EX-99.1 2 ppt.htm WEBCAST SLIDES ppt.htm

Great Plains Energy
Aquila Transaction Update
  
Exhibit 99.1
 
 

 
2
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Statements made in this release that are not based on historical facts are forward-looking, may involve risks and
uncertainties, and are intended to be as of the date when made. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to,
statements regarding projected delivered volumes and margins, the outcome of regulatory proceedings, cost estimates of
the comprehensive energy plan and other matters affecting future operations. In connection with the safe harbor provisions
of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, the registrants are providing a number of important factors that could
cause actual results to differ materially from the provided forward-looking information. These important factors include:
future economic conditions in the regional, national and international markets, including but not limited to regional and
national wholesale electricity markets; market perception of the energy industry, Great Plains Energy and KCP&L; changes in
business strategy, operations or development plans; effects of current or proposed state and federal legislative and
regulatory actions or developments, including, but not limited to, deregulation, re-regulation and restructuring of the electric
utility industry; decisions of regulators regarding rates KCP&L can charge for electricity; adverse changes in applicable laws,
regulations, rules, principles or practices governing tax, accounting and environmental matters including, but not limited to,
air and water quality; financial market conditions and performance including, but not limited to, changes in interest rates and
in availability and cost of capital and the effects on pension plan assets and costs; credit ratings; inflation rates;
effectiveness of risk management policies and procedures and the ability of counterparties to satisfy their contractual
commitments; impact of terrorist acts; increased competition including, but not limited to, retail choice in the electric utility
industry and the entry of new competitors; ability to carry out marketing and sales plans; weather conditions including
weather-related damage; cost, availability, quality and deliverability of fuel; ability to achieve generation planning goals and
the occurrence and duration of unplanned generation outages; delays in the anticipated in-service dates and cost increases
of additional generating capacity; nuclear operations; ability to enter new markets successfully and capitalize on growth
opportunities in non-regulated businesses and the effects of competition; workforce risks including compensation and
benefits costs; performance of projects undertaken by non-regulated businesses and the success of efforts to invest in and
develop new opportunities; the ability to successfully complete merger, acquisition or divestiture plans (including the
acquisition of Aquila, Inc., and Aquila’s sale of assets to Black Hills Corporation); the outcome of Great Plains Energy’s review
of strategic and structural alternatives for its subsidiary Strategic Energy, L.L.C.; and other risks and uncertainties. Other
risk factors are detailed from time to time in Great Plains Energy’s most recent quarterly report on Form 10-Q or annual
report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. This list of factors is not all-inclusive because it is
not possible to predict all factors.
Forward Looking Statement
 
 

 

Great Plains Energy
Aquila Transaction Update
Mike Chesser,
Chairman and CEO
 
 

 
4
  Strong performance at KCP&L
  Comprehensive Energy Plan
  Sierra Club agreement
  Strategic alternative review of
 Strategic Energy
  Pending acquisition of Aquila’s
 Missouri electric operations
Strategic Context - GPE / KCP&L
 
 

 
5
ü Strong support for transaction from
 shareholders of both companies
 
ü FERC approval received
 
ü Nebraska, Iowa, & Colorado approval of
 Black Hills transaction
ü Kansas settlement reached for Black Hills;
 agreement in principle for Great Plains
 Missouri hearings expected to begin in April
 Transaction anticipated to close in first half
 of 2008
+
FORGING A STRONGER
REGIONAL UTILITY
Aquila Transaction Update
 
 

 
6
Highlights of Revised Missouri Proposal
  Earlier savings to customers, plus mitigation of
 future rate increases for both companies
  Recovery of interest on Aquila non-investment grade
 debt through 2012 consistent with Aquila’s current
 approach
  Great Plains shareholders see accretion beginning in
 year 2
  Aquila shareholders become part of a financially
 stronger company, including investment grade credit
 rating and dividend payment
 
 

 
7
Note: Projection based on terms of revised regulatory proposal, including synergy capture assumptions
Customer Savings
Projected Customer Savings Mitigate
Future Rate Increases
 
 

 
Revised Proposal
Terry Bassham, CFO
Executive Vice President
Finance & Strategic Development
 
 

 
9
 Agreement in principle reached
 Terms of agreement will remain confidential until
 definitive document is signed and filed with the
 Commission
 Testimony supporting the agreement is expected to
 be filed on March 4, with a hearing on March 7
Kansas Agreement
 
 

 
10
What Has Changed
In Missouri
Previous “ask”

Current “ask”

Immediate approval for retention of 50% of
utility operational synergies ($260 million
net of transition costs) over 5 years
 
 
 
 
 
Recovery of utility operational synergies
through traditional ratemaking process
Regulatory lag expected to provide
opportunity for the retention of
approximately 50% of the synergies
Recovery of 50% of transition costs ($45
million) over 5 years
 
 
Recovery of 100% of updated transition cost
($58.9 million) over five years
Recovery of 100% of the transaction costs
($95 million) over 5 years
Recovery of 100% of the revised transaction
costs ($64.9 million) over 5 years
Company no longer requesting recovery of
CIC and Rabbi Trust for Senior Aquila officers
Recovery requested of actual interest costs
in Aquila customer rates
No recovery of Aquila actual interest costs in
excess of equivalent investment grade costs
Authorization to use additional
amortizations in Aquila rate cases to meet
credit metrics, consistent with KCP&L’s
treatment
Will include as a component in a future
regulatory plan for Aquila
Amounts shown are total amounts before allocations between Missouri and Kansas jurisdictions.
 
 

 
11
Missouri Hearings, Approval
 and Close
Shareholders
receive benefits of
synergies
File rate case
File rate case
Shareholders
receive benefits of
new synergies
Rates Effective
Rates Effective
Path to Synergy Sharing
 
 

 
12
Great Plains expects to realize $675 million of total savings and
synergies over five years
Interest Savings
Corporate Retained
& Merchant Savings
$302
$305
$68
$120
$131
$54
$27
$275
Significant Synergies Expected
 
 

 
13
Proximity Helps to Achieve
Synergy Numbers
 
 

 
14
Announced Synergies as a % of Combined Total O&M
Announced Synergies as a % of Combined Non-Fuel O&M
Source: RJ Rudden Associates, based on $279mm of regulated operational synergies net of purchased power
Estimates Are In Line With Comparable
Merger Savings
 
 

 
15
Shareholder Value Proposition
 Great Plains Shareholders
 Accretion in 2009 and beyond
 Investment in Aquila’s growth
 expands rate base
 Operational and financial scale:
 shared synergies mitigate future
 rate increases
 Efficient use of Aquila’s tax
 position
 Aquila Shareholders
 Investment grade credit rating
 to support rate base
 investments at lower costs
 Dividends
 Operational and financial scale:
 shared synergies mitigate future
 rate increases
 New regulatory plan to support
 future investment
 
 

 

Great Plains Energy
Aquila Transaction Update