XML 36 R24.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.23.2
Litigation
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2023
Loss Contingency [Abstract]  
Litigation

Note 16 – Litigation

The Corporation and its subsidiaries are involved in various claims and lawsuits incidental to their businesses from time to time and are also subject to asbestos litigation.

Asbestos Litigation

Claims have been asserted alleging personal injury from exposure to asbestos-containing components historically used in some products manufactured by predecessors of Air & Liquid (the “Asbestos Liability”). Air & Liquid, and in some cases the Corporation, are defendants (among a number of defendants, often in excess of 50 defendants) in claims filed in various state and federal courts.

Asbestos Claims

The following table reflects approximate information about the number of claims for Asbestos Liability against Air & Liquid and the Corporation for the six months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022 (number of claims not in thousands). The majority of the settlement and defense costs were reported and paid by insurers. Because claims are often filed and can be settled or dismissed in large groups, the amount and timing of settlements, as well as the number of open claims, can fluctuate significantly from period to period.

 

 

Six Months Ended June 30,

 

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

Total claims pending at the beginning of the period

 

 

6,259

 

 

 

6,097

 

New claims served

 

 

713

 

 

 

573

 

Claims dismissed

 

 

(274

)

 

 

(175

)

Claims settled

 

 

(209

)

 

 

(145

)

Total claims pending at the end of period (1)

 

 

6,489

 

 

 

6,350

 

Administrative closures (2)

 

 

(3,057

)

 

 

(2,864

)

Total active claims at the end of the period

 

 

3,432

 

 

 

3,486

 

Gross settlement and defense costs paid in period (in 000’s)

 

$

10,789

 

 

$

8,604

 

Avg. gross settlement and defense costs per claim resolved (in 000’s) (3)

 

$

22.34

 

 

$

26.89

 

(1)
Included as “total claims pending” are approximately 1,638 and 658 claims at June 30, 2023 and 2022, respectively, classified in various jurisdictions as “inactive” or transferred to a state or federal judicial panel on multi-district litigation.
(2)
Administrative closures include (i) those claims filed six or more years ago, (ii) claims previously classified in various jurisdictions as “inactive,” and (iii) claims transferred to a state or federal judicial panel on multi-district litigation. Collectively, these claims are unlikely to result in any liability to the Corporation.
(3)
Claims resolved do not include claims administratively closed.

Asbestos Insurance

The Corporation and Air & Liquid are parties to a series of settlement agreements (“Settlement Agreements”) with insurers having coverage obligations for the Asbestos Liability (the “Settling Insurers”). Under the Settlement Agreements, the Settling Insurers accept financial responsibility, subject to the terms and conditions of the respective agreements, including overall coverage limits, for pending and future claims for the Asbestos Liability. The Settlement Agreements encompass the majority of insurance policies providing coverage for claims for the Asbestos Liability.

The Settlement Agreements acknowledge Howden North America, Inc. (“Howden”) is entitled to coverage under policies covering the Asbestos Liability for claims arising out of the historical products manufactured or distributed by Buffalo Forge, a former subsidiary of the Corporation (the “Products”), which was acquired by Howden. The Settlement Agreements do not provide for any prioritization on access to the applicable policies or any sub-limits of liability as to Howden or the Corporation and Air & Liquid and, accordingly, Howden may access the coverage afforded by the Settling Insurers for any covered claim arising out of the Products. In general, access by Howden to the coverage afforded by the Settling Insurers for the Products will erode coverage under the Settlement Agreements available to the Corporation and Air & Liquid for the Asbestos Liability.

Asbestos Valuations

At December 31, 2006, with the assistance of a nationally recognized expert in the valuation of asbestos liabilities, the Corporation recorded its initial reserve for the Asbestos Liability. Since then, the Corporation and the nationally recognized expert in the valuation of asbestos liabilities have reviewed the Asbestos Liability and the underlying assumptions on a regular basis to determine whether any adjustment to the Asbestos Liability or the underlying assumptions were necessary. When warranted, the Asbestos Liability was adjusted to consider the current trends and new information becoming available and, if reasonably estimable, to extend the valuation of asbestos liabilities further into the future. In 2018, the valuation was extended to include claims projected to be asserted through the estimated final date by which the Corporation expects to have settled all asbestos-related claims.

In conjunction with the regular updates of the estimated Asbestos Liability, the Corporation also develops an estimate of defense costs expected to be incurred with settling the Asbestos Liability and probable insurance recoveries for the Asbestos Liability and defense costs. In developing the estimate of probable defense costs, the Corporation considers several factors including, but not limited to,

current and historical defense-to-indemnity cost ratios and expected defense-to-indemnity costs ratios. In developing the estimate of probable insurance recoveries, the Corporation considers the expert’s projection of settlement costs for the Asbestos Liability and management’s projection of associated defense costs. In addition, the Corporation consults with its outside legal counsel on insurance matters and a nationally recognized insurance consulting firm it retains to assist with certain policy allocation matters. The Corporation also considers a number of other factors including the Settlement Agreements in effect, policy exclusions, policy limits, policy provisions regarding coverage for defense costs, attachment points, gaps in the coverage, policy exhaustion, the nature of the underlying claims for the Asbestos Liability, estimated erosion of insurance limits on account of claims against Howden arising out of the Products, prior impairment of policies, insolvencies among certain of the insurance carriers, and creditworthiness of the remaining insurers based on publicly available information. Based on these factors, the Corporation estimates the probable insurance recoveries for the Asbestos Liability and defense costs for the corresponding time frame of the Asbestos Liability.

The following table summarizes activity relating to Asbestos Liability for the six months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022.

 

 

Six Months Ended June 30,

 

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

Asbestos liability, beginning of the year

 

$

153,575

 

 

$

180,314

 

Settlement and defense costs paid

 

 

(10,789

)

 

 

(8,604

)

Asbestos liability, end of the period

 

$

142,786

 

 

$

171,710

 

The following table summarizes activity relating to insurance recoveries for the six months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022.

 

 

Six Months Ended June 30,

 

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

Insurance receivable – asbestos, beginning of the year, as reported

 

$

105,910

 

 

$

121,297

 

Impact of adoption of new accounting standard

 

 

(476

)

 

 

-

 

Insurance receivable – asbestos, beginning of the year, as adjusted

 

 

105,434

 

 

 

121,297

 

Settlement and defense costs paid by insurance carriers

 

 

(6,211

)

 

 

(4,570

)

Insurance receivable – asbestos, end of the period

 

$

99,223

 

 

$

116,727

 

In conjunction with the adoption of the CECL accounting standard as of January 1, 2023, the Corporation established an allowance for expected credit losses of $476 reducing the insurance receivable to its estimated net realizable value. The allowance for expected credit losses is estimated based on historical insolvency experience, expected time frame until collection of insurance claim and assessments of current creditworthiness of insurers. The balance of the insurance receivable does not assume any recovery from insolvent carriers. A substantial majority of the insurance recoveries deemed probable is from insurance companies rated A – (excellent) or better by A.M. Best Corporation. There can be no assurance, however, there will not be insolvencies among the relevant insurance carriers, or the assumed percentage recoveries for certain carriers will prove correct.

Asbestos Assumptions

The amounts recorded for the Asbestos Liability and insurance receivable rely on assumptions based on currently known facts and strategy. The Corporation’s actual expenses or insurance recoveries could be significantly higher or lower than those recorded if assumptions used in the Corporation’s or the experts’ calculations vary significantly from actual results. Key variables in these assumptions include forecast of the population likely to have been exposed to asbestos; the number of people likely to develop an asbestos-related disease; estimated number of people likely to file an asbestos-related injury claim against the Corporation or its subsidiaries; an analysis of pending cases, by type of injury claimed and jurisdiction where the claim is filed; average settlement value of claims, by type of injury claimed and jurisdiction of filing; number and nature of new claims to be filed each year; average cost of disposing of each new claim; average annual defense costs; compliance by relevant parties with the terms of the Settlement Agreements; and the solvency risk with respect to the relevant insurance carriers. Other factors that may affect the Asbestos Liability and ability to recover under the Corporation’s insurance policies include uncertainties surrounding the litigation process from jurisdiction to jurisdiction and from case to case, reforms made by state and federal courts, and the passage of state or federal tort reform legislation.

The Corporation intends to continue to evaluate the Asbestos Liability, related insurance receivable, the sufficiency of its allowance for expected credit losses and the underlying assumptions on a regular basis to determine whether any adjustments to the estimates are required. Due to the uncertainties surrounding asbestos litigation and insurance, these regular reviews may result in the Corporation adjusting its current reserve; however, the Corporation is currently unable to estimate such future adjustments. Adjustments, if any, to the Corporation’s estimate of the Asbestos Liability, insurance receivable and/or allowance for expected credit losses could be material to the operating results for the period in which the adjustments to the liability, receivable or allowance are recorded and to the Corporation’s consolidated financial position and liquidity.