10-K

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003

Commission File Number 1-898

AMPCO-PITTSBURGH CORPORATION

Pennsylvania	25-1117717
(State of Incorporation)	I.R.S. Employer ID No.
600 Grant Street, Suite 4600 Pittsburgh, PA 15219	412/456-4400
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Registrant’s telephone number)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class	Name of each exchange on which registered
Common stock, $1 par value	New York Stock Exchange Philadelphia Stock Exchange
Series A Preference Stock Purchase Rights	New York Stock Exchange Philadelphia Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.    x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).    Yes  x    No  ¨.

The aggregate market value of the voting stock of Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation held by non-affiliates on June 30, 2003 (based upon the closing price of the Registrant’s Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) on that date) was approximately $41 million.

As of March 11, 2004, 9,707,497 common shares were outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE: Parts I, II and IV of this report incorporate by reference certain information from the Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2003.

PART I

ITEM 1 - BUSINESS

GENERAL DEVELOPMENT OF BUSINESS

Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation (the “Corporation”) was incorporated in Pennsylvania in 1929. The Corporation, individually or together with its consolidated subsidiaries, is also referred to herein as the “Registrant”.

The Corporation classifies its businesses in two segments – Forged and Cast Rolls and Air and Liquid Processing.

In 2003, all of the subsidiaries comprising the Corporation’s Plastics Processing Machinery segment were sold. For more information, see Note 2 on pages 19 and 20 of the Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2003, which is incorporated herein by reference.

The Corporation continues to evaluate the businesses it operates to ensure that they meet the long term objective of achieving maximum shareholder value.

FINANCIAL INFORMATION ABOUT SEGMENTS

The sales and operating profit of the Corporation’s two segments and the identifiable assets attributable to both segments for the three years ended December 31, 2003 are set forth in Note 18 (Business Segments) on page 29 of the Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2003, which is incorporated herein by reference.

2

NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

Forged and Cast Rolls Segment

Union Electric Steel Corporation produces forged hardened steel rolls for producers of steel, aluminum and other metals throughout the world. It is headquartered in Carnegie, Pennsylvania with three manufacturing facilities in Pennsylvania and one in Indiana. Union Electric Steel Corporation is considered one of the largest producers of forged hardened steel rolls in the world. In addition to several domestic competitors, several major European, South American and Japanese manufacturers also compete in both the domestic and foreign markets.

The Davy Roll Company Limited produces cast rolls for hot and cold strip mills, medium/heavy section mills and plate mills in a variety of iron and steel qualities. It is located in Gateshead, England and is a major European supplier of cast rolls to the metal working industry worldwide. It primarily competes with European, Asian and North and South American companies in both the domestic and foreign markets.

Air and Liquid Processing Segment

Aerofin Corporation produces finned tube and plate finned heat exchange coils for the commercial and industrial construction, process and utility industries and is headquartered in Lynchburg, Virginia.

3

Buffalo Air Handling Company produces large custom air handling systems used in commercial, institutional and industrial buildings and is headquartered in Amherst, Virginia.

Buffalo Pumps, Inc. manufactures a line of centrifugal pumps for the refrigeration, power generation and marine defense industries and is headquartered in North Tonawanda, New York.

All three of the companies in this segment are principally represented by a common independent sales organization and compete with several major competitors.

In both segments, the products are dependent on engineering, principally custom designed, and are sold to sophisticated commercial and industrial users in the United States and countries outside of the United States.

No one customer’s purchases in any segment were material to the Corporation in 2003. Contracts that may be subject to renegotiation or termination are not material to the Corporation. The Corporation’s businesses are not seasonal but are subject to the cyclical nature of the industries and markets served.

For additional information on the products produced and financial information about each segment, see pages 4 and 5 and Note 18 (Business Segments) on page 29 of the Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2003, which are incorporated herein by reference.

4

Raw Materials

Raw materials used in both segments are generally available from many sources and the Corporation is not dependent upon any single supplier for any raw material. Substantial volumes of raw materials used by the Corporation are subject to significant variations in price. The Corporation generally does not purchase or arrange for the purchase of any major portion of raw materials significantly in advance of the time it requires such materials.

Patents

While the Corporation holds some patents, trademarks and licenses, in the opinion of management, they are not material to either segment of the Corporation’s business, other than in protecting the goodwill associated with the names under which products are sold.

Backlog

The backlog of orders at December 31, 2003 was approximately $112,923,000 compared to a backlog of $100,922,000 at year-end 2002, which has been restated to exclude the Plastics Processing Machinery segment, which was sold in 2003. Most of those orders are expected to be filled in 2004.

Competition

The Corporation faces considerable competition from a large number of companies in both segments. The Corporation believes, however, that it is a significant factor in each of the principal markets which it serves. Competition in

5

both segments is based on quality, service, price and delivery. For additional information, see “Narrative Description of Business” section of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Research and Development

As part of an overall strategy to develop new markets and maintain leadership in each of the industry niches served, each of the Corporation’s businesses in both segments incurs expenditures for research and development. The activities that are undertaken are designed to develop new products, improve existing products and processes, enhance product quality, adapt products to meet customer specifications and reduce manufacturing costs. In the aggregate, these expenditures approximated $750,000 for 2003, 2002 and 2001.

Environmental Protection Compliance Costs

Expenditures for environmental control matters were not material to either segment in 2003 and such expenditures are not expected to be material in 2004.

Employees

On December 31, 2003, the Corporation had 1,152 active employees.

FINANCIAL INFORMATION ABOUT GEOGRAPHIC AREAS

The Forged and Cast Rolls segment has a manufacturing operation in the United Kingdom and a European sales and engineering support group in Belgium. For financial information relating to foreign and domestic operations see Note 18 (Business Segments) on page 29 of the Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2003, which is incorporated herein by reference.

6

Available Information

The Corporation’s Internet address is www.ampcopittsburgh.com. The Corporation makes available free of charge on its Internet website, access to its annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is filed, or furnished, to the Securities and Exchange Commission.

7

ITEM 2 - PROPERTIES

The location and general character of the principal locations in each segment, all of which are owned unless otherwise noted, are as follows:

Company and Location	Principal Use	Approximate Square Footage	Type of Construction
Forged and Cast Rolls Segment
Union Electric Steel Corp.
Route 18 Burgettstown, PA 15021	Manufacturing facilities	186,000 on 55 acres	Metal and steel
726 Bell Avenue Carnegie, PA 15106	Manufacturing facilities and offices	153,000 on 5 acres	Metal and steel
U.S. Highway 30 Valparaiso, IN 46383	Manufacturing facilities	88,000 on 20 acres	Metal and steel
1712 Greengarden Road Erie, PA 16501	Manufacturing facilities	40,000*	Metal and steel
Industrie Park B-3980 Tessenderlo Belgium	Sales and engineering offices	4,500*	Cement block
The Davy Roll Company
Coulthards Lane Gateshead, England	Manufacturing facilities and offices	274,000 on 12 acres	Steel framed, metal and brick

8

Company and Location	Principal Use	Approximate Square Footage	Type of Construction
Air and Liquid Processing Segment
Aerofin Corporation 4621 Murray Place Lynchburg, VA 24506	Manufacturing facilities and offices	146,000 on 15.3 acres	Brick, concrete and steel
Buffalo Air Handling Company Zane Snead Drive Amherst, VA 24531	Manufacturing facilities and offices	89,000 on 19.5 acres	Metal and steel
Buffalo Pumps, Inc. 874 Oliver Street N. Tonawanda, NY 14120	Manufacturing facilities and offices	94,000 on 7 acres	Metal, brick and cement block

* Facility is leased.

The Corporate office space is leased, as are several small sales offices. All of the owned facilities are adequate and suitable for their respective purposes.

The Corporation estimates that all of its facilities were operated within 65% to 90% of their normal capacity during 2003. Normal capacity is defined as capacity under approximately normal conditions with allowances made for unavoidable interruptions, such as lost time for repairs, maintenance, breakdowns, set-up, failure, supply delays, labor shortages and absences, Sundays, holidays, vacation, inventory taking, etc. The number of work shifts is also taken into consideration.

9

ITEM 3 - LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

The Corporation and its subsidiaries are involved in various claims and lawsuits incidental to their businesses. In addition, claims have been asserted alleging personal injury from exposure to asbestos-containing components historically used in some products of certain of the Corporation’s subsidiaries. Those subsidiaries, and in some cases, the Corporation, are defendants (among a number of defendants, typically over 50 and often over 100) in cases filed in various state and federal courts. The following table reflects information about these cases:

	2003		2002
Approximate open claims at end of period		18,000		16,339
Gross settlement and Defense costs	$	2,334,617	$	420,000
Approximate claims settled or dismissed during period.		250		20

Of the 18,000 claims pending as of December 31, 2003, over 15,000 were made in six lawsuits filed in Mississippi in 2002. Substantially all settlement and defense costs in the above table were paid by insurers.

On February 7, 2003, Utica Mutual Insurance Company (“Utica”) filed a lawsuit in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Oneida (“Oneida County Litigation”) against the Corporation and certain of the subsidiaries named in the underlying asbestos actions (the “Policyholder Defendants”) and three other insurance carriers that provided primary coverage to the Corporation (the “Insurer Defendants”). In the lawsuit, Utica disputed

10

certain coverage obligations to the Policyholder Defendants and asserted that the Insurer Defendants also had defense and indemnity obligations to the Policyholder Defendants.

As of November 24, 2003, the Policyholder Defendants and Utica had settled the Oneida County Litigation as among themselves, although the Oneida County Litigation remained pending because settlement had not been reached with all of the Insurer Defendants. Pursuant to the settlement, Utica accepted financial responsibility, subject to the limits of its policies and based on fixed defense percentages and specified indemnity allocation formulas, for a substantial majority of the asbestos personal injury claims arising out of exposure to alleged asbestos-containing components in products distributed by the Policyholder Defendants that are subsidiaries of the Corporation. Utica’s agreed share of such defense and indemnification costs varies depending upon the alleged asbestos-containing product at issue, whether Utica’s primary or umbrella policies are responsible for the claims and, for indemnification costs only, the years of the claimant’s exposure to asbestos.

On January 23, 2004, Utica sought the court’s approval to file an amended complaint seeking additional relief against the Policyholder Defendants that is substantially identical to the relief Utica seeks against those defendants in a separate lawsuit filed by Howden Buffalo, Inc. (“Howden”) in the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania (the “Pennsylvania Litigation”) that is described below. Utica also sought to add Howden as a defendant in the Oneida County Litigation.

11

On November 25, 2003, Howden filed the Pennsylvania Litigation against the Corporation, Utica and two of the Insurer Defendants (with Utica, the “Howden Insurer Defendants”). Howden alleges that (1) Buffalo Forge Company, a former subsidiary of the Corporation, or its predecessors (collectively or individually, “Buffalo Forge”) had rights in certain policies issued by the Howden Insurer Defendants; (2) those rights were transferred in the 1993 transaction whereby the Corporation sold all of the capital stock of Buffalo Forge to Howden Group America, Inc. and Howden Group Canada, Ltd.; and (3) those rights currently reside in Howden, as successor to Buffalo Forge. In the lawsuit, Howden is seeking a judicial determination of the rights and duties of the Corporation and the Howden Insurer Defendants under those policies with respect to asbestos-related personal injury claims asserted against Howden arising from the historical operations of Buffalo Forge, as well as monetary damages from Utica as a result of its denial of Howden’s rights under policies it issued that allegedly covered Buffalo Forge. The Corporation intends to defend the lawsuit vigorously. If Howden is successful in this lawsuit and obtains coverage from the Howden Insurer Defendants, however, any insurance recovery obtained by Howden under those policies could erode, in whole or in part, the applicable coverage limits, which would reduce or eliminate coverage amounts that otherwise may be available to the Corporation under those policies.

12

As one of the Howden Insurer Defendants, Utica has filed a cross-claim against the Corporation, and a third-party complaint against two of its subsidiaries, seeking a declaratory judgment that, to the extent Utica has defense or indemnity obligations to Howden: (1) Utica is entitled to contribution, subrogation and reimbursement from the Corporation or its subsidiaries with respect to defense and indemnity payments paid on behalf of the Corporation or its subsidiaries; and (2) the Corporation and its subsidiaries have no rights under the insurance contracts issued by Utica to Buffalo Forge. The Corporation believes that Utica’s cross-claim and third party claims, as well as the similar relief Utica now seeks in the Oneida county Litigation, are barred by a release provided in the settlement of the Oneida County Litigation and is otherwise without merit, and intends to assert that position in this lawsuit. If Utica is successful in obtaining the declaratory relief it seeks, it could eliminate insurance coverage provided to the Corporation by Utica.

The Corporation believes it has meritorious defenses to the Howden lawsuit and Utica’s cross claims. In addition, based on the Corporation’s claims experience to date with the underlying asbestos claims, the available insurance coverage and the identity of the subsidiaries that are named in the cases, the Corporation believes that the pending legal proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial condition or liquidity. The outcome of particular lawsuits, however, could be material to the consolidated results of operations of the period in which the costs, if any, are recognized.

13

There can be no assurance that the Corporation or certain of its subsidiaries will not be subjected to significant additional claims in the future or that the Corporation’s or its subsidiaries’ ultimate liability with respect to these claims will not present significantly greater and longer lasting financial exposure than presently contemplated. The Corporation has made an accrual in its financial statements to reflect its estimated share of costs for pending asbestos claims, based on deductible and similar features of its relevant insurance policies. In addition, the Corporation incurred uninsured legal costs in connection with advice on certain matters pertaining to these asbestos cases including insurance litigation and other issues. Those costs amounted to approximately $2.4 million in 2003.

With respect to environmental matters, the Corporation is currently performing certain remedial actions in connection with the sale of real estate previously owned and has been named a Potentially Responsible Party at one third-party landfill site used by a division that was previously sold. In addition, as a result of the sale of the Plastics Processing Machinery segment, the Corporation retained the liability to remediate certain environmental contamination at two of the sold locations and has agreed to indemnify the buyer against third-party claims arising from the discharge of certain contamination from one of these locations at a cost estimate of $2,100,000 which will be paid over several years and was provided for in the third quarter of 2003. Environmental exposures are difficult to assess and estimate for numerous

14

reasons including lack of reliable data, the multiplicity of possible solutions, the years of remedial and monitoring activity required, and identification of new sites. However, in the opinion of management, the potential liability for all environmental proceedings based on information known to date has been adequately reserved.

ITEM 4 - SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

No matter was submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of 2003.

15

PART II

ITEM 5 - MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF SECURITIES

The information called for by this item is set forth on pages 30 and 31 of the Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2003, which is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 6 - SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The information called for by this item is set forth on page 31 of the Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2003, which is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 7 - MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION

The information called for by this item is set forth on pages 6 through 12 of the Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2003, which are incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 7A - QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The information called for by this item is set forth in Note 11 (Financial Instruments) on page 26 and Consolidated Results of Operations on pages 7 through 9 of the Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2003, which is incorporated herein by reference.

16

ITEM 8 - FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

The information called for by this item is set forth on pages 13 through 30 of the Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2003, which are incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 9 - CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

The Corporation did not experience any changes in, or disagreements with its accountants on, accounting and financial disclosure during the period covered.

ITEM 9A - CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures: An evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this annual report was carried out under the supervision, and with the participation, of the Company’s management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer. Disclosure controls and procedures are defined under Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules as controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within required time periods. Based on that evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that the Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

17

Changes in Internal Control: Subsequent to the date of the evaluation discussed above, there have been no significant changes in the Corporation’s internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect the internal controls, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

18

PART III

ITEM 10 - DIRECTORS and EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

IDENTIFICATION OF DIRECTORS

Name, Age, Tenure as a Director, Position with the Corporation (1), Principal Occupation, Business Experience Past Five Years, and Other Directorships in Public Companies

Robert J. Appel (age 72, Director since February 2004; current term expires in 2006). Mr. Appel has been President of Appel Associates since May, 2003. Prior to May, 2003, he was a partner of Neuberger Berman (an investment advisory firm that was acquired by Lehman Brothers) for more than five years. He is, and has been for more than five years, a Trustee and member of the Investment Committee of Cornell University, and has chaired that Committee since 2001.

Louis Berkman (age 95, Director since 1960; current term expires in 2005). Mr. Berkman has been Chairman of the Board of the Corporation for more than five years. He is also Chairman and a director of The Louis Berkman Investment Company (steel products, fabricated metal products, building and industrial supplies).

Leonard M. Carroll (age 61, Director since 1996; current term expires in 2004). Mr. Carroll has been Managing Director of Seneca Capital Management, Inc., a private investment company, for more than five years. (N)

William D. Eberle (age 80, Director since 1982; current term expires in 2006). Mr. Eberle has been a private investor and consultant for more than five years and is Chairman of Manchester Associates, Ltd. He is also a director of Mitchell Energy & Development Co., America Service Group and Konover Property Trust.

Paul A. Gould (age 58, Director since 2002; current term expires in 2006). Mr. Gould has been managing director of Allen & Co., Inc., an investment banking company for more than five years. He is also a director of Liberty Media Corporation and UnitedGlobalCom Inc.

William K. Lieberman (age 56, Director since February 2004; current term expires in 2005). Mr. Lieberman has been President of The Lieberman Companies since 2003. For more than five years before 2003, he was Executive Vice President of Hilb, Rogal and Hamilton Company of Pittsburgh, an insurance firm.

19

IDENTIFICATION OF DIRECTORS – (cont’)

Name, Age, Tenure as a Director, Position with the Corporation (1), Principal Occupation, Business Experience Past Five Years, and Other Directorships in Public Companies

Robert A. Paul (age 66, Director since 1970; current term expires in 2006). Mr. Paul has been President and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation for more than five years. He is also President and a director of The Louis Berkman Investment Company and director of National City Corporation.

Laurence E. Paul (age 39, Director since 1998; current term expires in 2004). Mr. Paul has been a managing principal of Laurel Crown Capital, a private investment company since 2002. From 2001 to 2002 he was a Vice President of The Louis Berkman Company. From 1995 to February 2001 he served in various capacities, including as a Managing Director, of Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette (an Investment Banking firm), that was acquired by Credit Suisse First Boston in 2000. He is also a director of Biovail Corporation. (N)

Stephen E. Paul (age 36, Director since 2002; current term expires in 2005). Mr. Paul has been a managing principal of Laurel Crown Capital, a private investment company, since 2002. From 2001 to 2002 he was a Vice President of The Louis Berkman Company. From 1998 to 2001 he was Vice President of Business Development for eToys, Inc.

Carl H. Pforzheimer, III (age 67, Director since 1982; current term expires in 2005). Mr. Pforzheimer has been Managing Partner of Carl H. Pforzheimer & Co. (member of the New York and American Stock Exchanges) for more than five years.

Ernest G. Siddons (age 70, Director since 1981; current term expires in 2004). Mr. Siddons has been Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of the Corporation for more than five years. (N)

(N) Nominee for election at the April 29, 2004 Annual Shareholders Meeting

(1) Officers serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors.

20

IDENTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

In addition to Louis Berkman, Robert A. Paul and Ernest G. Siddons (see “Identification of Directors” above), the following are also Executive Officers of the Corporation:

Name, Age, Position with the Corporation (1), Business Experience Past Five Years

Rose Hoover (age 48). Ms. Hoover has been a Vice President and Secretary of the Corporation for more than five years.

Marliss D. Johnson (age 39). Ms. Johnson has been Vice President, Controller and Treasurer of the Corporation since July 1999. Prior to July 1999, she was a Senior Manager with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, a public accounting firm.

Terrence W. Kenny (age 44). Mr. Kenny has been Group Vice President of the Corporation for more than five years

Robert F. Schultz (age 56). Mr. Schultz has been Vice President Industrial Relations and Senior Counsel of the Corporation for more than five years.

(1) Officers serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors and none of the listed individuals serve as a director of a public company.

COMMITTEES

In 2003, the Compensation Committee, Nominating and Governance Committee and the Stock Option Committee were comprised of William D. Eberle (Chairman), Leonard M. Carroll and Carl H. Pforzheimer, III. The Audit Committee in 2003 was comprised of Carl H. Pforzheimer, III (Chairman), William D. Eberle and Leonard M. Carroll.

In February, 2004, upon recommendation of the Nominating and Governance Committee and in order to comply with current NYSE rules requiring

21

a majority of independent directors, Mr. Appel and Mr. Lieberman were elected to the Board. In addition, the Board reconsidered the membership of certain Committees and changed those Committees as follows: Compensation Committee: William D. Eberle (Chairman), Robert J. Appel and Paul A. Gould; Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee: Paul A. Gould (Chairman), William K. Lieberman and Carl H. Pforzheimer, III. Paul A. Gould was added to the Audit Committee and the membership of the Executive and Stock Option Committees did not change.

FAMILY RELATIONSHIPS

Louis Berkman is the father-in-law of Robert A. Paul, and grandfather of Laurence E. Paul and Stephen E. Paul (sons of Robert A. Paul). There are no other family relationships among the Directors and Executive Officers.

AUDIT COMMITTEE AND AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT

The Board of Directors has established an Audit Committee consisting of Carl H. Pforzheimer, III, William D. Eberle, Leonard M. Carroll and Paul A. Gould. Mr. Gould was elected to the Audit Committee in February 2004. The Board has determined that Carl H. Pforzheimer, III, Chairman of the Audit Committee, is a “financial expert” and “independent” as defined under applicable SEC rules.

SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Corporation’s directors, executive officers and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of the Corporation’s common stock, to file reports of holdings and transactions in the

22

Corporation’s common stock with the SEC and to furnish the Corporation with copies of all Section 16(a) reports that they file. Based on those records and other information furnished, during 2003, executive officers, directors and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of the Corporation’s common stock complied with all filing requirements.

CODE OF ETHICS

The Corporation has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to all of its officers, directors and employees, as well as an additional Code of Ethics that applies to the Company’s chief executive officer, chief financial officer, principal accounting officer and controller. Copies of both Codes are available on the Corporation’s website at www.ampcopittsburgh.com. In addition, the Corporation will provide copies of the Codes as requested by shareholders of record by written request to the Corporate Secretary, Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation, 600 Grant Street, Suite 4600, Pittsburgh, PA 15219. The Corporation will make any required disclosures regarding amendments to, or waivers of, provisions of its Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and its separate Code of Ethics for its chief executive officer, chief financial officer, principal accounting officer and controller by posting such information on its website or by filing a Form 8-K.

23

ITEM 11 - EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The following table sets forth certain information as to the total remuneration received for the past three years by the five most highly compensated executive officers of the Corporation, including the Chief Executive Officer (the “Named Executive Officers”):

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

Annual Compensation

(a)	(b)	(c)	(d)	(e)
Name and Principal Position	Year	Salary ($)	Bonus ($)	Other Annual Compensation ($) (1)
Robert A. Paul President and Chief Executive Officer	2003 2002 2001	411,000 400,000 400,000	59,080 60,000 0	3,333 3,333 822
Louis Berkman Chairman of the Board and Executive Committee	2003 2002 2001	300,000 300,000 400,000	0 0 0	381 739 1,645
Ernest G. Siddons Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer	2003 2002 2001	380,175 370,000 360,000	54,649 55,500 0	2,822 1,582 2,131
Terrence W. Kenny Group Vice President	2003 2002 2001	151,000 146,000 140,000	28,080 36,500 38,500	168 1,183 134
Robert F. Schultz Vice President Industrial Relations and Senior Counsel	2003 2002 2001	162,000 158,000 153,000	15,000 15,000 0	24,703(2) 26,777(2) 21,190(2)

(1) Unless otherwise noted, amount represents reimbursement of taxes in connection with a medical reimbursement plan.

(2) Mr. Schultz was the only individual in the compensation table whose total value of personal benefits exceeded the reporting threshold. Of the total value reported for 2003, 2002 and 2001, the value attributable to the personal use of a company provided vehicle was $8,545, $8,554, and $8,098 respectively.

24

COMPENSATION PURSUANT TO PLANS

Stock Option Plan

The Corporation’s 1997 Stock Option Plan, as amended, permits the grant of options exercisable for shares of Common Stock to corporate officers and other key employees of the Corporation and its subsidiaries upon such terms, including exercise price and conditions and timing of exercise, as may be determined by the Stock Option Committee. The Stock Option Plan authorizes the grant of awards up to a maximum of 600,000 shares of the Corporation’s Common Stock; however, the maximum number of Shares with respect to which stock options may be granted to any one participant in any fiscal year is 150,000. No options were granted in 2003.

Aggregated Option Exercises in Last Fiscal Year and Fiscal Year End Option Values

Name	Shares Acquired on Exercise (#)	Value Realized ($)	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options at Fiscal Year End(#) Exercisable/Unexercisable	Value of Unexercised In-the-Money Options at Fiscal Year End($) Exercisable/Unexercisable
Robert A. Paul	0	0	120,000/0	391,650/0
Louis Berkman	0	0	120,000/0	391,650/0
Ernest G. Siddons	0	0	80,000/0	252,975/0
Robert F. Schultz	5,000	12,450	25,000/0	87,688/0
Terrence W. Kenny	1,000	3,794	24,000/0	77,924/0

Pension Benefits

The Corporation has a tax qualified retirement plan (the “Plan”) applicable to the Named Executive Officers and other employees, to which the

25

Corporation makes annual contributions, as required, in amounts determined by the Plan’s actuaries. The Plan does not have an offset for Social Security and is fully paid for by the Corporation. Under the Plan, employees become fully vested after five years of participation and normal retirement age under the Plan is age 65 but actuarially reduced benefits may be available for early retirement at age 55. The primary benefit formula is 1.1% of the highest consecutive five year average earnings in the final ten years, times years of service. Federal law requires that 5% owners start receiving a pension no later than April 1 following the calendar year in which the age 70 ¹/2 is reached. Louis Berkman is currently receiving $7095 a month pursuant to the Plan. As an active employee, Mr. Berkman continues to receive credit for additional service rendered after age 70 ¹/2.

The Corporation adopted a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP) in 1988, which was amended and restated in 1996, for certain officers and key employees covering retirement after completion of ten years of service and attainment of age 55. All Named Executive Officers are participants in the SERP, except Louis Berkman. The combined retirement benefit at age 65 or older provided by the Plan and the SERP is 50% of the highest consecutive five year average earnings in the final ten years of service. The participants are eligible for reduced benefits for early retirement at age 55. A benefit equal to 50% of the benefit otherwise payable at age 65 is paid to the surviving spouse of any participant who has had at least five years of service, commencing on the

26

later of the month following the participant’s death or the month the participant would have reached age 55. In addition, there is an offset for pensions from other companies. Certain provisions, applicable if there is a change of control, are discussed below under “Termination of Employment and Change of Control Arrangements”.

The following shows the estimated annual pension that would be payable, without offset, under the Plan and the SERP, if applicable, to the individuals named in the compensation table assuming continued employment to retirement at age 65 or older, and assuming the total salary and bonus stated in the table for 2003 is the final five year average:

Louis Berkman			(1)
Robert A. Paul	$	235,040
Ernest G. Siddons	$	217,412
Terrence W. Kenny	$	89,540
Robert F. Schultz	$	88,500

(1) Mr. Berkman is currently receiving a pension pursuant to the Plan as described above.

COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS

In 2003, each Director who was not employed by the Corporation received an annual retainer (payable quarterly) of $10,000, except for the Chairman of the Audit Committee who received $12,500; $1,000 for each Board meeting and Audit Committee meeting attended and $500 for all other Committee meetings attended. Attendance can be either in person or by telephonic connection. Directors did not receive a fee for either Board or Committee meetings if they did not attend. Effective January 1, 2004, the annual retainer for non-employee directors increased to $15,000, except for the Chairman of the Audit Committee who will receive $17,500 per year.

27

TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT AND CHANGE OF CONTROL ARRANGEMENTS

Mr. Berkman, Mr. Paul and Mr. Siddons each have two year contracts (which automatically renew for one-year periods unless the Corporation chooses not to extend) providing for compensation equal to five times their annual compensation (with a provision to gross up to cover the cost of any federal excise tax on the benefits) in the event their employment is terminated by the Corporation or for good cause by the executive within 24 months following a change of control, as well as the right to equivalent office space and secretarial help for a period of one year after a change in control. All Vice Presidents and one other employee have two year contracts providing for three times their annual compensation in the event their employment is terminated by the Corporation or for good cause by the employee within 24 months following a change of control. All of the contracts provide for the continuation of employee benefits, for three years for the three senior executives and two years for the others, and the right to purchase the leased car used by the covered individual at the Corporation’s then book value. The same provisions concerning change in control that apply to the contracts apply to the SERP and vest the right to that pension arrangement. A change of control triggers the right to a lump sum payment equal to the present value of the vested benefit under the SERP, if applicable.

28

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION IN COMPENSATION DECISIONS

A Compensation Committee is appointed each year by the Board of Directors. The Compensation Committee for 2003 was comprised of three Directors: William D. Eberle (Chairman), Leonard M. Carroll and Carl H. Pforzheimer, III. None of the Committee members is now, or ever has been, an officer or employee of the Corporation.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Committee Responsibilities and Policies

The purpose of the Corporation’s Compensation Committee is to assist the Board of Directors in its oversight and evaluation responsibilities relating to compensation matters. In that role, the Compensation Committee has overall responsibility for evaluating and approving the structure, operation and effectiveness of the Corporation’s compensation plans and programs.

Specific duties of the Compensation Committee include, among other things: (a) annually reviewing and approving corporate goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer (the “CEO”), (b) evaluating the CEO’s performance in light of those goals and objectives, and (c) approving the CEO’s compensation level based on this evaluation. In addition, the Committee reviews management’s recommendations and makes recommendations to the full Board of Directors with respect to director compensation and other non-CEO executive compensation, including incentive-based and equity-based compensation.

29

Specifically, salaries for executive officers and managerial employees below the annual level of $200,000 are set by the Chairman, CEO and Executive Vice President of the Corporation. Salaries of $200,000 per year and above are reviewed and must be approved by the Board of Directors, after a recommendation by the Compensation Committee.

The Committee has the sole authority to retain and terminate any compensation consultant to assist it in these responsibilities.

The key objectives of the Committee’s policies on compensation and benefits are to enhance the Corporation’s ability to attract and retain highly qualified executives, to establish and maintain compensation and benefit programs that are fair and reasonably competitive with those of comparable organizations in light of prevailing economic and industry conditions, and to develop and maintain compensation programs that link compensation to the short-term and long-term performance of the Corporation and the interests of its stockholders.

The primary elements in the Corporation’s compensation program for its executive officers are an annual base salary, an annual incentive based bonus or in certain instances an annual discretionary cash bonus.

Executive Officer Compensation.

Compensation Committee Considerations. The compensation for the Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, as well as the other applicable executive officers, is typically based on an analysis conducted by the

30

Compensation Committee with reference to various objective and subjective factors. Although the performance of the Corporation is one factor in the Committee’s analysis, the Committee does not specifically link remuneration solely to quantitative measures of performance because of the cyclical nature of the industries and markets served by the Corporation. In setting compensation, the Committee also considers various qualitative factors, including competitive compensation arrangements of other companies within relevant industries, individual contributions, leadership ability and an executive officer’s overall performance. The Committee believes that this approach will further the Corporation’s goal to attract and retain quality management, thereby benefiting the long-term interest of shareholders.

2003 Base Salaries. In establishing the compensation reported for 2003, the Committee conducted its analysis as described above and considered the results of the Corporation. Taking into account the depressed economy and the down cycle of industries served, upon the request of the CEO, the Committee elected not to increase the CEO’s base salary in 2002; however, an increase was approved effective July 2003. An increase was also granted effective on the same date for the Corporation’s Chief Operating Officer. In December, the 2004 salary for the Chairman of the Board was reduced by $50,000.

Incentive Bonus Programs. The incentive bonus program for 2003 previously approved by the Compensation Committee covered Robert A. Paul and Ernest G. Siddons. Incentive payments were to be determined, based on

31

the Corporation’s 2003 income from operations performance as compared to the Corporation’s business plan. These payments were to be limited to 35% of base salary of participants. In 2003, Mr. Paul earned $59,080 and Mr. Siddons earned $54,649.

This report of the Compensation Committee shall not be deemed incorporated by reference by any general statement incorporating by reference this 10-K report into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that the Corporation specifically incorporates this report and the information contained herein by reference, and shall not otherwise be deemed filed under such Acts.

William D. Eberle, Chairman

Leonard M. Carroll

Carl H. Pforzheimer, III

32

STOCK PERFORMANCE GRAPH

Comparative Five-Year Total Returns*

Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation, Standard & Poors 500 and Value Line Steel

(Integrated) Index

(Performance results through 12/31/03)

Assumes $100 invested at the close of trading on the last trading day preceding January 1, 1999 in Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation common stock, Standard & Poors 500 and Steel (integrated).

* Cumulative total return assumes reinvestment of dividends.

In the above graph, the Corporation has used Value Line’s Steel (Integrated) Index for its peer comparison. The diversity of products produced by subsidiaries of the Corporation made it difficult to match to any one product-based peer group. The Steel Industry was chosen because it is impacted by some of the same end markets that the Corporation ultimately

33

serves, such as the automotive, appliance and construction industries. Historical stock price performance shown on the above graph is not necessarily indicative of future price performance.

ITEM 12 - SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS

As of March 11, 2004, Louis Berkman owned directly 215,000 shares of the Common Stock of the Corporation and had the right to acquire 120,000 shares pursuant to stock options. As of the same date, The Louis Berkman Investment Company, P. O. Box 576, Steubenville, OH 43952, owned beneficially and of record 2,363,842 shares of the Common Stock of the Corporation. Louis Berkman, an officer and director of The Louis Berkman Investment Company, owns directly 61.51% of its common stock. Robert A. Paul, an officer and director of The Louis Berkman Investment Company, disclaims beneficial ownership of the 38.49% of its common stock owned by his wife. Louis Berkman and Robert A. Paul are trustees of The Louis and Sandra Berkman Foundation and disclaim beneficial ownership of the 1,266 shares of the Corporation’s Common Stock held by such Foundation.

In March 2003, Gabelli Funds, Inc. and affiliates, Corporate Center, Rye, NY 10580, filed an amendment to its Schedule 13D with the SEC reporting they owned 1,805,542 shares or 18.74% of the Corporation’s Common Stock. In February 2004, Dimensional Fund Advisors Inc., 1299 Ocean Avenue, Santa

34

Monica, CA 90401, filed a Schedule 13G with the SEC disclosing that as of December 31, 2003 it had sole voting and dispositive power of 681,100 shares or 7.06% of the Corporation Common Stock (all of which shares are held in portfolios of various investment vehicles). In January 2004, Van Den Berg Management, 805 Las Cimas Parkway, Austin, TX 78746 filed a Schedule 13G with the SEC disclosing that as of December 2003 it had shared and sole voting and dispositive power of 836,347 shares or 8.67% of the Corporation’s Common Stock.

35

SECURITIES AUTHORIZED FOR ISSUANCE UNDER EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS

The following table summarizes information, as of the December 31, 2003, with respect to compensation plans under which equity securities of the Corporation are authorized for issuance:

Plan Category	Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights	Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights		Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders	484,000	$	10.44	45,000
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders	N/A		N/A	N/A
Total	484,000			45,000

36

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth, as of March 11, 2004, information concerning the beneficial ownership of the Corporation’s Common Stock by the Directors and Named Executive Officers and all Directors and Executive Officers of the Corporation as a group:

Name of beneficial owner	Amount and nature of beneficial ownership		Percent of class
Louis Berkman	2,701,108	(1)(2)	27.82
Robert A. Paul	177,922	(2)(3)	1.83
Ernest G. Siddons	51,833	(4)	.53
Robert F. Schultz	28,000	(5)	.29
Terrence W. Kenny	20,000	(6)	.21
Robert J. Appel	3,000		*
Paul A. Gould	3,000		*
Carl H. Pforzheimer, III	2,733	(7)	*
Leonard M. Carroll	1,500		*
Laurence E. Paul	1,000		*
Stephen E. Paul	1,000		*
William D. Eberle	1,000	(8)	*
William K. Lieberman	1,000	(9)	*
Directors and Executive Officers as a group (15 persons)	3,008,096	(10)	31.0

* less than .1%

(1) Includes 215,000 shares owned directly, 120,000 shares that he has the right to acquire within sixty days pursuant to stock options, 2,363,842 shares owned by The Louis Berkman Investment Company, and the following shares in which he disclaims beneficial ownership: 1,266 shares held by The Louis and Sandra Berkman Foundation, of which Louis Berkman and Robert A. Paul are trustees, and 1,000 shares owned by his wife.

37

(2) The Louis Berkman Investment Company owns beneficially and of record 2,363,842 shares of the Corporation’s Common Stock. Louis Berkman is an officer and director of The Louis Berkman Investment Company and owns directly 61.51% of its common shares. Robert A. Paul, an officer and director of The Louis Berkman Investment Company, disclaims beneficial ownership of the 38.49% of its common stock owned by his wife. The number of shares shown in the table for Robert A. Paul does not include any shares held by The Louis Berkman Investment Company.

(3) Includes 42,889 shares owned directly, 120,000 shares that he has the right to acquire within sixty days pursuant to stock options, and the following shares in which he disclaims beneficial ownership: 13,767 shares owned by his wife and 1,266 shares held by The Louis and Sandra Berkman Foundation, of which Robert A. Paul and Louis Berkman are Trustees.

(4) Includes 1,833 shares owned jointly with his wife and 50,000 shares that he has the right to acquire within sixty days pursuant to stock options.

(5) Includes 200 shares owned jointly with his wife, 2,800 shares owned directly and 25,000 shares that he has the right to acquire within sixty days pursuant to stock options.

(6) Shares that he has the right to acquire within sixty days pursuant to stock options.

(7) Includes 1,000 shares owned directly, 800 shares held by a trust of which he is a trustee and principal beneficiary, and the following shares in which he disclaims beneficial ownership: 133 shares held by his daughter and 800 shares held by a trust of which he is a trustee.

(8) Shares held by a trust of which he is a trustee.

(9) Shares held jointly with his wife.

(10) Includes 350,000 shares that certain officers have the right to acquire within sixty days pursuant to stock options and excludes double counting of shares deemed to be beneficially owned by more than one Director.

Unless otherwise indicated the individuals named have sole investment and voting power.

38

CHANGES IN CONTROL

The Corporation knows of no arrangements that may at a subsequent date result in a change in control of the Corporation.

39

ITEM 13 - CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

In 2003, the Corporation bought industrial supplies from a subsidiary of The Louis Berkman Investment Company in transactions in the ordinary course of business amounting to approximately $1,706,000. Additionally, The Louis Berkman Investment Company paid the Corporation $277,000 for certain administrative services. Louis Berkman was an officer, director and shareholder and Robert A. Paul was an officer and director of that company. These transactions and services were at prices generally available from outside sources. Transactions between the parties will also take place in 2004.

ITEM 14 - PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

The following table summarizes the aggregate fees billed to the Corporation by Deloitte & Touche LLP:

	2003		2002
Audit fees (a)	$	248,250	$	214,000
Audit – related fees (b)		14,085		8,225
Tax fees (c)		71,999		100,946
All other fees (d)		30,245		44,700
Total	$	364,579	$	367,871

(a) Fees for audit services for 2003 and 2002 consisted primarily of fees for the audit of the Corporation’s annual consolidated financial statements and other services related to SEC matters.

(b) Fees for audit-related services for 2003 and 2002 consisted of fees for the audit of the Corporation’s employee benefit plans and, for 2003, services rendered in connection with the sale of the Corporation’s Plastics Processing Machinery segment.

40

(c) Fees for tax services for 2003 and 2002 consisted of tax compliance and tax planning and advice. Fees for tax compliance services equaled $66,940 and $83,996 for 2003 and 2002, respectively. Tax compliance services are services rendered based upon facts already in existence or transactions that have already occurred to document, compute, and assess amounts to be included in tax filings and consisted of review of income tax returns, calculation of extraterritorial income exclusion and licensing fees for use of tax software. Tax planning and advice services are services rendered with respect to a proposed transaction and included consulting primarily for restructuring activities and value-added tax.

(d) Fees for all other services billed in 2003 and 2002 consisted of permitted non-audit services related to human capital advisory services.

In considering the nature of the services provided by Deloitte & Touche LLP, the Audit Committee determined that such services are compatible with the provision of independent audit services. The Audit Committee discussed these services with Deloitte & Touche LLP and the Corporation’s management to determine that they are permitted under the rules and regulations concerning auditor independence promulgated by the SEC to implement the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.

The Audit Committee has adopted a Policy for Approval of Audit and Non-Audit Services provided by the Corporation’s independent auditor. According to the Policy, the Corporation’s independent auditor may not provide the following prohibited services to the Corporation:

• maintain or prepare the Corporation’s accounting records or prepare the Corporation’s financial statements that are either filed with the SEC or form the basis of financial statements filed with the SEC;

41

• provide appraisal or valuation services when it is reasonably likely that the results of any valuation or appraisal would be material to the Corporation’s financial statements, or where the independent auditor would audit the results;

• provide certain management or human resource functions;

• serve as a broker-dealer, promoter or underwriter of the Corporation’s securities;

• provide any service in which the person providing the service must be admitted to practice before the courts of a U.S. jurisdiction;

• provide any internal audit services relating to accounting controls, financial systems, or financial statements; or

• design or implement a hardware or software system that aggregates source data underlying the financial statements or generates information that is significant to the Corporation’s financial statements, taken as a whole.

In addition, in connection with its adoption of the Policy, the Audit Committee pre-approved certain audit-related and other non-prohibited services. Any services not prohibited or pre-approved by the Policy must be pre-approved by the Audit Committee in accordance with the Policy. The Pre-Approval Policy will be reviewed and approved annually by the Board of Directors.

42

PART IV

ITEM 15 - EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

Financial Statements

The consolidated financial statements, together with the report thereon of Deloitte & Touche LLP appearing on pages 13 through 31 of the Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2003 are incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K Annual Report.

Financial Statement Schedules

The following additional financial data should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements in the accompanying Annual Report. Schedules not included with this additional financial data have been omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto.

	Schedule Number	Page Number
Index to Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation Financial Data		F-1
Report of Independent Accountants		F-2
Valuation and Qualifying Accounts and Reserves	II	F-3

43

3. Exhibits

Exhibit No.

(3) Articles of Incorporation and By-laws

a. Articles of Incorporation

Incorporated by reference to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1983; the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1984; the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1985; the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1987; and the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1998.

b. By-laws

Incorporated by reference to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1994; the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1996; and the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter ended June 30, 2001.

(4) Instruments defining the rights of securities holders

a. Rights Agreement between Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation and Chase Mellon Shareholder Services dated as of September 28, 1998.

Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 28, 1998.

(10) Material Contracts

a. 1988 Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan

Incorporated by reference to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1996.

b. Severance Agreements between Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation and certain officers and employees of Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation.

44

Incorporated by reference to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1988; the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1994, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 1994; the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1997; the Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 1998; and the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1999.

c. 1997 Stock Option Plan

Incorporated by reference to the Proxy Statement dated March 14, 1997 and the Proxy Statement dated March 15, 2000.

(13) Annual Report to Shareholders for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003.

(21) Significant Subsidiaries

(23) Consent of Expert

(31.1)  Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

(31.2)  Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

(32.1)  Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

(32.2)  Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Reports on Form 8-K

A Current Report on Form 8-K was filed on October 22, 2003 disclosing in Item 12 the Corporation’s earnings release for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003.

45

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	AMPCO-PITTSBURGH CORPORATION
	(Registrant)
March 12, 2004
	By	/s/ Louis Berkman
		Director, Chairman of the Board -
		Louis Berkman
	By	/s/ Robert A. Paul
		Director, President and Chief
		Executive Officer -
		Robert A. Paul
	By	/s/ Ernest G. Siddons
		Director, Executive Vice President
		and Chief Operating Officer -
		Ernest G. Siddons
	By	/s/ Marliss D. Johnson
		Vice President, Controller and
		Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer) -
		Marliss D. Johnson

46

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant, in their capacities as Directors, as of the date indicated.

March 12, 2004

By	/s/ Leonard M. Carroll
	Leonard M. Carroll
By	/s/ William D. Eberle
	William D. Eberle
By	/s/ Paul A. Gould
	Paul A. Gould
By	/s/ Laurence E. Paul
	Laurence E. Paul
By	/s/ Stephen E. Paul
	Stephen E. Paul
By	/s/ Carl H. Pforzheimer, III
	Carl H. Pforzheimer, III
By	/s/ Robert J. Appel
	Robert J. Appel
By	/s/ William K. Lieberman
	William K. Lieberman

Index to Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation Financial Data

	Schedule Number	Page Number
Index to Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation Financial Data		F-1
Report of Independent Accountants		F-2
Valuation and Qualifying Accounts and Reserves	II	F-3

F-1

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of

Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation

We have audited the consolidated balance sheets of Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2003, and have issued our report thereon dated February 16, 2004 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph concerning the adoption of a new accounting principle in 2002); such financial statements and report are included in your 2003 Annual Report to Shareholders and are incorporated herein by reference. Our audits also include the consolidated financial statement schedule II, Valuation and Qualifying Accounts, of Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation and subsidiaries for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, listed in Item 15. This financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the Corporation’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, such consolidated financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

February 16, 2004

F-2

Schedule II

Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation

Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

For the Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001

Column A	Column B		Column C			Column D			Column E
	Balance at beginning of period		Additions			Deductions- describe			Balance at enxd of period
Description			Charged to costs and expenses		Charged to other accounts - describe
Year ended December 31, 2003
Allowance for doubtful accounts	$	1,468,034	$	745,228		$	(1,670,668	)(1)	$	542,594
Year ended December 31, 2002
Allowance for doubtful accounts	$	1,306,368	$	337,735		$	(176,069	)(1)	$	1,468,034
Year ended December 31, 2001
Allowance for doubtful accounts	$	464,570	$	978,397		$	(136,599	)(1)	$	1,306,368

(1) Represents primarily write-off of accounts receivable customer balances.

F-3

EX-13

ampco pittsburgh

2003

ANNUAL REPORT TO SHAREHOLDERS

ampco pittsburgh 2003

Financial Highlights

	Year Ended December 31,
	2003		2002		2001
Net Sales	$	180,233,000	$	187,756,000	$	191,843,000
Income from Operations		5,061,000		11,034,000		1,299,000
Net Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations		2,549,000		5,962,000		(843,000	)
Shareholders’ Equity		144,545,000		150,021,000		157,407,000
Per Common Share:
Basic and Diluted Earnings –
Net Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations		0.27		0.62		(0.09	)
Shareholders’ Equity		14.97		15.58		16.38
Dividends		0.40		0.40		0.40
Market Price at Year End		13.67		12.16		10.75

Table of Contents

Letter to Shareholders	2
Review of Segments	4
Management’s Discussion and Analysis	6
Consolidated Balance Sheets	13
Consolidated Statements of Operations	14
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity	15
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	16
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	17
Quarterly Information – Unaudited	30
Common Stock Information	30
Five-Year Summary of Selected Financial Data	31
Report of Independent Accountants	31
Directors and Officers	32
Operating Companies	32
Shareholder Information	33

ampco pittsburgh 2003

Letter to Shareholders

Year 2003 continued the trend of presenting the Corporation with a series of formidable challenges. The economy gave signs of improvement but failed to ignite either industrial manufacturing or capital spending. Currency markets were turned upside down by a dramatic fall in the global value of the U.S. dollar. Then, as the year drew to a close, the Corporation was faced with unprecedented increases in the cost of commodities including steel scrap, ferroalloys, copper and natural gas. Although the Corporation has experienced downturns in the past, we believe that manufacturing industry is going through a structural change as work leaves the United States to benefit from lower labor costs available in China and other emerging nations and is unlikely to return in the near term, if ever. Combating this change and meeting the challenges have been a priority throughout 2003 and will be in the years to come.

Overall, after-tax results of the Corporation were substantially lower than in 2002 and a loss was reported. However, in light of conditions faced, excluding significant costs of asbestos litigation, income from operations was positive and in line with expectations. Losses from discontinued operations were incurred during 2003 (and prior year results restated) following the sale of the Plastics Processing Machinery group which was experiencing its third successive year of losses. Despite the well-documented weakness of the steel industry, the Forged and Cast Rolls group materially increased both sales and earnings. However, this improvement was not sufficient to offset the substantial drop in sales and earnings of the Air and Liquid Processing group which was burdened with the collapse of the energy sector and industrial and construction capital spending. Elsewhere in this report you will find financial analysis and overall results of the Corporation.

[GRAPHIC]

For the last two years, the Corporation been embroiled in and incurred more than $3 million on litigation and legal advice to defend itself from asbestos personal injury claims, and in efforts to compel insurance carriers to honor their obligations to cover these claims. These claims are mostly related to product specified by and for the U.S.

2

ampco pittsburgh 2003

government and manufactured more than sixty years ago. The Corporation believes that the legal system is not functioning in a fair or efficient way for asbestos plaintiffs or defendants, and that federal or state legislation is the best way to address this pervasive problem.

While it is difficult to predict any material increase in earnings until the current level of capital spending in the manufacturing, energy and construction industries improve, the Corporation is working hard to strengthen its position in the markets served. Elsewhere in this report it will be seen that the Forged and Cast Rolls group is investing to improve productivity, quality and capacity. It is also taking advantage of the demise of several of its European competitors and has forged links in China and India to expand its already global presence. The Air and Liquid Processing group has been severely impacted by the weak manufacturing economy, and in particular by the drop in demand for equipment for power generation. However, the group has focused on expanding its product offerings and reducing manufacturing costs. While neither group has been able to improve margins, the recent escalation in commodity prices mandates that the Corporation must increase prices or obtain surcharges and aggressive efforts have begun to this end.

The sale of the Plastics Processing Machinery group has increased the liquidity of the Corporation, which is expected to improve further during 2004. Acquiring an additional business has been and continues to be a priority. A number of potential acquisition candidates have been examined during the past year with no success. The Corporation is prepared to add debt to its cash resources if the right opportunity becomes available, but it must be the right one!

However, the Corporation’s balance sheet remains strong. Although difficult, Management is committed to finding ways to get profitability back to the levels of three and four years ago. Meanwhile, we thank all of the Corporation’s employees for their hard work and dedication and as always thank our customers and shareholders for their support.

/s/ Louis Berkman	/s/ Robert A. Paul	/s/ E. G. Siddons
Louis Berkman Chairman of the Board	Robert A. Paul President and Chief Executive Officer	Ernest G. Siddons Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer

3

ampco pittsburgh 2003

Forged and Cast Rolls Segment

Although sales and operating income improved materially, year 2003 was eventful for Union Electric Steel Corporation and its British subsidiary, The Davy Roll Company. While the group is relatively small, it is the second largest producer of forged steel and cast rolls in the world. It has a global market reach, with close to sixty percent of sales exported to countries beyond its domestic borders. The group had to navigate the volatility of the currency markets, weakness of the U.S. steel industry, customer bankruptcies and consolidations, mega mergers of steel companies in Europe and the burgeoning growth of steel production in China and Asia. The latter being the root cause of possibly the biggest problem of all facing the group and roll industry which is the severe raw materials squeeze that has sent scrap and alloy prices through the roof.

Union Electric Steel, the technology leader in the manufacture of forged hardened steel rolls, continues to focus on value added product which distinguishes it from other roll makers. Where customers can effectively monitor roll performance in their mills, use of Union Electric rolls will demonstrate lower roll cost per ton of finished product. That several major North American steel producers use Union Electric work rolls on an exclusive basis is testimony to this claim. The challenge is to convince other steel producers that “value in use” must be the measurement used to make the purchasing decision and not price alone. It is in pursuit of continuous product quality improvement that investment was made in 2003 and carried over into 2004 to upgrade ingot pouring and forge press equipment.

In recent years Davy Roll has experienced a most difficult environment. While the outlook remains tough, the closure of a number of European competitors has opened up opportunities for improvement. In particular, the bankruptcy and closure of Davy’s only UK cast roll competitor in November 2003 provided the opportunity to purchase several key roll-making machines from the Liquidator. This investment will allow expansion of capacity to meet increased demand and aid Davy in its continuous improvement initiatives when completely installed by late 2004.

[GRAPHIC]

The group will be challenged in 2004 more than ever. Selling prices which have been pressured downwards year after year by a customer base often in survival mode must be improved to cover uncontrollable cost increases which can no longer be offset by productivity gains. This must be the priority in order to return to levels of profitability necessary to support the investment that to be successful the roll industry must make.

4

ampco pittsburgh 2003

Air and Liquid Processing Segment

Last year’s record earnings for the group fell seventy percent as the anticipated decline in demand for power generating equipment and new construction impacted shipments. The increase in costs associated with asbestos litigation, and covered elsewhere in this report, also took its toll. There are similarities to the Forged and Cast Rolls group in that selling prices have been pressured downward for several years. This was offset by volume increases, productivity gains from investment in machine tools and improved methods. However, faced with further and uncontrollable cost increases including raw materials and employee benefits, the group must make additional efforts to improve selling prices. Despite these difficulties there were many positives in 2003 which will aid the group on the road back to the former levels of profitability.

Buffalo Pumps, severely impacted by the burst in the demand bubble for gas turbines that reduced sales of lube oil pumps, is building on its worldwide reputation for quality. Accordingly, it is poised to introduce a pump line with patented features focused on the chemical processing market. In addition, its product offering for the refrigeration market has been expanded to include larger capacity pumps. Late in 2003, Buffalo Pumps the rights to service replacement parts for a small defunct Canadian pump company. Each of these opportunities will only provide a partial contribution towards the loss of earnings resulting from the power generation market collapse. Meanwhile, the marine defense business continues to be significant with the year benefiting from increased parts orders associated with the Iraqi conflict.

Buffalo Air Handling hurt by the expected slowdown in new construction projects closed the small leased production facility in Forest, Virginia in mid-2003. With an eye to the future, the operation has developed an alternative method of constructing air handling units which will enable it to compete in new markets and also expand its product offering to its traditionally strong base in the pharmaceutical, healthcare and institutional markets.

Aerofin also experienced adverse impact from the weak economy and in particular in demand from the electric utility market which had been strong in 2002. Despite this weakness, Aerofin increased its capacity to manufacture plate fin coils by investment in capital equipment which will allow it to better serve original equipment customers when the economy and demand improves.

Difficult times and challenges are ahead for the Air and Liquid Processing group. However, the economic downturn, while bringing hardship and reduced earnings, has brought with it even more focus on productivity, methods and product development.

[GRAPHIC]

5

ampco pittsburgh 2003

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

Executive Overview

Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation (the Corporation) currently operates in two business segments – the Forged and Cast Rolls segment and the Air and Liquid Processing segment. The Corporation operated a third segment, the Plastics Processing Machinery segment, which was sold in August 2003.

The Forged and Cast Rolls segment consists of Union Electric Steel Corporation (Union Electric Steel), the world’s largest manufacturer of forged hardened steel rolls with its principal operations in Pennsylvania and Indiana, and Davy Roll Company Limited (Davy Roll), a manufacturer of cast rolls which has manufacturing facilities in England. Rolls are supplied to the metals industry principally to steel producers throughout the world. More than half of the annual sales are shipped to destinations outside the segment’s own domestic borders.

The Air and Liquid Processing segment consists of Aerofin Corporation (Aerofin), Buffalo Air Handling Company (Buffalo Air Handling) and Buffalo Pumps, Inc. (Buffalo Pumps). Aerofin and Buffalo Air Handling have operations in Virginia and Buffalo Pumps is headquartered in New York. Aerofin produces heat exchange coils for a variety of users including HVAC, power generation, industrial process and other manufacturing industries. Buffalo Air Handling produces custom designed air handling systems for commercial, institutional and industrial building markets. Buffalo Pumps manufactures centrifugal pumps for the defense, refrigeration and power generation industries. The segment distributes a significant portion of its products through a common independent group of sales offices located throughout the U.S.

The Corporation operates cyclical businesses that have been affected by the severe downturn in the economy and lack of capital spending by the manufacturing sector. Weak U.S. and European steel industries and the strength of the U.S. dollar, which has significantly reduced the profitability of export sales, have adversely impacted results of the Forged and Cast Rolls segment for several years. Excess capacity in the roll industry has also depressed selling prices as producers fought for available business. The current year saw some improvement in demand and relief from the weakening of the U.S. dollar. Additionally, earnings were bolstered by the sale of technology to China. Unprecedented increases in the price of scrap metals and ferroalloys during 2003 together with the already high cost of natural gas will make it difficult to materially improve profits in 2004. Despite this, the Corporation continues to invest in capital equipment to allow the segment to maintain its technology leadership and to expand the capacity of Davy Roll to meet the demands of its market following the demise of several European competitors.

The Air and Liquid Processing segment was not impacted by the weak economy until 2003. Long lead times for its products cause sales to lag any downturn. When the fall came, however, it was dramatic with earnings off seventy percent in 2003 from 2002. Particularly, Buffalo Air Handling experienced a significant reduction in new construction projects for the pharmaceutical, health care, education and auto markets. Additionally, when potential opportunities arose, competition starved for work drove prices and margins lower. An even bigger impact resulted from lack of demand for Buffalo Pumps’ lube oil pumps. For several years, this product benefited from a spike in sales of gas turbines for power generation which have dropped to only a fraction of recent levels. Each of the businesses has reduced its manning levels and improved manufacturing methods to enhance productivity during the downturn. Product offerings have also been upgraded and expanded which will partially offset the expected long-term reduction in the demand for power generation equipment.

Defending the Corporation against claims for personal injury alleged to result from asbestos-containing product manufactured as many as sixty years ago is a major task for Corporate management and the Air and Liquid Processing group. The Corporation believes substantially all of the claims are covered by insurance; however, such coverage is currently subject to challenge in the courts (see Note 16 to Consolidated Financial Statements).

The sale of the Plastics Processing Machinery segment eliminated loss-making operations. The transfer of building of machinery to lower cost producers in China and Asia made it unlikely for the segment to return to profitability. Accordingly, an unsolicited approach from a competitor for a cash purchase was attractive, despite a loss on the transaction, and added to the Corporation’s liquidity.

Efforts have and will continue to be made to find suitable investments or acquisitions.

6

ampco pittsburgh 2003

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Consolidated Results of Operations Overview

Consolidated sales and operating income for 2003, 2002 and 2001 were as indicated below. The sale of the Plastics Processing Machinery segment is accounted for as a discontinued operation; accordingly, results for this segment for the current and prior years have been reclassified from continuing operations to discontinued operations. A full discussion of the operating results for each of the segments is reviewed later in this section.

The Corporation

	2003		2002		2001
Sales	$	180,233	$	187,756	$	191,843
Operating income	$	5,061	$	11,034	$	1,299
Backlog	$	112,923	$	100,922	$	102,629

Sales for 2003 were lower than 2002 as a result of the continued decline in the demand for power generation equipment and reduction in construction spending for the Air and Liquid Processing group offset by increased volume for the Forged and Cast Rolls segment, especially in foreign markets. Sales for 2002 decreased from 2001 for both of the segments due to the decline in the industrial economy and the sale of the small metals forging and feed roll businesses in June 2002 and May 2001, respectively.

Operating income decreased by $5,973 in 2003 from 2002, partially attributable to $2,393 of legal costs incurred for case management and insurance recovery relating to lawsuits filed in connection with asbestos-containing products manufactured decades ago, an increase of $1,723 from the previous year. In addition, pension costs were higher in 2003 versus 2002 by approximately $1,136 principally due to unfavorable performance of plan assets in 2002 resulting in actuarial losses – a portion of which are amortized and included in pension expense in 2003. Also included in 2002 is a net gain on the disposition of assets and businesses of $603 arising primarily from the sale of the remaining land and building of the Belgian roll-making facility, which was closed in 2001, offset by the loss on the 2002 sale of the small metals forging business. The remaining decrease in operating income in 2003 from 2002 is directly attributable to lower volumes for the Air and Liquid Processing group, depressed pricing, higher employee benefit costs, and increased costs of raw materials and natural gas particularly for the Forged and Cast Rolls group.

Operating income increased by $9,735 in 2002 from 2001. Included in operating income for 2001 are restructuring and other charges of $7,280 for the permanent closure of the forged steel roll plant in Belgium in comparison to a net restructuring credit of $46 in 2002. In addition, 2002 includes a net gain on the disposition of assets and businesses of $603 whereas 2001 was impacted by a net loss of $189 primarily from the sale of the small feed roll business in the U.K. Legal costs were also lower in 2002 against 2001 by approximately $1,708 as a result of the settlement of a lawsuit in 2001 which was unrelated to the aforementioned asbestos claims. The expected increase in operating income was offset by approximately $900 of higher pension costs arising primarily from a lower expected return on plan assets caused principally from a decline in the fair value of plan assets. The remaining fluctuation is due to improvements in earnings by the Forged and Cast Rolls segment offset by declines in the operating results of the Air and Liquid Processing group.

The increase in backlog (unfilled orders on hand) at December 31, 2003 against December 31, 2002 is due to improvement in order intake of the Forged and Cast Rolls segment. The backlog at December 31, 2002 is slightly less than that as of December 31, 2001 with the increase for the Forged and Cast Rolls segment offset by a substantial decline for the Air and Liquid Processing segment.

Gross margin, excluding depreciation, as a percentage of net sales approximated 21.4% for 2003, 22.6% for 2002 and 22.4% for 2001. The decrease in gross margin in 2003 from the previous years is attributable to product mix including a higher content of export sales which have lower margins, depressed pricing, and higher raw material, natural gas and employee benefit costs.

Selling and administrative expenses totaled $27,210 (15.1% of net sales), $25,831 (13.8% of net sales), and $28,091 (14.6% of net sales) for 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Expenses for 2003 and 2002 included $2,393 and $670, respectively, for legal and case management costs for personal injury claims litigation related to asbestos-containing product and indemnity payments not expected to be recovered from insurance carriers (see Note 16 to Consolidated Financial Statements). Included in 2001 were $2,378 of litigation costs incurred related to a lawsuit which was settled in 2001. After consideration of these costs, selling and administrative expenses for 2003, 2002 and 2001 were comparable.

In 2002, the Corporation recorded restructuring charges of $616 for the reduction of manning levels at several of its operations. The restructurings arose as a result of weak economic conditions across each of the segments of the Corporation including a depressed steel industry, reduced demand for power generation equipment and a slowdown in construction and capital spending. In addition, approximately $662 of the 2001 restructuring and other charges provision was no longer needed and reversed to income in 2002, resulting in a net restructuring credit of $46. The

7

ampco pittsburgh 2003

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

2001 provision of $7,280 related primarily to restructuring and other costs for the permanent closure of its forged steel roll plant in Belgium. Annual savings arising from the restructurings approximated $3,500 in 2003 principally attributable to reduced labor costs following the closure of the Belgian facility. The corresponding impact on earnings is not evident due to changes in product mix and higher costs of raw materials, natural gas and employee benefits.

Interest expense was $332, $407 and $620 for 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The fluctuation is due to the decrease in interest rates. Other (expense) income equaled $(87), $354 and $(382) for 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The net expense in 2003 was a result of foreign exchange losses in 2003 versus gains in 2002 arising from the weakening of the U.S. dollar against foreign currencies, particularly the Euro. Included in other (expense) income for 2001 are additional environmental costs of $550 estimated to be incurred with respect to remediation of real estate sold in 1996. The remaining improvement in 2002 from 2001 was attributable to foreign exchange gains realized in 2002 versus foreign exchange losses for 2001 offset by lower interest income earned on cash and cash equivalents because of the continued decline in interest rates.

The Corporation recognized a tax provision on income from continuing operations of $2,093 (45.1% effective tax rate) and $5,019 (45.7% effective tax rate) for 2003 and 2002, respectively. Significant losses from foreign operations in 2001 for which no benefit was provided resulted in a tax provision in excess of earnings for 2001.

The plastics industry was in its third year of poor demand and low levels of capital investment and the outlook remained uncertain; accordingly, the Corporation sold the stock of the New Castle Industries, Inc. group of companies constituting its small Plastics Processing Machinery segment on August 15, 2003. The transaction is recorded as a discontinued operation and presented net of tax in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. A loss on disposal of approximately $4,600 comprised of a loss on sale of $2,000, curtailment and settlement of existing pension obligations of $500 and a provision for environmental remediation of $2,100 (see Note 17 to Consolidated Financial Statements) was recognized. The results of operations for current and prior year periods for this segment of approximately $(730), $(1,189), and $(194) for 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively, have been reclassified to discontinued operations. Net sales for this segment approximated $15,002, $24,620, and $27,324 in 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

Effective January 1, 2002, the Corporation adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” resulting in an after-tax write off of goodwill of $2,894 specific to the now-sold Plastics Processing Machinery segment. The write off is recorded as a cumulative effect of change in accounting, net of tax, in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. The impairment arose from the severe downturn in the plastics processing industry resulting in reduced selling prices and a significant reduction in demand.

As a result of the above, the Corporation incurred a net loss of $(2,549) or $(0.26) per common share for 2003 in comparison to $2,261 or $0.24 per common share for 2002 and $(983) or $(0.10) per common share for 2001.

Forged and Cast Rolls

	2003		2002		2001
Sales	$	110,431	$	95,901	$	96,879
Operating income (loss)	$	6,343	$	4,093	$	(4,920	)
Backlog	$	83,757	$	72,158	$	60,701

Sales for 2003 increased over the prior year on improvements in bookings, a healthier backlog and sale of cast roll technology to a Chinese roll producer. The strengthening of the Euro against the U.S. dollar and British pound contributed to the growth in volume of export sales. Sales for 2002 and 2001 were comparable as a result of the higher volume of shipments of cast rolls offsetting the majority of the $3,500 decline arising from the sale of Formet Ltd. in 2002 and Turner Chilled Rolls, Ltd. in 2001. Sales in 2002 of forged rolls were comparable to 2001 but included a larger content of export shipments.

Operating income for the group improved by $2,250 on higher volumes and despite increases in the costs of raw materials, natural gas and employee benefits. In large part, the increase came from the sale of technology by Davy Roll to a cast roll producer in China. The project, which commenced in 2003, is expected to be completed during the first half of 2004. In addition, segment earnings would have been lower had it not been for reductions in labor costs arising from the 2002 and 2001 restructurings. The financial weakness of the domestic and U.K. steel industries continues to be of concern with several major customers filing for bankruptcy. The increase in bankruptcy-related actions in 2003 in comparison to 2002 was approximately $355, net of a receipt of a dividend from a bankrupt estate which had been previously written off.

8

ampco pittsburgh 2003

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Earnings for 2002 benefited from a credit of $250 representing the net of restructuring charges of $412 for severance costs associated with the permanent reduction in U.K. manning levels offset by the reversal of unused restructuring provisions of $441 and a foreign currency adjustment credit of $221 relating to closure of the Belgian plant in 2001 and which resulted in a provision for restructuring and other charges of $7,280. In addition, in 2002, the Belgian facilities were sold at a gain of $917 and the Formet Ltd. operations at a loss of $240 in comparison to the sale of the Turner Chilled Rolls, Ltd. operations in 2001 at a loss of $152. Earnings for 2002 were further adversely impacted by higher costs of natural gas and alloys and poor selling prices and margins; the latter resulting in part from export sales due to the strength of the U.S. dollar against the Euro.

Order backlogs have continued to increase in 2003 from 2002 and 2001 both for the U.S. and U.K. operations although pricing levels remain depressed.

Air and Liquid Processing

	2003		2002		2001
Sales	$	69,802	$	91,855	$	94,964
Operating income	$	3,504	$	11,547	$	11,105
Backlog	$	29,166	$	28,764	$	41,928

Shipments and operating income for 2003 were lower for each of the operating units against the prior year with each being severely impacted by the fragile economy. Specifically, a dramatic reduction in demand for lube oil pumps for use with gas turbines by the power generation industry negatively affected Buffalo Pumps’ sales and operating income in 2003 as well as in 2002. The reduction results from an oversupply of turbines manufactured in the early 2000s. Pump sales for marine defense improved in 2003 and 2002 due to an increase in repairs arising from the Iraqi conflict and to new pumps sales for the continuation of various shipbuilding programs.

Sales and operating income decreased for Buffalo Air Handling and Aerofin in 2003 from 2002. Lack of industrial and construction spending adversely affected operating results in each of the years. These businesses typically lag the market in recessionary times or market recoveries and although the economy was faltering by 2000, Buffalo Air Handling enjoyed record level sales in 2001. Additionally, lack of business activity created additional competition as companies bid on work outside their typical niches. For Aerofin, sales and operating income for 2003 were negatively impacted by the economy resulting in customers delaying spending on equipment and up-grades. In 2002, Aerofin benefited from heightened demand from the utility markets for heat exchange coils which offset the effects of the recession-weakened industrial sector. However, this increased demand did not carry over into 2003.

This segment was also impacted by the majority of the legal and case management costs for personal injury claims litigation related to asbestos-containing product and indemnity payments not expected to be recovered from insurance carriers. For the Air and Liquid Processing segment, such costs approximated $2,285 and $564 in 2003 and 2002, respectively. Legal costs in 2001 for an unrelated lawsuit, which was settled in 2001, approximated $2,378. Operating income for 2002 also includes restructuring charges of $204 for severance costs associated with the permanent reduction in manning levels.

Backlog as of December 31, 2003 approximated that of the prior year. The decline at December 31, 2002 from 2001 is reflective of the reduction in construction spending and lower demand for power generation equipment.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Net cash flows from operating activities were positive for 2003, 2002 and 2001 at $4,101, $21,333 and $9,509, respectively. The increase in 2002 is primarily a result of changes in working capital including a significant decrease in accounts receivables arising from lower sales in the fourth quarter 2002.

Net cash flows from investing activities were $6,863, $(3,010) and $(8,206) in 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The improvement in 2003 is due to the sale of the Plastics Processing Machinery segment in August 2003 for $16,100 of which $15,600 was received by year end. In 2002, the Corporation sold the net assets of its small metals forging business for approximately $1,308, the balance of the proceeds of less than $100 was paid in June 2003, and the remaining assets of the Belgian facility in July 2002 for $1,447. In 2001, the Corporation sold the net assets of its small feed roll business for $1,060. Cash outflows relate primarily to capital expenditures which approximated $8,525, $4,184 and $8,417 in 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Investing activities for the discontinued operations relate primarily to capital expenditures. As of December 31, 2003, future capital expenditures totaling $4,749 have been approved. Funds on hand, funds generated from future operations and available lines of credit are expected to be sufficient to finance capital expenditure requirements. In addition, the Corporation continues to evaluate potential acquisitions.

9

ampco pittsburgh 2003

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Net cash outflows used in financing activities include quarterly dividends of $0.10 per common share for each of the three years. In addition, short-term borrowings of $2,000 were repaid in 2001. Proceeds from the issuance of common stock under the Corporation’s stock option plan amounted to $216, $238 and $16 in 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Financing activities of the discontinued operation represent repayment of $1,350 of industrial revenue bonds in 2002.

The change in the value of the Euro and the British pound against the dollar increased cash and cash equivalents by $624 and $766 for 2003 and 2002, respectively, and decreased cash and cash equivalents by $208 for 2001.

As a result of the above, cash and cash equivalents increased by $7,950 in 2003 and ended the year at $35,739 in comparison to $27,789 and $13,660 at December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The Corporation maintains short-term lines of credit in excess of the cash needs of its businesses. The total available at December 31, 2003 was approximately $8,300 (including £2,100 in the U.K. and €400 in Belgium).

The Corporation has the following contractual obligations outstanding as of December 31, 2003:

			Payments due by Period
	Total		< 1 year		1-3 years		3-5 years		> 5 years
Industrial Revenue Bond Debt	$	13,311	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	13,311
Operating Lease Obligations		4,629		680		975		654		2,320
Total	$	17,940	$	680	$	975	$	654	$	15,631

The Corporation is currently performing certain remedial actions in connection with the sale of real estate previously owned and has been named a Potentially Responsible Party at one third-party landfill site used by a division which was previously sold. In addition, as a result of the sale of the Plastics Processing Machinery segment, the Corporation retained the liability to remediate certain environmental contamination at two of the sold locations and has agreed to indemnify the buyer against third-party claims arising from the discharge of certain contamination from one of these locations at a cost estimate of $2,100 which will be paid over several years and was provided for in the third quarter of 2003. Environmental exposures are difficult to assess and estimate for numerous reasons including lack of reliable data, the multiplicity of possible solutions, the years of remedial and monitoring activity required, and identification of new sites. However, in the opinion of management, the potential liability for all environmental proceedings based on information known to date has been adequately reserved (see Note 17 to Consolidated Financial Statements).

The nature and scope of the Corporation’s business brings it into regular contact with a variety of persons, businesses and government agencies in the ordinary course of business. Consequently, the Corporation and its subsidiaries from time to time are named in various legal actions. The Corporation does not anticipate that its financial condition or liquidity will be materially affected by the costs of known, pending or threatened litigation (see Note 16 to Consolidated Financial Statements).

Market Risk

The Corporation views its primary market risk exposures to relate to changes in foreign currency exchange rates and commodity prices. To manage certain foreign exchange exposures, the Corporation’s policy is to hedge a portion of its foreign currency denominated sales and receivables – primarily U.S. sales denominated in Euros and British pounds and foreign sales denominated in U.S. dollars and Euros. Although strengthening of the U.S. dollar could result in a lower volume of exports from the U.S. and at reduced margins, it is expected that exports for the Corporation’s foreign operation would increase and gross margins would improve. Additionally, strengthening of the British pound could result in a lower volume of exports from the U.K. and at reduced margins; however, it is expected that exports for the Corporation’s domestic operations would increase and gross margins would improve. Accordingly, a 10% strengthening of either of the entities’ functional currency (the U.S. dollar and the British pound) is not expected to have a significant effect on the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements.

To reduce the effect of price changes for certain of its raw materials, the Corporation enters into futures contracts for a particular commodity and purchases a portion of its alloys in advance. Based on estimated annual purchases, a 10% fluctuation in commodity prices (including electricity, natural gas, scrap and alloys) would have less than a $2,500 impact (see Note 11 to Consolidated Financial Statements). The ability to pass these increases on to the customer is contingent upon current market conditions with the Corporation having to absorb a significant portion of such increase.

10

ampco pittsburgh 2003

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Effects of Inflation

While inflationary and market pressures on costs are likely to be experienced in 2004, it is anticipated that ongoing improvements in manufacturing efficiencies and cost savings efforts will mitigate the effects of inflation on 2004 operating income.

Application of Critical Accounting Policies

The Corporation has identified critical accounting policies that are important to the presentation of the Corporation’s financial condition, changes in financial condition and results of operations and involve the most complex or subjective assessments. Critical accounting policies relate to accounting for pension and other postretirement benefits, assessing recoverability of long-lived assets and goodwill, and environmental matters.

Accounting for pensions and other post retirement benefits involves estimating the cost of benefits to be provided well into the future and attributing that cost over the time period each employee works. To accomplish this, input from the Corporation’s actuary is evaluated and extensive use is made of assumptions about inflation, long-term rate of return on plan assets, mortality, turnover and discount rates. Specifically, the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is an estimate of average rates of earnings expected to be earned on funds invested or to be invested to provide for the benefits included in the projected benefit obligation. Since these benefits will be paid out over many years, the expected long-term rate of return is reflective of current investment returns and investment returns over a longer period. Consideration is also given to historical rates of return.

For the domestic plans, the average rates of return earned on the market-related value of plan assets by the Corporation averaged 7.1% for the five-year period of 1999-2003, and 11.5% for the ten-year period of 1994-2003. Accordingly, the Corporation believes the expected long-term rate of return of 8.5% for its domestic plans as of December 31, 2003 to be reasonable. The foreign plan was formed in connection with the acquisition of the U.K. operations with plan assets transferred from the seller’s plan to the newly-created plan in October 2001. As a result, similar historical experience for rates of return specific to the plan is not available. Instead, the expected long-term rate of return for the foreign plan is estimated based on the historical average returns earned by each of the asset classes in the plan. The Corporation believes the assumed long-term rate of return of 7.5% as of December 31, 2003 to be reasonable.

The discount rates utilized in determining future pension obligations and other post retirement benefits for each of the plans is based on rates of return on high-quality fixed-income investments currently available and expected to be available during the period to maturity of the pension and other post retirement benefits. High-quality fixed-income investments are defined as those investments which have received one of the two highest ratings given by a recognized rating agency with maturities of 10+ years.

The Corporation believes that the amounts recorded in the accompanying consolidated financial statements related to pension and other post retirement benefits are based on appropriate assumptions although actual outcomes could differ. A percentage point decrease in the rate of return would increase annual pension expense by approximately $1,500 (see Note 8 to Consolidated Financial Statements).

Property, plant and equipment are reviewed for recoverability whenever events or circumstances indicate the carrying amount of the long-lived assets may not be recoverable as outlined in SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets”. If the undiscounted cash flows generated from the use and eventual disposition of the assets are less than their carrying value, then the asset value may not be fully recoverable potentially resulting in a write-down of the asset value. Estimates of future cash flows are based on expected market conditions over the remaining useful life of the primary asset(s). Accordingly, assumptions are made about pricing, volume and asset-resale values. Actual results may differ from these assumptions. The Corporation believes the amounts recorded in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for property, plant and equipment are recoverable and are not impaired as of December 31, 2003.

Goodwill is no longer amortized but tested for impairment at the reporting unit level at least annually in connection with the Corporation’s strategic planning process. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is considered not impaired. Fair value is estimated using discounted cash flow methodologies and market comparable information and represents the amount at which the asset could be bought or sold in a current transaction between willing parties. Estimates of future cash flows are based on expected market conditions, pricing and volume. Actual results may differ from these assumptions. The Corporation believes the amount recorded in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for goodwill of $2,694 is recoverable and is not impaired as of December 31, 2003.

11

ampco pittsburgh 2003

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Environmental exposures are difficult to assess and estimate for numerous reasons including lack of reliable data, the multiplicity of possible solutions, the years of remedial and monitoring activity required, and identification of new sites. The Corporation believes the potential liability for all environmental proceedings based on information known to date has been adequately reserved (see Note 17 to consolidated Financial Statements).

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In November 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Interpretation No. 45, “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others” (FIN 45), which was effective for guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002. FIN 45 requires a guarantor to recognize, at the inception of a guarantee, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee. The Corporation currently does not guarantee the obligations of others; however, it does provide typical warranties in connection with acquisitions or divestitures. Adoption of FIN 45 did not impact the financial condition or results of operations of the Corporation. FIN 45 also requires certain disclosures related to product warranty costs (see Note 7 to Consolidated Financial Statements).

In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities” (FIN 46) which it revised in December 2003. The effective date for calendar year corporations was December 31, 2003. FIN 46, as revised, currently requires existing unconsolidated variable interest entities to be consolidated by their primary beneficiary if the entities do not effectively disperse risks among the various parties involved. Adoption of FIN 46 and its related amendments did not impact the financial condition or results of operations of the Corporation.

In April 2003, SFAS No. 149, “Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (SFAS No. 149) was issued codifying decisions previously made by the Derivatives Implementation Group and in connection with other FASB projects relating to financial instruments. SFAS No. 149 was effective for contracts entered into or modified after June 30, 2003 and has not had a significant impact on the financial condition or results of operations of the Corporation.

In May 2003, SFAS No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity” (SFAS No. 150) was issued which establishes standards for classifying and measuring certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. SFAS No. 150 was effective for the Corporation on July 1, 2003 and did not have a significant impact on the financial condition or results of operations of the Corporation.

Forward-Looking Statements

The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a safe harbor for forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of the Corporation. Management’s Discussion and Analysis and other sections of the Form 10-K as well as the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto contain forward-looking statements that reflect the Corporation’s current views with respect to future events and financial performance.

Forward-looking statements are identified by the use of the words “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “projects,” “forecasts” and other expressions that indicate future events and trends. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which such statements are made, are not guarantees of future performance or expectations and involve risks and uncertainties. In addition, there may be events in the future that the Corporation is not able to accurately predict or control which may cause actual results to differ materially from expectations expressed or implied by forward-looking statements. The Corporation undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, events or otherwise. These forward-looking statements shall not be deemed incorporated by reference by any general statement incorporating by reference this Form 10-K into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and shall not otherwise be deemed filed under such Acts.

12

ampco pittsburgh 2003

Consolidated Balance Sheets

	December 31,
(in thousands)	2003			2002
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	35,739		$	27,789
Receivables, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $543 in 2003 and $1,468 in 2002		38,802			34,946
Inventories		48,260			45,119
Other		11,525			6,193
Current assets of discontinued operations		—			6,437
Total current assets		134,326			120,484
Property, plant and equipment, at cost:
Land and land improvements		4,219			4,216
Buildings		25,149			24,600
Machinery and Equipment		130,015			121,992
		159,383			150,808
Accumulated depreciation		(89,885	)		(83,987	)
Net property, plant and equipment		69,498			66,821
Prepaid pensions		24,104			23,039
Goodwill		2,694			2,694
Other noncurrent assets		3,501			5,035
Noncurrent assets of discontinued operations		—			18,389
	$	234,123		$	236,462
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	11,761		$	11,292
Accrued payrolls and employee benefits		7,930			7,461
Other		14,338			13,417
Current liabilities of discontinued operations		—			2,733
Total current liabilities		34,029			34,903
Employee benefit obligations		16,680			16,182
Industrial Revenue Bond debt		13,311			13,311
Deferred income taxes		20,556			18,293
Other noncurrent liabilities		5,002			685
Noncurrent liabilities of discontinued operations		—			3,067
Total liabilities		89,578			86,441
Shareholders’ Equity:
Preference stock-no par value; authorized 3,000 shares; none issued		—			—
Common stock-par value $1; authorized 20,000 shares; issued and outstanding 9,654 shares in 2003, 9,632 shares in 2002		9,654			9,632
Additional paid-in capital		103,211			103,006
Retained earnings		39,564			45,970
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(7,884	)		(8,587	)
Total shareholders’ equity		144,545			150,021
	$	234,123		$	236,462

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

13

ampco pittsburgh 2003

Consolidated Statements of Operations

	For The Year Ended December 31,
(in thousands, except per share amounts)	2003			2002			2001
Net sales	$	180,233		$	187,756		$	191,843
Operating costs and expenses:
Costs of products sold (excluding depreciation)		141,739			145,377			148,810
Selling and administrative		27,210			25,831			28,091
Depreciation		6,214			6,163			6,174
Loss (gain) on disposition of assets and businesses		9			(603	)		189
Restructuring and other charges		—			(46	)		7,280
		175,172			176,722			190,544
Income from operations		5,061			11,034			1,299
Other (expense) income:
Interest expense		(332	)		(407	)		(620	)
Other – net		(87	)		354			(382	)
		(419	)		(53	)		(1,002	)
Income from continuing operations before income taxes		4,642			10,981			297
Income tax provision		2,093			5,019			1,140
Net income (loss) from continuing operations		2,549			5,962			(843	)
Discontinued operations:
Loss from operations, including loss on disposal of $4,600 in 2003		(5,330	)		(1,189	)		(194	)
Income tax benefit		232			382			54
		(5,098	)		(807	)		(140	)
Net (loss) income before cumulative effect of change
in accounting for goodwill		(2,549	)		5,155			(983	)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting for goodwill, net of income taxes of $ 1,558		—			(2,894	)		—
Net (loss) income	$	(2,549	)	$	2,261		$	(983	)
Basic and diluted earnings per common share:
Net income (loss) from continuing operations	$	0.27		$	0.62		$	(0.09	)
Net loss from discontinued operations	$	(0.53	)	$	(0.08	)	$	(0.01	)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting for goodwill	$	—		$	(0.30	)	$	—
Net (loss) income	$	(0.26	)	$	0.24		$	(0.10	)
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding		9,637			9,625			9,605

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

14

ampco pittsburgh 2003

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity

	Common Stock
(in thousands, except per share amounts)	Stated Capital		Additional Paid-in Capital		Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss			Total
Balance January 1, 2001	$	9,608	$	102,776	$	52,385		$	(2,292	)	$	162,477
Comprehensive loss:
Net loss 2001						(983	)					(983	)
Other comprehensive loss(a)									(261	)		(261	)
Comprehensive loss												(1,244	)
Issuance of common stock		1		15								16
Cash dividends ($0.40 per share)						(3,842	)					(3,842	)
Balance December 31, 2001		9,609		102,791		47,560			(2,553	)		157,407
Comprehensive loss:
Net income 2002						2,261						2,261
Other comprehensive loss(a)									(6,034	)		(6,034	)
Comprehensive loss												(3,773	)
Issuance of common stock		23		215								238
Cash dividends ($0.40 per share)						(3,851	)					(3,851	)
Balance December 31, 2002		9,632		103,006		45,970			(8,587	)		150,021
Comprehensive loss:
Net loss 2003						(2,549	)					(2,549	)
Other comprehensive income(a)									703			703
Comprehensive loss												(1,846	)
Issuance of common stock		22		205								227
Cash dividends ($0.40 per share)						(3,857	)					(3,857	)
Balance December 31, 2003	$	9,654	$	103,211	$	39,564		$	(7,884	)	$	144,545

^(a) The following table summarizes the components of other comprehensive income (loss) and accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax:

	Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments			Minimum Pension Liability			Derivatives			Unrealized Holding Gains (Losses) on Securities			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
Balance at January 1, 2001	$	(1,873	)	$	(788	)	$	—		$	369		$	(2,292	)
Change during year		(64	)		(18	)		(100	)		(79	)		(261	)
Balance at December 31, 2001		(1,937	)		(806	)		(100	)		290			(2,553	)
Change during year		2,515			(7,766	)		(472	)		(311	)		(6,034	)
Balance at December 31, 2002		578			(8,572	)		(572	)		(21	)		(8,587	)
Change during year		3,435			(1,510	)		(1,352	)		130			703
Balance at December 31, 2003	$	4,013		$	(10,082	)	$	(1,924	)	$	109		$	(7,884	)

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

15

ampco pittsburgh 2003

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

	For The Year Ended December 31,
(in thousands)	2003			2002			2001
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss) from continuing operations	$	2,549		$	5,962		$	(843	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) from continuing operations to net cash flows from operating activities:
Depreciation		6,214			6,163			6,174
Deferred income taxes		2,048			3,153			1,625
Pension and other post-retirement benefits		(1,824	)		(2,445	)		(3,889	)
Provisions for restructuring and other charges		—			(46	)		7,280
Provisions for bad debts and inventory write-downs		745			337			1,822
Other – net		11			(1,065	)		36
Operating activities of discontinued operations		345			2,666			475
Changes in assets/liabilities, net of effects from business acquisitions and divestitures:
Receivables		(4,617	)		6,814			(2,267	)
Inventories		(1,684	)		162			(1,734	)
Other assets		(5,452	)		2,494			(1,577	)
Accounts payable		660			(2,119	)		2,744
Accrued payrolls and employee benefits		1,749			(961	)		(300	)
Other liabilities		3,357			218			(37	)
Net cash flows provided by operating activities		4,101			21,333			9,509
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of property, plant and equipment		(8,525	)		(4,184	)		(8,417	)
Proceeds from the sale of businesses		15,600			1,225			1,060
Proceeds from the sale of assets		—			1,470			—
Investing activities of discontinued operations		(212	)		(1,465	)		(1,006	)
Other		—			(56	)		157
Net cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities		6,863			(3,010	)		(8,206	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Dividends paid		(3,854	)		(3,848	)		(3,842	)
Repayment of short-term borrowings		—			—			(2,000	)
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock		216			238			16
Financing activities of discontinued operations		—			(1,350	)		—
Net cash flows used in financing activities		(3,638	)		(4,960	)		(5,826	)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		624			766			(208	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		7,950			14,129			(4,731	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year		27,789			13,660			18,391
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year	$	35,739		$	27,789		$	13,660
Supplemental information:
Income tax payments	$	253		$	2,517		$	1,430
Interest payments		334			359			596
Supplemental non-cash information:
Recognition of funding (deficit) surplus (Note 8)	$	(646	)	$	(8,552	)	$	6,435
Note receivable from sale of businesses (Note 2)		500			83			—

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

16

ampco pittsburgh 2003

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

Description of Business

Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation (the Corporation) is in two business segments that manufacture and sell primarily custom-engineered equipment. The Forged and Cast Rolls segment, consisting of Union Electric Steel and Davy Roll, located in England, manufactures and sells forged hardened steel rolls and cast rolls (iron and steel) to the metals industry. The Air and Liquid Processing segment consists of Aerofin-heat exchange coils, Buffalo Air Handling-air handling systems, and Buffalo Pumps-centrifugal pumps, all of which sell to a variety of commercial and industrial users. The Corporation previously operated in a third segment, the Plastics Processing Machinery segment, which was sold in August 2003.

NOTE 1 – ACCOUNTING POLICIES:

The Corporation’s accounting policies conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. A summary of the significant accounting policies followed by the Corporation is presented below.

Certain amounts for preceding periods have been reclassified for comparability with the 2003 presentation. In addition, the sale of the Plastics Processing Machinery segment in 2003 (see Note 2) is accounted for as a discontinued operation with the results of operations for the current and prior periods being reclassified and presented net of tax in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. The assets and liabilities of this segment are presented as separate line items in the 2002 consolidated balance sheet and the notes to the consolidated financial statements have been adjusted accordingly.

Consolidation

All subsidiaries are wholly owned and are included in the consolidated financial statements. Intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Securities with purchased original maturities of three months or less are considered to be cash equivalents. The Corporation maintains cash and cash equivalents at various financial institutions which may exceed federally insured amounts.

Inventories

Inventories are valued at cost, which is lower than market. Cost of domestic raw materials, work-in-process and finished goods inventories is primarily determined by the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method. Cost of domestic supplies and foreign inventories is primarily determined by the first-in, first-out method.

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost with depreciation computed using the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives: land improvements – 15 to 20 years, buildings – 25 to 50 years and machinery and equipment – 5 to 25 years. Expenditures that extend economic useful lives are capitalized. Routine maintenance is charged to expense. Gains or losses are recognized on retirements or disposals. Property, plant and equipment are reviewed for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate the carrying amount may not be recoverable.

Goodwill

Effective January 1, 2002, the Corporation adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (SFAS No. 142). Accordingly, goodwill is no longer amortized but tested for impairment at the reporting unit level at least annually in conjunction with the Corporation’s strategic planning process. The Corporation’s reporting units are the major product lines comprising its reportable business segments. Fair value is estimated using discounted cash flow methodologies and market comparable information. Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 142, goodwill was amortized over its estimated useful life. The Corporation does not have any other material intangible assets.

Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Other comprehensive income (loss) includes changes in assets and liabilities from non-owner sources including foreign currency translation adjustments, changes in the minimum pension

17

ampco pittsburgh 2003

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

liability, changes in the fair value of derivatives and unrealized holding gains and losses on securities. Foreign currency translation adjustments exclude the effect of income taxes since earnings of non-U.S. subsidiaries are deemed to be reinvested for an indefinite period of time. The tax (expense) benefit associated with changes in the minimum pension liability was $0, $(423) and $10, for 2003, 2002 and 2001 respectively. A minimum pension liability was recorded in 2003 and 2002 relating to the foreign pension plan and a valuation allowance was provided against the resulting deferred tax asset since it is more likely than not the asset will not be realized. The tax benefit associated with changes in the fair value of derivatives was $974, $255 and $53 for 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The tax (expense) benefit associated with changes in the unrealized holding gains and losses on securities was $(70), $168 and $42 for 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue from sales is recognized when title to the product passes to the customer, which is generally when goods are shipped. Amounts billed to the customer for shipping and handling are recorded within net sales and the related costs are recorded within costs of products sold.

Product Warranty

Provisions for product warranties are recognized based on historical experience as a percentage of sales adjusted for potential claims when a liability is probable and for known claims.

Foreign Currency Translation

Assets and liabilities of the Corporation’s foreign operations are translated at year-end exchange rates and the statements of operations are translated at the average exchange rates for the year. Gains or losses resulting from translating foreign currency financial statements are accumulated as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive loss until the entity is sold or substantially liquidated.

Financial Instruments

Derivative instruments which include forward exchange and futures contracts are recorded in the consolidated balance sheet as either an asset or a liability measured at their fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative depends on the use of the derivative. To the extent that a derivative is effective as a cash flow hedge of an exposure to future changes in value, the change in fair value of the derivative is deferred in accumulated other comprehensive loss. Any portion considered to be ineffective is reported as a component of earnings immediately. To the extent that a derivative is effective as a hedge of an exposure to changes in fair value, the change in the derivative’s fair value will be offset in the statement of operations by the change in the fair value of the item being hedged and is recorded as a component of earnings. The Corporation does not enter into derivative transactions for speculative purposes and, therefore, holds no derivative instruments for trading purposes.

Income Taxes

Income taxes are recognized during the year in which transactions enter into the determination of financial statement income. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences of temporary differences between the book carrying amounts and the tax basis of assets and liabilities including net operating loss carry forwards.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Corporation accounts for stock-based compensation using the intrinsic value method prescribed in Accounting Principles Board Opinion (APB) No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.” Under the intrinsic value method, compensation expense is generally recognized only to the extent the market price of the common stock exceeds the exercise price of the stock option at the date of the grant.

Earnings Per Common Share

Basic earnings per common share are computed by dividing net income (loss) from continuing operations, net loss from discontinued operations, cumulative effect of change in accounting for goodwill, and net (loss) income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. The computation of diluted earnings per common share is similar to basic earnings per common share except that the denominator is increased to include the dilutive effect of the net additional common shares that would have been outstanding assuming exercise of outstanding stock options, calculated using the treasury stock method. The weighted average number of common shares outstanding assuming exercise of the stock options was 9,693,459 for 2003, 9,656,176 for 2002 and 9,622,936 for 2001.

18

ampco pittsburgh 2003

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In November 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Interpretation No. 45, “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others” (FIN 45), which was effective for guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002. FIN 45 requires a guarantor to recognize, at the inception of a guarantee, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee. The Corporation currently does not guarantee the obligations of others; however, it does provide typical warranties in connection with acquisitions or divestitures. Adoption of FIN 45 did not impact the financial condition or results of operations of the Corporation. FIN 45 also requires certain disclosures related to product warranty costs (see Note 7).

In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities” (FIN 46) which it revised in December 2003. The effective date for calendar year corporations was December 31, 2003. FIN 46, as revised, currently requires existing unconsolidated variable interest entities to be consolidated by their primary beneficiary if the entities do not effectively disperse risks among the various parties involved. Adoption of FIN 46 and its related amendments did not impact the financial condition or results of operations of the Corporation.

In April 2003, SFAS No. 149, “Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (SFAS No. 149) was issued codifying decisions previously made by the Derivatives Implementation Group and in connection with other FASB projects relating to financial instruments. SFAS No. 149 was effective for contracts entered into or modified after June 30, 2003 and has not had a significant impact on the financial condition or results of operations of the Corporation.

In May 2003, SFAS No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity” (SFAS No. 150) was issued which establishes standards for classifying and measuring certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. SFAS No. 150 was effective for the Corporation on July 1, 2003 and did not have a significant impact on the financial condition or results of operations of the Corporation.

NOTE 2 – ACQUISITIONS / DIVESTITURES:

The plastics industry was in its third year of poor demand and low levels of capital investment, accordingly, with the outlook continuing to be uncertain, the Corporation sold the stock of the New Castle Industries, Inc. group of companies constituting its small Plastics Processing Machinery segment on August 15, 2003. A loss on disposal of approximately $4,600 comprised of a loss on sale of $2,000, curtailment and settlement of existing pension obligations of $500 and a provision for environmental remediation of $2,100 (see Note 17) was recognized. In addition, the results of operations for current and prior year periods for this segment of approximately $(730), $(1,189), and $(194) for 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively, have been reclassified to discontinued operations. Net sales for this segment approximated $15,002, $24,620, and $27,324 in 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

In connection with the sale, the Corporation provided typical warranties to the buyer (such as those relating to income taxes, intellectual property, legal proceedings, product liabilities and title to property, plant and equipment) which primarily expire with the statutes of limitations. Losses suffered by the buyer as a result of the Corporation’s breach of warranties are reimbursable by the Corporation up to approximately $2,000. Based on experience while owning the segment, the Corporation believes no additional amounts will become due.

The sales price approximated $16,100, of which $15,600 was received in 2003 and the balance in January 2004. As of August 15, 2003 and December 31, 2002, assets for the segment approximated $24,000 and $24,800, respectively, and liabilities approximated $6,100 and $5,700, respectively, comprised of the following major categories:

	Aug. 15, 2003		Dec. 31, 2002
Current assets	$	6,400	$	6,400
Property, plant and equipment, net		16,200		16,900
Other non-current assets		1,400		1,500
	$	24,000	$	24,800
Current liabilities	$	2,600	$	2,700
Non-current liabilities		3,500		3,000
	$	6,100	$	5,700

In June 2002, the Corporation sold the net assets, excluding primarily trade receivables and payables, of Formet Ltd., its small metals forging business in England, for approximately its net book value or $1,308. A loss of approximately $240 was

19

ampco pittsburgh 2003

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

recognized relating primarily to the release of foreign currency translation losses previously recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss. In May 2001, the Corporation sold the net assets, excluding primarily trade receivables and payables, of Turner Chilled Rolls Ltd., its small feed roll business in England, for approximately $1,060. A loss of approximately $152 was recognized and related primarily to the release of foreign currency translation losses previously recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss.

The Corporation continues to evaluate potential acquisitions to ensure that long-term objectives of achieving maximum shareholder value are met.

NOTE 3 – RESTRUCTURING AND OTHER CHARGES:

In 2002, as a result of weak economic conditions across each of the segments of the Corporation including a depressed steel industry, reduced demand for power generation equipment and a slowdown in construction and capital spending, the Corporation made permanent reductions in manning levels at several of its operations. The initial pre-tax restructuring charge approximated $685 primarily for employee severance costs for the 64 employees terminated. Annual savings arising from the restructuring approximated $1,500 in 2003 resulting primarily from reduced labor costs; however, the corresponding impact on earnings is not evident due to lower shipments and manufacturing levels, changes in product mix and higher costs of raw materials, natural gas and employee benefits.

Restructuring activity for 2002 and 2003 was as follows:

	Initial 2002 Provision		Paid			Reversed to Income			Dec. 31 2002
Employee costs	$	634	$	(472	)	$	(69	)	$	93
Lease costs		11		(11	)		—			—
Other		40		(40	)		—			—
	$	685	$	(523	)	$	(69	)	$	93
	Jan. 1 2003		Paid			Reversed to Income			Dec. 31 2003
Employee costs	$	93	$	(93	)	$	—		$	—

In addition, in 2001, the Corporation undertook a review of its global roll-making capacity and recorded a pre-tax charge of $7,280 primarily for restructuring and other costs associated with the permanent closure of its forged steel roll plant in Belgium. Other costs of $800 related to the release of foreign currency adjustments recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss. Annual savings arising from the restructuring approximated $2,000 in 2003 principally related to a reduction in labor costs; however, the corresponding impact on earnings is not evident due to changes in product mix and higher costs of raw materials, natural gas and employee benefits. As of January 1, 2002, outstanding restructuring costs approximated $1,609 and related primarily to employee severance for the 96 employees terminated, estimated costs to restore the floor of the facility as a result of damage caused by the removal of machinery, and estimated holding costs through disposition of the facility. Restructuring activity for 2002 was as follows:

	Jan. 1 2002		Utilized/ Paid			(Charged) Reversed to Income			Dec. 31 2002
Employee costs	$	914	$	(1,054	)	$	140		$	—
Accrued liabilities and other costs		695		(114	)		(581	)		—
	$	1,609	$	(1,168	)	$	(441	)	$	—

The remaining assets, which consisted primarily of the land and building in Belgium and had a carrying value of approximately $170 as of December 31, 2001, were sold in July 2002 resulting in a gain of approximately $917. The sale took place much sooner than had been anticipated and the buyer purchased the building “as is”. Accordingly, the provision for costs to restore the floor of the facility as a result of damage caused by the removal of the machinery and remaining holding costs was reversed to income in the third quarter of 2002. In addition, restructuring and other charges included a credit of $221 relating to foreign currency adjustments.

NOTE 4 – GOODWILL:

The Corporation tested the goodwill attributable to each of its reporting units for impairment as of January 1, 2002. As a result, $4,452 of goodwill specific to the heat-transfer rolls unit of the now-sold Plastics Processing Machinery segment was written off and recorded as a cumulative effect of change in accounting, net of tax, in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. The impairment arose from the severe downturn in the plastics processing industry resulting in reduced selling prices and a significant reduction in demand. The Corporation tested remaining goodwill which relates to the Air and Liquid Processing segment as of December 31, 2003 and no impairment existed.

20

ampco pittsburgh 2003

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Net income (loss) from continuing operations for 2001 included goodwill amortization of $115. The following information reconciles previously reported net income (loss) from continuing operations and earnings per common share to amounts adjusted for the exclusion of goodwill amortization:

	Year Ended December 31,
	2003		2002		2001
Net income (loss) from continuing operations, as reported	$	2,549	$	5,962	$	(843	)
Add goodwill amortization, net of tax		—		—		75
	$	2,549	$	5,962	$	(768	)
Basic and diluted earnings per common share from continuing operations, as reported	$	0.27	$	0.62	$	(0.09	)
Goodwill amortization, net of tax		—		—		0.01
Basic and diluted earnings per common share from continuing operations, as adjusted	$	0.27	$	0.62	$	(0.08	)

NOTE 5 – INVENTORIES:

	2003		2002
Raw materials	$	11,803	$	12,642
Work-in-progress		23,392		21,656
Finished goods		7,894		5,943
Supplies		5,171		4,878
	$	48,260	$	45,119

The carrying amount of inventories valued on the LIFO method approximates current cost at December 31, 2003 and 2002. Approximately 70% and 71% of the inventory was valued using the LIFO method in 2003 and 2002, respectively.

NOTE 6 – BORROWING ARRANGEMENTS:

The Corporation maintains short-term lines of credit of approximately $8,300 (including £2,100 in the U.K. and €400 in Belgium). No amounts were outstanding under these lines of credit as of December 31, 2003 and 2002.

As of December 31, 2003, the Corporation had the following Industrial Revenue Bonds (IRBs) outstanding: (1) $4,120 tax exempt IRB maturing in 2020, interest at a floating rate which averaged 1.20% during the current year; (2) $7,116 taxable IRB maturing in 2027, interest at a floating rate which averaged 1.27% during the current year and (3) $2,075 tax-exempt IRB maturing in 2029, interest at a floating rate which averaged 1.20% during the current year. The IRBs are secured by letters of credit of equivalent amounts and require, among other things, maintenance of a minimum net worth and prohibits a leverage ratio in excess of a stipulated amount. The Corporation was in compliance with the applicable bank covenants as of December 31, 2003.

NOTE 7 – OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES:

	2003		2002
Customer-related liabilities	$	5,674	$	5,671
Forward exchange contracts		2,335		1,169
Other		6,329		6,577
	$	14,338	$	13,417

Included in customer-related liabilities are costs expected to be incurred with respect to product warranties. The following summarizes changes in the liability for product warranty claims for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002.

	2003			2002
Balance at the beginning of the year	$	3,209		$	3,113
Satisfaction of warranty claims		(1,921	)		(3,585	)
Provision for warranty claims		1,914			3,453
Other, primarily impact from changes in exchange rates		233			228
Balance at the end of the year	$	3,435		$	3,209

NOTE 8 – PENSION AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS:

Pension Plans

The Corporation has defined benefit pension plans covering substantially all of its U.S. employees, some of which require employee contributions. Generally, the benefits are based on years of service multiplied by either a fixed amount or a percentage of compensation. For its U.S. pension plans covered by the

21

ampco pittsburgh 2003

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), the Corporation’s policy is to fund at least the minimum actuarially computed annual contribution required under ERISA. Because these plans are fully funded, no additional contributions have been required or are expected to be required in 2004. Estimated benefit payments for subsequent years are $6,118 for 2004, $6,263 for 2005, $6,407 for 2006, $6,596 for 2007, $6,848 for 2008 and $39,352 for 2009-2013.

U.K. employees of Davy Roll participate either in a contributory defined benefit plan or, effective January 1, 2003 for new participants, a savings plan. The Davy Roll plans are non-U.S. plans and therefore are not covered by ERISA. Instead, contributions are based on local regulations. Employer contributions will continue to be made in accordance with local regulations. Contributions to the contributory defined benefit plan approximated $1,211, $845, and $68 in 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Contributions to the savings plan were less than $10 in 2003. As of December 31, 2003 and 2002, the accumulated benefit obligations exceeded the fair value of the assets; accordingly, an additional minimum pension liability of $2,194 and $1,138, respectively, was recognized. No additional contributions are expected to be required as a result of the additional minimum funding liability.

The Corporation also maintains a nonqualified defined benefit plan to provide supplemental retirement benefits for selected executives in addition to benefits provided under the Corporate sponsored pension plans. No contributions were made in 2003 or 2002 and $300 was contributed in 2001 to a grantor tax trust known as a “Rabbi” trust. No contributions are expected in 2004. The assets of the trust are subject to claims of the Corporation’s creditors, but otherwise must be used only for purposes of providing benefits under the plan. The fair market value of the trust at December 31, 2003 and 2002, which is included in other noncurrent assets, was $2,268 and $3,927, respectively, the decrease attributable to $1,800 being transferred to corporate assets. Changes in the fair market value of the trust are recorded as a component of other comprehensive income (loss). For financial reporting purposes, the plan is treated as a non-funded pension plan. Estimated benefit payments for subsequent years are approximately $135 each year for 2004 – 2008 and $738 in total for 2009-2013, assuming normal retirement of the participants.

Employees at one location participate in a multi-employer plan in lieu of the defined benefit pension programs. The Corporation contributed approximately $120, $114, and $101 in 2003, 2002, and 2001, respectively, to this plan.

Other Postretirement Benefits

The Corporation provides postretirement health care benefits principally to the bargaining groups of one subsidiary (the Plan). The Plan covers participants and their spouses and/or dependents who retire under the existing pension plan on other than a deferred vested basis and at the time of retirement have also rendered 15 or more years of continuous service irrespective of age. Other health care benefits are provided to retirees under plans no longer being offered by the Corporation. Retiree life insurance is provided to substantially all retirees. Postretirement benefits with respect to health care are subject to certain Medicare offsets. The Corporation also provides health care and life insurance benefits to former employees of certain discontinued operations. This obligation had been estimated and provided for at the time of disposal. The Corporation’s postretirement health care and life insurance plans are unfunded.

In December 2003, the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (the Act) was signed into law. The Act provides a prescription drug benefit and a federal subsidy to sponsors of a retiree health care benefit plan which offer a benefit that is at least actuarially equivalent to “Medicare D”. In accordance with existing guidance, the consolidated financial statements and disclosures that follow do not include any effects of the Act. The Corporation estimates its potential rebate will be insignificant.

Reconciliations

The following provides a reconciliation of projected benefit obligations, plan assets, the funded status of the plans and the amounts recognized in the balance sheets for the Corporation’s defined benefit plans calculated using a measurement date as of the end of the respective years.

22

ampco pittsburgh 2003

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

	U.S. Pension Benefits						Foreign Pension Benefits						Other Postretirement Benefits
	2003			2002			2003			2002			2003			2002
Change in projected benefit obligations:
Projected benefit obligations at January 1	$	108,796		$	98,120		$	23,379		$	21,037		$	12,453		$	9,171
Service cost		2,148			1,984			800			972			218			173
Interest cost		6,804			6,815			1,357			1,409			781			748
Foreign currency exchange rate changes		—			—			2,808			2,390			—			—
Plan amendments		1,247			3,758			—			—			—			786
Actuarial loss (gain)		1,985			3,248			5,532			(2,061	)		565			2,468
Transfer of projected benefit obligations		(6,578	)		—			—			—			—			—
Participant contributions		—			—			541			290			493			447
Benefits paid from plan assets		(5,214	)		(4,981	)		(1,211	)		(658	)		—			—
Benefits paid by the Corporation		(110	)		(148	)		—			—			(1,550	)		(1,340	)
Projected benefit obligations at December 31	$	109,078		$	108,796		$	33,206		$	23,379		$	12,960		$	12,453
Accumulated benefit obligations at December 31	$	103,032		$	103,511		$	25,518		$	18,545		$	12,960		$	12,453
Change in plan assets:
Fair value of plan assets at January 1	$	114,630		$	131,282		$	17,407		$	18,602		$	—		$	—
Actual return on plan assets		15,110			(11,671	)		3,430			(3,639	)		—			—
Transfer of plan assets		(6,578	)		—			—			—			—			—
Foreign currency exchange rate changes		—			—			1,946			1,967			—			—
Corporate contributions		110			148			1,211			845			1,057			893
Participant contributions		—			—			541			290			493			447
Gross benefits paid		(5,324	)		(5,129	)		(1,211	)		(658	)		(1,550	)		(1,340	)
Fair value of plan assets at December 31	$	117,948		$	114,630		$	23,324		$	17,407		$	—		$	—
Funded status of the plans:
Fair value of plan assets at December 31	$	117,948		$	114,630		$	23,324		$	17,407		$	—		$	—
Less projected benefit obligations		109,078			108,796			33,206			23,379			12,960			12,453
Funded status		8,870			5,834			(9,882	)		(5,972	)		(12,960	)		(12,453	)
Unrecognized actuarial loss (gain)		4,950			7,252			17,750			13,386			3,497			2,845
Unamortized prior service cost (benefit)		6,569			6,353			—			—			(1,106	)		(1,655	)
Unrecognized net transition obligation		3			9			—			—			—			—
	$	20,392		$	19,448		$	7,868		$	7,414		$	(10,569	)	$	(11,263	)
Amounts recognized in the balance sheets:
Prepaid pension costs	$	24,104		$	23,039		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		—			—			10,062			8,552			—			—
Minimum pension liability		—			—			(2,194	)		(1,138	)		—			—
Accrued benefit cost		(3,712	)		(3,591	)		—			—			(10,569	)		(11,263	)
	$	20,392		$	19,448		$	7,868		$	7,414		$	(10,569	)	$	(11,263	)

The pension assets are invested with the objective of maximizing long-term returns while minimizing material losses to meet future benefit obligations as they become due. The fluctuation in plan assets is attributable to benefit payments, contributions to the plans and returns on plan assets which were approximately 14% for 2003 and (9%) for 2002 for the domestic plans and approximately 18% and (17%), respectively, for the foreign plan. In addition, in connection with the 2003 sale of the Plastics Processing Machinery group, plan assets and liabilities associated with those participants of $6,578, which were actuarially determined, are held for transfer to the buyer once a qualified plan has been established.

23

ampco pittsburgh 2003

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

The following summarizes target asset allocations as of December 31, 2003 and major asset categories as of December 31, 2003 and 2002:

	U.S. Pension Benefits						Foreign Pension Benefits
	Target Allocation Dec. 31, 2003		Percentage of Plan Assets				Target Allocation Dec. 31, 2003		Percentage of Plan Assets
			2003		2002				2003		2002
Equity Securities	70-80	%	79	%	68	%	70-80	%	75	%	75	%
Fixed Income Securities	20-30	%	20	%	27	%	20-30	%	23	%	25	%
Other (primarily cash and cash equivalents)	0-10	%	1	%	5	%	—		2	%	—

The investment policy of the U.S. plans was modified in October 2003 revising the range of acceptable asset allocations. Under the current policy, investments in equity securities are primarily in common stocks of publicly traded U.S. companies, the majority of which pay dividends on a regular basis. No individual common stock is to comprise more than 5% of the equity security category and the portfolio is to diversify among numerous industries. Investments in fixed income securities are typically A-rated or better bonds with maturities of less than ten years, preferred stocks and convertible bonds.

The actual return on the fair value of plan assets is included in determining the funded status of the plans. In determining net periodic pension costs, the expected return on plan assets is used. Differences between the actual return on plan assets and the expected return on plan assets become a component of unrecognized net gains or losses. When these gains or losses exceed 10% of the greater of the projected benefit obligations or the market-related value of plan assets, they are amortized to net periodic pension costs over the average remaining service period of employees expected to receive benefits under the plans. As a result of favorable investment returns on plan assets since the early 1990s and a fully funded status, the domestic plans generate income. The foreign plan generates expense because the plan is not fully funded and service and interest costs exceed the return on plan assets.

Net periodic pension and other postretirement benefit costs include the following components for the year ended December 31:

	U.S. Pension Benefits									Foreign Pension Benefits									Other Postretirement Benefits
	2003			2002			2001			2003			2002			2001			2003			2002			2001
Service cost	$	2,148		$	1,984		$	1,759		$	800		$	972		$	2,002		$	218		$	173		$	117
Interest cost		6,804			6,815			6,771			1,357			1,409			2,441			781			748			634
Expected return on
plan assets		(10,819	)		(11,102	)		(10,642	)		(1,346	)		(1,429	)		(3,963	)		—			—			—
Amortization of prior
service cost (benefit)		550			614			325			—			—			—			(548	)		(548	)		(614	)
Actuarial (gain) loss		(4	)		(881	)		(654	)		559			531			(8	)		54			7			(2	)
Net benefit (income) cost	$	(1,321	)	$	(2,570	)	$	(2,441	)	$	1,370		$	1,483		$	472		$	505		$	380		$	135

Assumptions

Assumptions are reviewed on an annual basis. In determining the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets for both the U.S. and foreign plans, the Corporation evaluates the long-term returns earned by the plans, the mix of investments that comprise plan assets and expectations of future long-term investment returns. The following assumptions were used to determine the benefit obligations as of December 31:

	2003		2002		2003		2002		2003		2002
Discount rate	6.25	%	6.50	%	5.50	%	5.75	%	6.25	%	6.50	%
Rate of increases in compensation	3.00	%	3.00	%	3.25	%	2.75	%	—		—

24

ampco pittsburgh 2003

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

The following assumptions were used to determine net periodic pension and other postretirement benefit costs for the year ended December 31:

	2003		2002		2001		2003		2002		2001		2003		2002		2001
Discount rate	6.50	%	7.25	%	7.25	%	5.75	%	6.25	%	6.25	%	6.50	%	7.25	%	7.25	%
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets	8.50	%	8.50	%	8.50	%	7.50	%	7.50	%	7.50	%	—		—		—
Rate of increases in compensation	3.00	%	3.00	%	3.00	%	2.75	%	2.80	%	2.80	%	—

In addition, the assumed health care cost trend rate at December 31, 2003 for other postretirement benefits is 9% for 2004, gradually decreasing to 4.75% in 2009. In selecting rates for current and long-term health care assumptions, the Corporation considers known health care costs increases, the design of the benefit programs, the demographics of its active and retiree populations and expectations of inflation rates in the future. A one percentage point increase or decrease in the assumed health care cost trend rate would change the postretirement benefit obligation at December 31, 2003 and the annual benefit expense for 2003 by approximately $1,500 and $150, respectively.

NOTE 9 – AUTHORIZED AND ISSUED SHARES:

Under the Corporation’s Shareholder Rights Plan, each outstanding share of common stock carries one Preference Share Purchase Right (a Right). Under certain circumstances, each Right entitles the shareholder to buy 1/100 of a share of Series A Preference Stock at a $45.00 exercise price. The Rights are exercisable only if a party acquires, or commences a tender offer to acquire, beneficial ownership of 20% or more of the Corporation’s common stock without the approval of the independent directors on the Corporation’s Board of Directors.

After the Rights become exercisable, if anyone acquires 30% or more of the Corporation’s stock or assets, merges into the Corporation or engages in certain other transactions, each Right may be used to purchase shares of the Corporation’s common stock (or, under certain conditions, the acquirer’s common stock) worth twice the exercise price. The Corporation may redeem the Rights, which expire in November 2008, for one cent per Right under certain circumstances. At December 31, 2003, there are 3,000,000 shares of unissued preference stock, of which 150,000 shares have been designated as Series A Preference Stock for issuance in connection with these Rights.

NOTE 10 – STOCK OPTION PLAN:

Under the terms of the 1997 Stock Option Plan, as amended, options may be granted to selected employees to purchase, in the aggregate, up to 600,000 shares of the common stock of the Corporation. Options may be either incentive or non-qualified and are subject to terms and conditions, including exercise price and timing of exercise, as determined by the Stock Option Committee of the Board of Directors. The options vest at date of grant and have a ten-year life. To date, options have been granted at an exercise price equivalent to the market price on the date of grant; accordingly, no stock-based compensation costs have been recorded in net income.

Stock option activity during 2001 – 2003 was as follows:

	Shares Under Options		Exercise Price		Weighted Average Exercise Price
Balance at January 1, 2001	530,000				$	10.43
Exercised during 2001	(1,400	)	$	10.81
Balance at December 31, 2001	528,600				$	10.43
Exercised during 2002	(23,600	)	$	10.12
Balance at December 31, 2002	505,000				$	10.44
Exercised during 2003	(21,000	)	$	10.58
Balance at December 31, 2003	484,000				$	10.44

No stock options were granted during the three year period ended December 31, 2003; accordingly, there would be no effect on net income (loss) or earnings per common share for these years had the Corporation applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.”

25

ampco pittsburgh 2003

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Stock options outstanding and exercisable as of December 31, 2003 were as follows:

Shares Under Options	Weighted Average Exercise Price Per Share	Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life in Years
226,500	$10.00	5.0
252,500	10.81	6.3
5,000	11.13	7.0
484,000	$10.44	5.7

NOTE 11 – FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS:

Forward Foreign Exchange and Futures Contracts

Certain of the Corporation’s operations are subject to risk from exchange rate fluctuations in connection with sales in foreign currencies. To minimize this risk, forward foreign exchange contracts are purchased which are designated as fair value or cash flow hedges. As of December 31, 2003, approximately $39,144 of anticipated foreign denominated sales have been hedged with the underlying contracts settling at various dates beginning in 2004 through January 2009. As of December 31, 2003, the fair value of contracts expected to settle within the next 12 months which is recorded in other current liabilities approximated $2,335 and the fair value of the remaining contracts which is recorded in other noncurrent liabilities approximated $2,175. The change in the fair value of the contracts designated as cash flow hedges is recorded as a component of other comprehensive income (loss) and approximated $(2,200), net of taxes, as of December 31, 2003. The change in fair value will be reclassified into earnings when the projected sales occur with approximately $(1,125) expected to be released to earnings in 2004. In 2003, approximately $(1,306) was released into earnings.

Gains (losses) on foreign exchange transactions approximated $(206), $264 and $(233) for 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

In addition, one of the Corporation’s subsidiaries is subject to risk from increases in the price of a commodity used in the production of inventory. To minimize this risk, futures contracts are entered into which are designated as cash flow hedges. At December 31, 2003, approximately 99% or $1,714 of anticipated commodity purchases over the next 12 months are hedged. The fair value of the contracts expected to be settled within the next 12 months approximated $451 and the fair value of the remaining contracts approximated $8 as of December 31, 2003. The change in the fair value of the contracts designated as cash flow hedges is recorded as a component of other comprehensive income (loss) and approximated $276, net of taxes, as of December 31, 2003. The change in fair value will be reclassified into earnings when the projected sales occur.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The fair market value of forward foreign exchange contracts is determined based on the fair value of similar contracts with similar terms and remaining maturities. The fair value of futures contracts is based on market quotations. The fair value of other financial instruments classified as current assets or current liabilities approximates their carrying values due to the short-term maturity of these instruments. The fair value of the floating rate IRB debt approximates its carrying value.

NOTE 12 – INCOME TAXES:

At December 31, 2003, the Corporation had foreign tax credit carry forwards of $638 which expire in 2005, foreign net operating loss carry forwards of $9,240 which carry forward indefinitely, and domestic capital loss carry forwards of $8,786 arising from the disposition of the Plastics Processing Machinery segment which expire in 2008. A valuation allowance is provided when it is more likely than not that some or all of a deferred tax asset will not be realized.

Income from continuing operations before income taxes was comprised of the following:

	2003		2002			2001
Domestic	$	3,724	$	11,605		$	9,952
Foreign		918		(624	)		(9,655	)
	$	4,642	$	10,981		$	297

The provision (benefit) for taxes on income from continuing operations consisted of the following:

	2003			2002		2001
Current:
Federal	$	(359	)	$	1,785	$	(744	)
State		113			75		249
Foreign		291			6		10
		45			1,866		(485	)
Deferred:
Federal		1,792			2,759		1,804
State		256			394		211
Foreign		—			—		(390	)
		2,048			3,153		1,625
	$	2,093			5,019		1,140

26

ampco pittsburgh 2003

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Deferred tax assets and liabilities were comprised of the following:

	2003			2002
Assets
Employment-related liabilities	$	5,394		$	6,073
Pension liability – foreign		3,171			2,566
Depreciation – foreign		307			1,293
Liabilities related to discontinued operations and restructurings		1,682			1,846
Net operating loss – foreign		2,772			1,943
Capital loss carry forward		3,514			—
Other		6,273			4,546
Gross deferred tax assets		23,113			18,267
Valuation allowance		(13,073	)		(8,679	)
		10,040			9,588
Liabilities
Depreciation		(14,484	)		(14,049	)
Prepaid pensions		(9,642	)		(9,216	)
Other		(2,144	)		(1,410	)
Gross deferred tax liabilities		(26,270	)		(24,675	)
Net deferred tax liability	$	(16,230	)	$	(15,087	)

The difference between statutory U.S. federal income tax and the Corporation’s effective income tax on continuing operations was as follows:

	2003			2002			2001
Computed at statutory rate	$	1,625		$	3,843		$	104
Foreign income taxes		291			167			101
State income taxes		235			305			299
Valuation allowance		377			869			658
Foreign tax credits		(280	)		—			—
Other permanent items – net		(155	)		(165	)		(22	)
	$	2,093		$	5,019		$	1,140

NOTE 13 – OPERATING LEASES:

The Corporation leases certain factory and office space and certain office equipment. Operating lease expense was $776 in 2003, $897 in 2002 and $867 in 2001. Operating lease payments for subsequent years are $680 for 2004, $533 for 2005, $442 for 2006, $331 for 2007, $323 for 2008 and $2,320 thereafter.

NOTE 14 – RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT COSTS:

Expenditures relating to the development of new products, identification of products or process alternatives, and modifications and improvements to existing products and processes are expensed as incurred. These expenses approximated $750 for 2003, 2002 and 2001.

NOTE 15 – RELATED PARTIES:

The Corporation purchased industrial supplies from a subsidiary of The Louis Berkman Investment Company (LB Co) in the ordinary course of business. Certain directors of the Corporation are either officers, directors and/or shareholders of LB Co. Excluding the Plastics Processing Machinery segment, purchases approximated $1,432 in 2003, $1,420 in 2002 and $1,278 in 2001. In addition, LB Co paid the Corporation approximately $242 in 2003, $235 in 2002 and $188 in 2001 for certain administrative services. At December 31, 2003 and 2002, the net amount payable to LB Co approximated $121 and $85, respectively.

NOTE 16 – LITIGATION: (claims not in thousands)

The Corporation and its subsidiaries are involved in various claims and lawsuits incidental to their businesses. In addition, claims have been asserted alleging personal injury from exposure to asbestos-containing components historically used in some products of certain of the Corporation’s subsidiaries. Those subsidiaries, and in some cases, the Corporation, are defendants (among a number of defendants, typically over 50 and often over 100) in cases filed in various state and federal courts. The following table reflects information about these cases:

	2003		2002
Approximate open claims at end of period		18,000		16,339
Gross settlement and defense costs (in 000’s)	$	2,335	$	420
Approximate claims settled or dismissed during period		250		20

Of the 18,000 claims pending as of December 31, 2003, over 15,000 were made in six lawsuits filed in Mississippi in 2002. Substantially all settlement and defense costs in the above table were paid by insurers.

On February 7, 2003, Utica Mutual Insurance Company (“Utica”) filed a lawsuit in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Oneida (“Oneida County Litigation”) against the Corporation and certain of the subsidiaries named in the underlying asbestos actions (the “Policyholder Defendants”) and three other insurance carriers that provided primary coverage to the Corporation (the “Insurer Defendants”). In the lawsuit, Utica disputed certain coverage obligations to the Policyholder

27

ampco pittsburgh 2003

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Defendants and asserted that the Insurer Defendants also had defense and indemnity obligations to the Policyholder Defendants.

As of November 24, 2003, the Policyholder Defendants and Utica had settled the Oneida County Litigation as among themselves, although the Oneida County Litigation remained pending because settlement had not been reached with all of the Insurer Defendants. Pursuant to the settlement, Utica accepted financial responsibility, subject to the limits of its policies and based on fixed defense percentages and specified indemnity allocation formulas, for a substantial majority of the asbestos personal injury claims arising out of exposure to alleged asbestos – containing components in products distributed by the Policyholder Defendants that are subsidiaries of the Corporation. Utica’s agreed share of such defense and indemnification costs varies depending upon the alleged asbestos-containing product at issue, whether Utica’s primary or umbrella policies are responsible for the claims and, for indemnification costs only, the years of the claimant’s exposure to asbestos.

On January 23, 2004, Utica sought the court’s approval to file an amended complaint seeking additional relief against the Policyholder Defendants that is substantially identical to the relief Utica seeks against those defendants in a separate lawsuit filed by Howden Buffalo, Inc. (“Howden”) in the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania (the “Pennsylvania Litigation”) that is described below. Utica also sought to add Howden as a defendant in the Oneida County Litigation.

On November 25, 2003, Howden filed the Pennsylvania Litigation against the Corporation, Utica and two of the Insurer Defendants (with Utica, the “Howden Insurer Defendants”). Howden alleges that (1) Buffalo Forge Company, a former subsidiary of the Corporation, or its predecessors (collectively or individually, “Buffalo Forge”) had rights in certain policies issued by the Howden Insurer Defendants; (2) those rights were transferred in the 1993 transaction whereby the Corporation sold all of the capital stock of Buffalo Forge to Howden Group America, Inc. and Howden Group Canada, Ltd.; and (3) those rights currently reside in Howden, as successor to Buffalo Forge. In the lawsuit, Howden is seeking a judicial determination of the rights and duties of the Corporation and the Howden Insurer Defendants under those policies with respect to asbestos-related personal injury claims asserted against Howden arising from the historical operations of Buffalo Forge, as well as monetary damages from Utica as a result of its denial of Howden’s rights under policies it issued that allegedly covered Buffalo Forge. The Corporation intends to defend the lawsuit vigorously. If Howden is successful in this lawsuit and obtains coverage from the Howden Insurer Defendants, however, any insurance recovery obtained by Howden under those policies could erode, in whole or in part, the applicable coverage limits, which would reduce or eliminate coverage amounts that otherwise may be available to the Corporation under those policies.

As one of the Howden Insurer Defendants, Utica has filed a cross-claim against the Corporation, and a third-party complaint against two of its subsidiaries, seeking a declaratory judgment that, to the extent Utica has defense or indemnity obligations to Howden: (1) Utica is entitled to contribution, subrogation and reimbursement from the Corporation or its subsidiaries with respect to defense and indemnity payments paid on behalf of the Corporation or its subsidiaries; and (2) the Corporation and its subsidiaries have no rights under the insurance contracts issued by Utica to Buffalo Forge. The Corporation believes that Utica’s cross-claim and third party claims, as well as the similar relief Utica now seeks in the Oneida County Litigation, are barred by a release provided in the settlement of the Oneida County Litigation and is otherwise without merit, and intends to assert that position in this lawsuit. If Utica is successful in obtaining the declaratory relief it seeks, it could eliminate insurance coverage provided to the Corporation by Utica.

The Corporation believes it has meritorious defenses to the Howden lawsuit and Utica’s cross claims. In addition, based on the Corporation’s claims experience to date with the underlying asbestos claims, the available insurance coverage and the identity of the subsidiaries that are named in the cases, the Corporation believes that the pending legal proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial condition or liquidity. The outcome of particular lawsuits, however, could be material to the consolidated results of operations of the period in which the costs, if any, are recognized.

There can be no assurance that the Corporation or certain of its subsidiaries will not be subjected to significant additional claims in the future or that the Corporation’s or its subsidiaries’ ultimate liability with respect to these claims will not present significantly greater and longer lasting financial exposure than presently contemplated. The Corporation has made an accrual in its financial statements to reflect its estimated share of costs for pending asbestos claims, based on deductible and similar features of its relevant insurance policies. In addition, the Corporation incurred uninsured legal costs in connection with advice on certain matters pertaining to these asbestos cases including insurance litigation and other issues. These costs amounted to $2,393 and $670 in 2003 and 2002, respectively.

28

ampco pittsburgh 2003

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

NOTE 17 – ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS:

The Corporation is currently performing certain remedial actions in connection with the sale of real estate previously owned and has been named a Potentially Responsible Party at one third-party landfill site used by a division which was previously sold. In addition, as a result of the sale of the Plastics Processing Machinery segment, the Corporation retained the liability to remediate certain environmental contamination at two of the sold locations and has agreed to indemnify the buyer against third-party claims arising from the discharge of certain contamination from one of these locations at a cost estimate of $2,100 which will be paid over several years and was provided for in the third quarter of 2003. Environmental exposures are difficult to assess and estimate for numerous reasons including lack of reliable data, the multiplicity of possible solutions, the years of remedial and monitoring activity required, and identification of new sites. However, in the opinion of management, the potential liability for all environmental proceedings based on information known to date has been adequately reserved.

NOTE 18 – BUSINESS SEGMENTS:

The Corporation organizes its business into two operating segments. Summarized financial information concerning the Corporation’s reportable segments is shown in the following tables. Corporate assets included under Identifiable Assets represent cash and cash equivalents, deferred tax assets, prepaid pensions and other items not allocated to reportable segments. Long-lived assets exclude deferred tax assets. The accounting policies are the same as those described in Note 1.

	Net Sales						Income (Loss) Before Taxes
	2003		2002		2001		2003			2002			2001
Forged and Cast Rolls(1)	$	110,431	$	95,901	$	96,879	$	6,343		$	4,093		$	(4,920	)
Air and Liquid Processing(2)		69,802		91,855		94,964		3,504			11,547			11,105
Total Reportable Segments		180,233		187,756		191,843		9,847			15,640			6,185
Corporate costs, including other income (expense)		—		—		—		(5,205	)		(4,659	)		(5,888	)
	$	180,233	$	187,756	$	191,843	$	4,642		$	10,981		$	297

	Capital Expenditures						Depreciation Expense						Identifiable Assets
	2003		2002		2001		2003		2002		2001		2003		2002		2001
Forged and Cast Rolls	$	7,383	$	3,208	$	6,334	$	4,406	$	4,254	$	4,379	$	129,618	$	112,028	$	120,905
Air and Liquid Processing		1,124		936		2,005		1,766		1,866		1,756		42,020		44,647		48,776
Corporate		18		40		78		42		43		39		62,485		54,961		43,296
	$	8,525	$	4,184	$	8,417	$	6,214	$	6,163	$	6,174	$	234,123		211,636		212,977
Discontinued operations																24,826		28,594
															$	236,462	$	241,571

	Net Sales (3)						Long-Lived Assets						Income (Loss) Before Taxes
Geographic Areas:	2003		2002		2001		2003		2002		2001		2003		2002			2001
United States(2)	$	95,314	$	120,813	$	122,044	$	93,205	$	96,658	$	95,480	$	3,724	$	11,605		$	9,952
Foreign(1)		84,919		66,943		69,799		6,547		2,343		9,663		918		(624	)		(9,655	)
	$	180,233	$	187,756	$	191,843	$	99,752	$	99,001	$	105,143	$	4,642	$	10,981		$	297

⁽¹⁾ Income (loss) before taxes for 2001 was impacted by restructuring and other charges of $7,280.

⁽²⁾ Income (loss) before taxes for 2003, 2002, and 2001 was impacted by litigation costs of $2,393, $670 and $2,378, respectively.

⁽³⁾ Net sales are attributed to countries based on location of customer.

29

ampco pittsburgh 2003

Quarterly Information – Unaudited

2003	First Quarter			Second Quarter		Third Quarter			Fourth Quarter		Year
Net sales(a)	$	43,530		$	45,496	$	43,358		$	47,849	$	180,233
Gross profit(a)		9,105			10,206		9,144			10,039		38,494
Net income (loss)		197			391		(4,081	)		944		(2,549	)
Basic and diluted earnings per common share:
Net income (loss)		0.02			0.04		(0.42	)		0.10		(0.26	)
2002	First Quarter			Second Quarter		Third Quarter			Fourth Quarter		Year
Net sales(b)	$	48,618		$	50,937	$	47,854		$	40,347	$	187,756
Gross profit(b)		10,695			11,711		10,544			9,429		42,379
Income before cumulative effect of change in accounting for goodwill		1,219			2,100		1,267			569		5,155
Net income (loss)		(1,675	)		2,100		1,267			569		2,261
Basic and diluted earnings per common share:
Income before cumulative effect of change in accounting for goodwill		0.13			0.22		0.13			0.06		0.54
Net income (loss)		(0.17	)		0.22		0.13			0.06		0.24

^(a) Amounts differ from that previously reported in the applicable quarters Form 10-Q due to the sale of the Plastics Processing Machinery segment in August 2003. For the first and second quarters, this segment had sales of $6,149 and $6,251, respectively, and gross profit of $1,529 and $1,294, respectively.

^(b) Amounts differ from that previously reported in the applicable quarters Form 10-Q due to the sale of the Plastics Processing Machinery segment in August 2003. For each of quarters, this segment had sales of $6,081, $6,587, $6,124 and $5,828, respectively, and gross profit of $1,342, $1,392, $1,162 and $1,343, respectively.

Common Stock Information

The shares of common stock of Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation are traded on the New York Stock Exchange (symbol AP) and on the Philadelphia Stock Exchange. Cash dividends have been paid on common shares in every year since 1965.

	2003						2002
Quarter	High		Dividends Low		Declared		High		Dividends Low		Declared
First	$	13.55	$	11.90	$	0.10	$	11.85	$	10.40	$	0.10
Second		15.38		12.30		0.10		12.35		11.46		0.10
Third		13.82		11.39		0.10		12.17		9.81		0.10
Fourth		14.12		10.25		0.10		12.81		9.81		0.10
Year		15.38		10.25		0.40		12.81		9.81		0.40

31

ampco pittsburgh 2003

Five_Year Summary of Selected Financial Data

	Year Ended December 31,
(dollars, except per share amounts, and shares outstanding in thousands)	2003(1)			2002(2)		2001(3)			2000		1999(4)
Net sales	$	180,233		$	187,756	$	191,843		$	192,486	$	178,286
Net income (loss) from continuing operations		2,549			5,962		(843	)		15,375		14,114
Net (loss) income		(2,549	)		2,261		(983	)		16,192		15,144
Total assets		234,123			236,462		241,571			244,464		235,808
Long-term obligations		13,311			13,311		13,311			13,311		13,311
Shareholders’ equity		144,545			150,021		157,407			162,477		152,620
Basic and diluted earnings per common share:
Income (loss) from continuing operations		0.27			0.62		(0.09	)		1.60		1.47
Net (loss) income		(0.26	)		0.24		(0.10	)		1.68		1.58
Per common share:
Cash dividends declared		0.40			0.40		0.40			0.40		0.40
Shareholders’ equity		14.97			15.58		16.38			16.92		15.91
Market price at year end		13.67			12.16		10.75			12.00		10.13
Weighted average common shares outstanding		9,637			9,625		9,605			9,601		9,586
Number of shareholders		842			891		929			1,027		1,138
Number of employees		1,152			1,207		1,355			1,470		1,596

⁽¹⁾ Net income (loss) from continuing operations includes pre-tax litigation charges of $2,393.

⁽²⁾ Net income (loss) from continuing operations includes pre-tax litigation charges of $670 and net (loss) income includes the after-tax write off of goodwill of $2,894.

⁽³⁾ Net income (loss) from continuing operations includes pre-tax restructuring and other charges of $7,280 and pre-tax litigation costs of $2,378.

⁽⁴⁾ Includes results of Davy Roll from the August 2, 1999 date of acquisition.

Report of Independent Accountants

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2003 set forth on pages 13 through 29. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Corporation’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2003, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, on January 1, 2002, the Corporation changed its method of accounting for goodwill to adopt Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”.

/s/    DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP        

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

February 16, 2004

31

ampco pittsburgh 2003

Directors and Officers

Louis Berkman⁽¹⁾

Director

Chairman of the Board

Chairman, The Louis Berkman Investment Company

Robert A. Paul⁽¹⁾

Director

President and Chief Executive Officer

Ernest G. Siddons⁽¹⁾

Director

Executive Vice President and

Chief Operating Officer

Robert J. Appel⁽³⁾

Director

President, Appel Associates

Leonard M. Carroll^(1)(2)(5)

Director

Managing Director, Seneca Capital Management, Inc.

William D. Eberle^(2)(3)(5)

Director

Private Investor

Paul A. Gould^(2)(3)(4)

Director

Managing Director, Allen & Company, Inc.

William K. Lieberman⁽⁴⁾

Director

President, The Lieberman Companies

Laurence E. Paul

Director

Managing Principal, Laurel Crown Capital

Stephen E. Paul

Director

Managing Principal, Laurel Crown Capital

Carl H. Pforzheimer, III^(2)(4)(5)

Director

Managing Partner, Carl H. Pforzheimer & Co.

Rose Hoover

Vice President and Corporate Secretary

Dee Ann Johnson

Vice President, Controller and Treasurer

Terrence W. Kenny

Group Vice President

Robert F. Schultz

Vice President Industrial Relations

and Senior Counsel

⁽¹⁾ Member of the Executive Committee

⁽²⁾ Member of the Audit Committee

⁽³⁾ Member of the Compensation Committee

⁽⁴⁾ Member of the Nominating and Governance Committee

⁽⁵⁾ Member of the Stock Option Committee

Operating Companies

Union Electric Steel Corporation

www.uniones.com

Carnegie, Pennsylvania

Robert G. Carothers, President

Subsidiary Company:

The Davy Roll Company

www.davyroll.com

Gateshead, England

Stephen A. Bell, Managing Director

Aerofin Corporation

www.aerofin.com

Lynchburg, Virginia

David L. Corell, President

Buffalo Air Handling Company

www.buffaloair.com

Amherst, Virginia

William R. Phelps, President

Buffalo Pumps, Inc.

www.buffalopumps.com

North Tonawanda, New York

Charles R. Kistner, President

32

ampco pittsburgh 2003

Shareholder Information

Corporate Headquarters

600 Grant Street, Suite 4600

Pittsburgh, PA 15219

(412) 456-4400

Corporate Website

www.ampcopittsburgh.com

Transfer Agent, Registrar, Dividend Paying Agent

Mellon Investor Services LLC

www.melloninvestor.com

P.O. Box 3315

South Hackensack, NJ 07606

Phone: (800) 756-3353

TDD for Hearing Impaired: (800) 231-5469

Annual Meeting

The Annual Meeting of Shareholders will be held at The Duquesne Club, 325 Sixth Avenue, The Oliver Room, Pittsburgh, PA 15222 on Thursday, April 29, 2004 at 10:00 a.m.

10-K Report

A copy of Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is available without charge to shareholders upon written request to the Corporate Secretary at the Headquarters address above. It can also be accessed from our website without charge.

2003 Annual Report

This Annual Report and statements contained herein are submitted for the general information of the shareholders of Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation and are not intended for use in connection with or to induce the sale or purchase of securities.

Employment Policy

The Corporation is an Equal Opportunity Employer.

33

Corporate Headquarters

600 Grant Street, Suite 4600

Pittsburgh, PA 15219

(412) 456-4400

EX-21

Exhibit 21

SUBSIDIARIES

Name	Ownership	Jurisdiction of Incorporation
3048568 Nova Scotia Company	100% owned by Union Electric Steel Corporation	Nova Scotia
AP Venture Corp. III	100% owned by Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation	Delaware
Aerofin Corporation	100% owned by Ampco-Pittsburgh Securities V Corporation	New York
Ampco-Pittsburgh Securities III Corporation	100% owned by Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation	Delaware
Ampco-Pittsburgh Securities V Corporation	100% owned by Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation	Delaware
Ampco UES Sub, Inc.	100% owned by Union Electric Steel Corporation	Delaware
Buffalo Air Handling Company	100% owned by Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation	Delaware
Buffalo Pumps, Inc.	100% owned by Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation	Delaware
Union Electric Steel Corporation	100% owned by Ampco-Pittsburgh Securities V Corporation	Pennsylvania
Union Electric Steel B.V.B.A.	100% owned by 3048568 Nova Scotia Company	Belgium
Union Electric Steel (UK) Limited	100% owned by Ampco UES Sub, Inc.	England
The Davy Roll Company Limited	100% owned by Union Electric Steel (UK) Limited	England

The financial statements of all subsidiaries have been consolidated with those of the Corporation. Names of other subsidiaries have been omitted because, considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary, they would not constitute a significant subsidiary.

EX-23

Exhibit 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements on Form S-8 for the 1997 Stock Option Plan of Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 26, 1999 and May 25, 2000 of our report dated February 16, 2004, appearing in and incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2003.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

March 12, 2004

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Robert A. Paul, President and Chief Executive Officer of Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have;

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably like to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 12, 2004	/s/ Robert A. Paul
	Robert A. Paul
	President and Chief Executive Officer

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Marliss D. Johnson, Vice President, Controller and Treasurer of Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have;

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a. All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably like to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 12, 2004	/s/ Marliss D. Johnson
	Marliss D. Johnson
	Vice President, Controller and Treasurer

EX-32.1

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

Date: March 12, 2004	By:	/s/ Robert A. Paul
		Robert A. Paul
		President and Chief Executive Officer

EX-32.2

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

Date: March 12, 2004	By:	/s/ Marliss D. Johnson
		Marliss D. Johnson
		Vice President, Controller and Treasurer