XML 76 R13.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
GOODWILL
12 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2013
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]  
Goodwill Disclosure [Text Block]
Note 7—GOODWILL
 
Goodwill balances resulting from the acquisitions of SCB in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 and Celmet in fiscal 2010 are $13.7 million and $0.1 million, respectively. 
 
Since its acquisition, SCB has operated as a reporting unit of the Company, primarily in the military & aerospace market sector.  Due to changing circumstances, the Company determined it was necessary to perform a quantitative assessment which resulted in an impairment charge recorded in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013.
 
The Company performs its annual impairment test for SCB goodwill during the third quarter.  Prior to the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013, these tests indicated no impairment.  During the third quarter of fiscal 2013, we performed a qualitative impairment analysis as permitted by ASC 350 – Intangibles – Goodwill and Other.  We considered several factors including operating results in recent periods, backlog, market sector and macro-economic conditions and revenue.  At the time, we anticipated improved operating margins in future periods.  Government activities were not expected to have a significant impact on SCB as the majority of the programs that SCB’s customers participate in involve complex, advanced technology including unmanned vehicles, space defense and space exploration – and, as such, were more likely delayed as opposed to permanently cut.  Revenue growth also was expected to have a positive impact on operating margins due to improved leverage on existing overhead, selling and administrative costs.  The Company therefore determined it was not more likely than not that goodwill was impaired.
 
Since acquisition, operating expenses at the SCB reporting unit were at a level that would support anticipated higher revenue volumes.  Although revenue at the reporting unit increased in fiscal 2013 over fiscal 2012, growth was slower than projected at acquisition date.  During the second and third quarters of fiscal 2013, the Company made an effort to increase margins by implementing operational improvements at the reporting unit to reduce costs and improve efficiencies.  Notwithstanding improvements, SCB continued to experience poor operating performance.  As a result, the Company made strategic decisions during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013 to direct more revenue from existing and new customers in the military & aerospace market sector to our Albuquerque reporting unit.  This change in strategy is expected to improve leverage of expenses at Albuquerque while reducing expenses at SCB.  The result is limited, managed growth planned for the SCB reporting unit for the foreseeable future, with future additional growth in this market sector planned to occur at our other locations.
 
As part of the strategic change noted above, the Company has reduced planned operating expenses in order to better align them with current revenue volumes and planned reduced growth at the SCB reporting unit.  Fiscal 2014 measures to improve operating results include planned operational efficiencies, reduction of square footage leased and reduction of personnel, administrative, selling and other discretionary costs.  These changes are beginning to take effect in fiscal 2014; however it will take some time to realize the full impact.  Recent forecasts for the SCB reporting unit for fiscal 2014 include lower revenue and operating margin projections based on the Company’s plans to manage the level of operations at this reporting unit while continuing to grow business in the military & aerospace market sector at other reporting units.
 
Additionally, since the third quarter of fiscal 2013, uncertainties relative to the military & aerospace market sector have intensified.  Federal government indecision regarding funding of budget deficits resulted in a partial government shut-down during October 2013.  This followed Department of Defense spending reductions that already occurred as a result of sequestration in the spring of 2013.  A temporary suspension of the debt ceiling put an end to the October 2013 shutdown.  At the time the Company was performing its impairment analysis, the temporary suspension was scheduled to end in February 2014.  At that time, there would be the possibility of another partial shut-down and further cuts that could take effect in calendar 2014 if further sequestration could not be avoided.  Although instability has continued to be evident,  the Company continues to believe government funding for the majority of our customers’ programs that we support is more likely delayed as opposed to permanently cut.
 
As a result of the factors described above, the Company determined it was necessary to perform a quantitative step one goodwill impairment analysis as of the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013.  The fair value of the SCB reporting unit was estimated using discounted cash flows, which is an income approach.  The discount rates used were based on a weighted average cost of capital determined from relevant market comparisons, adjusted upward for risks specific to the reporting unit.  Future cash flows were projected based on estimates of future revenues, operating income and other factors, such as working capital and capital expenditures.  Factors taken into consideration in arriving at these estimates include historical results since acquisition, industry data, and expected challenging market conditions.  The projections do not include possible future benefits from customer relationships that may positively impact other reporting units, including Albuquerque, in the future.  Despite the planned changes described above, projections still indicate low operating margins, and the carrying value of the SCB reporting unit exceeds the fair value estimated in step one of the impairment analysis.  It was therefore necessary to perform step two to determine the amount of the impairment
 
The step two analysis was performed utilizing the same factors in the step one analysis described above.  The fair value of the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit were estimated and the residual fair value of the reporting unit was compared to the carrying value of goodwill.  Based on the results of the step two analysis, the Company recognized a goodwill impairment charge of $11.8 million.
 
In the time since the Company performed its impairment analysis, Congress has considered a proposed framework that would avoid another partial government shut-down and further sequestration in 2014.  However, details as to exactly how any agreement will impact the Company’s customers will take time to emerge.  Absent more clarity, the Company did not modify its impairment analysis.
 
As for the goodwill from the Celmet acquisition, there has been no impairment.
 
A summary of the total goodwill and accumulated impairment at period end follows:
 
 
 
September 30,
 
September 30,
 
Goodwill
 
2013
 
2012
 
(in thousands)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Goodwill
 
$
13,810
 
$
13,810
 
Accumulated impairment
 
 
(11,805)
 
 
-
 
Balance
 
$
2,005
 
$
13,810