10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2011

Commission file number: 1-5794

Masco Corporation

(Exact name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

Delaware	38-1794485
(State or Other	(IRS Employer
Jurisdiction	Identification No.)
of Incorporation)
21001 Van Born Road, Taylor, Michigan	48180
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)	(Zip Code)

(313) 274-7400

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

þ Yes               o No

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

þ Yes                o No

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer þ	Accelerated filer o	Non-accelerated filer o	Smaller reporting company o
		(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

o Yes               þ No

     Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Class	Shares Outstanding at October 25, 2011
Common stock, par value $1.00 per share	357,800,000

MASCO CORPORATION

INDEX

	Page No.
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements:
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010		1
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the Three Months and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010		2
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010		3
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity September 30, 2011 and 2010		4
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements		5-19
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		20-26
Item 4. Controls and Procedures		27
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION		28-30
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Item 6. Exhibits
Signature
EX-12
EX-31.A
EX-31.B
EX-32
EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT
EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT
EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 DEFINITION LINKBASE DOCUMENT

MASCO CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Unaudited)

September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010
(In Millions, Except Share Data)

	September 30,		December 31,
	2011		2010
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash investments	$	1,610	$	1,715
Receivables		1,133		888
Prepaid expenses and other		118		129
Inventories:
Finished goods		457		393
Raw material		297		246
Work in process		96		93
		850		732
Total current assets		3,711		3,464
Property and equipment, net		1,656		1,737
Goodwill		2,387		2,383
Other intangible assets, net		256		269
Other assets		202		287
Total assets	$	8,212	$	8,140
LIABILITIES
Current liabilities:
Notes payable	$	806	$	66
Accounts payable		866		602
Accrued liabilities		813		819
Total current liabilities		2,485		1,487
Long-term debt		3,224		4,032
Deferred income taxes and other		1,016		1,039
Total liabilities		6,725		6,558
Commitments and contingencies
EQUITY
Masco Corporation’s shareholders’ equity:
Common shares, par value $1 per share Authorized shares: 1,400,000,000; issued and outstanding: 2011 — 347,800,000; 2010 — 348,600,000		348		349
Preferred shares authorized: 1,000,000; issued and outstanding: 2011 — None; 2010 — None		—		—
Paid-in capital		50		42
Retained earnings		638		720
Accumulated other comprehensive income		231		273
Total Masco Corporation’s shareholders’ equity		1,267		1,384
Noncontrolling interest		220		198
Total equity		1,487		1,582
Total liabilities and equity	$	8,212	$	8,140

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

1

MASCO CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (Unaudited)

For the Three Months and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010
(In Millions Except Per Common Share Data)

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
Net sales	$	2,006		$	1,957		$	5,800		$	5,857
Cost of sales		1,511			1,463			4,348			4,325
Gross profit		495			494			1,452			1,532
Selling, general and administrative expenses		393			392			1,238			1,233
Operating profit		102			102			214			299
Other income (expense), net:
Interest expense		(63	)		(63	)		(190	)		(188	)
Impairment charge for financial investments		—			—			—			(33	)
Other, net		22			(1	)		74			(2	)
		(41	)		(64	)		(116	)		(223	)
Income before income taxes		61			38			98			76
Income tax expense		12			31			63			53
Net income		49			7			35			23
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest		13			12			37			32
Net income (loss) attributable to Masco Corporation	$	36		$	(5	)	$	(2	)	$	(9	)
Earnings (loss) per common share attributable to Masco Corporation:
Basic:
Net income (loss)	$	.10		$	(.02	)	$	(.01	)	$	(.03	)
Diluted:
Net income (loss)	$	.10		$	(.02	)	$	(.01	)	$	(.03	)
Amounts attributable to Masco Corporation:
Net income (loss)	$	36		$	(5	)	$	(2	)	$	(9	)

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

2

MASCO CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)

For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010
(In Millions)

	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
	2011			2010
CASH FLOWS FROM (FOR) OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Cash provided by operations	$	210		$	333
Increase in receivables		(245	)		(136	)
Increase in inventories		(118	)		(64	)
Increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities, net		248			103
Net cash from operating activities		95			236
CASH FLOWS FROM (FOR) FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Increase in debt		—			2
Payment of debt		(3	)		(3	)
Issuance of Notes, net of issuance costs		—			494
Retirement of Notes		(58	)		(359	)
Purchase of Company common stock		(30	)		(45	)
Cash dividends paid		(80	)		(81	)
Dividend payment to noncontrolling interest		(18	)		(15	)
Credit Agreement costs		(1	)		(9	)
Net cash for financing activities		(190	)		(16	)
CASH FLOWS FROM (FOR) INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Capital expenditures		(106	)		(88	)
Proceeds from disposition of:
Marketable securities		49			5
Other financial investments, net		43			6
Property and equipment		19			16
Purchases of other financial investments		(7	)		—
Other, net		(7	)		(26	)
Net cash for investing activities		(9	)		(87	)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash investments		(1	)		(9	)
CASH AND CASH INVESTMENTS:
(Decrease) increase for the period		(105	)		124
At January 1		1,715			1,413
At September 30	$	1,610		$	1,537

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

MASCO CORPORATION and Consolidated Subsidiaries (Unaudited)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
For the Periods Ended September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010

(In Millions, Except Per Share Data)

													Accumulated
				Common									Other
				Shares			Paid-In			Retained			Comprehensive			Noncontrolling
	Total			($1 par value)			Capital			Earnings			Income			Interest
Balance, January 1, 2010	$	2,817		$	350		$	42		$	1,871		$	366		$	188
Net (loss) income		23									(9	)					32
Cumulative translation adjustments		(37	)											(28	)		(9	)
Unrealized (loss) on marketable securities, net of income tax (benefit) of $(1)		(4	)											(4	)
Unrecognized prior service cost and net
loss, net of income tax of $3		5												5
Total comprehensive loss		(13	)
Shares issued		(1	)		1			(2	)
Shares retired:
Repurchased		(45	)		(3	)		(42	)
Surrendered (non-cash)		(6	)					(6	)
Cash dividends declared		(81	)								(81	)
Dividend payment to noncontrolling interest		(15	)														(15	)
Stock-based compensation		44						44
Balance, September 30, 2010	$	2,700		$	348		$	36		$	1,781		$	339		$	196
Balance, January 1, 2011		1,582			349			42			720			273			198
Net (loss) income		35									(2	)					37
Cumulative translation adjustments		8												5			3
Unrealized (loss) on marketable securities, net of income tax of $—		(38	)											(38	)
Unrealized (loss) on interest rate swaps, net of income tax of $—		(17	)											(17	)
Unrecognized prior service cost and net loss, net of income tax of $—		8												8
Total comprehensive income		(4	)
Shares issued		—			2			(2	)
Shares retired:
Repurchased		(30	)		(2	)		(28	)
Surrendered (non-cash)		(8	)		(1	)		(7	)
Cash dividends declared		(80	)								(80	)
Dividend payment to noncontrolling interest		(18	)														(18	)
Stock-based compensation		45						45
Balance, September 30, 2011	$	1,487		$	348		$	50		$	638		$	231		$	220

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

4

MASCO CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

A.	In the opinion of the Company, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments, of a normal recurring nature, necessary to present fairly its financial position as at September 30, 2011 and the results of operations for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 and cash flows and shareholders’ equity for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010. The condensed consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2010 was derived from audited financial statements.
	Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
	Effective January 1, 2011, the Company adopted new accounting guidance which addresses how to determine whether a sales arrangement involves multiple deliverables or contains more than one unit of accounting, and how the sales arrangement consideration should be allocated among the separate units of accounting. The Company evaluated this new guidance and the adoption did not have an impact on the Company’s financial position or its results of operations.
	In June 2011, new accounting guidance was issued regarding the presentation and disclosure of comprehensive income. The new guidance will require presentation of other comprehensive income items in the Company’s consolidated statement of income; such items will no longer be included in the statement of shareholders’ equity. The new guidance will also require additional disclosure for reclassification of items from other comprehensive income to the Company’s statement of income. The new guidance will be effective for the Company January 1, 2012. The Company does not expect this guidance to have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition or its results of operations.
	In September 2011, new accounting guidance was issued regarding impairment testing of goodwill. The new guidance would allow the Company to make a qualitative determination regarding potential goodwill impairment before performing the quantitative impairment test. The new guidance will be effective for the Company January 1, 2012. The Company does not anticipate utilizing the qualitative provisions of the new guidance.

5

MASCO CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)

B. The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, by segment, were as follows, in millions:

	Gross Goodwill		Accumulated			Net Goodwill
	At		Impairment			At
	Sep. 30, 2011		Losses			Sep. 30, 2011
Cabinets and Related Products	$	588	$	(364	)	$	224
Plumbing Products		539		(340	)		199
Installation and Other Services		1,819		(762	)		1,057
Decorative Architectural Products		294		—			294
Other Specialty Products		980		(367	)		613
Total	$	4,220	$	(1,833	)	$	2,387

	Gross Goodwill		Accumulated			Net Goodwill
	At		Impairment			At				At
	Dec. 31, 2010		Losses			Dec. 31, 2010		Other(A)		Sep. 30, 2011
Cabinets and Related Products	$	587	$	(364	)	$	223	$	1	$	224
Plumbing Products		536		(340	)		196		3		199
Installation and Other Services		1,819		(762	)		1,057		—		1,057
Decorative Architectural Products		294		—			294		—		294
Other Specialty Products		980		(367	)		613		—		613
Total	$	4,216	$	(1,833	)	$	2,383	$	4	$	2,387

(A) Other principally includes the effect of foreign currency translation.

Other indefinite-lived intangible assets were $185 million at both September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, and principally included registered trademarks. The carrying value of the Company’s definite-lived intangible assets was $71 million (net of accumulated amortization of $80 million) at September 30, 2011 and $84 million (net of accumulated amortization of $75 million) at December 31, 2010, and principally included customer relationships and non-compete agreements.

As a result of continued losses in the commercial businesses in the Installation and Other Services segment, at September 30, 2011, the Company recorded a pre-tax impairment charge of $7 million related to certain intangible assets for these businesses. The Company then assessed the goodwill associated with these businesses and determined no impairment was necessary at September 30, 2011.

6

MASCO CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)

C. Depreciation and amortization expense was $188 million and $209 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

D. The Company has maintained investments in available-for-sale securities and a number of private equity funds, principally as part of its tax planning strategies, as any gains enhance the utilization of any current and future tax capital losses. Financial investments included in other assets were as follows, in millions:

	September 30,		December 31,
	2011		2010
Auction rate securities	$	22	$	22
TriMas Corporation common stock		—		40
Total recurring investments		22		62
Private equity funds		92		106
Other investments		5		13
Total non-recurring investments		97		119
Total	$	119	$	181

The Company’s investments in available-for-sale securities at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were as follows, in millions:

			Pre-tax
			Unrealized		Unrealized		Recorded
	Cost Basis		Gains		Losses		Basis
September 30, 2011	$	19	$	3	$	—	$	22
December 31, 2010	$	22	$	40	$	—	$	62

Recurring Fair Value Measurements. Financial assets and (liabilities) measured at fair value on a recurring basis at each reporting period and the amounts for each level within the fair value hierarchy were as follows, in millions:

			Fair Value Measurements Using
					Significant
			Quoted		Other		Significant
			Market		Observable		Unobservable
	Sep. 30,		Prices		Inputs		Inputs
	2011		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Auction rate securities	$	22	$	—	$	—	$	22
Total	$	22	$	—	$	—	$	22

			Fair Value Measurements Using
					Significant
			Quoted		Other		Significant
			Market		Observable		Unobservable
	Dec. 31,		Prices		Inputs		Inputs
	2010		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Auction rate securities	$	22	$	—	$	—	$	22
TriMas Corporation		40		40		—		—
Total	$	62	$	40	$	—	$	22

7

MASCO CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)

Note D — continued:

The fair value of the auction rate securities held by the Company have been estimated, on a recurring basis, using a discounted cash flow model (Level 3 input). The significant inputs in the discounted cash flow model used to value the auction rate securities include: expected maturity of auction rate securities, discount rate used to determine the present value of expected cash flows and the assumptions for credit defaults, since the auction rate securities are backed by credit default swap agreements.

The following tables summarize the changes in Level 3 financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and the year ended December 31, 2010, in millions:

	Auction Rate
	Securities
Fair value January 1, 2011	$	22
Total losses included in earnings		—
Unrealized (losses)		—
Purchases		—
Settlements		—
Transfer from Level 3 to Level 2		—
Fair value at September 30, 2011	$	22

During 2010, the Company converted all of its holdings in Asahi Tec preferred stock into common stock, which was sold in its entirety in 2010 in open market transactions.

	Asahi Tec			Auction Rate
	Preferred Stock			Securities		Total
Fair value January 1, 2010	$	71		$	22	$	93
Total losses included in earnings		(28	)		—		(28	)
Unrealized losses		(23	)		—		(23	)
Purchases, issuances, settlements		—			—		—
Transfers from Level 3 to Level 2		(20	)		—		(20	)
Fair value at December 31, 2010	$	—		$	22	$	22

Non-Recurring Fair Value Measurements. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company did not measure any financial investments on a non-recurring basis, as there was no other-than-temporary decline in the estimated value of private equity funds. Financial investments measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis during 2010 and the amounts for each level within the fair value hierarchy were as follows, in millions:

			Fair Value Measurements Using
					Significant
			Quoted		Other		Significant
			Market		Observable		Unobservable		Total
	Dec. 31,		Prices		Inputs		Inputs		Gains
	2010		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)		(Losses)
Private equity funds	$	2	$	—	$	—	$	2	$	(4	)
Other private investments		—		—		—		—		(2	)
	$	2	$	—	$	—	$	2	$	(6	)

8

MASCO CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)

Note D — concluded:

The Company did not have any transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 financial assets in the first nine months of 2011 or in the full-year 2010.

Income and impairment charges for financial investments were as follows, in millions:

	Three Months Ended					Nine Months Ended
	September 30,					September 30,
	2011		2010			2011		2010
Realized gains (losses)
from:
TriMas Corporation common stock	$	—	$	—		$	41	$	—
Private equity funds		19		—			28		—
Other financial investments		—		(3	)		—		(2	)
Total realized gains	$	19	$	(3	)	$	69	$	(2	)
Impairment charges:
Asahi Tec Preferred Stock	$	—	$	—		$	—	$	(28	)
Private equity funds		—		—			—		(3	)
Other private investments		—		—			—		(2	)
Total impairment charges	$	—	$	—		$	—	$	(33	)

The fair value of the Company’s short-term and long-term fixed-rate debt instruments is based principally upon quoted market prices for the same or similar issues or the current rates available to the Company for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities. The aggregate estimated market value of short-term and long-term debt at September 30, 2011 was approximately $3.9 billion, compared with the aggregate carrying value of $4.0 billion. The aggregate estimated market value of short-term and long-term debt at December 31, 2010 was approximately $4.2 billion, compared with the aggregate carrying value of $4.1 billion.

E. In August 2011, the Company entered into new interest rate swap agreements to hedge the volatility in interest payments associated with the expected debt issuance planned to occur in 2012. These interest rate swaps are designed as cash flow hedges and effectively fix interest rates on the forecasted debt issuance based on 3-month LIBOR. The average fixed rate on the interest rate swaps is 2.8%. At September 30, 2011, the interest rate swap agreements covered a notional amount of $400 million, which we expect to issue in connection with the maturity of the Company’s $791 million fixed-rate debt due July 15, 2012 with an interest rate of 5.875%. At September 30, 2011, the interest rate swaps are considered 100 percent effective; therefore, the market valuation of $17 million is recorded in other comprehensive income in the Company’s statement of shareholders’ equity with a corresponding increase to accrued liabilities in the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2011.

9

MASCO CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)

Note E — concluded:

During 2011 and 2010, the Company entered into foreign currency exchange contracts to hedge currency fluctuations related to intercompany loans denominated in non-functional currencies. Based upon period-end market prices, the Company had recorded assets (liabilities) of $5 million and $(2) million to reflect contract prices at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. Such gains (losses) are partially offset by gains (losses) related to the translation of loans and accounts denominated in non-functional currencies. Gains (losses) related to these contracts are recorded in the Company’s consolidated statements of income in other income (expense), net. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company had recorded gains net of $1 million and $2 million, respectively, related to these foreign currency exchange contracts. For the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company had recorded gains (losses) net of $8 million and $(8) million, respectively, related to these foreign currency exchange contracts.

During 2011 and 2010, the Company, including certain of its European operations, also entered into foreign currency forward contracts to manage a portion of its exposure to currency fluctuations in the European euro and the U.S. dollar. Based upon period-end market prices, the Company had recorded liabilities of $— million and $3 million to reflect contract prices at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. Gains (losses) related to these contracts are recorded in the Company’s consolidated statements of income in other income (expense), net. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company had recorded gains (losses) net of $3 million and $(1) million, respectively, related to these foreign currency exchange contracts. For the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company had recorded gains net of $2 million and $1 million, respectively, related to these foreign currency exchange contracts.

In the event that the counterparties fail to meet the terms of the foreign currency forward contracts, the Company’s exposure is limited to the aggregate foreign currency rate differential with such institutions.

During 2011 and 2010, the Company entered into several contracts to manage its exposure to increases in the price of copper and zinc. Based upon period-end market prices, the Company had recorded (liabilities) assets of $(5) million and $7 million to reflect contract prices at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. Gains (losses) related to these contracts are recorded in the Company’s consolidated statements of income in cost of goods sold. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company had recorded (losses) gains net of $(10) million and $3 million, respectively, related to these commodity contracts. For the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company had recorded (losses) gains net of $(11) million and $4 million, respectively, related to these commodity contracts.

The fair value of these derivative contracts is estimated on a recurring basis, quarterly, using Level 2 inputs (significant other observable inputs).

10

MASCO CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)

F. Changes in the Company’s warranty liability were as follows, in millions:

	Nine Months Ended			Twelve Months Ended
	September 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
Balance at January 1	$	107		$	109
Accruals for warranties issued during the period		20			42
Accruals related to pre-existing warranties		7			(4	)
Settlements made (in cash or kind) during the period		(29	)		(37	)
Other, net		(2	)		(3	)
Balance at end of period	$	103		$	107

G.	Based on the limitations of the debt to total capitalization covenant, at September 30, 2011, the Company had additional borrowing capacity, subject to availability, of up to $979 million. Additionally, at September 30, 2011, the Company could absorb a reduction to shareholders’ equity of approximately $527 million, and remain in compliance with the debt to total capitalization covenant.
	In order to borrow under the Credit Agreement, there must not be any default in the Company’s covenants in the credit agreement (i.e., in addition to the two financial covenants, principally limitations on subsidiary debt, negative pledge restrictions, legal compliance requirements and maintenance of properties and insurance) and the Company’s representations and warranties in the credit agreement must be true in all material respects on the date of borrowing (i.e., principally no material adverse change or litigation likely to result in a material adverse change, since December 31, 2009, and, in each case, no material ERISA or environmental non-compliance and no material tax deficiency). The Company was in compliance with all covenants and no borrowings have been made at September 30, 2011.
	At September 30, 2011, no principal amount at maturity of Zero Coupon Convertible Senior Notes due 2031 (“Notes”) was outstanding. During the third quarter of 2011, holders of $108.1 million principal amount at maturity with an accreted value of $58.1 million of Notes required the Company to repurchase the Notes for cash of $57.9 million; the remaining Notes were retired.

H. The Company’s 2005 Long Term Stock Incentive Plan (the “2005 Plan”) provides for the issuance of stock-based incentives in various forms to employees and non-employee Directors of the Company. At September 30, 2011, outstanding stock-based incentives were in the form of long-term stock awards, stock options, phantom stock awards and stock appreciation rights. Pre-tax compensation expense and the related income tax benefit, for these stock-based incentives, were as follows, in millions:

	Three Months Ended					Nine Months Ended
	September 30,					September 30,
	2011			2010		2011			2010
Long-term stock awards	$	9		$	9	$	28		$	28
Stock options		6			6		17			17
Phantom stock awards and stock appreciation rights		(5	)		1		(3	)		—
Total	$	10		$	16	$	42		$	45
Income tax benefit (before valuation allowance)	$	4		$	6	$	16		$	17

11

MASCO CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)

Note H — continued:

Long-Term Stock Awards

Long-term stock awards are granted to key employees and non-employee Directors of the Company and do not cause net share dilution inasmuch as the Company continues the practice of repurchasing and retiring an equal number of shares on the open market.

The Company’s long-term stock award activity was as follows, shares in millions:

	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
	2011		2010
Unvested stock award shares at January 1		10		9
Weighted average grant date fair value	$	19	$	21
Stock award shares granted		2		3
Weighted average grant date fair value	$	13	$	14
Stock award shares vested		2		2
Weighted average grant date fair value	$	20	$	23
Stock award shares forfeited		—		—
Weighted average grant date fair value	$	18	$	19
Unvested stock award shares at September 30		10		10
Weighted average grant date fair value	$	17	$	19

At September 30, 2011 and 2010, there was $122 million and $136 million, respectively, of total unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested stock awards; such awards had a weighted average remaining vesting period of five years in both periods.

The total market value (at the vesting date) of stock award shares which vested during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 was $28 million and $22 million, respectively.

Stock Options

Stock options are granted to key employees of the Company. The exercise price equals the market price of the Company’s common stock at the grant date. These options generally become exercisable (vest ratably) over five years beginning on the first anniversary from the date of grant and expire no later than 10 years after the grant date.

The Company granted 2,372,500 of stock option shares in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 with a grant date exercise price approximating $13 per share. In the first nine months of 2011, 2,830,000 stock option shares were forfeited (including options that expired unexercised).

12

MASCO CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)

Note H — continued:

The Company’s stock option activity was as follows, shares in millions:

	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
	2011		2010
Option shares outstanding, January 1		37		36
Weighted average exercise price	$	21	$	23
Option shares granted, including restoration options		2		5
Weighted average exercise price	$	13	$	14
Option shares exercised		—		—
Aggregate intrinsic value on date of exercise (A)	$1 million		$1 million
Weighted average exercise price	$	8	$	8
Option shares forfeited		3		4
Weighted average exercise price	$	22	$	23
Option shares outstanding, September 30		36		37
Weighted average exercise price	$	21	$	21
Weighted average remaining option term (in years)		6		6
Option shares vested and expected to vest, September 30		36		37
Weighted average exercise price	$	21	$	22
Aggregate intrinsic value (A)	$—million		$15 million
Weighted average remaining option term (in years)		6		6
Option shares exercisable (vested), September 30		24		22
Weighted average exercise price	$	24	$	25
Aggregate intrinsic value (A)	$—million		$3 million
Weighted average remaining option term (in years)		4		4

(A) Aggregate intrinsic value is calculated using the Company’s stock price at each respective date, less the exercise price (grant date price) multiplied by the number of shares.

At September 30, 2011 and 2010, there was $39 million and $50 million, respectively, of unrecognized compensation expense (using the Black-Scholes option pricing model) related to unvested stock options; such options had a weighted average vesting period of three years in both 2011 and 2010.

13

MASCO CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)

Note H — concluded:

The weighted average grant date fair value of option shares granted and the assumptions used to estimate those values using a Black-Scholes option pricing model, were as follows:

	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
	2011			2010
Weighted average grant date fair value	$	5.10		$	5.30
Risk-free interest rate		2.72	%		2.77	%
Dividend yield		2.34	%		2.17	%
Volatility factor		49.00	%		46.01	%
Expected option life	6 years			6 years

I.	The Company sponsors qualified defined-benefit or defined-contribution retirement plans for most of its employees. In addition to the Company’s qualified defined-benefit pension plans, the Company has unfunded non-qualified defined-benefit pension plans covering certain employees, which provide for benefits in addition to those provided by the qualified pension plans. Substantially all salaried employees participate in non-contributory defined-contribution retirement plans, to which payments are determined annually by the Organization and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.
	During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company adjusted certain employee expense related accruals which resulted in a $5 million reduction to expenses related to the fourth quarter of 2010. The effect was not material to the previously issued financial statements.
	Effective January 1, 2010, the Company froze all future benefit accruals under substantially all of the Company’s domestic qualified and non-qualified defined-benefit pension plans. Future benefit accruals related to the Company’s foreign non-qualified plans were frozen several years ago.
	Net periodic pension cost for the Company’s defined-benefit pension plans was as follows, in millions:

	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2011					2010
	Qualified			Non-Qualified		Qualified			Non-Qualified
Service cost	$	1		$	—	$	2		$	—
Interest cost		12			2		11			3
Expected return on plan assets		(9	)		—		(9	)		—
Amortization of prior service cost		—			—		—			—
Amortization of net loss		2			1		3			—
Net periodic pension cost	$	6		$	3		7			3

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2011					2010
	Qualified			Non-Qualified		Qualified			Non-Qualified
Service cost	$	2		$	—	$	4		$	—
Interest cost		34			6		34			7
Expected return on plan assets		(25	)		—		(27	)		—
Amortization of prior service cost		—			—		—			—
Amortization of net loss		7			1		8			—
Net periodic pension cost	$	18		$	7	$	19		$	7

14

MASCO CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)

Note I — concluded:

At December 31, 2010, the Company reported a net liability of $522 million, of which $163 million was related to our non-qualified, supplemental retirement plans, which are not subject to the funding requirements of the Pension Protection Act. In accordance with the Pension Protection Act of 2006, the Adjusted Funding Target Attainment Percentage (“AFTAP”) for the various defined-benefit pension plans ranges from 62 percent to 86 percent. At December 31, 2010, the Company had one plan that offered accelerated benefits (i.e., lump sum distributions) and the AFTAP for that plan is less than 80 percent; therefore, the plan is prohibited from allowing participants to receive any lump sum distribution in excess of 50 percent of the benefit value. In addition, plan amendments increasing benefits or liabilities for that plan are also prohibited.

15

MASCO CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)

J. Information about the Company by segment and geographic area was as follows, in millions:

	Three Months Ended September 30,										Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2011		2010		2011			2010			2011		2010		2011			2010
	Net Sales(A)				Operating Profit (Loss)						Net Sales(A)				Operating Profit (Loss)
The Company’s operations by
segment were:
Cabinets and Related Products	$	307	$	357	$	(34	)	$	(61	)	$	944	$	1,160	$	(111	)	$	(113	)
Plumbing Products		768		686		91			97			2,239		2,031		270			267
Installation and Other Services		315		292		(27	)		(22	)		863		874		(93	)		(87	)
Decorative Architectural Products		455		463		88			104			1,322		1,357		247			300
Other Specialty Products		161		159		12			11			432		435		2			16
Total	$	2,006	$	1,957	$	130		$	129		$	5,800	$	5,857	$	315		$	383
The Company’s operations by geographic area were:
North America	$	1,524	$	1,528	$	80		$	79		$	4,420	$	4,617	$	178		$	257
International, principally Europe		482		429		50			50			1,380		1,240		137			126
Total	$	2,006	$	1,957		130			129		$	5,800	$	5,857		315			383
General corporate expense, net						(27	)		(27	)						(95	)		(84	)
Charge for litigation settlement (B)						(1	)		—							(6	)		—
Operating profit						102			102							214			299
Other income (expense), net						(41	)		(64	)						(116	)		(223	)
Income before income taxes					$	61		$	38						$	98		$	76

(A)	Inter-segment sales were not material.
(B)	Charge for litigation settlement relates to a business unit in the Cabinets and Related Products segment and the Other Specialty Products segment.

16

MASCO CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)

K. Other, net, which is included in other income (expense), net, was as follows, in millions:

	Three Months Ended					Nine Months Ended
	September 30,					September 30,
	2011		2010			2011			2010
Income from cash and
cash investments	$	2	$	2		$	5		$	4
Other interest income		1		—			1			1
Income (loss) from financial investments
(Note D)		19		(3	)		69			(2	)
Other items, net		—		—			(1	)		(5	)
Total other net	$	22	$	(1	)	$	74		$	(2	)

Other items, net, included $1 million and $— million of currency gains for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively. Other items, net, included $4 million and $(2) million of currency gains (losses) for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively.

L. Reconciliations of the numerators and denominators used in the computations of basic and diluted earnings per common share were as follows, in millions:

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
Numerator (basic and diluted):
Net income (loss)	$	36		$	(5	)	$	(2	)	$	(9	)
Allocation to unvested restricted stock awards		(1	)		(1	)		(2	)		(2	)
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders		35			(6	)		(4	)		(11	)
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders	$	35		$	(6	)	$	(4	)	$	(11	)
Denominator:
Basic common shares (based upon weighted average)		348			349			348			349
Add:
Contingent common shares		—			—			—			—
Stock option dilution		—			—			—			—
Diluted common shares		348			349			348			349

For the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company allocated dividends to the unvested restricted stock awards (participating securities).

Additionally, 37 million common shares for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 related to stock options were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per common share due to their antidilutive effect.

17

MASCO CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)

Note L — concluded:

In the first nine months of 2011, the Company granted 2 million shares of long-term stock awards; to offset the dilutive impact of these awards, the Company also repurchased and retired approximately 2 million shares of Company common stock, for cash aggregating $30 million. At September 30, 2011, the Company had 25 million shares of its common stock remaining under the July 2007 Board of Directors repurchase authorization.

On the basis of amounts paid (declared), cash dividends per common share were $.075 ($.075) and $.225 ($.225), respectively, for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2010.

M. The Company is subject to lawsuits and pending or asserted claims with respect to matters generally arising in the ordinary course of business.

As previously disclosed, a lawsuit was brought against the Company and a number of its insulation installation companies alleging that certain of their practices violated provisions of the federal antitrust laws. The case was filed in October 2004 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia by Columbus Drywall & Insulation, Inc., Leo Jones Insulation, Inc., Southland Insulators, Inc., Southland Insulators of Maryland, Inc. d/b/a Devere Insulation, Southland Insulators of Delaware LLC d/b/a Delmarva Insulation, and Whitson Insulation Company of Grand Rapids, Inc. against the Company, its subsidiaries Masco Contractors Services Group Corp., Masco Contractor Services Central, Inc. (“MCS Central”) and Masco Contractor Services East, Inc., and several insulation manufacturers (the “Columbus Drywall case”). In February 2009, the court certified a class of 377 insulation contractors. Another suit was filed in March 2003 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia by Wilson Insulation Company, Wilson Insulation of Augusta, Inc. and The Wilson Insulation Group, Inc. against the Company, Masco Contractor Services, Inc., and MCS Central that alleged anticompetitive conduct. This case has been removed from the court’s active docket. In March 2007, Albert Von Der Werth and Valerie Good filed suit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California against the Company, its subsidiary Masco Contractor Services, and several insulation manufacturers seeking class action status and alleging anticompetitive conduct. This case was subsequently transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia and has been administratively stayed by the court. An additional suit, which was filed in September 2005 and alleged anticompetitive conduct, was dismissed with prejudice in December 2006.

The Company is vigorously defending the Columbus Drywall case. Based upon the advice of its outside counsel, the Company believes that the conduct of the Company and its insulation installation companies, which is the subject of the above-described lawsuits, has not violated any antitrust laws. The Company is unable at this time to reliably estimate any potential liability which might occur from an adverse judgment. There cannot be any assurance that the Company will ultimately prevail in these lawsuits, or, if unsuccessful, that the ultimate liability would not be material and would not have a material adverse effect on its businesses or the methods used by its insulation installation companies in doing business.

18

MASCO CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (concluded)

N. The effective tax rate was 64 percent for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 primarily due to an increase in the valuation allowance related to net operating losses and losses in certain jurisdictions providing no tax benefit.

As a result of tax audit closings, settlements and expiration of applicable statutes of limitations in various jurisdictions within the next 12 months, the Company anticipates that it is reasonably possible that the liability for uncertain tax positions could be reduced by approximately $6 million.

O. In October 2011, the Company determined that several businesses in the Installation and Other Services segment related to commercial drywall installation, millwork and framing are not core to the Company’s long-term growth strategy and, accordingly, has embarked on a plan of disposition. The businesses had combined 2010 net sales of approximately $100 million and aggregate operating losses of $10 million (excluding any impairment charges). The Company expects proceeds from the dispositions will be less than the net book value of the businesses. The dispositions are expected to be completed within the next twelve months.

19

MASCO CORPORATION

Item 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

THIRD QUARTER 2011 AND THE FIRST NINE MONTHS 2011 VERSUS
THIRD QUARTER 2010 AND THE FIRST NINE MONTHS 2010

SALES AND OPERATIONS

     The following table sets forth the Company’s net sales and operating profit margins by business segment and geographic area, dollars in millions:

	Three Months Ended				Percent
	September 30,				(Decrease) Increase
	2011		2010		2011 vs. 2010
Net Sales:
Cabinets and Related Products	$	307	$	357		(14	%)
Plumbing Products		768		686		12	%
Installation and Other Services		315		292		8	%
Decorative Architectural Products		455		463		(2	%)
Other Specialty Products		161		159		1	%
Total	$	2,006	$	1,957		3	%
North America	$	1,524	$	1,528		—	%
International, principally Europe		482		429		12	%
Total	$	2,006	$	1,957		3	%

	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
	2011		2010
Net Sales:
Cabinets and Related Products	$	944	$	1,160	(19	%)
Plumbing Products		2,239		2,031	10	%
Installation and Other Services		863		874	(1	%)
Decorative Architectural Products		1,322		1,357	(3	%)
Other Specialty Products		432		435	(1	%)
Total	$	5,800	$	5,857	(1	%)
North America	$	4,420	$	4,617	(4	%)
International, principally Europe		1,380		1,240	11	%
Total	$	5,800	$	5,857	(1	%)

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
Operating Profit (Loss) Margins: (A)
Cabinets and Related Products		(11.1	%)		(17.1	%)		(11.8	%)		(9.7	%)
Plumbing Products		11.8	%		14.1	%		12.1	%		13.1	%
Installation and Other Services		(8.6	%)		(7.5	%)		(10.8	%)		(10.0	%)
Decorative Architectural Products		19.3	%		22.5	%		18.7	%		22.1	%
Other Specialty Products		7.5	%		6.9	%		.5	%		3.7	%
North America		5.2	%		5.2	%		4.0	%		5.6	%
International, principally Europe		10.4	%		11.7	%		9.9	%		10.2	%
Total		6.5	%		6.6	%		5.4	%		6.5	%
Total operating profit margin, as reported		5.1	%		5.2	%		3.7	%		5.1	%

(A) Before general corporate expense, net and the charge for litigation settlement; see Note J to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

20

MASCO CORPORATION

Item 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

We report our financial results in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) in the United States. However, we believe that certain non-GAAP performance measures and ratios, used in managing the business, may provide users of this financial information with additional meaningful comparisons between current results and results in prior periods. Non-GAAP performance measures and ratios should be viewed in addition to, and not as an alternative for, our reported results.

NET SALES

Net sales increased three percent and decreased one percent, respectively, for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 from the comparable periods of 2010. Excluding the positive effect of currency translation, net sales were flat and decreased three percent, respectively, for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 from the comparable periods of 2010. The following table reconciles reported net sales to net sales excluding acquisitions and the effect of currency translation, in millions:

	Three Months Ended					Nine Months Ended
	September 30,					September 30,
	2011			2010		2011			2010
Net sales, as reported	$	2,006		$	1,957	$	5,800		$	5,857
Acquisitions (none)		—			—		—			—
Net sales, excluding acquisitions		2,006			1,957		5,800			5,857
Currency translation		(40	)		—		(94	)		—
Net sales, excluding acquisitions and the effect of currency translation	$	1,966		$	1,957	$	5,706		$	5,857

North American net sales were negatively affected by the planned exit of certain cabinet product lines, which decreased sales by two percent and three percent, respectively, for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 from the comparable periods of 2010. North American net sales for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2011 were also negatively affected by lower sales volume of installation and other services, cabinets, paints and stains, builders’ hardware and windows, which, in the aggregate, decreased sales by five percent from the comparable period of 2010. Such declines were partially offset by selling price increases, which increased sales by three percent and two percent, respectively, for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 from the comparable periods of 2010.

     In local currencies, net sales from International operations increased four percent and five percent, respectively, for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011, primarily due to increased sales volume and selling prices of International plumbing products, offset by lower sales volume related to International cabinets and windows. A weaker U.S. dollar increased International net sales by eight percent and six percent, respectively, in the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011, compared to the same periods of 2010.

21

MASCO CORPORATION

Item 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

     Net sales of Cabinets and Related Products decreased in the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011, due to the planned exit of ready-to-assemble and other non-core in-stock cabinet product lines, which decreased net sales in this segment by 11 percent and 12 percent, respectively, from the comparable periods of 2010. Net sales in this segment were also negatively affected by lower sales volumes of both North American and International cabinets, which decreased sales in this segment by six percent and nine percent, respectively, in the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 from the comparable periods of 2010. A weaker U.S. dollar increased sales in this segment by two percent and one percent, respectively, for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 from the comparable periods of 2010. Such declines were partially offset by selling price increases.

     Net sales of Plumbing Products increased, due to increased sales volume in North America, which increased sales by three percent and one percent, respectively, in the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 from the comparable periods of 2010. In local currencies, net sales of International operations increased sales in this segment by three percent and four percent, respectively, in the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 from the comparable periods of 2010. Such increases in International sales were due to increased sales volume and increased selling prices. A weaker U.S. dollar increased sales in this segment by five percent and three percent, respectively, for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 from the comparable periods of 2010.

     Net sales of Installation and Other Services for the third quarter of 2011 were positively affected by increased sales volume and increased selling prices in the new home construction market and increased retrofit sales. Net sales in this segment decreased for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2011, due to lower sales volume, partially offset by increased selling prices in the new home construction market.

     Net sales of Decorative Architectural Products decreased for the three-month period ended September 30, 2011, due to lower sales volume of paints and stains. Net sales in this segment decreased for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2011 due to lower sales volume of paints and stains and builders’ hardware. Such declines were partially offset by increased selling prices of paints and stains and increased sales of paint products to the professional paint market.

     Net sales of Other Specialty Products decreased for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2011 primarily due to lower sales volume of windows in North America and the U.K., partially offset by increased selling prices and a more favorable product mix of windows in North America. A weaker U.S. dollar increased sales in this segment by one percent for both the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 from the comparable periods of 2010.

OPERATING MARGINS

     Our gross profit margins were 24.7 percent and 25.0 percent, respectively, for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 compared with 25.2 percent and 26.2 percent, respectively, for the comparable periods of 2010. Results for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 reflect a less favorable relationship between selling prices and commodity costs, increased litigation settlement expenses and increased expenses related to growth initiatives.

22

MASCO CORPORATION

Item 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

     Selling, general and administrative expenses, as a percentage of sales, were 19.6 percent and 21.3 percent, respectively, for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011, compared to 20.0 percent and 21.1 percent, respectively, for the comparable periods of 2010.

     We have been focused on the strategic rationalization of our businesses, including business consolidations, plant closures, headcount reductions, system implementations and other initiatives. Operating profit for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 includes $13 million and $60 million, respectively, of costs and charges related to our business rationalizations and other initiatives. For the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2010, we incurred costs and charges of $39 million and $104 million, respectively, related to these initiatives.

     We anticipate that full-year 2011 rationalization charges for the entire Company will aggregate approximately $100 million. In October 2011, we announced several plant closures related to our Milgard Window manufacturer in the Western U.S.; the additional cost is currently estimated at approximately $30 million, primarily related to accelerated depreciation expense, and has been included in our full-year estimate of rationalization charges. We continue to evaluate our businesses and the impact of market conditions on our businesses, which may result in additional rationalization charges including severance, plant closure costs and asset impairments.

     In October 2011, we determined that several businesses in the Installation and Other Services segment related to commercial drywall installation, millwork and framing are not core to our long-term growth strategy and, accordingly, we embarked on a plan of disposition. The businesses had combined 2010 net sales of approximately $100 million and aggregate operating losses of $10 million (excluding any impairment charges). We expect proceeds from the dispositions will be less than the net book value of the businesses. The dispositions are expected to be completed within the next twelve months.

     As a result of continued losses in the commercial businesses in the Installation and Other Services segment, at September 30, 2011, the Company recorded a pre-tax impairment charge of $7 million related to certain intangible assets for these businesses. The Company then assessed the goodwill associated with these businesses and determined no impairment was necessary at September 30, 2011.

     Operating margins in the Cabinets and Related Products segment for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 were positively affected by lower costs and charges associated with business rationalizations and the benefits associated with business rationalizations and other cost savings initiatives. Such benefits were offset by lower sales volume and the related under-absorption of fixed costs and a less favorable relationship between selling prices and commodity costs in both periods.

     Operating margins in the Plumbing Products segment for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 were negatively affected by a less favorable relationship between selling prices and commodity costs, a less favorable product mix and increased expenses related to growth initiatives. Such declines were partially offset by increased sales volume and the benefits associated with business rationalizations and other cost savings initiatives.

23

MASCO CORPORATION

Item 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

     Operating margins in the Installation and Other Services segment for the third quarter of 2011 were positively impacted by increased sales volume, offset by a less favorable relationship between selling prices and commodity costs and a $7 million impairment charge related to the intangible assets of certain businesses that will be sold. Operating margins in this segment for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2011 were negatively affected by lower sales volume and the related under-absorption of fixed costs. Both the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 were positively affected by the benefits associated with business rationalizations and other cost savings initiatives.

     Operating margins in the Decorative Architectural Products segment for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 reflect lower sales volume of paints and stains, a less favorable relationship between selling prices and commodity costs, and increased expenses related to growth initiatives.

     Operating margins in the Other Special Products segment for the third quarter of 2011 were positively affected by a favorable relationship between selling prices and commodity costs. Operating margins in this segment for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2011 reflect lower sales volume and the related under-absorption of fixed costs and increased expenses related to growth initiatives. Both the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 were positively affected by the benefits associated with business rationalizations and other cost savings initiatives.

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE), NET

     Other items, net, for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 included $1 million and $— million, respectively, of currency transaction gains. Other items, net, for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2010 included $4 million and $(2) million, respectively, of currency transaction gains (losses).

     For the nine-month period ended September 30, 2011, we recognized gains of $41 million related to the sale of TriMas common stock. For the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 we also recognized gains of $19 million and $28 million, respectively, related to distributions from private equity funds.

     For the nine-month period ended September 30, 2010, we recognized non-cash, pre-tax impairment charges of $33 million related to financial investments ($28 million related to Asahi Tec preferred stock and $5 million related to private equity funds and other private investments).

INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE

     Income (loss) (attributable to Masco Corporation) for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 was $36 million and $(2) million, respectively, compared with $(5) million and $(9) million, respectively, for the comparable periods of 2010. Diluted income (loss) per common share (attributable to Masco Corporation) for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 was $.10 per common share and $(.01) per common share, respectively, compared with $(.02) per common share and $(.03) per common share, respectively, for the comparable periods of 2010.

24

MASCO CORPORATION

Item 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

     The effective tax rates were 20 percent and 64 percent, respectively, for the three-month and nine-month periods ending September 30, 2011. The tax rate for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2011 is higher than our normalized tax rate of 36 percent primarily due to an increase in the valuation allowance related to net operating losses and losses in certain jurisdictions providing no tax benefit.

     The effective tax rates were 82 percent and 70 percent, respectively, for the three-month and nine-month periods ending September 30, 2010. The tax rates were higher than our normalized tax rate of 36 percent primarily due to certain plant closure costs and other losses in certain jurisdictions providing no tax benefit.

OTHER FINANCIAL INFORMATION

     Our current ratio was 1.5 to 1 and 2.3 to 1, respectively, at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. The change in the current ratio is due to the reclassification of $791 million of 5.875% notes due July 15, 2012 to short-term notes payable.

     For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, cash of $95 million was provided by operating activities.

     Net cash used by financing activities was $190 million. Financing activities include $80 million for the payment of cash dividends, $58 million for the re-purchase of the Zero Coupon Notes, and $30 million for the acquisition of Company common stock in open-market transactions to offset the dilutive impact of long-term stock awards granted in 2011. Net cash used for investing activities was $9 million and included $49 million of proceeds related to the sale of TriMas common stock, $43 million of net proceeds related to sale of other financial investments and $19 million of net proceeds related to the sale of fixed assets, partially offset by $106 million for capital expenditures.

     For 2011, we anticipate capital expenditures, excluding any potential 2011 acquisitions, to be approximately $170 million.

     Our cash and cash investments were $1.6 billion and $1.7 billion at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. Our cash and cash investments consist of overnight interest bearing money market demand and time deposit accounts, money market mutual funds and government securities.

     Of the $1.6 billion and the $1.7 billion of cash and cash investments held at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, $544 million and $493 million, respectively, is held in foreign subsidiaries. If these funds were needed for our operations in the U.S., their repatriation into the U.S. may result in additional U.S. income taxes or foreign withholding taxes. The amount of such taxes is dependent on the income tax laws and circumstances at the time of distribution.

     The Company has $791 million of fixed-rate debt due July 15, 2012 (“Notes”) with an interest rate of 5.875%. The Company plans to re-finance a portion of the Notes in 2012 and therefore has entered into new forward interest rate swap agreements to hedge the volatility in interest payments associated with this planned debt issuance. The interest rate swaps are intended to cover a notional amount of $400 million; the Company anticipates that it will redeem the remaining Notes for cash.

     We were in compliance with all covenants and had no borrowings under our credit agreement at September 30, 2011.

25

MASCO CORPORATION

Item 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

     We are subject to lawsuits and claims pending or asserted with respect to matters generally arising in the ordinary course of business. Note M to the condensed consolidated financial statements discusses certain specific claims pending against us.

     We believe that our present cash balance, cash flows from operations and, to the extent necessary, bank borrowings and future financial market activities, are sufficient to fund our working capital and other investment needs.

OUTLOOK FOR THE COMPANY

     The foreclosure process, credit availability, declining home values, and consumer confidence continue to dampen the U.S. economy and hinder any housing recovery. We continue to believe that housing start levels in 2011 will be flat with 2010. Longer-term, however, we are confident about the fundamentals for the new home construction and home improvement markets and we are optimistic about the future.

     We have several new programs that we are funding today that will drive future growth opportunities across our businesses. We are very encouraged with the progress we are making to increase our penetration with the North American cabinet dealer and with the professional painter. We also have exciting new programs that will launch later this year in plumbing, cabinets and builders’ hardware and we continue to invest in the development of international opportunities for paint and plumbing. We expect that improvements in our markets and in consumer spending, together with the changes we are driving across Masco and our financial strength, will create significant value for our shareholders.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

     Statements contained in this report that reflect our views about our future performance constitute “forward-looking statements” under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements can be identified by words such as “believe,” “anticipate,” “appear,” “may,” “will,” “intend,” “plan,” “estimate,” “expect,” “assume,” “seek,” and similar references to future periods. These views involve risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict and, accordingly, our actual results may differ materially from the results discussed in our forward-looking statements. We caution you against relying on any of these forward-looking statements. Our future performance may be affected by our reliance on new home construction and home improvement, our reliance on key customers, the cost and availability of raw materials, shifts in consumer preferences and purchasing practices, and our ability to achieve cost savings through the Masco Business System and other initiatives. These and other factors are discussed in detail in Item 1A, “Risk Factors” in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K. Our forward-looking statements in this report speak only as of the date of this report. Factors or events that cause our actual results to differ may emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict all of them. Unless required by law, we undertake no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

26

MASCO CORPORATION

Item 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

a. Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

The Company, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of its disclosure controls and procedures as required by Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(b) and 15d-15(b) as of September 30, 2011. Based on this evaluation, the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

b. Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting.

In connection with the evaluation of the Company’s “internal control over financial reporting” that occurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2011, which is required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by paragraph (d) of Exchange Rules 13a-15 or 15d-15 (as defined in paragraph (f) of Rule 13a-15), management determined that there was no change that materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect internal control over financial reporting.

27

MASCO CORPORATION

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

     There have been no material changes to the legal proceedings disclosed in Part I, Item 3, “Legal Proceedings,” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

     There have been no material changes to the risk factors of the Company set forth in Item 1A, “Risk Factors” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

28

MASCO CORPORATION

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION (continued)

Item 6. Exhibits

12	-	Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends
31a	-	Certification by Chief Executive Officer Required by Rule 13a- 14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
31b	-	Certification by Chief Financial Officer Required by Rule 13a- 14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
32	-	Certification Required by Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code
101	-	Interactive Data File

29

MASCO CORPORATION

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION, concluded

SIGNATURE

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	MASCO CORPORATION
	By:	/s/ John G. Sznewajs
		Name:	John G. Sznewajs
October 28, 2011		Title:	Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer

30

MASCO CORPORATION

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit

Exhibit 12	Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends
Exhibit 31a	Certification by Chief Executive Officer Required by Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Exhibit 31b	Certification by Chief Financial Officer Required by Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Exhibit 32	Certification Required by Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code
Exhibit 101	Interactive Data File

31

EX-12

Exhibit 12

MASCO CORPORATION

Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends

	(Dollars in Millions)
	Nine
	Months
	Ended
	Sep. 30,		Year Ended December 31,
	2011		2010			2009			2008			2007			2006
Earnings Before Income Taxes, Preferred Stock Dividends and Fixed Charges:
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes	$	98	$	(777	)	$	(151	)	$	(193	)	$	876		$	891
Deduct equity in undistributed loss (earnings) of fifty-percent-or- less-owned companies		—		—			—			(1	)		(2	)		(1	)
Add interest on indebtedness, net		189		249			224			228			258			241
Add amortization of debt expense		5		7			5			4			5			4
Add estimated interest factor for rentals		25		36			44			51			55			52
Earnings before income taxes, noncontrolling interest, net, fixed charges and preferred stock dividends	$	317	$	(485	)	$	122		$	89		$	1,192		$	1,187
Fixed Charges:
Interest on indebtedness	$	186	$	246		$	221		$	228		$	259		$	241
Amortization of debt expense		5		7			5			4			5			4
Estimated interest factor for rentals		25		36			44			51			55			52
Total fixed charges	$	216	$	289		$	270		$	283		$	319		$	297
Preferred stock dividends(a)	$	—	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—
Combined fixed charges and preferred stock dividends	$	216	$	289		$	270		$	283		$	319		$	297
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges		1.5		(1.7	)		0.5			0.3			3.7			4.0
Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges and preferred stock dividends		1.5		(1.7	)		0.5			0.3			3.7			4.0
Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges and preferred stock dividends excluding certain items (b)		1.5		0.9			1.5			2.2			4.2			5.4

(a)

Represents amount of income before provision for income taxes required to meet the preferred stock dividend requirements of the Company.

(b)

Excludes the 2011 litigation expense of $6 million and non-cash pre-tax impairment charge for other intangible assets of $7 million; the 2010 non-cash pre-tax impairment charge for goodwill and other intangible assets of $721 million and non-cash, pre-tax impairment charge for financial investments of $34 million; the 2009 non-cash, pre-tax charge for goodwill impairment of $262 million; non-cash, pre-tax impairment charge for financial investments of $10 million and litigation expense of $7 million; 2008 non-cash, pre-tax impairment charge for goodwill and other intangible assets of $467 million, financial investments of $58 million and litigation expense of $9 million; 2007 non-cash, pre-tax impairment charges for goodwill and other intangible assets of $119 million and the non-cash, pre-tax charge for financial investments of $22 million; and the 2006 non-cash, pre-tax impairment charges for goodwill and financial investments of $317 million and $101 million, respectively, and the pre-tax income related to the Behr litigation settlement of $1 million.

32

EX-31.A

Exhibit 31a

MASCO CORPORATION
Certification Required by Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934

I, Timothy Wadhams, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Masco Corporation (the Registrant);
2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.	The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b)	Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: October 28, 2011	By:	/s/ Timothy Wadhams
		Timothy Wadhams
		President and Chief Executive Officer

33

EX-31.B

Exhibit 31b

MASCO CORPORATION
Certification Required by Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934

I, John G. Sznewajs, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Masco Corporation (the Registrant);
2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.	The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b)	Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: October 28, 2011	By:	/s/ John G. Sznewajs
		John G. Sznewajs
		Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer

34

EX-32

Exhibit 32

MASCO CORPORATION
Certification Required by Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United States Code

     The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Masco Corporation Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2011 (the “Report”) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

     Timothy Wadhams, the President and Chief Executive Officer, and John G. Sznewajs, the Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer, of Masco Corporation, each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Masco Corporation.

Date: October 28, 2011	/s/ Timothy Wadhams
	Name:	Timothy Wadhams
	Title:	President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: October 28, 2011	/s/ John G. Sznewajs
	Name:	John G. Sznewajs
	Title:	Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer

35

XML

Subsequent Events (Details) (Sale [Member], USD $) In Millions	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2011
Sale [Member]
Subsequent Events (Textuals) [Abstract]
Net Sales	$ 100
Operating losses	10
Impairment related to goodwill and intangible assets	$ 0

XML

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited) (Parenthetical) (USD $)	Sep. 30, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Masco Corporation's shareholders' equity:
Common shares, par value	$ 1	$ 1
Common shares, shares authorized	1,400,000,000	1,400,000,000
Common shares, shares issued	347,800,000	348,600,000
Common shares, shares outstanding	347,800,000	348,600,000
Preferred shares, shares authorized	1,000,000	1,000,000
Preferred shares, shares issued
Preferred shares, shares outstanding

XML

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited) (USD $) In Millions, except Per Share data	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2010	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2010
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income [Abstract]
Net sales	$ 2,006	$ 1,957	$ 5,800	$ 5,857
Cost of sales	1,511	1,463	4,348	4,325
Gross profit	495	494	1,452	1,532
Selling, general and administrative expenses	393	392	1,238	1,233
Operating profit	102	102	214	299
Other income (expense), net:
Interest expense	(63)	(63)	(190)	(188)
Impairment charge for financial investments	0	0	0	(33)
Other, net	22	(1)	74	(2)
Total other income (expense), net	(41)	(64)	(116)	(223)
Income before income taxes	61	38	98	76
Income tax expense	12	31	63	53
Net income	49	7	35	23
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest	13	12	37	32
Net income (loss) attributable to Masco Corporation	36	(5)	(2)	(9)
Basic:
Net income (loss)	$ 0.10	$ (0.02)	$ (0.01)	$ (0.03)
Diluted:
Net income (loss)	$ 0.10	$ (0.02)	$ (0.01)	$ (0.03)
Amounts attributable to Masco Corporation:
Net income (loss)	$ 36	$ (5)	$ (2)	$ (9)

XML

Accounting Policies (Policies)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Accounting Policies (Policies) [Abstract]

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

Effective January 1, 2011, the Company adopted new accounting guidance which addresses how to determine whether a sales arrangement involves multiple deliverables or contains more than one unit of accounting, and how the sales arrangement consideration should be allocated among the separate units of accounting. The Company evaluated this new guidance and the adoption did not have an impact on the Company’s financial position or its results of operations.

In June 2011, new accounting guidance was issued regarding the presentation and disclosure of comprehensive income. The new guidance will require presentation of other comprehensive income items in the Company’s consolidated statement of income; such items will no longer be included in the statement of shareholders’ equity. The new guidance will also require additional disclosure for reclassification of items from other comprehensive income to the Company’s statement of income. The new guidance will be effective for the Company January 1, 2012. The Company does not expect this guidance to have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition or its results of operations.

In September 2011, new accounting guidance was issued regarding impairment testing of goodwill. The new guidance would allow the Company to make a qualitative determination regarding potential goodwill impairment before performing the quantitative impairment test. The new guidance will be effective for the Company January 1, 2012. The Company does not anticipate utilizing the qualitative provisions of the new guidance.

XML

Document and Entity Information	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2011	Oct. 25, 2011
Document and Entity Information [Abstract]
Entity Registrant Name	MASCO CORP /DE/
Entity Central Index Key	0000062996
Document Type	10-Q
Document Period End Date	Sep. 30, 2011
Amendment Flag	false
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2011
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q3
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--12-31
Entity Well-known Seasoned Issuer	Yes
Entity Voluntary Filers	No
Entity Current Reporting Status	Yes
Entity Filer Category	Large Accelerated Filer
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding (actual number)		357,800,000

XML

Other Commitments and Contingencies (Details)	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2011 Year Lawsuits Contractor
Other Commitments and Contingencies (Textuals) [Abstract]
Number of additional lawsuits filed on behalf of several of Masco's competitors in insulation installation business	2
Number of insulation installation contractors certified by the federal court in Atlanta	377
Number of additional lawsuits pending	1

XML

Warranty (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Warranty (Tables) [Abstract]

Warranty liability

	Nine Months Ended			Twelve Months Ended
	September 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
Balance at January 1	$	107		$	109
Accruals for warranties issued during the period		20			42
Accruals related to pre-existing warranties		7			(4	)
Settlements made (in cash or kind) during the period		(29	)		(37	)
Other, net		(2	)		(3	)
Balance at end of period	$	103		$	107

XML

Earning Per Common Share (Details) (USD $) In Millions, except Per Share data	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2010	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2010
Numerator (basic and diluted):
Net income (loss)	$ 36	$ (5)	$ (2)	$ (9)
Allocation to unvested restricted stock awards	(1)	(1)	(2)	(2)
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders	35	(6)	(4)	(11)
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders	35	(6)	(4)	(11)
Denominator
Basic common shares (based upon weighted average)	348	349	348	349
Add:
Contingent common shares	0	0	0	0
Stock option dilution	0	0	0	0
Diluted common shares	348	349	348	349
Earning Per Common Share (Textuals) [Abstract]
Cash dividends per common share paid	$ 0.75	$ (0.75)	$ 0.225	$ (0.225)
Cash dividends per common share declared	$ 0.75	$ (0.75)	$ 0.225	$ (0.225)
Grant of long term stock awards			2
Repurchase and retirement of common stock to offset the dilutive impact of long term stock awards			2
Repurchase and retirement of common stock cash aggregate to offset the dilutive effect			$ 30
Common stock outstanding under repurchase authorization	25		25
Convertible Debt Securities [Member]
Antidilutive Securities Excluded from Computation of Earnings Per Share [Line Items]
Antidilutive effect on computation of diluted earnings per common share	0	0	0	0
Outstanding Stock Awards [Member]
Antidilutive Securities Excluded from Computation of Earnings Per Share [Line Items]
Antidilutive effect on computation of diluted earnings per common share	37	37	37	37

XML

Derivatives

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Derivatives [Abstract]

Derivatives

E. In August 2011, the Company entered into new interest rate swap agreements to hedge the volatility in interest payments associated with the expected debt issuance planned to occur in 2012. These interest rate swaps are designed as cash flow hedges and effectively fix interest rates on the forecasted debt issuance based on 3-month LIBOR. The average fixed rate on the interest rate swaps is 2.8%. At September 30, 2011, the interest rate swap agreements covered a notional amount of $400 million, which we expect to issue in connection with the maturity of the Company’s $791 million fixed-rate debt due July 15, 2012 with an interest rate of 5.875%. At September 30, 2011, the interest rate swaps are considered 100 percent effective; therefore, the market valuation of $17 million is recorded in other comprehensive income in the Company’s statement of shareholders’ equity with a corresponding increase to accrued liabilities in the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2011.

During 2011 and 2010, the Company entered into foreign currency exchange contracts to hedge currency fluctuations related to intercompany loans denominated in non-functional currencies. Based upon period-end market prices, the Company had recorded assets (liabilities) of $5 million and $(2) million to reflect contract prices at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. Such gains (losses) are partially offset by gains (losses) related to the translation of loans and accounts denominated in non-functional currencies. Gains (losses) related to these contracts are recorded in the Company’s consolidated statements of income in other income (expense), net. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company had recorded gains net of $1 million and $2 million, respectively, related to these foreign currency exchange contracts. For the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company had recorded gains (losses) net of $8 million and $(8) million, respectively, related to these foreign currency exchange contracts.

During 2011 and 2010, the Company, including certain of its European operations, also entered into foreign currency forward contracts to manage a portion of its exposure to currency fluctuations in the European euro and the U.S. dollar. Based upon period-end market prices, the Company had recorded liabilities of $— million and $3 million to reflect contract prices at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. Gains (losses) related to these contracts are recorded in the Company’s consolidated statements of income in other income (expense), net. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company had recorded gains (losses) net of $3 million and $(1) million, respectively, related to these foreign currency exchange contracts. For the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company had recorded gains net of $2 million and $1 million, respectively, related to these foreign currency exchange contracts.

In the event that the counterparties fail to meet the terms of the foreign currency forward contracts, the Company’s exposure is limited to the aggregate foreign currency rate differential with such institutions.

During 2011 and 2010, the Company entered into several contracts to manage its exposure to increases in the price of copper and zinc. Based upon period-end market prices, the Company had recorded (liabilities) assets of $(5) million and $7 million to reflect contract prices at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. Gains (losses) related to these contracts are recorded in the Company’s consolidated statements of income in cost of goods sold. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company had recorded (losses) gains net of $(10) million and $3 million, respectively, related to these commodity contracts. For the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company had recorded (losses) gains net of $(11) million and $4 million, respectively, related to these commodity contracts.

The fair value of these derivative contracts is estimated on a recurring basis, quarterly, using Level 2 inputs (significant other observable inputs).

XML

Stock-Based Compensation (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Stock-Based Compensation (Tables) [Abstract]

Pre-tax compensation expense and related income tax benefit for stock-based incentives

	Three Months Ended					Nine Months Ended
	September 30,					September 30,
	2011			2010		2011			2010
Long-term stock awards	$	9		$	9	$	28		$	28
Stock options		6			6		17			17
Phantom stock awards and stock appreciation rights		(5	)		1		(3	)		—
Total	$	10		$	16	$	42		$	45
Income tax benefit (before valuation allowance)	$	4		$	6	$	16		$	17

Company's long-term stock award activity

	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
	2011		2010
Unvested stock award shares at January 1		10		9
Weighted average grant date fair value	$	19	$	21
Stock award shares granted		2		3
Weighted average grant date fair value	$	13	$	14
Stock award shares vested		2		2
Weighted average grant date fair value	$	20	$	23
Stock award shares forfeited		—		—
Weighted average grant date fair value	$	18	$	19
Unvested stock award shares at September 30		10		10
Weighted average grant date fair value	$	17	$	19

Company's stock option activity

	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
	2011		2010
Option shares outstanding, January 1		37		36
Weighted average exercise price	$	21	$	23
Option shares granted, including restoration options		2		5
Weighted average exercise price	$	13	$	14
Option shares exercised		—		—
Aggregate intrinsic value on date of exercise (A)	$1 million		$1 million
Weighted average exercise price	$	8	$	8
Option shares forfeited		3		4
Weighted average exercise price	$	22	$	23
Option shares outstanding, September 30		36		37
Weighted average exercise price	$	21	$	21
Weighted average remaining option term (in years)		6		6
Option shares vested and expected to vest, September 30		36		37
Weighted average exercise price	$	21	$	22
Aggregate intrinsic value (A)	$—million		$15 million
Weighted average remaining option term (in years)		6		6
Option shares exercisable (vested), September 30		24		22
Weighted average exercise price	$	24	$	25
Aggregate intrinsic value (A)	$—million		$3 million
Weighted average remaining option term (in years)		4		4

(A) Aggregate intrinsic value is calculated using the Company’s stock price at each respective date, less the exercise price (grant date price) multiplied by the number of shares.

Weighted average grant date fair value of option shares granted and the assumptions used to estimate those values using a black-scholes option pricing model

	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
	2011			2010
Weighted average grant date fair value	$	5.10		$	5.30
Risk-free interest rate		2.72	%		2.77	%
Dividend yield		2.34	%		2.17	%
Volatility factor		49.00	%		46.01	%
Expected option life	6 years			6 years

XML

Stock-Based Compensation (Details) (USD $) In Millions, except Share data, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2010	Sep. 30, 2011 Year Lawsuits Contractor Covenants	Sep. 30, 2010 Year
Pre-tax compensation expense and related income tax benefit for stock -based incentives
Long-term stock awards	$ 9	$ 9	$ 28	$ 28
Stock options	6	6	17	17
Phantom stock awards and stock appreciation rights	(5)	1	(3)
Total	10	16	42	45
Income tax benefit (before valuation allowance)	4	6	16	17
Company's long-term stock award activity
Unvested stock award shares at January 1			10,000,000	9,000,000
Weighted average grant date fair value			$ 19	$ 21
Stock award shares granted			2,000,000	3,000,000
Weighted average grant date fair value			$ 13	$ 14
Stock award shares vested			2,000,000	2,000,000
Weighted average grant date fair value			$ 20	$ 23
Stock award shares forfeited			0	0
Weighted average grant date fair value			$ 18	$ 19
Unvested stock award shares at September 30	10,000,000	10,000,000	10,000,000	10,000,000
Weighted average grant date fair value	$ 17	$ 19	$ 17	$ 19
Company's stock option activity
Option shares outstanding, January 1			37,000,000	36,000,000
Weighted average exercise price			$ 21	$ 23
Option shares granted, including restoration options			2,372,500	5,000,000
Weighted average exercise price			$ 13	$ 14
Option shares exercised			0	0
Aggregate intrinsic value on date of exercise			1	1
Weighted average exercise price			$ 8	$ 8
Option shares forfeited			2,830,000	4,000,000
Weighted average exercise price			$ 22	$ 23
Option shares outstanding, September 30	36,000,000	37,000,000	36,000,000	37,000,000
Weighted average exercise price	$ 21	$ 21	$ 21	$ 21
Weighted average remaining option term (in years)			6	6
Option shares vested and expected to vest, September 30	36,000,000	37,000,000	36,000,000	37,000,000
Weighted average exercise price	$ 21	$ 22	$ 21	$ 22
Aggregate intrinsic value	0	15	0	15
Weighted average remaining option term (in years)			6	6
Option shares exercisable (vested), September 30	24,000,000	22,000,000	24,000,000	22,000,000
Weighted average exercise price	$ 24	$ 25	$ 24	$ 25
Aggregate intrinsic value			0	3
Weighted average remaining option term (in years)			4	4
Weighted average grant date fair value of option shares granted and the assumptions used to estimate those values using a black-scholes option pricing model
Weighted average grant date fair value			$ 5.10	$ 5.30
Risk-free interest rate			2.72%	2.77%
Dividend yield			2.34%	2.17%
Volatility factor			49.00%	46.01%
Expected option life (in years)			6	6
Stock-Based Compensation (Textuals) (Abstract)
Typical vesting period of stock awards granted prior to January 1, 2010			10 years
Stock awards granted subsequent to January 1, 2010 have a vesting period, in years			5 years
Total unrecognized compensation expense	122	136	122	136
Remaining weighted average vesting period			5	5
Total market value (at the vesting date) of stock award shares			28	22
Grant and expire date			Not later than 10 years
Stock option shares granted			2,372,500	5,000,000
Approx grant date exercise price			$ 13
Stock option shares forfeited			2,830,000	4,000,000
Unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested stock options	$ 39	$ 50	$ 39	$ 50
Weighted average vesting period for unvested stock options			3	3

XML

Impairment Charges for Financial Assets (Details 5) (USD $) In Millions	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended		12 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2010	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2010	Dec. 31, 2010
Income from financial investments, net, included in other, net, within other income (expense), net, and impairment charges for financial investments
Realized gains (losses) from:	$ 19	$ (3)	$ 69	$ (2)
Impairment charge for financial investments	0	0	0	(33)
Trimas Corporation Common Stock [Member]
Income from financial investments, net, included in other, net, within other income (expense), net, and impairment charges for financial investments
Realized gains (losses) from:	0	0	41	0
Private Equity Funds [Member]
Income from financial investments, net, included in other, net, within other income (expense), net, and impairment charges for financial investments
Realized gains (losses) from:	19	0	28	0
Impairment charge for financial investments	0	0	0	3
Asahi Tec Corporation - preferred stock [Member]
Income from financial investments, net, included in other, net, within other income (expense), net, and impairment charges for financial investments
Impairment charge for financial investments	0	0	0	28
Other private investments [Member]
Income from financial investments, net, included in other, net, within other income (expense), net, and impairment charges for financial investments
Realized gains (losses) from:	0	(3)	0	(2)
Impairment charge for financial investments	$ 0	$ 0	$ 0	$ 2	$ 0

XML

Fair Value of Financial Investments and Liabilities (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Fair Value of Financial Investments and Liabilities (Tables) [Abstract]

Financial investments included in other assets

	September 30,		December 31,
	2011		2010
Auction rate securities	$	22	$	22
TriMas Corporation common stock		—		40
Total recurring investments		22		62
Private equity funds		92		106
Other investments		5		13
Total non-recurring investments		97		119
Total	$	119	$	181

Company's investments in available-for-sale securities

			Pre-tax
			Unrealized		Unrealized		Recorded
	Cost Basis		Gains		Losses		Basis
September 30, 2011	$	19	$	3	$	—	$	22
December 31, 2010	$	22	$	40	$	—	$	62

Recurring Fair Value Measurements

			Fair Value Measurements Using
					Significant
			Quoted		Other		Significant
			Market		Observable		Unobservable
	Sep. 30,		Prices		Inputs		Inputs
	2011		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Auction rate securities	$	22	$	—	$	—	$	22
Total	$	22	$	—	$	—	$	22

			Fair Value Measurements Using
					Significant
			Quoted		Other		Significant
			Market		Observable		Unobservable
	Dec. 31,		Prices		Inputs		Inputs
	2010		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Auction rate securities	$	22	$	—	$	—	$	22
TriMas Corporation		40		40		—		—
Total	$	62	$	40	$	—	$	22

Changes in Level 3 financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis

	Auction Rate
	Securities
Fair value January 1, 2011	$	22
Total losses included in earnings		—
Unrealized (losses)		—
Purchases		—
Settlements		—
Transfer from Level 3 to Level 2		—
Fair value at September 30, 2011	$	22

	Asahi Tec			Auction Rate
	Preferred Stock			Securities		Total
Fair value January 1, 2010	$	71		$	22	$	93
Total losses included in earnings		(28	)		—		(28	)
Unrealized losses		(23	)		—		(23	)
Purchases, issuances, settlements		—			—		—
Transfers from Level 3 to Level 2		(20	)		—		(20	)
Fair value at December 31, 2010	$	—		$	22	$	22

Non-Recurring Fair Value Measurements

			Fair Value Measurements Using
					Significant
			Quoted		Other		Significant
			Market		Observable		Unobservable		Total
	Dec. 31,		Prices		Inputs		Inputs		Gains
	2010		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)		(Losses)
Private equity funds	$	2	$	—	$	—	$	2	$	(4	)
Other private investments		—		—		—		—		(2	)
	$	2	$	—	$	—	$	2	$	(6	)

Income from financial investments, net, included in other, net, within other income (expense), net, and impairment charges for financial investments

	Three Months Ended					Nine Months Ended
	September 30,					September 30,
	2011		2010			2011		2010
Realized gains (losses)
from:
TriMas Corporation common stock	$	—	$	—		$	41	$	—
Private equity funds		19		—			28		—
Other financial investments		—		(3	)		—		(2	)
Total realized gains	$	19	$	(3	)	$	69	$	(2	)
Impairment charges:
Asahi Tec Preferred Stock	$	—	$	—		$	—	$	(28	)
Private equity funds		—		—			—		(3	)
Other private investments		—		—			—		(2	)
Total impairment charges	$	—	$	—		$	—	$	(33	)

XML

Segment Information

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Segment Information [Abstract]

Segment Information

J. Information about the Company by segment and geographic area was as follows, in millions:

	Three Months Ended September 30,										Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2011		2010		2011			2010			2011		2010		2011			2010
	Net Sales(A)				Operating Profit (Loss)						Net Sales(A)				Operating Profit (Loss)
The Company’s operations by
segment were:
Cabinets and Related Products	$	307	$	357	$	(34	)	$	(61	)	$	944	$	1,160	$	(111	)	$	(113	)
Plumbing Products		768		686		91			97			2,239		2,031		270			267
Installation and Other Services		315		292		(27	)		(22	)		863		874		(93	)		(87	)
Decorative Architectural Products		455		463		88			104			1,322		1,357		247			300
Other Specialty Products		161		159		12			11			432		435		2			16
Total	$	2,006	$	1,957	$	130		$	129		$	5,800	$	5,857	$	315		$	383
The Company’s operations by geographic area were:
North America	$	1,524	$	1,528	$	80		$	79		$	4,420	$	4,617	$	178		$	257
International, principally Europe		482		429		50			50			1,380		1,240		137			126
Total	$	2,006	$	1,957		130			129		$	5,800	$	5,857		315			383
General corporate expense, net						(27	)		(27	)						(95	)		(84	)
Charge for litigation settlement (B)						(1	)		—							(6	)		—
Operating profit						102			102							214			299
Other income (expense), net						(41	)		(64	)						(116	)		(223	)
Income before income taxes					$	61		$	38						$	98		$	76

(A)	Inter-segment sales were not material.
(B)	Charge for litigation settlement relates to a business unit in the Cabinets and Related Products segment and the Other Specialty Products segment.

XML

Accounting Policies

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Accounting Policies

A.	In the opinion of the Company, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments, of a normal recurring nature, necessary to present fairly its financial position as at September 30, 2011 and the results of operations for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 and cash flows and shareholders’ equity for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010. The condensed consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2010 was derived from audited financial statements.
	Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
	Effective January 1, 2011, the Company adopted new accounting guidance which addresses how to determine whether a sales arrangement involves multiple deliverables or contains more than one unit of accounting, and how the sales arrangement consideration should be allocated among the separate units of accounting. The Company evaluated this new guidance and the adoption did not have an impact on the Company’s financial position or its results of operations.
	In June 2011, new accounting guidance was issued regarding the presentation and disclosure of comprehensive income. The new guidance will require presentation of other comprehensive income items in the Company’s consolidated statement of income; such items will no longer be included in the statement of shareholders’ equity. The new guidance will also require additional disclosure for reclassification of items from other comprehensive income to the Company’s statement of income. The new guidance will be effective for the Company January 1, 2012. The Company does not expect this guidance to have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition or its results of operations.
	In September 2011, new accounting guidance was issued regarding impairment testing of goodwill. The new guidance would allow the Company to make a qualitative determination regarding potential goodwill impairment before performing the quantitative impairment test. The new guidance will be effective for the Company January 1, 2012. The Company does not anticipate utilizing the qualitative provisions of the new guidance.

XML

Recurring Fair Value Measurements (Details 1) (USD $) In Millions	Sep. 30, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Financial investments included in other assets
Total recurring investments	$ 22	$ 62
Auction rate securities [Member] | Quoted Market Prices (Level 1) [Member]
Financial investments included in other assets
Total recurring investments	0	0
Trimas Corporation Common Stock [Member] | Quoted Market Prices (Level 1) [Member]
Financial investments included in other assets
Total recurring investments		40
Quoted Market Prices (Level 1) [Member]
Financial investments included in other assets
Total recurring investments	0	40
Auction rate securities [Member] | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) [Member]
Financial investments included in other assets
Total recurring investments	0	0
Trimas Corporation Common Stock [Member] | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) [Member]
Financial investments included in other assets
Total recurring investments		0
Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) [Member]
Financial investments included in other assets
Total recurring investments	0	0
Auction rate securities [Member] | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) [Member]
Financial investments included in other assets
Total recurring investments	22	22
Trimas Corporation Common Stock [Member] | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) [Member]
Financial investments included in other assets
Total recurring investments		0
Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) [Member]
Financial investments included in other assets
Total recurring investments	22	22
Auction rate securities [Member]
Financial investments included in other assets
Total recurring investments	22	22
Trimas Corporation Common Stock [Member]
Financial investments included in other assets
Total recurring investments	$ 0	$ 40

XML

Debt

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Debt [Abstract]

Debt

G.	Based on the limitations of the debt to total capitalization covenant, at September 30, 2011, the Company had additional borrowing capacity, subject to availability, of up to $979 million. Additionally, at September 30, 2011, the Company could absorb a reduction to shareholders’ equity of approximately $527 million, and remain in compliance with the debt to total capitalization covenant.
	In order to borrow under the Credit Agreement, there must not be any default in the Company’s covenants in the credit agreement (i.e., in addition to the two financial covenants, principally limitations on subsidiary debt, negative pledge restrictions, legal compliance requirements and maintenance of properties and insurance) and the Company’s representations and warranties in the credit agreement must be true in all material respects on the date of borrowing (i.e., principally no material adverse change or litigation likely to result in a material adverse change, since December 31, 2009, and, in each case, no material ERISA or environmental non-compliance and no material tax deficiency). The Company was in compliance with all covenants and no borrowings have been made at September 30, 2011.
	At September 30, 2011, no principal amount at maturity of Zero Coupon Convertible Senior Notes due 2031 (“Notes”) was outstanding. During the third quarter of 2011, holders of $108.1 million principal amount at maturity with an accreted value of $58.1 million of Notes required the Company to repurchase the Notes for cash of $57.9 million; the remaining Notes were retired.

XML

Earning Per Common Share

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Earning Per Common Share [Abstract]

Earnings Per Common Share

L. Reconciliations of the numerators and denominators used in the computations of basic and diluted earnings per common share were as follows, in millions:

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
Numerator (basic and diluted):
Net income (loss)	$	36		$	(5	)	$	(2	)	$	(9	)
Allocation to unvested restricted stock awards		(1	)		(1	)		(2	)		(2	)
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders		35			(6	)		(4	)		(11	)
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders	$	35		$	(6	)	$	(4	)	$	(11	)
Denominator:
Basic common shares (based upon weighted average)		348			349			348			349
Add:
Contingent common shares		—			—			—			—
Stock option dilution		—			—			—			—
Diluted common shares		348			349			348			349

For the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company allocated dividends to the unvested restricted stock awards (participating securities).

Additionally, 37 million common shares for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 related to stock options were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per common share due to their antidilutive effect.

In the first nine months of 2011, the Company granted 2 million shares of long-term stock awards; to offset the dilutive impact of these awards, the Company also repurchased and retired approximately 2 million shares of Company common stock, for cash aggregating $30 million. At September 30, 2011, the Company had 25 million shares of its common stock remaining under the July 2007 Board of Directors repurchase authorization.

On the basis of amounts paid (declared), cash dividends per common share were $.075 ($.075) and $.225 ($.225), respectively, for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2010.

XML

Stock-Based Compensation

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Stock-Based Compensation [Abstract]

Stock-Based Compensation

H. The Company’s 2005 Long Term Stock Incentive Plan (the “2005 Plan”) provides for the issuance of stock-based incentives in various forms to employees and non-employee Directors of the Company. At September 30, 2011, outstanding stock-based incentives were in the form of long-term stock awards, stock options, phantom stock awards and stock appreciation rights. Pre-tax compensation expense and the related income tax benefit, for these stock-based incentives, were as follows, in millions:

	Three Months Ended					Nine Months Ended
	September 30,					September 30,
	2011			2010		2011			2010
Long-term stock awards	$	9		$	9	$	28		$	28
Stock options		6			6		17			17
Phantom stock awards and stock appreciation rights		(5	)		1		(3	)		—
Total	$	10		$	16	$	42		$	45
Income tax benefit (before valuation allowance)	$	4		$	6	$	16		$	17

Long-Term Stock Awards

Long-term stock awards are granted to key employees and non-employee Directors of the Company and do not cause net share dilution inasmuch as the Company continues the practice of repurchasing and retiring an equal number of shares on the open market.

The Company’s long-term stock award activity was as follows, shares in millions:

	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
	2011		2010
Unvested stock award shares at January 1		10		9
Weighted average grant date fair value	$	19	$	21
Stock award shares granted		2		3
Weighted average grant date fair value	$	13	$	14
Stock award shares vested		2		2
Weighted average grant date fair value	$	20	$	23
Stock award shares forfeited		—		—
Weighted average grant date fair value	$	18	$	19
Unvested stock award shares at September 30		10		10
Weighted average grant date fair value	$	17	$	19

At September 30, 2011 and 2010, there was $122 million and $136 million, respectively, of total unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested stock awards; such awards had a weighted average remaining vesting period of five years in both periods.

The total market value (at the vesting date) of stock award shares which vested during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 was $28 million and $22 million, respectively.

Stock Options

Stock options are granted to key employees of the Company. The exercise price equals the market price of the Company’s common stock at the grant date. These options generally become exercisable (vest ratably) over five years beginning on the first anniversary from the date of grant and expire no later than 10 years after the grant date.

The Company granted 2,372,500 of stock option shares in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 with a grant date exercise price approximating $13 per share. In the first nine months of 2011, 2,830,000 stock option shares were forfeited (including options that expired unexercised).

The Company’s stock option activity was as follows, shares in millions:

	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
	2011		2010
Option shares outstanding, January 1		37		36
Weighted average exercise price	$	21	$	23
Option shares granted, including restoration options		2		5
Weighted average exercise price	$	13	$	14
Option shares exercised		—		—
Aggregate intrinsic value on date of exercise (A)	$1 million		$1 million
Weighted average exercise price	$	8	$	8
Option shares forfeited		3		4
Weighted average exercise price	$	22	$	23
Option shares outstanding, September 30		36		37
Weighted average exercise price	$	21	$	21
Weighted average remaining option term (in years)		6		6
Option shares vested and expected to vest, September 30		36		37
Weighted average exercise price	$	21	$	22
Aggregate intrinsic value (A)	$—million		$15 million
Weighted average remaining option term (in years)		6		6
Option shares exercisable (vested), September 30		24		22
Weighted average exercise price	$	24	$	25
Aggregate intrinsic value (A)	$—million		$3 million
Weighted average remaining option term (in years)		4		4

(A) Aggregate intrinsic value is calculated using the Company’s stock price at each respective date, less the exercise price (grant date price) multiplied by the number of shares.

At September 30, 2011 and 2010, there was $39 million and $50 million, respectively, of unrecognized compensation expense (using the Black-Scholes option pricing model) related to unvested stock options; such options had a weighted average vesting period of three years in both 2011 and 2010.

The weighted average grant date fair value of option shares granted and the assumptions used to estimate those values using a Black-Scholes option pricing model, were as follows:

	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
	2011			2010
Weighted average grant date fair value	$	5.10		$	5.30
Risk-free interest rate		2.72	%		2.77	%
Dividend yield		2.34	%		2.17	%
Volatility factor		49.00	%		46.01	%
Expected option life	6 years			6 years

XML

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (Details) (USD $) In Millions	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Changes in carrying amount of goodwill
Gross Goodwill	$ 4,220	$ 4,216
Accumulated Impairment Losses	(1,833)	(1,833)
Goodwill	2,387	2,383
Other	4
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (Textuals) [Abstract]
Other indefinite-lived intangible assets	185	185
Carrying value of definite-lived intangible assets	71	84
Accumulated amortization	80	75
Pre-tax impairment	7
Cabinets and Related Products [Member]
Changes in carrying amount of goodwill
Gross Goodwill	588	587
Accumulated Impairment Losses	(364)	(364)
Goodwill	224	223
Other	1
Plumbing Products [Member]
Changes in carrying amount of goodwill
Gross Goodwill	539	536
Accumulated Impairment Losses	(340)	(340)
Goodwill	199	196
Other	3
Installation and Other Services [Member]
Changes in carrying amount of goodwill
Gross Goodwill	1,819	1,819
Accumulated Impairment Losses	(762)	(762)
Goodwill	1,057	1,057
Decorative Architectural Products [Member]
Changes in carrying amount of goodwill
Gross Goodwill	294	294
Accumulated Impairment Losses	0	0
Goodwill	294	294
Other Specialty Products [Member]
Changes in carrying amount of goodwill
Gross Goodwill	980	980
Accumulated Impairment Losses	(367)	(367)
Goodwill	$ 613	$ 613

XML

Warranty

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Warranty [Abstract]

Warranty

F. Changes in the Company’s warranty liability were as follows, in millions:

	Nine Months Ended			Twelve Months Ended
	September 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
Balance at January 1	$	107		$	109
Accruals for warranties issued during the period		20			42
Accruals related to pre-existing warranties		7			(4	)
Settlements made (in cash or kind) during the period		(29	)		(37	)
Other, net		(2	)		(3	)
Balance at end of period	$	103		$	107

XML

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity (Unaudited) (USD $) In Millions	Total	Common Shares ($1 par value)	Paid-In Capital	Retained Earnings	Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income	Noncontrolling Interest
Beginning balance at Dec. 31, 2009	$ 2,817	$ 350	$ 42	$ 1,871	$ 366	$ 188
Net (loss) income	23			(9)		32
Cumulative translation adjustments	(37)				(28)	(9)
Unrealized (loss) on marketable securities, net of income tax (benefit) of $x and $(1) for 9 months ended 30 Sep, 2011 and 2010, respectively	(4)				(4)
Unrecognized prior service cost and net loss, net of income tax of $x and $3 for 9 months ended 30 Sep, 2011 and 2010, respectively	5				5
Total comprehensive income (loss)	(13)
Shares issued	(1)	1	(2)
Shares retired:
Repurchased	(45)	(3)	(42)
Surrendered (non-cash)	(6)		(6)
Cash dividends declared	(81)			(81)
Dividend payment to noncontrolling interest	(15)					(15)
Stock-based compensation	44		44
Ending balance at Sep. 30, 2010	2,700	348	36	1,781	339	196
Beginning balance at Dec. 31, 2010	1,582	349	42	720	273	198
Net (loss) income	35			(2)		37
Cumulative translation adjustments	8				5	3
Unrealized (loss) on marketable securities, net of income tax (benefit) of $x and $(1) for 9 months ended 30 Sep, 2011 and 2010, respectively	(38)				(38)
Unrealized (loss) on interest rate swaps, net of income tax of $x	(17)				(17)
Unrecognized prior service cost and net loss, net of income tax of $x and $3 for 9 months ended 30 Sep, 2011 and 2010, respectively	8				8
Total comprehensive income (loss)	(4)
Shares issued	0	2	(2)
Shares retired:
Repurchased	(30)	(2)	(28)
Surrendered (non-cash)	(8)	(1)	(7)
Cash dividends declared	(80)			(80)
Dividend payment to noncontrolling interest	(18)					(18)
Stock-based compensation	45		45
Ending balance at Sep. 30, 2011	$ 1,487	$ 348	$ 50	$ 638	$ 231	$ 220

XML

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets [Abstract]

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

B. The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, by segment, were as follows, in millions:

	Gross Goodwill		Accumulated			Net Goodwill
	At		Impairment			At
	Sep. 30, 2011		Losses			Sep. 30, 2011
Cabinets and Related Products	$	588	$	(364	)	$	224
Plumbing Products		539		(340	)		199
Installation and Other Services		1,819		(762	)		1,057
Decorative Architectural Products		294		—			294
Other Specialty Products		980		(367	)		613
Total	$	4,220	$	(1,833	)	$	2,387

	Gross Goodwill		Accumulated			Net Goodwill
	At		Impairment			At				At
	Dec. 31, 2010		Losses			Dec. 31, 2010		Other(A)		Sep. 30, 2011
Cabinets and Related Products	$	587	$	(364	)	$	223	$	1	$	224
Plumbing Products		536		(340	)		196		3		199
Installation and Other Services		1,819		(762	)		1,057		—		1,057
Decorative Architectural Products		294		—			294		—		294
Other Specialty Products		980		(367	)		613		—		613
Total	$	4,216	$	(1,833	)	$	2,383	$	4	$	2,387

(A) Other principally includes the effect of foreign currency translation.

Other indefinite-lived intangible assets were $185 million at both September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, and principally included registered trademarks. The carrying value of the Company’s definite-lived intangible assets was $71 million (net of accumulated amortization of $80 million) at September 30, 2011 and $84 million (net of accumulated amortization of $75 million) at December 31, 2010, and principally included customer relationships and non-compete agreements.

As a result of continued losses in the commercial businesses in the Installation and Other Services segment, at September 30, 2011, the Company recorded a pre-tax impairment charge of $7 million related to certain intangible assets for these businesses. The Company then assessed the goodwill associated with these businesses and determined no impairment was necessary at September 30, 2011.

XML

Derivatives (Details) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2010	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2010	Dec. 31, 2010
Derivative [Line Items]
Gains (losses) related to these foreign currency forward contracts recorded in the Company consolidated statements of income	$ 2	$ 1	$ 3	$ (1)
Derivatives (Textuals) [Abstract]
Average fixed rate on interest rate swaps	2.80%		2.80%
Debt Instrument, Interest Rate Terms			3-month LIBOR
Gain (loss) related to hedging contracts	(11)	4	(10)	3
Liabilities related to foreign currency exchange contracts	0		0		3
Notional amount of interest rate swap agreement	400		400
Fixed-rate debt due July 15, 2012	791		791
Interest on notes	5.875%		5.875%
Market valuation recorded in other comprehensive income	17		17
Effectiveness of interest rate swaps	100.00%		100.00%
Intercompany Loans [Member]
Derivative [Line Items]
Gains (losses) related to these foreign currency forward contracts recorded in the Company consolidated statements of income	8	(8)	1	2
Interest rate derivative assets	5		5
Interest rate derivative liabilities					2
Fair Value Hedging [Member]
Derivative [Line Items]
Assets recorded by the company as a result of hedging activities	7		7
Liability recorded by the company as a result of hedging activities					$ (5)

XML

Earning Per Common Share (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Earning Per Common Share (Tables) [Abstract]

Numerators and denominators used in the computations of basic and diluted earnings per common share

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
Numerator (basic and diluted):
Net income (loss)	$	36		$	(5	)	$	(2	)	$	(9	)
Allocation to unvested restricted stock awards		(1	)		(1	)		(2	)		(2	)
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders		35			(6	)		(4	)		(11	)
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders	$	35		$	(6	)	$	(4	)	$	(11	)
Denominator:
Basic common shares (based upon weighted average)		348			349			348			349
Add:
Contingent common shares		—			—			—			—
Stock option dilution		—			—			—			—
Diluted common shares		348			349			348			349

XML

Depreciation and Amortization Expense

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Depreciation and Amortization Expense [Abstract]

Depreciation and Amortization Expense

C. Depreciation and amortization expense was $188 million and $209 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

XML

Debt (Details) (USD $)	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2011
Debt (Textuals) [Abstract]
Additional borrowing capacity	$ 979,000,000
Absorption of reduction to shareholders' equity to remain in compliance with covenant	527,000,000
Financial covenants	2
Borrowings under Five Year Revolving Credit Agreement	0
Principal amount of Zero Coupon Convertible Senior Notes	0
Principal amount of Zero Coupon Convertible Senior Notes due 2031	108,100,000
Accreted value principal amount of Zero Coupon Convertible Senior Notes	58,100,000
Zero Coupon Convertible Senior Notes due 2031 [Member]
Short-term Debt [Line Items]
Repurchase of senior notes for cash	$ 57,900,000

XML

Employee Retirement Plans (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Employee Retirement Plans (Tables) [Abstract]

Net periodic pension cost for defined-benefit pension plans

	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2011					2010
	Qualified			Non-Qualified		Qualified			Non-Qualified
Service cost	$	1		$	—	$	2		$	—
Interest cost		12			2		11			3
Expected return on plan assets		(9	)		—		(9	)		—
Amortization of prior service cost		—			—		—			—
Amortization of net loss		2			1		3			—
Net periodic pension cost	$	6		$	3		7			3

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2011					2010
	Qualified			Non-Qualified		Qualified			Non-Qualified
Service cost	$	2		$	—	$	4		$	—
Interest cost		34			6		34			7
Expected return on plan assets		(25	)		—		(27	)		—
Amortization of prior service cost		—			—		—			—
Amortization of net loss		7			1		8			—
Net periodic pension cost	$	18		$	7	$	19		$	7

XML

Depreciation and Amortization Expense (Details Textuals) (USD $) In Millions	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2010
Depreciation and Amortization Expense (Textuals) [Abstract]
Depreciation and amortization expense	$ 188	$ 209

XML

Warranty (Details) (USD $) In Millions	9 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Warranty liability
Balance at January 1	$ 107	$ 109
Accruals for warranties issued during the period	20	42
Accruals related to pre-existing warranties	7	(4)
Settlements made (in cash or kind) during the period	(29)	(37)
Other, net	(2)	(3)
Balance at end of period	$ 103	$ 107

XML

Other Income (Expense), Net (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Other Income (Expense), Net (Tables) [Abstract]

Other, net

	Three Months Ended					Nine Months Ended
	September 30,					September 30,
	2011		2010			2011			2010
Income from cash and
cash investments	$	2	$	2		$	5		$	4
Other interest income		1		—			1			1
Income (loss) from financial investments
(Note D)		19		(3	)		69			(2	)
Other items, net		—		—			(1	)		(5	)
Total other net	$	22	$	(1	)	$	74		$	(2	)

XML

Other Income (Expense), Net

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Other Income (Expense), Net [Abstract]

Other Income (Expense), Net

K. Other, net, which is included in other income (expense), net, was as follows, in millions:

	Three Months Ended					Nine Months Ended
	September 30,					September 30,
	2011		2010			2011			2010
Income from cash and
cash investments	$	2	$	2		$	5		$	4
Other interest income		1		—			1			1
Income (loss) from financial investments
(Note D)		19		(3	)		69			(2	)
Other items, net		—		—			(1	)		(5	)
Total other net	$	22	$	(1	)	$	74		$	(2	)

Other items, net, included $1 million and $— million of currency gains for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively. Other items, net, included $4 million and $(2) million of currency gains (losses) for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively.

XML

Fair Value of Financial Investments and Liabilities

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Fair Value of Financial Investments and Liabilities [Abstract]

Fair Value of Financial Investments and Liabilities

D. The Company has maintained investments in available-for-sale securities and a number of private equity funds, principally as part of its tax planning strategies, as any gains enhance the utilization of any current and future tax capital losses. Financial investments included in other assets were as follows, in millions:

	September 30,		December 31,
	2011		2010
Auction rate securities	$	22	$	22
TriMas Corporation common stock		—		40
Total recurring investments		22		62
Private equity funds		92		106
Other investments		5		13
Total non-recurring investments		97		119
Total	$	119	$	181

The Company’s investments in available-for-sale securities at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were as follows, in millions:

			Pre-tax
			Unrealized		Unrealized		Recorded
	Cost Basis		Gains		Losses		Basis
September 30, 2011	$	19	$	3	$	—	$	22
December 31, 2010	$	22	$	40	$	—	$	62

Recurring Fair Value Measurements. Financial assets and (liabilities) measured at fair value on a recurring basis at each reporting period and the amounts for each level within the fair value hierarchy were as follows, in millions:

			Fair Value Measurements Using
					Significant
			Quoted		Other		Significant
			Market		Observable		Unobservable
	Sep. 30,		Prices		Inputs		Inputs
	2011		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Auction rate securities	$	22	$	—	$	—	$	22
Total	$	22	$	—	$	—	$	22

			Fair Value Measurements Using
					Significant
			Quoted		Other		Significant
			Market		Observable		Unobservable
	Dec. 31,		Prices		Inputs		Inputs
	2010		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Auction rate securities	$	22	$	—	$	—	$	22
TriMas Corporation		40		40		—		—
Total	$	62	$	40	$	—	$	22

The fair value of the auction rate securities held by the Company have been estimated, on a recurring basis, using a discounted cash flow model (Level 3 input). The significant inputs in the discounted cash flow model used to value the auction rate securities include: expected maturity of auction rate securities, discount rate used to determine the present value of expected cash flows and the assumptions for credit defaults, since the auction rate securities are backed by credit default swap agreements.

The following tables summarize the changes in Level 3 financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and the year ended December 31, 2010, in millions:

	Auction Rate
	Securities
Fair value January 1, 2011	$	22
Total losses included in earnings		—
Unrealized (losses)		—
Purchases		—
Settlements		—
Transfer from Level 3 to Level 2		—
Fair value at September 30, 2011	$	22

During 2010, the Company converted all of its holdings in Asahi Tec preferred stock into common stock, which was sold in its entirety in 2010 in open market transactions.

	Asahi Tec			Auction Rate
	Preferred Stock			Securities		Total
Fair value January 1, 2010	$	71		$	22	$	93
Total losses included in earnings		(28	)		—		(28	)
Unrealized losses		(23	)		—		(23	)
Purchases, issuances, settlements		—			—		—
Transfers from Level 3 to Level 2		(20	)		—		(20	)
Fair value at December 31, 2010	$	—		$	22	$	22

Non-Recurring Fair Value Measurements. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company did not measure any financial investments on a non-recurring basis, as there was no other-than-temporary decline in the estimated value of private equity funds. Financial investments measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis during 2010 and the amounts for each level within the fair value hierarchy were as follows, in millions:

			Fair Value Measurements Using
					Significant
			Quoted		Other		Significant
			Market		Observable		Unobservable		Total
	Dec. 31,		Prices		Inputs		Inputs		Gains
	2010		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)		(Losses)
Private equity funds	$	2	$	—	$	—	$	2	$	(4	)
Other private investments		—		—		—		—		(2	)
	$	2	$	—	$	—	$	2	$	(6	)

The Company did not have any transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 financial assets in the first nine months of 2011 or in the full-year 2010.

Income and impairment charges for financial investments were as follows, in millions:

	Three Months Ended					Nine Months Ended
	September 30,					September 30,
	2011		2010			2011		2010
Realized gains (losses)
from:
TriMas Corporation common stock	$	—	$	—		$	41	$	—
Private equity funds		19		—			28		—
Other financial investments		—		(3	)		—		(2	)
Total realized gains	$	19	$	(3	)	$	69	$	(2	)
Impairment charges:
Asahi Tec Preferred Stock	$	—	$	—		$	—	$	(28	)
Private equity funds		—		—			—		(3	)
Other private investments		—		—			—		(2	)
Total impairment charges	$	—	$	—		$	—	$	(33	)

The fair value of the Company’s short-term and long-term fixed-rate debt instruments is based principally upon quoted market prices for the same or similar issues or the current rates available to the Company for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities. The aggregate estimated market value of short-term and long-term debt at September 30, 2011 was approximately $3.9 billion, compared with the aggregate carrying value of $4.0 billion. The aggregate estimated market value of short-term and long-term debt at December 31, 2010 was approximately $4.2 billion, compared with the aggregate carrying value of $4.1 billion.

XML

Income Taxes

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Income Taxes [Abstract]

Income Taxes

N. The effective tax rate was 64 percent for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 primarily due to an increase in the valuation allowance related to net operating losses and losses in certain jurisdictions providing no tax benefit.

As a result of tax audit closings, settlements and expiration of applicable statutes of limitations in various jurisdictions within the next 12 months, the Company anticipates that it is reasonably possible that the liability for uncertain tax positions could be reduced by approximately $6 million.

XML

Fair Value of Financial Investments and Liabilities (Details Textuals) (USD $) In Billions	Sep. 30, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Fair Value of Financial Investments and Liabilities (Textuals) [Abstract]
Estimated market value of long-term and short-term debt	$ 3.9	$ 4.2
Aggregate carrying value of long-term and short-term debt	$ 4.0	$ 4.1

XML

Segment Information (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Segment Information (Tables) [Abstract]

Company by segment and geographic area

	Three Months Ended September 30,										Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2011		2010		2011			2010			2011		2010		2011			2010
	Net Sales(A)				Operating Profit (Loss)						Net Sales(A)				Operating Profit (Loss)
The Company’s operations by
segment were:
Cabinets and Related Products	$	307	$	357	$	(34	)	$	(61	)	$	944	$	1,160	$	(111	)	$	(113	)
Plumbing Products		768		686		91			97			2,239		2,031		270			267
Installation and Other Services		315		292		(27	)		(22	)		863		874		(93	)		(87	)
Decorative Architectural Products		455		463		88			104			1,322		1,357		247			300
Other Specialty Products		161		159		12			11			432		435		2			16
Total	$	2,006	$	1,957	$	130		$	129		$	5,800	$	5,857	$	315		$	383
The Company’s operations by geographic area were:
North America	$	1,524	$	1,528	$	80		$	79		$	4,420	$	4,617	$	178		$	257
International, principally Europe		482		429		50			50			1,380		1,240		137			126
Total	$	2,006	$	1,957		130			129		$	5,800	$	5,857		315			383
General corporate expense, net						(27	)		(27	)						(95	)		(84	)
Charge for litigation settlement (B)						(1	)		—							(6	)		—
Operating profit						102			102							214			299
Other income (expense), net						(41	)		(64	)						(116	)		(223	)
Income before income taxes					$	61		$	38						$	98		$	76

(A)	Inter-segment sales were not material.
(B)	Charge for litigation settlement relates to a business unit in the Cabinets and Related Products segment and the Other Specialty Products segment.

XML

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) (USD $) In Millions	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2010
CASH FLOWS FROM (FOR) OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Cash provided by operations	$ 210	$ 333
Increase in receivables	(245)	(136)
Increase in inventories	(118)	(64)
Increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities, net	248	103
Net cash from operating activities	95	236
CASH FLOWS FROM (FOR) FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Increase in debt		2
Payment of debt	(3)	(3)
Issuance of Notes, net of issuance costs		494
Retirement of Notes	(58)	(359)
Purchase of Company common stock	(30)	(45)
Cash dividends paid	(80)	(81)
Dividend payment to noncontrolling interest	(18)	(15)
Credit Agreement costs	(1)	(9)
Net cash for financing activities	(190)	(16)
CASH FLOWS FROM (FOR) INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Capital expenditures	(106)	(88)
Proceeds from disposition of:
Marketable securities	49	5
Other financial investments, net	43	6
Property and equipment	19	16
Purchases of other financial investments	(7)
Other, net	(7)	(26)
Net cash for investing activities	(9)	(87)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash investments	(1)	(9)
CASH AND CASH INVESTMENTS:
(Decrease) increase for the period	(105)	124
At January 1	1,715	1,413
At September 30	$ 1,610	$ 1,537

XML

Subsequent Events

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Subsequent Events [Abstract]

Subsequent Events

O. In October 2011, the Company determined that several businesses in the Installation and Other Services segment related to commercial drywall installation, millwork and framing are not core to the Company’s long-term growth strategy and, accordingly, has embarked on a plan of disposition. The businesses had combined 2010 net sales of approximately $100 million and aggregate operating losses of $10 million (excluding any impairment charges). The Company expects proceeds from the dispositions will be less than the net book value of the businesses. The dispositions are expected to be completed within the next twelve months.

XML

Employee Retirement Plans (Details) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	9 Months Ended	12 Months Ended	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended		3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010 Plan	Sep. 30, 2011 Qualified [Member]	Sep. 30, 2010 Qualified [Member]	Sep. 30, 2011 Qualified [Member]	Sep. 30, 2010 Qualified [Member]	Sep. 30, 2011 Non-Qualified [Member]	Sep. 30, 2010 Non-Qualified [Member]	Sep. 30, 2011 Non-Qualified [Member]	Sep. 30, 2010 Non-Qualified [Member]	Dec. 31, 2010 Non-Qualified [Member]
Net periodic pension cost for defined-benefit pension plans
Service cost			$ 1	$ 2	$ 2	$ 4	$ 0	$ 0	$ 0	$ 0
Interest cost			12	11	34	34	2	3	6	7
Expected return on plan assets			(9)	(9)	(25)	(27)	0	0	0	0
Amortization of prior service cost			0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Amortization of net loss			2	3	7	8	1	0	1	0
Net periodic pension cost			6	7	18	19	3	3	7	7
Net Liability of defined-benefit pension plans		522									163
Employee Retirement Plans (Textuals) [Abstract]
Minimum adjusted funding target attainment percentage of defined-benefit pension plans		62.00%
Maximum adjusted funding target attainment percentage of defined-benefit pension plans		86.00%
Number of plan offered for accelerated benefit		1
Adjusted Funding Target Attainment Percentage		less than 80 percent
Prohibited percentage of lump sum distribution		excess of 50 percent
Reduction in employee expenses related accruals	$ 5

XML

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (Tables) [Abstract]

Changes in carrying amount of goodwill

	Gross Goodwill		Accumulated			Net Goodwill
	At		Impairment			At
	Sep. 30, 2011		Losses			Sep. 30, 2011
Cabinets and Related Products	$	588	$	(364	)	$	224
Plumbing Products		539		(340	)		199
Installation and Other Services		1,819		(762	)		1,057
Decorative Architectural Products		294		—			294
Other Specialty Products		980		(367	)		613
Total	$	4,220	$	(1,833	)	$	2,387

	Gross Goodwill		Accumulated			Net Goodwill
	At		Impairment			At				At
	Dec. 31, 2010		Losses			Dec. 31, 2010		Other(A)		Sep. 30, 2011
Cabinets and Related Products	$	587	$	(364	)	$	223	$	1	$	224
Plumbing Products		536		(340	)		196		3		199
Installation and Other Services		1,819		(762	)		1,057		—		1,057
Decorative Architectural Products		294		—			294		—		294
Other Specialty Products		980		(367	)		613		—		613
Total	$	4,216	$	(1,833	)	$	2,383	$	4	$	2,387

(A) Other principally includes the effect of foreign currency translation.

XML

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity (Unaudited) (Parenthetical) (USD $) In Millions	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2010
Income tax benefit on unrealized (loss) on marketable securities	$ 0	$ (1)
Income tax benefit on unrecognized prior service cost	0	3
Income tax benefit on unrealized gain (loss) on interest rate swaps	0
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
Income tax benefit on unrealized (loss) on marketable securities	0	(1)
Income tax benefit on unrecognized prior service cost	0	3
Income tax benefit on unrealized gain (loss) on interest rate swaps	$ 0

XML

Employee Retirement Plans

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Employee Retirement Plans [Abstract]

Employee Retirement Plans

I.	The Company sponsors qualified defined-benefit or defined-contribution retirement plans for most of its employees. In addition to the Company’s qualified defined-benefit pension plans, the Company has unfunded non-qualified defined-benefit pension plans covering certain employees, which provide for benefits in addition to those provided by the qualified pension plans. Substantially all salaried employees participate in non-contributory defined-contribution retirement plans, to which payments are determined annually by the Organization and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.
	During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company adjusted certain employee expense related accruals which resulted in a $5 million reduction to expenses related to the fourth quarter of 2010. The effect was not material to the previously issued financial statements.
	Effective January 1, 2010, the Company froze all future benefit accruals under substantially all of the Company’s domestic qualified and non-qualified defined-benefit pension plans. Future benefit accruals related to the Company’s foreign non-qualified plans were frozen several years ago.
	Net periodic pension cost for the Company’s defined-benefit pension plans was as follows, in millions:

	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2011					2010
	Qualified			Non-Qualified		Qualified			Non-Qualified
Service cost	$	1		$	—	$	2		$	—
Interest cost		12			2		11			3
Expected return on plan assets		(9	)		—		(9	)		—
Amortization of prior service cost		—			—		—			—
Amortization of net loss		2			1		3			—
Net periodic pension cost	$	6		$	3		7			3

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2011					2010
	Qualified			Non-Qualified		Qualified			Non-Qualified
Service cost	$	2		$	—	$	4		$	—
Interest cost		34			6		34			7
Expected return on plan assets		(25	)		—		(27	)		—
Amortization of prior service cost		—			—		—			—
Amortization of net loss		7			1		8			—
Net periodic pension cost	$	18		$	7	$	19		$	7

At December 31, 2010, the Company reported a net liability of $522 million, of which $163 million was related to our non-qualified, supplemental retirement plans, which are not subject to the funding requirements of the Pension Protection Act. In accordance with the Pension Protection Act of 2006, the Adjusted Funding Target Attainment Percentage (“AFTAP”) for the various defined-benefit pension plans ranges from 62 percent to 86 percent. At December 31, 2010, the Company had one plan that offered accelerated benefits (i.e., lump sum distributions) and the AFTAP for that plan is less than 80 percent; therefore, the plan is prohibited from allowing participants to receive any lump sum distribution in excess of 50 percent of the benefit value. In addition, plan amendments increasing benefits or liabilities for that plan are also prohibited.

XML

Financial Investments Included in Other Assets (Details) (USD $) In Millions	9 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Financial investments included in other assets
Total recurring investments	$ 22	$ 62
Total non-recurring investments	97	119
Total	119	181
Company's investments in available-for-sale securities
Cost Basis	19	22
Pre-tax Unrealized Gains	3	40
Pre-tax Unrealized Losses	0	0
Recorded Basis	22	62
Auction rate securities [Member]
Financial investments included in other assets
Total recurring investments	22	22
Trimas Corporation Common Stock [Member]
Financial investments included in other assets
Total recurring investments	0	40
Private Equity Funds [Member]
Financial investments included in other assets
Total non-recurring investments	92	106
Other investments [Member]
Financial investments included in other assets
Total non-recurring investments	$ 5	$ 13

XML

Other Commitments and Contingencies

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Other Commitments and Contingencies [Abstract]

Other Commitments and Contingencies

M. The Company is subject to lawsuits and pending or asserted claims with respect to matters generally arising in the ordinary course of business.

As previously disclosed, a lawsuit was brought against the Company and a number of its insulation installation companies alleging that certain of their practices violated provisions of the federal antitrust laws. The case was filed in October 2004 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia by Columbus Drywall & Insulation, Inc., Leo Jones Insulation, Inc., Southland Insulators, Inc., Southland Insulators of Maryland, Inc. d/b/a Devere Insulation, Southland Insulators of Delaware LLC d/b/a Delmarva Insulation, and Whitson Insulation Company of Grand Rapids, Inc. against the Company, its subsidiaries Masco Contractors Services Group Corp., Masco Contractor Services Central, Inc. (“MCS Central”) and Masco Contractor Services East, Inc., and several insulation manufacturers (the “Columbus Drywall case”). In February 2009, the court certified a class of 377 insulation contractors. Another suit was filed in March 2003 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia by Wilson Insulation Company, Wilson Insulation of Augusta, Inc. and The Wilson Insulation Group, Inc. against the Company, Masco Contractor Services, Inc., and MCS Central that alleged anticompetitive conduct. This case has been removed from the court’s active docket. In March 2007, Albert Von Der Werth and Valerie Good filed suit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California against the Company, its subsidiary Masco Contractor Services, and several insulation manufacturers seeking class action status and alleging anticompetitive conduct. This case was subsequently transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia and has been administratively stayed by the court. An additional suit, which was filed in September 2005 and alleged anticompetitive conduct, was dismissed with prejudice in December 2006.

The Company is vigorously defending the Columbus Drywall case. Based upon the advice of its outside counsel, the Company believes that the conduct of the Company and its insulation installation companies, which is the subject of the above-described lawsuits, has not violated any antitrust laws. The Company is unable at this time to reliably estimate any potential liability which might occur from an adverse judgment. There cannot be any assurance that the Company will ultimately prevail in these lawsuits, or, if unsuccessful, that the ultimate liability would not be material and would not have a material adverse effect on its businesses or the methods used by its insulation installation companies in doing business.

XML

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited) (USD $) In Millions	9 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Current assets:
Cash and cash investments	$ 1,610	$ 1,715
Receivables	1,133	888
Prepaid expenses and other	118	129
Inventories:
Finished goods	457	393
Raw material	297	246
Work in process	96	93
Total Inventories	850	732
Total current assets	3,711	3,464
Property and equipment, net	1,656	1,737
Goodwill	2,387	2,383
Other intangible assets, net	256	269
Other assets	202	287
Total assets	8,212	8,140
Current liabilities:
Notes payable	806	66
Accounts payable	866	602
Accrued liabilities	813	819
Total current liabilities	2,485	1,487
Long-term debt	3,224	4,032
Deferred income taxes and other	1,016	1,039
Total liabilities	6,725	6,558
Commitments and contingencies
Masco Corporation's shareholders' equity:
Common shares, par value $1 per share Authorized shares: 1,400,000,000; issued and outstanding: 2011- 347,800,000; 2010 - 348,600,000	348	349
Preferred shares authorized: 1,000,000; issued and outstanding: 2011 - None; 2010 - None
Paid-in capital	50	42
Retained earnings	638	720
Accumulated other comprehensive income	231	273
Total Masco Corporation's shareholders' equity	1,267	1,384
Noncontrolling interest	220	198
Total equity	1,487	1,582
Total liabilities and equity	$ 8,212	$ 8,140

XML

Level 3 Financial Assets Fair Value (Details 2) (USD $) In Millions	9 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Changes in Level 3 financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis
Fair value, Beginning Balance		$ 93
Total losses included in earnings		(28)
Unrealized losses		(23)
Purchases, issuances, settlements		0
Transfers from Level 3 to Level 2		(20)
Fair value, Ending Balance		22
Asahi Tec Corporation - preferred stock [Member]
Changes in Level 3 financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis
Fair value, Beginning Balance		71
Total losses included in earnings		(28)
Unrealized losses		(23)
Purchases, issuances, settlements		0
Transfers from Level 3 to Level 2		(20)
Fair value, Ending Balance		0
Auction rate securities [Member]
Changes in Level 3 financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis
Fair value, Beginning Balance	22	22
Total losses included in earnings	0	0
Unrealized losses	0	0
Purchases	0
Settlements	0
Purchases, issuances, settlements		0
Transfers from Level 3 to Level 2	0	0
Fair value, Ending Balance	$ 22	$ 22

XML

Income Taxes (Details) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2011
Income Taxes (Textuals) [Abstract]
Anticipation of the reasonably possible change in uncertain tax positions	$ 6
Effective tax rate related to net operating losses	64.00%

XML

Segment Information (Details) (USD $) In Millions	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2010	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2010
Company by segment and geographic area
Segment Reporting, Net Sales	$ 2,006	$ 1,957	$ 5,800	$ 5,857
Segment Reporting, Operating Profit (Loss)	130	129	315	383
General corporate expense, net	(27)	(27)	(95)	(84)
Charge for litigation settlement	(1)		(6)
Operating profit	102	102	214	299
Other income (expense), net	(41)	(64)	(116)	(223)
Income before income taxes	61	38	98	76
Cabinets and Related Products [Member]
Company by segment and geographic area
Segment Reporting, Net Sales	307	357	944	1,160
Segment Reporting, Operating Profit (Loss)	(34)	(61)	(111)	(113)
Plumbing Products [Member]
Company by segment and geographic area
Segment Reporting, Net Sales	768	686	2,239	2,031
Segment Reporting, Operating Profit (Loss)	91	97	270	267
Installation and Other Services [Member]
Company by segment and geographic area
Segment Reporting, Net Sales	315	292	863	874
Segment Reporting, Operating Profit (Loss)	(27)	(22)	(93)	(87)
Decorative Architectural Products [Member]
Company by segment and geographic area
Segment Reporting, Net Sales	455	463	1,322	1,357
Segment Reporting, Operating Profit (Loss)	88	104	247	300
Other Specialty Products [Member]
Company by segment and geographic area
Segment Reporting, Net Sales	161	159	432	435
Segment Reporting, Operating Profit (Loss)	12	11	2	16
North America [Member]
Company by segment and geographic area
Segment Reporting, Net Sales	1,524	1,528	4,420	4,617
Segment Reporting, Operating Profit (Loss)	80	79	178	257
International, principally Europe [Member]
Company by segment and geographic area
Segment Reporting, Net Sales	482	429	1,380	1,240
Segment Reporting, Operating Profit (Loss)	$ 50	$ 50	$ 137	$ 126

XML

Other Income (Expense), Net (Details) (USD $) In Millions	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2010	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2010
Other, net
Income from cash and cash investments	$ 2	$ 2	$ 5	$ 4
Other interest income	1	0	1	1
Income (loss) from financial investments (Note D)	19	(3)	69	(2)
Other items, net	0	0	(1)	(5)
Total other, net	22	(1)	74	(2)
Other Income (Expense), Net (Textuals) [Abstract]
Currency gains (losses) included in other items , net	$ 1	$ 4	$ 0	$ (2)

XML

Non-recurring Fair Value Measurements (Details 3) (USD $) In Millions	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended		12 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2010	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2010	Dec. 31, 2010
Non-Recurring Fair Value Measurements
Fair value on a non-recurring basis of financial investments					$ 2
Impairment charge for financial investments	0	0	0	(33)
Private Equity Funds [Member] | Quoted Market Prices (Level 1) [Member]
Non-Recurring Fair Value Measurements
Fair value on a non-recurring basis of financial investments					0
Quoted Market Prices (Level 1) [Member]
Non-Recurring Fair Value Measurements
Fair value on a non-recurring basis of financial investments					0
Private Equity Funds [Member] | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) [Member]
Non-Recurring Fair Value Measurements
Fair value on a non-recurring basis of financial investments					0
Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) [Member]
Non-Recurring Fair Value Measurements
Fair value on a non-recurring basis of financial investments					0
Private Equity Funds [Member] | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) [Member]
Non-Recurring Fair Value Measurements
Fair value on a non-recurring basis of financial investments					2
Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) [Member]
Non-Recurring Fair Value Measurements
Fair value on a non-recurring basis of financial investments					2
Private Equity Funds [Member] | Total Gains (Losses) [Member]
Non-Recurring Fair Value Measurements
Impairment charge for financial investments					(4)
Other private investments [Member] | Total Gains (Losses) [Member]
Non-Recurring Fair Value Measurements
Impairment charge for financial investments					(2)
Total Gains (Losses) [Member]
Non-Recurring Fair Value Measurements
Impairment charge for financial investments					(6)
Private Equity Funds [Member]
Non-Recurring Fair Value Measurements
Fair value on a non-recurring basis of financial investments					2
Impairment charge for financial investments	0	0	0	3
Other private investments [Member]
Non-Recurring Fair Value Measurements
Impairment charge for financial investments	$ 0	$ 0	$ 0	$ 2	$ 0