valuation
Technique
 
Unobservable Input
 
Range
(Weighted Average)
Auction rate securities
 
Discounted cash flow
 
Years to principal recovery
 
2 yrs. - 12 yrs. (3 yrs.)
 
 
 
 
Illiquidity premium
 
6%

The Company reviews the fair value hierarchy classification on a quarterly basis. Changes in the ability to observe valuation inputs may result in a reclassification of levels for certain securities within the fair value hierarchy. The Company’s policy is to recognize transfers into and out of levels within the fair value hierarchy at the end of the fiscal quarter in which the actual event or change in circumstances that caused the transfer occurs. There were no transfers between Level 1, Level 2, or Level 3 during the fiscal years ended April 25, 2014 or April 26, 2013. When a determination is made to classify an asset or liability within Level 3, the determination is based upon the significance of the unobservable inputs to the overall fair value measurement.
The following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of items measured at fair value on a recurring basis that used significant unobservable inputs (Level 3):
(in millions)
Total Level 3
 Investments
 
Corporate debt
 securities
 
Auction rate
securities

Mortgage-
backed securities
 
Other asset-
backed securities
Balance as of April 26, 2013
$
127

 
$
10

 
$
103

 
$
14

 
$

Total realized losses and other-than-temporary impairment losses included in earnings
(5
)
 

 
(5
)
 

 

Total unrealized gains included in other comprehensive income
4

 

 
3

 
1

 

Settlements
(20
)
 
(1
)
 
(4
)
 
(15
)
 

Balance as of April 25, 2014
$
106

 
$
9

 
$
97


$

 
$


(in millions)
Total Level 3
 Investments
 
Corporate debt
securities
 
Auction rate
securities
 
Mortgage-
backed securities
 
Other asset-
backed securities
Balance as of April 27, 2012
$
172

 
$
10

 
$
127

 
$
29

 
$
6

Total unrealized gains included in other comprehensive income
11

 

 
11

 

 

Settlements
(56
)
 

 
(35
)
 
(15
)
 
(6
)
Balance as of April 26, 2013
$
127

 
$
10

 
$
103

 
$
14

 
$


Assets and Liabilities That Are Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
Non-financial assets such as equity and other securities that are accounted for using the cost or equity method, goodwill and IPR&D, intangible assets, and property, plant, and equipment are measured at fair value when there is an indicator of impairment and recorded at fair value only when an impairment is recognized.
The Company holds investments in equity and other securities that are accounted for using the cost or equity method, which are classified as other assets in the consolidated balance sheets. The aggregate carrying amount of these investments was $666 million as of April 25, 2014 and $549 million as of April 26, 2013. These cost or equity method investments are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. The fair value of the Company’s cost or equity method investments is not estimated if there are no identified events or changes in circumstance that may have a significant adverse effect on the fair value of these investments. During fiscal years 2014, 2013, and 2012, the Company determined that the fair values of certain cost method investments were below their carrying values and that the carrying values of these investments were not expected to be recoverable within a reasonable period of time. As a result, the Company recognized $10 million, $21 million, and $10 million in impairment charges in fiscal years 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively. These investments fall within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, due to the use of significant unobservable inputs to determine fair value, as the investments are privately-held entities without quoted market prices. To determine the fair value of these investments, the Company used all pertinent financial information available related to the entities, including financial statements and market participant valuations from recent and proposed equity offerings.
The Company assesses the impairment of goodwill annually in the third quarter and whenever an event occurs or circumstances change that would indicate that the carrying amount may be impaired. The aggregate carrying amount of goodwill was $10.593 billion as of April 25, 2014 and $10.329 billion as of April 26, 2013, respectively.
Impairment testing for goodwill is performed at the reporting unit level. The test for impairment of goodwill requires the Company to make several estimates about fair value, most of which are based on projected future cash flows. The Company calculated the excess of each reporting unit's fair value over its carrying amount, including goodwill, utilizing a discounted cash flow analysis. As a result of the analysis performed, the fair value of each reporting unit's goodwill was deemed to be greater than the carrying value. The Company did not record any goodwill impairments during fiscal years 2014, 2013, or 2012.
The recently acquired businesses of Cardiocom and Kanghui are separate reporting units and are tested for goodwill impairment independently; therefore, they are more sensitive to changes in assumptions impacting fair value. The carrying amount of goodwill was $409 million and $123 million for the Kanghui and Cardiocom reporting units, respectively, as of April 25, 2014. As of the date of the goodwill testing, the fair values of these two reporting units exceeded their respective carrying values by more than 10 percent.
The Company assesses the impairment of IPR&D annually in the third quarter and whenever an event occurs or circumstances change that would indicate that the carrying amount may be impaired. The aggregate carrying amount of IPR&D was $119 million as of April 25, 2014 and $363 million as of April 26, 2013, respectively. The majority of IPR&D at April 25, 2014 is related to IN.PACT family of drug-eluting balloons. Similar to the goodwill impairment test, the IPR&D impairment test requires the Company to make several estimates about fair value, most of which are based on projected future cash flows. The Company calculated the excess of IPR&D asset fair values over their carrying values utilizing a discounted future cash flow analysis. As a result of the analysis performed during fiscal year 2014, the fair value of certain IPR&D assets were deemed to be less than their carrying value, resulting in an impairment loss of $207 million, primarily related to the Ardian acquisition, that was recorded in acquisition-related items in the consolidated statements of earnings. The Ardian impairment resulted from the Company's January 2014 announcement that the U.S. pivotal trial in renal denervation for treatment-resistant hypertension, Symplicity HTN-3, failed to meet its primary efficacy endpoint. Based on the results of the trial, the Company suspended enrollment in the renal denervation hypertension trials that were being conducted in the U.S., Japan, and India. See discussion below for additional information on impairments recorded on the Ardian long-lived asset group. As a result of the analysis performed during fiscal year 2013, the fair value of IPR&D assets were deemed to be less than the carrying value, resulting in a pre-tax impairment loss of $5 million that was recorded in acquisition-related items in the consolidated statements of earnings. The Company did not record any IPR&D impairments during fiscal year 2012. Due to the nature of IPR&D projects, the Company may experience future delays or failures to obtain regulatory approvals to conduct clinical trials, failures of such clinical trials, delays or failures to obtain required market clearances or other failures to achieve a commercially viable product, and as a result, may record impairment losses in the future.
The Company assesses intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an intangible asset (asset group) may not be recoverable. The aggregate carrying amount of intangible assets, excluding IPR&D, was $2.167 billion as of April 25, 2014 and $2.310 billion as of April 26, 2013. When events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an intangible asset may not be recoverable, the Company calculates the excess of an intangible asset's carrying value over its undiscounted future cash flows. If the carrying value is not recoverable, an impairment loss is recorded based on the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value. The inputs used in the fair value analysis fall within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy due to the use of significant unobservable inputs to determine fair value. During fiscal years 2014, 2013 and 2012, the Company determined that a change in events and circumstances indicated that the carrying amount of certain intangible assets, representing less than five percent of the total aggregate carrying amount of intangible assets, may not be fully recoverable. During fiscal year 2014, the carrying amount of Ardian intangible assets was less than the undiscounted future cash flows, therefore, the Company assessed the fair value of the assets and recorded an impairment of $41 million that was included in acquisition-related items in the consolidated statements of earnings. During fiscal year 2013, the carrying amount of one intangible asset was less than the undiscounted future cash flows, therefore, the Company assessed the asset's fair value and there were no material impairments recorded. The Company did not record any intangible asset impairments during fiscal year 2012.
The Company assesses the impairment of property, plant, and equipment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of property, plant, and equipment assets may not be recoverable. During fiscal year 2014, the Company determined that a change in events and circumstances indicated that the carrying amount of Ardian property, plant, and equipment may not be fully recoverable and recorded an impairment of $3 million that was recorded in acquisition-related items in the consolidated statements of earnings. As part of the Company’s restructuring initiatives, the Company recorded property, plant, and equipment impairments of $16 million, $6 million, and $9 million during fiscal years 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively, in restructuring charges, net in the consolidated statements of earnings. For further discussion of the restructuring initiatives refer to Note 3.
Financial Instruments Not Measured at Fair Value
The estimated fair value of the Company’s long-term debt, including the short-term portion, as of April 25, 2014 was $11.856 billion compared to a principal value of $11.375 billion, and as of April 26, 2013 was $10.820 billion compared to a principal value of $9.928 billion. Fair value was estimated using quoted market prices for the publicly registered senior notes, classified as Level 1 within the fair value hierarchy. The fair values and principal values consider the terms of the related debt and exclude the impacts of debt discounts and derivative/hedging activity.