XML 23 R8.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.5.0.2
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2016
Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies [Text Block]
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Organization
Great Plains Energy, a Missouri corporation incorporated in 2001, is a public utility holding company and does not own or operate any significant assets other than the stock of its subsidiaries.  Great Plains Energy's wholly owned direct subsidiaries with significant operations are as follows:
KCP&L is an integrated, regulated electric utility that provides electricity to customers primarily in the states of Missouri and Kansas.  KCP&L has one active wholly owned subsidiary, Kansas City Power & Light Receivables Company (KCP&L Receivables Company).
KCP&L Greater Missouri Operations Company (GMO) is an integrated, regulated electric utility that provides electricity to customers in the state of Missouri.  GMO also provides regulated steam service to certain customers in the St. Joseph, Missouri area.  GMO has two active wholly owned subsidiaries, GMO Receivables Company and MPS Merchant Services, Inc. (MPS Merchant).  MPS Merchant has certain long-term natural gas contracts remaining from its former non-regulated trading operations.
Great Plains Energy also wholly owns GPE Transmission Holding Company, LLC (GPETHC). GPETHC owns 13.5% of Transource Energy, LLC (Transource) with the remaining 86.5% owned by AEP Transmission Holding Company, LLC (AEPTHC), a subsidiary of American Electric Power Company, Inc. GPETHC accounts for its investment in Transource under the equity method. Transource is focused on the development of competitive electric transmission projects.
Each of Great Plains Energy's and KCP&L's consolidated financial statements includes the accounts of their subsidiaries.  Intercompany transactions have been eliminated.
Great Plains Energy's sole reportable business segment is electric utility.  See Note 19 for additional information.
Basic and Diluted Earnings per Common Share Calculation
To determine basic earnings per common share (EPS), preferred stock dividend requirements are deducted from net income before dividing by the average number of common shares outstanding.  The effect of dilutive securities, calculated using the treasury stock method, assumes the issuance of common shares applicable to performance shares and restricted stock.
The following table reconciles Great Plains Energy's basic and diluted EPS.
 
Three Months Ended June 30
 
Year to Date
June 30
 
2016
 
2015
 
2016
 
2015
Income
(millions, except per share amounts)
Net income
$
32.0

 
$
44.4

 
$
58.4

 
$
63.3

Less: preferred stock dividend requirements
0.4

 
0.4

 
0.8

 
0.8

Earnings available for common shareholders
$
31.6

 
$
44.0

 
$
57.6

 
$
62.5

Common Shares Outstanding
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

Average number of common shares outstanding
154.6

 
154.1

 
154.5

 
154.1

Add: effect of dilutive securities
0.2

 
0.4

 
0.4

 
0.4

Diluted average number of common shares outstanding
154.8

 
154.5

 
154.9

 
154.5

Basic and diluted EPS
$
0.20

 
$
0.28

 
$
0.37

 
$
0.40


There were no anti-dilutive shares excluded from the computation of dilutive EPS for the three months ended and year to date June 30, 2016 and 2015.
Dividends Declared
In August 2016, Great Plains Energy's Board of Directors (Great Plains Energy Board) declared a quarterly dividend of $0.2625 per share on Great Plains Energy's common stock.  The common dividend is payable September 20, 2016, to shareholders of record as of August 29, 2016.  

In August 2016, KCP&L's Board of Directors declared a cash dividend payable to Great Plains Energy of $55 million payable on September 19, 2016.
New Accounting Standards
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. The ASU will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) when it becomes effective. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, deferring the effective date of ASU No. 2014-09 one year, from January 1, 2017, to January 1, 2018. The Companies plan to adopt ASU No. 2014-09 on January 1, 2018. The standard permits the use of either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. The Companies are evaluating the effect that ASU No. 2014-09 will have on their consolidated financial statements and related disclosures and have not yet selected a transition method nor have they determined the effect of the standard on their ongoing financial reporting.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases, which requires an entity that is a lessee to record a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for lease payments on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months.  Leases will be classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the income statement.  The new guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and is required to be applied using a modified retrospective approach.  The Companies are evaluating the effect that ASU No. 2016-02 will have on their consolidated financial statements and related disclosures and have not yet determined the effect of the standard on their ongoing financial reporting.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Compensation-Stock Compensation, which is intended to simplify several areas of accounting for share-based compensation arrangements, including the income tax impact, classification on the statement of cash flows and forfeitures. The new guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and early adoption is permitted. This guidance will be applied either prospectively, retrospectively or using a modified retrospective transition method, depending on the area covered in this update. The Companies have not yet selected a transition method but ASU No. 2016-09 is not expected to have a significant impact on their ongoing financial reporting.