vhi10q0610.htm

	Page number
Part I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements.

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets – December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2010 (unaudited)	3

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited) – Three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2010	5

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) – Six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2010	6

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Equity and Comprehensive Income – Six months ended June 30, 2010 (unaudited)	8

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)	9

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.	29

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	50

Item 4. Controls and Procedures	51

Part II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.	52

Item 1A. Risk Factors.	53

Item 6. Exhibits.	53

Items 2, 3, 4 and 5 of Part II are omitted because there is no information to report.

ASSETS	December 31, 2009		June 30, 2010
			(unaudited)

Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	68.7	$	46.2
Restricted cash equivalents		8.9		9.6
Marketable securities		6.1		1.6
Accounts and other receivables, net		222.9		269.6
Inventories, net		312.0		258.3
Prepaid expenses and other		17.7		14.9
Deferred income taxes		11.9		11.9

Total current assets		648.2		612.1

Other assets:
Marketable securities		279.5		295.3
Investment in affiliates		116.1		114.6
Goodwill		396.9		396.9
Deferred income taxes		185.5		183.6
Other assets		103.5		102.2

Total other assets		1,081.5		1,092.6

Property and equipment:
Land		56.3		51.4
Buildings		293.8		269.1
Equipment		1,176.1		1,085.4
Mining properties		68.4		59.4
Construction in progress		20.7		21.4
		1,615.3		1,486.7
Less accumulated depreciation		934.7		878.4

Net property and equipment		680.6		608.3

Total assets	$	2,410.3	$	2,313.0

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY	December 31, 2009			June 30, 2010
				(unaudited)

Current liabilities:
Current maturities of long-term debt	$	2.5		$	23.6
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		288.1			240.5
Income taxes		3.9			3.9
Deferred income taxes		4.7			3.8

Total current liabilities		299.2			271.8

Noncurrent liabilities:
Long-term debt		988.4			953.8
Deferred income taxes		360.7			363.8
Accrued pension costs		130.5			111.8
Accrued environmental costs		37.9			37.2
Accrued postretirement benefits costs		25.5			25.7
Other liabilities		69.7			62.6

Total noncurrent liabilities		1,612.7			1,554.9

Equity:
Valhi stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock		667.3			667.3
Common stock		1.2			1.2
Additional paid-in capital		-			-
Accumulated deficit		(197.7	)		(204.1	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(3.2	)		(8.3	)
Treasury stock		(38.9	)		(38.9	)

Total Valhi stockholders' equity		428.7			417.2

Noncontrolling interest in subsidiaries		69.7			69.1

Total equity		498.4			486.3

Total liabilities and equity	$	2,410.3		$	2,313.0

	Three months ended					Six months ended
	June 30,					June 30,
	2009			2010		2009			2010
	(unaudited)

Revenues and other income:
Net sales	$	312.1		$	415.7	$	589.4		$	772.5
Other income, net		20.8			3.9		51.0			31.9

Total revenues and other income		332.9			419.6		640.4			804.4

Costs and expenses:
Cost of sales		295.9			326.3		568.6			617.0
Selling, general and administrative		53.9			58.1		105.3			116.4
Litigation settlement and contract termination		-			-		-			33.3
Assets held for sale write-down		.7			-		.7			-
Interest		16.7			17.0		32.7			34.4

Total costs and expenses		367.2			401.4		707.3			801.1

Income (loss) before income taxes		(34.3	)		18.2		(66.9	)		3.3

Provision for income taxes (benefit)		(13.7	)		11.8		(22.9	)		(18.2	)

Net income (loss)		(20.6	)		6.4		(44.0	)		21.5

Noncontrolling interest in net income (loss) of subsidiaries		(1.6	)		1.9		(5.0	)		3.4

Net income (loss) attributable to Valhi stockholders	$	(19.0	)	$	4.5	$	(39.0	)	$	18.1

Amounts attributable to Valhi stockholders:

Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share	$	(.16	)	$	.04	$	(.34	)	$	.14

Cash dividends per share	$	.10		$	.10	$	.20		$	.20

Basic and diluted weighted average shares Outstanding		114.3			114.3		114.3			114.3

	Six months ended June 30,
	2009			2010
	(unaudited)

Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)	$	(44.0	)	$	21.5
Depreciation and amortization		29.2			31.6
Gain on sale of business		(6.3	)		-
Gain on litigation settlement		(11.1	)		-
Accrued litigation settlement and contract termination		-			33.3
Litigation setttlment payments		-			(19.0	)
Assets held for sale write-down		.7			-
Benefit plan expense greater (less) than cash funding requirements:
Defined benefit pension expense		(2.4	)		1.1
Other postretirement benefit expense		.1			.1
Deferred income taxes		(30.6	)		(24.2	)
Net distributions from Ti02 manufacturing joint venture		4.6			1.5
Other, net		2.8			2.7
Change in assets and liabilities:
Accounts and other receivables, net		(23.6	)		(89.3	)
Inventories, net		139.0			26.2
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		(20.3	)		(21.7	)
Accounts with affiliates		(2.5	)		19.5
Income taxes		1.8			1.1
Other, net		5.3			4.5

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		42.7			(11.1	)

Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures		(38.4	)		(18.6	)
Capitalized permit costs		(4.2	)		(1.2	)
Purchases of marketable securities		(4.1	)		(7.5	)
Proceeds from:
Disposal of marketable securities		3.5			2.6
Disposal of restricted marketable securities		-			5.2
Sale of business		6.7			.5
Real estate-related litigation settlement		11.8			-
Change in restricted cash equivalents, net		.4			(.7	)
Other, net		.3			(.1	)

Net cash used in investing activities		(24.0	)		(19.8	)

	Six months ended June 30,
	2009			2010
	(unaudited)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Indebtedness:
Borrowings	$	210.0		$	251.1
Principal payments		(142.7	)		(207.6	)
Deferred financing costs paid		(.1	)		-
Purchases of Kronos common stock		(.1	)		-
Valhi cash dividends paid		(22.7	)		(22.7	)
Distributions to noncontrolling interest in subsidiaries		(2.5	)		(2.5	)
Purchase of noncontrolling interest in subsidiary		-			(7.0	)
Issuance of common stock and other		.1			-

Net cash provided by financing activities		42.0			11.3

Cash and cash equivalents – net change from:
Operating, investing and financing activities		60.7			(19.6	)
Currency translation		2.3			(2.9	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		37.0			68.7

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	100.0		$	46.2


Supplemental disclosures:
Cash paid for:
Interest, net of amounts capitalized	$	32.4		$	32.4
Income taxes paid (refunded), net		4.0			(12.2	)

Noncash investing activities:
Note receivable from sale of business		.7			-
Accrual for capital expenditures		10.5			4.7
Accrual for capitalized permit costs		1.6			2.2

Noncash financing activities:
Promissory notes payable incurred in connection with litigation settlements and contract termination		-			30.0

	Valhi Stockholders’ Equity
											Accumulated
					Additional						other						Non-
	Preferred		Common		paid-in			Accumulated			comprehensive			Treasury			controlling			Total			Comprehensive
	stock		stock		capital			deficit			loss			Stock			Interest			equity			income (loss)
	(unaudited)

Balance at December 31, 2009	$	667.3	$	1.2	$	-		$	(197.7	)	$	(3.2	)	$	(38.9	)	$	69.7		$	498.4

Net income		-		-		-			18.1			-			-			3.4			21.5		$	21.5

Other comprehensive loss, net		-		-		-			-			(5.1	)		-			(1.1	)		(6.2	)		(6.2	)

Equity transaction with noncontrolling interest		-		-		.2			-			-			-			.1			.3			-

Cash dividends		-		-		(.3	)		(22.4	)		-			-			(2.5	)		(25.2	)		-

Other		-		-		.1			(2.1	)		-			-			(.5	)		(2.5	)		-


Balance at June 30, 2010	$	667.3	$	1.2	$	-		$	(204.1	)	$	(8.3	)	$	(38.9	)	$	69.1		$	486.3

Comprehensive income																							$	15.3

Organization - We are majority owned by Contran Corporation, which directly and through its subsidiaries owns approximately 93% of our outstanding common stock at June 30, 2010. Substantially all of Contran's outstanding voting stock is held by trusts established for the benefit of certain children and grandchildren of Harold C. Simmons (for which Mr. Simmons is the sole trustee) or is held directly by Mr. Simmons or other persons or entities related to Mr. Simmons. Consequently, Mr. Simmons may be deemed to control Contran and us.

Basis of Presentation - Consolidated in this Quarterly Report are the results of our majority-owned and wholly-owned subsidiaries, including NL Industries, Inc., Kronos Worldwide, Inc., CompX International Inc., Tremont LLC and Waste Control Specialists LLC (“WCS”). Kronos (NYSE: KRO), NL (NYSE: NL) and CompX (NYSE: CIX) each file periodic reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).

The unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Quarterly Report have been prepared on the same basis as the audited Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 that we filed with the SEC on March 10, 2009 (the “2009 Annual Report”). In our opinion, we have made all necessary adjustments (which include only normal recurring adjustments) in order to state fairly, in all material respects, our consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows as of the dates and for the periods presented. We have condensed the Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2009 contained in this Quarterly Report as compared to our audited Consolidated Financial Statements at that date, and we have omitted certain information and footnote disclosures (including those related to the Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2009) normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). Certain reclassifications have been made to conform the prior year’s Consolidated Financial Statements to the current year’s classifications. Our results of operations for the interim periods ended June 30, 2010 may not be indicative of our operating results for the full year. The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Quarterly Report should be read in conjunction with our 2009 Consolidated Financial Statements contained in our 2009 Annual Report.

Business segment	Entity	% controlled at June 30, 2010

Chemicals	Kronos	95%
Component products	CompX	87%
Waste management	WCS	100%

	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
	2009			2010			2009			2010
	(In millions)

Net sales:
Chemicals	$	282.1		$	380.1		$	530.1		$	699.8
Component products		29.2			34.4			57.7			67.2
Waste management		.8			1.2			1.6			5.5

Total net sales	$	312.1		$	415.7		$	589.4		$	772.5

Cost of sales:
Chemicals	$	268.4		$	295.3		$	512.8		$	555.3
Component products		23.0			25.5			46.7			49.2
Waste management		4.5			5.5			9.1			12.5

Total cost of sales	$	295.9		$	326.3		$	568.6		$	617.0

Gross margin:
Chemicals	$	13.7		$	84.8		$	17.3		$	144.5
Component products		6.2			8.9			11.0			18.0
Waste management		(3.7	)		(4.3	)		(7.5	)		(7.0	)

Total gross margin	$	16.2		$	89.4		$	20.8		$	155.5

Operating income (loss):
Chemicals	$	(20.0	)	$	40.4		$	(45.5	)	$	63.0
Component products		(.9	)		3.0			(1.9	)		4.7
Waste management		(6.7	)		(8.0	)		(13.2	)		(14.7	)

Total operating income (loss)		(27.6	)		35.4			(60.6	)		53.0

Equity in loss of investee		-			(.2	)		(.7	)		(.1	)

General corporate items:
Securities earnings		6.6			6.6			13.0			13.1
Insurance recoveries		2.0			.1			2.7			18.3
Litigation settlement gains		11.1			-			23.0			-
Litigation settlement expense		-			-			-			(32.2	)
Gain on sale of business		(.1	)		-			6.3			-
General expenses, net		(9.6	)		(6.7	)		(17.9	)		(14.4	)
Interest expense		(16.7	)		(17.0	)		(32.7	)		(34.4	)

Income (loss) before income taxes	$	(34.3	)	$	18.2		$	(66.9	)	$	3.3

Segment results we report may differ from amounts separately reported by our various subsidiaries and affiliates due to purchase accounting adjustments and related amortization or differences in the way we define operating income. Intersegment sales are not material. Of the $33.3 million aggregate litigation settlement and contract termination expense we recognized in the first six months of 2010, $1.1 million relates to WCS and is included in the determination of its operating loss, and the remaining $32.2 million relates to NL. See Notes 7 and 12. Component Products operating income in the second quarter and first six months of 2009 includes the effect of a $.7 million write-down of assets held for sale, see Note 7 in our 2009 Annual Report.

	December 31, 2009		June 30, 2010
	(In millions)

Raw materials:
Chemicals	$	56.4	$	44.5
Component products		4.8		6.4

Total raw materials		61.2		50.9

Work in process:
Chemicals		18.2		13.6
Component products		6.2		6.8

Total in-process products		24.4		20.4

Finished products:
Chemicals		161.8		130.2
Component products		5.3		4.7

Total finished products		167.1		134.9

Supplies (primarily chemicals)		59.3		52.1

Total	$	312.0	$	258.3

	December 31, 2009		June 30, 2010
	(In millions)

Marketable securities:
The Amalgamated Sugar Company LLC	$	250.0	$	250.0
Titanium Metals Corporation (“TIMET”)		28.5		40.0
Other		1.0		5.3

Total	$	279.5	$	295.3


Investment in affiliates:
TiO2 manufacturing joint venture, Louisiana Pigment Company, L.P. (“LPC”)	$	98.7	$	97.2
Other		17.4		17.4

Total	$	116.1	$	114.6

Other assets:
Waste disposal site operating permits, net	$	53.5	$	56.1
Real-estate related note receivable		15.0		15.0
IBNR receivables		7.5		7.7
Deferred financing costs		6.0		4.3
Other intangible assets		1.4		1.1
Pension asset		.3		.3
Other		19.8		17.7

Total	$	103.5	$	102.2

Our noncurrent marketable securities are carried at fair value using quoted market prices, primarily Level 1 inputs as defined by Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 820-10-35, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, except for our investment in The Amalgamated Sugar Company (“Amalgamated”). Our investment in Amalgamated is measured using significant unobservable inputs, which are Level 3 inputs. Please refer to Note 4 in our 2009 Annual Report for a complete description of the valuation methodology for our investment in Amalgamated. There have been no changes to the carrying value of this investment during the periods presented. See Note 13.


	December 31, 2009		June 30, 2010
	(In millions)

Current:
Accounts payable	$	124.5	$	105.8
Employee benefits		34.8		35.2
Payable to affiliates:
LPC		12.0		10.9
Contran – trade items		14.1		15.6
TIMET		-		.7
Accrued sales discounts and rebates		21.4		11.0
Environmental costs		11.0		7.5
Interest		8.0		7.0
Deferred income		7.5		.9
Other		54.8		45.9

Total	$	288.1	$	240.5

Noncurrent:
Reserve for uncertain tax positions	$	35.2	$	36.1
Insurance claims and expenses		11.7		11.9
Employee benefits		9.2		7.9
Deferred income		8.5		1.1
Payable to affiliate – TIMET		.3		-
Other		4.8		5.6

Total	$	69.7	$	62.6

	December 31, 2009		June 30, 2010
	(In millions)
Valhi:
Snake River Sugar Company	$	250.0	$	250.0
Contran credit facility		54.9		69.0
Promissory note payable to Contran		30.0		30.0
Total Valhi debt		334.9		349.0

Subsidiary debt:
Kronos International: 6.5% Senior Secured Notes		574.6		493.3
European bank credit facility		13.0		18.6
CompX promissory note payable to TIMET		42.2		42.2
Kronos U.S. bank credit facility		16.7		-
Kronos Contran credit facility		-		31.6
NL promissory note (see Note 12)		-		18.0
WCS 6% promissory note payable		-		12.0
CompX bank credit facility		-		5.0
Other		9.5		7.7

Total subsidiary debt		656.0		628.4

Total debt		990.9		977.4

Less current maturities		2.5		23.6

Total long-term debt	$	988.4	$	953.8

Valhi - During the first six months of 2010, we had net borrowings of $14.1 million under our Contran credit facility. The average interest rate on these outstanding borrowings at June 30, 2010 was 5.75%. The average interest rate on the Contran promissory note was 1.75% at June 30, 2010. On March 31, 2010 we amended both the Contran credit facility and the Contran promissory note to extend their maturity date, and such facilities are now due on demand, but in any event no earlier than March 31, 2012, and on July 1, 2010 we amended the Contran promissory note to increase the size of the facility from $70 million to $100 million.

Kronos - During the first six months of 2010, we borrowed a net euro 6.0 million ($10.3 million when borrowed/repaid) under Kronos’ European credit facility and repaid a net $16.7 million under Kronos’ U.S. credit facility. The average interest, rates on the outstanding euro borrowings at June 30, 2010 were 4.15%. Kronos European revolving credit facility currently matures in May 2011. We have commenced discussions with the lenders of the facility regarding an extension of the facility, and we expect to have a new agreement of extension in place prior to the maturity.

In May 2010, Kronos satisfied certain specified financial covenants in its European revolving credit facility, and as a result the maximum borrowing availability under such facility returned to the full euro 80 million facility size at that time. In addition, in August 2010 Kronos satisfied the financial ratio of net secured debt to earnings before income taxes, interest and depreciation as defined in the credit facility, and as a result two financial covenants added to such credit facility in September 2009 became no longer effective, and the interest rate on outstanding borrowings under such credit facility will prospectively be reduced from LIBOR plus a margin ranging from 3% to 4% to LIBOR plus 1.75%.

In April 2010, Kronos entered into an unsecured revolving credit facility with Contran pursuant to which Kronos may borrow up to $40.0 million from Contran. The loans from Contran bear interest, payable quarterly, at the prime rate minus 0.5%, with all outstanding principal due on demand and in any event no later than December 31, 2011. The amount of Kronos’ outstanding borrowing at any time is solely at the discretion of Contran. As of June 30, 2010, Kronos had aggregate borrowings outstanding from Contran of $31.6 million. The average interest rate on these outstanding borrowings at June 30, 2010 was 2.75%. While Kronos’ revolving credit facility with Contran is due on demand, we have classified the outstanding balance under such facility as a noncurrent liability at June 30, 2010 because Kronos could completely repay such outstanding borrowings by borrowing an equal amount under its $70 million U.S. revolving bank credit facility that matures in September 2011.

WCS – As part of the termination of a contract with a former customer regarding various contractual and legal claims, in April 2010 WCS issued the former customer a $12.0 million long-term promissory note. The note is unsecured, bears interest at a fixed rate of 6% and is payable in five equal annual installments of principal plus accrued interest beginning on December 31, 2010. We have the right to prepay the note at any time without penalty. A substantial portion of the principal amount of the promissory note issued was offset against deferred revenue that was unearned by us. The remaining $1.1 million we recognized in contract termination expense related to this agreement in the first quarter of 2010.

Restrictions and Other - Certain of the credit facilities with unrelated, third-party lenders described above require the respective borrowers to maintain minimum levels of equity, require the maintenance of certain financial ratios, limit dividends and additional indebtedness and contain other provisions and restrictive covenants customary in lending transactions of this type. We are in compliance with all of our debt covenants at June 30, 2010. We believe we will be able to comply with the financial covenants contained in all of our credit facilities through the maturity of the respective facility; however if future operating results differ materially from our expectations, we may be unable to maintain compliance.

	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
	2009			2010			2009			2010
	(In millions)

Service cost	$	1.8		$	2.5		$	3.6		$	5.2
Interest cost		6.8			6.4			13.4			12.9
Expected return on plan assets		(5.5	)		(5.2	)		(10.7	)		(10.5	)
Amortization of unrecognized:
Prior service cost		.3			.3			.6			.6
Net transition obligations		.1			.2			.2			.3
Recognized actuarial losses		1.9			1.6			3.7			3.3

Total	$	5.4		$	5.8		$	10.8		$	11.8

	Six months ended June 30,
	2009			2010
	(In millions)

Securities earnings:
Dividends and interest	$	13.1		$	13.0
Securities transactions, net		(.1	)		.1

Total securities earnings		13.0			13.1

Equity in loss of investee		(.7	)		(.1	)
Currency transactions, net		6.4			(.4	)
Insurance recoveries		2.7			18.3
Gain on litigation settlements		23.0			-
Gain on sale of business		6.3			-
Other, net		.3			1.0

Total	$	51.0		$	31.9

Insurance recoveries reflect, in part, amounts we received from certain of our former insurance carriers, and relate to the recovery of prior lead pigment and asbestos litigation defense costs incurred by us. In addition, a substantial portion of the insurance recoveries we recognized in the first quarter of 2010 relates to the NL litigation settlement discussed in Note 12.

We provided certain research, laboratory and quality control services within and outside the sweetener industry for Amalgamated and others. In January 2009, we sold our research, laboratory and quality control business to Amalgamated for an aggregate sales price of $7.5 million, consisting of $6.7 million in cash paid at closing and $500,000 which was paid in February 2010 and $250,000 payable in February 2011. The amounts owed to us in 2010 and 2011 do not bear interest, and we recognized these amounts at their aggregate net present value of approximately $.7 million. We recognized a pre-tax gain of $6.3 million from the sale of this business. The revenues, pre-tax income and total assets of the operations sold are not material in any period presented.

The litigation settlement gains in 2009 include a first quarter gain of $11.9 million related to amounts we received from Halliburton Company in recovery of past environmental remediation and related legal costs we had previously incurred, and a second quarter gain of $11.1 million related to the second closing associated with the settlement of condemnation proceedings on certain real property formerly owned by NL that is subject to environmental remediation.

	Six months ended June 30,
	2009			2010
	(In millions)

Expected tax benefit, at U.S. federal Statutory income tax rate of 35%	$	(23.4	)	$	1.2
Incremental U.S. tax and rate differences on equity in earnings		(4.9	)		15.5
Non-U.S. tax rates		1.8			(1.3	)
German tax attribute adjustments		-			(35.2	)
Nondeductible expenses		2.2			1.0
Nontaxable income		(.9	)		(.2	)
Prior year adjustments		-			(.7	)
Change in reserve for uncertain tax positions		1.2			.8
U.S. state income taxes, net		.8			.4
Other, net		.3			.3

Income tax benefit	$	(22.9	)	$	(18.2	)

Tax authorities are continuing to examine certain of our foreign tax returns and have or may propose tax deficiencies, including penalties and interest. We cannot guarantee that these tax matters will be resolved in our favor due to the inherent uncertainties involved in settlement initiatives and court and tax proceedings. We believe we have adequate accruals for additional taxes and related interest expense that could ultimately result from tax examinations. We believe the ultimate disposition of tax examinations should not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity. We currently estimate that our unrecognized tax benefits will decrease by $.5 million within the next twelve months due to certain statutes of limitation.

As a consequence of a European Court ruling that resulted in a favorable resolution of certain income tax issues in Germany, during the first quarter of 2010 the German tax authorities agreed to an increase in Kronos’ German net operating loss carryforwards. Accordingly, we recognized a non-cash income tax benefit of $35.2 million in the first quarter of 2010.

Under GAAP, we are required to recognize a deferred income tax liability with respect to the incremental U.S. (federal and state) and foreign withholding taxes that would be incurred when undistributed earnings of a foreign subsidiary are subsequently repatriated, unless management has determined that those undistributed earnings are permanently reinvested for the foreseeable future. Prior to March 31, 2010, we had not recognized a deferred income tax liability related to incremental income taxes on the pre-2005 undistributed earnings of CompX’s Taiwanese subsidiary, as those earnings were deemed to be permanently reinvested. We are required to reassess the permanent reinvestment conclusion on an ongoing basis to determine if our intentions have changed. At the end of March 2010, and based primarily upon changes in our cash management plans, we determined that none of the undistributed earnings of CompX’s Taiwanese subsidiary can now be considered to be permanently reinvested in Taiwan. Accordingly, in the first quarter of 2010 we recognized an aggregate $1.9 million provision for deferred income taxes on the pre-2005 undistributed earnings of our Taiwanese subsidiary. Consequently, none of the undistributed earnings of our Component Products non-U.S. operations are now considered to be not permanently reinvested.

	Six months ended
	June 30,
	2009			2010
	(In millions)

Net income (loss) attributable to Valhi stockholders	$	(39.0	)	$	18.1

Transfers from noncontrolling interest:
Increase in additional paid-in capital for purchase of 14,000 shares of Kronos common stock		.2			-

Equity adjustment, Note 12		-			.4

Issuance of subsidiary common stock		.1			(.1	)

Transfers from noncontrolling interest		.3			.3

Net income (loss) attributable to Valhi stockholders and change from noncontrolling interest in subsidiaries	$	(38.7	)	$	18.4

NL's former operations included the manufacture of lead pigments for use in paint and lead-based paint. NL, other former manufacturers of lead pigments for use in paint and lead-based paint (together, the “former pigment manufacturers”), and the Lead Industries Association (“LIA”), which discontinued business operations in 2002, have been named as defendants in various legal proceedings seeking damages for personal injury, property damage and governmental expenditures allegedly caused by the use of lead-based paints. Certain of these actions have been filed by or on behalf of states, counties, cities or their public housing authorities and school districts, and certain others have been asserted as class actions. These lawsuits seek recovery under a variety of theories, including public and private nuisance, negligent product design, negligent failure to warn, strict liability, breach of warranty, conspiracy/concert of action, aiding and abetting, enterprise liability, market share or risk contribution liability, intentional tort, fraud and misrepresentation, violations of state consumer protection statutes, supplier negligence and similar claims.

The plaintiffs in these actions generally seek to impose on the defendants responsibility for lead paint abatement and health concerns associated with the use of lead-based paints, including damages for personal injury, contribution and/or indemnification for medical expenses, medical monitoring expenses and costs for educational programs. To the extent the plaintiffs seek compensatory or punitive damages in these actions, such damages are generally unspecified. In some cases, the damages are unspecified pursuant to the requirements of applicable state law. A number of cases are inactive or have been dismissed or withdrawn. Most of the remaining cases are in various pre-trial stages. Some are on appeal following dismissal or summary judgment rulings in favor of either the defendants or the plaintiffs. In addition, various other cases are pending (in which we are not a defendant) seeking recovery for injury allegedly caused by lead pigment and lead-based paint. Although we are not a defendant in these cases, the outcome of these cases may have an impact on cases that might be filed against us in the future.

We believe that these actions are without merit, and we intend to continue to deny all allegations of wrongdoing and liability and to defend against all actions vigorously. We do not believe it is probable that we have incurred any liability with respect to all of the lead pigment litigation cases to which we are a party, and liability to us that may result, if any, in this regard cannot be reasonably estimated, because:

Accordingly, we have not accrued any amounts for any of the pending lead pigment and lead-based paint litigation cases. New cases may continue to be filed against us. We cannot assure you that we will not incur liability in the future in respect of any of the pending or possible litigation in view of the inherent uncertainties involved in court and jury rulings. The resolution of any of these cases could result in recognition of a loss contingency accrual that could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations for the interim or annual period during which such liability is recognized, and a material adverse impact on our consolidated financial condition and liquidity.

General - Our operations are governed by various environmental laws and regulations. Certain of our businesses are and have been engaged in the handling, manufacture or use of substances or compounds that may be considered toxic or hazardous within the meaning of applicable environmental laws and regulations. As with other companies engaged in similar businesses, certain of our past and current operations and products have the potential to cause environmental or other damage. We have implemented and continue to implement various policies and programs in an effort to minimize these risks. Our policy is to maintain compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations at all of our plants and to strive to improve our environmental performance. From time to time, we may be subject to environmental regulatory enforcement under U.S. and foreign statutes, the resolution of which typically involves the establishment of compliance programs. It is possible that future developments, such as stricter requirements of environmental laws and enforcement policies, could adversely affect our production, handling, use, storage, transportation, sale or disposal of such substances. We believe that all of our facilities are in substantial compliance with applicable environmental laws.

Certain properties and facilities used in our former operations, including NL’s divested primary and secondary lead smelters and former mining locations are the subject of civil litigation, administrative proceedings or investigations arising under federal and state environmental laws. Additionally, in connection with past disposal practices, we are currently involved as a defendant, potentially responsible party (“PRP”) or both, pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, as amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (“CERCLA”), and similar state laws in various governmental and private actions associated with waste disposal sites, mining locations, and facilities we or our predecessors currently or previously owned, operated or were used by us or our subsidiaries, or their predecessors, certain of which are on the United States Environmental Protection Agency’s (“EPA”) Superfund National Priorities List or similar state lists. These proceedings seek cleanup costs, damages for personal injury or property damage and/or damages for injury to natural resources. Certain of these proceedings involve claims for substantial amounts. Although we may be jointly and severally liable for these costs, in most cases we are only one of a number of PRPs who may also be jointly and severally liable, and among whom costs may be shared or allocated. In addition, we are also a party to a number of personal injury lawsuits filed in various jurisdictions alleging claims related to environmental conditions alleged to have resulted from our operations.

In addition, the imposition of more stringent standards or requirements under environmental laws or regulations, new developments or changes regarding site cleanup costs or allocation of costs among PRPs, solvency of other PRPs, the results of future testing and analysis undertaken with respect to certain sites or a determination that we are potentially responsible for the release of hazardous substances at other sites, could cause our expenditures to exceed our current estimates. Because we may be jointly and severally liable for the total remediation cost at certain sites, the amount for which we are ultimately liable may exceed our accruals due to, among other things, the reallocation of costs among PRPs or the insolvency of one or more PRPs. We cannot assure you that actual costs will not exceed accrued amounts or the upper end of the range for sites for which estimates have been made, and we cannot assure you that costs will not be incurred for sites where no estimates presently can be made. Further, additional environmental matters may arise in the future. If we were to incur any future liability, this could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations and liquidity.

We record liabilities related to environmental remediation obligations when estimated future expenditures are probable and reasonably estimable. We adjust our environmental accruals as further information becomes available to us or as circumstances change. Such further information or changed circumstances could include, among other things, new assertions of liability, revised expectations regarding the nature, timing and extent of any remediation required or revised estimates of the allocation of remediation costs among PRPs, and such further information or changed circumstances could result in an increase or reduction in our accrued environmental costs. We generally do not discount estimated future expenditures to their present value due to the uncertainty of the timing of the pay out. We recognize recoveries of remediation costs from other parties, if any, as assets when their receipt is deemed probable. At June 30, 2010, we have not recognized any receivables for recoveries.

We do not know and cannot estimate the exact time frame over which we will make payments for our accrued environmental costs. The timing of payments depends upon a number of factors including the timing of the actual remediation process; which in turn depends on factors outside of our control. At each balance sheet date, we estimate the amount of our accrued environmental costs we expect to pay within the next twelve months, and we classify this estimate as a current liability. We classify the remaining accrued environmental costs as a noncurrent liability.

	Amount
	(In millions)

Balance at the beginning of the period	$	48.9
Reductions charged against expense, net		(.9	)
Changes in currency exchange rates		(.1	)
Payments, net		(3.2	)

Balance at the end of the period	$	44.7

Amounts recognized in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at the end of the period:
Current liability	$	7.5
Noncurrent liability		37.2

Total	$	44.7

NL - On a quarterly basis, we evaluate the potential range of our liability at sites where NL, its present or former subsidiaries have been named as a PRP or defendant. At June 30, 2010, we accrued approximately $43 million, related to approximately 50 sites, for those environmental matters related to NL which we believe are at the present time and/or in their current phase reasonably estimable. The upper end of the range of reasonably possible costs to us for sites for which we believe it is currently possible to estimate costs is approximately $78 million, including the amount currently accrued. We have not discounted these estimates to present value.

We believe that it is not possible to estimate the range of costs for certain sites. At June 30, 2010, there were approximately 5 sites for which we are not currently able to estimate a range of costs. For these sites, generally the investigation is in the early stages, and we are unable to determine whether or not NL actually had any association with the site, the nature of our responsibility, if any, for the contamination at the site and the extent of contamination at and cost to remediate the site. The timing and availability of information on these sites is dependent on events outside of our control, such as when the party alleging liability provides information to us. At certain of these previously inactive sites, NL has received general and special notices of liability from the EPA and/or state agencies alleging that NL, sometimes with other PRPs, is liable for past and future costs of remediating environmental contamination allegedly caused by former operations. These notifications may assert that NL, along with any other alleged PRPs, is liable for past and/or future clean-up costs that could be material to us if we are ultimately found liable.

In July 2010, we entered into a settlement agreement with another PRP pursuant to which, among other things, the other PRP reimbursed us for certain remediation and legal costs we had previously incurred for certain sites related to one of our former business units, and the PRP also affirmed its full responsibility to indemnify us for all claims (environmental or otherwise) with respect to certain specified sites related to our former business unit as well as indemnify us for any future claims that may arise related to such former business unit. As a result of the July 2010 settlement agreement, in the third quarter of 2010 we expect to recognize a litigation settlement gain of $6.1 million, consisting of $4.0 million related to the PRP’s cash reimbursement of prior remediation and legal costs and $2.1 million related to a reduction in our accrued environmental remediation costs resulting from the PRP’s agreement to indemnify us.

We are involved in certain legal proceedings with a number of our former insurance carriers regarding the nature and extent of the carriers’ obligations to us under insurance policies with respect to certain lead pigment and asbestos lawsuits. The issue of whether insurance coverage for defense costs or indemnity or both will be found to exist for our lead pigment and asbestos litigation depends upon a variety of factors, and we cannot assure you that such insurance coverage will be available.

We recognize insurance recoveries in income only when receipt of the recovery is probable and the amount is determinable. We have agreements with two former insurance carriers pursuant to which the carriers reimburse us for a portion of our future lead pigment litigation defense costs, and one such carrier reimburses us for a portion of our future asbestos litigation defense costs. We are not able to determine how much we will ultimately recover from these carriers for defense costs incurred by us because of certain issues that arise regarding which defense costs qualify for reimbursement. While we continue to seek additional insurance recoveries, we do not know if we will be successful in obtaining reimbursement for either defense costs or indemnity. We have not considered any additional potential insurance recoveries in determining accruals for lead pigment or asbestos litigation matters.

NL - In June 2010, the case captioned Contran Corporation, et al. v. Terry S. Casey, et al. (Case No. 07-04855, 192nd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas) was dismissed with prejudice in accordance with the previously reported settlement agreement. In May 2010, pursuant to such agreement, we paid $26.0 million in cash and NL issued an $18.0 million long-term promissory note. The note bears interest, payable quarterly, at the prime rate. Fifty percent of the principal amount will be payable on each of December 1, 2011 and December 1, 2012. The note is collateralized by shares of Kronos and CompX common stock, owned by NL, and having an aggregate market value of at least 200% of the outstanding principal amount of the promissory note. Under certain conditions, NL has agreed to prepay up to $4.0 million principal amount of such indebtedness.

For financial reporting purposes, we classified $32.2 million of the aggregate payable under the settlement agreement as a litigation settlement expense in respect of certain claims made by plaintiffs in the litigation. NL had insurance coverage for a portion of such litigation settlement, and a substantial portion of the insurance recoveries we recognized in the first quarter of 2010 relates to such coverage. With respect to the other claim of the plaintiffs as it relates to the repurchase of their EMS noncontrolling interest, the resulting $2.5 million increase over our previous estimate of such payment is accounted for as a reduction in stockholders’ equity in accordance with GAAP, of which $2.1 million is attributable to Valhi stockholders and $.4 million is attributable to the shareholders representing the noncontrolling interest of NL.

NL has been named as a defendant in various lawsuits in several jurisdictions, alleging personal injuries as a result of occupational exposure primarily to products manufactured by its former operations containing asbestos, silica and/or mixed dust. In addition, some plaintiffs allege exposure to asbestos from working in various facilities previously owned and/or operated by NL. There are approximately 1,226 of these types of cases remain pending, involving a total of approximately 2,670 plaintiffs. In addition, the claims of approximately 7,500 plaintiffs have been administratively dismissed or placed on the inactive docket in Ohio, Indiana and Texas state courts. We do not expect these claims will be re-opened unless the plaintiffs meet the courts’ medical criteria for asbestos-related claims. We have not accrued any amounts for this litigation because of the uncertainty of liability and inability to reasonably estimate the liability, if any. To date, we have not been adjudicated liable in any of these matters. Based on information available to us, including:

we believe that the range of reasonably possible outcomes of these matters will be consistent with our historical costs (which are not material). Furthermore, we do not expect any reasonably possible outcome would involve amounts material to our consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity. We have sought and will continue to vigorously seek, dismissal and/or a finding of no liability from each claim. In addition, from time to time, we have received notices regarding asbestos or silica claims purporting to be brought against former subsidiaries, including notices provided to insurers with which we have entered into settlements extinguishing certain insurance policies. These insurers may seek indemnification from us.

CompX – CompX is involved, from time to time, in various contractual, product liability, patent (or intellectual property), employment and other claims and disputes incidental to its business. On February 10, 2009, Humanscale Corporation (“Humanscale”) filed a complaint with the U.S. International Trade Commission (“ITC”) requesting that the ITC commence an investigation pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 to evaluate allegations concerning the unlawful importation of certain adjustable keyboard support products into the U.S. by CompX’s Canadian subsidiary. The products were alleged to infringe certain claims under a U.S. patent held by Humanscale. The complaint sought as relief the barring of future imports of the products into the U.S. until the expiration of the related patent in March 2011. The ITC hearing was completed on December 4, 2009. On July 9, 2010, the ITC issued its final judgment that CompX had not infringed on the Humanscale patents and that the patents are invalid. The final judgment is subject to appeal.

On February 13, 2009, Humanscale filed a complaint for patent infringement in the United States District Court, Eastern District of Virginia, against CompX and its Canadian subsidiary involving the identical patent in question in the ITC case. On March 30, 2009, CompX filed for a stay in the U.S. District Court Action pending the completion of the related case before the ITC. On May 19, 2009, the court granted CompX’s motion to stay the Humanscale claim of patent infringement. With the issuance of the final determination in the ITC case on July 9, 2010, Humanscale may now proceed with their claim in U.S. District Court unless they choose to appeal the ITC judgment. While the ITC determined that we did not infringe the patents and that the patents in question are invalid, the U.S. District Court is not bound by these determinations.

In conjunction with CompX’s filing of a stay of Humanscale’s patent infringement claim in the U.S. District Court on March 30, 2009, CompX filed a counterclaim of patent infringement against Humanscale for infringement of certain of CompX’s keyboard support patents by Humanscale’s models 2G, 4G and 5G support arms. A jury trial was completed on February 25, 2010 relating to CompX’s counterclaims with the jury finding that Humanscale infringed on CompX’s patents and awarded damages to CompX in excess of $19 million for past royalties. We anticipate the judge will issue a final judgment in August 2010. The verdict is subject to appeal. Due to the uncertain nature of the on-going legal proceedings, we have not accrued a receivable for the amount of the award.

In addition to the litigation described above, we and our affiliates are involved in various other environmental, contractual, product liability, patent (or intellectual property), employment and other claims and disputes incidental to our present and former businesses. In certain cases, we have insurance coverage for these items, although we do not expect any additional material insurance coverage for our environmental claims.

	Fair Value Measurements
	Total			Quoted Prices in Active Markets (Level 1)			Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	(In millions)

December 31, 2009:
Marketable securities:
Current	$	6.1		$	-		$	6.1	$	-
Noncurrent		279.5			28.6			.9		250.0

Currency forward contracts		1.6			1.6			-		-

June 30, 2010:
Marketable securities:
Current		1.6			-			1.6		-
Noncurrent		295.3			40.0			5.3		250.0

Currency forward contracts		(3.1	)		(3.1	)		-		-

We periodically use currency forward contracts to manage a nominal portion of currency exchange rate market risk associated with trade receivables, or similar exchange rate risk associated with future sales, denominated in a currency other than the holder's functional currency. These contracts generally relate to our Chemicals and Component Products operations. We have not entered into these contracts for trading or speculative purposes in the past, nor do we currently anticipate entering into such contracts for trading or speculative purposes in the future. Some of the currency forward contracts we enter into meet the criteria for hedge accounting under GAAP and are designated as cash flow hedges. For these currency forward contracts, gains and losses representing the effective portion of our hedges are deferred as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income, and are subsequently recognized in earnings at the time the hedged item affects earnings. For the currency forward contracts we enter into which do not meet the criteria for hedge accounting, we mark-to-market the estimated fair value of such contracts at each balance sheet date, with any resulting gain or loss recognized in income currently as part of net currency transactions. The fair value of the currency forward contracts is determined using Level 1 inputs as defined by ASC Topic 820-10-35 based on the foreign currency spot forward rates quoted by banks or foreign currency dealers.

an aggregate of $44.0 million for an equivalent value of Canadian dollars at exchange rates ranging from Cdn. $1.04 to Cdn. $1.08 per U.S. dollar. These contracts with Wachovia Bank, National Association, mature from July 2010 through May 2011 at a rate of $4 million per month, subject to early redemption provisions at our option. At June 30, 2010, the actual exchange rate was Cdn. $1.03 per U.S. dollar;

an aggregate $52.1 million for an equivalent value of Norwegian kroner at exchange rates ranging from kroner 5.88 to kroner 6.60 per U.S. dollar. These contracts with DnB Nor Bank ASA mature from July 2010 through July 2011 at a rate of $2.3 million to $5.5 million per month. At June 30, 2010, the actual exchange rate was kroner 6.44 per U.S. dollar; and

an aggregate euro 10.6 million for an equivalent value of Norwegian kroner at exchange rates ranging from kroner 8.47 to kroner 9.08 per euro. These contracts with DnB Nor Bank ASA mature from July 2010 through December 2010 at a rate of euro 1.6 million to euro 1.8 million per month, subject to early redemption provisions at our option. At June 30, 2010, the actual exchange rate was kroner 7.97 per euro.

The estimated fair value of our currency forward contracts at June 30, 2010 was a $3.1 million net liability, which is included in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as (i) $1.2 million recognized as part of Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets and (ii) $4.3 million recognized as a part of Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities. There is also a corresponding $3.1 million currency transaction loss in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. We are not currently using hedge accounting for our outstanding currency forward contracts at June 30, 2010, and we did not use hedge accounting for any of such contracts we previously held earlier in 2010 and during 2009.

In addition to the currency forward contracts discussed above, in the third quarter of 2010 our Chemicals Segment entered into currency forward contracts to exchange an aggregate of $8 million for an equivalent value of Canadian dollars at an exchange rate of Cdn. $1.06 per U.S. dollar. These contracts with Wachovia Bank, National Association, mature from June 2011 through July 2011 and are subject to early redemption provisions at our option.


	December 31, 2009				June 30, 2010
	Carrying amount		Fair value		Carrying amount		Fair value
	(In millions)

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash equivalents	$	78.0	$	78.0	$	56.1	$	56.1
Real-estate related note receivable		15.0		15.0		15.0		15.0

Long-term debt (excluding capitalized leases):
Publicly-traded fixed rate debt -
KII Senior Secured Notes	$	574.6	$	466.2	$	493.3	$	422.0
Snake River Sugar Company fixed rate loans		250.0		250.0		250.0		250.0
CompX variable rate promissory note		42.2		42.2		42.2		42.2
Variable rate debt to Contran		84.9		84.9		130.6		130.6
Variable rate bank credit facilities		29.1		29.1		23.6		23.6
Variable rate debt to former shareholders		-		-		18.0		18.0
Other fixed-rate debt		.5		.5		12.4		12.4

Noncontrolling interest in:
NL common stock	$	43.6	$	57.1	$	41.0	$	50.3
Kronos common stock		15.0		38.4		17.4		46.3
CompX common stock		11.1		12.2		10.7		16.0

Valhi stockholders' equity	$	428.7	$	1,597.3	$	417.2	$	1,411.0

The fair value of our publicly-traded marketable securities, noncontrolling interest in NL, Kronos and CompX and our common stockholders' equity are all based upon quoted market prices, Level 1 inputs as defined at each balance sheet date. The fair value of our 6.5% Notes are also based on quoted market prices at each balance sheet date; however, these quoted market prices represent Level 2 inputs because the markets in which the Notes trade are not active. At December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2010, the estimated market price of the 6.5% Notes was approximately euro 809 and euro 853, respectively, per euro 1,000 principal amount. The fair value of our fixed-rate nonrecourse loans from Snake River Sugar Company is based upon the $250 million redemption price of our investment in Amalgamated, which collateralizes the nonrecourse loans (this is a Level 3 input). Fair values of the variable interest rate note receivable and variable interest debt and other fixed-rate debt are deemed to approximate book value. Due to their near-term maturities, the carrying amounts of accounts receivable and accounts payable are considered equivalent to fair value. See Notes 5 and 7.

We are primarily a holding company. We operate through our wholly-owned and majority-owned subsidiaries, including NL Industries, Inc., Kronos Worldwide, Inc., CompX International Inc., Tremont LLC and Waste Control Specialists LLC (“WCS”). Kronos (NYSE: KRO), NL (NYSE: NL) and CompX (NYSE: CIX) each file periodic reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).

•

Component Products – We operate in the component products industry through our majority ownership of CompX. CompX is a leading global manufacturer of security products, precision ball bearing slides and ergonomic computer support systems used in the office furniture, transportation, tool storage and a variety of other industries. CompX also manufactures stainless steel exhaust systems, gauges and throttle controls for the performance boat industry.

•

Waste Management – WCS is our wholly-owned subsidiary which owns and operates a West Texas facility for the processing, treatment, storage and disposal of hazardous, toxic and certain types of low-level radioactive waste. WCS obtained a byproduct disposal license in 2008 and began disposal operations in October 2009. In January 2009 WCS received a low-level radioactive waste disposal license, which was signed in September 2009. Construction of the low-level radioactive waste facility is currently expected to begin by the end of 2010, following the completion of some pre-construction licensing and administrative matters, and is expected to be operational in late 2011.

This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as amended. Statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that are not historical in nature are forward-looking in nature about our future that are not statements of historical fact. Statements in this report including, but not limited to, statements found in Item 2 - "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," are forward-looking statements that represent our beliefs and assumptions based on currently available information. In some cases you can identify these forward-looking statements by the use of words such as "believes," "intends," "may," "should," "could," "anticipates," "expects" or comparable terminology, or by discussions of strategies or trends. Although we believe the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, we do not know if these expectations will be correct. Forward-looking statements by their nature involve substantial risks and uncertainties that could significantly impact expected results. Actual future results could differ materially from those predicted. While it is not possible to identify all factors, we continue to face many risks and uncertainties. Among the factors that could cause our actual future results to differ materially from those described herein are the risks and uncertainties discussed in this Quarterly Report and those described from time to time in our other filings with the SEC including, but not limited to, the following:

Should one or more of these risks materialize (or the consequences of such development worsen), or should the underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results could differ materially from those currently forecasted or expected. We disclaim any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement whether as a result of changes in information, future events or otherwise.

Net income attributable to Valhi stockholders was $4.5 million, or $.04 per diluted share, in the second quarter of 2010 compared to a net loss attributable to Valhi stockholders of $19.0 million, or $.16 per diluted share, in the second quarter of 2009. As more fully discussed below, our diluted income per share increased from 2009 to 2010 primarily due to the net effects of:

Net income attributable to Valhi stockholders was $18.1 million, or $.14 per diluted share, in the first six months of 2010 compared to a net loss attributable to Valhi stockholders of $39.0 million, or $.34 per diluted share, in the same period of 2009. The net income attributable to Valhi stockholders in the first six months of 2010 was primarily due to an income tax benefit recognized during the first quarter discussed below. As more fully discussed below, our diluted income per share increased from 2009 to 2010 primarily due to the net effects of:

Our net loss attributable to Valhi stockholders in 2009 includes (i) a gain of $.07 per diluted share as a result of a litigation settlement, (ii) a gain of $.04 per diluted share from the sale of a business, (iii) a gain of $.05 per diluted share (net of tax and noncontrolling interest) as a result of the second close of a litigation settlement and (iv) income of $.01 per diluted share related to certain insurance recoveries we recognized.

We consider TiO2 to be a “quality-of-life” product, with demand affected by gross domestic product (“GDP”) and overall economic conditions in our markets located in various regions of the world. Over the long-term, we expect demand for TiO2 will grow by 2% to 3% per year, consistent with our expectations for the long-term growth in GDP. However, even if we and our competitors maintain consistent shares of the worldwide market, demand for TiO2 in any interim or annual period may not change in the same proportion as the change in GDP, in part due to relative changes in the TiO2 inventory levels of our customers. We believe our customers’ inventory levels are partly influenced by their expectation for future changes in TiO2 selling prices. The majority of our TiO2 grades and substantially all of our production are considered commodity pigment products; we compete for sales primarily on the basis of price.

	Three months ended June 30,									Six months ended June 30,
	2009			2010			% Change			2009			2010			% Change
	(Dollars in millions)

Net sales	$	282.1		$	380.1			35	%	$	530.1		$	699.8			32	%
Cost of sales		268.4			295.3			10			512.8			555.3			8

Gross margin	$	13.7		$	84.8			521	%	$	17.3		$	144.5			739	%

Operating income (loss)	$	(20.0	)	$	40.4			302	%	$	(45.5	)	$	63.0			238	%

Percent of net sales:
Cost of sales		95	%		78	%					97	%		79	%
Gross margin		5			22						3			21
Operating income (loss)		(7	)		11						(9	)		9

Ti02 operating statistics:
Sales volumes*		114			148			30	%		211			270			28	%
Production volumes*		87			134			54			151			258			71

Percent change in net sales:
Ti02 product pricing								6	%								3	%
Ti02 sales volumes								30									28
Ti02 product mix								1									-
Changes in currency exchange rates								(2	)								1

Total								35	%								32	%

Net Sales - Our Chemicals Segment’s sales increased 35% in the second quarter of 2010 compared to the second quarter of 2009, primarily due to a 30% increase in sales volumes along with a 6% increase in average TiO2 selling prices, partially offset by the negative impact of currency exchange rates. We estimate the unfavorable effect of changes in currency exchange rates decreased our Chemicals Segment’s net sales by approximately $6 million, or 2%, as compared to the same period in 2009. Our Chemicals Segment’s net sales increased 32% in the first six months of 2010 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2009 primarily due to a 28% increase in sales volumes along with a 3% increase in average TiO2 selling prices and the positive impact of currency exchange rates. We estimate the favorable effect of changes in currency exchange rates increased our Chemicals Segment’s net sales by approximately $4 million, or 1%, as compared to the same period in 2009. The Chemicals Segment’s sales volumes in the second quarter and first six months of 2010 are both new records for their respective periods. TiO2 selling prices will increase or decrease generally as a result of competitive market pressures and changes in the relative level of supply and demand. We currently expect average selling prices in the second half of 2010 to be higher than the average selling prices in the first six months of 2010. Our increase in sales volumes in both periods is due to higher demand across all market segments resulting from the improvement in current economic conditions. We expect demand will continue to remain above 2009 levels for the remainder of the year.

Cost of Sales - Our Chemicals Segment’s cost of sales percentage decreased significantly in the second quarter and first six months of 2010 compared to the same periods last year, primarily due to the significantly higher production volumes in 2010, as we implemented temporary plant curtailments during the first half of 2009 in order to reduce our finished goods inventories to an appropriate level and due to higher selling prices in both periods of 2010 as compared to 2009. Such temporary plant curtailments resulted in approximately $30 million and $80 million of unabsorbed fixed production costs which were charged directly to cost of sales in the second quarter and first six months of 2009, respectively.

In the second quarter of 2010, TiO2 production volumes increased 54%, utility costs were lower by $2.3 million and maintenance costs increased $6.2 million as compared to the second quarter of 2009. In addition, cost of sales in the second quarter of 2010 was negatively impacted by approximately $4 million as a result of a higher production costs in the ore we produced in 2010 at our ilmenite mines in Norway.

In the first six months of 2010 TiO2 production volumes increased 71%, raw material costs were lower by $7.4 million, utility costs were lower by $11.7 million and maintenance costs increased $10.9 million as compared to the first six months of 2009. In addition, cost of sales in the first six months of 2010 was negatively impacted by approximately $8 million as a result of a higher production costs in 2010 at our ilmenite mines in Norway.

Operating Income (Loss) - Our Chemicals Segment’s operating income increased significantly in the second quarter and first six months of 2010, primarily due to the significant increase in our gross margin and increased sales volumes. Gross margin has increased in both periods primarily because of higher sales volumes, higher selling prices and lower manufacturing costs per ton resulting from higher production volumes. However, changes in currency exchange rates have negatively affected our gross margin and operating income (loss). We estimate that changes in currency exchange rates decreased operating income (loss) by approximately $12 million and $20 million in the second quarter and first six months of 2010, respectively, as compared to the same periods in 2009.

Our Chemicals Segment’s operating income (loss) is net of amortization of purchase accounting adjustments made in conjunction with our acquisitions of interests in NL and Kronos. As a result, we recognize additional depreciation expense above the amounts Kronos reports separately, substantially all of which is included within cost of sales. We recognized an additional $1.2 million and $1.3 million of additional depreciation expense in the first six months of 2009 and 2010, respectively, which reduced our reported Chemicals Segment operating income (loss) as compared to amounts reported separately by Kronos.

Currency Exchange Rates – Our Chemicals Segment has substantial operations and assets located outside the United States (primarily in Germany, Belgium, Norway and Canada). The majority of sales generated from our foreign operations are denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, principally the euro, other major European currencies and the Canadian dollar. A portion of our sales generated from our foreign operations is denominated in the U.S. dollar. Certain raw materials used worldwide, primarily titanium-containing feedstocks, are purchased in U.S. dollars, while labor and other production costs are purchased primarily in local currencies. Consequently, the translated U.S. dollar value of our foreign sales and operating results are subject to currency exchange rate fluctuations which may favorably or adversely impact reported earnings and may affect the comparability of period-to-period operating results. In addition to the impact of the translation of sales and expenses over time, our foreign operations also generate currency transaction gains and losses which primarily relate to the difference between the currency exchange rates in effect when non-local currency sales or operating costs are initially accrued and when such amounts are settled with the non-local currency.

Impact of changes in currency exchange rates Three months ended June 30, 2010 vs June 30, 2009
	Transaction gains/(losses) recognized								Translation gain/loss- impact of rate changes			Total currency impact 2009 vs 2010
	2009		2010			Change			Translation gain/loss- impact of rate changes			Total currency impact 2009 vs 2010
	(in millions)
Impact on:
Net sales	$	-	$	-		$	-		$	(6	)	$	(6	)
Operating income (loss)		1		(3	)		(4	)		(8	)		(12	)

Impact of changes in currency exchange rates Six months ended June 30, 2010 vs June 30, 2009
	Transaction gains/(losses) recognized								Translation gain/loss- impact of rate changes			Total currency impact 2009 vs 2010
	2009		2010			Change			Translation gain/loss- impact of rate changes			Total currency impact 2009 vs 2010
	(in millions)
Impact on:
Net sales	$	-	$	-		$	-		$	4		$	4
Operating income (loss)		7		(1	)		(8	)		(12	)		(20	)

Outlook - During 2009 and to-date in 2010, our Chemicals Segment has announced various TiO2 price increases, a portion of which were implemented during the second half of 2009 and the first six months of 2010, with portions of the remainder expected to be implemented during the second half of 2010. Our average TiO2 selling prices were 3% higher in the first half of 2010 as compared to the first half of 2009, and our average selling prices at the end of the first half of 2010 were 5% higher as compared to the end of 2009. Based on an expected continuation of strong demand levels, we anticipate our average selling prices will continue to increase during the remainder of 2010.

In response to the worldwide economic slowdown and weak consumer confidence, we reduced our production volumes during the first half of 2009 in order to reduce our finished goods inventory, improve our liquidity and match production to market demand. Overall industry pigment demand has been and is expected to continue to be higher in 2010 as compared to 2009 as a result of improving worldwide economic conditions. While we operated our facilities at approximately 58% of capacity during the first half of 2009, we increased our capacity utilization to approximately 94% during the second half of 2009. We operated our plants at near full capacity utilization during the first half of 2010 and we currently expect to continue to operate our facilities at near full capacity levels during the remainder of 2010. Our expected capacity utilization levels could be adjusted upwards or downwards to match changes in demand for our products. We also expect relative increases in raw material, energy and freight costs during the remainder of 2010 and a portion of any future price increases would compensate for such increases in our operating costs.

We expect operating income will be higher in 2010 as compared to 2009, as the favorable effects of the worldwide economic recovery and improving consumer confidence will continue to improve demand in all of our key market segments. The expected increase in our sales volumes for 2010 should allow us to maintain our near full capacity utilization for the remainder of the year. With such improved capacity utilization levels and higher expected selling prices, we expect to report improved operating and financial performance in 2010.

Our expectations as to the future of the TiO2 industry are based upon a number of factors beyond our control, including worldwide growth of gross domestic product, competition in the marketplace, solvency and continued operation of competitors, unexpected or earlier than expected capacity additions or reductions and technological advances. If actual developments differ from our expectations, our results of operations could be unfavorably affected.

	Three months ended June 30,									Six months ended June 30,
	2009			2010			% Change			2009			2010			% Change
	(Dollars in millions)

Net sales	$	29.2		$	34.4			18	%	$	57.7		$	67.2			16	%
Cost of sales		23.0			25.5			11			46.7			49.2			5

Gross margin	$	6.2		$	8.9			42	%	$	11.0		$	18.0			63	%

Operating income (loss)	$	(.9	)	$	3.0			410	%	$	(1.9	)	$	4.7			348	%

Percent of net sales:
Cost of sales		79	%		74	%					81	%		73	%
Gross margin		21			26						19			27
Operating income (loss)		(3	)		9						(3	)		7

Cost of Sales - Our Component Products Segment’s cost of sales percentage improved in the second quarter of 2010 and the first six months of 2010 compared to the same periods in 2009. As a result, gross margin increased over the same periods. The resulting increase in gross margin is primarily due to improved coverage of overhead and fixed manufacturing costs from higher sales volume and the related efficiency gains from the increase in capacity utilization. In addition the gross margin percentage is slightly lower in the second quarter of 2010 compared to the six-month period of 2010 due to an increase in raw material costs.

Operating Income (Loss) - Our Component Products Segment had operating income in the second quarter and first six months of 2010, compared to operating losses in the same periods of 2009 primarily due to the net impact of improved gross margins as a result of improved cost of sales ratios. Improved gross margins were partially offset by an increase in patent litigation expenses in the first six months of 2010 relating to Furniture Components reporting unit of $1.9 million in the period compared to $1.0 million in the same period of 2009. In the second quarter and first six months of 2010 we estimated that relative changes in currency exchange rates decreased operating income by $.4 million and $1.0 million, respectively. In addition we had a $.7 million write-down of assets held for sale in the second quarter of 2009.

Currency Exchange Rates – Our Component Products Segment has substantial operations and assets located outside the United States in Canada and Taiwan. The majority of sales generated from our foreign operations are denominated in the U.S. dollar, with the rest denominated in other currencies, principally the Canadian dollar and the New Taiwan dollar. Most raw materials, labor and other production costs for our foreign operations are denominated primarily in local currencies. Consequently, the translated U.S. dollar values of our foreign sales and operating results are subject to currency exchange rate fluctuations which may favorably or unfavorably impact reported earnings and may affect comparability of period-to-period operating results. In addition to the impact of the translation of sales and expenses over time, our foreign operations also generate currency transaction gains and losses which primarily relate to the difference between the currency exchange rates in effect when non-local currency sales or operating costs are initially accrued and when such amounts are settled with the non-local currency.

Three months ended June 30, 2010 vs. 2009 (in millions)
	Transaction gains/(losses)						Translation gain/loss- impact of rate			Total currency impact
	2009		2010		Change		changes			2010 vs. 2009
Impact on:
Net sales	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	.3		$	.3
Operating income		-		.1		.1		(.5	)		(.4	)

Six months ended June 30, 2010 vs. 2009 (in millions)
	Transaction gains/(losses)						Translation gain/loss- impact of rate			Total currency impact
		2009		2010	Change		changes			2010 vs. 2009

Impact on:
Net sales	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	.7		$	.7
Operating income		-		.1		.1		(1.1	)		(1.0	)

Outlook – Demand for Component Products Segment’s products has increased as conditions in the overall economy have improved, although there is still uncertainty as to the sustainability of the related increase in sales. While changes in market demand are not within our control, we are focused on the areas we can impact. Staffing levels are continuously being evaluated in relation to sales order rates resulting in headcount adjustments, to the extent possible, to match staffing levels with demand. We expect our lean manufacturing and cost improvement initiatives to continue to positively impact our productivity and result in a more efficient infrastructure that we are beginning to leverage as growth in demand returns. Additionally, we continue to seek opportunities to gain market share in markets we currently serve, expand into new markets and develop new product features in order to mitigate the impact of changes in demand as well as broaden our sales base.

In addition to challenges with overall demand, volatility in the cost of raw materials is ongoing. The cost of commodity raw materials began to increase during the first half of 2010 as compared to the end of 2009, and we currently expect these costs to continue to be volatile during the remainder of 2010. We generally seek to mitigate the impact of fluctuations in raw material costs on our margins through improvements in production efficiencies or other operating cost reductions as well as occasional larger quantity tactical spot buys of raw materials which may result in higher inventory balances for a period of time. In the event we are unable to offset raw material cost increases with other cost reductions, it may be difficult to recover those cost increases through increased product selling prices or raw material surcharges due to the competitive nature of the markets served by our products. Consequently, overall operating margins may be affected by raw material cost pressures.

A competitor has filed claims against us for patent infringement. We have denied the allegations of patent infringement and we are defending the lawsuits vigorously. While we currently believe the disposition of these claims should not have a material, long-term adverse effect on our operating income, we expect to continue to incur costs defending against such claims during the short-term that are likely to be material to our operating income.

General – We have operated our Waste Management Segment’s waste management facility on a relatively limited basis while we navigated the regulatory licensing requirements to receive permits for the disposal of byproduct waste material and for a broad range of low-level and mixed low-level radioactive wastes (“LLRW”). We previously filed license applications for such disposal capabilities with the applicable Texas state agencies. In May 2008, the TCEQ issued us a license for the disposal of byproduct material. Byproduct material includes uranium or thorium mill tailings as well as equipment, pipe and other materials used to handle and process the mill tailings. We began construction of the byproduct facility infrastructure at our site in Andrews County, Texas in the third quarter of 2008 and this facility began disposal operations in October 2009. In January 2009, TCEQ issued a near-surface low-level and mixed LLRW disposal license to us. This license was signed in September 2009. Construction of the LLRW site is currently expected to commence by the end of 2010, following the completion of some pre-construction licensing and administrative matters, and is expected to be operational in late 2011. While construction for the LLRW disposal facility is pending, we currently have facilities that allow us to treat, store and dispose of a broad range of hazardous and toxic wastes and byproducts material, and to treat and store a broad range of low-level and mixed LLRW.

Net Sales and Operating Loss – The Waste Management Segment’s sales increased in the second quarter and first six months of 2010 compared to the same periods in 2009, primarily due to revenue associated with a new waste acceptance contract and the disposal of certain hazardous waste which had previously been stored at Waste Management’s facility. The Waste Management Segment’s operating loss increased in the second quarter primarily due to increased operating costs and in the first six months of 2010 the operating loss increased primarily due to contract termination expense of $1.1 million related to an agreement to terminate a disposal contract with a former customer. We continue to seek to increase our Waste Management Segment’s sales volumes from waste streams permitted under our current licenses.

Outlook – Having obtained the final regulatory license we need to commence full scale operations, we are in process of preparing to construct the facilities we will need to provide “one-stop shopping” for hazardous, toxic, low-level and mixed LLRW and radioactive byproduct material. WCS will have the broadest range of capabilities of any commercial enterprise in the U.S. for the storage, treatment and permanent disposal of these materials, which we believe will give WCS a significant and valuable competitive advantage in the industry once final construction is completed in mid-2011. We are also exploring opportunities to obtain certain types of new business (including disposal and storage of certain types of waste) that, if obtained, could help to increase our Waste Management Segment’s sales, and decrease our Waste Management Segment’s operating loss. Our ability to increase our Waste Management Segment’s sales volumes through receipt of these waste streams, together with improved operating efficiencies through further cost reductions and increased capacity utilization, are important factors in improving our Waste Management Segment’s operating results and cash flows. Until we are able to increase our Waste Management Segment’s sales volumes, we generally expect to continue to report operating losses in our Waste Management Segment. While achieving increased sales volumes could result in operating profits, we currently do not believe we will report any significant levels of Waste Management operating profit until we have started to generate revenues following completion of the construction discussed above.

Interest and Dividend Income – A significant portion of our interest and dividend income in both 2010 and 2009 relates to the distributions we received from The Amalgamated Sugar Company LLC. We recognized dividend income from the LLC of $6.3 million and $12.7 million in each of the second quarters and first six months of 2009 and 2010, respectively.

Insurance Recoveries – Insurance recoveries relate to amounts NL received from certain of its former insurance carriers, and relate principally to the recovery of prior lead pigment and asbestos litigation defense costs incurred by NL. We have agreements with certain former insurance carriers pursuant to which the carriers reimburse us for a portion of our future lead pigment litigation defense costs, and one such carrier reimburses us for a portion of our future asbestos litigation defense costs. We are not able to determine how much we will ultimately recover from these carriers for defense costs incurred by us because of certain issues that arise regarding which defense costs qualify for reimbursement.

In addition to the insurance recoveries discussed above, our insurance recoveries in the first six months of 2010 include an insurance recovery recognized in the first quarter of 2010 in connection with the litigation settlement discussed in Note 12 to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. NL had insurance coverage for a portion of the litigation settlement, and a substantial portion of the insurance recoveries we recognized in the first quarter of 2010 relates to such coverage.

Other Income – In the first quarter of 2009, we recognized a pre-tax litigation settlement gain of $11.9 million related to amounts we received in the first quarter of 2009 in recovery of past environmental remediation and related legal costs we had previously incurred. In the second quarter of 2009 we recognized a $11.1 million pre-tax gain on the second closing on property covered under a litigation settlement reached in the fourth quarter of 2008. See Note 9 to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. Also in 2009 we recognized a $6.3 million gain on the sale of the assets of our research, laboratory and quality control business to The Amalgamated Sugar Company LLC. See Note 9 to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Corporate Expenses and Other Items, Net - The $33.3 million in litigation settlements and contract termination expense are discussed in Notes 7 and 12 to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. Corporate expenses were 30% lower at $6.7 million in the second quarter of 2010 compared to $9.6 million in the same period in 2009 and corporate expenses were 20% lower at $14.4 million in the second quarter of 2010 compared to $17.9 million in the same period in 2009. Corporate expenses decreased primarily due to lower defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit expense, lower environmental related expenses and lower incentive compensation expense which included certain incentive compensation paid in connection with the sale of our research and development business in the first quarter of 2009. In addition we had lower litigation and related costs at NL. Included in corporate expense are:

We expect our corporate expenses in 2010 will be lower than in 2009 primarily due to the lower expected pension and other postretirement benefit expense. The level of our litigation and related expenses varies from period to period depending upon, among other things, the number of cases in which we are currently involved, the nature of such cases and the current stage of such cases (e.g. discovery, pre-trial motions, trial or appeal, if applicable). In addition, we adjust our environmental accruals as further information becomes available to us or as circumstances change. Such further information or changed circumstances could result in an increase or reduction in our accrued environmental costs. See Note 12 to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. If our current expectations regarding the number of cases in which we expected to be involved during 2010, or the nature of such cases, were to change, our corporate expenses could be higher than we currently estimate.

Obligations for environmental remediation costs are difficult to assess and estimate, and it is possible that actual costs for environmental remediation will exceed accrued amounts or that costs will be incurred in the future for sites in which we cannot currently estimate the liability. If these events were to occur during 2010, our corporate expenses would be higher than our current estimates. In addition, we adjust our environmental accruals as further information becomes available to us or as circumstances change. Such further information or changed circumstances could result in an increase or reduction in our accrued environmental costs. See Note 12 to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Interest Expense – We have a significant amount of indebtedness denominated in the euro, primarily through our subsidiary Kronos International, Inc. (“KII”). KII has outstanding euro 400 million aggregate principal amount of 6.5% Senior Secured Notes due in 2013 outstanding. The interest expense we recognize on these fixed rate Notes varies with fluctuations in the euro exchange rate.

Interest expense increased to $17.0 million in the second quarter of 2010 from $16.7 million in the second quarter of 2009 and increased to $34.4 million in the first six months of 2010 from $32.7 million in the first six months of 2009 primarily due to higher average debt balances at Valhi parent, NL and CompX and higher interest rates on our European credit facility and changes in currency exchange rates which offset the effect of decreased average borrowings under Kronos’ revolving credit facilities. Excluding the effect of currency exchange rates, we expect interest expense will continue to be higher in 2010 as compared to 2009 due to continued higher average balances of outstanding borrowings at Valhi parent in 2010 and higher interest rates on certain of our credit facilities.

Provision for Income Taxes (Benefit) – Our income tax provision was $11.8 million in the second quarter of 2010 compared to a benefit of $13.7 million in the second quarter of 2009. We had an income tax benefit of $18.2 million in the first six months of 2010 compared to a $22.9 million benefit in the first six months of 2009. Our tax rate varies as the contribution of income from our business units changes. Our income tax benefit in the first six months of 2010 includes a $35.2 million income tax benefit related to a European Court ruling in the first quarter of 2010 that resulted in a favorable resolution of certain income tax issues in Germany and an increase in the amount of our German corporate and trade tax net operating loss carryforwards. Our income tax benefit in the first quarter of 2010 also includes an aggregate $1.9 million provision for deferred income taxes on the pre-2005 undistributed earnings of our Taiwanese subsidiary.

We have substantial net operating loss carryforwards in Germany (the equivalent of $941 million for German corporate purposes and $288 million for German trade tax purposes at December 31, 2009), which amounts exclude the adjustment to such carryforwards recognized in the first quarter of 2010 (see Note 10 to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements). At June 30, 2010, we have concluded that no deferred income tax asset valuation allowance is required to be recognized with respect to such carryforwards, principally because (i) such carryforwards have an indefinite carryforward period, (ii) we have utilized a portion of such carryforwards during the most recent three-year period and (iii) we currently expect to utilize the remainder of such carryforwards over the long term. However, prior to the complete utilization of such carryforwards, particularly if we were to generate losses in our German operations for an extended period of time, it is possible that we might conclude the benefit of such carryforwards would no longer meet the more-likely-than-not recognition criteria, at which point we would be required to recognize a valuation allowance against some or all of the then-remaining tax benefit associated with the carryforwards.

Noncontrolling Interest in Net Income (Loss) of Subsidiaries – Noncontrolling interest in net income was $1.9 million in the second quarter of 2010 compared to a loss of $1.6 million in the second quarter of 2009, and income of $3.4 million in the first six months of 2010 compared to a loss of $5.0 million in the first six months of 2009. In the second quarter and first six months of 2010 we had operating income at Kronos and CompX compared to operating losses at each of the these subsidiaries in the second quarter and first six months of 2009.

	December 31,	June 30,	December 31,	June 30,
	2008	2009	2009	2010

Kronos:
Days sales outstanding	64 days	67 days	56 days	59 days
Days sales in inventory	113 days	42 days	58 days	49 days

CompX:
Days sales outstanding	41 days	44 days	37 days	45 days
Days sales in inventory	70 days	74 days	64 days	64 days

We do not have complete access to the cash flows of our majority-owned subsidiaries, due in part to limitations contained in certain credit agreements of our subsidiaries and because we do not own 100% of these subsidiaries. A detail of our consolidated cash flows from operating activities is presented in the table below. Intercompany dividends have been eliminated.

	Six months ended June 30,
	2009			2010
	(In millions)

Cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Valhi exclusive of subsidiaries	$	15.5		$	21.3
CompX		5.5			1.1
Kronos		44.5			(3.5	)
WCS		(7.8	)		(9.2	)
NL exclusive of its subsidiaries		(3.1	)		(6.3	)
Tremont		8.8			(1.9	)
Other		1.1			.1
Eliminations		(21.8	)		(12.8	)

Total	$	42.7		$	(11.2	)

During the first six months of 2010, we had net borrowings of euro 6.0 million ($10.3 million when borrowed/repaid) under Kronos’ European bank credit facility, repaid a net $16.7 million under Kronos’ U.S. bank credit facility, had net borrowings of $31.6 million on Kronos’ revolving facility with Contran, and had net borrowings of $5.0 million under CompX’s revolving credit facility. During the first six months of 2010, we had net borrowings of $14.1 million under our Contran credit facility. We paid aggregate cash dividends of $22.7 million ($.10 per share per quarter) on our common stock in the first six months of 2010. Distributions to noncontrolling interest in subsidiaries in the first six months of 2010 are primarily comprised of CompX dividends paid to shareholders other than NL.

Certain of our revolving credit facilities with unrelated, third party lenders require the respective borrowers to maintain minimum levels of equity, require the maintenance of certain financial ratios, limit dividends and additional indebtedness and contain other provisions and restrictive covenants customary in lending transactions of this type. We are in compliance with all of our debt covenants at June 30, 2010. We believe we will be able to comply with the financial covenants contained in all of our credit facilities through the maturity of the respective facilities; however if future operating results differ materially from our expectations we may be unable to maintain compliance.

Our primary source of liquidity on an ongoing basis is our cash flows from operating activities and borrowings under various lines of credit and notes. We generally use these amounts to (i) fund capital expenditures, (ii) repay short-term indebtedness incurred primarily for working capital purposes and (iii) provide for the payment of dividends (including dividends paid to us by our subsidiaries) or treasury stock purchases. From time-to-time we will incur indebtedness, generally to (i) fund short-term working capital needs, (ii) refinance existing indebtedness, (iii) make investments in marketable and other securities (including the acquisition of securities issued by our subsidiaries and affiliates) or (iv) fund major capital expenditures or the acquisition of other assets outside the ordinary course of business. Occasionally we sell assets outside the ordinary course of business, and we generally use the proceeds to (i) repay existing indebtedness (including indebtedness which may have been collateralized by the assets sold), (ii) make investments in marketable and other securities, (iii) fund major capital expenditures or the acquisition of other assets outside the ordinary course of business or (iv) pay dividends.

We routinely compare our liquidity requirements and alternative uses of capital against the estimated future cash flows we expect to receive from our subsidiaries, and the estimated sales value of those units. As a result of this process, we have in the past sought, and may in the future seek, to raise additional capital, refinance or restructure indebtedness, repurchase indebtedness in the market or otherwise, modify our dividend policies, consider the sale of our interests in our subsidiaries, affiliates, business units, marketable securities or other assets, or take a combination of these and other steps, to increase liquidity, reduce indebtedness and fund future activities. Such activities have in the past and may in the future involve related companies. From time to time we and our subsidiaries may enter into intercompany loans as a cash management tool. Such notes are structured as revolving demand notes and pay and receive interest on terms we believe are more favorable than current debt and investment market rates. The companies that receive these notes have sufficient borrowing capacity to repay the notes at anytime upon demand. All of these notes and related interest expense and income are eliminated in our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

We periodically evaluate acquisitions of interests in or combinations with companies (including our affiliates) that may or may not be engaged in businesses related to our current businesses. We intend to consider such acquisition activities in the future and, in connection with this activity, may consider issuing additional equity securities and increasing indebtedness. From time to time, we also evaluate the restructuring of ownership interests among our respective subsidiaries and related companies.

Based upon our expectations of our operating performance, and the anticipated demands on our cash resources, we expect to have sufficient liquidity to meet our short-term obligations (defined as the twelve-month period ending June 30, 2011). In this regard, see the discussion above in “Outstanding Debt Obligations.” If actual developments differ from our expectations, our liquidity could be adversely affected.

(1) As previously reported, in May 2010 Kronos satisfied certain specified financial covenants in its European revolving credit facility, and as a result the maximum borrowing availability under such facility returned

to the full euro 80 million facility size at that time. The amount of unused credit availability under Kronos’ European credit facility indicated above reflects the full euro 80 million facility size.

Although CompX has $32.5 million in availability under its bank credit facility, at June 30, 20010 CompX could only borrow $21 million and still be in compliance with its debt covenants. Lower future results could further restrict or prohibit CompX’s borrowings under the Credit Agreement. We could borrow all of the amounts noted above without violating any covenants of the credit facilities.

The WCS amount includes approximately $5 million in capitalized permit costs. Capital spending for 2010 is expected to be funded through cash generated from operations and credit facilities. Our Waste Management Segment’s LLRW disposal license was issued in January 2009 and signed in September 2009. With the receipt of this license, WCS expects to begin construction of its LLRW facility in late 2010. Approximately $16 million of WCS’ planned capital spending relates to the new facility. WCS is currently seeking financing to fund construction of these facilities, and a delay in obtaining such financing could result in a delay in constructing the LLRW facility. In May 2009, the Andrews County voters approved a potential bond sale of up to $75 million to provide financing for the construction. However, the county has not yet issued the bonds, and we can provide no assurance that the bonds will be issued.

CompX’s board of directors authorized the repurchase of its Class A common stock in open market transactions, including block purchases, or in privately-negotiated transactions at unspecified prices and over an unspecified period of time. At June 30, 2010 approximately 678,000 shares were available for purchase under these authorizations.

Because our operations are conducted primarily through subsidiaries and affiliates, our long-term ability to meet parent company level corporate obligations is largely dependent on the receipt of dividends or other distributions from our subsidiaries and affiliates. In February 2009, Kronos’ board suspended its quarterly dividend after considering the challenges and opportunities that exist in the Ti02 products industry and we do not currently expect to receive a dividend from Kronos in 2010. NL’s current quarterly cash dividend is $.125 per share, although in the past NL has paid a dividend in the form of Kronos common stock. If NL continues to pay its regular quarterly dividends in cash, based on the 40.4 million shares we held of NL common stock at June 30, 2010, we would receive aggregate annual dividends from NL of $20.2 million. We do not expect to receive any distributions from WCS during 2010. All of our ownership interest in CompX is held through our ownership in NL, as such we do not receive any dividends from CompX. Instead any dividend CompX declares is paid to NL.

We have in the past, and may in the future, purchase the securities of our subsidiaries and affiliates or third parties in market or privately-negotiated transactions. We base our purchase decision on a variety of factors, including an analysis of the optimal use of our capital, taking into account the market value of the securities and the relative value of expected returns on alternative investments. In connection with these activities, we may consider issuing additional equity securities or increasing our indebtedness. We may also evaluate the restructuring of ownership interests of our businesses among our subsidiaries and related companies.

We generally do not guarantee any indebtedness or other obligations of our subsidiaries or affiliates. Our subsidiaries are not required to pay us dividends. If one or more of our subsidiaries were unable to maintain its current level of dividends, either due to restrictions contained in a credit agreement or to satisfy its liabilities or otherwise, our ability to service our liabilities or to pay dividends on our common stock could be adversely impacted. If this were to occur, we might consider reducing or eliminating our dividends or selling interests in subsidiaries or other assets. If we were required to liquidate assets to generate funds to satisfy our liabilities, we might be required to sell at what we believe would be less than the value of such assets.

WCS’ primary source of liquidity currently consists of intercompany borrowings from one of our wholly-owned subsidiaries under the terms of a revolving credit facility. We eliminate these intercompany borrowings in our Consolidated Financial Statements. During the first six months of 2010, WCS borrowed a net $8.0 million from our subsidiary. WCS used these net borrowings primarily to fund its operating loss and capital expenditures. The outstanding amount of this intercompany borrowing, which is eliminated in our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, was $12.6 million at June 30, 2010 and $4.6 million at December 31, 2009. We expect that WCS will likely borrow additional amounts during the remainder of 2010 from our subsidiary. In addition to WCS’ borrowing availability under this facility, we currently expect WCS’ cash needs in 2010 to be provided in part by certain third-party borrowings. If WCS is not successful in obtaining third-party borrowings, it is probable the amount WCS may borrow under this facility would be increased to compensate.

In June 2010, NL entered into a promissory note with Valhi that allows NL to borrow up to $40 million. We also eliminate any such intercompany borrowings in our Consolidated Financial Statement. In June 2010, NL borrowed a net $2.8 million from us. We expect that NL will likely borrow additional amounts from us during the remainder of 2010.

The terms of The Amalgamated Sugar Company LLC Company Agreement provide for an annual "base level" of cash dividend distributions (sometimes referred to as distributable cash) by the LLC of $26.7 million, from which we are entitled to a 95% preferential share. Distributions from the LLC are dependent, in part, upon the operations of the LLC. We record dividend distributions from the LLC as income when they are declared by the LLC, which is generally the same month in which we receive the distributions, although distributions may in certain cases be paid on the first business day of the following month. To the extent the LLC's distributable cash is below this base level in any given year, we are entitled to an additional 95% preferential share of any future annual LLC distributable cash in excess of the base level until such shortfall is recovered. Based on the LLC's current projections for 2010, we expect distributions received from the LLC in 2010 will exceed our debt service requirements under our $250 million loans from Snake River Sugar Company by approximately $1.8 million.

We may, at our option, require the LLC to redeem our interest in the LLC beginning in 2012, and the LLC has the right to redeem our interest in the LLC beginning in 2027. The redemption price is generally $250 million plus the amount of certain undistributed income allocable to us, if any. In the event we require the LLC to redeem our interest in the LLC, Snake River has the right to accelerate the maturity of and call our $250 aggregate million loans from Snake River. Redemption of our interest in the LLC would result in us reporting income related to the disposition of our LLC interest for income tax purposes, although we would not be expected to report a gain in earnings for financial reporting purposes at the time our LLC interest is redeemed. However, because of Snake River’s ability to call our $250 million loans from Snake River upon redemption of our interest in the LLC, the net cash proceeds (after repayment of the debt) generated by the redemption of our interest in the LLC could be less than the income taxes that we would be required to pay as a result of the disposition.

In addition to those legal proceedings described in Note 12 to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, various legislation and administrative regulations have, from time to time, been proposed that seek to (i) impose various obligations on present and former manufacturers of lead pigment and lead-based paint (including NL) with respect to asserted health concerns associated with the use of such products and (ii) effectively overturn court decisions in which NL and other pigment manufacturers have been successful. Examples of such proposed legislation include bills which would permit civil liability for damages on the basis of market share, rather than requiring plaintiffs to prove that the defendant's product caused the alleged damage, and bills which would revive actions barred by the statute of limitations. While no legislation or regulations have been enacted to date that are expected to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity, enactment of such legislation could have such an effect.

We are exposed to market risk, including currency exchange rates, interest rates and equity security prices. For a discussion of such market risk items, please refer to Part I, Item 7A - “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” in our 2009 Annual Report. There have been no material changes in these market risks during the first six months of 2010.

We periodically use currency forward contracts to manage a nominal portion of currency exchange rate market risk associated with trade receivables, or similar exchange rate risk associated with future sales, denominated in a currency other than the holder's functional currency. These contracts generally relate to our Chemicals and Component Products operations. We have not entered into these contracts for trading or speculative purposes in the past, nor do we currently anticipate entering into such contracts for trading or speculative purposes in the future. Some of the currency forward contracts we enter into meet the criteria for hedge accounting under GAAP and are designated as cash flow hedges. For these currency forward contracts, gains and losses representing the effective portion of our hedges are deferred as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income, and are subsequently recognized in earnings at the time the hedged item affects earnings. For the currency forward contracts we enter into which do not meet the criteria for hedge accounting, we mark-to-market the estimated fair value of such contracts at each balance sheet date, with any resulting gain or loss recognized in income currently as part of net currency transactions. See Note 13 to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

We maintain a system of disclosure controls and procedures. The term "disclosure controls and procedures," as defined by regulations of the SEC, means controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file or submit to the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Act”), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information we are required to disclose in the reports we file or submit to the SEC under the Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions to be made regarding required disclosure. Each of Steven L. Watson, our President and Chief Executive Officer, and Bobby D. O’Brien, our Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, have evaluated the design and operating effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2010. Based upon their evaluation, these executive officers have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2010.

We also maintain internal control over financial reporting. The term “internal control over financial reporting,” as defined by Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f), means a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by our board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP, and includes those policies and procedures that:

As permitted by the SEC, our assessment of internal control over financial reporting excludes (i) internal control over financial reporting of our equity method investees and (ii) internal control over the preparation of our financial statement schedules required by Article 12 of Regulation S-X. However, our assessment of internal control over financial reporting with respect to our equity method investees did include our controls over the recording of amounts related to our investment that are recorded in our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, including controls over the selection of accounting methods for our investments, the recognition of equity method earnings and losses and the determination, valuation and recording of our investment account balances.

County of Santa Clara v. Atlantic Richfield Company, et al. (Superior Court of the State of California, County of Santa Clara, Case No. CV788657). In July 2010, the California Supreme Court ruled that public entities could pursue this public nuisance case assisted by private counsel on a contingent fee basis after revising the respective retention agreements to conform with the requirements set forth in the Supreme Court’s opinion. The Supreme Court (1) clarified that the government attorneys overseeing the external, contingency fee counsel must, at a minimum, retain complete control over the course and conduct of the case; retain veto power over any decisions made by outside counsel; and be personally involved in overseeing the litigation and (2) remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with its opinion.

Delaware		87-0110150
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(IRS Employer Identification No.)

	Item No.		Exhibit Index

	31.1		Certification

	31.2		Certification

	32.1		Certification

		VALHI, INC. (Registrant)



Date August 5, 2010		/s/ Bobby D. O’Brien
		Bobby D. O’Brien (Vice President and Chief Financial Officer)

Date August 5, 2010		/s/ Gregory M. Swalwell
		Gregory M. Swalwell (Vice President and Controller, Principal Accounting Officer)