10-Q

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D. C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

[ X ] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2008

OR

[     ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number	Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter and Principal Office Address and Telephone Number	State of Incorporation	I.R.S. Employer Identification Number
1-16681	The Laclede Group, Inc. 720 Olive Street St. Louis, MO 63101 314-342-0500	Missouri	74-2976504
1-1822	Laclede Gas Company 720 Olive Street St. Louis, MO 63101 314-342-0500	Missouri	43-0368139

Indicate by check mark whether the registrants (1) have filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such report) and (2) have been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes [ X ] No [     ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act):

The Laclede Group, Inc.:	Large accelerated filer	[     ]	Accelerated filer	[ X ]	Non-accelerated filer	[     ]
Laclede Gas Company:	Large accelerated filer	[     ]	Accelerated filer	[     ]	Non-accelerated filer	[ X ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act):

The Laclede Group, Inc.:	Yes	[     ]	No	[ X ]
Laclede Gas Company:	Yes	[     ]	No	[ X ]

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock as of the latest practicable date:

		Shares Outstanding At
Registrant	Description of Common Stock	August 5, 2008
The Laclede Group, Inc.:	Common Stock ($1.00 Par Value)	21,971,760
Laclede Gas Company:	Common Stock ($1.00 Par Value)	10,391  *

* 100% owned by The Laclede Group, Inc.

TABLE OF CONTENTS			Page No.
PART 1.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1	Financial Statements
	The Laclede Group, Inc.:
		Statements of Consolidated Income	4
		Statements of Consolidated Comprehensive Income	5
		Consolidated Balance Sheets	6-7
		Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows	8
		Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	9-22
	Laclede Gas Company:
		Statements of Income	Ex. 99.1, p. 1
		Statements of Comprehensive Income	Ex. 99.1, p. 2
		Balance Sheets	Ex. 99.1, p. 3-4
		Statements of Cash Flows	Ex. 99.1, p. 5
		Notes to Financial Statements	Ex. 99.1, p. 6-13
Item 2	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
		Results of Operations (The Laclede Group, Inc.)	23-35
	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
		Results of Operations (Laclede Gas Company)	Ex. 99.1, p. 14-23
Item 3	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		36
Item 4	Controls and Procedures		36
PART II.  OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1	Legal Proceedings		37
Item 2	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		37
Item 5	Other Information		37
Item 6	Exhibits		37
SIGNATURES – The Laclede Group, Inc.			38
SIGNATURES – Laclede Gas Company			39
INDEX TO EXHIBITS			40

FILING FORMAT

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is a combined report being filed by two separate registrants: The Laclede Group, Inc. (Laclede Group or the Company) and Laclede Gas Company (Laclede Gas or the Utility).

2

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

The interim financial statements included herein have been prepared by the Company, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007.

3

Item 1. Financial Statements

THE LACLEDE GROUP, INC.
STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED INCOME
(UNAUDITED)
	Three Months Ended					Nine Months Ended
	June 30,					June 30,
(Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)		2008			2007		2008		2007
Operating Revenues:
Regulated Gas Distribution	$	189,598		$	185,696	$	1,017,579	$	1,027,777
Non-Regulated Gas Marketing		314,646			218,771		735,831		548,088
Other		1,244			1,753		3,774		4,187
Total Operating Revenues		505,488			406,220		1,757,184		1,580,052
Operating Expenses:
Regulated
Natural and propane gas		112,896			121,490		713,263		746,589
Other operation expenses		34,285			29,283		108,487		99,779
Maintenance		6,543			5,830		18,592		17,488
Depreciation and amortization		8,819			8,565		26,295		25,630
Taxes, other than income taxes		14,549			13,360		60,485		60,467
Total Regulated Operating Expenses		177,092			178,528		927,122		949,953
Non-Regulated Gas Marketing		308,035			212,948		714,928		531,497
Other		1,102			1,589		3,815		4,398
Total Operating Expenses		486,229			393,065		1,645,865		1,485,848
Operating Income		19,259			13,155		111,319		94,204
Other Income and (Income Deductions) – Net		(836	)		1,027		2,889		5,403
Interest Charges:
Interest on long-term debt		4,876			5,626		14,877		16,877
Interest on long-term debt to unconsolidated affiliate trust		347			69		486		208
Other interest charges		1,189			1,826		7,408		8,199
Total Interest Charges		6,412			7,521		22,771		25,284
Income from Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes
and Dividends on Laclede Gas Redeemable Preferred Stock		12,011			6,661		91,437		74,323
Income Tax Expense		2,902			1,888		30,713		26,110
Dividends on Laclede Gas Redeemable Preferred Stock		8			10		27		33
Income from Continuing Operations		9,101			4,763		60,697		48,180
Income from Discontinued Operations, Net
of Income Tax (Note 2)		158			4,499		20,819		988
Net Income	$	9,259		$	9,262	$	81,516	$	49,168
Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding		21,701			21,478		21,614		21,434
Basic Earnings Per Share of Common Stock:
Income from Continuing Operations	$	0.42		$	0.22	$	2.81	$	2.24
Income from Discontinued Operations		0.01			0.21		0.96		0.05
Net Income	$	0.43		$	0.43	$	3.77	$	2.29
Diluted Earnings Per Share of Common Stock:
Income from Continuing Operations	$	0.41		$	0.22	$	2.80	$	2.24
Income from Discontinued Operations		0.01			0.21		0.96		0.05
Net Income	$	0.42		$	0.43	$	3.76	$	2.29
Dividends Declared Per Share of Common Stock	$	0.375		$	0.365	$	1.125	$	1.095
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

4

THE LACLEDE GROUP, INC.
STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(UNAUDITED)
	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
(Thousands)		2008			2007			2008			2007
Net Income	$	9,259		$	9,262		$	81,516		$	49,168
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Before Tax:
Net gains (losses) on cash flow hedging derivative instruments:
Net hedging gain (loss) arising during period		(10,388	)		5,194			(16,266	)		3,222
Reclassification adjustment for (gains) losses included
in net income		3,256			(2,464	)		(1,184	)		(4,384	)
Net unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedging
derivative instruments		(7,132	)		2,730			(17,450	)		(1,162	)
Amortization of actuarial loss included in net periodic
pension cost		43			—			129			—
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Before Tax		(7,089	)		2,730			(17,321	)		(1,162	)
Income Tax Expense (Benefit) Related to Items of
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)		(2,739	)		1,055			(6,692	)		(449	)
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Tax		(4,350	)		1,675			(10,629	)		(713	)
Comprehensive Income	$	4,909		$	10,937		$	70,887		$	48,455
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

5

THE LACLEDE GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(UNAUDITED)
	June 30,			Sept. 30,			June 30,
(Thousands)	2008			2007			2007
ASSETS
Utility Plant	$	1,215,336		$	1,187,828		$	1,176,954
Less:  Accumulated depreciation and amortization		402,229			394,034			392,250
Net Utility Plant		813,107			793,794			784,704
Non-utility property		3,952			4,065			4,050
Other investments		43,226			43,635			43,309
Property and investments of discontinued operations		—			42,601			42,748
Other Property and Investments		47,178			90,301			90,107
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents		32,971			52,746			36,365
Accounts receivable:
Gas customers – billed and unbilled		103,602			102,224			104,038
Other		126,871			57,861			79,241
Allowances for doubtful accounts		(14,107	)		(11,232	)		(15,591	)
Delayed customer billings		18,389			—			11,621
Inventories:
Natural gas stored underground at LIFO cost		84,205			138,256			55,301
Propane gas at FIFO cost		19,907			19,950			19,950
Materials, supplies, and merchandise at average cost		5,699			4,990			5,656
Derivative instrument assets		18,948			31,057			23,379
Unamortized purchased gas adjustments		3,341			12,813			13,387
Deferred income taxes		9,245			—			6,255
Prepayments and other		19,847			27,914			26,848
Current assets of discontinued operations		—			30,756			32,851
Total Current Assets		428,918			467,335			399,301
Deferred Charges:
Prepaid pension cost		—			—			55,101
Regulatory assets		267,574			285,054			168,458
Other		4,409			4,669			6,223
Total Deferred Charges		271,983			289,723			229,782
Total Assets	$	1,561,186		$	1,641,153		$	1,503,894

6

THE LACLEDE GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Continued)
(UNAUDITED)
	June 30,			Sept. 30,		June 30,
(Thousands, except share amounts)	2008			2007		2007
CAPITALIZATION AND LIABILITIES
Capitalization:
Common stock (70,000,000 shares authorized, 21,961,795,     21,645,637, and 21,605,135 shares issued, respectively)	$	21,962		$	21,646	$	21,605
Paid-in capital		144,955			136,061		134,277
Retained earnings		324,694			268,761		276,052
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		(8,772	)		1,857		2,942
Total Common Stock Equity		482,839			428,325		434,876
Redeemable preferred stock (less current sinking fund     requirements) – Laclede Gas		467			627		627
Long-term debt to unconsolidated affiliate trust		—			46,400		46,400
Long-term debt (less current portion) – Laclede Gas		309,167			309,122		309,101
Total Capitalization		792,473			784,474		791,004
Current Liabilities:
Notes payable		58,600			211,400		102,100
Accounts payable		191,402			99,109		123,568
Advance customer billings		—			25,440		—
Current portion of long-term debt and preferred stock		160			40,160		40,160
Wages and compensation accrued		13,267			11,532		9,811
Dividends payable		8,326			7,970		7,951
Customer deposits		14,923			15,899		17,322
Interest accrued		6,204			11,103		6,595
Taxes accrued		26,313			20,922		33,660
Deferred income taxes current		—			2,644		—
Other		6,257			5,756		5,301
Current liabilities of discontinued operations		—			21,730		18,273
Total Current Liabilities		325,452			473,665		364,741
Deferred Credits and Other Liabilities:
Deferred income taxes		233,368			223,750		232,610
Unamortized investment tax credits		4,030			4,200		4,259
Pension and postretirement benefit costs		71,164			63,678		20,471
Asset retirement obligations		27,300			26,125		25,899
Regulatory liabilities		84,436			39,589		37,100
Other		22,963			22,554		23,885
Deferred credits and other liabilities of discontinued operations		—			3,118		3,925
Total Deferred Credits and Other Liabilities		443,261			383,014		348,149
Total Capitalization and Liabilities	$	1,561,186		$	1,641,153	$	1,503,894
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

7

THE LACLEDE GROUP, INC.
STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
	Nine Months Ended
	June 30,
(Thousands)	2008			2007
Operating Activities:
Net Income	$	81,516		$	49,168
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in)       operating activities:
Gain on sale of discontinued operations		(44,491	)		—
Depreciation, amortization, and accretion		27,828			28,879
Deferred income taxes and investment tax credits		(6,247	)		(20,124	)
Other – net		3,225			1,529
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable – net		(67,513	)		(34,762	)
Unamortized purchased gas adjustments		9,472			30,994
Deferred purchased gas costs		72,856			38,022
Accounts payable		92,780			26,640
Delayed customer billings - net		(43,829	)		(43,064	)
Taxes accrued		5,391			18,142
Natural gas stored underground		54,051			82,175
Other assets and liabilities		8,215			(25,607	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		193,254			151,992
Investing Activities:
Proceeds from sale of discontinued operations		83,554			—
Capital expenditures		(41,503	)		(43,020	)
Other investments		(76	)		(131	)
Proceeds from unconsolidated affiliate trust’s redemption of its common securities		1,400			—
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		43,375			(43,151	)
Financing Activities:
Maturity of first mortgage bonds		(40,000	)		—
Redemption of long-term debt to unconsolidated affiliate trust		(46,400	)		—
Repayment of short-term debt – net		(152,800	)		(105,200	)
Issuance of common stock		6,863			5,353
Dividends paid		(24,197	)		(23,310	)
Preferred stock reacquired		(160	)		(159	)
Other		290			62
Net cash used in financing activities		(256,404	)		(123,254	)
Net Decrease in Cash and Cash Equivalents		(19,775	)		(14,413	)
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period		52,746			50,778
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period	$	32,971		$	36,365
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Paid During the Period for:
Interest	$	30,109		$	30,731
Income taxes		40,924			20,418
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

8

THE LACLEDE GROUP, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

These notes are an integral part of the accompanying consolidated financial statements of The Laclede Group, Inc. (Laclede Group or the Company) and its subsidiaries. In the opinion of Laclede Group, this interim report includes all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring accruals) necessary for the fair presentation of the results of operations for the periods presented. This Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in the Company’s Fiscal Year 2007 Form 10-K.

The consolidated financial position, results of operations, and cash flows of Laclede Group are comprised primarily from the financial position, results of operations, and cash flowsof Laclede Gas Company (Laclede Gas or the Utility). Laclede Gas is a regulated natural gas distribution utility having a material seasonal cycle. As a result, these interim statements of income for Laclede Group are not necessarily indicative of annual results or representative of succeeding quarters of the fiscal year. Due to the seasonal nature of the business of Laclede Gas, earnings are typically concentrated in the November through April period, which generally corresponds with the heating season.

DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS - On March 31, 2008, Laclede Group sold 100% of its interest in SM&P Utility Resources, Inc. (SM&P), its wholly-owned subsidiary, which comprised the Non-Regulated Services segment. In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, the results of operations for SM&P are reported as discontinued operations in the statement of income and its associated assets and liabilities are classified separately in the balance sheet. The operating results of SM&P have been aggregated and reported on the Statements of Consolidated Income as Income from Discontinued Operations, Net of Income Tax. The Company has reported in discontinued operations interest expense based on amounts previously recorded by SM&P. Discontinued operations does not include general corporate overheads previously recorded by SM&P. Prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current-period presentation. For additional information relative to the Company’s sale of SM&P, refer to Note 2, Discontinued Operations.

REVENUE RECOGNITION - Laclede Gas reads meters and bills its customers on monthly cycles. The Utility records its regulated gas distribution revenues from gas sales and transportation services on an accrual basis that includes estimated amounts for gas delivered, but not yet billed. The accruals for unbilled revenues are reversed in the subsequent accounting period when meters are actually read and customers are billed. The amounts of accrued unbilled revenues at June 30, 2008 and 2007, for the Utility, were $10.9 million and $7.2 million, respectively. The amount of accrued unbilled revenue at September 30, 2007 was $11.9 million.

INCOME TAXES - Laclede Group and its subsidiaries have elected, for tax purposes only, various accelerated depreciation provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. In addition, certain other costs are expensed currently for tax purposes while being deferred for book purposes. Effective October 1, 2007, generally accepted accounting principles require that tax benefits be recognized in the financial statements as determined by new recognition and measurement provisions. These provisions permit the benefit from a tax position to be recognized only if, and to the extent that, it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained upon examination by the taxing authority, based on the technical merits of the position. Unrecognized tax benefits and related interest and penalties, if any, are recorded as liabilities or as a reduction to deferred tax assets. Laclede Group companies record deferred tax liabilities and assets measured by enacted tax rates for the net tax effect of all temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities in the financial statements, and the related tax basis. Changes in enacted tax rates, if any, and certain property basis differences will be reflected by entries to regulatory asset or liability accounts for regulated companies, and will be reflected as income or loss for non-regulated companies.

Laclede Gas’ investment tax credits utilized prior to 1986 have been deferred and are being amortized in accordance with regulatory treatment over the useful life of the related property.

GOODWILL - The Company previously reported Goodwill separately on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, the total of which was fully attributable to SM&P, and was included in the Non-Regulated Services operating segment. During the quarter ended March 31, 2008, the Company sold 100% of its interest in SM&P, thereby reducing Goodwill to zero at March 31, 2008. Goodwill for prior periods has been reclassified in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and is included in the Property and Investments of Discontinued Operations line. For further information on the sale of SM&P, see Note 2, Discontinued Operations.

GROSS RECEIPTS TAXES - Gross receipts taxes associated with Laclede Gas’ natural gas utility service are imposed on the Utility and billed to its customers. These amounts are recorded gross in the Statements of Consolidated Income. Amounts recorded in Regulated Gas Distribution Operating Revenues for the quarters ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 were $9.0 million and $8.1 million, respectively. Amounts recorded in Regulated Gas Distribution Operating Revenues for the nine months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 were $47.2 million and $46.9 million, respectively. Gross receipts taxes are expensed by the Utility and included in the Taxes, Other Than Income Taxes line.

9

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION - Awards of stock-based compensation are made pursuant to The Laclede Group 2006 Equity Incentive Plan and the Restricted Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors. Refer to Note 1 of the Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007 for descriptions of these plans.

During the nine months ended June 30, 2008, the Company awarded 74,100 shares of performance-contingent restricted stock to executive officers at a weighted average grant date fair value of $29.32 per share. This number of shares represents the maximum shares that can be earned pursuant to the terms of the awards. The shares were awarded on December 5, 2007 and have a performance period ending in September 2010, during which participants are entitled to receive full dividends and voting rights on 49,400 of these shares based on the target level of performance. The number of shares that will ultimately vest is dependent upon the attainment of certain levels of earnings and dividend growth performance goals; further, under the terms of the award, the Compensation Committee (Committee) of the Board of Directors may reduce by up to 50% the number of shares that vest if the Company’s total shareholder return (TSR) during the performance period ranks in the bottom quartile relative to a comparator group of companies. This TSR provision is considered a market condition under generally accepted accounting principles and is discussed further below.

During the nine months ended June 30, 2008, the Company made a separate award of 15,000 shares of performance-contingent restricted stock to an executive officer at a weighted average grant date fair value of $33.26 per share. This number of shares represents the maximum shares that can be earned pursuant to the terms of the award. The shares were awarded on December 5, 2007 and have a performance period ending in September 2009, during which the participant is entitled to receive full dividends and voting rights on 10,000 of these shares based on the target level of performance. The number of shares that will ultimately vest is dependent upon the attainment of certain business development performance metrics and succession management objectives and is not subject to the aforementioned TSR provision.

The weighted average grant date fair value of performance-contingent restricted stock awarded during the nine months ended June 30, 2007 was $34.95 per share.

Performance-contingent restricted stock activity for the nine months ended June 30, 2008 is presented below:

			Weighted
			Average
			Grant Date
	Shares		Fair Value
Nonvested at September 30, 2007	110,000			$	32.87
Granted	89,100			$	29.99
Vested	—			$	—
Forfeited	(20,000	)		$	33.15
Nonvested at June 30, 2008	179,100			$	31.40

During the nine months ended June 30, 2008, the Company awarded 23,250 shares of time-vested restricted stock to executives and key employees at a weighted average grant date fair value of $34.25 per share. These shares were awarded on December 5, 2007 and vest in December 2010. In the interim, participants receive full dividends and voting rights.

During the nine months ended June 30, 2008, the Company made a special award of 15,000 time-vested restricted stock units to an executive officer at a weighted average grant date fair value of $28.49 per share. Each restricted stock unit represents a contingent right to receive one share of Laclede Group common stock. The units were awarded on February 14, 2008 and vest in December 2011. The participant is required to retain the shares acquired upon vesting for twelve months from the date of delivery of the shares. No dividends are paid or accrue during the vesting period. Furthermore, the participant has no voting rights in the interim.

During the nine months ended June 30, 2008, the Company awarded 12,500 shares of time-vested restricted stock to non-employee directors at a weighted average grant date fair value of $33.77 per share. These shares were awarded on January  31, 2008. The weighted average fair value of restricted stock awarded to non-employee directors during the nine months ended June 30, 2007 was $32.74 per share. These shares vest depending on the participant’s age upon entering the plan and years of service as a director. The plan’s trustee acquires the shares for the awards in the open market and holds the shares as trustee for the benefit of the non-employee directors until the restrictions expire. In the interim, the participants receive full dividends and voting rights.

10

Time-vested restricted stock and time-vested restricted stock unit activity for the nine months ended June 30, 2008 is presented below:

			Weighted
			Average
	Shares/		Grant Date
	Units		Fair Value
Nonvested at September 30, 2007	9,000			$	32.44
Granted	50,750			$	32.43
Vested	(2,900	)		$	33.77
Forfeited	—			$	—
Nonvested at June 30, 2008	56,850			$	32.36

No stock options were granted during the nine months ended June 30, 2008. The weighted average fair value of stock options granted during the nine months ended June 30, 2007 was $8.07 per option.

Stock option activity for the nine months ended June 30, 2008 is presented below:

					Weighted
					Average
			Weighted		Remaining	Aggregate
			Average		Contractual	Intrinsic
			Exercise		Term	Value
	Shares		Price		(Years)	($000)
Outstanding at September 30, 2007	617,100		$	30.04
Granted	—		$	—
Exercised	(157,000	)	$	27.98
Forfeited	(15,000	)	$	30.88
Expired	(7,750	)	$	31.14
Outstanding at June 30, 2008	437,350		$	30.73	6.6	$	4,217
Fully Vested and Expected to Vest   at June 30, 2008	424,705		$	30.67	6.6	$	4,119
Exercisable at June 30, 2008	256,725		$	29.42	6.0	$	2,812

The closing price of the Company’s common stock was $40.37 at June 30, 2008.

Compensation cost for performance-contingent restricted stock awards is based upon the probable outcome of the performance conditions. For shares that do not vest or are not expected to vest due to the outcome of the performance conditions, no compensation cost is recognized and any previously recognized compensation cost is reversed.

The fair value of awards of performance-contingent and time-vested restricted stock and restricted stock units, not subject to the TSR provision, is estimated using the closing price of the Company’s stock on the date of the grant. For those awards that do not pay dividends during the vesting period, the estimate of fair value is reduced by the present value of the dividends expected to be paid on the Company’s common stock during the performance period, discounted using an appropriate U.S. Treasury yield. For shares subject to the TSR provision, the estimated impact of this market condition is reflected in the grant date fair value per share of the awards. Accordingly, compensation cost is not reversed to reflect any actual reductions in the awards that may result from the TSR provision. However, if the Company’s TSR during the performance period ranks in the bottom quartile relative to a comparator group of companies and the Committee elects not to reduce the award (or reduce by a lesser amount), this election would be accounted for as a modification of the original award and additional compensation cost would be recognized at that time. The grant date fair value per share of the awards subject to the TSR provision awarded during the nine months ended June 30, 2008 was valued by a Monte Carlo simulation model that assessed the probabilities of various TSR outcomes.

11

The amounts of compensation cost recognized for share-based compensation arrangements are presented below:

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
(Thousands)	2008			2007			2008			2007
Total compensation cost	$	508		$	584		$	1,930		$	1,816
Compensation cost capitalized		(112	)		(127	)		(410	)		(388	)
Compensation cost recognized in net income		396			457			1,520			1,428
Income tax benefit recognized in net income		(153	)		(177	)		(587	)		(552	)
Compensation cost recognized in net income,
net of income tax	$	243		$	280		$	933		$	876

As of June 30, 2008, there was $4.6 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested share-based compensation arrangements (options and restricted stock). That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.5 years.

NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS - In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Interpretation Number 48 (FIN 48), “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes.” FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” Under FIN 48, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from a tax position only if it is at least more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon settlement with the taxing authorities. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. The Company adopted the provisions of FIN 48 as of October 1, 2007. For details regarding the cumulative effect of adoption and other pertinent information, see Note 7, Income Taxes.

In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements.” This Statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The Statement applies to fair value measurements required under other accounting guidance that require or permit fair value measurements. Accordingly, this Statement does not require any new fair value measurements. The guidance in this Statement does not apply to the Company’s stock-based compensation plans accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment.” Except as described below, SFAS No. 157 is effective for the Company as of the beginning of fiscal year 2009. In February 2008, the FASB issued two Staff Positions that amend SFAS No. 157. The first FASB Staff Position (FSP), No. FAS 157-1, excludes from the scope of SFAS No. 157 accounting pronouncements that address fair value measurements for purposes of lease classification and measurement. The second FSP, No. FAS 157-2, delays the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). Application of SFAS No. 157 to these items will be effective for the Company as of the beginning of fiscal year 2010. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of this Statement, as amended by these Staff Positions, on its consolidated financial statements.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans.” As discussed in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s Fiscal Year 2007 Form 10-K, Laclede Group adopted the recognition and disclosure provisions of this Statement effective September 30, 2007. The Statement also requires that plan assets and benefit obligations be measured as of the date of the employer’s fiscal year-end statement of financial position. This requirement is effective for the Company as of the end of fiscal year 2009. In conjunction with adoption of this provision of SFAS No. 158, the Company will be required to change its valuation date for its pension and other postretirement plans from June 30 to September 30. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adoption of the change in measurement date on its consolidated financial statements.

12

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities.” The Statement permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not currently required to be measured at fair value. SFAS No. 159 also establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between entities that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. This Statement does not affect any existing accounting literature that requires certain assets and liabilities to be carried at fair value. Upon adoption of SFAS No. 159, entities are permitted to choose, at specified election dates, to measure eligible items at fair value (fair value option). Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected are reported in earnings at each reporting date. The decision about whether to elect the fair value option is applied instrument by instrument with few exceptions. The decision is also irrevocable (unless a new election date occurs) and must be applied to entire instruments and not to portions of instruments. SFAS No. 159 requires that cash flows related to items measured at fair value be classified in the statement of cash flows according to their nature and purpose as required by SFAS No. 95, “Statement of Cash Flows” (as amended). SFAS No. 159 is effective for the Company as of the beginning of fiscal year 2009. The Company is currently evaluating the provisions of this Statement.

In June 2007, the FASB ratified the consensus reached in Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 06-11, “Accounting for Income Tax Benefits of Dividends on Share-Based Payment Awards.” This Issue addresses how an entity should recognize the tax benefit received on dividends that are (a) paid to employees holding equity-classified nonvested shares, equity-classified nonvested share units, or equity-classified outstanding share options and (b) charged to retained earnings under SFAS No. 123(R). The Task Force reached a consensus that such tax benefits should be recognized as an increase in additional paid-in capital. This EITF Issue also addresses how the accounting for these tax benefits is affected if an entity’s estimate of forfeitures changes in subsequent periods. This EITF Issue is effective for Laclede Group as of the beginning of fiscal year 2009. The Company is currently evaluating the provisions of this EITF Issue.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements.” This Statement amends Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, “Consolidated Financial Statements.” A noncontrolling interest, sometimes called a minority interest, is the portion of equity in a subsidiary not attributable, directly or indirectly, to a parent. SFAS No. 160 clarifies that noncontrolling interests should be separately reported as equity in the balance sheet. Additionally, SFAS No. 160 requires certain changes in presentation to income statements. SFAS No. 160 also addresses accounting for changes in the parent’s ownership interest of a subsidiary, accounting for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary, and disclosure requirements. This Statement is effective for Laclede Group as of the beginning of fiscal year 2010. Currently, all of Laclede Group’s consolidated subsidiaries are wholly owned and therefore adoption of this Statement is not expected to have any effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007) (141(R)), “Business Combinations.” This Statement revises SFAS No. 141 but retains the fundamental requirements in SFAS No. 141 that the acquisition method (formerly known as purchase method) of accounting be used for all business combinations. SFAS No. 141(R) requires an acquirer to recognize the assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at the acquisition date, measured at their fair values as of that date, with limited exceptions specified in the Statement. SFAS 141(R) requires acquisition-related costs to be accounted for separately instead of being allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. SFAS No. 141(R) also amends the guidance related to the recognition of certain assets acquired and liabilities assumed that relate to contingencies, research and development assets acquired that have no alternative future use, and negative goodwill arising from a bargain purchase. Laclede Group is required to adopt SFAS No. 141(R) prospectively to business combinations with acquisition dates on or after October 1, 2009 (fiscal 2010). Because this Statement is only applicable to future business combinations, existing amounts reported on the Company’s consolidated financial statements will not be impacted by adoption of this Statement.

In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.” This Statement amends SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” by requiring enhanced disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under Statement 133 and its related interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. This Statement will be effective for the Company’s interim and annual financial statements beginning in the second quarter of fiscal year 2009. This Statement encourages, but does not require, comparative disclosures for earlier periods at initial adoption. The Company is currently evaluating the provisions of this Statement.

In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.” SFAS No. 162 identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting principles to be used in the preparation and presentation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. This statement will be effective 60 days after the Securities and Exchange Commission approves the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board’s amendments to AU Section 411, “The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.” The Company does not anticipate that the adoption of SFAS No. 162 will have any effect on its consolidated financial statements.

13

In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 163, “Accounting for Financial Guarantee Insurance Contracts-an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 60.” This Statement provides clarification to the guidance in SFAS No. 60, “Accounting and Reporting by Insurance Enterprises,” and expands disclosure requirements. This Statement is effective for Laclede Group as of the beginning of fiscal year 2010. Because SFAS No. 163 is primarily applicable to insurance enterprises that issue financial guarantee insurance contracts, the Company does not anticipate that the adoption of this Statement will have any effect on its consolidated financial statements.

In June 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. EITF 03-6-1, “Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities.” This FSP addresses whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating securities prior to vesting and, therefore, need to be included in the earnings allocation in computing earnings per share (EPS) under the two-class method described by SFAS No. 128, “Earnings per Share.” The guidance in this FSP states that unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and shall be included in the computation of EPS pursuant to the two-class method. This FSP is effective for Laclede Group as of the beginning of fiscal year 2010. The FSP requires that the guidance be applied retrospectively to all prior-period EPS data presented. The Company is currently assessing the potential impact of this FSP on its EPS calculations.

2. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

On March 31, 2008, the Company completed the sale of 100% of its interest in its wholly-owned subsidiary, SM&P, to Stripe Acquisition, Inc. (an affiliate of Kohlberg Management VI, LLC) for $85 million in cash, subject to certain closing and post-closing adjustments. SM&P is an underground facilities locating and marking business that comprised Laclede Group’s Non-Regulated Services operating segment. The sales agreement included representations, warranties, and indemnification provisions customary for such transactions and was filed as an exhibit to the March 31, 2008 Form 10-Q. For information concerning Laclede Group’s obligations under these provisions, see Note 10, Commitments and Contingencies.

In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, the operating results of SM&P have been aggregated and reported on the Statements of Consolidated Income as Income from Discontinued Operations, Net of Income Tax. The Company has reported in discontinued operations interest expense based on amounts previously recorded by SM&P. For the quarter ended June 30, 2007, discontinued operations includes pre-tax interest expense of $0.9 million. For the nine months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, discontinued operations includes pre-tax interest expense of $1.6 million and $2.5 million, respectively. Discontinued operations does not include general corporate overheads. Income from Discontinued Operations reported in the Statements of Consolidated Income consists of the following:

	Three Months Ended					Nine Months Ended
	June 30,					June 30,
(Thousands)	2008			2007		2008			2007
Operating revenues	$	—		$	51,707	$	65,423		$	118,270
Income (loss) from operations		—			7,363		(9,387	)		1,799
Gain on disposal		—			—		44,491			—
Pre-tax income		—			7,363		35,104			1,799
Income tax expense (benefit)		(158	)		2,864		14,285			811
Income from Discontinued Operations	$	158		$	4,499	$	20,819		$	988

Income from Discontinued Operations for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 was $0.2 million due to minor income tax adjustments related to the gain on disposal.

14

The assets and liabilities of SM&P have been segregated from continuing operations and have been reported as assets or liabilities of discontinued operations on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Assets and liabilities of SM&P reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as discontinued operations consist of the following:

	Sept. 30,		June 30,
(Thousands)	2007		2007
Assets
Property and Investments:
Goodwill	$	33,595	$	33,595
Property, plant, and equipment – net		7,204		7,420
Other investments		1,802		1,733
Total Property and Investments		42,601		42,748
Current Assets:
Accounts receivable – net		28,816		30,639
Other		1,940		2,212
Total Current Assets		30,756		32,851
Total Assets	$	73,357	$	75,599
Liabilities
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	7,720	$	4,998
Wages and compensation accrued		3,950		5,879
Other		10,060		7,396
Total Current Liabilities		21,730		18,273
Deferred credits and other liabilities		3,118		3,925
Total Liabilities	$	24,848	$	22,198

3. EARNINGS PER SHARE

SFAS No. 128, “Earnings Per Share,” requires dual presentation of basic and diluted EPS. Basic EPS does not include potentially dilutive securities and is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS assumes the issuance of common shares pursuant to the Company’s stock-based compensation plans at the beginning of each respective period, or at the date of grant or award, if later. Shares attributable to stock options and time-vested restricted stock are excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share if the effect would be antidilutive. For both the quarter and nine months ended June 30, 2008, there were no shares attributable to antidilutive outstanding stock options or time-vested restricted stock excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share. For the quarter and nine months ended June 30, 2007, there were 207,500 and 114,500 antidilutive shares, respectively. Performance-contingent restricted stock awards are only included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share to the extent the underlying performance conditions are satisfied (a) prior to the end of the reporting period or (b) would be satisfied if the end of the reporting period were the end of the related contingency period and the result would be dilutive. For both the quarter and nine months ended June 30, 2008, 149,000 shares of nonvested performance-contingent restricted stock were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share. For both the quarter and nine months ended June 30, 2007, 110,000 shares were excluded.

15

	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
(Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)		2008		2007		2008		2007
Basic EPS:
Income from Continuing Operations	$	9,101	$	4,763	$	60,697	$	48,180
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding		21,701		21,478		21,614		21,434
Earnings Per Share of Common Stock from
Continuing Operations	$	0.42	$	0.22	$	2.81	$	2.24
Diluted EPS:
Income from Continuing Operations	$	9,101	$	4,763	$	60,697	$	48,180
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding		21,701		21,478		21,614		21,434
Dilutive Effect of Stock Options
and Restricted Stock		114		41		93		49
Weighted Average Diluted Shares		21,815		21,519		21,707		21,483
Earnings Per Share of Common Stock from
Continuing Operations	$	0.41	$	0.22	$	2.80	$	2.24

4. PENSION PLANS AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS

Laclede Gas has non-contributory defined benefit, trusteed forms of pension plans covering substantially all employees. Benefits are based on years of service and the participant’s compensation during the highest three years of the last ten years of employment. Plan assets consist primarily of corporate and U.S. government obligations and pooled equity funds.

Pension costs for the quarters ending June 30, 2008 and 2007 were $1.5 million and $1.4 million, respectively, including amounts charged to construction. Pension costs for the nine months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 were $4.6 million and $4.1 million, respectively, including amounts charged to construction.

The net periodic pension costs include the following components:

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
(Thousands)	2008			2007			2008			2007
Service cost – benefits earned
during the period	$	3,243		$	3,106		$	9,728		$	9,317
Interest cost on projected
benefit obligation		4,670			4,482			14,010			13,447
Expected return on plan assets		(5,162	)		(5,074	)		(15,487	)		(15,222	)
Amortization of prior service cost		272			284			816			851
Amortization of actuarial loss		791			920			2,373			2,761
Sub-total		3,814			3,718			11,440			11,154
Loss on lump sum settlement		—			—			—			945
Regulatory adjustment		(2,280	)		(2,364	)		(6,840	)		(8,037	)
Net pension cost	$	1,534		$	1,354		$	4,600		$	4,062

Pursuant to the provisions of the Laclede Gas pension plans, pension obligations may be satisfied by lump-sum cash payments. Pursuant to a Missouri Public Service Commission (MoPSC or Commission) Order, lump-sum payments are recognized as settlements (which can result in gains or losses) only if the total of such payments exceeds 100% of the sum of service and interest costs. No lump sum payments were recognized as settlements during the nine months ended June 30, 2008. Lump sum payments recognized as settlements during the nine months ended June 30, 2007 were $2.8 million.

16

Pursuant to a MoPSC Order, the return on plan assets is based on the market-related value of plan assets implemented prospectively over a four-year period. Gains or losses not yet includible in pension cost are amortized only to the extent that such gain or loss exceeds 10% of the greater of the projected benefit obligation or the market-related value of plan assets. Such excess is amortized over the average remaining service life of active participants. The recovery in rates for the Utility’s qualified pension plans is based on an allowance of $4.1 million annually effective October 1, 2005 and $4.8 million annually effective August 1, 2007. The difference between this amount and pension expense as calculated pursuant to the above and that otherwise would be included in the Statements of Consolidated Income and Consolidated Comprehensive Income is deferred as a regulatory asset or regulatory liability.

SM&P maintains a non-qualified, defined benefit plan with four participants that was frozen to new participants in 2002. The plan is a non-qualified plan and therefore has no assets held in trust. Net pension cost related to the plan is not material. The Company sold 100% of its interest in SM&P on March 31, 2008, and the liabilities for this plan remain with SM&P.

Laclede Gas provides certain life insurance benefits at retirement. Medical insurance is available after early retirement until age 65. The transition obligation not yet includible in postretirement benefit cost is being amortized over 20 years. Postretirement benefit costs for the quarters ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 were $1.9 million and $2.0 million, respectively, including amounts charged to construction. Postretirement benefit costs for the nine months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 were $5.7 million and $5.9 million, respectively, including amounts charged to construction.

Net periodic postretirement benefit costs consisted of the following components:

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
(Thousands)	2008			2007			2008			2007
Service cost – benefits earned
during the period	$	1,140		$	1,016		$	3,420		$	3,047
Interest cost on accumulated
postretirement benefit obligation		977			899			2,931			2,699
Expected return on plan assets		(509	)		(430	)		(1,528	)		(1,292	)
Amortization of transition obligation		34			34			102			102
Amortization of prior service cost		(582	)		(582	)		(1,746	)		(1,746	)
Amortization of actuarial loss		746			811			2,238			2,434
Sub-total		1,806			1,748			5,417			5,244
Regulatory adjustment		104			222			314			668
Net postretirement benefit cost	$	1,910		$	1,970		$	5,731		$	5,912

Missouri state law provides for the recovery in rates of SFAS No. 106, “Employers’ Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions,” accrued costs provided that such costs are funded through an independent, external funding mechanism. Laclede Gas established Voluntary Employees’ Beneficiary Association (VEBA) and Rabbi trusts as its external funding mechanisms. VEBA and Rabbi trusts’ assets consist primarily of money market securities and mutual funds invested in stocks and bonds.

Pursuant to a MoPSC Order, the return on plan assets is based on the market-related value of plan assets implemented prospectively over a four-year period. Gains and losses not yet includible in postretirement benefit cost are amortized only to the extent that such gain or loss exceeds 10% of the greater of the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation or the market-related value of plan assets. Such excess is amortized over the average remaining service life of active participants. Previously, the recovery in rates for the postretirement benefit costs was based on an alternative methodology for amortization of unrecognized gains and losses as ordered by the MoPSC. The Commission ordered that the recovery in rates be based on an annual allowance of $7.6 million, effective August 1, 2007. The difference between this amount and postretirement benefit cost based on the above and that otherwise would be included in the Statements of Consolidated Income and Consolidated Comprehensive Income is deferred as a regulatory asset or regulatory liability.

17

5. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

In the course of its business, Laclede Group’s non-regulated gas marketing affiliate, Laclede Energy Resources, Inc. (LER), enters into fixed-price commitments associated with the purchase or sale of natural gas. LER manages the price risk associated with these commitments by either closely matching the offsetting physical purchase or sale of natural gas at fixed prices or through the use of exchange-traded futures contracts to lock in margins. At June 30, 2008, LER’s unmatched positions were not material to Laclede Group’s financial position or results of operations.

Settled and open futures positions were as follows at June 30, 2008:

	Position Month	MMBtu (millions)	Average Price per MMBtu
Settled short positions	July 2008	1.07	$	12.12
Settled long positions	July 2008	0.16		10.82
Open short futures positions	August 2008	1.12		11.67
	September 2008	0.45		9.40
	October 2008	0.18		9.82
	November 2008	0.81		10.02
	December 2008	0.34		9.55
	January 2009	0.31		9.76
	February 2009	0.31		9.74
	March 2009	0.27		9.69
	April 2009	0.03		10.72
	November 2009	0.10		8.80
	December 2009	0.15		8.83
	January 2010	0.15		8.83
	February 2010	0.15		8.83
	March 2010	0.10		8.80
Open long futures positions	August 2008	0.06		7.60
	September 2008	0.06		7.60
	October 2008	0.06		7.60
	November 2008	0.06		7.60
	December 2008	0.06		7.60
	April 2009	0.30		8.94

The above futures contracts are derivative instruments, and management has designated these items as cash flow hedges of forecasted transactions. The fair values of the instruments are recognized on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The change in the fair value of the effective portion of these hedge instruments is recorded, net of tax, in Other Comprehensive Income. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income is a component of Total Common Stock Equity. These amounts will reduce or be charged to Non-Regulated Gas Marketing Operating Revenues or Expenses in the Statements of Consolidated Income as the hedged transactions occur. As of June 30, 2008, it is expected that approximately $10.0 million of pre-tax unrealized losses will be reclassified into the Consolidated Statement of Income during the next twelve months. The ineffective portions of these hedge instruments are charged or credited to Non-Regulated Gas Marketing Operating Revenues or Expenses. The net amount of pre-tax losses recognized in earnings for the ineffective portion of cash flow hedges was $0.9 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 and $1.3 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2008. The net amount of pre-tax gains recognized in earnings for the ineffective portion of cash flow hedges was $0.5 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2007. The net amount of ineffectiveness recognized for the nine months ended June 30, 2007 was not material. Cash flows from hedging transactions are classified in the same category as the cash flows from the items that are being hedged in the Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows.

18

6. LONG-TERM DEBT TO UNCONSOLIDATED AFFILIATE TRUST

In fiscal year 2003, Laclede Group formed Laclede Capital Trust I (Trust), its affiliated, nonconsolidated trust, for the sole purpose of issuing trust securities and investing the gross proceeds of the sale of the trust securities in debt securities of Laclede Group. All of the Trust securities had a liquidation value of $25 per share and a dividend rate of 7.70%, with all of its common securities being owned by Laclede Group and all of its preferred securities being sold to the public. The Trust’s sole asset was the Company’s $46.4 million aggregate principal amount of 7.70% debentures due December 1, 2032, which had the same economic terms as the Trust securities and were reflected as Long-term debt to unconsolidated affiliate trust on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company’s investment in the Trust common securities was included on the Other investments line on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

On May 5, 2008, Laclede Group redeemed in full its $46.4 million subordinated debentures, which also triggered the redemption of all of the Trust common and preferred securities on the same date. Interest on the debentures and distributions on the Trust securities ceased on and after the redemption date. Upon redemption, Laclede Group recognized a pre-tax loss of $1.4 million, primarily attributable to unamortized issuance costs. A portion of the proceeds received from the sale of SM&P was used to fund the redemption. The Trust was dissolved on June 16, 2008.

7. INCOME TAXES

The Company adopted the provisions of FIN 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes,” as of October 1, 2007. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” Pursuant to FIN 48, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from a tax position only if it is at least more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position.

Upon adoption of FIN 48, the Company recognized a reduction to beginning retained earnings as a cumulative-effect adjustment totaling $1.1 million, reclassified $2.5 million of income tax liabilities from current to non-current liabilities, and increased its liabilities for accrued interest and penalties. Total unrecognized tax benefits as of October 1, 2007 were $2.1 million, all of which would have favorably impacted the effective tax rate, if recognized. The Company recognizes potential accrued interest and penalties related to its uncertain tax positions as interest expense and other income deductions, respectively. Potential interest and penalties accrued (net of income tax benefit) associated with the Company’s uncertain tax positions were $1.5 million at October 1, 2007. Unrecognized tax benefits, accrued interest payable, and accrued penalties payable are included in the Other line of the Deferred Credits and Other Liabilities section of the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The Company is subject to U.S. federal income tax as well as income tax of state and local jurisdictions. The Company is no longer subject to examination for fiscal years prior to 2005. The federal statute of limitations remains open until June 15, 2009 and 2010 for fiscal years 2005 and 2006, respectively. However, during the quarter ended March 31, 2008, the Company effectively settled an audit with the Internal Revenue Service for those periods. Completion of the audit represents an event requiring the Company to re-evaluate its uncertain tax positions. As a result, the Company recognized fiscal years 2005 and 2006 unrecognized tax benefits of $1.0 million, which favorably impacted the effective tax rate, and reversed $1.6 million of accrued interest and penalties (net of income tax benefit). During the quarter ended June 30, 2008, the statute of limitations for the Company’s fiscal year 2004 expired. As a result, previously unrecognized tax benefits of $0.3 million were recognized by the Company, which favorably impacted the effective tax rate, and $0.1 million of related accrued interest and penalties were reversed (net of income tax benefit).

Total FIN 48 unrecognized tax benefits at June 30, 2008 were $0.9 million, all of which would favorably impact the effective tax rate, if recognized. Potential interest and penalties associated with these liabilities were immaterial. The Company does not expect to make any significant tax payment related to any of the above obligations within the next twelve months.

19

8. OTHER INCOME AND (INCOME DEDUCTIONS) – NET

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
(Thousands)	2008			2007			2008			2007
Allowance for funds used during construction	$	(21	)	$	(2	)	$	(46	)	$	(18	)
Interest income		738			835			3,558			4,072
Other income		472			376			1,192			922
Other income deductions		(2,025	)		(182	)		(1,815	)		427
Other Income and (Income Deductions) – Net	$	(836	)	$	1,027		$	2,889		$	5,403

The decrease in Other Income and (Income Deductions) – Net for the nine months ended June 30, 2008, compared with the nine months ended June 30, 2007, was primarily due to higher investment losses, a loss on the redemption of long-term debt (primarily unamortized issuance costs), lower income associated with carrying costs applied to under-recoveries of gas costs, and reduced income associated with changes in the cash surrender value of life insurance policies. These factors were partially offset by a reversal of tax-related expenses and additional proceeds related to the Company’s interest, as a policyholder, in the sale of a mutual insurance company. Carrying costs on under-recoveries of gas costs are recovered through the Utility’s Purchased Gas Adjustment (PGA) Clause.

9. INFORMATION BY OPERATING SEGMENT

All of Laclede Group’s subsidiaries are wholly owned. The Regulated Gas Distribution segment consists of the regulated operations of Laclede Gas and is the core business segment of Laclede Group. Laclede Gas is a public utility engaged in the retail distribution and sale of natural gas serving an area in eastern Missouri, with a population of approximately 2.1 million, including the City of St. Louis and parts of ten other counties in eastern Missouri. The Non-Regulated Gas Marketing segment includes the results of LER, a subsidiary engaged in the non-regulated marketing of natural gas and related activities. Other includes Laclede Pipeline Company’s transportation of liquid propane regulated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) as well as non-regulated activities, including real estate development, the compression of natural gas, and financial investments in other enterprises. These operations are conducted through five subsidiaries. Other also includes Laclede Gas’ non-regulated merchandise sales business. Certain intersegment revenues with Laclede Gas are not eliminated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 71, “Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types of Regulation.” Those types of transactions include sales of natural gas from Laclede Gas to LER, sales of natural gas from LER to Laclede Gas, and transportation services provided by Laclede Pipeline Company to Laclede Gas. These revenues are shown on the Intersegment Revenues lines in the table under Regulated Gas Distribution, Non-Regulated Gas Marketing, and Other columns, respectively.

Previously, SM&P comprised the Non-Regulated Services segment and its financial information was presented separately. As discussed in Note 2, Discontinued Operations, the Company sold SM&P on March 31, 2008. Accordingly, financial information for this segment has been reclassified and reported as discontinued operations in the Consolidated Financial Statements. Under generally accepted accounting principles, general corporate overhead expenses may not be reported in discontinued operations. Amounts of such expenses that were previously reported by SM&P but that are required to be reported in continuing operations are reflected in the Unallocated & Eliminations column of the table below. Prior periods reported in the table below have been reclassified to conform to the current-period presentation of segment information.

20

			Non-
	Regulated		Regulated					Unallocated
	Gas		Gas					&
(Thousands)	Distribution		Marketing		Other			Eliminations			Consolidated
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2008
Revenues from external
customers	$	189,597	$	311,609	$	984		$	—		$	502,190
Intersegment revenues		1		3,037		260			—			3,298
Total operating revenues		189,598		314,646		1,244			—			505,488
Income (loss) from continuing
operations		5,501		4,267		(667	)		—			9,101
Total assets of continuing
operations		1,382,002		177,893		113,369			(112,078	)		1,561,186
Nine Months Ended
June 30, 2008
Revenues from external
customers	$	1,016,302	$	728,017	$	2,995		$	—		$	1,747,314
Intersegment revenues		1,277		7,814		779			—			9,870
Total operating revenues		1,017,579		735,831		3,774			—			1,757,184
Income (loss) from continuing
operations		46,579		14,782		(400	)		(264	)		60,697
Total assets of continuing
operations		1,382,002		177,893		113,369			(112,078	)		1,561,186
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2007
Revenues from external
customers	$	168,673	$	213,036	$	1,493		$	—		$	383,202
Intersegment revenues		17,023		5,735		260			—			23,018
Total operating revenues		185,696		218,771		1,753			—			406,220
Income (loss) from continuing
operations		846		3,854		292			(229	)		4,763
Total assets of continuing
operations		1,288,098		130,417		78,208			(68,428	)		1,428,295
Nine Months Ended
June 30, 2007
Revenues from external
customers	$	992,383	$	508,561	$	3,408		$	—		$	1,504,352
Intersegment revenues		35,394		39,527		779			—			75,700
Total operating revenues		1,027,777		548,088		4,187			—			1,580,052
Income (loss) from continuing
operations		37,214		10,971		580			(585	)		48,180
Total assets of continuing
operations		1,288,098		130,417		78,208			(68,428	)		1,428,295

21

10. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Laclede Gas owns and operates natural gas distribution, transmission, and storage facilities, the operations of which are subject to various environmental laws, regulations, and interpretations. While environmental issues resulting from such operations arise in the ordinary course of business, such issues have not materially affected the Company’s or Laclede Gas’ financial position and results of operations. As environmental laws, regulations, and their interpretations change, however, Laclede Gas may be required to incur additional costs. See Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s Fiscal Year 2007 Form 10-K for information relative to environmental matters generally. There have been no significant changes relative to environmental matters during the nine months ended June 30, 2008.

On December 28, 2006, the MoPSC Staff proposed a disallowance of $7.2 million related to Laclede Gas’ recovery of its purchased gas costs applicable to fiscal 2005. On September 14, 2007, the Staff withdrew its pursuit of $5.5 million of the disallowance it had originally proposed. Laclede Gas believes that the remaining $1.7 million of the MoPSC Staff’s proposed disallowance lacks merit and intends to vigorously oppose the adjustment in proceedings before the MoPSC.

On December 31, 2007, the MoPSC Staff filed a memorandum with the Commission proposing a disallowance of $2.8 million related to Laclede Gas’ recovery of its purchased gas costs applicable to fiscal 2006. Laclede Gas believes that the MoPSC Staff’s position lacks merit and intends to vigorously oppose the adjustment in proceedings before the MoPSC. In addition, the MoPSC’s Staff’s memorandum raised questions regarding whether certain sales and capacity release transactions subject to the FERC’s oversight were consistent with the FERC’s regulations and policies regarding capacity release. The Company commenced an internal review of the questions raised by the MoPSC Staff and notified the FERC Staff that it took this action. Subsequently, as a result of the internal review, the Company has provided the FERC Staff with a report regarding compliance of sales and capacity release activities with the FERC’s regulations and policies. On July 23, 2008, the FERC Staff requested additional information, which will be provided by the Company.

As reported in Note 2, Discontinued Operations, during the quarter ended March 31, 2008, the Company sold 100% of its interest in its wholly-owned subsidiary SM&P. The sales agreement (Agreement) includes representations and warranties customary for such transactions, including, among others, representations and warranties of the parties as to brokers’ fees; of SM&P as to its financial status, contracts, title to and condition of personal and real property, taxes, legal compliance, environmental matters, employee benefits, and intellectual property. The Agreement also includes customary indemnification provisions under which Laclede’s aggregate indemnification obligations are limited to a maximum of $7.0 million for most claims. Obligations subject to this maximum apply only in the event claims exceed a stated deductible, both individually and in the aggregate. However, this maximum limitation and deductible do not apply to obligations associated with taxes, employee benefits, title to personal property, and certain other fundamental representations and warranties. A maximum potential future payment amount cannot be estimated for these obligations. The terms of the indemnifications in the Agreement are generally dependent upon the statute of limitations applicable to the particular representations and warranties made by the Company, although certain representations and warranties have an indefinite life under the Agreement. As of June 30, 2008, the carrying amount of the liability recognized for these indemnification obligations was $0.2 million, based on the Company’s assessment of risk.

Laclede Group is involved in other litigation, claims, and investigations arising in the normal course of business. While the results of such litigation cannot be predicted with certainty, management, after discussion with counsel, believes that the final outcome will not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position or results of operations of the Company.

Laclede Gas has several operating leases for the rental of vehicles that contain provisions requiring Laclede Gas to guarantee certain amounts related to the residual value of the leased property. These leases have various terms, the longest of which extends through 2014. At June 30, 2008, the maximum guarantees under these leases were $1.7 million. However, the Utility estimates that the residual value of the leased vehicles will be adequate to satisfy most of the guaranteed amounts. At June 30, 2008, the carrying value of the liability recognized for these guarantees was $0.3 million.

Laclede Gas and LER have entered into various contracts, expiring on dates through 2017, for the storage, transportation, and supply of natural gas. Minimum payments required under the contracts in place at June 30, 2008 are estimated at approximately $2.7 billion. Additional contracts are generally entered into prior to or during the heating season.

Laclede Group had guarantees totaling $57.5 million for performance and payment of certain wholesale gas supply purchases by LER, as of June 30, 2008. Since that date, total guarantees issued by Laclede Group on behalf of LER increased by $1.0 million bringing the total to $58.5 million in guarantees outstanding at August 4, 2008. No amounts have been recorded for these guarantees in the financial statements.

Laclede Gas Company’s Financial Statements and Notes to Financial Statements are included in Exhibit 99.1 to this report.

22

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

THE LACLEDE GROUP, INC.

This management’s discussion analyzes the financial condition and results of operations of The Laclede Group, Inc. (Laclede Group or the Company) and its subsidiaries. It includes management’s view of factors that affect its business, explanations of past financial results including changes in earnings and costs from the prior year periods, and their effects on overall financial condition and liquidity.

Certain matters discussed in this report, excluding historical information, include forward-looking statements. Certain words, such as “may,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “seek,” and similar words and expressions identify forward-looking statements that involve uncertainties and risks. Future developments may not be in accordance with our expectations or beliefs and the effect of future developments may not be those anticipated. Among the factors that may cause results to differ materially from those contemplated in any forward-looking statement are:

• weather conditions and catastrophic events, particularly severe weather in the natural gas producing areas of the country;

• volatility in gas prices, particularly sudden and sustained spikes in natural gas prices;

• the impact of higher natural gas prices on our competitive position in relation to suppliers of alternative heating sources, such as electricity;

• changes in gas supply and pipeline availability; particularly those changes that impact supply for and access to our market area;

• legislative, regulatory and judicial mandates and decisions, some of which may be retroactive, including those affecting

• allowed rates of return

• incentive regulation

• industry structure

• purchased gas adjustment provisions

• rate design structure and implementation

• franchise renewals

• environmental or safety matters

• taxes

• pension and other postretirement benefit liabilities and funding obligations

• accounting standards;

• the results of litigation;

• retention of, ability to attract, ability to collect from and conservation efforts of customers;

• capital and energy commodity market conditions, including the ability to obtain funds for necessary capital expenditures and general operations and the terms and conditions imposed for obtaining sufficient gas supply;

• discovery of material weakness in internal controls; and

• employee workforce issues.

Readers are urged to consider the risks, uncertainties and other factors that could affect our business as described in this report. All forward-looking statements made in this report rely upon the safe harbor protections provided under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. We do not, by including this statement, assume any obligation to review or revise any particular forward-looking statement in light of future events.

The Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes thereto.

23

THE LACLEDE GROUP, INC.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Laclede Group’s earnings are primarily derived from the regulated activities of its largest subsidiary, Laclede Gas Company (Laclede Gas or the Utility), Missouri’s largest natural gas distribution company. Laclede Gas is regulated by the Missouri Public Service Commission (MoPSC or Commission) and serves the City of St. Louis and parts of ten other counties in eastern Missouri. Laclede Gas delivers natural gas to retail customers at rates, and in accordance with tariffs, authorized by the MoPSC. The Utility’s earnings are primarily generated by the sale of heating energy. The Utility’s innovative weather mitigation rate design lessens the impact of weather volatility on Laclede Gas customers during cold winters and stabilizes the Utility’s earnings by recovering fixed costs more evenly during the heating season. Due to the seasonal nature of the business of Laclede Gas, Laclede Group’s earnings are seasonal in nature and are typically concentrated in the November through April period, which generally corresponds with the heating season.

On March 31, 2008, the Company completed the sale of 100% of its interest in its wholly-owned subsidiary SM&P Utility Resources, Inc. (SM&P) to Stripe Acquisition, Inc. (an affiliate of Kohlberg Management VI, LLC) for $85 million in cash, subject to certain closing and post-closing adjustments. SM&P is an underground facilities locating and marking business that comprised Laclede Group’s Non-Regulated Services operating segment. The sales agreement included representations, warranties, and indemnification provisions customary for such transactions and was filed as an exhibit to the March 31, 2008 Form 10-Q. In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, the results of operations for SM&P are reported as discontinued operations in the Consolidated Statements of Income and its associated assets and liabilities are classified separately in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Laclede Energy Resources, Inc. (LER) is engaged in the non-regulated marketing of natural gas and related activities. LER markets natural gas to both on-system Utility transportation customers and customers outside of Laclede Gas’ traditional service territory, including large retail and wholesale customers. As such, LER’s operations and customer base are subject to fluctuations in market conditions.

Other subsidiaries provide less than 10% of consolidated revenues.

Laclede Group’s strategy continues to include efforts to stabilize and improve the performance of its core Utility, while developing non-regulated businesses and taking a measured approach in the pursuit of additional growth opportunities that complement the Utility business.

As for the Utility, mitigating the impact of weather fluctuations on Laclede Gas customers while improving the ability to recover its authorized distribution costs and return continues to be a fundamental component of Laclede Group’s strategy. The Utility’s distribution costs are the essential, primarily fixed expenditures it must incur to operate and maintain a more than 16,000 mile natural gas distribution system and related storage facilities. With regard to the storage facilities owned by Laclede Gas, management is currently undertaking an evaluation of the Utility’s natural gas storage field, which was developed more than 50 years ago, to assess the field’s current and future capabilities. In addition, Laclede Gas is working to continually improve its ability to provide reliable natural gas service at a reasonable cost, while maintaining and building a secure and dependable infrastructure. The settlement of the Utility’s 2007 rate case resulted in enhancements to the Utility’s weather mitigation rate design that better ensure the recovery of its fixed costs and margins despite variations in sales volumes due to the impacts of weather and other factors that affect customer usage. The Utility’s income from off-system sales remains subject to fluctuations in market conditions. In conjunction with the settlement of the 2005 rate case, effective October 1, 2005, the Utility retained all pre-tax income from off-system sales and capacity release revenues up to $12 million annually. Pre-tax amounts in excess of $12 million were shared with customers, with the Utility retaining 50% of amounts exceeding that threshold. The Stipulation & Agreement approved by the MoPSC in the Utility’s 2007 rate case increases the portion of pre-tax income from off-system sales and capacity release revenues that is shared with customers. Effective October 1, 2007, the Utility is allowed to retain 15% to 25% of the first $6 million in annual income earned (depending on the level of income earned) and 30% of income exceeding $6 million annually. Some of the factors impacting the level of off-system sales include the availability and cost of the Utility’s natural gas supply, the weather in its service area, and the weather in other markets. When Laclede Gas’ service area experiences warmer-than-normal weather while other markets experience colder weather or supply constraints, some of the Utility’s natural gas supply is available for off-system sales and there may be a demand for such supply in other markets.

24

Laclede Gas continues to work actively to reduce the impact of higher costs associated with wholesale natural gas prices by strategically structuring its natural gas supply portfolio and through the use of financial instruments. Nevertheless, the cost of purchased gas remains high, relative to historical levels. The Utility’s Purchased Gas Adjustment (PGA) Clause allows Laclede Gas to flow through to customers, subject to prudence review, the cost of purchased gas supplies, including costs, cost reductions, and related carrying costs associated with the use of financial instruments to hedge the purchase price of natural gas, as well as gas inventory carrying costs. The Utility believes it will continue to be able to obtain sufficient gas supply. The generally higher price levels may continue to affect sales volumes (due to the conservation efforts of customers) and cash flows (associated with the timing of collection of gas costs and related accounts receivable from customers).

Laclede Group continues to develop its other subsidiaries. LER continues to focus on growing its markets on a long-term and sustainable basis by providing both on-system Utility transportation customers and customers outside of Laclede Gas’ traditional service area with another choice in non-regulated natural gas suppliers. Nevertheless, income from LER’s operations is subject to fluctuations in market conditions.

Quarter Ended June 30, 2008

Earnings

Overview – Net Income (Loss) by Operating Segment	Quarter Ended
	June 30,
(Millions, After-tax)		2008			2007
Regulated Gas Distribution	$	5.5		$	0.9
Non-Regulated Gas Marketing		4.3			3.9
Other		(0.7	)		—
Income from Continuing Operations		9.1			4.8
Income from Discontinued Operations		0.2			4.5
Net Income	$	9.3		$	9.3

Laclede Group’s consolidated net income was $9.3 million for both the quarters ended June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2007. Basic and diluted earnings per share were $0.43 and $0.42, respectively, for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, compared with basic and diluted earnings per share of $0.43 for the quarter ended June 30, 2007. Results for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 included the effect of SM&P’s seasonal operating income, reported as discontinued operations this year as a result of the sale of SM&P on March 31, 2008. Consolidated net income was unchanged from the same period last year despite the absence of earnings this year from SM&P, the impact of which was offset by higher income reported by both Laclede Group’s regulated gas distribution and non-regulated gas marketing segments.

Income from Continuing Operations

Laclede Group’s income from continuing operations was $9.1 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, compared with $4.8 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2007. Basic and diluted earnings per share from continuing operations were $0.42 and $0.41, respectively, for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, compared with basic and diluted earnings per share of $0.22 for the quarter ended June 30, 2007. Earnings results reported by both Laclede Group’s regulated gas distribution and non-regulated gas marketing segments increased over the quarter ended June 30, 2007. Variations in income from continuing operations were primarily attributable to the factors described below.

Regulated Gas Distribution net income increased by $4.6 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, compared with the quarter ended June 30, 2007. The increase in net income was primarily due to the following factors, quantified on a pre-tax basis:

• the benefit of the general rate increase, effective August 1, 2007, totaling $8.7 million; and,

• interim benefits of a rate design change, effective August 1, 2007, and other variations totaling $5.1 million.

25

These factors were partially offset by:

• increases in operation and maintenance expenses, excluding the provision for uncollectible accounts, totaling $3.1 million;

• an increase in the provision for uncollectible accounts, totaling $2.6 million; and,

• lower income from off-system sales and capacity release, totaling $2.0 million, primarily due to a reduction in the Utility’s share of such income (pursuant to the 2007 rate case).

The Non-Regulated Gas Marketing segment reported an increase in earnings of $0.4 million, compared with the same quarter last year, primarily due to higher margins on sales of natural gas by LER and slightly higher sales volumes.

Regulated Operating Revenues and Operating Expenses

Laclede Gas passes on to Utility customers (subject to prudence review) increases and decreases in the wholesale cost of natural gas in accordance with its PGA Clause. The volatility of the wholesale natural gas market results in fluctuations from period to period in the recorded levels of, among other items, revenues and natural gas cost expense. Nevertheless, increases and decreases in the cost of gas associated with system gas sales volumes have no direct effect on net revenues and net income.

Regulated gas distribution operating revenues for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 were $189.6 million, or $3.9 million more than the same quarter last year. Temperatures experienced in the Utility’s service area during the quarter were 16.1% colder than the same quarter last year and 28.4% colder than normal. Total system therms sold and transported were 0.13 billion for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, compared with 0.14 billion for the same quarter last year. Total off-system therms sold and transported were 0.03 billion for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, compared with 0.05 billion for the same quarter last year. The increase in regulated operating revenues was primarily attributable to the following factors:

	Quarter Ended
(Millions)	June 30, 2008
Lower off-system sales volumes		$	(15.4	)
Higher prices charged for off-system sales			11.2
General rate increase, effective August 1, 2007			8.7
Higher charges for system gas sales and other variations			4.0
Lower wholesale gas costs passed on to Utility customers (subject to prudence review by the MoPSC)			(4.0	)
Lower Infrastructure System Replacement Surcharge (ISRS) revenues			(0.6	)
Total Variation		$	3.9

Regulated operating expenses for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 decreased $1.4 million from the same quarter last year. Natural and propane gas expense decreased $8.6 million, or 7.1%, from last year’s level, primarily attributable to lower rates charged by our suppliers, lower off-system gas expense, and lower system volumes purchased for sendout. Other operation and maintenance expenses increased $5.7 million, or 16.3%, primarily due to a higher provision for uncollectible accounts, increased maintenance and distribution charges, higher legal fees, and increased group insurance charges. These factors were partially offset by decreased injuries and damages expenses. Taxes, other than income, increased $1.2 million, or 8.9%, primarily due to higher gross receipts taxes (attributable to the increased revenues).

Non-Regulated Gas Marketing Operating Revenues and Operating Expenses

Non-regulated gas marketing operating revenues increased $95.9 million, primarily due to increased per unit gas sales prices charged by LER and increased sales volumes. The increase in non-regulated gas marketing operating expenses totaling $95.1 million was primarily associated with higher prices charged by suppliers and increased volumes purchased.

Other Income and (Income Deductions) – Net

The $1.9 million decrease in other income and (income deductions) – net was primarily due to a loss on the redemption of long-term debt (primarily unamortized issuance costs), higher investment losses, and lower income associated with carrying costs applied to under-recoveries of gas costs. Carrying costs on under-recoveries of gas costs are recovered through the Utility’s PGA Clause.

26

Interest Charges

The $1.1 million decrease in interest charges was primarily due to a reduction in interest on long-term debt resulting from the November 2007 maturity of $40 million principal amount of 7 1/2% First Mortgage Bonds.

Income Taxes

The $1.0 million increase in income taxes was primarily due to higher pre-tax income, partially offset by the recognition of previously unrecognized tax benefits recorded pursuant to Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48), “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes,” and the net effect of various property-related deductions.

Income from Discontinued Operations

Laclede Group closed on the sale of 100% of its interest in SM&P on March 31, 2008. Income from discontinued operations for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 was $4.5 million, attributable to SM&P’s seasonal operating income. Basic and diluted earnings per share from discontinued operations for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 were $0.21.

Nine Months Ended June 30, 2008

Earnings

Overview – Net Income (Loss) by Operating Segment	Nine Months Ended
	June 30,
(Millions, After-tax)		2008			2007
Regulated Gas Distribution	$	46.6		$	37.2
Non-Regulated Gas Marketing		14.8			11.0
Other		(0.7	)		—
Income from Continuing Operations		60.7			48.2
Income from Discontinued Operations		20.8			1.0
Net Income	$	81.5		$	49.2

Laclede Group’s consolidated net income was $81.5 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2008, compared with $49.2 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2007. Basic and diluted earnings per share were $3.77 and $3.76, respectively, for the nine months ended June 30, 2008, compared with basic and diluted earnings per share of $2.29 for the nine months ended June 30, 2007. Earnings per share increased compared to last year largely due to the one-time gain realized on the sale of Laclede Group’s wholly-owned subsidiary, SM&P. Earnings results reported by both Laclede Group’s regulated gas distribution segment and its non-regulated gas marketing segment also increased over the nine months ended June 30, 2007.

Income from Continuing Operations

Laclede Group’s income from continuing operations was $60.7 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2008, compared with $48.2 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2007. Basic and diluted earnings per share from continuing operations were $2.81 and $2.80, respectively, for the nine months ended June 30, 2008, compared with basic and diluted earnings per share of $2.24 for the nine months ended June 30, 2007. Earnings results reported by both Laclede Group’s regulated gas distribution segment and its non-regulated gas marketing segment increased over the same period last year. Variations in income from continuing operations were primarily attributable to the factors described below.

27

Regulated Gas Distribution net income increased by $9.4 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2008, compared with the nine months ended June 30, 2007. The increase in net income was primarily due to the following factors, quantified on a pre-tax basis:

• the benefit of the general rate increase, effective August 1, 2007, totaling $30.4 million;

• the effect of higher system gas sales volumes and other variations totaling $2.3 million; and,

• the recognition of previously unrecognized tax benefits and the reversal of related expenses, totaling $1.5 million.

These factors were partially offset by:

• lower income from off-system sales and capacity release, totaling $9.5 million, primarily due to a reduction in the Utility’s share of such income (pursuant to the 2007 rate case);

• an increase in the provision for uncollectible accounts, totaling $4.9 million; and,

• increases in operation and maintenance expenses, excluding the provision for uncollectible accounts, totaling $4.9 million.

The Non-Regulated Gas Marketing segment reported an increase in earnings of $3.8 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2008, compared with the same period last year, primarily due to higher margins on sales of natural gas by LER, increased sales volumes, and the reversal of tax-related expenses.

Regulated Operating Revenues and Operating Expenses

Regulated gas distribution operating revenues for the nine months ended June 30, 2008 were $1.0 billion, or $10.2 million less than the same period last year. Temperatures experienced in the Utility’s service area during the nine months ended June 30, 2008 were 6.8% colder than the same period last year, but 0.6% warmer than normal. Total system therms sold and transported were 0.85 billion for the nine months ended June 30, 2008, compared with 0.82 billion for the same period last year. Total off-system therms sold and transported were 0.14 billion for the nine months ended June 30, 2008, compared with 0.21 billion for the same period last year. Increases and decreases in the cost of gas associated with system gas sales volumes have no direct effect on net revenues and net income. The decrease in regulated operating revenues was primarily attributable to the following factors:

	Nine Months
	Ended
(Millions)	June 30, 2008
Lower off-system sales volumes		$	(48.6	)
Lower wholesale gas costs passed on to Utility customers (subject to prudence review by the MoPSC)			(47.2	)
Higher system sales volumes, primarily due to colder weather, and other variations			34.0
General rate increase, effective August 1, 2007			30.4
Higher prices charged for off-system sales			22.8
Lower ISRS revenues			(1.6	)
Total Variation		$	(10.2	)

Regulated operating expenses for the nine months ended June 30, 2008 decreased $22.8 million from the same period last year. Natural and propane gas expense decreased $33.3 million, or 4.5%, from last year’s level, primarily attributable to lower rates charged by our suppliers and lower off-system gas expense, partially offset by increased system volumes purchased for sendout. Other operation and maintenance expenses increased $9.8 million, or 8.4%, primarily due to a higher provision for uncollectible accounts, increased maintenance and distribution expenses, higher legal fees, increased pension costs, the effect of a gain on the disposal of assets recorded last year, and higher wage rates. Depreciation and amortization expense increased $0.7 million, or 2.6%, primarily due to additional depreciable property.

Non-Regulated Gas Marketing Operating Revenues and Operating Expenses

Non-regulated gas marketing operating revenues increased $187.7 million, primarily due to higher per unit gas sales prices charged by LER and increased sales volumes. The increase in non-regulated gas marketing operating expenses totaling $183.4 million was primarily associated higher prices charged by suppliers and increased volumes purchased.

28

Other Income and (Income Deductions) – Net

The $2.5 million decrease in other income and (income deductions) – net was primarily due to higher investment losses, a loss on the redemption of long-term debt (primarily unamortized issuance costs), lower income associated with carrying costs applied to under-recoveries of gas costs, and reduced income associated with changes in the cash surrender value of life insurance policies. These factors were partially offset by a reversal of tax-related expenses and additional proceeds related to the Company’s interest, as a policyholder, in the sale of a mutual insurance company. Carrying costs on under-recoveries of gas costs are recovered through the Utility’s PGA Clause.

Interest Charges

The $2.5 million decrease in interest charges was primarily due to a reduction in interest on long-term debt resulting from the November 2007 maturity of $40 million principal amount of 7 1/2% First Mortgage Bonds and the reversal of tax-related expenses.

Income Taxes

The $4.6 million increase in income taxes was primarily due to higher pre-tax income, partially offset by the recognition of previously unrecognized tax benefits recorded pursuant to FIN 48.

Income from Discontinued Operations

The sale of SM&P on March 31, 2008 resulted in after-tax earnings of approximately $26 million, net of associated costs of disposal. Income from discontinued operations for the nine months ended June 30, 2008 was $20.8 million, consisting of the net effect of the sale and SM&P’s seasonal operating loss through the March 31 sale date. Income from discontinued operations was $1.0 million for the same period last year, reflecting SM&P’s operating income for the period. Basic and diluted earnings per share from discontinued operations were $0.96 for the nine months ended June 30, 2008, compared with basic and diluted earnings per share of $0.05 for the same period last year.

Labor Agreement

Laclede Gas’ labor agreement with Locals 11-6 and 11-194 of the United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied-Industrial and Service Workers International Union (Union), which represents approximately 65% of Laclede Gas’ employees, expired at midnight, July 31, 2008. On August 4, 2008, Laclede Gas and Union representatives reached a new four-year labor agreement replacing the prior agreement. The new contract will expire at midnight on July 31, 2012.

REGULATORY MATTERS

During fiscal 2006, the MoPSC approved permanent modifications to the Cold Weather Rule affecting the disconnection and reconnection practices of utilities during the winter heating season. Those modifications included provisions to allow the Utility to obtain accounting authorizations and defer for future recovery certain costs incurred with the modifications. During fiscal 2007, the Utility deferred for future recovery $2.7 million of costs associated with the fiscal 2007 heating season. On October 31, 2007, the Utility filed for determination and subsequent recovery of the deferred amount. On November 16, 2007, the MoPSC directed the MoPSC Staff and the Missouri Office of Public Counsel (Public Counsel) to submit their positions regarding the Utility’s filing by February 28, 2008. On February 28, 2008, the Utility and the MoPSC Staff filed a Non-unanimous Stipulation & Agreement in which these parties agreed to a recovery of $2.5 million of costs. The Non-unanimous Stipulation & Agreement was opposed by Public Counsel, and a hearing in this matter was held before the Commission on March 31, 2008. On April 17, 2008, the Commission issued its Report and Order approving the $2.5 million cost recovery recommended by the Utility and the MoPSC Staff. Consistent with the approved amount, the Utility recorded a reduction in its deferral totaling $0.2 million during the quarter ended March 31, 2008. On May 29, 2008, Public Counsel appealed the MoPSC’s April 17 Order to the Cole County, Missouri Circuit Court. Laclede Gas believes that Public Counsel’s appeal is without merit and intends to vigorously oppose the appeal.

29

On November 9, 2007, the Utility made an ISRS filing with the Commission designed to increase revenues by $1.6 million annually. On January 15, 2008, the Commission approved implementation of the surcharge to be effective January 18, 2008. On April 25, 2008, the Utility made an ISRS filing with the Commission designed to increase revenues by $1.9 million annually. On June 24, 2008, the Commission approved implementation of the surcharge in the full amount requested, effective June 30, 2008.

On December 28, 2006, the MoPSC Staff proposed a disallowance of $7.2 million related to Laclede Gas’ recovery of its purchased gas costs applicable to fiscal 2005. On September 14, 2007, the Staff withdrew its pursuit of $5.5 million of the disallowance it had originally proposed. Laclede Gas believes that the remaining $1.7 million of the MoPSC Staff’s proposed disallowance lacks merit and intends to vigorously oppose the adjustment in proceedings before the MoPSC.

On December 31, 2007, the MoPSC Staff filed a memorandum with the Commission proposing a disallowance of $2.8 million related to Laclede Gas’ recovery of its purchased gas costs applicable to fiscal 2006. Laclede Gas believes that the MoPSC Staff’s position lacks merit and intends to vigorously oppose the adjustment in proceedings before the MoPSC. In addition, the MoPSC’s Staff’s memorandum raised questions regarding whether certain sales and capacity release transactions, subject to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)’s oversight, were consistent with the FERC’s regulations and policies regarding capacity release. The Company commenced an internal review of the questions raised by the MoPSC Staff and notified the FERC Staff that it took this action. Subsequently, as a result of the internal review, the Company has provided the FERC Staff with a report regarding compliance of sales and capacity release activities with the FERC’s regulations and policies. On July 23, 2008, the FERC Staff requested additional information, which will be provided by the Company.

On July 9, 2008, Laclede Gas made a tariff filing with the MoPSC that would make the payment provisions for the restoration of gas service under the Utility’s Cold Weather Rule available to customers in the summer of 2008 and enable the Utility to increase or decrease its PGA rates to correct for any shortfall or surplus created by the difference between the gas cost portion of the Utility’s actual net bad debt write-offs and the amount of such cost that is embedded in its existing rates. Such filing is pending before the MoPSC.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, and capital resources is based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Generally accepted accounting principles require that we make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We evaluate our estimates on an ongoing basis. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates. We believe the following represent the more significant items requiring the use of judgment and estimates in preparing our consolidated financial statements:

Allowances for doubtful accounts – Estimates of the collectibility of trade accounts receivable are based on historical trends, age of receivables, economic conditions, credit risk of specific customers, and other factors. The Utility’s provision for uncollectible accounts is dependent on the regulatory treatment provided for such costs. As approved by the MoPSC, the Utility is allowed to defer for future recovery certain costs associated with amendments to the Cold Weather Rule.

Employee benefits and postretirement obligations – Pension and postretirement obligations are calculated by actuarial consultants that utilize several statistical factors and other assumptions related to future events, such as discount rates, returns on plan assets, compensation increases, and mortality rates. For the Utility, the amount of expense recognized and the amounts reflected in other comprehensive income are dependent upon the regulatory treatment provided for such costs, as discussed further below. Certain liabilities related to group medical benefits and workers’ compensation claims, portions of which are self-insured and/or contain “stop-loss” coverage with third-party insurers to limit exposure, are established based on historical trends.

30

Laclede Gas accounts for its regulated operations in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 71, “Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types of Regulation.” This Statement sets forth the application of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for those companies whose rates are established by or are subject to approval by an independent third-party regulator. The provisions of SFAS No. 71 require, among other things, that financial statements of a regulated enterprise reflect the actions of regulators, where appropriate. These actions may result in the recognition of revenues and expenses in time periods that are different than non-regulated enterprises. When this occurs, costs are deferred as assets in the balance sheet (regulatory assets) and recorded as expenses when those amounts are reflected in rates. Also, regulators can impose liabilities upon a regulated company for amounts previously collected from customers and for recovery of costs that are expected to be incurred in the future (regulatory liabilities). Management believes that the current regulatory environment supports the continued use of SFAS No. 71 and that all regulatory assets and regulatory liabilities are recoverable or refundable through the regulatory process. Management believes the following represent the more significant items recorded through the application of SFAS No. 71:

The Utility’s PGA Clause allows Laclede Gas to flow through to customers, subject to prudence review, the cost of purchased gas supplies, including the costs, cost reductions, and related carrying costs associated with the Utility’s use of natural gas financial instruments to hedge the purchase price of natural gas. The difference between actual costs incurred and costs recovered through the application of the PGA are recorded as regulatory assets and regulatory liabilities that are recovered or refunded in a subsequent period. The PGA Clause also authorizes the Utility to recover costs it incurs to finance its investment in gas supplies that are purchased during the storage injection season for sale during the heating season. The PGA Clause also permits the application of carrying costs to all over- or under-recoveries of gas costs, including costs and cost reductions associated with the use of financial instruments. Effective October 1, 2007, the PGA Clause also provides for a portion of income from off-system sales and capacity release revenues to be flowed through to customers.

The Company records deferred tax liabilities and assets measured by enacted tax rates for the net tax effect of all temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes, and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Changes in enacted tax rates, if any, and certain property basis differences will be reflected by entries to regulatory asset or liability accounts for regulated companies, and will be reflected as income or loss for non-regulated companies. Pursuant to the direction of the MoPSC, Laclede Gas’ provision for income tax expense for financial reporting purposes reflects an open-ended method of tax depreciation. Laclede Gas’ provision for income tax expense also records the income tax effect associated with the difference between overheads capitalized to construction for financial reporting purposes and those recognized for tax purposes without recording an offsetting deferred income tax expense. These two methods are consistent with the regulatory treatment prescribed by the MoPSC.

Asset retirement obligations are recorded in accordance with SFAS No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations” and FIN 47, “Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations.” Asset retirement obligations are calculated using various assumptions related to the timing, method of settlement, inflation, and profit margins that third parties would demand to settle the future obligations. These assumptions require the use of judgment and estimates and may change in future periods as circumstances dictate. As authorized by the MoPSC, Laclede Gas accrues future removal costs associated with its property, plant and equipment through its depreciation rates, even if a legal obligation does not exist as defined by SFAS No. 143 and FIN 47. The difference between removal costs recognized in depreciation rates and the accretion expense and depreciation expense recognizable under SFAS No. 143 and FIN 47 is a timing difference between the recovery of these costs in rates and their recognition for financial reporting purposes. Accordingly, consistent with SFAS No. 71, these differences are deferred as regulatory liabilities.

The amount of net periodic pension and other postretirement benefit cost recognized in the financial statements related to the Utility’s qualified pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans is based upon allowances, as approved by the MoPSC, which have been established in the rate-making process for the recovery of these costs from customers. The differences between these amounts and actual pension and other postretirement benefit costs incurred for financial reporting purposes are deferred as regulatory assets or regulatory liabilities. SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans,” requires that changes that affect the funded status of pension and other postretirement benefit plans, but that are not yet required to be recognized as components of pension and other postretirement benefit cost, be reflected in other comprehensive income. For the Utility’s qualified pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans, amounts that would otherwise be reflected in other comprehensive income are deferred with entries to regulatory assets or regulatory liabilities.

31

For further discussion of significant accounting policies, see Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007.

ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

The Company has evaluated or is in the process of evaluating the impact that recently issued accounting standards will have on the Company’s financial position or results of operations upon adoption. For disclosures related to the adoption of new accounting standards, see the New Accounting Standards section of Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

FINANCIAL CONDITION

CREDIT RATINGS

As of June 30, 2008, credit ratings for outstanding securities for Laclede Group and Laclede Gas issues were as follows:

Type of Facility	S&P	Moody’s	Fitch
Laclede Group Corporate Rating	A		A-
Laclede Gas First Mortgage Bonds	A	A3	A+
Laclede Gas Commercial Paper	A-1	P-2

The Company has investment grade ratings, and believes that it will have adequate access to the financial markets to meet its capital requirements. These ratings remain subject to review and change by the rating agencies.

CASH FLOWS

The Company’s short-term borrowing requirements typically peak during colder months when Laclede Gas borrows money to cover the lag between when it purchases its natural gas and when its customers pay for that gas. Changes in the wholesale cost of natural gas, variations in the timing of collections of gas cost under the Utility’s PGA Clause, the seasonality of accounts receivable balances, and the utilization of storage gas inventories cause short-term cash requirements to vary during the year, and can cause significant variations in the Utility’s cash provided by or used in operating activities.

Net cash provided by operating activities for the nine months ended June 30, 2008 was $193.3 million, compared with $152.0 million for the same period last year. The variation is primarily attributable to differences in the timing of the collections of gas cost under the Utility’s PGA Clause, including the effects of this year’s reduction in net cash payments associated with the Utility’s use of natural gas financial instruments, and higher operating income this year. These variations are partially offset by an increase in cash paid for income taxes.

Net cash provided by investing activities for the nine months ended June 30, 2008 was $43.4 million, compared with net cash used in investing activities of $43.2 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2007. The variation is primarily attributable to the proceeds from the sale of SM&P recorded this year.

Net cash used in financing activities was $256.4 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2008, compared with $123.3 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2007. The variation is primarily attributable to increased repayments of short-term debt, the redemption of the Company’s long-term debt to an unconsolidated affiliate trust, and the maturity of long-term debt this year. The Company used a portion of the proceeds from the aforementioned sale of SM&P to fund the redemption of the long-term debt to the unconsolidated affiliate trust.

32

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

As indicated above, the Company’s short-term borrowing requirements typically peak during the colder months. These short-term cash requirements have traditionally been met through the sale of commercial paper supported by lines of credit with banks. Laclede Gas has a line of credit in place of $320 million. During the second quarter, the expiration of this line was extended one year to December 2011 from December 2010. In November 2007, the Utility established a seasonal line of credit of $40 million, which expired in March 2008. The Utility had short-term borrowings aggregating to a maximum of $304.5 million at any one time during the nine months ended June 30, 2008. Short-term commercial paper borrowings outstanding at June 30, 2008 were $58.6 million. The weighted average interest rate on these short-term borrowings was 3.0% per annum at June 30, 2008. Based on total short-term borrowings at June 30, 2008, a change in interest rates of 100 basis points would increase or decrease pre-tax earnings and cash flows of Laclede Group by approximately $0.6 million on an annual basis. Portions of such increases or decreases may be offset through the application of PGA carrying costs. In addition, Laclede Gas had borrowings from Laclede Group totaling $44.4 million at June 30, 2008.

Laclede Gas’ lines of credit include covenants limiting total debt, including short-term debt, to no more than 70% of total capitalization and requiring earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) to be at least 2.25 times interest expense. On June 30, 2008, total debt was 53% of total capitalization. For the twelve months ended June 30, 2008, EBITDA was 3.97 times interest expense.

Laclede Gas has on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) an effective shelf registration on Form S-3 for issuance of $350 million of securities. The full amount of this shelf registration remains available to Laclede Gas at this time. The Utility has authority from the MoPSC to issue up to $500 million in First Mortgage Bonds, unsecured debt, and equity securities. In May 2008, pursuant to this authority, the Utility sold 26 shares of its common stock to Laclede Group for $0.9 million, leaving $493.3 million remaining under this authorization as of the date of this filing. The amount, timing, and type of additional financing to be issued will depend on cash requirements and market conditions.

On November 1, 2007, Laclede Gas paid at maturity $40 million principal amount of 7 1/2% First Mortgage Bonds. This maturity was funded through short-term borrowings. At June 30, 2008, Laclede Gas had fixed-rate long-term debt totaling $310 million. While these long-term debt issues are fixed-rate, they are subject to changes in fair value as market interest rates change. However, increases or decreases in fair value would impact earnings and cash flows only if Laclede Gas were to reacquire any of these issues in the open market prior to maturity.

On May 5, 2008, Laclede Group redeemed in full its $46.4 million subordinated debentures, which also triggered the redemption of all of the Laclede Capital Trust I (Trust) common and preferred securities on the same date. Interest on the debentures and distributions on the Trust securities ceased on and after the redemption date. Upon redemption, Laclede Group recognized a pre-tax loss of $1.4 million, primarily attributable to unamortized issuance costs. A portion of the proceeds received from the sale of SM&P was used to fund the redemption. The Trust was dissolved on June 16, 2008.

Laclede Group has on file a shelf registration on Form S-3 with the SEC that allows for the issuance of equity securities, other than preferred stock, and debt securities. Of the $500 million of securities originally registered under this Form S-3, $362.4 million remain registered and unissued as of June 30, 2008. The amount, timing, and type of additional financing to be issued under this shelf registration will depend on cash requirements and market conditions.

Short-term cash requirements outside of Laclede Gas have generally been met with internally-generated funds. However, Laclede Group has $50 million in working capital lines of credit, $40 million of which expires in August 2009 and $10 million of which expires in October 2008, to meet short-term liquidity needs of its subsidiaries. These lines of credit have covenants limiting the total debt of the consolidated Laclede Group to no more than 70% of the Company’s total capitalization. This ratio stood at 43% on June 30, 2008. These lines were previously used to provide letters of credit on behalf of SM&P, and have been used to provide for seasonal funding needs of the various other subsidiaries from time to time. Just prior to the SM&P sale, the letters of credit provided on behalf of SM&P totaled $2.8 million. Such letters have been released and extinguished. There were no borrowings under Laclede Group’s lines during the quarter.

Laclede Gas has several operating leases for the rental of vehicles that contain provisions requiring Laclede Gas to guarantee certain amounts related to the residual value of the leased property. These leases have various terms, the longest of which extends through 2014. At June 30, 2008, the maximum guarantees under these leases were $1.7 million. However, the Utility estimates that the residual value of the leased vehicles will be adequate to satisfy most of the guaranteed amounts. At June 30, 2008, the carrying value of the liability recognized for these guarantees was $0.3 million.

33

Laclede Group had guarantees totaling $57.5 million for performance and payment of certain wholesale gas supply purchases by LER, as of June 30, 2008. Since that date, total guarantees issued by Laclede Group on behalf of LER increased by $1.0 million bringing the total to $58.5 million in guarantees outstanding at August 4, 2008. No amounts have been recorded for these guarantees in the financial statements.

Utility capital expenditures were $40.2 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2008, compared with $41.5 million for the same period last year. Non-utility capital expenditures were $1.3 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2008, compared with $1.5 million for the same period last year.

Consolidated capitalization at June 30, 2008, excluding current obligations of preferred stock, consisted of 60.9% Laclede Group common stock equity, 0.1% Laclede Gas preferred stock equity, and 39.0% Laclede Gas long-term debt.

It is management’s view that the Company has adequate access to capital markets and will have sufficient capital resources, both internal and external, to meet anticipated capital requirements.

The seasonal nature of Laclede Gas’ sales affects the comparison of certain balance sheet items at June 30, 2008 and at September 30, 2007, such as Accounts Receivable - Net, Gas Stored Underground, Notes Payable, Accounts Payable, Regulatory Assets and Regulatory Liabilities, and Delayed and Advance Customer Billings. The Consolidated Balance Sheet at June 30, 2007 is presented to facilitate comparison of these items with the corresponding interim period of the preceding fiscal year.

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

As of June 30, 2008, Laclede Group had contractual obligations with payments due as summarized below (in millions):

			Payments due by period
			Remaining						Fiscal Years
Contractual Obligations	Total		Fiscal Year 2008		Fiscal Years 2009-2010		Fiscal Years 2011-2012		2013 and thereafter
Principal Payments on Long-Term Debt	$	310.0	$	—	$	—	$	25.0	$	285.0
Interest Payments on Long-Term Debt		382.4		1.2		39.0		36.5		305.7
Operating Leases (a)		11.1		1.3		7.6		2.2		—
Purchase Obligations – Natural Gas (b)		2,706.3		375.7		1,621.9		590.6		118.1
Purchase Obligations – Other (c)		119.1		6.4		25.9		19.2		67.6
Total (d)	$	3,528.9	$	384.6	$	1,694.4	$	673.5	$	776.4

(a)	Operating lease obligations are primarily for office space, vehicles, and power operated equipment in the gas distribution segment. Additional payments will be incurred if renewal options are exercised under the provisions of certain agreements.
(b)	These purchase obligations represent the minimum payments required under existing natural gas transportation and storage contracts and natural gas supply agreements in the utility gas distribution and non-regulated gas marketing segments. These amounts reflect fixed obligations as well as obligations to purchase natural gas at future market prices, calculated using June 30, 2008 New York Mercantile Exchange futures prices. Laclede Gas recovers the costs related to its purchases, transportation, and storage of natural gas through the operation of its PGA Clause, subject to prudence review; however, variations in the timing of collections of gas costs from customers affect short-term cash requirements. Additional contractual commitments are generally entered into prior to or during the heating season.
(c)	These purchase obligations reflect miscellaneous agreements for the purchase of materials and the procurement of services necessary for normal operations.
(d)	The categories of Capital Leases and Other Long-Term liabilities have been excluded from the table above because there are no applicable amounts of contractual obligations under these categories. Also, commitments related to pension and postretirement benefit plans have been excluded from the table above. The Company does not expect to make any contributions to its qualified, trusteed pension plans during the remainder of fiscal year 2008. Laclede Gas anticipates a $0.1 million contribution relative to its non-qualified pension plans during the remainder of fiscal year 2008. With regard to the postretirement benefits, the Company anticipates Laclede Gas will contribute $4.1 million to the qualified trusts and $0.1 million directly to participants from Laclede Gas’ funds during the remainder of fiscal year 2008. For further discussion of the Company’s pension and postretirement benefit plans, refer to Note 4, Pension Plans and Other Postretirement Benefits, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

34

MARKET RISK

Laclede Gas adopted a risk management policy that provides for the purchase of natural gas financial instruments with the goal of managing price risk associated with purchasing natural gas on behalf of its customers. This policy prohibits speculation. Costs and cost reductions, including carrying costs, associated with the Utility’s use of natural gas financial instruments are allowed to be passed on to the Utility’s customers through the operation of its PGA Clause, through which the MoPSC allows the Utility to recover gas supply costs. Accordingly, Laclede Gas does not expect any adverse earnings impact as a result of the use of these financial instruments. At June 30, 2008, the Utility held 7.4 million MMBtu of futures contracts at an average price of $9.03 per MMBtu. Additionally, 13.8 million MMBtu of other price risk mitigation was in place through the use of option-based strategies. These positions have various expiration dates, the longest of which extends through March 2009.

In the course of its business, Laclede Group’s non-regulated gas marketing affiliate, LER, enters into fixed price commitments associated with the purchase or sale of natural gas. As part of LER’s risk management policy, LER manages the price risk associated with these commitments by either closely matching the offsetting physical purchase or sale of natural gas at fixed prices or through the use of exchange-traded futures contracts to lock in margins. At June 30, 2008, LER’s unmatched positions are not material to Laclede Group’s financial position or results of operations.

ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS

Laclede Gas owns and operates natural gas distribution, transmission, and storage facilities, the operations of which are subject to various environmental laws, regulations, and interpretations. While environmental issues resulting from such operations arise in the ordinary course of business, such issues have not materially affected the Company’s or Laclede Gas’ financial position and results of operations. As environmental laws, regulations, and their interpretations change, however, Laclede Gas may be required to incur additional costs. For information relative to environmental matters, see Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007. There have been no significant changes relative to environmental matters during the nine months ended June 30, 2008.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

Laclede Group has no off-balance sheet arrangements.

Laclede Gas Company’s Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition is included in Exhibit 99.1 of this report.

35

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

For this discussion, see the “Market Risk” subsection in Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, on page 35 of this report.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15e and Rule 15d-15e under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our third fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

36

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

For a description of environmental matters and legal proceedings, see Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007. For a description of pending regulatory matters of Laclede Gas, see Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Regulatory Matters, on page 29 of this report.

Laclede Group and its subsidiaries are involved in litigation, claims, and investigations arising in the normal course of business. While the results of such litigation cannot be predicted with certainty, management, after discussion with counsel, believes that the final outcome will not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position or results of operations of the Company.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

On May 12, 2008, the Board of Directors of Laclede Gas approved the sale of 26 shares of Laclede Gas common stock to Laclede Group. The proceeds from the sale, totaling $0.9 million, were used to reduce short-term borrowings. Exemption from registration was claimed under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

Item 5. Other Information

(a) On August 1, 2008, Laclede Group executed an amendment to its $40 million line of credit with U.S. Bank, National Association to extend its term for an additional year, expiring on August 3, 2009. In addition, the parties amended certain terms related to rates and fees. The amendment is filed with this Form 10-Q as exhibit 10.1.

Item 6. Exhibits

(a) See Exhibit Index

37

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrants have duly caused this report to be signed on their behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

		The Laclede Group, Inc.
Dated:	August 4, 2008	By:	/s/ Mark D. Waltermire
			Mark D. Waltermire
			Chief Financial Officer
			(Authorized Signatory and Chief Financial Officer)

38

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrants have duly caused this report to be signed on their behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

		Laclede Gas Company
Dated:	August 4, 2008	By:	/s/ Mark D. Waltermire
			Mark D. Waltermire
			Senior Vice President and
			Chief Financial Officer
			(Authorized Signatory and Chief Financial Officer)

39

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

Exhibit No.
10.1	-	Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement between the Company and U.S. Bank, National Association executed on August 1, 2008.
12	-	Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.
31	-	CEO and CFO Certifications under Exchange Act Rule 13a – 14(a).
32	-	CEO and CFO Section 1350 Certifications.
99.1	-	Laclede Gas Company - Financial Statements, Notes to Financial Statements, and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

40

EX-10.1

Exhibit 10.1

SECOND AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED REVOLVING CREDIT AGREEMENT

THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED REVOLVING CREDIT AGREEMENT (this “Second Amendment”) is made and entered into as of August 4, 2008, by and between THE LACLEDE GROUP, INC., a Missouri corporation (“Borrower”), and U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, a national banking association (“Lender”), and has reference to the following facts and circumstances (the “Recitals”):

A Borrower and Lender executed the Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of August 4, 2005 (the “2005 Agreement”), pursuant to which Borrower executed the Revolving Credit Note dated August 4, 2005, payable to the order of Lender, in the principal amount of up to $40,000,000 (as amended, the “Note”).

B. The 2005 Agreement was previously amended as provided in the First Amendment to Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of March 31, 2008 (the 2005 Agreement as amended thereby, hereafter referred to as the “Agreement”; all capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined in this Second Amendment shall have the respective meanings ascribed to them in the Agreement).

C. Borrower and Lender desire to further amend the Agreement, in the manner hereinafter set forth.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Borrower and Lender hereby agree as follows:

1.  Recitals.  The Recitals are true and correct, and, together with the defined terms set forth therein, are incorporated herein by this reference.

2.  Amendment to Agreement.  The Agreement is amended as follows:

(a) The definitions of “Applicable Commitment Fee Rate”, “Applicable LIBOR Margin”, “Applicable Prime Margin”, and “Revolving Credit Period” in Section 1.01 of the Agreement are deleted and replaced with the following:

“Applicable Commitment Fee Rate shall mean an annual rate equal to 15/100 Percent (0.15%).”

“Applicable LIBOR Margin shall mean an annual rate equal to 60/100 Percent (0.60%).”

“Applicable Prime Margin shall mean an annual rate equal to Zero Percent (0%).”

“Revolving Credit Period shall mean the period commencing on the date of this Agreement and ending August 3, 2009; provided, however, that the Revolving Credit Period shall end on the date the Lender’s Revolving Credit Commitment is terminated pursuant to Section 6 or otherwise.”

(b) The definition of “Applicable Rating Level” in Section 1.01 of the Agreement is deleted.

(c) Sub-sections (a) and (b) in the definition of “Interest Period” in Section 1.01 of the Agreement are deleted and replaced with the following:

“(a) initially, the period commencing on the date selected by Borrower in the applicable Interest Rate Selection Notice and ending seven (7) days, one (1) month, two (2) months, three (3) months, or six (6) months thereafter, as Borrower may elect in the applicable Interest Rate Selection Notice; and (b) thereafter, each period commencing on the last day of the immediately preceding Interest Period applicable to such LIBOR Loan and ending seven (7) days, one (1) month, two (2) months, three (3) months, or six (6) months, as Borrower may elect in the applicable Interest Rate Selection Notice; provided that:”

3.  Costs and Expenses.  Borrower hereby agrees to reimburse Lender upon demand for all out-of-pocket costs and expenses (including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses) incurred by Lender in the preparation, negotiation and execution of this Second Amendment and any and all other agreements, documents, instruments and/or certificates relating to this Second Amendment.  All of the obligations of Borrower under this paragraph shall survive the payment of Borrower’s Obligations and the termination of the Agreement as amended hereby.

4.  References to Agreement.  All references in the Agreement to “this Agreement” and any other references of similar import shall henceforth mean the Agreement as amended by this Amendment.

5.  Full Force and Effect.  Except to the extent specifically amended by this Second Amendment, all of the terms, provisions, conditions, covenants, representations and warranties contained in the Agreement and the Note shall be and remain in full force and effect and the same are hereby ratified and confirmed.

6.  Benefit.  This Second Amendment shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of Borrower and Lender and their respective successors and assigns, except that Borrower may not assign, transfer or delegate any of its rights or obligations under the Agreement as amended by this Amendment.

7.  Representations and Warranties.  Borrower hereby represents and warrants to Lender that:

(a) the execution, delivery and performance by Borrower of this Second Amendment are within the corporate powers of Borrower, have been duly authorized by all necessary corporate action and require no action by or in respect of, consent of or filing or recording with, any governmental or regulatory body, instrumentality, authority, agency or official or any other Person;

(b) the execution, delivery and performance by Borrower of this Second Amendment do not conflict with, or result in a breach of the terms, conditions or provisions of, or constitute a default under or result in any violation of, the terms of the Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws of Borrower, any applicable law, rule, regulation, order, writ, judgment or decree of any court or governmental or regulatory body, instrumentality authority, agency or official or any agreement, document or instrument to which Borrower is a party or by which Borrower or any of its property is bound or to which Borrower or any of its property is subject;

(c) this Second Amendment has been duly executed and delivered by Borrower and constitutes the legal, valid and binding obligation of Borrower enforceable against Borrower in accordance with its terms, except as such enforceability may be limited by (i) applicable bankruptcy, insolvency or similar laws affecting the enforcement of creditors’ rights generally and (ii) general principles of equity (regardless of whether such enforceability is considered in a proceeding in equity or at law);

(d) all of the representations and warranties made by Borrower in the Agreement and/or in any of the other Transaction Documents are true and correct in all material respects on and as of the date of this Second Amendment as if made on and as of the date of this Second Amendment; and

(e) as of the date of this Second Amendment, no Default or Event of Default under or within the meaning of the Agreement has occurred and is continuing.

8.  Release.  Borrower hereby unconditionally releases, acquits, waives, and forever discharges Lender and its successors, assigns, directors, officers, agents, employees, representatives and attorneys from any

- 2 - -

and all liabilities, claims, causes of action or defenses, if any, and for any action taken or for any failure to take any action, existing at any time prior to the execution of this Second Amendment.

9.  Inconsistency.  In the event of any inconsistency or conflict between this Second Amendment and the Agreement, the terms, provisions and conditions contained in this Amendment shall govern and control.

10. Missouri Law.  This Second Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the substantive laws of the State of Missouri (without reference to conflict of law principles).

11. Notice Required by Section 432.047 R.S. Mo.  ORAL AGREEMENTS OR COMMITMENTS TO LOAN MONEY, EXTEND CREDIT OR TO FORBEAR FROM ENFORCING REPAYMENT OF A DEBT INCLUDING PROMISES TO EXTEND OR RENEW SUCH DEBT ARE NOT ENFORCEABLE. TO PROTECT YOU (BORROWER(S)) AND US (CREDITOR) FROM MISUNDERSTANDING OR DISAPPOINTMENT, ANY AGREEMENTS WE REACH COVERING SUCH MATTERS ARE CONTAINED IN THIS WRITING WHICH IS THE COMPLETE AND EXCLUSIVE STATEMENT OF THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN US, EXCEPT AS WE MAY LATER AGREE IN WRITING TO MODIFY IT.

12. Conditions Precedent.  Notwithstanding any provision contained in this Second Amendment to the contrary, this Second Amendment shall not be effective unless and until Lender shall have received the following, all in form and substance acceptable to Lender:

(a) this Second Amendment, duly executed by Borrower;

(b) the Consent of Guarantor duly executed by Laclede Energy;

(c) the following organizational documents of Borrower:  (i) a copy of resolutions of the Board of Directors of Borrower, duly adopted, which authorize the execution, delivery and performance of this Amendment; (ii) an incumbency certificate, executed by the Secretary of Borrower, which shall identify by name and title and bear the signatures of all of the officers of Borrower executing this Amendment; and (iii) a certificate of corporate good standing of Borrower issued by the Secretary of State of the State of Missouri, or other evidence of good standing satisfactory to Lender;

(d) the following organizational documents of Laclede Energy:  (i) a copy of resolutions of the Board of Directors of Laclede Energy, duly adopted, which authorize the execution, delivery and performance of the Consent of Guarantor; (ii) an incumbency certificate, executed by the Secretary of Laclede Energy, which shall identify by name and title and bear the signatures of all of the officers of Borrower executing the Consent of Guarantor; and (iii) a certificate of corporate good standing of Laclede Energy issued by the Secretary of State of the State of Missouri, or other evidence of good standing satisfactory to Lender; and

(e) such other documents and information as reasonably requested by Lender.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Borrower and Lender have executed this Second Amendment as of the day and year first above written.

- 3 - -

(SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE)

- 4 - -

SIGNATURE PAGE-

SECOND AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED REVOLVING CREDIT AGREEMENT

Borrower:
THE LACLEDE GROUP, INC.
By:	/s/ Lynn D. Rawlings
	Lynn D. Rawlings, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary
Lender:
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
By:	/s/ Karen Meyer
	Karen Meyer, Vice President

- 5 - -

EX-12

Exhibit 12

THE LACLEDE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
SCHEDULE OF COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
		Twelve Months Ended
		June 30,		September 30,
	(Thousands of Dollars)		2008		2007		2006		2005		2004		2003
	Income from continuing operations before interest
	charges and income taxes	$	116,467	$	101,866	$	100,079	$	78,677	$	78,605	$	81,532
	Add: One third of applicable
	rentals charged to operating
	expense (which approximates
	the interest factor)		1,645		1,485		1,291		938		538		457
	Total Earnings	$	118,112	$	103,351	$	101,370	$	79,615	$	79,143	$	81,989
	Interest on long-term debt –
	Laclede Gas	$	20,502	$	22,502	$	22,329	$	22,835	$	22,010	$	20,169
	Other interest		10,919		11,432		10,554		4,419		3,511		3,971
	Add: One third of applicable
	rentals charged to operating
	expense (which approximates
	the interest factor)		1,645		1,485		1,291		938		538		457
	Total Fixed Charges	$	33,066	$	35,419	$	34,174	$	28,192	$	26,059	$	24,597
	Ratio of Earnings to Fixed
	Charges		3.57		2.92		2.97		2.82		3.04		3.33

LACLEDE GAS COMPANY
SCHEDULE OF COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
		Twelve Months Ended
		June 30,		September 30,
	(Thousands of Dollars)		2008		2007		2006		2005		2004		2003
	Income before interest
	charges and income taxes	$	90,376	$	80,134	$	72,077	$	72,092	$	73,956	$	76,274
	Add: One third of applicable
	rentals charged to operating
	expense (which approximates
	the interest factor)		1,645		1,485		1,291		938		538		457
	Total Earnings	$	92,021	$	81,619	$	73,368	$	73,030	$	74,494	$	76,731
	Interest on long-term debt	$	20,502	$	22,502	$	22,329	$	22,835	$	22,010	$	20,169
	Other interest		10,983		11,101		10,236		4,076		3,192		3,752
	Add: One third of applicable
	rentals charged to operating
	expense (which approximates
	the interest factor)		1,645		1,485		1,291		938		538		457
	Total Fixed Charges	$	33,130	$	35,088	$	33,856	$	27,849	$	25,740	$	24,378
	Ratio of Earnings to Fixed
	Charges		2.78		2.33		2.17		2.62		2.89		3.15

EX-31

Exhibit 31

CERTIFICATION

I, Douglas H. Yaeger, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of The Laclede Group, Inc.;
2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.	The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b)	Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and
b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:	August 4, 2008	Signature:	/s/ Douglas H. Yaeger
			Douglas H. Yaeger
			Chairman of the Board,
			President and Chief
			Executive Officer

CERTIFICATION

I, Mark D. Waltermire, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of The Laclede Group, Inc.;
2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.	The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b)	Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and
b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:	August 4, 2008	Signature:	/s/ Mark D. Waltermire
			Mark D. Waltermire
			Chief Financial Officer

CERTIFICATION

I, Douglas H. Yaeger, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Laclede Gas Company;
2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.	The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b)	Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and
b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:	August 4, 2008	Signature:	/s/ Douglas H. Yaeger
			Douglas H. Yaeger
			Chairman of the Board,
			President and Chief
			Executive Officer

CERTIFICATION

I, Mark D. Waltermire, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Laclede Gas Company;
2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.	The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b)	Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and
b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:	August 4, 2008	Signature:	/s/ Mark D. Waltermire
			Mark D. Waltermire
			Senior Vice President and
			Chief Financial Officer

EX-32

Exhibit 32

Section 1350 Certification

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Douglas H. Yaeger, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of The Laclede Group, Inc., hereby certify that

(a)	To the best of my knowledge, the accompanying report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
(b)	To the best of my knowledge, the information contained in the accompanying report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of The Laclede Group, Inc.

Date:	August 4, 2008	/s/ Douglas H. Yaeger
		Douglas H. Yaeger
		Chairman of the Board, President
		and Chief Executive Officer

Section 1350 Certification

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Mark D. Waltermire, Chief Financial Officer of The Laclede Group, Inc., hereby certify that

(a)	To the best of my knowledge, the accompanying report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
(b)	To the best of my knowledge, the information contained in the accompanying report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of The Laclede Group, Inc.

Date:	August 4, 2008	/s/ Mark D. Waltermire
		Mark D. Waltermire
		Chief Financial Officer

Section 1350 Certification

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Douglas H. Yaeger, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of Laclede Gas Company, hereby certify that

(a)	To the best of my knowledge, the accompanying report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
(b)	To the best of my knowledge, the information contained in the accompanying report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of  Laclede Gas Company.

Date:	August 4, 2008	/s/ Douglas H. Yaeger
		Douglas H. Yaeger
		Chairman of the Board, President
		and Chief Executive Officer

Section 1350 Certification

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Mark D. Waltermire, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Laclede Gas Company, hereby certify that

(a)	To the best of my knowledge, the accompanying report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
(b)	To the best of my knowledge, the information contained in the accompanying report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of  Laclede Gas Company.

Date:	August 4, 2008	/s/ Mark D. Waltermire
		Mark D. Waltermire
		Senior Vice President and
		Chief Financial Officer

EX-99.1

Exhibit 99.1

LACLEDE GAS COMPANY
STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(UNAUDITED)
	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
(Thousands)		2008			2007			2008		2007
Operating Revenues:
Utility	$	189,598		$	185,696		$	1,017,579	$	1,027,777
Other		630			1,128			2,156		2,568
Total Operating Revenues		190,228			186,824			1,019,735		1,030,345
Operating Expenses:
Utility
Natural and propane gas		112,896			121,490			713,263		746,589
Other operation expenses		34,285			29,283			108,487		99,779
Maintenance		6,543			5,830			18,592		17,488
Depreciation and amortization		8,819			8,565			26,295		25,630
Taxes, other than income taxes		14,549			13,360			60,485		60,467
Total Utility Operating Expenses		177,092			178,528			927,122		949,953
Other		569			1,080			2,099		2,515
Total Operating Expenses		177,661			179,608			929,221		952,468
Operating Income		12,567			7,216			90,514		77,877
Other Income and (Income Deductions) – Net		(152	)		551			1,357		3,752
Interest Charges:
Interest on long-term debt		4,876			5,626			14,877		16,877
Other interest charges		1,306			1,813			8,042		8,160
Total Interest Charges		6,182			7,439			22,919		25,037
Income Before Income Taxes		6,233			328			68,952		56,592
Income Tax Expense (Benefit)		687			(558	)		22,311		19,313
Net Income		5,546			886			46,641		37,279
Dividends on Redeemable Preferred Stock		8			10			27		33
Earnings Applicable to Common Stock	$	5,538		$	876		$	46,614	$	37,246
See Notes to Financial Statements.

1

LACLEDE GAS COMPANY
STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(UNAUDITED)
	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
(Thousands)		2008		2007		2008		2007
Net Income	$	5,546	$	886	$	46,641	$	37,279
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Before Tax:
Amortization of actuarial loss included in net periodic
pension cost		43		—		129		—
Income Tax Expense Related to Items of Other
Comprehensive Income		17		—		50		—
Other Comprehensive Income, Net of Tax		26		—		79		—
Comprehensive Income	$	5,572	$	886	$	46,720	$	37,279
See Notes to Financial Statements.

2

LACLEDE GAS COMPANY
BALANCE SHEETS
(UNAUDITED)
	June 30,			Sept. 30,			June 30,
(Thousands)	2008			2007			2007
ASSETS
Utility Plant	$	1,215,336		$	1,187,828		$	1,176,954
Less:  Accumulated depreciation and amortization		402,229			394,034			392,250
Net Utility Plant		813,107			793,794			784,704
Other Property and Investments		37,514			36,933			36,661
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents		3,022			2,454			2,623
Accounts receivable:
Gas customers – billed and unbilled		103,602			102,224			104,038
Associated companies		168			253			412
Other		9,305			8,973			7,606
Allowances for doubtful accounts		(13,836	)		(10,961	)		(15,320	)
Delayed customer billings		18,389			—			11,621
Inventories:
Natural gas stored underground at LIFO cost		84,186			138,198			55,280
Propane gas at FIFO cost		19,907			19,950			19,950
Materials, supplies, and merchandise at average cost		5,573			4,864			5,531
Derivative instrument assets		14,694			26,296			19,798
Unamortized purchased gas adjustments		3,341			12,813			13,387
Deferred income taxes		4,676			275			6,255
Prepayments and other		8,293			6,970			8,699
Total Current Assets		261,320			312,309			239,880
Deferred Charges:
Prepaid pension cost		—			—			55,101
Regulatory assets		267,574			285,054			168,458
Other		4,234			3,113			4,652
Total Deferred Charges		271,808			288,167			228,211
Total Assets	$	1,383,749		$	1,431,203		$	1,289,456

3

LACLEDE GAS COMPANY
BALANCE SHEETS (Continued)
(UNAUDITED)
	June 30,			Sept. 30,			June 30,
(Thousands, except share amounts)	2008			2007			2007
CAPITALIZATION AND LIABILITIES
Capitalization:
Common stock and Paid-in capital (10,391, 10,307, and     10,279 shares issued, respectively)	$	156,343		$	151,510		$	150,036
Retained earnings		218,226			195,728			208,433
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(1,648	)		(1,727	)		(834	)
Total Common Stock Equity		372,921			345,511			357,635
Redeemable preferred stock (less current sinking fund     requirements)		467			627			627
Long-term debt (less current portion)		309,167			309,122			309,101
Total Capitalization		682,555			655,260			667,363
Current Liabilities:
Notes payable		58,600			211,400			102,100
Notes payable – associated companies		44,426			—			—
Accounts payable		73,382			45,084			53,653
Accounts payable – associated companies		9,021			4,065			8,805
Advance customer billings		—			25,440			—
Current portion of long-term debt and preferred stock		160			40,160			40,160
Wages and compensation accrued		13,267			11,532			9,811
Dividends payable		8,371			7,974			7,953
Customer deposits		14,923			15,899			17,322
Interest accrued		6,204			10,806			6,297
Taxes accrued		25,372			19,210			35,227
Other		5,106			5,342			4,979
Total Current Liabilities		258,832			396,912			286,307
Deferred Credits and Other Liabilities:
Deferred income taxes		232,974			223,192			224,300
Unamortized investment tax credits		4,030			4,200			4,259
Pension and postretirement benefit costs		71,164			63,678			20,471
Asset retirement obligations		27,226			26,054			25,867
Regulatory liabilities		84,436			39,589			37,100
Other		22,532			22,318			23,789
Total Deferred Credits and Other Liabilities		442,362			379,031			335,786
Total Capitalization and Liabilities	$	1,383,749		$	1,431,203		$	1,289,456
See Notes to Financial Statements.

4

LACLEDE GAS COMPANY
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
	Nine Months Ended
	June 30,
(Thousands)	2008			2007
Operating Activities:
Net Income	$	46,641		$	37,279
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash     provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		26,295			25,630
Deferred income taxes and investment tax credits		(5,329	)		(20,237	)
Other – net		1,446			954
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable – net		1,250			1,486
Unamortized purchased gas adjustments		9,472			30,994
Deferred purchased gas costs		72,856			38,022
Accounts payable		33,741			6,693
Delayed customer billings - net		(43,829	)		(43,064	)
Taxes accrued		6,162			19,682
Natural gas stored underground		54,012			82,137
Other assets and liabilities		7,444			(12,574	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		210,161			167,002
Investing Activities:
Capital expenditures		(40,164	)		(41,457	)
Other investments		168			577
Net cash used in investing activities		(39,996	)		(40,880	)
Financing Activities:
Maturity of first mortgage bonds		(40,000	)		—
Repayment of short-term debt – net		(108,374	)		(105,200	)
Dividends paid		(24,261	)		(23,350	)
Issuance of common stock to Laclede Group		2,905			2,834
Preferred stock reacquired		(160	)		(159	)
Other		293			62
Net cash used in financing activities		(169,597	)		(125,813	)
Net Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents		568			309
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period		2,454			2,314
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period	$	3,022		$	2,623
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Paid (Refunded) During the Period for:
Interest	$	27,825		$	28,132
Income taxes		11,584			(2,052	)
See Notes to Financial Statements.

5

LACLEDE GAS COMPANY

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

These notes are an integral part of the accompanying financial statements of Laclede Gas Company (Laclede Gas or the Utility). In the opinion of Laclede Gas, this interim report includes all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring accruals) necessary for the fair presentation of the results of operations for the periods presented. This Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the Notes to Financial Statements contained in Laclede Gas’ Fiscal Year 2007 Form 10-K.

Laclede Gas is a regulated natural gas distribution utility having a material seasonal cycle. As a result, these interim statements of income for Laclede Gas are not necessarily indicative of annual results or representative of succeeding quarters of the fiscal year. Due to the seasonal nature of the business of Laclede Gas, earnings are typically concentrated in the November through April period, which generally corresponds with the heating season.

BASIS OF PRESENTATION - In compliance with generally accepted accounting principles, transactions between Laclede Gas and its affiliates as well as intercompany balances on Laclede Gas’ Balance Sheet have not been eliminated from the Laclede Gas financial statements.

Laclede Gas provides administrative and general support to affiliates. All such costs, which are not material, are billed to the appropriate affiliates. Also, Laclede Group may charge or reimburse Laclede Gas for certain tax-related amounts. Unpaid balances relating to these activities are reflected in the Laclede Gas Balance Sheets as Accounts Receivable-Associated Companies or as Accounts Payable-Associated Companies. Additionally, Laclede Gas may, on occasion, borrow funds from or lend funds to affiliated companies. Unpaid balances relating to these arrangements, if any, are reflected in Notes Receivable-Associated Companies or Notes Payable-Associated Companies.

REVENUE RECOGNITION - Laclede Gas reads meters and bills its customers on monthly cycles. The Utility records its utility operating revenues from gas sales and transportation services on an accrual basis that includes estimated amounts for gas delivered, but not yet billed. The accruals for unbilled revenues are reversed in the subsequent accounting period when meters are actually read and customers are billed. The amounts of accrued unbilled revenues at June 30, 2008 and 2007, for the Utility, were $10.9 million and $7.2 million, respectively. The amount of accrued unbilled revenue at September 30, 2007 was $11.9 million.

INCOME TAXES - Laclede Gas has elected, for tax purposes only, various accelerated depreciation provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. In addition, certain other costs are expensed currently for tax purposes while being deferred for book purposes. Effective October 1, 2007, generally accepted accounting principles require that tax benefits be recognized in the financial statements as determined by new recognition and measurement provisions. These provisions permit the benefit from a tax position to be recognized only if, and to the extent that, it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained upon examination by the taxing authority, based on the technical merits of the position. Unrecognized tax benefits and related interest and penalties, if any, are recorded as liabilities or as a reduction to deferred tax assets. Laclede Gas records deferred tax liabilities and assets measured by enacted tax rates for the net tax effect of all temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities in the financial statements, and the related tax basis. Changes in enacted tax rates, if any, and certain property basis differences will be reflected by entries to regulatory asset or liability accounts.

Laclede Gas’ investment tax credits utilized prior to 1986 have been deferred and are being amortized in accordance with regulatory treatment over the useful life of the related property.

Laclede Group files a consolidated federal income tax return and allocates income taxes to Laclede Gas and its other subsidiaries as if each entity were a separate taxpayer.

GROSS RECEIPTS TAXES - Gross receipts taxes associated with Laclede Gas’ natural gas utility service are imposed on the Utility and billed to its customers. These amounts are recorded gross in the Statements of Income. Amounts recorded in Utility Operating Revenues for the quarters ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 were $9.0 million and $8.1 million, respectively. Amounts recorded in Utility Operating Revenues for the nine months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 were $47.2 million and $46.9 million, respectively. Gross receipts taxes are expensed by the Utility and included in the Taxes, Other Than Income Taxes line.

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION - Officers and employees of Laclede Gas, as determined by the Compensation Committee of Laclede Group’s Board of Directors, are eligible to be selected for awards under The Laclede Group 2006 Equity Incentive Plan. For Laclede Group’s non-employee directors, shares are awarded under the Restricted Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors. Refer to Note 1 of the Financial Statements included in the Utility’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007 for descriptions of these plans. For awards made to its employees, the Utility records its allocation of compensation cost from Laclede Group with a corresponding increase to additional paid-in capital.

6

The amounts of compensation cost allocated to the Utility for share-based compensation arrangements are presented below:

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
(Thousands)	2008			2007			2008			2007
Total compensation cost	$	456		$	492		$	1,625		$	1,536
Compensation cost capitalized		(112	)		(127	)		(410	)		(388	)
Compensation cost recognized in net income		344			365			1,215			1,148
Income tax benefit recognized in net income		(133	)		(142	)		(470	)		(444	)
Compensation cost recognized in net income,
net of income tax	$	211		$	223		$	745		$	704

As of June 30, 2008, there was $4.1 million in unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested share-based compensation arrangements (options and restricted stock) that is expected to be allocated to the Utility over a weighted average period of 2.5 years.

NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS - In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Interpretation Number 48 (FIN 48), “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes.” FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” Under FIN 48, Laclede Gas may recognize the tax benefit from a tax position only if it is at least more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon settlement with the taxing authorities. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. Laclede Gas adopted the provisions of FIN 48 as of October 1, 2007. For details regarding the cumulative effect of adoption and other pertinent information, see Note 3, Income Taxes.

In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements.” This Statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The Statement applies to fair value measurements required under other accounting guidance that require or permit fair value measurements. Accordingly, this Statement does not require any new fair value measurements. The guidance in this Statement does not apply to the Laclede Group’s stock-based compensation plans accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment.” Except as described below, SFAS No. 157 is effective for the Utility as of the beginning of fiscal year 2009. In February 2008, the FASB issued two Staff Positions that amend SFAS No. 157. The first FASB Staff Position (FSP), No. FAS 157-1, excludes from the scope of SFAS No. 157 accounting pronouncements that address fair value measurements for purposes of lease classification and measurement. The second FSP, No. FAS 157-2, delays the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). Application of SFAS No. 157 to these items will be effective for Laclede Gas as of the beginning of fiscal year 2010. The Utility is currently evaluating the potential impact of this Statement, as amended by these Staff Positions, on its financial statements.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans.” As discussed in Note 2 to the Financial Statements included in the Utility’s Fiscal Year 2007 Form 10-K, Laclede Gas adopted the recognition and disclosure provisions of this Statement effective September 30, 2007. The Statement also requires that plan assets and benefit obligations be measured as of the date of the employer’s fiscal year-end statement of financial position. This requirement is effective for the Utility as of the end of fiscal year 2009. In conjunction with adoption of this provision of SFAS No. 158, the Utility will be required to change its valuation date for its pension and other postretirement plans from June 30 to September 30. The Utility is currently evaluating the impact of adoption of the change in measurement date on its financial statements.

7

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities.” The Statement permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not currently required to be measured at fair value. SFAS No. 159 also establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between entities that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. This Statement does not affect any existing accounting literature that requires certain assets and liabilities to be carried at fair value. Upon adoption of SFAS No. 159, entities are permitted to choose, at specified election dates, to measure eligible items at fair value (fair value option). Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected are reported in earnings at each reporting date. The decision about whether to elect the fair value option is applied instrument by instrument with few exceptions. The decision is also irrevocable (unless a new election date occurs) and must be applied to entire instruments and not to portions of instruments. SFAS No. 159 requires that cash flows related to items measured at fair value be classified in the statement of cash flows according to their nature and purpose as required by SFAS No. 95, “Statement of Cash Flows” (as amended). SFAS No. 159 is effective for the Utility as of the beginning of fiscal year 2009. Laclede Gas is currently evaluating the provisions of this Statement.

In June 2007, the FASB ratified the consensus reached in Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 06-11, “Accounting for Income Tax Benefits of Dividends on Share-Based Payment Awards.” This Issue addresses how an entity should recognize the tax benefit received on dividends that are (a) paid to employees holding equity-classified nonvested shares, equity-classified nonvested share units, or equity-classified outstanding share options and (b) charged to retained earnings under SFAS No. 123(R). The Task Force reached a consensus that such tax benefits should be recognized as an increase in additional paid-in capital. This EITF Issue also addresses how the accounting for these tax benefits is affected if an entity’s estimate of forfeitures changes in subsequent periods. This EITF Issue is effective for Laclede Gas as of the beginning of fiscal year 2009. The Utility is currently evaluating the provisions of this EITF Issue.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements.” This Statement amends Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, “Consolidated Financial Statements.” A noncontrolling interest, sometimes called a minority interest, is the portion of equity in a subsidiary not attributable, directly or indirectly, to a parent. SFAS No. 160 clarifies that noncontrolling interests should be separately reported as equity in the balance sheet. Additionally, SFAS No. 160 requires certain changes in presentation to income statements. SFAS No. 160 also addresses accounting for changes in the parent’s ownership interest of a subsidiary, accounting for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary, and disclosure requirements. This Statement is effective for Laclede Gas as of the beginning of fiscal year 2010. Currently, Laclede Gas does not have any subsidiaries and therefore adoption of this Statement is not expected to have any effect on the Utility’s financial statements.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007) (141(R)), “Business Combinations.” This Statement revises SFAS No. 141 but retains the fundamental requirements in SFAS No. 141 that the acquisition method (formerly known as purchase method) of accounting be used for all business combinations. SFAS No. 141(R) requires an acquirer to recognize the assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at the acquisition date, measured at their fair values as of that date, with limited exceptions specified in the Statement. SFAS 141(R) requires acquisition-related costs to be accounted for separately instead of being allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. SFAS No. 141(R) also amends the guidance related to the recognition of certain assets acquired and liabilities assumed that relate to contingencies, research and development assets acquired that have no alternative future use, and negative goodwill arising from a bargain purchase. Laclede Gas is required to adopt SFAS No. 141(R) prospectively to business combinations with acquisition dates on or after October 1, 2009 (fiscal 2010). Because this Statement is only applicable to future business combinations, existing amounts reported on the Utility’s financial statements will not be impacted by adoption of this Statement.

In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.” This Statement amends SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” by requiring enhanced disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under Statement 133 and its related interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. This Statement will be effective for Laclede Gas’s interim and annual financial statements beginning in the second quarter of fiscal year 2009. This Statement encourages, but does not require, comparative disclosures for earlier periods at initial adoption. The Utility is currently evaluating the provisions of this Statement.

In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.” SFAS No. 162 identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting principles to be used in the preparation and presentation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. This statement will be effective 60 days after the Securities and Exchange Commission approves the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board’s amendments to AU Section 411, “The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.” The Utility does not anticipate that the adoption of SFAS No. 162 will have any effect on its financial statements.

8

In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 163, “Accounting for Financial Guarantee Insurance Contracts-an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 60.” This Statement provides clarification to the guidance in SFAS No. 60, “Accounting and Reporting by Insurance Enterprises,” and expands disclosure requirements. This Statement is effective for Laclede Gas as of the beginning of fiscal year 2010. Because SFAS No. 163 is primarily applicable to insurance enterprises that issue financial guarantee insurance contracts, the Utility does not anticipate that the adoption of this Statement will have any effect on its financial statements.

2. PENSION PLANS AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS

Laclede Gas has non-contributory defined benefit, trusteed forms of pension plans covering substantially all employees. Benefits are based on years of service and the participant’s compensation during the highest three years of the last ten years of employment. Plan assets consist primarily of corporate and U.S. government obligations and pooled equity funds.

Pension costs for the quarters ending June 30, 2008 and 2007 were $1.5 million and $1.4 million, respectively, including amounts charged to construction. Pension costs for the nine months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 were $4.6 million and $4.1 million, respectively, including amounts charged to construction.

The net periodic pension costs include the following components:

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
(Thousands)	2008			2007			2008			2007
Service cost – benefits earned
during the period	$	3,243		$	3,106		$	9,728		$	9,317
Interest cost on projected
benefit obligation		4,670			4,482			14,010			13,447
Expected return on plan assets		(5,162	)		(5,074	)		(15,487	)		(15,222	)
Amortization of prior service cost		272			284			816			851
Amortization of actuarial loss		791			920			2,373			2,761
Sub-total		3,814			3,718			11,440			11,154
Loss on lump sum settlement		—			—			—			945
Regulatory adjustment		(2,280	)		(2,364	)		(6,840	)		(8,037	)
Net pension cost	$	1,534		$	1,354		$	4,600		$	4,062

Pursuant to the provisions of the Laclede Gas pension plans, pension obligations may be satisfied by lump-sum cash payments. Pursuant to a Missouri Public Service Commission (MoPSC or Commission) Order, lump-sum payments are recognized as settlements (which can result in gains or losses) only if the total of such payments exceeds 100% of the sum of service and interest costs. No lump sum payments were recognized as settlements during the nine months ended June 30, 2008. Lump sum payments recognized as settlements during the nine months ended June 30, 2007 were $2.8 million.

Pursuant to a MoPSC Order, the return on plan assets is based on the market-related value of plan assets implemented prospectively over a four-year period. Gains or losses not yet includible in pension cost are amortized only to the extent that such gain or loss exceeds 10% of the greater of the projected benefit obligation or the market-related value of plan assets. Such excess is amortized over the average remaining service life of active participants. The recovery in rates for the Utility’s qualified pension plans is based on an allowance of $4.1 million annually effective October 1, 2005 and $4.8 million annually effective August 1, 2007. The difference between this amount and pension expense as calculated pursuant to the above and that otherwise would be included in the Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income is deferred as a regulatory asset or regulatory liability.

Laclede Gas provides certain life insurance benefits at retirement. Medical insurance is available after early retirement until age 65. The transition obligation not yet includible in postretirement benefit cost is being amortized over 20 years. Postretirement benefit costs for the quarters ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 were $1.9 million and $2.0 million, respectively, including amounts charged to construction. Postretirement benefit costs for the nine months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 were $5.7 million and $5.9 million, respectively, including amounts charged to construction.

9

Net periodic postretirement benefit costs consisted of the following components:

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
(Thousands)	2008			2007			2008			2007
Service cost – benefits earned
during the period	$	1,140		$	1,016		$	3,420		$	3,047
Interest cost on accumulated
postretirement benefit obligation		977			899			2,931			2,699
Expected return on plan assets		(509	)		(430	)		(1,528	)		(1,292	)
Amortization of transition obligation		34			34			102			102
Amortization of prior service cost		(582	)		(582	)		(1,746	)		(1,746	)
Amortization of actuarial loss		746			811			2,238			2,434
Sub-total		1,806			1,748			5,417			5,244
Regulatory adjustment		104			222			314			668
Net postretirement benefit cost	$	1,910		$	1,970		$	5,731		$	5,912

Missouri state law provides for the recovery in rates of SFAS No. 106, “Employers’ Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions,” accrued costs provided that such costs are funded through an independent, external funding mechanism. Laclede Gas established Voluntary Employees’ Beneficiary Association (VEBA) and Rabbi trusts as its external funding mechanisms. VEBA and Rabbi trusts’ assets consist primarily of money market securities and mutual funds invested in stocks and bonds.

Pursuant to a MoPSC Order, the return on plan assets is based on the market-related value of plan assets implemented prospectively over a four-year period. Gains and losses not yet includible in postretirement benefit cost are amortized only to the extent that such gain or loss exceeds 10% of the greater of the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation or the market-related value of plan assets. Such excess is amortized over the average remaining service life of active participants. Previously, the recovery in rates for the postretirement benefit costs was based on an alternative methodology for amortization of unrecognized gains and losses as ordered by the MoPSC. The Commission ordered that the recovery in rates be based on an annual allowance of $7.6 million, effective August 1, 2007. The difference between this amount and postretirement benefit cost based on the above and that otherwise would be included in the Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income is deferred as a regulatory asset or regulatory liability.

3. INCOME TAXES

Laclede Group files a consolidated federal and state tax return and allocates income taxes to Laclede Gas and its other subsidiaries as if each entity were a separate taxpayer. Laclede Group and Laclede Gas adopted the provisions of FIN 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes,” as of October 1, 2007. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” Pursuant to FIN 48, the Utility may recognize the tax benefit from a tax position only if it is at least more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position.

Upon adoption of FIN 48, Laclede Gas recognized an increase to beginning retained earnings as a cumulative-effect adjustment totaling $0.4 million and reclassified $2.1 million of income tax liabilities from current to non-current liabilities. Total unrecognized tax benefits as of October 1, 2007 were $1.9 million, all of which would have favorably impacted the effective tax rate, if recognized. The Utility recognizes potential accrued interest and penalties related to its uncertain tax positions as interest expense and other income deductions, respectively. Potential interest and penalties accrued (net of income tax benefit) associated with the Utility’s uncertain tax positions were $0.2 million at October 1, 2007. Unrecognized tax benefits, accrued interest payable, and accrued penalties payable are included in the Other line of the Deferred Credits and Other Liabilities section of the Balance Sheets.

10

Laclede Group and/or Laclede Gas are subject to U.S. federal income tax as well as income tax of state and local jurisdictions. These companies are no longer subject to examination for fiscal years prior to 2005. The federal statute of limitations remains open until June 15, 2009 and 2010 for fiscal years 2005 and 2006, respectively. However, during the quarter ended March 31, 2008, Laclede Group effectively settled an audit with the Internal Revenue Service for those periods. Completion of the audit represents an event requiring the Utility to re-evaluate its uncertain tax positions. As a result, the Utility recognized fiscal years 2005 and 2006 unrecognized tax benefits of $1.0 million, which favorably impacted the effective tax rate, and reversed $0.2 million of accrued interest and penalties (net of income tax benefit). During the quarter ended June 30, 2008, the statute of limitations for Laclede Group’s fiscal year 2004 expired. As a result, previously unrecognized tax benefits of $0.3 million were recognized by the Utility, which favorably impacted the effective tax rate, and $0.1 million of related accrued interest and penalties were reversed (net of income tax benefit).

Total FIN 48 unrecognized tax benefits at June 30, 2008 were $0.9 million, all of which would favorably impact the effective tax rate, if recognized. Potential interest and penalties associated with these liabilities were immaterial. The Utility does not expect to make any significant tax payment related to any of the above obligations within the next twelve months.

4. OTHER INCOME AND (INCOME DEDUCTIONS) – NET

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
(Thousands)	2008			2007			2008			2007
Allowance for funds used during construction	$	(21	)	$	(2	)	$	(46	)	$	(18	)
Interest income		71			359			1,615			2,483
Other income		472			376			1,012			791
Other income deductions		(674	)		(182	)		(1,224	)		496
Other Income and (Income Deductions) – Net	$	(152	)	$	551		$	1,357		$	3,752

The decrease in Other Income and (Income Deductions) – Net for the nine months ended June 30, 2008, compared with the nine months ended June 30, 2007, was primarily due to higher investment losses, lower income associated with carrying costs applied to under-recoveries of gas costs, and reduced income associated with changes in the cash surrender value of life insurance policies. These factors were partially offset by additional proceeds related to Laclede Gas’ interest, as a policyholder, in the sale of a mutual insurance company. Carrying costs on under-recoveries of gas costs are recovered through the Utility’s Purchased Gas Adjustment (PGA) Clause.

11

5. INFORMATION BY OPERATING SEGMENT

The Regulated Gas Distribution segment consists of the regulated operations of Laclede Gas. The Non-Regulated Other segment includes the retail sale of gas appliances. There are no material intersegment revenues.

	Regulated		Non-		Adjustments
	Gas		Regulated		&
(Thousands)	Distribution		Other		Eliminations		Total
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2008
Operating revenues	$	189,598	$	630	$	—	$	190,228
Net income		5,509		37		—		5,546
Total assets		1,382,002		1,747		—		1,383,749
Nine Months Ended
June 30, 2008
Operating revenues	$	1,017,579	$	2,156	$	—	$	1,019,735
Net income		46,606		35		—		46,641
Total assets		1,382,002		1,747		—		1,383,749
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2007
Operating revenues	$	185,696	$	1,128	$	—	$	186,824
Net income		856		30		—		886
Total assets		1,288,098		1,358		—		1,289,456
Nine Months Ended
June 30, 2007
Operating revenues	$	1,027,777	$	2,568	$	—	$	1,030,345
Net income		37,247		32		—		37,279
Total assets		1,288,098		1,358		—		1,289,456

6. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Laclede Gas owns and operates natural gas distribution, transmission, and storage facilities, the operations of which are subject to various environmental laws, regulations, and interpretations. While environmental issues resulting from such operations arise in the ordinary course of business, such issues have not materially affected Laclede Gas’ financial position and results of operations. As environmental laws, regulations, and their interpretations change, however, Laclede Gas may be required to incur additional costs. See Note 12 to the Financial Statements included in Laclede Gas’ Fiscal Year 2007 Form 10-K for information relative to environmental matters generally. There have been no significant changes relative to environmental matters during the nine months ended June 30, 2008.

On December 28, 2006, the MoPSC Staff proposed a disallowance of $7.2 million related to Laclede Gas’ recovery of its purchased gas costs applicable to fiscal 2005. On September 14, 2007, the Staff withdrew its pursuit of $5.5 million of the disallowance it had originally proposed. Laclede Gas believes that the remaining $1.7 million of the MoPSC Staff’s proposed disallowance lacks merit and intends to vigorously oppose the adjustment in proceedings before the MoPSC.

On December 31, 2007, the MoPSC Staff filed a memorandum with the Commission proposing a disallowance of $2.8 million related to Laclede Gas’ recovery of its purchased gas costs applicable to fiscal 2006. Laclede Gas believes that the MoPSC Staff’s position lacks merit and intends to vigorously oppose the adjustment in proceedings before the MoPSC. In addition, the MoPSC’s Staff’s memorandum raised questions regarding whether certain sales and capacity release transactions subject to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)’s oversight were consistent with the FERC’s regulations and policies regarding capacity release. Laclede Group commenced an internal review of the questions raised by the MoPSC Staff and notified the FERC Staff that it took this action. Subsequently, as a result of the internal review, Laclede Group has provided the FERC Staff with a report regarding compliance of sales and capacity release activities with the FERC’s regulations and policies. On July 23, 2008, the FERC Staff requested additional information, which will be provided by Laclede Group.

12

Laclede Gas is involved in other litigation, claims, and investigations arising in the normal course of business. While the results of such litigation cannot be predicted with certainty, management, after discussion with counsel, believes that the final outcome will not have a material adverse effect on the financial position or results of operations of the Utility.

Laclede Gas has several operating leases for the rental of vehicles that contain provisions requiring Laclede Gas to guarantee certain amounts related to the residual value of the leased property. These leases have various terms, the longest of which extends through 2014. At June 30, 2008, the maximum guarantees under these leases were $1.7 million. However, the Utility estimates that the residual value of the leased vehicles will be adequate to satisfy most of the guaranteed amounts. At June 30, 2008, the carrying value of the liability recognized for these guarantees was $0.3 million.

Laclede Gas has entered into various contracts, expiring on dates through 2017, for the storage, transportation, and supply of natural gas. Minimum payments required under the contracts in place at June 30, 2008 are estimated at approximately $437 million. Additional contracts are generally entered into prior to or during the heating season.

13

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

LACLEDE GAS COMPANY

This management’s discussion analyzes the financial condition and results of operations of Laclede Gas Company (Laclede Gas or the Utility). It includes management’s view of factors that affect its business, explanations of past financial results including changes in earnings and costs from the prior year periods, and their effects on overall financial condition and liquidity.

Certain matters discussed in this report, excluding historical information, include forward-looking statements. Certain words, such as “may,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “seek,” and similar words and expressions identify forward-looking statements that involve uncertainties and risks. Future developments may not be in accordance with our expectations or beliefs and the effect of future developments may not be those anticipated. Among the factors that may cause results to differ materially from those contemplated in any forward-looking statement are:

• weather conditions and catastrophic events, particularly severe weather in the natural gas producing areas of the country;

• volatility in gas prices, particularly sudden and sustained spikes in natural gas prices;

• the impact of higher natural gas prices on our competitive position in relation to suppliers of alternative heating sources, such as electricity;

• changes in gas supply and pipeline availability; particularly those changes that impact supply for and access to our market area;

• legislative, regulatory and judicial mandates and decisions, some of which may be retroactive, including those affecting

• allowed rates of return

• incentive regulation

• industry structure

• purchased gas adjustment provisions

• rate design structure and implementation

• franchise renewals

• environmental or safety matters

• taxes

• pension and other postretirement benefit liabilities and funding obligations

• accounting standards;

• the results of litigation;

• retention of, ability to attract, ability to collect from and conservation efforts of customers;

• capital and energy commodity market conditions, including the ability to obtain funds for necessary capital expenditures and general operations and the terms and conditions imposed for obtaining sufficient gas supply;

• discovery of material weakness in internal controls; and

• employee workforce issues.

Readers are urged to consider the risks, uncertainties and other factors that could affect our business as described in this report. All forward-looking statements made in this report rely upon the safe harbor protections provided under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. We do not, by including this statement, assume any obligation to review or revise any particular forward-looking statement in light of future events.

The Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read in conjunction with the Utility’s Financial Statements and the Notes thereto.

14

LACLEDE GAS COMPANY

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Laclede Gas is regulated by the Missouri Public Service Commission (MoPSC or Commission) and serves the City of St. Louis and parts of ten other counties in eastern Missouri. Laclede Gas delivers natural gas to retail customers at rates, and in accordance with tariffs, authorized by the MoPSC. The Utility’s earnings are primarily generated by the sale of heating energy. The Utility’s innovative weather mitigation rate design lessens the impact of weather volatility on Laclede Gas customers during cold winters and stabilizes the Utility’s earnings by recovering fixed costs more evenly during the heating season. Due to the seasonal nature of the business of Laclede Gas, earnings are typically concentrated in the November through April period, which generally corresponds with the heating season.

Mitigating the impact of weather fluctuations on Laclede Gas customers while improving the ability to recover its authorized distribution costs and return continues to be a fundamental component of Laclede Gas’ strategy. The Utility’s distribution costs are the essential, primarily fixed expenditures it must incur to operate and maintain a more than 16,000 mile natural gas distribution system and related storage facilities. With regard to the storage facilities owned by Laclede Gas, management is currently undertaking an evaluation of the Utility’s natural gas storage field, which was developed more than 50 years ago, to assess the field’s current and future capabilities. In addition, Laclede Gas is working to continually improve its ability to provide reliable natural gas service at a reasonable cost, while maintaining and building a secure and dependable infrastructure. The settlement of the Utility’s 2007 rate case resulted in enhancements to the Utility’s weather mitigation rate design that better ensure the recovery of its fixed costs and margins despite variations in sales volumes due to the impacts of weather and other factors that affect customer usage. The Utility’s income from off-system sales remains subject to fluctuations in market conditions. In conjunction with the settlement of the 2005 rate case, effective October 1, 2005, the Utility retained all pre-tax income from off-system sales and capacity release revenues up to $12 million annually. Pre-tax amounts in excess of $12 million were shared with customers, with the Utility retaining 50% of amounts exceeding that threshold. The Stipulation & Agreement approved by the MoPSC in the Utility’s 2007 rate case increases the portion of pre-tax income from off-system sales and capacity release revenues that is shared with customers. Effective October 1, 2007, the Utility is allowed to retain 15% to 25% of the first $6 million in annual income earned (depending on the level of income earned) and 30% of income exceeding $6 million annually. Some of the factors impacting the level of off-system sales include the availability and cost of the Utility’s natural gas supply, the weather in its service area, and the weather in other markets. When Laclede Gas’ service area experiences warmer-than-normal weather while other markets experience colder weather or supply constraints, some of the Utility’s natural gas supply is available for off-system sales and there may be a demand for such supply in other markets.

Laclede Gas continues to work actively to reduce the impact of higher costs associated with wholesale natural gas prices by strategically structuring its natural gas supply portfolio and through the use of financial instruments. Nevertheless, the cost of purchased gas remains high, relative to historical levels. The Utility’s Purchased Gas Adjustment (PGA) Clause allows Laclede Gas to flow through to customers, subject to prudence review, the cost of purchased gas supplies, including costs, cost reductions, and related carrying costs associated with the use of financial instruments to hedge the purchase price of natural gas, as well as gas inventory carrying costs. The Utility believes it will continue to be able to obtain sufficient gas supply. The generally higher price levels may continue to affect sales volumes (due to the conservation efforts of customers) and cash flows (associated with the timing of collection of gas costs and related accounts receivable from customers).

Quarter Ended June 30, 2008

Earnings

Laclede Gas’ net income for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 was $5.5 million, compared with net income of $0.9 million for the same quarter last year. The increase in net income was primarily due to the following factors, quantified on a pre-tax basis:

• the benefit of the general rate increase, effective August 1, 2007, totaling $8.7 million; and,

• interim benefits of a rate design change, effective August 1, 2007, and other variations totaling $5.1 million.

15

These factors were partially offset by:

• increases in operation and maintenance expenses, excluding the provision for uncollectible accounts, totaling $3.1 million;

• an increase in the provision for uncollectible accounts, totaling $2.6 million; and,

• lower income from off-system sales and capacity release, totaling $2.0 million, primarily due to a reduction in the Utility’s share of such income (pursuant to the 2007 rate case).

Utility Operating Revenues and Operating Expenses

Laclede Gas passes on to Utility customers (subject to prudence review) increases and decreases in the wholesale cost of natural gas in accordance with its PGA Clause. The volatility of the wholesale natural gas market results in fluctuations from period to period in the recorded levels of, among other items, revenues and natural gas cost expense. Nevertheless, increases and decreases in the cost of gas associated with system gas sales volumes have no direct effect on net revenues and net income.

Utility operating revenues for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 were $189.6 million, or $3.9 million more than the same quarter last year. Temperatures experienced in the Utility’s service area during the quarter were 16.1% colder than the same quarter last year and 28.4% colder than normal. Total system therms sold and transported were 0.13 billion for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, compared with 0.14 billion for the same quarter last year. Total off-system therms sold and transported were 0.03 billion for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, compared with 0.05 billion for the same quarter last year. The increase in utility operating revenues was primarily attributable to the following factors:

	Quarter Ended
(Millions)	June 30, 2008
Lower off-system sales volumes		$	(15.4	)
Higher prices charged for off-system sales			11.2
General rate increase, effective August 1, 2007			8.7
Higher charges for system gas sales and other variations			4.0
Lower wholesale gas costs passed on to Utility customers (subject to prudence review by the MoPSC)			(4.0	)
Lower Infrastructure System Replacement Surcharge (ISRS) revenues			(0.6	)
Total Variation		$	3.9

Utility operating expenses for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 decreased $1.4 million from the same quarter last year. Natural and propane gas expense decreased $8.6 million, or 7.1%, from last year’s level, primarily attributable to lower rates charged by our suppliers, lower off-system gas expense, and lower system volumes purchased for sendout. Other operation and maintenance expenses increased $5.7 million, or 16.3%, primarily due to a higher provision for uncollectible accounts, increased maintenance and distribution charges, higher legal fees, and increased group insurance charges. These factors were partially offset by decreased injuries and damages expenses. Taxes, other than income, increased $1.2 million, or 8.9%, primarily due to higher gross receipts taxes (attributable to the increased revenues).

Other Income and (Income Deductions) - Net

Other income and (income deductions) – net decreased $0.7 million, primarily due to increased investment losses and lower income associated with carrying costs applied to under-recoveries of gas costs. Carrying costs on under-recoveries of gas costs are recovered through the Utility’s PGA Clause.

Interest Charges

The $1.3 million decrease in interest charges was primarily due to a reduction in interest on long-term debt resulting from the November 2007 maturity of $40 million principal amount of 7 1/2% First Mortgage Bonds.

Income Taxes

The $1.2 million increase in income taxes was primarily due to higher pre-tax income, partially offset by the recognition of previously unrecognized tax benefits recorded pursuant to Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48), “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes,” and the net effect of various property-related deductions.

16

Nine Months Ended June 30, 2008

Earnings

Laclede Gas’ net income for the nine months ended June 30, 2008 was $46.6 million, compared with net income of $37.2 million for the same period last year. The increase in net income was primarily due to the following factors, quantified on a pre-tax basis:

• the benefit of the general rate increase, effective August 1, 2007, totaling $30.4 million;

• the effect of higher system gas sales volumes and other variations totaling $2.3 million; and,

• the recognition of previously unrecognized tax benefits and the reversal of related expenses, totaling $1.5 million.

These factors were partially offset by:

• lower income from off-system sales and capacity release, totaling $9.5 million, primarily due to a reduction in the Utility’s share of such income (pursuant to the 2007 rate case);

• an increase in the provision for uncollectible accounts, totaling $4.9 million; and,

• increases in operation and maintenance expenses, excluding the provision for uncollectible accounts, totaling $4.9 million.

Utility Operating Revenues and Operating Expenses

Utility operating revenues for the nine months ended June 30, 2008 were $1.0 billion, or $10.2 million less than the same period last year. Temperatures experienced in the Utility’s service area during the nine months ended June 30, 2008 were 6.8% colder than the same period last year, but 0.6% warmer than normal. Total system therms sold and transported were 0.85 billion for the nine months ended June 30, 2008, compared with 0.82 billion for the same period last year. Total off-system therms sold and transported were 0.14 billion for the nine months ended June 30, 2008, compared with 0.21 billion for the same period last year. Increases and decreases in the cost of gas associated with system gas sales volumes have no direct effect on net revenues and net income. The decrease in utility operating revenues was primarily attributable to the following factors:

	Nine Months
	Ended
(Millions)	June 30, 2008
Lower off-system sales volumes		$	(48.6	)
Lower wholesale gas costs passed on to Utility customers (subject to prudence review by the MoPSC)			(47.2	)
Higher system sales volumes, primarily due to colder weather, and other variations			34.0
General rate increase, effective August 1, 2007			30.4
Higher prices charged for off-system sales			22.8
Lower ISRS revenues			(1.6	)
Total Variation		$	(10.2	)

Utility operating expenses for the nine months ended June 30, 2008 decreased $22.8 million from the same period last year. Natural and propane gas expense decreased $33.3 million, or 4.5%, from last year’s level, primarily attributable to lower rates charged by our suppliers and lower off-system gas expense, partially offset by increased system volumes purchased for sendout. Other operation and maintenance expenses increased $9.8 million, or 8.4%, primarily due to a higher provision for uncollectible accounts, increased maintenance and distribution expenses, higher legal fees, increased pension costs, the effect of a gain on the disposal of assets recorded last year, and higher wage rates. Depreciation and amortization expense increased $0.7 million, or 2.6%, primarily due to additional depreciable property.

Other Income and (Income Deductions) - Net

Other income and (income deductions) – net decreased $2.4 million due to higher investment losses, lower income associated with carrying costs applied to under-recoveries of gas costs, and reduced income associated with changes in the cash surrender value of life insurance policies. These factors were partially offset by additional proceeds related to Laclede Gas’ interest, as a policyholder, in the sale of a mutual insurance company. Carrying costs on under-recoveries of gas costs are recovered through the Utility’s PGA Clause.

17

Interest Charges

The $2.1 million decrease in interest charges was primarily due to a reduction in interest on long-term debt resulting from the November 2007 maturity of $40 million principal amount of 7 1/2% First Mortgage Bonds.

Income Taxes

The $3.0 million increase in income taxes was primarily due to higher pre-tax income, partially offset by the recognition of previously unrecognized tax benefits recorded pursuant to FIN 48.

Labor Agreement

Laclede Gas’ labor agreement with Locals 11-6 and 11-194 of the United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied-Industrial and Service Workers International Union (Union), which represents approximately 65% of Laclede Gas’ employees, expired at midnight, July 31, 2008. On August 4, 2008, Laclede Gas and Union Representatives reached a new four-year labor agreement replacing the prior agreement. The new contract will expire at midnight on July 31, 2012. 

REGULATORY MATTERS

During fiscal 2006, the MoPSC approved permanent modifications to the Cold Weather Rule affecting the disconnection and reconnection practices of utilities during the winter heating season. Those modifications included provisions to allow the Utility to obtain accounting authorizations and defer for future recovery certain costs incurred with the modifications. During fiscal 2007, the Utility deferred for future recovery $2.7 million of costs associated with the fiscal 2007 heating season. On October 31, 2007, the Utility filed for determination and subsequent recovery of the deferred amount. On November 16, 2007, the MoPSC directed the MoPSC Staff and the Missouri Office of Public Counsel (Public Counsel) to submit their positions regarding the Utility’s filing by February 28, 2008.On February 28, 2008, the Utility and the MoPSC Staff filed a Non-unanimous Stipulation & Agreement in which these parties agreed to a recovery of $2.5 million of costs. The Non-unanimous Stipulation & Agreement was opposed by Public Counsel, and a hearing in this matter was held before the Commission on March 31, 2008. On April 17, 2008, the Commission issued its Report and Order approving the $2.5 million cost recovery recommended by the Utility and the MoPSC Staff. Consistent with the approved amount, the Utility recorded a reduction in its deferral totaling $0.2 million during the quarter ended March 31, 2008. On May 29, 2008, Public Counsel appealed the MoPSC’s April 17 Order to the Cole County, Missouri Circuit Court. Laclede Gas believes that Public Counsel’s appeal is without merit and intends to vigorously oppose the appeal.

On November 9, 2007, the Utility made an ISRS filing with the Commission designed to increase revenues by $1.6 million annually. On January 15, 2008, the Commission approved implementation of the surcharge to be effective January 18, 2008. On April 25, 2008, the Utility made an ISRS filing with the Commission designed to increase revenues by $1.9 million annually. On June 24, 2008, the Commission approved implementation of the surcharge in the full amount requested, effective June 30, 2008.

On December 28, 2006, the MoPSC Staff proposed a disallowance of $7.2 million related to Laclede Gas’ recovery of its purchased gas costs applicable to fiscal 2005. On September 14, 2007, the Staff withdrew its pursuit of $5.5 million of the disallowance it had originally proposed. Laclede Gas believes that the remaining $1.7 million of the MoPSC Staff’s proposed disallowance lacks merit and intends to vigorously oppose the adjustment in proceedings before the MoPSC.

On December 31, 2007, the MoPSC Staff filed a memorandum with the Commission proposing a disallowance of $2.8 million related to Laclede Gas’ recovery of its purchased gas costs applicable to fiscal 2006. Laclede Gas believes that the MoPSC Staff’s position lacks merit and intends to vigorously oppose the adjustment in proceedings before the MoPSC. In addition, the MoPSC’s Staff’s memorandum raised questions regarding whether certain sales and capacity release transactions, subject to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)’s oversight, were consistent with the FERC’s regulations and policies regarding capacity release. Laclede Group commenced an internal review of the questions raised by the MoPSC Staff and notified the FERC Staff that it took this action. Subsequently, as a result of the internal review, Laclede Group has provided the FERC Staff with a report regarding compliance of sales and capacity release activities with the FERC’s regulations and policies. On July 23, 2008, the FERC Staff requested additional information, which will be provided by Laclede Group.

18

On July 9, 2008, Laclede Gas made a tariff filing with the MoPSC that would make the payment provisions for the restoration of gas service under the Utility’s Cold Weather Rule available to customers in the summer of 2008 and enable the Utility to increase or decrease its PGA rates to correct for any shortfall or surplus created by the difference between the gas cost portion of the Utility’s actual net bad debt write-offs and the amount of such cost that is embedded in its existing rates. Such filing is pending before the MoPSC.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, and capital resources is based upon our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Generally accepted accounting principles require that we make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We evaluate our estimates on an ongoing basis. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates. We believe the following represent the more significant items requiring the use of judgment and estimates in preparing our financial statements:

Allowances for doubtful accounts – Estimates of the collectibility of trade accounts receivable are based on historical trends, age of receivables, economic conditions, credit risk of specific customers, and other factors. The Utility’s provision for uncollectible accounts is dependent on the regulatory treatment provided for such costs. As approved by the MoPSC, the Utility is allowed to defer for future recovery certain costs associated with amendments to the Cold Weather Rule.

Employee benefits and postretirement obligations – Pension and postretirement obligations are calculated by actuarial consultants that utilize several statistical factors and other assumptions related to future events, such as discount rates, returns on plan assets, compensation increases, and mortality rates. For the Utility, the amount of expense recognized and the amounts reflected in other comprehensive income are dependent upon the regulatory treatment provided for such costs, as discussed further below. Certain liabilities related to group medical benefits and workers’ compensation claims, portions of which are self-insured and/or contain “stop-loss” coverage with third-party insurers to limit exposure, are established based on historical trends.

Laclede Gas accounts for its regulated operations in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 71, “Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types of Regulation.” This Statement sets forth the application of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for those companies whose rates are established by or are subject to approval by an independent third-party regulator. The provisions of SFAS No. 71 require, among other things, that financial statements of a regulated enterprise reflect the actions of regulators, where appropriate. These actions may result in the recognition of revenues and expenses in time periods that are different than non-regulated enterprises. When this occurs, costs are deferred as assets in the balance sheet (regulatory assets) and recorded as expenses when those amounts are reflected in rates. Also, regulators can impose liabilities upon a regulated company for amounts previously collected from customers and for recovery of costs that are expected to be incurred in the future (regulatory liabilities). Management believes that the current regulatory environment supports the continued use of SFAS No. 71 and that all regulatory assets and regulatory liabilities are recoverable or refundable through the regulatory process. Management believes the following represent the more significant items recorded through the application of SFAS No. 71:

The Utility’s PGA Clause allows Laclede Gas to flow through to customers, subject to prudence review, the cost of purchased gas supplies, including the costs, cost reductions, and related carrying costs associated with the Utility’s use of natural gas financial instruments to hedge the purchase price of natural gas. The difference between actual costs incurred and costs recovered through the application of the PGA are recorded as regulatory assets and regulatory liabilities that are recovered or refunded in a subsequent period. The PGA Clause also authorizes the Utility to recover costs it incurs to finance its investment in gas supplies that are purchased during the storage injection season for sale during the heating season. The PGA Clause also permits the application of carrying costs to all over- or under-recoveries of gas costs, including costs and cost reductions associated with the use of financial instruments. Effective October 1, 2007, the PGA Clause also provides for a portion of income from off-system sales and capacity release revenues to be flowed through to customers.

19

Laclede Gas records deferred tax liabilities and assets measured by enacted tax rates for the net tax effect of all temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes, and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Changes in enacted tax rates, if any, and certain property basis differences will be reflected by entries to regulatory asset or liability accounts. Pursuant to the direction of the MoPSC, Laclede Gas’ provision for income tax expense for financial reporting purposes reflects an open-ended method of tax depreciation. Laclede Gas’ provision for income tax expense also records the income tax effect associated with the difference between overheads capitalized to construction for financial reporting purposes and those recognized for tax purposes without recording an offsetting deferred income tax expense. These two methods are consistent with the regulatory treatment prescribed by the MoPSC.

Asset retirement obligations are recorded in accordance with SFAS No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations” and FIN 47, “Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations.” Asset retirement obligations are calculated using various assumptions related to the timing, method of settlement, inflation, and profit margins that third parties would demand to settle the future obligations. These assumptions require the use of judgment and estimates and may change in future periods as circumstances dictate. As authorized by the MoPSC, Laclede Gas accrues future removal costs associated with its property, plant and equipment through its depreciation rates, even if a legal obligation does not exist as defined by SFAS No. 143 and FIN 47. The difference between removal costs recognized in depreciation rates and the accretion expense and depreciation expense recognizable under SFAS No. 143 and FIN 47 is a timing difference between the recovery of these costs in rates and their recognition for financial reporting purposes. Accordingly, consistent with SFAS No. 71, these differences are deferred as regulatory liabilities.

The amount of net periodic pension and other postretirement benefit cost recognized in the financial statements related to the Utility’s qualified pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans is based upon allowances, as approved by the MoPSC, which have been established in the rate-making process for the recovery of these costs from customers. The differences between these amounts and actual pension and other postretirement benefit costs incurred for financial reporting purposes are deferred as regulatory assets or regulatory liabilities. SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans,” requires that changes that affect the funded status of pension and other postretirement benefit plans, but that are not yet required to be recognized as components of pension and other postretirement benefit cost, be reflected in other comprehensive income. For the Utility’s qualified pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans, amounts that would otherwise be reflected in other comprehensive income are deferred with entries to regulatory assets or regulatory liabilities.

For further discussion of significant accounting policies, see Note 1 to the Financial Statements included in Exhibit 99.1 of the Laclede Group’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007.

ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

Laclede Gas has evaluated or is in the process of evaluating the impact that recently issued accounting standards will have on the Utility’s financial position or results of operations upon adoption. For disclosures related to the adoption of new accounting standards, see the New Accounting Standards section of Note 1 to the Financial Statements.

FINANCIAL CONDITION

CREDIT RATINGS

As of June 30, 2008, credit ratings for outstanding securities for Laclede Gas issues were as follows:

Type of Facility	S&P	Moody’s	Fitch
Laclede Gas First Mortgage Bonds	A	A3	A+
Laclede Gas Commercial Paper	A-1	P-2

The Utility has investment grade ratings, and believes that it will have adequate access to the financial markets to meet its capital requirements. These ratings remain subject to review and change by the rating agencies.

20

CASH FLOWS

Laclede Gas’ short-term borrowing requirements typically peak during colder months when Laclede Gas borrows money to cover the lag between when it purchases its natural gas and when its customers pay for that gas. Changes in the wholesale cost of natural gas, variations in the timing of collections of gas cost under the Utility’s PGA Clause, the seasonality of accounts receivable balances, and the utilization of storage gas inventories cause short-term cash requirements to vary during the year, and can cause significant variations in the Utility’s cash provided by or used in operating activities.

Net cash provided by operating activities for the nine months ended June 30, 2008 was $210.2 million, compared with $167.0 million for the same period last year. The variation is primarily attributable to differences in the timing of the collections of gas cost under the Utility’s PGA Clause, including the effects of this year’s reduction in net cash payments associated with the Utility’s use of natural gas financial instruments, and higher operating income this year. These variations are partially offset by an increase in net cash payments to Laclede Group for the Utility’s allocation of income taxes.

Net cash used in investing activities for the nine months ended June 30, 2008 was $40.0 million, compared with $40.9 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2007. Cash used in investing activities primarily reflected capital expenditures in both periods.

Net cash used in financing activities was $169.6 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2008, compared with $125.8 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2007. The variation primarily reflects this year’s maturity of long-term debt as well as increased repayments of short-term debt.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

As indicated above, the Utility’s short-term borrowing requirements typically peak during the colder months. These short-term cash requirements have traditionally been met through the sale of commercial paper supported by lines of credit with banks. Laclede Gas has a line of credit in place of $320 million. During the second quarter, the expiration of this line was extended one year to December 2011 from December 2010. In November 2007, the Utility established a seasonal line of credit of $40 million, which expired in March 2008. The Utility had short-term borrowings aggregating to a maximum of $304.5 million at any one time during the nine months ended June 30, 2008. Short-term commercial paper borrowings outstanding at June 30, 2008 were $58.6 million. In addition to these borrowings, the Utility had outstanding notes payable to Laclede Group totaling $44.4 million at June 30, 2008. The weighted average interest rate on the total short-term borrowings of $103.0 million was 3.1% per annum at June 30, 2008. Based on total short-term borrowings at June 30, 2008, a change in interest rates of 100 basis points would increase or decrease pre-tax earnings and cash flows of Laclede Gas by approximately $1.0 million on an annual basis. Portions of such increases or decreases may be offset through the application of PGA carrying costs.

Laclede Gas’ lines of credit include covenants limiting total debt, including short-term debt, to no more than 70% of total capitalization and requiring earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) to be at least 2.25 times interest expense. On June 30, 2008, total debt was 53% of total capitalization. For the twelve months ended June 30, 2008, EBITDA was 3.97 times interest expense.

Laclede Gas has on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission an effective shelf registration on Form S-3 for issuance of $350 million of securities. The full amount of this shelf registration remains available to Laclede Gas at this time. The Utility has authority from the MoPSC to issue up to $500 million in First Mortgage Bonds, unsecured debt, and equity securities. In May 2008, pursuant to this authority, the Utility sold 26 shares of its common stock to Laclede Group for $0.9 million, leaving $493.3 million remaining under this authorization as of the date of this filing. The amount, timing, and type of additional financing to be issued will depend on cash requirements and market conditions.

On November 1, 2007, Laclede Gas paid at maturity $40 million principal amount of 7 1/2% First Mortgage Bonds. This maturity was funded through short-term borrowings. At June 30, 2008, Laclede Gas had fixed-rate long-term debt totaling $310 million. While these long-term debt issues are fixed-rate, they are subject to changes in fair value as market interest rates change. However, increases or decreases in fair value would impact earnings and cash flows only if Laclede Gas were to reacquire any of these issues in the open market prior to maturity.

21

Laclede Gas has several operating leases for the rental of vehicles that contain provisions requiring Laclede Gas to guarantee certain amounts related to the residual value of the leased property. These leases have various terms, the longest of which extends through 2014. At June 30, 2008, the maximum guarantees under these leases were $1.7 million. However, the Utility estimates that the residual value of the leased vehicles will be adequate to satisfy most of the guaranteed amounts. At June 30, 2008, the carrying value of the liability recognized for these guarantees was $0.3 million.

Utility capital expenditures were $40.2 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2008, compared with $41.5 million for the same period last year.

Capitalization at June 30, 2008, excluding current obligations of preferred stock, consisted of 54.6% common stock equity, 0.1% preferred stock, and 45.3% long-term debt.

It is management’s view that Laclede Gas has adequate access to capital markets and will have sufficient capital resources, both internal and external, to meet anticipated capital requirements.

The seasonal nature of Laclede Gas’ sales affects the comparison of certain balance sheet items at June 30, 2008 and at September 30, 2007, such as Accounts Receivable – Net, Gas Stored Underground, Notes Payable, Accounts Payable, Regulatory Assets and Regulatory Liabilities, and Delayed and Advance Customer Billings. The Balance Sheet at June 30, 2007 is presented to facilitate comparison of these items with the corresponding interim period of the preceding fiscal year.

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

As of June 30, 2008, Laclede Gas had contractual obligations with payments due as summarized below (in millions):

			Payments due by period
			Remaining						Fiscal Years
Contractual Obligations	Total		Fiscal Year 2008		Fiscal Years 2009-2010		Fiscal Years 2011-2012		2013 and thereafter
Principal Payments on Long-Term Debt	$	310.0	$	—	$	—	$	25.0	$	285.0
Interest Payments on Long-Term Debt		382.4		1.2		39.0		36.5		305.7
Operating Leases (a)		11.1		1.3		7.6		2.2		—
Purchase Obligations – Natural Gas (b)		436.5		72.2		163.6		129.7		71.0
Purchase Obligations – Other (c)		119.0		6.4		25.8		19.2		67.6
Total (d)	$	1,259.0	$	81.1	$	236.0	$	212.6	$	729.3

(a)	Operating lease obligations are primarily for office space, vehicles, and power operated equipment. Additional payments will be incurred if renewal options are exercised under the provisions of certain agreements.
(b)	These purchase obligations represent the minimum payments required under existing natural gas transportation and storage contracts and natural gas supply agreements. These amounts reflect fixed obligations as well as obligations to purchase natural gas at future market prices, calculated using June 30, 2008 New York Mercantile Exchange futures prices. Laclede Gas recovers the costs related to its purchases, transportation, and storage of natural gas through the operation of its PGA Clause, subject to prudence review; however, variations in the timing of collections of gas costs from customers affect short-term cash requirements. Additional contractual commitments are generally entered into prior to or during the heating season.
(c)	These purchase obligations reflect miscellaneous agreements for the purchase of materials and the procurement of services necessary for normal operations.
(d)	The categories of Capital Leases and Other Long-Term liabilities have been excluded from the table above because there are no applicable amounts of contractual obligations under these categories. Also, commitments related to pension and postretirement benefit plans have been excluded from the table above. The Utility does not expect to make any contributions to its qualified, trusteed pension plans during the remainder of fiscal year 2008. Laclede Gas anticipates a $0.1 million contribution relative to its non-qualified pension plans during the remainder of fiscal year 2008. With regard to the postretirement benefits, the Utility anticipates it will contribute $4.1 million to the qualified trusts and $0.1 million directly to participants from Laclede Gas’ funds during the remainder of fiscal year 2008. For further discussion of the Utility’s pension and postretirement benefit plans, refer to Note 2, Pension Plans and Other Postretirement Benefits, of the Notes to Financial Statements.

22

MARKET RISK

Laclede Gas adopted a risk management policy that provides for the purchase of natural gas financial instruments with the goal of managing price risk associated with purchasing natural gas on behalf of its customers. This policy prohibits speculation. Costs and cost reductions, including carrying costs, associated with the Utility’s use of natural gas financial instruments are allowed to be passed on to the Utility’s customers through the operation of its PGA Clause, through which the MoPSC allows the Utility to recover gas supply costs. Accordingly, Laclede Gas does not expect any adverse earnings impact as a result of the use of these financial instruments. At June 30, 2008, the Utility held 7.4 million MMBtu of futures contracts at an average price of $9.03 per MMBtu. Additionally, 13.8 million MMBtu of other price risk mitigation was in place through the use of option-based strategies. These positions have various expiration dates, the longest of which extends through March 2009.

ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS

Laclede Gas owns and operates natural gas distribution, transmission, and storage facilities, the operations of which are subject to various environmental laws, regulations, and interpretations. While environmental issues resulting from such operations arise in the ordinary course of business, such issues have not materially affected Laclede Gas’ financial position and results of operations. As environmental laws, regulations, and their interpretations change, however, Laclede Gas may be required to incur additional costs. For information relative to environmental matters, see Note 12 to the Financial Statements included in the Utility’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007. There have been no significant changes relative to environmental matters during the nine months ended June 30, 2008.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

Laclede Gas has no off-balance sheet arrangements.

23