-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, FbLNxmRgW+IakFiRtOKWAG4DLgZZfGnhq8Qj10i+cMfPe3Hn1Yjb+jRgEvyGfhF5 vPQAaLZ5gRR/L4jVFzxakw== 0000049816-98-000034.txt : 19981123 0000049816-98-000034.hdr.sgml : 19981123 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0000049816-98-000034 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 10-Q/A PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 1 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 19980930 FILED AS OF DATE: 19981120 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: ILLINOIS POWER CO CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000049816 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: ELECTRIC & OTHER SERVICES COMBINED [4931] IRS NUMBER: 370344645 STATE OF INCORPORATION: IL FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 10-Q/A SEC ACT: SEC FILE NUMBER: 001-03004 FILM NUMBER: 98755674 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 500 S 27TH ST STREET 2: C/O HARRIS TRUST & SAVINGS BANK CITY: DECATUR STATE: IL ZIP: 62525-1805 BUSINESS PHONE: 2174246600 FORMER COMPANY: FORMER CONFORMED NAME: ILLINOIS IOWA POWER CO DATE OF NAME CHANGE: 19660822 10-Q/A 1 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D. C. 20549 Form 10-Q/A1 (X) QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 OR ( ) TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from __________to __________ Commission Registrants; State of Incorporation; IRS Employer File Number Address; and Telephone Number Identification No. 1-11327 Illinova Corporation 37-1319890 (an Illinois Corporation) 500 S. 27th Street Decatur, IL 62521 (217) 424-6600 1-3004 Illinois Power Company 37-0344645 (an Illinois Corporation) 500 S. 27th Street Decatur, IL 62521 (217) 424-6600 Indicate by check mark whether the registrants (1) have filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such report), and (2) have been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Illinova Yes X No Corporation ---- ---- Illinois Power Yes X No Company ---- ---- Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers' classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: Illinova Corporation Common stock, no par value, 71,713,387 shares outstanding at October 31, 1998 Illinois Power Company Common stock, no par value, 65,150,562 shares outstanding held by Illinova Corporation at October 31, 1998 1 ILLINOVA CORPORATION AND ILLINOIS POWER COMPANY Item 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS This report contains estimates, projections and other forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results or outcomes could differ materially from those provided in the forward-looking statements as a result of such important factors as: the outcome of state and federal regulatory proceedings affecting the restructuring of the electric and gas utility industries; the impacts of new laws and regulations on Illinova and its subsidiaries relating to restructuring, environmental and other matters; the effects of increased competition on the utility businesses; risks of owning and operating a nuclear facility; changes in prices and cost of fuel; factors affecting non-utility investments, such as the risk of doing business in foreign countries; construction and operation risks; and increases in financing costs. All forward-looking statements are based upon information presently available, and Illinova and IP assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statements. Reference is made to the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements and Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations presented in Illinova's 1997 Annual Report to Shareholders (included in the Proxy Statement), the Consolidated Financial Statements and Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations presented in IP's 1997 Annual Report to Shareholders (included in the Information Statement), and Illinova's and IP's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997 and Illinova's and IP's Report on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31 and June 30, 1998, and Illinova's and IP's 1998 Form 8-K filings. ILLINOVA SUBSIDIARIES IP, a subsidiary of Illinova, engages in the generation, transmission, distribution and sale of electric energy and the distribution, transportation and sale of natural gas in the State of Illinois. IP has publicly traded preferred shares outstanding but its common stock is wholly-owned by Illinova. IGC is a wholly-owned independent power subsidiary of Illinova and invests in energy supply projects throughout the world. IGC's strategy is to invest in and develop "greenfield" power plants, acquire existing generation facilities and provide power plant operations and maintenance services. IEP is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Illinova. IEP develops and markets energy-related services to the unregulated energy market throughout the United States and engages in the brokering and marketing of electric power and gas. IIC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Illinova and was licensed by the State of Vermont as a captive insurance company. The primary business of IIC is to insure certain risks of Illinova and its subsidiaries. IBE is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Illinova and was created to account for miscellaneous business activities not regulated by the ICC or the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and not falling within the business scope of other Illinova subsidiaries. 18 LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES CAPITAL RESOURCES AND REQUIREMENTS Cash flows from operations during the first nine months of 1998, supplemented by external financing, were sufficient to meet ongoing operating requirements and to service existing common and preferred stock dividends, debt requirements, IP's construction requirements and Illinova's investments in its subsidiaries. However, Illinova's and IP's liquidity has decreased as a result of higher than expected replacement power costs and higher Clinton costs combined with lower revenues caused by the rate reduction mandated by P.A. 90-561 and lower than anticipated subsidiary earnings. Illinova expects to use cash flows, supplemented by external financing, to meet operating requirements and to continue to service existing debt, IP's preferred and Illinova common stock dividends, IP's sinking fund requirements and Illinova's and IP's anticipated subsidiary investments and construction requirements for the remainder of 1998. On January 28, 1998, Illinova issued $40 million of 6.46% medium-term notes due October 1, 2002 under an existing $300 million shelf registration statement. On September 9, 1998 Illinova issued an additional $30 million of 6.15% medium-term notes due September 10, 2001 under the same shelf registration. Illinova currently has authority to issue an additional $130 million in debt securities under this shelf registration. Illinova's $110 million revolving credit agreement is subject to termination if Clinton is not operational by January 31, 1999. In anticipation of this possibility, Illinova has initiated action to replace this revolving credit agreement with a new facility. There is no assurance that this can be done on terms as favorable as the current agreement. IP pays Illinova dividends on the IP common stock held by Illinova to provide Illinova cash for operations. IP also is allowed to periodically repurchase its common stock from Illinova in accordance with authority granted by the ICC, contingent on IP meeting certain cash flow tests. Although IP currently satisfies this cash flow test, it is anticipated that it will not satisfy the test at year-end 1998 and for a portion of 1999. This test failure will not impact the ability to repurchase Illinova equity shares using securitization proceeds. Illinova's current $130 million capacity under the existing shelf registration should meet its cash requirements through the first quarter of 1999. Illinova is developing additional financial capabilities to meet future needs. IP issued a redemption notice for all outstanding bonds of its 6.00% Pollution Control First Mortgage Bonds due 2007 ($18.7 million) and its 8.30% Pollution Control First Mortgage Bonds due 2017 ($33.8 million). Both series were called April 1, 1998. On March 6, 1998, IP issued $18.7 million of 5.40% Pollution Control Mortgage Bonds due 2028 and $33.8 million of 5.40% Pollution Control Mortgage Bonds due 2028. On May 8, 1998, IP filed an SEC Form S-3 registration for a $200 million debt shelf authorization. This debt shelf became effective May 27, 1998. On July 21, 1998, IP issued $100 million of 6.25% Mortgage Bonds due 2002 against this registration. On September 16, 1998, IP issued $100 million of 6.00% Mortgage Bonds due 2003 against this same shelf registration. On September 28,1998, IP issued a call notice on the 6.60% Series A Pollution Control Bonds due May 1, 2004. The bonds were called at par on November 1, 1998. IP's capital requirements for construction were approximately $190 million and $131 million during the nine months ended September 30, 1998 and 1997, respectively. Through 2000 IP plans to complete improvements in its generation facilities including pollution control equipment, equipment to support use of Powder River Basin coal and new combustion turbine peaking units. These improvements will cost approximately $300 million. In addition to these investments, IP will be required to deposit $62 million in cash with the IP Fuel Company Trustee for noteholders and take title to the partially depleted nuclear fuel in the reactor at Clinton Power Station on March 2, 1999 if Clinton does 19 not return to service by January 31, 1999. IP currently has the authority to issue $250 million in long-term debt and $500 million in short-term debt, which includes $350 million in committed bank lines of credit. Of these authorized amounts, IP has $128 million in remaining capacity that may be utilized to issue commercial paper and extend floating rate notes. IP anticipates that this liquidity will be sufficient to address its requirements into the second quarter of 1999. IP is developing additional financial capabilities to meet future needs. On June 24, 1998, IP filed an application with the ICC seeking approval for securitization notes totaling $864 million. This represents 25% of the company's capitalization at December 31, 1996 as allowed by the 1997 Electric Utility Transition Funding law. The proceeds from these notes will be used to lower IP's cost of capital by repurchasing stock and retiring debt. The ICC approved and issued the Transitional Funding Order on September 10, 1998. On September 16, 1998, IP filed a shelf registration statement on Form S-3 with the SEC. On September 30, 1998, the Internal Revenue Service issued a private letter ruling to IP holding that, among other things, the notes will be obligations of IP for federal income tax purposes. Interest paid on the notes generally will be taxable to a United States Noteholder as ordinary interest income. Presently, IP's mortgage bonds are rated Baa1 by Moody's, BBB+ by Duff & Phelps and BBB by Standard & Poor's. IP's preferred stock is rated Baa2 by Moody's and BBB- by both Duff & Phelps and Standard & Poor's. Illinova's senior and medium-term notes have a rating of Baa3 from Moody's and BBB- from Standard & Poor's. On July 6, 1998, a change in outlook was issued. The outlook from Moody's changed from stable to negative and the outlook from Standard & Poor's changed from positive to stable. To avoid any possible constraint imposed by Federal or State laws as discussed above, on October 14, 1998, the Board of Directors declared IP preferred stock dividends for the first quarter of 1999 and declared IP common stock dividends which were paid in November totaling $.62 per share. ACCOUNTING MATTERS For further information on accounting issues, see "Accounting Matters" under "Regulatory and Legal Matters" of the "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements" on page 13 of this report. CLINTON POWER STATION In September 1996, a leak in a recirculation pump seal caused IP operations personnel to shut down Clinton. Clinton has not resumed operation. In January 1997 and again in June 1997, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) named Clinton among plants having a trend of declining performance. In June 1997, IP committed to conduct an Integrated Safety Assessment (ISA) to thoroughly assess Clinton's performance. The ISA was conducted by a team of 30 individuals with extensive nuclear experience and no 20 substantial previous involvement at Clinton. Their report concluded that the underlying reasons for the performance problems at Clinton were ineffective leadership throughout the organization in providing standards of excellence, complacency throughout the organization, barrier weaknesses and weaknesses in teamwork. In late October, a team commissioned by the NRC performed an evaluation to validate the ISA results. In December, this team concluded that the findings of the ISA accurately characterized Clinton's performance deficiencies and their causes. On January 5, 1998, IP and PECO Energy Company (PECO) announced an agreement under which PECO will provide management services for Clinton. Although a PECO team will help manage the plant, IP continues to maintain the operating license for Clinton and retain ultimate oversight of the plant. PECO employees have assumed senior positions at Clinton, but the plant will remain primarily staffed by IP employees. IP made this decision based on a belief that bringing in PECO's experienced management team would be the most efficient way to get Clinton back on line and operating at a superior level as quickly as possible. On January 21, 1998, the NRC placed Clinton on its Watch List of nuclear plants that require additional regulatory oversight because of declining performance. Twice a year the NRC evaluates the performance of nuclear power plants in the United States and identifies those which require additional regulatory oversight. Once placed on the Watch List, a plant must demonstrate consistent improved performance before it is removed from the list. The Watch List issued on July 29, 1998 still included Clinton. The NRC will monitor Clinton more closely than plants not on the Watch List. This may include increased inspections, additional required documentation, NRC-required approval of processes and procedures and higher-level NRC oversight. On February 19, 1998, IP filed Clinton's Summary Plan for Excellence with the NRC. The Plan for Excellence provides a comprehensive set of strategies and associated actions necessary to improve performance, permit safe restart of the plant and achieve excellence in operations. IP is implementing the actions required prior to plant restart. This recovery/restart program to get Clinton back online is going through a formal parallel review process by the NRC. The NRC has advised IP that it must submit a written report to the NRC at least two weeks prior to restarting Clinton, giving the agency reasonable assurance that IP's actions to correct recurring weaknesses in the corrective action program have been effective. After the report is submitted, the NRC staff will meet with IP's management to discuss the plant's readiness for restart. IP announced October 19, 1998 that it now appears likely the plant's restart will be after the first of the year. Moving restart into next year will increase the expense for the station's recovery process. IP currently expects Clinton's 1998 operating and maintenance expenses to be at least $88 million more than Clinton's 1997 expenses, totaling approximately $210 to $215 million for 1998. The prolonged outage at Clinton is having an adverse effect on Illinova's and IP's financial condition, through higher operating and maintenance and capital costs, lost opportunities to sell energy, and replacement power costs. The magnitude of these costs and lost opportunities is unknown because of uncertainty regarding the timing of Clinton's return to service, the ultimate cost of restart and uncertain market conditions. If Clinton is not back in service by the end of January 1999, IP must deposit $62 million with the IP Fuel Co. Trustee for noteholders for the acquisition of core fuel from IP Fuel Co. Previously disclosed earnings expectations are subject to the effects of these uncertainties and changes. 21 REGULATORY MATTERS RATE REDUCTION FILING IP submitted written filings with the ICC in June 1998 to begin the process of implementing a 15 percent residential rate reduction effective August 1, 1998. On July 22, 1998, IP filed a plan with the ICC for a one time reduction in residential and small commercial customers' electric bills of approximately 7.5 percent for the month of August in consideration of their energy conservation efforts this summer. The reduction was in addition to the 15 percent residential rate reduction that was effective August 1, 1998 and had the effect of beginning the 15 percent residential electric rate reduction two weeks early. ATTORNEY GENERAL COMPLAINT On July 17, 1998, a complaint against IP was filed at the ICC by the Illinois State Attorney General. The complaint alleges that IP failed to meet its statutory obligations to provide adequate and reliable service in connection with this summer's electric supply situation (for further disclosure, see "Power Supply and Reliability" on pages 25-26). It asks the ICC to conduct a management audit of IP and seeks an order requiring IP to offer compensation to customers for voluntary conservation and service interruptions. The Company believes it can effectively defend itself against these allegations, however, the outcome at this point is uncertain. SOYLAND POWER COORDINATION AGREEMENT The FERC approved an amended Power Coordination Agreement (PCA) between Soyland and IP in July 1997. Under the amended PCA, Soyland was allowed to prepay an Elected Capacity Reduction Fee associated with a unilateral reduction in its base capacity charge under the PCA. In December 1997, Soyland signed a letter of intent to pay in advance the remainder of its base capacity charges in the PCA. Soyland obtained the necessary financing and regulatory approvals during the second quarter of 1998. During the first quarter of 1998, IP received $30 million from Soyland and the remaining $40 million was received during the second quarter of 1998. The prepayment has been deferred and is being recognized as interchange revenue evenly over the initial term of the PCA which is from September 1, 1996 through August 31, 2006. UNIFORM FUEL ADJUSTMENT CLAUSE (UFAC) Previously, IP's rate schedules contained provisions for passing through to its electric customers increases or decreases in the cost of energy provided to its native load customers under the UFAC. Such costs included fuel and allowable fuel transportation costs, emission allowance costs, DOE spent fuel disposal fees and costs of power purchased to serve native load. On March 6, 1998, IP filed with ICC the necessary documents required for elimination of the UFAC. This established a new base fuel cost recoverable in IP's electric tariffs effective on the date of the filing. As provided in P.A. 90-561, the new base fuel cost is 1.287 cents per kwh, which is equal to 91 percent of IP's average prudent and allowable fuel and purchased power supply costs in the two most recent years for which the ICC has approved the level of recovery. Every year UFAC cost recoveries are audited by the ICC in a reconciliation proceeding in which they may be adjusted upward for actual costs not recovered, or downward through a disallowance of costs incurred. By opting out of the UFAC, IP eliminated exposure for potential disallowed fuel and purchased power costs for periods after December 31, 1996, as those years will no longer be subject to the ICC's annual reconciliation proceeding. This change will prevent IP from 22 automatically passing through increases in cost and will expose IP to the risks and opportunities of price volatility in the marketplace. Whether electric energy costs will continue to be recovered in revenues from customers will depend on a number of factors, including the number of customers served, demand for electric service and changes in fuel cost components. These variables may be influenced, in turn, by market conditions, availability of generating capacity, future regulatory proceedings and environmental protection costs, among other things. DEREGULATION RULEMAKINGS AND TARIFFS As a result of P.A. 90-561, ICC rulemakings are underway covering issues such as affiliated interests and reliability. These regulatory proceedings, alone or in combination, could significantly impact how IP operates and is organized, but they are not likely to have a material impact on financial results. Under the new rules, Illinois utilities must keep records identifying service interruptions experienced by each customer. Illinois utilities must also file an annual report detailing the reliability of its service and explaining its plans for reliability improvements. In addition, each utility must also report the number and causes of service interruptions that were due to causes within the utility's control. Outage targets were established for service to individual customers and for system performance. OPEN ACCESS AND COMPETITION In January 1998, IP, in conjunction with eight other transmission-owning entities, filed with the FERC for all approvals necessary to create and implement the Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc. (MISO). On September 16, 1998, the FERC issued an order authorizing the creation of a MISO. The MISO must now elect a seven-person independent board of directors within seventy five days of approval. The goals of this joint undertaking are to: 1) put in place a tariff allowing easy and nondiscriminatory access to transmission facilities in a multi-state region, 2) enhance regional reliability and 3) establish an entity that operates independently of any transmission owner(s) or other market participants, thus furthering competition in the wholesale generation market consistent with the objectives of the FERC's Order No. 888. Since January 1998, four other transmission-owning entities joined the MISO. Participation in an ISO by utilities was one of the requirements included in P.A. 90-561 enacted in 1997. The MISO has a stated goal to begin limited operation in 1999, and to be fully operational in the year 2000. See "Open Access and Competition" under "Regulatory and Legal Matters" of the "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements" on page 12 of this report for additional information. YEAR 2000 DATA PROCESSING In November 1996, Illinova deployed a project team to coordinate the identification, evaluation and implementation of changes to computer systems and applications necessary to achieve a year 2000 date conversion with no effect on customers or disruption to business operations. These actions are necessary to ensure that systems and applications will recognize and process coding for the year 2000 and beyond. Major areas of potential business impact have been identified. Illinova has inventoried 99% of its systems and assessment is 95% complete. Implementation efforts are approximately 34% complete. Illinova also is communicating with third parties with whom it does business to facilitate continued business operations. 23 The cost of achieving year 2000 compliance is estimated to be approximately $20.4 million through 1999. The amount expended as of October 31, 1998 is $6.4 million. Contingency plans for operating without year 2000 compliance have not been developed. Such activity is expected to begin in the fourth quarter of 1998, but exact timing will depend on assessment of progress. Project completion for Illinova is planned for the fourth quarter of 1999 for Illinova overall. For IP alone, the project is scheduled to be virtually complete by mid year 1999. If Illinova, IP or critical interfacing third parties' year 2000 efforts are unsuccessful, some or all of Illinova's and IP's commercial and operational activities could be interrupted for an indefinite time. In addition to monetary loss, equipment could be damaged and public safety impaired. It is uncertain whether such damage would be catastrophic or minimal. It is impossible to assess third party performance beyond Illinova's and IP's control. DIVERSIFIED BUSINESS ACTIVITIES IGC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Illinova, invests in energy-related projects throughout the world. Prior to the fourth quarter 1998, IGC owned 50 percent of the North American Energy Services Company (NAES) and in October 1998, IGC purchased the remaining 50 percent. NAES supplies a broad range of operations, maintenance and support services to the world-wide independent power generation industry and operates the Tenaska generation plants in which IGC has an equity interest. ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS GAS MANUFACTURING SITES See "Manufactured Gas Plant Sites" under "Regulatory and Legal Matters" of the "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements" on page 16 of this report. NITROGEN OXIDE On September 24,1998, the Administrator of the US Environmental Protection Agency signed a final rule (commonly known as the NOx SIP Call) requiring 22 States and the District of Columbia to submit State implementation plans that address the regional transport of ground-level ozone through reductions in nitrogen oxides (NOx). The rule imposes an ozone-season NOx tonnage cap on each state. States have the ability to choose their NOx emission reduction strategy; however, utility and large industrial sources are the most likely targets for reductions. The State reduction plans are required by September, 1999 and NOx emission reduction measures must be in place by May 1, 2003. Utility NOx emissions are expected to be capped based on a NOx limit of 0.15 pounds per million Btu of heat input; this is equivalent to an 85% reduction in utility sector NOx emissions. IP's preliminary estimate to comply with the anticipated utility NOx limit is $129 to $140 million beyond the $97.5 million cost of the Phase II Acid Rain NOx reduction requirements. The NOx SIP Call is expected to be challenged by utility and industrial organizations as well as several states. EMISSION ALLOWANCE EXCHANGES The value of emission allowances expected to be given up in future periods as the result of exchange agreements was recorded in the third quarter 1998 at the current market price and a liability of $9.8 million was recognized. This obligation will be adjusted as price fluctuates until the allowances are surrendered. 24 GLOBAL WARMING On December 11, 1997, international negotiations to reduce greenhouse gas emissions concluded with the adoption of the Kyoto Protocol. This Protocol requires the United States to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 7% below 1990 levels during the years 2008 through 2012 and to make further reductions thereafter. This Protocol must be ratified by the United States Senate. United States Senate Resolution 98 (passed 95-0) indicates the Senate would not ratify an agreement that fails to involve all countries or would damage the United States economy. Ratification will be a major political issue since the Protocol does not contain key elements that Senate Resolution 98 said would be necessary for ratification. It is anticipated that ratification will not occur in 1998. IP will face major changes in how it generates electricity if the Kyoto Protocol is ratified, or if the Protocol's reduction goals are incorporated into other environmental regulations. IP would have to repower some generating units and change from coal to natural gas in other units to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. IP estimates that compliance with these proposed regulations may require significant capital outlays and an increase in annual operating expenses which could have a material adverse impact on Illinova and IP. POWER SUPPLY AND RELIABILITY Electricity was in short supply throughout Illinois and Wisconsin this summer because of an unusually high number of plant outages in this region. IP was able to secure generation and transmission capacity in order to guard against disruptions in service. IP took additional steps to avoid potential shortages, including inspecting and upgrading transmission lines and equipment, readying emergency procedures and restarting two plants that were in cold-shutdown. Expenses incurred as a result of the shortage of electricity this summer have had a material adverse impact on Illinova and IP. IP experienced unprecedented and unexpected prices for power purchases during the last week of June 1998. Replacement power costs for the second quarter of 1998 were $49 million higher than the second quarter of 1997 and $55 million higher through June 1998 as compared to 1997. In addition, during June 1998 IP recorded an accrual of $58.3 million for probable and reasonably estimable losses on power sales commitments with scheduled third quarter 1998 delivery dates. The earnings impact of replacement power costs for the third quarter of 1998 was in line with July 1998 projections. The ultimate amount of 1998 losses associated with power sales commitments and lost margin on sales to native load customers was largely the result of factors influencing the price of purchased power such as regional weather, regional generation capacity, market conditions including prices and liquidity, generation and transmission availability as well as factors affecting IP's generating and transmission capacity. In addition, IP is subject to future price and capacity risk related to electric power supply contracts for the years 1999 and 2000. In the fourth quarter of 1998, IP expects to accrue an additional amount of approximately $20 million to provide for other 1999 and 2000 sales agreements that it previously expected to fulfill through IP generation. The ultimate financial impact of these contracts will depend on market conditions and IP's system availability. IP will continue to review its accounting treatment of these commitments as further guidance is issued by the EITF regarding issue 98-10, "Accounting for Energy Trading and Risk Management Activities." See discussion of EITF 98-10 under "Accounting Matters" in the "Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements" on page 15. On July 7, 1998, IP testified before the ICC and July 8, 1998 before the Environment and Energy Committee of the Illinois House of Representatives 25 with regard to the electric supply problems of late June and IP's supply plans for the rest of the summer. IP stated it was monitoring power plant maintenance and transmission system preparation. In the third quarter, in response to the summer supply situation, IP increased MWH generation 16.4 percent compared to the same quarter of 1997 by running selected plants at peak and re-activating oil-fired generating plants previously placed in cold shutdown. In addition to having Clinton back in service, IP expects to have more than 400 megawatts of additional generation on line for the summer of 1999. That includes approximately 235 megawatts from five oil-fired units being brought up from cold shutdown and 176 megawatts from four natural gas turbines that IP plans to install before next summer. Total cost for the two projects is estimated at $87 million. IP also plans to refurbish nine gas turbines already in service at a cost of $13 million. At a public ICC proceeding on reliability on October 4, 1998, IP said that, even though it expects Clinton to be available by summer 1999, for purposes of advance coverage of anticipated summer demand it is using the assumption that Clinton will not be operating. Options being considered include various demand side management initiatives, power purchases and selected financial and insurance products. At an ICC proceeding on reliability October 4, 1998, IP said that, even though it expects Clinton to be available by summer 1999, for purposes of covering anticipated summer demand, it is assuming that Clinton will not be operational. Various demand side management initiatives, power purchases, and financial and insurance products are being used or reviewed as approaches to reduce the risk of supply shortage. 26 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized. ILLINOVA CORPORATION (Registrant) By /s/ Larry F. Altenbaumer --------------------------- Larry F. Altenbaumer Chief Financial Officer Treasurer and Controller on behalf of Illinova Corporation Date: November 19, 1998 31 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized. ILLINOIS POWER COMPANY (Registrant) By /s/ Larry F. Altenbaumer --------------------------- Larry F. Altenbaumer Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer on behalf of Illinois Power Company Date: November 19, 1998 32 -----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----