Commitments and Contingencies

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2020

Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]

Commitments and Contingencies

Commitments and Contingencies.

a.Environmental - MGE Energy and MGE.

Columbia

In February 2021, MGE and the other co-owners of Columbia announced plans to retire that facility. The co-owners intend to retire Unit 1 by the end of 2023 and Unit 2 by the end of 2024. Final timing and retirement dates for Units 1 and 2 are subject to PSCW and regional regulatory reviews, including identification and approval of energy and capacity resources to replace Columbia. Effects of environmental compliance discussed below will depend upon the final retirement dates approved and compliance requirement dates.

Water Quality

Water quality regulations promulgated by the EPA and WDNR in accordance with the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, commonly known as the Clean Water Act (CWA), impose restrictions on discharges of various pollutants into surface waters. The CWA also regulates surface water quality issues that affect aquatic life, such as water temperatures, chemical concentrations, intake structures, and wetlands filling. The CWA also includes discharge standards, which require the use of effluent-treatment processes equivalent to categorical "best practicable" or "best available" technologies. The CWA regulates discharges from "point sources," such as power plants, by establishing discharge limits via water discharge permits. MGE's power plants operate under Wisconsin Pollution Discharge Elimination System (WPDES) permits issued by the WDNR to ensure compliance with these discharge limits. Permits are subject to periodic renewal.

EPA's Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for Steam Electric Power Generating Point Source Category

In August 2020, the EPA finalized rule modifications to the Effluent Limitations Guidelines (ELG) for the steam electric power generating industry. The ELG rule establishes federal limits on the amount of metals and other pollutants that can be discharged in wastewater from new and existing steam electric generation plants. The rule will be applied to Wisconsin-based power plants as they renew their WPDES permits, but no later than December 31, 2023. The operators of the Columbia and Elm Road Units have indicated that equipment upgrades may be necessary to comply with the current discharge standards.

In February 2021, MGE and the other owners of Columbia filed a Certificate of Authority (CA) application with the PSCW. The CA application commits to close Columbia's wet pond system to comply with the Coal Combustions Residuals (CCR) Rule as described in further detail in the solid waste section below. By committing to close the wet pond system, Columbia will be in compliance with ELG requirements.

The operator of the Elm Road Units has been evaluating the rule impacts and has conducted an analysis of compliance obligations, pollution prevention technologies, and their associated costs. In February 2021, MGE and its co-owner filed a CA application with the PSCW. If approved, MGE's share of the estimated costs to comply with the rule is estimated to be approximately $4 million. Pending approval from the PSCW, construction is expected to begin in 2022. MGE will continue to work with the Elm

Road operator to determine the final costs and timing of compliance.

Management believes that any compliance costs will be recovered in future rates based on previous treatment of environmental compliance projects.

EPA Cooling Water Intake Rules (Section 316(b))

Section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act requires that the cooling water intake structures at electric power plants meet best available technology standards to reduce mortality from entrainment (drawing aquatic life into a plant's cooling system) and impingement (trapping aquatic life on screens). The EPA finalized its Section 316(b) rule for existing facilities in 2014. Section 316(b) requirements are implemented in Wisconsin through modifications to plants' WPDES permits, which govern plant wastewater discharges.

WCCF, Blount, and Columbia are considered existing plants under this rule. WCCF employs a system that meets the Section 316(b) rule. Blount's WPDES permit assumes that the plant meets best technology available (BTA) for the duration of the permit, which expires in 2023. However, MGE must perform an entrainment study by the end of 2021 to determine future BTA, which will be included with the next permit renewal. Section 316(b) applies to river intakes at the Columbia plant. Columbia's operator received a permit in 2019 requiring studies of intake structures to help determine BTA. BTA improvements may not be required given that Columbia could be fully retired before the issuance of the next permit, which is expected to be issued in 2023 or later. MGE will continue to work with Columbia’s operator to evaluate all regulatory requirements applicable to the planned retirements. Management believes that the Section 316(b) rule will not have a material effect on its existing plants and that any compliance costs will be recovered in future rates based on previous treatment of environmental compliance projects.

Air Quality

Federal and state air quality regulations impose restrictions on various emissions, including emissions of particulate matter (PM), sulfur dioxide (SO₂), nitrogen oxides (NO_x), and other pollutants, and require permits for operation of emission sources. These permits have been obtained by MGE and must be renewed periodically. Current EPA initiatives under the Clean Air Act, including the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR) and National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), have the potential to result in additional operating and capital expenditure costs for MGE.

EPA's Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Reduction Guidelines under the Clean Air Act 111(d) Rule

In January 2021, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (D.C. Circuit) vacated and remanded to the EPA the Affordable Clean Energy Rule (ACE Rule) and the repeal of the predecessor Clean Power Plan Rule (CPP Rule), both of which regulated greenhouse gas emissions from existing electric generation units pursuant to Section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act. MGE is still evaluating this D.C. Circuit decision for what impacts it may have on MGE operations. MGE will continue to evaluate the rule development and monitor ongoing and potential legal proceedings.

National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) and Related Rules

The EPA's NAAQS regulations have been developed to set ambient levels of six pollutants to protect sensitive human populations (primary NAAQS) and the environment (secondary NAAQS) from the negative effects of exposure to these pollutants at higher levels. The Clean Air Act requires that the EPA periodically review, and adjust as necessary, the NAAQS for these six air pollutants. The EPA's NAAQS review can result in a lowering of the allowed ambient levels of a pollutant, a change in how the pollutant is monitored, and/or a change in which sources of that pollutant are regulated. States implement any necessary monitoring and measurement changes and recommend areas for attainment (meets the ambient requirements) or nonattainment (does not meet these standards). The EPA makes final attainment and nonattainment determinations. States must come up with a state implementation plan (SIP) to get nonattainment areas into attainment and maintain air quality in attainment areas. A company with facilities located in a nonattainment area will be most affected. Its facilities may be subject to additional data submission and measurement requirements during permitting renewals, its facilities may need to meet new emission limitations set by the SIP (which could result in significant

capital expenditures), and it may have additional expenses and/or difficulties expanding existing facilities or building new facilities. The process, which starts with determining acceptable primary and/or secondary NAAQS and ends with executing SIPs can take years. Since the NAAQS regulations have the potential to affect both existing and new facilities, MGE continuously monitors changes to these rules to evaluate whether changes could impact its operations. In addition, the EPA has adopted interstate transport rules, such as the CSAPR, to address contributions to NAAQS nonattainment from upwind sources in neighboring states. In the following paragraphs we discuss specific NAAQS and transport rule developments that may affect MGE.

Ozone NAAQS

In May 2018, the EPA issued a final rule designating the northeast portion of Milwaukee County as being in nonattainment with Ozone NAAQS. The Elm Road Units are located in Milwaukee County, outside the designated nonattainment area. In August 2018, several environmental groups, the City of Chicago, and the State of Illinois filed federal lawsuits challenging several of the EPA's attainment designation decisions, including the partial Milwaukee County designation as being too narrow and not sufficiently protective. In July 2020, the U.S. District Court of the District of Columbia remanded the partial Milwaukee County attainment designation back to the EPA for further explanation. If the entire county were to be considered in nonattainment, the State of Wisconsin would need to develop an implementation plan that addressed emissions that contribute to Ozone (NO_x and Volatile Organic Compound emissions) for the county, which could affect operations and emissions control obligations of the Elm Road units. MGE is monitoring the outcome of the EPA's remand analysis and how it may affect the Elm Road Units in Milwaukee County. At this time, MGE expects that the 2015 Ozone NAAQS will not have a material effect on its existing plants based on final designations.

EPA's Cross-State Air Pollution Rule

The EPA's CSAPR and its progeny are a suite of interstate air pollution transport rules designed to reduce ozone and fine particulate (PM2.5) air levels in areas that the EPA has determined as being significantly impacted by pollution from upwind states. This is accomplished in the CSAPR through a reduction in SO₂ and NO_x from qualifying fossil-fuel fired power plants in upwind "contributing" states. NO_x and SO₂ contribute to fine particulate pollution and NO_x contributes to ozone formation in downwind areas. Reductions are achieved through a cap and trade system. Individual plants can meet their caps through modifications and/or buying allowances on the market.

In 2016 the EPA finalized a CSAPR Update Rule to address pollution transport related to an updated ozone NAAQS. In September 2019, the D.C. Circuit remanded the rule to the EPA holding that the rule improperly provided only a partial remedy for addressing interstate transport of pollutants from upwind to downwind states. In October 2020 the EPA published a proposed CSAPR Update Rule to address the remand which explicitly excludes Wisconsin. The EPA is under court order to finalize this update by March 2021. If the proposed rule is finalized as written, Wisconsin will not be subject to the emissions reductions included in the CSAPR Update Rule but will remain subject to the reductions required by the original CSAPR.

MGE has met its current obligations through a combination of reduced emissions through pollution control (e.g., SCR installation at Columbia), as well as owned, received, and purchased allowances. While uncertainty remains around CSAPR due to legal challenges, MGE expects to meet ongoing CSAPR obligations for the foreseeable future. MGE will continue to monitor developments to this rule.

Clean Air Visibility Rule (CAVR)

Columbia is subject to the best available retrofit technology (BART) regulations, a subsection of the EPA's CAVR, which may require pollution control retrofits. Columbia's existing pollution control upgrades, and the EPA's stance that compliance with the CSAPR equals compliance with BART, should mean that Columbia will not need to do additional work to meet BART requirements. At this time, however, the BART regulatory obligations, compliance strategies, and costs remain uncertain in Wisconsin due to the continued legal challenges surrounding CSAPR and CAVR. MGE will continue to monitor developments to this rule.

Columbia Clean Air Act Litigation

Columbia is a coal-fired generating station operated by WPL and in which WPL, WPSC, and MGE have ownership interests. In December 2009, the EPA sent a Notice of Violation (NOV) to the co-owners, including MGE. The NOV alleged that WPL and the Columbia co-owners failed to comply with appropriate pre-construction review and permitting requirements and, as a result, violated the Prevention of Significant Deterioration program requirements, Title V Operating Permit requirements of the CAA, and the Wisconsin SIP. In June 2013, the court approved and entered a consent decree entered by the EPA, Sierra Club, and the co-owners of Columbia. One of the requirements of the consent decree required installation of an SCR system at Columbia Unit 2 by December 31, 2018. Installation of the SCR was approved by the PSCW and the SCR was placed in service in 2018. The consent decree remains open for compliance monitoring, but significant additional operating and capital expenditures are not expected.

Solid Waste

EPA's Coal Combustion Residuals Rule

The EPA's 2015 Coal Combustion Residuals Rule (CCR) regulates coal ash from burning coal for the purpose of generating electricity as a solid waste and defines what ash use activities would be considered generally exempt beneficial reuse of coal ash. The CCR rule also regulates landfills, ash ponds, and other surface impoundments used for coal combustion residuals by regulating their design, location, monitoring, and operation.

In July 2018, the EPA published a final rule that included amendments to the CCR. The amendments include the allowance of alternative performance standards for landfills and surface impoundments, revised risk-based groundwater protection standards, and an extension of the deadline by which certain facilities must cease the placement of waste in CCR units. In August 2018, the D.C. Circuit vacated parts of the 2015 CCR for not being sufficiently protective of the environment. In August 2020, the EPA revised the CCR rule to require owners or operators of coal-fired power plants to stop transporting CCR and non-CCR wastewater (a process known as "sluicing") to unlined surface impoundments. In addition, regulated entities must initiate impoundment closure as soon as feasible and in no event later than April 2021, unless the EPA grants an extension. Columbia requested an extension to comply by October 2022. The EPA will address the remaining issues on remand in a subsequent action.

Review of the Elm Road Units has indicated that the costs to comply with the CRR rule are not expected to be significant. Columbia's operator has completed a review of its system and has developed a compliance plan. In February 2021, a CA application was filed with the PSCW for approval to install technology required to cease bottom ash transport water discharges rather than extend the longevity of the ash ponds. If approved, MGE's share of the estimated costs of the project would be approximately $4 million. Construction is expected to be completed by the end of 2022.

In 2015, MGE recorded an asset retirement obligation for its share of the legal liability associated with the effect of the CCR rule. Actual costs of compliance may be different than the amount recorded due to potential changes in compliance strategies that will be used, as well as other potential cost estimate changes. MGE will continue to monitor final rule modifications to assess potential impacts on our operations.

b.Legal Matters - MGE Energy and MGE.

MGE is involved in various legal matters that are being defended and handled in the normal course of business. MGE maintains accruals for such costs that are probable of being incurred and subject to reasonable estimation. The accrued amount for these matters is not material to the financial statements. MGE does not expect the resolution of these matters to have a material adverse effect on its consolidated results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows.

In January 2021, certain environmental groups filed a petition against the PSCW regarding MGE's 2021 rate settlement. MGE has intervened in the petition in cooperation with the PSCW. See Footnote 9.a. for more information regarding this matter.

c.Purchase Contracts - MGE Energy and MGE.

MGE Energy and MGE have entered into various commodity supply, transportation, and storage contracts to meet their obligations to deliver electricity and natural gas to customers. Management expects to recover these costs in future customer rates.

As of December 31, 2020, the future minimum commitments related to these purchase contracts were as follows:

(In thousands)		2021		2022		2023		2024		2025		Thereafter
Coal(a)	$	11,399	$	5,249	$	1,515	$	-	$	-	$	-
Natural gas
Transportation and storage(b)		21,851		22,120		22,553		22,553		22,553		18,316
Supply(c)		9,527		-		-		-		-		-
Purchase power(d)		27,017		15,399		5,856		5,458		5,567		11,717
Renewable energy(e)		6,663		2,862		1,245		759		776		30,939
Other		2,833		2,044		1,711		776		104		892
	$	79,290	$	47,674	$	32,880	$	29,546	$	29,000	$	61,864

(a)Total coal commitments for the Columbia and Elm Road Units, including transportation. Fuel procurement for MGE's jointly owned Columbia and Elm Road Units is handled by WPL and WEPCO, respectively, who are the operators of those facilities.

(b)MGE's natural gas transportation and storage contracts require fixed monthly payments for firm supply pipeline transportation and storage capacity. The pricing components of the fixed monthly payments for the transportation and storage contracts are approved by FERC but may be subject to change.

(c)These commitments include market-based pricing.

(d)MGE has several purchase power agreements to help meet future electric supply requirements.

(e)Operational commitments for solar and wind facilities.

d.Other Commitments.

MGE Energy holds investments in nonpublic venture capital funds. From time to time, these entities require additional capital infusions from their investors. MGE Energy has committed to contribute $13.6 million in capital for such infusions. The timing of these infusions is dependent on the needs of the investee and is therefore uncertain at this time.

In addition, MGE Energy has a three-year agreement with a venture debt fund expiring in December 2022. MGE Energy has committed to invest up to a total of $1.5 million into this fund. As of December 31, 2020, MGE Energy has $0.4 million remaining in commitments. The timing of infusions is dependent on the needs of the fund and is therefore uncertain at this time.

MGE has several other commitments related to various projects. Payments for these commitments are expected to be as follows:

(In thousands)		2021		2022		2023		2024		2025		Thereafter
Other commitments	$	333	$	333	$	333	$	333	$	333	$	2,999