-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, ENmf7fj+XwPeKoMixHuu7JeECKwTbkjxqbnsM+3jCAa89uI2LC5lpJyd4Hsxoh4/ c+xjEamrxlkXhI0pgr+XeA== 0000054291-99-000019.txt : 19991028 0000054291-99-000019.hdr.sgml : 19991028 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0000054291-99-000019 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 10-Q PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 3 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 19990930 FILED AS OF DATE: 19991027 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: KAISER ALUMINUM & CHEMICAL CORP CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000054291 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: PRIMARY PRODUCTION OF ALUMINUM [3334] IRS NUMBER: 940928288 STATE OF INCORPORATION: DE FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 10-Q SEC ACT: SEC FILE NUMBER: 001-03605 FILM NUMBER: 99734441 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 6177 SUNOL BOULEVARD CITY: PLEASANTON STATE: CA ZIP: 94566-7769 BUSINESS PHONE: 5104621122 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 6177 SUNOL BLVD CITY: PLEASANTON STATE: CA ZIP: 94566-7769 FORMER COMPANY: FORMER CONFORMED NAME: PERMANENTE METALS CORP DATE OF NAME CHANGE: 19660905 10-Q 1 KACC THIRD QUARTER 10-Q ================================================================= SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 Commission file number 1-3605 KAISER ALUMINUM & CHEMICAL CORPORATION (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) DELAWARE 94-0928288 (State of incorporation) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) 6177 SUNOL BOULEVARD, PLEASANTON, CALIFORNIA 94566-7769 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) (925) 462-1122 (Registrant's telephone number, including area code) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ------ ------- At October 15, 1999, the registrant had 46,171,365 shares of Common Stock outstanding. ================================================================= KAISER ALUMINUM & CHEMICAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -------------------- CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (In millions of dollars)
September 30, December 31, 1999 1998 ------------------------------ ASSETS (Unaudited) Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents $ 8.6 $ 98.3 Receivables 293.2 288.2 Inventories 554.2 543.5 Prepaid expenses and other current assets 120.7 104.9 ------------------------------ Total current assets 976.7 1,034.9 Investments in and advances to unconsolidated affiliates 96.5 128.3 Property, plant, and equipment - net 1,059.7 1,108.7 Deferred income taxes 430.5 376.9 Other assets 535.9 346.0 ------------------------------ Total $ 3,099.3 $ 2,994.8 ============================== LIABILITIES & STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY Current liabilities: Accounts payable $ 196.2 $ 173.3 Accrued interest 24.7 37.3 Accrued salaries, wages, and related expenses 59.4 73.8 Accrued postretirement medical benefit obligation - 48.2 48.2 current portion Other accrued liabilities 153.0 150.2 Payable to affiliates 82.4 75.3 Long-term debt - current portion .3 .4 ------------------------------ Total current liabilities 564.2 558.5 Long-term liabilities 733.7 533.0 Accrued postretirement medical benefit obligation 684.1 694.3 Long-term debt 969.9 962.6 Minority interests 95.1 101.9 Redeemable preference stock 19.4 20.1 Commitments and contingencies Stockholders' equity: Preferred stock 1.5 1.5 Common stock 15.4 15.4 Additional capital 2,142.9 2,052.8 Accumulated deficit (244.1) (151.2) Less: Note receivable from parent (1,882.8) (1,794.1) ------------------------------ Total stockholders' equity 32.9 124.4 ------------------------------ Total $ 3,099.3 $ 2,994.8 ==============================
The accompanying notes to interim consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements. KAISER ALUMINUM & CHEMICAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED INCOME (LOSS) (Unaudited) (In millions of dollars)
Quarter Ended Nine Months Ended September 30, September 30, ----------------------------- ----------------------------- 1999 1998 1999 1998 ----------------------------- ----------------------------- Net sales $ 520.3 $ 541.6 $ 1,524.7 $ 1,753.4 ----------------------------- ----------------------------- Costs and expenses: Cost of products sold 463.9 458.2 1,397.7 1,458.8 Depreciation and amortization 20.9 24.5 69.4 74.8 Selling, administrative, research and development, and general 28.4 28.0 82.6 88.5 Non-cash impairment of Micromill assets 19.1 - 19.1 - ----------------------------- ----------------------------- Total costs and expenses 532.3 510.7 1,568.8 1,622.1 ----------------------------- ----------------------------- Operating income (loss) (12.0) 30.9 (44.1) 131.3 Other income (expense): Interest expense (27.3) (27.7) (82.4) (82.6) Other - net (21.9) 1.3 (19.3) (.5) ----------------------------- ----------------------------- Income (loss) before income taxes and minority interests (61.2) 4.5 (145.8) 48.2 Benefit (provision) for income taxes 21.1 6.7 49.9 (8.5) Minority interests 1.3 - 4.1 1.3 ----------------------------- ----------------------------- Net income (loss) $ (38.8) $ 11.2 $ (91.8) $ 41.0 ============================= =============================
The accompanying notes to interim consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements. KAISER ALUMINUM & CHEMICAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOWS (Unaudited) (In millions of dollars)
Nine Months Ended September 30, -------------------------------- 1999 1998 -------------------------------- Cash flows from operating activities: Net income (loss) $ (91.8) $ 41.0 Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash (used) provided by operating activities: Depreciation and amortization (including deferred financing costs of $3.2 and $3.0) 72.6 77.8 Gain on sale of interest in AKW joint venture (50.5) - Non-cash impairment of Micromill assets 19.1 - Non-cash benefit for income taxes - (8.3) Equity in (income) loss of unconsolidated affiliates, net of distributions (2.0) .9 Minority interests (4.1) (1.3) (Increase) decrease in receivables (5.0) 43.0 (Increase) decrease in inventories (10.7) 48.6 (Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses and other current assets (35.2) 26.1 Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued interest 10.3 (17.2) Decrease in payable to affiliates and other accrued liabilities (1.1) (47.4) (Decrease) increase in accrued and deferred income taxes (56.4) 3.1 Increase (decrease) in net long-term assets and liabilities 28.2 (26.8) Other (.9) 7.6 -------------------------------- Net cash (used) provided by operating activities (127.5) 147.1 -------------------------------- Cash flows from investing activities: Proceeds from sale of interest in AKW joint venture 70.4 - Capital expenditures (40.3) (52.3) Other .1 .2 -------------------------------- Net cash provided (used) by investing activities 30.2 (52.1) -------------------------------- Cash flows from financing activities: Borrowings under revolving credit facility, net 7.7 - Repayments of long-term debt (.4) (7.1) Capital stock issued 1.4 .1 Incurrance of financing costs - (.6) Decrease in restricted cash, net .7 3.3 Dividends paid (.4) (.5) Redemption of minority interests' preference stock (1.4) (8.6) -------------------------------- Net cash provided (used) by financing activities 7.6 (13.4) -------------------------------- Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents during (89.7) 81.6 the period Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 98.3 15.8 -------------------------------- Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 8.6 $ 97.4 ================================ Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: Interest paid, net of capitalized interest $ 91.8 $ 92.6 Income taxes paid 11.2 9.8 Tax allocation payments to Kaiser Aluminum Corporation - 2.7
The accompanying notes to interim consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements. NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (In millions of dollars, except prices and per share amounts) 1. GENERAL Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation (the "Company") is the principal operating subsidiary of Kaiser Aluminum Corporation ("Kaiser"). Kaiser is a subsidiary of MAXXAM Inc. ("MAXXAM"). MAXXAM and one of its wholly owned subsidiaries together own approximately 63% of the Company's Common Stock with the remaining approximately 37% publicly held. The foregoing unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X as promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, these financial statements do not include all of the disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. These unaudited interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 1998. In the opinion of management, the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements furnished herein include all adjustments, all of which are of a normal recurring nature, necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented. The preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles requires the use of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities known to exist as of the date the financial statements are published, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Uncertainties with respect to such estimates and assumptions are inherent in the preparation of the Company's consolidated financial statements; accordingly, it is possible that the actual results could differ from these estimates and assumptions, which could have a material effect on the reported amounts of the Company's consolidated financial position and results of operations. Operating results for the quarter and nine-month periods ended September 30, 1999, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 1999. Certain reclassifications of prior-year information were made to conform to the current presentation. INCIDENT AT GRAMERCY FACILITY On July 5, 1999, the Company's Gramercy, Louisiana alumina refinery was extensively damaged by an explosion in the digestion area of the plant. Twenty-four employees were injured in the incident, several of them severely. As a result of the incident, alumina production at the facility was completely curtailed. Production at the plant is currently expected to remain curtailed until at least mid-2000 when the Company expects to begin partial production. Based on preliminary estimates, full production is currently expected to be achieved by the end of 2000 or shortly thereafter. However, any delay in obtaining the necessary permits or approvals to begin construction or operations would likely delay these expected production dates. Shortly after the incident, the Company declared force majeure with respect to certain of its third party alumina and hydrate sales contracts and third party vendor purchase contracts. However, the Company subsequently agreed to supply certain third party alumina customers. See Business Interruption below. The cause of the incident is under investigation by the Company and governmental agencies. Depending on the outcome of the ongoing investigations by the various government agencies, the Company could be subject to civil and/or criminal fines and penalties. However, as more fully explained below, based on what is known to date, the Company currently believes that the financial impact of this incident (in excess of insurance deductibles and self-retention provisions) will be largely offset by insurance coverage. The Company has significant amounts of insurance coverage related to the Gramercy incident. Deductibles and self-retention provisions under the insurance coverage for the incident total $5.0, which amounts have been charged to Cost of products sold during the quarter ended September 30, 1999. The Company's insurance coverage has four separate components: property damage, business interruption, liability and workers' compensation. These components are discussed in the following paragraphs. Property Damage. The Company's insurance policies provide that, if the Company rebuilds the facility (which is the Company's current intention), the Company will be reimbursed for the costs of repairing or rebuilding the damaged portion of the facility using new materials of like kind and quality with no deduction for depreciation. The Company and its engineers are in the process of developing construction alternatives and cost projections to rebuild the facility. Once this process is complete, the Company will have detailed discussions with the insurance carriers and their representatives regarding the amount of reimbursement. The Company currently expects that it will be able to reach an agreement with its insurance carriers as to a minimum amount of property damage reimbursement during the fourth quarter of 1999. However, there can be no assurance that the discussions with the insurance carriers and their representatives will be completed by the end of the fourth quarter or that the minimum amount of insurance proceeds will be known by that time. It is unclear when the Company will reach a final agreement as to the ultimate amount of recoveries the Company will receive. At September 30, 1999, the Company had accrued approximately $3.0 for estimated property damage insurance recoveries. As the estimated amount of reimbursement becomes known to the Company, it will be required under generally accepted accounting principles to recognize gains to the extent that the estimated insurance proceeds exceed the carrying value of the damaged property, which is approximately $15.0. Such gains may be reflected beginning in the fourth quarter of 1999 and from time to time thereafter as additional property reimbursements are agreed to by the insurance carriers. The amount of such gains is expected to be significant. The overall impact of recognizing the gains will be a significant increase in stockholders' equity and an increase in depreciation expense in future years once production is restored. Business Interruption. The Company's insurance policies provide for the reimbursement of specified continuing expenses incurred during the interruption period plus lost profits (or less expected losses) plus other expenses incurred as a result of the incident. Operations at the Gramercy facility and a 49%-owned facility in Jamaica, which supplies bauxite to Gramercy, will continue to incur operating expenses until production at the Gramercy facility is restored. The Gramercy facility will also incur incremental costs for clean up and other activities during the remainder of 1999 and 2000. Additionally, the Company will incur increased costs as a result of recent agreements to supply certain of Gramercy's major customers with alumina, despite the fact that the Company had declared force majeure with respect to the contracts shortly after the incident. The Company is purchasing alumina from third parties, in excess of the amounts of alumina available from other Company-owned facilities, to supply these customers' needs as well as to meet intersegment requirements. In consideration of all of the foregoing items, the Company has recorded expected business interruption insurance recoveries totaling $22.0 as a reduction of Cost of products sold, which amount substantially offsets actual expenses incurred during the quarter ended September 30, 1999. However, the amount recorded represents an estimate of the Company's business interruption coverage, based on preliminary discussions with the insurance carriers and their representatives, and is, therefore, subject to change. The Company currently believes that additional amounts may be recoverable. Any adjustments to the recorded amounts of expected recovery will be reflected from time to time as agreements with the insurance carriers are reached. The amounts of such adjustments could be material. Since production has been completely curtailed at the Gramercy facility, the Company has, for the time being, suspended depreciation of the facility. Depreciation expense for the first six months of 1999 was approximately $6.0. However, the Company believes that the depreciation expense that would have been incurred may, at least in part, be recoverable under its business interruption insurance coverage. Liability. The incident has also resulted in more than thirty lawsuits being filed against the Company alleging, among other things, property damage and personal injury. In addition, a claim for alleged business interruption losses has been made by a neighboring business. The aggregate amount of damages sought in the lawsuits and other claims cannot be determined at this time; however, the Company does not currently believe the damages will exceed the amount of coverage under its liability policies. Workers' Compensation. Claims relating to all of the injured employees are expected to be covered under the Company's workers' compensation or liability policies. However, the aggregate amount of workers' compensation claims cannot be determined at this time and it is possible that such claims could exceed the Company's coverage limitations. While it is presently impossible to determine the aggregate amount of claims that may be incurred, or whether they will exceed the Company's coverage limitations, the Company currently believes that any amount in excess of the coverage limitations will not have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial position or liquidity. However, it is possible that as additional facts become available, additional charges may be required and such charges could be material to the period in which they are recorded. Timing of Insurance Recoveries. As of September 30, 1999, the Company has accrued receivables totaling approximately $25.0 for estimated recoveries under its property damage and business interruption insurance coverage. The Company is currently working with the insurance carriers to minimize, to the extent possible, the amount and period of time between when the Company incurs costs and when it is reimbursed. Delays in receiving insurance proceeds could have a temporary adverse impact on the Company's short-term liquidity and delay the rebuilding of the Gramercy facility. LABOR RELATED COSTS The Company is currently operating five of its U.S. facilities with salaried employees and other workers as a result of the September 30, 1998, strike by the United Steelworkers of America ("USWA") and the subsequent "lock-out" by the Company in January 1999. However, the Company has continued to accrue certain benefits for the USWA members during the period of the strike and subsequent lock-out. For purposes of computing the benefit-related costs and liabilities to be reflected in the accompanying interim consolidated financial statements, the Company has based its accruals on the terms of the previously existing (expired) USWA contract. Any differences between any amounts accrued and any amounts ultimately agreed to during the collective bargaining process will be reflected in future results upon settlement or during the term of any new contract. Impairment of Micromill Assets As previously announced, in early 1999, the Company began a search for a strategic partner for the further development and deployment of its Micromill(TM) technology. This change in strategic course was based on management's conclusion that additional time and investment would be required to achieve a commercial success. Given the Company's other strategic priorities, the Company believed that introducing added commercial and financial resources was the appropriate course of action for capturing the maximum long-term value. A number of third parties were contacted regarding joint ventures or other arrangements. Based on negotiations with these third parties, the Company now believes that a sale of the Micromill assets and technology is more likely than a partnership and that any such sales transaction would likely result in the Company receiving a combination of a small up-front payment and future payments based on the subsequent performance and profitability of the Micromill technology. As a result of these negotiations, the Company concluded that the carrying value of the Micromill assets should be reduced by $19.1. Accordingly, the Company recorded a non-cash impairment charge to reflect this write-down in the third quarter of 1999. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standard Board ("FASB") issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. SFAS No. 133 requires companies to recognize all derivative instruments as assets or liabilities in the balance sheet and to measure those instruments at fair value. Under SFAS No. 133, the Company will be required to "mark-to-market" its hedging positions at each period-end in advance of recording the physical transactions to which the hedges relate. Changes in the fair value of the Company's open hedging positions will be reflected as an increase or reduction in stockholders' equity through comprehensive income. The impact of the changes in fair value of the Company's hedging positions will reverse out of comprehensive income (net of any fluctuations in other "open" positions) and will be reflected in traditional net income when the subsequent physical transactions occur. Currently, the dollar amount of the Company's comprehensive income adjustments is not significant so there is not a significant difference between "traditional" net income and comprehensive income. However, differences between comprehensive income and traditional net income may become significant in future periods as SFAS No. 133 will result in fluctuations in comprehensive income and stockholders' equity in periods of price volatility, despite the fact that the Company's cash flow and earnings will be "fixed" to the extent hedged. This result is contrary to the intent of the Company's hedging program, which is to "lock-in" a price (or range of prices) for products sold/used so that earnings and cash flows are subject to reduced risk of volatility. Adoption of SFAS No. 133 was initially required on or before January 1, 2000. However, in June 1999, the FASB issued SFAS No. 137 which delayed the required implementation date of SFAS No. 133 to no later than January 1, 2001. The Company is currently evaluating how and when to implement SFAS No. 133. 2. INVENTORIES The classification of inventories is as follows:
September 30, December 31, 1999 1998 ----------------------------- Finished fabricated aluminum products $ 138.3 $ 112.4 Primary aluminum and work in process 181.0 205.6 Bauxite and alumina 112.8 109.5 Operating supplies and repair and maintenance parts 122.1 116.0 ----------------------------- Total $ 554.2 $ 543.5 =============================
Substantially all product inventories are stated at last-in, first-out (LIFO) cost, not in excess of market. Replacement cost is not in excess of LIFO cost. 3. CONTINGENCIES Environmental Contingencies The Company is subject to a number of environmental laws, to fines or penalties assessed for alleged breaches of such environmental laws, and to claims and litigation based upon such laws. The Company currently is subject to a number of claims under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended by the Superfund Amendments Reauthorization Act of 1986 ("CERCLA"), and, along with certain other entities, has been named as a potentially responsible party for remedial costs at certain third-party sites listed on the National Priorities List under CERCLA. Based on the Company's evaluation of these and other environmental matters, the Company has established environmental accruals primarily related to potential solid waste disposal and soil and groundwater remediation matters. At September 30, 1999, the balance of such accruals, which are primarily included in Long-term liabilities, was $49.7. These environmental accruals represent the Company's estimate of costs reasonably expected to be incurred based on presently enacted laws and regulations, currently available facts, existing technology, and the Company's assessment of the likely remediation actions to be taken. The Company expects that these remediation actions will be taken over the next several years and estimates that annual expenditures to be charged to these environmental accruals will be approximately $3.0 to $7.0 for the years 1999 through 2004 and an aggregate of approximately $31.0 thereafter. As additional facts are developed and definitive remediation plans and necessary regulatory approvals for implementation of remediation are established or alternative technologies are developed, changes in these and other factors may result in actual costs exceeding the current environmental accruals. As the resolution of these matters is subject to further regulatory review and approval, no specific assurance can be given as to when the factors upon which a substantial portion of this estimate is based can be expected to be resolved. However, the Company is currently working to resolve certain of these matters. The Company believes that it has insurance coverage available to recover certain incurred and future environmental costs and is actively pursuing claims in this regard. No assurances can be given that the Company will be successful in attempts to recover incurred or future costs from insurers or that the amount of recoveries received will ultimately be adequate to cover costs incurred. While uncertainties are inherent in the final outcome of these environmental matters, and it is presently impossible to determine the actual costs that ultimately may be incurred, management currently believes that the resolution of such uncertainties should not have a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations, or liquidity. Asbestos Contingencies The Company is a defendant in a number of lawsuits, some of which involve claims of multiple persons, in which the plaintiffs allege that certain of their injuries were caused by, among other things, exposure to asbestos during, and as a result of, their employment or association with the Company or exposure to products containing asbestos produced or sold by the Company. The lawsuits generally relate to products the Company has not sold for at least 20 years. At September 30, 1999, the number of such claims pending was approximately 96,600, as compared with 86,400 at December 31, 1998. In 1998, approximately 22,900 of such claims were received and 13,900 were settled or dismissed. During the quarter and nine-month periods ended September 30, 1999, approximately 6,700 and 23,000 of such claims were received and 4,800 and 12,800 of such claims were settled or dismissed. However, the foregoing claim and settlement figures as of and for the quarter and nine-month periods ended September 30, 1999, do not reflect the fact that as of September 30, 1999, the Company has reached agreements under which it expects to settle approximately 28,000 of the pending asbestos-related claims over an extended period. The Company maintains a liability for estimated asbestos- related costs for claims filed to date and an estimate of claims to be filed over a 10 year period (i.e., through 2009). The Company's estimate is based on the Company's view, at each balance sheet date, of the current and anticipated number of asbestos-related claims, the timing and amounts of asbestos-related payments, the status of ongoing litigation and settlement initiatives, and the advice of Wharton Levin Ehrmantraut Klein & Nash, P.A., with respect to the current state of the law related to asbestos claims. However, there are inherent uncertainties involved in estimating asbestos-related costs and the Company's actual costs could exceed the Company's estimates due to changes in facts and circumstances after the date of each estimate. Further, while the Company does not presently believe there is a reasonable basis for estimating asbestos-related costs beyond 2009 and, accordingly, no accrual has been recorded for any costs which may be incurred beyond 2009, there is a reasonable possibility that such costs may continue beyond 2009, and that such costs could be substantial. As of September 30, 1999, an estimated asbestos-related cost accrual of $396.0, before consideration of insurance recoveries, has been reflected in the accompanying financial statements primarily in Long-term liabilities. The Company estimates that annual future cash payments for asbestos-related costs will range from approximately $50.0 to $75.0 in the years 2000 to 2003 and an aggregate of approximately $121.0 thereafter. The Company believes that it has insurance coverage available to recover a substantial portion of its asbestos- related costs. Although the Company has settled asbestos-related coverage matters with certain of its insurance carriers, other carriers have not yet agreed to settlements. The timing and amount of future recoveries from these insurance carriers will depend on the pace of claims review and processing by such carriers and on the resolution of any disputes regarding coverage under such policies. The Company believes that substantial recoveries from the insurance carriers related to existing asbestos-related liabilities are probable. The Company reached this conclusion after considering its prior insurance-related recoveries in respect of asbestos-related claims, existing insurance policies and the advice of Heller Ehrman White & McAuliffe with respect to applicable insurance coverage law relating to the terms and conditions of those policies. Accordingly, an estimated aggregate insurance recovery of $317.9, determined on the same basis as the asbestos-related cost accrual, is recorded primarily in Other assets at September 30, 1999. However, no assurances can be given that the Company will be able to project similar recovery percentages for future asbestos-related claims or that the amounts related to future asbestos-related claims will not exceed the Company's aggregate insurance coverage. Management continues to monitor claims activity, the status of lawsuits (including settlement initiatives), legislative developments, and costs incurred in order to ascertain whether an adjustment to the existing accruals should be made to the extent that historical experience may differ significantly from the Company's underlying assumptions. This process resulted in the Company reflecting charges of $15.2 and $53.2 (included in Other income(expense)) in the quarter and nine-month periods ended September 30, 1999, for asbestos-related claims, net of expected insurance recoveries, based on recent cost and other trends experienced by the Company and other companies. While uncertainties are inherent in the final outcome of these asbestos matters and it is presently impossible to determine the actual costs that ultimately may be incurred and insurance recoveries that will be received, management currently believes that, based on the factors discussed in the preceding paragraphs, the resolution of asbestos-related uncertainties and the incurrence of asbestos- related costs net of related insurance recoveries should not have a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial position or liquidity. However, as the Company's estimates are periodically re-evaluated, additional charges may be necessary and such charges could be material to the results of the period in which they are recorded. Labor Matters In connection with the USWA strike and subsequent lock-out by the Company, certain allegations of unfair labor practices ("ULPs") were filed with the National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB") by the USWA. As previously disclosed, the Company responded to all such allegations and believed that they were without merit. In July 1999, the Oakland, California, regional office of the NLRB dismissed all material charges filed against the Company. In September 1999, the union filed an appeal of this ruling with the NLRB general counsel's office in Washington, DC. If the original decision were to be reversed, the matter would be referred to an administrative law judge for a hearing whose outcome would be subject to an additional appeal either by the USWA or the Company. This process could take months or years. Although the Company knows of no reason why the original decision would be reversed on appeal, there can be no certainty that the original NLRB decision will be upheld. If these proceedings eventually resulted in a definitive ruling against the Company, it could be obligated to provide back pay to USWA members at the five plants and such amount could be significant. However, while uncertainties are inherent in the final outcome of such matters, the Company believes that the resolution of the alleged ULPs should not result in a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations, or liquidity. Other Contingencies The Company is involved in various other claims, lawsuits, and other proceedings relating to a wide variety of matters. While uncertainties are inherent in the final outcome of such matters, and it is presently impossible to determine the actual costs that ultimately may be incurred, management currently believes that the resolution of such uncertainties and the incurrence of such costs should not have a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations, or liquidity. See Note 10 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 1998, for additional information on commitments and contingencies. 4. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND RELATED HEDGING PROGRAMS At September 30, 1999, the net unrealized loss on the Company's position in aluminum forward sales and option contracts (excluding the impact of those contracts discussed below which have been marked to market), energy forward purchase and option contracts, and forward foreign exchange contracts was approximately $36.6 (based on comparisons to applicable quarter-end published market prices). As the Company's hedging activities are generally designed to lock-in a specified price or range of prices, gains or losses on the derivative contracts utilized in these hedging activities will generally be offset by losses or gains, respectively, on the transactions being hedged. Alumina and Aluminum The Company's earnings are sensitive to changes in the prices of alumina, primary aluminum and fabricated aluminum products, and also depend to a significant degree upon the volume and mix of all products sold. Primary aluminum prices have historically been subject to significant cyclical price fluctuations. Alumina prices as well as fabricated aluminum product prices (which vary considerably among products) are significantly influenced by changes in the price of primary aluminum but generally lag behind primary aluminum price changes by up to three months. Since 1993, the Average Midwest United States transaction price for primary aluminum has ranged from approximately $.50 to $1.00 per pound. From time to time in the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into hedging transactions to provide price risk management in respect of the net exposure of earnings and cash flows resulting from (i) anticipated sales of alumina, primary aluminum and fabricated aluminum products, less (ii) expected purchases of certain items, such as aluminum scrap, rolling ingot, and bauxite, whose prices fluctuate with the price of primary aluminum. Forward sales contracts are used by the Company to effectively fix the price that the Company will receive for its shipments. The Company also uses option contracts (i) to establish a minimum price for its product shipments, (ii) to establish a "collar" or range of prices for the Company's anticipated sales, and/or (iii) to permit the Company to realize possible upside price movements. As of September 30, 1999, the Company had sold forward, at fixed prices, approximately 6,000* tons of primary aluminum with respect to the remainder of 1999. As of September 30, 1999, the Company had also entered into option contracts that established a price range for an additional 65,000, 341,000 and 180,000 tons of primary aluminum for the remainder of 1999, 2000 and 2001, respectively. ---------------------- * All references to tons in this report refer to metric tons of 2,204.6 pounds. Additionally, through September 30, 1999, the Company had entered into a series of transactions with a counterparty that will provide the Company with a premium over the forward market prices at the date of the transaction for 4,000 tons of primary aluminum per month during the period October 1999 through June 2001. The Company also contracted with the counterparty to receive certain fixed prices (also above the forward market prices at the date of the transaction) on 8,000 tons of primary aluminum per month over a three year period commencing October 2001, unless market prices during certain periods decline below a stipulated "floor" price, in which case, the fixed price sales portion of the transactions terminate. The price at which the October 2001 and later transactions terminate is well below current market prices. While the Company believes that the October 2001 and later transactions are consistent with its stated hedging objectives, these positions do not qualify for treatment as a "hedge" under current accounting guidelines. Accordingly, these positions are "mark-to-market" each period. For the quarter and nine-month periods ended September 30, 1999, the Company recorded mark-to-market charges of $5.9 and $20.0 in Other income (expense) associated with the transactions described in this paragraph. As of September 30, 1999, virtually all the Company's sales of alumina to third parties for 1999, 2000 and 2001 are indexed to future prices of primary aluminum. Energy The Company is exposed to energy price risk from fluctuating prices for fuel oil and diesel fuel consumed in the production process. The Company from time to time in the ordinary course of business enters into hedging transactions with major suppliers of energy and energy related financial instruments. As of September 30, 1999, the Company held a combination of fixed price purchase and option contracts for an average of 249,000 and 232,000 barrels per month of fuel oil and diesel fuel for 1999 and 2000, respectively. Foreign Currency The Company enters into forward exchange contracts to hedge material cash commitments in respect of foreign subsidiaries or affiliates. At September 30, 1999, the Company had net forward foreign exchange contracts totaling approximately $113.1 for the purchase of 170.0 Australian dollars from October 1999 through May 2001, in respect of its Australian dollar-denominated commitments for the remainder of 1999 through May 2001. In addition, the Company has entered into an option contract to purchase 42.0 Australian dollars for the period from January 2000 through June 2001. See Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 1998, for additional information concerning the use of derivative financial instruments. 5. SIGNIFICANT ACQUISITIONS AND DISPOSITIONS In February 1999, the Company, through a subsidiary, completed the acquisition of its joint venture partner's 45% interest in Kaiser LaRoche Hydrate Partners ("KLHP") for a cash purchase price of approximately $10.0. As the Company already owned 55% of KLHP, the results of KLHP were already included in the Company's consolidated financial statements. On April 1, 1999, the Company completed the previously announced sale of its 50% interest in AKW L.P. ("AKW"), an aluminum wheels joint venture, to its partner, Accuride Corporation for $70.4. The sale resulted in the Company recognizing a net pre-tax gain of $50.5 in the second quarter of 1999. The Company's equity in income of AKW for the nine-month period ended September 30, 1999, was $2.5. The Company's equity in income of AKW for the quarter and nine-month periods ended September 30, 1998, was $2.2 and $5.6, respectively. 6. INTERIM OPERATING SEGMENT INFORMATION The Company uses a portion of its bauxite, alumina and primary aluminum production for additional processing at its downstream facilities. Transfers between business units are made at estimated market prices. The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 1998. Business unit results are evaluated internally by management before any allocation of corporate overhead and without any charge for income taxes or interest expense. See Note 12 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 1998, for additional information regarding the Company's segments. Financial information by operating segment for the quarters and nine months ended September 30, 1999 and 1998 is as follows:
Quarter Ended Nine Months Ended September 30, September 30, ------------------------------ ------------------------------ 1999 1998 1999 1998 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------ Net Sales: Bauxite and Alumina: (1) Net sales to unaffiliated customers $ 108.3 $ 129.3 $ 308.8 $ 359.5 Intersegment sales 33.7 21.2 86.3 99.5 -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- 142.0 150.5 395.1 459.0 -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Primary Aluminum: Net sales to unaffiliated customers 113.5 94.6 303.1 326.6 Intersegment sales 65.7 66.9 177.9 194.7 -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- 179.2 161.5 481.0 521.3 -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Flat-Rolled Products 140.8 166.2 444.4 557.5 Engineered Products 134.5 132.6 405.8 451.2 Minority interests 23.2 18.8 62.6 58.6 Eliminations (99.4) (88.0) (264.2) (294.2) -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- $ 520.3 $ 541.6 $ 1,524.7 $ 1,753.4 ============== ============== ============== ============== Operating income (loss): Bauxite and Alumina (2) $ .9 $ 9.3 $ (10.4) $ 38.7 Primary Aluminum (3) 10.0 13.6 (10.5) 55.8 Flat-Rolled Products 5.8 16.7 20.7 56.2 Engineered Products 12.2 11.8 29.8 43.3 Micromill (22.3) (4.5) (28.6) (14.4) Eliminations 1.1 1.1 6.6 3.5 Corporate and Other (19.7) (17.1) (51.7) (51.8) -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- $ (12.0) $ 30.9 $ (44.1) $ 131.3 ============== ============== ============== ============== Depreciation and amortization: Bauxite and Alumina (4) $ 6.0 $ 8.8 $ 23.8 $ 27.4 Primary Aluminum 6.9 7.5 21.2 22.5 Flat-Rolled Products 4.0 4.1 12.2 12.2 Engineered Products 2.6 2.6 7.9 8.0 Micromill .7 .7 2.1 2.2 Corporate and Other .7 .8 2.2 2.5 -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- $ 20.9 $ 24.5 $ 69.4 $ 74.8 ============== ============== ============== ==============
(1) Net sales for the quarter ended September 30, 1999, include approximately 190 tons of alumina purchased from third parties and resold to certain unaffiliated customers of the Gramercy facility and 60 tons of alumina purchased from third parties and resold to the Company's primary aluminum business unit. (2) Operating income (loss) for the quarter and nine-month period ended September 30, 1999, includes estimated business interruption insurance recoveries totaling $22.0. (3) Operating income (loss) for the quarter and nine-month period ended September 30, 1999, includes potline preparation and restart costs of $1.9 and $11.5, respectively. (4) Depreciation was suspended for the Gramercy facility for the quarter ended September 30, 1999, as a result of the July 5, 1999, incident. Depreciation expense for the Gramercy facility for the six months ended June 30, 1999, was approximately $6.0. Excluding the February 1999 purchase of the remaining interest in KLHP, which affected the Bauxite and Alumina segment, and the April 1999 sale of the Company's interest in AKW, which affected the Engineered Products segment, there were no material changes in segment assets since December 31, 1998. Capital expenditures made during the first nine months of 1999 (other than the acquisition of the interest in KLHP) were incurred on a relatively ratable basis among the Company's four primary operating business segments. ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL ------------------------------------------------- CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS ----------------------------------- This section should be read in conjunction with the response to Item 1, Part I, of this Report. This section contains statements which constitute "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements appear in a number of places in this section (see, for example, "Recent Events and Developments," "Results of Operations," and "Liquidity and Capital Resources"). Such statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as "believes," "expects," "may," "estimates," "will," "should," "plans" or "anticipates" or the negative thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology, or by discussions of strategy. Readers are cautioned that any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve significant risks and uncertainties, and that actual results may vary materially from those in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors. These factors include the effectiveness of management's strategies and decisions, general economic and business conditions, developments in technology, year 2000 technology issues, new or modified statutory or regulatory requirements, and changing prices and market conditions. This section and the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998, each identify other factors that could cause such differences. No assurance can be given that these are all of the factors that could cause actual results to vary materially from the forward-looking statements. RECENT EVENTS AND DEVELOPMENTS INCIDENT AT GRAMERCY FACILITY On July 5, 1999, the Company's Gramercy, Louisiana alumina refinery was extensively damaged by an explosion in the digestion area of the plant. Twenty-four employees were injured in the incident, several of them severely. As a result of the incident, alumina production at the facility was completely curtailed. Production at the plant is currently expected to remain curtailed until at least mid-2000 when the Company expects to begin partial production. Based on preliminary estimates, full production is currently expected to be achieved by the end of 2000 or shortly thereafter. However, any delay in obtaining the necessary permits or approvals to begin construction or operations would likely delay these expected production dates. Shortly after the incident, the Company declared force majeure with respect to certain of its third party alumina and hydrate sales contracts and third party vendor purchase contracts. However, the Company subsequently agreed to supply certain third party alumina customers. See Business Interruption below. The cause of the incident is under investigation by the Company and governmental agencies. Depending on the outcome of the ongoing investigations by the various government agencies, the Company could be subject to civil and/or criminal fines and penalties. However, as more fully explained below, based on what is known to date, the Company currently believes that the financial impact of this incident (in excess of insurance deductibles and self-retention provisions) will be largely offset by insurance coverage. The Company has significant amounts of insurance coverage related to the Gramercy incident. Deductibles and self-retention provisions under the insurance coverage for the incident total $5.0 million, which amounts have been charged to Cost of products sold during the quarter ended September 30, 1999. The Company's insurance coverage has four separate components: property damage, business interruption, liability and workers' compensation. These components are discussed in the following paragraphs. Property Damage. The Company's insurance policies provide that, if the Company rebuilds the facility (which is the Company's current intention), the Company will be reimbursed for the costs of repairing or rebuilding the damaged portion of the facility using new materials of like kind and quality with no deduction for depreciation. The Company and its engineers are in the process of developing construction alternatives and cost projections to rebuild the facility. Once this process is complete, the Company will have detailed discussions with the insurance carriers and their representatives regarding the amount of reimbursement. The Company currently expects that it will be able to reach an agreement with its insurance carriers as to a minimum amount of property damage reimbursement during the fourth quarter of 1999. However, there can be no assurance that the discussions with the insurance carriers and their representatives will be completed by the end of the fourth quarter or that the minimum amount of insurance proceeds will be known by that time. It is unclear when the Company will reach a final agreement as to the ultimate amount of recoveries the Company will receive. At September 30, 1999, the Company had accrued approximately $3.0 million for estimated property damage insurance recoveries. As the estimated amount of reimbursement becomes known to the Company, it will be required under generally accepted accounting principles to recognize gains to the extent that the estimated insurance proceeds exceed the carrying value of the damaged property, which is approximately $15.0 million. Such gains may be reflected in the fourth quarter of 1999 and from time to time thereafter as additional property reimbursements are agreed to by the insurance carriers. The amount of such gains is expected to be significant. The overall impact of recognizing the gains will be a significant increase in stockholders' equity and an increase in depreciation expense in future years once production is restored. Business Interruption. The Company's insurance policies provide for the reimbursement of specified continuing expenses incurred during the interruption period plus lost profits (or less expected losses) plus other expenses incurred as a result of the incident. Operations at the Gramercy facility and a 49%-owned facility in Jamaica, which supplies bauxite to Gramercy, will continue to incur operating expenses until production at the Gramercy facility is restored. The Gramercy facility will also incur incremental costs for clean up and other activities during the remainder of 1999 and 2000. Additionally, the Company will incur increased costs as a result of recent agreements to supply certain of Gramercy's major customers with alumina, despite the fact that the Company had declared force majeure with respect to the contracts shortly after the incident. The Company is purchasing alumina from third parties, in excess of the amounts of alumina available from other Company-owned facilities, to supply these customers' needs as well as to meet intersegment requirements. In consideration of all of the foregoing items, the Company has recorded expected business interruption insurance recoveries totaling $22.0 million as a reduction of Cost of products sold, which amount substantially offsets actual expenses incurred during the quarter ended September 30, 1999. However, the amount recorded represents an estimate of the Company's business interruption coverage, based on preliminary discussions with the insurance carriers and their representatives, and is, therefore, subject to change. The Company currently believes that additional amounts may be recoverable. Any adjustments to the recorded amounts of expected recovery will be reflected from time to time as agreements with the insurance carriers are reached. The amounts of such adjustments could be material. Since production has been curtailed at the Gramercy facility, the Company has, for the time being, suspended depreciation of the facility. Depreciation expense for the first six months of 1999 was approximately $6.0 million. However, the Company believes that the depreciation expense that would have been incurred may, at least in part, be recoverable under its business interruption insurance coverage. Liability. The incident has also resulted in more than thirty lawsuits being filed against the Company alleging, among other things, property damage and personal injury. In addition, a claim for alleged business interruption losses has been made by a neighboring business. The aggregate amount of damages sought in the lawsuits and other claims cannot be determined at this time; however, the Company does not currently believe the damages will exceed the amount of coverage under its liability policies. Workers' Compensation. Claims relating to all of the injured employees are expected to be covered under the Company's workers' compensation or liability policies. However, the aggregate amount of workers' compensation claims cannot be determined at this time and it is possible that such claims could exceed the Company's coverage limitations. While it is presently impossible to determine the aggregate amount of claims that may be incurred, or whether they will exceed the Company's coverage limitations, the Company currently believes that any amount in excess of the coverage limitations will not have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial position or liquidity. However, it is possible that as additional facts become available, additional charges may be required and such charges could be material to the period in which they are recorded. Timing of Insurance Recoveries. As of September 30, 1999, the Company has accrued receivables totaling approximately $25.0 million for estimated recoveries under its property damage and business interruption insurance coverage. The Company is currently working with the insurance carriers to minimize, to the extent possible, the amount and period of time between when the Company incurs costs and when it is reimbursed. Delays in receiving insurance proceeds could have a temporary adverse impact on the Company's short-term liquidity and delay the rebuilding of the Gramercy facility. LABOR MATTERS Substantially all of the Company's hourly workforce at its Gramercy, Louisiana, alumina refinery, Mead and Tacoma, Washington, aluminum smelters, Trentwood, Washington, rolling mill, and Newark, Ohio, extrusion facility were covered by a master labor agreement with the United Steelworkers of America (the "USWA") which expired on September 30, 1998. The parties did not reach an agreement prior to the expiration of the master agreement and the USWA chose to strike. In January 1999, the Company declined an offer by the USWA to have the striking workers return to work at the five plants without a new agreement. The Company imposed a lock-out to support its bargaining position and continues to operate the plants with salaried employees and other workers as it has since the strike began. As a result of the USWA strike, the Company temporarily curtailed three out of a total of eleven potlines at its Mead and Tacoma, Washington, aluminum smelters at September 30, 1998 (representing approximately 70,000 tons per year of production capacity out of a total combined production capacity of 273,000 tons per year at the facilities). The first of the two Mead potline restarts was completed during the second quarter of 1999. Restart activities on the second of the two Mead potlines were completed in August 1999. The timing for any restart of the Tacoma potline has yet to be determined and will depend upon market conditions and other factors. While the Company initially experienced an adverse strike- related impact on its profitability, the Company currently believes that the Company's operations at the affected facilities have been substantially stabilized and will be able to run at, or near, full capacity, and that the effect of the incremental costs associated with operating the affected plants during the dispute was eliminated or substantially reduced as of January 1999 (excluding the impacts of the restart costs discussed above and the effect of market factors such as the continued market-related curtailment at the Tacoma smelter). However, no assurances can be given that the Company's efforts to run the plants on a sustained basis, without a significant business interruption or material adverse impact on the Company's operating results, will be successful. The Company and the USWA continue to communicate. The objective of the Company has been, and continues to be, to negotiate a fair labor contract that is consistent with its business strategy and the commercial realities of the marketplace. Strategic Initiatives The Company has previously disclosed that it believes it had met, and exceeded, its goal of achieving $120.0 million of pre-tax cost reductions and other profit improvements, independent of metal price changes, measured against 1996 results prior to the end of the third quarter of 1998, when the impact of such items as smelter operating levels, the USWA strike and changes in foreign currency exchange rates are excluded from the analysis. The Company remains committed to sustaining the full $120.0 million improvement and to generating additional profit improvements in future years; however, no assurances can be given that the Company will be successful in this regard. In addition to working to improve the performance of the Company's existing assets, the Company has devoted significant efforts analyzing its existing asset portfolio with the intent of focusing its efforts and capital in sectors of the industry that are considered most attractive, and in which the Company believes it is well positioned to capture value. The initial steps of this process resulted in the June 1997 acquisition of the Bellwood extrusion facility, the May 1997 formation of AKW L.P. ("AKW"), the rationalization of certain of the Company's Engineered Products operations, the Company's investment to expand its production capacity for heat treat flat-rolled products at its Trentwood, Washington, rolling mill, and the Company's fourth quarter 1998 decision to seek a strategic partner for further development and deployment of the Company's Micromill(TM) technology (see, however, Impairment of Micromill Assets below). This process has continued in 1999. In February 1999, the Company completed the acquisition of the remaining 45% interest in Kaiser LaRoche Hydrate Partners ("KLHP"), an alumina marketing venture, from its joint venture partner for a cash purchase price of approximately $10.0 million. Additionally, in April 1999, the Company completed the sale of its interest in AKW, an aluminum wheel joint venture, to its partner, Accuride Corporation for $70.4 million. The cash sale represents a continuation of the Company's strategy to focus its resources and efforts in industry segments that are considered most attractive and in which it believes it is well positioned to capture value. Another area of emphasis has been a continuing focus on managing the Company's legacy liabilities, including the Company's active pursuit of claims in respect of insurance coverage for certain incurred and future environmental costs, as evidenced by the Company's fourth quarter 1998, receipt of recoveries totaling approximately $35.0 million related to current and future claims against certain of its insurers. See Note 10 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 1998, for additional information regarding insurance recoveries. Additional portfolio analysis and initiatives are continuing. Impairment of Micromill Assets As previously announced, in early 1999, the Company began a search for a strategic partner for the further development and deployment of its Micromill technology. This change in strategic course was based on management's conclusion that additional time and investment would be required to achieve a commercial success. Given the Company's other strategic priorities, the Company believed that introducing added commercial and financial resources was the appropriate course of action for capturing the maximum long-term value. A number of third parties were contacted regarding joint ventures or other arrangements. Based on negotiations with these third parties, the Company now believes that a sale of the Micromill assets and technology is more likely than a partnership and that any such sales transaction would likely result in the Company receiving a combination of a small up-front payment and future payments based on the subsequent performance and profitability of the Micromill technology. As a result of these negotiations, the Company concluded that the carrying value of the Micromill assets should be reduced by $19.1 million. Accordingly, the Company recorded a non-cash impairment charge to reflect this write-down in the third quarter of 1999. Valco Operating Level The Company's 90%-owned Volta Aluminium Company Limited ("Valco") smelter in Ghana operated only one of its five potlines during most of 1998. Each of Valco's potlines is capable of producing approximately 40,000 tons per year of primary aluminum. Valco earned compensation in 1998 (in the form of energy credits to be utilized over the last half of 1998 and during 1999) from the Volta River Authority ("VRA") in lieu of the power necessary to run two of the potlines that were curtailed during 1998. The compensation substantially mitigated the financial impact in 1998 of the curtailment of such lines. However, Valco did not receive any compensation from the VRA for one additional potline which was curtailed in January 1998. Valco's power allocation for 1999 was sufficient for the smelter to increase its operations from one potline to three potlines as of January 1. However, production was well below this level in the first half of the year due to the timing of restarts for the two incremental potlines. Consequently, to compensate for low production the first half of the year, Valco has operated above an equivalent three-potline annual rate during the third quarter of 1999 and is expected to continue this production rate during the fourth quarter of 1999. Valco is not expected to receive notice of its 2000 power allocation until sometime in the fourth quarter of 1999. However, taking into account the strong rains in the region and the current lake level, the Company currently expects that Valco may be allocated sufficient power to operate at least four potlines throughout 2000. However, there can be no assurances that Valco will be allocated sufficient power to run four potlines or that the Valco will, in fact, operate at that level. Valco has notified the VRA that it believes it had the contractual rights at the beginning of 1998 and 1999 to sufficient energy to run four and one-half potlines for the balance of both years. Valco continues to seek compensation from the VRA with respect to the 1998 and 1999 reductions in its power allocation. Valco and the VRA also are in continuing discussions concerning other matters, including steps that might be taken to reduce the likelihood of power curtailments in the future. No assurances can be given as to the success of these discussions. Electric Power Contract - Anglesey Aluminium Limited The Company owns a 49% interest in the Anglesey Aluminium Limited ("Anglesey") smelter in Wales. Electric power for the Anglesey smelter is supplied under a contract which expires in 2001. Anglesey expects to enter into a new power agreement in the fourth quarter of 1999 under which the existing contract would terminate early, in April 2000, and the new agreement would replace it for the period April 2000 through September 2005. The Company expects that the price of power under the new agreement will be greater than the price under the present contract, which will reduce the Company's earnings associated with the Anglesey smelter. However, Anglesey has ongoing initiatives to offset the impact of increased energy costs through cost reduction and revenue enhancement initiatives by 2001. However, no assurance can be given that these initiatives will be successful in offsetting such increased energy costs. RESULTS OF OPERATIONS As an integrated aluminum producer, the Company uses a portion of its bauxite, alumina, and primary aluminum production for additional processing at certain of its downstream facilities. Intersegment transfers are valued at estimated market prices. The following table provides selected operational and financial information on a consolidated basis with respect to the Company for the quarter and nine-month periods ended September 30, 1999 and 1998. The following data should be read in conjunction with the Company's interim consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto, contained elsewhere herein. See Note 12 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 1998, for further information regarding segments. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of those for a full year. SELECTED OPERATIONAL AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION (Unaudited) (In millions of dollars, except shipments and prices)
Quarter Ended Nine Months Ended September 30, September 30, ------------------------------ ------------------------------ 1999 1998 1999 1998 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------ Shipments: (000 tons) Alumina (1) Third Party 572.4 644.6 1,670.8 1,721.7 Intersegment 191.4 123.8 531.0 536.2 -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Total Alumina 763.8 768.4 2,201.8 2,257.9 -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Primary Aluminum Third Party 75.4 61.5 207.3 210.3 Intersegment 44.6 48.8 130.4 134.9 -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Total Primary Aluminum 120.0 110.3 337.7 345.2 -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Flat-Rolled Products 54.3 57.0 165.8 180.3 -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Engineered Products 42.9 40.7 127.8 130.7 -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Average Realized Third Party Sales Price: (4) Alumina (per ton) $ 177 $ 190 $ 173 $ 195 Primary Aluminum (per pound) $ .68 $ .70 $ .66 $ .70 Net Sales: Bauxite and Alumina (1) Third Party (includes net sales of $ 108.3 $ 129.3 $ 308.8 $ 359.5 bauxite) Intersegment 33.7 21.2 86.3 99.5 -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Total Bauxite & Alumina 142.0 150.5 395.1 459.0 -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Primary Aluminum Third Party 113.5 94.6 303.1 326.6 Intersegment 65.7 66.9 177.9 194.7 -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Total Primary Aluminum 179.2 161.5 481.0 521.3 -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Flat-Rolled Products 140.8 166.2 444.4 557.5 Engineered Products 134.5 132.6 405.8 451.2 Minority Interests 23.2 18.8 62.6 58.6 Eliminations (99.4) (88.0) (264.2) (294.2) -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Total Net Sales $ 520.3 $ 541.6 $ 1,524.7 $ 1,753.4 ============== ============== ============== ============== Operating Income (Loss): Bauxite & Alumina (2) $ .9 $ 9.3 $ (10.4) $ 38.7 Primary Aluminum (3) 10.0 13.6 (10.5) 55.8 Flat-Rolled Products 5.8 16.7 20.7 56.2 Engineered Products 12.2 11.8 29.8 43.3 Micromill (22.3) (4.5) (28.6) (14.4) Eliminations 1.1 1.1 6.6 3.5 Corporate (19.7) (17.1) (51.7) (51.8) -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Total Operating Income (Loss) $ (12.0) $ 30.9 $ (44.1) $ 131.3 ============== ============== ============== ============== Net Income (Loss) $ (39.2) $ 10.8 $ (93.1) $ 39.5 ============== ============== ============== ============== Capital Expenditures $ 10.0 $ 15.6 $ 40.3 $ 52.3 ============== ============== ============== ==============
(1) Net sales for the quarter ended September 30, 1999, include approximately 190 tons of alumina purchased from third parties and resold to certain unaffiliated customers of the Gramercy facility and 60 tons of alumina purchased from third parties and resold to the Company's primary aluminum business unit. (2) Operating income (loss) for the quarter and nine-month periods ended September 30, 1999, includes estimated business insurance recoveries totaling $22.0. Additionally, depreciation was suspended for the Gramercy facility for the quarter ended September 30, 1999, as a result of the July 5, 1999, incident. Depreciation expense for the Gramercy facility for the six months ended June 30, 1999, was approximately $6.0. (3) Operating income (loss) for the quarter and nine-month periods ended September 30, 1999, includes potline restart costs of $1.9 and $11.5, respectively. (4) Average realized prices for the Company's Flat-rolled products and Engineered products segments are not presented as such prices are subject to fluctuations due to changes in product mix. Average realized third party sales prices for alumina and primary aluminum include the impact of hedging activities. Overview The Company's operating results are sensitive to changes in prices of alumina, primary aluminum, and fabricated aluminum products, and also depend to a significant degree on the volume and mix of all products sold and on the Company's hedging strategies. Primary aluminum prices have historically been subject to significant cyclical price fluctuations. See Note 4 of Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of the Company's hedging activities. Changes in global, regional, or country-specific economic conditions can have a significant impact on overall demand for aluminum-intensive fabricated products in the transportation, distribution, and packaging markets. Such changes in demand can directly affect the Company's earnings by impacting the overall volume and mix of such products sold. To the extent that these end-use markets weaken, demand can also diminish for what the Company sometimes refers to as the "upstream" products: alumina and primary aluminum. During 1998, the Average Midwest United States transaction price ("AMT Price") per pound of primary aluminum experienced a steady decline during the year, beginning the year in the $.70 to $.75 range and ending the year in the low $.60 range. During the first nine months of 1999, the AMT Price for primary aluminum increased from a per pound range of $.57 to $.67 during the first six months to a $.67 to $.72 per pound range during the third quarter. The AMT Price for primary aluminum for the week ended October 15, 1999, was approximately $.71 per pound. QUARTER AND NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999, COMPARED TO QUARTER AND NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 Summary The Company reported a net loss of $39.2 million for the third quarter of 1999 compared to a net income of $10.8 million for the same period in 1998. Net sales in the third quarter of 1999 totaled $520.3 million compared to $541.6 million in the third quarter of 1998. For the nine-month period ended September 30, 1999, the Company reported a net loss of $93.1 million compared to net income of $39.5 million for the nine-month period ended September 30, 1998. Net sales for the nine-month period ended September 30, 1999, were $1,524.7 compared to $1,753.4 million for the first nine months of 1998. Results for the quarter ended September 30, 1999, included a non-cash pre-tax charge of $19.1 million to reduce the carrying value of the Company's Micromill assets, a non-cash pre-tax charge of $15.2 million for asbestos-related claims and a pre-tax charge of $5.9 million to reflect mark-to-market adjustments on certain primary aluminum hedging transactions. Results for the nine- month period ended September 30, 1999, included the non-cash pre-tax Micromill charge, pre-tax charges of $20.0 million to reflect mark-to-market adjustments on certain primary aluminum hedging transactions and non-cash pre-tax charges of $53.2 million for asbestos-related claims. The charges for the nine-month period were offset by a pre-tax gain of $50.5 million on the sale of the Company's interests in AKW. Results for the quarter and nine-month periods ended September 30, 1998, included two essentially offsetting non-recurring items, a favorable $8.3 million non-cash tax provision benefit resulting from the resolution of certain matters and the unfavorable gross profit impact of preparing for a strike by employees represented by the USWA at five locations. Additionally, results for the nine-month period included charges related to additional litigation reserves of $3.9 million. Bauxite and Alumina Third party net sales of alumina declined 16% for the quarter ended September 30, 1999, as compared to the same period in 1998 as a result of a 7% decline in third party average realized price and a 11% decline in third party alumina shipments. While the per ton amount realized from third party sales of alumina under the Company's primary aluminum linked alumina sales contracts actually rose quarter over quarter, the Company's average realized third party prices declined due to a decrease in net gains from the Company's hedging activities. While primary aluminum prices have increased by approximately 7% in the third quarter of 1999 over second quarter 1999 prices, this increase in prices will not be reflected in the segment's sales or operating results until the following quarter as most of the Company's alumina sales contracts are linked to metal prices on a lagged basis of up to three months. The decline in third party shipments of alumina between the third quarter of 1999 and 1998 resulted primarily from differences in the timing of shipments and, to a lesser extent, the net effect of the Gramercy incident, after considering the 190,000 tons of alumina purchased by the Company from third parties to fulfill third party sales contracts. Intersegment net sales for the third quarter of 1999 increased by 59% as compared to the same period in 1998. The increase in net sales was due to a 55% increase in intersegment shipments, primarily resulting from the impact of Valco operating three potlines in 1999 as compared to one potline in 1998 and a 3% increase in the intersegment average realized price due to higher primary aluminum prices in 1999 over the same period in 1998. For the nine-month period ended September 30, 1999, third party net sales of alumina were 14% lower than the comparable period in 1998 as the result of a 11% decline in third party average realized prices and a 3% decrease in third party shipments. The decline in average realized prices during the first nine months of 1999 as compared to 1998 was attributable to lower realizations under the Company's primary aluminum linked alumina sales contracts caused by lower primary aluminum market prices as well as a decrease in net gains from the Company's hedging activities. The decrease in year-over-year shipments was primarily the effect of the Gramercy incident described above. Intersegment net sales for the nine-month period ended September 30, 1999, declined by 13% as compared to the same period in 1998. The decline in net sales was primarily due to the 12% decline in intersegment average realized price, due to lower primary aluminum prices, as well as reduced intersegment shipments, resulting from potline curtailments at the Company's Washington smelters. Segment operating income for the quarter and nine-month periods ended September 30, 1999, was down from the comparable periods in 1998 primarily as a result of the price and, to a lesser extent, the volume factors discussed above. Segment operating income for the quarter and nine-months ended September 30, 1999, also reflects the net impact of the Gramercy incident (see "Recent Events and Developments" above) after estimated insurance recoveries. Segment operating income for the quarter and nine-month periods ended September 30, 1998, included the adverse impact of approximately $1.0 million of incremental strike- related costs. PRIMARY ALUMINUM Third party net sales of primary aluminum for the third quarter of 1999 were up 20% as compared to the same period in 1998 as a result of a 23% increase in third party shipments offset, in part, by a 3% decrease in the average realized third party sales prices. The increase in quarterly shipments was primarily due to the favorable impact of Valco operating three potlines in 1999, as compared to one potline in 1998, net of the unfavorable impact of the curtailments of one potline at the Tacoma smelter and one potline at the Mead smelter for a portion of the quarter. While average primary aluminum market prices for the quarter ended September 30, 1999, were greater than those in the third quarter of 1998, the Company experienced a reduction in quarter-over-quarter average realized third party prices as a result of a decrease in net gains from the Company's hedging activities. Intersegment net sales in the third quarter of 1999 decreased approximately 2% from 1998. Intersegment shipments decreased 9% from the comparable prior year period while the average realized price increased by 8%. The increase in the average realized price resulted from higher primary aluminum prices for 1999 over the same period in 1998. The decrease in intersegment shipments between 1999 and 1998 was due to the timing of shipments to the Company's fabricated business units as well as reduced internal requirements, primarily at the Company's flat-rolled business units. For the nine-month period ended September 30, 1999, third party net sales of primary aluminum declined approximately 7% from the comparable period in 1998, primarily as a result of a 6% decline in third party average realized prices. Third party shipments were essentially flat. The decline in third party average realized prices was attributable to both a decrease in primary aluminum market prices and a decrease in net gains from the Company's hedging activities. Intersegment net sales for the first nine months of 1999 were down 9% as compared to the same period in 1998. Intersegment average realized prices were down 5% reflecting lower market prices for aluminum. Intersegment shipments declined 3% and was due to the timing of shipments to the Company's fabricated business units. Segment operating income for the quarter and nine-month periods ended September 30, 1999, was down from the comparable periods of 1998. The most significant component of this decline was the reduction in average realized prices discussed above. However, also included in 1999 results were the adverse impact of the Valco and Washington smelter potline curtailments (including the fact that there is no mitigating compensation being earned in 1999 for the Valco potline curtailments) and costs of approximately $1.9 million and $11.5 million for the quarter and nine-month periods ended September 30, 1999, respectively, associated with preparing and restarting potlines at Valco and the Washington smelters. Segment operating income for the quarter and nine-month periods ended September 30, 1998, included the adverse impact of approximately $5.0 million of incremental strike-related costs. FLAT-ROLLED PRODUCTS Net sales of flat-rolled products for the third quarter of 1999 declined by 15% compared to the third quarter of 1998 as a result of a 11% decline in average realized prices and a 5% decline in shipments. The reduction in shipments was primarily due to reduced demand in 1999 for aerospace heat treat products offset, in small part, by increased shipments of general engineering products. The decline in 1999 average realized prices resulted primarily from a shift of product mix (from aerospace products, which have a higher price and operating margin, to other products) and a reduction in prices resulting from reduced demand for heat treat products. For the nine-month period ended September 30, 1999, net sales of flat rolled products declined by 20% from the comparable period in 1998 as a result of a 13% decline in average realize price and a 8% decline in product shipments. The declines in year-to-date 1999 prices and shipments as compared to 1998 were attributable to the same factors described above for the third quarter of 1999 and were also responsible for the significant decline in segment operating income both for the third quarter and year-to- date periods. Segment operating income for the quarter and nine-month periods ended September 30, 1998, included the adverse impact of approximately $3.0 million of incremental strike-related costs. ENGINEERED PRODUCTS Third quarter 1999 net sales of engineered products were slightly higher than those in the third quarter of 1998. A 5% increase in product shipments was substantially offset by a 4% decline in average realized prices. The increase in quarterly shipments was due to a strong increase in the 1999 demand for ground transportation products offset, in part, by a reduced demand in 1999 for aerospace products. The reduction in average realized price between periods was attributable to a change in product mix (higher ground transportation shipments offset by lower aerospace shipments). For the nine-month period ended September 30, 1999, net sales of engineered products declined by approximately 10% from the comparable period in 1998, as a result of a 8% decline in average realized prices and a 2% decline in product shipments. The decline in year-to-date average prices was due to the change in product mix as described above for the third quarter of 1999. On a year-to-date basis, shipments of engineered products for 1999 declined slightly from 1998 as reduced aerospace shipments were almost entirely offset by increased ground transportation product shipments. The reasons for the increase in segment operating income for the third quarter 1999 from the comparable period in 1998 were the same factors as discussed above. Segment operating income for the 1999 year-to-date period declined from the comparable period in 1998 as a result of the reduced equity in earnings from AKW (which partnership interests were sold in April 1999) as well as the product mix shift discussed above. Segment operating income for the quarter and nine-month periods ended September 30, 1998, included the adverse impact of approximately $1.0 million of incremental strike-related costs. ELIMINATIONS Eliminations of intersegment profit vary from period to period depending on fluctuations in market prices as well as the amount and timing of the affected segments' production and sales. Corporate and Other Corporate operating expenses included corporate general and administrative expenses which were not allocated to the Company's business segments. Corporate operating expenses for the quarter ended September 30, 1999, increased over the prior year and other recent periods primarily as a result of a $3.0 million non-cash re-allocation of certain benefit costs between the Corporate and other business segments. LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES Operating Activities At September 30, 1999, the Company had working capital of $407.3 million, compared with working capital of $471.6 million at December 31, 1998. The decrease in working capital primarily resulted from a decrease in Cash and cash equivalents and an increase in Prepaid expenses and other current assets which resulted primarily from increased workers compensation insurance deposits. INVESTING ACTIVITIES Capital expenditures during the nine months ended September 30, 1999, were $40.3 million. The only significant expenditure was the purchase of the remaining 45% interest in KLHP for approximately $10.0 million. The remainder of the year-to-date 1999 capital expenditures were primarily used to improve production efficiency and reduce operating costs. Total consolidated capital expenditures (of which approximately 8% is expected to be funded by the Company's minority partners in certain foreign joint ventures) are expected to be between $60 and $133 million per annum in each of 1999 through 2001, prior to any consideration of plans to rebuild the Gramercy facility. Management continues to evaluate numerous projects all of which would require substantial capital, both in the United States and overseas. The level of capital expenditures may be adjusted from time to time depending on the Company's price outlook for primary aluminum and other products, the Company's ability to assure future cash flows through hedging or other means, the Company's financial position and other factors. Financing Activities and Liquidity At September 30, 1999, the Company had long-term debt of $970 million, including $7.7 million outstanding under the revolving credit facility of the Credit Agreement, compared with $963.0 million at December 31, 1998. At September 30, 1999, $244.1 million (of which $54.7 million could have been used for letters of credit) was available to the Company under the Credit Agreement. Loans under the Credit Agreement bear interest at a spread (which varies based on the results of a financial test) over either a base rate or LIBOR at the Company's option. During the quarter ended September 30, 1999, the average per annum interest rate on loans outstanding under the Credit Agreement was approximately 9.75%. The Credit Agreement does not permit Kaiser, and significantly restricts the Company's ability, to pay any dividends on their common stock. As of September 30, 1999, the Company had accrued receivables relating to the Gramercy incident totaling approximately $25.0 million for estimated recoveries under its property damage and business interruption insurance coverage. The Company is currently working with the insurance carriers to minimize, to the extent possible, the amount and period of time between when the Company incurs costs and when it is reimbursed. Delays in receiving insurance proceeds could have a temporary adverse impact on the Company's short-term liquidity and delay the rebuilding of the Gramercy facility. However, management believes that the Company's existing cash resources, together with cash flows from operations and borrowings under the Credit Agreement, will be sufficient to meet its working capital and capital expenditure requirements for the next year. The Company's ability to make payments on and to refinance its debt depends on its ability to generate cash in the future. This, to a certain extent, is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors beyond the Company's control. The Company will need to refinance all or a substantial portion of its debt on or before its maturity. No assurance can be given that the Company will be able to refinance its debt on acceptable terms. However, with respect to long-term liquidity, management believes that operating cash flow, together with the ability to obtain both short and long-term financing, should provide sufficient funds to meet the Company's working capital and capital expenditure requirements. OTHER MATTERS Year 2000 Readiness Disclosure The Company utilizes software and related technologies throughout its business that will be affected by the date change to the year 2000. There may also be technology embedded in certain of the equipment owned or used by the Company that is susceptible to the year 2000 date change as well. The Company has a company-wide program which coordinates the year 2000 efforts of its individual business units and tracks their progress. The intent of the program is to make sure that critical items are identified on a sufficiently timely basis to assure that the necessary resources can be committed to address any material risk areas that could prevent the Company's systems and assets from being able to meet the Company's business needs and objectives. Year 2000 progress and readiness has also been the subject of the Company's normal, recurring internal audit function. Each of the Company's business units has developed year 2000 plans specifically tailored to its individual situation. A wide range of solutions is being implemented, including modifying existing systems and, in limited cases where it is cost effective, purchasing new systems. Total spending related to these projects, which began in 1997 and is expected to continue through 1999, is currently estimated to be in the $10-15 million range. As of September 30, 1999, the Company estimates that approximately $1.8 million of year 2000 expenditures are yet to be incurred. Such remaining amounts are expected to be incurred during the fourth quarter of 1999. System modification costs were expensed as incurred. Costs associated with new systems are being capitalized and will be amortized over the life of the system. In total, the Company believes that its remediation and testing efforts are over 90% complete at September 30, 1999. The balance is expected to be completed by November 1999. The Company plans to commit the necessary resources for these efforts. In addition to addressing the Company's internal systems, the company-wide program involved identification of key suppliers, customers, and other third-party relationships that could be impacted by year 2000 issues. A general survey has been conducted of the Company's supplier and customer base. Direct contact has been made with parties which are deemed to be particularly critical including financial institutions, power suppliers, and customers, with which the Company has a material relationship. Each business unit, including the corporate group, has developed a contingency plan covering the steps that would be taken if a year 2000 problem were to occur despite the Company's best efforts to identify and remediate all critical at-risk items. Formal contingency plans have been completed for approximately 85% of the Company's facilities and their individual systems as of September 30, 1999. Contingency plans for the remaining facilities and systems are expected to be completed by October 31, 1999. When complete, each contingency plan will address, among other things, matters such as alternative suppliers for critical inputs, incremental standby labor requirements at the millennium to address any problems as they occur, and backup processing capabilities for critical equipment or processes. The goal of the contingency plans will be to minimize any business disruption, such as power shortages and failures by major suppliers, and the associated financial implications. While the Company believes that its program has identified the critical issues and associated costs necessary to address possible year 2000 problems, there can be no assurances that the program or underlying steps implemented were successful in resolving all such issues. If the steps taken by the Company (or critical third parties) are not successful in identifying and remediating all significant year 2000 issues, business disruptions or delays could occur and could have a material adverse impact on the Company's results and financial condition. The Company believes that the most likely worst case scenario would involve shortages or unanticipated outages of energy requirements. Our operations, particularly in the smelting facilities, require significant quantities of energy. Curtailments or disruptions of energy supplies would result in full or partial shutdowns of these operations until energy availability could be restored. In addition, an unanticipated loss of energy supply could result in damage to production equipment. However, based on the information the Company has gathered to date and the Company's expectations of its ability to remediate problems encountered, the Company currently believes that significant business disruptions that would have a material impact on the Company's results or financial condition will not be encountered. ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET ----------------------------------------------------- RISK ---- See Part I, Item 7A. "QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK" in the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998. As a result of the Company's hedging activities through September 30, 1999, approximately 50%, 70% and 30% of the Company's net hedgable volume with respect to the fourth quarter of 1999, 2000 and 2001, respectively, is subject to minimum and maximum contract prices. The average minimum contract prices with respect to the balance of 1999, 2000 and 2001 range from moderately below to significantly below the average AMT price for the week ended October 15, 1999. The average maximum contract prices with respect to the fourth quarter of 1999 and 2000 approximate the average AMT price for the week ended October 15, 1999. The average maximum contract price with respect to 2001 is moderately above the average AMT price for the week ended October 15, 1999. While the aforementioned hedging contracts lock in a range of prices for a portion of the Company's net hedgable volume, the Company's average realized prices will typically exceed the amounts realized on its hedging contracts due to location, product and purity premiums on the physical metal sales. PART II - OTHER INFORMATION ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS ----------------- Asbestos-related Litigation The Company is a defendant in a number of lawsuits, some of which involve claims of multiple persons, in which the plaintiffs allege that certain of their injuries were caused by, among other things, exposure to asbestos during, and as a result of, their employment or association with the Company or exposure to products containing asbestos produced or sold by the Company. The portion of Note 3 of Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this report under the heading "Asbestos Contingencies" is incorporated herein by reference. See Part I, Item 3. "LEGAL PROCEEDINGS - Asbestos-related Litigation" in the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998. ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K -------------------------------- (a) Exhibits. Exhibit No. Exhibit ----------- ------- 3.1 Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation (the "Company" or "KACC"), dated July 25, 1989 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1, dated August 25, 1989, filed by KACC, Registration No. 33-30645). 3.2 Certificate of Retirement of KACC, dated February 7, 1990 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,1989, filed by KACC, File No. 1-3605). 3.3 Certificate of Retirement of KACC, dated October 1, 1997 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 1997, filed by KACC, File No. 1-3605). *4.1 Seventeenth Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of September 24, 1999, amending the Credit Agreement, dated as February 15, 1994, as amended, among KACC, Kaiser, the financial institutions party thereto and BankAmerica Business Credit, as agent. *27 Financial Data Schedule. (b) Reports on Form 8-K. A Report on Form 8-K was filed by the Company on July 2, 1999, announcing the expected impact of certain non-operating adjustments on second quarter 1999 results. A Report on Form 8-K was filed by the Company on July 9, 1999, announcing that on July 5, 1999, KACC's Gramercy, Louisiana alumina refinery had been extensively damaged by an explosion and that production at the plant would be curtailed for several months. No other Current Report on Form 8-K was filed by the Company during the quarter ended September 30, 1999. --------------- * Filed herewith SIGNATURE Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized, who have signed this report on behalf of the registrant as the principal financial officer and principal accounting officer of the registrant, respectively. KAISER ALUMINUM & CHEMICAL CORPORATION /s/John T. La Duc By:------------------------- John T. La Duc Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) /s/Daniel D.Maddox By:------------------------- Daniel D. Maddox Vice President and Controller (Principal Accounting Officer) Dated: October 26, 1999 EX-4 2 EXHIBIT 4.1 SEVENTEENTH AMENDMENT TO CREDIT AGRMT E x e c u t I o n C o p y SEVENTEENTH AMENDMENT TO CREDIT AGREEMENT ----------------------------------------- THIS SEVENTEENTH AMENDMENT TO CREDIT AGREEMENT (this "Amendment"), dated as of September 24, 1999, is by and between --------- KAISER ALUMINUM & CHEMICAL CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION, a Delaware ------- corporation (the "Parent Guarantor"), the various financial ---------------- institutions that are or may from time to time become parties to the Credit Agreement referred to below (collectively, the "Lenders" and, individually, a "Lender"), and Bank of America, ------- ------ N.A. (successor to BankAmerica Business Credit, Inc., a Delaware corporation), as agent (in such capacity, together with its successors and assigns in such capacity, the "Agent") for the ----- Lenders. Capitalized terms used, but not defined, herein shall have the meanings given to such terms in the Credit Agreement, as amended hereby. W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, the Company, the Parent Guarantor, the Lenders and the Agent are parties to the Credit Agreement, dated as of February 15, 1994, as amended by the First Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of July 21, 1994, the Second Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of March 10, 1995, the Third Amendment to Credit Agreement and Acknowledgement, dated as of July 20, 1995, the Fourth Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of October 17, 1995, the Fifth Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of December 11, 1995, the Sixth Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of October 1, 1996, the Seventh Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of December 17, 1996, the Eighth Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of February 24, 1997, the Ninth Amendment to Credit Agreement and Acknowledgment, dated as of April 21, 1997, the Tenth Amendment to Credit Agreement and Assignment, dated as of June 25, 1997, the Eleventh Amendment to Credit Agreement and Limited Waivers, dated as of October 20, 1997, the Twelfth Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of January 13, 1998, the Thirteenth Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of July 20, 1998, the Fourteenth Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of December 11, 1998, the Fifteenth Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of February 23, 1999 and the Sixteenth Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of March 26, 1999 (the "Credit Agreement"); and ----------------- WHEREAS, the parties hereto have agreed to amend the Credit Agreement as herein provided; NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: Section 1. Amendments to Credit Agreement. ------------------------------ 1.1 Amendments to Article I: Definitions and Accounting ---------------------------------------------------- Terms. - ----- Subsection 1.1 of the Credit Agreement is hereby -------------- amended by amending the definition of "Minimum Net Worth" ----------------- contained therein to read in its entirety as follows: " Minimum Net Worth' means (a) for each Fiscal Quarter ----------------- of the Company ending on or prior to December 31, 1998 (commencing with the Fiscal Quarter ending September 30, 1996), $500,000,000 plus 50% of Net Income (but not loss) for each such Fiscal Quarter, (b) for the two Fiscal Quarters of the Company ending on March 31, 1999 and June 30, 1999, $600,000,000 plus 50% of Net Income (but not loss) for each such Fiscal Quarter, and (c) for each Fiscal Quarter of the Company ending thereafter, $550,000,000 plus 50% of Net Income (but not loss) for each such Fiscal Quarter." 1.2 Amendments to Article IX: Covenants. ------------------------------------ A. Section 9.2.4(a) of the Credit Agreement is hereby ---------------- amended by deleting the proviso contained therein and substituting the following therefor: "provided that for purposes of this Section 9.2.4(a), -------- ---------------- the calculation of Net Worth shall exclude (i) the effect of any non-cash charges, up to an aggregate amount of $70,000,000, in respect of the Micromill project, including (without limitation) any write-down of Micromill project assets located at the Center for Technology in Pleasanton, California, and at the Micromill facility near Reno, Nevada, (ii) the net cumulative effect of any mark-to-market gains or losses incurred after December 31, 1998, up to an aggregate net amount of $50,000,000 of losses, on aluminum hedging agreements of the Company and its Subsidiaries that do not qualify for hedging treatment under GAAP, (iii) the effect of any non-cash charges, up to an aggregate amount of $30,000,000, in respect of the settlement of the Company's labor dispute with the United Steelworkers of America, and (iv) the net cumulative effect of any gains or losses, up to an aggregate net amount of $50,000,000 of losses, in respect of adjustments to the net cost basis of the assets of the Gramercy, Louisiana facility as a result of the explosion at such facility, all of the above adjustments to be reflected on the relevant Compliance Certificate." B. Section 9.2.4(b) of the Credit Agreement is hereby ---------------- amended to read in its entirety as follows: "(b) Interest Coverage Ratio. The Company shall not permit the Interest Coverage Ratio (i) for the one Fiscal Quarter period ending March 31, 1996 to be less than 1.1 to 1.0, (ii) for the two Fiscal Quarter period ending June 30, 1996 to be less than 1.2 to 1.0, (iii) for the three Fiscal Quarter period ending September 30, 1996 to be less than 0.5 to 1.0, (iv) for the four Fiscal Quarter period ending December 31, 1996 to be less than 0.3 to 1.0, (v) for the one Fiscal Quarter period ending June 30, 1997 to be less than 0.2 to 1.0, (vi) for the two Fiscal Quarter period ending September 30, 1997 to be less than 0.4 to 1.0, (vii) for the three Fiscal Quarter period ending December 31, 1997 to be less than 0.6 to 1.0 and (viii) for the four Fiscal Quarter period ending on the last day of each of the Fiscal Quarters set forth below to be less than the correlative ratio indicated: Date Ratio ----- ----- First Fiscal Quarter of 1998 0.80 to 1.00 Second Fiscal Quarter of 1998 1.20 to 1.00 Third Fiscal Quarter of 1998 1.60 to 1.00 Fourth Fiscal Quarter of 1998 1.10 to 1.00 First Fiscal Quarter of 1999 No Test Second Fiscal Quarter of 1999 No Test Third Fiscal Quarter of 1999 No Test Fourth Fiscal Quarter of 1999 No Test First Fiscal Quarter of 2000 0.50 to 1.00 Second Fiscal Quarter of 2000 1.00 to 1.00 Third Fiscal Quarter of 2000 1.25 to 1.00 Fourth Fiscal Quarter of 2000 1.50 to 1.00 First Fiscal Quarter of 2001 2.00 to 1.00 Second Fiscal Quarter of 2001 2.00 to 1.00 ; provided that for purposes of calculating the Interest -------- Coverage Ratio under this Section 9.2.4(b), (i) EBITDA shall ---------------- exclude (A) the effect of any non-cash charges, up to an aggregate amount of $70,000,000, in respect of the Micromill project, including (without limitation) any write-down of Micromill project assets located at the Center for Technology in Pleasanton, California, and at the Micromill facility near Reno, Nevada, (B) the net cumulative effect of any mark-to-market gains or losses, for the relevant four Fiscal Quarter period, up to an aggregate net amount of $50,000,000 of losses, on aluminum hedging agreements of the Company and its Subsidiaries that do not qualify for hedging treatment under GAAP, (C) the effect of any non-cash charges, up to an aggregate amount of $30,000,000, in respect of the settlement of the Company's labor dispute with the United Steelworkers of America, and (D) the net cumulative effect of any gains or losses, up to an aggregate net amount of $50,000,000 of losses, in respect of adjustments to the net cost basis of the assets of the Gramercy, Louisiana facility as a result of the explosion at such facility, all of the above adjustments to be reflected on the relevant Compliance Certificate; and (ii) Adjusted Capital Expenditures shall not be subtracted from EBITDA." C. Section 9.2.7 of the Credit Agreement is hereby ------------- amended by adding the following at the end of clause (b) thereof: "; provided, however, that for purposes of calculating -------- ------- Adjusted Capital Expenditures for each Fiscal Year after the 1998 Fiscal Year, there shall be excluded all amounts spent by the Company or its Subsidiaries to reconstruct the Gramercy, Louisiana facility to the extent such amounts are covered by valid and collectible insurance from solvent insurers." D. Section 9.2.18 of the Credit Agreement is hereby -------------- amended by (i) deleting the word "and" at the end of clause (vii) thereof; (ii) deleting the period at the end of clause (viii) thereof and substituting the phrase "; and" therefor, and (iii) adding the following as new clause (ix) thereof: "(ix) the Company and its wholly-owned Subsidiaries may transfer the capital stock or other ownership interest of any of their respective wholly-owned Subsidiaries to the Company or any of its wholly-owned Subsidiaries; provided, -------- however, that (a) the capital stock or other ownership ------- interest of an Obligor shall be transferred only to another Obligor, (b) the capital stock or other ownership interest of a Domestic Subsidiary of the Company shall be transferred only to the Company or another Domestic Subsidiary of the Company and (c) the capital stock or other ownership interest of a Subsidiary that is pledged to the Agent on behalf of the Lenders shall be transferred only to another Obligor." Section 2. Conditions to Effectiveness. --------------------------- This Amendment shall become effective as of the date hereof only when the following conditions shall have been satisfied and notice thereof shall have been given by the Agent to the Parent Guarantor, the Company and each Lender (the date of satisfaction of such conditions and the giving of such notice being referred to herein as the "Seventeenth Amendment Effective ------------------------------- Date"): - ---- A. The Agent shall have received for each Lender counterparts hereof duly executed on behalf of the Parent Guarantor, the Company, the Agent and the Required Lenders (or notice of the approval of this Amendment by the Required Lenders satisfactory to the Agent shall have been received by the Agent). B. The Agent shall have received: (1) Resolutions of the Board of Directors or of the Executive Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company and the Parent Guarantor approving and authorizing the execution, delivery and performance of this Amendment, certified by their respective corporate secretaries or assistant secretaries as being in full force and effect without modification or amendment as of the date of execution hereof by the Company or the Parent Guarantor, as the case may be; (2) A signature and incumbency certificate of the officers of the Company and the Parent Guarantor executing this Amendment; (3) For each Lender, an opinion, addressed to the Agent and each Lender, from Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, in form and substance satisfactory to the Agent; (4) Such other information, approvals, opinions, documents or instruments as the Agent may reasonably request; and (5) For the pro rata benefit of the Lenders, a fee in the amount of $100,000. Section 3. Company's Representations and ----------------------------- Warranties. - ---------- In order to induce the Lenders and the Agent to enter into this Amendment and to amend the Credit Agreement in the manner provided herein, the Parent Guarantor and the Company represent and warrant to each Lender and the Agent that, as of the Seventeenth Amendment Effective Date, after giving effect to the effectiveness of this Amendment, the following statements are true and correct in all material respects: A. Authorization of Agreements. The execution and --------------------------- delivery of this Amendment by the Company and the Parent Guarantor and the performance of the Credit Agreement as amended by this Amendment (the "Amended Agreement") by the Company and ----------------- the Parent Guarantor are within such Obligor's corporate powers and have been duly authorized by all necessary corporate action on the part of the Company and the Parent Guarantor, as the case may be. B. No Conflict. The execution and delivery by the ----------- Company and the Parent Guarantor of this Amendment and the performance by the Company and the Parent Guarantor of the Amended Agreement do not: (1) contravene such Obligor's Organic Documents; (2) contravene the Senior Indenture, the New Senior Indenture, the Additional New Senior Indentures, or the Subordinated Indenture or contravene any other contractual restriction where such a contravention has a reasonable possibility of having a Materially Adverse Effect or contravene any law or governmental regulation or court decree or order binding on or affecting such Obligor or any of its Subsidiaries; or (3) result in, or require the creation or imposition of, any Lien on any of such Obligor's properties or any of the properties of any Subsidiary of such Obligor, other than pursuant to the Loan Documents. C. Binding Obligation. This Amendment has been duly ------------------ executed and delivered by the Company and the Parent Guarantor and this Amendment and the Amended Agreement constitute the legal, valid and binding obligations of the Company and the Parent Guarantor, enforceable against the Company and the Parent Guarantor in accordance with their respective terms, except as may be limited by bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium or similar laws relating to or limiting creditors' rights generally and by general principles of equity. D. Governmental Approval, Regulation, etc. No --------------------------------------- authorization or approval or other action by, and no notice to or filing with, any governmental authority or regulatory body or any other Person is required for the due execution, delivery or performance of this Amendment by the Company or the Parent Guarantor. E. Incorporation of Representations and Warranties ----------------------------------------------- from Credit Agreement. Each of the statements set forth in - --------------------- Section 7.2.1 of the Credit Agreement is true and correct. - ------------- Section 4. Acknowledgement and Consent. --------------------------- The Company is a party to the Company Collateral Documents, in each case as amended through the date hereof, pursuant to which the Company has created Liens in favor of the Agent on certain Collateral to secure the Obligations. The Parent Guarantor is a party to the Parent Collateral Documents, in each case as amended through the date hereof, pursuant to which the Parent Guarantor has created Liens in favor of the Agent on certain Collateral and pledged certain Collateral to the Agent to secure the Obligations of the Parent Guarantor. Certain Subsidiaries of the Company are parties to the Subsidiary Guaranty and/or one or more of the Subsidiary Collateral Documents, in each case as amended through the date hereof, pursuant to which such Subsidiaries have (i) guarantied the Obligations and/or (ii) created Liens in favor of the Agent on certain Collateral. The Company, the Parent Guarantor and such Subsidiaries are collectively referred to herein as the "Credit ------ Support Parties", and the Company Collateral Documents, the - --------------- Parent Collateral Documents, the Subsidiary Guaranty and the Subsidiary Collateral Documents are collectively referred to herein as the "Credit Support Documents". ------------------------ Each Credit Support Party hereby acknowledges that it has reviewed the terms and provisions of the Credit Agreement as amended by this Amendment and consents to the amendment of the Credit Agreement effected as of the date hereof pursuant to this Amendment. Each Credit Support Party acknowledges and agrees that any of the Credit Support Documents to which it is a party or otherwise bound shall continue in full force and effect. Each Credit Support Party hereby confirms that each Credit Support Document to which it is a party or otherwise bound and all Collateral encumbered thereby will continue to guaranty or secure, as the case may be, the payment and performance of all obligations guaranteed or secured thereby, as the case may be. Each Credit Support Party (other than the Company and the Parent Guarantor) acknowledges and agrees that (i) notwithstanding the conditions to effectiveness set forth in this Amendment, such Credit Support Party is not required by the terms of the Credit Agreement or any other Loan Document to consent to the amendments to the Credit Agreement effected pursuant to this Amendment and (ii) nothing in the Credit Agreement, this Amendment or any other Loan Document shall be deemed to require the consent of such Credit Support Party to any future amendments to the Credit Agreement. Section 5. Miscellaneous. ------------- A. Reference to and Effect on the Credit Agreement ----------------------------------------------- and the Other Loan Documents. - ---------------------------- (1) On and after the Seventeenth Amendment Effective Date, each reference in the Credit Agreement to "this Agreement", "hereunder", "hereof", "herein" or words of like import referring to the Credit Agreement, and each reference in the other Loan Documents to the "Credit Agreement", "thereunder", "thereof" or words of like import referring to the Credit Agreement shall mean and be a reference to the Amended Agreement. (2) Except as specifically amended by this Amendment, the Credit Agreement and the other Loan Documents shall remain in full force and effect and are hereby ratified and confirmed. B. Applicable Law. THIS AMENDMENT SHALL BE DEEMED TO -------------- BE A CONTRACT MADE UNDER AND GOVERNED BY THE INTERNAL LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, WITHOUT GIVING EFFECT TO SUCH LAWS RELATING TO CONFLICTS OF LAWS. C. Headings. The various headings of this Amendment -------- are inserted for convenience only and shall not affect the meaning or interpretation of this Amendment or any provision hereof. D. Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed by ------------ the parties hereto in several counterparts and by the different parties on separate counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original and all of which shall constitute together but one and the same instrument; signature pages may be detached from multiple separate counterparts and attached to a single counterpart so that all signature pages are physically attached to the same document. E. Severability. Any provision of this Amendment ------------ which is prohibited or unenforceable in any jurisdiction shall, as to such provision and such jurisdiction, be ineffective to the extent of such prohibition or unenforceability without invalidating the remaining provisions of this Amendment or affecting the validity or enforceability of such provisions in any other jurisdiction. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been duly executed and delivered as of the day and year first above written. KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION KAISER ALUMINUM & CHEMICAL CORPORATION By: /s/Karen A. Twitchell By: /s/Karen A. Twitchell Name Printed: Karen A. Twitchell Name Printed: Karen A. Twitchell Its: Treasurer Its: Treasurer BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. (successor to BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. BankAmerica Business Credit, Inc.), (successor to BankAmerica as Agent Business Credit, Inc.) By: /s/Michael J. Jasaitis By: /s/Michael J. Jasaitis Name: Michael J. Jasaitis Name: Michael J. Jasaitis Its: Vice President Its: Vice President BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. (formerly known THE CIT GROUP/BUSINESS as Bank of America National Trust and CREDIT, INC. Savings Association) By: /s/Michael Balok By: /s/Grant Weiss Name Printed: Michael Balok Name Printed: Grant Weiss Its: Managing Director Its: Assistant Vice President CONGRESS FINANCIAL CORPORATION HELLER FINANCIAL, INC. (WESTERN) By: /s/Kristine Metchikig By: /s/Richard J. Halston Name Printed: Kristine Metchikig Name Printed: Richard J. Halston Its: Vice President Its: Assistant Vice President LA SALLE BANK NATIONAL TRANSAMERICA BUSINESS CREDIT ASSOCIATION (formerly known as CORPORATION La Salle National Bank) By: /s/Douglas C. Colleth By: /s/Robert L. Heinz Name Printed: Douglas C. Colleth Name Printed: Robert L. Heinz Its: First Vice President Its: Senior Vice President ABN AMRO BANK N.V. By: /s/Jeffrey A. French Name Printed: Jeffrey A. French Its: Senior Vice President By: /s/Corinna Fong Name Printed: Corinna Fong Its: Credit Officer ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED TO: AKRON HOLDING CORPORATION KAISER ALUMINUM & CHEMICAL INVESTMENT, INC. By: /s/Karen A. Twitchell By: /s/Karen A. Twitchell Name Printed: Karen A. Twitchell Name Printed: Karen A. Twitchell Its: Treasurer Its: Treasurer KAISER ALUMINUM PROPERTIES, KAISER ALUMINUM TECHNICAL INC. SERVICES, INC. By: /s/Karen A. Twitchell By: /s/Karen A. Twitchell Name Printed: Karen A. Twitchell Name Printed: Karen A. Twitchell Its: Treasurer Its: Treasurer OXNARD FORGE DIE COMPANY, INC. KAISER ALUMINIUM INTERNATIONAL, INC. By: /s/Karen A. Twitchell By: /s/Karen A. Twitchell Name Printed: Karen A. Twitchell Name Printed: Karen A. Twitchell Its: Treasurer Its: Treasurer KAISER ALUMINA AUSTRALIA KAISER FINANCE CORPORATION CORPORATION By: /s/Karen A. Twitchell By: /s/Karen A. Twitchell Name Printed: Karen A. Twitchell Name Printed: Karen A. Twitchell Its: Treasurer Its: Treasurer ALPART JAMAICA INC. KAISER JAMAICA CORPORATION By: /s/Karen A. Twitchell By: /s/Karen A. Twitchell Name Printed: Karen A. Twitchell Name Printed: Karen A. Twitchell Its: Treasurer Its: Treasurer KAISER BAUXITE COMPANY KAISER EXPORT COMPANY By: /s/Karen A. Twitchell By: /s/Karen A. Twitchell Name Printed: Karen A. Twitchell Name Printed: Karen A. Twitchell Its: Treasurer Its: Treasurer KAISER MICROMILL HOLDINGS, LLC KAISER SIERRA MICROMILLS, LLC By: /s/Karen A. Twitchell By: /s/Karen A. Twitchell Name Printed: Karen A. Twitchell Name Printed: Karen A. Twitchell Its: Treasurer Its: Treasurer KAISER TEXAS SIERRA MICROMILLS, KAISER TEXAS MICROMILL LLC HOLDINGS, LLC By: /s/Karen A. Twitchell By: /s/Karen A. Twitchell Name Printed: Karen A. Twitchell Name Printed: Karen A. Twitchell Its: Treasurer Its: Treasurer KAISER BELLWOOD CORPORATION KAISER TRANSACTION CORP. By: /s/Karen A. Twitchell By: /s/Karen A. Twitchell Name Printed: Karen A. Twitchell Name Printed: Karen A. Twitchell Its: Treasurer Its: Treasurer EX-27 3
5 This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the consolidated financial statements of the Comapany for the nine months ended September 30, 1999, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statments. 0000054291 KAISER ALUMINUM & CHEMICAL CORPORATON 1,000,000 9-MOS DEC-31-1999 JAN-01-1999 SEP-30-1999 9 0 299 6 554 977 1,996 936 3,099 564 970 19 2 15 16 3,099 1,525 1,525 1,398 1,398 69 0 82 (146) (50) (92) 0 0 0 (92) 0 0
-----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----