-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, Wt7Bu2PV3c9TX4l3kOzYhe0VJ+1VcGKOADxu3q9+qBXyR6KAfbm/CNSIEeg+5Eqy lmjQdWhDhg8UhZntI49q9w== 0001193125-06-164945.txt : 20060808 0001193125-06-164945.hdr.sgml : 20060808 20060808094626 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0001193125-06-164945 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 10-Q PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 4 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 20060630 FILED AS OF DATE: 20060808 DATE AS OF CHANGE: 20060808 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: LYDALL INC /DE/ CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000060977 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: TEXTILE MILL PRODUCTS [2200] IRS NUMBER: 060865505 STATE OF INCORPORATION: DE FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 10-Q SEC ACT: 1934 Act SEC FILE NUMBER: 001-07665 FILM NUMBER: 061011211 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: ONE COLONIAL RD STREET 2: P O BOX 151 CITY: MANCHESTER STATE: CT ZIP: 06045-0151 BUSINESS PHONE: 2036461233 FORMER COMPANY: FORMER CONFORMED NAME: COLONIAL BOARD CO DATE OF NAME CHANGE: 19700115 10-Q 1 d10q.htm QUARTERLY REPORT FOR THE PERIOD ENDING JUNE 30, 2006 Quarterly Report for the period ending June 30, 2006
Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 


Form 10-Q

 


 

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006

OR

 

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from              to             

Commission File Number: 1-7665

 


LYDALL, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 


 

Delaware   06-0865505
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
  (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
One Colonial Road, Manchester, Connecticut   06042
(Address of principal executive offices)   (zip code)

 

(860) 646-1233

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

None

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

 


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer  ¨    Accelerated filer  x    Non-accelerated filer  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

 

Common stock $.10 par value per share.  
Total Shares outstanding July 28, 2006   16,221,443

 



Table of Contents

LYDALL, INC.

INDEX

 

              Page
Number
Part I.   Financial Information   
  Item 1.    Financial Statements   
     Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations    3-4
     Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets    5
     Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows    6
     Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements    7-13
  Item 2.    Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations    14-22
  Item 3.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk    23
  Item 4.    Controls and Procedures    23
Part II.   Other Information   
  Item 1.    Legal Proceedings    24
  Item 1A.    Risk Factors    24
  Item 2.    Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds    24
  Item 6.    Exhibits    24
Signature    25
Exhibit Index    26

 

2


Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

LYDALL, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(In Thousands Except Per Share Data)

 

     Quarter Ended
June 30,
     2006    2005
     (Unaudited)

Net sales

   $ 83,445    $ 81,474

Cost of sales

     64,599      64,163
             

Gross margin

     18,846      17,311

Selling, product development and administrative expenses

     14,456      13,406
             

Operating income

     4,390      3,905

Interest expense

     422      502

Other expense, net

     46      140
             

Income before income taxes

     3,922      3,263

Income tax expense

     1,449      1,171
             

Net income

   $ 2,473    $ 2,092
             

Earnings per share:

     

Basic

   $ .15    $ .13

Diluted

   $ .15    $ .13

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:

     

Basic

     16,138      16,067

Diluted

     16,197      16,137

See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

3


Table of Contents

LYDALL, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(In Thousands Except Per Share Data)

 

     Six Months Ended
June 30,
     2006     2005
     (Unaudited)

Net sales

   $ 165,633     $ 153,995

Cost of sales

     128,855       120,604
              

Gross margin

     36,778       33,391

Selling, product development and administrative expenses

     28,966       28,109
              

Operating income

     7,812       5,282

Interest expense

     877       832

Other (income) expense, net

     (17 )     190
              

Income before income taxes

     6,952       4,260

Income tax expense

     2,567       1,525
              

Net income

   $ 4,385     $ 2,735
              

Earnings per share:

    

Basic

   $ .27     $ .17

Diluted

   $ .27     $ .17

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:

    

Basic

     16,138       16,064

Diluted

     16,193       16,148

See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

4


Table of Contents

LYDALL, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In Thousands)

 

     June 30,
2006
    December 31,
2005
 
     (Unaudited)        
ASSETS     

Current assets:

    

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 2,923     $ 2,162  

Accounts receivable, net

     56,034       52,295  

Inventories, net

     33,806       36,754  

Prepaid expenses and other current assets, net

     8,704       7,050  
                

Total current assets

     101,467       98,261  

Property, plant and equipment, at cost

     206,170       204,421  

Accumulated depreciation

     (103,379 )     (100,963 )
                

Net, property, plant and equipment

     102,791       103,458  

Goodwill

     30,884       30,884  

Other assets, net

     16,412       15,646  
                

Total assets

   $ 251,554     $ 248,249  
                
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY     

Current liabilities:

    

Current portion of long-term debt

   $ 1,113     $ 3,185  

Accounts payable

     25,133       23,751  

Accrued payroll and other compensation

     5,954       5,681  

Other accrued liabilities

     9,863       7,939  
                

Total current liabilities

     42,063       40,556  

Long-term debt

     23,201       30,256  

Deferred tax liabilities

     20,643       17,332  

Pension and other long-term liabilities

     10,618       16,876  

Commitments and contingencies

    

Stockholders’ equity:

    

Preferred stock

     —         —    

Common stock

     2,256       2,255  

Capital in excess of par value

     46,233       46,186  

Unearned compensation

     —         (330 )

Retained earnings

     172,893       168,508  

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

     (2,372 )     (9,409 )
                
     219,010       207,210  

Treasury stock, at cost

     (63,981 )     (63,981 )
                

Total stockholders’ equity

     155,029       143,229  
                

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

   $ 251,554     $ 248,249  
                

See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

5


Table of Contents

LYDALL, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In Thousands)

 

     Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
     2006     2005  
     (Unaudited)  

Cash flows from operating activities:

    

Net income

   $ 4,385     $ 2,735  

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from operating activities:

    

Depreciation and amortization

     7,860       7,542  

Accretion of asset retirement obligations

     72       —    

Deferred income taxes

     539       471  

Stock based compensation

     275       157  

Loss on disposition of property, plant and equipment

     315       52  

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

    

Accounts receivable

     (2,615 )     (4,150 )

Inventories

     3,944       (2,200 )

Accounts payable

     852       1,115  

Accrued payroll and other compensation

     276       1,371  

Other, net

     (1,416 )     965  
                

Net cash provided by operating activities

     14,487       8,058  
                

Cash flows from investing activities:

    

Capital expenditures

     (4,029 )     (8,683 )
                

Net cash used for investing activities

     (4,029 )     (8,683 )
                

Cash flows from financing activities:

    

Debt proceeds

     41,450       57,899  

Debt repayments

     (51,462 )     (60,538 )

Reimbursement of cash from leasing company

     —         3,133  

Common stock issued

     103       197  
                

Net cash (used) provided by financing activities

     (9,909 )     691  
                

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash

     212       (333 )
                

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

     761       (267 )

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

     2,162       1,580  
                

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

   $ 2,923     $ 1,313  
                

See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

6


Table of Contents

LYDALL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. Basis of Financial Statement Presentation

Lydall designs and manufactures specialty engineered automotive thermal and acoustical barriers, passive and active industrial thermal and insulating solutions, air and liquid filtration media, medical filtration media and devices and biopharmaceutical processing components for demanding thermal/acoustical and filtration/separation applications.

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Lydall, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company” or the “Registrant”). All financial information is unaudited for the interim periods reported. All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated in the condensed consolidated financial statements. The condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with the same accounting principles followed in the preparation of the Company’s annual financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2005, except for the Company’s adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment,” on January 1, 2006 (See Note 5). The year-end condensed consolidated balance sheet was derived from the December 31, 2005 audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Management believes that all adjustments, which include only normal recurring adjustments necessary to fairly present the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods reported, have been included. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. Certain prior year components of the condensed consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to be consistent with current year presentation.

2. Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations

In March 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Interpretation No. 47, “Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 143” (“FIN 47”). This interpretation clarified the timing of liability recognition for legal obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets when the timing and/or method of settlement of the obligation are conditional on a future event. The Company adopted FIN 47 on October 1, 2005 and determined that conditional legal obligations existed for certain of the Company’s owned and leased facilities related primarily to building materials and leasehold improvements. The Company recorded a liability for conditional asset retirement obligations of approximately $0.6 million as of December 31, 2005.

The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share as if FIN 47 had been applied during the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2005:

 

In thousands except per share amounts

   Quarter Ended
June 30, 2005
    Six Months Ended
June 30, 2005
 

Net income – as reported

   $ 2,092     $ 2,735  

Less: Total depreciation and interest accretion costs, net of tax

     (8 )     (17 )
                

Net income – pro forma

   $ 2,084     $ 2,718  
                

Basic earnings per common share:

    

Net income – as reported

   $ .13     $ .17  

Net income – pro forma

   $ .13     $ .17  

Diluted earnings per common share:

    

Net income – as reported

   $ .13     $ .17  

Net income – pro forma

   $ .13     $ .17  

 

7


Table of Contents

Accrued liabilities for conditional asset retirement obligations as of June 30, 2006 were as follows:

 

In thousands

   Total

Balance as of December 31, 2005

   $ 620

Accretion

     72

Other

     32
      

Balance as of June 30, 2006

   $ 724
      

3. Inventories

Inventories, net of valuation reserves, as of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 were as follows:

 

In thousands

   June 30,
2006
    December 31,
2005
 

Raw materials

   $ 14,026     $ 14,295  

Work in process

     11,664       12,017  

Finished goods

     9,213       11,077  
                
     34,903       37,389  

Less: Progress billings

     (1,097 )     (635 )
                

Total inventories

   $ 33,806     $ 36,754  
                

Raw materials, work in process and finished goods inventories were net of valuation reserves of $2.9 million and $3.2 million as of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively. Progress billings relate to tooling inventory, which is included in work in process inventory in the above table.

4. Earnings Per Share

Basic and diluted earnings per common share are calculated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 128, “Earnings per Share.” Basic earnings per common share are equal to net income divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share are equal to net income divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, including the effect of stock options and stock awards, where such effect is dilutive.

 

     Quarter Ended
June 30, 2006
   Quarter Ended
June 30, 2005

In thousands except per share amounts

   Net
Income
   Average
Shares
   Per Share
Amount
   Net
Income
   Average
Shares
   Per Share
Amount

Basic earnings per share

   $ 2,473    16,138    $ .15    $ 2,092    16,067    $ .13

Effect of dilutive options and awards

     —      59      —        —      70      —  
                                     

Diluted earnings per share

   $ 2,473    16,197    $ .15    $ 2,092    16,137    $ .13
                                     

 

     Six Months Ended
June 30, 2006
   Six Months Ended
June 30, 2005

In thousands except per share amounts

   Net
Income
   Average
Shares
   Per Share
Amount
   Net
Income
   Average
Shares
   Per Share
Amount

Basic earnings per share

   $ 4,385    16,138    $ .27    $ 2,735    16,064    $ .17

Effect of dilutive options and awards

     —      55      —        —      84      —  
                                     

Diluted earnings per share

   $ 4,385    16,193    $ .27    $ 2,735    16,148    $ .17

 

8


Table of Contents

Options to purchase approximately 0.8 million and 1.1 million shares of common stock were excluded from the quarter ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 computations of diluted earnings per share, respectively, and options to purchase approximately 0.8 million and 0.7 million shares of common stock were excluded from the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 computations of diluted earnings per share, respectively. These options were excluded because the assumed proceeds from the exercise were greater than the average market price of the Company’s common stock.

5. Stock Based Compensation

The Company has stock-based compensation plans under which incentive and non-qualified stock options and restricted shares may be granted to employees and outside directors from common stock or treasury shares. Options issued by the Company under its stock option plans have a term of ten years and generally vest ratably over a period of four years. Restricted grants are expensed over the vesting period of the award. Under all stock option plans, the exercise price of the stock option is set on the grant date and may not be less than the fair market value per share on that date.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment.” SFAS No. 123(R) requires that companies account for awards of equity instruments under the fair value method of accounting and recognize such amounts in their statements of operations. The Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R) on January 1, 2006 using the modified prospective method, and in connection therewith compensation expense was recognized in its consolidated statement of operations for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2006. The financial statements of prior interim periods do not reflect any restated amounts. The Company recognizes expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of the entire award. Stock-based compensation expense includes the estimated effects of forfeitures, and such estimates of forfeitures will be adjusted over the requisite service period to the extent actual forfeitures differ, or are expected to differ, from such estimates. The effect of changes in estimated forfeitures will be recognized in the period of change and will also impact the amount of expense to be recognized in future periods. The Company estimates the fair value of option grants based on the Black Scholes option-pricing model. Expected volatility and expected term are based on historical information. The Company determined that its future volatility and expected term are not likely to differ from the Company’s historical stock price volatility and historical exercise data, respectively.

Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company recorded stock-based compensation in accordance with the provisions of APB Opinion 25. The Company estimated the fair value of stock option awards in accordance with SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” and disclosed the resulting estimated compensation effect on net income on a pro forma basis. Forfeitures of employee awards were provided in the pro forma effects as they occurred.

As a result of adopting SFAS 123(R) on January 1, 2006, the Company’s income before income taxes for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2006 was $0.1 million and $0.2 million, lower respectively, than if the Company had continued to account for share based compensation under APB Opinion No. 25. In addition, net income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 was $0.1 million, or $0.01 per diluted share, lower than if the Company had continued to account for share based compensation under APB Opinion No. 25. During the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2006, the Company incurred approximately $0.1 million and $0.3 million, respectively, in expense for all stock-based compensation plans, including restricted stock awards, which was primarily recorded in selling, product development and administrative expense. At June 30, 2006, the total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested awards was approximately $1.2 million, with a weighted average expected amortization period of 3.0 years.

Compensation for restricted stock is recorded based on the market value of the stock on the grant date and amortized to expense over the vesting period of the award. Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company capitalized the full amount of the restricted stock as unearned compensation with an offset to additional paid-in capital. Upon adoption of SFAS 123(R) on January 1, 2006, the Company eliminated the unamortized balance of $0.3 million against additional paid-in capital.

 

9


Table of Contents

The following table illustrates the pro forma effect on net income and earnings per share for compensation cost for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2005 had compensation cost been recognized for the Company’s stock based compensation based on the fair value of the options at the grant dates using the Black-Scholes fair value method for option pricing.

 

In thousands except per share amounts

   Quarter Ended
June 30, 2005
    Six Months Ended
June 30, 2005
 

Net income – as reported

   $ 2,092     $ 2,735  

Add: Stock-based employee compensation expense included in net income, net of related tax effects

     50       100  

Less: Total stock-based employee compensation expense under FAS 123, using the fair value method, net of related tax effects

     (278 )     (553 )
                

Net income – pro forma

   $ 1,864     $ 2,282  
                

Basic earnings per common share:

    

Net income – as reported

   $ .13     $ .17  

Net income – pro forma

   $ .12     $ .14  

Diluted earnings per common share:

    

Net income – as reported

   $ .13     $ .17  

Net income – pro forma

   $ .12     $ .14  

The amounts included in the table above have been adjusted to correct the amount of stock-based compensation expense previously reported under FAS 123. The amounts above have been adjusted in order to reflect the impact of forfeitures of stock options on the reported stock-based employee compensation expense.

The following table is a summary of option activity of the Company’s Plans during the six months ended June 30, 2006:

 

Fixed Options (In thousands except per share data)

   Shares     Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
   Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual Term
(years)
   Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value

Outstanding at December 31, 2005

   1,169     $ 10.47      

Granted

   32     $ 9.35      

Exercised

   (3 )   $ 7.29      

Forfeited/Cancelled

   (34 )   $ 12.20      
              

Outstanding at June 30, 2006

   1,164     $ 10.40    6.40    $ 510
                        

Options exercisable at June 30, 2006

   845     $ 11.26    5.37    $ 116
                        

There were 32,275 options and 19,950 options granted during the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, was less than $0.1 million.

The fair value of each option granted is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions for the quarters ended:

     Quarter Ended June 30,  
     2006     2005  

Risk-free interest rate

   4.86 %   3.75 %

Expected life

   7 years     7 years  

Expected volatility

   41 %   47 %

Expected dividend yield

   0 %   0 %

 

10


Table of Contents

The following is a summary of the Company’s nonvested restricted shares as of June 30, 2006, and changes during the six months ended June 30, 2006:

 

Nonvested Restricted Shares (In thousands except per share data)

   Shares     Weighted-Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value

Nonvested at December 31, 2005

   74     $ 10.95

Granted

   —       $ —  

Vested

   —       $ —  

Forfeited

   (1 )   $ 9.94
        

Nonvested at June 30, 2006

   73     $ 10.96
        

In August 2003, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a Stock Repurchase Program (the “Repurchase Program”) to mitigate the potentially dilutive effects of stock options and shares of restricted and unrestricted stock granted by the Company. Under the Repurchase Program, shares may be purchased by the Company up to the quantity of shares underlying options and other equity-based awards granted after January 1, 2003 under shareholder approved plans. Under the current terms and conditions of its domestic revolving credit facility, the Company’s stock repurchase activity is limited to no more than $1.8 million in any fiscal quarter and no more than $5.0 million during any fiscal year. As of June 30, 2006, there were approximately 0.7 million shares remaining available for purchase under the Repurchase Program. No shares were repurchased during the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2006.

6. Employer Sponsored Benefit Plans

As of June 30, 2006, the Company maintains three defined benefit pension plans (“pension plans”) that cover the majority of domestic Lydall employees. The pension plans are noncontributory and benefits are based on either years of service or eligible compensation paid while a participant is in a plan. The Company’s funding policy is to fund not less than the ERISA minimum funding standard and not more than the maximum amount that can be deducted for federal income tax purposes.

Effective January 1, 2006, Lydall closed its defined benefit pension plans to new employees hired after December 31, 2005, who are not covered under a collective bargaining agreement.

On April 27, 2006, the Board of Directors of the Company approved an amendment to certain of the Company’s domestic defined benefit pension plans, effective June 30, 2006, which provided that benefits under these pension plans will stop accruing for all eligible employees not covered under a collective bargaining agreement. Concurrently, the Board of Directors approved an increase in the Company’s matching cash contribution to the Company’s 401(k) plan to 100 percent of employee pretax contributions up to 6 percent of compensation. The amendment resulted in a pension curtailment loss of $15,000 during the second quarter of 2006.

The measurement of pension plan liabilities at April 30, 2006, for the defined benefit pension plans impacted by the amendment, resulted in the reductions of: (i) additional minimum pension liabilities by $5.1 million, (ii) intangible assets by $0.1 million, (iii) deferred tax assets by $1.9 million and (iv) accumulated other comprehensive loss by $3.1 million, during the quarter ended June 30, 2006.

The Company expects to contribute up to $5.4 million in cash to its defined benefit pension plans in 2006. Contributions of $1.4 million and $2.4 million were made during the quarter ended and six months ended June 30, 2006, respectively. No contributions were made during the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2005.

 

11


Table of Contents

The Company also maintains an unfunded Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP) that provides supplemental income payments after retirement to certain former senior executives. On December 7, 2005, the Company amended the SERP so that no additional participants will be eligible to participate in the SERP and no further benefits will accrue under the SERP after December 31, 2005.

The following is a summary of the components of net periodic benefit cost for the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2006 and June 30, 2005:

 

     Quarter Ended     Six Months Ended  
   June 30,     June 30,  

In thousands

   2006     2005     2006     2005  

Components of net periodic benefit cost:

        

Service cost

   $ 235     $ 452     $ 797     $ 906  

Interest cost

     587       614       1,263       1,232  

Curtailment loss

     15       —         15       —    

Expected return on assets

     (640 )     (596 )     (1,282 )     (1,192 )

Amortization of unrecognized actuarial loss

     104       209       373       421  
                                

Net periodic benefit cost

   $ 301     $ 679     $ 1,166     $ 1,367  
                                

7. Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive income (loss) for the periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 was as follows:

 

     Quarter Ended     Six Months Ended  
   June 30,     June 30,  

In thousands

   2006     2005     2006     2005  

Net Income

   $ 2,473     $ 2,092     $ 4,385     $ 2,735  

Changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):

        

Foreign currency translation

     2,809       (2,436 )     3,963       (4,943 )

Minimum pension liability, net of tax

     3,092       —         3,092       —    

Unrealized (loss) gain on derivative instruments, net of tax

     (31 )     42       (18 )     112  
                                

Total comprehensive income (loss)

   $ 8,343     $ (302 )   $ 11,422     $ (2,096 )
                                

8. Segment Information

Lydall’s reportable segments are: Thermal/Acoustical and Filtration/Separation. All other businesses are aggregated in Other Products and Services. For a full description of each segment, refer to the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” reported in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.

 

12


Table of Contents
     Quarter Ended
June 30,
    Six Months Ended
June 30,
 

In thousands

   2006     2005     2006     2005  

Thermal/Acoustical:

        

Automotive

   $ 44,616     $ 44,288     $ 87,745     $ 81,654  

Passive thermal

     8,255       6,725       16,114       12,994  

Active thermal

     4,399       5,183       9,768       9,347  
                                

Thermal/Acoustical Segment net sales

   $ 57,270     $ 56,196     $ 113,627     $ 103,995  

Filtration/Separation:

        

Filtration

   $ 15,212     $ 15,461     $ 29,864     $ 30,978  

Vital Fluids

     3,292       2,733       7,017       4,711  
                                

Filtration/Separation Segment net sales

   $ 18,504     $ 18,194     $ 36,881     $ 35,689  

Other Products and Services:

        

Transport, distribution and warehousing services

   $ 5,984     $ 5,511     $ 11,517     $ 10,794  

Specialty products

     2,331       2,307       4,866       4,783  
                                

Other Products and Services net sales

   $ 8,315     $ 7,818     $ 16,383     $ 15,577  

Eliminations and Other

     (644 )     (734 )     (1,258 )     (1,266 )
                                

Consolidated Net Sales

   $ 83,445     $ 81,474     $ 165,633     $ 153,995  
                                

Operating income by segment was as follows:

 

     Quarter Ended     Six Months Ended  
   June 30,     June 30,  

In thousands

   2006     2005     2006     2005  

Thermal/Acoustical

   $ 6,631     $ 5,134     $ 12,878     $ 9,003  

Filtration/Separation

     843       1,913       1,801       3,820  

Other Products and Services

     1,036       718       1,599       1,307  

Corporate Office Expenses

     (4,120 )     (3,860 )     (8,466 )     (8,848 )
                                

Consolidated Operating Income

   $ 4,390     $ 3,905     $ 7,812     $ 5,282  
                                

9. Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155, “Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments, an amendment of FASB Statements No. 133 and 140” (“FAS 155”). The Statement eliminates the exemption from applying Statement 133 to interests in securitized financial assets so that similar instruments are accounted for similarly regardless of the form of the instruments and also provides a fair value measurement election. FAS 155 is effective for all financial instruments acquired or issued during fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2006. The adoption of this statement is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In June 2006, the FASB issued, FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109”. This Interpretation clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. This Interpretation prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. This Interpretation also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. This Interpretation is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this Interpretation on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

 

13


Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Cautionary Note Concerning Factors That May Affect Future Results

In the interest of more meaningful disclosure, Lydall and its management make statements regarding the future outlook of the Company, which constitute “forward-looking statements” under the securities laws. These forward-looking statements are intended to provide management’s current expectations for the future operating and financial performance of the Company, based on assumptions and estimates currently believed to be valid. Forward-looking statements are included under the “Overview and Outlook” section of this Item and elsewhere within this report and are generally identified through the use of language such as “believe,” “expect,” “may,” “plan,” “project,” “estimate,” “anticipate” and other words of similar meaning in connection with the discussion of future operating or financial performance. All forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements. Some of the factors that might cause such a difference include risks and uncertainties which are detailed in the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Cautionary Note Concerning Factors That May Affect Future Results” and “Risk Factors” sections of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. These risks include, among others: a major downturn of the automotive market, which accounted for approximately 53 percent of Lydall’s net sales for the six months ended June 30, 2006, dependence on large customers, pricing for automotive products, unforeseen changes in raw material pricing and supply, specifically, aluminum and other metals used in most of the Company’s heat-shield products and various fibers used in thermal/acoustical and filtration/separation products. In addition, increases in energy pricing, inherent risks at international operations, the timing and performance of new-product introductions, and compliance with environmental laws and regulations can impact Lydall’s projected results. Lydall does not undertake to update any forward-looking statement made in this report or that may from time to time be made by or on behalf of the Company.

Overview and Outlook

Business Environment Overview

Lydall designs and manufactures specialty engineered automotive thermal and acoustical barriers, passive and active industrial thermal and insulating solutions, filtration media, medical filtration media and devices and biopharmaceutical processing components for demanding thermal/acoustical and filtration/separation applications. Lydall’s thermal/acoustical and filtration/separation businesses are in markets that present growth opportunities and we expect the businesses to grow over the long term, primarily through the introduction of new products, expansion of share in existing markets and penetration of new markets. As many of Lydall’s operations do business on a worldwide basis, Lydall’s results can be impacted by global, regional and industry economic and political factors.

Global automotive net sales represent approximately 53 percent of the Company’s year-to-date net sales. While the Company experienced approximately 8 percent growth in global automotive net sales in the six months ended June 30, 2006 compared with the same period in 2005, a reduction in vehicle production volumes, or a major decline in the production of specific vehicles in which Lydall has significant content, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s profitability in future quarters.

Global environmental and economic conditions could also impact Lydall’s business segments. Significant increases in energy costs, as well as increases in raw material pricing, specifically, aluminum used in most of the Company’s heat-shield products and various fibers used in thermal/acoustical as well as filtration/separation products, could increase manufacturing costs. The Company expects its aluminum costs to increase during the remainder of 2006, which could lower operating income in future periods, should the Company not have the ability to pass some or all of these incremental costs on to its customers.

 

14


Table of Contents

Operational Matters

During the second quarter and six months ended June 30, 2006, net sales of the Company’s air filtration business, included in the Company’s Filtration/Separation Segment, were lower than in the comparable period of 2005. This decrease was primarily due to a reduction in market share resulting from competitor pricing actions. The Company is working closely with its customers to regain market share. The result of these efforts cannot be determined at this time.

The Vital Fluids’ business, which is part of the Company’s Filtration/Separation Segment, faced operational issues during the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2006. While Vital Fluids’ net sales increased during the quarter and year ended June 30, 2006, higher per unit manufacturing costs as well as inventory obsolescence and a quality issue have had a negative impact on gross margin and operating income.

The Company has continued to focus on Lean Six Sigma initiatives. As this process continues, the Company anticipates that these efforts will identify ways to improve processes and work flow, reduce costs and leverage synergies across the organization. While, the Company has started to see a positive impact on operating margins as a result of Lean Six Sigma initiatives, the Company cannot determine the timing and future impact of these initiatives at this time.

Results of Operations

The following table presents selected statement of operations line items for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2006 on a comparative basis with the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2005 expressed as a relative percentage of consolidated net sales:

 

     Quarter Ended     Six Months Ended  

In thousands

  

June 30,

2006

   

June 30,

2005

   

June 30,

2006

   

June 30,

2005

 

Net sales

   100.0 %   100.0 %   100.0 %   100.0 %

Cost of sales

   77.4 %   78.8 %   77.8 %   78.3 %

Gross margin

   22.6 %   21.2 %   22.2 %   21.7 %

Selling, product development and administrative expenses

   17.3 %   16.5 %   17.5 %   18.3 %

Operating income

   5.3 %   4.8 %   4.7 %   3.4 %

Net income

   3.0 %   2.6 %   2.6 %   1.8 %

Note: All of the following tabular comparisons, unless otherwise indicated, are for the three months ended June 30, 2006 (Q2-06) and June 30, 2005 (Q2-05) and for the six months ended June 30, 2006 (YTD-06) and June 30, 2005 (YTD-05).

Net Sales

 

     Quarter Ended     Six Months Ended  

In thousands

   Q2-06    Q2-05    Percent
Change
    YTD-06    YTD-05    Percent
Change
 

Net sales

   $ 83,445    $ 81,474    2.4 %   $ 165,633    $ 153,995    7.6 %

The increase in net sales for the second quarter of 2006 of $2.0 million or 2.4 percent, compared with 2005, was partially the result of increased net sales from the Thermal/Acoustical segment by $1.1 million. Contributing to this increase were higher passive thermal products and automotive products net sales of $1.5 million and $0.3 million, respectively, offset by a decrease

 

15


Table of Contents

in active thermal products net sales of $0.8 million. The Filtration/Separation segment net sales increased by $0.3 million, as a result of a $0.6 million increase in Vital Fluids’ products net sales, offset by a decrease in filtration media net sales of $0.3 million. Other products and services net sales increased $0.5 million for the quarter.

The increase in net sales for the six months ended June 30, 2006 of $11.6 million or 7.6 percent, compared with 2005, was primarily the result of increased net sales from the Thermal/Acoustical segment of $9.6 million, which included increases in automotive products net sales of $6.1 million, passive thermal products net sales of $3.1 million and active thermal products net sales of $0.4 million. The Filtration/Separation segment net sales increased by $1.2 million, as a result of an increase of $2.3 million in Vital Fluids’ products net sales, partially offset by a decrease in filtration media net sales of $1.1 million. Other products and services net sales increased $0.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006, as compared with 2005.

Gross Margin

 

     Quarter Ended     Six Months Ended  

In thousands

   Q2-06     Q2-05     Percent
Change
    YTD-06     YTD-05     Percent
Change
 

Gross margin

   $ 18,846     $ 17,311     8.9 %   $ 36,778     $ 33,391     10.1 %

Percentage of sales

     22.6 %     21.2 %       22.2 %     21.7 %  

The increase in gross margin percentage in the second quarter of 2006 to 22.6 percent from 21.2 percent in the same period of 2005 was due to increased gross margins in the Company’s Thermal/Acoustical segment, which was partially offset by a decrease in the Filtration/Separation segment gross margin. The combination of higher sales volume and manufacturing process improvements in the Thermal/Acoustical segment contributed to a higher gross margin percentage in 2006 compared to 2005.

The increase in gross margin percentage in the six months ended June 30, 2006 to 22.2 percent from 21.7 percent in the same period of 2005 was principally due to increased gross margins in the Company’s Thermal/Acoustical segment, partially offset by a decrease in Filtration/Separation segment gross margin. The combination of higher sales volume and manufacturing process improvements in the Thermal/Acoustical segment contributed to a higher gross margin percentage in 2006 compared to 2005.

Selling, Product Development and Administrative Expenses

 

     Quarter Ended     Six Months Ended  

In thousands

   Q2-06     Q2-05     Percent
Change
    YTD-06     YTD-05     Percent
Change
 

Selling, product development and administrative expenses

   $ 14,456     $ 13,406     7.8 %   $ 28,966     $ 28,109     3.0 %

Percentage of sales

     17.3 %     16.5 %       17.5 %     18.3 %  

The increase in selling, product development and administrative expenses of $1.1 million in the second quarter of 2006, compared to the same period in 2005, was primarily due to increases in incentive compensation expense of $0.6 million, sales commission expense of $0.3 million and severance expense of $0.2 million. Offsetting these increases was a reduction of $0.2 million in compliance costs related to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“SOX”). The increase in net sales for the current quarter, compared to the prior year’s quarter, contributed to higher sales commission expense in the current quarter.

 

16


Table of Contents

The increase in selling, product development and administrative expenses of $0.9 million in the six months ended June 30, 2006, compared to 2005, was primarily due to increases in incentive compensation expense of $0.4 million, sales commission expense of $0.7 million, salaries and benefits expense of $0.5 million and severance expense of $0.3 million. Offsetting these increases was a reduction of $1.3 million in compliance costs related to SOX. The increase in net sales for the year, compared to the prior year, contributed to higher sales commission expense in the current year. Higher salaries and benefits expense was primarily due to annual wage adjustments and increased health insurance costs, partially offset by lower pension expense.

Interest Expense

 

     Quarter Ended     Six Months Ended  

In thousands

   Q2-06     Q2-05     Percent
Change
    YTD-06     YTD-05     Percent
Change
 

Interest expense

   $ 422     $ 502     (15.9 )%   $ 877     $ 832     5.4 %

Weighted average interest rate

     5.8 %     4.9 %       5.9 %     4.8 %  

Interest expense was lower for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, compared to the quarter ended June 30, 2005, due to lower borrowings partially offset by higher interest rates.

Interest expense was higher for the six months ended June 30, 2006 due to higher interest rates and accretion of interest expense of approximately $0.1 million on the Company’s liabilities for asset retirement obligations.

Other Income/Expense

Other income and expense for the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 consisted of insignificant activity related to foreign exchange transaction gains and losses and investment income.

Income Taxes

The effective tax rate for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 was 36.9 percent compared with 35.9 percent for the same period of 2005. The effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2006 was 36.9 percent compared with 35.8 percent for the same period of 2005. The Company has been informed that an audit of a prior year tax return should be concluded in the third quarter of 2006. Management has not yet determined the impact that this may have on income tax expense for the balance of 2006.

 

17


Table of Contents

Segment Results

The following table presents sales information for the key product and service groups included within each operating segment for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2006 compared with the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2005:

 

In thousands

  

Quarter Ended

June 30, 2006

   

Quarter Ended

June 30, 2005

   

Dollar

Change

   

Percentage

Change

 

Thermal/Acoustical:

        

Automotive

   $ 44,616     $ 44,288     $ 328     0.7 %

Passive thermal

     8,255       6,725       1,530     22.8 %

Active thermal

     4,399       5,183       (784 )   (15.1 )%
                          

Thermal/Acoustical Segment net sales

   $ 57,270     $ 56,196     $ 1,074     1.9 %

Filtration/Separation:

        

Filtration

   $ 15,212     $ 15,461     $ (249 )   (1.6 )%

Vital Fluids

     3,292       2,733       559     20.5 %
                          

Filtration/Separation Segment net sales

   $ 18,504     $ 18,194     $ 310     1.7 %

Other Products and Services:

        

Transport, distribution and warehousing services

   $ 5,984     $ 5,511     $ 473     8.6 %

Specialty products

     2,331       2,307       24     1.0 %
                          

Other Products and Services net sales

   $ 8,315     $ 7,818     $ 497     6.4 %

Eliminations and Other

     (644 )     (734 )     90     12.3 %
                          

Consolidated Net Sales

   $ 83,445     $ 81,474     $ 1,971     2.4 %
                              

 

In thousands

  

Six Months Ended

June 30, 2006

   

Six Months Ended

June 30, 2005

   

Dollar

Change

   

Percentage

Change

 

Thermal/Acoustical:

        

Automotive

   $ 87,745     $ 81,654     $ 6,091     7.5 %

Passive thermal

     16,114       12,994       3,120     24.0 %

Active thermal

     9,768       9,347       421     4.5 %
                          

Thermal/Acoustical Segment net sales

   $ 113,627     $ 103,995     $ 9,632     9.3 %

Filtration/Separation:

        

Filtration

   $ 29,864     $ 30,978     $ (1,114 )   (3.6 )%

Vital Fluids

     7,017       4,711       2,306     48.9 %
                          

Filtration/Separation Segment net sales

   $ 36,881     $ 35,689     $ 1,192     3.3 %

Other Products and Services:

        

Transport, distribution and warehousing services

   $ 11,517     $ 10,794     $ 723     6.7 %

Specialty products

     4,866       4,783       83     1.7 %
                          

Other Products and Services net sales

   $ 16,383     $ 15,577     $ 806     5.2 %

Eliminations and Other

     (1,258 )     (1,266 )     8     0.6 %
                          

Consolidated Net Sales

   $ 165,633     $ 153,995     $ 11,638     7.6 %
                              

 

18


Table of Contents

Operating income by segment was as follows:

 

    

Quarter Ended

June 30, 2006

   

Quarter Ended

June 30, 2005

   

Dollar Change

    Percentage
Change
 

In thousands

  

Operating

Income

   Operating
Margin %
   

Operating

Income

   Operating
Margin %
     

Thermal/Acoustical

   $ 6,631    11.6 %   $ 5,134    9.1 %   $ 1,497     29.2 %

Filtration/Separation

     843    4.6 %     1,913    10.5 %     (1,070 )   (55.9 )%

Other Products and Services

     1,036    12.5 %     718    9.2 %     318     44.3 %

 

    

Six Months Ended

June 30, 2006

   

Six Months Ended

June 30, 2005

    Dollar Change    

Percentage
Change

 

In thousands

  

Operating

Income

   Operating
Margin %
   

Operating

Income

   Operating
Margin %
     

Thermal/Acoustical

   $ 12,878    11.3 %   $ 9,003    8.7 %   $ 3,875     43.0 %

Filtration/Separation

     1,801    4.9 %     3,820    10.7 %     (2,019 )   (52.9 )%

Other Products and Services

     1,599    9.8 %     1,307    8.4 %     292     22.3 %

Thermal/Acoustical

Thermal/Acoustical Segment net sales increased to $57.3 million for the second quarter of 2006 compared with $56.2 million for the same period of 2005. Foreign currency translation impact was insignificant for the second quarter. Passive thermal products sales primarily used in heating, ventilating and air conditioning systems and appliances increased by $1.5 million in the second quarter of 2006 compared with the same quarter of 2005. This increase was due to greater demand and market penetration. In addition, automotive net sales increased $0.3 million, including an increase in automotive parts net sales by $1.8 million, partially offset by lower automotive tooling sales. Sales of Affinity® temperature-control active thermal products decreased by $0.8 million quarter over quarter primarily due to lower demand in the quarter and delayed shipment of certain orders.

The increase in operating income and operating margin percentage in the Thermal/Acoustical Segment for the second quarter of 2006 of $1.5 million and 2.5 percentage points, respectively, compared to the second quarter of 2005, was primarily due to an increase in operating income from the automotive operations. A higher volume of automotive parts sales and increased gross margin percentages contributed to the increase in operating income. Gross margin percentages improved due to lower per-unit manufacturing costs as a result of cost reduction initiatives and higher volumes during the quarter. Lower sales of Affinity® temperature-control active thermal products in the current quarter, compared to the same quarter of 2005, contributed to a reduction in active thermal operating income in the quarter. In addition, incentive compensation expense in the segment was $0.3 million higher for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, as compared to the quarter ended June 30, 2005, which lowered operating income in the current quarter.

Thermal/Acoustical Segment net sales increased to $113.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 compared with $104.0 million for the same period of 2005. Foreign currency translation decreased segment net sales by $1.5 million, or 1.4 percent, for the period. The increase in segment net sales primarily resulted from increased automotive parts sales of 10.1 percent in North America and 7.2 percent in Europe. The Company is benefiting from a strengthening collaboration between our European and domestic operations. This dynamic is enabling the Company to work with customers on a much broader basis, resulting in increased business with European transplants in the United States. The increase in segment net sales also resulted from increased passive thermal products sales primarily used in heating, ventilating and air conditioning systems and appliances, which increased by $3.1 million in the six months ended June 30, 2006 compared with the same period of 2005. This increase was due to greater demand and market penetration. In addition, sales of Affinity® temperature-control active thermal products increased $0.4 million period over period.

 

19


Table of Contents

The increase in operating income and operating margin percentage in the Thermal/Acoustical Segment for the six months ended June 30, 2006 of $3.9 million and 2.6 percentage points, respectively, compared to the same period of 2005, was primarily due to an increase in operating income from the North American and European automotive operations. This increase was primarily due to higher volume of automotive part sales and increased gross margin percentages. Gross margin percentages improved due to lower per-unit manufacturing costs as a result of cost reduction initiatives and higher volumes during the period. Incentive compensation expense and sales commission expense in the segment were each $0.5 million higher for the six months ended June 30, 2006, as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2005, which lowered operating income year-to-date.

Filtration/Separation

Segment net sales increased by $0.3 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 compared with the same period of 2005. Foreign currency translation impact was insignificant for the second quarter. The overall increase in segment net sales for the quarter, compared with the same period of 2005, primarily related to increased net sales for liquid filtration products of $1.0 million and Vital Fluids’ products net sales of $0.6 million, offset by a decrease of air filtration media net sales of $1.3 million. The increase in liquid filtration net sales was due to greater demand from existing and new customers. Vital Fluids’ products net sales increased primarily from greater bioprocessing sales, due to the Company moving back to a more effective direct sales force approach as opposed to external representatives that were utilized prior to 2005, as well as an increase in blood product sales. Blood product net sales were higher in the current quarter due to the prior year quarter sales being impacted by a blood product recall. The decrease in net sales of air filtration media was due to the continued pricing competition in certain markets.

Segment operating income decreased $1.1 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 compared with the same period of 2005. While Vital Fluids’ net sales increased during the current quarter, compared to the same quarter of 2005, gross margin and operating income were negatively impacted by inventory obsolescence and a quality issue resulting in charges aggregating to $0.5 million. In addition, severance expense and incentive compensation expense in the segment were each $0.2 million higher for the second quarter of 2006, as compared to the same period in 2005, which lowered operating income for the segment during the quarter ended June 30, 2006.

Segment net sales increased by $1.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 compared with the same period of 2005. Foreign currency translation decreased segment net sales by $0.5 million, or 1.5 percent, for the period. The overall increase was related to increased sales for liquid filtration products of $1.5 million and Vital Fluids’ products net sales of $2.3 million, offset by a decrease of air filtration media sales of $2.6 million. Liquid filtration net sales increased $1.5 million due to increased demand from existing and new customers. The increase in Vital Fluids’ products net sales was equally attributable to increased blood product sales and bioprocessing sales. Blood product net sales were higher in the current year due to the prior year being impacted by the blood product recall. Bioprocessing sales increased due to the Company moving back to a more effective direct sales force approach as opposed to external representatives that were utilized prior to 2005. The decrease in air filtration media sales was related to the continued pricing competition in certain markets.

Segment operating income decreased $2.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 compared with the same period of 2005. While Vital Fluids’ net sales increased during the current period, compared to the same period of 2005, gross margin and operating income were negatively impacted by inventory obsolescence and a quality issue resulting in charges aggregating to $0.5 million. The decrease in overall segment operating income was also related to lower overall gross margin contribution by air filtration products, as a result of lower sales, partially offset by improvement in the liquid filtration business gross margin due to increased sales. In addition, severance expense and incentive compensation expense in the segment were $0.3 million and $0.2 million higher, respectively, during the six months ended June 30, 2006, as compared to the same period of 2005.

 

20


Table of Contents

Other Products and Services

The increase in Other Products and Services (OPS) net sales of $0.5 million for the second quarter of 2006, compared to the same period in 2005, was primarily related to increased revenues from the trucking and warehousing operations of the transport business. The trucking operations were able to post higher revenues compared with the same period of 2005 through expanded sales to current customers and negotiated price increases. The warehousing operations have benefited from a higher volume of activity.

Operating income from OPS increased $0.3 million in the second quarter of 2006 compared to the same quarter in 2005. Operating margin percentage for OPS increased to 12.5 percent of net sales in 2006, compared with 9.2 percent of net sales in 2005. These increases were primarily due to increased net sales of trucking and warehousing operations and improved gross margin percentages for specialty products.

The increase in Other Products and Services (OPS) net sales of $0.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006, compared to 2005, was primarily related to increased revenues from the trucking and warehousing operations of the transport business. The trucking operations were able to post higher revenues compared with the same period of 2005 through expanded sales to current customers and negotiated price increases. The warehousing operations have benefited from a higher volume of activity.

Operating income from OPS increased by $0.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 compared to the same period in 2005. Operating margin percentage for OPS increased to 9.8 percent of net sales in 2006, compared with 8.4 percent of net sales in 2005. These increases were primarily due to increased net sales of trucking and warehousing operations and improved gross margin percentages for specialty products.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash and cash equivalents were $2.9 million as of June 30, 2006 compared with $2.2 million at December 31, 2005.

Working capital as of June 30, 2006 was $59.4 million compared with $57.7 million as of December 31, 2005. The increase in working capital during the quarter was primarily due to an increase in accounts receivable of $3.7 million and a decrease of $2.1 million in the current portion of long-term debt, offset by a decrease of $2.9 million in inventories. The increase in accounts receivable was due to higher sales in the second quarter of 2006 compared to the fourth quarter of 2005. The reduction in the current portion of long-term debt was due to paying off debt with cash flow generated from operations.

Capital expenditures were $4.0 million for the six months of 2006, compared with $8.7 million for the same period of 2005. Capital spending for 2006 is expected to be approximately $11.0 million to $13.0 million.

As of June 30, 2006, the Company reduced its total outstanding debt by $9.1 million since December 31, 2005, utilizing cash flow generated from operations. The Company had unused borrowing capacity of $46.0 million under various credit facilities as of June 30, 2006. Management believes that ongoing operations and current financing arrangements provide sufficient capacity to meet working capital and pension funding requirements and to fund future capital expenditures.

Critical Accounting Estimates

The preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Note 1 of the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 and the “Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements” of this report describe the significant accounting policies and critical accounting estimates used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements. The Company’s management is required to make judgments and estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. Actual results could differ from management’s estimates. Other than described below, there have been no significant changes in the Company’s critical accounting estimates during the six months ended June 30, 2006.

 

21


Table of Contents

Pensions

On April 27, 2006, the Board of Directors of the Company approved an amendment to certain of the Company’s domestic defined benefit pension plans, effective June 30, 2006, which provided that benefits under these pension plans will stop accruing for all eligible employees not covered under a collective bargaining agreement. Concurrently, the Board of Directors approved an increase in the Company’s matching cash contribution to the Company’s 401(k) plan to 100 percent of employee pretax contributions up to 6 percent of compensation. The amendment resulted in a pension curtailment loss of $15,000 during the second quarter of 2006. The Company recorded a reduction in its employee sponsored benefit plans’ expense of $0.4 million in the second quarter of 2006 compared to the second quarter of 2005. As a result of the amendment and based on pension plan assumptions at the measurement date of April 30, 2006, pension expense for 2006 is expected to be approximately $2.2 million lower than the projected pension expense of $3.5 million previously disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. In addition, the Company expects its matching contribution expense to the Company’s 401(k) plan to increase by approximately $0.4 million - $0.6 million in 2006.

The measurement of pension plan liabilities at April 30, 2006, for the defined benefit pension plans impacted by the amendment, resulted in the reductions of: (i) additional minimum pension liabilities by $5.1 million, (ii) intangible assets by $0.1 million, (iii) deferred tax assets by $1.9 million and (iv) accumulated other comprehensive loss by $3.1 million, during the quarter ended June 30, 2006.

The Company expects to contribute up to $5.4 million in cash to its defined benefit pension plans in 2006. Contributions of $1.4 million and $2.4 million were made during the quarter ended and six months ended June 30, 2006, respectively. No contributions were made during the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2005.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

On January 1, 2006 the Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R) using the modified prospective transition method. SFAS No. 123(R) requires that companies account for awards of equity instruments under the fair value method of accounting and recognize such amounts in their statements of operations. The Company now recognizes compensation expense in its consolidated statements of operations over the service period that the awards are expected to vest. During the six month period ended June 30, 2006, the Company incurred approximately $0.2 million in expense for its stock-based compensation plans, including restricted stock awards, which was primarily recorded in selling, product development and administrative expenses. At June 30, 2006, the total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested awards was approximately $1.2 million, with a weighted average expected amortization period of 3.0 years.

In February 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 155, “Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments, an amendment of FASB Statements No. 133 and 140” (“FAS 155”). The Statement eliminates the exemption from applying Statement 133 to interests in securitized financial assets so that similar instruments are accounted for similarly regardless of the form of the instruments and also provides a fair value measurement election. This statement is effective for all financial instruments acquired or issued during fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2006. The adoption of this statement is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109”. This Interpretation clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. This Interpretation prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. This Interpretation also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. This Interpretation is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this Interpretation on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

 

22


Table of Contents

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

There have been no material changes in market risks from those disclosed in Item 7A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company’s management, including the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer and Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, conducted an evaluation as of June 30, 2006 of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e)). Based on that evaluation, the President and Chief Executive Officer and Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective in ensuring that all material information required to be disclosed in the reports the Company files and submits under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 has been made known to them on a timely basis and that it has been properly recorded, processed, summarized and reported, as required.

Changes in Internal Controls

There have not been any changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting during the six months ended June 30, 2006 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting.

 

23


Table of Contents

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

On July 18, 2003, a lawsuit was filed in the Superior Court in Hartford, Connecticut by the Company against a former employee. On November 2, 2004 the Connecticut Superior Court rendered its decision on this matter, fully sustaining the Company’s claims against the former employee. The Court held an additional hearing at which it found the former employee to be liable to the Company for actual damages, punitive damages and payment of the Company’s attorney fees. The Court’s rulings have been appealed by the former employee and the appeal was heard by the Connecticut Supreme Court in the second quarter of 2006. At this time, the Company cannot determine the outcome of the appeal. The final resolution of this matter may have a material impact on the future results of operations and cash flows of the Company.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

There have been no material changes from risk factors as previously disclosed in Item 1A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

In August 2003, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a Stock Repurchase Program (the “Repurchase Program”) to mitigate the potentially dilutive effects of stock options and shares of restricted and unrestricted stock granted by the Company. Under the approved Repurchase Program, shares may be purchased by the Company up to the quantity of shares underlying options and other equity-based awards granted after January 1, 2003 under shareholder approved plans. There were approximately 0.7 million shares that remained available for repurchase under the Repurchase Program as of June 30, 2006. No shares were repurchased during the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2006.

Item 6. Exhibits

 

Exhibit
Number

  

Description

  3.1    Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant, as amended, filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K dated March 12, 2004 and incorporated herein by this reference.
  3.2    Bylaws of the Registrant, as amended and restated as of December 11, 2003, filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on 10-K dated March 12, 2004 and incorporated herein by this reference.
31.1    Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, filed herewith.
31.2    Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, filed herewith.
32.1    Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.

 

24


Table of Contents

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

    LYDALL, INC.

August 8, 2006

    By:  

/s/ Thomas P. Smith

     

Thomas P. Smith

Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

(On behalf of the Registrant and as

Principal Financial Officer)

 

25


Table of Contents

LYDALL, INC.

Index to Exhibits

 

Exhibit
Number

    
  3.1   Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant, as amended, filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K dated March 12, 2004 and incorporated herein by this reference.
  3.2   Bylaws of the Registrant, as amended and restated as of December 11, 2003, filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on 10-K dated March 12, 2004 and incorporated herein by this reference.
31.1   Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, filed herewith.
31.2   Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, filed herewith.
32.1   Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.

 

26

EX-31.1 2 dex311.htm CERTIFICATION OF THE CEO PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(A) AND RULE 15D-14(A) Certification of the CEO Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a)

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, David Freeman, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Lydall, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

 

  a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

  b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 

  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

  a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

August 8, 2006

 

/s/ David Freeman

   

David Freeman

President and Chief Executive Officer

EX-31.2 3 dex312.htm CERTIFICATION OF THE CFO PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(A) AND RULE 15D-14(A) Certification of the CFO Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a)

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Thomas P. Smith, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Lydall, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

 

  a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

  b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 

  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

  a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

August 8, 2006

 

/s/ Thomas P. Smith

   

Thomas P. Smith

Vice President, Chief Financial

Officer and Treasurer

EX-32.1 4 dex321.htm CERTIFICATION OF THE CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 Certification of the CEO and CFO pursuant to Section 906

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lydall, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned officers of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:

 

  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

The foregoing certifications are accompanying the Form 10-Q solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and are not being filed as a part of this Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.

 

August 8, 2006

 

/s/ David Freeman

 

David Freeman

President and Chief Executive Officer

August 8, 2006

 

/s/ Thomas P. Smith

 

Thomas P. Smith

Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

-----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----