XML 49 R24.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.3.0.814
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2015
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Fair Value of Financial Instruments - MGE Energy and MGE.

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or would be paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The accounting standard clarifies that fair value should be based on the assumptions market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability including assumptions about risk. The standard also establishes a three level fair value hierarchy based upon the observability of the assumptions used and requires the use of observable market data when available. The levels are:

Level 1 - Pricing inputs are quoted prices within active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 - Pricing inputs are quoted prices within active markets for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations that are correlated with or otherwise verifiable by observable market data.

Level 3 - Pricing inputs are unobservable and reflect management's best estimate of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.

a. Fair Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities Recorded at the Carrying Amount.

At September 30, 2015, and December 31, 2014, the carrying amount of cash, cash equivalents, and outstanding commercial paper approximates fair market value due to the short maturity of those investments and obligations. The estimated fair market value of MGE Energy's and MGE's long-term debt is based on quoted market prices for similar financial instruments at September 30, 2015, and December 31, 2014. Since long-term debt is not traded in an active market, it is classified as Level 2. The estimated fair market value of MGE Energy's and MGE's financial instruments are as follows:

September 30, 2015December 31, 2014
(In thousands)Carrying AmountFair ValueCarrying AmountFair Value
MGE Energy
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents$94,267$94,267$65,755$65,755
Liabilities:
Short-term debt - commercial paper--7,0007,000
Long-term debt*396,562446,176399,690457,420
MGE
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents$41,971$41,971$4,562$4,562
Liabilities:
Short-term debt - commercial paper--7,0007,000
Long-term debt*396,562446,176399,690457,420
*Includes long-term debt due within one year.

b. Recurring Fair Value Measurements.

The following table presents the balances of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis for MGE Energy and MGE.

Fair Value as of September 30, 2015
(In thousands)TotalLevel 1Level 2Level 3
MGE Energy
Assets:
Derivatives, net$379$-$-$379
Exchange-traded investments627627--
Total Assets$1,006$627$-$379
Liabilities:
Derivatives, net(a)$57,777$316$-$57,461
Deferred compensation3,160-3,160-
Total Liabilities$60,937$316$3,160$57,461
MGE
Assets:
Derivatives, net$379$-$-$379
Exchange-traded investments122122--
Total Assets$501$122$-$379
Liabilities:
Derivatives, net(a)$57,777$316$-$57,461
Deferred compensation3,160-3,160-
Total Liabilities$60,937$316$3,160$57,461

Fair Value as of December 31, 2014
(In thousands)TotalLevel 1Level 2Level 3
MGE Energy
Assets:
Derivatives, net$642$-$-$642
Exchange-traded investments927927--
Total Assets$1,569$927$-$642
Liabilities:
Derivatives, net(a)$55,640$1,012$-$54,628
Deferred compensation2,832-2,832-
Total Liabilities$58,472$1,012$2,832$54,628
MGE
Assets:
Derivatives, net$642$-$-$642
Exchange-traded investments350350--
Total Assets$992$350$-$642
Liabilities:
Derivatives, net(a)$55,640$1,012$-$54,628
Deferred compensation2,832-2,832-
Total Liabilities$58,472$1,012$2,832$54,628
(a) These amounts are shown gross and exclude $0.8 million and $2.2 million of collateral that was
posted against derivative positions with counterparties as of September 30, 2015, and
December 31, 2014, respectively.

No transfers were made in or out of Level 1 or Level 2 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015.

Investments include exchange-traded investment securities valued using quoted prices on active exchanges and are therefore classified as Level 1.

Derivatives include exchange-traded derivative contracts, over-the-counter transactions, a purchased power agreement, and FTRs. Most exchange-traded derivative contracts are valued based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets and are therefore classified as Level 1. A small number of exchange-traded derivative contracts are valued using quoted market pricing in markets with insufficient volumes and are therefore classified as Level 3. Transactions done with an over-the-counter party are on inactive markets and are therefore considered unobservable and classified as Level 3. These transactions are valued based on quoted prices from markets with similar exchange traded transactions. FTRs are priced based upon monthly auction results for identical or similar instruments in a closed market with limited data available and are therefore classified as Level 3.

The purchased power agreement (see Footnote 9) was valued using an internally-developed pricing model and therefore is classified as Level 3. The model projects future market energy prices and compares those prices to the projected power costs to be incurred under the contract. Inputs to the model require significant management judgment and estimation. Future energy prices are based on a forward power pricing curve using exchange-traded contracts in the electric futures market, where such exchange-traded contracts exist, and upon calculations based on forward gas prices, where such exchange-traded contracts do not exist. A basis adjustment is applied to the market energy price to reflect the price differential between the market price delivery point and the counterparty delivery point. The historical relationship between the delivery points is reviewed and a discount (below 100%) or premium (above 100%) is derived. This comparison is done for both peak times when demand is high and off peak times when demand is low. If the basis adjustment is lowered, the fair value measurement will decrease, and if the basis adjustment is increased, the fair value measurement will increase.

The projected power costs anticipated to be incurred under the purchased power agreement are determined using many factors, including historical generating costs, future prices, and expected fuel mix of the counterparty. An increase in the projected fuel costs would result in a decrease in the fair value measurement of the purchased power agreement. A significant input that MGE estimates is the counterparty's fuel mix in determining the projected power cost. MGE also considers the assumptions that market participants would use in valuing the asset or liability. This consideration includes assumptions about market risk such as liquidity, volatility, and contract duration. The fair value model uses a discount rate that incorporates discounting, credit, and model risks.

This model is prepared by members of MGE's Energy Accounting department. On a quarterly basis, management in the Energy Supply and Finance departments review the assumptions, inputs, and fair value measurements.

The following table presents the significant unobservable inputs used in the pricing model.

Model Input
Significant Unobservable InputsSeptember 30, 2015December 31, 2014
Basis adjustment:
On peak97.4%98.1%
Off peak95.4%95.0%
Counterparty fuel mix:
Internal generation60% - 75%50% - 70%
Purchased power40% - 25%50% - 30%

The deferred compensation plan allows participants to defer certain cash compensation into a notional investment account. These amounts are included within other deferred liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets of MGE Energy and MGE. The notional investments earn interest based upon the semiannual rate of U.S. Treasury Bills having a 26 week maturity increased by 1% compounded monthly with a minimum annual rate of 7%, compounded monthly. The notional investments are based upon observable market data, however, since the deferred compensation obligations themselves are not exchanged in an active market, they are classified as Level 2.

The following table summarizes the changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis for both MGE Energy and MGE.

Three Months EndedNine Months Ended
September 30,September 30,
(In thousands)2015201420152014
Beginning balance$(56,194)$(49,349)$(53,986)$(64,628)
Realized and unrealized gains (losses):
Included in regulatory liabilities (assets)(888)(3,752)(3,096)11,528
Included in other comprehensive income----
Included in earnings(2,285)(1,419)(4,497)5,837
Included in current assets---(89)
Purchases6,3646,37117,49719,900
Sales--34(60)
Issuances----
Settlements(4,079)(4,952)(13,034)(25,589)
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3----
Balance as of September 30,$(57,082)$(53,101)$(57,082)$(53,101)
Total gains (losses) included in earnings attributed to
the change in unrealized gains (losses) related to
assets and liabilities held at September 30,(b)$-$-$-$-

The following table presents total realized and unrealized gains (losses) included in income for Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis for both MGE Energy and MGE (b).

Three Months EndedNine Months Ended
September 30,September 30,
(In thousands)2015201420152014
Purchased Power Expense$(2,302)$(1,411)$(4,515)$5,845
Cost of Gas Sold Expense17(8)18(8)
Total$(2,285)$(1,419)$(4,497)$5,837

(b) MGE's exchange-traded derivative contracts, over-the-counter party transactions, purchased power agreement, and FTRs are subject to regulatory deferral. These derivatives are therefore marked to fair value and are offset in the financial statements with a corresponding regulatory asset or liability.