Note 1 – Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of American Greetings Corporation and its subsidiaries (the “Corporation”) have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary to fairly present financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods have been included. On August 9, 2013, the Corporation completed a merger whereby the Corporation was acquired by Century Intermediate Holding Company, a company that was formed by the Chairman of the Board, the co-Chief Executive Officers of the Corporation and certain other members of the Weiss family and related entities (the “Merger”). As a result of the Merger, the Corporation’s equity is no longer publicly traded. As such, earnings per share information is not required.

The Corporation’s fiscal year ends on February 28 or 29. References to a particular year refer to the fiscal year ending in February of that year. For example, 2014 refers to the year ended February 28, 2014. The Corporation’s subsidiary, AG Retail Cards Limited is consolidated on a one-month lag corresponding with its fiscal year-end of January 31 for 2015.

These interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Corporation’s financial statements and notes thereto included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 28, 2014, from which the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position at February 28, 2014, presented herein, has been derived.

The Corporation’s investments in less than majority-owned companies in which it has the ability to exercise significant influence over the operation and financial policies are accounted for using the equity method except when they qualify as variable interest entities (“VIE”) and the Corporation is the primary beneficiary, in which case, the investments are consolidated in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 810 (“ASC 810”), “Consolidation.” Investments that do not meet the above criteria are accounted for under the cost method.

Prior to the fourth quarter of 2014, the Corporation held an approximate 15% equity interest in Schurman Fine Papers (“Schurman”) which is a VIE as defined in ASC 810. Schurman owns and operates specialty card and gift retail stores in the United States and Canada. The stores are primarily located in malls and strip shopping centers. During the third quarter of 2014, the Corporation determined that, due to continued operating losses, shareholders’ deficit and lack of return on the Corporation’s investment, the cost method investment was permanently impaired. As a result, the Corporation recorded an impairment charge in the amount of $1.9 million which reduced the carrying amount of the investment to zero. In addition, during the fourth quarter of 2014, in order to mitigate ongoing risks to the Corporation that may arise from retaining an equity interest in Schurman, the Corporation transferred to Schurman its 15% equity interest and, as a result, no longer has an equity interest in Schurman.

The Corporation provides Schurman limited credit support through the provision of a liquidity guaranty (“Liquidity Guaranty”) in favor of the lenders under Schurman’s senior revolving credit facility (the “Senior Credit Facility”). Pursuant to the terms of the Liquidity Guaranty, the Corporation has guaranteed the repayment of up to $10.0 million of Schurman’s borrowings under the Senior Credit Facility to help ensure that Schurman has sufficient borrowing availability under this facility. The Liquidity Guaranty is required to be backed by a letter of credit for the term of the Liquidity Guaranty, which is currently anticipated to end in July 2016. The Corporation’s obligations under the Liquidity Guaranty generally may not be triggered unless Schurman’s lenders under its Senior Credit Facility have substantially completed the liquidation of the collateral under Schurman’s Senior Credit Facility, or 91 days after the liquidation is started, whichever is earlier, and will be limited to the deficiency, if any, between the amount owed and the amount collected in connection with the liquidation. There was no triggering event or liquidation of collateral as of August 29, 2014 requiring the use of the Liquidity Guaranty.

During the current period, the Corporation assessed the variable interests in Schurman and determined that a third party holder of variable interests has the controlling financial interest in the VIE and thus, the third party, not the Corporation, is the primary beneficiary. In completing this assessment, the Corporation identified the activities that it considers most significant to the future economic success of the VIE and determined that it does not have the power to direct those activities. As such, Schurman is not consolidated in the Corporation’s results. The Corporation’s maximum exposure to loss as it relates to Schurman as of August 29, 2014 includes:

•

Liquidity Guaranty of Schurman’s indebtedness of $10.0 million;

•

normal course of business trade and other receivables due from Schurman of $28.5 million, the balance of which fluctuates throughout the year due to the seasonal nature of the business; and

•

the retail store operating leases currently subleased to Schurman, the aggregate lease payments for the remaining life of which was $5.8 million, $7.1 million and $9.4 million as of August 29, 2014, February 28, 2014 and August 30, 2013, respectively.

Correction of Immaterial Errors

During the first quarter of 2015, the Corporation identified and corrected errors in the accounting for income taxes that related to the year ended February 28, 2014. These errors primarily related to the Corporation’s failure to consider all sources of available taxable income when assessing the need for a valuation allowance against certain deferred tax assets and the recognition of a liability for an uncertain tax position. These errors were the result of the significant complexity created as a result of the Merger and related transactions. The impact of correcting these items had a non-cash effect, decreasing tax expense and increasing net income by $4.1 million. Based on its evaluation as discussed more fully below, the Corporation concluded that the corrections to the financial statements were immaterial to its financial results for the year ended February 28, 2014 and its expected financial results for the year ending February 28, 2015.

In accordance with ASC Topic 250, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections, the Corporation evaluated the effects of the errors on its financial statements for the year ended February 28, 2014 and the expected full year financial results for the year ending February 28, 2015 and concluded that the results of operations for these periods are not materially misstated. In reaching its conclusion, the Corporation considered numerous qualitative and quantitative factors, including but not limited to the following:

•

In evaluating the financial and operational performance, the Corporation’s shareholder and debt holders focus on performance metrics such as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”), operating income and cash flows from operations, none of which were impacted by the correction of the errors,

•

The numeric impact of the error on the Corporation’s results of operations, including the net dollar impact, the impact as a percentage of period earnings, the impact on financial trends, and the impact on non-GAAP measures such as adjusted operating income the Corporation presents in quarterly public debt holder conference calls, which were deemed immaterial, particularly in light of the Corporation’s stakeholders’ focus on EBITDA, operating income and cash flows from operations, and

•

The absence of any impact on the Corporation’s compliance with its debt covenants, management compensation or segment reporting.

Based on its evaluation, the Corporation concluded that it is not probable that the judgment of a reasonable person relying on the financial statements would have been changed or influenced by the error or correction of the error.