XML 34 R23.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.5.0.2
Income Taxes
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2016
Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]  
Income Taxes
INCOME TAXES
 
 
For the Three Months Ended
 
For the Nine Months Ended
 
 
September 30,
2016
 
October 2,
2015
 
September 30,
2016
 
October 2,
2015
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Effective Income Tax Rate
 
35.9
%
 
34.7
%
 
34.8
%
 
28.9
%


The effective income tax rate represents the combined federal, state and foreign tax effects attributable to pretax earnings for the period. The increase in the effective tax rate for the three-month fiscal period ended September 30, 2016, as compared to the rate for the corresponding quarter in the prior year is primarily due to international rate differences and certain discrete return to provision differences recognized in the three-month fiscal period ended September 30, 2016. The increase in the effective tax rate for the nine-month fiscal period ended September 30, 2016, as compared to the rate for the corresponding period in the prior year is due to certain discrete items which were recognized in the nine-month fiscal period ended October 2, 2015. These were primarily the result of changes in tax laws which made it more likely than not that the Company would realize future state tax benefits associated with certain net operating loss carryforwards for which, prior to the changes in the tax laws, the Company had established valuation allowances. These state tax law changes were amended in the fourth quarter of 2015 causing the amount of the anticipated benefit to be reduced and therefore a portion of the valuation allowances were reinstated at that time.

A valuation allowance for deferred tax assets, including those associated with net operating loss carryforwards, is recognized when it is more likely than not that some or all of the benefit from the deferred tax asset will not be realized. To assess that likelihood, the Company uses estimates and judgment regarding future taxable income, and considers the tax consequences in the jurisdiction where such taxable income is generated, to determine whether a valuation allowance is required. Such evidence can include current financial position, results of operations, both actual and forecasted, the reversal of deferred tax liabilities, and tax planning strategies, as well as the current and forecasted business economics.

The Company has assessed both positive and negative evidence to estimate whether sufficient future taxable income will be generated to utilize operating loss carryforwards associated with certain foreign operations that will permit the Company to use $2.1 million of deferred tax assets associated with these foreign operations as of September 30, 2016. Through the end of the third quarter of 2016, the Company believes it is more likely than not that these deferred tax assets will be realized and as such, has not recorded a valuation allowance. Going forward, management will continue to assess the available positive and negative evidence to determine whether it is likely sufficient future taxable income will be generated to permit the use of these deferred tax assets. The amount of the deferred tax asset considered realizable could be adjusted if estimates of future taxable income are reduced or increased, or if additional weight is given to subjective evidence such as future expected growth because objective negative evidence in the form of cumulative losses is no longer present.