XML 1094 R17.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Goodwill and Specifically Identifiable Intangible Assets
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2012
Notes to Financial Statements [Abstract]  
Goodwill and Specifically Identifiable Intangible Assets

10. Goodwill and Specifically Identifiable Intangible Assets

 

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill (in millions) by reportable segment were as follows:

          For the Year Ended December 31, 2012
         Acquisition Cumulative        
         BalanceImpairment           
         as ofas of     Balance
         Beginning-Beginning-       as of End-
          of-Year  of-Year  Impairment  Other  of-Year
Annuities $ 1,040  $ (600)  $ -  $ -  $ 440
Retirement Plan Services   20    -    -    -    20
Life Insurance   2,188    (649)    -    -    1,539
Group Protection   274    -    -    -    274
Other Operations - Media   341    (341)    -    -    -
 Total goodwill $ 3,863  $ (1,590)  $ -  $ -  $ 2,273

          For the Year Ended December 31, 2011
         Acquisition Cumulative        
         BalanceImpairment           
         as ofas of     Balance
         Beginning-Beginning-       as of End-
          of-Year  of-Year  Impairment  Other  of-Year
Annuities $ 1,040  $ (600)  $ -  $ -  $ 440
Retirement Plan Services   20    -    -    -    20
Life Insurance   2,188    -    (650)    1    1,539
Group Protection   274    -    -    -    274
Other Operations - Media   341    (244)    (97)    -    -
 Total goodwill $ 3,863  $ (844)  $ (747)  $ 1  $ 2,273

Included in the other category were adjustments related to income tax deductions recognized when stock options attributable to mergers were exercised or the release of unrecognized tax benefits acquired through mergers.

 

We perform a Step 1 goodwill impairment analysis on all of our reporting units at least annually on October 1. To determine the implied fair value for our reporting units, we utilize primarily a discounted cash flow valuation technique (“income approach”), although limited available market data is also considered. In determining the estimated fair value, we consider discounted cash flow calculations, the level of our own share price and assumptions that market participants would make in valuing the reporting unit. This analysis requires us to make judgments about revenues, earnings projections, capital market assumptions and discount rates.

 

As of October 1, 2012, our Annuities, Retirement Plan Services and Group Protection reporting units passed the Step 1 analysis, and although the carrying value of the net assets for Group Protection was within the estimated fair value range, we deemed it prudent to validate the carrying value of goodwill through a Step 2 analysis. Given the Step 1 results, we also performed a Step 2 analysis for our Life Insurance reporting unit. Based upon our Step 2 analysis for Life Insurance and Group Protection, we determined that there was no impairment due to the implied fair value of goodwill being in excess of the carrying value of goodwill.

 

As of October 1, 2011, our Annuities, Retirement Plan Services and Group Protection reporting units passed the Step 1 analysis, and although the carrying value of the net assets for Group Protection was within the estimated fair value range, we deemed it prudent to validate the carrying value of goodwill through a Step 2 analysis. Given the Step 1 results, we also performed a Step 2 analysis for our Life Insurance and Media reporting units. Based upon our Step 2 analysis for Life Insurance, we recorded a goodwill impairment that was attributable primarily to marketplace dynamics and lower expectations associated with product changes that we have implemented or will implement shortly that we believe will have an unfavorable effect on our sales levels for a period of time. Based upon our Step 2 analysis for Group Protection, we determined that there was no impairment due to the implied fair value of goodwill being in excess of the carrying value of goodwill. Based upon our Step 2 analysis for Media, we recorded a goodwill impairment that was primarily a result of the deterioration in operating environment and outlook for the business.

 

As of October 1, 2010, all of our reporting units passed the Step 1 analysis, and although the carrying value of the net assets was within the estimated fair value range for our Life Insurance reporting unit, we deemed it prudent to validate the carrying value of goodwill through a Step 2 analysis. In our Step 2 analysis of the Life Insurance reporting unit, we determined there was no impairment due to the implied fair value of goodwill being in excess of the carrying value of goodwill.

 

The gross carrying amounts and accumulated amortization (in millions) for each major specifically identifiable intangible asset class by reportable segment were as follows:

 

         As of December 31, 2012  As of December 31, 2011  
         Gross      Gross     
         Carrying Accumulated Carrying Accumulated 
         Amount Amortization Amount Amortization 
Life Insurance:                
 Sales force$ 100  $ 27  $ 100  $ 23  
Retirement Plan Services:                
 Mutual fund contract rights (1)  5    -    2    -  
Other Operations:                
 FCC licenses (1)  129    -    118    -  
 Other  4    3    4    3  
  Total$ 238  $ 30  $ 224  $ 26  

  • No amortization recorded as the intangible asset has indefinite life.

 

Future estimated amortization of specifically identifiable intangible assets (in millions) as of December 31, 2012, was as follows:

          
2013$ 4 
2014  4 
2015  4 
2016  4 
2017  4