XML 47 R12.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Derivative Instruments
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2012
Notes to Financial Statements [Abstract]  
Derivative Instruments

6. Derivative Instruments

 

We maintain an overall risk management strategy that incorporates the use of derivative instruments to minimize significant unplanned fluctuations in earnings that are caused by interest rate risk, foreign currency exchange risk, equity market risk, default risk, basis risk and credit risk. See Note 1 in our 2011 Form 10-K for a detailed discussion of the accounting treatment for derivative instruments. See Note 6 in our 2011 Form 10-K for a detailed discussion of our derivative instruments and use of them in our overall risk management strategy which information is incorporated herein by reference. In addition, we have entered into forward-starting interest rate swaps that hedge the interest rate risk of floating rate bond coupon payments by replicating a fixed rate bond.  See Note 13 for additional disclosures related to the fair value of our derivative instruments and Note 4 for derivative instruments related to our consolidated VIEs.

 

We have derivative instruments with off-balance-sheet risks whose notional or contract amounts exceed the credit exposure. Outstanding derivative instruments with off-balance-sheet risks (in millions) were as follows:

                As of September 30, 2012 As of December 31, 2011
                Notional  Fair Value Notional  Fair Value
                Amounts Asset Liability Amounts Asset Liability
Qualifying Hedges                  
Cash flow hedges:                  
 Interest rate contracts (1) $ 3,336 $ 210 $ - $ 2,512 $ 130 $ -
 Foreign currency contracts (1)   420   25   -   340   38   -
  Total cash flow hedges   3,756   235   -   2,852   168   -
Fair value hedges:                  
 Interest rate contracts (1)   875   307   -   1,675   319   -
 Equity collar (1)   9   -   -   -   -   -
  Total fair value hedges   884   307   -   1,675   319   -
Non-Qualifying Hedges                  
Interest rate contracts (1)   36,714   750   -   30,232   568   -
Foreign currency contracts (1)   138   -   -   4   -   -
Equity market contracts (1)   19,276   1,780   -   16,401   2,096   -
Credit contracts (1)   47   -   3   48   -   -
Credit contracts (2)   188   -   16   148   -   16
Embedded derivatives:                  
 Indexed annuity contracts (3)   -   -   733   -   -   399
 Guaranteed living benefits ("GLB")                  
  reserves (3)   -   -   1,411   -   -   2,217
 Reinsurance related (4)   -   -   215   -   -   168
   Total derivative instruments $ 61,003 $ 3,072 $ 2,378 $ 51,360 $ 3,151 $ 2,800

  • Reported in derivative investments on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
  • Reported in other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
  • Reported in future contract benefits on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
  • Reported in reinsurance related embedded derivatives on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

 

The maturity of the notional amounts of derivative instruments (in millions) was as follows:

          Remaining Life as of September 30, 2012
          Less Than 1 – 5 6 – 10 11 – 30 Over 30  
          1 Year  Years Years Years Years Total
Interest rate contracts (1)$ 3,110 $ 20,203 $ 6,307 $ 10,092 $ 1,213 $ 40,925
Foreign currency contracts (2)  138   179   191   50   -   558
Equity market contracts  9,917   3,863   5,477   25   3   19,285
Credit contracts  40   195   -   -   -   235
 Total derivative instruments                 
  with notional amounts$ 13,205 $ 24,440 $ 11,975 $ 10,167 $ 1,216 $ 61,003

  • As of September 30, 2012, the latest maturity date for which we were hedging our exposure to the variability in future cash flows for these instruments was June 2042.
  • As of September 30, 2012, the latest maturity date for which we were hedging our exposure to the variability in future cash flows for these instruments was April 2028.

 

The change in our unrealized gain (loss) on derivative instruments in accumulated OCI (in millions) was as follows:

          For the Nine
          Months Ended
          September 30,
          2012 2011
Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Derivative Instruments     
Balance as of beginning-of-year$ 119 $ (15)
Other comprehensive income (loss):     
Cumulative effect from adoption of new accounting standards  -   4
 Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the year:     
  Cash flow hedges:     
   Interest rate contracts  67   178
   Foreign currency contracts  (3)   7
  Fair value hedges:     
   Interest rate contracts  3   3
 Change in foreign currency exchange rate adjustment  (7)   (1)
 Change in DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL  9   (1)
 Transfers from derivative instruments to bonds through basis adjustment 13   -
 Income tax benefit (expense)  (30)   (65)
 Less:     
  Reclassification adjustment for gains (losses) included in net income (loss):     
   Cash flow hedges:     
    Interest rate contracts (1)  (17)   (6)
    Interest rate contracts (2)  -   3
    Foreign currency contracts (1)  3   (3)
   Fair value hedges:     
    Interest rate contracts (2)  3   3
  Associated amortization of DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL  2   -
  Income tax benefit (expense)  3   1
     Balance as of end-of-period$ 177 $ 112

  • The OCI offset is reported within net investment income on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).
  • The OCI offset is reported within interest and debt expense on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).

 

The gains (losses) on derivative instruments (in millions) recorded within income (loss) from continuing operations on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) were as follows:

          For the Three For the Nine
          Months Ended Months Ended
          September 30, September 30,
          2012 2011 2012 2011
Qualifying Hedges           
Cash flow hedges:           
 Interest rate contracts (1)$ (6) $ (2) $ (17) $ (7)
 Foreign currency contracts (1)  2   2   4   3
  Total cash flow hedges  (4)   -   (13)   (4)
Fair value hedges:           
 Interest rate contracts (2)  5   13   28   38
Non-Qualifying Hedges           
Interest rate contracts (1)  (4)   (25)   (23)   (41)
Interest rate contracts (3)  (2)   982   206   1,008
Foreign currency contracts (3)  (4)   (5)   (8)   (11)
Equity market contracts (3)  (343)   694   (773)   560
Equity market contracts (4)  (136)   154   (246)   120
Credit contracts (1)  -   (1)   (1)   (1)
Credit contracts (3)  (7)   (8)   (2)   (6)
Embedded derivatives:           
 Indexed annuity contracts (3)  (63)   135   (143)   81
 GLB reserves (3)  570   (2,065)   861   (1,935)
 Reinsurance related (3)  (30)   (58)   (48)   (76)
 AFS securities (1)  -   -   -   1
   Total derivative instruments$ (18) $ (184) $ (162) $ (266)

  • Reported in net investment income on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).
  • Reported in interest and debt expense on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).
  • Reported in realized gain (loss) on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).
  • Reported in commissions and other expenses on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).

 

Gains (losses) (in millions) on derivative instruments designated and qualifying as cash flow hedges were as follows:

        For the Three For the Nine
        Months Ended Months Ended
        September 30, September 30,
        2012 2011 2012 2011
Gain (loss) recognized as a component of OCI with           
 the offset to net investment income$ (5) $ - $ (15) $ (4)

As of September 30, 2012, $22 million of the deferred net losses on derivative instruments in accumulated OCI were expected to be reclassified to earnings during the next 12 months. This reclassification would be due primarily to the interest rate variances related to the interest rate swap agreements.

 

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, there were no material reclassifications to earnings due to hedged firm commitments no longer deemed probable or due to hedged forecasted transactions that had not occurred by the end of the originally specified time period.

 

Gains (losses) (in millions) on derivative instruments designated and qualifying as fair value hedges were as follows:

        For the Three For the Nine
        Months Ended Months Ended
        September 30, September 30,
        2012 2011 2012 2011
Gain (loss) recognized as a component of OCI with           
 the offset to interest expense$ 1 $ 1 $ 3 $ 3

Information related to our open credit default swap liabilities for which we are the seller (dollars in millions) was as follows:

As of September 30, 2012
       Credit            
  Reason Nature  Rating of   Number     Maximum
  for of  Underlying  of   Fair Potential
Maturity Entering Recourse Obligation (1) Instruments Value (2) Payout
12/20/2012 (3)   (5)   (6)  BBB+    4  $ - $ 40
12/20/2016 (4)   (5)   (6)  BBB-    3    (6)   68
03/20/2017 (4)   (5)   (6)  BBB-    4    (11)   81
            11  $ (17) $ 189

As of December 31, 2011
       Credit            
  Reason Nature  Rating of   Number     Maximum
  for of  Underlying  of   Fair Potential
Maturity Entering Recourse Obligation (1) Instruments Value (2) Payout
12/20/2012 (3)   (5)   (6)  BBB+    4  $ - $ 40
12/20/2016 (4)   (5)   (6)  BBB+    3    (12)   68
03/20/2017 (4)   (5)   (6)  BBB    2    (4)   40
            9  $ (16) $ 148

  • Represents average credit ratings based on the midpoint of the applicable ratings among Moody's, S&P and Fitch Ratings, as scaled to the corresponding S&P ratings.
  • Broker quotes are used to determine the market value of credit default swaps.
  • These credit default swaps were sold to our contract holders prior to 2007, where we determined there was a spread versus premium mismatch.
  • These credit default swaps were sold to a counter-party of the consolidated VIEs as discussed in Note 4 in our 2011 Form 10-K.
  • Credit default swaps were entered into in order to generate income by providing default protection in return for a quarterly payment.
  • Sellers do not have the right to demand indemnification or compensation from third parties in case of a loss (payment) on the contract.

 

Details underlying the associated collateral of our open credit default swaps for which we are the seller, if credit risk related contingent features were triggered (in millions), are as follows:

         As of   As of  
        September 30,December 31,
         2012  2011 
Maximum potential payout $ 189  $ 148 
Less:        
 Counterparty thresholds   -    - 
  Maximum collateral potentially required to post $ 189  $ 148 

Certain of our credit default swap agreements contain contractual provisions that allow for the netting of collateral with our counterparties related to all of our collateralized financing transactions that we have outstanding. If these netting agreements were not in place, we would have been required to post approximately $16 million as of September 30, 2012, after considering the fair values of the associated investments counterparties' credit ratings as compared to ours and specified thresholds that once exceeded result in the payment of cash.

 

Credit Risk

 

We are exposed to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by our counterparties on various derivative contracts and reflect assumptions regarding the credit or nonperformance risk. The nonperformance risk is based upon assumptions for each counterparty's credit spread over the estimated weighted average life of the counterparty exposure less collateral held. As of September 30, 2012, the nonperformance risk adjustment was $4 million. The credit risk associated with such agreements is minimized by purchasing such agreements from financial institutions with long-standing, superior performance records. Additionally, we maintain a policy of requiring all derivative contracts to be governed by an International Swaps and Derivatives Association (“ISDA”) Master Agreement. We are required to maintain minimum ratings as a matter of routine practice in negotiating ISDA agreements. Under some ISDA agreements, our insurance subsidiaries have agreed to maintain certain financial strength or claims-paying ratings. A downgrade below these levels could result in termination of derivative contracts, at which time any amounts payable by us would be dependent on the market value of the underlying derivative contracts. In certain transactions, we and the counterparty have entered into a collateral support agreement requiring either party to post collateral when net exposures exceed pre-determined thresholds. These thresholds vary by counterparty and credit rating. The amount of such exposure is essentially the net replacement cost or market value less collateral held for such agreements with each counterparty if the net market value is in our favor. As of September 30, 2012, our exposure was $50 million.

 

The amounts recognized (in millions) by S&P credit rating of counterparty, for which we had the right to reclaim cash collateral or were obligated to return cash collateral, were as follows:

  As of September 30, 2012 As of December 31, 2011
  Collateral  Collateral  Collateral  Collateral
  Posted by Posted by Posted by Posted by
S&P Counter- LNC Counter- LNC
Credit  Party (Held by Party (Held by
Rating of (Held by Counter- (Held by Counter-
Counterparty LNC) Party) LNC) Party)
             
AA $ 46 $ - $ 35 $ -
AA-   76   -   219   -
A+   668   -   848   -
A   879   (83)   1,681   (120)
A-   1,415   -   387   -
BBB   2   -   -   -
  $ 3,086 $ (83) $ 3,170 $ (120)