10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)
x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008
OR
o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                 to

Commission File Number 001-15283

DineEquity, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	95-3038279
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
450 North Brand Boulevard, Glendale, California	91203-1903
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

(818) 240-6055

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x  No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer x	Accelerated filer o
Non-accelerated filer o	Smaller reporting company o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o  No x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Class	Outstanding as of October 24, 2008
Common Stock, $.01 par value	17,476,545

DINEEQUITY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

INDEX

		Page
PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION	2
	Item 1—Financial Statements	2
	Consolidated Balance Sheets—September 30, 2008 (unaudited) and December 31, 2007	2
	Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited)—Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 and 2007	3
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited)—Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 and 2007	4
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	5
	Item 2—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	17
	Item 3—Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	38
	Item 4—Controls and Procedures	38
PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION	39
	Item 1—Legal Proceedings	39
	Item 1A—Risk Factors	39
	Item 2—Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	39
	Item 3—Defaults Upon Senior Securities	39
	Item 4—Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	39
	Item 5—Other Information	39
	Item 6—Exhibits	39
	Signatures	40

1

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.  Financial Statements.

DINEEQUITY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share amounts)

	September 30, 2008			December 31, 2007
	(Unaudited)
Assets
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	100,144		$	26,838
Restricted cash	82,030			128,138
Short-term investments, at market value	275			300
Receivables, net	79,133			115,335
Inventories	13,117			13,280
Prepaid income taxes	15,104			30,695
Prepaid expenses	11,041			30,831
Deferred income taxes	55,992			21,862
Assets held for sale	12,065			60,347
Current assets related to discontinued operations	5,231			6,052
Total current assets	374,132			433,678
Non-current restricted cash	55,528			57,962
Restricted assets related to captive insurance subsidiary	6,182			10,518
Long-term receivables	276,972			288,452
Property and equipment, net	901,073			1,139,616
Goodwill	810,874			730,728
Other intangible assets, net	1,005,148			1,011,457
Other assets, net	152,200			156,193
Non-current assets related to discontinued operations	2,558			2,558
Total assets	$	3,584,667		$	3,831,162
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Current liabilities
Accounts payable	$	34,419		$	99,019
Accrued employee compensation and benefits	50,362			56,795
Deferred revenue	39,600			76,802
Accrued financing costs	20,000			63,045
Other accrued expenses	60,690			49,203
Deferred compensation	—			21,236
Accrued interest payable	3,724			15,240
Total current liabilities	208,795			381,340
Long-term debt	1,920,789			2,263,887
Financing obligations, less current maturities	363,639			—
Capital lease obligations, less current maturities	163,113			168,242
Deferred income taxes	438,478			504,865
Other liabilities	116,162			113,103
Non-current liabilities related to discontinued operations	1,423			3,302
Commitments and contingencies
Preferred stock, Series A, $1 par value, 220,000 shares authorized; 190,000 shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007	187,050			187,050
Stockholders’ equity
Convertible Preferred stock, Series B, at accreted value, 10,000,000 shares authorized; 35,000 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007	36,781			35,181
Common stock, $.01 par value, 40,000,000 shares authorized; September 30, 2008: 23,711,151 shares issued and 17,480,556 shares outstanding; December 31, 2007: 23,359,664 shares issued and 17,105,469 shares outstanding	230			230
Additional paid-in-capital	163,480			149,564
Retained earnings	292,602			338,790
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(31,356		)	(36,738		)
Treasury stock, at cost (6,230,595 shares and 6,254,195 shares at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively)	(276,519		)	(277,654		)
Total stockholders’ equity	185,218			209,373
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	3,584,667		$	3,831,162

See the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

2

DINEEQUITY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2008			2007			2008			2007
Revenues
Franchise revenues	$	87,429		$	48,782		$	264,784		$	142,766
Company restaurant sales	265,919			4,546			874,337			13,155
Rental income	32,962			33,242			98,495			99,310
Financing revenues	4,871			4,785			20,487			15,735
Total revenues	391,181			91,355			1,258,103			270,966
Costs and Expenses
Franchise expenses	24,255			22,478			70,016			65,068
Company restaurant expenses	236,356			5,164			772,625			15,149
Rental expenses	24,488			24,678			73,758			73,853
Financing expenses	326			458			6,213			987
General and administrative expenses	41,788			17,842			138,592			48,066
Interest expense	50,490			3,393			152,698			8,885
Impairment and closure charges	28,345			—			69,500			55
Loss on derivative financial instrument	—			35,618			—			35,618
Amortization of intangible assets	3,077			—			9,056			—
Other (income) expense, net	(703		)	467			(2,563		)	1,717
(Gain) loss on extinguishment of debt	(2,434		)	—			(2,434		)	2,223
Total costs and expenses	405,988			110,098			1,287,461			251,621
(Loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes	(14,807		)	(18,743		)	(29,358		)	19,345
Benefit (provision) for income taxes	3,096			7,127			12,318			(5,518		)
(Loss) income from continuing operations	(11,711		)	(11,616		)	(17,040		)	13,827
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax	(93		)	—			(295		)	—
Net (loss) income	$	(11,804	)	$	(11,616	)	$	(17,335	)	$	13,827
Net (loss) income	$	(11,804	)	$	(11,616	)	$	(17,335	)	$	13,827
Less: Series A preferred stock dividends	(4,750		)	—			(14,250		)	—
Less: Accretion of Series B preferred stock	(544		)	—			(1,600		)	—
Less: Net loss allocated to unvested participating restricted stock	687			—			1,194			—
Net (loss) income available to common stockholders	$	(16,411	)	$	(11,616	)	$	(31,991	)	$	13,827
Net (loss) income available to common stockholders per share
Basic	$	(0.98	)	$	(0.69	)	$	(1.91	)	$	0.80
Diluted	$	(0.98	)	$	(0.69	)	$	(1.91	)	$	0.80
Weighted average shares outstanding
Basic	16,786			16,935			16,752			17,310
Diluted	16,786			16,935			16,752			17,351
Dividends declared per common share	$	0.25		$	0.25		$	0.75		$	0.75
Dividends paid per common share	$	0.25		$	0.25		$	0.75		$	0.75

See the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

3

DINEEQUITY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2008			2007
Cash flows from operating activities
Net (loss) income	$	(17,335	)	$	13,827
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to cash flows provided by operating activities
Depreciation and amortization	82,479			16,461
Loss on derivative financial instrument	—			35,618
Impairment and closure charges	69,500			55
(Gain) loss on extinguishment of debt	(2,434		)	2,223
Deferred income taxes	(48,585		)	(15,690		)
Stock-based compensation expense	10,237			3,820
Tax benefit from stock-based compensation	1,463			2,991
Excess tax benefit from stock options exercised	(315		)	(2,689		)
Gain on disposition of assets	(440		)	(98		)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
Receivables	35,858			961
Inventories	149			74
Prepaid expenses	9,552			(1,193		)
Accounts payable	(36,768		)	(6,718		)
Accrued employee compensation and benefits	(4,748		)	(1,008		)
Deferred revenues	(37,202		)	—
Other accrued expenses	(240		)	2,480
Other	105			(4,803		)
Cash flows provided by operating activities	61,276			46,311
Cash flows from investing activities
Additions to property and equipment	(26,951		)	(2,246		)
(Additions) reductions to long-term receivables	(555		)	611
Payment of accrued acquisition costs	(10,247		)	(6,512		)
Collateral released by captive insurance subsidiary	4,042			—
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment	40,158			795
Principal receipts from notes and equipment contracts receivable	12,359			12,044
Additions to assets held for sale	(526		)	(169		)
Other	146			(415		)
Cash flows provided by investing activities	18,426			4,108
Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt	35,000			208,000
Proceeds from financing obligations	369,991			—
Repayment of long-term debt	(381,236		)	(147,206		)
Principal payments on capital lease and financing obligations	(6,528		)	(3,661		)
Dividends paid	(24,243		)	(13,044		)
Payment of preferred stock issuance costs	(1,500		)	—
Purchase of treasury stock, net	—			(77,020		)
Reissuance of treasury stock	677			970
Proceeds from stock options exercised	989			8,885
Excess tax benefit from stock options exercised	315			2,689
Payment of accrued debt issuance costs	(48,403		)	(14,491		)
Prepayment penalties on early debt extinguishment	—			(1,219		)
Restricted cash related to securitization	48,542			—
Cash flows used in financing activities	(6,396		)	(36,097		)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents	73,306			14,322
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year	26,838			19,516
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year	$	100,144		$	33,838
Supplemental disclosures
Interest paid	$	133,568		$	23,383
Income taxes paid	$	33,411		$	19,200

See the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

4

DINEEQUITY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

1. General

Effective June 2, 2008, IHOP Corp. changed its corporate name to DineEquity, Inc. (the “Company”). The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2008.

The consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2007 has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements.

These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.

2. Basis of Presentation

The Company’s fiscal quarter ends on the Sunday closest to the last day of each quarter. For convenience, all fiscal quarters are reported as ending on March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31. The third fiscal quarters presented herein ended September 28, 2008 and September 30, 2007, respectively.

On November 29, 2007, the Company completed the acquisition of Applebee’s International, Inc. (“Applebee’s”) pursuant to an agreement and plan of merger entered into by and among the Company, CHLH Corp. and Applebee’s. Upon consummation of the acquisition, Applebee’s became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries that are consolidated in accordance with U.S. GAAP. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. However, the subsidiaries have not guaranteed the obligations of the Company, and the assets of the subsidiaries generally are not available to pay creditors of the Company. Also, the Company has not guaranteed the obligations of the subsidiaries, and the assets of the Company generally are not available to pay creditors of the subsidiaries.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires the Company’s management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an ongoing basis, the Company evaluates its estimates, including those related to provisions for doubtful accounts, legal contingencies, income taxes, long-lived assets and goodwill. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Certain reclassifications have been made to prior year information to conform to the current year presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on the net income or financial position previously reported.

3. New Accounting Pronouncements

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (“SFAS 157”). In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) No. 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, which delayed for one year the applicability of SFAS 157’s fair-value measurements to certain nonfinancial assets and liabilities. The Company adopted SFAS 157 as of January 1, 2008, except as it applies to those nonfinancial assets and liabilities affected by the one-year delay. The adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of adopting the remaining provisions of SFAS 157 on its consolidated financial position and results of operations.

5

3. New Accounting Pronouncements, continued

In June 2007, the EITF reached consensus on Issue No. 06-11, Accounting for Income Tax Benefits of Dividends on Share-Based Payment Awards (“EITF 06-11”). EITF 06-11 requires that the tax benefit related to dividend equivalents paid on restricted stock units which are expected to vest be recorded as an increase to additional paid-in capital. The impact of adopting EITF 06-11 in 2008 did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations (“SFAS 141(R)”). SFAS 141(R) establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree and the goodwill acquired. SFAS 141(R) also establishes disclosure requirements to enable the evaluation of the nature and financial effects of the business combination. SFAS 141(R) is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company will adopt SFAS 141(R) in the first quarter of fiscal 2009 and apply the provisions of this statement for any acquisition after the adoption date. As the statement may only be applied prospectively, the adoption of SFAS 141(R) would impact our consolidated financial statements only if the Company enters into a business combination after the effective date.

In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (“SFAS 161”). This statement requires companies to provide enhanced disclosures about (a) how and why they use derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, and its related interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect a company’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS 161 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. The Company will adopt the new disclosure requirements on or before the required effective date. As SFAS 161 does not change current accounting practice, there will be no impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets (“FSP FAS 142-3”). FSP FAS 142-3 amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (“SFAS 142”). The intent of FSP FAS 142-3 is to improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS 142 and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under SFAS 141(R) and other applicable accounting literature. FSP FAS 142-3 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 and must be applied prospectively to intangible assets acquired after the effective date. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact, if any, of FSP FAS 142-3 on its consolidated financial statements.

In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“SFAS 162”). This statement is intended to improve financial reporting by identifying a consistent framework, or hierarchy, for selecting accounting principles to be used in preparing financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with U.S. GAAP. While this statement formalizes the sources and hierarchy of U.S. GAAP within the authoritative accounting literature, it does not change the accounting principles that are already in place.  This statement will be effective November 17, 2008. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact, if any, of the adoption of SFAS 162 on its consolidated financial statements.

4. Business Acquisition

The total transaction value (including direct transaction costs and expenses) of the Applebee’s acquisition was approximately $2.0 billion. The Company has accounted for the Applebee’s acquisition using the purchase method and, accordingly, the results of operations related to this acquisition have been included in the consolidated results of the Company since the acquisition date. The purchase price for this acquisition was allocated to tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values at the acquisition date of November 29, 2007. The Company believes the fair values assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed were based on reasonable assumptions. The purchase price allocation for the Applebee’s acquisition is preliminary. The Company’s fair value estimates for the purchase price allocation may change during the allowable allocation period, which is up to one year from the acquisition date, if additional information becomes available.

A significant portion of the fair value assigned to property and equipment in the preliminary purchase price allocation was related to 511 Applebee’s company-operated restaurants. In the preliminary purchase price allocation, the Company used global assumptions as to rental data and capitalization rates that were applied to the entire portfolio of properties.

6

4. Business Acquisition, continued

Subsequently, the Company analyzed this information on a store-by-store basis and determined certain fair values from the preliminary purchase price valuation should be revised downwards. Additionally, the data used to estimate the capitalization rate in the preliminary allocation was based in part on industry data, the reporting of which lagged the actual timing by several months. Once data on capitalization rates being utilized in late November 2007 became available, the Company updated the capitalization rate assumptions accordingly. As a result of the review described above, the estimated fair value allocated to property and equipment was revised downward by approximately $146 million in the second fiscal quarter of 2008.

The table below summarizes the three balance sheet items most impacted by the revision to the preliminary purchase price allocation as of November 29, 2007. The impact on all other balance sheet items was not significant.

	Preliminary Purchase Price Allocation			Adjustment			Revised Purchase Price Allocation
	(in thousands)
Property and equipment *	$	890,623		$	(146,019	)	$	744,604
Goodwill	719,961			91,132			811,093
Deferred income tax liability (non-current)	(479,453		)	50,086			(429,367		)

* Including assets reclassified to held for sale subsequent to November 29, 2007

The unaudited pro forma data of the Company for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007 set forth below gives effect to the Applebee’s acquisition as if it had occurred at the beginning of 2007 and includes (1) the amortization of other comprehensive loss resulted from a swap the Company entered into in July 2007 to hedge the interest payments on the securitization transactions which were entered into on November 29, 2007 to finance the acquisition; (2) interest expense (including amortization) related to the securitization transactions that took place during 2007; (3) additional depreciation and amortization expense related to the pro forma stepped-up basis of assets acquired in the acquisition and (4) the tax effect resulting from the pro forma adjustments based on an assumed effective annual tax rate of 39.5%. This pro forma data is presented for informational purposes only and does not purport to be indicative of the results of future operations of the Company or of the results that would have actually been attained had the acquisition taken place at the beginning of 2007.

	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2008 actual			2007 pro forma
	(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Total revenues	$	391,181		$	415,048
Total net loss	$	(11,804	)	$	(25,643	)
Total net loss available to common shareholders	$	(16,411	)	$	(30,937	)
Pro forma net loss per share
Basic	$	(0.98	)	$	(1.83	)
Diluted	$	(0.98	)	$	(1.83	)

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2008 actual			2007 pro forma
	(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Total revenues	$	1,258,103		$	1,262,954
Total net loss	$	(17,335	)	$	(26,159	)
Total net loss available to common shareholders	$	(31,991	)	$	(42,009	)
Pro forma net loss per share
Basic	$	(1.91	)	$	(2.43	)
Diluted	$	(1.91	)	$	(2.43	)

7

5. Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The Company assesses long-lived assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the assets may not be recoverable. As discussed in Note 9, Financing Obligations, in June 2008 the Company entered into sale-leaseback transactions related to 182 parcels of real estate (land, buildings and improvements). The net book value of the real estate assets exceeded the proceeds received by the Company from the transactions by approximately $40.8 million. Accordingly, an impairment loss of that amount was recorded in the second fiscal quarter of 2008.

As part of the ongoing assessment of the recoverability of its long-lived assets, the Company recorded impairment charges of $28.3 million for the three-month period ended September 30, 2008. Of that amount, $26.8 million related to Applebee’s properties and primarily resulted from a continuing deterioration in credit markets in general and a decline in operating results of Applebee’s company-operated restaurants expected to be franchised in particular geographic areas.  The remainder of the impairment related to an individual underperforming IHOP property.

6. Segments

The Company’s revenues and expenses are recorded in four segments: franchise operations, company restaurant operations, rental operations, and financing operations. Within each segment, the Company operates two distinct restaurant concepts: Applebee’s and IHOP.

Applebee’s

The franchise operations segment consists of restaurants operated by Applebee’s franchisees in the United States, 17 countries outside the United States and one U.S. territory. Franchise operations revenue consists primarily of franchise royalty revenues. Franchise operations expenses include costs related to intellectual property provided to certain franchisees.

The company restaurant operations segment consists of company-operated restaurants in the United States and China. Company restaurant sales are retail sales at company-operated restaurants. Company restaurant expenses are operating expenses at company-operated restaurants and include food, labor, benefits, utilities, rent and other restaurant operating costs.

Rental operations and financing operations activities are not currently part of Applebee’s business.

IHOP

The franchise operations segment consists of restaurants operated by IHOP franchisees and area licensees in the United States, one U.S. territory and two countries outside the United States—Canada and Mexico. Franchise operations revenue consists primarily of franchise royalty revenues, sales of proprietary products, franchise advertising fees and the portion of the franchise fees allocated to IHOP intellectual property. Franchise operations expenses include advertising expense, the cost of proprietary products and pre-opening training expenses and other franchise-related costs.

The company restaurant operations segment consists of company-operated restaurants in the United States. In addition, from time to time, restaurants that are reacquired from franchisees are operated by IHOP on a temporary basis. Company restaurant sales are retail sales at company-operated restaurants. Company restaurant expenses are operating expenses at company-operated restaurants and include food, labor, benefits, utilities, rent and other restaurant operating costs.

Rental operations revenue includes revenue from operating leases and interest income from direct financing leases. Rental operations expenses are costs of operating leases and interest expense on capital leases on franchisee-operated restaurants.

Financing operations revenue consists of the portion of franchise fees not allocated to IHOP intellectual property, sales of equipment, as well as interest income from the financing of franchise fees and equipment leases. Financing expenses are primarily the cost of restaurant equipment.

8

6. Segments, continued

Information on segments is as follows:

	For the Three Months Ended September 30,
	2008
	Applebee’s			IHOP			Total			2007
	(In thousands)
Revenues from External Customers
Franchise operations	$	35,750		$	51,679		$	87,429		$	48,782
Company restaurants	262,165			3,754			265,919			4,546
Rental operations	—			32,962			32,962			33,242
Financing operations	—			4,871			4,871			4,785
Total	$	297,915		$	93,266		$	391,181		$	91,355
Interest Expense
Company restaurants	$	78		$	106		$	184		$	—
Rental operations	—			5,016			5,016			5,134
Financing operations	—			—			—			29
Corporate	41,783			8,707			50,490			3,393
Total	$	41,861		$	13,829		$	55,690		$	8,556
Depreciation and amortization
Franchise operations	$	2,506		$	—		$	2,506		$	—
Company restaurants	8,357			177			8,534			230
Rental operations	—			2,956			2,956			3,055
Corporate	1,634			1,520			3,154			1,556
Total	$	12,497		$	4,653		$	17,150		$	4,841
(Loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes
Franchise operations	$	35,105		$	28,069		$	63,174		$	26,304
Company restaurants	29,984			(422		)	29,562			(618		)
Rental operations	—			8,474			8,474			8,564
Financing operations	—			4,545			4,545			4,327
Corporate	(90,366		)	(30,196		)	(120,562		)	(57,320		)
Total	$	(25,277	)	$	10,470		$	(14,807	)	$	(18,743	)

	For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2008
	Applebee’s			IHOP			Total			2007
	(In thousands)
Revenues from External Customers
Franchise operations	$	111,400		$	153,384		$	264,784		$	142,766
Company restaurants	863,058			11,279			874,337			13,155
Rental operations	—			98,495			98,495			99,310
Financing operations	—			20,487			20,487			15,735
Total	$	974,458		$	283,645		$	1,258,103		$	270,966
Interest Expense
Company restaurants	$	383		$	306		$	689		$	—
Rental operations	—			15,228			15,228			15,663
Financing operations	—			28			28			45
Corporate	126,592			26,106			152,698			8,885
Total	$	126,975		$	41,668		$	168,643		$	24,593
Depreciation and amortization
Franchise operations	$	7,521		$	—		$	7,521		$	—
Company restaurants	28,218			547			28,765			669
Rental operations	—			8,964			8,964			8,997
Corporate	3,696			4,586			8,282			4,934
Total	$	39,435		$	14,097		$	53,532		$	14,600
(Loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes
Franchise operations	$	109,759		$	85,009		$	194,768		$	77,698
Company restaurants	103,144			(1,433		)	101,711			(1,994		)
Rental operations	—			24,737			24,737			25,457
Financing operations	—			14,274			14,274			14,748
Corporate	(273,527		)	(91,321		)	(364,848		)	(96,564		)
Total	$	(60,624	)	$	31,266		$	(29,358	)	$	19,345

9

7. Income Taxes

The Company files U.S. federal income tax returns, as well as tax returns in various state and foreign jurisdictions. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2004, or to state or non-U.S. income tax examinations for years before 2000.

The Company adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—An Interpretation of FASB No. 109 (“FIN 48”) on January 1, 2007. As a result of the implementation of FIN 48, the Company recognized a $0.7 million increase in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits, excluding related income tax benefits, which was accounted for as a reduction of retained earnings at January 1, 2007. At December 31, 2007, the Company had a liability for unrecognized tax benefit including potential interest and penalties, net of related tax benefit, totaling $16.9 million, of which approximately $0.1 million is expected to be paid within one year. For the remaining liability, due to the uncertainties related to these tax matters, the Company is unable to make a reasonably reliable estimate when cash settlement with a taxing authority will occur.

The total unrecognized tax benefits as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 were $15.2 million and $13.8 million, respectively, excluding interest, penalties and related income tax benefits. Of the $15.2 million, $3.4 million excluding related tax benefits would be included in the effective tax rate if recognized prior to adoption of SFAS No. 141(R). The Company estimates the unrecognized tax benefits may decrease over the upcoming 12 months by an amount up to $0.4 million related to the settlement with taxing authorities and the lapse of the statute of limitations.

As of September 30, 2008, the accrued interest and penalties were $7.2 million and $2.6 million, respectively, excluding any related income tax benefits. As of December 31, 2007, the accrued interest and penalties were $8.0 million and $2.6 million, respectively, excluding any related income tax benefits. The decrease of $0.8 million of accrued interest is primarily related to the release of reserves, which was partially offset by the accrual of interest during the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The Company recognizes interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits and penalties as a component of income tax expense which is recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

The Company has various state net operating loss carryovers representing $1.5 million of state taxes as of December 31, 2007. The net operating loss carryovers will expire, if unused, during the period from 2008 through 2027.

The Company has recorded a deferred tax asset related to a change in the enacted tax law for the state of Michigan. The Company cannot assert on a more than likely basis that the asset will be realized. Therefore, a valuation allowance of $3.6 million has been recorded to offset the entire asset. Of the $3.6 million, $0.7 million was recorded in the year ended December 31, 2007 and $2.9 million was recorded as part of the preliminary purchase price allocation of Applebee’s.

The effective tax rate for the benefit recognized was 20.9% and 42.0% for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008, respectively. The effective tax rate for the benefit recognized is lower than the federal statutory rate of 35% for the three-month period ended September 30, 2008 primarily due to the non-deductibility for tax purposes of certain impairment charges recognized in the period. The effective tax rate for the benefit recognized is higher than the federal statutory rate of 35% for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2008 primarily due to tax credits, partially offset by state income taxes and the non-deductibility for tax purposes of certain impairment charges recognized in the period. The tax credits are mainly FICA tip and other compensation-related tax credits associated with Applebee’s company-owned restaurant operations.

10

8. Long-term Debt

Long-term debt consists of the following components:

	September 30, 2008 (unaudited)			December 31, 2007
	(In thousands)
Series 2007-1 Class A-2-I-X Fixed Rate Term Senior Notes due December 2037, at a fixed interest rate of 7.2836%	$	—		$	350,000
Series 2007-1 Class A-2-II-A Fixed Rate Term Senior Notes due December 2037, at a fixed rate of 7.1767% (inclusive of an insurance premium of 0.75%)	650,841			675,000
Series 2007-1 Class A-2-II-X Fixed Rate Term Senior Notes due December 2037, at a fixed rate of 7.0588%	649,394			650,000
Series 2007-1 Class M-1 Fixed Rate Term Subordinated Notes due December 2037, at a fixed rate of 8.4044%	119,000			119,000
Series 2007-1 Class A-1 Variable Funding Senior Notes, final maturity date December 2037, at a rate of 5.15% and 8.0% as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively	100,000			75,000
Series 2007-1 Fixed Rate Notes due March 2037, at a fixed rate of 5.744% (inclusive of an insurance premium of 0.60%)	175,000			175,000
Series 2007-2 Variable Funding Notes, final maturity date March 2037, at a rate of 2.74% and 5.6% as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively	15,000			15,000
Series 2007-3 Fixed Rate Term Notes due December 2037, at a fixed rate of 7.0588%	245,000			245,000
Discount on Fixed Rate Notes	(33,446		)	(40,113		)
Total debt	1,920,789			2,263,887
Less current maturities	—			—
Long-term debt	$	1,920,789		$	2,263,887

For a complete description of the respective instruments, refer to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.

In August 2008, the Company retired certain Series 2007-1 Class A-2-II-A Fixed Rate Term Senior Notes due December 2037 with a face amount of $23.5 million for a cash payment of $20.0 million. The transaction resulted in a gain of $2.4 million after the write-off of the discount and deferred financing costs related to the debt retired.

In October 2008, the Company retired certain Series 2007-1 Class A-2-II-X Fixed Rate Term Senior Notes due December 2037 with a face amount of $35.2 million for a cash payment of $20.0 million. The Company expects to recognize a gain on extinguishment of debt of approximately $13.6 million after the write-off of the discount and deferred financing costs related to the debt retired (See Note 15, Subsequent Events).

9. Financing Obligations

On May 19, 2008, the Company entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement relating to the sale and leaseback of 181 parcels of real property (the “Sale-Leaseback Transaction”), each of which is improved with a restaurant operating as an Applebee’s Neighborhood Grill and Bar (the “Property(ies)”). On June 13, 2008, the closing date of the Sale-Leaseback Transaction, the Company entered into a Master Land and Building Lease (“Master Lease”) for the Properties. The proceeds received from the transaction were $337.2 million. The Master Lease calls for an initial term of twenty years and four five-year options to extend the term.

The Company has an ongoing obligation related to any Property until such time as the lease related to that Property is assigned to a qualified franchisee in a transaction meeting certain parameters set forth in the Master Lease. Due to this continuing involvement, the transaction was recorded under the financing method in accordance with SFAS No. 98, Accounting for Leases: Sale-Leaseback Transactions Involving Real Estate, Sales-Type Leases of Real Estate, Definition of the Lease Term, and Initial Direct Costs of Direct Financing Leases—an amendment of FASB Statements No. 13, 66, and 91 and a rescission of FASB Statement No. 26 and Technical Bulletin No. 79-11, (“SFAS 98”) and SFAS No. 66, Accounting for Sales of Real Estate (“SFAS 66”).

11

9. Financing Obligations, continued

Accordingly, the value of the land, buildings and improvements will remain on the Company’s books and the buildings and improvements will continue to be depreciated over their remaining useful lives. The net proceeds received have been recorded as a financing obligation.  A portion of the lease payments is recorded as a decrease to the financing obligation and a portion is recognized as interest expense. In the event the lease obligation of any individual Property or group of Properties is assumed by a qualified franchisee, the Company’s continuing involvement will cease. At that time, that portion of the transaction related to that Property or group of Properties is expected to be recorded as a sale in accordance with SFAS 98 and SFAS 66 and the net book value of those Properties will be removed from the Company’s books, along with a ratable portion of the remaining financing obligation.

In July 2008, the Company entered into a sale-leaseback transaction with respect to its support center in Lenexa, Kansas. In connection with this transaction, the Company received approximately $39 million in proceeds. The initial term of the leaseback agreement is 15 years. As the Company expects to have continuing involvement in the form of future subleasing of a substantial portion of the support center, the transaction was recorded under the financing method in accordance with SFAS No. 98 as described above.

During the third fiscal quarter of 2008, the lease obligation related to one Property was assigned to a qualified franchisee. In accordance with the accounting described above, the transaction related to this property was recorded as a sale with property and equipment and financing obligations each reduced by $1.9 million.

As of September 30, 2008, $8.4 million was included in other accrued expenses as the current portion of financing obligations and $363.6 million was reported as long-term financing obligations in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

As of September 30, 2008, future minimum lease payments during the initial terms of the leases related to the sale-leaseback transactions are as follows:

Fiscal Years	(In thousands)
Remainder of 2008	$	8,671
2009	35,329
2010	35,700
2011	36,072
2012	36,127
2013	36,182
Thereafter	507,372
Total	$	695,453

10. Stock-Based Compensation

From time to time, the Company grants stock options and restricted stock to officers, directors and employees of the Company under the 2001 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2001 Plan”) and the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan for Non-Employee Directors (the “2005 Plan”). The stock options generally vest over a three-year period and have a maturity of ten years from the issuance date. Option exercise prices equal the closing price of the common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the date of grant. Restricted stock provides for the issuance of shares of the Company’s common stock at no cost to the holder and generally vests over terms determined by the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors. The restricted stock generally vests only if the employee is actively employed by the Company on the vesting date, and unvested restricted shares are forfeited upon termination, retirement before age 65, death or disability, unless the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors determines otherwise. When vested options and restricted stock are issued, the Company generally issues new shares from its authorized but unissued share pool or utilizes treasury stock.

12

10. Stock-Based Compensation, continued

The following table summarizes the components of the Company’s stock-based compensation expense included in general and administrative expenses in the consolidated financial statements:

	Three Months Ended September 30,					Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2008		2007			2008			2007
	(In thousands)
Total Stock-Based Compensation:
Pre-tax compensation expense	$	3,181	$	1,575		$	10,237		$	3,820
Tax provision (benefit)	174		(599		)	(4,300		)	(1,090		)
Total stock-based compensation expense, net of tax	$	3,355	$	976		$	5,937		$	2,730

As of September 30, 2008, $21.7 million and $7.3 million (including estimated forfeitures) of total unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted stock and stock options, respectively, is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 1.97 years for restricted stock and 2.5 years for stock options.

The estimated fair values of the options granted year-to-date in 2008 were calculated using a Black-Scholes option pricing model. The following summarizes the assumptions used in the 2008 Black-Scholes model:

Risk-free interest rate	2.88		%
Weighted average volatility	75.82		%
Dividend yield	2.90		%
Expected years until exercise	4.90
Forfeitures	6.72		%
Weighted average fair value of options granted	$	19.08

Option activity under the Company’s stock option plan as of September 30, 2008, and changes during the nine months ended September 30, 2008, were as follows:

	Shares		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (in Years)	Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at December 31, 2007	541,756		$	36.41
Granted	533,500		$	36.69
Exercised	(41,500	)	$	23.82
Forfeited	(55,383	)	$	42.70
Outstanding at September 30, 2008	978,373		$	36.74	6.98	$	43,820
Vested at September 30, 2008 and Expected to Vest	914,867		$	36.76	6.81	$	43,820
Exercisable at September 30, 2008	486,313		$	37.01	4.44	$	43,820

The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value (the difference between the Company’s closing stock price on the last trading day of the third quarter of 2008 and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of in-the-money options) that would have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their options on September 30, 2008. The amount of aggregate intrinsic value will change based on the fair market value of the Company’s stock and the number of in-the-money options.

A summary of restricted stock activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 is presented below:

	Shares		Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Nonvested at December 31, 2007	435,290		$	52.91
Granted	379,335		$	40.20
Released	(50,675	)	$	55.04
Forfeited	(63,170	)	$	45.61
Nonvested at September 30, 2008	700,780		$	46.53

13

11. Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income

The components of comprehensive (loss) income, net of taxes, are as follows:

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2008			2007			2008			2007
	(In thousands)
Net (loss) income	$	(11,804	)	$	(11,616	)	$	(17,335	)	$	13,827
Other comprehensive income
Interest rate swap	1,997			(21,408		)	5,676			(21,275		)
Temporary decline in available-for-sale securities	—			—			(294		)	—
Total comprehensive loss	$	(9,807	)	$	(33,024	)	$	(11,953	)	$	(7,448	)

The amount of income tax benefit allocated to the interest rate swap was $2.4 million and $6.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The amount of income tax benefit allocated to the temporary decline in securities was $0.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008.

12. Assets Held for Sale

The Company classifies assets as held for sale and ceases the depreciation and amortization of the assets when there is a plan for disposal of the assets and those assets meet the held for sale criteria as defined in SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-lived Assets. At December 31, 2007, assets held for sale comprised primarily the old corporate headquarters of Applebee’s, Applebee’s corporate aircraft, and Applebee’s company-operated restaurants in California and Nevada expected to be refranchised.

In January 2008, the Company sold the old corporate headquarters for $9.0 million, net of commissions, and the corporate aircraft for approximately $2.8 million.

Certain purchase price fair values allocated to property and equipment as of November 29, 2007, were revised downward. As a result, assets held for sale were reduced by $11.2 million. Additionally, as the result of continuing deterioration in the credit markets in general and a decline in operating results of Applebee’s company-operated restaurants expected to be franchised in particular geographic areas, an impairment was recognized on assets held for sale of $4.0 million.

During 2008, four parcels of land held for future restaurant development and three company-owned restaurants in the Delaware market were reclassified as assets held for sale. Additionally, one company-owned restaurant was reclassified out of assets held for sale after a determination was made the Company had continuing involvement with the property.

The sales of the restaurants in California and Delaware were completed the third fiscal quarter of 2008.  The Company received proceeds of approximately $29.2 million from these transactions.

At September 30, 2008, assets held for sale comprised primarily company-operated restaurants in Nevada expected to be refranchised and four parcels of land held for future restaurant development.

The following table summarizes the changes in the balance of assets held for sale during 2008:

	(in millions)
Balance December 31, 2007	$	60.3
Purchase price valuation adjustments	(11.2		)
Impairment charges	(4.0		)
Assets sold	(34.4		)
Assets reclassified to held for sale	3.3
Assets reclassified from held for sale	(2.5		)
Other	0.6
Balance September 30, 2008	$	12.1

14

13. Net (Loss) Income Per Share

The computation of the Company’s basic and diluted net (loss) income per share is as follows:

	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2008			2007
	(In thousands, except per share data)
Numerator for basic and dilutive income—per common share:
Net loss	$	(11,804	)	$	(11,616	)
Less: Series A preferred stock dividends	(4,750		)	—
Less: Accretion of Series B preferred stock *	(544		)	—
Less: Net loss allocated to unvested participating restricted stock	687			—
Net loss available to common stockholders— basic	$	(16,411	)	$	(11,616	)
Denominator:
Weighted average outstanding shares of common stock	16,786			16,935
Dilutive effect of:
Common stock equivalents *	—			—
Common stock and common stock equivalents	16,786			16,935
Net loss per common share:
Basic	$	(0.98	)	$	(0.69	)
Diluted	$	(0.98	)	$	(0.69	)

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2008			2007
	(In thousands, except per share data)
Numerator for basic and dilutive income—per common share:
Net (loss) income	$	(17,335	)	$	13,827
Less: Series A preferred stock dividends	(14,250		)	—
Less: Accretion of Series B preferred stock*	(1,600		)	—
Less: Net loss allocated to unvested participating restricted stock	1,194			—
Net (loss) income available to common stockholders — basic	$	(31,991	)	$	13,827
Denominator:
Weighted average outstanding shares of common stock	16,752			17,310
Dilutive effect of:
Common stock equivalents *	—			41
Common stock and common stock equivalents	16,752			17,351
Net (loss) income per common share:
Basic	$	(1.91	)	$	0.80
Diluted	$	(1.91	)	$	0.80

*The effects of adding shares from the assumed conversion of Series B Convertible Preferred stock to the denominator, the related add-back of the dividends on Series B Convertible Preferred stock to the numerator and the effect of adding stock option equivalents and restricted stock to the denominator are anti-dilutive for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and the three months ended September 30, 2007.

15

14. Commitments and Contingencies

In addition to those matters that are described in previous reports, the Company is subject to various lawsuits, claims and governmental inspections or audits arising in the ordinary course of business. Some of these lawsuits purport to be class actions and/or seek substantial damages. In the opinion of management, these matters are adequately covered by insurance or, if not so covered, are without merit or are of such a nature or involve amounts that would not have a material adverse impact on the Company’s business or consolidated financial statements.

15. Subsequent Events

On October 9, 2008, the Company closed the sale of 15 company-operated Applebee’s restaurants in Nevada and received after-tax proceeds of approximately $7.8 million.

On October 27, 2008, the Company announced it had entered into asset purchase agreements for the sale of 66 company-operated Applebee’s restaurants located in Houston and Dallas, Texas and Albuquerque, New Mexico. The agreements for the sale of these restaurants do not contain financing contingencies, but are subject to regulatory processes related to liquor license transfer and other customary closing conditions.  Both Texas transactions are expected to close in the fourth quarter 2008, with the New Mexico transaction expected to close early in the first quarter 2009.

In October 2008, the Company retired certain Series 2007-1 Class A-2-II-X Fixed Rate Term Senior Notes due December 2037 with a face amount of $35.2 million for a cash payment of $20.0 million. The Company expects to recognize a gain on extinguishment of debt of approximately $13.6 million after the write-off of the discount and deferred financing costs related to the debt retired.

16

Item 2.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Forward-Looking Statements

The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a safe harbor for forward-looking statements in certain circumstances. This report contains statements that involve expectations, plans or intentions (such as those relating to future business or financial results, new features or services, or management strategies). These statements are forward-looking and are subject to risks and uncertainties, so actual results may vary materially from those expressed or implied by any forward-looking statements. You can identify these forward-looking statements by words such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “intend,” “plan,” and other similar expressions. You should consider our forward-looking statements in light of the risks discussed under the heading “Risk Factors” in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K, as well as our consolidated financial statements, related notes, and the other financial information appearing elsewhere in this report and our other filings with the U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission. We assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statements.

Overview

The following discussion and analysis provides information we believe is relevant to an assessment and understanding of our consolidated results of operations and financial condition. The discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in Item 1 of Part I of this Quarterly Report and the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007. Except where the context indicates otherwise, the words “we,” “us,” “our” and the “Company” refer to DineEquity, Inc., together with its subsidiaries that are consolidated in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

Effective June 2, 2008, IHOP Corp. changed its corporate name to DineEquity, Inc. The Company was incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware in 1976. We own and operate two restaurant concepts in the casual dining and family dining niches: Applebee’s Neighborhood Grill and Bar®, or Applebee’s, and International House of Pancakes, or IHOP. The first International House of Pancakes restaurant opened in 1958 in Toluca Lake, California. Shortly thereafter the Company’s predecessor began developing and franchising additional restaurants. In November 2007, the Company completed the acquisition of Applebee’s International, Inc. (“Applebee’s”), which became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. References herein to Applebee’s and IHOP restaurants are to these two restaurant concepts, whether operated by franchisees or the Company. Retail sales at restaurants that are owned by franchises and area licensees are not attributable to the Company. With more than 3,300 franchised or owned-and-operated restaurants combined, we are one of the largest full-service restaurant companies in the world.

Restaurant Concepts

Applebee’s

We franchise and operate restaurants in the bar and grill segment of the casual dining industry under the name “Applebee’s Neighborhood Grill & Bar®.” With 1,997 system-wide restaurants as of September 30, 2008, Applebee’s Neighborhood Grill & Bar is one of the largest casual dining concepts in the world, in terms of number of restaurants and market share.

Generally, Applebee’s franchise arrangements consist of a development agreement plus a separate franchise agreement for each franchised restaurant. Development agreements grant the exclusive right to develop restaurants in a designated geographic area over a specified period of time. The term of a domestic development agreement is generally 20 years. The development agreements provide for an initial development schedule of one to five years, as agreed upon by the Company and the franchisee. After the initial development schedule, the Company and the franchisee generally execute supplemental development schedules as provided in the development agreement.

The franchisee enters into a separate franchise agreement for the operation of each Applebee’s restaurant. Our standard franchise agreement has a term of 20 years and permits renewal for up to an additional 20 years upon payment of an additional franchise fee. Our standard franchise arrangement calls for an initial franchisee fee of $35,000 and a royalty fee equal to 4% of the restaurant’s monthly net sales. We have agreements with a majority of our franchisees for Applebee’s restaurants opened before January 1, 2000, which provide for a royalty rate of 4% and extend the initial term of the franchise agreements until 2020. The terms, royalties and advertising fees under a limited number of franchise agreements and other franchise fees under older development agreements vary from the currently offered arrangements.

17

We currently require domestic franchisees of Applebee’s restaurants to contribute 2.75% of their gross sales to a national advertising fund and to spend at least 1% of their gross sales on local marketing and promotional activities. Under most Applebee’s franchise agreements, we have the ability to increase the amount of the required combined contribution to the national advertising fund and the amount required to be spent on local marketing and promotional activities to a maximum of 5% of gross sales.

We are pursuing a strategy which contemplates transitioning from our current 76% franchised system to an approximately 98% franchised system. Since November 29, 2007 we have franchised 44 company-owned restaurants in the California, Nevada and Delaware markets and we have agreements to franchise an additional 66 company-owned restaurants. This heavily franchised business model is expected to demand less capital, generate higher margins, and reduce the volatility of cash flow performance over time. Additionally, we sold 182 of our fee-owned Applebee’s properties (approximately 91% of our total fee-owned locations) through sale-leaseback transactions in June 2008 and we completed the sale-leaseback of our Lenexa restaurant support center in July 2008.

The following table summarizes Applebee’s franchisee restaurant development commitments for 2008 and 2009 since the Applebee’s development agreements generally provide for a series of two-year development commitments after the initial development period.

	Opened through	Scheduled Opening of Restaurants by Year
	September  30, 2008	Balance of 2008	2009
Domestic development commitments	23	5	26
International development commitments	11	10	24
	34	15	50

We have amended development agreements with a small number of franchisees due to changes in market conditions and concerns about possible new unit performance in specific markets.  In addition, for a portion of the year we allowed certain franchisees to delay building restaurants while the Company evaluated the approval of a new prototype restaurant design.

IHOP

Under our current business model which was adopted in January 2003, a potential franchisee first enters into a single store development agreement or a multi-store development agreement and, upon completion of a prescribed approval procedure, is primarily responsible for the initial development and financing of the new IHOP franchised restaurant. In general, we do not provide any financing with respect to the franchise fee or otherwise. The franchisee uses its own capital and financial resources along with third party financial sources to purchase or lease a site, build and equip the business and fund working capital needs.

The cash received from a typical franchise development arrangement includes (a) (i) a location fee equal to $15,000 upon execution of a single store development agreement or (ii) a development fee equal to $20,000 for each IHOP restaurant that the franchisee contracts to develop upon execution of a multi-store development agreement; (b) a franchise fee equal to (i) $50,000 (against which the $15,000 location fee will be credited) for a restaurant developed under a single store development agreement or (ii) $40,000 (against which the $20,000 development fee will be credited) for each restaurant developed under a multi-store development agreement, in each case paid upon execution of the franchise agreement; (c) franchise royalties equal to 4.5% of weekly gross sales; (d) revenue from the sale of pancake and waffle dry-mixes; and (e) franchise advertising fees. The franchise advertising fees are comprised of (i) a local advertising fee generally equal to 2.0% of weekly gross sales, which is usually collected by us and then used to cover the cost of local media purchases and other local advertising expenses incurred by a local advertising cooperative, and (ii) a national advertising fee equal to 1.0% of weekly gross sales. Area licensees are required to pay lesser amounts toward advertising. As approved by our franchisees, in 2007 and 2008 a portion of the local advertising contribution has been reallocated to the national advertising fund allowing us to advertise on a national basis in order to reach our target audience more frequently and more cost effectively.

IHOP franchised restaurants established prior to 2004 under our old business model (the “Old Business Model”) were usually developed by the Company, and required our substantial involvement in all aspects of the development and financing of the restaurants. In particular, under the Old Business Model, we identified the site for a new IHOP restaurant, purchased or leased the site from a third party, built and equipped the restaurant and then franchised it to the franchisee. In addition, IHOP typically financed approximately 80% of the franchise fee over five to eight years and leased the restaurant and equipment to the franchisee over a 25-year period.

18

The cash received from a typical franchise arrangement under the Old Business Model included: (a) the franchise fee, a portion of which (typically 20%) was paid upon execution of the franchise agreement; (b) interest income from the financing arrangements for the unpaid portion of the franchise fee under the franchise notes; (c) franchise royalties typically equal to 4.5% of weekly gross sales; (d) income from the subleasing of the leased real property under a franchisee sublease and income from the leasing of the owned real property under the related leases to franchisees; (e) income from the leasing of equipment under an equipment lease; (f) revenue from the sale of pancake and waffle dry-mixes; and (g) franchise advertising fees. The franchise advertising fees are comprised of (i) a local advertising fee generally equal to 2.0% of weekly gross sales under the franchise agreement, which was usually collected by us and then used to cover the cost of local media purchases and other local advertising expenses incurred by a local advertising cooperative, and (ii) a national advertising fee equal to 1.0% of weekly gross sales under the franchise agreement. As approved by our franchisees, in 2007 and 2008 a portion of the local advertising contribution has been reallocated to the national advertising fund allowing us to advertise on a national basis in order to reach our target audience more frequently and more cost effectively. In a few cases, with respect to the reacquired restaurants or otherwise, we have agreed to accept reduced royalties and/or lease payments from franchisees or have provided other accommodations to franchisees for a period of time in order to assist them in either establishing or reinvigorating their business.

The following table summarizes IHOP signed restaurant development commitments including options as of September 30, 2008:

	Number of Signed	Scheduled Opening of Restaurants
	Agreements at 9/30/08	Remainder of 2008	2009	2010	2011 and thereafter	Total
Single-store development agreements	11	5	5	1	—	11
Multi-store development agreements	91	38	69	52	202	361
International territorial agreements	7	4	5	6	49	64
	109	47	79	59	251	436

The actual number of scheduled openings in any period may differ from the number of signed commitments following the conclusion of negotiations with franchisees regarding possible modifications to their development obligations. The Company expects franchisees to open from 20 to 25 IHOP restaurants in the fourth quarter of 2008.

Segments

We identify our segments based on the organizational units used by management to monitor performance and make operating decisions. Our revenues and expenses are recorded in four segments: franchise operations, company restaurant operations, rental operations, and financing operations. Within the applicable segment, we operate two distinct restaurant concepts: Applebee’s and IHOP.

Applebee’s

The franchise operations segment consists of restaurants operated by Applebee’s franchisees in the United States, 17 countries outside the United States and one U.S. territory. Franchise operations revenue consists primarily of franchise royalty revenues. Franchise operations expenses include costs related to intellectual property provided to franchisees.

The company restaurant operations segment consists of company-operated restaurants in the United States and China. Company restaurant sales are retail sales at company-operated restaurants. Company restaurant expenses are operating expenses at company-operated restaurants and include food, labor, benefits, utilities, rent and other restaurant operating costs.

Rental operations and financing operations activities are not currently part of Applebee’s business.

IHOP

The franchise operations segment consists of restaurants operated by IHOP franchisees and area licensees in the United States, one U.S. territory and two countries outside the United States—Canada and Mexico. Franchise operations revenue consists primarily of franchise royalty revenues, sales of proprietary products, franchise advertising fees and the portion of the franchise fees allocated to IHOP intellectual property. Franchise operations expenses include advertising expenses, the cost of proprietary products and pre-opening training expenses and other franchise-related costs.

19

The company restaurant operations segment consists of company-operated restaurants in the United States. In addition, from time to time, restaurants that are reacquired from franchisees are operated by IHOP on a temporary basis. Company restaurant sales are retail sales at company-operated restaurants. Company restaurant expenses are operating expenses at company-operated restaurants and include food, labor, benefits, utilities, rent and other restaurant operating costs.

Rental operations revenue includes revenue from operating leases and interest income from direct financing leases. Rental operations expenses are costs of operating leases and interest expense on capital leases on franchisee-operated restaurants. The rental operations segment is exclusively generated by IHOP.

Financing operations revenue consists of the portion of franchise fees not allocated to IHOP intellectual property, sales of equipment, as well as interest income from the financing of franchise fees and equipment leases. Financing expenses are primarily the cost of restaurant equipment.

Key Overall Strategies—Update

See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.—Key Overall Strategies” contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 for a detailed discussion of Applebee’s and IHOP’s key strategies.

Recent developments with respect to several key strategies for Applebee’s include:

Franchise Company-Operated Restaurants and Sell Owned Real Estate

·We have franchised 44 restaurants in the California, Nevada and Delaware markets and have agreements to franchise 66 additional restaurants, exceeding our goal to franchise 100 company-operated Applebee’s restaurants in fiscal 2008.

·In June 2008, we completed sale-leaseback transactions for 182, or 91%, of our fee-owned, company-operated restaurants as discussed in Note 9 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

·In July 2008, we completed the sale-leaseback of our restaurant support headquarters in Lenexa, Kansas.

Re-energize the Applebee’s Brand

·In March 2008, we introduced a new Applebee’s advertising campaign—“It’s a Whole New Neighborhood.” Our message in the ads clearly focuses on classic Grill & Bar food in a way that is unique to Applebee’s.

·During the first quarter of 2008, we also solidified new brand positioning for Applebee’s, refined our customer targets, introduced our new menu strategy, and finalized our marketing approach through 2009.

·We plan on promoting value offerings for the balance of 2008 to compete more effectively and to drive improved traffic performance.

Improve Restaurant Operations

·Our strategy to improve operations execution at Applebee’s restaurants system-wide has begun. An operations rating system has been developed and will be implemented in the fourth quarter of 2008.

Strengthen Company Restaurant Profitability

·We have implemented several initiatives to increase restaurant profitability including improved labor rate controls, a change in vacation policy, menu simplification, price increases, and detailed review of complimentary meals and discounts in our restaurants. While operating margins have been favorably impacted by these initiatives, the improvement has been partially offset by reduced guest traffic, and higher commodity and utilities costs.  We expect to see further improvement with our restaurant sales and operating margins in the last quarter of 2008 as we deploy new value-oriented strategies, we continue to improve hourly labor productivity, we reduce hourly benefits, we continue our focus on managing controllable spending and as utility costs are operated to moderate.

20

Restaurant Data

The following table sets forth, for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30 of the current year and prior year, the number of effective restaurants in the IHOP system and information regarding the percentage change in sales at those restaurants compared to the same periods in the prior year. “Effective restaurants” are the number of restaurants in a given period, adjusted to account for restaurants open for only a portion of the period. Information is presented for all effective restaurants in the IHOP system, which includes IHOP restaurants owned by the Company, as well as those owned by franchisees and area licensees. Sales at restaurants that are owned by franchisees and area licensees are not attributable to the Company. However, we believe that presentation of this information is useful in analyzing our revenues because franchisees and area licensees pay us royalties and advertising fees that are generally based on a percentage of their sales, as well as rental payments under leases that are usually based on a percentage of their sales. Management also uses this information to make decisions about future plans for the development of additional restaurants as well as evaluation of current operations. Pro forma information on Applebee’s restaurant data and restaurant development and franchising activity is presented in the section entitled “Pro Forma Comparison of Three Months and Nine Months ended September 30, 2008 with Three Months and Nine Months ended September 30, 2007 —Applebee’s” herein.

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2008		2007		2008		2007
IHOP Restaurant Data
Effective restaurants(a)
Franchise	1,190		1,151		1,183		1,139
Company	10		12		10		12
Area license	157		158		157		159
Total	1,357		1,321		1,350		1,310
System-wide(b)
Sales percentage change(c)	3.8	%	7.2	%	6.1	%	6.6	%
Same-store sales percentage change(d)	0.2	%	2.0	%	2.2	%	1.8	%
Franchise(b)
Sales percentage change(c)	4.3	%	7.3	%	6.7	%	6.7	%
Same-store sales percentage change(d)	0.3	%	2.0	%	2.2	%	1.8	%
Company
Sales percentage change(c)	(17.4	)%	30.2	%	(14.3	)%	36.3	%
Area License(b)
Sales percentage change(c)	0.7	%	3.9	%	2.1	%	4.3	%

(a)“Effective restaurants” are the number of restaurants in a given fiscal period adjusted to account for restaurants open for only a portion of the period. Information is presented for all effective restaurants in the IHOP system, which includes IHOP restaurants owned by the Company as well as those owned by franchisees and area licensees.

(b)“System-wide sales” are retail sales at IHOP restaurants operated by franchisees, area licensees and the Company, as reported to the Company. Franchise restaurant sales were $547.7 million and $1,638.1 million for the third quarter and first nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively, and sales at area license restaurants were $52.0 million and $163.3 million for the third quarter and first nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively.  Franchise restaurant sales were $525.2 million and $1,535.0 million for the third quarter and first nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively, and sales at area license restaurants were $51.6 million and $159.9 million for the third quarter and first nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively. Sales at restaurants that are owned by franchisees and area licensees are not attributable to the Company.

(c)“Sales percentage change” reflects, for each category of restaurants, the percentage change in sales in any given fiscal period compared to the prior fiscal period for all restaurants in that category.

(d)“Same-store sales percentage change” reflects the percentage change in sales, in any given fiscal period compared to the prior fiscal period, for restaurants that have been operated throughout both fiscal periods that are being compared and have been open for at least 18 months. Because of new unit openings and store closures, the restaurants open throughout both fiscal periods being compared will be different from period to period. Same-store sales percentage change does not include data on restaurants located in Florida.

21

The following table summarizes our restaurant development and franchising activity:

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2008		2007		2008		2007
	(Unaudited)				(Unaudited)
IHOP Restaurant Development Activity
Beginning of period	1,361		1,319		1,344		1,302
New openings
Company-developed	—		—		—		—
Domestic franchisee-developed	17		14		41		35
International franchisee-developed	1		—		2		2
Area license	1		—		2		—
Total new openings	19		14		45		37
Closings
Company and domestic franchise	(5	)	(2	)	(11	)	(7	)
International franchise	—		—		(1	)	—
Area license	—		(3	)	(2	)	(4	)
End of period	1,375		1,328		1,375		1,328
Summary-end of period
Franchise	1,205		1,161		1,205		1,161
Company	13		11		13		11
Area license	157		156		157		156
Total	1,375		1,328		1,375		1,328
IHOP Restaurant Franchising Activity
Company-developed	—		—		—		—
Franchisee-developed	17		14		41		35
International franchisee-developed	1		—		2		2
Rehabilitated and refranchised	1		2		10		4
Total restaurants franchised	19		16		53		41
Reacquired by the Company	(4	)	—		(13	)	(6	)
Closed	(5	)	(2	)	(11	)	(6	)
Net addition	10		14		29		29

22

Comparison of the Three Months and Nine Months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007

Overview

Our results for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 were significantly impacted by the amount of interest expense on $2.3 billion of funded debt incurred during fiscal 2007, impairment charges, a loss on a derivative financial instrument in 2007 that did not recur and the impact on both segment profit and general and administrative expenses of the consolidation of Applebee’s results of operations (see “Pro Forma Comparison of Three Months and Nine Months ended September 30, 2008 with Three Months and Nine Months ended September 30, 2007 —Applebee’s”).

	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2008			2007			Variance
	(In thousands)
Revenues
Applebee’s	$	297,915		$	—		$	297,915
IHOP	93,266			91,355			1,911
Total revenues	391,181			91,355			299,826
Cost of revenues
Applebee’s	232,825			—			(232,825		)
IHOP	52,600			52,778			178
Total cost of revenues	285,425			52,778			(232,647		)
Segment Profit
Applebee’s	65,090			—			65,090
IHOP	40,666			38,577			2,089
Total segment profit	105,756			38,577			67,179
General and administrative expenses	41,788			17,842			(23,946		)
Interest expense	50,490			3,393			(47,097		)
Impairment and closure charges	28,345			—			(28,345		)
Loss on derivative financial instrument	—			35,618			35,618
Amortization of intangible assets	3,077			—			(3,077		)
Other (income) expense	(703		)	467			1,170
(Gain) loss on extinguishment of debt	(2,434		)	—			2,434
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes	$	(14,807	)	$	(18,743	)	$	3,936

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2008			2007		Variance
	(In thousands)
Revenues
Applebee’s	$	974,458		$	—	$	974,458
IHOP	283,645			270,966		12,679
Total revenues	1,258,103			270,966		987,137
Cost of revenues
Applebee’s	761,554			—		(761,554		)
IHOP	161,058			155,057		(6,001		)
Total cost of revenues	922,612			155,057		(767,555		)
Segment Profit
Applebee’s	212,904			—		212,904
IHOP	122,587			115,909		6,678
Total segment profit	335,491			115,909		219,582
General and administrative expenses	138,592			48,066		(90,526		)
Interest expense	152,698			8,885		(143,813		)
Impairment and closure charges	69,500			55		(69,445		)
Loss on derivative financial instrument	—			35,618		35,618
Amortization of intangible assets	9,056			—		(9,056		)
Other (income) expense	(2,563		)	1,717		4,280
(Gain) loss on extinguishment of debt	(2,434		)	2,223		4,657
(Loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes	$	(29,358	)	$	19,345	$	(48,703	)

23

Key components of changes in our financial results for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 compared to the same periods of 2007 included:

·Revenues for the third quarter increased $299.8 million, comprising the addition of $297.9 million from Applebee’s operations and an increase of $1.9 million, or 2.1%, at IHOP. Year-to-date revenues increased $987.1 million, comprising the addition of $974.4 million from Applebee’s operations and an increase of $12.7 million, or 4.7%, at IHOP.

·Segment profit for the third quarter increased $67.2 million, consisting of $65.1 million from the acquisition of Applebee’s, along with a $2.1 million, or 5.4%, improvement at IHOP. Year-to-date segment profit increased $219.6 million, consisting of $212.9 million from the acquisition of Applebee’s, along with a $6.7 million, or 5.8%, improvement at IHOP.

·Consolidated interest expense increased by $47.1 million and $143.8 million for the three-month and nine-month periods, respectively, ended September 30, 2008 compared to the same periods of the prior year. The increases related primarily to interest on acquisition-related debt.

·Consolidated pre-tax loss decreased by $3.9 million for the three-month period ended September 30, 2008 compared to the same period of the prior year. While the increase in segment profit was offset by increases in interest expense, general and administrative expenses and impairment losses, the loss on derivative instrument of $35.6 million recognized in the third quarter of 2007 did not recur. Consolidated pre-tax income decreased by $48.7 million for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2008 compared to the same period of the prior year, as the increase in segment profit was more than offset by increases in interest expense, general and administrative expenses and impairment charges. The increase in expenses was only partially offset by the favorable impact of the loss on derivative instrument of $35.6 million recognized in the third quarter of 2007 that did not recur.

Franchise Operations

	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2008		2007		Variance
	(In thousands)
Franchise Revenues
Applebee’s	$	35,750	$	—	$	35,750
IHOP	51,679		48,782		2,897
Total franchise revenues	87,429		48,782		38,647
Cost of revenues
Applebee’s	645		—		(645		)
IHOP	23,610		22,478		(1,132		)
Total cost of revenues	24,255		22,478		(1,777		)
Franchise Segment Profit
Applebee’s	35,105		—		35,105
IHOP	28,069		26,304		1,765
Total franchise segment profit	$	63,174	$	26,304	$	36,870

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2008		2007		Variance
	(In thousands)
Franchise Revenues
Applebee’s	$	111,400	$	—	$	111,400
IHOP	153,384		142,766		10,618
Total franchise revenues	264,784		142,766		122,018
Cost of revenues
Applebee’s	1,641		—		(1,641		)
IHOP	68,375		65,068		(3,307		)
Total cost of revenues	70,016		65,068		(4,948		)
Franchise Segment Profit
Applebee’s	109,759		—		109,759
IHOP	85,009		77,698		7,311
Total franchise segment profit	$	194,768	$	77,698	$	117,070

24

Consolidated franchise revenues grew by 79.2% and 85.5%, respectively, for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 compared to the same periods of the prior year. Consolidated franchise revenues primarily grew due to the Applebee’s acquisition (see “Pro Forma Comparison of Three Months and Nine Months ended September 30, 2008 with Three Months and Nine Months ended September 30, 2007 —Applebee’s”). In addition, IHOP franchise revenues increased $2.9 million, or 5.9%, and $10.6 million, or 7.4%, respectively, for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 compared to the same periods of the prior year.  The increase in IHOP franchise revenues was primarily due to a 4.3% increase in IHOP franchise restaurant sales in the third quarter of 2008 compared to the same period of 2007 and a 6.8% increase for the first nine months of 2008 compared to the same period of 2007.  These increases were primarily attributable to the following:

·effective IHOP franchise restaurants increased by 39 restaurants (3.4%) and 44 restaurants (3.9%), respectively, in the third quarter and first nine months of 2008 compared with the same periods in 2007; and

·same-store sales for IHOP franchise restaurants increased by 0.3% and 2.2%, respectively, in the third quarter and first nine months of 2008. The increases for both periods reflected a higher average guest check partially offset by negative guest traffic growth.

“Effective restaurants” are the number of restaurants in a given fiscal period adjusted to account for restaurants open for only a portion of the period. Franchise restaurant retail sales are sales recorded at restaurants that are owned by franchisees and area licensees and are not attributable to the Company. Franchise restaurant retail sales are useful in analyzing our franchise revenues because franchisees and area licensees pay us royalties and other fees that are generally based on a percentage of their sales.

Consolidated franchise operations profit, which is franchise revenues less franchise expenses, increased by $36.9 million and $117.1 million, respectively, comparing the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 with the same periods of the prior year, of which $35.1 million and $109.8 million, respectively, were due to the Applebee’s acquisition (see “Pro Forma Comparison of Three Months and Nine Months ended September 30, 2008 with Three Months and Nine Months ended September 30, 2007 —Applebee’s “).

IHOP franchise operations profit increased by $1.8 million in the third quarter of 2008 compared to the same period in 2007. This increase was due primarily to the $2.9 million increase in revenue discussed above, partially offset by higher franchise expenses, which increased $1.1 million, resulting in a 0.4% improvement in margin (as a percentage of sales). IHOP franchise operations profit increased by $7.3 million in the first nine months of 2008 compared to the same period in 2007. This increase was due primarily to the $10.6 million increase in revenue discussed above, partially offset by higher franchise expenses, which increased $3.3 million, resulting in a 1.0% improvement in margin (as a percentage of sales). The improvement in margin in both periods was due primarily to lower bad debt expenses.

Company Restaurant Operations

	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2008			2007			Variance
	(In thousands)
Company Restaurant Sales
Applebee’s	$	262,165		$	—		$	262,165
IHOP	3,754			4,546			(792		)
Total company restaurant sales	265,919			4,546			261,373
Cost of revenues
Applebee’s	232,181			—			(232,181		)
IHOP	4,176			5,164			988
Total cost of revenues	236,357			5,164			(231,193		)
Company Restaurant Segment Profit (Loss)
Applebee’s	29,984			—			29,984
IHOP	(422		)	(618		)	196
Total company restaurant segment profit (loss)	$	29,562		$	(618	)	$	30,180

25

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2008			2007			Variance
	(In thousands)
Company Restaurant Sales
Applebee’s	$	863,058		$	—		$	863,058
IHOP	11,279			13,155			(1,876		)
Total company restaurant sales	874,337			13,155			861,182
Cost of revenues
Applebee’s	759,914			—			(759,914		)
IHOP	12,712			15,149			2,437
Total cost of revenues	772,626			15,149			(757,477		)
Company Restaurant Segment Profit (Loss)
Applebee’s	103,144			—			103,144
IHOP	(1,433		)	(1,994		)	561
Total company restaurant segment profit (loss)	$	101,711		$	(1,994	)	$	103,705

Total company restaurant sales increased by $261.4 million and $861.2 million, respectively, for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 compared to the same periods of the prior year.  The increase in total company restaurant sales was primarily due to the Applebee’s acquisition (see “Pro Forma Comparison of Three Months and Nine Months ended September 30, 2008 with Three Months and Nine Months ended September 30, 2007 —Applebee’s”). Company restaurant expenses increased by $231.2 million and $757.5 million, respectively, for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 compared to the same periods of the prior year.  These increases were due exclusively to Applebee’s, which represented $232.2 million and $759.9 million of the increases in the respective periods.

Company restaurant operations losses for IHOP company restaurants were $0.4 million and $1.4 million for the third quarter and first nine months of 2008, respectively, which was a slight improvement over losses of $0.6 million and $2.0 million in the same respective periods of 2007. This improvement was primarily due to lower salary and benefits costs.

Rental Operations

All of our rental operations relate to IHOP restaurants; there are currently no Applebee’s rental operations. Rental income includes revenue from operating leases and interest income from direct financing leases. Rental expenses are costs of prime operating leases and interest expense on prime capital leases on franchisee-operated restaurants.

A prime lease is a lease between the Company and a third party, the landlord, whereby the Company pays rent to the landlord. Restaurants on these leases are either subleased to a franchisee or, in a few instances, operated by the Company. A sublease is a lease between the Company and a franchisee, whereby the franchisee pays rent to the Company.

Rental operations revenues decreased by $0.3 million and $0.8 million, respectively, for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 compared to the same periods of the prior year.  Rental operations profit, which is rental revenues less rental expenses, decreased by $0.1 million and $0.7 million for the three-month and nine-month periods, respectively, ended September 30, 2008 compared to the same periods of the prior year due primarily to terminated subleases on restaurants reacquired.

Financing Operations

All of our financing operations relate to IHOP restaurants; there are currently no Applebee’s financing operations. Financing revenues increased by $0.1 million and $4.8 million, respectively, for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 compared to the same periods of the prior year.  Revenues from sales of franchises and equipment increased by $0.4 million in the third quarter of 2008. This increase was essentially offset by a decrease of $0.3 million in franchise and equipment note interest due to the ongoing reduction in franchise fee note balances. For the first nine months of 2008, revenues from sales of franchises and equipment increased by $5.9 million due to the refranchising of 14 restaurants in the 2008 period compared to the refranchising of four restaurants in the same period in 2007, partially offset by a decrease of $1.1 million in franchise and equipment note interest due to the ongoing reduction in franchise fee note balances.

Financing expenses decreased by $0.1 million and increased by $5.2 million, respectively, in the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 compared to the same periods in 2007. The increase during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2008 was primarily due to expenses associated with a higher number of refranchised restaurants in the

26

2008 period compared to 2007, as noted above.  Financing operations profit increased by $0.2 million in the third quarter of 2008 compared with the same period in 2007.  Financing operations profit decreased by $0.5 million for the first nine months of 2008 compared with the same period of 2007 as gains on refranchising were more than offset by the decline in note interest.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses increased by $23.9 million for the three-month period ended September 30, 2008 compared to the same period of the prior year.  Of this amount, $22.3 million was associated with general and administrative expenses recorded at Applebee’s; the remainder of the increase primarily was due to increased professional and consulting services of $1.9 million, primarily related to the ongoing integration of Applebee’s.

General and administrative expenses increased by $90.5 million for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2008 compared to the same period of the prior year.  Of this amount, $76.1 million was associated with general and administrative expenses recorded at Applebee’s; the remainder of the increase primarily was due to litigation settlements of $4.7 million, higher compensation expenses of $2.0 million, primarily related to the issuance of restricted stock and stock options, and increased professional and consulting services of $5.5 million, primarily related to the ongoing integration of Applebee’s.

Interest Expense

Interest expense increased by $47.1 million and $143.8 million, for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008, respectively, compared to the same periods of the prior year. The increases were primarily due to Applebee’s acquisition-related debt.

Impairment and Closure Charges

Impairment and closure charges were $28.3 million and $69.5 million, respectively, for the three-month and nine- month periods ended September 30, 2008.

In June 2008, the Company entered into sale-leaseback transactions relating to 182 parcels of real estate comprising land, buildings and improvements. The net book value of the real estate exceeded the proceeds received by $40.8 million. All of the parcels involved in the transactions had been acquired in the November 29, 2007 acquisition of Applebee’s and their estimated fair value was assigned as part of the purchase price allocation as of that date. The Company evaluated events subsequent to November 29, 2007 and noted a deterioration in both the domestic real estate and credit markets between the date of the purchase price allocation and the June 2008 closing date of the sale-leaseback transactions. In the absence of objective evidence to the contrary, the Company concluded that the estimated fair value of the real estate determined in the purchase price allocation had been reasonable and the decline in value related primarily to market events subsequent to the acquisition date necessitating an impairment charge as opposed to an adjustment to the allocated purchase price.

As part of the ongoing assessment of the recoverability of its long-lived assets, the Company recorded impairment charges of $28.3 million for the three-month period ended September 30, 2008. Of that amount, $26.8 million related to Applebee’s properties and resulted primarily from a continuing deterioration in the credit markets in general and a decline in the operating results of Applebee’s company-operated restaurants expected to be franchised in particular geographic areas.  The remainder of the impairment related to an individual IHOP property.

Loss on Derivative Financial Instrument

On July 16, 2007, we entered into an interest rate swap contract (the “Swap”) as a condition of the Applebee’s acquisition financing with Lehman Brothers Special Financial Inc. (“LBSFI”), guaranteed by Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. (“LBHI”). The Swap was intended to hedge our interest payments on the asset-backed notes that were issued in November 2007 to finance the Applebee’s acquisition. The Swap sets forth the terms of a five-year interest rate swap in which we would be the fixed rate payer and LBSFI would be the floating rate payer (the “Reference Swap”). The Reference Swap has an effective date of July 16, 2008, a notional amount of $2.039 billion, a floating rate of LIBOR and a fixed rate of 5.694%.

As of September 30, 2007, the fair value of the Swap was $70.3 million. Using the Hypothetical Derivative Method, we determined that the change in fair value of the effective portion of the Swap amounted to $34.7 million ($21.4 million net of tax effect) and is included as part of Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income (see Note 11).  The Company also determined, based upon management’s estimate of future pay down of the related debt, that the change in fair value of the

27

ineffective portion of the Swap was $35.6 million which was recorded as loss on a derivative financial instrument for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2007.

We terminated the Swap upon the consummation of the Applebee’s acquisition on November 29, 2007.

(Gain) Loss on Extinguishment of Debt

In August 2008, we retired certain Series 2007-1 Class A-2-II-A Fixed Rate Term Senior Notes due December 2037 with a face amount of $23.5 million for a cash payment of $20.0 million. The transaction resulted in a gain of $2.4 million after the write-off of the discount and deferred financing costs related to the debt retired.

In October 2008, we retired certain Series 2007-1 Class A-2-II-X Fixed Rate Term Senior Notes due December 2037 with a face amount of $35.2 million for a cash payment of $20.0 million. We expect to recognize a gain on extinguishment of debt of approximately $13.6 million after the write-off of the discount and deferred financing costs related to the debt retired.

In March 2007, the early retirement of debt resulted in a loss of $2.2 million. The loss comprised $1.2 million in prepayment penalties and $1.0 million due to the write-off of deferred financing costs related to the debt retired.

Other Income and Expense

Other income was $0.7 million and $2.6 million, respectively, for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 compared to other expense of $0.5 million and $1.7 million, respectively, for the same periods of the prior year. The primary reason for the increase is interest income earned on the increased restricted cash balances related to the acquisition-related debt.

Provision for Income Taxes

The effective tax rate for the benefit recognized was 20.9% and 42.0% for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008, respectively. The effective tax rate for the benefit recognized is lower than the federal statutory rate of 35% for the three-month period ended September 30, 2008 primarily due to the non-deductibility for tax purposes of certain impairment charges recognized in the period. The effective tax rate for the benefit recognized is higher than the federal statutory rate of 35% for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2008 primarily due to tax credits, partially offset by state income taxes and the non-deductibility for tax purposes of certain impairment charges recognized in the period. The tax credits are mainly FICA tip and other compensation-related tax credits associated with Applebee’s company-owned restaurant operations.

28

Pro Forma Comparison of Three Months and Nine Months ended September 30, 2008 with Three Months and Nine Months ended September 30, 2007 —Applebee’s

The following is a comparison of (i) information for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2008 for our Applebee’s segment and (ii) information for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2007 for Applebee’s International, Inc. prior to the acquisition date (“Predecessor Applebee’s”).

Restaurant Data

The following table sets forth, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, the number of effective restaurants in the Applebee’s system and information regarding the percentage change in sales at those restaurants compared to the same period in the prior year.

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2008		2007 (e)		2008		2007 (e)
Applebee’s Restaurant Data
Effective restaurants(a)
Company	481		508		501		506
Franchise	1,513		1,439		1,487		1,426
Total	1,994		1,947		1,988		1,932
System-wide(b)
Applebee’s domestic sales percentage change(c)	(1.5	)%	3.1	%	0.6	%	2.2	%
Applebee’s domestic same-store sales percentage change(d)	(3.1	)%	(0.3	)%	(1.4	)%	(1.8	)%
Franchise(b)
Applebee’s domestic sales percentage change(c)	(1.2	)%	3.1	%	1.6	%	2.4	%
Applebee’s domestic same-store sales percentage change(d)	(3.1	)%	(0.4	)%	(1.6	)%	(1.7	)%
Company
Applebee’s domestic sales percentage change(c)	(9.3	)%	3.0	%	(2.3	)%	1.5	%
Applebee’s domestic same-store sales percentage change(d)	(3.1	)%	(0.2	)%	(0.6	)%	(2.0	)%

(a)“Effective restaurants” are the number of restaurants in a given fiscal period adjusted to account for restaurants open for only a portion of the period. Information is presented for all effective restaurants in the Applebee’s system, which includes restaurants owned by Applebee’s as well as those owned by franchisees and international licensees.

(b)“System-wide sales” are sales of Applebee’s restaurants operated by franchisees and Applebee’s as reported to the Company. The Company acquired Applebee’s International, Inc. on November 29, 2007. Domestic franchise restaurant sales for Applebee’s restaurants were $827.3 million and $817.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and $2.6 billion and $2.5 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Franchise restaurant sales are sales recorded at restaurants that are owned by franchisees and are not attributable to either the Company or Predecessor Applebee’s. Franchise restaurant sales are useful in analyzing our franchise revenues because franchisees pay royalties and other fees that are generally based on a percentage of their sales.

(c)“Sales percentage change” reflects, for each category of restaurants, the percentage change in sales in any given fiscal year compared to the prior fiscal year for all restaurants in that category. All periods for company-owned Applebee’s restaurants exclude the impact of discontinued operations.

(d)“Same-store sales percentage change” reflects the percentage change in sales, in any given fiscal year compared to the prior fiscal year, for restaurants that have been operated throughout both fiscal periods that are being compared and have been open for at least 18 months. Because of new unit openings and store closures, the restaurants open throughout both fiscal periods being compared will be different from period to period.

(e)Data for Predecessor Applebee’s.

29

The following table summarizes Applebee’s restaurant development and franchising activity:

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2008		2007(a)		2008		2007(a)
Applebee’s Restaurant Development Activity
Beginning of period	1,993		1,943		1,976		1,930
New openings
Company-developed	—		2		1		12
Franchisee-developed	7		14		34		42
Total new openings	7		16		35		54
Closings
Company	—		—		(3	)	(23	)
Franchise	(3	)	(6	)	(11	)	(8	)
End of period	1,997		1,953		1,997		1,953
Summary-end of period
Company	480		510		480		510
Franchise	1,517		1,443		1,517		1,443
Total	1,997		1,953		1,997		1,953
Applebee’s Restaurant Franchising Activity
Domestic franchisee-developed	6		9		23		30
International franchisee-developed	1		5		11		12
Total restaurants franchised	7		14		34		42
Closings
Domestic franchisee	(2	)	(6	)	(9	)	(8	)
International franchisee	(1	)	—		(2	)	—
Net addition	4		8		23		34

(a)Data for Predecessor Applebee’s.

Results of Operations

The following table illustrates a comparison of certain financial results of Applebee’s for the three-month and nine- month periods ended September 30, 2008 on a stand-alone basis with that of Predecessor Applebee’s for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007:

	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2008		2007 (a)		Variance
	(In thousands)
Franchise revenues	$	35,750	$	34,832	$	918
Franchise expenses	645		357		(288		)
Franchise operating profit	35,105		34,475		630
Company restaurant sales	262,165		288,861		(26,696		)
Company restaurant expenses	232,181		262,520		30,339
Company restaurant operating profit	29,984		26,341		3,643

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2008		2007 (a)		Variance
	(In thousands)
Franchise revenues	$	111,400	$	108,860	$	2,540
Franchise expenses	1,641		1,100		(541		)
Franchise operating profit	109,759		107,760		1,999
Company restaurant sales	863,058		883,128		(20,070		)
Company restaurant expenses	759,914		785,252		25,338
Company restaurant operating profit	103,144		97,876		5,268

(a)Data for Predecessor Applebee’s.

30

Franchise Operations

Applebee’s franchise revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2008 increased 2.6% from $34.8 million to $35.8 million as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2007 primarily due to a 5.1% increase in effective restaurants from 1,439 restaurants in 2007 to 1,513 restaurants in 2008. Franchise restaurant same-store sales were down 3.1% compared with the same quarter of the prior year.

Applebee’s franchise revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 increased 2.3% from $108.9 million to $111.4 million as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2007 primarily due to a 4.3% increase in effective restaurants from 1,426 restaurants in 2007 to 1,487 restaurants in 2008. Franchise restaurant same-store sales were down 1.6% compared with the same nine months of the prior year.

Company Restaurant Operations

As a result of a 5.3% decrease in the number of effective restaurants mainly due to the franchising of 29 Company restaurants and a 3.1% decrease in same store sales, Applebee’s company restaurant sales for the three months ended September 30, 2008 decreased 9.2% from $288.9 million to $262.2 million as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2007. The decrease in same store sales was due to a decline in guest traffic offset by an increase in average guest check, of which approximately 4.0% related to menu pricing increases and the remainder to a favorable menu mix shift, reduced complimentary meals and discounts and server incentive contests.

Applebee’s company restaurant sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 decreased 2.3% from $883.1 million to $863.1 million as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2007. The increase in 2008 was mainly driven by a 1.0% decrease in the effective number of restaurants and a decrease in same stores sales of 0.6%. The decrease in same store sales is driven mainly by a decline in guest traffic partially offset by an increase in average guest check, of which approximately 3.3% related to menu pricing increases and the remainder due to a favorable menu mix shift, reduced complimentary meals and discounts and server incentives contests.

Applebee’s company restaurant operating profit for the three months ended September 30, 2008 increased by $3.6 million from $26.3 million to $30.0 million as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2007. Applebee’s company restaurant operating profit for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 increased by $5.3 million from $97.8 million to $103.1 million as compared to the first nine months ended September 30, 2007. The components of company restaurant expenses, as a percentage of company restaurant sales, were as follows:

	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2008		2007 (a)		Variance
Food and beverage	27.0	%	26.7	%	(0.3	)%
Labor	34.5	%	35.3	%	0.8	%
Direct and occupancy	27.1	%	28.8	%	1.7	%
Pre-opening expense	—		0.1	%	0.1	%
Total Cost of Company Restaurant Sales (b)	88.6	%	90.9	%	2.3	%

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2008		2007 (a)		Variance
Food and beverage	26.8	%	26.6	%	(0.2	)%
Labor	35.0	%	34.6	%	(0.4	)%
Direct and occupancy	26.2	%	27.6	%	1.4	%
Pre-opening expense	—		0.2	%	0.2	%
Total Cost of Company Restaurant Sales (b)	88.0	%	88.9	%	0.9	%

(a)  Data for Predecessor Applebee’s.

(b)  Percentages may not add due to rounding.

Total food and beverage costs as a percent of company restaurant sales increased by 0.3% for the three months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007 due primarily to the impact of higher commodity costs and an unfavorable shift in menu mix partially offset by menu price increases and better menu optimization.

31

Total labor costs as a percent of company restaurant sales decreased by 0.8% for the three months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007 due to a reduction in average hourly wage rates and lower management bonus payouts.

Direct and occupancy costs decreased as a percent of company restaurant sales by 1.7% for the three months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007 due primarily to lower depreciation expense which resulted from purchase price allocations and lower advertising partially driven by reduced sales.

Pre-opening expense as a percent of company restaurant sales decreased by 0.1% for the three months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007 due to the cessation of development of company restaurants in the first quarter of 2008.

Total food and beverage costs as a percent of company restaurant sales increased by 0.2% for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007 due primarily to higher food costs related to increased commodity costs and the unfavorable shift in menu mix, partially offset by menu price increases.

Total labor costs as a percent of company restaurant sales increased by 0.4% for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007 due to inclusion of transition-related bonus programs and higher restaurant management incentive compensation, partially offset by reductions in hourly labor due to an increased guest check.

Direct and occupancy costs as a percent of company restaurant sales decreased by 1.4% for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007 due primarily to favorable year-over-year comparisons for depreciation expense which resulted from purchase price allocations related to the Applebee’s acquisition as well as lower depreciation expense due to the reclassification of approximately 40 restaurants to assets held for sale, partially offset by an increase in rent expense associated with purchase accounting.

Pre-opening expense as a percent of company restaurant sales decreased by 0.2% for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007 due to the cessation of development of company restaurants in the first quarter of 2008.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our primary ongoing sources of liquidity are cash provided by operating activities and principal receipts from notes and equipment contracts receivable from our franchisees. Principal uses of cash are capital investment, payments of dividends and, more recently, repayment of long-term debt and related costs associated with the acquisition of Applebee’s.

During the first nine months of 2008, we have completed sale-leaseback transactions for the real property on which 181 of the 199 fee-owned, company-operated Applebee’s restaurants are situated, the sale of one additional fee-owned real estate parcel and a sale-leaseback transaction with respect to Applebee’s new corporate headquarters in Lenexa, Kansas.  We received approximately $378 million in proceeds from these transactions. During the first nine months of 2008, we completed the franchising of 26 company-operated Applebee’s restaurants in California and three company-operated Applebee’s restaurants in Delaware. We received proceeds of approximately $29.2 million from these transactions.

The proceeds from these transactions were used primarily to repay $350 million of Series 2007-1 Class A-2-I-X Fixed Rate Term Senior Notes (the “Class A-2-I-X Notes”), to repay portions of other long-term debt, to pay transaction expenses (payment of which had been deferred) related to the acquisition of Applebee’s and for general corporate purposes.

For the next several years, we expect our sources of liquidity to be significantly supplemented by proceeds from the franchising of the majority of Applebee’s 479 company-operated domestic restaurants and the sale of the remaining 17 fee-owned real estate parcels. The franchising of 15 company-operated Applebee’s restaurants in Nevada closed in the fourth quarter of 2008, and in October we signed agreements for the franchising of an additional 66 company-operated Applebee’s restaurants in Texas and New Mexico which are expected to close in the fourth quarter of 2008 or the first quarter of 2009.

Applebee’s has a $100 million revolving credit facility, the Series 2007-1 Class A-1 Variable Funding Senior Notes, committed to by Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (LBHI) (the “Lehman Facility”). LBHI filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on September 15, 2008. This bankruptcy filing created uncertainty as to our ability to continue to access funds under the Lehman Facility. As a result, in September 2008, the Company borrowed an additional $35 million under the Lehman Facility, bringing our total borrowings to the maximum of $100 million, which amount was outstanding at

32

September 30, 2008. The $35 million has been used to purchase money market funds that are invested in U.S. government securities. The money market funds are considered cash equivalents.

IHOP has a $25 million revolving credit facility, the Series 2007-2 Variable Funding Notes (the “IHOP Facility”). At September 30, 2008, borrowings under the IHOP Facility were $15 million. We do not believe there would be significant impediments to accessing any of the remaining $10 million of credit available under the IHOP Facility.

We currently anticipate that our cash and cash equivalents, together with expected cash flows from operations, sale-leaseback transactions and franchising activities will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash requirements for working capital, capital expenditures and other obligations for at least the next 12 months.

Operating Activities

Cash provided by operating activities is primarily driven by revenues earned and collected from our franchisees, operating earnings from our company-operated restaurants and profit from our rental operations and financing operations. Franchise revenues consist of royalties, IHOP advertising fees and sales of proprietary products for IHOP which fluctuate with increases or decreases in franchise retail sales. Franchise retail sales are impacted by the development of IHOP and Applebee’s restaurants by our franchisees and by fluctuations in same-store sales. Operating earnings from company-operated restaurants are impacted by many factors which include but are not limited to changes in traffic pattern, pricing activities and changes in operating expenses. Rental operations profit is rental income less rental expenses. Rental income includes revenues from operating leases and interest income from direct financing leases. Rental expenses are costs of prime operating leases and interest expense on prime capital leases on franchisee-operated restaurants. Financing operations revenue consists of the portion of franchise fees not allocated to IHOP intellectual property, sales of equipment, as well as interest income from the financing of franchise fees and equipment leases. Financing expenses are primarily the cost of restaurant equipment.

Cash provided by operating activities increased to $61.3 million in the first nine months of 2008 from $46.3 million in the same period in 2007, primarily due to cash from operations generated by Applebee’s. While consolidated net income was $31.2 million lower in the first nine months of 2008 compared with the same period of 2007, the nine months ended September 30, 2008 included a non-cash impairment charge of $69.5 million and non-cash depreciation and amortization charges that were $66.0 million higher than in 2007 while the nine months ended September 30, 2007 included a non-cash loss on a derivative financial instrument of $35.6 million. Further, while cash flow from receivables collections related to Applebee’s company-owned restaurants increased, this was offset by the reduction of deferred income due to increased redemptions of gift cards (revenue from which is recognized in the current period as redeemed, while cash was received in a prior period) and lower payables.

Investing Activities

Net cash provided by investing activities of $18.4 million in the first nine months of 2008 was primarily attributable to $40.2 million in proceeds from sales of property and equipment and $12.4 million in principal receipts from notes and equipment contracts receivable partially offset by $27.0 million in capital expenditures and $10.2 million in Applebee’s acquisition costs paid during 2008. The proceeds from sales of property and equipment primarily came from the franchising of Applebee’s company-operated restaurants in California and Delaware along with the sale of Applebee’s old headquarters and corporate aircraft. Approximately $9.0 million of the 2008 capital expenditures related to completion of the construction of Applebee’s new Lenexa, Kansas headquarters. The Company currently estimates that capital expenditures for fiscal 2008 will range from $30 million to $34 million.

Financing Activities

Financing activities used net cash of $6.4 million in the first nine months of 2008. Cash provided by financing activities primarily consisted of $370.0 million from the sale-leaseback of 181 fee-owned Applebee’s-operated restaurants and Applebee’s new Lenexa, Kansas headquarters, additional borrowings of $35.0 million and a decrease of $48.5 million in restricted cash related to the securitizations enabled by the repayment of securitized long-term debt. These items were more than offset by the repayment of $387.8 million of long-term debt and capital lease and financing obligations (primarily $350 million of Class A-2-I-X Notes), $49.9 million paid in debt and preferred stock issuance costs, and $24.2 million in dividend payments on common stock and Series A Preferred Stock.

33

Share Repurchases and Dividends

Under the current stock repurchase program, which began in 2003, we are authorized to repurchase up to 7.2 million shares of common stock. Since the inception of the program, we have bought back 6.3 million shares for a total of $280.0 million, leaving 0.9 million shares available for repurchase under this program. There were no shares repurchased during the first nine months of 2008. We do not expect to repurchase shares during the remaining six months of 2008 or during fiscal 2009, but will consider resuming share repurchases in 2010 or 2011, financial conditions permitting.

We have accrued $4.75 million as dividends for the Series A Perpetual Preferred Stock as of the quarter ended September 30, 2008, included in other accrued expenses in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The dividends were paid September 30, 2008, the second day of our fiscal fourth quarter. The accreted value of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock increased by $0.5 million and $1.6 million, respectively, during the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008.

The Company has paid regular quarterly dividends of $0.25 per common share since May 2003. On October 7, 2008, the Company declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.25 per common share, payable on November 18, 2008, to stockholders of record as of October 29, 2008. Future dividends will be declared at the discretion of the Board of Directors.

Debt Instruments and Related Covenants

For information on the Company’s outstanding debt instruments, refer to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. As of September 30, 2008, the Company was in compliance with all covenants and restrictions related to its debt instruments.

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

Refer to Note 9 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for disclosure of new financing obligations entered into during the first nine months of 2008.

Critical Accounting Policies

We prepare our Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires senior management to make estimates, assumptions and subjective or complex judgments that are inherently uncertain and may significantly impact the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Changes in the estimates, assumptions and judgments affecting the application of these policies may result in materially different amounts being reported under different conditions or using different assumptions. We consider the following policies to be most critical in understanding the judgments that are involved in preparing our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Derivative Financial Instruments

In the normal course of business, we may utilize derivative instruments to manage our exposure to interest rate risks. We account for our derivative instruments under SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (“SFAS 133”), as amended by SFAS No. 138, Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133, and SFAS No. 149, Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. The standard requires that all derivative instruments be recorded on the balance sheet at fair value and establishes criteria for designation and effectiveness of the hedging relationships.

We use derivative financial instruments primarily for purposes of hedging exposures to fluctuations in interest rates. All derivatives are recognized on the balance sheet at fair value. For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as a cash flow hedge (i.e., hedging the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows that is attributable to a particular risk), the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative instrument is reported as a component of other comprehensive income or loss and reclassified into earnings in the same line item associated with the forecasted transaction in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings (for example, in “interest expense” when the hedged transactions are interest cash flows associated with debt). The remaining gain or loss on the derivative instrument in excess of the cumulative change in the present value of future cash flows of the hedged item, if any, is recognized in other income/expense in current earnings during the period of change.

At inception of the hedge, we choose the Hypothetical Derivative Method of effectiveness calculation, which we must use for the life of the contract, and we will measure effectiveness quarterly. When hedge treatment is achieved under SFAS 133, the changes in fair values related to the effective portion of the derivatives are recorded in other comprehensive

34

income or loss or in income/expense, depending on the designation of the derivative as a cash flow hedge. We obtain the values on a quarterly basis from the counterparty of the derivative contracts. The undesignated portion of the derivative contract is calculated and recorded in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations for each quarter until settled.

Income Taxes

We provide for income taxes based on our estimate of federal and state income tax liabilities. Our annual tax rate is based on our income, statutory tax rates and tax planning opportunities available to us in the various jurisdictions in which we operate. Tax laws are complex and subject to different interpretations by the taxpayers and respective governmental authorities. Significant judgment is required in determining our tax expense and in evaluating our tax positions. We review our tax positions quarterly and adjust the balances as new information becomes available.

We recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities using the enacted tax rates for the effect of temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of recorded assets and liabilities. Deferred tax accounting requires that deferred tax assets be reduced by a valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that some portions or all of the net deferred tax assets will not be realized. This test requires projection of our taxable income into future years to determine if there will be taxable income sufficient to realize the tax assets. The preparation of the projections requires considerable judgment and is subject to change to reflect future events and changes in the tax laws. When we establish or reduce the valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets, our income tax expense will increase or decrease, respectively, in the period such determination is made.

Tax contingency reserves result from our estimates of potential liabilities resulting from differences between actual and audited results. We usually file our income tax returns several months after our fiscal year end. All tax returns are subject to audit by federal and state governments, usually years after the returns are filed, and could be subject to differing interpretation of the tax laws. Changes in the tax contingency reserves result from resolution of audits of prior year filings, the expiration of the statute of limitations, changes in tax laws and current year estimates for asserted and unasserted items. Inherent uncertainties exist in estimates of tax contingencies due to changes in tax law, both legislated and concluded through the various jurisdictions’ tax court systems. Significant changes in our estimates could materially affect our reported results.

Under FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—An Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (“FIN 48”), tax positions that previously failed to meet the more-likely-than-not threshold should be recognized in the first subsequent financial reporting period in which that threshold is met. Previously recognized tax positions that no longer meet the more-likely-than-not threshold should be derecognized in the first subsequent financial reporting period in which that threshold is not longer met. We are subject to taxation in many jurisdictions, and the calculation of our tax liabilities involves dealing with uncertainties in the application of complex tax laws and regulations in various tax jurisdictions. The application is subject to legal and factual interpretation, judgment and uncertainty. Tax laws and regulations themselves are subject to change as a result of changes in fiscal policy, changes in legislation, the evolution of regulations and court rulings. Therefore, the actual liability for taxes may be materially different from our estimates, which could result in the need to record additional tax liabilities or potentially to reverse previously recorded tax liabilities.

Leases

Our restaurants are located on (i) sites owned by us, (ii) sites leased by us from third parties and (iii) sites owned or leased by franchisees. At the inception of the lease, each property is evaluated to determine whether the lease will be accounted for as an operating or capital lease in accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 13, Accounting for Leases, and subsequent amendments.

The lease term used for straight-line rent expense is calculated from the date we obtain possession of the leased premises through the lease termination date. Prior to January 2, 2006, we capitalized rent expense from possession date through construction completion and reported the related asset in property and equipment. Capitalized rent was amortized through depreciation and amortization expense over the estimated useful life of the related assets limited to the lease term. Straight-line rent recorded during the preopening period (construction completion through restaurant open date) was recorded as expense. Commencing January 2, 2006, we expense rent from possession date through restaurant open date, in accordance with FASB Staff Position No. 13-1, Accounting for Rental Costs Incurred during a Construction Period. Once a restaurant opens for business, we record straight-line rent over the lease term plus contingent rent to the extent it exceeds the minimum rent obligation per the lease agreement. We use a consistent lease term when calculating depreciation of leasehold improvements, when determining straight-line rent expense and when determining classification of our leases as either operating or capital.

There is potential for variability in the rent holiday period, which begins on the possession date and ends on the restaurant open date, during which no cash rent payments are typically due under the terms of the lease. Factors that may affect the length of the rent holiday period generally relate to construction related delays. Extension of the rent holiday period due to delays in restaurant opening will result in greater preopening rent expense recognized during the rent holiday period and lesser occupancy expense during the rest of the lease term (post-opening).

35

For leases that contain rent escalations, we record the total rent payable during the lease term, as determined above, on the straight-line basis over the term of the lease (including the rent holiday period beginning upon our possession of the premises), and record the difference between the minimum rents paid and the straight-line rent as a lease obligation. Certain leases contain provisions that require additional rental payments based upon restaurant sales volume (“contingent rent”). Contingent rentals are accrued each period as the liabilities are incurred, in addition to the straight-line rent expense noted above.

Certain of our lease agreements contain tenant improvement allowances. For purposes of recognizing incentives, we amortize the incentives over the shorter of the estimated useful life or lease term. For tenant improvement allowances, we also record a deferred rent liability or an obligation in our non-current liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets.

Management makes judgments regarding the probable term for each restaurant property lease, which can impact the classification and accounting for a lease as capital or operating, the rent holiday and/or escalations in payment that are taken into consideration when calculating straight-line rent and the term over which leasehold improvements for each restaurant are amortized. These judgments may produce materially different amounts of depreciation, amortization and rent expense than would be reported if different assumed lease terms were used.

Stock-Based Compensation

We account for stock-based compensation in accordance with SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (“SFAS 123(R)”). Accordingly, we measure stock-based compensation expense at the grant date based on the fair value of the award, and recognize the expense over the employee’s requisite service period using the straight-line method. Under SFAS 123(R), the fair value of each employee stock option and restricted stock award is estimated on the date of grant using an option pricing model that meets certain requirements. We currently use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the fair value of our share-based compensation. The Black-Scholes model meets the requirements of SFAS 123(R). The measurement of stock-based compensation expense is based on several criteria including, but not limited to, the valuation model used and associated input factors, such as expected term of the award, stock price volatility, risk free interest rate and forfeiture rate. These inputs are subjective and are determined using management’s judgment. If differences arise between the assumptions used in determining stock-based compensation expense and the actual factors which become known over time, we may change the input factors used in determining future stock-based compensation expense. Any such changes could materially impact our operations in the period in which the changes are made and in subsequent periods.

Long-Lived Assets

We assess long-lived and intangible assets with finite lives for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the assets may not be recoverable. We test impairment using historical cash flows and other relevant facts and circumstances as the primary basis for our estimates of future cash flows. We consider factors such as the number of years the restaurant has been operated by us, sales trends, cash flow trends, remaining lease life, and other factors which apply on a case-by-case basis. The analysis is performed at the individual restaurant level for indicators of permanent impairment. Recoverability of the restaurant’s assets is measured by comparing the assets’ carrying value to the undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated over the assets’ remaining useful life or remaining lease term, whichever is less. If the total expected undiscounted future cash flows are less than the carrying amount of the assets, the carrying amount is written down to the estimated fair value, and a loss resulting from impairment is recognized by charging to earnings. This process requires the use of estimates and assumptions, which are subject to a high degree of judgment. If these assumptions change in the future, we may be required to record impairment charges for these assets.

Goodwill and Intangibles

Goodwill represents the excess of acquisition cost over the fair value of the net assets of acquired businesses. The amounts and useful lives assigned to intangible assets acquired, other than goodwill, impact the amount and timing of future amortization. The value of our intangible assets, including goodwill, could be impacted by future adverse changes such as (i) any future declines in our operating results, (ii) a decline in the valuation of our common stock, or (iii) any failure to meet the performance projections included in our forecasts of future operating results. We evaluate these assets, including intangible assets deemed to have indefinite lives, on an annual basis in the fourth quarter or more frequently if we believe indicators of impairment exist. In the process of our annual impairment review, we primarily use the income approach method of valuation that includes the discounted cash flow method as well as other generally accepted valuation methodologies to determine the fair value of our intangible assets. Management’s judgment is required in the forecasts of future operating results that are used in the discounted cash flow method of valuation.

Lease Financing Obligations

Lease financing obligations pertain to real estate transactions accounted for under the financing method as required by SFAS No. 98Accounting for Leases: Sale-Leaseback Transactions Involving Real Estate, Sales-Type Leases of Real Estate, Definition of the Lease Term, and Initial Direct Costs of Direct Financing Leases—an amendment of FASB

36

Statements No. 13, 66, and 91 and a rescission of FASB Statement No. 26 and Technical Bulletin No. 79-11 (“SFAS 98”). The assets (land, building and improvements) subject to these obligations remain on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet at their historical costs and such assets (excluding land) continue to be depreciated over their remaining useful lives. The proceeds received by the Company from these transactions are recorded as lease financing obligations and the lease payments are applied as payments of principal and interest. The selection of the interest rate on lease financing obligations is evaluated at inception of the lease based on the Company’s incremental borrowing rate adjusted to the rate required to prevent recognition of a non-cash loss or negative amortization of the obligation through the end of the primary lease term.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (“SFAS 157”). In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) No. 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, which delayed for one year the applicability of SFAS 157’s fair-value measurements to certain nonfinancial assets and liabilities. The Company adopted SFAS 157 as of January 1, 2008, except as it applies to those nonfinancial assets and liabilities affected by the one-year delay. The adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations. We are currently evaluating the potential impact of adopting the remaining provisions of SFAS 157 on our consolidated financial position and results of operations.

In June 2007, the EITF reached consensus on Issue No. 06-11, Accounting for Income Tax Benefits of Dividends on Share-Based Payment Awards (“EITF 06-11”). EITF 06-11 requires that the tax benefit related to dividend equivalents paid on restricted stock units which are expected to vest be recorded as an increase to additional paid-in capital. The impact of adopting EITF 06-11 in 2008 did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations (“SFAS 141(R)”). SFAS 141(R) establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree and the goodwill acquired. SFAS 141(R) also establishes disclosure requirements to enable the evaluation of the nature and financial effects of the business combination. SFAS 141(R) is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. We will adopt SFAS 141(R) in the first quarter of fiscal 2009 and apply the provisions of this statement for any acquisition after the adoption date. We are currently evaluating the potential impact, if any, of the adoption of SFAS 141(R) on our consolidated financial statements.

In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (“SFAS 161”). This statement requires companies to provide enhanced disclosures about (a) how and why they use derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under Statement 133 and its related interpretations and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect a company’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS 161 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. The Company will comply with the new disclosure requirements on or before the required effective date. As SFAS 161 does not change current accounting practice, there will be no impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets (“FSP FAS 142-3”). FSP FAS 142-3 amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (“SFAS 142”). The intent of FSP FAS 142-3 is to improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS 142 and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under SFAS 141(R) and other applicable accounting literature. FSP FAS 142-3 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 and must be applied prospectively to intangible assets acquired after the effective date. We are currently evaluating the potential impact, if any, of FSP FAS 142-3 on our consolidated financial statements.

In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“SFAS 162”). This statement is intended to improve financial reporting by identifying a consistent framework, or hierarchy, for selecting accounting principles to be used in preparing financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with U.S. GAAP. While this statement formalizes the sources and hierarchy of U.S. GAAP within the authoritative accounting literature, it does not change the accounting principles that are already in place.  This statement will be effective November 17, 2008. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact, if any, of the adoption of SFAS 162 on its consolidated financial statements.

37

Item 3.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.

There were no material changes from the information contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K as of December 31, 2007.

Item 4.  Controls and Procedures.

Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

The Company’s management, with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.

There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

38

Part II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.  Legal Proceedings.

In addition to those matters that are described in previous filings, we are subject from time to time to lawsuits, claims and governmental inspections or audits arising in the ordinary course of business. Some of these lawsuits purport to be class actions and/or seek substantial damages. In the opinion of management, these matters are adequately covered by insurance or, if not so covered, are without merit or are of such a nature or involve amounts that would not have a material adverse impact on our business or consolidated financial position.

Item 1A.  Risk Factors.

There were no material changes from the information contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K as of December 31, 2007.

Item 2.  Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

(a) - (c) Not applicable

Item 3.  Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

None.

Item 4.  Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

None.

Item 5.  Other Information.

None.

Item 6.  Exhibits.

3.1	Restated Certificate of Incorporation of DineEquity, Inc. (Exhibit 3.1 to DineEquity, Inc.’s Form 8-K filed June 2, 2008 is incorporated herein by reference).
3.2	Bylaws of DineEquity, Inc. (Exhibit 3.2 to DineEquity, Inc.’s Form 8-K file June 2, 2008 is incorporated herein by reference).
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

39

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	DineEquity, Inc. (Registrant)
October 31, 2008	BY:	/s/ JULIA A. STEWART
		Julia A. Stewart
(Date)		Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
October 31, 2008		/s/ GREGGORY KALVIN
		Greggory Kalvin
(Date)		Acting Chief Financial Officer and Vice President, Corporate Controller (Principal Financial Officer)

40

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

Certification Pursuant to

Rule 13a-14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934, As Amended

I, Julia A. Stewart, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of DineEquity, Inc., certify that:

1.I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of DineEquity, Inc.;

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

(d)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date October 31, 2008
	/s/ JULIA A. STEWART
	Julia A. Stewart
	Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

Certification Pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, As Amended

I, Greggory Kalvin, Acting Chief Financial Officer and Vice President, Corporate Controller of DineEquity, Inc., certify that:

1.I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of DineEquity, Inc.;

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

(d)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: October 31, 2008

/s/ GREGGORY KALVIN

Greggory Kalvin

Acting Chief Financial Officer and Vice President, Corporate Controller
(Principal Financial Officer)

EX-32.1

Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of DineEquity, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 31, 2008, (the “Report”), Julia A. Stewart, as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of her knowledge, that,:

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: October 31, 2008	/s/ JULIA A. STEWART
	Julia A. Stewart
	Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

This certification accompanies the Quarterly Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

EX-32.2

Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of DineEquity, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 31, 2008, (the “Report”), Greggory Kalvin, as Acting Chief Financial Officer and Vice President, Corporate Controller of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that,:

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: October 31, 2008	/s/ GREGGORY KALVIN
	Greggory Kalvin
	Acting Chief Financial Officer and Vice President, Corporate Controller (Principal Financial Officer)

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.