XML 33 R18.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.6.0.2
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, Net
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2016
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]  
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, Net
GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET

Goodwill

The following table sets forth the change in the carrying amount of goodwill for each reportable segment and for the Company:
 
 
2016
 
2015
 
 

Distribution
 
Aerospace
 
Total
 

Distribution
 
Aerospace
 
Total
In thousands
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gross balance at beginning of period
 
$
149,204

 
$
219,758

 
$
368,962

 
$
141,612

 
$
113,221

 
$
254,833

Accumulated impairment
 

 
(16,252
)
 
(16,252
)
 

 
(16,252
)
 
(16,252
)
Net balance at beginning of period
 
149,204

 
203,506

 
352,710

 
141,612

 
96,969

 
238,581

Additions
 

 
2,138

 
2,138

 
7,592

 
106,488

 
114,080

Impairments
 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency translation
 

 
(7,342
)
 
(7,342
)
 

 
49

 
49

Purchase price adjustment
 

 
(9,612
)
 
(9,612
)
 

 

 

Net balance at end of period
 
$
149,204

 
$
188,690

 
$
337,894

 
$
149,204

 
$
203,506

 
$
352,710

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Accumulated impairment at end of period
 
$

 
$
(16,252
)
 
$
(16,252
)
 
$

 
$
(16,252
)
 
$
(16,252
)

 
Additions to goodwill in the Company's Aerospace segment primarily relate to an earnout payment associated with a previous acquisition. See Note 3, Acquisitions, for further discussion of these acquisitions. During the purchase price measurement period, the Company made adjustments to the purchase price allocation related to the GRW acquisition. These adjustments were for the finalization of certain tax matters and the reduction of the accrual related to the environmental remediation at the Rimpar, Germany facility.

2016 Analysis

The Company performed a reevaluation of its reporting units for the purposes of its annual goodwill assessment. As previously disclosed in our 2015 Form 10-K, RWG, EXTEX and GRW were reorganized under the single management team of Kaman Specialty Bearings and Engineered Products. The Company tested the new reporting unit for impairment immediately after its creation by comparing the sum of the fair values of the entities moved into the new reporting unit to the carrying value of the new reporting unit, noting the fair value exceeded the carrying value. Prior to the reorganization, these reporting units were stand-alone reporting units. The fair value of RWG was assessed as part of our 2015 annual test for goodwill impairment, prepared during the fourth quarter of 2015. EXTEX and GRW were acquired during the fourth quarter of 2015 and as such were not included in the 2015 annual test for goodwill impairment. There were no significant changes to the conditions of the entities in the new reporting unit that would have impacted the results of the analysis as of January 1, 2016. Since this is the first year the Company assessed goodwill at this reporting unit level, the two-step impairment test was performed.

In accordance with ASC 350, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (“ASC 350”), the Company evaluates goodwill for possible impairment on at least an annual basis. Upon completion of our 2016 qualitative assessment of events and circumstances affecting recorded goodwill as described in Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, the Company concluded that all reporting units, other than KPP - Orlando, should receive a Step 1 analysis. The qualitative assessment performed for KPP - Orlando took into consideration the following factors: general economic conditions, industry specific performance, changes in carrying values of the reporting unit, the assessment of assumptions used in the previous fair value calculation and changes in transaction multiples. The results of this analysis indicated that this reporting unit did not need to proceed to the two-step impairment test.
9. GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET (CONTINUED)

Goodwill - continued

2016 Analysis - continued

For the remaining reporting units the Company performed a Step 1 analysis. The results of the Step 1 analyses indicated that the Company did not need to proceed to Step 2, as the percentage by which the fair value exceeds the carrying value was greater than 25% for all reporting units other than Aerosystems, whose fair value exceeded carrying value by 4%. The Company performed a sensitivity analysis relative to the discount rate and growth rate selected and determined a decrease of 1% in the terminal growth rate or an increase of 1% in the discount rate would not result in a fair value calculation less than the carrying value for the Kaman Specialty Bearings and Engineered Products and Kaman Distribution reporting units. An increase of 1% in the discount rate would result in a fair value approximately 5% less than the carrying value for the Kaman Aerosystems reporting unit. A decrease of 1% in the terminal growth rate would not result in a fair value calculation less than the carrying value for the Kaman Aerosystems reporting unit.

2015 Analysis

In accordance with ASC 350, the Company evaluates goodwill for possible impairment on at least an annual basis. For the Company's 2015 annual assessment a Step 1 analysis was performed for all of its reporting units that carry goodwill. The result of these analyses indicated that the Company did not need to proceed to Step 2, as the percentage by which the fair value exceeded the carrying value was greater than 13% for all reporting units. The Company performed a sensitivity analysis relative to the discount rate and growth rate selected and determined a decrease of 1% in the terminal growth rate or an increase of 1% in the discount rate would not result in a fair value calculation less than the carrying value for any of the reporting units.

Other Intangible Assets

Other intangible assets consisted of:

 
 
 
 
At December 31,
 
At December 31,
 
 
 
 
2016
 
2015
 
 
Amortization
Period
 
Gross
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Gross
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
In thousands
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Customer lists / relationships
 
6-26 years
 
$
154,745

 
$
(51,800
)
 
$
158,831

 
$
(41,445
)
Developed technologies
 
10-20 years
 
19,049

 
(1,394
)
 
19,055

 
(154
)
Trademarks / trade names
 
3-15 years
 
8,344

 
(3,250
)
 
8,478

 
(2,556
)
Non-compete agreements and other
 
1-9 years
 
8,096

 
(7,444
)
 
8,453

 
(6,006
)
Patents
 
17 years
 
523

 
(425
)
 
523

 
(416
)
Total
 
 
 
$
190,757

 
$
(64,313
)
 
$
195,340

 
$
(50,577
)


The decrease in the other intangible assets balance at December 31, 2016, as compared to December 31, 2015, is primarily due to amortization. See Note 3, Acquisitions, for further discussion of these acquisitions. Intangible asset amortization expense was $15.6 million, $11.8 million and $10.6 million in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

In accordance with ASC 360 - Property, Plant, and Equipment ("ASC 360"), the Company is required to evaluate long-lived intangible assets for possible impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amounts may not be recoverable. During the fourth quarter of 2016, the Company evaluated certain long-lived intangible assets associated with our U.K. Composites facility. The Company compared the carrying amount of these long-lived intangible assets to the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the assets. The carrying value did not exceed the fair value, indicating there was no impairment of long-lived intangible assets held by the U.K. Composites business.
9. GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET (CONTINUED)

Other Intangible Assets - continued

Estimated amortization expense for the next five years associated with intangible assets existing as of December 31, 2016, is as follows:
In thousands
 
2017
$
15,435

2018
$
14,173

2019
$
12,217

2020
$
11,718

2021
$
11,232



In order to determine the useful life of acquired intangible assets, the Company considered numerous factors, most importantly the industry considerations associated with the acquired entities. The Company determined the amortization period for the acquired intangible assets for its acquisitions in 2015 based primarily on an analysis of their historical customer sales attrition information and the period over which the assets are expected to deliver meaningful cash flow generation in support of the fair value of the asset.