XML 55 R12.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Fair Value Measurements
9 Months Ended
Sep. 28, 2012
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.

The following table presents the carrying value and fair value of financial instruments that are not carried at fair value at September 28, 2012 and December 31, 2011:
 
 
September 28, 2012
 
December 31, 2011
In thousands
 
Carrying Value
 
Fair Value
 
Carrying Value
 
Fair Value
Long-term debt
 
$
273,567

 
$
304,120

 
$
203,522

 
$
218,048



The above fair values were computed based on quoted market prices and discounted future cash flows, as applicable. Differences from carrying values are attributable to interest rate changes subsequent to when the transaction occurred. The increase in fair value of the long-term debt is driven by increased borrowings and an increase in the quoted market price for the Company's convertible notes.

The fair values of Cash and cash equivalents, Accounts receivable, net, Notes payable, and Accounts payable - trade approximate their carrying amounts due to the short-term maturities of these instruments.

5. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (CONTINUED)

The Company uses a three-level fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. This hierarchy requires the Company to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The three levels of inputs used to measure fair value are as follows:
 
Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 — Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for markets that are not active or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. This includes certain pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies and similar techniques that use significant unobservable inputs.

Recurring Fair Value Measurements

The table below segregates all financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis (at least annually) into the most appropriate level within the fair value hierarchy based on the inputs used to determine their fair value at the measurement date:
 
Total Carrying
Value at
 
Quoted prices in
active markets
(Level 1)
 
Significant other
observable
inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant
unobservable
inputs
(Level 3)
In thousands
September 28,
2012
 
 
 
Derivative instruments
$
1,464

 
$

 
$
1,464

 
$

Total assets
$
1,464

 
$

 
$
1,464

 
$

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Contingent consideration
$
3,138

 
$

 
$

 
$
3,138

Total liabilities
$
3,138

 
$

 
$

 
$
3,138

 
Total Carrying
Value at
 
Quoted prices in
active markets
(Level 1)
 
Significant other
observable
inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant
unobservable
inputs
(Level 3)
In thousands
December 31,
2011
 
 
 
Derivative instruments
$
3,518

 
$

 
$
3,518

 
$

Total assets
$
3,518

 
$

 
$
3,518

 
$

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Contingent consideration
$
3,355

 
$

 
$

 
$
3,355

Total liabilities
$
3,355

 
$

 
$

 
$
3,355



The Company’s derivative instruments are foreign exchange contracts that are measured at fair value using observable market inputs such as forward rates and our counterparties’ credit risks. Based on these inputs, the derivative instruments are classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy and have been included in other current assets and other assets on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 28, 2012 and December 31, 2011. Based on the continued ability to trade and enter into forward contracts, we consider the markets for our fair value instruments to be active.

The Company evaluated the credit risk associated with the counterparties to these derivative instruments and determined that as of September 28, 2012, such credit risks have not had an adverse impact on the fair value of these instruments.



5. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (CONTINUED)

Recurring Fair Value Measurements (Continued)

The Company’s contingent consideration liability, included in Other accruals and payables and Other long-term liabilities on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, is associated with the 2011 acquisition of the assets of Target Electronic Supply ("Target"). This liability was measured at fair value based on the potential payments of the liability associated with the unobservable input of the estimated post-acquisition financial results of Target through 2014 and, therefore, is a Level 3 liability. The table below presents a rollforward of the instruments valued using Level 3 inputs:

In thousands
 
 
Balance at December 31, 2011
 
$
3,355

Reduction of liability released to income
 
(483
)
Accretion of implicit interest expense
 
266

Balance at September 28, 2012
 
$
3,138