Note 4—Employee Benefit Plans

Mattel and certain of its subsidiaries have qualified and nonqualified retirement plans covering substantially all employees of these companies. These plans include defined benefit pension plans, defined contribution retirement plans, postretirement benefit plans, and deferred compensation and excess benefit plans. In addition, Mattel makes contributions to government-mandated retirement plans in countries outside the US where its employees work.

A summary of retirement plan expense is as follows:


	For the Year
	2014		2013		2012
	(In thousands)
Defined contribution retirement plans	$	43,819	$	43,694	$	40,266
Defined benefit pension plans		18,124		30,747		33,597
Deferred compensation and excess benefit plans		4,840		9,298		5,740
Postretirement benefit plans		1,461		2,245		1,607

	$	68,244	$	85,984	$	81,210

Defined Benefit Pension and Postretirement Benefit Plans

Mattel provides defined benefit pension plans for eligible domestic employees, which are intended to comply with the requirements of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”). Some of Mattel’s foreign subsidiaries have defined benefit pension plans covering substantially all of their eligible employees. Mattel funds these plans in accordance with the terms of the plans and local statutory requirements, which differ for each of the countries in which the subsidiaries are located. Mattel also has unfunded postretirement health insurance plans covering certain eligible domestic employees.

A summary of the components of Mattel’s net periodic benefit cost and other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive income for the years ended December 31 is as follows:


	Defined Benefit Pension Plans									Postretirement Benefit Plans
	2014			2013			2012			2014			2013		2012
	(In thousands)
Net periodic benefit cost:
Service cost	$	7,515		$	12,982		$	13,285		$	67		$	82	$	79
Interest cost		27,708			25,580			29,530			1,377			1,585		1,411
Expected return on plan assets		(31,833	)		(29,786	)		(31,270	)		—			—		—
Amortization of prior service credit		(1,037	)		(1,057	)		(502	)		—			—		—
Recognized actuarial loss		15,771			21,193			19,020			17			578		117
Settlement loss		—			1,835			3,534			—			—		—

Net periodic benefit cost	$	18,124		$	30,747		$	33,597		$	1,461		$	2,245	$	1,607

Other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive income:
Net actuarial loss (gain)	$	48,502		$	(95,744	)	$	27,144		$	(2,205	)	$	3,470	$	4,755
Prior service cost (credit)		20			—			(11,789	)		—			—		—
Amortization of prior service credit		1,037			1,057			501			—			—		—

Total recognized in other comprehensive income (a)	$	49,559		$	(94,687	)	$	15,856		$	(2,205	)	$	3,470	$	4,755

Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and other comprehensive income	$	67,683		$	(63,940	)	$	49,453		$	(744	)	$	5,715	$	6,362

(a)

Amounts exclude related tax (benefit) expense of $(17.8) million, $32.5 million, and $(2.3) million, during 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively, which are also included in other comprehensive income.

Net periodic benefit cost for Mattel’s domestic defined benefit pension and postretirement benefit plans was calculated on January 1 of each year using the following assumptions:


	For the Year
	2014			2013			2012
Defined benefit pension plans:
Discount rate		4.7	%		4.0	%		4.5	%
Weighted average rate of future compensation increases		3.8	%		3.8	%		3.8	%
Long-term rate of return on plan assets		8.0	%		8.0	%		8.0	%

Postretirement benefit plans:
Discount rate		4.7	%		4.0	%		4.5	%
Annual increase in Medicare Part B premium		6.0	%		6.0	%		6.0	%

Health care cost trend rate:
Pre-65		8.5	%		8.5	%		7.5	%
Post-65		7.5	%		7.5	%		7.5	%

Ultimate cost trend rate:
Pre-65		6.1	%		6.1	%		5.0	%
Post-65		5.4	%		5.4	%		5.0	%

Year that the rate reaches the ultimate cost trend rate:
Pre-65		2030			2030			2017
Post-65		2030			2030			2017

Discount rates, weighted average rates of future compensation increases, and long-term rates of return on plan assets for Mattel’s foreign defined benefit pension plans differ from the assumptions used for Mattel’s domestic defined benefit pension plans due to differences in local economic conditions in the locations where the non-US plans are based. The rates shown in the preceding table are indicative of the weighted average rates of all Mattel’s defined benefit pension plans given the relative insignificance of the foreign plans to the consolidated total.

The estimated net actuarial loss and prior service credit for the domestic defined benefit pension plans that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive loss into net periodic benefit cost in 2015 is $16.7 million. The estimated net actuarial loss for the domestic postretirement benefit plans that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive loss into net periodic benefit cost in 2015 is $0.1 million.

Mattel used a measurement date of December 31, 2014 for its defined benefit pension and postretirement benefit plans. A summary of the changes in benefit obligation and plan assets is as follows:


	Defined Benefit Pension Plans						Postretirement Benefit Plans
	2014			2013			2014			2013
	(In thousands)
Change in Benefit Obligation:
Benefit obligation, beginning of year	$	616,938		$	669,351		$	37,914		$	35,433
Service cost		7,515			12,982			67			82
Interest cost		27,708			25,580			1,377			1,585
Impact of currency exchange rate changes		(10,673	)		(2,206	)		—			—
Actuarial loss (gain)		75,839			(57,418	)		(2,188	)		4,048
Benefits paid		(39,686	)		(31,351	)		(2,768	)		(3,234	)

Benefit obligation, end of year	$	677,641		$	616,938		$	34,402		$	37,914

Change in Plan Assets:
Plan assets at fair value, beginning of year	$	456,445		$	406,163		$	—		$	—
Actual return on plan assets		43,804			47,529			—			—
Employer contributions		21,596			32,078			2,768			3,234
Impact of currency exchange rate changes		(6,219	)		2,026			—			—
Benefits paid		(39,686	)		(31,351	)		(2,768	)		(3,234	)

Plan assets at fair value, end of year	$	475,940		$	456,445		$	—		$	—

Net Amount Recognized in Consolidated Balance Sheets:
Funded status, end of year	$	(201,701	)	$	(160,493	)	$	(34,402	)	$	(37,914	)

Current accrued benefit liability		(2,540	)		(2,661	)		(3,600	)		(2,700	)
Noncurrent accrued benefit liability		(199,161	)		(157,832	)		(30,802	)		(35,214	)

Total accrued benefit liability	$	(201,701	)	$	(160,493	)	$	(34,402	)	$	(37,914	)

Amounts Recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss (a):
Net actuarial loss	$	253,593		$	205,091		$	4,914		$	7,119
Prior service (credit)		(9,036	)		(10,093	)		—			—

	$	244,557		$	194,998		$	4,914		$	7,119

(a)

Amounts exclude related tax benefits of $88.0 million and $70.2 million for December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, which are also included in accumulated other comprehensive loss.

The accumulated benefit obligation differs from the projected benefit obligation in that it assumes future compensation levels will remain unchanged. Mattel’s accumulated benefit obligation for its defined benefit pension plans as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 totaled $632.2 million and $579.0 million, respectively.

The assumptions used in determining the projected and accumulated benefit obligations of Mattel’s domestic defined benefit pension and postretirement benefit plans are as follows:


	December 31,
	2014			2013
Defined benefit pension plans:
Discount rate		3.8	%		4.7	%
Weighted average rate of future compensation increases		3.8	%		3.8	%

Postretirement benefit plans:
Discount rate		3.8	%		4.7	%
Annual increase in Medicare Part B premium		6.0	%		6.0	%

Health care cost trend rate:
Pre-65		7.5	%		8.5	%
Post-65		8.8	%		7.5	%

Ultimate cost trend rate:
Pre-65		4.5	%		6.1	%
Post-65		4.5	%		5.4	%

Year that the rate reaches the ultimate cost trend rate:
Pre-65		2023			2030
Post-65		2024			2030

A one percentage point increase/(decrease) in the assumed health care cost trend rate for each future year would impact the postretirement benefit obligation as of December 31, 2014 by $2.0 million and $(1.7) million, respectively, and the service and interest cost recognized for 2014 by $0.1 million and $(0.1) million, respectively.

The estimated future benefit payments for Mattel’s defined benefit pension and postretirement benefit plans are as follows:


	Defined Benefit Pension Plans		Postretirement Benefit Plans
	(In thousands)
2015	$	31,082	$	3,600
2016		40,340		3,400
2017		41,846		3,400
2018		43,161		3,300
2019		41,119		3,200
2020 – 2024		186,866		14,100

Mattel expects to make cash contributions totaling approximately $21 million to its defined benefit pension and postretirement benefit plans in 2015, which includes approximately $7 million for benefit payments for its unfunded plans.

Mattel periodically commissions a study of the plans’ assets and liabilities to determine an asset allocation that would best match expected cash flows from the plans’ assets to expected benefit payments. Mattel monitors the returns earned by the plans’ assets and reallocates investments as needed. Mattel’s overall investment strategy is to achieve an adequately diversified asset allocation mix of investments that provides for both near-term benefit payments as well as long-term growth. The assets are invested in a combination of indexed and actively managed funds. The target allocations for Mattel’s domestic plan assets, which comprise 80% of Mattel’s total plan assets, are 35% in US equities, 35% in non-US equities, 20% in US long-term bonds, and 10% in US Treasury inflation-protected securities. The US equities are benchmarked against the S&P 500, and the non-US equities are benchmarked against a combination of developed and emerging markets indices. Fixed income securities are long-duration bonds intended to closely match the duration of the liabilities and include US government treasuries and agencies, corporate bonds from various industries, and mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities.

Mattel’s defined benefit pension plan assets are measured and reported in the financial statements at fair value using inputs, which are more fully described in “Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements—Fair Value Measurements,” as follows:


	December 31, 2014
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
	(In thousands)
Collective trust funds:
US equity securities	$	—	$	174,027	$	—	$	174,027
International equity securities		—		166,432		—		166,432
International fixed income		—		47,260		—		47,260
US government and US government agency securities		—		36,531		—		36,531
US corporate debt instruments		—		24,628		—		24,628
International corporate debt instruments		—		4,700		—		4,700
Mutual funds		561		15,000		—		15,561
Other		—		6,801		—		6,801

Total	$	561	$	475,379	$	—	$	475,940


	December 31, 2013
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
	(In thousands)
Collective trust funds:
US equity securities	$	—	$	174,735	$	—	$	174,735
International equity securities		—		164,998		—		164,998
International fixed income		—		41,523		—		41,523
US government and US government agency securities		—		31,434		—		31,434
US corporate debt instruments		—		21,171		—		21,171
International corporate debt instruments		—		4,996		—		4,996
Mutual funds		1,520		7,221		—		8,741
Other		—		8,847		—		8,847

Total	$	1,520	$	454,925	$	—	$	456,445

The fair value of collective trust funds and mutual funds are determined based on the net asset value of shares held at year-end. The fair value of US government securities, US government agency securities, and corporate debt instruments are determined based on quoted market prices or are estimated using pricing models with observable inputs, quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics, or discounted cash flows.

Mattel’s defined benefit pension plan assets are not directly invested in Mattel common stock. Mattel believes that the long-term rate of return on plan assets of 8.0% used in determining plan expense for the year ended December 31, 2014 was reasonable based on historical returns.

Defined Contribution Retirement Plans

Domestic employees are eligible to participate in a 401(k) savings plan, the Mattel, Inc. Personal Investment Plan (the “Plan”), sponsored by Mattel, which is a funded defined contribution plan intended to comply with ERISA’s requirements. Contributions to the Plan include voluntary contributions by eligible employees and employer automatic and matching contributions by Mattel. The Plan allows employees to allocate both their voluntary contributions and their employer automatic and matching contributions to a variety of investment funds, including a fund that is invested in Mattel common stock (the “Mattel Stock Fund”). Employees are not required to allocate any of their Plan account balance to the Mattel Stock Fund, allowing employees to limit or eliminate their exposure to market changes in Mattel’s stock price. Furthermore, the Plan limits the percentage of the employee’s total account balance that may be allocated to the Mattel Stock Fund to 25%. Employees may generally reallocate their account balances on a daily basis. However, pursuant to Mattel’s insider trading policy, employees classified as insiders and restricted personnel under Mattel’s insider trading policy are limited to certain periods in which they may make allocations into or out of the Mattel Stock Fund.

Certain non-US employees participate in other defined contribution retirement plans with varying vesting and contribution provisions.

Deferred Compensation and Excess Benefit Plans

Mattel maintains a deferred compensation plan that permits certain officers and key employees to elect to defer portions of their compensation. The deferred compensation plan, together with certain contributions made by Mattel and participating employees to an excess benefit plan, earns various rates of return. The liability for these plans as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 was $73.6 million and $68.0 million, respectively, and is included in other noncurrent liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets. Changes in the market value of the participant-selected investment options are recorded as retirement plan expense within other selling and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations. Separately, Mattel has purchased group trust-owned life insurance contracts designed to assist in funding these programs. The cash surrender value of these policies, valued at $67.6 million and $66.0 million as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, are held in an irrevocable grantor trust, the assets of which are subject to the claims of Mattel’s creditors and are included in other noncurrent assets in the consolidated balance sheets.

Incentive Compensation Plans

Mattel has annual incentive compensation plans under which officers and key employees may earn incentive compensation based on Mattel’s performance and are subject to certain approvals of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. For 2014, 2013, and 2012, $25.2 million, $65.0 million, and $108.1 million, respectively, was charged to expense for awards under these plans.

Mattel had two long-term incentive program (“LTIP”) performance cycles in place for the time period between 2012 and 2014: (i) a January 1, 2011—December 31, 2013 performance cycle, which was established by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors in March 2011, and (ii) a January 1, 2014—December 31, 2016 performance cycle, which was established by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors in March 2014.

For the January 1, 2011—December 31, 2013 LTIP performance cycle, Mattel granted performance-based restricted stock units (“Performance RSUs”) under the Mattel, Inc. 2010 Equity and Long-Term Compensation Plan to officers and certain employees providing services to Mattel. Performance RSUs granted under this program were earned based on an initial target number with the final number of Performance RSUs payable being determined based on the product of the initial target number of Performance RSUs multiplied by a performance factor based on measurements of Mattel’s performance with respect to: (i) annual operating result targets for each year in the performance cycle using a net operating profit after taxes less capital charge measure and a net sales performance measure (“the 2011-2013 performance-related components”), and (ii) Mattel’s total stock return (“TSR”) for the three-year performance cycle relative to the TSR realized by companies comprising the S&P 500 as of the first day of the performance cycle (“the 2011-2013 market-related component”), adjusted for dividends declared during the three-year performance cycle. The Performance RSUs also had dividend equivalent rights that were converted to shares of Mattel common stock when the underlying Performance RSUs were earned and paid in shares of Mattel common stock. For the January 1, 2011—December 31, 2013 LTIP performance cycle, 1.0 million shares were earned relating to the 2011-2013 performance-related components, 0.5 million shares were earned relating to the 2011-2013 market-related component, and 0.1 million shares were earned related to dividend equivalent rights, resulting in a total of 1.6 million shares that vested in February 2014.

For the January 1, 2011—December 31, 2013 LTIP performance cycle, the weighted average grant date fair value of the 2011-2013 performance-related and 2011-2013 market-related components of the Performance RSUs were $42.30 and $4.59 per share, respectively, for 2013, and $32.87 and $4.55 per share, respectively, for 2012. During 2013 and 2012, $10.0 million and $12.4 million, respectively, was charged to expense relating to the 2011-2013 performance-related components. Additionally, during 2013 and 2012, Mattel recognized share-based compensation expense of $1.4 million and $1.8 million, respectively, for the 2011-2013 market-related component.

For the January 1, 2014—December 31, 2016 LTIP performance cycle, Mattel also granted 2014-2016 Performance RSUs under the Mattel, Inc. 2010 Equity and Long-Term Compensation Plan to officers and certain employees providing services to Mattel. Performance RSUs granted under this program are also earned based on an initial target number with the final number of Performance RSUs payable being determined based on the product of the initial target number of Performance RSUs multiplied by a performance factor based on measurements of Mattel’s performance with respect to: (i) annual operating result targets for each year in the performance cycle using a net operating profit after taxes less capital charge measure and a net sales performance measure (“the 2014-2016 performance-related components”), and (ii) Mattel’s TSR for the three-year performance cycle relative to the TSR realized by companies comprising the S&P 500 as of the first day of the performance cycle (“the 2014-2016 market-related component”), adjusted for dividends declared during the three-year performance cycle. The Performance RSUs also have dividend equivalent rights that are converted to shares of Mattel common stock only when and to the extent the underlying Performance RSUs are earned and paid in shares of Mattel common stock. For the 2014-2016 performance-related components, the range of possible outcomes is that between zero and 0.5 million shares can be earned for each year during the performance cycle. For the 2014-2016 market-related component, the possible outcomes range from an upward adjustment of 0.5 million shares to a downward adjustment of 0.5 million shares to the results of the performance-related components over the three-year performance cycle.

For the January 1, 2014—December 31, 2016 LTIP performance cycle, the weighted average grant date fair value of the performance-related and market-related components of the Performance RSUs were $39.03 and $(3.57) per share, respectively, for 2014. During 2014, actual results did not meet minimum performance thresholds, as such no shares were earned and no expense was recognized related to the 2014-2016 performance-related component. During 2014, no share-based compensation expense was recorded related to the 2014-2016 market-related component.

The fair values of the performance-related components were based on the closing stock prices of Mattel’s common stock on each of the grant dates. The fair values of the market-related component were estimated at the grant dates using a Monte Carlo valuation methodology.