XML 27 R14.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.6.0.2
Note 8. Fair Value
6 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2016
Fair Value [Abstract]  
Fair Value Disclosures
Fair Value
Kimball categorizes assets and liabilities measured at fair value into three levels based upon the assumptions (inputs) used to price the assets or liabilities. Level 1 provides the most reliable measure of fair value, whereas level 3 generally requires significant management judgment. The three levels are defined as follows:
Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.
Level 2: Observable inputs other than those included in level 1. For example, quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets or quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in inactive markets.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs reflecting management’s own assumptions about the inputs used in pricing the asset or liability.
Our policy is to recognize transfers between these levels as of the end of each quarterly reporting period. There were no transfers between these levels during the six months ended December 31, 2016. There were also no changes in the inputs or valuation techniques used to measure fair values compared to those disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016.
We hold a total investment of $1.3 million in a privately-held company, consisting of $0.5 million in non-marketable equity securities invested during fiscal year 2016, and $0.8 million in stock warrants invested during the quarter ended September 30, 2016. The investment in non-marketable equity securities is classified as a level 3 financial asset and is accounted for using the cost method, as explained in the Financial Instruments Not Carried At Fair Value section below. The investment in stock warrants is also classified as a level 3 financial asset and is accounted for as a derivative instrument valued on a recurring basis, as explained in the Financial Instruments Recognized at Fair Value section below. See Note 9 - Investments of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding the investment in non-marketable equity securities, and Note 10 - Derivative Instruments of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding the investment in stock warrants. No other purchases or sales of level 3 assets occurred during the three and six months ended December 31, 2016.
Financial Instruments Recognized at Fair Value:
The following methods and assumptions were used to measure fair value:
Financial Instrument
 
Level
 
Valuation Technique/Inputs Used
Cash Equivalents: Money market funds
 
1
 
Market - Quoted market prices
Cash Equivalents: Commercial paper
 
2
 
Market - Based on market data which use evaluated pricing models and incorporate available trade, bid, and other market information.
Available-for-sale securities: Secondary market certificates of deposit
 
2
 
Market - Based on market data which use evaluated pricing models and incorporate available trade, bid, and other market information.
Available-for-sale securities: Municipal bonds
 
2
 
Market - Based on market data which use evaluated pricing models and incorporate available trade, bid, and other market information.
Trading securities: Mutual funds held in nonqualified SERP
 
1
 
Market - Quoted market prices
Derivative Assets: Stock warrants
 
3
 
Market - Stock warrants are analyzed for reasonableness on a quarterly basis. The privately-held company is currently in an early stage of start-up. The pricing of recent purchases or sales of the investment are considered, as well as positive and negative qualitative evidence, in the assessment of fair value.


Recurring Fair Value Measurements:
As of December 31, 2016 and June 30, 2016, the fair values of financial assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis using the market approach were as follows:
(Amounts in Thousands)
December 31, 2016
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash equivalents: Money market funds
$
37,970

 
$

 
$

 
$
37,970

Cash equivalents: Commercial paper

 
11,026

 

 
11,026

Available-for-sale securities: Secondary market certificates of deposit

 
9,397

 

 
9,397

Available-for-sale securities: Municipal bonds

 
9,408

 

 
9,408

Trading Securities: Mutual funds in nonqualified SERP
10,548

 

 

 
10,548

Derivatives: Stock warrants

 

 
750

 
750

Total assets at fair value
$
48,518

 
$
29,831

 
$
750

 
$
79,099

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(Amounts in Thousands)
June 30, 2016
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash equivalents: Money market funds
$
45,880

 
$

 
$

 
$
45,880

Trading Securities: Mutual funds in nonqualified SERP
10,001

 

 

 
10,001

Total assets at fair value
$
55,881

 
$

 
$

 
$
55,881


The nonqualified supplemental employee retirement plan (“SERP”) assets consist primarily of equity funds, balanced funds, target date funds, a bond fund, and a money market fund. The SERP investment assets are offset by a SERP liability which represents Kimball’s obligation to distribute SERP funds to participants. See Note 9 - Investments of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding the SERP.
Financial Instruments Not Carried At Fair Value:
Financial instruments that are not reflected in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value that have carrying amounts which approximate fair value include the following:
Financial Instrument
 
Level
 
Valuation Technique/Inputs Used
Notes receivable
 
2
 
Market - Price approximated based on the assumed collection of receivables in the normal course of business, taking into account the customer’s non-performance risk
Non-marketable equity securities (cost-method investments, which carry shares at cost except in the event of impairment)
 
3
 
Cost Method, with Impairment Recognized Using a Market-Based Valuation Technique - See the explanation below the table regarding the method used to periodically estimate the fair value of cost-method investments.
Long-term debt (carried at amortized cost)
 
3
 
Income - Price estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis based on quoted long-term debt market rates, taking into account Kimball’s non-performance risk

The $0.5 million investment in non-marketable equity securities of a privately-held company is accounted for using the cost method. Kimball does not have the ability to exercise significant influence over the operating and financial policies of the investee. On a periodic basis, but no less frequently than quarterly, these investments are assessed for impairment when there are events or changes in circumstances that may have a significant adverse effect on the fair value of the investment. If a significant adverse effect on the fair value of the investment were to occur and was deemed to be other-than-temporary, the fair value of the investment would be estimated, and the amount by which the carrying value of the cost-method investment exceeds its fair value would be recorded as an impairment loss.
The carrying value of our cash deposit accounts, trade accounts receivable, trade accounts payable, and dividends payable approximates fair value due to the relatively short maturity and immaterial non-performance risk.