EX-21 4 dex21.htm SUBSIDIARIES Subsidiaries

Exhibit 21

SUBSIDIARIES

Name   Ownership   Jurisdiction of
Incorporation

 
 
3048568 Nova Scotia Company   100% owned by
Union Electric Steel
Corporation
  Nova Scotia
         
AP Venture Corp. III   100% owned by
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation
  Delaware
         
Aerofin Corporation   100% owned by
Ampco-Pittsburgh Securities V
Corporation
  New York
         
Ampco NCII Sub, Inc.   100% owned by
New Castle Industries, Inc.
  Delaware
         
Ampco-Pittsburgh Securities
III Corporation
  100% owned by
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation
  Delaware
         
Ampco-Pittsburgh Securities
V Corporation
  100% owned by
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation
  Delaware
         
Ampco UES Sub, Inc.   100% owned by
Union Electric Steel Corporation
  Delaware
         
Atlantic Grinding & Welding, Inc.   100% owned by
Ampco NCII Sub, Inc.
  Pennsylvania
         
Bimex Industries, Inc.   100% owned by
Ampco NCII Sub, Inc.
  Delaware
         
Buffalo Air Handling Company   100% owned by
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation
  Delaware
         
Buffalo Pumps, Inc.   100% owned by
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation
  Delaware
         
F. R. Gross Co., Inc.   100% owned by
Ampco-Pittsburgh Securities
V Corporation
  Pennsylvania
         
Keystone Rolls Company   100% owned by
Ampco NCII Sub, Inc.
  Pennsylvania
         
New Castle Industries, Inc.   100% owned by
Ampco UES Sub, Inc.
  Pennsylvania


SUBSIDIARIES (Cont’)

Name   Ownership   Jurisdiction of
Incorporation

 
 
Union Electric Steel Corporation   100% owned by
Ampco-Pittsburgh Securities
V Corporation
  Pennsylvania
         
Union Electric Steel B.V.B.A.   100% owned by 3048568
Nova Scotia Company
  Belgium
         
Union Electric Steel (UK) Limited   100% owned by Ampco UES
Sub, Inc.
  England
         
The Davy Roll Company Limited   100% owned by Union
Electric Steel (UK) Limited
  England

     The financial statements of all subsidiaries have been consolidated with those of the Corporation. Names of other subsidiaries have been omitted because, considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary, they would not constitute a significant subsidiary.