|
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 | |
| FORM 10-Q | |
| [X] | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2015 |
| OR | |
| [ ] | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 for the transition period from _________ to ___________ |
|
Commission File Number |
Registrant; State of Incorporation; Address and Telephone Number |
IRS Employer Identification No. |
| 1-11459 |
PPL Corporation (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter) (Pennsylvania) Two North Ninth Street Allentown, PA 18101-1179 (610) 774-5151 |
23-2758192 |
| 1-905 |
PPL Electric Utilities Corporation (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter) (Pennsylvania) Two North Ninth Street Allentown, PA 18101-1179 (610) 774-5151 |
23-0959590 |
| 333-173665 |
LG&E and KU Energy LLC (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter) (Kentucky) 220 West Main Street Louisville, KY 40202-1377 (502) 627-2000 |
20-0523163 |
| 1-2893 |
Louisville Gas and Electric Company (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter) (Kentucky) 220 West Main Street Louisville, KY 40202-1377 (502) 627-2000 |
61-0264150 |
| 1-3464 |
Kentucky Utilities Company (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter) (Kentucky and Virginia) One Quality Street Lexington, KY 40507-1462 (502) 627-2000 |
61-0247570 |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrants (1) have filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrants were required to file such reports), and (2) have been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
| PPL Corporation | Yes X | No | ||
| PPL Electric Utilities Corporation | Yes X | No | ||
| LG&E and KU Energy LLC | Yes X | No | ||
| Louisville Gas and Electric Company | Yes X | No | ||
| Kentucky Utilities Company | Yes X | No |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrants have submitted electronically and posted on their corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrants were required to submit and post such files).
| PPL Corporation | Yes X | No | ||
| PPL Electric Utilities Corporation | Yes X | No | ||
| LG&E and KU Energy LLC | Yes X | No | ||
| Louisville Gas and Electric Company | Yes X | No | ||
| Kentucky Utilities Company | Yes X | No |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrants are large accelerated filers, accelerated filers, non-accelerated filers, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
Large accelerated filer |
Accelerated filer |
Non-accelerated filer |
Smaller reporting company | ||
| PPL Corporation | [ X ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | |
| PPL Electric Utilities Corporation | [ ] | [ ] | [ X ] | [ ] | |
| LG&E and KU Energy LLC | [ ] | [ ] | [ X ] | [ ] | |
| Louisville Gas and Electric Company | [ ] | [ ] | [ X ] | [ ] | |
| Kentucky Utilities Company | [ ] | [ ] | [ X ] | [ ] |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrants are shell companies (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
| PPL Corporation | Yes | No X | ||
| PPL Electric Utilities Corporation | Yes | No X | ||
| LG&E and KU Energy LLC | Yes | No X | ||
| Louisville Gas and Electric Company | Yes | No X | ||
| Kentucky Utilities Company | Yes | No X |
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
| PPL Corporation | Common stock, $0.01 par value, 669,969,737 shares outstanding at July 24, 2015. | |
| PPL Electric Utilities Corporation | Common stock, no par value, 66,368,056 shares outstanding and all held by PPL Corporation at July 24, 2015. | |
| LG&E and KU Energy LLC | PPL Corporation directly holds all of the membership interests in LG&E and KU Energy LLC. | |
| Louisville Gas and Electric Company | Common stock, no par value, 21,294,223 shares outstanding and all held by LG&E and KU Energy LLC at July 24, 2015. | |
| Kentucky Utilities Company | Common stock, no par value, 37,817,878 shares outstanding and all held by LG&E and KU Energy LLC at July 24, 2015. |
This document is available free of charge at the Investors section of PPL Corporation's website at www.pplweb.com. However, information on this website does not constitute a part of this Form 10-Q.
PPL ELECTRIC UTILITIES CORPORATION
LG&E and KU Energy LLC
Louisville Gas and Electric Company
Kentucky Utilities Company
FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED June 30, 2015
Table of Contents
This combined Form 10-Q is separately filed by the following Registrants in their individual capacity: PPL Corporation, PPL Electric Utilities Corporation, LG&E and KU Energy LLC, Louisville Gas and Electric Company and Kentucky Utilities Company. Information contained herein relating to any individual Registrant is filed by such Registrant solely on its own behalf, and no Registrant makes any representation as to information relating to any other Registrant, except that information under "Forward-Looking Information" relating to subsidiaries of PPL Corporation is also attributed to PPL Corporation and information relating to the subsidiaries of LG&E and KU Energy LLC is also attributed to LG&E and KU Energy LLC.
Unless otherwise specified, references in this Report, individually, to PPL Corporation, PPL Electric Utilities Corporation, LG&E and KU Energy LLC, Louisville Gas and Electric Company and Kentucky Utilities Company are references to such entities directly or to one or more of their subsidiaries, as the case may be, the financial results of which subsidiaries are consolidated into such Registrants in accordance with GAAP. This presentation has been applied where identification of particular subsidiaries is not material to the matter being disclosed, and to conform narrative disclosures to the presentation of financial information on a consolidated basis.
(THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY.)
GLOSSARY OF TERMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
PPL Corporation and its subsidiaries
KU - Kentucky Utilities Company, a public utility subsidiary of LKE engaged in the regulated generation, transmission, distribution and sale of electricity, primarily in Kentucky.
LG&E - Louisville Gas and Electric Company, a public utility subsidiary of LKE engaged in the regulated generation, transmission, distribution and sale of electricity and the distribution and sale of natural gas in Kentucky.
LKE - LG&E and KU Energy LLC, a subsidiary of PPL and the parent of LG&E, KU and other subsidiaries.
LKS - LG&E and KU Services Company, a subsidiary of LKE that provides services to LKE and its subsidiaries.
PPL - PPL Corporation, the parent holding company of PPL Electric, PPL Energy Funding, PPL Capital Funding, LKE and other subsidiaries.
PPL Capital Funding - PPL Capital Funding, Inc., a financing subsidiary of PPL that provides financing for the operations of PPL and certain subsidiaries. Debt issued by PPL Capital Funding is guaranteed as to payment by PPL.
PPL Electric - PPL Electric Utilities Corporation, a public utility subsidiary of PPL engaged in the regulated transmission and distribution of electricity in its Pennsylvania service area and that provides electricity supply to its retail customers in this area as a PLR.
PPL Energy Funding - PPL Energy Funding Corporation, a subsidiary of PPL and the parent holding company of PPL Global and other subsidiaries.
PPL EU Services - PPL EU Services Corporation, a subsidiary of PPL that, beginning in 2015, provides support services and corporate functions such as financial, supply chain, human resources and information technology services primarily to PPL Electric and its affiliates.
PPL Global - PPL Global, LLC, a subsidiary of PPL Energy Funding that, primarily through its subsidiaries, owns and operates WPD, PPL's regulated electricity distribution businesses in the U.K.
PPL Services - PPL Services Corporation, a subsidiary of PPL that provides services to PPL and its subsidiaries.
PPL WPD Limited - an indirect U.K. subsidiary of PPL Global. PPL WPD Limited holds a liability for a closed defined benefit pension plan and a receivable with WPD plc.
Registrant(s) - refers to the Registrants named on the cover of this Report (each a "Registrant" and collectively, the "Registrants").
Subsidiary Registrant(s) - Registrants that are direct or indirect wholly owned subsidiaries of PPL: PPL Electric, LKE, LG&E and KU.
WPD - refers to WPD plc and its subsidiaries together with a sister company PPL WPD Ltd.
WPD (East Midlands) - Western Power Distribution (East Midlands) plc, a British regional electricity distribution utility company.
WPD plc - Western Power Distribution plc, formerly known as Western Power Distribution Limited, an indirect U.K. subsidiary of PPL Global. Its principal indirectly owned subsidiaries are WPD (East Midlands), WPD (South Wales), WPD (South West) and WPD (West Midlands).
WPD Midlands - refers to WPD (East Midlands) and WPD (West Midlands), collectively.
WPD (South Wales) - Western Power Distribution (South Wales) plc, a British regional electricity distribution utility company.
| i |
WPD (South West) - Western Power Distribution (South West) plc, a British regional electricity distribution utility company.
WPD (West Midlands) - Western Power Distribution (West Midlands) plc, a British regional electricity distribution utility company.
WKE - Western Kentucky Energy Corp., a subsidiary of LKE that leased certain non-utility generating plants in western Kentucky until July 2009.
Other terms and abbreviations
£ - British pound sterling.
2014 Form 10-K - Annual Report to the SEC on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 Form 10-K.
Act 11 - Act 11 of 2012 that became effective on April 16, 2012. The Pennsylvania legislation authorizes the PUC to approve two specific ratemaking mechanisms: the use of a fully projected future test year in base rate proceedings and, subject to certain conditions, a DSIC.
Act 129 - Act 129 of 2008 that became effective in October 2008. The law amends the Pennsylvania Public Utility Code and creates an energy efficiency and conservation program and smart metering technology requirements, adopts new PLR electricity supply procurement rules, provides remedies for market misconduct and changes to the Alternative Energy Portfolio Standard (AEPS).
AFUDC - Allowance for Funds Used During Construction, the cost of equity and debt funds used to finance construction projects of regulated businesses, which is capitalized as part of construction costs.
AOCI - accumulated other comprehensive income or loss.
ARO - asset retirement obligation.
Basis - when used in the context of derivatives and commodity trading, the commodity price differential between two locations, products or time periods.
Cane Run Unit 7 - a natural gas combined-cycle unit in Kentucky, jointly owned by LG&E and KU, which provides electric generating capacity of 640 MW (141 MW and 499 MW to LG&E and KU).
CCR(s) - Coal Combustion Residual(s). CCRs include fly ash, bottom ash and sulfur dioxide scrubber wastes.
Clean Air Act - federal legislation enacted to address certain environmental issues related to air emissions, including acid rain, ozone and toxic air emissions.
Clean Water Act - federal legislation enacted to address certain environmental issues relating to water quality including effluent discharges, cooling water intake, and dredge and fill activities.
COBRA - Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act, which provides individuals the option to temporarily continue employer group health insurance coverage after termination of employment.
CPCN - Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity. Authority granted by the KPSC pursuant to Kentucky Revised Statute 278.020 to provide utility service to or for the public or the construction of certain plant, equipment, property or facility for furnishing of utility service to the public.
Customer Choice Act - the Pennsylvania Electricity Generation Customer Choice and Competition Act, legislation enacted to restructure the state's electric utility industry to create retail access to a competitive market for generation of electricity.
DNO - Distribution Network Operator in the U.K.
| ii |
DOJ - U.S. Department of Justice.
DPCR4 - Distribution Price Control Review 4, the U.K. five-year rate review period applicable to WPD that commenced April 1, 2005.
DPCR5 - Distribution Price Control Review 5, the U.K. five-year rate review period applicable to WPD that commenced April 1, 2010.
DRIP - PPL Amended and Restated Dividend Reinvestment and Direct Stock Purchase Plan.
DSIC - the Distribution System Improvement Charge authorized under Act 11, which is an alternative ratemaking mechanism providing more-timely cost recovery of qualifying distribution system capital expenditures.
DSM - Demand Side Management. Pursuant to Kentucky Revised Statute 278.285, the KPSC may determine the reasonableness of DSM plans proposed by any utility under its jurisdiction. Proposed DSM mechanisms may seek full recovery of costs and revenues lost by implementing DSM programs and/or incentives designed to provide financial rewards to the utility for implementing cost-effective DSM programs. The cost of such programs shall be assigned only to the class or classes of customers which benefit from the programs.
ECR - Environmental Cost Recovery. Pursuant to Kentucky Revised Statute 278.183, Kentucky electric utilities are entitled to the current recovery of costs of complying with the Clean Air Act, as amended, and those federal, state or local environmental requirements that apply to coal combustion wastes and by-products from the production of energy from coal.
EEI - Edison Electric Institute, the association that represents U.S. investor-owned electric companies.
ELG(s) - Effluent Limitation Guidelines, regulations promulgated by the EPA.
EPA - Environmental Protection Agency, a U.S. government agency.
EPS - earnings per share.
Equity Unit(s) - a PPL equity unit, issued in April 2011, consisting of a Purchase Contract and, initially, a 5.0% undivided beneficial ownership interest in $1,000 principal amount of PPL Capital Funding 4.32% Junior Subordinated Notes due 2019.
E.W. Brown - a generating station in Kentucky with capacity of 1,594 MW.
FERC - Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, the U.S. federal agency that regulates, among other things, interstate transmission and wholesale sales of electricity, hydroelectric power projects and related matters.
FGD - flue-gas desulfurization, a pollution control process for the removal of sulfur dioxide from exhaust gas.
Fitch - Fitch, Inc., a credit rating agency.
GAAP - Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the U.S.
GBP - British pound sterling.
GHG - greenhouse gas(es).
GLT - Gas Line Tracker. The KPSC approved LG&E's recovery of costs associated with gas service lines, gas risers, leak mitigation, and gas main replacements. Rate recovery became effective on January 1, 2013.
Holdco - Talen Energy Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation, which was formed for the purposes of the June 1, 2015 spinoff of PPL Energy Supply, LLC.
| iii |
If-Converted Method - A method applied to calculate diluted EPS for a company with outstanding convertible debt. The method is applied as follows: Interest charges (after-tax) applicable to the convertible debt are added back to net income and the convertible debt is assumed to have been converted to equity at the beginning of the period, and the resulting common shares are treated as outstanding shares. Both adjustments are made only for purposes of calculating diluted EPS. This method was applied to PPL's Equity Units prior to settlement.
IRS - Internal Revenue Service, a U.S. government agency.
KPSC - Kentucky Public Service Commission, the state agency that has jurisdiction over the regulation of rates and service of utilities in Kentucky.
LIBOR - London Interbank Offered Rate.
MATS - Mercury and Air Toxics Standards, regulations promulgated by the EPA.
Moody's - Moody's Investors Service, Inc., a credit rating agency.
MW - megawatt, one thousand kilowatts.
NAAQS - National Ambient Air Quality Standards periodically adopted pursuant to the Clean Air Act.
NERC - North American Electric Reliability Corporation.
NGCC - Natural gas-fired combined-cycle generating plant.
NorthWestern - NorthWestern Corporation, a Delaware corporation, and successor in interest to Montana Power's electricity delivery business, including Montana Power's rights and obligations under contracts with PPL Montana.
NPNS - the normal purchases and normal sales exception as permitted by derivative accounting rules. Derivatives that qualify for this exception may receive accrual accounting treatment.
NRC - Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the U.S. federal agency that regulates nuclear power facilities.
OCI - other comprehensive income or loss.
Ofgem - Office of Gas and Electricity Markets, the British agency that regulates transmission, distribution and wholesale sales of electricity and related matters.
OVEC - Ohio Valley Electric Corporation, located in Piketon, Ohio, an entity in which LKE indirectly owns an 8.13% interest (consists of LG&E's 5.63% and KU's 2.50% interests), which is accounted for as a cost-method investment. OVEC owns and operates two coal-fired power plants, the Kyger Creek plant in Ohio and the Clifty Creek plant in Indiana, with combined summer rating capacities of 2,120 MW.
PLR - Provider of Last Resort, the role of PPL Electric in providing default electricity supply within its delivery area to retail customers who have not chosen to select an alternative electricity supplier under the Customer Choice Act.
PP&E - property, plant and equipment.
PPL EnergyPlus - prior to the June 1, 2015 spinoff of PPL Energy Supply, PPL EnergyPlus, LLC, a subsidiary of PPL Energy Supply that marketed and traded wholesale and retail electricity and gas, and supplied energy and energy services in competitive markets.
PPL Energy Supply - prior to the June 1, 2015 spinoff , PPL Energy Supply, LLC, a subsidiary of PPL Energy Funding and the parent company of PPL EnergyPlus and other subsidiaries.
PPL Montana - prior to the June 1, 2015 spinoff of PPL Energy Supply, PPL Montana, LLC, an indirect subsidiary of PPL Energy Supply, LLC that generated electricity for wholesale sales in Montana and the Pacific Northwest.
| iv |
PUC - Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, the state agency that regulates certain ratemaking, services, accounting and operations of Pennsylvania utilities.
RAV - regulatory asset value. This term, used within the U.K. regulatory environment, is also commonly known as RAB or regulatory asset base. RAV is based on historical investment costs at time of privatization, plus subsequent allowed additions less annual regulatory depreciation, and represents the value on which DNOs earn a return in accordance with the regulatory cost of capital. RAV is indexed to Retail Price Index (RPI) in order to allow for the effects of inflation. Since the beginning of DPCR5 in April 2010, RAV additions have been based on a percentage of annual total expenditures, which will continue from April 2015 under RIIO-ED1. RAV is intended to represent expenditures that have a long-term benefit to WPD (similar to capital projects for the U.S. regulated businesses that are generally included in rate base).
RCRA - Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976.
Regulation S-X - SEC regulation governing the form and content of and requirements for financial statements required to be filed pursuant to the federal securities laws.
RFC - ReliabilityFirst Corporation, one of eight regional entities with delegated authority from NERC that work to safeguard the reliability of the bulk power systems throughout North America.
RIIO-ED1 - RIIO represents "Revenues = Incentive + Innovation + Outputs." RIIO-ED1 refers to the initial eight-year rate review period applicable to WPD which commenced April 1, 2015.
Riverstone - Riverstone Holdings LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and ultimate parent company of the entities that own the competitive power generation business contributed to Talen Energy other than the competitive power generation business contributed by virtue of the spinoff of a newly formed parent of PPL Energy Supply.
RJS Power - RJS Generation Holdings LLC, a Delaware limited liability company controlled by Riverstone, that owns the competitive power generation business contributed by its owners to Talen Energy other than the competitive power generation business contributed by virtue of the spinoff of a newly formed parent of PPL Energy Supply.
RMC - Risk Management Committee.
S&P - Standard & Poor's Ratings Services, a credit rating agency.
Sarbanes-Oxley - Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which sets requirements for management's assessment of internal controls for financial reporting. It also requires an independent auditor to make its own assessment.
SCRs - selective catalytic reduction, a pollution control process for the removal of nitrogen oxide from exhaust gas.
Scrubber - an air pollution control device that can remove particulates and/or gases (primarily sulfur dioxide) from exhaust gases.
SEC - the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, a U.S. government agency primarily responsible to protect investors and maintain the integrity of the securities markets.
SERC - SERC Reliability Corporation, one of eight regional entities with delegated authority from NERC that work to safeguard the reliability of the bulk power systems throughout North America.
Smart meter - an electric meter that utilizes smart metering technology.
Smart metering technology - technology that can measure, among other things, time of electricity consumption to permit offering rate incentives for usage during lower cost or demand intervals. The use of this technology also has the potential to strengthen network reliability.
Superfund - federal environmental statute that addresses remediation of contaminated sites; states also have similar statutes.
Talen Energy - Talen Energy Corporation, the Delaware corporation formed to be the publicly traded company and owner of the competitive generation assets of PPL Energy Supply and certain affiliates of Riverstone.
| v |
Talen Energy Marketing - PPL EnergyPlus' new name subsequent to the spinoff of PPL Energy Supply.
Tolling agreement - agreement whereby the owner of an electricity generating facility agrees to use that facility to convert fuel provided by a third party into electricity for delivery back to the third party.
Total shareowner return - the change in market value of a share of the Company's common stock plus the value of all dividends paid on a share of the common stock during the applicable performance period, divided by the price of the common stock as of the beginning of the performance period. The price used for purposes of this calculation is the average share price for the 20 trading days at the beginning and end of the applicable period.
Treasury Stock Method - A method applied to calculate diluted EPS that assumes any proceeds that could be obtained upon exercise of options and warrants (and their equivalents) would be used to purchase common stock at the average market price during the relevant period.
VaR - value-at-risk, a statistical model that attempts to estimate the value of potential loss over a given holding period under normal market conditions at a given confidence level.
Volumetric risk - the risk that the actual load volumes provided under full-requirement sales contracts could vary significantly from forecasted volumes.
VSCC - Virginia State Corporation Commission, the state agency that has jurisdiction over the regulation of Virginia corporations, including utilities.
| vi |
Statements contained in this Form 10-Q concerning expectations, beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, strategies, future events or performance and underlying assumptions and other statements that are other than statements of historical fact are "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the federal securities laws. Although the Registrants believe that the expectations and assumptions reflected in these statements are reasonable, there can be no assurance that these expectations will prove to be correct. Forward-looking statements are subject to many risks and uncertainties, and actual results may differ materially from the results discussed in forward-looking statements. In addition to the specific factors discussed in each Registrant's 2014 Form 10-K and in "Item 2. Combined Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in this Form 10-Q, the following are among the important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements.
| · | fuel supply; |
| · | continuing ability to recover fuel costs and environmental expenditures in a timely manner at LG&E and KU, and natural gas supply costs at LG&E; |
| · | weather conditions affecting customer energy use; |
| · | availability of existing generation facilities; |
| · | the duration of and cost associated with unscheduled outages at our generating facilities; |
| · | transmission and distribution system conditions and operating costs; |
| · | expansion of alternative sources of electricity generation; |
| · | collective labor bargaining negotiations; |
| · | the outcome of litigation against the Registrants and their subsidiaries; |
| · | potential effects of threatened or actual terrorism, war or other hostilities, cyber-based intrusions or natural disasters; |
| · | the commitments and liabilities of the Registrants and their subsidiaries; |
| · | the effectiveness of our risk management techniques, including hedging; |
| · | our ability to attract and retain qualified employees; |
| · | volatility in market demand and prices for energy and transmission services; |
| · | competition in retail and wholesale power and natural gas markets; |
| · | market prices of commodity inputs for ongoing capital expenditures; |
| · | capital market conditions, including the availability of capital or credit, changes in interest rates and certain economic indices, and decisions regarding capital structure; |
| · | stock price performance of PPL; |
| · | volatility in the fair value of debt and equity securities and its impact on the value of assets in defined benefit plans, and the potential cash funding requirements if fair value declines; |
| · | interest rates and their effect on pension and retiree medical liabilities and interest payable on certain debt securities; |
| · | volatility in or the impact of other changes in financial markets and economic conditions; |
| · | new accounting requirements or new interpretations or applications of existing requirements; |
| · | changes in securities and credit ratings; |
| · | changes in foreign currency exchange rates for British pound sterling; |
| · | current and future environmental conditions, regulations and other requirements and the related costs of compliance, including environmental capital expenditures, emission allowance costs and other expenses; |
| · | changes in political, regulatory or economic conditions in states, regions or countries where the Registrants or their subsidiaries conduct business; |
| · | receipt of necessary governmental permits, approvals and rate relief; |
| · | new state, federal or foreign legislation or regulatory developments; |
| · | the outcome of any rate cases or other cost recovery or revenue filings by PPL Electric, LG&E, KU or WPD; |
| · | the impact of any state, federal or foreign investigations applicable to the Registrants and their subsidiaries and the energy industry; |
| · | the effect of any business or industry restructuring; |
| · | development of new projects, markets and technologies; |
| · | performance of new ventures; and |
| · | business dispositions or acquisitions and our ability to realize expected benefits from such business transactions. |
Any such forward-looking statements should be considered in light of such important factors and in conjunction with other documents of the Registrants on file with the SEC.
| 1 |
New factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in forward-looking statements emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for the Registrants to predict all such factors, or the extent to which any such factor or combination of factors may cause actual results to differ from those contained in any forward-looking statement. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which such statement is made, and the Registrants undertake no obligation to update the information contained in such statement to reflect subsequent developments or information.
| 2 |
The accompanying
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.
| 3 |
The accompanying
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.
| 4 |
The accompanying
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.
| 5 |
The accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial
Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.
| 6 |
| CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS | |||||||||
| PPL Corporation and Subsidiaries | |||||||||
| (Unaudited) | |||||||||
| (Millions of Dollars, shares in thousands) | |||||||||
| June 30, | December 31, | ||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | ||||||||
| Liabilities and Equity | |||||||||
| Current Liabilities | |||||||||
| Short-term debt | $ | 1,100 | $ | 836 | |||||
| Long-term debt due within one year | 1,000 | 1,000 | |||||||
| Accounts payable | 902 | 995 | |||||||
| Taxes | 130 | 263 | |||||||
| Interest | 191 | 298 | |||||||
| Dividends | 250 | 249 | |||||||
| Customer deposits | 309 | 304 | |||||||
| Regulatory liabilities | 137 | 91 | |||||||
| Other current liabilities | 490 | 632 | |||||||
| Current liabilities of discontinued operations | 2,775 | ||||||||
| Total Current Liabilities | 4,509 | 7,443 | |||||||
| Long-term Debt | 17,103 | 17,173 | |||||||
| Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities | |||||||||
| Deferred income taxes | 3,538 | 3,227 | |||||||
| Investment tax credits | 130 | 132 | |||||||
| Accrued pension obligations | 1,078 | 1,457 | |||||||
| Asset retirement obligations | 487 | 324 | |||||||
| Regulatory liabilities | 977 | 992 | |||||||
| Other deferred credits and noncurrent liabilities | 481 | 525 | |||||||
| Noncurrent liabilities of discontinued operations | 3,963 | ||||||||
| Total Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities | 6,691 | 10,620 | |||||||
| Commitments and Contingent Liabilities (Notes 6 and 10) | |||||||||
| Equity | |||||||||
| Common stock - $0.01 par value (a) | 7 | 7 | |||||||
| Additional paid-in capital | 9,564 | 9,433 | |||||||
| Earnings reinvested | 2,654 | 6,462 | |||||||
| Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (2,284) | (2,274) | |||||||
| Total Equity | 9,941 | 13,628 | |||||||
| Total Liabilities and Equity | $ | 38,244 | $ | 48,864 | |||||
| (a) | 780,000 shares authorized; 669,514 and 665,849 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014. |
The accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.
| 7 |
| (a) | Shares in thousands. Each share entitles the holder to one vote on any question presented at any shareowners' meeting. |
The accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial
Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.
| 8 |
(THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY.)
| 9 |
| (a) | Net income approximates comprehensive income. |
The
accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.
| 10 |
The accompanying
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.
| 11 |
The accompanying
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.
| 12 |
| CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS | |||||||||
| PPL Electric Utilities Corporation and Subsidiaries | |||||||||
| (Unaudited) | |||||||||
| (Millions of Dollars, shares in thousands) | |||||||||
| June 30, | December 31, | ||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | ||||||||
| Liabilities and Equity | |||||||||
| Current Liabilities | |||||||||
| Short-term debt | $ | 168 | |||||||
| Long term debt due within one year | 100 | $ | 100 | ||||||
| Accounts payable | 308 | 325 | |||||||
| Accounts payable to affiliates | 81 | 70 | |||||||
| Taxes | 30 | 85 | |||||||
| Interest | 34 | 34 | |||||||
| Regulatory liabilities | 110 | 76 | |||||||
| Other current liabilities | 82 | 103 | |||||||
| Total Current Liabilities | 913 | 793 | |||||||
| Long-term Debt | 2,503 | 2,502 | |||||||
| Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities | |||||||||
| Deferred income taxes | 1,553 | 1,483 | |||||||
| Accrued pension obligations | 147 | 212 | |||||||
| Regulatory liabilities | 26 | 18 | |||||||
| Other deferred credits and noncurrent liabilities | 76 | 60 | |||||||
| Total Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities | 1,802 | 1,773 | |||||||
| Commitments and Contingent Liabilities (Notes 6 and 10) | |||||||||
| Equity | |||||||||
| Common stock - no par value (a) | 364 | 364 | |||||||
| Additional paid-in capital | 1,810 | 1,603 | |||||||
| Earnings reinvested | 779 | 750 | |||||||
| Total Equity | 2,953 | 2,717 | |||||||
| Total Liabilities and Equity | $ | 8,171 | $ | 7,785 | |||||
| (a) | 170,000 shares authorized; 66,368 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014. |
The accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial
Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.
| 13 |
| (a) | Shares in thousands. All common shares of PPL Electric stock are owned by PPL. |
| (b) | Includes non-cash contributions of $47 million. |
The
accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.
| 14 |
The
accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.
| 15 |
The accompanying
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.
| 16 |
The accompanying
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.
| 17 |
The accompanying
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.
| 18 |
| CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS | |||||||||
| LG&E and KU Energy LLC and Subsidiaries | |||||||||
| (Unaudited) | |||||||||
| (Millions of Dollars) | |||||||||
| June 30, | December 31, | ||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | ||||||||
| Liabilities and Equity | |||||||||
| Current Liabilities | |||||||||
| Short-term debt | $ | 561 | $ | 575 | |||||
| Long-term debt due within one year | 900 | 900 | |||||||
| Notes payable with affiliates | 59 | 41 | |||||||
| Accounts payable | 346 | 399 | |||||||
| Accounts payable to affiliates | 8 | 2 | |||||||
| Customer deposits | 52 | 52 | |||||||
| Taxes | 59 | 36 | |||||||
| Price risk management liabilities | 5 | 5 | |||||||
| Price risk management liabilities with affiliates | 46 | 66 | |||||||
| Regulatory liabilities | 27 | 15 | |||||||
| Interest | 24 | 23 | |||||||
| Other current liabilities | 113 | 131 | |||||||
| Total Current Liabilities | 2,200 | 2,245 | |||||||
| Long-term Debt | 3,667 | 3,667 | |||||||
| Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities | |||||||||
| Deferred income taxes | 1,406 | 1,241 | |||||||
| Investment tax credits | 129 | 131 | |||||||
| Accrued pension obligations | 274 | 305 | |||||||
| Asset retirement obligations | 437 | 274 | |||||||
| Regulatory liabilities | 951 | 974 | |||||||
| Price risk management liabilities | 40 | 43 | |||||||
| Other deferred credits and noncurrent liabilities | 215 | 268 | |||||||
| Total Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities | 3,452 | 3,236 | |||||||
| Commitments and Contingent Liabilities (Notes 6 and 10) | |||||||||
| Member's equity | 4,329 | 4,248 | |||||||
| Total Liabilities and Equity | $ | 13,648 | $ | 13,396 | |||||
The accompanying
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.
| 19 |
The accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial
Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.
| 20 |
(THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY.)
| 21 |
| (a) | Net income equals comprehensive income. |
The
accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.
| 22 |
The accompanying
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.
| 23 |
The accompanying
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.
| 24 |
| CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS | |||||||||
| Louisville Gas and Electric Company | |||||||||
| (Unaudited) | |||||||||
| (Millions of Dollars, shares in thousands) | |||||||||
| June 30, | December 31, | ||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | ||||||||
| Liabilities and Equity | |||||||||
| Current Liabilities | |||||||||
| Short-term debt | $ | 259 | $ | 264 | |||||
| Long-term debt due within one year | 250 | 250 | |||||||
| Accounts payable | 210 | 240 | |||||||
| Accounts payable to affiliates | 16 | 20 | |||||||
| Customer deposits | 25 | 25 | |||||||
| Taxes | 28 | 19 | |||||||
| Price risk management liabilities | 5 | 5 | |||||||
| Price risk management liabilities with affiliates | 23 | 33 | |||||||
| Regulatory liabilities | 15 | 10 | |||||||
| Interest | 6 | 6 | |||||||
| Other current liabilities | 41 | 42 | |||||||
| Total Current Liabilities | 878 | 914 | |||||||
| Long-term Debt | 1,103 | 1,103 | |||||||
| Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities | |||||||||
| Deferred income taxes | 777 | 700 | |||||||
| Investment tax credits | 35 | 36 | |||||||
| Accrued pension obligations | 36 | 57 | |||||||
| Asset retirement obligations | 109 | 66 | |||||||
| Regulatory liabilities | 446 | 458 | |||||||
| Price risk management liabilities | 40 | 43 | |||||||
| Other deferred credits and noncurrent liabilities | 97 | 111 | |||||||
| Total Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities | 1,540 | 1,471 | |||||||
| Commitments and Contingent Liabilities (Notes 6 and 10) | |||||||||
| Stockholder's Equity | |||||||||
| Common stock - no par value (a) | 424 | 424 | |||||||
| Additional paid-in capital | 1,541 | 1,521 | |||||||
| Earnings reinvested | 259 | 229 | |||||||
| Total Equity | 2,224 | 2,174 | |||||||
| Total Liabilities and Equity | $ | 5,745 | $ | 5,662 | |||||
| (a) | 75,000 shares authorized; 21,294 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014. |
The accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial
Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.
| 25 |
| (a) | Shares in thousands. All common shares of LG&E stock are owned by LKE. |
The accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial
Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.
| 26 |
(THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY.)
| 27 |
| (a) | Net income approximates comprehensive income. |
The
accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.
| 28 |
The accompanying
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.
| 29 |
The accompanying
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.
| 30 |
| CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS | |||||||||
| Kentucky Utilities Company | |||||||||
| (Unaudited) | |||||||||
| (Millions of Dollars, shares in thousands) | |||||||||
| June 30, | December 31, | ||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | ||||||||
| Liabilities and Equity | |||||||||
| Current Liabilities | |||||||||
| Short-term debt | $ | 227 | $ | 236 | |||||
| Long-term debt due within one year | 250 | 250 | |||||||
| Accounts payable | 124 | 141 | |||||||
| Accounts payable to affiliates | 36 | 47 | |||||||
| Customer deposits | 27 | 27 | |||||||
| Taxes | 28 | 14 | |||||||
| Price risk management liabilities with affiliates | 23 | 33 | |||||||
| Regulatory liabilities | 12 | 5 | |||||||
| Interest | 12 | 11 | |||||||
| Other current liabilities | 42 | 41 | |||||||
| Total Current Liabilities | 781 | 805 | |||||||
| Long-term Debt | 1,841 | 1,841 | |||||||
| Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities | |||||||||
| Deferred income taxes | 987 | 884 | |||||||
| Investment tax credits | 94 | 95 | |||||||
| Accrued pension obligations | 43 | 59 | |||||||
| Asset retirement obligations | 328 | 208 | |||||||
| Regulatory liabilities | 505 | 516 | |||||||
| Other deferred credits and noncurrent liabilities | 64 | 101 | |||||||
| Total Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities | 2,021 | 1,863 | |||||||
| Commitments and Contingent Liabilities (Notes 6 and 10) | |||||||||
| Stockholder's Equity | |||||||||
| Common stock - no par value (a) | 308 | 308 | |||||||
| Additional paid-in capital | 2,596 | 2,596 | |||||||
| Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | (1) | ||||||||
| Earnings reinvested | 338 | 302 | |||||||
| Total Equity | 3,241 | 3,206 | |||||||
| Total Liabilities and Equity | $ | 7,884 | $ | 7,715 | |||||
| (a) | 80,000 shares authorized; 37,818 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014. |
The accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial
Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.
| 31 |
| (a) | Shares in thousands. All common shares of KU stock are owned by LKE. |
The accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial
Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.
| 32 |
Combined Notes to Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)
1. Interim Financial Statements
(All Registrants)
Capitalized terms and abbreviations appearing in the unaudited combined notes to condensed financial statements are defined in the glossary. Dollars are in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise noted. The specific Registrant to which disclosures are applicable is identified in parenthetical headings in italics above the applicable disclosure or within the applicable disclosure. Within combined disclosures, amounts are disclosed for any Registrant when significant.
The accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X and, therefore, do not include all of the information and footnote disclosures required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation in accordance with GAAP are reflected in the condensed financial statements. All adjustments are of a normal recurring nature, except as otherwise disclosed. Each Registrant's Balance Sheet at December 31, 2014 is derived from that Registrant's 2014 audited Balance Sheet. The financial statements and notes thereto should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes contained in each Registrant's 2014 Form 10-K. The results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year ending December 31, 2015 or other future periods, because results for interim periods can be disproportionately influenced by various factors, developments and seasonal variations.
The classification of certain prior period amounts has been changed to conform to the presentation in the June 30, 2015 financial statements.
(PPL)
"Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations (net of income taxes)" on the Statements of Income includes the activities of PPL Energy Supply, substantially representing PPL's Supply segment, which was spun off and distributed to PPL shareowners on June 1, 2015. PPL Energy Supply's assets and liabilities have been reclassified on the Balance Sheet at December 31, 2014 to assets and liabilities of discontinued operations. The assets and liabilities were distributed and removed from PPL's Balance Sheets in the second quarter of 2015. In addition, the Statements of Cash Flows separately report the cash flows of the discontinued operations. See Note 8 for additional information.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
(All Registrants)
The following accounting policy disclosures represent updates to Note 1 to each indicated Registrant's 2014 Form 10-K and should be read in conjunction with those disclosures.
Accounts Receivable (PPL and PPL Electric)
In accordance with a PUC-approved purchase of accounts receivable program, PPL Electric purchases certain accounts receivable from alternative electricity suppliers at a discount, which reflects a provision for uncollectible accounts. The alternative electricity suppliers have no continuing involvement or interest in the purchased accounts receivable. The purchased accounts receivable are initially recorded at fair value using a market approach based on the purchase price paid and are classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, PPL Electric purchased $276 million and $607 million of accounts receivable from unaffiliated third parties and $53 million and $146 million from PPL EnergyPlus. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, PPL Electric purchased $253 million and $614 million of accounts receivable from unaffiliated third parties and $79 million and $184 million from PPL EnergyPlus. PPL Electric's purchases from PPL EnergyPlus for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 include purchases through May 31, 2015, which is the period during which PPL Electric and PPL EnergyPlus were affiliated entities. As a result of the June 1, 2015 spinoff of PPL Energy Supply and creation of Talen Energy, PPL EnergyPlus (renamed Talen Energy Marketing) is no longer an affiliate of PPL Electric. PPL Electric's purchases from Talen Energy Marketing subsequent to May 31, 2015 are purchases from an unaffiliated third party.
| 33 |
Depreciation (PPL)
Effective January 1, 2015, after completing a review of the useful lives of its distribution network assets, WPD extended the weighted average useful lives of these assets to 69 years from 55 years. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, this change in useful lives resulted in lower depreciation of $22 million ($17 million after-tax or $0.03 per share) and $42 million ($33 million after-tax or $0.05 per share).
New Accounting Guidance Adopted (All Registrants)
Reporting of Discontinued Operations
Effective January 1, 2015, the Registrants prospectively adopted accounting guidance that changes the criteria for determining what should be classified as a discontinued operation and the related presentation and disclosure requirements. A discontinued operation may include a component of an entity or a group of components of an entity, or a business activity.
A disposal of a component of an entity or a group of components of an entity is required to be reported in discontinued operations if the disposal represents a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on the entity's operations and financial results when any of the following occurs: (1) The components of an entity or group of components of an entity meets the criteria to be classified as held for sale, (2) The component of an entity or group of components of an entity is disposed of by sale, or (3) The component of an entity or group of components of an entity is disposed of other than by sale (for example, by abandonment or in a distribution to owners in a spinoff).
As a result of the spinoff on June 1, 2015, PPL Energy Supply has been reported as a discontinued operation under the new discontinued operations guidance. See Note 8 for additional information.
3. Segment and Related Information
(PPL)
See Note 2 in PPL's 2014 Form 10-K for a discussion of reportable segments and related information.
On June 1, 2015, PPL completed the spinoff of PPL Energy Supply, which substantially represented PPL's Supply segment. As a result of this transaction, PPL no longer has a Supply segment. See Note 8 for additional information.
Financial data for the segments and reconciliation to PPL's consolidated results for the periods ended June 30 are:
| Three Months | Six Months | |||||||||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||||||
| Income Statement Data | ||||||||||||||||
| Revenues from external customers | ||||||||||||||||
| U.K. Regulated | $ | 587 | $ | 672 | $ | 1,284 | $ | 1,320 | ||||||||
| Kentucky Regulated | 714 | 722 | 1,613 | 1,656 | ||||||||||||
| Pennsylvania Regulated | 476 | 448 | 1,106 | 1,039 | ||||||||||||
| Corporate and Other | 4 | 7 | 8 | 12 | ||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 1,781 | $ | 1,849 | $ | 4,011 | $ | 4,027 | ||||||||
| Net Income (loss) | ||||||||||||||||
| U.K. Regulated (a) | $ | 190 | $ | 187 | $ | 565 | $ | 393 | ||||||||
| Kentucky Regulated | 47 | 58 | 156 | 165 | ||||||||||||
| Pennsylvania Regulated | 49 | 52 | 136 | 137 | ||||||||||||
| Corporate and Other (b) | (36) | (67) | (55) | (76) | ||||||||||||
| Discontinued Operations (c) | (1,007) | (1) | (912) | (74) | ||||||||||||
| Total | $ | (757) | $ | 229 | $ | (110) | $ | 545 | ||||||||
| 34 |
| June 30, | December 31, | ||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | ||||||
| Balance Sheet Data | |||||||
| Assets | |||||||
| U.K. Regulated | $ | 15,973 | $ | 16,005 | |||
| Kentucky Regulated | 13,314 | 13,062 | |||||
| Pennsylvania Regulated | 8,171 | 7,785 | |||||
| Corporate and Other (d) | 786 | 1,095 | |||||
| Discontinued Operations (c) | 10,917 | ||||||
| Total assets | $ | 38,244 | $ | 48,864 | |||
| (a) | Includes unrealized gains and losses from economic activity. See Note 14 for additional information. |
| (c) | See Note 8 for additional information. |
| (d) | Primarily consists of unallocated items, including cash, PP&E and the elimination of inter-segment transactions. |
(PPL)
Basic EPS is computed by dividing income available to PPL common shareowners by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the applicable period. Diluted EPS is computed by dividing income available to PPL common shareowners by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding, increased by incremental shares that would be outstanding if potentially dilutive non-participating securities were converted to common shares as calculated using the Treasury Stock Method or the If-Converted Method, as applicable. Incremental non-participating securities that have a dilutive impact are detailed in the table below.
Reconciliations of the amounts of income and shares of PPL common stock (in thousands) for the periods ended June 30 used in the EPS calculation are:
| Three Months | Six Months | ||||||||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | ||||||||||||
| Income (Numerator) | |||||||||||||||
| Income from continuing operations after income taxes | $ | 250 | $ | 230 | $ | 802 | $ | 619 | |||||||
| Less amounts allocated to participating securities | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Income from continuing operations after income taxes available to PPL | |||||||||||||||
| common shareowners - Basic | 249 | 229 | 800 | 616 | |||||||||||
| Plus interest charges (net of tax) related to Equity Units (a) | 9 | ||||||||||||||
| Income from continuing operations after income taxes available to PPL | |||||||||||||||
| common shareowners - Diluted | $ | 249 | $ | 229 | $ | 800 | $ | 625 | |||||||
| Income (loss) from discontinued operations (net of income taxes) available | |||||||||||||||
| to PPL common shareowners - Basic and Diluted | $ | (1,007) | $ | (1) | $ | (912) | $ | (74) | |||||||
| Net income (loss) | $ | (757) | $ | 229 | $ | (110) | $ | 545 | |||||||
| Less amounts allocated to participating securities | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Net income (loss) available to PPL common shareowners - Basic | (758) | 228 | (112) | 542 | |||||||||||
| Plus interest charges (net of tax) related to Equity Units (a) | 9 | ||||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) available to PPL common shareowners - Diluted | $ | (758) | $ | 228 | $ | (112) | $ | 551 | |||||||
| Shares of Common Stock (Denominator) | |||||||||||||||
| Weighted-average shares - Basic EPS | 668,415 | 653,132 | 667,698 | 642,002 | |||||||||||
| Add incremental non-participating securities: | |||||||||||||||
| Share-based payment awards | 2,871 | 2,100 | 2,315 | 1,806 | |||||||||||
| Equity Units (a) | 10,560 | 21,119 | |||||||||||||
| Weighted-average shares - Diluted EPS | 671,286 | 665,792 | 670,013 | 664,927 | |||||||||||
| Basic EPS | |||||||||||||||
| Available to PPL common shareowners: | |||||||||||||||
| Income from continuing operations after income taxes | $ | 0.37 | $ | 0.35 | $ | 1.20 | $ | 0.96 | |||||||
| Income (loss) from discontinued operations (net of income taxes) | (1.50) | (1.37) | (0.12) | ||||||||||||
| Net Income (Loss) Available to PPL common shareowners | $ | (1.13) | $ | 0.35 | $ | (0.17) | $ | 0.84 | |||||||
| Diluted EPS | |||||||||||||||
| Available to PPL common shareowners: | |||||||||||||||
| Income from continuing operations after income taxes | $ | 0.37 | $ | 0.34 | $ | 1.19 | $ | 0.94 | |||||||
| Income (loss) from discontinued operations (net of income taxes) | (1.50) | (1.36) | (0.11) | ||||||||||||
| Net Income (Loss) Available to PPL common shareowners | $ | (1.13) | $ | 0.34 | $ | (0.17) | $ | 0.83 | |||||||
| 35 |
| (a) | In 2014, the If-Converted Method was applied to the Equity Units prior to the March 2014 settlement. |
For the periods ended June 30, PPL issued common stock related to stock-based compensation plans as follows (in thousands):
| Three Months | Six Months | |||||||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||||
| Stock-based compensation plans (a) | 992 | 922 | 2,437 | 2,018 | ||||||||||
| DRIP | 424 | 843 | ||||||||||||
| (a) | Includes stock options exercised, vesting of performance units, vesting of restricted stock and restricted stock units and conversion of stock units granted to directors. |
For the periods ended June 30, the following shares (in thousands) were excluded from the computations of diluted EPS because the effect would have been antidilutive.
| Three Months | Six Months | |||||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||
| Stock options | 348 | 790 | 1,085 | 2,060 | ||||||||
| Performance units | 1 | 73 | 1 | |||||||||
| Restricted stock units | 61 | |||||||||||
Reconciliations of income taxes for the periods ended June 30 are:
| (PPL) | ||||||||||||||||
| Three Months | Six Months | |||||||||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||||||
| Federal income tax on Income from Continuing Operations Before | ||||||||||||||||
| Income Taxes at statutory tax rate - 35% | $ | 112 | $ | 139 | $ | 382 | $ | 333 | ||||||||
| Increase (decrease) due to: | ||||||||||||||||
| State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit | 9 | 3 | 29 | 16 | ||||||||||||
| Valuation allowance adjustments (a) | 5 | 46 | 8 | 46 | ||||||||||||
| Impact of lower U.K. income tax rates | (36) | (31) | (98) | (76) | ||||||||||||
| U.S. income tax on foreign earnings - net of foreign tax credit (b) | 10 | (1) | 21 | |||||||||||||
| Federal and state tax reserve adjustments (c) | (12) | (1) | (12) | (1) | ||||||||||||
| Intercompany interest on U.K. financing entities | (3) | (1) | (11) | (3) | ||||||||||||
| Other | (4) | 1 | (9) | (3) | ||||||||||||
| Total increase (decrease) | (41) | 27 | (94) | |||||||||||||
| Total income taxes | $ | 71 | $ | 166 | $ | 288 | $ | 333 | ||||||||
| (b) | During the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, PPL recorded lower income tax expense due to a decrease in taxable dividends. |
| (c) | During the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, PPL recorded a tax benefit to adjust the settled refund amount approved by Joint Committee of Taxation for the open audit years 1998-2011. |
| (PPL Electric) | ||||||||||||||||
| Three Months | Six Months | |||||||||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||||||
| Federal income tax on Income Before Income Taxes at statutory | ||||||||||||||||
| tax rate - 35% | $ | 30 | $ | 29 | $ | 81 | $ | 77 | ||||||||
| Increase (decrease) due to: | ||||||||||||||||
| State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit | 4 | 4 | 14 | 12 | ||||||||||||
| Federal and state tax reserve adjustments | 2 | (1) | 2 | (1) | ||||||||||||
| Depreciation not normalized | (1) | (1) | (2) | (3) | ||||||||||||
| Other | 1 | (1) | ||||||||||||||
| Total increase (decrease) | 6 | 2 | 14 | 7 | ||||||||||||
| Total income taxes | $ | 36 | $ | 31 | $ | 95 | $ | 84 | ||||||||
| 36 |
| (LKE) | ||||||||||||||||
| Three Months | Six Months | |||||||||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||||||
| Federal income tax on Income from Continuing Operations Before | ||||||||||||||||
| Income Taxes at statutory tax rate - 35% | $ | 37 | $ | 37 | $ | 104 | $ | 102 | ||||||||
| Increase (decrease) due to: | ||||||||||||||||
| State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit | 4 | 4 | 11 | 10 | ||||||||||||
| Valuation allowance adjustment (a) | 5 | 8 | ||||||||||||||
| Other | (1) | (2) | (2) | |||||||||||||
| Total increase (decrease) | 8 | 4 | 17 | 8 | ||||||||||||
| Total income taxes | $ | 45 | $ | 41 | $ | 121 | $ | 110 | ||||||||
| (a) | Represents a valuation allowance against tax credits expiring in 2016 and 2017 that are more likely than not to expire before being utilized. |
| (LG&E) | ||||||||||||||||
| Three Months | Six Months | |||||||||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||||||
| Federal income tax on Income Before Income Taxes at statutory | ||||||||||||||||
| tax rate - 35% | $ | 20 | $ | 20 | $ | 50 | $ | 48 | ||||||||
| Increase (decrease) due to: | ||||||||||||||||
| State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit | 2 | 2 | 5 | 5 | ||||||||||||
| Other | (1) | (2) | ||||||||||||||
| Total increase (decrease) | 2 | 1 | 5 | 3 | ||||||||||||
| Total income taxes | $ | 22 | $ | 21 | $ | 55 | $ | 51 | ||||||||
| (KU) | ||||||||||||||||
| Three Months | Six Months | |||||||||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||||||
| Federal income tax on Income Before Income Taxes at statutory | ||||||||||||||||
| tax rate - 35% | $ | 22 | $ | 23 | $ | 66 | $ | 66 | ||||||||
| Increase (decrease) due to: | ||||||||||||||||
| State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit | 2 | 2 | 7 | 7 | ||||||||||||
| Other | 1 | (2) | (1) | |||||||||||||
| Total increase (decrease) | 2 | 3 | 5 | 6 | ||||||||||||
| Total income taxes | $ | 24 | $ | 26 | $ | 71 | $ | 72 | ||||||||
Unrecognized Tax Benefits (PPL)
Changes to unrecognized tax benefits for the periods ended June 30 were as follows.
| Three Months | Six Months | ||||||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | ||||||||||
| PPL | |||||||||||||
| Beginning of period | $ | 20 | $ | 22 | $ | 20 | $ | 22 | |||||
| Additions based on tax positions of prior years | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Reductions based on tax positions of prior years | (2) | (2) | |||||||||||
| Settlements | (15) | (15) | |||||||||||
| End of period | $ | 5 | $ | 21 | $ | 5 | $ | 21 | |||||
In February 2015, PPL and the IRS Appeals division reached a settlement on the amount of PPL's refund from its open audits for the years 1998 - 2011. In April 2015, PPL was notified that the Joint Committee on Taxation approved PPL's settlement. In the second quarter of 2015, PPL recorded a tax benefit of $23 million, which includes an estimate of interest on the refund. Of this amount, $11 million is reflected in continuing operations. Final determination of interest on the refund is still pending from the IRS.
| 37 |
(All Registrants)
The following table provides information about the regulatory assets and liabilities of cost-based rate-regulated utility operations.
| PPL | PPL Electric | ||||||||||||
| June 30, | December 31, | June 30, | December 31, | ||||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | ||||||||||
| Current Regulatory Assets: | |||||||||||||
| Environmental cost recovery | $ | 16 | $ | 5 | |||||||||
| Gas supply clause | 1 | 15 | |||||||||||
| Transmission service charge | 7 | 6 | $ | 7 | $ | 6 | |||||||
| Other | 10 | 11 | 3 | 6 | |||||||||
| Total current regulatory assets (a) | $ | 34 | $ | 37 | $ | 10 | $ | 12 | |||||
| Noncurrent Regulatory Assets: | |||||||||||||
| Defined benefit plans | $ | 745 | $ | 720 | $ | 417 | $ | 372 | |||||
| Taxes recoverable through future rates | 319 | 316 | 319 | 316 | |||||||||
| Storm costs | 108 | 124 | 38 | 46 | |||||||||
| Unamortized loss on debt | 74 | 77 | 46 | 49 | |||||||||
| Interest rate swaps | 98 | 122 | |||||||||||
| Accumulated cost of removal of utility plant | 125 | 114 | 125 | 114 | |||||||||
| AROs | 91 | 79 | |||||||||||
| Other | 9 | 10 | 1 | ||||||||||
| Total noncurrent regulatory assets | $ | 1,569 | $ | 1,562 | $ | 946 | $ | 897 | |||||
| Current Regulatory Liabilities: | |||||||||||||
| Generation supply charge | $ | 31 | $ | 28 | $ | 31 | $ | 28 | |||||
| Demand side management | 12 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Gas supply clause | 9 | 6 | |||||||||||
| Transmission formula rate | 66 | 42 | 66 | 42 | |||||||||
| Storm damage expense | 10 | 3 | 10 | 3 | |||||||||
| Other | 9 | 10 | 3 | 3 | |||||||||
| Total current regulatory liabilities | $ | 137 | $ | 91 | $ | 110 | $ | 76 | |||||
| Noncurrent Regulatory Liabilities: | |||||||||||||
| Accumulated cost of removal of utility plant | $ | 693 | $ | 693 | |||||||||
| Coal contracts (b) | 38 | 59 | |||||||||||
| Power purchase agreement - OVEC (b) | 88 | 92 | |||||||||||
| Net deferred tax assets | 24 | 26 | |||||||||||
| Act 129 compliance rider | 26 | 18 | $ | 26 | $ | 18 | |||||||
| Defined benefit plans | 21 | 16 | |||||||||||
| Interest rate swaps | 84 | 84 | |||||||||||
| Other | 3 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Total noncurrent regulatory liabilities | $ | 977 | $ | 992 | $ | 26 | $ | 18 | |||||
| LKE | LG&E | KU | |||||||||||||||||
| June 30, | December 31, | June 30, | December 31, | June 30, | December 31, | ||||||||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | ||||||||||||||
| Current Regulatory Assets: | |||||||||||||||||||
| Environmental cost recovery | $ | 16 | $ | 5 | $ | 9 | $ | 4 | $ | 7 | $ | 1 | |||||||
| Gas supply clause | 1 | 15 | 1 | 15 | |||||||||||||||
| Fuel adjustment clause | 4 | 2 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||
| Other | 7 | 1 | 7 | 1 | |||||||||||||||
| Total current regulatory assets | $ | 24 | $ | 25 | $ | 10 | $ | 21 | $ | 14 | $ | 4 | |||||||
| Noncurrent Regulatory Assets: | |||||||||||||||||||
| Defined benefit plans | $ | 328 | $ | 348 | $ | 203 | $ | 215 | $ | 125 | $ | 133 | |||||||
| Storm costs | 70 | 78 | 39 | 43 | 31 | 35 | |||||||||||||
| Unamortized loss on debt | 28 | 28 | 18 | 18 | 10 | 10 | |||||||||||||
| Interest rate swaps | 98 | 122 | 75 | 89 | 23 | 33 | |||||||||||||
| AROs | 91 | 79 | 33 | 28 | 58 | 51 | |||||||||||||
| Other | 8 | 10 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||
| Total noncurrent regulatory assets | $ | 623 | $ | 665 | $ | 370 | $ | 397 | $ | 253 | $ | 268 | |||||||
| 38 |
| LKE | LG&E | KU | ||||||||||||||||||
| June 30, | December 31, | June 30, | December 31, | June 30, | December 31, | |||||||||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||||||||
| Current Regulatory Liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Demand side management | $ | 12 | $ | 2 | $ | 5 | $ | 1 | $ | 7 | $ | 1 | ||||||||
| Gas supply clause | 9 | 6 | 9 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel adjustment clause | 4 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Gas line tracker | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||
| Other | 1 | 4 | 1 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total current regulatory liabilities | $ | 27 | $ | 15 | $ | 15 | $ | 10 | $ | 12 | $ | 5 | ||||||||
| Noncurrent Regulatory Liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Accumulated cost of removal | ||||||||||||||||||||
| of utility plant | $ | 693 | $ | 693 | $ | 303 | $ | 302 | $ | 390 | $ | 391 | ||||||||
| Coal contracts (b) | 38 | 59 | 16 | 25 | 22 | 34 | ||||||||||||||
| Power purchase agreement - OVEC (b) | 88 | 92 | 60 | 63 | 28 | 29 | ||||||||||||||
| Net deferred tax assets | 24 | 26 | 23 | 24 | 1 | 2 | ||||||||||||||
| Defined benefit plans | 21 | 16 | 21 | 16 | ||||||||||||||||
| Interest rate swaps | 84 | 84 | 42 | 42 | 42 | 42 | ||||||||||||||
| Other | 3 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | ||||||||||||||
| Total noncurrent regulatory liabilities | $ | 951 | $ | 974 | $ | 446 | $ | 458 | $ | 505 | $ | 516 | ||||||||
| (a) | For PPL, these amounts are included in "Other current assets" on the Balance Sheets. |
| (b) | These liabilities were recorded as offsets to certain intangible assets that were recorded at fair value upon the acquisition of LKE by PPL. |
U. K. Activities (PPL)
RIIO-ED1
On April 1, 2015, the RIIO-ED1 eight-year price control period commenced for WPD's four DNOs. See "Item 1. Business - Segment Information - U. K. Regulated Segment" of PPL's 2014 Form 10-K for additional information on RIIO-ED1.
Ofgem Review of Line Loss Calculation
In March 2014, Ofgem issued its final decision on the DPCR4 line loss incentives and penalties mechanism. As a result, during the first quarter of 2014 WPD increased its liability by $65 million for over-recovery of line losses with a reduction to "Utility" revenues on the Statement of Income. WPD began refunding the liability to customers on April 1, 2015 and will continue through March 31, 2019. The liability at June 30, 2015 was $88 million.
Kentucky Activities (PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU)
Rate Case Proceedings
On November 26, 2014, LG&E and KU filed requests with the KPSC for increases in annual base rates for LG&E's electric and gas operations and KU's electric operations. On April 20, 2015, LG&E and KU, and the other parties to the proceeding, filed a unanimous settlement agreement with the KPSC. The settlement agreement was approved by the KPSC on June 30, 2015. Among other things, the settlement provides for increases in the annual revenue requirements associated with KU base electricity rates of $125 million and LG&E base gas rates of $7 million. The annual revenue requirement associated with base electricity rates at LG&E was not changed. Although the settlement did not establish a specific return on equity with respect to the base rates, an authorized 10% return on equity will be utilized in the ECR and GLT mechanisms. The settlement agreement provides for deferred recovery of costs associated with Green River Units 3 and 4 through their retirement. The new regulatory asset will be amortized over three years. The settlement also provides regulatory asset treatment for the difference between pension expense currently booked in accordance with LG&E and KU's pension accounting policy and pension expense using a 15 year amortization period for actuarial gains and losses. The new rates and all elements of the settlement became effective July 1, 2015.
KPSC Landfill Proceedings
On May 22, 2015, LG&E and KU filed an application with the KPSC for a declaratory order that the existing CPCN and ECR approvals regarding the initial phases of construction and rate recovery of the landfill for management of CCRs at the
| 39 |
Trimble County Station remain in effect. The current design of the proposed landfill provides for construction in substantially the same location as originally proposed with approximately the same storage capacity and expected useful life. On May 20, 2015, the owner of an underground limestone mine filed a complaint with the KPSC requesting it to revoke the CPCN for the Trimble County landfill and limit recovery of costs for the Ghent Station landfill on the grounds that, as a result of cost increases, the proposed landfill no longer constitutes the least cost alternative for CCR management. The KPSC has initiated its own investigation, consolidated the proceedings, and ordered an accelerated procedural schedule. Although the companies continue to believe that the landfills at the Trimble County and Ghent stations are the least cost options and the CPCN and prior KPSC determinations provide the necessary regulatory authority to proceed with construction of the landfill and obtain cost recovery, LG&E and KU are currently unable to predict the outcome or impact of the pending proceedings.
Pennsylvania Activities (PPL and PPL Electric)
Act 11 authorizes the PUC to approve two specific ratemaking mechanisms: the use of a fully projected future test year in base rate proceedings and, subject to certain conditions, the use of a Distribution System Improvement Charge (DSIC). Such alternative ratemaking procedures and mechanisms provide opportunity for accelerated cost-recovery and, therefore, are important to PPL Electric as it is in a period of significant capital investment to maintain and enhance the reliability of its delivery system, including the replacement of aging distribution assets.
Rate Case Proceeding
On March 31, 2015, PPL Electric filed a request with the PUC for an increase in its annual distribution revenue requirement of approximately $167.5 million. The proposal would result in a rate increase of 3.9% on a total bill basis and is expected to become effective on January 1, 2016. PPL Electric's application includes a request for an authorized return-on-equity of 10.95%. The application is based on a fully projected future test year of January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016. PPL Electric cannot predict the outcome of this proceeding.
Distribution System Improvement Charge (DSIC)
On March 31, 2015, PPL Electric filed a petition requesting a waiver of the DSIC cap of 5% of billed revenues and approval to increase the maximum allowable DSIC from 5% to 7.5% for service rendered after January 1, 2016. PPL Electric filed the petition concurrently with its 2015 rate case and the Administrative Law Judge granted PPL Electric's request to consolidate these two proceedings. PPL Electric cannot predict the outcome of this proceeding.
Storm Damage Expense Rider (SDER)
In its December 28, 2012 final rate case order, the PUC directed PPL Electric to file a proposed SDER. The SDER is a reconcilable automatic adjustment clause under which PPL Electric annually will compare actual storm costs to storm costs allowed in base rates and refund or recoup any differences from customers. In March 2013, PPL Electric filed its proposed SDER with the PUC and, as part of that filing, requested recovery of the 2012 qualifying storm costs related to Hurricane Sandy. PPL Electric proposed that the SDER become effective January 1, 2013 at a zero rate with qualifying storm costs incurred in 2013 and the 2012 Hurricane Sandy costs included in rates effective January 1, 2014. In April 2014, the PUC issued a final order approving the SDER with a January 1, 2015 effective date and initially including actual storm costs compared to collections for December 2013 through November 2014. As a result, PPL Electric reduced its regulatory liability by $12 million in March 2014. Also, as part of the April 2014 order, PPL Electric was authorized to recover Hurricane Sandy storm damage costs through the SDER of $29 million over a three-year period beginning January 1, 2015.
On June 20, 2014, the Office of Consumer Advocate (OCA) filed a petition with the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania requesting that the Court reverse and remand the April 2014 order permitting PPL Electric to establish the SDER. This matter remains pending before the Commonwealth Court. On January 15, 2015, the PUC issued a final order closing an investigation related to an OCA complaint concerning PPL Electric's October 2014 preliminary SDER calculation and modified the effective date of the SDER to February 1, 2015.
| 40 |
Smart Meter Rider (SMR)
Act 129 requires installation of smart meters for new construction, upon the request of consumers and at their cost, or on a depreciation schedule not exceeding 15 years. Under Act 129, EDCs are able to recover the costs of providing smart metering technology. All of PPL Electric's metered customers currently have advanced meters installed at their service locations capable of many of the functions required under Act 129. PPL Electric conducted pilot projects and technical evaluations of its current advanced metering technology and concluded that the current technology does not meet all of the requirements of Act 129. PPL Electric recovered the cost of its evaluations through a cost recovery mechanism, the Smart Meter Rider. In August 2013, PPL Electric filed with the PUC an annual report describing the actions it was taking under its Smart Meter Plan during 2013 and its planned actions for 2014. PPL Electric also submitted revised SMR charges that became effective January 1, 2014. In June 2014, PPL Electric filed its final Smart Meter Plan with the PUC. In that plan, PPL Electric proposes to replace all of its current meters with advanced meters that meet the Act 129 requirements. Full deployment of the new meters is expected to be complete by the end of 2019. The total cost of the project is estimated to be approximately $450 million, of which approximately $328 million is expected to be capital. PPL Electric proposes to recover these costs through the SMR which the PUC previously approved for recovery of such costs. On April 30, 2015, the Administrative Law Judge assigned by the PUC to review PPL Electric's Smart Meter Plan issued a recommended decision approving the plan with minor modifications. The recommended decision is subject to final approval by and remains pending before the PUC.
Federal Matters
FERC Wholesale Formula Rates (PPL, LKE and KU)
In September 2013, KU filed an application with the FERC to adjust the formula rate under which KU provides wholesale requirements power sales to 12 municipal customers. Among other changes, the application requests an amended formula whereby KU would charge cost-based rates with a subsequent true-up to actual costs, replacing the current formula which does not include a true-up. KU's application proposed an authorized return on equity of 10.7%. Certain elements, including the new formula rate, became effective April 23, 2014, subject to refund. In April 2014, nine municipalities submitted notices of termination, under the original notice period provisions, to cease taking power under the wholesale requirements contracts. Such terminations are to be effective in 2019, except in the case of one municipality with a 2017 effective date. In addition, a tenth municipality has become a transmission-only customer as of June 2015. In July 2014, KU agreed on settlement terms with the two municipal customers that did not provide termination notices and filed the settlement proposal with the FERC for its approval. In August 2014, the FERC issued an order on the interim settlement agreement allowing the proposed rates to become effective pending a final order. If approved, the settlement agreement will resolve the rate case with respect to these two municipalities, including approval of the formula rate with a true-up provision and authorizing a return on equity of 10% or the return on equity awarded to other parties in this case, whichever is lower. In July 2015, KU and the nine terminating municipalities reached a settlement in principle which, subject to FERC approval, would resolve open matters, including providing for certain refunds, approving the formula rate with a true-up provision, and authorizing a 10.25% return on equity. An unresolved matter with one terminating municipality may be the subject of further negotiations or proceedings. KU cannot predict the ultimate outcome of these FERC proceedings regarding its wholesale power agreements with the municipalities, but does not currently anticipate significant remaining refunds beyond amounts already recorded.
Credit Arrangements and Short-term Debt
(All Registrants)
The Registrants maintain credit facilities to enhance liquidity, provide credit support and provide a backstop to commercial paper programs. For reporting purposes, on a consolidated basis, the credit facilities and commercial paper programs of PPL Electric, LKE, LG&E and KU also apply to PPL and the credit facilities and commercial paper programs of LG&E and KU also apply to LKE. The amounts borrowed below are recorded as "Short-term debt" on the Balance Sheets. The following credit facilities were in place at:
| 41 |
| June 30, 2015 | December 31, 2014 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Letters of | Letters of | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Credit | Credit | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| and | and | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial | Commercial | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Expiration | Paper | Unused | Paper | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Date | Capacity | Borrowed | Issued | Capacity | Borrowed | Issued | ||||||||||||||||||||
| PPL | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| U.K. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| WPD plc | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Syndicated Credit Facility | Dec. 2016 | £ | 210 | £ | 130 | £ | 80 | £ | 103 | |||||||||||||||||
| WPD (South West) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Syndicated Credit Facility | July 2019 | 245 | 245 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| WPD (East Midlands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Syndicated Credit Facility | July 2019 | 300 | 112 | 188 | 64 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| WPD (West Midlands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Syndicated Credit Facility | July 2019 | 300 | 300 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Uncommitted Credit Facilities | 65 | £ | 4 | 61 | £ | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total U.K. Credit Facilities (a) | £ | 1,120 | £ | 242 | £ | 4 | £ | 874 | £ | 167 | £ | 5 | ||||||||||||||
| U.S. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| PPL Capital Funding | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Syndicated Credit Facility | July 2019 | $ | 300 | $ | 300 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Syndicated Credit Facility | Nov. 2018 | 300 | 300 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bilateral Credit Facility | Mar. 2016 | 150 | $ | 20 | 130 | $ | 21 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Uncommitted Credit Facility | 65 | 1 | 64 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total PPL Capital Funding Credit Facilities | $ | 815 | $ | 21 | $ | 794 | $ | 22 | ||||||||||||||||||
| PPL Electric | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Syndicated Credit Facility | July 2019 | $ | 300 | $ | 169 | $ | 131 | $ | 1 | |||||||||||||||||
| LKE | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Syndicated Credit Facility (b) | Oct. 2018 | $ | 75 | $ | 75 | $ | 75 | |||||||||||||||||||
| LG&E | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Syndicated Credit Facility | July 2019 | $ | 500 | $ | 259 | $ | 241 | $ | 264 | |||||||||||||||||
| KU | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Syndicated Credit Facility | July 2019 | $ | 400 | $ | 227 | $ | 173 | $ | 236 | |||||||||||||||||
| Letter of Credit Facility | Oct. 2017 | 198 | 198 | 198 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total KU Credit Facilities | $ | 598 | $ | 425 | $ | 173 | $ | 434 | ||||||||||||||||||
| (b) | LKE's interest rates on outstanding borrowings at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, were 1.44% and 1.67%. |
PPL Electric, LG&E and KU maintain commercial paper programs to provide an additional financing source to fund short-term liquidity needs, as necessary. Commercial paper issuances, included in "Short-term debt" on the Balance Sheets, are supported by the respective Registrant's Syndicated Credit Facility. The following commercial paper programs were in place at:
| June 30, 2015 | December 31, 2014 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Weighted - | Commercial | Weighted - | Commercial | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Average | Paper | Unused | Average | Paper | |||||||||||||||||||
| Interest Rate | Capacity | Issuances | Capacity | Interest Rate | Issuances | ||||||||||||||||||
| PPL Electric | 0.42% | $ | 300 | $ | 168 | $ | 132 | ||||||||||||||||
| LG&E | 0.49% | 350 | 259 | 91 | 0.42% | $ | 264 | ||||||||||||||||
| KU | 0.48% | 350 | 227 | 123 | 0.49% | 236 | |||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 1,000 | $ | 654 | $ | 346 | $ | 500 | |||||||||||||||
| 42 |
(LKE)
See Note 11 for discussion of intercompany borrowings.
(PPL)
At-The-Market Stock Offering Program
In February 2015, PPL entered into two separate equity distribution agreements, pursuant to which PPL may sell, from time to time, up to an aggregate of $500 million of its common stock. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, PPL issued 421,700 shares of common stock under the program at an average price of $33.73 per share, receiving net proceeds of $14 million.
Distributions
In May 2015, PPL declared its quarterly common stock dividend, payable July 1, 2015, at 37.25 cents per share (equivalent to $1.49 per annum). On August 3, 2015, PPL announced that the company is increasing its common stock dividend to 37.75 cents per share on a quarterly basis (equivalent to $1.51 per annum). The increased dividend will be payable on October 1, 2015 to shareowners of record as of September 10, 2015. Future dividends, declared at the discretion of the Board of Directors, will depend upon future earnings, cash flows, financial and legal requirements and other factors. See Note 8 for information regarding the June 1, 2015 distribution to PPL's shareowners of a newly formed entity, Holdco, which at closing owned all of the membership interests of PPL Energy Supply and all of the common stock of Talen Energy.
8. Acquisitions, Development and Divestitures
(All Registrants)
The Registrants from time to time evaluate opportunities for potential acquisitions, divestitures and development projects. Development projects are reexamined based on market conditions and other factors to determine whether to proceed with the projects, sell, cancel or expand them, execute tolling agreements or pursue other options. Any resulting transactions may impact future financial results. See Note 8 in the 2014 Form 10-K for additional information.
Discontinued Operations
Spinoff of PPL Energy Supply
In June 2014, PPL and PPL Energy Supply executed definitive agreements with affiliates of Riverstone to spin off PPL Energy Supply and immediately combine it with Riverstone's competitive power generation businesses to form a new, stand-alone, publicly traded company named Talen Energy. The transaction was subject to customary closing conditions, including receipt of regulatory approvals from the NRC, FERC, DOJ and PUC, all of which were received by mid-April 2015. On April 29, 2015, PPL's Board of Directors declared the June 1, 2015 distribution to PPL's shareowners of record on May 20, 2015 of a newly formed entity, Holdco, which at closing owned all of the membership interests of PPL Energy Supply and all of the common stock of Talen Energy.
Immediately following the spinoff on June 1, 2015, Holdco merged with a special purpose subsidiary of Talen Energy, with Holdco continuing as the surviving company to the merger and as a wholly owned subsidiary of Talen Energy and the sole owner of PPL Energy Supply. Substantially contemporaneous with the spinoff and merger, RJS Power was contributed by its owners to become a subsidiary of Talen Energy. PPL shareowners received approximately 0.1249 shares of Talen Energy common stock for each share of PPL common stock they owned on May 20, 2015. Following completion of these transactions, PPL shareowners owned 65% of Talen Energy and affiliates of Riverstone owned 35%. The spinoff had no effect on the number of PPL common shares owned by PPL shareowners or the number of shares of PPL common stock outstanding. The transaction is intended to be tax-free to PPL and its shareowners for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
PPL has no continuing ownership interest in, control of, or affiliation with Talen Energy and Talen Energy Supply (formerly PPL Energy Supply).
| 43 |
Loss on Spinoff
In conjunction with the accounting for the spinoff, PPL evaluated
whether the fair value of the Supply segment's net assets was less than the carrying value as of the June 1, 2015 spinoff date.
PPL considered several valuation methodologies to derive a fair value estimate of its Supply segment at the spinoff date. These
methodologies included considering the closing "when-issued" Talen Energy market value on June 1, 2015 (the spinoff date),
adjusted for the proportional share of the equity value attributable to the Supply segment, as well as, the valuation methods consistently
used in PPL's goodwill impairment assessments - an income approach using a discounted cash flow analysis of the Supply segment
and an alternative market approach considering market multiples of comparable companies.
Although the market value of Talen Energy approach utilized the most observable inputs of the three approaches, PPL considered certain limitations of the "when-issued" trading market for the spinoff transaction including the short trading duration, lack of liquidity in the market and anticipated initial Talen stock ownership base selling pressure, among other factors, and concluded that these factors limit this input being solely determinative of the fair value of the Supply segment. As such, PPL also considered the other valuation approaches in estimating the overall fair value, but ultimately assigned the highest weighting to the Talen Energy market value approach.
The following table summarizes PPL's fair value analysis:
| Weighted | ||||||
| Fair Value | ||||||
| Approach | Weighting | (in billions) | ||||
| Talen Energy Market Value | 50% | $ | 1.4 | |||
| Income/Discounted Cash Flow | 30% | 1.1 | ||||
| Alternative Market (Comparable Company) | 20% | 0.7 | ||||
| Estimated Fair Value | $ | 3.2 | ||||
A key assumption included in the fair value estimate is the application of a control premium of 25% in the two market approaches. PPL concluded it was appropriate to apply a control premium in these approaches as the goodwill impairment testing guidance was followed in determining the estimated fair value of the Supply segment which has historically been a reporting unit for PPL. This guidance provides that the market price of an individual security (and thus the market capitalization of a reporting unit with publically traded equity securities) may not be representative of the fair value of the reporting unit. This guidance also indicates that substantial value may arise to a controlling shareholder from the ability to take advantage of synergies and other benefits that arise from control over another entity, and that the market price of a Company's individual share of stock does not reflect this additional value to a controlling shareholder. Therefore, the quoted market price need not be the sole measurement basis for determining the fair value, and including a control premium is appropriate in measuring the fair value of a reporting unit.
In determining the control premium, PPL reviewed premiums received during the last five years in market sales transactions obtained from observable independent power producer and hybrid utility transactions greater than $1 billion. Premiums for these transactions ranged from 5% to 42% with a median of approximately 25%. Given these metrics, PPL concluded a control premium of 25% to be reasonable for both of the market valuation approaches used.
Assumptions used in the discounted cash flow analysis included forward energy prices, forecasted generation, and forecasted operation and maintenance expenditures that were consistent with assumptions used in the Energy Supply portion of the recent Talen Energy business planning process and a market participant discount rate.
Using these methodologies and weightings, PPL determined the estimated fair value of the Supply segment (Classified as Level 3) was below its carrying value of $4.1 billion and recorded a loss on the spinoff of $879 million, which is reflected in discontinued operations and is nondeductible for tax purposes. This amount served to reduce the basis of the net assets accounted for as a dividend at the June 1, 2015 spinoff date.
Costs of Spinoff
Following the announcement of the transaction to form Talen Energy, efforts were initiated to identify the appropriate staffing for Talen Energy and for PPL and its subsidiaries following completion of the spinoff. Organizational plans were substantially completed in 2014. The new organizational plans identified the need to resize and restructure the organizations and as a result, in 2014, estimated charges for employee separation benefits were recorded. See Note 8 in the 2014 Form 10-K for additional information. The separation benefits include cash severance compensation, lump sum COBRA
| 44 |
reimbursement payments and outplacement services. Most separations and payment of separation benefits are expected to be completed by the end of 2015. At June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the recorded liabilities related to the separation benefits were $13 million and $21 million, which are included in "Other current liabilities" on the Balance Sheets.
Additional employee-related costs incurred primarily include accelerated stock-based compensation and pro-rated performance-based cash incentive and stock-based compensation awards, primarily for PPL Energy Supply employees and for PPL Services employees who became PPL Energy Supply employees in connection with the transaction. PPL Energy Supply recognized $24 million of these costs at the spinoff closing date which are reflected in discontinued operations.
As the vesting for all PPL Energy Supply employees was accelerated and all remaining unrecognized compensation expense accelerated concurrently with the spinoff, PPL does not expect to recognize significant future compensation costs for equity awards held by former PPL Energy Supply employees. PPL's future stock-based compensation expense will not be significantly impacted by equity award adjustments that occurred as a result of the spinoff. Stock-based compensation expense recognized in future periods will correspond to the unrecognized compensation expense as of the date of the spinoff. Unrecognized compensation expense as of the date of the spinoff reflects the unamortized balance of the original grant date fair value of the equity awards held by PPL employees.
PPL recorded $36 million and $42 million of third-party costs related to this transaction during the three and six months ended June 30, 2015. Of these costs, $29 million and $31 million were primarily for bank advisory, legal and accounting fees to facilitate the transaction, and are reflected in discontinued operations. An additional $7 million and $11 million of consulting and other costs were incurred to prepare the new Talen Energy organization for the spinoff and reconfigure the remaining PPL service functions. These costs are primarily recorded in "Other operation and maintenance" on the Statement of Income. PPL recorded $16 million of third-party costs related to this transaction during the three and six months ended June 30, 2014. No significant additional third-party costs are expected to be incurred.
At the close of the transaction, $72 million ($42 million after-tax) of cash flow hedges, primarily unamortized losses on PPL interest rate swaps recorded in AOCI and designated as cash flow hedges of PPL Energy Supply's future interest payments, were reclassified into earnings and reflected in discontinued operations.
Continuing Involvement
As a result of the spinoff, PPL and PPL Energy Supply entered into a Transition Services Agreement (TSA) which terminates no later than two years from the spinoff date. The TSA sets forth the terms and conditions for PPL and Talen Energy to provide certain transition services to one another. PPL will provide Talen Energy certain information technology, financial and accounting, human resource and other specified services. For the period June 1, 2015 to June 30, 2015, the amounts PPL billed Talen Energy for these services were not significant. In general, the fees for the transition services allow the provider to recover its cost of the services, including overheads, but without margin or profit.
Additionally, prior to the spinoff, through the annual competitive solicitation process, PPL EnergyPlus was awarded supply contracts for a portion of the PLR generation supply for PPL Electric, which were retained by Talen Energy Marketing as part of the spinoff transaction. PPL Electric's supply contracts with Talen Energy Marketing extend through December 2015. The energy purchases were previously included in PPL Electric's Statements of Income as "Energy purchases from affiliate" but were eliminated in PPL's Consolidated Statements of Income.
For the period June 1, 2015 to June 30, 2015, PPL Electric's energy purchases from Talen Energy Marketing were not significant and are no longer considered affiliate transactions.
Summarized Results of Discontinued Operations
The operations of the Supply segment are included in "Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations (net of income taxes)" on the Statements of Income. Following are the components of Discontinued Operations in the Statements of Income for the periods ended June 30:
| 45 |
| Three Months | Six Months | ||||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | ||||||||
| Operating revenues | $ | 483 | $ | 1,046 | $ | 1,427 | $ | 118 | |||
| Operating expenses | 561 | 1,006 | 1,328 | 164 | |||||||
| Other Income (Expense) - net | (29) | (8) | (22) | (2) | |||||||
| Interest Expense (a) | 112 | 50 | 150 | 98 | |||||||
| Income (loss) before income taxes | (219) | (18) | (73) | (146) | |||||||
| Income tax expense (benefit) | (91) | (17) | (40) | (72) | |||||||
| Loss on spinoff | (879) | (879) | |||||||||
| Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations (net of income taxes) | $ | (1,007) | $ | (1) | $ | (912) | $ | (74) | |||
| (a) | Includes interest associated with the Supply Segment with no additional allocation as the Supply segment was sufficiently capitalized. |
Summarized Assets and Liabilities of Discontinued Operations
The assets and liabilities of PPL's Supply segment for all periods prior to the spinoff are included in "Current assets of discontinued operations", "Noncurrent assets of discontinued operations", "Current liabilities of discontinued operations" and "Noncurrent liabilities of discontinued operations" on PPL's Balance Sheet. Net assets, after recognition of the loss on spinoff, of $3.2 billion were distributed to PPL shareowners on June 1, 2015, as a result of the completion of the spinoff of PPL Energy Supply. The following major classes of assets and liabilities were distributed and removed from PPL's Balance Sheet on June 1, 2015. Additionally, the following major classes of assets and liabilities were reclassified to discontinued operations as of December 31, 2014:
| Discontinued | ||||||
| Distribution at | Operations at | |||||
| June 1, | December 31, | |||||
| 2015 | 2014 | |||||
| Cash and cash equivalents (a) | $ | 371 | $ | 352 | ||
| Restricted cash and cash equivalents | 156 | 176 | ||||
| Accounts receivable and unbilled revenues | 325 | 504 | ||||
| Fuels, materials and supplies | 415 | 455 | ||||
| Price risk management assets | 784 | 1,079 | ||||
| Other current assets | 65 | 34 | ||||
| Total Current Assets | 2,116 | 2,600 | ||||
| Investments | 999 | 980 | ||||
| PP&E, net | 6,384 | 6,428 | ||||
| Goodwill | 338 | 338 | ||||
| Other intangibles | 260 | 257 | ||||
| Price risk management assets | 244 | 239 | ||||
| Other noncurrent assets | 78 | 75 | ||||
| Total Noncurrent Assets | 8,303 | 8,317 | ||||
| Total assets | $ | 10,419 | $ | 10,917 | ||
| Short-term debt and long-term debt due within one year | $ | 885 | $ | 1,165 | ||
| Accounts payable | 252 | 361 | ||||
| Price risk management liabilities | 763 | 1,024 | ||||
| Other current liabilities | 229 | 225 | ||||
| Total Current Liabilities | 2,129 | 2,775 | ||||
| Long-term debt (excluding current portion) | 1,932 | 1,683 | ||||
| Deferred income taxes | 1,259 | 1,223 | ||||
| Price risk management liabilities | 206 | 193 | ||||
| Accrued pension obligations | 244 | 299 | ||||
| Asset retirement obligations | 443 | 415 | ||||
| Other deferred credits and noncurrent liabilities | 103 | 150 | ||||
| Total Noncurrent Liabilities | 4,187 | 3,963 | ||||
| Total liabilities | $ | 6,316 | $ | 6,738 | ||
| Adjustment for loss on spinoff | 879 | |||||
| Net assets distributed | $ | 3,224 | ||||
| 46 |
Montana Hydro Sale
In November 2014, PPL Montana completed the sale to NorthWestern of 633 MW of hydroelectric generating facilities located in Montana for approximately $900 million in cash. The proceeds from the sale remained with PPL and did not transfer to Talen Energy as a result of the spinoff of PPL Energy Supply. The sale included 11 hydroelectric power facilities and related assets, included in the Supply segment.
As the Montana hydroelectric power facilities were previously reported as a component of PPL Energy Supply and the Supply Segment, the components of discontinued operations for these facilities contained in the Statements of Income are included in the disclosure above.
Development
Future Capacity Needs (PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU)
Cane Run Unit 7 was put into commercial operation on June 19, 2015. LG&E retired one coal-fired generating unit at the Cane Run plant in March 2015 and retired the remaining two coal-fired generating units at the plant in June 2015. LG&E incurred costs of $11 million directly related to these retirements consisting of an inventory write-down and separation benefits. However, there were no gains or losses on the retirement of these units.
In October 2013, LG&E and KU announced plans for a 10 MW solar generation facility to be operational in 2016 at a cost of approximately $36 million. In December 2014, a final order was issued by the KPSC approving the request to construct the solar generating facility at E.W. Brown.
(PPL)
PPL performed a remeasurement of the assets and the obligations for the PPL Retirement Plan and PPL Postretirement Benefit plans as of May 31, 2015 to allow for separation of those plans for PPL and Talen Energy as required in accordance with the spinoff transaction agreements. The net pension obligations for all active PPL Energy Supply employees and for individuals who terminated employment from PPL Energy Supply on or after July 1, 2000 were distributed and removed from PPL's Balance Sheet. The net other postretirement benefit obligations for all active PPL Energy Supply employees were distributed and removed from PPL's Balance Sheet. In addition, the net nonqualified pension plan obligations for all PPL Energy Supply active and inactive employees were retained by PPL. As a result, PPL distributed and removed from its Balance Sheet $244 million of net accrued pension obligations and $7 million of other postretirement benefit obligations. See Note 8 for additional information on the spinoff of PPL Energy Supply.
(PPL, LKE and LG&E)
Certain net periodic defined benefit costs are applied to accounts that are further distributed between capital and expense, including certain costs allocated to applicable subsidiaries for plans sponsored by PPL Services and LKE. Following are the net periodic defined benefit costs (credits) of the plans sponsored by PPL and its subsidiaries, LKE and its subsidiaries and LG&E for the periods ended June 30:
| Pension Benefits | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Three Months | Six Months | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| U.S. | U.K. | U.S. | U.K. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2015 (b) | 2014 (c) | 2015 | 2014 | 2015 (b) | 2014 (c) | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||||||||||||
| PPL | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Service cost | $ | 26 | $ | 24 | $ | 19 | $ | 18 | $ | 56 | $ | 49 | $ | 39 | $ | 36 | ||||||||||
| Interest cost | 52 | 56 | 77 | 90 | 110 | 112 | 156 | 178 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Expected return on plan assets | (69) | (72) | (129) | (132) | (145) | (144) | (260) | (262) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Amortization of: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Prior service cost | 2 | 5 | 4 | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Actuarial (gain) loss | 22 | 7 | 40 | 33 | 47 | 14 | 79 | 66 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Net periodic defined benefit | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| costs (credits) prior to | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| termination benefits | 33 | 20 | 7 | 9 | 72 | 41 | 14 | 18 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 47 |
| Pension Benefits | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Three Months | Six Months | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| U.S. | U.K. | U.S. | U.K. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2015 (b) | 2014 (c) | 2015 | 2014 | 2015 (b) | 2014 (c) | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Termination benefits (a) | 20 | 20 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net periodic defined benefit | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| costs (credits) | $ | 33 | $ | 40 | $ | 7 | $ | 9 | $ | 72 | $ | 61 | $ | 14 | $ | 18 | ||||||||||
| Pension Benefits | ||||||||||||||
| Three Months | Six Months | |||||||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||||
| LKE | ||||||||||||||
| Service cost | $ | 6 | $ | 5 | $ | 13 | $ | 11 | ||||||
| Interest cost | 17 | 16 | 34 | 33 | ||||||||||
| Expected return on plan assets | (22) | (21) | (44) | (41) | ||||||||||
| Amortization of: | ||||||||||||||
| Prior service cost | 2 | 1 | 4 | 2 | ||||||||||
| Actuarial (gain) loss | 9 | 3 | 17 | 6 | ||||||||||
| Net periodic defined benefit costs (credits) | $ | 12 | $ | 4 | $ | 24 | $ | 11 | ||||||
| LG&E | ||||||||||||||
| Service cost | $ | 1 | $ | 1 | $ | 1 | $ | 1 | ||||||
| Interest cost | 4 | 3 | 7 | 7 | ||||||||||
| Expected return on plan assets | (5) | (5) | (10) | (10) | ||||||||||
| Amortization of: | ||||||||||||||
| Prior service cost | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
| Actuarial (gain) loss | 3 | 2 | 6 | 3 | ||||||||||
| Net periodic defined benefit costs (credits) | $ | 3 | $ | 1 | $ | 5 | $ | 2 | ||||||
| (a) | Includes termination benefits of $4 million for PPL Electric. The remaining $16 million relates to PPL Energy Supply and is reflected in discontinued operations. |
| Other Postretirement Benefits | |||||||||||||
| Three Months | Six Months | ||||||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | ||||||||||
| PPL | |||||||||||||
| Service cost | $ | 3 | $ | 3 | $ | 7 | $ | 6 | |||||
| Interest cost | 7 | 8 | 14 | 16 | |||||||||
| Expected return on plan assets | (7) | (7) | (14) | (13) | |||||||||
| Net periodic defined benefit costs (credits) | $ | 3 | $ | 4 | $ | 7 | $ | 9 | |||||
| LKE | |||||||||||||
| Service cost | $ | 2 | $ | 1 | $ | 3 | $ | 2 | |||||
| Interest cost | 3 | 3 | 5 | 5 | |||||||||
| Expected return on plan assets | (2) | (2) | (3) | (3) | |||||||||
| Amortization of: | |||||||||||||
| Prior service cost | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Net periodic defined benefit costs (credits) | $ | 3 | $ | 2 | $ | 6 | $ | 5 | |||||
In addition to the specific plans it sponsors, LG&E is allocated costs of defined benefit plans sponsored by LKE based on its participation in those plans, which management believes are reasonable. PPL Electric and KU do not directly sponsor any defined benefit plans. PPL Electric is allocated costs of defined benefit plans sponsored by PPL Services and KU is allocated costs of defined benefit plans sponsored by LKE based on their participation in those plans, which management believes are reasonable. For the periods ended June 30, PPL Services allocated the following net periodic defined benefit costs to PPL Electric, and LKE allocated the following net periodic defined benefit costs to LG&E and KU.
| Three Months | Six Months | |||||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||
| PPL Electric (a) | $ | 8 | $ | 10 | $ | 16 | $ | 15 | ||||
| LG&E | 4 | 2 | 7 | 4 | ||||||||
| KU | 4 | 1 | 9 | 4 |
| 48 |
10. Commitments and Contingencies
All commitments, contingencies and guarantees associated with PPL Energy Supply and its subsidiaries were retained by Talen Energy Supply and its subsidiaries at the spinoff date without recourse to PPL.
Legal Matters
(All Registrants)
PPL and its subsidiaries are involved in legal proceedings, claims and litigation in the ordinary course of business. PPL and its subsidiaries cannot predict the outcome of such matters, or whether such matters may result in material liabilities, unless otherwise noted.
WKE Indemnification (PPL and LKE)
See footnote (e) to the table in "Guarantees and Other Assurances" below for information on an LKE indemnity relating to its former WKE lease, including related legal proceedings.
(PPL, LKE and LG&E)
Cane Run Environmental Claims
In December 2013, six residents, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, filed a class action complaint against LG&E and PPL in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Kentucky alleging violations of the Clean Air Act and RCRA. In addition, these plaintiffs assert common law claims of nuisance, trespass and negligence. These plaintiffs seek injunctive relief and civil penalties, plus costs and attorney fees, for the alleged statutory violations. Under the common law claims, these plaintiffs seek monetary compensation and punitive damages for property damage and diminished property values for a class consisting of residents within four miles of the plant. In their individual capacities, these plaintiffs seek compensation for alleged adverse health effects. In response to a motion to dismiss filed by PPL and LG&E, in July 2014, the court dismissed the plaintiffs' RCRA claims and all but one Clean Air Act claim, but declined to dismiss their common law tort claims. Upon motion of LG&E and PPL, the district court certified for appellate review the issue of whether the state common law claims are preempted by federal statute. In December 2014, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit issued an order granting appellate review regarding the above matter and such issues as may appropriately be presented by the parties and determined by the court. Oral argument is scheduled for August 2015. PPL, LKE and LG&E cannot predict the outcome of this matter. LG&E retired one coal-fired unit at the Cane Run plant in March 2015 and the remaining two coal-fired units at the plant in June 2015.
Mill Creek Environmental Claims
In May 2014, the Sierra Club filed a citizen suit against LG&E in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Kentucky for alleged violations of the Clean Water Act. The Sierra Club alleges that various discharges at the Mill Creek plant constitute violations of the plant's water discharge permit. The Sierra Club seeks civil penalties, injunctive relief, costs and attorney's fees. In July 2015, the Court held a hearing regarding various cross-motions for summary judgment which are pending. PPL, LKE and LG&E cannot predict the outcome of this matter or the potential impact on the operations of the Mill Creek plant but believe the plant is operating in compliance with the permits.
Regulatory Issues (All Registrants)
See Note 6 for information on regulatory matters related to utility rate regulation.
Electricity - Reliability Standards
The NERC is responsible for establishing and enforcing mandatory reliability standards (Reliability Standards) regarding the bulk power system. The FERC oversees this process and independently enforces the Reliability Standards.
| 49 |
The Reliability Standards have the force and effect of law and apply to certain users of the bulk power electricity system, including electric utility companies, generators and marketers. Under the Federal Power Act, the FERC may assess civil penalties of up to $1 million per day, per violation, for certain violations.
PPL, LG&E, KU and PPL Electric monitor their compliance with the Reliability Standards and continue to self-report potential violations of certain applicable reliability requirements and submit accompanying mitigation plans, as required. The resolution of a small number of potential violations is pending. Any Regional Reliability Entity (including RFC or SERC) determination concerning the resolution of violations of the Reliability Standards remains subject to the approval of the NERC and the FERC.
In the course of implementing their programs to ensure compliance with the Reliability Standards by those PPL affiliates subject to the standards, certain other instances of potential non-compliance may be identified from time to time. The Registrants cannot predict the outcome of these matters, and cannot estimate a range of reasonably possible losses, if any.
In October 2012, the FERC initiated its consideration of proposed changes to Reliability Standards to address the impacts of geomagnetic disturbances on the reliable operation of the bulk-power system, which might, among other things, lead to a requirement to install equipment that blocks geomagnetically induced currents on implicated transformers. In May 2013, FERC issued Order No. 779, requiring NERC to submit two types of Reliability Standards for FERC's approval. The first type would require certain owners and operators of the nation's electricity infrastructure, such as the Registrants, to develop and implement operational procedures to mitigate the effects of geomagnetic disturbances on the bulk-power system. This NERC proposed standard was filed by NERC with FERC for approval in January 2014, and was approved in June 2014. The second type is to require owners and operators of the bulk-power system to assess certain geomagnetic disturbance events and develop and implement plans to protect the bulk-power system from those events. This proposal was filed by NERC with FERC for approval and in May 2015 FERC proposed to approve NERC's proposed standard. The proposal addressed many of the industry's concerns and the Registrants do not presently anticipate significant costs to comply with the requirements if finalized as proposed.
Environmental Matters - Domestic
(All Registrants)
Due to the environmental issues discussed below or other environmental matters, it may be necessary for the Registrants to modify, curtail, replace or cease operation of certain facilities or performance of certain operations to comply with statutes, regulations and other requirements of regulatory bodies or courts. In addition, legal challenges to new environmental permits or rules add to the uncertainty of estimating the future cost of these permits and rules.
LG&E and KU are entitled to recover, through the ECR mechanism, certain costs of complying with the Clean Air Act, as amended, and those federal, state or local environmental requirements applicable to coal combustion wastes and by-products from facilities that generate electricity from coal in accordance with approved compliance plans. Costs not covered by the ECR mechanism for LG&E and KU and all such costs for PPL Electric are subject to rate recovery before the companies' respective state regulatory authorities, or the FERC, if applicable. Because PPL Electric does not own any generating plants, its exposure to related environmental compliance costs is reduced. PPL, PPL Electric, LKE, LG&E and KU can provide no assurances as to the ultimate outcome of future environmental or rate proceedings before regulatory authorities.
(PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU)
Air
The Clean Air Act, which regulates air pollutants from mobile and stationary sources, has a significant impact on the operation of fossil fuel plants. The Clean Air Act requires the EPA periodically to review and establish concentration levels in the ambient air for six criteria pollutants to protect public health and welfare. These concentration levels are known as NAAQS. The six criteria pollutants are carbon monoxide, lead, nitrogen dioxide, ozone, particulate matter and SO2.
Federal environmental regulations of these criteria pollutants require states to adopt implementation plans, known as SIPs, for certain pollutants, which detail how the state will attain the standards that are mandated by the relevant law or regulation. Each state identifies the areas within its boundaries that meet the NAAQS (attainment areas) and those that do not (non-attainment areas), and must develop a SIP both to bring non-attainment areas into compliance with the NAAQS and to maintain good air quality in attainment areas. In addition, for attainment of ozone and fine particulates standards, states in
| 50 |
the eastern portion of the country, including Kentucky, are subject to a regional program developed by the EPA known as the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule. The NAAQS, future revisions to the NAAQS and SIPs implementing them, or future revisions to regional programs, may require installation of additional pollution controls, the costs of which PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU believe are subject to cost recovery.
Although PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU do not currently anticipate significant costs to comply with these programs, changes in market or operating conditions could result in different costs than anticipated.
National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)
In 2008, the EPA revised the NAAQS for ozone and proposed to further strengthen the standard in November 2014.The EPA is required under court order to finalize the standard by October 1, 2015. States are also obligated to address interstate transport issues associated with new ozone standards through the establishment of "good neighbor" state implementation plans for those states that are found to contribute significantly to another states' non-attainment. States that are not in the ozone transport region, including Kentucky, are working together to evaluate further nitrogen oxide reductions from fossil-fueled plants with SCRs. The nature and timing of any additional reductions resulting from these evaluations cannot be predicted at this time.
In 2010, the EPA finalized revised NAAQS for sulfur dioxide and required states to identify areas that meet those standards and areas that are in "non-attainment". In July 2013, the EPA finalized non-attainment designations for parts of the country, including part of Jefferson County in Kentucky. Attainment must be achieved by 2018. PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU anticipate that some of the measures required for compliance with Clean Air Act regulations governing attainment of ozone or particulates standards, such as upgraded or new sulfur dioxide scrubbers at certain plants and the previously announced retirement of coal-fired generating units at LG&E's Cane Run plant and KU's Green River and Tyrone plants, will help to achieve compliance with the new sulfur dioxide standard. If additional reductions were to be required, the costs could be significant.
Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS)
In February 2012, the EPA finalized the MATS rule requiring reductions of mercury and other hazardous air pollutants from fossil-fuel fired power plants, with an effective date of April 16, 2012. The MATS rule was challenged by industry groups and states and was upheld by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D. C. Circuit Court (D.C. Circuit Court) in April 2014. A group of states subsequently petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court (Supreme Court) to review this decision and on June 29, 2015, the Supreme Court held that the EPA failed to properly consider costs when deciding to regulate hazardous air emissions from power plants under MATS. The Court remanded the matter to the D.C. Circuit Court. EPA's MATS rule remains in effect pending action by the D.C. Circuit Court. It is uncertain whether the D.C. Circuit Court will vacate the MATS rule, remand the rule to the EPA, or require further proceedings or actions.
LG&E and KU have installed significant controls in connection with the MATS rule and in conjunction with compliance with other environmental requirements, including fabric-filter baghouses, upgraded FGDs or chemical additive systems for which appropriate KPSC authorization and/or ECR treatment has been received. PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU cannot predict the outcome of this matter or the potential impact, if any, on plant operations, rate treatment or future capital or operating needs.
New Source Review (NSR)
The EPA has continued its NSR enforcement efforts targeting coal-fired generating plants. The EPA has asserted that modification of these plants has increased their emissions and, consequently, that they are subject to stringent NSR requirements under the Clean Air Act. PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU received various EPA information requests in 2007 and 2009, but have received no further communications from the EPA related to those requests since providing their responses. States and environmental groups also have commenced litigation alleging violations of the NSR regulations by coal-fired generating plants across the nation. PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU cannot predict the outcome of these matters, and cannot estimate the impact, if any.
If any PPL subsidiary is found to have violated NSR regulations by significantly increasing pollutants through a major plant modification, the subsidiary would, among other things, be required to meet stringent permit limits reflecting Best Available Control Technology (BACT) for pollutants meeting the NAAQS in the area and reflecting Lowest Achievable Emission Rates for pollutants not meeting the NAAQS in the area. The costs to meet such limits, including installation of technology at certain units, could be significant.
| 51 |
Trimble County Unit 2 Air Permit
The Sierra Club and other environmental groups petitioned the Kentucky Environmental and Public Protection Cabinet to overturn the air permit issued for the Trimble County Unit 2 baseload coal-fired generating unit, but the agency upheld the permit in an order issued in September 2007. In response to subsequent petitions by environmental groups, the EPA ordered certain non-material changes to the permit which, in January 2010, were incorporated into a final revised permit issued by the Kentucky Division for Air Quality. In March 2010, the environmental groups petitioned the EPA to object to the revised state permit. Until the EPA issues a final ruling on the pending petition and all available appeals are exhausted, PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU cannot predict the outcome of this matter or the potential impact on plant operations, including increased capital costs, if any.
Climate Change
(All Registrants)
As a result of the April 2007 U.S. Supreme Court decision that the EPA has authority under the Clean Air Act to regulate carbon dioxide emissions from new motor vehicles, in April 2010 the EPA and the U.S. Department of Transportation issued new light-duty vehicle emissions standards that applied beginning with 2012 model year vehicles. The EPA also clarified that this standard, beginning in 2011, authorized regulation of carbon dioxide emissions from stationary sources under the NSR and Title V operating permit provisions of the Clean Air Act. The EPA's rules were challenged in court and on June 23, 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the EPA has the authority to regulate carbon dioxide emissions under these provisions of the Clean Air Act but only for stationary sources that would otherwise have been subject to these provisions due to significant increases in emissions of other pollutants. As a result, any new sources or major modifications to an existing GHG source causing a net significant increase in carbon dioxide emissions must comply with BACT permit limits for carbon dioxide if it would otherwise be subject to BACT or lowest achievable emissions rate limits due to significant increases in other pollutants.
In June 2013, President Obama released his Climate Action Plan that reiterates the goal of reducing GHG emissions in the U.S. "in the range of" 17% below 2005 levels by 2020 through such actions as regulating power plant emissions, promoting increased use of renewables and clean energy technology, and establishing more restrictive energy efficiency standards. Additionally, the Climate Action Plan calls for the U.S. to prepare for the impacts of climate change. Requirements related to this Plan could affect the Registrants and others in the industry as modifications may be needed to electricity delivery systems to improve the ability to withstand major storms in order to meet those requirements. As further described below, the EPA has proposed rules pursuant to this directive for both new and existing power plants, which it expects to finalize in the third quarter of 2015. The EPA has also announced that it will develop a federal implementation plan which would apply to any states that fail to submit an acceptable state implementation plan under these rules. The EPA's authority to promulgate these regulations under Section 111 of the Clean Air Act when the sources are already regulated under Section 112 is under challenge in the D.C. Circuit Court. Oral arguments were heard on April 16, 2015.
The EPA's proposal for new power plants was issued in January 2014. The revised proposal calls for separate emission standards for coal and gas units based on the application of different technologies. The coal standard is based on the application of partial carbon capture and sequestration technology, but because this technology is not presently commercially available, the revised proposal effectively precludes the construction of new coal-fired plants. The standard for NGCC power plants is the same as the EPA proposed in 2012 and is not continuously achievable. The preclusion of new coal-fired plants and the compliance difficulties posed for new gas-fired plants could have a significant industry-wide impact.
The EPA's proposal for existing power plants was issued in June 2014. The existing plant proposal contains state-specific rate-based reduction goals and guidelines for the development, submission and implementation of state plans to achieve the state goals. State-specific goals were calculated from 2012 data by applying EPA's broad interpretation and definition of the Best System of Emission Reduction resulting in stringent targets to be met in two phases (2020-2029 and 2030 and beyond). The EPA believes it has offered some flexibility to the states as to how state compliance plans can be crafted, including the option to demonstrate compliance on a mass basis and through multi-state collaborations. The EPA is also proposing potential state plan extensions based on the type of plan filed (single or multi state). LG&E and KU have analyzed the proposal and identified potential impacts and solutions in comments filed in December 2014. PPL also submitted Supplemental Comments to FERC through EEI, advocating for reliability coordination and relief in response to technical conferences hosted by FERC on the reliability implications of implementing this rule. LG&E and KU are also working closely with state regulators in the development of Kentucky's state implementation plan. The regulation of carbon dioxide
| 52 |
emissions from existing power plants could have a significant industry-wide impact depending on the structure and stringency of the final rule and state implementation plans.
(PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU)
In April 2014, the Kentucky General Assembly passed legislation which limits the measures that the Kentucky Energy and Environment Cabinet may consider in setting performance standards to comply with the EPA's regulations governing GHG emissions from existing sources. The legislation provides that such state GHG performance standards shall be based on emission reductions, efficiency measures, and other improvements available at each power plant, rather than renewable energy, end-use energy efficiency, fuel switching and re-dispatch. These statutory restrictions may make it more difficult for Kentucky to achieve the GHG reduction levels which the EPA has proposed for Kentucky.
A number of lawsuits have been filed asserting common law claims including nuisance, trespass and negligence against various companies with GHG emitting plants and, although the decided cases to date have not sustained claims brought on the basis of these theories of liability, the law remains unsettled on these claims. In June 2011, the U.S. Supreme Court in the case of AEP v. Connecticut ruled that federal common law claims against five utility companies for allegedly causing a public nuisance as a result of their emissions of GHGs were displaced by the Clean Air Act and regulatory actions of the EPA. In addition, in Comer v. Murphy Oil (Comer case), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (Fifth Circuit) upheld a district court ruling that plaintiffs did not have standing to pursue state common law claims against companies that emit GHGs. The plaintiffs in the Comer case later filed a substantially similar complaint against a larger group of companies which was subsequently dismissed by the U. S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi. The lower court's ruling was affirmed by the Fifth Circuit in May 2013. Additional litigation in federal and state courts over such issues is continuing. PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU cannot predict the outcome of these matters.
(PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU)
Water/Waste
Coal Combustion Residuals (CCRs)
On April 17, 2015, the EPA published its final rule regulating CCRs. CCRs include fly ash, bottom ash and sulfur dioxide scrubber wastes. The rule will become effective on October 14, 2015. It imposes extensive new requirements, including location restrictions, design and operating standards, groundwater monitoring and corrective action requirements and closure and post-closure care requirements on CCR impoundments and landfills that are located on active power plants and not closed. Under the rule, the EPA will regulate CCRs as non-hazardous under Subtitle D of RCRA and allow beneficial use of CCRs, with some restrictions. This self-implementing rule requires posting of compliance documentation on a publicly accessible website and is enforceable through citizen suits. LG&E's and KU's plants using surface impoundments for management and disposal of CCRs will be most impacted by this rule. The rule's requirements for covered CCR impoundments and landfills include commencement or completion of closure activities generally between three and ten years from certain triggering events. PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU also anticipate incurring capital or operation and maintenance costs prior to that time to address other provisions of the rule, such as groundwater monitoring and disposal facility modifications or closings, or to implement various compliance strategies.
In connection with the final CCR rule, LG&E and KU recorded increases to existing AROs during the second quarter of 2015. See Note 16 for additional information. Further increases to AROs or changes to current capital plans or to operating costs may be required as estimates are refined based on closure developments, groundwater monitoring results, and regulatory or legal proceedings. Costs relating to this rule are subject to rate recovery.
Trimble County Landfill
In May 2011, LG&E submitted an application for a special waste landfill permit to handle CCRs generated at the Trimble County plant. In May 2013, the Kentucky Division of Waste Management denied the permit application on the grounds that the proposed facility would violate the Kentucky Cave Protection Act. In January 2014, LG&E submitted to the Kentucky Division of Waste Management a landfill permit application for an alternate site adjacent to the plant. LG&E has also applied for other necessary regulatory approvals including a dredge and fill permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, in which proceeding the EPA or the public have submitted certain comments to which LG&E and KU have responded. PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU are unable to determine the potential impact of this matter until all permits are issued and any resulting
| 53 |
legal challenges are concluded. See Note 6 for additional information on Kentucky Public Service Commission proceedings relating to the Trimble County Landfill.
Clean Water Act
Regulations under the federal Clean Water Act dictate permitting and mitigation requirements for many of LG&E's and KU's construction projects. Many of those requirements relate to power plant operations, including requirements related to the treatment of pollutants in effluents prior to discharge, the temperature of effluent discharges and the location, design and construction of cooling water intake structures at generating facilities, standards intended to protect aquatic organisms by reducing capture in the screens attached to cooling water intake structures (impingement) at generating facilities and the water volume brought into the facilities (entrainment). The requirements could impose significant costs which are subject to rate recovery.
Effluent Limitations Guidelines (ELGs)
In June 2013, the EPA published proposed regulations to revise discharge limitations for steam electric generation wastewater permits. The proposed limitations are based on the EPA review of available treatment technologies and their capacity for reducing pollutants and include new requirements for fly ash and bottom ash transport water and metal cleaning waste waters, as well as new limits for scrubber wastewater and landfill leachate. The EPA's proposed ELGs contain requirements that would affect the inspection and operation of CCR facilities if finalized as proposed. The proposal contains alternative approaches, some of which could impose significant costs on LG&E's and KU's coal-fired plants. The final regulation is expected to be issued by the fourth quarter of 2015. At the present time, PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU are unable to estimate a range of reasonably possible costs, but the costs could be significant. Pending finalization of the ELGs, certain states (including Kentucky) and environmental groups are proposing more stringent technology-based limits in permit renewals. Depending on the final limits imposed, the costs of compliance could be significant and costs could be imposed ahead of federal timelines. Costs to comply with ELGs or technology-based limits are subject to rate recovery.
(PPL, LKE and LG&E)
Clean Water Act Section 316(b)
The EPA's final 316(b) rule for existing facilities became effective in October 2014, and regulates cooling water intake structures and their impact on aquatic organisms. States are allowed broad discretion to make site-specific determinations under the rule. The rule requires existing facilities to choose between several options to reduce the impact to aquatic organisms that become trapped against water intake screens (impingement) and to determine the intake structure's impact on aquatic organisms pulled through a plant's cooling water system (entrainment). Plants equipped with closed-cycle cooling, an acceptable option, would likely not incur substantial costs. Once-through systems would likely require additional technology to comply with the rule. Mill Creek Unit 1 is the only unit expected to be impacted. PPL, LKE, and LG&E are evaluating compliance strategies but do not presently expect the compliance costs, which are subject to rate recovery, to be significant.
(All Registrants)
Waters of the United States (WOTUS)
On May 27, 2015, the EPA released a final rule on the definition of WOTUS. Although the rule was meant to clarify which streams and other bodies of water fall under the jurisdiction of EPA and the Army Corps of Engineers under the Clean Water Act, significant ambiguity remains. The Registrants do not currently expect the rule to have a significant impact on their operations. Until such time as ongoing litigation is complete, however, the Registrants are unable to predict the impact of the rule which could be substantial and include significant project delays and added costs, as permits and other regulatory requirements may be imposed for many activities presently not covered by permitting requirements (including vegetation management for transmission lines and activities affecting storm water conveyances and wetlands). However, these costs are subject to rate recovery.
Other Issues
The EPA is reassessing its polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB) regulations under the Toxic Substance Control Act, which currently allow certain PCB articles to remain in use. In April 2010, the EPA issued an Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for changes to these regulations. This rulemaking could lead to a phase-out of all or some PCB-containing equipment. The EPA has postponed the release of the revised regulations to March 2016. The Registrants cannot predict at
| 54 |
this time the outcome of these proposed EPA regulations and what impact, if any, they would have on their facilities, but the costs could be significant.
(PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU)
In May 2010, the Kentucky Waterways Alliance and other environmental groups filed a petition with the Kentucky Energy and Environment Cabinet (KEEC) challenging the Kentucky Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit issued in April 2010, which covers water discharges from the Trimble County plant. In November 2010, the KEEC issued a final order upholding the permit which was subsequently appealed by the environmental groups. In September 2013, the Franklin Circuit Court reversed the KEEC order upholding the permit and remanded the permit to the agency for further proceedings. LG&E and the KEEC appealed the order to the Kentucky Court of Appeals. In July 2015, the Court of Appeals upheld the lower court ruling. LG&E and the KEEC have moved for rehearing. PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU are unable to predict the outcome of this matter or the potential impact, if any, on plant operations or future capital or operating needs.
Superfund and Other Remediation (All Registrants)
PPL Electric is potentially responsible for costs at several sites listed by the EPA under the federal Superfund program, including the Columbia Gas Plant site, the Metal Bank site, the Brodhead site and the Ward Transformer site. Clean-up actions have been or are being undertaken at all of these sites, the costs of which have not been significant to PPL Electric. Should the EPA require different or additional measures in the future, however, or should PPL Electric's share of costs at multi-party sites increase substantially more than currently expected, the costs could be significant.
PPL Electric, LG&E and KU are investigating, responding to agency inquiries, remediating, or have completed the remediation of, several sites that were not addressed under a regulatory program such as Superfund, but for which PPL Electric, LG&E and KU may be liable for remediation. These include a number of former coal gas manufacturing plants in Pennsylvania and Kentucky previously owned or operated or currently owned by predecessors or affiliates of PPL Electric, LG&E and KU. To date, the costs of these sites have not been significant. There are additional sites, formerly owned or operated by PPL Electric, LG&E and KU predecessors or affiliates, for which PPL Electric, LG&E and KU lack information on current site conditions and are therefore unable to predict what, if any, potential liability they may have.
Depending on the outcome of investigations at sites where investigations have not begun or been completed or developments at sites for which PPL Electric, LG&E and KU currently lack information, the costs of remediation and other liabilities could be significant. PPL, PPL Electric, LKE, LG&E and KU cannot estimate a range of reasonably possible losses, if any, related to these matters.
The EPA is evaluating the risks associated with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and naphthalene, chemical by-products of coal gas manufacturing. As a result of the EPA's evaluation, individual states may establish stricter standards for water quality and soil cleanup. This could require several PPL subsidiaries to take more extensive assessment and remedial actions at former coal gas manufacturing plants. PPL, PPL Electric, LKE, LG&E and KU cannot estimate a range of reasonably possible losses, if any, related to these matters.
From time to time, PPL's subsidiaries undertake remedial action in response to notices of violations, spills or other releases at various on-site and off-site locations, negotiate with the EPA and state and local agencies regarding actions necessary for compliance with applicable requirements, negotiate with property owners and other third parties alleging impacts from PPL's operations and undertake similar actions necessary to resolve environmental matters that arise in the course of normal operations. Based on analyses to date, resolution of these environmental matters is not expected to have a significant adverse impact on the operations of PPL, PPL Electric, LG&E and KU.
Future cleanup or remediation work at sites currently under review, or at sites not currently identified, may result in significant additional costs for PPL, PPL Electric, LG&E and KU.
Environmental Matters - WPD (PPL)
WPD's distribution businesses are subject to environmental regulatory and statutory requirements. PPL believes that WPD has taken and continues to take measures to comply with the applicable laws and governmental regulations for the protection of the environment.
| 55 |
Other
Guarantees and Other Assurances
(All Registrants)
In the normal course of business, the Registrants enter into agreements that provide financial performance assurance to third parties on behalf of certain subsidiaries. Such agreements include, for example, guarantees, stand-by letters of credit issued by financial institutions and surety bonds issued by insurance companies. These agreements are entered into primarily to support or enhance the creditworthiness attributed to a subsidiary on a stand-alone basis or to facilitate the commercial activities in which these subsidiaries engage.
(PPL)
PPL fully and unconditionally guarantees all of the debt securities of PPL Capital Funding.
(All Registrants)
The table below details guarantees provided as of June 30, 2015. "Exposure" represents the estimated maximum potential amount of future payments that could be required to be made under the guarantee. The probability of expected payment/performance under each of these guarantees is remote except for "WPD guarantee of pension and other obligations of unconsolidated entities" and "Indemnification of lease termination and other divestitures." The total recorded liability at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, was $24 million and $26 million for PPL and $19 million for LKE for both periods. For reporting purposes, on a consolidated basis, all guarantees of PPL Electric, LKE, LG&E and KU also apply to PPL, and all guarantees of LG&E and KU also apply to LKE.
| Exposure at | Expiration | |||||
| June 30, 2015 | Date | |||||
| PPL | ||||||
| Indemnifications related to the WPD Midlands acquisition | (a) | |||||
| WPD indemnifications for entities in liquidation and sales of assets | $ | 12 | (b) | 2018 | ||
| WPD guarantee of pension and other obligations of unconsolidated entities | 121 | (c) | ||||
| PPL Electric | ||||||
| Guarantee of inventory value | 28 | (d) | 2016 | |||
| LKE | ||||||
| Indemnification of lease termination and other divestitures | 301 | (e) | 2021 - 2023 | |||
| LG&E and KU | ||||||
| LG&E and KU guarantee of shortfall related to OVEC | (f) | |||||
| In connection with their sales of various businesses, WPD and its affiliates have provided the purchasers with indemnifications that are standard for such transactions, including indemnifications for certain pre-existing liabilities and environmental and tax matters or have agreed to continue their obligations under existing third-party guarantees, either for a set period of time following the transactions or upon the condition that the purchasers make reasonable efforts to terminate the guarantees. Finally, WPD and its affiliates remain secondarily responsible for lease payments under certain leases that they have assigned to third parties. |
| 56 |
indemnitee filed a motion for discretionary review with the Kentucky Supreme Court seeking to overturn the arbitration decision. LKE believes its indemnification obligations in this matter remain subject to various uncertainties, including additional legal, arbitration and contractual developments, as well as future prices, availability and demand for the subject excess power. The ultimate outcomes of the WKE termination-related indemnifications cannot be predicted at this time. Additionally, LKE has indemnified various third parties related to historical obligations for other divested subsidiaries and affiliates. The indemnifications vary by entity and the maximum exposures range from being capped at the sale price to no specified maximum; LKE could be required to perform on these indemnifications in the event of covered losses or liabilities being claimed by an indemnified party. LKE cannot predict the ultimate outcomes of indemnification circumstances, but does not currently expect such outcomes to result in significant losses above the amounts recorded.
The Registrants provide other miscellaneous guarantees through contracts entered into in the normal course of business. These guarantees are primarily in the form of indemnification or warranties related to services or equipment and vary in duration. The amounts of these guarantees often are not explicitly stated, and the overall maximum amount of the obligation under such guarantees cannot be reasonably estimated. Historically, no significant payments have been made with respect to these types of guarantees and the probability of payment/performance under these guarantees is remote.
PPL, on behalf of itself and certain of its subsidiaries, maintains insurance that covers liability assumed under contract for bodily injury and property damage. The coverage provides maximum aggregate coverage of $225 million. This insurance may be applicable to obligations under certain of these contractual arrangements.
11. Related Party Transactions
PLR Contracts/Purchase of Accounts Receivable (PPL Electric)
PPL Electric holds competitive solicitations for PLR generation supply. PPL EnergyPlus has been awarded a portion of the PLR generation supply through these competitive solicitations. The purchases from PPL EnergyPlus are included in PPL Electric's Statements of Income as "Energy purchases from affiliate" through May 31, 2015, the period through which PPL Electric and PPL EnergyPlus were affiliated entities. As a result of the June 1, 2015 spinoff of PPL Energy Supply and creation of Talen Energy, PPL EnergyPlus (renamed Talen Energy Marketing) is no longer an affiliate of PPL Electric. PPL Electric's purchases from Talen Energy Marketing subsequent to May 31, 2015 are purchases from an unaffiliated third party.
Under the standard Default Service Supply Master Agreement for the solicitation process, PPL Electric requires all suppliers to post collateral once credit exposures exceed defined credit limits. Wholesale suppliers are required to post collateral with PPL Electric when: (a) the market price of electricity to be delivered by the wholesale suppliers exceeds the contract price for the forecasted quantity of electricity to be delivered; and (b) this market price exposure exceeds a contractual credit limit. In no instance is PPL Electric required to post collateral to suppliers under these supply contracts.
PPL Electric's customers may choose an alternative supplier for their generation supply. See Note 2 for additional information regarding PPL Electric's purchases of accounts receivable from alternative suppliers, including Talen Energy Marketing, formerly PPL EnergyPlus. See Note 8 for additional information regarding the spinoff of PPL Energy Supply.
Support Costs (PPL Electric, LKE, LG&E and KU)
PPL Services and LKS provide their respective PPL and LKE subsidiaries with administrative, management and support services. In 2015, PPL EU Services was formed to provide the majority of financial, supply chain, human resources and facilities management services primarily to PPL Electric. PPL Services will continue to provide certain corporate functions. For all service companies, the costs of these services are charged to the respective recipients as direct support costs. General costs that cannot be directly attributed to a specific entity are allocated and charged to the respective recipients as indirect support costs. PPL Services and PPL EU Services use a three-factor methodology that includes the applicable recipients' invested capital, operation and maintenance expenses and number of employees to allocate indirect costs. LKS bases its indirect allocations on the subsidiaries' number of employees, total assets, revenues, number of customers and/or other statistical information. PPL Services, PPL EU Services and LKS charged the following amounts for the periods ended June 30, and believe these amounts are reasonable, including amounts applied to accounts that are further distributed between capital and expense.
| 57 |
| Three Months | Six Months | |||||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||
| PPL Electric from PPL Services | $ | 25 | $ | 38 | $ | 55 | $ | 79 | ||||
| LKE from PPL Services | 4 | 4 | 8 | 8 | ||||||||
| PPL Electric from PPL EU Services | 17 | 32 | ||||||||||
| LG&E from LKS | 53 | 57 | 104 | 105 | ||||||||
| KU from LKS | 58 | 59 | 114 | 112 |
LG&E and KU also provide services to each other and to LKS. Billings between LG&E and KU relate to labor and overheads associated with union and hourly employees performing work for the other company, charges related to jointly-owned generating units and other miscellaneous charges. Tax settlements between LKE and LG&E and LKE and KU are reimbursed through LKS.
LKE maintains a $225 million revolving line of credit with a PPL Energy Funding subsidiary whereby LKE can borrow funds on a short-term basis at market-based rates. At June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, $59 million and $41 million were outstanding and were reflected in "Notes payable with affiliates" on the consolidated Balance Sheets. The interest rate on borrowings is equal to one-month LIBOR plus a spread. The interest rates on the outstanding borrowing at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 were 1.68% and 1.65%. Interest on the revolving line of credit was not significant for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014.
Intercompany Derivatives (LKE, LG&E and KU)
Periodically, LG&E and KU enter into forward-starting interest rate swaps with PPL. These hedging instruments have terms identical to forward-starting swaps entered into by PPL with third parties. See Note 14 for additional information on intercompany derivatives.
Other (PPL Electric, LG&E and KU)
See Note 9 for discussions regarding intercompany allocations associated with defined benefits.
12. Other Income (Expense) - net
(PPL)
"Other Income (Expense) - net" for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 consisted primarily of losses on economic foreign currency exchange contracts. See Note 14 for additional information on these derivatives.
(PPL Electric, LKE, LG&E and KU)
The components of "Other Income (Expense) - net" for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 for PPL Electric, LKE, LG&E and KU were not significant.
13. Fair Value Measurements and Credit Concentration
(All Registrants)
Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (an exit price). A market approach (generally, data from market transactions), an income approach (generally, present value techniques and option-pricing models), and/or a cost approach (generally, replacement cost) are used to measure the fair value of an asset or liability, as appropriate. These valuation approaches incorporate inputs such as observable, independent market data and/or unobservable data that management believes are predicated on the assumptions market participants would use to price an asset or liability. These inputs may incorporate, as applicable, certain risks such as nonperformance risk, which includes credit risk. The fair value of a group of financial assets and liabilities is measured on a net basis. Transfers between levels are recognized at end-of-reporting-period values. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, there were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2. See Note 1 in each Registrant's 2014 Form 10-K for information on the levels in the fair value hierarchy.
| 58 |
Recurring Fair Value Measurements
The assets and liabilities measured at fair value, excluding assets and liabilities of discontinued operations at December 31, 2014, were:
| June 30, 2015 | December 31, 2014 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| PPL | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Assets | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 846 | $ | 846 | $ | 1,399 | $ | 1,399 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Short-term investments | 120 | 120 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Restricted cash and cash equivalents (a) | 32 | 32 | 31 | 31 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Price risk management assets (b): | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Foreign currency contracts | 93 | $ | 93 | 130 | $ | 130 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Cross-currency swaps | 63 | 63 | 29 | 28 | $ | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Total price risk management assets | 156 | 156 | 159 | 158 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Auction rate securities (c) | 2 | $ | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total assets | $ | 1,036 | $ | 878 | $ | 156 | $ | 2 | $ | 1,711 | $ | 1,550 | $ | 158 | $ | 3 | |||||||||||
| Liabilities | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Price risk management liabilities (b): | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest rate swaps | $ | 104 | $ | 104 | $ | 156 | $ | 156 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Foreign currency contracts | 20 | 20 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cross-currency swaps | 3 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total price risk management liabilities | $ | 124 | $ | 124 | $ | 161 | $ | 161 | |||||||||||||||||||
| PPL Electric | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Assets | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 28 | $ | 28 | $ | 214 | $ | 214 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Restricted cash and cash equivalents (a) | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total assets | $ | 30 | $ | 30 | $ | 217 | $ | 217 | |||||||||||||||||||
| LKE | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Assets | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 13 | $ | 13 | $ | 21 | $ | 21 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Cash collateral posted to counterparties (d) | 9 | 9 | 21 | 21 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total assets | $ | 22 | $ | 22 | $ | 42 | $ | 42 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Liabilities | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Price risk management liabilities: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest rate swaps | $ | 91 | $ | 91 | $ | 114 | $ | 114 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total price risk management liabilities | $ | 91 | $ | 91 | $ | 114 | $ | 114 | |||||||||||||||||||
| LG&E | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Assets | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 7 | $ | 7 | $ | 10 | $ | 10 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Cash collateral posted to counterparties (d) | 9 | 9 | 21 | 21 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total assets | $ | 16 | $ | 16 | $ | 31 | $ | 31 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Liabilities | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Price risk management liabilities: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest rate swaps | $ | 68 | $ | 68 | $ | 81 | $ | 81 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total price risk management liabilities | $ | 68 | $ | 68 | $ | 81 | $ | 81 | |||||||||||||||||||
| KU | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Assets | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 6 | $ | 6 | $ | 11 | $ | 11 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total assets | $ | 6 | $ | 6 | $ | 11 | $ | 11 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Liabilities | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Price risk management liabilities: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest rate swaps | $ | 23 | $ | 23 | $ | 33 | $ | 33 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total price risk management liabilities | $ | 23 | $ | 23 | $ | 33 | $ | 33 | |||||||||||||||||||
| (a) | Current portion is included in "Other current assets" and long-term portion is included in "Other noncurrent assets" on the Balance Sheets. |
| (b) | Included in "Other current assets", "Other current liabilities", "Other noncurrent assets" and "Other deferred credits and noncurrent liabilities" on the Balance Sheets. |
| (c) | Included in "Other noncurrent assets" on the Balance Sheets. |
| 59 |
Price Risk Management Assets/Liabilities - Interest Rate Swaps/Foreign Currency Contracts/Cross-Currency Swaps (PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU)
To manage interest rate risk, PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU use interest rate contracts such as forward-starting swaps, floating-to-fixed swaps and fixed-to-floating swaps. To manage foreign currency exchange risk, PPL uses foreign currency contracts such as forwards, options and cross-currency swaps that contain characteristics of both interest rate and foreign currency contracts. An income approach is used to measure the fair value of these contracts, utilizing readily observable inputs, such as forward interest rates (e.g., LIBOR and government security rates) and forward foreign currency exchange rates (e.g., GBP), as well as inputs that may not be observable, such as credit valuation adjustments. In certain cases, market information cannot practicably be obtained to value credit risk and therefore internal models are relied upon. These models use projected probabilities of default and estimated recovery rates based on historical observances. When the credit valuation adjustment is significant to the overall valuation, the contracts are classified as Level 3. Cross-currency swaps are valued by PPL's Treasury department, which reports to the Chief Financial Officer (CFO). Accounting personnel, who also report to the CFO, interpret analysis quarterly to classify the contracts in the fair value hierarchy. Valuation techniques are evaluated periodically.
Nonrecurring Fair Value Measurements
See Note 8 for information regarding the estimated fair value of the Supply segment's net assets as of the June 1, 2015 spinoff date.
Financial Instruments Not Recorded at Fair Value (All Registrants)
The carrying amounts of long-term debt on the Balance Sheets and their estimated fair values are set forth below, excluding long-term debt of discontinued operations at December 31, 2014. The fair values were estimated using an income approach by discounting future cash flows at estimated current cost of funding rates, which incorporate the credit risk of the Registrants. Long-term debt is classified as Level 2. The effect of third-party credit enhancements is not included in the fair value measurement.
| June 30, 2015 | December 31, 2014 | ||||||||||||
| Carrying | Carrying | ||||||||||||
| Amount | Fair Value | Amount | Fair Value | ||||||||||
| PPL | $ | 18,103 | $ | 20,211 | $ | 18,173 | $ | 20,466 | |||||
| PPL Electric | 2,603 | 2,855 | 2,602 | 2,990 | |||||||||
| LKE | 4,567 | 4,810 | 4,567 | 4,946 | |||||||||
| LG&E | 1,353 | 1,408 | 1,353 | 1,455 | |||||||||
| KU | 2,091 | 2,222 | 2,091 | 2,313 | |||||||||
The carrying value of short-term debt (including notes between affiliates), when outstanding, approximates fair value due to the variable interest rates associated with the short-term debt and is classified as Level 2.
14. Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
Risk Management Objectives
(All Registrants)
PPL has a risk management policy approved by the Board of Directors to manage market risk associated with commodities, interest rates on debt issuances and foreign exchange (including price, liquidity and volumetric risk) and credit risk (including non-performance risk and payment default risk). The RMC, comprised of senior management and chaired by the Chief Risk Officer, oversees the risk management function. Key risk control activities designed to ensure compliance with the risk policy and detailed programs include, but are not limited to, credit review and approval, validation of transactions, verification of risk and transaction limits, and VaR analyses.
Market Risk
Market risk includes the potential loss that may be incurred as a result of price changes associated with a particular financial or commodity instrument as well as market liquidity and volumetric risks. Forward contracts, futures contracts, options, swaps and structured transactions are utilized as part of risk management strategies to minimize unanticipated fluctuations in earnings caused by changes in commodity prices, volumes of full-requirement sales contracts, basis exposure, interest rates
| 60 |
and foreign currency exchange rates. Many of the contracts meet the definition of a derivative. All derivatives are recognized on the Balance Sheets at their fair value, unless NPNS is elected.
The following summarizes the market risks that affect PPL and its Subsidiary Registrants.
| · | PPL is exposed to commodity price risk through its domestic subsidiaries as described below. WPD is exposed to volumetric risk which is significantly mitigated as a result of the method of regulation in the U.K. |
| · | PPL Electric is exposed to commodity price risk from its obligation as PLR; however, its PUC-approved cost recovery mechanism substantially eliminates its exposure to this risk. PPL Electric also mitigates its exposure to volumetric risk by entering into full-requirement supply agreements to serve its PLR customers. These supply agreements transfer the volumetric risk associated with the PLR obligation to the energy suppliers. |
| · | LG&E's and KU's rates include certain mechanisms for fuel and environmental expenses. In addition, LG&E's rates include certain mechanisms for gas supply. These mechanisms generally provide for timely recovery of market price and volumetric fluctuations associated with these expenses. |
Interest rate risk
| · | PPL and its subsidiaries are exposed to interest rate risk associated with forecasted fixed-rate and existing floating-rate debt issuances. PPL and WPD hold over-the-counter cross currency swaps to limit exposure to market fluctuations on interest and principal payments from changes in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates. LG&E utilizes over-the-counter interest rate swaps to limit exposure to market fluctuations on floating-rate debt. PPL, LG&E and KU utilize forward starting interest rate swaps to hedge changes in benchmark interest rates, when appropriate, in connection with future debt issuances. |
| · | PPL and its subsidiaries are exposed to interest rate risk associated with debt securities held by defined benefit plans. This risk is significantly mitigated to the extent that the plans are sponsored at, or sponsored on behalf of, the regulated domestic utilities and for certain plans at WPD due to the recovery mechanisms in place. |
Equity securities price risk
| · | PPL and its subsidiaries are exposed to equity securities price risk associated with defined benefit plans. This risk is significantly mitigated at the regulated domestic utilities and for certain plans at WPD due to the recovery mechanisms in place. |
| · | PPL is exposed to equity securities price risk from future stock sales and/or purchases. |
Foreign currency risk
| · | PPL is exposed to foreign currency exchange risk primarily associated with its investments in and earnings of U.K. affiliates. |
Credit Risk
Credit risk is the potential loss that may be incurred due to a counterparty's non-performance.
PPL is exposed to credit risk from "in-the-money" interest rate and foreign currency derivatives with financial institutions, as well as additional credit risk through certain of its subsidiaries, as discussed below.
In the event a supplier of LKE (through its subsidiaries LG&E and KU) or PPL Electric defaults on its obligation, those entities would be required to seek replacement power or replacement fuel in the market. In general, subject to regulatory review or other processes, appropriate incremental costs incurred by these entities would be recoverable from customers through applicable rate mechanisms, thus mitigating the financial risk for these entities.
| 61 |
PPL and its subsidiaries have credit policies in place to manage credit risk, including the use of an established credit approval process, daily monitoring of counterparty positions and the use of master netting agreements or provisions. These agreements generally include credit mitigation provisions, such as margin, prepayment or collateral requirements. PPL and its subsidiaries may request additional credit assurance, in certain circumstances, in the event that the counterparties' credit ratings fall below investment grade, their tangible net worth falls below specified percentages or their exposures exceed an established credit limit.
Master Netting Arrangements
Net derivative positions on the balance sheets are not offset against the right to reclaim cash collateral (a receivable) or the obligation to return cash collateral (a payable) under master netting arrangements.
PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU had no obligation to return cash collateral under master netting arrangements at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014.
PPL, LKE and LG&E posted $9 million and $21 million of cash collateral under master netting arrangements at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014.
KU did not post any cash collateral under master netting arrangements at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014.
See "Offsetting Derivative Instruments" below for a summary of derivative positions presented in the balance sheets where a right of setoff exists under these arrangements.
(PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU)
PPL and its subsidiaries issue debt to finance their operations, which exposes them to interest rate risk. Various financial derivative instruments are utilized to adjust the mix of fixed and floating interest rates in their debt portfolio, adjust the duration of the debt portfolio and lock in benchmark interest rates in anticipation of future financing, when appropriate. Risk limits under PPL's risk management program are designed to balance risk exposure to volatility in interest expense and changes in the fair value of the debt portfolio due to changes in benchmark interest rates.
Cash Flow Hedges
(PPL)
Interest rate risks include exposure to adverse interest rate movements for outstanding variable rate debt and for future anticipated financings. Financial interest rate swap contracts that qualify as cash flow hedges may be entered into to hedge floating interest rate risk associated with both existing and anticipated debt issuances. At June 30, 2015, PPL held an aggregate notional value in interest rate swap contracts of $1.3 billion that range in maturity through 2045. The amount outstanding includes swaps entered into by PPL on behalf of LG&E and KU. Realized gains and losses on the LG&E and KU swaps are probable of recovery through regulated rates; as such, any gains and losses on these derivatives are included in regulatory assets or liabilities and will be recognized in "Interest Expense" on the Statements of Income over the life of the underlying debt at the time the underlying hedged interest expense is recorded.
At June 30, 2015, PPL held an aggregate notional value in cross-currency interest rate swap contracts of $1.3 billion that range in maturity from 2016 through 2028 to hedge the interest payments and principal of WPD's U.S. dollar-denominated senior notes.
Cash flow hedges are discontinued if it is no longer probable that the original forecasted transaction will occur by the end of the originally specified time period and any amounts previously recorded in AOCI are reclassified into earnings once it is determined that the hedged transaction is probable of not occurring.
As a result of the June 1, 2015 spinoff of PPL Energy Supply, all PPL cash flow hedges associated with PPL Energy Supply were ineffective and discontinued and therefore, reclassified into earnings and reflected in discontinued operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015. See Note 8 for additional information. There were no such reclassifications for the three months ended June 30, 2014. For the six months ended June 30, 2014, PPL had an insignificant amount reclassified into earnings associated with discontinued cash flow hedges.
| 62 |
At June 30, 2015, the accumulated net unrecognized after-tax gains (losses) on qualifying derivatives that are expected to be reclassified into earnings during the next 12 months were $(29) million. Amounts are reclassified as the hedged interest expense is recorded.
Periodically, LG&E and KU enter into forward-starting interest rate swaps with PPL that have terms identical to forward-starting swaps entered into by PPL with third parties. Realized gains and losses on all of these swaps are probable of recovery through regulated rates; as such, any gains and losses on these derivatives are included in regulatory assets or liabilities and will be recognized in "Interest Expense" on the Statements of Income over the life of the underlying debt at the time the underlying hedged interest expense is recorded. At June 30, 2015, the total notional amount of forward starting interest rate swaps outstanding was $1 billion (LG&E and KU each held contracts of $500 million). The swaps range in maturity through 2045.
Economic Activity (PPL, LKE and LG&E)
LG&E enters into interest rate swap contracts that economically hedge interest payments on variable rate debt. Because realized gains and losses from the swaps, including a terminated swap contract, are recoverable through regulated rates, any subsequent changes in fair value of these derivatives are included in regulatory assets or liabilities until they are realized as interest expense. Realized gains and losses are recognized in "Interest Expense" on the Statements of Income at the time the underlying hedged interest expense is recorded. At June 30, 2015, LG&E held contracts with a notional amount of $179 million that range in maturity through 2033.
(PPL)
PPL is exposed to foreign currency risk, primarily through investments in and earnings of U.K. affiliates. PPL has adopted a foreign currency risk management program designed to hedge certain foreign currency exposures, including firm commitments, recognized assets or liabilities, anticipated transactions and net investments. In addition, PPL enters into financial instruments to protect against foreign currency translation risk of expected GBP earnings.
Net Investment Hedges
PPL enters into foreign currency contracts on behalf of a subsidiary to protect the value of a portion of its net investment in WPD. The contracts outstanding at June 30, 2015 had a notional amount of £134 million (approximately $221 million based on contracted rates). The settlement dates of these contracts range from November 2015 through June 2016.
At June 30, 2015, PPL had $13 million of accumulated net investment hedge after tax gains (losses) that were included in the foreign currency translation adjustment component of AOCI, compared to $14 million at December 31, 2014.
Economic Activity
PPL enters into foreign currency contracts on behalf of a subsidiary to economically hedge GBP-denominated anticipated earnings. At June 30, 2015, the total exposure hedged by PPL was approximately £1.6 billion (approximately $2.5 billion based on contracted rates). These contracts had termination dates ranging from July 2015 through December 2017.
(All Registrants)
All derivative instruments are recorded at fair value on the Balance Sheet as an asset or liability unless NPNS is elected. NPNS contracts for PPL and PPL Electric include certain full-requirement purchase contracts and other physical purchase contracts. Changes in the fair value of derivatives not designated as NPNS are recognized currently in earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met and designated as such, except for the changes in fair values of LG&E's and KU's interest rate swaps that are recognized as regulatory assets or regulatory liabilities. See Note 6 for amounts recorded in regulatory assets and regulatory liabilities at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014.
| 63 |
See Notes 1 and 17 in each Registrant's 2014 Form 10-K for additional information on accounting policies related to derivative instruments.
The following table presents the fair value and location of derivative instruments recorded on the Balance Sheets, excluding derivative instruments of discontinued operations.
| June 30, 2015 | December 31, 2014 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Derivatives designated as | Derivatives not designated | Derivatives designated as | Derivatives not designated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| hedging instruments | as hedging instruments | hedging instruments | as hedging instruments | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Assets | Liabilities | Assets | Liabilities | Assets | Liabilities | Assets | Liabilities | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Current: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Price Risk Management | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Assets/Liabilities (a): | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest rate swaps (b) | $ | 59 | $ | 5 | $ | 94 | $ | 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Cross-currency swaps (b) | $ | 28 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Foreign currency | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| contracts | 12 | $ | 42 | 17 | $ | 12 | $ | 67 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Total current | 40 | 59 | 42 | 22 | 12 | 97 | 67 | 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Noncurrent: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Price Risk Management | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Assets/Liabilities (a): | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest rate swaps (b) | 40 | 14 | 43 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cross-currency swaps (b) | 35 | 29 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Foreign currency | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| contracts | 39 | 3 | 5 | 46 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total noncurrent | 35 | 39 | 43 | 34 | 14 | 46 | 45 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total derivatives | $ | 75 | $ | 59 | $ | 81 | $ | 65 | $ | 46 | $ | 111 | $ | 113 | $ | 50 | |||||||||||||
| (a) | Included in "Other current assets", "Other current liabilities", "Other noncurrent assets" and "Other deferred credits and noncurrent liabilities" on the Balance Sheets. |
| (b) | Excludes accrued interest, if applicable. |
The following tables present the pre-tax effect of derivative instruments recognized in income, OCI or regulatory assets and regulatory liabilities for the periods ended June 30, 2015.
| Three Months | Six Months | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Gain (Loss) | Gain (Loss) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Recognized | Recognized | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| in Income | in Income | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| on Derivative | Gain (Loss) | on Derivative | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Gain (Loss) | (Ineffective | Reclassified | (Ineffective | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Location of | Reclassified | Portion and | from AOCI | Portion and | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Derivative Gain | Gain (Loss) | from AOCI | Amount | into | Amount | |||||||||||||||||||
| (Loss) Recognized in | Recognized | into Income | Excluded from | Income | Excluded from | |||||||||||||||||||
| Derivative | OCI (Effective Portion) | in Income | (Effective | Effectiveness | (Effective | Effectiveness | ||||||||||||||||||
| Relationships | Three Months | Six Months | on Derivative | Portion) | Testing) | Portion) | Testing) | |||||||||||||||||
| Cash Flow Hedges: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest rate swaps | $ | 17 | $ | (2) | Interest expense | $ | (3) | $ | (7) | |||||||||||||||
| Discontinued | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| operations | $ | (77) | $ | (77) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Cross-currency swaps | 15 | 36 | Interest expense | 1 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Other income | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (expense) - net | 15 | 32 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Commodity contracts | Discontinued | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| operations | 6 | 7 | 13 | 7 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 32 | $ | 34 | $ | 19 | $ | (70) | $ | 40 | $ | (70) | ||||||||||||
| Net Investment Hedges: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Foreign currency contracts | $ | (17) | $ | (1) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 64 |
| Derivatives Not Designated as | Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in | |||||||
| Hedging Instruments | Income on Derivative | Three Months | Six Months | |||||
| Foreign currency contracts | Other income (expense) - net | $ | (102) | $ | (14) | |||
| Interest rate swaps | Interest expense | (2) | (4) | |||||
| Total | $ | (104) | $ | (18) | ||||
| Derivatives Not Designated as | Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized as | |||||||
| Hedging Instruments | Regulatory Liabilities/Assets | Three Months | Six Months | |||||
| Interest rate swaps | Regulatory assets - noncurrent | $ | 7 | $ | 3 | |||
| Hedging Instruments | Regulatory Liabilities/Assets | Three Months | Six Months | |||||
| Interest rate swaps | Regulatory assets - noncurrent | $ | 76 | $ | 20 | |||
The following tables present the pre-tax effect of derivative instruments recognized in income, OCI, or regulatory assets and regulatory liabilities for the periods ended June 30, 2014.
| Three Months | Six Months | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Gain (Loss) | Gain (Loss) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Recognized | Recognized | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| in Income | in Income | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| on Derivative | Gain (Loss) | on Derivative | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Gain (Loss) | (Ineffective | Reclassified | (Ineffective | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Location of | Reclassified | Portion and | from AOCI | Portion and | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Derivative Gain | Gain (Loss) | from AOCI | Amount | into | Amount | |||||||||||||||||||
| (Loss) Recognized in | Recognized | into Income | Excluded from | Income | Excluded from | |||||||||||||||||||
| Derivative | OCI (Effective Portion) | in Income | (Effective | Effectiveness | (Effective | Effectiveness | ||||||||||||||||||
| Relationships | Three Months | Six Months | on Derivative | Portion) | Testing) | Portion) | Testing) | |||||||||||||||||
| Cash Flow Hedges: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest rate swaps | $ | (14) | $ | (60) | Interest expense | $ | (4) | $ | (9) | $ | 2 | |||||||||||||
| Cross-currency swaps | 9 | (16) | Interest expense | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Other income | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (expense) - net | (29) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Commodity contracts | Discontinued | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| operations | 13 | 22 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | (5) | $ | (76) | $ | 10 | $ | (15) | $ | 2 | ||||||||||||||
| Net Investment Hedges: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Foreign currency contracts | $ | (14) | $ | (18) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Derivatives Not Designated as | Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in | |||||||
| Hedging Instruments | Income on Derivative | Three Months | Six Months | |||||
| Foreign currency contracts | Other income (expense) - net | $ | (72) | $ | (96) | |||
| Interest rate swaps | Interest expense | (2) | (4) | |||||
| Total | $ | (74) | $ | (100) | ||||
| Derivatives Not Designated as | Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized as | |||||||
| Hedging Instruments | Regulatory Liabilities/Assets | Three Months | Six Months | |||||
| Interest rate swaps | Regulatory assets - noncurrent | $ | (2) | $ | (6) | |||
The following table presents the fair value and the location on the Balance Sheets of derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges.
| June 30, 2015 | December 31, 2014 | |||||||||||||||||
| Assets | Liabilities | Assets | Liabilities | |||||||||||||||
| Current: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Price Risk Management | ||||||||||||||||||
| Assets/Liabilities (a): | ||||||||||||||||||
| Interest rate swaps | $ | 46 | $ | 66 | ||||||||||||||
| (a) | Represents the location on the Balance Sheets. |
| 65 |
The following table presents the pre-tax effect of derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges that are recognized in regulatory assets for the periods ended June 30, 2015.
| Derivative Instruments | Location of Gain (Loss) | Three Months | Six Months | |||||
| Interest rate swaps | Regulatory assets - noncurrent | $ | 76 | $ | 20 | |||
The following table presents the fair value and the location on the Balance Sheets of derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges.
| June 30, 2015 | December 31, 2014 | |||||||||||||||||
| Assets | Liabilities | Assets | Liabilities | |||||||||||||||
| Current: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Price Risk Management | ||||||||||||||||||
| Assets/Liabilities (a): | ||||||||||||||||||
| Interest rate swaps | $ | 23 | $ | 33 | ||||||||||||||
| (a) | Represents the location on the Balance Sheets. |
The following table presents the pre-tax effect of derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges that are recognized in regulatory assets for the periods ended June 30, 2015.
| Derivative Instruments | Location of Gain (Loss) | Three Months | Six Months | |||||
| Interest rate swaps | Regulatory assets - noncurrent | $ | 38 | $ | 10 | |||
The following table presents the fair value and the location on the Balance Sheets of derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges.
| June 30, 2015 | December 31, 2014 | |||||||||||||||||
| Assets | Liabilities | Assets | Liabilities | |||||||||||||||
| Current: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Price Risk Management | ||||||||||||||||||
| Assets/Liabilities (a): | ||||||||||||||||||
| Interest rate swaps | $ | 23 | $ | 33 | ||||||||||||||
| (a) | Represents the location on the Balance Sheets. |
The following table presents the pre-tax effect of derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges that are recognized in regulatory assets for the periods ended June 30, 2015.
| Derivative Instruments | Location of Gain (Loss) | Three Months | Six Months | |||||
| Interest rate swaps | Regulatory assets - noncurrent | $ | 38 | $ | 10 | |||
The following table presents the fair value and the location on the Balance Sheets of derivatives not designated as hedging instruments.
| June 30, 2015 | December 31, 2014 | |||||||||||||||||
| Assets | Liabilities | Assets | Liabilities | |||||||||||||||
| Current: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Price Risk Management | ||||||||||||||||||
| Assets/Liabilities (a): | ||||||||||||||||||
| Interest rate swaps | $ | 5 | $ | 5 | ||||||||||||||
| Total current | 5 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||
| 66 |
| June 30, 2015 | December 31, 2014 | |||||||||||||||||
| Assets | Liabilities | Assets | Liabilities | |||||||||||||||
| Noncurrent: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Price Risk Management | ||||||||||||||||||
| Assets/Liabilities (a): | ||||||||||||||||||
| Interest rate swaps | 40 | 43 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total noncurrent | 40 | 43 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total derivatives | $ | 45 | $ | 48 | ||||||||||||||
| (a) | Represents the location on the Balance Sheets. |
The following tables present the pre-tax effect of derivatives not designated as cash flow hedges that are recognized in income or regulatory assets for the periods ended June 30, 2015.
| Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in | ||||||||
| Derivative Instruments | Income on Derivatives | Three Months | Six Months | |||||
| Interest rate swaps | Interest expense | $ | (2) | $ | (4) | |||
| Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in | ||||||||
| Derivative Instruments | Regulatory Assets | Three Months | Six Months | |||||
| Interest rate swaps | Regulatory assets - noncurrent | $ | 7 | $ | 3 | |||
The following tables present the pre-tax effect of derivatives not designated as cash flow hedges that are recognized in income or regulatory assets for the periods ended June 30, 2014.
| Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in | ||||||||
| Derivative Instruments | Income on Derivatives | Three Months | Six Months | |||||
| Interest rate swaps | Interest expense | $ | (2) | $ | (4) | |||
| Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in | ||||||||
| Derivative Instruments | Regulatory Assets | Three Months | Six Months | |||||
| Interest rate swaps | Regulatory assets - noncurrent | $ | (2) | $ | (6) | |||
Offsetting Derivative Instruments
PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU or certain of their subsidiaries have master netting arrangements in place and also enter into agreements pursuant to which they trade certain energy and other products. Under the agreements, upon termination of the agreement as a result of a default or other termination event, the non-defaulting party typically would have a right to set off amounts owed under the agreement against any other obligations arising between the two parties (whether under the agreement or not), whether matured or contingent and irrespective of the currency, place of payment or place of booking of the obligation.
PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU have elected not to offset derivative assets and liabilities and not to offset net derivative positions against the right to reclaim cash collateral pledged (an asset) or the obligation to return cash collateral received (a liability) under derivatives agreements. The table below summarizes the derivative positions presented in the balance sheets where a right of setoff exists under these arrangements and related cash collateral received or pledged.
| Assets | Liabilities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Eligible for Offset | Eligible for Offset | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cash | Cash | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Derivative | Collateral | Derivative | Collateral | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Gross | Instruments | Received | Net | Gross | Instruments | Pledged | Net | ||||||||||||||||||
| June 30, 2015 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Treasury Derivatives | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| PPL | $ | 156 | $ | 64 | $ | 92 | $ | 124 | $ | 64 | $ | 9 | $ | 51 | |||||||||||
| LKE | 91 | 9 | 82 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| LG&E | 68 | 9 | 59 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| KU | 23 | 23 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 67 |
| Assets | Liabilities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Eligible for Offset | Eligible for Offset | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cash | Cash | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Derivative | Collateral | Derivative | Collateral | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Gross | Instruments | Received | Net | Gross | Instruments | Pledged | Net | ||||||||||||||||||
| December 31, 2014 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Treasury Derivatives | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| PPL | $ | 159 | $ | 65 | $ | 94 | $ | 161 | $ | 65 | $ | 21 | $ | 75 | |||||||||||
| LKE | 114 | 20 | 94 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| LG&E | 81 | 20 | 61 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| KU | 33 | 33 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Credit Risk-Related Contingent Features
Certain derivative contracts contain credit risk-related contingent features which, when in a net liability position, would permit the counterparties to require the transfer of additional collateral upon a decrease in the credit ratings of PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU or certain of their subsidiaries. Most of these features would require the transfer of additional collateral or permit the counterparty to terminate the contract if the applicable credit rating were to fall below investment grade. Some of these features also would allow the counterparty to require additional collateral upon each downgrade in credit rating at levels that remain above investment grade. In either case, if the applicable credit rating were to fall below investment grade, and assuming no assignment to an investment grade affiliate were allowed, most of these credit contingent features require either immediate payment of the net liability as a termination payment or immediate and ongoing full collateralization on derivative instruments in net liability positions.
Additionally, certain derivative contracts contain credit risk-related contingent features that require adequate assurance of performance be provided if the other party has reasonable concerns regarding the performance of PPL's, LKE's, LG&E's, and KU's obligations under the contracts. A counterparty demanding adequate assurance could require a transfer of additional collateral or other security, including letters of credit, cash and guarantees from a creditworthy entity. This would typically involve negotiations among the parties. However, amounts disclosed below represent assumed immediate payment or immediate and ongoing full collateralization for derivative instruments in net liability positions with "adequate assurance" features.
(PPL, LKE and LG&E)
At June 30, 2015, derivative contracts in a net liability position that contain credit risk-related contingent features, collateral posted on those positions and the related effect of a decrease in credit ratings below investment grade are summarized as follows:
| PPL | LKE | LG&E | |||||||||
| Aggregate fair value of derivative instruments in a net liability position with credit risk-related | |||||||||||
| contingent features | $ | 42 | $ | 28 | $ | 28 | |||||
| Aggregate fair value of collateral posted on these derivative instruments | 9 | 9 | 9 | ||||||||
| Aggregate fair value of additional collateral requirements in the event of | |||||||||||
| a credit downgrade below investment grade (a) | 33 | 19 | 19 | ||||||||
| (a) | Includes the effect of net receivables and payables already recorded on the Balance Sheet. |
(PPL)
The change in the carrying amount of goodwill for the six months ended June 30, 2015 was due to the effect of foreign currency exchange rates on the U.K. Regulated segment.
| 16. Asset Retirement Obligations | ||||||||||||||
| (PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU) | ||||||||||||||
| The changes in the carrying amounts of AROs were as follows. | ||||||||||||||
| 68 |
| PPL | LKE | LG&E | KU | |||||||||||
| Balance at December 31, 2014 | $ | 336 | $ | 285 | $ | 74 | $ | 211 | ||||||
| Accretion | 8 | 7 | 2 | 5 | ||||||||||
| Changes in estimated cash flow or settlement date | 163 | 163 | 46 | 117 | ||||||||||
| Effect of foreign currency exchange rates | (2) | |||||||||||||
| Obligations settled | (2) | (2) | (2) | |||||||||||
| Balance at June 30, 2015 | $ | 503 | $ | 453 | $ | 120 | $ | 333 | ||||||
Substantially all of the ARO balances are classified as noncurrent at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014.
In connection with the final CCR rule, LG&E and KU recorded increases of $162 million ($45 million at LG&E and $117 million at KU) to the existing AROs during the second quarter of 2015. Further increases to AROs or changes to current capital plans or to operating costs may be required as estimates are refined based on closure developments, groundwater monitoring results and regulatory or legal proceedings. PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU believe relevant costs relating to this rule are subject to rate recovery. See Note 10 for information on the final CCR rule.
LG&E's and KU's accretion and ARO-related depreciation expense are recorded as a regulatory asset, such that there is no net earnings impact.
17. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
(PPL and LKE)
The after-tax changes in AOCI by component for the periods ended June 30 were as follows.
| Foreign | Unrealized gains (losses) | Defined benefit plans | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| currency | Available- | Equity | Prior | Actuarial | Transition | |||||||||||||||||||
| translation | for-sale | Qualifying | investees' | service | gain | asset | ||||||||||||||||||
| adjustments | securities | derivatives | AOCI | costs | (loss) | (obligation) | Total | |||||||||||||||||
| PPL | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| March 31, 2015 | $ | (352) | $ | 206 | $ | 9 | $ | $ | 3 | $ | (2,178) | $ | 1 | $ | (2,311) | |||||||||
| Amounts arising during the period | (83) | 2 | 21 | (6) | 53 | (13) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Reclassifications from AOCI | (1) | 27 | 38 | 64 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Net OCI during the period | (83) | 1 | 48 | (6) | 91 | 51 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Distribution of PPL Energy | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Supply (Note 8) | (207) | (55) | 238 | (24) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| June 30, 2015 | $ | (435) | $ | $ | 2 | $ | $ | (3) | $ | (1,849) | $ | 1 | $ | (2,284) | ||||||||||
| December 31, 2014 | $ | (286) | $ | 202 | $ | 20 | $ | 1 | $ | 3 | $ | (2,215) | $ | 1 | $ | (2,274) | ||||||||
| Amounts arising during the period | (149) | 7 | 27 | (6) | 52 | (69) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Reclassifications from AOCI | (2) | 10 | (1) | 76 | 83 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Net OCI during the period | (149) | 5 | 37 | (1) | (6) | 128 | 14 | |||||||||||||||||
| Distribution of PPL Energy | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Supply (Note 8) | (207) | (55) | 238 | (24) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| June 30, 2015 | $ | (435) | $ | $ | 2 | $ | $ | (3) | $ | (1,849) | $ | 1 | $ | (2,284) | ||||||||||
| March 31, 2014 | $ | 120 | $ | 177 | $ | 67 | $ | 1 | $ | (5) | $ | (1,790) | $ | 1 | $ | (1,429) | ||||||||
| Amounts arising during the period | (3) | 14 | (1) | (2) | 8 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Reclassifications from AOCI | (1) | (5) | 1 | 28 | 23 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Net OCI during the period | (3) | 13 | (6) | 1 | 26 | 31 | ||||||||||||||||||
| June 30, 2014 | $ | 117 | $ | 190 | $ | 61 | $ | 1 | $ | (4) | $ | (1,764) | $ | 1 | $ | (1,398) | ||||||||
| December 31, 2013 | $ | (11) | $ | 173 | $ | 94 | $ | 1 | $ | (6) | $ | (1,817) | $ | 1 | $ | (1,565) | ||||||||
| Amounts arising during the period | 128 | 19 | (47) | (2) | 98 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Reclassifications from AOCI | (2) | 14 | 2 | 55 | 69 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Net OCI during the period | 128 | 17 | (33) | 2 | 53 | 167 | ||||||||||||||||||
| June 30, 2014 | $ | 117 | $ | 190 | $ | 61 | $ | 1 | $ | (4) | $ | (1,764) | $ | 1 | $ | (1,398) | ||||||||
| LKE | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| March 31, 2015 | $ | (1) | $ | (8) | $ | (36) | $ | (45) | ||||||||||||||||
| Amounts arising during the period | (8) | (8) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Reclassifications from AOCI | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net OCI during the period | 1 | (8) | (7) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| June 30, 2015 | $ | (1) | $ | (7) | $ | (44) | $ | (52) | ||||||||||||||||
| 69 |
| Foreign | Unrealized gains (losses) | Defined benefit plans | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| currency | Available- | Equity | Prior | Actuarial | Transition | |||||||||||||||||||
| translation | for-sale | Qualifying | investees' | service | gain | asset | ||||||||||||||||||
| adjustments | securities | derivatives | AOCI | costs | (loss) | (obligation) | Total | |||||||||||||||||
| December 31, 2014 | $ | (8) | $ | (37) | $ | (45) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Amounts arising during the period | (8) | (8) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Reclassifications from AOCI | $ | (1) | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Net OCI during the period | (1) | 1 | (7) | (7) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| June 30, 2015 | $ | (1) | $ | (7) | $ | (44) | $ | (52) | ||||||||||||||||
| March 31, 2014 | $ | (2) | $ | 14 | $ | 12 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Amounts arising during the period | (2) | (2) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net OCI during the period | (2) | (2) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| June 30, 2014 | $ | (2) | $ | 12 | $ | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||
| December 31, 2013 | $ | 1 | $ | (2) | $ | 14 | $ | 13 | ||||||||||||||||
| Amounts arising during the period | (2) | (2) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Reclassifications from AOCI | (1) | (1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net OCI during the period | (1) | (2) | (3) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| June 30, 2014 | $ | (2) | $ | 12 | $ | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||
The following table presents the gains (losses) and related income taxes for reclassifications from AOCI for the periods ended June 30. The defined benefit plan components of AOCI are not reflected in their entirety in the statement of income during the periods; rather, they are included in the computation of net periodic defined benefit costs (credits). See Note 9 for additional information.
| Three Months | Six Months | Affected Line Item on the | |||||||||||||
| Details about AOCI | 2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | Statements of Income | ||||||||||
| Available-for-sale securities | $ | 2 | $ | 2 | $ | 4 | $ | 4 | Other Income (Expense) - net | ||||||
| Total Pre-tax | 2 | 2 | 4 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Income Taxes | (1) | (1) | (2) | (2) | |||||||||||
| Total After-tax | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Qualifying derivatives | |||||||||||||||
| Interest rate swaps | (3) | (4) | (7) | (7) | Interest Expense | ||||||||||
| (77) | (77) | Discontinued operations | |||||||||||||
| Cross-currency swaps | 15 | 32 | (29) | Other Income (Expense) - net | |||||||||||
| 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | Interest Expense | |||||||||||
| Energy commodities | 13 | 13 | 20 | 22 | Discontinued operations | ||||||||||
| Total Pre-tax | (51) | 10 | (30) | (13) | |||||||||||
| Income Taxes | 24 | (5) | 20 | (1) | |||||||||||
| Total After-tax | (27) | 5 | (10) | (14) | |||||||||||
| Equity investees' AOCI | 2 | Other Income (Expense) - net | |||||||||||||
| Total Pre-tax | 2 | ||||||||||||||
| Income Taxes | (1) | ||||||||||||||
| Total After-tax | 1 | ||||||||||||||
| Defined benefit plans | |||||||||||||||
| Prior service costs | (2) | (4) | |||||||||||||
| Net actuarial loss | (50) | (36) | (101) | (72) | |||||||||||
| Total Pre-tax | (50) | (38) | (101) | (76) | |||||||||||
| Income Taxes | 12 | 9 | 25 | 19 | |||||||||||
| Total After-tax | (38) | (29) | (76) | (57) | |||||||||||
| Total reclassifications during the period | $ | (64) | $ | (23) | $ | (83) | $ | (69) | |||||||
| 70 |
18. New Accounting Guidance Pending Adoption
(All Registrants)
Accounting for Revenue from Contracts with Customers
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued accounting guidance that establishes a comprehensive new model for the recognition of revenue from contracts with customers. This model is based on the core principle that revenue should be recognized to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.
This guidance can be applied using either a full retrospective
or modified retrospective transition method. The FASB has affirmed a recent proposal to defer the effective date of the standard
by one year, which for public business entities, would result in initial application of this guidance in annual reporting periods
beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods within those years. The proposed standard allows entities to early adopt
the guidance as of the original effective date of the standard, which for public business entities is annual reporting periods
beginning after December 15, 2016. Pending the FASB's issuance of the effective date deferral, the Registrants expect to adopt
this guidance effective January 1, 2018.
The Registrants are currently assessing the impact of adopting this guidance, as well as the transition method they will use.
Reporting Uncertainties about an Entity's Ability to Continue as a Going Concern
In August 2014, the FASB issued accounting guidance which will require management to assess, for each interim and annual period, whether there are conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about an entity's ability to continue as a going concern. Substantial doubt about an entity's ability to continue as a going concern exists when relevant conditions and events, considered in the aggregate, indicate that it is probable that the entity will be unable to meet its obligations as they become due within one year after the date the financial statements are issued.
When management identifies conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about an entity's ability to continue as a going concern, management is required to disclose information that enables users of the financial statements to understand the principal conditions or events that raised substantial doubt about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern and management's evaluation of the significance of those conditions or events. If substantial doubt about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern has been alleviated as a result of management's plan, the entity should disclose information that allows the users of the financial statements to understand those plans. If the substantial doubt about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern is not alleviated by management's plans, management's plans to mitigate the conditions or events that gave rise to the substantial doubt about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern should be disclosed, as well as a statement that there is substantial doubt the entity's ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date the financial statements are issued.
For all entities, this guidance should be applied prospectively within the annual periods ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early adoption is permitted.
The Registrants will adopt this guidance for the annual period ending December 31, 2016. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a significant impact on the Registrants.
Determining Whether the Host Contract in a Hybrid Financial Instrument Issued in the Form of a Share Is More Akin to Debt or to Equity
In November 2014, the FASB issued guidance that clarifies how current accounting guidance should be interpreted when evaluating the economic characteristics and risks of a host contract of a hybrid financial instrument issued in the form of a share. This guidance does not change the current criteria for determining whether separation of an embedded derivative feature from a hybrid financial instrument is required. Entities are still required to evaluate whether the economic risks of the embedded derivative feature are clearly and closely related to those of the host contract, among other relevant criteria.
An entity should consider the substantive terms and features of the entire hybrid financial instrument, including the embedded derivative feature being evaluated for bifurcation, in evaluating the nature of the host contract to determine whether the host contract is more akin to a debt instrument or more akin to an equity instrument. An entity should assess the relative strength of the debt-like and equity-like terms and features when determining how to weight those terms and features.
| 71 |
For public business entities, this guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015 and should be applied using a modified retrospective method for existing hybrid financial instruments issued in the form of a share as of the beginning of the fiscal year the guidance is adopted. Early adoption is permitted. Retrospective application is permitted but not required.
The Registrants will adopt this guidance on January 1, 2016. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a significant impact on the Registrants.
Income Statement Presentation of Extraordinary and Unusual Items
In January 2015, the FASB issued accounting guidance that eliminates the concept of extraordinary items, which requires an entity to separately classify, present in the income statement and disclose material events and transactions that are both unusual and occur infrequently. The requirement to report material events or transactions that are unusual or infrequent as a separate component of income from continuing operations has been retained, as has the requirement to separately present the nature and financial effects of each event or transaction in the income statement as a separate component of continuing operations or disclose them within the notes to the financial statements. The scope of these requirements has been expanded to include items that are both unusual and occur infrequently.
For all entities, this guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted provided that an entity applies the guidance from the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. The guidance may be applied either retrospectively or prospectively.
The Registrants will adopt this guidance on January 1, 2016. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a significant impact on the Registrants.
Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs
In April 2015, the FASB issued accounting guidance to simplify the presentation of debt issuance costs by requiring debt issuance costs to be presented on the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the associated debt liability, consistent with the presentation of debt discounts.
For public business entities, this guidance should be applied retrospectively for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted.
The Registrants will adopt this guidance on January 1, 2016. The adoption of this guidance will require the Registrants to reclassify debt issuance costs from assets to long-term debt, and is not expected to have a significant impact on the Registrants.
| 72 |
Item 2. Combined
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations
(All Registrants)
This "Item 2. Combined Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" is separately filed by PPL Corporation, PPL Electric, LKE, LG&E and KU. Information contained herein relating to any individual Registrant is filed by such Registrant solely on its own behalf, and no Registrant makes any representation as to information relating to any other Registrant. The specific Registrant to which disclosures are applicable is identified in parenthetical headings in italics above the applicable disclosure or within the applicable disclosure for each Registrant's related activities and disclosures. Within combined disclosures, amounts are disclosed for any Registrant when significant.
The following should be read in conjunction with the Registrants' Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and the accompanying Notes and with the Registrants' 2014 Form 10-K. Capitalized terms and abbreviations are defined in the glossary. Dollars are in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise noted.
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" includes the following information:
| · | "Overview" provides a description of each Registrant's business strategy, a description of key factors expected to impact future earnings and a discussion of important financial and operational developments. |
| · | "Results of Operations" for PPL provides a detailed analysis of earnings by segment, and for PPL Electric, LKE, LG&E and KU, includes a summary of earnings. For all Registrants, "Margins" provides explanations of non-GAAP financial measures and "Statement of Income Analysis" addresses significant changes in principal line items on the Statements of Income, comparing the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 with the same periods in 2014. |
| · | "Financial Condition - Liquidity and Capital Resources" provides an analysis of the Registrants' liquidity positions and credit profiles. This section also includes a discussion of rating agency actions. |
| · | "Financial Condition - Risk Management" provides an explanation of the Registrants' risk management programs relating to market and credit risk. |
(PPL)
PPL, headquartered in Allentown, Pennsylvania, is a utility
holding company. PPL, through its regulated utility subsidiaries, delivers electricity to customers in the U.K., Pennsylvania,
Kentucky, Virginia and Tennessee; delivers natural gas to customers in Kentucky; and generates electricity from power plants in
Kentucky. In June 2014, PPL and PPL Energy Supply executed definitive agreements with affiliates of Riverstone to combine their
competitive power generation businesses into a new, stand-alone, publicly traded company named Talen Energy. The transaction was
completed on June 1, 2015. See "Financial and Operational Developments - Other Financial and Operational Developments - Spinoff
of PPL Energy Supply" below for additional information.
| 73 |
PPL's principal subsidiaries are shown below (* denotes an SEC registrant).
| PPL Corporation* | |||||||||||||||||
| PPL Capital Funding | |||||||||||||||||
|
PPL Global ● Engages in the regulated distribution of electricity in the U.K. |
LKE*
|
PPL Electric* ● Engages in the regulated transmission and distribution of electricity in Pennsylvania |
|||||||||||||||
|
LG&E* ● Engages in the regulated generation, transmission, distribution and sale of electricity and distribution and sale of natural gas in Kentucky |
KU* ● Engages in the regulated generation, transmission, distribution and sale of electricity, primarily in Kentucky |
||||||||||||||||
| U.K. Regulated Segment |
Kentucky Regulated Segment |
Pennsylvania Regulated Segment |
|||||||||||||||
PPL's reportable segments' results primarily represent the results of the Subsidiary Registrants, except that the reportable segments are also allocated certain corporate level financing and other costs that are not included in the results of the applicable Subsidiary Registrants. The U.K. Regulated segment does not have a related Subsidiary Registrant.
In addition to PPL, the other Registrants included in this filing are as follows.
(PPL Electric)
PPL Electric, headquartered in Allentown, Pennsylvania, is a direct wholly owned subsidiary of PPL and a regulated public utility that is an electricity transmission and distribution service provider in eastern and central Pennsylvania. PPL Electric is subject to regulation as a public utility by the PUC, and certain of its transmission activities are subject to the jurisdiction of FERC under the Federal Power Act. PPL Electric delivers electricity in its Pennsylvania service area and provides electricity supply to retail customers in that area as a PLR under the Customer Choice Act.
(LKE)
LKE, headquartered in Louisville, Kentucky, is a wholly owned subsidiary of PPL and a holding company that owns regulated utility operations through its subsidiaries, LG&E and KU, which constitute substantially all of LKE's assets. LG&E and KU are engaged in the generation, transmission, distribution and sale of electricity. LG&E also engages in the distribution and sale of natural gas. LG&E and KU maintain their separate corporate identities and serve customers in Kentucky under their respective names. KU also serves customers in Virginia under the Old Dominion Power name and in Tennessee under the KU name.
(LG&E)
LG&E, headquartered in Louisville, Kentucky, is a wholly owned subsidiary of LKE and a regulated utility engaged in the generation, transmission, distribution and sale of electricity and distribution and sale of natural gas in Kentucky. LG&E is subject to regulation as a public utility by the KPSC, and certain of its transmission activities are subject to the jurisdiction of the FERC under the Federal Power Act.
(KU)
KU, headquartered in Lexington, Kentucky, is a wholly owned subsidiary of LKE and a regulated utility engaged in the generation, transmission, distribution and sale of electricity in Kentucky, Virginia and Tennessee. KU is subject to regulation as a public utility by the KPSC, the VSCC and the Tennessee Regulatory Authority, and certain of its transmission and wholesale power activities are subject to the jurisdiction of the FERC under the Federal Power Act. KU serves its Virginia customers under the Old Dominion Power name and its Kentucky and Tennessee customers under the KU name.
| 74 |
(All Registrants)
The strategy for the regulated businesses of WPD, PPL Electric, LG&E and KU is to provide efficient, reliable and safe operations and strong customer service, maintain constructive regulatory relationships and achieve timely recovery of costs. These regulated businesses also focus on achieving stable, long-term growth in earnings and rate base, or RAV, as applicable. Both rate base and RAV are expected to grow for the foreseeable future as a result of significant capital expenditure programs to maintain existing assets and to improve system reliability and, for LKE, LG&E and KU, to comply with federal and state environmental regulations related to coal-fired electricity generation facilities.
For the U.K. regulated businesses, effective April 1, 2015 under the RIIO-ED1 price control period, 80% of network related expenditures are added to the RAV and, together with adjustments for inflation as measured by Retail Price Index (RPI) and a return on RAV, recovered through allowed revenue with the remaining 20% of expenditures being recovered in the current regulatory year. RAV is intended to represent expenditures that have a long-term benefit to WPD (similar to capital projects for the U.S. regulated businesses). The RAV balance at March 31, 2015 will continue to be recovered over 20 years and additions after April 1, 2023 will be recovered over 45 years; a transitional arrangement will gradually change the recoverable life during the current eight-year price control period, resulting in an expected average useful life of 35 years for RAV additions in that period. In addition, incentive targets have been adjusted in RIIO-ED1, resulting in lower total available incentive revenues. See "Financial and Operational Developments - Other Financial and Operational Developments - RIIO-ED1" below for additional information.
For the U. S. regulated businesses, recovery of capital project costs is achieved through various rate-making mechanisms, including periodic base rate case proceedings, annual FERC formula rate mechanisms, and other regulatory agency-approved recovery mechanisms. In Kentucky, the KPSC has adopted a series of regulatory mechanisms (ECR, DSM, GLT, fuel adjustment clause, gas supply clause and recovery on certain construction work-in-progress) that reduce regulatory lag and provide timely recovery of and return on, as appropriate, prudently incurred costs. In Pennsylvania, the FERC transmission formula rate, DSIC mechanism and other recovery mechanisms are in place to reduce regulatory lag and provide for timely recovery of and a return on, prudently incurred costs.
To manage financing costs and access to credit markets, and to fund capital expenditures, a key objective of the Registrants is to maintain investment grade credit ratings and adequate liquidity positions. In addition, the Registrants have financial and operational risk management programs that, among other things, are designed to monitor and manage exposure to earnings and cash flow volatility related, as applicable, to changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and counterparty credit quality. To manage these risks, PPL generally uses contracts such as forwards, options, and swaps.
(PPL)
Earnings generated by PPL's U.K. subsidiaries are subject to foreign currency translation risk. The U.K. subsidiaries also have currency exposure to the U.S. dollar to the extent of their U.S. dollar denominated debt. To manage these risks, PPL generally uses contracts such as forwards, options and cross currency swaps that contain characteristics of both interest rate and foreign currency exchange contracts.
Following the June 1, 2015 spinoff of PPL Energy Supply, PPL has no continuing ownership interest in, control of, or affiliation with Talen Energy and Talen Energy Supply (formerly, PPL Energy Supply). The transaction is intended to be tax-free to PPL and its shareowners for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
Going forward, PPL's focus will be on its regulated utility businesses in the U.K., Kentucky and Pennsylvania, serving more than 10 million customers. PPL intends to maintain a strong balance sheet and manage its finances consistent with maintaining investment grade credit ratings and providing a competitive total shareowner return, including an attractive dividend. Excluding costs required to provide transition services to Talen Energy and following the spinoff transaction, PPL expects to reduce annual ongoing corporate support costs by approximately $75 million.
See "Financial and Operational Developments - Other Financial and Operational Developments - Costs of Spinoff" and "Loss on Spinoff" below for additional information.
| 75 |
Financial and Operational Developments
PPL's earnings by reportable segments for the periods ended June 30 were as follows:
| Three Months | Six Months | ||||||||||||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | $ Change | 2015 | 2014 | $ Change | ||||||||||||||
| U.K. Regulated | $ | 190 | $ | 187 | $ | 3 | $ | 565 | $ | 393 | $ | 172 | |||||||
| Kentucky Regulated | 47 | 58 | (11) | 156 | 165 | (9) | |||||||||||||
| Pennsylvania Regulated | 49 | 52 | (3) | 136 | 137 | (1) | |||||||||||||
| Corporate and Other (a) | (36) | (67) | 31 | (55) | (76) | 21 | |||||||||||||
| Income from Continuing Operations | |||||||||||||||||||
| After Income Taxes | 250 | 230 | 20 | 802 | 619 | 183 | |||||||||||||
| Discontinued Operations (b) | (1,007) | (1) | (1,006) | (912) | (74) | (838) | |||||||||||||
| Net Income (Loss) | $ | (757) | $ | 229 | $ | (986) | $ | (110) | $ | 545 | $ | (655) | |||||||
| Income from Continuing Operations | |||||||||||||||||||
| After Income Taxes | |||||||||||||||||||
| EPS - basic | $ | 0.37 | $ | 0.35 | 0.02 | $ | 1.20 | $ | 0.96 | $ | 0.24 | ||||||||
| EPS - diluted (c) | $ | 0.37 | $ | 0.34 | 0.03 | $ | 1.19 | $ | 0.94 | $ | 0.25 | ||||||||
| Net Income (Loss) | |||||||||||||||||||
| EPS - basic | $ | (1.13) | $ | 0.35 | (1.48) | $ | (0.17) | $ | 0.84 | $ | (1.01) | ||||||||
| EPS - diluted (c) | $ | (1.13) | $ | 0.34 | (1.47) | $ | (0.17) | $ | 0.83 | $ | (1.00) | ||||||||
| (a) | Primarily includes unallocated corporate-level financing and other costs. Also includes certain costs related to the spinoff of PPL Energy Supply. See the following table of special items for additional information. |
| (b) | As a result of the spinoff of PPL Energy Supply, substantially representing PPL's Supply segment, the earnings of the Supply segment are included in Discontinued Operations. Included is an $879 million charge reflecting the difference between PPL's recorded value for the Supply segment and its estimated fair value as of the spinoff date, determined in accordance with applicable accounting rules under GAAP. See Note 8 to the Financial Statements for additional information. |
| (c) | See Note 4 to the Financial Statements for information on the Equity Units' impact on the calculation of diluted EPS. |
The following after-tax gains (losses), in total, which management considers special items, impacted PPL's results for the periods ended June 30. See PPL's "Results of Operations - Segment Earnings" for details of each segment's special items.
| Three Months | Six Months | ||||||||||||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | Change | 2015 | 2014 | $ Change | ||||||||||||||
| U.K. Regulated | $ | (53) | $ | (33) | $ | (20) | $ | (14) | $ | (91) | $ | 77 | |||||||
| Kentucky Regulated | (12) | 1 | (13) | (12) | 1 | (13) | |||||||||||||
| Pennsylvania Regulated | (4) | 4 | (4) | 4 | |||||||||||||||
| Corporate and Other (a) | (14) | (50) | 36 | (20) | (52) | 32 | |||||||||||||
| Discontinued Operations (b) | (1,007) | (1) | (1,006) | (912) | (74) | (838) | |||||||||||||
| Total PPL | $ | (1,086) | $ | (87) | $ | (999) | $ | (958) | $ | (220) | $ | (738) | |||||||
| (a) | 2015 primarily includes transition costs related to the spinoff of PPL Energy Supply. 2014 primarily includes $46 million of deferred income tax expense to adjust valuation allowances that were previously supported by the earnings of PPL Energy Supply. See Note 8 for additional information on the spinoff. |
| (b) | As a result of the spinoff of PPL Energy Supply, substantially representing PPL's Supply segment, the earnings of the Supply segment are included in Discontinued Operations and considered to be a special item. Included is an $879 million charge reflecting the difference between PPL's recorded value for the Supply segment and its estimated fair value as of the spinoff date, determined in accordance with applicable accounting rules under GAAP. See Note 8 to the Financial Statements for additional information. |
(PPL)
Excluding special items, higher earnings are expected in 2015 compared with 2014, after adjusting 2014 to include certain dissynergies in the Corporate and Other category related to the spinoff of PPL Energy Supply. This increase is primarily attributed to increases in the U.K. Regulated and Kentucky Regulated segments and lower Corporate and Other charges. The following projections and factors underlying these projections (on an after-tax basis) are provided for PPL's segments and the Corporate and Other category and the related Registrants.
| 76 |
(PPL's U.K. Regulated Segment)
Excluding special items, higher earnings are projected in 2015 compared with 2014, primarily driven by lower income taxes and lower depreciation expense, partially offset by lower utility revenue as WPD transitions to a new eight-year price control period (RIIO-ED1) effective April 1, 2015. The remaining 2015 foreign currency earnings exposure for this segment is fully hedged.
(PPL's Kentucky Regulated Segment and LKE, LG&E and KU)
Excluding special items, higher earnings are projected in 2015 compared with 2014, primarily driven by electric and gas base rate increases effective July 1, 2015, and returns on additional environmental capital investments, partially offset by higher operation and maintenance expense, higher depreciation and higher financing costs.
(PPL's Pennsylvania Regulated Segment and PPL Electric)
Excluding special items, lower earnings are projected in 2015 compared with 2014, primarily driven by higher operation and maintenance expense, higher depreciation, higher financing costs and a benefit recorded in the first quarter of 2014 for a change in estimate of a regulatory liability, partially offset by higher transmission margins and returns on distribution improvement capital investments.
(PPL's Corporate and Other Category)
Excluding special items, lower costs are projected in 2015 compared with 2014, after adjusting 2014 to include certain dissynergies in the Corporate and Other category related to the spinoff of PPL Energy Supply, primarily driven by the reduction of those dissynergies in 2015 through corporate restructuring efforts and lower income taxes.
(All Registrants)
Earnings in future periods are subject to various risks and uncertainties. See "Forward-Looking Information," the rest of this Item 2, Notes 6 and 10 to the Financial Statements and "Item 1A. Risk Factors" in this Form 10-Q (as applicable) and "Item 1. Business" and "Item 1A. Risk Factors" in the Registrants' 2014 Form 10-K for a discussion of the risks, uncertainties and factors that may impact future earnings.
Other Financial and Operational Developments
Regulatory Requirements
(PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU)
The businesses of LKE, LG&E and KU are subject to extensive federal, state and local environmental laws, rules and regulations, including those pertaining to CCRs, GHG, ELGs and MATS. See "Financial Condition - Environmental Matters" below for additional information on these requirements. These and other stringent environmental requirements have led PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU, to announce plans to close certain of their coal-fired generating plants.
As a result of the environmental requirements discussed above, LKE projects $2.2 billion ($1.1 billion each at LG&E and KU) in capital investment over the next five years and anticipates retiring two coal-fired units at KU no later than early 2016 with a combined summer capacity rating of 161 MW. LG&E retired a 240 MW coal-fired unit in March 2015 and two additional coal-fired units, with a combined summer capacity rating of 323 MW, in June 2015 at the Cane Run plant. The retirement of these units is not expected to have a material impact on the financial condition or results of operations of PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU.
(All Registrants)
The Registrants cannot predict the impact that future regulatory requirements may have on their financial condition or results of operations.
| 77 |
(PPL)
Spinoff of PPL Energy Supply
In June 2014, PPL and PPL Energy Supply executed definitive agreements with affiliates of Riverstone to spin off PPL Energy Supply and immediately combine it with Riverstone's competitive power generation businesses to form a new, stand-alone, publicly traded company named Talen Energy. The transaction was subject to customary closing conditions, including receipt of regulatory approvals from the NRC, FERC, DOJ and PUC, all of which were received by mid-April 2015. On April 29, 2015, PPL's Board of Directors declared the June 1, 2015 distribution to PPL's shareowners of record on May 20, 2015 of a newly formed entity, Holdco, which at closing owned all of the membership interests of PPL Energy Supply and all of the common stock of Talen Energy.
Immediately following the spinoff on June 1, 2015, Holdco merged with a special purpose subsidiary of Talen Energy, with Holdco continuing as the surviving company to the merger and as a wholly owned subsidiary of Talen Energy and the sole owner of PPL Energy Supply. Substantially contemporaneous with the spinoff and merger, RJS Power was contributed by its owners to become a subsidiary of Talen Energy. PPL shareowners received approximately 0.1249 shares of Talen Energy common stock for each share of PPL common stock they owned on May 20, 2015. Following completion of these transactions, PPL shareowners owned 65% of Talen Energy and affiliates of Riverstone owned 35%. The spinoff had no effect on the number of PPL common shares owned by PPL shareowners or the number of shares of PPL common stock outstanding. The transaction is intended to be tax-free to PPL and its shareowners for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
PPL has no continuing ownership interest in, control of, or affiliation with Talen Energy and Talen Energy Supply (formerly PPL Energy Supply).
Loss on Spinoff
In conjunction with the accounting for the spinoff, PPL evaluated
whether the fair value of the Supply segment's net assets was less than the carrying value as of the June 1, 2015 spinoff date.
PPL considered several valuation methodologies to derive a fair value estimate of its Supply segment at the spinoff date. These
methodologies included considering the closing "when-issued" Talen Energy market value on June 1, 2015 (the spinoff date)
adjusted for the proportional share of the equity value attributable to the Supply segment, as well as the valuation methods consistently
used in PPL's goodwill impairment assessments - an income approach using a discounted cash flow analysis of the Supply segment
and an alternative market approach considering market multiples of comparable companies.
Although the market value of Talen Energy approach utilized the most observable inputs of the three approaches, PPL considered certain limitations of the "when-issued" trading market for the spinoff transaction including the short trading duration, lack of liquidity in the market and anticipated initial Talen stock ownership base selling pressure, among other factors, and concluded that these factors limit this input being solely determinative of the fair value of the Supply segment. As such, PPL also considered the other valuation approaches in estimating the overall fair value, but ultimately assigned the highest weighting to the Talen Energy market value approach.
The following table summarizes PPL's fair value analysis:
| Weighted | |||||||
| Fair Value | |||||||
| Approach | Weighting | (in billions) | |||||
| Talen Energy Market Value | 50% | $ | 1.4 | ||||
| Income/Discounted Cash Flow | 30% | 1.1 | |||||
| Alternative Market (Comparable Company) | 20% | 0.7 | |||||
| Estimated Fair Value | $ | 3.2 |
A key assumption included in the fair value estimate is the application of a control premium of 25% in the two market approaches. PPL concluded it was appropriate to apply a control premium in these approaches as the goodwill impairment testing guidance was followed in determining the estimated fair value of the Supply segment which has historically been a reporting unit for PPL. This guidance provides that the market price of an individual security (and thus the market capitalization of a reporting unit with publically traded equity securities) may not be representative of the fair value of the reporting unit. This guidance also indicates that substantial value may arise to a controlling shareholder from the ability to take advantage of synergies and other benefits that arise from control over another entity, and that the market price of a
| 78 |
Company's individual share of stock does not reflect this additional value to a controlling shareholder. Therefore, the quoted market price need not be the sole measurement basis for determining the fair value, and including a control premium is appropriate in measuring the fair value of a reporting unit.
In determining the control premium, PPL reviewed premiums received during the last five years in market sales transactions obtained from observable independent power producer and hybrid utility transactions greater than $1 billion. Premiums for these transactions ranged from 5% to 42% with a median of approximately 25%. Given these metrics, PPL concluded a control premium of 25% to be reasonable for both of the market valuation approaches used.
Assumptions used in the discounted cash flow analysis included forward energy prices, forecasted generation, and forecasted operation and maintenance expenditures that were consistent with assumptions used in the Energy Supply portion of the recent Talen Energy business planning process and a market participant discount rate.
Using these methodologies and weightings, PPL determined the estimated fair value of the Supply segment (Classified as Level 3) was below its carrying value of $4.1 billion and recorded a loss on the spinoff of $879 million, which is reflected in discontinued operations and is nondeductible for tax purposes. This amount served to reduce the basis of the net assets accounted for as a dividend at the June 1, 2015 spinoff date.
Costs of Spinoff
Following the announcement of the transaction to form Talen Energy as discussed in "Business Strategy" above, efforts were initiated to identify the appropriate staffing for Talen Energy and for PPL and its subsidiaries following completion of the spinoff. Organizational plans were substantially completed in 2014. The new organizational plans identified the need to resize and restructure the organizations and as a result, in 2014, estimated charges for employee separation benefits were recorded. See Note 8 in the 2014 Form 10-K for additional information. The separation benefits include cash severance compensation, lump sum COBRA reimbursement payments and outplacement services. Most separations and payment of separation benefits are expected to be completed by the end of 2015. At June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the recorded liabilities related to the separation benefits were $13 million and $21 million, which are included in "Other current liabilities" on the Balance Sheets.
Additional employee-related costs incurred primarily include accelerated stock-based compensation and pro-rated performance-based cash incentive and stock-based compensation awards, primarily for PPL Energy Supply employees and for PPL Services employees who became PPL Energy Supply employees in connection with the transaction. PPL Energy Supply recognized $24 million of these costs at the spinoff closing date which are reflected in discontinued operations.
PPL recorded $36 million and $42 million of third-party costs related to this transaction during the three and six months ended June 30, 2015. Of these costs, $29 million and $31 million were primarily for bank advisory, legal and accounting fees to facilitate the transaction, and are reflected in discontinued operations. An additional $7 million and $11 million of consulting and other costs were incurred to prepare the new Talen Energy organization for the spinoff and reconfigure the remaining PPL service functions. These costs are primarily recorded in "Other operation and maintenance" on the Statement of Income. PPL recorded $16 million of third-party costs related to this transaction during the three and six months ended June 30, 2014. No significant additional third-party costs are expected to be incurred.
At the close of the transaction, $72 million ($42 million after-tax) of cash flow hedges, primarily unamortized losses on PPL interest rate swaps recorded in AOCI and designated as cash flow hedges of PPL Energy Supply's future interest payments, were reclassified into earnings and reflected in discontinued operations.
Discontinued Operations
The operations of the Supply segment are included in "Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations (net of income taxes)" on the Statements of Income.
The assets and liabilities of PPL's Supply segment for all periods prior to the spinoff are included in "Current assets of discontinued operations", "Noncurrent assets of discontinued operations", "Current liabilities of discontinued operations" and "Noncurrent liabilities of discontinued operations" on PPL's Balance Sheet.
Net assets, after recognition of the loss on spinoff, of $3.2 billion were distributed to PPL shareowners on June 1, 2015, as a result of the completion of the spinoff of PPL Energy Supply.
| 79 |
See Note 8 to the financial statements for additional information related to the spinoff of PPL Energy Supply.
RIIO-ED1
On April 1, 2015, the RIIO-ED1 eight-year price control period commenced for WPD's four DNOs. In February 2014, Ofgem published formal confirmation that WPD's Business Plans submitted by its four DNOs under RIIO-ED1 were accepted as submitted, or "fast-tracked." Fast tracking affords several benefits to the WPD DNOs including the ability to collect additional revenue equivalent to 2.5% of total annual expenditures during the eight-year price control period, or approximately $43 million annually, greater revenue certainty and a higher level of cost savings retention. See "Item 1. Business - Segment Information - U.K. Regulated Segment" of PPL's 2014 Form 10-K for additional information on RIIO-ED1.
Depreciation
Effective January 1, 2015, after completing a review of the useful lives of its distribution network assets, WPD extended the weighted average useful lives of these assets to 69 years from 55 years. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, this change in useful lives resulted in lower depreciation of $22 million ($17 million after-tax or $0.03 per share) and $42 million ($33 million after-tax or $0.05 per share). It is expected to result in an annual reduction in depreciation of approximately $86 million ($68 million after-tax or $0.10 per share) in 2015.
IRS Audits for 1998 - 2011
In February 2015, PPL and the IRS Appeals division reached a settlement on the amount of PPL's refund from its open audits for the years 1998 - 2011. In April 2015, PPL was notified that the Joint Committee on Taxation approved PPL's settlement. In the second quarter of 2015, PPL recorded a tax benefit of $23 million, which includes an estimate of interest on the refund. Of this amount, $11 million is reflected in continuing operations. Final determination of interest on the refund is still pending from the IRS.
(PPL and PPL Electric)
Rate Case Proceedings
On March 31, 2015, PPL Electric filed a request with the PUC for an increase in its annual distribution revenue requirement of approximately $167.5 million. The proposal would result in a rate increase of 3.9% on a total bill basis and is expected to become effective on January 1, 2016. PPL Electric's application includes a request for an authorized return-on-equity of 10.95%. The application is based on a fully projected future test year of January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016.
Concurrently, PPL Electric filed a petition requesting a waiver of the DSIC cap of 5% of billed revenues and approval to increase the maximum allowable DSIC from 5% to 7.5% for service rendered after January 1, 2016. PPL Electric requested that the PUC consolidate these two proceedings and the Administrative Law Judge granted PPL Electric's request.
(PPL, LKE and KU)
FERC Wholesale Formula Rates
In September 2013, KU filed an application with the FERC to adjust the formula rate under which KU provides wholesale requirements power sales to 12 municipal customers. Among other changes, the application requests an amended formula whereby KU would charge cost-based rates with a subsequent true-up to actual costs, replacing the current formula which does not include a true-up. KU's application proposed an authorized return on equity of 10.7%. Certain elements, including the new formula rate, became effective April 23, 2014, subject to refund. In April 2014, nine municipalities submitted notices of termination, under the original notice period provisions, to cease taking power under the wholesale requirements contracts. Such terminations are to be effective in 2019, except in the case of one municipality with a 2017 effective date. In addition, a tenth municipality has become a transmission-only customer as of June 2015. In July 2014, KU agreed on settlement terms with the two municipal customers that did not provide termination notices and filed the settlement proposal with the FERC for its approval. In August 2014, the FERC issued an order on the interim settlement agreement allowing the proposed rates to become effective pending a final order. If approved, the settlement agreement will resolve the rate case with respect to these two municipalities, including approval of the formula rate with a true-up provision and authorizing a return on equity of 10% or the return on equity awarded to other parties in this case, whichever is lower. In July 2015, KU and the nine terminating municipalities reached a settlement in principle which, subject to FERC approval, would resolve
| 80 |
open matters, including providing for certain refunds, approving the formula rate with a true-up provision, and authorizing a 10.25% return on equity. An unresolved matter with one terminating municipality may be the subject of further negotiations or proceedings. KU cannot predict the ultimate outcome of these FERC proceedings regarding its wholesale power agreements with the municipalities, but does not currently anticipate significant remaining refunds beyond amounts already recorded.
(PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU)
Rate Case Proceedings
On November 26, 2014, LG&E and KU filed requests with the KPSC for increases in annual base rates for LG&E's electric and gas operations and KU's electric operations. On April 20, 2015, LG&E and KU, and the other parties to the proceeding, filed a unanimous settlement agreement with the KPSC. The settlement agreement was approved by the KPSC on June 30, 2015. Among other things, the settlement provides for increases in the annual revenue requirements associated with KU base electricity rates of $125 million and LG&E base gas rates of $7 million. The annual revenue requirement associated with base electricity rates at LG&E was not changed. Although the settlement did not establish a specific return on equity with respect to the base rates, an authorized 10% return on equity will be utilized in the ECR and GLT mechanisms. The settlement agreement provides for deferred recovery of costs associated with Green River Units 3 and 4 through their retirement. The new regulatory asset will be amortized over three years. The settlement also provides regulatory asset treatment for the difference between pension expense currently booked in accordance with LG&E and KU's pension accounting policy and pension expense using a 15 year amortization period for actuarial gains and losses. The new rates and all elements of the settlement became effective July 1, 2015.
(LKE and KU)
On June 30, 2015, KU filed an application with the VSCC to increase annual Virginia base electricity revenue by approximately $7.2 million, representing an increase of 10.1%. KU's application is based on an authorized 10.5% return on equity. Subject to regulatory review and approval, new rates would become effective April 1, 2016.
(PPL)
The discussion for PPL provides a review of results by reportable segment. The "Margins" discussion provides explanations of non-GAAP financial measures (Kentucky Gross Margins and Pennsylvania Gross Delivery Margins) and a reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures to "Operating Income." The "Statement of Income Analysis" discussion addresses significant changes in principal line items on PPL's Statements of Income, comparing the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 with the same periods in 2014. "Segment Earnings, Margins and Statement of Income Analysis" is presented separately for PPL.
Tables analyzing changes in amounts between periods within "Segment Earnings" and "Statement of Income Analysis" are presented on a constant U.K. foreign currency exchange rate basis, where applicable, in order to isolate the impact of the change in the exchange rate on the item being explained. Results computed on a constant U.K. foreign currency exchange rate basis are calculated by translating current year results at the prior year weighted-average U.K. foreign currency exchange rate.
(Subsidiary Registrants)
The discussion for each of PPL Electric, LKE, LG&E and KU provides a summary of earnings. The "Margins" discussion includes a reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures to "Operating Income" and "Statement of Income Analysis" addresses significant changes in principal line items on the Statements of Income comparing the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 with the same periods in 2014. "Earnings, Margins and Statement of Income Analysis" is presented separately for PPL Electric, LKE, LG&E and KU.
(All Registrants)
The results for interim periods can be disproportionately influenced by numerous factors and developments and by seasonal variations. As such, the results of operations for interim periods do not necessarily indicate results or trends for the year or future periods.
| 81 |
PPL: Segment Earnings, Margins and Statement of Income Analysis
Segment Earnings
U.K. Regulated Segment
The U.K. Regulated segment consists of PPL Global which primarily includes WPD's regulated electricity distribution operations, the results of hedging the translation of WPD's earnings from British pound sterling into U.S. dollars, and certain costs, such as U.S. income taxes, administrative costs, and allocated financing costs. The U.K. Regulated segment represents 70% of PPL's Income from Continuing Operations After Income Taxes for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 42% of PPL's assets at June 30, 2015.
Net Income for the periods ended June 30 includes the following results.
| Three Months | Six Months | ||||||||||||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | $ Change | 2015 | 2014 | $ Change | ||||||||||||||
| Utility revenues | $ | 575 | $ | 659 | $ | (84) | $ | 1,261 | $ | 1,296 | $ | (35) | |||||||
| Energy-related businesses | 12 | 13 | (1) | 23 | 24 | (1) | |||||||||||||
| Total operating revenues | 587 | 672 | (85) | 1,284 | 1,320 | (36) | |||||||||||||
| Other operation and maintenance | 96 | 117 | (21) | 199 | 225 | (26) | |||||||||||||
| Depreciation | 59 | 87 | (28) | 118 | 170 | (52) | |||||||||||||
| Taxes, other than income | 37 | 40 | (3) | 73 | 78 | (5) | |||||||||||||
| Energy-related businesses | 8 | 8 | 15 | 15 | |||||||||||||||
| Total operating expenses | 200 | 252 | (52) | 405 | 488 | (83) | |||||||||||||
| Other Income (Expense) - net | (100) | (72) | (28) | (12) | (96) | 84 | |||||||||||||
| Interest Expense | 103 | 115 | (12) | 203 | 237 | (34) | |||||||||||||
| Income Taxes | (6) | 46 | (52) | 99 | 106 | (7) | |||||||||||||
| Net Income | $ | 190 | $ | 187 | $ | 3 | $ | 565 | $ | 393 | $ | 172 | |||||||
The changes in the results of the U.K. Regulated segment between these periods were due to the factors set forth below, which reflect certain items that management considers special and effects of movements in foreign currency exchange on separate lines within the table and not in their respective Statement of Income line items. See below for additional detail of the special items.
| Three Months | Six Months | ||||||
| U.K. | |||||||
| Utility revenues | $ | (21) | $ | 12 | |||
| Other operation and maintenance | 11 | 7 | |||||
| Depreciation | 22 | 42 | |||||
| Interest expense | 1 | 7 | |||||
| Other | (1) | (1) | |||||
| Income taxes | 7 | 1 | |||||
| U.S. | |||||||
| Interest expense and other | 2 | 11 | |||||
| Income taxes | 11 | 19 | |||||
| Foreign currency exchange, after-tax | (9) | (3) | |||||
| Special items, after-tax | (20) | 77 | |||||
| Total | $ | 3 | $ | 172 | |||
U.K.
| · | Lower utility revenues for the three month period primarily due to $33 million from the April 1, 2015 price decrease primarily resulting from the commencement of RIIO-ED1, partially offset by $12 million of higher volume primarily due to weather. |
| · | Higher utility revenues for the six month period primarily due to $46 million from the April 1, 2014 price increase, partially offset by $37 million from the April 1, 2015 price decrease primarily resulting from the commencement of RIIO-ED1. |
| · | Lower other operation and maintenance for the three month period primarily due to $9 million of lower network maintenance expense. |
| 82 |
| · | Lower depreciation expense for the three and six month periods primarily due to a $22 million and $42 million impact of an extension of the network asset lives. See Note 2 to the Financial Statements for additional information. |
U.S.
| · | Lower income taxes for the three and six month periods primarily due to decreases in taxable dividends. |
The following after-tax gains (losses), which management considers special items, also impacted the U.K. Regulated segment's results during the periods ended June 30.
| Income Statement | Three Months | Six Months | |||||||||||||
| Line Item | 2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||||
| Other Income | |||||||||||||||
| Foreign currency-related economic hedges, net of tax of $38, $18, $18, $21 (a) | (Expense)-net | $ | (71) | $ | (33) | $ | (34) | $ | (39) | ||||||
| Other operation | |||||||||||||||
| WPD Midlands acquisition-related adjustment, net of tax of $0, $0, ($1), $0 | and maintenance | 2 | |||||||||||||
| Change in WPD line loss accrual, net of tax of $0, $0, $0, $13(b) | Utility | (52) | |||||||||||||
| Settlement of certain income tax positions (c) | Income Taxes | 18 | 18 | ||||||||||||
| Total | $ | (53) | $ | (33) | $ | (14) | $ | (91) | |||||||
| (a) | Represents unrealized gains (losses) on contracts that economically hedge anticipated GBP denominated earnings. |
| (b) | In March 2014, Ofgem issued its final decision on the DPCR4 line loss incentives and penalties mechanism. As a result, WPD increased its existing liability by $65 million, pre-tax, for over-recovery of line losses. See Note 6 to the Financial Statements for additional information. |
| (c) | Relates to the April 2015 settlement of open audits for the years 1998-2011. See Note 5 to the Financial Statements for additional information. |
Kentucky Regulated Segment
The Kentucky Regulated segment consists primarily of LKE's regulated electricity generation, transmission and distribution operations of LG&E and KU, as well as LG&E's regulated distribution and sale of natural gas. In addition, certain financing costs are allocated to the Kentucky Regulated segment. The Kentucky Regulated segment represents 19% of PPL's Income from Continuing Operations After Income Taxes for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 35% of PPL's assets at June 30, 2015.
Net Income for the periods ended June 30 includes the following results.
| Three Months | Six Months | ||||||||||||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | $ Change | 2015 | 2014 | $ Change | ||||||||||||||
| Utility revenues | $ | 714 | $ | 722 | $ | (8) | $ | 1,613 | $ | 1,656 | $ | (43) | |||||||
| Fuel | 214 | 231 | (17) | 467 | 508 | (41) | |||||||||||||
| Energy purchases | 28 | 36 | (8) | 120 | 160 | (40) | |||||||||||||
| Other operation and maintenance | 214 | 206 | 8 | 423 | 412 | 11 | |||||||||||||
| Depreciation | 94 | 87 | 7 | 189 | 173 | 16 | |||||||||||||
| Taxes, other than income | 15 | 13 | 2 | 29 | 26 | 3 | |||||||||||||
| Total operating expenses | 565 | 573 | (8) | 1,228 | 1,279 | (51) | |||||||||||||
| Other Income (Expense) - net | (5) | (2) | (3) | (6) | (4) | (2) | |||||||||||||
| Interest Expense | 56 | 53 | 3 | 111 | 108 | 3 | |||||||||||||
| Income Taxes | 41 | 36 | 5 | 112 | 100 | 12 | |||||||||||||
| Net Income | $ | 47 | $ | 58 | $ | (11) | $ | 156 | $ | 165 | $ | (9) | |||||||
The changes in the results of the Kentucky Regulated segment between these periods were due to the factors set forth below, which reflect amounts classified as Kentucky Gross Margins and certain items that management considers special on separate lines within the table and not in their respective Statement of Income line items. See below for additional detail of the special items.
| Three Months | Six Months | |||||
| Kentucky Gross Margins | $ | 10 | $ | 23 | ||
| Other operation and maintenance | (9) | (10) | ||||
| Depreciation | (3) | |||||
| Taxes, other than income | (1) | (2) | ||||
| Other income (expense) - net | 2 | 3 | ||||
| Interest expense | (3) | (3) | ||||
| Income taxes | 3 | (4) | ||||
| Special items | (13) | (13) | ||||
| Total | $ | (11) | $ | (9) | ||
| 83 |
| · | See "Margins - Changes in Non-GAAP Financial Measures" for an explanation of Kentucky Gross Margins. |
| · | Higher other operation and maintenance for the three month period primarily due to $5 million of higher pension expense attributed to the change in mortality tables and lower discount rate in 2015 and $10 million of higher costs directly related to the Cane Run units' retirements consisting of an inventory write-down and separation benefits, partially offset by $4 million of lower storm expenses. |
| · | Higher other operation and maintenance for the six month period primarily due to $9 million of higher pension expense attributed to the change in mortality tables and lower discount rate in 2015 and $11 million of higher costs directly related to the Cane Run units' retirements consisting of an inventory write-down and separation benefits, partially offset by $10 million of lower storm expenses. |
The following after-tax gains (losses), which management considers special items, also impacted the Kentucky Regulated
segment's results during the periods ended June 30.
| Income Statement | Three Months | Six Months | |||||||||||||
| Line Item | 2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||||
| EEI adjustments, net of tax of $0, $0, $0, $0 (a) | Other Income (Expense)-net | $ | 1 | $ | 1 | ||||||||||
| LKE acquisition-related adjustment (b) | Other Income (Expense)-net | $ | (4) | $ | (4) | ||||||||||
| Certain valuation allowances (c) | Income Taxes | (8) | (8) | ||||||||||||
| Total | $ | (12) | $ | 1 | $ | (12) | $ | 1 | |||||||
| (a) | Recorded by KU. |
| (b) | Recorded at PPL and allocated to the Kentucky Regulated segment. The amount represents a settlement between E.ON AG (a German corporation and the indirect parent of E.ON US Investments Corp., the former parent of LKE) and PPL for a tax matter. |
| (c) | Recorded at LKE and represents a valuation allowance against tax credits expiring in 2016 and 2017 that are more likely than not to expire before being utilized. |
Pennsylvania Regulated Segment
The Pennsylvania Regulated segment includes the regulated electricity transmission and distribution operations of PPL Electric. The Pennsylvania Regulated segment represents 17% of PPL's Income from Continuing Operations After Income Taxes for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 21% of PPL's assets at June 30, 2015.
Net Income for the periods ended June 30 includes the following results.
| Three Months | Six Months | ||||||||||||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | $ Change | 2015 | 2014 | $ Change | ||||||||||||||
| Utility revenues | $ | 476 | $ | 449 | $ | 27 | $ | 1,106 | $ | 1,041 | $ | 65 | |||||||
| Energy purchases | |||||||||||||||||||
| External | 138 | 114 | 24 | 365 | 303 | 62 | |||||||||||||
| Intersegment | 5 | 21 | (16) | 14 | 48 | (34) | |||||||||||||
| Other operation and maintenance | 140 | 135 | 5 | 273 | 269 | 4 | |||||||||||||
| Depreciation | 52 | 45 | 7 | 103 | 90 | 13 | |||||||||||||
| Taxes, other than income | 25 | 23 | 2 | 60 | 55 | 5 | |||||||||||||
| Total operating expenses | 360 | 338 | 22 | 815 | 765 | 50 | |||||||||||||
| Other Income (Expense) - net | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||||
| Interest Expense | 33 | 29 | 4 | 64 | 58 | 6 | |||||||||||||
| Income Taxes | 36 | 31 | 5 | 95 | 84 | 11 | |||||||||||||
| Net Income | $ | 49 | $ | 52 | $ | (3) | $ | 136 | $ | 137 | $ | (1) | |||||||
The changes in the components of the Pennsylvania Regulated segment's results between these periods were due to the factors set forth below, which reflect amounts classified as Pennsylvania Gross Delivery Margins and a certain item that management considers special on separate lines within the table and not in their respective Statement of Income line items. See below for additional detail of the special items.
| 84 |
| Three Months | Six Months | |||||
| Pennsylvania Gross Delivery Margins | $ | 13 | $ | 26 | ||
| Other operation and maintenance | (8) | (6) | ||||
| Depreciation | (7) | (13) | ||||
| Interest expense | (4) | (6) | ||||
| Other | 2 | 3 | ||||
| Income taxes | (3) | (9) | ||||
| Special item, after-tax | 4 | 4 | ||||
| Total | $ | (3) | $ | (1) | ||
| · | See "Margins - Changes in Non-GAAP Financial Measures" for an explanation of Pennsylvania Gross Delivery Margins. |
| · | Higher other operation and maintenance expense for the three month period primarily due to higher corporate service costs. |
| · | Higher other operation and maintenance expense for the six month period primarily due to $9 million of higher corporate service costs, partially offset by $6 million of lower storm costs. |
| · | Higher depreciation expense for the three and six month periods primarily due to PP&E additions, net related to the ongoing efforts to ensure the reliability of the delivery system and the replacement of aging infrastructure. |
| · | Higher interest expense for the three and six month periods primarily due to the issuance of first mortgage bonds in June 2014. |
| · | Higher income taxes for the three month period primarily due to federal and state tax reserve adjustments. |
| · | Higher income taxes for the six month period primarily due to higher pre-tax income and federal and state tax reserve adjustments. |
The following after-tax (loss), which management considers a special item, also impacted the Pennsylvania Regulated segment's results during the periods ended June 30.
| Income Statement | Three Months | Six Months | |||||||||||||
| Line Item | 2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||||
| Other operation | |||||||||||||||
| Separation benefits, net of tax of $0, $2, $0, $2 (a) | and maintenance | $ | (4) | $ | (4) | ||||||||||
| (a) | In June 2014, PPL Electric's largest IBEW local ratified a new three-year labor agreement. In connection with the new agreement, bargaining unit one-time voluntary retirement benefits were recorded. |
Margins
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
Management utilizes the following non-GAAP financial measures as indicators of performance for its businesses.
| · | "Kentucky Gross Margins" is a single financial performance measure of the electricity generation, transmission and distribution operations of the Kentucky Regulated segment, LKE, LG&E and KU, as well as the Kentucky Regulated segment's, LKE's and LG&E's distribution and sale of natural gas. In calculating this measure, fuel, energy purchases and certain variable costs of production (recorded as "Other operation and maintenance" on the Statements of Income) are deducted from revenues. In addition, certain other expenses, recorded as "Other operation and maintenance", "Depreciation" and "Taxes, other than income" on the Statements of Income, associated with approved cost recovery mechanisms are offset against the recovery of those expenses, which are included in revenues. These mechanisms allow for direct recovery of these expenses and, in some cases, returns on capital investments and performance incentives. As a result, this measure represents the net revenues from electricity and gas operations. |
| · | "Pennsylvania Gross Delivery Margins" is a single financial performance measure of the electricity delivery operations of the Pennsylvania Regulated segment and PPL Electric, which includes transmission and distribution activities. In calculating this measure, utility revenues and expenses associated with approved recovery mechanisms, including energy |
| 85 |
provided as a PLR, are offset with minimal impact on earnings. Costs associated with these mechanisms are recorded in "Energy purchases," "Other operation and maintenance," which is primarily Act 129 costs, and "Taxes, other than income," which is primarily gross receipts tax. This performance measure includes PLR energy purchases by PPL Electric from PPL EnergyPlus, which are reflected in "Energy purchases from affiliate" in the reconciliation tables. As a result of the spinoff of PPL Energy Supply and creation of Talen Energy on June 1, 2015, PPL EnergyPlus (renamed Talen Energy Marketing) is no longer an affiliate of PPL Electric. PPL Electric's purchases from Talen Energy Marketing subsequent to May 31, 2015 are reflected in "Energy Purchases" in the reconciliation tables. This measure represents the revenues from the Pennsylvania Regulated segment's and PPL Electric's electricity delivery operations.
These measures are not intended to replace "Operating Income," which is determined in accordance with GAAP, as an indicator of overall operating performance. Other companies may use different measures to analyze and report their results of operations. Management believes these measures provide additional useful criteria to make investment decisions. These performance measures are used, in conjunction with other information, by senior management and PPL's Board of Directors to manage the operations and analyze actual results compared with budget.
Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures
The following table contains the components from the Statement of Income that are included in the non-GAAP financial measures and a reconciliation to PPL's "Operating Income" for the periods ended June 30.
| 2015 Three Months | 2014 Three Months | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Kentucky | PA Gross | Kentucky | PA Gross | |||||||||||||||||||
| Gross | Delivery | Operating | Gross | Delivery | Operating | |||||||||||||||||
| Margins | Margins | Other (a) | Income (b) | Margins | Margins | Other (a) | Income (b) | |||||||||||||||
| Operating Revenues | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Utility | $ | 714 | $ | 476 | $ | 575 | (c) | $ | 1,765 | $ | 722 | $ | 449 | $ | 659 | (c) | $ | 1,830 | ||||
| Energy-related businesses | 16 | 16 | 19 | 19 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total Operating Revenues | 714 | 476 | 591 | 1,781 | 722 | 449 | 678 | 1,849 | ||||||||||||||
| Operating Expenses | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel | 214 | 214 | 231 | 1 | 232 | |||||||||||||||||
| Energy purchases | 28 | 138 | 4 | 170 | 36 | 114 | 21 | 171 | ||||||||||||||
| Energy purchases from affiliate | 5 | (5) | 21 | (21) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Other operation and | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| maintenance | 24 | 27 | 403 | 454 | 25 | 23 | 399 | 447 | ||||||||||||||
| Depreciation | 9 | 207 | 216 | 2 | 228 | 230 | ||||||||||||||||
| Taxes, other than income | 1 | 23 | 52 | 76 | 21 | 56 | 77 | |||||||||||||||
| Energy-related businesses | 13 | 13 | 14 | 14 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total Operating Expenses | 276 | 193 | 674 | 1,143 | 294 | 179 | 698 | 1,171 | ||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 438 | $ | 283 | $ | (83) | $ | 638 | $ | 428 | $ | 270 | $ | (20) | $ | 678 | ||||||
| 2015 Six Months | 2014 Six Months | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Kentucky | PA Gross | Kentucky | PA Gross | |||||||||||||||||||
| Gross | Delivery | Operating | Gross | Delivery | Operating | |||||||||||||||||
| Margins | Margins | Other (a) | Income (b) | Margins | Margins | Other (a) | Income (b) | |||||||||||||||
| Operating Revenues | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Utility | $ | 1,613 | $ | 1,106 | $ | 1,260 | (c) | $ | 3,979 | $ | 1,656 | $ | 1,041 | $ | 1,295 | (c) | $ | 3,992 | ||||
| Energy-related businesses | 32 | 32 | 35 | 35 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total Operating Revenues | 1,613 | 1,106 | 1,292 | 4,011 | 1,656 | 1,041 | 1,330 | 4,027 | ||||||||||||||
| Operating Expenses | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel | 467 | 467 | 508 | 508 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Energy purchases | 120 | 365 | 14 | 499 | 160 | 303 | 47 | 510 | ||||||||||||||
| Energy purchases from affiliate | 14 | (14) | 48 | (48) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Other operation and | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| maintenance | 49 | 53 | 795 | 897 | 48 | 48 | 791 | 887 | ||||||||||||||
| Depreciation | 16 | 416 | 432 | 3 | 452 | 455 | ||||||||||||||||
| Taxes, other than income | 2 | 56 | 104 | 162 | 1 | 50 | 109 | 160 | ||||||||||||||
| Energy-related businesses | 26 | 26 | 28 | 28 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total Operating Expenses | 654 | 488 | 1,341 | 2,483 | 720 | 449 | 1,379 | 2,548 | ||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 959 | $ | 618 | $ | (49) | $ | 1,528 | $ | 936 | $ | 592 | $ | (49) | $ | 1,479 | ||||||
| (a) | Represents amounts excluded from Margins. |
| (b) | As reported on the Statements of Income. |
| (c) | Primarily represents WPD's utility revenue. |
| 86 |
Changes in Non-GAAP Financial Measures
The following table shows the non-GAAP financial measures by PPL's reportable segment and by component, as applicable, for the periods ended June 30 as well as the change between periods. The factors that gave rise to the changes are described following the table.
| Three Months | Six Months | ||||||||||||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | $ Change | 2015 | 2014 | $ Change | ||||||||||||||
| Kentucky Regulated | |||||||||||||||||||
| Kentucky Gross Margins | |||||||||||||||||||
| LG&E | $ | 206 | $ | 196 | $ | 10 | $ | 436 | $ | 422 | $ | 14 | |||||||
| KU | 232 | 232 | 523 | 514 | 9 | ||||||||||||||
| LKE | $ | 438 | $ | 428 | $ | 10 | $ | 959 | $ | 936 | $ | 23 | |||||||
| Pennsylvania Regulated | |||||||||||||||||||
| Pennsylvania Gross Delivery Margins | |||||||||||||||||||
| Distribution | $ | 193 | $ | 189 | $ | 4 | $ | 435 | $ | 438 | $ | (3) | |||||||
| Transmission | 90 | 81 | 9 | 183 | 154 | 29 | |||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 283 | $ | 270 | $ | 13 | $ | 618 | $ | 592 | $ | 26 | |||||||
Kentucky Gross Margins
Kentucky Gross Margins increased for the three months ended June 30, 2015 compared with 2014 primarily due to returns on additional environmental capital investments of $12 million ($9 million at LG&E and $3 million at KU).
Kentucky Gross Margins increased for the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared with 2014 primarily due to returns on additional environmental capital investments of $30 million ($19 million at LG&E and $11 million at KU), higher demand revenue of $7 million ($2 million at LG&E and $5 million at KU) partially offset by lower sales volume of $10 million ($4 million at LG&E and $6 million at KU). The change in sales volumes were driven by milder winter weather conditions in 2015 compared to 2014.
Pennsylvania Gross Delivery Margins
Distribution
Distribution margins increased for the three months ended June 30, 2015 compared with 2014, primarily due to a $4 million favorable effect of distribution improvement capital investments.
Distribution margins were relatively flat for the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared with 2014, due to a $8 million favorable effect of distribution improvement capital investments and a $7 million impact of favorable weather, primarily offset by a $12 million benefit recorded in the first quarter of 2014 as a result of a change in estimate of a regulatory liability.
Transmission
Transmission margins increased for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2015 compared with 2014 primarily due to increased capital investment.
| Statement of Income Analysis -- | |||||||||
| Utility Revenues | |||||||||
| The increase (decrease) in utility revenues for the periods ended June 30, 2015 compared with 2014 was due to: | |||||||||
| Three Months | Six Months | ||||||||
| Domestic: | |||||||||
| PPL Electric (a) | $ | 27 | $ | 65 | |||||
| LKE (b) | (8) | (43) | |||||||
| Total Domestic | 19 | 22 | |||||||
| 87 |
| Three Months | Six Months | ||||||
| U.K.: | |||||||
| Price (c) | (33) | 9 | |||||
| Foreign currency exchange rates | (63) | (110) | |||||
| Volume | 12 | 1 | |||||
| Line loss accrual adjustments (d) | 65 | ||||||
| Total U.K. | (84) | (35) | |||||
| Total | $ | (65) | $ | (13) | |||
| (a) | See "Pennsylvania Gross Delivery Margins" for further information. |
| (b) | See "Kentucky Gross Margins" for further information. |
| (c) | The decrease for the three month period was primarily due to a price decrease effective April 1, 2015 resulting from the commencement of RIIO-ED1. The increase for the six month period was due to a price increase effective April 1, 2014, partially offset by a price decrease effective April 1, 2015. |
| (d) | The increase for the six month period was due to unfavorable accrual adjustments in 2014 based on Ofgem's final decision on the DPCR4 line loss incentives and penalties. See Note 6 to the Financial Statements for additional information. |
Certain Operating Revenues and Expenses Included in "Margins"
The following Statement of Income line items and their related decrease during the periods ended June 30, 2015 compared with 2014 are included above within "Margins" and are not discussed separately.
| Three Months | Six Months | ||||||
| Fuel | $ | (18) | $ | (41) | |||
| Energy purchases | (1) | (11) | |||||
| Other Operation and Maintenance | |||||||
| The increase (decrease) in other operation and maintenance for the periods ended June 30, 2015 compared with 2014 was due to: | |||||||
| Three Months | Six Months | ||||||
| Domestic: | |||||||
| Cane Run retired units | $ | 10 | $ | 11 | |||
| Uncollectible accounts | 3 | 6 | |||||
| External transition costs associated with the spinoff of PPL Energy Supply | 7 | 11 | |||||
| Other | 7 | 8 | |||||
| U.K.: | |||||||
| Network maintenance | (9) | (15) | |||||
| Foreign currency exchange rates | (10) | (17) | |||||
| Pension | (4) | (7) | |||||
| Engineering management | 9 | ||||||
| WPD Midlands acquisition-related adjustment | (3) | ||||||
| Other | 3 | 7 | |||||
| Total | $ | 7 | $ | 10 | |||
Depreciation
Depreciation decreased by $14 million and $23 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 compared with 2014, primarily due to a $22 million and $42 million reduction from an extension of the WPD network asset lives partially offset by additions to PP&E, net primarily at the domestic utilities. See Note 2 to the Financial Statements for additional information on the extension of WPD network asset lives.
Other Income (Expense) - net
Other income (expense) - net decreased by $28 million and increased by $89 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 compared with 2014, primarily due to changes in realized and unrealized losses on foreign currency contracts to economically hedge GBP denominated earnings from WPD.
| Interest Expense | |||||||
| The increase (decrease) in interest expense for the periods ended June 30, 2015 compared with 2014 was due to: | |||||||
| 88 |
| Three Months | Six Months | ||||||
| Long-term debt interest expense | $ | 5 | |||||
| Loss on extinguishment of debt (a) | (9) | ||||||
| Net amortization of debt discounts, premiums and issuance costs | $ | 11 | 11 | ||||
| Capitalized interest and debt component of AFUDC | 5 | 7 | |||||
| Foreign currency exchange rates | (10) | (17) | |||||
| Other | 1 | 3 | |||||
| Total | $ | 7 | $ | ||||
| (a) | In March 2014, PPL Capital Funding remarketed and exchanged junior subordinated notes that were originally issued in April 2011 as a component of PPL's 2011 Equity Units. |
| Income Taxes | |||||||
| The increase (decrease) in income taxes for the periods ended June 30, 2015 compared with 2014 was due to: | |||||||
| Three Months | Six Months | ||||||
| Change in pre-tax income at current period tax rates | $ | (24) | $ | 46 | |||
| Valuation allowance adjustments (a) | (41) | (38) | |||||
| Federal and state tax reserve adjustments (b) | (11) | (11) | |||||
| U.S. income tax on foreign earnings net of foreign tax credit (c) | (10) | (22) | |||||
| Intercompany interest on U.K. financing entities | (2) | (8) | |||||
| Reduction in U.K. income tax rates | (2) | (6) | |||||
| Other | (5) | (6) | |||||
| Total | $ | (95) | $ | (45) | |||
| (a) | As a result of the spinoff announcement, PPL recorded deferred income tax expense during the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 to adjust valuation allowances on deferred tax assets primarily for state net operating loss carryforwards that were previously supported by the earnings of PPL Energy Supply. |
| (b) | During the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, PPL recorded a tax benefit to adjust the settled refund amount approved by Joint Committee on Taxation for the open audit years 1998-2011. |
| (c) | During the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, PPL recorded lower income tax expense due to a decrease in taxable dividends. |
See Note 5 to the Financial Statements for additional information.
Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations (net of income taxes)
Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations (net of income taxes) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 includes the results of operations of PPL Energy Supply, which was spun off from PPL on June 1, 2015 and substantially represents PPL's former Supply segment. See "Discontinued Operations" in Note 8 to the Financial Statements for additional information.
PPL Electric: Earnings, Margins and Statement of Income Analysis
| Earnings | |||||||||||||
| Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | ||||||||||||
| June 30, | June 30, | ||||||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | ||||||||||
| Net Income | $ | 49 | $ | 52 | $ | 136 | $ | 137 | |||||
| Special item, gains (losses), after-tax | (4) | (4) | |||||||||||
Excluding a special item, earnings decreased for the three month period in 2015 compared with 2014 primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expense and higher depreciation expense, partially offset by higher margins from additional transmission capital investments and returns on distribution improvement capital investments.
Excluding a special item, earnings decreased for the six month period in 2015 compared with 2014 primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expense, higher depreciation expense, higher interest expense and a benefit recorded in the first quarter of 2014 for a change in the estimate of a regulatory liability, partially offset by higher margins from additional transmission capital investments, returns on distribution improvement capital investments and favorable weather.
The table below quantifies the changes in the components of Net Income between these periods, which reflects amounts classified as Pennsylvania Gross Delivery Margins and an item that management considers special on separate lines within the table and not in their respective Statement of Income line items.
| 89 |
| Three Months | Six Months | |||||
| Pennsylvania Gross Delivery Margins | $ | 13 | $ | 26 | ||
| Other operation and maintenance | (8) | (6) | ||||
| Depreciation | (7) | (13) | ||||
| Other | 2 | 3 | ||||
| Interest expense | (4) | (6) | ||||
| Income taxes | (3) | (9) | ||||
| Special item, after-tax (a) | 4 | 4 | ||||
| Total | $ | (3) | $ | (1) | ||
| (a) | See PPL's "Results of Operations - Segment Earnings - Pennsylvania Regulated Segment" for details. |
Margins
"Pennsylvania Gross Delivery Margins" is a non-GAAP financial performance measure that management utilizes as an indicator of the performance of its business. See PPL's "Results of Operations - Margins" for information on why management believes this measure is useful and for explanations of the underlying drivers of the changes between periods.
The following tables contain the components from the Statements of Income that are included in this non-GAAP financial measure and a reconciliation to "Operating Income" for the periods ended June 30.
| 2015 Three Months | 2014 Three Months | ||||||||||||||||||||
| PA Gross | PA Gross | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Delivery | Operating | Delivery | Operating | ||||||||||||||||||
| Margins | Other (a) | Income (b) | Margins | Other (a) | Income (b) | ||||||||||||||||
| Operating Revenues | $ | 476 | $ | 476 | $ | 449 | $ | 449 | |||||||||||||
| Operating Expenses | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Energy purchases | 138 | 138 | 114 | 114 | |||||||||||||||||
| Energy purchases from affiliate | 5 | 5 | 21 | 21 | |||||||||||||||||
| Other operation and maintenance | 27 | $ | 113 | 140 | 23 | $ | 112 | 135 | |||||||||||||
| Depreciation | 52 | 52 | 45 | 45 | |||||||||||||||||
| Taxes, other than income | 23 | 2 | 25 | 21 | 2 | 23 | |||||||||||||||
| Total Operating Expenses | 193 | 167 | 360 | 179 | 159 | 338 | |||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 283 | $ | (167) | $ | 116 | $ | 270 | $ | (159) | $ | 111 | |||||||||
| 2015 Six Months | 2014 Six Months | ||||||||||||||||||||
| PA Gross | PA Gross | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Delivery | Operating | Delivery | Operating | ||||||||||||||||||
| Margins | Other (a) | Income (b) | Margins | Other (a) | Income (b) | ||||||||||||||||
| Operating Revenues | $ | 1,106 | $ | 1,106 | $ | 1,041 | $ | 1,041 | |||||||||||||
| Operating Expenses | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Energy purchases | 365 | 365 | 303 | 303 | |||||||||||||||||
| Energy purchases from affiliate | 14 | 14 | 48 | 48 | |||||||||||||||||
| Other operation and maintenance | 53 | $ | 220 | 273 | 48 | $ | 221 | 269 | |||||||||||||
| Depreciation | 103 | 103 | 90 | 90 | |||||||||||||||||
| Taxes, other than income | 56 | 4 | 60 | 50 | 5 | 55 | |||||||||||||||
| Total Operating Expenses | 488 | 327 | 815 | 449 | 316 | 765 | |||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 618 | $ | (327) | $ | 291 | $ | 592 | $ | (316) | $ | 276 | |||||||||
| (a) | Represents amounts excluded from Margins. |
| (b) | As reported on the Statements of Income. |
Statement of Income Analysis --
Certain Operating Revenues and Expenses Included in "Margins"
The following Statement of Income line items and their related increase (decrease) during the periods ended June 30, 2015 compared with 2014 are included above within "Margins" and are not discussed separately.
| 90 |
| Three Months | Six Months | ||||||
| Operating revenues | $ | 27 | $ | 65 | |||
| Energy purchases | 24 | 62 | |||||
| Energy purchases from affiliate | (16) | (34) | |||||
| Other Operation and Maintenance | ||||||
| The increase (decrease) in other operation and maintenance for the periods ended June 30, 2015 compared with 2014 was due to: | ||||||
| Three Months | Six Months | |||||
| Vegetation management | $ | (2) | ||||
| Storm costs | $ | 2 | (8) | |||
| Act 129 | (2) | 3 | ||||
| Uncollectible accounts | 3 | 6 | ||||
| Corporate service costs | 6 | 9 | ||||
| Bargaining unit one-time voluntary retirement benefits | (6) | (6) | ||||
| Other | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Total | $ | 5 | $ | 4 | ||
Depreciation
Depreciation increased by $7 million and $13 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 compared with 2014, primarily due to PP&E additions, net related to the ongoing efforts to ensure the reliability of the delivery system and the replacement of aging infrastructure.
Interest Expense
Interest expense increased by $4 million and $6 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 compared with 2014, primarily due to the issuance of first mortgage bonds in June 2014.
| Income Taxes | ||||||
| The increase in income taxes for the periods ended June 30, 2015 compared with 2014 was due to: | ||||||
| Three Months | Six Months | |||||
| Change in pre-tax income at current period tax rates | $ | 1 | $ | 6 | ||
| Federal and state tax reserve adjustments | 3 | 3 | ||||
| Other | 1 | 2 | ||||
| Total | $ | 5 | $ | 11 | ||
See Note 5 to the Financial Statements for additional information.
LKE: Earnings, Margins and Statement of Income Analysis
| Earnings | |||||||||||||
| Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | ||||||||||||
| June 30, | June 30, | ||||||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | ||||||||||
| Net Income | $ | 60 | $ | 65 | $ | 177 | $ | 180 | |||||
| Special items, gains (losses), after-tax | (8) | 1 | (8) | 1 | |||||||||
Excluding special items, earnings increased for the three and six month periods in 2015 compared with 2014 primarily due to higher returns on additional environmental capital investments partially offset by higher other operation and maintenance expense and lower sales volumes. The change in sales volume was primarily attributable to milder winter weather conditions in 2015 compared to 2014.
| 91 |
The table below quantifies the changes in the components of Net Income between these periods, which reflect amounts classified as Margins and certain items that management considers special on separate lines within the table and not in their respective Statement of Income line items.
| Three Months | Six Months | |||||
| Margins | $ | 10 | $ | 23 | ||
| Other operation and maintenance | (9) | (10) | ||||
| Depreciation | (3) | |||||
| Taxes, other than income | (1) | (2) | ||||
| Other income (expense)- net | 2 | 3 | ||||
| Interest expense | (2) | (2) | ||||
| Income taxes | 4 | (3) | ||||
| Special items, after-tax (a) | (9) | (9) | ||||
| Total | $ | (5) | $ | (3) | ||
| (a) | See PPL's "Results of Operations - Segment Earnings - Kentucky Regulated Segment" for details of special items. |
Margins
"Margins" is a non-GAAP financial performance measure that management utilizes as an indicator of the performance of its business. See PPL's "Results of Operations - Margins" for an explanation of why management believes this measure is useful and the underlying drivers of the changes between periods. Within PPL's discussion, LKE's Margins are referred to as "Kentucky Gross Margins."
The following tables contain the components from the Statements of Income that are included in this non-GAAP financial measure and a reconciliation to "Operating Income" for the periods ended June 30.
| 2015 Three Months | 2014 Three Months | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Operating | Operating | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Margins | Other (a) | Income (b) | Margins | Other (a) | Income (b) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Operating Revenues | $ | 714 | $ | 714 | $ | 722 | $ | 722 | |||||||||||||||
| Operating Expenses | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel | 214 | 214 | 231 | 231 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Energy purchases | 28 | 28 | 36 | 36 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Other operation and maintenance | 24 | $ | 190 | 214 | 25 | $ | 181 | 206 | |||||||||||||||
| Depreciation | 9 | 85 | 94 | 2 | 85 | 87 | |||||||||||||||||
| Taxes, other than income | 1 | 14 | 15 | 13 | 13 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total Operating Expenses | 276 | 289 | 565 | 294 | 279 | 573 | |||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 438 | $ | (289) | $ | 149 | $ | 428 | $ | (279) | $ | 149 | |||||||||||
| 2015 Six Months | 2014 Six Months | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Operating | Operating | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Margins | Other (a) | Income (b) | Margins | Other (a) | Income (b) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Operating Revenues | $ | 1,613 | $ | 1,613 | $ | 1,656 | $ | 1,656 | |||||||||||||||
| Operating Expenses | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel | 467 | 467 | 508 | 508 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Energy purchases | 120 | 120 | 160 | 160 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Other operation and maintenance | 49 | $ | 374 | 423 | 48 | $ | 364 | 412 | |||||||||||||||
| Depreciation | 16 | 173 | 189 | 3 | 170 | 173 | |||||||||||||||||
| Taxes, other than income | 2 | 27 | 29 | 1 | 25 | 26 | |||||||||||||||||
| Total Operating Expenses | 654 | 574 | 1,228 | 720 | 559 | 1,279 | |||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 959 | $ | (574) | $ | 385 | $ | 936 | $ | (559) | $ | 377 | |||||||||||
| (a) | Represents amounts excluded from Margins. |
| (b) | As reported on the Statements of Income. |
| 92 |
Statement of Income Analysis --
Certain Operating Revenues and Expenses included in "Margins"
The following Statement of Income line items and their related decrease during the periods ended June 30, 2015 compared with 2014 are included above within "Margins" and are not discussed separately.
| Three Months | Six Months | ||||||
| Operating revenues | $ | 8 | $ | 43 | |||
| Fuel | 17 | 41 | |||||
| Energy purchases | 8 | 40 | |||||
| Other Operation and Maintenance | ||||||
| The increase in other operation and maintenance expense for the periods ended June 30, 2015 compared with 2014 was due to: | ||||||
| Three Months | Six Months | |||||
| Cane Run retired units | $ | 10 | $ | 11 | ||
| Pension | 5 | 9 | ||||
| Storm costs | (4) | (10) | ||||
| Other | (3) | 1 | ||||
| Total | $ | 8 | $ | 11 | ||
Depreciation
Depreciation increased by $7 million and $16 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 compared with 2014 primarily due to additions to PP&E, net.
Income Taxes
Income taxes increased $11 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared with 2014 due to the establishment of a valuation allowance on a deferred tax asset of $8 million and the change in pre-tax income at current period tax rates.
LG&E: Earnings, Margins and Statement of Income Analysis
| Earnings | |||||||||||||
| Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | ||||||||||||
| June 30, | June 30, | ||||||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | ||||||||||
| Net Income | $ | 35 | $ | 35 | $ | 88 | $ | 87 | |||||
Earnings were substantially the same for the three and six month periods in 2015 compared with 2014 primarily due to returns on additional environmental capital investments partially offset by higher other operation and maintenance expense and lower sales volume. The change in sales volume was primarily attributable to milder winter weather conditions in 2015 compared to 2014.
The table below quantifies the changes in the components of Net Income between these periods, which reflect amounts classified as Margins on a separate line within the table and not in their respective Statement of Income line items.
| Three Months | Six Months | |||||
| Margins | $ | 10 | $ | 14 | ||
| Other operation and maintenance | (11) | (9) | ||||
| Depreciation | 2 | 1 | ||||
| Taxes, other than income | 1 | |||||
| Other income (expense) - net | 1 | |||||
| Interest expense | (1) | (2) | ||||
| Income taxes | (1) | (4) | ||||
| Total | $ | $ | 1 | |||
| 93 |
Margins
"Margins" is a non-GAAP financial performance measure that management utilizes as an indicator of the performance of its business. See PPL's "Results of Operations - Margins" for an explanation of why management believes this measure is useful and the underlying drivers of the changes between periods. Within PPL's discussion, LG&E's Margins are included in "Kentucky Gross Margins."
The following tables contain the components from the Statements of Income that are included in this non-GAAP financial measure and a reconciliation to "Operating Income" for the periods ended June 30.
| 2015 Three Months | 2014 Three Months | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Operating | Operating | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Margins | Other (a) | Income (b) | Margins | Other (a) | Income (b) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Operating Revenues | $ | 331 | $ | 331 | $ | 344 | $ | 344 | |||||||||||||||
| Operating Expenses | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel | 82 | 82 | 104 | 104 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Energy purchases, including affiliate | 28 | 28 | 31 | 31 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Other operation and maintenance | 10 | $ | 93 | 103 | 12 | $ | 82 | 94 | |||||||||||||||
| Depreciation | 4 | 36 | 40 | 1 | 38 | 39 | |||||||||||||||||
| Taxes, other than income | 1 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 7 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total Operating Expenses | 125 | 135 | 260 | 148 | 127 | 275 | |||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 206 | $ | (135) | $ | 71 | $ | 196 | $ | (127) | $ | 69 | |||||||||||
| 2015 Six Months | 2014 Six Months | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Operating | Operating | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Margins | Other (a) | Income (b) | Margins | Other (a) | Income (b) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Operating Revenues | $ | 770 | $ | 770 | $ | 823 | $ | 823 | |||||||||||||||
| Operating Expenses | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel | 185 | 185 | 221 | 221 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Energy purchases, including affiliate | 119 | 119 | 155 | 155 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Other operation and maintenance | 22 | $ | 177 | 199 | 24 | $ | 168 | 192 | |||||||||||||||
| Depreciation | 7 | 75 | 82 | 1 | 76 | 77 | |||||||||||||||||
| Taxes, other than income | 1 | 13 | 14 | 13 | 13 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total Operating Expenses | 334 | 265 | 599 | 401 | 257 | 658 | |||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 436 | $ | (265) | $ | 171 | $ | 422 | $ | (257) | $ | 165 | |||||||||||
| (a) | Represents amounts excluded from Margins. |
| (b) | As reported on the Statements of Income. |
Statement of Income Analysis --
Certain Operating Revenues and Expenses included in "Margins"
The following Statement of Income line items and their related increase (decrease) during the periods ended June 30, 2015 compared with 2014 are included above within "Margins" and are not discussed separately.
| Three Months | Six Months | ||||||
| Retail and wholesale | $ | 3 | $ | (22) | |||
| Electric revenue from affiliate | (16) | (31) | |||||
| Fuel | (22) | (36) | |||||
| Energy purchases | (6) | (36) | |||||
| Energy purchases from affiliate | 3 | ||||||
| Other Operation and Maintenance | ||||||
| The increase in other operation and maintenance expense for the periods ended June 30, 2015 compared with 2014 was due to: | ||||||
| 94 |
| Three Months | Six Months | |||||
| Cane Run retired units | $ | 10 | $ | 11 | ||
| Pension | 3 | 5 | ||||
| Storm costs | (1) | (5) | ||||
| Other | (3) | (4) | ||||
| Total | $ | 9 | $ | 7 | ||
Depreciation
Depreciation increased by $5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared with 2014 primarily due to additions to PP&E, net.
Income Taxes
Income taxes increased by $4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared with 2014 primarily due to the change in pre-tax income at current period tax rates.
KU: Earnings, Margins and Statement of Income Analysis
| Earnings | |||||||||||||
| Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | ||||||||||||
| June 30, | June 30, | ||||||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | ||||||||||
| Net Income | $ | 39 | $ | 40 | $ | 117 | $ | 117 | |||||
| Special items, gains (losses), after-tax | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||
Excluding a special item, earnings were substantially the same for the three and six month periods in 2015 compared with 2014 primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expense offset by an increase in returns on additional environmental capital investments.
The table below quantifies the changes in the components of Net Income between these periods, which reflect amounts classified as Margins and a certain item that management considers special on separate lines within the table and not in their respective Statement of Income line items.
| Three Months | Six Months | |||||
| Margins | $ | $ | 9 | |||
| Other operation and maintenance | (1) | (5) | ||||
| Depreciation | (3) | (5) | ||||
| Taxes, other than income | (2) | (2) | ||||
| Other income (expense)- net | 1 | |||||
| Interest expense | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Income taxes | 2 | 1 | ||||
| Special item, after-tax | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Total | $ | (1) | $ | |||
Margins
"Margins" is a non-GAAP financial performance measure that management utilizes as an indicator of the performance of its business. See PPL's "Results of Operations - Margins" for an explanation of why management believes this measure is useful and the underlying drivers of the changes between periods. Within PPL's discussion, KU's Margins are included in "Kentucky Gross Margins."
The following tables contain the components from the Statements of Income that are included in this non-GAAP financial measure and a reconciliation to "Operating Income" for the periods ended June 30.
| 95 |
| 2015 Three Months | 2014 Three Months | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Operating | Operating | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Margins | Other (a) | Income (b) | Margins | Other (a) | Income (b) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Operating Revenues | $ | 396 | $ | 396 | $ | 404 | $ | 404 | |||||||||||||||
| Operating Expenses | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel | 132 | 132 | 127 | 127 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Energy purchases, including affiliate | 13 | 13 | 31 | 31 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Other operation and maintenance | 14 | $ | 95 | 109 | 13 | $ | 94 | 107 | |||||||||||||||
| Depreciation | 5 | 49 | 54 | 1 | 46 | 47 | |||||||||||||||||
| Taxes, other than income | 8 | 8 | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total Operating Expenses | 164 | 152 | 316 | 172 | 146 | 318 | |||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 232 | $ | (152) | $ | 80 | $ | 232 | $ | (146) | $ | 86 | |||||||||||
| 2015 Six Months | 2014 Six Months | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Operating | Operating | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Margins | Other (a) | Income (b) | Margins | Other (a) | Income (b) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Operating Revenues | $ | 881 | $ | 881 | $ | 902 | $ | 902 | |||||||||||||||
| Operating Expenses | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel | 282 | 282 | 287 | 287 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Energy purchases, including affiliate | 39 | 39 | 74 | 74 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Other operation and maintenance | 27 | $ | 186 | 213 | 24 | $ | 181 | 205 | |||||||||||||||
| Depreciation | 9 | 98 | 107 | 2 | 93 | 95 | |||||||||||||||||
| Taxes, other than income | 1 | 14 | 15 | 1 | 12 | 13 | |||||||||||||||||
| Total Operating Expenses | 358 | 298 | 656 | 388 | 286 | 674 | |||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 523 | $ | (298) | $ | 225 | $ | 514 | $ | (286) | $ | 228 | |||||||||||
| (a) | Represents amounts excluded from Margins. |
| (b) | As reported on the Statements of Income. |
Statement of Income Analysis --
Certain Operating Revenues and Expenses included in "Margins"
The following Statement of Income line items and their related increase (decrease) during the periods ended June 30, 2015 compared with 2014 are included above within "Margins" and are not discussed separately.
| Three Months | Six Months | ||||||
| Retail and wholesale | $ | (11) | $ | (21) | |||
| Electric revenue from affiliate | 3 | ||||||
| Fuel | 5 | (5) | |||||
| Energy purchases | (2) | (4) | |||||
| Energy purchases from affiliate | (16) | (31) | |||||
| Other Operation and Maintenance | ||||||
| The increase in other operation and maintenance expense for the periods ended June 30, 2015 compared with 2014 was due to: | ||||||
| Three Months | Six Months | |||||
| Pension | $ | 3 | $ | 6 | ||
| Cane Run 7 operations | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Timing and scope of generation maintenance | (1) | 1 | ||||
| Storm costs | (3) | (5) | ||||
| Other | 2 | 5 | ||||
| Total | $ | 2 | $ | 8 | ||
Depreciation
Depreciation increased by $7 million and $12 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 compared with 2014 primarily due to additions to PP&E, net.
| 96 |
| (a) | At June 30, 2015, $226 million of cash and cash equivalents were denominated in GBP. If these amounts would be remitted as dividends, PPL would not anticipate a material incremental U.S. tax cost. Historically, dividends paid by foreign subsidiaries have been limited to distributions of the current year's earnings. See Note 5 to the Financial Statements in PPL's 2014 Form 10-K for additional information on undistributed earnings of WPD. |
Net cash provided by (used in) operating, investing and financing activities from continuing operations for the six month period ended June 30, and the changes between periods, were as follows.
| PPL | PPL Electric | LKE | LG&E | KU | |||||||||||
| 2015 | |||||||||||||||
| Operating activities | $ | 970 | $ | 76 | $ | 703 | $ | 389 | $ | 360 | |||||
| Investing activities | (1,575) | (483) | (626) | (349) | (275) | ||||||||||
| Financing activities | (71) | 221 | (85) | (43) | (90) | ||||||||||
| 2014 | |||||||||||||||
| Operating activities | $ | 1,293 | $ | 148 | $ | 517 | $ | 203 | $ | 297 | |||||
| Investing activities | (1,700) | (295) | (502) | (249) | (305) | ||||||||||
| Financing activities | 349 | 271 | (27) | 43 | 5 | ||||||||||
| Change - Cash Provided (Used) | |||||||||||||||
| Operating activities | $ | (323) | $ | (72) | $ | 186 | $ | 186 | $ | 63 | |||||
| Investing activities | 125 | (188) | (124) | (100) | 30 | ||||||||||
| Financing activities | (420) | (50) | (58) | (86) | (95) | ||||||||||
Operating Activities
The components of the change in cash provided by (used in) operating activities from continuing operations for the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared with 2014 were as follows.
| PPL | PPL Electric | LKE | LG&E | KU | ||||||||||||||
| Change - Cash Provided (Used) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Net income | $ | 183 | $ | (1) | $ | (3) | $ | 1 | ||||||||||
| Non-cash components | (67) | 21 | 43 | 74 | $ | 5 | ||||||||||||
| Working capital | (314) | (96) | 188 | 118 | 104 | |||||||||||||
| Defined benefit plan funding | (103) | (14) | (23) | (15) | (16) | |||||||||||||
| Other operating activities | (22) | 18 | (19) | 8 | (30) | |||||||||||||
| Total | $ | (323) | $ | (72) | $ | 186 | $ | 186 | $ | 63 | ||||||||
| 97 |
(PPL)
PPL had a $323 million decrease in cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations in 2015 compared with 2014.
| · | Income from continuing operations improved by $183 million between the periods. This was offset by $67 million less net non-cash expenses. The net $116 million increase from net income and non-cash components in 2015 compared with 2014 reflects higher margins in the Pennsylvania and Kentucky regulated segments and lower income taxes. |
| · | The $314 million decrease in cash from changes in working capital was primarily due to a decrease in taxes payable, primarily due to higher income tax payments in 2015. The decrease also reflects lower other current liabilities and an increase in prepayments. |
| · | Defined benefit plan funding was $103 million higher in 2015. |
(PPL Electric)
PPL Electric had a $72 million decrease in cash provided by operating activities in 2015 compared with 2014.
| · | The $96 million decline in cash from changes in working capital was partially due to decreases in taxes payable (primarily due to higher income tax payments in 2015) and prepayment of gross receipts tax, partially offset by a decrease in accounts receivable. |
| · | Defined benefit plan funding was $14 million higher in 2015. |
(LKE)
LKE had a $186 million increase in cash provided by operating activities in 2015 compared with 2014.
| · | LKE's non-cash components of net income included a $16 million increase in depreciation expense due to additional assets in service since the second quarter of 2014, and a net $17 million increase in current regulatory assets and regulatory liabilities due to the timing of rate recovery mechanisms. |
| · | The increase in cash from working capital was driven primarily by a decrease in income tax receivable as a result of receiving payment from PPL for the use of excess tax depreciation deductions in 2014, an increase in taxes payable due to timing of payments, and net changes in accounts receivable and unbilled revenue due to colder winter weather in 2014, partially offset by a decrease in accounts payable due to the timing of fuel purchases and payments. |
(LG&E)
LG&E had a $186 million increase in cash provided by operating activities in 2015 compared with 2014.
| · | LG&E's non-cash components of net income included a $5 million increase in depreciation expense due to additional assets in service since the second quarter of 2014, a net $23 million increase in current regulatory assets and regulatory liabilities due to the timing of rate recovery mechanisms, and a $38 million increase in deferred income taxes. The increase in deferred income taxes was primarily due to an increase in accelerated tax depreciation over book depreciation of $54 million, partially offset by an increase of $15 million of net operating loss. |
| · | The increase in cash from working capital was driven primarily by a decrease in income tax receivable as a result of receiving payment from LKE for the use of excess tax depreciation deductions in 2014, an increase in taxes payable due to timing of payments, a decrease in accounts receivable from affiliates due to timing of intercompany settlements associated with capital expenditures, inventory, and energy sales to KU, and net changes in accounts receivable and unbilled revenue due to colder winter weather in 2014, partially offset by a decrease in accounts payable due to the timing of fuel purchases and payments. |
(KU)
KU had a $63 million increase in cash provided by operating activities in 2015 compared with 2014.
| · | KU's non-cash components of net income included a $12 million increase in depreciation expense due to additional assets in service since the second quarter of 2014, partially offset by a net $6 million increase in current regulatory assets and regulatory liabilities due to the timing of rate recovery mechanisms. |
| 98 |
| · | The increase in cash from working capital was driven primarily by a decrease in income tax receivable as a result of receiving payments from LKE for the use of excess tax depreciation deductions in 2014, an increase in taxes payable due to timing of payments, net changes in accounts receivable and unbilled revenue due to colder winter weather in 2014, and an increase in accounts payable due to the timing of fuel purchases and payments, partially offset by a decrease in accounts payable to affiliates due to timing of intercompany settlements associated with capital expenditures, inventory, and energy purchases from LG&E. |
Investing Activities
(All Registrants)
Expenditures for Property, Plant and Equipment
Investment in PP&E is the primary investing activity of the registrants. The change in expenditures for PP&E for the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared with 2014 was as follows.
| PPL | PPL Electric | LKE | LG&E | KU | |||||||||||
| (Increase) Decrease | $ | (1) | $ | (44) | $ | (74) | $ | (100) | $ | 26 | |||||
For PPL, increases in project expenditures at PPL Electric and LG&E, were offset by lower expenditures at WPD and KU. The increase in expenditures for PPL Electric was primarily due to the Northeast Pocono reliability project, smart grid projects and other various projects, partially offset by the completion of the Susquehanna-Roseland transmission project. The increase in expenditures for LG&E was primarily due to environmental air projects at LG&E's Mill Creek plant, partially offset by lower expenditures for construction of Cane Run Unit 7 which was put into commercial operation in June 2015. The decrease in expenditures for KU was related to lower expenditures for the construction of Cane Run Unit 7, environmental air projects and CCR projects at KU's Ghent and E.W. Brown plants.
Other Significant Changes in Components of Investing Activities
(PPL)
PPL received $135 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 from the sale of short-term investments.
(PPL and PPL Electric)
PPL Electric received $150 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 on notes receivable from affiliates.
Financing Activities
(All Registrants)
The components of the change in cash provided by (used in) financing activities from continuing operations for the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared with 2014 was as follows.
| PPL | PPL Electric | LKE | LG&E | KU | ||||||||||||
| Change - Cash Provided (Used) | ||||||||||||||||
| Long-term debt issuances/retirements, net | $ | 31 | $ | (286) | ||||||||||||
| Stock issuances/redemptions, net | (934) | |||||||||||||||
| Dividends | (30) | (20) | $ | 2 | $ | 5 | ||||||||||
| Capital contributions/distributions, net | 65 | $ | 13 | (33) | (66) | |||||||||||
| Change in short-term debt, net | 493 | 188 | (89) | (55) | (34) | |||||||||||
| Other financing activities | 20 | 3 | 18 | |||||||||||||
| Total | $ | (420) | $ | (50) | $ | (58) | $ | (86) | $ | (95) | ||||||
For the six months ended June 30, 2015, PPL required $420 million less cash from financing activities primarily due to the ability to use cash-on-hand in conjunction with cash from operating activities to support the significant capital expenditure programs of its subsidiaries.
| 99 |
See Note 7 to the Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q for information on 2015 short and long-term debt activity, equity transactions and PPL dividends. See the Registrants' 2014 Form 10-K for information on 2014 activity.
Credit Facilities
The Registrants maintain credit facilities to enhance liquidity, provide credit support and provide a backstop to commercial paper programs. Amounts borrowed under these credit facilities are reflected in "Short-term debt" on the Balance Sheets. At June 30, 2015, the total committed borrowing capacity and the use of that capacity under these credit facilities was as follows:
External (All Registrants)
| Letters of | |||||||||||||
| Credit | |||||||||||||
| and | |||||||||||||
| Committed | Commercial | Unused | |||||||||||
| Capacity | Borrowed | Paper Issued | Capacity | ||||||||||
| PPL Capital Funding Credit Facilities | $ | 750 | $ | 20 | $ | 730 | |||||||
| PPL Electric Credit Facility | 300 | 169 | 131 | ||||||||||
| LKE Credit Facility | 75 | $ | 75 | ||||||||||
| LG&E Credit Facility | 500 | 259 | 241 | ||||||||||
| KU Credit Facilities | 598 | 425 | 173 | ||||||||||
| Total LKE | 1,173 | 75 | 684 | 414 | |||||||||
| Total U.S. Credit Facilities (a) | $ | 2,223 | $ | 75 | $ | 873 | $ | 1,275 | |||||
| Total U.K. Credit Facilities (b) | £ | 1,055 | £ | 242 | £ | 813 | |||||||
| (a) | The commitments under the U.S. credit facilities are provided by a diverse bank group, with no one bank and its affiliates providing an aggregate commitment of more than the following percentages of the total committed capacity: PPL - 13%, PPL Electric - 7%, LKE - 21%, LG&E - 7% and KU - 37%. |
| (b) | The amounts borrowed at June 30, 2015 were USD-denominated borrowings of $200 million and GPB-denominated borrowings which equated to $171 million. At June 30, 2015, the USD equivalent of unused capacity under the U.K. committed credit facilities was $1.2 billion. |
| The commitments under the U.K. credit facilities are provided by a diverse bank group, with no one bank providing more than 14% of the total committed capacity. |
See Note 7 to the Financial Statements for further discussion of the Registrants' credit facilities.
Intercompany (LKE, LG&E and KU)
| Committed | Other Used | Unused | ||||||||||
| Capacity | Borrowed | Capacity | Capacity | |||||||||
| LKE Credit Facility | $ | 225 | $ | 59 | $ | 166 | ||||||
| LG&E Money Pool (a) | 500 | $ | 259 | 241 | ||||||||
| KU Money Pool (a) | 500 | 227 | 273 | |||||||||
| (a) | LG&E and KU participate in an intercompany money pool agreement whereby LKE, LG&E and/or KU make available funds up to $500 million at an interest rate based on a market index of commercial paper issues. However, the FERC has issued a maximum short-term debt limit for each utility at $500 million from any source. |
See Note 11 to the Financial Statements for further discussion of intercompany credit facilities.
Commercial Paper (All Registrants)
PPL Electric, LG&E and KU maintain commercial paper programs to provide an additional financing source to fund short-term liquidity needs, as necessary. Commercial paper issuances, included in "Short-term debt" on the Balance Sheets, are supported by the respective Registrant's Syndicated Credit Facility. The following commercial paper programs were in place at June 30, 2015:
| 100 |
| Commercial | ||||||||||
| Paper | Unused | |||||||||
| Capacity | Issuances | Capacity | ||||||||
| PPL Electric | $ | 300 | $ | 168 | $ | 132 | ||||
| LG&E | 350 | 259 | 91 | |||||||
| KU | 350 | 227 | 123 | |||||||
| Total LKE | 700 | 486 | 214 | |||||||
| Total PPL | $ | 1,000 | $ | 654 | $ | 346 | ||||
(PPL)
At-the-Market Stock Offering Program
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, PPL issued 421,700 shares of common stock under the program at an average price of $33.73 per share, receiving net proceeds of $14 million.
See Note 7 to the Financial Statements for additional information.
Common Stock Dividends
In May 2015, PPL declared its quarterly common stock dividend, payable July 1, 2015, at 37.25 cents per share (equivalent to $1.49 per annum). On August 3, 2015, PPL announced that the company is increasing its common stock dividend to 37.75 cents per share on a quarterly basis (equivalent to $1.51 per annum). The increased dividend will be payable on October 1, 2015 to shareowners of record as of September 10, 2015. Future dividends, declared at the discretion of the Board of Directors, will be dependent upon future earnings, cash flows, financial and legal requirements and other factors.
Rating Agency Actions
(All Registrants)
Moody's, S&P and Fitch have periodically reviewed the credit ratings of the debt of the Registrants and their subsidiaries. Based on their respective independent reviews, the rating agencies may make certain ratings revisions or ratings affirmations.
A credit rating reflects an assessment by the rating agency of the creditworthiness associated with an issuer and particular securities that it issues. The credit ratings of the Registrants and their subsidiaries are based on information provided by the Registrants and other sources. The ratings of Moody's, S&P and Fitch are not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any securities of the Registrants or their subsidiaries. Such ratings may be subject to revisions or withdrawal by the agencies at any time and should be evaluated independently of each other and any other rating that may be assigned to the securities. The credit ratings of the Registrants and their subsidiaries affect their liquidity, access to capital markets and cost of borrowing under their credit facilities.
The rating agencies have taken the following actions related to the Registrants and their subsidiaries during 2015.
In January 2015, Fitch withdrew its ratings for PPL, PPL Capital Funding, PPL Electric, LKE, LG&E, and KU.
(PPL)
In May 2015, Moody's upgraded the following ratings with a stable outlook:
| · | the long-term issuer rating from Baa3 to Baa2 for PPL; |
| · | the senior unsecured rating from Baa3 to Baa2 for PPL Capital Funding; and |
| · | the junior subordinated rating from Ba1 to Baa3 for PPL Capital Funding. |
In May 2015, Fitch affirmed and withdrew its ratings for PPL UK Distribution Holdings Limited (formerly known as PPL WW), WPD (South Wales) and WPD (South West).
In June 2015, S&P upgraded the following ratings with a stable outlook:
| · | the long-term issuer rating from BBB to A- for PPL; |
| 101 |
| · | the senior unsecured rating from BBB- to BBB+ for PPL Capital Funding; and |
| · | the junior subordinated rating from BB+ to BBB for PPL Capital Funding. |
In June 2015, S&P affirmed the short-term ratings for WPD plc, WPD (East Midlands), WPD (West Midlands), WPD (South Wales) and WPD (South West). S&P also upgraded the following ratings with a stable outlook:
| · | the long-term issuer rating from BBB to A- for WPD plc, WPD (East Midlands), WPD (West Midlands), WPD (South Wales) and WPD (South West); |
| · | the senior unsecured rating from BBB- to BBB+ for WPD plc; and |
| · | the senior unsecured rating from BBB to A- for WPD (East Midlands), WPD (West Midlands), WPD (South Wales) and WPD (South West). |
(PPL and PPL Electric)
In May 2015, Moody's affirmed its ratings and revised its outlook to positive for PPL Electric.
In June 2015, S&P affirmed its commercial paper rating and upgraded the following ratings with a stable outlook for PPL Electric:
| · | the long-term issuer rating from BBB to A-; and |
| · | the senior secured rating from A- to A. |
(PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU)
In May 2015, Moody's upgraded the following ratings with a stable outlook for LKE:
| · | the long-term issuer rating from Baa2 to Baa1; and |
| · | the senior unsecured rating from Baa2 to Baa1. |
In June 2015, S&P affirmed its commercial paper ratings for LG&E and KU. S&P also upgraded the following ratings with a stable outlook:
| · | the long-term issuer ratings from BBB to A- for LKE, LG&E and KU; |
| · | the senior secured ratings from A- to A for LG&E and KU; and |
| · | the senior unsecured rating from BBB- to BBB+ for LKE. |
In June 2015, S&P upgraded its ratings from AA+ to AAA for KU's 2000 Series A Solid Waste Disposal Facility Revenue Bonds, KU's 2004 Series A and 2008 Series A Environmental Facilities Revenue Bonds and KU's 2006 Series B Environmental Facilities Revenue Refunding Bonds and removed them from CreditWatch with positive implications.
Ratings Triggers
(PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU)
Various derivative and non-derivative contracts, including contracts for the sale and purchase of electricity and fuel, commodity transportation and storage, interest rate and foreign currency instruments (for PPL), contain provisions that require the posting of additional collateral or permit the counterparty to terminate the contract, if PPL's, LKE's, LG&E's or KU's or their subsidiaries' credit rating, as applicable, were to fall below investment grade. See Note 14 to the Financial Statements for a discussion of "Credit Risk-Related Contingent Features," including a discussion of the potential additional collateral requirements for PPL, LKE and LG&E for derivative contracts in a net liability position at June 30, 2015.
(All Registrants)
For additional information on the Registrants' liquidity and capital resources, see "Item 7. Combined Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," in the Registrants' 2014 Form 10-K.
| 102 |
Market Risk
(All Registrants)
See Notes 13 and 14 to the Financial Statements for information about the Registrants' risk management objectives, valuation techniques and accounting designations.
The forward-looking information presented below provides estimates of what may occur in the future, assuming certain adverse market conditions and model assumptions. Actual future results may differ materially from those presented. These disclosures are not precise indicators of expected future losses, but only indicators of possible losses under normal market conditions at a given confidence level.
Interest Rate Risk
The Registrants and their subsidiaries issue debt to finance their operations, which exposes them to interest rate risk. The Registrants and their subsidiaries utilize various financial derivative instruments to adjust the mix of fixed and floating interest rates in their debt portfolios, adjust the duration of their debt portfolios and lock in benchmark interest rates in anticipation of future financing, when appropriate. Risk limits under the risk management program are designed to balance risk exposure to volatility in interest expense and changes in the fair value of the debt portfolios due to changes in the absolute level of interest rates.
The following interest rate hedges were outstanding at June 30, 2015.
| Effect of a | ||||||||||||
| Fair Value, | 10% Adverse | Maturities | ||||||||||
| Exposure | Net - Asset | Movement | Ranging | |||||||||
| Hedged | (Liability) (a) | in Rates (b) | Through | |||||||||
| PPL | ||||||||||||
| Cash flow hedges | ||||||||||||
| Interest rate swaps (c) | $ | 1,300 | $ | (59) | $ | (52) | 2045 | |||||
| Cross-currency swaps (d) | 1,262 | 63 | (159) | 2028 | ||||||||
| Economic hedges | ||||||||||||
| Interest rate swaps (e) | 179 | (45) | (3) | 2033 | ||||||||
| LKE | ||||||||||||
| Cash flow hedges | ||||||||||||
| Interest rate swaps (c) | 1,000 | (46) | (44) | 2045 | ||||||||
| Economic hedges | ||||||||||||
| Interest rate swaps (e) | 179 | (45) | (3) | 2033 | ||||||||
| LG&E | ||||||||||||
| Cash flow hedges | ||||||||||||
| Interest rate swaps (c) | 500 | (23) | (22) | 2045 | ||||||||
| Economic hedges | ||||||||||||
| Interest rate swaps (e) | 179 | (45) | (3) | 2033 | ||||||||
| KU | ||||||||||||
| Cash flow hedges | ||||||||||||
| Interest rate swaps (c) | 500 | (23) | (22) | 2045 | ||||||||
| (a) | Includes accrued interest, if applicable. |
| (b) | Effects of adverse movements decrease assets or increase liabilities, as applicable, which could result in an asset becoming a liability. Sensitivities represent a 10% adverse movement in interest rates, except for cross-currency swaps which also includes foreign currency exchange rates. |
| (c) | Changes in the fair value of such cash flow hedges are recorded in equity or as regulatory assets or regulatory liabilities, if recoverable through regulated rates, and reclassified into earnings in the same period during which the item being hedged affects earnings. |
| (d) | Cross-currency swaps are utilized to hedge the principal and interest payments of WPD's U.S. dollar-denominated senior notes. Changes in the fair value of these instruments are recorded in equity and reclassified into earnings in the same period during which the item being hedged affects earnings. |
| (e) | Realized changes in the fair value of such economic hedges are recoverable through regulated rates and any subsequent changes in the fair value of these derivatives are included in regulatory assets or regulatory liabilities. |
The Registrants are exposed to a potential increase in interest expense and to changes in the fair value of their debt portfolios. The estimated impact of a 10% adverse movement in interest rates on interest expense at June 30, 2015 was insignificant for PPL, PPL Electric, LKE, LG&E and KU. The estimated impact of a 10% adverse movement in interest rates on the fair value of debt at June 30, 2015 is shown below.
| 103 |
| 10% Adverse | ||||||||||||||||
| Movement | ||||||||||||||||
| in Rates | ||||||||||||||||
| PPL | $ | 630 | ||||||||||||||
| PPL Electric | 131 | |||||||||||||||
| LKE | 135 | |||||||||||||||
| LG&E | 43 | |||||||||||||||
| KU | 81 | |||||||||||||||
Foreign Currency Risk (PPL)
PPL is exposed to foreign currency risk primarily through investments in U.K. affiliates. Under its risk management program, PPL may enter into financial instruments to hedge certain foreign currency exposures, including translation risk of expected earnings, firm commitments, recognized assets or liabilities, anticipated transactions and net investments.
The following foreign currency hedges were outstanding at June 30, 2015.
| Effect of a | ||||||||||||
| 10% | ||||||||||||
| Adverse | ||||||||||||
| Movement | ||||||||||||
| in Foreign | ||||||||||||
| Fair Value, | Currency | Maturities | ||||||||||
| Exposure | Net - Asset | Exchange | Ranging | |||||||||
| Hedged | (Liability) | Rates (a) | Through | |||||||||
| Net investment hedges (b) | £ | 134 | $ | 12 | $ | (21) | 2016 | |||||
| Economic hedges (c) | 1,571 | 61 | (230) | 2017 | ||||||||
| (a) | Effects of adverse movements decrease assets or increase liabilities, as applicable, which could result in an asset becoming a liability. |
| (b) | To protect the value of a portion of its net investment in WPD, PPL executes forward contracts to sell GBP. |
| (c) | To economically hedge the translation of expected earnings denominated in GBP to U.S. dollars. |
Commodity Price Risk (Non-trading)
(PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU)
LG&E's and KU's retail electric and natural gas rates and municipal wholesale electric rates are set by regulatory commissions and the fuel costs incurred are directly recoverable from customers. As a result, LG&E and KU are subject to commodity price risk for only a small portion of their business operations. LG&E and KU sell excess economic generation to maximize the value of the physical assets at times when the assets are not required to serve LG&E's or KU's customers. See Note 14 to the Financial Statements for additional information.
(PPL and PPL Electric)
PPL Electric is exposed to market price and volumetric risks from its obligation as a PLR. The PUC has approved a cost recovery mechanism that allows PPL Electric to pass through to customers the cost associated with fulfilling its PLR obligation. This cost recovery mechanism substantially eliminates PPL Electric's exposure to market price risk. PPL Electric also mitigates its exposure to volumetric risk by entering into full-requirement energy supply contracts for the majority of its PLR obligations. These supply contracts transfer the volumetric risk associated with the PLR obligation to the energy suppliers.
Credit Risk (All Registrants)
See Notes 13 and 14 to the Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q and "Risk Management - Credit Risk" in the Registrants' 2014 Form 10-K for additional information.
Foreign Currency Translation (PPL)
The value of the British pound sterling fluctuates in relation to the U.S. dollar. Changes in this exchange rate resulted in a foreign currency translation loss of $149 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015, which primarily reflected a $376 million decrease to PP&E and goodwill offset by a decrease of $227 million to net liabilities. Changes in this exchange rate
| 104 |
resulted in a foreign currency translation gain of $140 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014, which primarily reflected a $349 million increase to PP&E and goodwill offset by an increase of $209 million to net liabilities. The impact of foreign currency translation is recorded in AOCI.
Related Party Transactions (All Registrants)
The Registrants are not aware of any material ownership interests or operating responsibility by senior management in outside partnerships, including leasing transactions with variable interest entities, or other entities doing business with the Registrants. See Note 11 to the Financial Statements for additional information on related party transactions for PPL Electric, LKE, LG&E and KU.
Acquisitions, Development and Divestitures
(All Registrants)
The Registrants from time to time evaluate opportunities for potential acquisitions, divestitures and development projects. Development projects are reexamined based on market conditions and other factors to determine whether to proceed with the projects, sell, cancel or expand them, execute tolling agreements or pursue other options. See Note 8 to the Financial Statements for information on the more significant activities.
(PPL)
See Note 8 to the Financial Statements for information on the spinoff of PPL Energy Supply.
(All Registrants)
Extensive federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations are applicable to PPL's, LKE's, LG&E's and KU's air emissions, water discharges and the management of hazardous and solid waste, as well as other aspects of the Registrants' businesses. The cost of compliance or alleged non-compliance cannot be predicted with certainty but could be significant. In addition, costs may increase significantly if the requirements or scope of environmental laws or regulations, or similar rules, are expanded or changed. Costs may take the form of increased capital expenditures or operating and maintenance expenses, monetary fines, penalties or other restrictions. Many of these environmental law considerations are also applicable to the operations of key suppliers, or customers, such as coal producers and industrial power users, and may impact the cost for their products or their demand for the Registrants' services. Increased capital and operating costs are subject to rate recovery. PPL, PPL Electric, LKE, LG&E and KU can provide no assurances as to the ultimate outcome of future environmental or rate proceedings before regulatory authorities.
The following is a discussion of the more significant environmental matters. See Note 10 to the Financial Statements and "Item 1. Business - Environmental Matters" in the Registrants' 2014 Form 10-K for additional information on environmental matters.
Climate Change
Physical effects associated with climate change could include the impact of changes in weather patterns, such as storm frequency and intensity, and the resultant potential damage, as applicable, to the Registrants' generation assets, electricity transmission and delivery systems, as well as impacts on the Registrants' customers. In addition, changed weather patterns could potentially reduce annual rainfall in areas where PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU have hydroelectric generating facilities or where river water is used to cool their fossil powered generators, as applicable. The Registrants cannot currently predict whether their businesses will experience these potential risks or estimate the cost of their related consequences.
In June 2013, President Obama released his Climate Action Plan which reiterates the goal of reducing GHG emissions in the U.S. through such actions as regulating power plant emissions, promoting increased use of renewables and clean energy technology, and establishing more restrictive energy efficiency standards. Additionally, the Climate Action Plan calls for the U.S. to prepare for the impacts of climate change. Requirements related to this plan could affect the Registrants and others in the industry as modifications may be needed to electricity delivery systems to improve the ability to withstand major storms in order to meet those requirements. As further described below, the EPA has proposed rules pursuant to this directive for both new power plants and existing power plants, which it expects to finalize in the third quarter of 2015. The EPA has also announced that it will develop a federal implementation plan which would apply to any states that fail to submit an
| 105 |
acceptable state implementation plan under these rules. The EPA's authority to promulgate these regulations under Section 111 of the Clean Air Act when the sources are already regulated under Section 112 is under challenge in the D.C. Circuit Court. Oral arguments were heard on April 16, 2015.
The EPA's proposal for new power plants was issued in January 2014. The proposed limits for coal-fired plants can only be achieved through carbon capture and sequestration, a technology that is not presently commercially viable and, therefore, effectively preclude the construction of new coal-fired plants. The proposed standards for new gas-fired plants may also not be continuously achievable. The preclusion of new coal-fired plants and the compliance difficulties posed for new gas-fired plants could have a significant industry-wide impact.
The EPA's proposal for existing power plants was issued in June 2014. The existing plant proposal contains stringent, state-specific rate-based reduction goals to be achieved in two phases (2020-2029 and 2030 and beyond). The EPA believes it has offered some flexibility to the states as to how state compliance plans can be crafted, including the option to demonstrate compliance on a mass basis and through multi-state collaborations. The EPA is also proposing potential state plan extensions based on the type of plan filed (single or multi-state). LG&E and KU have analyzed the proposal and identified potential impacts and solutions in comments filed in December 2014. PPL also submitted Supplemental Comments to FERC through EEI, advocating for reliability coordination and relief in response to technical conferences hosted by FERC on the reliability implications of implementing this rule. LG&E and KU are also working closely with state regulators in the development of Kentucky's state implementation plan. The regulation of carbon dioxide emissions from existing plants could have a significant industry-wide impact depending on the structure and stringency of the final rule and state implementation plans.
Waters of the United States (WOTUS)
On May 27, 2015, the EPA released a final rule on the definition of WOTUS. Although the rule was meant to clarify which streams and other bodies of water fall under the jurisdiction of EPA and the Army Corps of Engineers under the Clean Water Act, significant ambiguity remains. The Registrants do not currently expect the rule to have a significant impact on their operations. Until such time as ongoing litigation is complete, however, the Registrants are unable to predict the impact of the rule which could be substantial and include significant project delays and added costs, as permits and other regulatory requirements may be imposed for many activities presently not covered by permitting requirements (including vegetation management for transmission lines and activities affecting storm water conveyances and wetlands). However, these costs are subject to rate recovery.
(PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU)
Coal Combustion Residuals (CCRs)
On April 17, 2015, the EPA published its final rule regulating CCRs. CCRs include fly ash, bottom ash and sulfur dioxide scrubber wastes. The rule will become effective on October 14, 2015. It imposes extensive new requirements, including location restrictions, design and operating standards, groundwater monitoring and corrective action requirements and closure and post-closure care requirements on CCR impoundments and landfills that are located on active power plants and not closed. Under the rule, the EPA will regulate CCRs as non-hazardous under Subtitle D of RCRA and allow beneficial use of CCRs, with some restrictions. This self-implementing rule requires posting of compliance documentation on a publicly accessible website and is enforceable through citizen suits. LG&E's and KU's plants using surface impoundments for management and disposal of CCRs will be most impacted by this rule. The rule's requirements for covered CCR impoundments and landfills include commencement or completion of closure activities generally between three and ten years from certain triggering events. PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU also anticipate incurring capital or operation and maintenance costs prior to that time to address other provisions of the rule, such as groundwater monitoring and disposal facility modifications or closings, or to implement various compliance strategies.
In connection with the final CCR rule, LG&E and KU recorded increases to existing AROs during the second quarter of 2015. See Note 16 for additional information. Further increases to AROs or changes to current capital plans or to operating costs may be required as estimates are refined based on closure developments, groundwater monitoring results and regulatory or legal proceedings. Costs relating to this rule are subject to rate recovery.
Effluent Limitation Guidelines (ELGs)
In June 2013, the EPA published proposed regulations to revise discharge limitations for steam electric generation wastewater permits. The proposed limitations are based on the EPA review of available treatment technologies and their capacity for reducing pollutants and include new requirements for fly ash and bottom ash transport water and metal cleaning waste waters, as well as new limits for scrubber wastewater and landfill leachate. The EPA's proposed ELGs contain requirements that would affect the inspection and operation of CCR facilities, if finalized as proposed. The proposal contains alternative approaches, some of which could impose significant costs on LG&E's and KU's coal-fired plants. The final
| 106 |
regulation is expected to be issued by the fourth quarter of 2015. At the present time, PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU are unable to estimate a range of reasonably possible costs, but the costs could be significant. Pending finalization of the ELGs, certain states (including Kentucky) and environmental groups are proposing more stringent technology-based limits in permit renewals. Depending on the final limits imposed, the costs of compliance could be significant and costs could be imposed ahead of federal timelines. Costs to comply with ELGs or technology-based limits are subject to rate recovery.
Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS)
In February 2012, the EPA finalized the MATS rule requiring reductions of mercury and other hazardous air pollutants from fossil-fuel fired power plants, with an effective date of April 16, 2012. The MATS rule was challenged by industry groups and states and was upheld by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit Court (D.C. Circuit Court) in April 2014. A group of states subsequently petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court (Supreme Court) to review this decision and on June 29, 2015, the Supreme Court held that the EPA failed to properly consider costs when deciding to regulate hazardous air emissions from power plants under MATS. The Court remanded the matter to the D.C. Circuit Court. EPA's MATS rule remains in effect pending action by the D.C. Circuit Court. It is uncertain whether the D.C. Circuit Court will vacate the MATS rule, remand the rule to the EPA, or require further proceedings or actions.
LG&E and KU have installed significant controls in connection with the MATS rule and in conjunction with compliance with other environmental requirements, including fabric-filter baghouses, upgraded FGDs or chemical additive systems for which appropriate KPSC authorization and/or ECR treatment has been received. PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU cannot predict the outcome of this matter or the potential impact, if any, on plant operations, rate treatment or future capital or operating needs.
National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)
In 2008, the EPA revised the NAAQS for ozone and proposed to further strengthen the standard in November 2014.The EPA is required under court order to finalize the standard by October 1, 2015. States are also obligated to address interstate transport issues associated with new ozone standards through the establishment of "good neighbor" state implementation plans for those states that are found to contribute significantly to another states' non-attainment. States that are not in the ozone transport region, including Kentucky, are working together to evaluate further nitrogen oxide reductions from fossil-fueled plants with SCRs. The nature and timing of any additional reductions resulting from these evaluations cannot be predicted at this time.
In 2010, the EPA finalized revised NAAQS for sulfur dioxide and required states to identify areas that meet those standards and areas that are in "non-attainment". In July 2013, the EPA finalized non-attainment designations for parts of the country, including part of Jefferson County in Kentucky. Attainment must be achieved by 2018. PPL, LKE, LG&E and KU anticipate that some of the measures required for compliance with Clean Air Act regulations governing attainment of ozone or particulates standards, such as upgraded or new sulfur dioxide scrubbers at certain plants and the previously announced retirement of coal-fired generating units, at LG&E's Cane Run plant and KU's Green River and Tyrone plants, will help to achieve compliance with the new sulfur dioxide standard. If additional reductions were to be required, the costs could be significant. Such costs are subject to rate recovery.
New Accounting Guidance (All Registrants)
See Notes 2 and 18 to the Financial Statements for a discussion of new accounting guidance adopted and pending adoption.
Application of Critical Accounting Policies (All Registrants)
Financial condition and results of operations are impacted by the methods, assumptions and estimates used in the application of critical accounting policies. The following table summarizes the accounting policies by Registrant that are particularly important to an understanding of the reported financial condition or results of operations, and require management to make estimates or other judgments of matters that are inherently uncertain. See "Item 7. Combined Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in the Registrants' 2014 Form 10-K for a discussion of each critical accounting policy.
| PPL | ||||||||||||||||
| PPL | Electric | LKE | LG&E | KU | ||||||||||||
| Defined Benefits | X | X | X | X | X | |||||||||||
| Loss Accruals | X | X | X | X | X | |||||||||||
| Income Taxes | X | X | X | X | X | |||||||||||
| Asset Impairments (Excluding Investments) | X | X | X | X | ||||||||||||
| AROs | X | X | X | X | ||||||||||||
| Price Risk Management | X | X | X | X | ||||||||||||
| Regulatory Assets and Liabilities | X | X | X | X | X | |||||||||||
| Revenue Recognition - unbilled revenue | X | X | X | X | ||||||||||||
| 107 |
PPL Corporation
PPL Electric Utilities Corporation
LG&E and KU Energy LLC
Louisville Gas and Electric Company
Kentucky Utilities Company
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Reference is made to "Risk Management" in "Item 2. Combined Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations."
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.
The Registrants' principal executive officers and principal financial officers, based on their evaluation of the Registrants' disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) have concluded that, as of June 30, 2015, the Registrants' disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that material information relating to the Registrants and their consolidated subsidiaries is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the SEC's rules and forms, particularly during the period for which this quarterly report has been prepared. The aforementioned principal officers have concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures are also effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including the principal executive and principal financial officers, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
(b) Change in internal controls over financial reporting.
The Registrants' principal executive officers and principal financial officers have concluded that there were no changes in the Registrants' internal control over financial reporting during the Registrants' second fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants' internal control over financial reporting.
PPL Corporation
Following the announcement of the transaction to spin off PPL Energy Supply, LLC to form Talen Energy, management determined the appropriate staffing for Talen Energy and for PPL and its subsidiaries. During the six months ended June 30, 2015, staffing changes, including the consolidation of certain positions and transition of responsibilities, resulted in changes in certain individuals responsible for executing internal controls. However, changes to system applications, business processes and the associated internal controls were not significant. Management has taken steps to minimize the risk from the changes in individuals executing internal controls.
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
For information regarding pending administrative and judicial proceedings involving regulatory, environmental and other matters, which information is incorporated by reference into this Part II, see:
| · | "Item 3. Legal Proceedings" in each Registrant's 2014 Form 10-K; and | ||
| · | Notes 6 and 10 to the Financial Statements. |
There have been no material changes in the Registrants' risk factors from those disclosed in "Item 1A. Risk Factors" of the Registrants' 2014 Form 10-K, except that as a result of the June 1, 2015 spinoff by PPL of PPL Energy Supply, the risk factors disclosed under the heading "Risks Related to Supply Segment" at pages 26 through 31 of the Registrants' 2014 Form 10-K are no longer applicable.
| 108 |
| (1) | Represents shares of common stock withheld by PPL at the request of its executive officers to pay income taxes upon the vesting of the officers' restricted stock awards, as permitted under the terms of PPL's Incentive Compensation Plan and Incentive Compensation Plan for Key Employees. |
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
The following Exhibits indicated by an asterisk preceding the Exhibit number are filed herewith. The balance of the Exhibits has heretofore been filed with the Commission and pursuant to Rule 12(b)-32 are incorporated herein by reference. Exhibits indicated by a [_] are filed or listed pursuant to Item 601(b)(10)(iii) of Regulation S-K.
| 3(a) | - | Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of PPL Corporation, effective as of May 21, 2015 (Exhibit 3(i) to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated May 27, 2015) |
| 3(b) | - | Bylaws of PPL Corporation, effective as of May 21, 2015 (Exhibit 3(ii) to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated May 27, 2015) |
| *4(a) | - | Amendment No. 11 to the PPL Employee Stock Ownership Plan, dated May 11, 2015 |
| [_]10(a) | - | Form of Retention Agreement, dated May 6, 2015, among PPL Corporation, PPL Services Corporation and Robert J. Grey (Exhibit 99.1 to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated May 7, 2015) |
| [_]10(b) | - | Form of Grant Letter dated May 29, 2015 (Exhibit 10.1 to PPL Corporation Form 8-K Report (File No. 1-11459) dated June 1, 2015) |
| *12(a) | - | PPL Corporation and Subsidiaries Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends |
| *12(b) | - | PPL Electric Utilities Corporation and Subsidiaries Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends |
| *12(c) | - | LG&E and KU Energy LLC and Subsidiaries Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges |
| *12(d) | - | Louisville Gas and Electric Company Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges |
| *12(e) | - | Kentucky Utilities Company Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges |
| 109 |
| Certifications pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2015, filed by the following officers for the following companies: | ||
| *31(a) | - | PPL Corporation's principal executive officer |
| *31(b) | - | PPL Corporation's principal financial officer |
| *31(c) | - | PPL Electric Utilities Corporation's principal executive officer |
| *31(d) | - | PPL Electric Utilities Corporation's principal financial officer |
| *31(e) | - | LG&E and KU Energy LLC's principal executive officer |
| *31(f) | - | LG&E and KU Energy LLC's principal financial officer |
| *31(g) | - | Louisville Gas and Electric Company's principal executive officer |
| *31(h) | - | Louisville Gas and Electric Company's principal financial officer |
| *31(i) | - | Kentucky Utilities Company's principal executive officer |
| *31(j) | - | Kentucky Utilities Company's principal financial officer |
| Certifications pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2015, furnished by the following officers for the following companies: | ||
| *32(a) | - | PPL Corporation's principal executive officer and principal financial officer |
| *32(b) | - | PPL Electric Utilities Corporation's principal executive officer and principal financial officer |
| *32(c) | - | LG&E and KU Energy LLC's principal executive officer and principal financial officer |
| *32(d) | - | Louisville Gas and Electric Company's principal executive officer and principal financial officer |
| *32(e) | - | Kentucky Utilities Company's principal executive officer and principal financial officer |
| 101.INS | - | XBRL Instance Document |
| 101.SCH | - | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema |
| 101.CAL | - | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase |
| 101.DEF | - | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase |
| 101.LAB | - | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase |
| 101.PRE | - | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase |
| 110 |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrants have duly caused this report to be signed on their behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized. The signature for each undersigned company shall be deemed to relate only to matters having reference to such company or its subsidiaries.
| PPL Corporation | ||
| (Registrant) | ||
| Date: August 3, 2015 | /s/ Stephen K. Breininger | |
| Stephen K. Breininger | ||
| Vice President and Controller | ||
| (Principal Accounting Officer) | ||
| PPL Electric Utilities Corporation | ||
| (Registrant) | ||
| Date: August 3, 2015 | /s/ Dennis A. Urban, Jr. | |
| Dennis A. Urban, Jr. | ||
| Controller | ||
| (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) | ||
| LG&E and KU Energy LLC | ||
| (Registrant) | ||
| Louisville Gas and Electric Company | ||
| (Registrant) | ||
| Kentucky Utilities Company | ||
| (Registrant) | ||
| Date: August 3, 2015 | /s/ Kent W. Blake | |
|
Kent W. Blake Chief Financial Officer |
||
| (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) | ||
| 111 |
Exhibit 4(a)
AMENDMENT NO. 11
TO
PPL EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN
WHEREAS, PPL Services Corporation (“PPL”) has adopted the PPL Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“Plan”) effective January 1, 2000; and
WHEREAS, the Plan was amended and restated effective January 1, 2002, and subsequently amended by Amendment No. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10; and
NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:
I. Effective April 10, 2015, Article V Allocation is amended to read as follows:
Article V
Allocation
(a) Any cash dividends paid prior to July 1, 2003 with respect to Stock that is allocated to a Participant's Account as of the record date of such dividend shall be paid no later than 90 days after the close of the Plan Year to the Participant in cash either by the Trustee or directly by PPL, a Participating Company or PPL Corporation.
(b) Any cash dividends paid on or after July 1, 2003 with respect to Stock that is allocated to a Participant’s Account as of the record date of such dividend shall be, as elected by the Participant in the manner and at the time prescribed by the Employee Benefit Plan Board, (1) distributed in cash to the Participant as soon as administratively practicable following the date such dividend is paid by PPL Corporation (but in no event later than 90 days after the close of the Plan Year in which such dividend is paid by PPL Corporation) or (2) credited to the Participant’s Account and invested in additional Stock. Dividends that are invested in Stock in the Plan pursuant to an election under section 404(k)(A)(iii) of the Code shall be treated as earnings under the Plan. Pursuant to rules established by the Employee Benefit Plan Board, a Participant’s failure to elect either a cash distribution or investment in Stock shall be deemed an election of cash distribution.
(c) Effective July 1, 2003, any non-cash distributions paid with respect to Stock allocated to a Participant’s Account shall be credited to the Participant’s Account and invested in additional Stock and treated as earnings under the Plan.
The initial deposit of non-cash dividends to the Trust shall commence a blackout of any and all distribution activity under Article VII with respect to such non-cash dividends until such time as the Employee Benefit Plan Board specifies the blackout shall end. The allocable share of non-cash dividends for each Participant’s account shall be established in a temporary sub-account which shall have no distributions permitted. The sub-accounts shall be liquidated and reinvested in stock in an orderly manner, and such sub-accounts, when allocated their allocable share of the stock purchased by reinvestment of non-cash dividends, shall be merged into the Participant’s accounts when the blackout ends. Article VII distributions for the Participant’s full account, including the additional stock from the merged sub-account, shall be permitted as of the date the blackout ends. During the blackout, only that portion of the Participant’s account which is not in the temporary sub-account may have distributions described in Article VII.
II. Except as provided in this Amendment No. 11, all other provisions of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment No. 11 is executed this ____ day of _____________, 2015.
| Employee Benefit Plan Board | |
| By: ___________________________________ | |
| Julissa Burgos | |
| Chair, Employee Benefit Plan Board |
| Exhibit 12(a) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| PPL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGES AND | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Millions of Dollars) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 6 Months | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| June 30, | Years Ended December 31, (a) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2015(a) | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Earnings, as defined: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income from Continuing Operations Before | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income Taxes | $ | 1,090 | $ | 2,129 | $ | 1,728 | $ | 1,406 | $ | 922 | $ | 321 | |||||||||||
| Adjustment to reflect earnings from equity method | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| investments on a cash basis (b) | (2) | 34 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 1,088 | 2,129 | 1,728 | 1,440 | 922 | 321 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total fixed charges as below | 590 | 1,095 | 1,096 | 1,065 | 1,022 | 698 | |||||||||||||||||
| Less: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Capitalized interest | 8 | 11 | 11 | 6 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Preferred security distributions of subsidiaries | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| on a pre-tax basis | 5 | 23 | 21 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest expense and fixed charges related to | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| discontinued operations | 150 | 186 | 235 | 235 | 231 | 255 | |||||||||||||||||
| Total fixed charges included in Income from | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes | 432 | 898 | 850 | 819 | 764 | 422 | |||||||||||||||||
| Total earnings | $ | 1,520 | $ | 3,027 | $ | 2,578 | $ | 2,259 | $ | 1,686 | $ | 743 | |||||||||||
| Fixed charges, as defined: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest charges (c) | $ | 586 | $ | 1,073 | $ | 1,058 | $ | 1,019 | $ | 955 | $ | 637 | |||||||||||
| Estimated interest component of operating rentals | 4 | 22 | 38 | 41 | 44 | 39 | |||||||||||||||||
| Preferred security distributions of subsidiaries | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| on a pre-tax basis | 5 | 23 | 21 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Fixed charges of majority-owned share of 50% or | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| less-owned persons | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total fixed charges (d) | $ | 590 | $ | 1,095 | $ | 1,096 | $ | 1,065 | $ | 1,022 | $ | 698 | |||||||||||
| Ratio of earnings to fixed charges | 2.6 | 2.8 | 2.4 | 2.1 | 1.7 | 1.1 | |||||||||||||||||
| Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges and | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| preferred stock dividends (e) | 2.6 | 2.8 | 2.4 | 2.1 | 1.7 | 1.1 | |||||||||||||||||
| (a) | All periods reflect PPL's Supply segment as Discontinued Operations. See Note 8 to the Financial Statements for additional information. | |
| (b) | Includes other-than-temporary impairment loss of $25 million in 2012. | |
| (c) | Includes interest on long-term and short-term debt, as well as amortization of debt discount, expense and premium - net. | |
| (d) | Interest on unrecognized tax benefits is not included in fixed charges. | |
| (e) | PPL, the parent holding company, does not have any preferred stock outstanding; therefore, the ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges and preferred stock dividends is the same as the ratio of earnings to fixed charges. |
| 112 |
| Exhibit 12(b) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| PPL ELECTRIC UTILITIES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGES AND | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Millions of Dollars) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 6 Months | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| June 30, | Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Earnings, as defined: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income Before Income Taxes | $ | 231 | $ | 423 | $ | 317 | $ | 204 | $ | 257 | $ | 192 | |||||||||||
| Total fixed charges as below | 69 | 131 | 117 | 107 | 105 | 102 | |||||||||||||||||
| Total earnings | $ | 300 | $ | 554 | $ | 434 | $ | 311 | $ | 362 | $ | 294 | |||||||||||
| Fixed charges, as defined: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest charges (a) | $ | 67 | $ | 127 | $ | 113 | $ | 104 | $ | 102 | $ | 101 | |||||||||||
| Estimated interest component of operating rentals | 2 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||
| Total fixed charges (b) | $ | 69 | $ | 131 | $ | 117 | $ | 107 | $ | 105 | $ | 102 | |||||||||||
| Ratio of earnings to fixed charges | 4.3 | 4.2 | 3.7 | 2.9 | 3.4 | 2.9 | |||||||||||||||||
| Preferred stock dividend requirements on a pre-tax | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| basis | $ | 6 | $ | 21 | $ | 23 | |||||||||||||||||
| Fixed charges, as above | $ | 69 | $ | 131 | $ | 117 | 107 | 105 | 102 | ||||||||||||||
| Total fixed charges and preferred stock dividends | $ | 69 | $ | 131 | $ | 117 | $ | 113 | $ | 126 | $ | 125 | |||||||||||
| Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges and | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| preferred stock dividends | 4.3 | 4.2 | 3.7 | 2.8 | 2.9 | 2.4 | |||||||||||||||||
| (a) | Includes interest on long-term and short-term debt, as well as amortization of debt discount, expense and premium - net. | |
| (b) | Interest on unrecognized tax benefits is not included in fixed charges. |
| 113 |
| Exhibit 12(c) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| LG&E AND KU ENERGY LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Millions of Dollars) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Predeces- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Successor (a) | sor (b) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 6 Months | Year | Year | Year | Year | 2 Months | 10 Months | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ended | Ended | Ended | Ended | Ended | Ended | Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Jun. 30, | Dec. 31, | Dec. 31, | Dec. 31, | Dec. 31, | Dec. 31, | Oct. 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Earnings, as defined: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income from Continuing Operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Before Income Taxes | $ | 298 | $ | 553 | $ | 551 | $ | 331 | $ | 419 | $ | 70 | $ | 300 | ||||||||||||||
| Adjustment to reflect earnings from | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| equity method investments on a cash | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| basis (c) | (2) | (1) | (1) | 33 | (1) | (4) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mark to market impact of derivative | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| instruments | 2 | (20) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 296 | 552 | 550 | 364 | 418 | 72 | 276 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total fixed charges as below | 89 | 173 | 151 | 157 | 153 | 25 | 158 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Total earnings | $ | 385 | $ | 725 | $ | 701 | $ | 521 | $ | 571 | $ | 97 | $ | 434 | ||||||||||||||
| Fixed charges, as defined: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest charges (d) (e) | $ | 85 | $ | 167 | $ | 145 | $ | 151 | $ | 147 | $ | 24 | $ | 153 | ||||||||||||||
| Estimated interest component of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| operating rentals | 4 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Total fixed charges | $ | 89 | $ | 173 | $ | 151 | $ | 157 | $ | 153 | $ | 25 | $ | 158 | ||||||||||||||
| Ratio of earnings to fixed charges | 4.3 | 4.2 | 4.6 | 3.3 | 3.7 | 3.9 | 2.7 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| (a) | Post-acquisition activity covering the time period after October 31, 2010. | |
| (b) | Pre-acquisition activity covering the time period prior to November 1, 2010. | |
| (c) | Includes other-than-temporary impairment loss of $25 million in 2012. | |
| (d) | Includes interest on long-term and short-term debt, as well as amortization of loss on reacquired debt and amortization of debt discount, expense and premium - net. | |
| (e) | Includes a credit for amortization of a fair market value adjustment of $7 million in 2013. |
| 114 |
| Exhibit 12(d) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| LOUISVILLE GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Millions of Dollars) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Predeces- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Successor (a) | sor (b) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 6 Months | Year | Year | Year | Year | 2 Months | 10 Months | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ended | Ended | Ended | Ended | Ended | Ended | Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Jun. 30, | Dec. 31, | Dec. 31, | Dec. 31, | Dec. 31, | Dec. 31, | Oct. 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Earnings, as defined: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income Before Income Taxes | $ | 143 | $ | 272 | $ | 257 | $ | 192 | $ | 195 | $ | 29 | $ | 167 | ||||||||||||||
| Mark to market impact of derivative | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| instruments | 1 | (20) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 143 | 272 | 257 | 192 | 195 | 30 | 147 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total fixed charges as below | 28 | 51 | 36 | 44 | 46 | 8 | 40 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Total earnings | $ | 171 | $ | 323 | $ | 293 | $ | 236 | $ | 241 | $ | 38 | $ | 187 | ||||||||||||||
| Fixed charges, as defined: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest charges (c) (d) | $ | 26 | $ | 49 | $ | 34 | $ | 42 | $ | 44 | $ | 8 | $ | 38 | ||||||||||||||
| Estimated interest component of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| operating rentals | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total fixed charges | $ | 28 | $ | 51 | $ | 36 | $ | 44 | $ | 46 | $ | 8 | $ | 40 | ||||||||||||||
| Ratio of earnings fixed charges | 6.1 | 6.3 | 8.1 | 5.4 | 5.2 | 4.8 | 4.7 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| (a) | Post-acquisition activity covering the time period after October 31, 2010. | |
| (b) | Pre-acquisition activity covering the time period prior to November 1, 2010. | |
| (c) | Includes interest on long-term and short-term debt, as well as amortization of loss on reacquired debt and amortization of debt discount, expense and premium - net. | |
| (d) | Includes a credit for amortization of a fair market value adjustment of $7 million in 2013. |
| 115 |
| Exhibit 12(e) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| KENTUCKY UTILITIES COMPANY | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Millions of Dollars) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Predeces- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Successor (a) | sor (b) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 6 Months | Year | Year | Year | Year | 2 Months | 10 Months | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ended | Ended | Ended | Ended | Ended | Ended | Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Jun. 30, | Dec. 31, | Dec. 31, | Dec. 31, | Dec. 31, | Dec. 31, | Oct. 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Earnings, as defined: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income Before Income Taxes | $ | 188 | $ | 355 | $ | 360 | $ | 215 | $ | 282 | $ | 55 | $ | 218 | ||||||||||||||
| Adjustment to reflect earnings from | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| equity method investments on a cash | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| basis (c) | (2) | (1) | (1) | 33 | (1) | (4) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 186 | 354 | 359 | 248 | 281 | 55 | 214 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total fixed charges as below | 40 | 80 | 73 | 72 | 73 | 11 | 71 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Total earnings | $ | 226 | $ | 434 | $ | 432 | $ | 320 | $ | 354 | $ | 66 | $ | 285 | ||||||||||||||
| Fixed charges, as defined: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest charges (d) | $ | 38 | $ | 77 | $ | 70 | $ | 69 | $ | 70 | $ | 10 | $ | 69 | ||||||||||||||
| Estimated interest component of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| operating rentals | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Total fixed charges | $ | 40 | $ | 80 | $ | 73 | $ | 72 | $ | 73 | $ | 11 | $ | 71 | ||||||||||||||
| Ratio of earnings to fixed charges | 5.7 | 5.4 | 5.9 | 4.4 | 4.8 | 6.0 | 4.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| (a) | Post-acquisition activity covering the time period after October 31, 2010. | |
| (b) | Pre-acquisition activity covering the time period prior to November 1, 2010. | |
| (c) | Includes other-than-temporary impairment loss of $25 million in 2012. | |
| (d) | Includes interest on long-term and short-term debt, as well as amortization of loss on reacquired debt and amortization of debt discount, expense and premium - net. | |
| 116 |
Exhibit 31(a)
CERTIFICATION | ||||
| I, WILLIAM H. SPENCE, certify that: | ||||
| 1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PPL Corporation (the "registrant"); | |||
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; | |||
| 3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; | |||
| 4. | The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: | |||
| a. | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; | |||
| b. | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; | |||
| c. | Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and | |||
| d. | Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and | |||
| 5. | The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): | |||
| a. | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and | |||
| b. | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. | |||
| Date: August 3, 2015 | /s/ William H. Spence | |||
|
William H. Spence Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) PPL Corporation | ||||
| 117 |
Exhibit 31(b)
CERTIFICATION | ||||
| I, VINCENT SORGI, certify that: | ||||
| 1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PPL Corporation (the "registrant"); | |||
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; | |||
| 3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; | |||
| 4. | The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: | |||
| a. | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; | |||
| b. | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; | |||
| c. | Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and | |||
| d. | Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and | |||
| 5. | The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): | |||
| a. | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and | |||
| b. | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. | |||
| Date: August 3, 2015 | /s/ Vincent Sorgi | |||
|
Vincent Sorgi Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) PPL Corporation | ||||
| 118 |
Exhibit 31(c)
CERTIFICATION | ||||
| I, GREGORY N. DUDKIN, certify that: | ||||
| 1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PPL Electric Utilities Corporation (the "registrant"); | |||
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; | |||
| 3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; | |||
| 4. | The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: | |||
| a. | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; | |||
| b. | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; | |||
| c. | Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and | |||
| d. | Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and | |||
| 5. | The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): | |||
| a. | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and | |||
| b. | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. | |||
| Date: August 3, 2015 | /s/ Gregory N. Dudkin | |||
|
Gregory N. Dudkin President (Principal Executive Officer) PPL Electric Utilities Corporation | ||||
| 119 |
Exhibit 31(d)
CERTIFICATION | ||||
| I, DENNIS A. URBAN, JR., certify that: | ||||
| 1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PPL Electric Utilities Corporation (the "registrant"); | |||
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; | |||
| 3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; | |||
| 4. | The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: | |||
| a. | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; | |||
| b. | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; | |||
| c. | Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and | |||
| d. | Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and | |||
| 5. | The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): | |||
| a. | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and | |||
| b. | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. | |||
| Date: August 3, 2015 | /s/ Dennis A. Urban, Jr. | |||
|
Dennis A. Urban, Jr. Controller (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) PPL Electric Utilities Corporation | ||||
| 120 |
Exhibit 31(e)
CERTIFICATION | ||||
| I, VICTOR A. STAFFIERI, certify that: | ||||
| 1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of LG&E and KU Energy LLC (the "registrant"); | |||
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; | |||
| 3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; | |||
| 4. | The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: | |||
| a. | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; | |||
| b. | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; | |||
| c. | Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and | |||
| d. | Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and | |||
| 5. | The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): | |||
| a. | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and | |||
| b. | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. | |||
| Date: August 3, 2015 | /s/ Victor A. Staffieri | |||
|
Victor A. Staffieri Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President (Principal Executive Officer) LG&E and KU Energy LLC | ||||
| 121 |
Exhibit 31(f)
CERTIFICATION | ||||
| I, KENT W. BLAKE, certify that: | ||||
| 1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of LG&E and KU Energy LLC (the "registrant"); | |||
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; | |||
| 3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; | |||
| 4. | The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: | |||
| a. | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; | |||
| b. | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; | |||
| c. | Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and | |||
| d. | Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and | |||
| 5. | The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): | |||
| a. | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and | |||
| b. | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. | |||
| Date: August 3, 2015 | /s/ Kent W. Blake | |||
|
Kent W. Blake Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) LG&E and KU Energy LLC | ||||
| 122 |
Exhibit 31(g)
CERTIFICATION | ||||
| I, VICTOR A. STAFFIERI, certify that: | ||||
| 1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Louisville Gas and Electric Company (the "registrant"); | |||
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; | |||
| 3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; | |||
| 4. | The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: | |||
| a. | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; | |||
| b. | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; | |||
| c. | Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and | |||
| d. | Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and | |||
| 5. | The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): | |||
| a. | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and | |||
| b. | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. | |||
| Date: August 3, 2015 | /s/ Victor A. Staffieri | |||
|
Victor A. Staffieri Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President (Principal Executive Officer) Louisville Gas and Electric Company | ||||
| 123 |
Exhibit 31(h)
CERTIFICATION | ||||
| I, KENT W. BLAKE, certify that: | ||||
| 1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Louisville Gas and Electric Company (the "registrant"); | |||
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; | |||
| 3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; | |||
| 4. | The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: | |||
| a. | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; | |||
| b. | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; | |||
| c. | Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and | |||
| d. | Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and | |||
| 5. | The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): | |||
| a. | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and | |||
| b. | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. | |||
| Date: August 3, 2015 | /s/ Kent W. Blake | |||
|
Kent W. Blake Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) Louisville Gas and Electric Company | ||||
| 124 |
Exhibit 31(i)
CERTIFICATION | ||||
| I, VICTOR A. STAFFIERI, certify that: | ||||
| 1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Kentucky Utilities Company (the "registrant"); | |||
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; | |||
| 3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; | |||
| 4. | The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: | |||
| a. | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; | |||
| b. | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; | |||
| c. | Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and | |||
| d. | Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and | |||
| 5. | The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): | |||
| a. | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and | |||
| b. | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. | |||
| Date: August 3, 2015 | /s/ Victor A. Staffieri | |||
|
Victor A. Staffieri Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President (Principal Executive Officer) Kentucky Utilities Company | ||||
| 125 |
Exhibit 31(j)
CERTIFICATION | ||||
| I, KENT W. BLAKE, certify that: | ||||
| 1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Kentucky Utilities Company (the "registrant"); | |||
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; | |||
| 3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; | |||
| 4. | The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: | |||
| a. | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; | |||
| b. | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; | |||
| c. | Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and | |||
| d. | Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and | |||
| 5. | The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): | |||
| a. | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and | |||
| b. | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. | |||
| Date: August 3, 2015 | /s/ Kent W. Blake | |||
|
Kent W. Blake Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) Kentucky Utilities Company | ||||
| 126 |
Exhibit 32(a)
CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
FOR PPL CORPORATION'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED June 30, 2015
In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PPL Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Covered Report"), we, William H. Spence, the Principal Executive Officer of the Company, and Vincent Sorgi, the Principal Financial Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that:
| · | The Covered Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and | |
| · | The information contained in the Covered Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
| Date: August 3, 2015 | /s/ William H. Spence | ||
|
William H. Spence Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) PPL Corporation
| |||
| /s/ Vincent Sorgi | |||
|
Vincent Sorgi Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) PPL Corporation |
|||
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
| 127 |
Exhibit 32(b)
CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
FOR PPL ELECTRIC UTILITIES CORPORATION'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED June 30, 2015
In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PPL Electric Utilities Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Covered Report"), we, Gregory N. Dudkin, the Principal Executive Officer of the Company, and Dennis A. Urban, Jr., the Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that:
| · | The Covered Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and | |
| · | The information contained in the Covered Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
| Date: August 3, 2015 | /s/ Gregory N. Dudkin | |
|
Gregory N. Dudkin President (Principal Executive Officer) PPL Electric Utilities Corporation | ||
| /s/ Dennis A. Urban, Jr. | ||
|
Dennis A. Urban, Jr. Controller (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) PPL Electric Utilities Corporation | ||
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
| 128 |
Exhibit 32(c)
CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
FOR LG&E AND KU ENERGY LLC'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED June 30, 2015
In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of LG&E and KU Energy LLC (the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Covered Report"), we, Victor A. Staffieri, the Principal Executive Officer of the Company, and Kent W. Blake, the Principal Financial Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that:
| · | The Covered Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and | |
| · | The information contained in the Covered Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
| Date: August 3, 2015 | /s/ Victor A. Staffieri | |
|
Victor A. Staffieri Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President (Principal Executive Officer) LG&E and KU Energy LLC | ||
| /s/ Kent W. Blake | ||
|
Kent W. Blake Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) LG&E and KU Energy LLC | ||
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
| 129 |
Exhibit 32(d)
CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
FOR LOUISVILLE GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED June 30, 2015
In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Louisville Gas and Electric Company (the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Covered Report"), we, Victor A. Staffieri, the Principal Executive Officer of the Company, and Kent W. Blake, the Principal Financial Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that:
| · | The Covered Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and | |
| · | The information contained in the Covered Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
| Date: August 3, 2015 | /s/ Victor A. Staffieri | |
|
Victor A. Staffieri Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President (Principal Executive Officer) Louisville Gas and Electric Company | ||
| /s/ Kent W. Blake | ||
|
Kent W. Blake Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) Louisville Gas and Electric Company | ||
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
| 130 |
Exhibit 32(e)
CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
FOR KENTUCKY UTILITIES COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED June 30, 2015
In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Kentucky Utilities Company (the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Covered Report"), we, Victor A. Staffieri, the Principal Executive Officer of the Company, and Kent W. Blake, the Principal Financial Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that:
| · | The Covered Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and | |
| · | The information contained in the Covered Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
| Date: August 3, 2015 | /s/ Victor A. Staffieri | |
|
Victor A. Staffieri Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President (Principal Executive Officer) Kentucky Utilities Company | ||
| /s/ Kent W. Blake | ||
|
Kent W. Blake Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) Kentucky Utilities Company | ||
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
| 131 |
780,000 shares authorized; 669,514 and 665,849 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 .
170,000 shares authorized; 66,368 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 .
Net income equals comprehensive income.
75 , 000 shares authorized ; 21 , 294 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 .
Shares in thousands. All common shares of LG&E stock are owned by LKE .
80,000 shares authorized; 37 , 818 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 .
Shares in thousands. All common shares of K U stock are owned by LKE .
These liabilities were recorded as offsets to certain intangible assets that were recorded at fair value upon the acquisition of LKE by PPL.
In 2014, the If-Converted Method was applied to the Equity Units prior to the March 2014 settlement.
Includes stock options exercised, vesting of performance units, vesting of restricted stock and restricted stock units and conversion of stock units granted to directors.
Current portion is included in "Other current assets" and long-term portion is included in "Other noncurrent assets" on the Balance Sheets.
Included in "Other noncurrent assets" on the Balance Sheets.
Indemnification to the liquidators and certain others for existing liabilities or expenses or liabilities arising during the liquidation process. The indemnifications are limited to distributions made from the subsidiary to its parent either prior or subsequent to liquidation or are not explicitly stated in the agreements. The indemnifications generally expire two to seven years subsequent to the date of dissolution of the entities. The exposure noted only includes those cases where the agre ements provide for specific limits.
In connection with their sales of various businesses, WPD and its affiliates have provided the purchasers with indemnifications that are standard for such transactions, including indemnifications for certain pre- existing liabilities and environmental and tax matters or have agreed to continue their obligations under existing third-party guarantees, either for a set period of time following the transactions or upon the condition that the purchasers make reasonable efforts to terminate the guarantees. Finally, WPD and its affiliates remain secondarily responsible for lease payments under certain leases that they have assigned to third parties.
Relates to certain obligations of discontinued or modified electric associations that were guaranteed at the time of privatization by the participating members. Costs are allocated to the members and can be reallocated if an existing member becomes insolvent. At June 30, 2015 , WPD has recorded an estimated disc ounted liability for which the expected payment/performance is probable. Neither the expiration date nor the maximum amount of potential payments for certain obligations is explicitly stated in the related agreements, and as a result, the exposure has bee n estimated.
A third party logistics firm provides inventory procurement and fulfillment services. The logistics firm has title to the inventory, however, upon termination of the contracts, PPL Electric has guaranteed to purchase any remainin g inventory that has not been used or sold.
LKE provides certain indemnifications covering the due and punctual payment, performance and disch arge by each party of its respective obligations. The most comprehensive of these guarantees is the LKE guarantee covering operational, regulatory and environmental commitments and indemnifications made by WKE under a 2009 Transaction Termina tion Agreement. This guarantee has a term of 12 years ending July 2021, and a maximum exposure of $ 200 million, exclusive of c ertain items such as government fines and penalties that fall outside the cap. Another WKE-r elated LKE guarantee covers other indemnifications related to the purchase price of excess power , has a term expiring in 2023, and a maximum exposure of $ 100 million. In May 2012, LKE's indemnitee received an unfavorable arbitration panel's decision interpreting this matter. In October 2014, LKE’s indemnitee filed a motion for discretionary review with the Kentucky Supreme Court seeking to overturn the arbitration decision. LKE believes its indemnification obligations in this matter remain subject to various uncertainties, including additional legal, arbitration and contractual developments, as well as future prices, availability and demand for the subje ct excess power. The ultimate outcomes of the WKE termination-related indemnifications cannot be predicted at this time. Additionally, LKE has indemnified various third parties related to historical obligations for other divested subsidiaries and a ffiliates. The indemnifications vary by entity and the maximum exposures range from being capped at the sale price to no specified maximum; LKE could be required to perform on these indemnifications in the event of covered losses or liabilities being clai med by an indemnified party. LKE cannot predict the ultimate outcomes of indemnification circumstances, but does not currently expect such outcomes to result in significant losses above the amounts recorded.
Shares in thousands. Each share entitles the holder to one vote on any question presented at any shareowners' meeting.
Net income approximates comprehensive income.
Shares in thousands. All common shares of PPL Electric stock are owned by PPL.
Excludes accrued interest, if applicable.
Primarily consists of unallocated items, including cash, PP&E and the elimination of inter-segment transaction s.
Included in "Other noncurrent assets" on the Balance Sheets. R epresent s cash collateral posted to offset the exposure with co unterparties related to certain interest rate swaps under master netting arrangements that are not offset.
WPD plc 's amounts borrowed at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 were USD-denominated borrowings of $ 200 million and $ 161 million, which bore interest at 1.89% and 1.86% . WPD (East Midlands) amounts borrowed at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 were GBP-denominated borrowings which equated to $ 171 million and $ 100 million, which bore interes t at 1.01% for both periods. At June 30, 2015 , the unused capacity under the U.K. credit facilities was $ 1.3 billion.
Includes the effect of net receivables and payables alread y recorded on the Balance Sheet.
Includes unrealized gains and losses from economic activity . See Note 14 for additional information.
2015 includes transition costs to prepare the new Talen Energy organization for the June 1, 2015 spinoff and reconfigure the remaining PPL Services functions. See Note 8 for additional information.
See Note 8 for additional information.
LKE’s interest rates on outstanding borrowings at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 , were 1.44% and 1.67% .
As a result of the spinoff announceme nt, PPL recorded deferred income tax expense during the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 to adjust valuation allowances on deferred tax assets primarily for state net operating loss carryforwards that were previously supported by the earnings of PPL Energy Supply. See Note 8 for additional information on the spinoff .
During the three and six months ended June 30, 201 5 , PPL recorded lower income tax expense due to a decrease in taxa ble dividends .
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, PPL recorded a tax benefit to adjust the settled refund amount approved by Joint Committee of Taxation for the open audit years 1998-2011 .
Included in “Other current assets”, “Other current liabilities”, “Other noncurrent assets” and “Other deferred credits and noncurrent liabilities” on the Balance Sheets.
Included in "Other current assets", "Other current liabilities", "Other noncurrent assets" and "Other deferred credits and noncurrent liabilities" on the B alance S heets .
Includes termination benefits of $ 4 million for PPL Electric . The remaining $ 16 million relates to PPL Energy Supply and is reflected in d iscontinued o perations .
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 , the total net periodic defined benefit cost include $ 7 million and $ 18 million reflected in d iscontinued o perati ons related to costs allocated from PPL's plans to PPL Energy Supply prior to the spinoff .
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 , the total net periodic defined benefit cost include $ 23 million and $ 28 million reflected in d iscontinued o perations related to costs allocated from PPL's plans to PPL Energy Supply.
The three and six months ended June 30, 2014 include $ 4 million of termination benefits for PPL Electric related to a one-time voluntary retirement window offered to certain bargaining unit employees.
Includes non-cash contributions of $ 47 million .
Represents a valuation allowance against tax credits expiring in 2016 and 2017 that are more likely than not to expire before being utilized.
The distribution of PPL Energy Supply ’s cash and cash equivalents at June 1, 2015 is included in "Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities - discontinu ed operations" on the Statement of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2015 .
Includes interest associated with the Supply Segment with no additional allocation as the Supply segment was sufficiently capitalized.
Represents the location on the Balance Sheets
Related Party Transactions (Tables) |
6 Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2015 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| PPL Electric Utilities Corp [Member] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Related Party Transactions [Line Items] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Intercompany Support Cost Allocations | PPL Services, PPL EU Services and LKS charged the following amounts for the periods ended June 30, and believe these amounts are reasonable, including amounts applied to accounts that are further distributed between capital and expense.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| LG And E And KU Energy LLC [Member] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Related Party Transactions [Line Items] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Intercompany Support Cost Allocations | PPL Services, PPL EU Services and LKS charged the following amounts for the periods ended June 30, and believe these amounts are reasonable, including amounts applied to accounts that are further distributed between capital and expense.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Louisville Gas And Electric Co [Member] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Related Party Transactions [Line Items] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Intercompany Support Cost Allocations | PPL Services, PPL EU Services and LKS charged the following amounts for the periods ended June 30, and believe these amounts are reasonable, including amounts applied to accounts that are further distributed between capital and expense.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Kentucky Utilities Co [Member] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Related Party Transactions [Line Items] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Intercompany Support Cost Allocations | PPL Services, PPL EU Services and LKS charged the following amounts for the periods ended June 30, and believe these amounts are reasonable, including amounts applied to accounts that are further distributed between capital and expense.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financing Activities (Long-term Debt and Equity Securities) (Details) $ / shares in Units, $ in Millions |
1 Months Ended | 3 Months Ended | 6 Months Ended | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Feb. 26, 2015
USD ($)
Integer
|
Jun. 30, 2015
USD ($)
$ / shares
shares
|
Jun. 30, 2015
USD ($)
$ / shares
shares
|
Jun. 30, 2014
USD ($)
|
|
| At-the-Market Stock Offering Program (Numeric) [Abstract] | ||||
| Net proceeds from issuance of common stock | $ 83 | $ 1,017 | ||
| At The Market Stock Offering Program [Member] | ||||
| At-the-Market Stock Offering Program (Numeric) [Abstract] | ||||
| Number of distribution agreements | Integer | 2 | |||
| Aggregate sales price of common stock based on two separate equity distribution agreements | $ 500 | |||
| Shares of common stock issued during the period | shares | 421,700 | 421,700 | ||
| Average price per common share | $ / shares | $ 33.73 | $ 33.73 | ||
| Net proceeds from issuance of common stock | $ 14 | $ 14 | ||
Income Taxes (Unrecognized Tax Benefits and Tax Litigation) (Details) - USD ($) $ in Millions |
3 Months Ended | 6 Months Ended | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2015 |
Jun. 30, 2014 |
Jun. 30, 2015 |
Jun. 30, 2014 |
|
| Unrecognized Tax Benefits [Abstract] | ||||
| Beginning of period | $ 20 | $ 22 | $ 20 | $ 22 |
| Additions based on tax positions of prior years | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Reductions based on tax positions of prior years | 0 | (2) | 0 | (2) |
| Settlements | (15) | 0 | (15) | 0 |
| End of period | $ 5 | $ 21 | $ 5 | $ 21 |