0000930413-01-501307.txt : 20011019
0000930413-01-501307.hdr.sgml : 20011019
ACCESSION NUMBER: 0000930413-01-501307
CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: U-1/A
PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 7
FILED AS OF DATE: 20011012
FILER:
COMPANY DATA:
COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY INC
CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000004904
STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: ELECTRIC SERVICES [4911]
IRS NUMBER: 134922640
STATE OF INCORPORATION: NY
FISCAL YEAR END: 1231
FILING VALUES:
FORM TYPE: U-1/A
SEC ACT: 1935 Act
SEC FILE NUMBER: 070-09785
FILM NUMBER: 1757658
BUSINESS ADDRESS:
STREET 1: 1 RIVERSIDE PLZ
CITY: COLUMBUS
STATE: OH
ZIP: 43215
BUSINESS PHONE: 6142231000
FORMER COMPANY:
FORMER CONFORMED NAME: KINGSPORT UTILITIES INC
DATE OF NAME CHANGE: 19660906
U-1/A
1
c22015_u1-.txt
AMENDMENT NO. 2
File No. 70-9785
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
---------------------------------
AMENDMENT NO. 2
TO
FORM U-1
----------------------------------
APPLICATION OR DECLARATION
under the
PUBLIC UTILITY HOLDING COMPANY ACT OF 1935
* * *
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, INC.
1 Riverside Plaza, Columbus, Ohio 43215
---------------------------------------
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE CORPORATION
1 Riverside Plaza, Columbus, Ohio 43215
---------------------------------------
CENTRAL AND SOUTH WEST CORPORATION
1 Riverside Plaza, Columbus, Ohio 43215
---------------------------------------
CENTRAL POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY
539 North Carancahua Street, Corpus Christi, Texas 78401-2802
-------------------------------------------------------------
COLUMBUS SOUTHERN POWER COMPANY
1 Riverside Plaza, Columbus, Ohio 43215
---------------------------------------
OHIO POWER COMPANY
301 Cleveland Avenue, S.W., Canton, Ohio 44702
----------------------------------------------
SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY
428 Travis Street, Shreveport, Louisiana 71156-0001
---------------------------------------------------
WEST TEXAS UTILITIES COMPANY
301 Cypress Street, Abilene, Texas 78601-5820
---------------------------------------------
(Name of company or companies filing this statement
and addresses of principal executive offices)
* * *
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, INC.
1 Riverside Plaza, Columbus, Ohio 43215
---------------------------------------
(Name of top registered holding company
parent of each applicant or declarant)
* * *
Susan Tomasky, General Counsel
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE CORPORATION
1 Riverside Plaza, Columbus, Ohio 43215
---------------------------------------
(Name and address of agent for service)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
NUMBER
Glossary of Terms ............................................................ I
Item 1. Description of the Proposed Transaction ........................... 1
A. Introduction .................................................. 1
B. Description of the Applicants ................................. 3
C. Overview of the Proposed Restructuring ........................ 5
1. Reorganization of the Texas Operating Companies ........... 7
2. Reorganization of the Ohio Operating Companies ............ 9
D. Overview of Requested Authorizations .......................... 9
1. The Transaction ............................................ 9
a. Formation and Capitalization of Enterprises,
Wholesale Holdco and Domestic Holdco ................... 10
b. Formation of Texas PGCs and Tax Beneficial Entities .... 10
c. Formation of EDC Subsidiaries .......................... 11
d. Capitalization of Subsidiaries ......................... 11
e. Transfers .............................................. 12
2. Agreements ................................................. 15
3. Services, Goods and Assets Involving the
Utility Operating Companies ................................ 16
E. Financing Plan ................................................. 17
1. Overview of the Financing Request .......................... 17
2. Parameters for Financing and Hedging
Transaction Authorization .................................. 18
a. Effective Cost of Money ................................ 18
b. Maturity of Debt and Final Redemption
on Preferred Securities ................................ 19
c. Insurance Expenses ..................................... 19
d. Use of Proceeds ........................................ 19
e. Financial Condition .................................... 20
f. Hedging Transactions ................................... 22
3. AEP Guarantees, Intra-system Advances and
EWG Investment ............................................. 23
a. Guarantees ............................................. 23
b. Intra-system Advances .................................. 25
c. EWG Investment ......................................... 25
4. Unregulated Holding Companies Authority .................... 26
a. Financing Authority .................................... 26
b. Guarantee Authority .................................... 27
c. Hedging Transaction Authority .......................... 27
d. Intra-system Advances .................................. 27
5. Unregulated Subsidiaries Authority ......................... 27
a. Financing Authority .................................... 27
b. Guarantee Authority .................................... 28
c. Hedging Transaction Authority .......................... 28
PAGE
NUMBER
6. Reg Holdco Authority ....................................... 28
a. Financing Authority .................................... 28
b. Guarantee Authority .................................... 29
c. Hedging Transaction Authority .......................... 29
d. Intra-system Advances .................................. 29
7. Regulated Subsidiaries Authority ........................... 29
a. Financing Authority .................................... 29
b. Guarantee Authority .................................... 30
c. Money Pool Authority ................................... 30
d. Hedging Transaction Authority .......................... 30
8. Finance Subsidiary Authority ............................... 30
F. AEP's Non-utility Holdings ..................................... 31
G. Request for Authority to Pay Dividends Out of Capital or
Unearned Surplus by the Utility Subsidiaries ................... 31
H. Other Regulatory Approvals ..................................... 32
Item 2. Fees, Commissions and Expenses ..................................... 33
Item 3. Applicable Statutory Provisions .................................... 33
A. Sections 9 and 10 .............................................. 34
1. The Transaction Complies With State Law .................... 35
2. The Capital Structure is not Unduly Complicated ............ 35
3. The Consideration is Fair and Reasonable ................... 37
B. Section 12 and Rule 46 ......................................... 37
C. Section 13(b) Compliance ....................................... 38
D. Rule 54 Compliance ............................................. 39
Item 4. Regulatory Approval ................................................ 40
Item 5. Procedure .......................................................... 40
Item 6. Exhibits and Financial Statements .................................. 41
a. Exhibits .............................................. 41
b. Financial Statements .................................. 41
Item 7. Information as to Environmental Effects ............................ 42
Signature ................................................................... 42
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
When the following terms and abbreviations appear in the text of this
Application, they have the meanings indicated below:
TERM MEANING
1935 Act............................. Public Utility Holding Company Act of
1935
AEP.................................. American Electric Power Company, Inc.
AEPSC................................ American Electric Power Service
Corporation
Applicants........................... AEP, AEPSC, CPL, CSP, CSW, OPCo, SWEPCO
and WTU
Commission........................... Securities and Exchange Commission
CPL.................................. Central Power and Light Company
CPL EDC.............................. CPL following the transfer of its
generating assets and related liabilities
CPL PGC.............................. A to-be-formed PGC organized to hold the
generating assets and related liabilities
of CPL
CPL PGC LLC.......................... A to-be-formed limited liability company
organized by CPL PGC to act as the
general partner of CPL PGC LP
CPL PGC LP........................... a to-be-formed limited partnership
organized by CPL PGC to hold its
generation assets and related liabilities
CSP.................................. Columbus Southern Power Company
CSP EDC.............................. a to-be-formed EDC organized to hold the
transmission and distribution assets and
related liabilities of CSP
CSP PGC.............................. CSP following the transfer of its
transmission and distribution assets and
related liabilities
CSW.................................. Central and South West Corporation
Domestic Holdco...................... Domestic Generating Holding Company, a
to-be-formed wholly owned subsidiary
corporation or limited liability company
of Wholesale Holdco
EDC.................................. Energy Delivery Company
Enterprises.......................... AEP Enterprises, a to-be-formed wholly
owned subsidiary corporation or limited
liability company of AEP
TERM MEANING
ETCs................................. exempt telecommunications companies
within the meaning of Section 34 of the
1935 Act and related rules thereunder
EWGs................................. exempt wholesale generators within the
meaning of Section 32 of the 1935 Act and
related rules thereunder
FERC................................. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Finance Applicants................... CPL EDC, CPL PGC, CPL PGC LLC, CPL PGC
LP, CSP EDC, CSP PGC, Domestic Holdco,
Enterprises, OPCo EDC, OPCo PGC, Reg
Holdco, SWEPCO EDC, Wholesale Holdco, WTU
EDC, WTU PGC, WTU PGC LLC and WTU PGC LP
FUCOs................................ Foreign Utility Companies within the
meaning of Section 33 of the 1935 Act and
related rules thereunder
Holding Companies.................... collectively, Enterprises, Wholesale
Holdco, Domestic Holdco and Reg Holdco
LPSC................................. Louisiana Public Service Commission
OPCo ................................ Ohio Power Company
OPCo EDC............................. a to-be-formed EDC organized to hold the
transmission and distribution assets and
related liabilities of OPCo
OPCo PGC............................. OPCo following the transfer of its
transmission and distribution assets and
related liabilities
Operating Companies.................. collectively, CPL, CSP, OPCo, SWEPCO and
WTU
PGC.................................. Power Generating Company
PUCO................................. Public Utilities Commission of Ohio
PUCT................................. Public Utility Commission of Texas
Reg Holdco........................... Central and South West Corporation
Regulated Subsidiaries............... CPL EDC, CSP EDC, OPCo EDC, SWEPCO EDC
and WTU EDC
REP.................................. Retail Electric Provider
Restructured Generation Assets ...... The generation assets of CPL, CSP, OPC
and WTU immediately prior to the
Transaction
Rule 58 Subsidiaries................. energy related companies within the
meaning of Rule 58
TERM MEANING
STP.................................. South Texas Project 2,630 MW nuclear
generating station
Subsidiaries......................... the to-be-formed wholly-owned direct and
indirect subsidiaries of each Operating
Company
SWEPCO............................... Southwestern Electric Power Company
SWEPCO EDC........................... a to-be-formed EDC organized to hold the
transmission and distribution assets and
related liabilities of SWEPCO situated in
Texas
Unregulated Holding Companies........ Enterprises, Wholesale Holdco and
Domestic Holdco
Unregulated Subsidiaries............. CPL PGC, CPL PGC LLC, CPL PGC LP, CSP,
OPCo, WTU PGC, WTU PGC LLC and WTU PGC LP
Unregulated Unit..................... the direct and indirect subsidiaries of
Enterprises
Utility Subsidiaries................. CPL EDC, CPL PGC, CPL PGC LLC, CPL PGC
LP, CSP EDC, CSP PGC, OPCo EDC, OPCo PGC,
SWEPCO, SWEPCO EDC, WTU EDC, WTU PGC, WTU
PGC LLC and WTU PGC LP
Vertically-Integrated Companies ..... AEP Generating Company, Appalachian Power
Company, Indiana Michigan Power Company,
Kentucky Power Company, Kingsport Power
Company and Wheeling Power Company (each
of which is currently directly owned by
AEP and (except for AEP Generating
Company) remains subject to regulation by
at least one state utility commission)
Wholesale Holdco..................... Wholesale Holding Company, a to-be-formed
wholly owned subsidiary corporation or
limited liability company of Enterprises
WTU.................................. West Texas Utilities Company
WTU EDC.............................. WTU following the transfer of its
generation assets and related liabilities
WTU PGC.............................. a to-be-formed PGC organized to hold the
generation assets and related liabilities
of WTU
WTU PGC LLC.......................... a to-be-formed limited liability company
organized by WTU PGC to act as the
general partner of WTU PGC LP
WTU PGC LP .......................... a to-be-formed limited partnership
organized by WTU PGC to hold its
generation assets and related liabilities
This amendment restates in its entirety Amendment No. 1 to the
Application-Declaration filed on August 22, 2001.
ITEM 1. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED TRANSACTIONS
A. INTRODUCTION
AEP and CSW, holding companies registered under the 1935 Act, CPL, CSP,
OPCo, SWEPCO, WTU, each a direct or indirect wholly owned public utility
electric subsidiary of AEP, and AEPSC, hereby file this Application-Declaration
with the Commission under Sections 6(a), 7, 9(a), 10, 12 and 13(b) of the 1935
Act, and Rules 43(a), 44, 45, 46, 54, 90 and 91 thereunder, for authority to
engage in certain transactions in connection with state mandated restructuring
in Ohio and Texas.
AEP holds vertically-integrated electric utility companies with retail
utility operations in eleven states - Arkansas, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana,
Michigan, Ohio, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia and West Virginia. These
states have reached different decisions as to whether, when and how to
restructure their electric industries. Texas and Ohio have opted to deregulate
generation, require separation of the generation and energy delivery functions,
and eliminate the concept of native load retail service, all in favor of free
and open competition at retail and have approved restructuring plans that are to
be implemented by January 1, 2002.
Under these approved plans, the Operating Companies will legally separate
their assets between:
o PGC affiliates that will sell power and energy at wholesale, and
o EDC affiliates that will own transmission and local distribution
facilities and transport the energy and perform metering
functions.
In connection with this restructuring, AEP proposes to realign certain of its
utility and non-utility businesses under three first-tier subsidiaries in a
manner similar to that approved in Exelon Corporation, HCAR No. 27259 (Oct. 20,
2000). Of interest here:
o CSW, as the Reg Holdco(1), will serve as an intermediate holding
company for the EDC affiliates and certain other AEP
public-utility subsidiary companies that are not required to
restructure, including, subject to any necessary state approval,
the Vertically-Integrated Companies.
o Enterprises will serve as an intermediate holding company for
AEP's non-utility businesses and, through Wholesale Holdco and
Domestic Holdco, for the PGC affiliates and the system's other
"unregulated" generation.
o AEPSC will continue to provide services to the AEP system
companies. Among other things, AEPSC will provide centralized and
regionalized management and support for both regulated and
unregulated generation.
Charts setting forth the AEP system and the Operating Companies
post-restructuring are attached hereto as Exhibit B-1. The mechanics of the
proposed restructuring are described more fully herein.
AEP respectfully requests authority to form and capitalize Enterprises,
Wholesale Holdco, Domestic Holdco and Subsidiaries to be formed for the purpose
of acquiring and holding certain utility and other assets of each Operating
Company and for each Operating Company to transfer to the applicable Subsidiary
certain utility and other assets (the "Transfers") and for certain of the
Operating Companies and Subsidiaries to be dividended to AEP and for AEP to
contribute certain of the Operating Companies and Subsidiaries to Enterprises,
Wholesale Holdco, Domestic Holdco and/or Reg Holdco to implement their
respective plans to separate their generation and power marketing businesses
from their transmission and distribution businesses in the states of Texas and
Ohio as more fully described herein (the "Transaction").
Certain financing authority will be required in connection with the
restructuring. These financing requests, which are
----------
(1) Throughout this Application-Declaration names are used for affiliates of
the Applicants that are intended to be descriptive of the functions such
affiliates will serve after the reorganization of the AEP system to comply with
the state restructuring laws of Ohio and Texas is completed. Such names are
fictitious and used as a matter of descriptive convenience. The actual legal
names of such affiliates will be determined as part of the implementation of
such reorganization.
2
described more fully herein at Item 1.E., are consistent with the ongoing needs
of the restructured entities and similar to the "housekeeping" authority that
the Commission has granted to other companies.
B. DESCRIPTION OF THE APPLICANTS
AEP is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of New York,
with its principal offices in Columbus, Ohio. AEP is one of the largest investor
owned electric public utility holding companies in the United States serving
over 4.8 million retail customers in eleven states and selling bulk power at
wholesale both within and beyond its domestic retail service area. AEP and CSW
completed their merger on June 15, 2000 and as a result AEP now has 38,000
megawatts of generation, over 38,000 miles of transmission lines and 186,000
miles of distribution lines in the United States. Subsidiaries own 544 megawatts
as independent power producers in Colorado, Florida and Texas. In recent years
AEP has expanded its domestic operations to include gas marketing, processing,
storage and transportation operations, electric, gas and coal trading operations
and telecommunication services. Subsidiaries also provide power engineering,
generation and transmission plant maintenance and construction, and energy
management services worldwide. AEP is one of the largest traders of electricity
and gas in the United States.
AEP intends to continue to expand its competitive energy business by
growing the trading and marketing business through expanding operations to be a
leading trader in all energy commodities; optimizing the operations of its
assets to yield maximum value in competitive markets; and acquiring generation
and natural gas assets that complement this strategy.
As of July 24, 2001, Standard & Poor's rating of AEP's senior unsecured
indebtedness was BBB+ while Moody's was Baa1.
CPL is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the state of
Texas, and has its principal office in Corpus Christi, Texas. CPL is a wholly
owned subsidiary of CSW, and an indirect subsidiary of AEP and is a public
utility under the 1935 Act. CPL is engaged in generating, transmitting and
distributing electric energy to the public in south Texas. CPL also owns an
undivided 25.2% interest in STP Nuclear Operating Company, which operates and
maintains the STP, of which CPL owns an 25.2% undivided interest. CPL serves
approximately 661,000 retail customers. In addition to its undivided interest in
STP,
3
CPL owns 3,861 MW of coal- and gas-fired generating capacity. As of July 24,
2001, Standard & Poor's rating of CPL's senior unsecured indebtedness was BBB+
while Moody's was Baa1.
CSP is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the state of
Ohio, and has its principal office in Columbus, Ohio. CSP is a wholly owned
subsidiary of AEP and is a public utility under the 1935 Act. CSP is engaged in
generating, transmitting and distributing electric energy to the public in
central and southern Ohio. CSP owns 2,595 MW of coal-fired generating capacity
which includes 1,330 MW in generating facilities jointly owned with two
unaffiliated utilities. CSP serves approximately 658,000 retail customers in
Ohio. CSP also sells electricity to wholesale customers. As of July 24, 2001,
Standard & Poor's rating of CSP's senior unsecured indebtedness was BBB+ while
Moody's was A3.
OPCo is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the state of
Ohio, and has its principal office in Canton, Ohio. OPCo is a wholly owned
subsidiary of AEP and is a public utility under the 1935 Act. OPCo is engaged in
generating, transmitting and distributing electric energy to the public in
northwestern, east central, eastern and southern Ohio. OPCo owns 8,464 MW of
coal-fired generating capacity and 48 MW of hydroelectric generating capacity.
OPCo serves approximately 679,000 retail customers in Ohio. OPCo also sells
electricity to wholesale customers. As of July 24, 2001, Standard & Poor's
rating of OPCo's senior unsecured indebtedness was BBB+ while Moody's was A3.
SWEPCO is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the state
of Delaware, and has its principal office in Shreveport, Louisiana. SWEPCO is a
wholly owned subsidiary of CSW, and an indirect subsidiary of AEP and is a
public utility under the 1935 Act. SWEPCO is engaged in generating, transmitting
and distributing electric energy to the public in east Texas, northwestern
Louisiana and southwestern Arkansas. SWEPCO owns 4,487 MW of coal- and gas-fired
generating capacity. SWEPCO serves approximately 422,000 retail customers.
SWEPCO also sells electricity to wholesale customers. As of July 24, 2001,
Standard & Poor's rating of SWEPCO's senior unsecured indebtedness was BBB+
while Moody's was A2.
WTU is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the state of
Texas, and has its principal office in Abilene, Texas. WTU is a wholly owned
subsidiary of CSW, and an indirect subsidiary of AEP and is a public utility
under the 1935 Act.
4
WTU is engaged in generating, transmitting and distributing electric energy to
the public in western and northern parts of Texas. WTU owns 1,376 MW of coal and
gas-fired generating capacity. WTU serves approximately 189,000 retail
customers. WTU also sells electricity to wholesale customers. As of July 24,
2001, Standard & Poor's rating of WTU's senior unsecured indebtedness was BBB+
with no corresponding Moody's rating of senior unsecured indebtedness.
ENTERPRISES, WHOLESALE HOLDCO AND DOMESTIC HOLDCO. For a variety of tax,
regulatory and business reasons, AEP has determined that the best way to
organize its non-utility subsidiaries is through the creation of Enterprises.
Enterprises will be a first tier subsidiary of AEP. It will own all of Wholesale
Holdco. Wholesale Holdco, in turn, will own Domestic Holdco, which will hold,
directly or indirectly, the PGCs. Enterprises, Wholesale Holdco and Domestic
Holdco will be formed to hold utility and non-utility subsidiaries of AEP whose
revenues derive from competitive, usually market-based, activity. This structure
allows AEP to align its non-utility enterprises and its non-State regulated
electric generating business in an efficient and simple manner. AEP is seeking
EWG status for CPL PGC, WTU PGC, their respective subsidiaries, CSP PGC and OPCo
PGC. If EWG status is not obtained within twelve months of the date of the
anticipated order in this file, Enterprises, Wholesale Holdco and Domestic
Holdco will register as holding companies under the 1935 Act.
REG HOLDCO. Likewise, for a variety of tax, regulatory and business
reasons, AEP has determined that it wishes to retain another intermediate
holding company - Reg Holdco - in its corporate organization. This company would
hold the EDCs and, in some instances subject to any necessary state approval,
other operating utility subsidiaries that are not required to restructure,
including the Vertically-Integrated Companies. Reg Holdco is a holding company
and will remain a registered company following the Transaction.
C. OVERVIEW OF THE PROPOSED RESTRUCTURING
The assets involved in the Transfers are generating facilities, the step-up
transformers, circuit breakers, interconnection facilities, related facilities
and other assets associated with generating units and their operations that CPL
and WTU will transfer to CPL PGC and WTU PGC, respectively, and transmission
lines and other transmission facilities and distribution lines and other
distribution facilities and other
5
assets that CSP, OPCo and SWEPCO will transfer to CSP EDC, OPCo EDC and SWEPCO
EDC, respectively, that will be chartered to own, maintain and operate
transmission and distribution facilities located in the states of Ohio and
Texas, respectively.
Exhibit B-1 to this Application contains diagrams of the pre-Transfer and
post-Transfer organizations of Applicants and their relevant affiliates. Exhibit
D-7 to this Application contains a list of the generating stations that CPL and
WTU will transfer to CPL PGC and WTU PGC, respectively, and a description of the
transmission and distribution facilities that CSP, OPCo and SWEPCO will transfer
to CSP EDC, OPCo EDC and SWEPCO EDC, respectively.
CPL, SWEPCO and WTU will make their Transfers to comply with the provisions
of a Texas statute commonly referred to as S.B. 7.(2) S.B. 7 requires vertically
integrated electric utilities to separate ownership of their generating and
other power supply assets from ownership of their transmission and distribution
assets no later than January 1, 2002. Under S.B. 7, vertically integrated
utilities are generally obligated to disaggregate into at least three separate
corporate units: (1) a PGC that will sell power and energy at wholesale; (2) an
EDC that will own transmission and local distribution facilities and perform
metering functions, but is prohibited from owning power supply facilities or
selling electricity; and (3) a REP that will sell electricity to retail
customers. By order issued July 7, 2000, the PUCT approved corporate separation
plans CPL, WTU and SWEPCO filed to explain how they will comply with S.B. 7 (see
Exhibit D-2 to this Application). Per PUCT Substantive Rule 25.342(d)(4), all
transfers made in compliance with S.B. 7 must be recorded at book value.
CSP and OPCo will make their Transfers to comply with the provisions of an
Ohio statute that provides for Competitive Retail Electric Service, commonly
referred to as S.B. 3.3 The statute directs vertically integrated electric
utilities that offer retail electric service in Ohio to separate their
generating and other competitive operations (such as aggregation, marketing, and
brokering) and related assets from their transmission and distribution
operations and assets. On September 28, 2000, the PUCO approved corporate
separation plans CSP and OPCo filed to explain how they will comply with S.B.(3)
----------
(2) Tex. Util. Code Ann.ss.39.001-909 (Vernon Supp. 2000).
(3) Ohio Rev. Code Ann.ss.ss.4928.01-67 (Anderson 2000).
6
(see Exhibit D-4 to this Application). Under their approved corporate separation
plans (which plans assume that all transfers will be made at book value), CSP
and OPCo proposed, subject to receipt of federal regulatory approvals, to
transfer their transmission and distribution assets and operations to EDC
affiliates.
1. REORGANIZATION OF THE TEXAS OPERATING COMPANIES
To comply with S.B. 7, each of CPL and WTU will contribute their
generating assets to newly formed PGC affiliates, WTU PGC and CPL PGC.(4)
Subsequently, CPL EDC and WTU EDC will dividend the common stock of, or limited
liability interest in, CPL PGC and WTU PGC to Reg Holdco, which, in turn, will
dividend the stock or limited liability interest to AEP.(5) In turn, AEP will
contribute such common stock or limited liability interest to Enterprises, which
will contribute such common stock or limited liability interest to Wholesale
Holdco, which will contribute such common stock or limited liability interest to
Domestic Holdco. AEP is seeking state consent for EWG status for CPL PGC and WTU
PGC including their respective subsidiaries as more fully described below.(6)
----------
(4) CPL has committed to divest by June 2002 its Lon Hill Units 1-4, which have
an aggregate generating capability of 546 MW, its Nueces Bay plant, which has a
generating capability of 559 MW, and its Joslin Unit 1, which has a generating
capability of 249 MW, subject to certain recall rights with respect to CPL's
obligation to serve retail customers in ERCOT. CPL made this commitment in
connection with the PUCT proceedings brought to consider the merger of CSW and
AEP. AEP is seeking EWG status for the entity owning these units. In the event
EWG status is not obtained in time, divestiture of such generating capability to
third parties is sought from the Commission pursuant to Section 12(d) of the
1935 Act.
(5) CPL and WTU may delay the transfer of their stock in CPL PGC and WTU PGC
until sometime after June 15, 2002, in order to avoid adverse tax consequences
relating to intra-corporate transfers after a merger.
(6) In addition to the foregoing affiliate transfers, CPL, SWEPCO and WTU seek
authority to sell certain utility assets to non-affiliates as required by
Section 39.051 of S.B. 7 which states "On or before September 1, 2000, each
electric utility shall separate from its regulated utility activities its
customer energy services business activities that are otherwise also already
widely available in the competitive market". In accordance with this Section,
PUCT developed and adopted PUCT Substantive Rule 25.341(6) which prohibits
regulated utilities from providing certain facilities and/or services that the
PUCT believes to be generally available in the open market. The prohibited
facilities and/or services identified in the Rule are classified as "competitive
energy services" and consist of nonroadway lights, distribution facilities
including distribution transformers, conductors, and associated distribution
equipment beyond the customer's primary metering point and substation facilities
dedicated to serving individual customers.
7
SWEPCO will retain title to its generating assets because it provides
bundled retail electric service in Louisiana, which to date has not adopted
retail competition legislation, and in Arkansas, where SWEPCO is not obligated
to separate ownership of its generating assets from its transmission and
distribution assets.(7) In order to comply with S.B. 7, however, on or before
January 1, 2002 (or such later date as determined by the PUCT), SWEPCO will
contribute its transmission and distribution assets located in Texas and related
business operations to a wholly owned EDC subsidiary, SWEPCO EDC. CPL EDC and
WTU EDC will retain their respective transmission and distribution assets and
after transfer of their generating assets to CPL PGC and WTU PGC, CPL EDC and
WTU EDC will operate as EDCs.
On September 25, 2001, AEP announced that it had filed a request with
the PUCT to delay implementation of competition from January 1, 2002 until March
31, 2003 in those portions of the state that lie in the Southwest Power Pool.
The request was made to allow adequate time for infrastructure, processes and
procedures to be in place for fair competition. If granted, the delay would
effect all of SWEPCO's service territory in Texas and a small portion of WTU's
service territory.
As illustrated by the post-Transfer organization chart in Exhibit B-1,
Reg Holdco will also hold the common stock of certain other regulated utility
subsidiaries of AEP, subject to any required state approval.
----------
CPL, SWEPCO and WTU have offered their customers the option to (i) purchase such
facilities from the utility; (ii) provide their own facilities; or (iii) convert
their service to secondary metering. Should the customer elect to purchase the
affected facilities, CPL, SWEPCO and WTU request authority to sell the affected
assets, the proceeds of which could total up to $30 million. By order of the
PUCT, the price for purchased facilities agreed to prior to October 1, 2001 will
be based on the original market cost at the time the facility was placed in
service adjusted for depreciation and undepreciated contributions in aid to
construction ("CIAC") multiplied times 1.10; provided that the total cost of the
facility will not exceed original market cost adjusted for depreciation and
undepreciated CIAC plus $15,000. After October 1, the price for purchased
facilities will be based on reproduction cost less depreciation. The actual
purchase does not have to be completed until January 1, 2004. The purchase price
for nonroadway lighting facilities must be 50% of their replacement cost as
mandated by the PUCT.
(7) The Arkansas legislature recently postponed the start of retail electric
competition in Arkansas to a date no earlier than October 1, 2003 and no later
than October 1, 2005.
8
As a part of the Texas retail access program, the Texas retail rates
of CPL, WTU and SWEPCO are frozen until December 31, 2001. On and after January
1, 2002, bundled Texas retail residential and small commercial customers
formerly served by CPL, WTU and SWEPCO will be served by REPs at the "price to
beat" established for their respective Texas service areas.
2. REORGANIZATION OF THE OHIO OPERATING COMPANIES
To comply with S.B. 3, CSP and OPCo will contribute their transmission
and distribution assets to CSP EDC and OPCo EDC, respectively. The common stock
of, or limited liability interest in, OPCo EDC and CSP EDC will be dividended to
AEP. AEP, in turn, will contribute such common stock or limited liability
interest to Reg Holdco. Surviving CSP PGC and OPCo PGC will be PGCs whose common
stock AEP will contribute to Enterprises, which will contribute such common
stock to Wholesale Holdco, which will contribute such common stock to Domestic
Holdco. AEP is seeking state consent for EWG status for CSP PGC and OPCo PGC.
Under S.B. 3, CSP EDC and OPCo EDC must serve as default suppliers to
residential customers that do not choose an alternative power supplier. The
retail rates for power supply that OPCo EDC and CSP EDC will charge Ohio retail
residential customers that do not choose an alternative supplier will be frozen
for the first five years of retail competition, unless the PUCO finds that
effective competition with respect to particular customer classes is occurring
before the end of a five-year market development period.
D. OVERVIEW OF REQUESTED AUTHORIZATIONS
1. THE TRANSACTION
AEP's corporate separation is designed to align the company's legal
structure and business activities with the realities of a restructuring electric
industry. Corporate separation responds to the changing laws, regulations and
business requirements of the electric industry. AEP's realigned corporate legal
structure complies with restructuring statutory and regulatory requirements and
provides greater flexibility to conduct business. This realignment consists of
actual legal corporate separation of certain subsidiaries and companies of AEP
and is not a functional reorganization of those entities. See Exhibit B-1 (the
post-Transfer corporate structure chart)
9
for a complete diagram of the final corporate structure sought by Applicants.
(a) Formation and Capitalization of Enterprises, Wholesale
Holdco and Domestic Holdco
AEP seeks authorization to form and capitalize Enterprises, a
first tier wholly owned corporation or limited liability company, Wholesale
Holdco (a wholly-owned subsidiary corporation or limited liability company
of Enterprises) and Domestic Holdco (a wholly-owned subsidiary corporation
or limited liability company of Wholesale Holdco). AEP, Enterprises and
Wholesale Holdco, respectively, propose to make an initial capital
contribution to Enterprises, Wholesale Holdco and Domestic Holdco,
respectively, in an amount to be determined, in exchange for all of the
common stock of, or limited liability interest in, Enterprises, Wholesale
Holdco and Domestic Holdco, respectively. AEP, Enterprises and Wholesale
Holdco, respectively, seek authorization for Enterprises, Wholesale Holdco
and Domestic Holdco to issue, and for AEP, Enterprises and Wholesale
Holdco, respectively, to acquire, all of the common stock of, or limited
liability interest in, Enterprises, Wholesale Holdco and Domestic Holdco,
respectively.
(b) Formation of Texas PGCs and Tax Beneficial Entities
AEP seeks approval for: (1) CPL to form and capitalize CPL PGC
for the purpose of holding the generation assets and related liabilities of
CPL; (2) WTU to form and capitalize WTU PGC for the purpose of holding the
generation assets and related liabilities of WTU; (3) CPL PGC to form and
capitalize CPL PGC LLC, which would serve as the general partner of CPL PGC
LP; (4) CPL PGC and CPL PGC LLC to form and capitalize CPL PGC LP for the
purpose of holding the generation assets and related liabilities of CPL
PGC; (5) WTU PGC to form and capitalize WTU PGC LLC, which would serve as
the general partner of WTU PGC LP; and (6) WTU PGC and WTU PGC LLC to form
and capitalize WTU PGC LP for the purpose of holding the generation assets
and related liabilities of WTU PGC.
10
(c) Formation of EDC Subsidiaries
AEP seeks approval for: (1) OPCo to form and capitalize OPCo EDC
for the purpose of holding the transmission and distribution assets and
related liabilities of OPCo; (2) CSP to form and capitalize CSP EDC for the
purpose of holding the transmission and distribution assets and related
liabilities of CSP; and (3) SWEPCO to form and capitalize SWEPCO EDC for
the purpose of holding the Texas-based transmission and distribution assets
and related liabilities of SWEPCO.
(d) Capitalization of Subsidiaries
(i) AEP seeks approval for CPL to acquire all of the
common stock of, or limited liability interest in, CPL PGC in exchange
for transferring its generation assets (including its interest in STP)
and related liabilities to CPL PGC and for CPL PGC to issue, and for
CPL to acquire, all of the common stock of, or limited liability
interest in, CPL PGC.
(ii) AEP seeks approval for CPL PGC to acquire all of the
membership interests of CPL PGC LLC in exchange for sufficient
capitalization for CPL PGC LLC to act as general partner of CPL PGC LP
and for CPL PGC LLC to issue, and for CPL PGC to acquire, all of the
membership interests of CPL PGC LLC.
(iii) AEP seeks approval for CPL PGC to acquire all of the
limited partnership interest of CPL PGC LP in exchange for
transferring its generation assets and related liabilities to CPL PGC
LP, for CPL PGC LLC to acquire the general partnership interest of CPL
PGC LP, for CPL PGC LP to issue, and for CPL PGC to acquire, all of
the limited partnership interest of CPL PGC LP and for CPL PGC LP to
issue, and for CPL PGC LLC to acquire, the general partnership
interest of CPL PGC LP.
(iv) AEP seeks approval for WTU to acquire all of the
common stock of, or limited liability interest in, WTU PGC in exchange
for transferring its generation assets and related liabilities to WTU
PGC and for WTU PGC to issue, and for WTU to acquire, all
11
of the common stock of, or limited liability interest in, WTU PGC.
(v) AEP seeks approval for WTU PGC to acquire all of the
membership interests of WTU PGC LLC in exchange for sufficient
capitalization for WTU PGC LLC to act as general partner of WTU PGC LP
and for WTU PGC LLC to issue, and for WTU PGC to acquire, all of the
membership interests of WTU PGC LLC.
(vi) AEP seeks approval for WTU PGC to acquire all of the
limited partnership interest of WTU PGC LP in exchange for
transferring its generation assets and related liabilities to WTU PGC
LP, for WTU PGC LLC to acquire the general partnership interest of WTU
PGC LP, for WTU PGC LP to issue, and for WTU PGC to acquire, all of
the limited partnership interest of WTU PGC LP and for WTU PGC LP to
issue, and for WTU PGC LLC to acquire, the general partnership
interest of WTU PGC LP.
(vii) AEP seeks approval for OPCo to acquire all of the
common stock of, or limited liability interest in, OPCo EDC in
exchange for transferring its transmission and distribution assets and
related liabilities to OPCo EDC and for OPCo EDC to issue, and for
OPCo to acquire, all of the common stock of, or limited liability
interest in, OPCo EDC.
(viii) AEP seeks approval for CSP to acquire all of the
common stock of, or limited liability interest in, CSP EDC in exchange
for transferring its transmission and distribution assets and related
liabilities to CSP EDC and for CSP EDC to issue, and for CSP to
acquire, all of the common stock of, or limited liability interest in,
CSP EDC.
(e) Transfers
(i) AEP seeks approval for CPL to transfer or contribute
a total of 100% of its ownership interests in its generation assets
(estimated net book value at December 31, 2000, $2,366.3 million) and
related liabilities (estimated book value at December 31, 2000,
$1,980.1 million) to CPL PGC at their net book value at the transfer
date and for CPL PGC to transfer or contribute a total of 100% of its
12
ownership interests in such generation assets and related liabilities
to CPL PGC LP at the same book value.
(ii) AEP seeks approval for WTU to transfer or contribute
a total of 100% of its ownership interests in its generation assets
(estimated net book value at December 31, 2000, $484.1 million) and
related liabilities (estimated book value at December 31, 2000, $333.4
million) to WTU PGC at their net book value at the transfer date and
for WTU PGC to transfer or contribute a total of 100% of its ownership
interests in such generation assets and related liabilities to WTU PGC
LP at the same book value.
(iii) AEP seeks approval for OPCo to transfer or
contribute a total of 100% of its ownership interests in its
transmission and distribution assets (estimated net book value at
December 31, 2000, $2,231.5 million) and related liabilities
(estimated book value at December 31, 2000, $536.6 million) to OPCo
EDC at their book value at the transfer date.
(iv) AEP seeks approval for CSP to transfer or contribute
a total of 100% of its ownership interests in its transmission and
distribution assets (estimated net book value at December 31, 2000,
$1,440.4 million) and related liabilities (estimated book value at
December 31, 2000, $424.8 million) to CSP EDC at their book value at
the transfer date.
(v) AEP seeks approval for SWEPCO to transfer or
contribute a total of 100% of its ownership interests in its Texas
transmission and distribution assets (estimated net book value as of
December 31, 2000, $631.6 million) and related liabilities (estimated
book value at December 31, 2000, $174.0 million) to SWEPCO EDC at
their book value at the transfer date.
(vi) After the transfers are executed, AEP seeks approval
for:
o CPL EDC to dividend CPL PGC's common stock or limited
liability interest to CSW, which will dividend the stock to
AEP, which will
13
contribute the stock to Enterprises, which will contribute
the stock or limited liability interest to Wholesale Holdco,
which will contribute the stock or limited liability
interest to Domestic Holdco.
o WTU EDC to dividend WTU PGC's common stock or limited
liability interest to CSW, which will dividend the stock to
AEP, which will contribute the stock or limited liability
interest to Enterprises, which will contribute the stock or
limited liability interest to Wholesale Holdco, which will
contribute the stock to Domestic Holdco.
o OPCo PGC to dividend OPCo EDC's common stock or limited
liability interest to AEP, which will contribute the stock
or limited liability interest to Reg Holdco.
o CSP PGC to dividend CSP EDC's common stock or limited
liability interest to AEP, which will contribute the stock
or limited liability interest to Reg Holdco.
o SWEPCO to dividend the common stock or limited liability
interest of SWEPCO EDC to CSW.
(vii) Upon completion of the Transaction, Reg Holdco will
hold CPL EDC, WTU EDC, SWEPCO, SWEPCO EDC, OPCo EDC and CSP EDC, each
of which will own transmission and distribution assets and related
liabilities (other than SWEPCO which will continue to be a vertically
integrated utility with respect to its assets located outside of
Texas.) Domestic Holdco will hold, among other things, CPL PGC, WTU
PGC, OPCo PGC and CSP PGC, each of which will own, directly or
indirectly, generation assets and related liabilities and, upon all
necessary state and federal regulatory approval, will be EWGs.
(viii) Subject to any required state approval, AEP seeks
authorization to contribute the stock of the Vertically-Integrated
Companies to Reg Holdco and for Reg Holdco to acquire the stock of the
Vertically-Integrated Companies.
14
AEP proposes to restructure its non-utility holdings (including
utility holdings that are no longer subject to state regulation) from time to
time as may be necessary or appropriate in the furtherance of its authorized
non-utility activities. The restructuring could involve the acquisition of one
or more new special-purpose subsidiaries to acquire and hold direct or indirect
interests in any or all of AEP's existing or future authorized non-utility
businesses. The restructuring could also involve the creation, capitalization
and acquisition of a subsidiary to hold the non-utility interests, the transfer
of existing subsidiaries, or portions of existing businesses, among AEP
associates and/or the reincorporation of existing subsidiaries in a different
state. This authority would enable AEP to consolidate similar businesses and to
participate effectively in authorized non-utility activities, without the need
to apply for or receive additional Commission approval.(8)
2. AGREEMENTS
(a) Authorization is requested for AEPSC to render
services to any direct or indirect subsidiary of any Applicant to be formed
as permitted in this file, pursuant to the existing AEP Service Agreement.
All services will be performed in adherence with the 'at cost' provisions
of Rules 90 and 91 under the 1935 Act.
(b) AEP may establish a specialized service company for
dispatch, wholesale trading, and fuel procurement of the generation assets
not subject to state regulation and/or other energy-related services
("GenServCo"). The GenServCo will pay the salaries of its employees and be
responsible for the administration of all employee benefit plans. Affiliate
companies will reimburse GenServCo for its expenses on a full cost basis in
accordance with the requirements imposed by Section 13 of the 1935 Act and
the Rules promulgated thereunder. AEP will provide information regarding
such a service company by pre- or post-effective amendment hereto which
will include a services agreement.
(c) In order to comply with S.B. 7, a division of AEPSC may be
established to meet Texas code of conduct concerns which in general
prohibit PGCs and EDCs in that state from sharing the services of a single
service
----------
(8) Similar authority was granted to Columbia and other registered holding
companies. SEE Columbia Energy Group, HCAR No. 27099 (Nov. 5, 1999).
15
provider with respect to engineering, purchasing of electric transmission,
transmission and distribution system operations and marketing services. If
created, this division would perform some but not all of the services
contemplated in the existing AEP Service Agreement and would function
pursuant to a service agreement substantially the same as the existing AEP
Service Agreement and pursuant to the allocation methods approved for
AEPSC.
(d) Authorization is requested for the time period following
receipt of respective state regulatory approval of relevant portions of the
Transaction but prior to the Transaction for the Operating Companies to
enter into Operating Agreements with the respective Subsidiaries for the
purpose of allowing the Operating Companies to operate the respective
utility and related assets of the Subsidiaries. These agreements may be
necessary to transfer control of such assets before assets can be
transferred because of mortgage or financial restrictions or delays in
obtaining assignments of environmental permits or other regulatory
approvals.
3. SERVICES, GOODS AND ASSETS INVOLVING THE UTILITY OPERATING
COMPANIES
The Utility Subsidiaries and Vertically-Integrated Companies may
provide to one another and other associate companies services incidental to
their utility businesses, including but not limited to, infrastructure services,
maintenance, storm outage emergency repairs, and services of personnel with
specialized expertise related to the operation of the utility. These services
will be provided in accordance with Rules 87, 90, and 91. Moreover, in
accordance with Rules 87, 90, and 91, certain goods may be provided through a
leasing arrangement or otherwise by one Utility Subsidiary to one or more
associate companies, and certain assets may be used by one Utility Subsidiary
for the benefit of one or more other associate companies. Because these services
will be provided and goods transferred in accordance with applicable rules, no
relief is sought from the Commission regarding these services.
Although CPL PGC, CPL PGC LP, WTU PGC, WTU PGC LP, CSP PGC and OPCo
PGC each will be a "public-utility company" until AEP obtains EWG status for
such companies, none is subject to State rate regulation or will have "captive"
customers.
16
E. FINANCING PLAN
1. OVERVIEW OF THE FINANCING REQUEST
The Applicants hereby request authorization to engage in the financing
transactions set forth herein through June 30, 2005 (the "Authorization
Period"). The approval by the Commission of this Application will give the
Applicants the flexibility that will allow them to respond quickly and
efficiently to their financing needs and to changes in market conditions,
allowing them to efficiently and effectively carry on competitive business
activities designed to provide benefits to customers and shareholders.
The financing authorizations requested herein relate to:
(a) issuances by AEP of guarantees of obligations of affiliated
or unaffiliated persons in favor of other unaffiliated persons and the
acquisition of the securities of the Holding Companies;
(b) issuances of securities and guarantees, the entering into of
transactions to manage interest rate risk ("hedging transactions")(9) and
the acquisition of the securities of the Unregulated Subsidiaries by the
Unregulated Holding Companies;
(c) issuances of securities and guarantees and the entering into
of hedging transactions by the Unregulated Subsidiaries to the extent not
exempt pursuant to Rule 52 (although each Unregulated Subsidiary will be an
"electric utility company" under the 1935 Act, none will be subject to the
jurisdiction of any State commission in connection with the issuance of
securities - therefore, all securities issuances for the Unregulated
Subsidiaries will require approval of the Commission until EWG status is
obtained);
----------
(9) "Hedging Transactions" include only those transactions related to financing
activities. Engaging in futures and other commodity related risk management by
AEP and its subsidiaries constitute part of their normal business activities and
as such do not require Commission approval. SEE Southern Energy, Inc., HCAR No.
27020 (May 13, 1999); Entergy Corp., HCAR No. 26812 (Jan. 6, 1998); New
Century Energies, HCAR No. 26748 (Aug. 1, 1997); National Fuel Gas Co., HCAR No.
26667 (Feb. 12, 1997).
17
(d) issuances of securities and guarantees, the entering into of
hedging transactions and the acquisition of the securities of the Regulated
Subsidiaries by Reg Holdco to the extent not exempt pursuant to Rules 52
and 45;
(e) issuances of securities and guarantees and the participation
in the AEP Money Pool and the entering into of hedging transactions by the
Regulated Subsidiaries to the extent not exempt pursuant to Rule 52;
(f) the ability of AEP and its subsidiaries to pay dividends out
of capital or unearned surplus;
(g) the formation of financing entities and the issuance by such
entities of securities otherwise authorized to be issued and sold pursuant
to this Application or pursuant to applicable exemptions under the 1935
Act, including intra-system guarantees of such securities; and
(h) To the extent the conversion of the PGC affiliates from
"public-utility companies" to EWGs counts as "aggregate investment" in EWGs
for purposes of Rule 53, obtaining authorization to 'invest' (pursuant to
the transactions described herein, including the financings and guarantees)
in the PGC affiliate EWGs up to the aggregate estimated net book value of
the Restructured Generation Assets (approximately $9,425 million as of
December 31, 2000).
2. PARAMETERS FOR FINANCING AND HEDGING TRANSACTION AUTHORIZATION
Authorization is requested herein to engage in certain financing
transactions during the Authorization Period for which the specific terms and
conditions are not at this time known, and which may not be covered by Rule 52,
without further prior approval by the Commission. The following general terms
will be applicable where appropriate to the financing transactions requested to
be authorized hereby:
(a) Effective Cost of Money
The effective cost of money on long-term debt borrowings
occurring pursuant to the authorizations granted under this Application
will not exceed the greater of (i)
18
500 basis points over the comparable term U.S. Treasury securities or (ii)
a gross spread over U.S. Treasuries that is consistent with similar
securities of comparable credit quality and maturities issued by other
companies.(10) The effective cost of money on short-term debt borrowings
pursuant to authorizations granted under this Application will not exceed
the greater of (i) 350 basis points over the comparable term London
Interbank Offered Rate ("LIBOR") or (ii) a gross spread over LIBOR that is
consistent with similar securities of comparable credit quality and
maturities issued by other companies. The dividend rate on any series of
preferred securities will not exceed the greater of (a) 700 basis points
over the yield to maturity of a U.S. Treasury security having a remaining
term equal to the term of such series of preferred securities or (b) a rate
that is consistent with similar securities of comparable credit quality and
maturities issued by other companies.
(b) Maturity of Debt and Final Redemption on Preferred
Securities
The maturity of indebtedness will not exceed 50 years. All
preferred securities will be redeemed no later than 50 years after the
issuance thereof.
(c) Issuance Expenses
The underwriting fees, commissions or other similar remuneration
paid in connection with the non-competitive issue, sale or distribution of
a security pursuant to this Application (not including any original issue
discount) will not exceed 5% of the principal or total amount of the
security being issued.
(d) Use of Proceeds
The proceeds from the sale of securities in external financing
transactions will be used for general corporate purposes including:
o the financing, in part, of the capital expenditures of the AEP
System;
----------
(10) SEE The Southern Company, HCAR No. 27134 (Feb. 9, 2000).
19
o the financing of working capital requirements of the AEP System;
o the acquisition, retirement or redemption pursuant to Rule 42 of
securities previously issued by AEP subsidiaries without the need
for prior Commission approval; and
o other lawful purposes, and, for the Unregulated Holding
Companies, the direct or indirect investment in companies
authorized by prior Order of this Commission, Rule 58 companies,
other subsidiaries approved by the Commission, EWGs, FUCOs and
ETCs.(11) The Applicants represent that no such financing
proceeds will be used to acquire or form a new subsidiary unless
such financing is consummated in accordance with an order of the
Commission or an available exemption under the 1935 Act.
Direct or indirect investments by AEP in Rule 58 Subsidiaries
would be subject to the limitations of Rule 58.
(e) Financial Condition
The Operating Companies are financially sound and each have
investment grade ratings from major national rating agencies as indicated
in Item 1.B. The business of the Unregulated Unit will be conducted by
companies that will also be financially sound.(12) Furthermore, AEP has an
investment grade rating (a senior unsecured debt rating of BBB+ from
Standard & Poor's and Baa1 from Moody's). The consolidated common equity of
AEP was 33.5% of total Consolidated Capitalization (common equity,
preferred stock
----------
(11) AEP will make additional investments in EWGs and FUCOs during the
Authorization Period. Accordingly, Rules 53 and 54 apply to this Application.
Compliance with these rules is addressed below.
(12) As a newly formed group, companies in the Unregulated Unit may not have a
rating from nationally recognized rating agencies immediately when it commences
operations. As noted herein, the absence of an investment grade rating will
likely increase the necessity for the Unregulated Unit to receive financial
support from AEP.
20
and long-term and short-term debt, including current maturities of
long-term debt) as of June 30, 2001.(13)
AEP commits that (a) its common equity (as reflected on the
balance sheets contained in its most recent 10-K or 10-Q filed with the
Commission pursuant to the 1934 Act) will be at least 30% of its
Consolidated Capitalization and (b) it will maintain at least an investment
grade corporate or senior unsecured debt rating by at least one nationally
recognized rating agency. Further, the Utility Subsidiaries commit that
each will maintain common equity of at least 30% of its capitalization
(calculated in the same manner provided, however, that CPL may exclude
securitization debt from the calculation of indebtedness and total
capitalization)(14) and at least an investment grade rating by one
nationally recognized rating agency. The consequences of failing to
maintain an investment grade rating or common equity of at least 30% of
Consolidated Capitalization when required is that such company would
require additional Commission approval to issue securities except for
securities which would result in an increase in such common equity
percentage or restoration of such rating.
----------
(13) See footnote 14 below for the reasons it is appropriate to consider the
special status of securitization debt for purposes of consideration of the
financial condition of AEP and its Utility Subsidiaries.
(14) The Commission has recognized that it is appropriate to consider
securitization debt in the calculation of capitalization to determine compliance
with its traditional test of a minimum equity component of capitalization of
30%. SEE West Penn Power Co., HCAR No. 27091 (Oct. 19, 1999) (exemption from 30%
equity standard granted where utility's equity ratio was 15% because of
transition bonds and other factors; excluding transition bonds, utility would
satisfy 30% test). This approach is consistent with the rating agencies analysis
of the impact of securitization on a utility's capital structure. AEP
anticipates that the outstanding securitization bonds of any subsidiary will be
rated "AAA." The structure of these financings, the orders of the respective
State commissions and the statutory provisions of each State ensure that there
will be sufficient cash flow from a dedicated portion of payments made by
utility customers to at all times provide for principal and interest on the
securitization bonds. The rates paid by customers are subject to adjustment in
accordance with procedures of the respective states to ensure that amounts
collected are sufficient to meet debt service and other requirements under the
securitization financings. SEE Utility Stranded Costs: Rating the Securitization
of Transition Tariffs, Special Report, FitchIBCA (September 24, 1998) (available
at www.FitchIBCA.com).
21
(f) Hedging Transactions
Interest rate hedging transactions with respect to existing
indebtedness ("Interest Rate Hedges"), subject to certain limitations and
restrictions, would be entered into in order to reduce or manage interest
rate cost or risk. Interest Rate Hedges would only be entered into with
counterparties ("Approved Counterparties") whose senior debt ratings, or
whose parent companies' senior debt ratings, as published by Standard and
Poor's Ratings Group, are equal to or greater than BBB, or an equivalent
rating from Moody's Investors' Service or Fitch Investor Service. Interest
Rate Hedges will involve the use of financial instruments and derivatives
commonly used in today's capital markets, such as interest rate swaps,
options, caps, collars, floors, and structured notes (i.e., a debt
instrument in which the principal and/or interest payments are indirectly
linked to the value of an underlying asset or index), or transactions
involving the purchase or sale, including short sales, of U.S. Treasury
obligations. The transactions would be for fixed periods and stated
notional amounts. In no case will the notional principal amount of any
interest rate swap exceed that of the underlying debt instrument and
related interest rate exposure. Applicants will not engage in speculative
transactions. Fees, commissions and other amounts payable to the
counterparty or exchange (excluding, however, the swap or option payments)
in connection with an Interest Rate Hedge will not exceed those generally
obtainable in competitive markets for parties of comparable credit quality.
In addition, interest rate hedging transactions with respect to
anticipated debt offerings (the "Anticipatory Hedges"), subject to certain
limitations and restrictions would only be entered into with Approved
Counterparties, and would be utilized to fix and/or limit the interest rate
risk associated with any new issuance through (i) a forward sale of
exchange-traded U.S. Treasury futures contracts, U.S. Treasury obligations
and/or a forward swap (each a "Forward Sale"); (ii) the purchase of put
options on U.S. Treasury obligations (a "Put Options Purchase"); (iii) a
Put Options Purchase in combination with the sale of call options on U.S.
Treasury obligations (a "Zero Cost Collar"); (iv) transactions involving
the purchase or sale, including short sales, of U.S. Treasury obligations;
or (v) some combination of a Forward Sale, Put
22
Options Purchase, Zero Cost Collar and/or other derivative or cash
transactions, including, but not limited to structured notes, options, caps
and collars, appropriate for the Anticipatory Hedges. Anticipatory Hedges
may be executed on-exchange ("On-Exchange Trades") with brokers through the
opening of futures and/or options positions traded on the Chicago Board of
Trade or the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, the opening of over-the-counter
positions with one or more counterparties ("Off-Exchange Trades"), or a
combination of On-Exchange Trades and Off-Exchange Trades. Each Applicant
will determine the optimal structure of each Anticipatory Hedge transaction
at the time of execution. Applicants may decide to lock in interest rates
and/or limit its exposure to interest rate increases. Applicants represent
that each Interest Rate Hedge and Anticipatory Hedge will be treated for
accounting purposes under generally accepted accounting principles.
Applicants will comply with the then existing financial disclosure
requirements of the Financial Accounting Standards Board associated with
hedging transactions.(15)
3. AEP GUARANTEES, INTRA-SYSTEM ADVANCES AND EWG INVESTMENT
(a) Guarantees
AEP requests authorization to enter into guarantees, obtain
letters of credit, enter into support or expense agreements or otherwise
provide credit support with respect to the obligations of the Finance
Applicants as may be appropriate or necessary to enable such Finance
Applicant to carry on in the ordinary course of its respective business in
an aggregate principal amount, and to enter into guarantees of
non-affiliated third parties obligations in the ordinary course of AEP's
business ("AEP Guarantees") in an amount not to exceed $15.0 billion
outstanding at any one time (not taking into account obligations exempt
pursuant to Rule 45). Any such guarantees shall also be subject to the
limitations of Rule 58(a)(1) or the Rule 53 limitation then in effect for
AEP, as applicable. Each guarantor proposes to charge each
----------
(15) The proposed terms and conditions of the Interest Rate Hedges and
Anticipatory Hedges are substantially the same as the Commission has approved in
other cases. SEE Entergy Corporation, HCAR No. 27371 (April 3, 2001); New
Century Energies, Inc., et al., HCAR No. 27000 (April 7, 1999); and Ameren
Corp., et al., HCAR No. 27053 (July 23, 1999).
23
subsidiary a fee for each guarantee provided on its behalf that is
comparable to those obtainable by the beneficiary of the guarantee from
third parties.
A substantial amount of the guarantees proposed to be issued by
AEP will be in connection with the Unregulated Unit. As a result of the
Transaction, the Unregulated Unit will be a newly formed business
consisting of the generating assets of CPL, WTU, CSP and OPCo. The
Unregulated Unit will also conduct the power marketing and trading
operations previously conducted by CPL, WTU, CSP and OPCo. For various
business reasons, AEP may wish to provide credit support in connection with
the Unregulated Unit's obligations to independent power producers to
purchase the output of generating units, in connection with the trading
positions of the Unregulated Unit entered into in the ordinary course of
the Unregulated Unit's energy marketing and trading business and for other
purposes. AEP may wish to provide guarantees to the Unregulated Unit for
reasons that are not unusual in today's increasingly competitive
electricity markets.
The second reason for the requested level of guarantee authority
is that many of the counterparties with whom the Unregulated Unit will buy
and sell power may demand that the Unregulated Unit provide credit support,
as its credit rating may not be as strong as the present credit ratings of
CPL, CSP, OPCo and WTU.
The provision of parent guarantees by holding companies to
affiliates in the generation and power marketing business is a standard
industry practice. Given the substantial volume of the Unregulated Unit's
business, AEP's $15.0 billion request for authority to issue guarantees,
including the guarantees relating to the Unregulated Unit, is reasonable
and appropriate under current industry practice. AEP expects the
Unregulated Unit to grow quickly and obtain its own investment grade rating
soon after the Restructuring. To the extent the Unregulated Unit has such a
rating, the need for support from AEP will likely be reduced. However, in
that situation, the Unregulated Unit will likely be required to offer its
guarantee in connection with the business activities of its subsidiaries
through which AEP's generation business will be developed.
24
Certain of the guarantees referred to above may be in support of
the obligations of subsidiaries which are not capable of exact
quantification. In such cases, AEP will determine the exposure under such
guarantee for purposes of measuring compliance with the $15.0 billion
limitation by appropriate means including estimation of exposure based on
loss experience or projected potential payment amounts. If appropriate,
such estimates will be made in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles. Such estimation will be reevaluated periodically.
AEP requests that this guarantee authority include the ability to
guarantee debt. The debt guaranteed will comply with the parameters set
forth in this Section E. Any guarantees or other credit support
arrangements outstanding at the end of the Authorization Period will
continue until expiration or termination in accordance with their terms.
The aggregate amount of the guarantees issued by AEP for the
purpose of funding any direct or indirect investment in an EWG or FUCO
would not, when added to AEP's "aggregate investment" (as defined in Rule
53(a)(1)) in all such companies, exceed the Rule 53 limitation then in
effect for AEP.
Direct or indirect investments by AEP in Rule 58 Subsidiaries
would be subject to the limitations of Rule 58.
(b) Intra-system Advances
Authority is sought for AEP to acquire the debt or other
securities of the Holding Companies for the purpose of lending to them. All
such intra-company conduit financing transactions shall comply with the "at
cost" requirements of Rules 45 and 52.
(c) EWG Investment
As noted above, AEP is seeking EWG status for the PGC affiliates
that will own the Restructured Generation Assets. Immediately following the
Transaction, the PGC affiliates will be "public-utility companies" under
the 1935 Act. Once EWG status is obtained, each PGC affiliate will be an
EWG and the Restructured Generation Assets owned
25
by each will be "eligible facilities" under the 1935 Act. To the extent the
conversion of the PGC affiliates from "public-utility companies" to EWGs
counts as "aggregate investment" in EWGs for purposes of Rule 53, AEP seeks
authorization to 'invest' (pursuant to the transactions described herein,
including the financings and guarantees) in the PGC affiliate EWGs up to
the aggregate estimated net book value of the Restructured Generation
Assets (approximately $9,425 million as of December 31, 2000).
No new financing is associated with the obtaining of EWG status
for the PGC affiliates. AEP respectfully submits that the obtaining of EWG
status by the PGC affiliates, when it occurs, is a purely legal distinction
under the 1935 Act and is without economic effect on the capitalization or
retained earnings of the AEP system or its financial condition. In point of
fact, AEP respectfully suggests that the application of Rule 53 to an
internal reorganization/restructuring transaction in which generation
assets are simply being moved from one subsidiary to another was not the
kind of transaction at which Rule 53 was targeted.
To the extent, however, that staff deems the conversion of the
PGC affiliates from "public-utility companies" to EWGs counts as "aggregate
investment" in EWGs for purposes of Rule 53, AEP will require the authority
to 'invest' (pursuant to the transactions described herein, including the
financings and guarantees) in the PGC affiliate EWGs up to the aggregate
estimated net book value of the Restructured Generation Assets. The
authority requested herein is essential if AEP is to successfully adapt to
the state-law mandated restructuring described in this file and which
materially impacts significant portions of its regulated utility
operations. AEP must obtain sufficient investment flexibility under the
1935 Act to obtain EWG status for the PGCs owning the Restructured
Generation Assets. For the foregoing reasons, AEP hereby requests the
authorization to 'invest' in EWGs as described above.
4. UNREGULATED HOLDING COMPANIES AUTHORITY
(a) Financing Authority
Authority is sought for each Unregulated Holding Company to
engage in financings and to issue securities to
26
non-affiliated and affiliated entities subject to and in accordance with
the parameters set forth in Item E.2, above, in an aggregate principal
amount not to exceed $5.0 billion, other than the refunding of outstanding
securities, which would not be limited.
(b) Guarantee Authority
Authority is sought for each Unregulated Holding Company to issue
guarantees and extend credit support to any Unregulated Subsidiary, Finance
Subsidiary, as defined below, owned by it or any other Unregulated Holding
Company subject to and in accordance with the parameters set forth in Item
E.3.(a), above, in an aggregate amount not to exceed $10.0 billion,
exclusive of any guarantees and other forms of credit support that are
exempt pursuant to Rule 45 and Rule 52, provided however, that the amount
of guarantees in respect of obligations of any Rule 58 Subsidiaries shall
remain subject to the limitations of Rule 58(a)(1).
(c) Hedging Transaction Authority
Authority is sought for each Unregulated Holding Company to enter
into any hedging transaction subject to and in accordance with the
parameters set forth in Item E.2, above.
(d) Intra-system Advances
Authority is sought for each Unregulated Holding Company to
acquire the debt or other securities of any Unregulated Subsidiary or other
Unregulated Holding Company for the purpose of lending to such Unregulated
Subsidiary or other Unregulated Holding Company. All such intra-company
conduit financing transactions shall comply with the "at cost" requirements
of Rules 45 and 52.
5. UNREGULATED SUBSIDIARIES AUTHORITY
(a) Financing Authority
Authority is sought for each Unregulated Subsidiary, to the
extent not exempt under Rule 52, to engage in financings(16) and to issue
securities to non-
----------
(16) CPL PGC is expected to assume the obligations on certain pollution control
loan obligations of CPL issued in connection with facilities located at the
27
affiliated and affiliated entities subject to and in accordance with the
parameters set forth in Item E.2, above, up to the following principal
amounts, other than the refunding of outstanding securities, which would
not be limited:
CPL PGC, CPL PGC LP, CPL PGC LLC............ 1,000,000,000
CSP PGC..................................... 500,000,000
OPCo PGC.................................... 1,000,000,000
WTU PGC, WTU PGC LP, WTU PGC LLC............ 250,000,000
(b) Guarantee Authority
Authority is sought for each Unregulated Subsidiary to issue
guarantees and extend credit support to any subsidiary owned by it
(including any Finance Subsidiary, as defined below) or to any other
Unregulated Subsidiary subject to and in accordance with the parameters set
forth in Item E.3.(a), above, in amounts not to exceed the amounts set
forth in Item E.5.(a), above, exclusive of any guarantees and other forms
of credit support that are exempt pursuant to Rule 45 and Rule 52, provided
however, that the amount of guarantees in respect of obligations of any
Rule 58 Subsidiaries shall remain subject to the limitations of Rule
58(a)(1).
(c) Hedging Transaction Authority
Authority is sought for each Unregulated Subsidiary to enter into
any hedging transaction subject to and in accordance with the parameters
set forth in Item E.2, above.
6. REG HOLDCO AUTHORITY
(a) Financing Authority
Authority is sought for Reg Holdco to engage in financings and to
issue securities to non-affiliated and affiliated entities subject to and
in accordance with the parameters set forth in Item E.2, above, in an
aggregate principal amount not to exceed $10.0 billion, other than
----------
generating stations to be transferred to CPL PGC from CPL. WTU PGC is expected
to assume the obligations on certain pollution control loan obligations of WTU
issued in connection with facilities located at the generating stations to be
transferred to WTU PGC from WTU.
28
the refunding of outstanding securities, which would not be limited.
(b) Guarantee Authority
Authority is sought for Reg Holdco to issue guarantees and extend
credit support to any Regulated Subsidiary and any Finance Subsidiary, as
defined below owned by it subject to and in accordance with the parameters
set forth in Item E.3.(a), above, in an aggregate amount not to exceed
$10.0 billion.
(c) Hedging Transaction Authority
Authority is sought for Reg Holdco to enter into any hedging
transaction subject to and in accordance with the parameters set forth in
Item E.2, above.
(d) Intra-system Advances
Authority is sought for Reg Holdco to acquire the debt or other
securities of any affiliated public utility company (other than the
Unregulated Subsidiaries) for the purpose of lending to such affiliate. All
such intra-company conduit financing transactions shall comply with the "at
cost" requirements of Rules 45 and 52.
7. REGULATED SUBSIDIARIES AUTHORITY
(a) Financing Authority
Authority is sought for each Regulated Subsidiary, to the extent
not exempt under Rule 52, to engage in financings and to issue securities
to non-affiliated and affiliated entities subject to and in accordance with
the parameters set forth in Item E.2, above, up to the following principal
amounts, other than the refunding of outstanding securities, which would
not be limited:
CPL EDC..................................... 1,000,000,000
CSP EDC..................................... 1,000,000,000
OPCo EDC.................................... 1,250,000,000
SWEPCO EDC.................................. 500,000,000
WTU EDC..................................... 500,000,000
29
(b) Guarantee Authority
Authority is sought for each Regulated Subsidiary to issue
guarantees and extend credit support to any subsidiary owned by it
(including any Finance Subsidiary, as defined below) subject to and in
accordance with the parameters set forth in Item E.3.(a), above, in amounts
not to exceed the amounts set forth in Item E.7.(a), above.
(c) Money Pool Authority
AEP currently administers the AEP Money Pool as authorized by
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, INC. ET AL., HCAR No. 27186 (June 14,
2000) subject to the general authority set forth therein and CENTRAL AND
SOUTH WEST CORP., HCAR No. 26697 (March 28, 1997) and CENTRAL AND SOUTH
WEST CORP., HCAR No. 26854 (April 3, 1998) and any subsequent orders which
may be issued relating to the AEP Money Pool (collectively, the "Money Pool
Orders"). Authority is sought for each Regulated Subsidiary to participate
in the AEP Money Pool subject to and as set forth in the Money Pool Orders
and to be permitted to issue, to the extent not exempt under Rule 52,
short-term debt up to the amounts set forth below (which amounts shall be
included in the limits set forth in Item E.7.(a), above):
CPL EDC..................................... 200,000,000
CSP EDC..................................... 175,000,000
OPCo EDC.................................... 250,000,000
SWEPCO EDC.................................. 100,000,000
WTU EDC..................................... 75,000,000
(d) Hedging Transaction Authority
Authority is sought for each Regulated Subsidiary to enter into
any hedging transaction subject to and in accordance with the parameters set
forth in Item E.2, above.
8. FINANCE SUBSIDIARY AUTHORITY
Authority is sought for any Finance Applicant to organize and acquire
all of the common stock or other equity interests of one or more subsidiaries
(collectively, the "Financing Subsidiary") for the purpose of effecting any
financing as described herein. Authority is further sought for
30
any Financing Subsidiary to effect any such transaction for which any Finance
Applicant has received authority herein to effect per this Section E.
F. AEP'S NON-UTILITY HOLDINGS
Applicants propose to restructure AEP's non-utility holdings from time to
time as may be necessary or appropriate in the furtherance of its authorized
non-utility activities. The restructuring could involve the acquisition of one
or more new special-purpose subsidiaries to acquire and hold direct or indirect
interests in any or all of the AEP system's existing or future authorized
non-utility businesses. The restructuring could also involve the transfer of
existing subsidiaries, or portions of existing businesses, among AEP associates
and/or the reincorporation of existing subsidiaries in a different state. This
would enable the AEP system to consolidate similar businesses and to participate
effectively in authorized non-utility activities, without the need to apply for
or receive additional Commission approval.(17)
These direct or indirect subsidiaries might be corporations, partnerships,
limited liability companies or other entities in which AEP, directly or
indirectly, might have a 100% interest, a majority equity or debt position, or a
minority debt or equity position. These subsidiaries would engage only in
businesses to the extent the AEP system is authorized, whether by statute, rule,
regulation or order, to engage in those businesses. AEP does not seek
authorization to acquire an interest in any non-associate Company as part of the
authority requested in this Application and states that the reorganization will
not result in the entry by the AEP system into a new, unauthorized line of
business.
G. REQUEST FOR AUTHORITY TO PAY DIVIDENDS OUT OF CAPITAL OR UNEARNED
SURPLUS BY THE UTILITY SUBSIDIARIES
Section 12 of the 1935 Act, and Rule 46 thereunder, generally prohibit the
payment of dividends out of "capital or unearned surplus" except pursuant to an
order of the Commission. The legislative history explains that this provision
was intended to "prevent the milking of operating companies in the interest of
the controlling holding company groups." S. Rep. No.
----------
(17) PowerGen plc, HCAR No. 27291 (Dec. 6, 2000); Columbia Energy Group, HCAR
No. 27099 (Nov. 5, 1999).
31
621, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. 34 (1935).(18) In determining whether to permit a
registered holding company to pay dividends out of capital surplus, as discussed
in the 1991 case involving Eastern Utilities Associates, the Commission
considers various factors, including: (i) the asset value of the company in
relation to its capitalization; (ii) the company's prior earnings; (iii) the
company's current earnings in relation to the proposed dividend; and (iv) the
company's projected cash position after payment of a dividend. In recent cases,
the Commission has determined that holding company systems may continue to pay
dividends although retained earnings have been reduced or eliminated because of
write-offs associated with State utility regulation restructuring legislation or
because of application of generally accepted accounting principles to a merger
involving two previously unaffiliated companies.
For extraordinary reasons related to the adoption of utility restructuring
legislation in Texas and Ohio, CPL, CSP, OPCo, SWEPCO and WTU will each have on
a pro forma basis, unusual reductions in their respective retained earnings
which may make it difficult in some cases to continue to pay dividends at
historical levels without such dividends being paid from paid-in-capital.
Generally accepted accounting principles may result in an elimination of
retained earnings at CPL, CSP, OPCo, SWEPCO and WTU. Further, such elimination
may have the effect of limiting the amount available for dividends. Accordingly,
authority is requested for AEP and the Holding Companies to pay dividends out of
capital or unearned surplus.
H. OTHER REGULATORY APPROVALS
The goals of the proposed restructuring are to comply with the requirements
of Texas and Ohio while maintaining the benefits of integrated operations for
system consumers and, in particular, continuing to provide customers with a
reliable power supply. To that end, all of AEP's energy regulators will be
involved in some aspect of the restructuring.
The proposed transactions will require approvals from the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission ("FERC") under Sections 203 and 205 of the Federal Power
Act in connection with the transfer of assets and the restructuring of
FERC-approved Operating and Interconnection agreements (to remove companies in
deregulated states). Applications were filed with the FERC on July 24, 2001 and
copies are attached hereto as Exhibit D-7.
----------
(18) Compare Section 305(a) of the Federal Power Act.
32
In addition, AEP is seeking orders from each of its state regulators,
pursuant to Section 32(c) of the 1935 Act, to establish EWG status for all Ohio
and Texas generation. EWG status is needed to enable AEP to divest certain
generation by July, 2002, in fulfillment of its merger commitments. AEP will
seek FERC certification once the state orders have been received.
ITEM 2. FEES, COMMISSIONS AND EXPENSES
Estimated fees and expenses expected to be incurred by Applicants in
connection with the Transaction will be filed by amendment.
ITEM 3. APPLICABLE STATUTORY PROVISIONS
SECTIONS OF THE 1935 ACT TRANSACTIONS TO WHICH SECTION OR RULE MAY BE
APPLICABLE:
9, 10 and 11 and rules thereunder Creation of Enterprises, Wholesale Holdco
and Domestic Holdco
11(b)(2) and rules thereunder Declaration that Enterprises, Wholesale
Holdco, Domestic Holdco and Reg Holdco are
not subsidiary companies or holding
companies solely with respect to the
"great-grandfather" provisions of Section
11(b)(2)
9, 10 and 12 and rules thereunder Transfers of utility assets and securities
of public utility subsidiaries
13 and rules thereunder Approval of services to be provided by AEPSC
to the direct and indirect subsidiaries
formed herein; approval of the performance
of certain services between AEP system
companies
6, 7, 9, 10 and 12 and rules Transfers of utility assets and securities
thereunder of public utility subsidiaries
6 and 7 and rules thereunder Issuance of securities
12 and rules thereunder Dividends out of paid-in capital
The relevant standards for Commission review of this Application under
Sections 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12 and 13 of the 1935 Act, and Rules 43(a), 44, 45,
46, 54, 90 and 91 thereunder.
33
A. SECTIONS 9 & 10
Section 9(a)(1) provides that unless the Commission under Section 10 has
approved the acquisition, it shall be unlawful for any registered holding
company or any subsidiary company thereof "to acquire, directly or indirectly,
any securities or utility assets or any other interest in any business." Section
10(f) provides that:
The Commission shall not approve any acquisition as to which an
application is made under this section unless it appears to the
satisfaction of the Commission that such State laws as may apply in
respect of such acquisition have been complied with, except where the
Commission finds that compliance with such State laws would be
detrimental to the carrying out of the provisions of Section 11.
If the requirements of subsection (f) of this section are satisfied, the
Commission shall approve the acquisition unless the Commission finds that:
(1) such acquisition will tend towards interlocking relations or the
concentration of control of public-utility companies, of a kind or to an
extent detrimental to the public interest or the interest of investors or
consumers;
(2) in case of the acquisition of securities or utility assets, the
consideration, including all fees, commissions, and other remuneration, to
whomsoever paid, to be given, directly or indirectly, in connection with
such acquisition is not reasonable or does not bear fair relation to the
sums invested in or the earning capacity of the utility assets to be
acquired or the utility assets underlying the securities to be acquired; or
(3) such acquisition will unduly complicate the capital structure of
the holding-company system of the applicant or will be detrimental to the
public interest or the interest of investors or consumers or the proper
functioning of such holding-company system.
The Transaction, for the reasons set forth below, satisfy the
standards of Section 10 of the 1935 Act.
34
1. THE TRANSACTION COMPLIES WITH STATE LAW
The Transaction complies with, or upon completion of the record shall
comply with, applicable state laws on the matter of restructuring and the
transfer of utility assets. Specifically, each Operating Company has structured
the Transaction in response to state law and legislative mandate. The
Transaction puts into effect the state regulatory and legislative determination
that restructuring is in the public interest.
The Transaction is reasonably incidental, economically necessary and
appropriate to the operations of each Operating Company and the AEP system.
Specifically, the Transaction will (a) allow AEP to continue to serve the needs
of its regulated customers while positioning the AEP system for competition in
the deregulated generation market; (b) segregate the transmission and
distribution assets into rate-regulated subsidiaries; (c) allow each deregulated
Operating Company to manage and operate its respective generating assets with
due regard to market considerations; and, (d) increase the flexibility for
financing activities on cost-effective terms that reflect the costs of capital
for each area of business activity.
2. THE CAPITAL STRUCTURE IS NOT UNDULY COMPLICATED
AEP seeks approval to form one first tier holding company,
Enterprises, to hold the interests in Wholesale Holdco; a second tier holding
company, Wholesale Holdco, to hold the interests in Domestic Holdco and a third
tier holding company, Domestic Holdco, to hold the PGCs. Each holding company is
necessary to achieve a simple corporate structure while minimizing the Federal
and State income tax impact of combining the unregulated businesses of AEP.
Alternative structures were considered but each had serious disadvantages
including potential tax liabilities.
Alternative structures which would minimize tax liability were much
less desirable from a business organization viewpoint and involved much more
complicated corporate structures. With respect to Reg Holdco, AEP wishes to
emphasize the separation of its "wires" business - the transmission and
distribution functions of the EDCs - from its non-State regulated utilities -
the PGCs - and non-utility - Enterprises - businesses. Providing a corporate
organization that clearly and
35
fully separates the distribution business from other businesses will better
insulate the distribution business, which will continue to be regulated, from
unregulated business. Further, providing a separate management structure for the
distribution business will provide for management focus on that business
enabling better integration and efficient development of that business.
The Commission has recognized in recent cases that there are
organizational, regulatory and tax benefits to the creation of intermediate
holding companies that should be considered. The harms that the 1935 Act
envisioned would be prevented by the reduction or elimination of intermediate
holding companies are unlikely to occur given modern financial reporting and
affiliate transaction requirements. AEP's proposal will not result in harmful
pyramiding of holding company groups. There is no risk of unfair or inequitable
distribution of voting power from the proposal. No proposed holding company will
issue any voting securities to anyone other than AEP or a directly or indirectly
wholly owned subsidiary of AEP. Consequently, the Commission should approve the
formation of such entities, "look through" the intermediate holding companies or
treat them as a single company for purposes of analysis under Section 11(b)(2)
of the 1935 Act.(19)
Enterprises and Reg Holdco will be wholly-owned, directly by AEP.
Other than to enhance the full integration of the regulated utilities, Reg
Holdco will not affect the operation of CPL EDC, WTU EDC, SWEPCO, SWEPCO EDC,
CSP EDC or OPCo EDC. Likewise, Enterprises will not affect the operation of CPL
PGC, WTU PGC, CSP PGC and OPCo PGC. Thus, there is no possibility that
implementation and continuance of the proposed transaction structure could
result in an undue or unnecessarily complex capital structure or inequitable
distribution of voting power to the detriment of the public interest or the
interest of consumers. This is not the type of situation that concerned the
drafters of the 1935 Act and AEP urges the Commission to exercise its discretion
to find that any apparent complexity of the proposed transaction structure is
neither undue nor unnecessary.
----------
(19) Exelon Corporation, HCAR No. 27256 (Oct. 19, 2000) (approving intermediate
holding company structure resulting from merger); National Grid Group plc, HCAR
No. 27154 (Mar. 15, 2000) (intermediate holding companies necessary for
cross-border tax considerations); Dominion Resources, HCAR No. 27113 (Dec. 15,
1999) (intermediate holding company "CNG Acquisitions" to hold CNG's utility
subsidiaries under alternative form of merger).
36
The Transaction does not unduly complicate the capital structure of
the AEP system. The capital structure of the AEP system on a consolidated basis
will be essentially unchanged. The Transaction will tend toward the proper
functioning of the AEP system in a partly deregulated, partly regulated
operating environment. The Transaction results in a more economical and
efficient system. The resulting increased efficiency of operations significantly
offsets any perceived added complexity caused by the Transaction.(20) Being done
in part because of state mandate and for all of the foregoing reasons, the
Transaction satisfies the requirements of, and is entirely consistent with the
1935 Act.
3. THE CONSIDERATION IS FAIR AND REASONABLE
The consideration to be paid in connection with the Transaction is
fair and reasonable. Indeed, each state public utility commission has approved
or will approve the corporate separation plan as it relates to its particular
jurisdiction.
B. SECTION 12 & RULE 46
Section 12(c) governs the proposed dividends for which authorization
has been sought. Section 12(c) provides that:
It shall be unlawful for any registered holding company or any
subsidiary company thereof, by use of the mails or any means or
instrumentality of interstate commerce, or otherwise, to declare or
pay any dividend on any security of such company or to acquire,
retire, or redeem any security of such company, in contravention of
such rules and regulations or orders as the Commission deems necessary
or appropriate to protect the financial integrity of companies in
holding-company systems, to safeguard the working capital of
public-utility companies, to prevent the payment of dividends out of
capital or unearned surplus, or to prevent the circumvention of the
provisions of this chapter or the rules, regulations, or orders
thereunder.
----------
(20) SEE Wisconsin's Environmental Decade, Inc. v SEC, 882 F.2d 523, 527 (D.C.
Cir. 1989); Northeast Utilities, HCAR No. 25221 (Dec. 21, 1990); Entergy Corp.,
HCAR No. 25136 (Aug. 27, 1990).
37
AEP expects that the distribution of entities owning utility assets of this
magnitude, in each instance could be a dividend out of "capital or unearned
surplus" within the meaning of Rule 46 under the 1935 Act. Applicants believe
that, in the overall context of the Transaction, neither shareholders,
ratepayers nor the public will be adversely affected.21 The distributions will
be structured as such in order to minimize the tax burden on the Applicants. The
distributions are fundamentally necessary to effect the transfer of their
respective generation or transmission and distribution assets to an affiliate in
the AEP system in accordance with the relevant order of each respective state
utility commission. The distributions will be the final step in the
reorganization of the AEP system, in accordance with, and fulfillment of, the
regulations and legislative policies and objectives that culminated in
deregulation of and competition in electrical generation in each state, as
described herein. The distributions are not intended to harm the interests of
any Operating Company, successor or, ultimately, AEP. The AEP system will
continue to own the assets transferred by such distributions. Subject to any
necessary state approvals, the regulated parts of the AEP system that are not
subject to deregulation and competition will be owned directly by Reg Holdco.
For these reasons, the proposed distributions are entirely consistent with the
policies and principles behind Section 12 of the 1935 Act.
C. SECTION 13(B) COMPLIANCE
Section 13(b) of the 1935 Act provides that:
It shall be unlawful for any subsidiary company of any registered
holding company or for any mutual service company, by use of the mails
or any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce, or otherwise,
to enter into or take any step in the performance of any service,
sales, or construction contract by which such company undertakes to
perform services or construction work for, or sell goods to, any
associate company thereof except in accordance with such terms and
conditions and subject to such limitations and prohibitions as the
Commission by rules and regulations or order shall prescribe as
necessary or appropriate in the public interest or for the
----------
(21) IBID. The Commission, among other things, authorized the dividending of
interests to Genco.
38
protection of investors or consumers and to insure that such contracts
are performed economically and efficiently for the benefit of such
associate companies at cost, fairly and equitably allocated between
such companies.
Any transaction between AEPSC and any newly formed affiliates and any
related service agreements shall be in compliance with section 13(b) of the 1935
Act and Rules 87, 90 and 91 under the 1935 Act.
D. RULE 54 COMPLIANCE
Rule 54 provides that, in determining whether to approve an application
which does not relate to any EWG or FUCO, the Commission shall not consider the
effect of the capitalization or earnings of any such EWG or FUCO which is a
subsidiary of a registered holding company if the requirements of Rule 53(a),
(b) and (c) are satisfied.
AEP consummated the merger with Central and South West Corporation on June
15, 2000 pursuant to an order issued June 14, 2000 (HCAR No. 27186), which
further authorized AEP to invest up to 100% of its consolidated retained
earnings, with consolidated retained earnings to be calculated on the basis of
the combined consolidated retained earnings of AEP and CSW (as extended pursuant
to HCAR No. 27316, December 26, 2000, the "Rule 53(c) Order").
AEP currently meets all of the conditions of Rule 53(a) and none of the
conditions set forth in Rule 53(b) exist or will exist as a result of the
transactions proposed herein.
RULE 53(a)(1) At June 30, 2001, AEP's "aggregate investment", as defined in
Rule 53(a)(1), in EWGs and FUCOs was approximately $1.315 billion, or about
40.6% of AEP's "consolidated retained earnings", also as defined in Rule
53(a)(1), for the four quarters ended June 30, 2001 ($3.242 billion).
RULE 53(a)(2) Each FUCO in which AEP invests will maintain books and
records and make available the books and records required by Rule 53(a)(2).
RULE 53(a)(3) No more than 2% of the employees of the electric utility
subsidiaries of AEP will, at any one time, directly or indirectly, render
services to any FUCO.
39
RULE 53(a)(4) AEP has submitted and will submit a copy of Item 9 and
Exhibits G and H of AEP's Form U5S to each of the public service commissions
having jurisdiction over the retail rates of AEP's electric utility
subsidiaries.
RULE 53(b) (i) Neither AEP nor any subsidiary of AEP is the subject of any
pending bankruptcy or similar proceeding; (ii) AEP's average consolidated
retained earnings for the four quarters ended June 30, 2001 ($3,242,159,000)
represented a decrease of approximately $302,490,000 (or 8.5%) in the average
consolidated retained earnings from the four quarters ended June 30, 2000
($3,544,649,000); and (iii) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000, AEP did
not report operating losses attributable to its direct or indirect investments
in EWGs and FUCOs.
AEP's interests in EWGs and FUCOs have made a positive contribution to
earnings over the four calendar years ending after the Rule 53(c) Order.
Accordingly, since the date of the Rule 53(c) Order, the capitalization and
earnings attributable to AEP's investments in EWGs and FUCOs has not had an
adverse impact on AEP's financial integrity.
ITEM 4. REGULATORY APPROVAL
The FERC must approve the sale of utility assets and other action
contemplated in this Application. The LPSC must approve the business unbundling
plan of SWEPCO.
On July 7, 2000, the PUCT issued an order approving the corporate
separation plan of CPL, SWEPCO and WTU (Exhibit D-2.) On September 28, 2000, the
PUCO issued an order on each of OPCo and CSP's request to separate its
generation assets from its transmission and generation assets. In that order,
the PUCO approved the Stipulation Agreement requiring the separation of each of
OPCo and CSP's generation assets from its transmission and distribution assets
as determined in accordance with accepted PUCO procedures (Exhibit D-4). On
September 1, 2000, SWEPCO filed an application before the LPSC seeking approval
to transfer its Texas transmission and distribution assets to SWEPCO EDC
(Exhibit D-5).
ITEM 5. PROCEDURE
It is requested that the Commission's order granting this Application or
Declaration be issued on or before October 1,
40
2001. There should be no recommended decision by a hearing or other responsible
officer of the Commission and no 30-day waiting period between the issuance of
the Commission's order and its effective date. Applicants consent to the
Division of Corporate Regulation assisting in the preparation of the
Commission's decision and order in this matter, unless the Division opposes the
Transaction covered by this Application or Declaration.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(a) Exhibits:
B-1 Form of Proposed AEP Structure (previously filed on Form SE)
D-1 PUCT Application
D-2 PUCT Order
D-3 PUCO Application
D-4 PUCO Order
D-5 LPSC Application
D-6 LPSC Order (to be filed by amendment)
D-7 FERC Application
D-8 FERC Order (to be filed by amendment)
F Opinion of Counsel (to be filed by amendment)
(b) Financial statements:
Consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2001 and consolidated statements
of income for the period ended June 30, 2001 of AEP, CPL, CSP, OPCo, SWEPCO and
WTU. (Incorporated by reference from AEP's Form 10-Q for the period ended June
30, 2001, File No. 1-3525.)
41
ITEM 7. INFORMATION AS TO ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS
As described in Item 1, the proposed transactions are of a routine and
strictly financial nature in the ordinary course of AEP's business and the
Commission's action in this matter will not constitute any major federal action
significantly affecting the quality of the human environment.
No other federal agency has prepared or is preparing an environmental
impact statement with regard to the proposed transactions.
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Public Utility Holding Company Act of
1935, the undersigned companies have duly caused this statement to be signed on
their behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, INC.
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE CORPORATION
CENTRAL AND SOUTH WEST CORPORATION
CENTRAL POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY
COLUMBUS SOUTHERN POWER COMPANY
OHIO POWER COMPANY
SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY
WEST TEXAS UTILITIES COMPANY
/s/ A.A. Pena
-----------------------------
Treasurer
Dated: October 12, 2001
42
EX-99.D1
3
c22015_ex99-d1.txt
PETITION FOR TIMELY ENTRY OF PRELIMINARY ORDER
DOCKET NO.______________
APPLICATION OF CENTRAL POWER ss. BEFORE THE
AND LIGHT COMPANY, WEST TEXAS ss.
UTILITIES COMPANY, AND ss. PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION
SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER ss.
COMPANY FOR APPROVAL OF ss.
PROPOSED BUSINESS SEPARATION PLAN ss. OF TEXAS
PETITION OF CENTRAL POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY,
WEST TEXAS UTILITIES COMPANY, AND
SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY
AND REQUEST FOR THE TIMELY ENTRY OF A PRELIMINARY ORDER
Central Power and Light Company, West Texas Utilities Company, and
Southwestern Electric Power Company (the Companies) jointly file the attached
Business Separation Plan-Filing Package pursuant to Section 39.051 of the Public
Utility Regulatory Act (PURA) and P.U.C. SUBST. R. 25.342. The Companies seek
approval of the plan by the Public Utility Commission of Texas (Commission) as
well as the more specific relief requested below.
I. THE APPLICANTS
--------------
Each of the Companies is a wholly owned subsidiary of Central and South
West Corporation (CSW), a public utility holding company registered under the
Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935 with utility subsidiaries that
provide electric service to approximately 1.7 million customers in four states.
Central Power and Light Company is headquartered in Corpus Christi, Texas,
and provides electric service in south Texas. West Texas Utilities Company is
headquartered in Abilene, Texas, and provides electric service in west Texas.
Southwestern Electric Power Company is headquartered in Shreveport, Louisiana,
and provides electric service in east Texas and in portions of Louisiana and
Arkansas.
II. DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVES
--------------------------
Philip F. Ricketts Joe N. Pratt
Bracewell & Patterson, L.L.P. Pratt and Grant, P.C.
Suite 2300 Suite 250, One Northpoint Centre
111 Congress Avenue 6836 Austin Center Boulevard
Austin, Texas 78701 Austin, Texas 78731
(512) 472-7800 (512) 794-2100
(512) 472-9123 (FAX) (512) 794-2111 (FAX)
III. SERVICE
-------
Pursuant to P.U.C. PROC. R. 22.74(b), the Companies designate their
authorized representative for purpose of service of pleadings as follows:
Ron Ford
CSW Services, Inc.
Norwest Bank Building
400 West 15th Street, Suite No. 650
Austin, Texas 78701
(512) 481 4564
(512) 481-4588 (FAX)
IV. PERSONS AFFECTED
----------------
All customers and classes of customers of the Companies will be affected by
this filing.
V. JURISDICTION
------------
The Commission has jurisdiction over this filing pursuant to Section 39.051
of PURA.
VI. THE PROPOSED BUSINESS SEPARATION PLAN
-------------------------------------
The proposed business separation plan is set forth in detail in the
attached Business Separation Plan-Filing Package, which includes supporting
testimony.
The plan proposes that full legal entity or structural separation of the
Companies occur in two stages in order to minimize refinancing costs that must
be incurred to address existing contractual requirements related to existing
securities issued by the Companies. The first stage would occur on January 1,
2002, and would last up to six years. By January 1, 2002, separate legal
entities with separate management would be established to conduct energy
delivery, power generation, and retail electric provider businesses. During the
first-stage period, the electric delivery and generation assets, as well as
certain operating employees, will remain with the Companies, although those
assets and
-2-
employees will be managed and controlled by the electric delivery and power
generation businesses. The primary purpose of the Companies after January 1,
2002, will be to hold legal ownership of the electric delivery and generation
assets. All employees and assets needed by the retail electric provider will be
transferred to it by January 1, 2002. No later than January 1, 2008, all assets
and employees of the Companies will have been transferred to the energy delivery
company and power generation company as the existing contractual requirements
that affect the transfer of legal ownership of assets are eliminated through
refinancing in a cost efficient manner. Further details of the Companies' plan
are contained in the testimony of Mark D. Roberson and Wendy D. Hargus that is a
part of this filing.
The plan also requests certain approvals, to the extent the Commission
deems them necessary, for the Companies to continue offering certain services
from September 1, 2000, to January 1, 2002.
VII. REQUEST FOR A PRELIMINARY ORDER
-------------------------------
The Companies believe that the above-described two-stage process complies
with the letter and intent of the industry restructuring provisions of PURA.
However, in the event that the Commission decides to require transfers of
employees and the legal ownership of all assets by January 1, 2002, it will be
necessary for the Companies to immediately begin implementing a number of
federal and other state filings to accomplish such a transfer. If the Companies
first learn of this request in late 2000 or early 2001, when a final order is
issued in this proceeding, it will be very difficult, if not impossible, to
obtain the necessary federal and state approvals for the asset transfers by
January 1, 2002. Accordingly, the Companies respectfully request that the
Commission timely issue a preliminary order in this case which addresses the
issue of whether the Companies' proposed two-step plan complies with PURA.
VIII. PROTECTIVE ORDER
----------------
While no confidential information is being filed in the Business Separation
Plan-Filing Package, the Companies anticipate that during the course of this
proceeding they may be asked to furnish confidential information, the disclosure
of which to third parties would place the Companies at a severe competitive
disadvantage or cause the Companies to violate contractual confidentiality
obligations. Therefore, the Companies may later request that a protective order
be entered in this case.
-3-
IX. NOTICE
------
The Companies propose that notice of this case consist of published
newspaper notice in the service areas of each of the Companies once a week for
two consecutive weeks. The companies further propose that individual notice be
provided to each participant in Project No. 20970; to each intervenor in Docket
No. 19265, the proceeding involving the merger of CSW and American Electric
Power Company; and to each municipality served by the Companies. A copy of a
proposed public notice for newspaper publication is attached as Exhibit 1. The
Companies propose that the individual notice to the above persons and entities
consist of a copy of the proposed public notice sent by electronic mail or first
class mail.
X. REQUESTED COMMISSION ACTIONS
----------------------------
1. The Companies request that the proposed business separation plan be
approved, including any necessary waivers to continue to provide certain
competitive energy services until January 1, 2002.
2. The Companies request that the Commission timely issue a preliminary
order declaring that the Companies' proposed two-stage restructuring plan
complies with PURA and the Commission's rules.
3. The Companies further request that the Commission approve the proposed
form of notice.
-4-
Respectfully submitted,
BRACEWELL & PATTERSON, L.L.P. PRATT AND GRANT, P.C.
Suite 2300 Suite 250, One Northpoint Centre
111 Congress Avenue 6836 Austin Center Boulevard
Austin, Texas 78701 Austin, Texas 78731
(512) 472-7800 (512) 794-2100
(512) 472-9123 (fax) (512) 794-2111 (fax)
By: /s/ Philip F. Ricketts By: /s/ Joe N. Pratt
----------------------------------- ------------------------------
Philip F. Ricketts Joe N. Pratt
State Bar No. 16882500 State Bar No. 16240100
ATTORNEYS FOR APPLICANTS
-5-
EXHIBIT 1
Page 1 of 2
PUBLIC NOTICE
On January 10, 2000, Central Power and Light Company, West Texas Utilities
Company, and Southwestern Electric Power Company (the Companies) filed with the
Public Utility Commission of Texas (the Commission) a business separation plan
as required by Section 39.051 of the Public Utility Regulatory Act (PURA) and
Section 25.342 of the Commission's substantive rules. As required by Section
39.051 of PURA, the plan proposes that each of the companies, subject to certain
actions by other federal and state regulatory authorities, be separated into
three new businesses, one of which will provide transmission and distribution or
electric delivery services to competitive retail electric providers, one of
which will be a competitive retail electric provider, and one of which will
provide competitive wholesale generation services. The plan further provides
that each newly created business will operate independently of each other
pursuant to a code of conduct which will govern transactions between the
businesses and their affiliates, after the introduction of electric competition,
to recognize federal and state code of conduct requirements and appropriate
business practices.
The three new businesses will be managed by three new separate legal
entities which will be created by January 1, 2002, at which time all functions
now provided by the Companies will be separated into the new businesses. All
assets and employees of the Companies will be transferred to the new legal
entities by January 1, 2008.
The plan also contains a proposal for physical separation of the new
businesses, for sharing of information and technology systems, and for
maintenance of separate books and records for the new businesses. It also
provides details regarding the separation of functions and operations among the
new businesses, financial and legal aspects of the proposed business separation,
asset and liability transfers to the new businesses, and the provision of
corporate support services through a separate organization. It also contains a
proposed plan for interim separation of certain services designated by the
Commission as "competitive energy services" on or before September 1, 2000, as
required by Section 39.051(a) of PURA and Section 25.343 of the Commission's
substantive rules.
EXHIBIT I
Page 2 of 2
The plan does not propose any change in the existing rates of the
Companies. On April 1, 2000, the Companies will file an application with the
Commission requesting that rates be set for the new transmission and
distribution utility business which begins operation on January 1, 2002.
This filing has been assigned Docket No. __________________. Persons who
wish to intervene or comment upon these proceedings should notify the
Commission. A request to intervene or for further information should be mailed
directly to the Public Utility Commission of Texas, P. O. Box 13326, Austin,
Texas 78711-3326. Further information may also be obtained by calling the
Commission's Office of Consumer Affairs at (512) 396-7120. Hearing and speech
impaired individuals with text telephones may contact the Commission at (512)
936-7136.
-2-
EX-99.D2
4
c22015_ex99-d2.txt
PRATT AND GRANT LETTER
[PRATT & GRANT LETTERHEAD]
June 8, 2000
Administrative Law Judge Melene R. Dodson
Office of Policy Development
Public Utility Commission of Texas
1701 N. Congress Avenue
Austin, Texas 78701
RE: Docket No, 21953, SOAH Docket No. 473-00-0498 - APPLICATION OF
CENTRAL POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY, SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER
COMPANY AND WEST TEXAS UTILITIES COMPANY FOR APPROVAL OF PROPOSED
BUSINESS SEPARATION PLAN PURSUANT TO 25.342
Dear Judge Dodson:
Attached is the stipulation that resolves the structural business
separation issues in this docket. The stipulation lists the positions of the
parties to this case with the exception of the Louisiana Public Service
Commission (LPSC). The LPSC is no longer actively participating in this docket
because it has opened its own docket to monitor the restructuring efforts in
Texas and other states and take any necessary steps to ensure protection of
Louisiana customers.
Very truly yours,
/s/ Joe N. Pratt
----------------
Joe N. Pratt
cc: All Parties of Record
Attachment
1
SOAH DOCKET NO. 473-00-0498
PUC DOCKET NO. 21953
APPLICATION OF CENTRAL POWER ss.
AND LIGHT COMPANY, ss. STATE OFFICE OF
SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER ss.
COMPANY AND WEST TEXAS ss.
UTILITIES COMPANY FOR ss. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
APPROVAL OF PROPOSED BUSINESS ss.
SEPARATION PLAN PURSUANT TO ss.
25.342 ss.
STIPULATION
-----------
This stipulation is entered between Central Power and Light Company (CPL),
West Texas Utilities Company (WTU) and Southwestern Electric Power Company
(SWEPCO), together referred to as the CSW Companies; the Office of Regulatory
Affairs for the Public Utility Commission of Texas; Office of Public Utility
Counsel and South Texas Electric Cooperative. Parties that have stated they do
not oppose this stipulation are as follows:
o Cities Served by CPL and WTU
o State of Texas
o Texas Industrial Energy Consumers
o Rayburn County Electric Cooperative, Inc. and Magic Valley Electric
Cooperative, Inc.
o Shell Energy Services Co., L.L.C.
o Consumers Union
o Commercial Ratepayer Coalition
o Power Choice, Inc.; Corpus Christi Power & Light, L.C.C.; Hino
Electric Power Company
o Texas Legal Services Center
o Texas Ratepayers' Organization to Save Energy
o New Energy Texas, L.L.C.
Parties whose position on the stipulation is not known are as follows:
o Public Citizen
o Competitive Power Advocates; PG&E Corporation
The signatories to this docket stipulate that the proposed structural
separation plan of Central and South West Corporation (CSW), described below for
the CSW Companies is
1
consistent with the requirements of PURA ss. 39.051 and resolves all disputes
concerning the structural business separation of the CSW Companies. The CSW
Companies will separate their business activities, personnel and assets no later
than January 1, 2002, in accordance with the following plan:
CSW will establish three new first-tier subsidiaries as separate legal
entities: an Energy Delivery Company (EDC), a Power Generation Company (PGC) and
a Retail Electric Provider (REP). Attachment 1 hereto is a diagram reflecting
the restructured entities. CPL, WTU and SWEPCO will take necessary steps
regarding their existing debt to accomplish the transfer of assets. The EDC,
PGC, and REP companies will each issue new debt securities to finance assets
transferred to the new entities. After separation, there will be no
cross-collateralization between entities. As a result, the EDC and its
subsidiaries will only be responsible for debt related to authorized
transmission and distribution (T&D) utility operations, functions and assets.
All issues related to the appropriate capital structures for the EDC and its
subsidiaries will be resolved in the proceedings under PURA ss. 39.201 to
establish rates for T&D services.
REP
The REP will be a separate legal entity with its own assets and
employees, and debt, if any, that will provide retail electric
services in Texas in compliance with all requirements of PURA.
PGC
The PGC will employ generation management employees that will
manage, direct and control generation operations and the wholesale
sale of electricity. Existing wholesale power sales contracts will be
performed by the PGC for CPL and WTU. The PGC will own two separate
legal entity subsidiaries. One will own CPL's generating assets and
will employ the generation employees that are currently employed by
CPL. A separate legal entity will own WTU's generating assets and will
employ the generation employees currently employed by WTU. SWEPCO will
continue to own its generation located in Texas and other states, and
will continue to employ generation operating and maintenance personnel
but those employees will be managed by the PGC. SWEPCO will register
as a power generation company in Texas. Nothing in this plan will
affect SWEPCO's obligations under PURA relating to capacity auctions.
2
EDC
The EDC will employ the management employees that will direct,
manage and control the provision of regulated transmission and
distribution (T&D) utility services in Texas. The EDC will own three
separate legal entities: one each to own the T&D assets currently
owned by CPL, WTU and SWEPCO in Texas and employ the T&D employees
currently employed by CPL, WTU and SWEPCO in Texas. The EDC
subsidiaries for the CPL, WTU and SWEPCO Texas subsidiaries will be
the providers of tariffed T&D utility services and the CCNs currently
issued to CPL, WTU and SWEPCO will be transferred to these
subsidiaries.
CSW maintains that implementation of this plan will require CPL, WTU and
SWEPCO to obtain other regulatory approvals, including approvals from the
Securities and Exchange Commission, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the Arkansas and Louisiana Public Service
Commission. A listing of the filings known to CSW at this time is attached as
Attachment 2. The CSW Companies intend to initiate the filings within 180 days
after receipt of a Texas PUC order approving the form of separation. The
signatories agree to not challenge the form of separation in filings in other
jurisdictions seeking regulatory approval of separation. CPL, WTU and SWEPCO
commit to make a filing with this Commission of any orders issued by any of the
other jurisdictions that modify the plan approved by this Commission and notify
the Commission of any delay in obtaining any approval if that delay will affect
the ability of the Companies to implement the plan effective January 1, 2002.
Parties to this case will have ten days from the filing of any order modifying
the plan to file a response as to whether they believe the modification is
material.
This stipulation addresses and resolves only the issue of whether the
structural business separation of CPL, WTU and SWEPCO complies with PURA. By
agreeing to this stipulation, no party to this case waives, prejudices or
otherwise affects their ability or right to contest other issues or portions in
other dockets, including ratemaking issues and the recovery of restructuring
costs in the PURA ss. 39.201 proceedings.
3
CENTRAL POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY TEXAS RATEPAYERS'
SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY ORGANIZATION TO SAVE ENERGY
WEST TEXAS UTILITIES COMPANY By:
By: /s/ Joe N. Pratt -------------------------------
------------------------------- Title:
Title: Attorney ----------------------------
---------------------------- Date:
Date: June 8, 2000 -----------------------------
-----------------------------
SHELL ENERGY SERVICES CO., L.L.C.
OFFICE OF REGULATORY AFFAIRS
PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS By:
-------------------------------
By: Illegible Title:
------------------------------- ----------------------------
Title: Attorney-Legal Date:
---------------------------- -----------------------------
Date: 5/8/00
-----------------------------
STEERING COMMITTEE OF CITIES
SERVED BY CPL
OFFICE OF PUBLIC UTILITY COUNSEL
By:
By: Illegible -------------------------------
------------------------------- Title:
Title: Assistant Public Counsel ----------------------------
---------------------------- Date:
Date: June 8, 2000 -----------------------------
-----------------------------
COMPETITIVE POWER ADVOCATES
TEXAS LEGAL SERVICES CENTER PG&E CORPORATION
By: By:
------------------------------- -------------------------------
Title: Title:
---------------------------- ----------------------------
Date: Date:
----------------------------- -----------------------------
STATE OF TEXAS
By:
-------------------------------
Title:
----------------------------
Date:
-----------------------------
4
NEW ENERGY TEXAS, L.L.C.
By: TEXAS INDUSTRIAL ENERGY CONSUMERS
-------------------------------
Title: By:
---------------------------- -------------------------------
Date: Title:
----------------------------- ----------------------------
Date:
-----------------------------
LOUISIANA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
By: COMMERCIAL RATEPAYER COALITION
-------------------------------
Title: By:
---------------------------- -------------------------------
Date: Title:
----------------------------- ----------------------------
Date:
-----------------------------
POWER CHOICE, INC.
CORPUS CHRISTI POWER & LIGHT, L.C.C.
HIND ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY PUBLIC CITIZEN TEXAS
By: By:
------------------------------- -------------------------------
Title: Title:
---------------------------- ----------------------------
Date: Date:
----------------------------- -----------------------------
RAYBURN COUNTRY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. CONSUMERS UNION
MID-TEX ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC.
MAGIC VALLEY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. By:
-------------------------------
By: Title:
------------------------------- ----------------------------
Title: Date:
---------------------------- -----------------------------
Date:
-----------------------------
SOUTH TEXAS ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE
By:
-------------------------------
Title:
----------------------------
Date:
-----------------------------
5
CITY OF BROWNSVILLE
By:
-------------------------------
Title:
----------------------------
Date:
-----------------------------
TEX-LA ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE OF TEXAS, INC.
NORTHEAST TEXAS ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC.
By:
-------------------------------
Title:
----------------------------
Date:
-----------------------------
FOWLER ENERGY COMPANY
By:
-------------------------------
Title:
----------------------------
Date:
-----------------------------
6
COMMERCIAL RATEPAYER COALITION
By: CITY OF BROWNSVILLE
-------------------------------
Title: By:
---------------------------- -------------------------------
Date: Title:
----------------------------- ----------------------------
Date:
-----------------------------
PUBLIC CITIZEN TEXAS
By: TEX-LA ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE OF TEXAS, INC.
------------------------------- NORTHEAST TEXAS ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC.
Title:
---------------------------- By:
Date: -------------------------------
----------------------------- Title:
----------------------------
Date:
CONSUMERS UNION -----------------------------
By:
------------------------------- FOWLER ENERGY COMPANY
Title:
---------------------------- By:
Date: -------------------------------
----------------------------- Title:
----------------------------
Date:
SOUTH TEXAS ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE -----------------------------
By: /s/ Joe Campbell
-------------------------------
Title: Attorney for STEC
----------------------------
Date: 6/1/00
-----------------------------
5
Attachment 1
EXHIBIT WGH-2A
Legal Entity Structure
(January 1, 2001)
-------------------
CSW
-------------------
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | | | | |
--------------------- -------------------- -------------------- -------------------- -------------------- | -------------------
ENERGY DELIVERY RETAIL ELECTRIC POWER GENERATION CSWS OTHER EXISTING | SWEPCO
COMPANY PROVIDER COMPANY UNREGULATED +--
(EDC) (REP) (PGC) COMPANIES | -------------------
--------------------- -------------------- -------------------- -------------------- -------------------- | PSO -
| | +--
| --------------------- | -------------------- -------------------
| CPL-EDC | CPL-PGC
+-- +-- (holding company)
| --------------------- | --------------------
| | | |
| | --------------------- | | --------------------
| | CPL-ERCOT | | CPL-PGC
| +-- Transco | +-- (assets)
| | --------------------- | --------------------
| | |
| | --------------------- | --------------------
| | SPE | WTU-PGC
| +-- +--
| --------------------- --------------------
|
| ---------------------
| WTU-EDC
+--
| ---------------------
| |
| | ---------------------
| | WTU/ERCOT
| +-- Transco
| | ---------------------
|
| ---------------------
| SWEPCO-EDC
+--
---------------------
|
| ---------------------
| SWEPCO/SPP
+-- Transco
---------------------
Attachment 2
OTHER REQUIRED FILINGS TO IMPLEMENT SEPARATION PLAN
Other filings required to implement the separation plan include at least the
following:
* SEC Filing Under PUHCA
- Creation of new subsidiaries
- Approval of necessary financings
* FERC Filings:
- Transfer of ownership and control of CPL, WTU AND SWEPCO assets
- OATT tariff revisions - to make CPL, WTU AND SWEPCO EDC subsidiaries
entities charging for transmission service
- Interconnection agreements - new CPL/WTU PGC subsidiaries and SWEPCO
with the new CPL, SWEPCO AND WTU EDC subsidiaries
- Network transmission agreements and network operating agreements for
PGC, CPL/WTU PGC subsidiaries and SWEPCO with CPL, WTU and SWEPCO EDC
subsidiaries
- Service agreements between REP AND CPL/WTU/SWEPCO EDC subsidiaries
- Revisions to CSW operating agreement - creation of agency relationship
for PGC to manage generation assets
- Management agreement for EDC - creation of relationship for EDC to
manage T&D assets
- Revisions to CSW transmission coordination agreement - to reflect new
management and asset relationships
* Nuclear Regulatory Commission - transfer of STP license to CPL sub of PGC
* APSC or LPSC - Approval of separation of Texas T&D Assets
SOAH DOCKET NO. 473-00-0498
P.U.C. DOCKET NO. 21953
APPLICATION OF CENTRAL POWER ss. PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION
AND LIGHT COMPANY, ss.
SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER ss. OF TEXAS
COMPANY AND WEST TEXAS ss.
UTILITIES COMPANY FOR ss.
APPROVAL OF PROPOSED BUSINESS ss.
SEPARATION PLAN PURSUANT TO ss.
25.342 ss.
INTERIM ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION AND SETTLEMENT REGARDING
APPROVAL OF BUSINESS SEPARATION PLAN
On June 8, 2000, Central Power and Light Company (CPL), Southwestern
Electric Power Company (SWEPCO), and West Texas Utilities Company (WTU),
(collectively referred to as CSW), the Office of Regulatory Affairs (ORA) of the
Public Utility Commission of Texas, the Office of Public Utility Counsel (OPC),
and South Texas Electric Cooperative filed with the Public Utility Commission of
Texas (Commission) a request for approval of a stipulation and settlement
regarding the application for approval of CSW's business separation plan
pursuant to P.U.C. SUBST. R. 25.342. All of the parties to the proceeding either
support the stipulation, have not expressed a position on the matter, or, in the
case of the Louisiana Public Service Commission, have withdrawn ftom the case.
The principal issue in this proceeding is whether the business separation
plan establishes separate legal entities to carry out various functions in the
restructured electric market. The Commission concludes that CSW's proposed plan
would create legally distinct entities and is consistent with PURA ss. 39.051.
I. BACKGROUND
On January 10, 2000, CSW filed its application for approval of its business
separation plan pursuant to P.U.C. SUBST. R. 25.342. In its initial application,
CSW proposed a two-stage separation of the companies in order to minimize
refinancing costs. During the first-stage period, beginning January 1, 2002, the
electric delivery and generation assets, as well as certain
PUC DOCKET NO. 21953 Interim Order Page 2 of 3
operating employees, would remain with the existing utility companies, although
those assets and employees would be managed and controlled by an energy delivery
company (EDC) and power generation company (PGC). CSW proposed to transfer all
assets and employees of the existing utility companies to the EDC and PGC no
later than January 1, 2008.
As established in the Order Memorializing Pre-hearing Conference and
Clarifying Nature of Referral to SOAH, issued on February 16, 2000, the scope of
the expedited hearing before the Commission in this docket is "whether the
proposed plan creates a functional separation, as opposed to creating legally
distinct entities, and if such functional separation fulfills the requirements
of PURA." At the hearing conducted in this docket on March 16, 2000, the
Commission determined that the proposed corporate structure was not appropriate,
but deferred a final decision to allow CSW to amend its business separation
plan. The parties agreed to file an agreed proposed interim order on the
business separation plan on June 1, 2000. On June 5, an order was issued
granting CSW's motion for a one-week delay until June 8, 2000. CSW filed a
revised plan to create separate legal entities for the power generation, energy
delivery, and retail sales functions.
II. ORDERING PARAGRAPHS
Consistent with the stipulation and settlement, the Commission:
1) Admits into evidence the Supplemental Testimonies of Mark D. Roberson and
Wendy G. Hargus, filed May 15, 2000, and the Stipulation, filed June 8,
2000 for the limited purpose of establishing pertinent facts justifying the
interim relief granted in this Order;
2) Finds that CSW's proposed plan does not create a "functional separation as
opposed to creating legally distinct entities;"
3) Finds that CSW's proposed plan is consistent with PURA ss. 39.051;
4) Finds that the settlement in this docket is in the public interest;
PUC DOCKET NO. 21953 Interim Order Page 3 of 3
5) Finds that there is no need for further hearings before the Commission in
this docket on the question of whether CSW's proposed plan creates a
functional separation, as opposed to creating legally distinct entities;
and
6) Finds that issues related to CSW's business separation plan that are not
addressed by the settlement, including, but not limited to issues relating
to CSW's code of conduct, ratemaking issues, and/or the recovery of
restructuring costs, may be considered in the proceeding to review CSW's
proposed tariffs for its transmission and distribution utility filed on
March 31, 2000 as Dockets No. 22352 (CPL), 22353 (SWEPCO), and 22354 (WTU).
SIGNED AT AUSTIN, TEXAS the 7th day of July, 2000.
PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS
/s/ Pat Wood, III
----------------------------------
PAT WOOD, III, CHAIRMAN
/s/ Judy Walsh
----------------------------------
JUDY WALSH, COMMISSIONER
/s/ Brett A. Perlman
----------------------------------
BRETT A. PERLMAN, COMMISSIONER
EX-99.D3
5
c22015_ex99-d3.txt
APPLICATIONS FOR APPROVAL
BEFORE
THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF OHIO
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF )
COLUMBUS SOUTHERN POWER COMPANY FOR )
APPROVAL OF ELECTRIC TRANSITION PLAN AND ) CASE NO. 99- ___-EL-ETP
APPLICATION FOR RECEIPT OF TRANSITION )
REVENUES )
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF )
OHIO POWER COMPANY FOR )
APPROVAL OF ELECTRIC TRANSITION PLAN )
AND APPLICATION FOR RECEIPT OF ) CASE NO. 99- ___-EL-ETP
TRANSITION REVENUES )
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
APPLICATIONS OF COLUMBUS SOUTHERN POWER COMPANY AND OHIO POWER
COMPANY FOR APPROVAL OF ELECTRIC TRANSITION PLANS AND
APPLICATIONS FOR RECEIPT OF TRANSITION REVENUES
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Edward J. Brady, Esq.
Kevin F. Duffy, Esq.
Marvin I. Resnik, Esq.
Trial Attorney
American Electric Power Service Corporation
1 Riverside Plaza
Columbus, Ohio 43215
(614) 223-1606
Fax: (614) 223-1687
Email: miresnik@aep.com
Daniel R. Conway, Esq.
Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur
41 South High Street
Columbus, Ohio 43215
(614) 227-2270
Fax: (614) 227-2100
Email: dconway@porterwright.com
Attorneys for Columbus Southern Power Company
and Ohio Power Company
BEFORE
THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF OHIO
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF )
COLUMBUS SOUTHERN POWER COMPANY FOR )
APPROVAL OF ELECTRIC TRANSITION PLAN AND ) CASE NO. 99- ___-EL-ETP
APPLICATION FOR RECEIPT OF TRANSITION )
REVENUES
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF )
OHIO POWER COMPANY FOR )
APPROVAL OF ELECTRIC TRANSITION PLAN )
AND APPLICATION FOR RECEIPT OF ) CASE NO. 99- ___-EL-ETP
TRANSITION REVENUES )
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
APPLICATIONS OF COLUMBUS SOUTHERN POWER COMPANY AND OHIO
POWER COMPANY FOR APPROVAL OF ELECTRIC TRANSITION PLANS AND
APPLICATIONS FOR RECEIPT OF TRANSITION REVENUES
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. INTRODUCTION
Ohio Power Company ("OPCO") and Columbus Southern Power Company ("CSP")
(collectively referred to herein as the "Companies") are "electric utilities" as
defined by ss. 4928.01(A)(11), Ohio Rev. Code, supplying "retail electric
service," as defined in ss. 4928.01(A)(27). Section 4928.31(A) requires each
electric utility to file with the Commission a plan for the utility's provision
of retail electric service during the transition to a competitive market, i.e.,
during "the market development period."
Section 4928.31(A) describes the various elements that such a "Transition
Plan" must include and others that it may include. Pursuant to ss. 4928.06(A),
the Commission promulgated
rules for Transition Plans and Consumer Education Plans on November 30, 1999, in
Case No. 99-1141-EL-ORD.(1)
II. TRANSITION PLAN
Accordingly, CSP and OPCO hereby submit their Transition Plan filings under
ss. 4928.31(A). As further explained below, the Companies' Transition Plans
address all of the five elements that ss. 4928.31(A) requires: (1) a rate
unbundling plan; (2) a corporate separation plan; (3) plans to address
operational support systems and other technical implementation issues; (4) an
employee assistance plan; and (5) a consumer education plan. In addition to
those required elements, the Transition Plans address other elements that ss.
4928.31(A) permits, but does not require: (1) tariff terms and conditions to
address matters necessary to accommodate electric restructuring; (2) an
application for the opportunity to receive transition revenues; and (3) a plan
for the independent operation of the Companies' transmission facilities.
Finally, the Transition Plans include a shopping incentive plan, pursuant to
Rule 4901:1-20-03(C)(3). For purposes of providing a clear understanding of
their filings, the Companies have addressed all of the requirements contained in
the Commission's rules.
A. ELEMENTS OF THE TRANSITION PLAN
1. RATE UNBUNDLING PLAN (PART A)
CSP and OPCO will conduct their rate unbundling consistent with ss.
4928.31(A)(1), ss. 4928.34(A)(1) to (7), and Rule 4901:1-20-03, Ohio
Administrative Code, Appendix A. Beginning on the starting date of competitive
retail electric service, there will be two tariff offerings: the Standard Tariff
and the Open Access Distribution Tariff. The first tariff applies to
----------
(1) On December 29, 1999, CSP and OPCO jointly filed an Application for
Rehearing and sought clarification of several rules included in the Commission's
November 30, 1999 Order.
2
those customers who do not choose an alternative electric supplier and continue
to take energy-related services from either of the distribution companies. The
second tariff applies to those customers who choose an alternative electric
supplier. The rate schedules for the Standard Tariff detail the generation,
transmission and distribution components of existing rates and include the
following riders: Universal Service Fund, Energy Efficiency Fund, KWH Tax, Gross
Receipts Tax Credit, Property Tax Credit, Municipal Income Tax, Franchise Tax
and Regulatory Asset Charge. The riders included in the Open Access Distribution
Tariff are the same except that there is an additional Transition Charge, but no
Property Tax Credit. The tariffs and charges are described in detail in the
testimony of Witnesses Thomas, Roush, and Forrester.
2. CORPORATE SEPARATION PLAN (PART B)
CSP and OPCO will implement and operate under a Corporate Separation Plan
consistent with ss. 4928.31(A)(2) and ss. 4928.17. Since the Code of Conduct,
adopted by the Commission under Rule 4901:1-20-16(G)(4), governs relationships
between the corporate entities established pursuant to the Corporate Separation
Plan, the Code of Conduct will become effective upon implementation of the
Corporate Separation Plan. In addition, the Companies will comply with ss.
4928.17(A)(3) as of January 1, 2000.
As part of the Corporate Separation Plan, included as Part B, each Company
plans to establish a new transmission subsidiary and a new distribution
subsidiary, the details of which are set forth in Part B to this Application,
and explained in the testimony of Witnesses Forrester, Knorr and Pena. These new
distribution subsidiaries will own and operate all of the distribution assets
currently owned by CSP and OPCO, respectively. While the new transmission
subsidiaries will own the transmission assets, currently owned by CSP and OPCO,
respectively, those assets will be operated in a manner described in Witness
Baker's testimony. The generation assets will remain with CSP and OPCO. The new
distribution and transmission
3
subsidiaries will be public utilities, as defined in ss.ss. 4905.02 and 03. The
plan will be implemented with appropriate recognition of the substantial
overlapping financial arrangements that currently exist. The goal is to separate
each operating company in an orderly and economically efficient manner, and to
minimize additional transition costs that result from prematurely unwinding the
existing financial arrangements. Because CSP's and OPCO's customers will
continue to receive the same level of service, the transaction will be
transparent to them. CSP and OPCO request that the Commission approve their
Corporate Separation Plan at the same time the Commission approves their
Transition Plans.
While the Companies believe that Am. Sub. S.B. No. 3 provides the
Commission with ample statutory authority by which to approve the proposed
Corporate Separation Plan as filed, the Commission may have statutory authority
under ss. 4905.48 (B) and (C) and ss. 4905.63(2), to approve the transfer of
assets from CSP and OPCO to their transmission and distribution subsidiaries.(3)
To the extent the Commission determines to assert jurisdiction over the proposed
transactions based on ss. 4905.48 or ss. 4905.63, the Companies urge the
Commission to 1) determine that they have met the necessary filing requirements
under such statutory provisions
----------
(2) While the two subsidiaries of each Company are not yet public
utilities, they will be upon completion of the transaction. Thus, to the extent
that the Commission determines that ss. 4905.63, provides jurisdiction to review
the transfer of assets that the Companies' Corporate Separations Plans
contemplate, the Companies also request the appropriate approvals which that
statutory provision contemplates.
(3) No abandonment of service will occur as a result of the proposed
transactions. Therefore, Commission review of the proposed transfer of assets
under ss. 4905.20 and ss. 4905.21 (known as the "Miller Act"), is not necessary
and would be inconsistent with the Commission's treatment of similar
applications. SEE, WESTERN UNION CORP, Case No. 89-649-TP-ABN (Aug. 6, 1998),
COLUMBIA Gas, Case No. 90-754-GA-ATR (Oct. 25, 1990), COLUMBIA GAS, Case No.
90-1561-GA-ATR (Dec. 13, 1980), and NETWORK ONE, Case No. 97-1534-CT-ATR (Aug.
6, 1998). In the event the Commission determines, nevertheless, to assert Miller
Act jurisdiction over the proposed transactions, the Companies urge the
Commission to conduct its review within the context of the Transition Plan
proceedings and to notify the Companies promptly if the Commission requires any
additional information to complete its review. In addition, the Companies
request that, if the Miller Act is applied, the Commission find that the notice
of these Applications is sufficient to satisfy the notice requirements under the
Miller Act.
4
through their pending request for approval of their Transition Plans filed in
these proceedings, 2) utilize the information provided through testimony and
exhibits in the Transition Plan filings as support for approval, and 3) conduct
any further review, including a public hearing if necessary, and grant approval
within the context of these proceedings.
The testimony submitted in support of the Companies' Transition Plans
includes extensive information regarding the proposed transactions. If
jurisdiction exists under ss. 4905.48 (B) and (C), the information included in
the Transition Plan filings fully supports an approval of the transfer of assets
under that section. However, should the Commission require any additional
information, CSP and OPCO recommend that the Commission seek such information
during the course of its review of the Transition Plan filings. Therefore, to
the extent the Commission exercises jurisdiction under ss. 4905.48(B) and (C),
it should proceed with review and grant approval of the transactions in tandem
with its review and approval of the Transition Plans.
3. PLAN(S) TO ADDRESS OPERATIONAL SUPPORT SYSTEMS AND OTHER
TECHNICAL IMPLEMENTATION ISSUES (PART C)
CSP and OPCO will implement a plan or plans to address operational support
systems and other technical implementation issues pertaining to competitive
retail electric service. The plan(s) will be consistent with ss. 4928.31(A)(3)
and Rule 4901:1-20-03, Appendix B. Those plans are presented in Part C to the
Transition Plan filings. Included in that Part is a project timeline which
demonstrates that the Companies have already completed a number of activities in
an effort to implement operational support systems. The plans are further
described in Witness Laine's testimony.
4. EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PLAN (PART D)
CSP and OPCO have plans for providing severance, retraining, early
retirement, retention, outplacement, and other assistance for their employees.
The Companies, however, at
5
this time, have not identified any employee who will be affected by electric
utility restructuring under Chapter 4928. Therefore, the Companies are not
requesting recovery, at this time, of any Employee Assistance Plan costs as part
of their Application to Receive Transition Revenue. The Companies' Employee
Assistance Plans, which are consistent with ss. 4928.31(A)(4), and Rule
4901:1-20-03, Appendix C, are described in Witness Ackerman's testimony.
5. CONSUMER EDUCATION PLAN (PART E)
CSP and OPCO, working with the state's other electric utilities through the
Ohio Electric Utility Institute, will implement a statewide and coordinated
local-territory campaign plan by which they will provide consumer education on
electric restructuring under Chapter 4928. Consistent with ss. 4928.31(A)(5) and
ss. 4928.42, and the Commission-ordered consumer education plan set forth in
Attachment II of the Commission's November 30, 1999, Order, CSP's and OPCO's
Consumer Education Plans will be supervised by the Commission's Staff. The
Consumer Education Plans are included in Part E. Additional information
regarding the plans is included in Witness Forrester's testimony.
B. COMPONENTS OF A TRANSITION PLAN THAT SECTION 4928.31(A) PERMITS
1. TARIFF TERMS AND CONDITIONS TO ADDRESS MATTERS NECESSARY TO
ACCOMMODATE ELECTRIC RESTRUCTURING
Section 4928.31(A) permits an electric utility to include in its Transition
Plan tariff terms and conditions to address matters necessary to accommodate
electric restructuring, including reasonable requirements for changing suppliers
and the length of commitment by a customer for service. As set forth in Part A,
CSP's and OPCO's plans include a tariff for customers who continue to take
energy-related services from the Companies and a distribution-only tariff that
will apply to any customer who switches to an alternative provider. The tariffs
are explained in Witness Thomas's testimony.
6
2. APPLICATION FOR OPPORTUNITY TO RECEIVE TRANSITION REVENUES (PART F)
CSP and OPCO hereby apply for an opportunity to receive transition revenues
as authorized under ss.ss. 4928.31 to 4928.40. They request recovery of stranded
generation costs for the difference between the lower estimated market price of
electric energy and the unbundled generation rate of each current applicable
rate schedule. The charge for such recovery for each Company will be on a
(cent)/KWH basis, as shown on Schedule UNB-2 of the Application. Such costs are
to be recovered over the five-year transition period. Further, the Companies
request recovery, over a 10-year period, of generation-related regulatory
assets, including new regulatory assets resulting from compliance with electric
industry restructuring obligations. The transition recovery mechanism is
consistent with ss.ss. 4928.31 to 4928.40 and Rule 4901:1-20-03, Appendix D. CSP
requests recovery of $363,199,000, attributed to existing and new regulatory
assets. OPCO requests recovery of $610,786,000 attributed to existing and new
regulatory assets. The recovery amounts are reflected in Witness Roush's
testimony. An overview of the transition revenue recovery mechanism is provided
in Witness Forrester's testimony.
3. PLAN FOR THE INDEPENDENT OPERATION OF TRANSMISSION FACILITIES (PART G)
The Companies will also implement a plan for the independent operation of
their transmission facilities. This component of the Transition Plans will be
consistent with ss. 4928.12 and ss. 4928.34(A)(13), and Rule 4901:1-20-17, to
the extent that such sections and rule are not preempted by federal law, do not
improperly interfere with interstate commerce, or are otherwise
7
not beyond the Commission's statutory authority.(4) CSP and OPCO intend to
participate in the Alliance RTO, pending FERC approval. The Companies anticipate
that the Alliance RTO will be operational during 2001. The plan is set forth in
Part G and supported by Witness Baker.
4. SHOPPING INCENTIVE (PART H)
The shopping incentives being proposed by each of the Companies are set
forth in Part H, which is sponsored by Witness Forrester. The shopping
incentives, or "the prices to compare," represent the lower of the market price
or the unbundled generation rates of the current tariff for each Company.
Company Witness Forrester explains in his testimony why the shopping incentive
is not greater than the lower of the market price or the unbundled generation
rate and why the Companies are not proposing that the incentive be increased in
the second and third years.
C. REQUEST FOR ACCOUNTING AUTHORITY TO ESTABLISH NEW REGULATORY ASSETS
CSP and OPCO propose to establish new regulatory assets in these Transition
Plan proceedings. The new regulatory assets for both Companies include: 1) the
cost resulting from SFAS 106 (Post-Retirement Benefits) Transition Obligation;
2) the cost mandated by Am. Sub. S. B. No. 3 for consumer education on electric
restructuring; 3) the cost of the development and operation of the operational
support systems that the electric distribution service provider must have to
allow electric consumers to choose their supplier of electric generation
service; and 4) the cost of CSP and OPCO's Transition Plan filings including the
public notice required and the necessary hearings on both Companies' transition
filings. As set forth in Part F, these other
----------
(4) By submitting an Independent Transmission Plan, the Companies do not
waive the arguments made in the Commission's Transition Plan rulemaking
proceeding, in Case No. 99-1141-EL-ORD, and their Application for Rehearing
filed on December 29, 1999, regarding the limitations of the Commission's
jurisdiction to review and approve the Plan.
8
projected transition costs total $73,684,000 for CSP, and $90,260,000 for OPCO.
These amounts are supported by Witnesses Forrester, McCoy, and Laine.
The Companies request that the Commission grant the necessary financial
accounting approvals to permit CSP and OPCO to treat these transition costs as
Ohio retail jurisdictional regulatory assets and confirm that the costs will be
recovered in regulated rates and reflected as such in their general purpose
financial statements. Without such approval and confirmation, the Companies
would be required, under financial accounting rules promulgated by the Financial
Accounting Standards Board, to write-off those regulatory assets to expense,
thereby reducing net income and retained earnings. Thus, the Companies request
specific approval in a Commission Order of the amount of generation-related,
Ohio retail jurisdictional regulatory assets and the timing of their recovery in
accordance with the Transition Cost Recovery Plan included in the Companies'
filing.
D. CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
On this same date, CSP and OPCO are filing a Motion for Protective Order to
maintain the confidentiality of certain information, identified in that motion,
that the Companies deem competitively sensitive and proprietary. The information
has been redacted from the filings. In light of the pending public records
request of Mr. Dave Rinebolt, on behalf of Ohio Partners for Affordable Energy,
for copies of FirstEnergy Corp.'s documents filed under seal with its transition
plan, the Companies will not be filing any of the confidential information with
the Commission at this time. When the issues regarding the proprietary
information that Mr. Rinebolt's public records request raises are finally
resolved in a satisfactory manner, the Companies will submit their confidential
information under seal.
9
CSP and OPCO intend to provide the confidential information to intervening
parties. However, the information will only be provided to the parties subject
to mutually agreeable protective arrangements, which address the difficult
issues inherent in providing highly competitive confidential information to
competitors. The basis for the Companies' entitlement to maintain the
confidentiality of their information is more fully explained in the Motion for
Protective Order.
E. MISCELLANEOUS
Attached to this Application is the Companies' witness list which briefly
describes the subject matter addressed in each of the witnesses' testimony
submitted in support of the Companies' Transition Plans and requests for
transition revenues. Concurrent with this filing, the Companies have each
provided notice of their Transition Plan filings to all parties to their most
recent electric rate cases and conjunctive electric service cases. In addition,
a combined public notice of these Applications will be made in accordance with
Rule 4901:1-20-05. Copies of these notices are attached as part of this
Application.
F. CONCLUSION
The exhibits filed with these Applications contain the support necessary
for the Commission to make the findings required by ss. 4928.34. Therefore, the
Companies respectfully request that the Commission approve the Transition Plans
as filed and as described in the testimony in support of the Applications,
authorize the Companies to collect transition revenues as requested, approve the
tariffs filed with the Applications, authorize the accounting changes requested
in the Applications, and make any other necessary determinations to meet its
statutory obligations under Chapter 4928. Further, the Companies request that,
if the Commission
10
determines that it cannot approve the Transition Plans as filed, the Commission
hold a hearing on that portion of the Transition Plans subject to question.
Respectfully submitted,
-------------------------------------
Edward J. Brady, Esq.
Kevin F. Duffy, Esq.
Marvin I. Resnik, Esq.
Trial Attorney
American Electric Power Service
Corporation
1 Riverside Plaza
Columbus, Ohio 43215
(614) 223-1606
Fax: (614) 223-1687
Email: miresnik@aep.com
Daniel R. Conway, Esq.
Porter Wright Morris & Arthur
41 South High Street
Columbus, Ohio 43215-6194
(614) 227-2270
Fax: (614) 227-2100
Email: dconway@porterwright.com
Attorneys for Columbus Southern Power
Company and Ohio Power Company
11
EX-99.D4
6
c22015_ex99-d4.txt
SUMMARY
Exhibit 99.D-4
SUMMARY OF
THE COMMISSION'S OPINION AND ORDER OF SEPTEMBER 28, 2000
IN THE COLUMBUS SOUTHERN POWER COMPANY AND OHIO POWER COMPANY
ELECTRIC TRANSITION PLAN CASES
CASE NOS. 99-1729-EL-ETP AND 99-1730-EL-ETP
On June 22, 1999, the Ohio General Assembly passed legislation requiring
the restructuring of the electric utility industry and providing for retail
competition with regard to the generation component of electric service (Amended
Substitute Senate Bill No. 3 of the 123rd General Assembly). Governor Bob Taft
signed this legislation (SB 3) on July 6, 1999, and most provisions of SB 3
became effective on October 5, 1999. Section 4928.31, Revised Code, requires
each electric utility to file with the Commission a transition plan for the
company's provision of retail electric service in the state of Ohio.
On December 30, 1999, Columbus Southern Power Company and Ohio Power
Company (hereinafter jointly referred to as "AEP") filed transition plans, as
well as requests for receipt of transition revenues. On May 8, 2000, a
stipulation and recommendation on AEP's transition plans, was filed on behalf of
the following 23 parties:
AEP,
Appalachian People's Action Coalition,
Association for Hospitals and Health Systems,
also d/b/a the Ohio Hospital Association,
Buckeye Power, Inc.,
Columbia Energy Services Corporation,
Columbia Energy Power Marketing Corporation,
Enron Energy Services, Inc.,
Industrial Energy Users-Ohio,
The Kroger Company,
Mid-Atlantic Power Supply Association,
National Energy Marketers Association,
NewEnergy Midwest, LLC,
Ohio Consumers' Counsel,
Ohio Council of Retail Merchants,
Ohio Department of Development,
Ohio Manufacturers' Association,
Ohio Partners for Affordable Energy,
Ohio Rural Electric Cooperatives, Inc.
Peco Energy Company, d/b/a Exelon Energy,
Public Utilities Commission staff,
Strategic Energy L.L.P.,
WPS Energy Services, Inc., and
WSOS Community Action Commission, Inc.
Dynegy, Inc. and Ohio Environmental Council have stated that they do not
oppose the May 8, 2000 stipulation. The evidentiary hearings were held on May 9,
31, and June 7, 8, and 12, 2000. Local public hearings were held on June 5,
2000, in East Liverpool, Ohio and on June 22, 2000, in Columbus, Ohio. On June
19, 2000, AEP and Ameritech New Media, Inc. filed a stipulation to resolve their
differences.
99-1729-EL-ETP and 99-1730-EL-ETP -ii-
In the opinion and order, the Commission is approving the agreements
submitted by the various parties listed above with certain modifications
regarding the load shaping service, the operational support plan, and the
employee assistance plan. The Commission defers a ruling upon the independent
transmission plan, as allowed by Section 4928.34(A)(13), Revised Code. The
Commission found that the terms of the agreements, considered in their totality,
advance the public interest and provides substantial benefits to all customer
classes. The stipulations provide for extended rate freezes, flexibility for
larger contract customers not otherwise available, and defined transition
periods for AEP. The stipulations, among other things:
(1) Provide a five-percent reduction of AEP's generation component for
residential rate schedules;
(2) Create shopping credits that facilitate the development of the retail
marketplace;
(3) Commit AEP to absorb certain costs associated with transitioning to a
competitive marketplace;
(4) Commit AEP to provide certain types of assistance to transmission
users for a period of time;
(5) Commit AEP to provide funds (up to $10 million) for reimbursement of
certain transmission costs of suppliers and customers;
(6) Commit AEP to develop and propose resolutions of reciprocity and
interface/seams issues;
(7) Provide a credit to suppliers for consolidated billing; and
(8) Provide relief from certain charges for certain customers that switch
suppliers between 2006 and 2007.
The Commission also determined that AEP's transition plan filings, as
amended by the settlement agreements and subject to the conclusions in the
decision, are in compliance with the statutory requirements contained in SB 3.
By approving the stipulations as set forth in this decision, the Commission also
authorizes certain accounting treatments for AEP to create the necessary
regulatory assets, defer costs, and recover those costs through a regulatory
transition charge.
THIS SUMMARY WAS PREPARED TO PROVIDE A BRIEF STATEMENT OF THE COMMISSION'S
ACTION IN THESE CASES. IT IS NOT PART OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION AND DOES NOT
SUPERSEDE THE FULL TEXT OF THE COMMISSION'S OPINION AND ORDER.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
APPEARANCES:..................................................................1
OPINION: .....................................................................3
I. SUMMARY OF THESE PROCEEDINGS.............................................3
II. SUMMARY OF THE STIPULATIONS .............................................6
III. OPPOSITION TO THE TRANSITION PLANS AND STIPULATIONS AND REVIEW
OF SECTION 4928.34, REVISED CODE........................................9
A. Unbundling Plan and Transition Costs...............................10
1. MDP Shopping Incentives....................................11
2. Post-MDP Incentive for OP Residential Customers .......... 14
3. Commission's Future Ability to Respond to the Market ..... 15
4. Generation Transition Charges and Stranded Generation
Benefits .............................................. 15
5. Frozen Generation Rates ...................................18
6. Distribution Rate Freeze...................................19
7. USF Rider and EERLF Rider..................................20
8. Load Shaping Service.......................................20
9. Remaining Concerns with the Unbundling Plan and
Transition Costs .......................................21
B. Corporate Separation Plan .........................................23
C. OSP ...............................................................25
1. Supplier Consolidated Billing Credit ......................26
2. Residential Customer Switching/Minimum Stay Requirement ...28
3. Switching Fee and Alternative Metering Credit .............29
4. Supplier Registration Requirements.........................30
5. Overall OSP Conclusion ....................................31
D. Employee Assistance Plan (EAP) ....................................32
E. Consumer Education Plan ...........................................33
F. Independent Transmission Plan .....................................34
G. Section 4928.34(A)(14), Revised Code ..............................37
H. Accounting Authority .... .........................................37
IV. THREE-PART TEST FOR EVALUATING STIPULATIONS.............................38
V. GROSS RECEIPTS/EXCISE TAX ISSUE.........................................40
VI. FILED MOTIONS ..........................................................45
A. Motions to Reject Transition Plans as Inadequate ..................45
B. OCTA Motion to Intervene and Subsequent Conditional Withdrawal ....45
C. Motion for Protective Order .......................................45
D. Motion for Compliance Tariff Review Process .......................46
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: ....................................47
ORDER: ......................................................................48
BEFORE
THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF OHIO
In the Matter of the Applications of )
Columbus Southern Power Company and )
Ohio Power Company for Approval of ) Case Nos. 99-1729-EL-ETP
Their Electric Transition Plans and for ) 99-1730-EL-ETP
Receipt of Transition Revenues )
OPINION AND ORDER
The Commission, coming now to consider the stipulations, testimony, and
other evidence presented in these proceedings, hereby issues its Opinion and
Order.
APPEARANCES:
------------
Marvin I. Resnick, Edward J. Brady, and Kevin F. Duffy, American Electric
Power Service Corporation, One Riverside Plaza, Columbus, Ohio 43215, and
Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur, LLP, by Daniel R. Conway and Mary Kay Fenlon,
41 South High Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215-6194, on behalf of Columbus Southern
Power Company and Ohio Power Company.
Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General of the State of Ohio, by Duane W.
Luckey, Section Chief, and Thomas W. McNamee and Stephen A. Reilly, Assistant
Attorneys General, Public Utilities Section, 180 East Broad Street, 9th Floor,
Columbus, Ohio 43215-3793, on behalf of the staff of the Public Utilities
Commission of Ohio.
Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General of the State of Ohio, by Jodi M.
Elsass-Locker, Assistant Attorney General, 77 South High Street, 29th Floor,
Columbus, Ohio 43215, and Maureen R. Grady, 369 South Roosevelt Avenue,
Columbus, Ohio 43209, on Behalf of the Ohio Department of Development.
Robert S. Tongren, Ohio Consumers' Counsel, and Colleen L. Mooney, Terry L.
Etter, Ann M. Hotz, and Dirken D. Winkler, Assistant Consumers' Counsel, 10 West
Broad Street, Suite 1800, Columbus, Ohio 43215-3485, on behalf of the
residential customers of Columbus Southern Power Company and Ohio Power Company.
McNees, Wallace & Nurick, by Samuel C. Randazzo, Gretchen J. Hummel, and
Kimberly J. Wile, Fifth Third Center, 21 East State Street, Suite 1700,
Columbus, Ohio 43215-4228, on behalf of Industrial Energy Users-Ohio.
Boehm, Kurtz & Lowry, by Michael L. Kurtz, 2110 CBLD Center, 36 East
Seventh Street, Cincinnati, Ohio 45202, on behalf of The Kroger Company.
Chester, Willcox & Saxbe LLP, by John W. Bentine and Jeffrey L. Small, 17
South High Street, Suite 900, Columbus, Ohio 43215, and William T. Zigli and
Ivan L. Henderson, 601 Lakeside Avenue, Room 106, Cleveland, Ohio 44144, and
Climaco, Lefkowitz, Peca, Wilcox & Garfoli Co. LPA, by Anthony J. Garfoli, Joe
Hegedus, and Scott Simpkins, on behalf of the city of Cleveland.
99-1729-EL-ETP and 99-1730-EL-ETP -2-
Chester, Willcox & Saxbe LLP, by John W. Bentine and Jeffrey L. Small, 17
South High Street, Suite 900, Columbus, Ohio 43215, on behalf of the Ohio
Council of Retail Merchants and American Municipal Power-Ohio, Inc.
Craig G. Goodman, 3333 K Street, NW, Suite 425, Washington D.C. 20007, on
behalf of The National Energy Marketers Association.
Calfee, Halter & Griswold LLP, by Kevin M. Sullivan, Richard J. Mattera,
and Peter A. Rosato, 1400 McDonald Investment Center, 800 Superior Avenue,
Cleveland, Ohio 44114, on behalf of Ameritech New Media, Inc.
William M. Ondrey Gruber, 2714 Leighton Road, Shaker Heights, Ohio 44120,
and Vicki L. Deisner, 1207 Grandview Avenue, Room 201, Columbus, Ohio
43212-3449, on behalf of Ohio Environmental Council.
David C. Rinebolt, 337 South Main Street, 4th Floor, Suite 5, Findlay, Ohio
45840, on behalf of Ohio Partners for Affordable Energy.
Ohio State Legal Services Association, by Michael R. Smalz, 861 North High
Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, on behalf of the Appalachian People's Action
Coalition.
Ellis Jacobs, 333 West First Street, Suite 500, Dayton, Ohio 45402, on
behalf of the WSOS Community Action Commission, Inc.
Bricker & Eckler LLP, by Sally W. Bloomfield, Elizabeth H. Watts, and Amy
Straker Bartemes, 100 South Third Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215-4291, on behalf
of Mid-Atlantic Power Supply Association, Columbia Energy Services Corporation,
Columbia Energy Power Marketing Corporation, and Ohio Manufacturers'
Association.
Bricker & Eckler LLP, by Sally W. Bloomfield, Elizabeth H. Watts, and Amy
Straker Bartemes, 100 South Third Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215-4291, and David
Dulick, 2600 Monroe Boulevard, Norristown, Pennsylvania 19403, on behalf of Peco
Energy d/b/a Exelon Energy.
Bricker & Eckler LLP, by Sally W. Bloomfield, Elizabeth H. Watts, and Amy
Straker Bartemes, 100 South Third Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215-4291, and Wanda
M. Schiller, Two Gateway Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15222, on behalf of
Strategic Energy L.L.C.
Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP, by Paul F. Forshay, Keith McCrea, James M.
Bushee, David A. Codevilla, and Daniel J. Oginsky, 1275 Pennsylvania, Avenue,
NW, Washington D.C. 20004-2415; and Amy Gold, P.O. Box 4402, Houston, Texas
77210, on behalf of Shell Energy Services Co., LLC.
Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease, by M. Howard Petricoff, 52 East Gay Street,
P.O. Box 1008, Columbus, Ohio 43216-1008, on behalf of NewEnergy Midwest, LLC
and WPS Energy Services, Inc.
99-1729-EL-ETP and 99-1730-EL-ETP -3-
Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease, by M. Howard Petricoff, 52 East Gay Street,
P.O. Box 1008, Columbus, Ohio 43216-1008, and Janine L. Migden, Enron Corp., 400
Metro Place North, Dublin, Ohio 43017-3375, on behalf of Enron Energy Services,
Inc.
Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease, by M. Howard Petricoff and Joseph C. Blasko,
52 East Gay Street, P.O. Box 1008, Columbus, Ohio 43216-1008, and David L.
Cruthirds, 1000 Louisiana Street, Suite 5800, Houston, Texas 77002-5050, on
behalf of Dynegy, Inc.
Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease, by Philip F. Downey and Stephen M. Howard,
52 East Gay Street, P.O. Box 1008, Columbus, Ohio 43216-1008, on behalf of the
Ohio Cable Telecommunications Association.
Thompson Hine & Flory, LLP, by Robert P. Mone and Scott A. Campbell, 10
West Broad Street, Suite 700, Columbus, Ohio 43215, on behalf of Ohio Rural
Electric Cooperatives, Inc. and Buckeye Power, Inc.
Logothetis, Pence & Doll, by John R. Doll, 111 West First Street, Suite
1100, Dayton, Ohio 45402-1156, and Speigel & McDairmid, by Cynthia S. Bogorad,
Scott H. Strauss, David B. Lieb, 1350 New York Avenue NW, Suite 1100, Washington
D.C. 20005-4798, on behalf of United Workers Union of America, AFL-CIO, and the
Utility Workers Union of America, Local Union Nos. 111, 116, 296, 468, 478, 492,
and 544.
Richard L. Sites, 155 East Broad Street, 15th Floor, Columbus, Ohio 43215,
on behalf of the Association for Hospitals and Health Systems, also d/b/a Ohio
Hospital Association.
Taft, Stettinius & Hollister LLP, by James J. Mayer, 1800 Firstar Tower,
425 Walnut Street, Cincinnati, Ohio 45202-3957, and Thomas J. Russell, Unicom,
Corporation, 125 Clark Street, Room 1535, Chicago, Illinois 60603, on behalf of
Unicom Energy, Inc. and Unicom Energy Services, Inc.
Thomas M. Myers, 56000 Dilles Bottom, Shadyside, Ohio 43947, on behalf of
International United Mine Workers of America (UMWA), AFL-CIO, and UMWA District
Six; Local Union Nos. 1604, 1857, 1886, and 6362.
OPINION:
I. HISTORY OF THESE PROCEEDINGS
On June 22, 1999, the Ohio General Assembly passed legislation requiring
the restructuring of the electric utility industry and providing for retail
competition with regard to the generation component of electric service (Amended
Substitute Senate Bill No. 3 of the 123rd General Assembly). Governor Bob Taft
signed this legislation (hereinafter SB3) on July 6, 1999, and most provisions
of SB 3 became effective on October 5, 1999. Section 4928.31, Revised Code,
requires each electric utility to file with the Commission a transition plan for
the company's provision of retail electric service in the state of Ohio. The
plan must include a rate unbundling plan, a corporate separation plan, a plan to
address operational support systems and any other technical implication issues
99-1729-EL-ETP and 99-1730-EL-ETP -4-
related to competitive retail electric service, an employee assistance plan, and
a consumer education plan.
On November 30, 1999, as subsequently modified and/or clarified on January
4, 20, and 27, and February 17, 2000, the Commission adopted rules for the
filing and processing of electric transition plans and adopted a consumer
education framework. IN THE MATTER OF THE COMMISSION'S PROMULGATION OF RULES FOR
ELECTRIC TRANSITION PLANS AND OF A CONSUMER EDUCATION PLAN, PURSUANT TO CHAPTER
4928, REVISED CODE, Case No. 99-1141-EL-ORD.
On December 30, 1999, the Columbus Southern Power Company and Ohio Power
Company(l) each filed transition applications with the Commission. Each company
requested approval of its electric transition plan and for authorization to
recover transition revenues. Thereafter, on January 14 and February 28, 200O,
AEP filed amendments to the transition plan applications.
A technical conference was conducted on January 10, 2000 at which AEP
explained its filing and answered questions from participants. Preliminary
objections to the applications were submitted on February 10, 11, 14, and 15,
2000. Pursuant to Section 4928.32(B), Revised Code, the Staff Report of
Exceptions and Recommendations was filed on March 28, 2000. A
procedural/settlement conference was conducted on March 3, 2000, and, on March
10, 2000, the attorney examiner issued an entry summarizing the rulings made
during the conference and scheduling an additional prehearing conference. AEP
filed additional supplemental testimony on April 18, 2000, in accordance with
the attorney examiner's directive.
Intervention was granted in this proceeding to the following parties:
Appalachian People's Action Coalition (APAC);
American Municipal Power-Ohio, Inc. (AMP-Ohio);
Ameritech New Media, Inc. (ANM);
Association for Hospitals and Health Systems, also
d/b/a the Ohio Hospital Association (OHA);
Buckeye Power, Inc.;
City of Cleveland (Cleveland);
Columbia Energy Services Corporation;
Columbia Energy Power Marketing Corporation
(Columbia Energy companies(2));
Dynegy, Inc. (Dynegy);
Enron Energy Services, Inc. (Enron);
Industrial Energy Users-Ohio (IEU-Ohio);
The Kroger Company (Kroger);
Mid-Atlantic Power Supply Association (MAPSA);
National Energy Marketers Association (NEMA);
---------
(1) The two utilities will be referred to individually as "CSP" and "OP" or
collectively as "the companies" or "AEP", since the utilities are operating
companies within the American Electric Power family.
(2) Columbia Energy Services Corporation and Columbia Energy Power Marketing
Corporation jointly filed a motion to intervene in these proceedings and shall
be jointly referred to as "Columbia Energy companies".
99-1729-EL-ETP and 99-1730-EL-ETP -5-
New Energy Midwest, LLC (New Energy);
Ohio Consumers' Counsel (OCC);
Ohio Council of Retail Merchants (OCRM);
Ohio Department of Development (ODOD);
Ohio Environmental Council (OEC);
Ohio Manufacturers' Association (OMA);
Ohio Partners for Affordable Energy (OPAE);
Ohio Rural Electric Cooperatives, Inc. (OREC(3));
Peco Energy Company, d/b/a Exelon Energy (Exelon);
PP&L EnergyPlus Co., LLC (EnergyPlus);(4)
Shell Energy Services Company, L.L.C. (Shell);
Strategic Energy L.L.P. (Strategic);
Unicom Energy, Inc.; .
Unicom Energy Services, Inc. (Unicom(5));
United Mine Workers of America, AFL-CIO;
UMWA District Six, Local Union Nos. 1604, 1857, 1886,
and 6362 (UMWA(6));
Utility Workers Union of America, AFL-CIO;
Utility Workers Union of America, Local Union Nos.
111, 116, 296, 468, 478, 492, and 544 (UWUA(7));
WPS Energy Services, Inc. (WPS); and
WSOS Community Action Commission, Inc. (WSOS).
The joint motion to intervene by Ohio Edison Company, The Cleveland
Electric Illuminating Company, and The Toledo Edison Company was denied on March
23, 2000. The Ohio Cable Telecommunications Association (OCTA) filed to
intervene in these proceedings. However, OCTA filed two days later a notice of
conditional withdrawal of its intervention request.
The second prehearing conference was conducted as scheduled on April 28,
2000. On May 8, 2000, a stipulation and recommendation (Jt. Ex. 1) was filed.
That stipulation was signed by AEP, the Commission staff, APAC, Columbia Energy
companies, Enron, NewEnergy, WPS, Exelon, IEU-Ohio, Kroger, MAPSA, NEMA, OCC,
OCRM, OHA, OPAE, OREC, Strategic, WSOS, ODOD, and OMA. The stipulation purports
to resolve all issues in these proceedings, except for one issue related to
AEP's proposed gross receipts/excise tax rider. Dynegy and OEC later stated that
they do not oppose the stipulation. On May 8, 2000, Shell filed testimony
opposing the transition plans in several respects. The hearing
-----------
(3) Buckeye Power, Inc. and Ohio Rural Electric Cooperatives, Inc. jointly
filed a motion to intervene in these proceedings and shall be jointly
referred to as "OREC".
(4) EnergyPlus was granted intervention in these proceedings, but filed a
notice of withdrawal on March 13, 2000.
(5) Unicom Energy, Inc. and Unicom Energy Services, Inc. jointly filed a motion
to intervene in these proceedings and shall be jointly referred to as
"Unicom".
(6) United Mine Workers of America, AFL-CIO and UMWA District Six, Local Union
Nos. 1604, 1857, 1886, and 6362 jointly filed a motion to intervene in
these proceedings and shall be jointly referred to as "UMWA".
(7) Utility Workers Union of America, AFL-CIO, and Utility Workers Union of
America, Local Union Nos. 111, 116, 296, 468, 478, 492, and 544, jointly
filed a motion to intervene in these proceedings and shall be jointly
referred to as "UWUA".
99-1729-EL-ETP and 99-1730-EL-ETP -6-
began on May 9, 2000, at which time it became clear that there was opposition to
the proposed stipulation. At the request of the parties, the hearing was
continued and, pursuant to oral rulings made by the attorney examiners, parties
interested in the gross receipts/excise tax issue were given an opportunity to
present evidence for the Commission's consideration. Additionally, parties were
given the opportunity to present evidence in support of and in opposition to the
stipulation. The hearing then continued on May 31, June 7, 8, and 12, 2000. Only
AEP, OCC, Shell, the staff, and UWUA participated in the later stages of the
hearing.
On June 19, 2000, AEP and ANM file an agreement to remove from AEP's
transition plan proceedings the substantive issues related to AEP's originally
proposed pole attachment tariff provisions. Those two parties agreed that the
pole attachment issues should instead be addressed in two cases already pending
before the Commission. IN THE MATTER OF APPLICATIONS OF COLUMBUS SOUTHERN POWER
COMPANY AND QHIO POWER COMPANY FOR APPROVAL OF POLE ATTACHMENT TARIFFS AND
RELATED MATTERS, Case Nos. 97-1568-EL-ATA and 97-1569-EL-ATA.
Local public hearings were conducted on June 5 and 22, 2000, in East
Liverpool and Columbus, Ohio, respectively. On July 10, 25, and 26, 2000, AEP,
OCC, Shell, the staff, IEU-OH, and UWUA filed briefs.
II. SUMMARY OF THE STIPULATIONS
The stipulation submitted on May 8, 2000 provides, among other things, that
the companies' transition plans (as then-supplemented and revised) should be
approved, except as specifically modified in that stipulation. Additionally, the
stipulation states that:
(1) Neither company will impose any lost revenue charges (generation
transition charges) on any switching customer (Sec. IV).
(2) All distribution electric rates in effect on December 31, 2005, will
be frozen through December 31, 2007 for OP and through December 31,
2008 for CSP. Such frozen rates can, however, be adjusted to reflect
the cost of complying with changes in environmental
(distribution-related), tax and regulatory laws or regulations, relief
from storm damage expenses, in the event of an emergency, or to
reflect changes in the transmission/distribution facilities allocation
(Sec. V).
(3) CSP will absorb the first $20 million of consumer education, customer
choice implementation, and transition plan filing costs and will be
permitted to defer the remainder of those actual costs (estimated to
be $40.6 million), plus a carrying charge and recover those costs by a
rider as a cost of service in future distribution rates. OP will
absorb the first $20 million of consumer education, customer choice
implementation, and transition plan filing costs and will be permitted
to defer the remainder of those actual costs (estimated to be $45.5
million),
99-1729-EL-ETP and 99-1730-EL-ETP -7-
plus a carrying charge and recover those costs by a rider as a cost of
service in future distribution rates. Determination of costs to be
recovered (including the carrying charge) will be subject to
Commission review (Sec. VI).
(4) During the market development period (MDP), CSP will provide a
shopping incentive of 2.5 mills/kilowatt-hour to the first 25 percent
of the residential class load that switches to a competitor. Any
unused portion of that shopping incentive will be credited to CSP's
regulatory transition cost recovery. There will be no further shopping
incentive for CSP and no shopping incentive at all for OP (Sec. VII).
(5) AEP will transfer, by December 15, 2001, all operational control of
transmission facilities to an operating regional transmission
organization (RTO) that is approved by the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission (FERC). In the meantime, the companies will provide up to
$10 million for certain costs imposed upon any supplier or customer
associated with transmission charges imposed by the Pennsylvania-New
Jersey-Maryland (PJM) Independent System Operator and/or Midwest
Independent System Operator (MISO) for generation originating in those
areas (Sec. VIII).(8)
(6) The companies shall refile: (a) the unbundled residential tariffs so
as to reflect a five percent reduction in the generation component,
including the regulatory transition charge (RTC) component, and shall
not seek to reduce that five percent during the MDP; and (b) the
tariffs and UNB-8 schedules so as to achieve a revenue-neutral rate
design and equalized bills within the commercial class (Sec. IX and
X).
(7) For issues being handled by the operational support plan (OSP) working
group, the signatory parties accept any resolutions agreed upon by the
working group. Further, the companies agree to abide by the
determinations of the Commission as they relate to OSP issues (Sec.
XI).
(8) With respect to customer switching, the operating companies agree
that, during the MDP, customers that can take generation service from
the companies during any part of May 16 through September 15 must
either remain a customer through April 15 of the following year or
choose a market-based tariff which will not be lower than the
generation cost
------------
(8) The stipulation specifically noted that, if any governmental agency
invalidates or imposes conditions upon this aspect of the stipulation, the
provision is deemed withdrawn and the parties agree to negotiate in good
faith to restore the value of the provision.
99-1729-EL-ETP and 99-1730-EL-ETP -8-
embedded in the standard offer. Nonaggregated residential customers
will be permitted to shop three times during the MDP and to return two
times to the default tariff before being required to choose from one
of the above two options (Sec. XII).
(9) The companies shall provide distribution services to each retail
customer or supplier of electric energy in the same quality and price
and subject to the same terms and conditions as provided by the
companies to similarly situated retail customers, itself or any
affiliate. Before participating in an approved RTO, the companies
and/or their affiliates shall provide transmission services under
their pro forma transmission tariff and in compliance with federal
conduct requirements (Sec. XIII).
(10) AEP will provide a $1.00 credit to suppliers for each consolidated
bill issued by that provider during the first year of the MDP. The
signatory parties agree to further negotiate a similar future credit.
AEP shall reasonably attempt to implement supplier consolidated
billing as soon as practicable (Sec. XIV).
(11) Commercial and industrial customers need only provide 90 days notice
to the companies of their intent to purchase electricity from another
supplier, including providing such notice 90 days prior to January 1,
2001 (Sec. XV).
(12) The companies' revenues from RTCs during the transition period and
from existing frozen and unbundled rates recovered during the MDP are
sufficient to recover regulatory assets as of the beginning of the MDP
and for obligations required by the stipulation. The signatory parties
agree that the Commission should direct the companies to amortize such
regulatory assets during the MDP and thereafter, until fully
amortized. Recorded regulatory assets as of the beginning of the MDP
should be amortized on a per-kilowatt basis during the MDP and
recovered through existing frozen and unbundled rates. Additionally,
the signatory parties suggest that the Commission specifically address
concerns of potential violations of the Internal Revenue Code's
normalization rules regarding amortization of liabilities related to
investment tax credits and excess deferred income taxes (Sec. XVII and
Attach. I).
(13) Between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2007, the first 20 percent of
OP residential customer load that switches from OP's standard offer as
of December 31, 2005, to another provider will not be charged the RTC.
Customers that remain
99-1729-EL-ETP and 99-1730-EL-ETP -9-
on the standard offer under Section 4928.14(A) or (B), Revised Code,
do not count as load that switches to a new provider (Sec. XVIII).(9)
(14) AEP and the signatory marketers will further negotiate an AEP load
shaping service. All such marketing intervenors shall be notified of
dates, times, and locations for such meetings (Sec. XIX).
(15) The operating companies will establish Universal Service Fund (USF)
riders and Energy Efficiency Revolving Loan Fund (EERLF) riders at the
rates determined by ODOD and approved by the Commission (Sec. XX).
(16) The marketer intervenors' acceptance of the companies' corporate
separation plan does not constitute acceptance of the companies'
interpretation of Rule 4901:1-20-16(G)(4), Ohio Administrative Code
(O.A.C.), relating to code of conduct (Sec. XXI).
(17) The parties agree that the stipulation is conditioned upon acceptance
in its entirety and without alteration. If the Commission rejects all
or part of the agreement, or materially modifies its terms, any
adversely affected party may file an application for rehearing or
terminate and withdraw from the stipulation (Sec. XXII).
As noted above, a second stipulation was filed in these dockets. On June
19, 2000, AEP and ANM filed a stipulation (hereinafter referred to as the ANM
agreement, so as to distinguish it from the other stipulation) to remove from
AEP's transition plan proceedings the substantive issues related to AEP's
originally proposed pole attachment tariff provisions. Among other things, ANM
does not object to AEP'S proposed withdrawal of the originally proposed pole
attachment tariffs, while AEP agrees to not object to ANM's involvement
(including discovery activities) in AEP's pending pole attachment tariff
proceedings in Case Nos. 97-1568-EL-ATA and 97-1569-EL-ATA, SUPRA. AEP further
agrees to not include the originally proposed pole attachment tariff provisions
in any filing in the transition plan proceedings.
III. OPPOSITION TO THE TRANSITION PLANS AND STIPULATIONS AND REVIEW OF SECTION
4928.34, REVISED CODE
Although a large number of parties were granted intervention in this
proceeding, only Shell and the UWUA continued to offer any opposition to AEP's
transition plans, as modified by the settlement agreements entered into by the
majority of parties. The UWUA addressed only one issue related to AEP's employee
assistance plan. Shell, on the other hand, takes issue with several particular
aspects of the transition plan stipulation on
----------
(9) The stipulation specifically noted that, if this provision is rejected by
the Commission or determined unlawful by a court, the remainder of the
stipulation will remain in effect.
99-1729-EL-ETP and 99-1730-EL-ETP -10-
legal and conceptual grounds. Moreover, in Shell's view, it does not believe
that the stipulation as a whole will establish the incentives for competitive
suppliers to either enter AEP's service territory or remain there over time, all
the while providing a financial windfall to AEP, (Shell Initial Br. at 3-4,
61-66, 68; Shell Reply Br. at 1-2, 7, 17). AEP OCC, IEU-Ohio, and the staff
argue that the stipulation balances the diverse interests of nearly all parties
to these proceedings and provides a number of varied benefits that are in the
public interest, some of which are beyond what the Commission has authority to
order (AEP Ex. 18, at 5-10; AEP Initial Br. at 10; OCC Initial Br. at 12-13; OCC
Reply Br. at 11; IEU Br. at 3-4; Staff Initial Br. at 5, 6-8; Staff Reply Br. at
3-4).
As noted earlier, Section 4928.31(A), Revised Code, provides that the
company's transition plan must include a rate unbundling plan that specifies the
unbundled components for electric generation, transmission, and distribution
service components to be charged by the company on the start date of competitive
retail electric service. The transition plan must also contain a corporate
separation plan, a plan to address operational support systems, an employee
assistance plan, and a consumer education plan (ID.). AEP's transition plans
include those, as well as other proposals.
Section 4928.34(A), Revised Code, requires the Commission to make
determinations with respect to 15 separate "prerequisites" prior to approving a
company's transition plan. Each of the opposing intervenors' comments and the 15
prerequisites is discussed below.
A. UNBUNDLING PLAN AND TRANSITION COSTS
Beginning on the start date of competitive electric service, AEP proposes
two tariff offerings: the standard tariff for customers who do not choose an
alternative electric supplier and the open access distribution tariff for
customers who do choose an alternative electric supplier. AEP's transition plan
proposed that the open access distribution tariff be similar to the standard
tariff, except that a stranded, generation transition charge (GTC) applies and
no property tax credit applies (AEP Ex. 2, Part A). The individual components
were derived based upon cost-of-service studies from CSP's and OP's last rate
cases and were then functionalized (AEP Ex. 24A at 13-14). Adjustments were made
to reflect the overall revenue level resulting from the prior rate cases and to
match individual customer class revenues (ID.). For CSP, special adjustments
were made so that the adjusted distribution component equaled the sum of the
unbundled distribution and transmission components, less the revenue generated
by the Open Access Transmission Tariff (OATT) (AEP Ex. 8A at 4). AEP sought
recovery of stranded generation costs during the MDP and regulatory assets over
the full 10-year period allowed by Section 4928.40, Revised Code (AEP EX. 16, at
9-10; AEP Ex. 9A at 13). The companies also identified several transition costs
that they requested be established as new regulatory assets (AEP EX. 2, Part F,
Sec. (B)(1)(a); AEP Ex. 16, at 6; AEP Ex. 9A at 8-12; AEP Ex. 9C at 6). AEP
included the five-percent reduction required by Section 4928.40 (C), Revised
Code, in the proposed residential service rates (AEP Ex. 24A at 19).
99-1729-EL-ETP and 99-1730-EL-ETP -11-
AEP proposed to recover the following under the transition plan as filed:
Company Regulatory Assets Other Transition Costs Total
------- ----------------- ---------------------- -----
CSP $289,515,000 $73,684,000 $363,199,000
OP $520,526,000 $90,260,000 $610,786,000
(AEP Ex. 2, Part F).
AEP contends that the stipulation provides additional benefits to the
proposed unbundling plan and transition charges in several ways (AEP Initial Br.
at 21-22, 59, 65-67). First, all distribution rates will be mostly frozen,
effective December 15, 2005 through 2007 for OP and through 2008 for CSP (Jt.
Ex. 1, at 3-4). Second, the frozen distribution rates can be adjusted to reflect
changes in the functionalization of the transmission/distribution facilities
under FERC's seven-factor test (ID. at 4). Third, the companies' tariffs and
UNB-8 schedules will be revised consistent with Attachment 2 to the stipulation,
in order to achieve revenue neutral rate designs and to equalize bill impacts
for commercial customers (ID. at 7). Fourth, the companies will refile unbundled
residential rate schedules that apply a five-percent reduction of the generation
component, including the RTC component (ID. at 6). Fifth, the stipulation
shortens the period during which the companies can recover stranded
generation-related regulatory assets (from 10 years to seven years for OP and
eight years for CSP) and limits the RTC levels for several years (ID. at 4 and
Attach. 1). Next, the stipulation also specifies the levels of the RTCs for
seven- and eight-year periods (ID. at Attach. 1). Under the stipulation, the
companies can recover the following amounts as transition costs:
Company In RTC During MDP In Distribution Rates in Later Years
------- ----------------- ------------------------------------
CSP $191,156,000 $40,526,000
OP $425,230,000 $45,533,000
(ID.; Tr. III, 50, 141).
Additionally, AEP states that the companies have each foregone assessing
its proposed GTCs on switching customers and $20 million in customer education,
customer choice implementation and transition plan filing costs (Jt. Ex. 1, at 3
and 4). The remainder of customer education, customer choice implementation and
transition plan filing costs (approximately $40.5 and $45.5 million) will be
deferred. CSP has agreed to provide an additional shopping incentive of 2.5
mills/kilowatt-hour for the first 25 percent of CSP's residential load that
switches during the MDP, with the unused portion at December 31, 2005, being
credited to the RTC (ID. at 5). Lastly, OP agreed that, for 2006 and 2007, the
first 20 percent of OP residential customers that switch will not be charged the
RTC (ID. at 10).
1. MDP SHOPPING INCENTIVES
AEP's transition plans proposed shopping incentives that were the lower of
the estimated market cost of electric energy or the unbundled generation rate
(AEP Ex. 9A at 28; AEP Ex. 2 at Part H; Tr. IV, 105). AEP did not propose to
increase the incentives in the MDP (AEP Ex. 9A at 28-29). The stipulation
includes an explicit additional shopping
99-1729-EL-ETP and 99-1730-EL-ETP -12-
incentive of 2.5 mills/kWh for the first 25 percent of CSP's residential load
that switches during the MDP, with the unused portion at December 31, 2005,
being credited to the RTC (Jt. Ex. 1, at 5).
In AEP's view, the transition plan stipulation would increase the proposed
shopping incentive amounts by virtue of the companies agreeing to forego the
amount of the GTCs and by the additional 2.5 mills/kilowatt-hour for the CSP
residential class (AEP Initial Br. at 43).(10) AEP acknowledges that the
stipulation states that "there will be no shopping incentive for [OP]", but
contends that the language means there will be no explicit monetary incentive
for OP customers during the MDP beyond that set forth in the plan (AEP Reply Br.
at 22). Additionally, AEP argues that several other provisions in the
stipulation constitute monetary and structural incentives to encourage shopping
for CSP and OP customers (Tr. III, 148, 153, 157-160, 165, 167; AEP Reply Br. at
20-22).
Shell has criticized the shopping incentive provisions of the stipulation
for several reasons. In Shell's opinion, the key to engendering good
alternatives to the standard offer during the MDP is an adequate shopping credit
structure that reflects the costs of serving retail markets and that adjusts to
reflect significant changes in underlying wholesale costs (Shell Initial Br. at
2).(11) First, Shell argues that the shopping credit scheme does not meet the
requirements of SB 3 since the stipulation does not provide any shopping
incentive for CSP commercial customers or for any OP customers during the entire
MDP (ID. at 13; Shell Ex. 7, at 4, 8). In this respect, Shell states that
neither the stipulation nor the transition plan provides a complete shopping
incentive that will meet the statutory minimum switch rate or the Commission's
requirements (Shell Initial Br. at 13-14; Shell Reply Br. at 9-12). Next, Shell
states that the stipulation's terms discriminate against OP residential
ratepayers since the CSP counterparts will have a shopping credit (Shell Ex. 7,
at 4; Shell Initial Br. at 13-18).
Also, Shell argues that the CSP shopping incentive is too small to produce
the 20 percent load switching during the MDP (Shell Ex. 7, at 9-10; Shell
Initial Br. at 12, 14, 18-19). Shell further states that there has been no
evidence to support the CSP shopping credit level. Additionally, Shell states
that, since there is no designated shopping credit for OP, the credit is simply
the unbundled generation component in OP's tariff (Shell Ex. 6, at 49; Shell Ex.
7, at 8; Shell Initial Br. at 19). Shell provides an illustration as to why a
marketer cannot effectively compete in AEP's territory under these circumstances
(Shell Initial Br. at 19-23). Shell further states that the proposed fixed
shopping incentives can become less economic over time, as other costs increase
(Shell Initial Br. at 19-25, 32; Shell Ex. 7, at 7-10). Moreover, Shell points
out that the declining block rate aspect of the shopping credits makes it
increasingly difficult for the competitors and will frustrate achievement of SB
3's 20 percent load switching (Shell Ex. 7, at 10; Shell Initial Br. at 23).
Shell recommends that the Commission either: (1) direct the parties to return to
the bargaining table to devise an
-----------------
(10) AEP states that this level of shopping incentive could not have been
achieved without CSP's consent because the total amount exceeds the
unbundled generation component for CSP's residential customers, which is
the highest level the Commission could require. See, Section 4928.04(A),
Revised Code.
(11) Shell's witness Dr. Wilson distinguished between a shopping credit and a
shopping incentive. He explained that a "shopping credit" is the "total
amount by which the switching customer's bill would be reduced because the
customer is taking service from an independent provider", while the
"shopping incentive" is a "component of the shopping credit and is
specifically designed to encourage 20 percent of the market to shift"
during the MDP (Tr. V,74).
99-1729-EL-ETP and 99-1730-EL-ETP -13-
agreement that makes blocks of generation capacity (at predetermined prices)
available for competitive suppliers (modeled after Duquesne Light Company and
FirstEnergy Corporation arrangements); or (2) increase the shopping credits to
the levels recommended by its expert witness (Shell Ex. 6, at 56-60; Shell Ex.
7, at 10-11; Shell Initial Br. at 26-28). Shell contends that those changes are
necessary, not to make it more economical for She11 to serve customers, but to
induce the 20 percent customer switching mandated by SB 3 (Shell Reply Br. at
17). Finally, Shell states that the Commission should establish a tracking
mechanism to adjust the shopping credits in response to wholesale price
increases or annually review the adequacy of the shopping credits in each
service territory (Shell Ex.7, at 10-11; Shell Initial Br. at 35; Shell Reply
Br. at 15).
With regard to Shell's discrimination argument, AEP states that SB 3 does
not require all transition plans to be the same and, thus, the fact that the 2.5
mills only applies to CSP residential customers cannot be found improper (AEP
Reply Br. at 27). AEP contends that nearly every other marketer in these
proceedings supports the shopping incentives of the stipulation and that is
telling of their significance (ID. at 22). AEP criticizes Shell's expert's
suggested shopping incentives as not being based upon the companies' actual
unbundled generation components and as violating Section 4928.40(A), Revised
Code, because they exceed the unbundled generation component (AEP Initial Br. at
44-46; AEP Reply Br. at 24). Moreover, AEP states that the Commission has no
authority to order the companies to make blocks of generation available to
suppliers (AEP Reply Br. at 18,24). Therefore, the Commission should support the
voluntary resolution that satisfied nearly every interested party (ID.).
The staff contends that SB 3's 20 percent switching rate is not a mandate
(Staff Reply Br. at 5-6). Rather, it is one basis upon which the Commission can
end the MDP early (ID.). Also, the staff states that, since the companies'
transition charges are so low, the large shopping incentives that Shell seeks
are not possible because the effect of Shell's request would deny the companies
the opportunity to collect any transition costs from customers who shop (ID. at
8-9).
Shell argues first that the stipulation is discriminatory and violates SB 3
because it includes a shopping incentive during the MDP for CSP residential
ratepayers, but not for OP residential ratepayers. Then, Shell also argues that
there will be insufficient shopping incentives for both companies, which will be
the generation shopping credit.(12) Thus, Shell has acknowledged that there
would be an OP shopping incentive during the MDP under the stipulation and
transition plan. At first blush, the stipulation would leave the impression that
there will be no shopping incentive at all during the MDP for OP customers.
However, AEP's plan included a shopping incentive for OP customers during the
MDP and the stipulation did not modify that incentive. The fact that the
proposed shopping incentives during the MDP vary between CSP and OP customers
does not, in and of itself, lead us to conclude that the proposal before us
should be rejected. In fact, we have already approved different shopping
incentives between Ohio's utilities and the fact that both companies are within
the AEP family does not convince us that the shopping incentives must be the
same in order to be reasonable.
-----------------
(12) We do not believe that Shell has presented consistent arguments on this
point.
99-1729-EL-ETP and 99-1730-EL-ETP -14-
The main thrust of Shell's argument against the proposed MDP shopping
incentives is that they will be too small to engender competition. We do not
agree with Shell's contention that the MDP shopping incentives are unlikely to
affect the market in AEP's territory. We believe that the stipulation's 2.5
mills/kWh (for the first 25 percent of CSP residential customers, which is
approximately 125,000 customers) will further help ensure that CSP's residential
customers have an incentive to shop. The remaining customers will have an
adequate incentive to shop inasmuch as the shopping incentives will equal either
the estimated market cost of electric energy or 100 percent of the unbundled
generation rate. As Shell's Dr. Wilson acknowledged, there is not going to be
one number that gives every supplier the ability to make it in a competitive
market (Tr. V, 80). We believe, however, the MDP shopping incentives proposed
will effectively foster early competition by providing significant motivation to
CSP and OP customers to switch retail generation suppliers.
2. POST-MDP INCENTIVE FOR OP RESIDENTIAL CUSTOMERS
Section XVIII of the stipulation states that, for 2006 and 2007, the first
20 percent of OP residential customers that switch will not be charged the RTC
(Jt. Ex.1, at 10-11). It is estimated that, in the first year (2006),
approximately $5 million of RTC revenues will not be collected (Tr. III, 117).
AEP will not amortize these RTC costs for future collection; it will expense the
cost (ID. at 117-118). Shell contends that this provision of the stipulation
violates SB 3 because the transition charge is "nonbypassable" and is not
permitted to be discounted, per Sections 4928.37(A)(1)(b) and (3), Revised Code
(Shell Initial Br. at 28-29).
In response, AEP argues that the RTC cannot be "bypassable" during the MDP
only and, since the MDP will not extend beyond December 31, 2005, this provision
does not violate Section 4928.37(A)(1)(b), Revised Code (AEP Reply Br. at
28-29). As for the discount aspect of the provision, AEP states that, although
the provision may "have the 'effect' of discounting the RTC, [it] is no
different than providing an explicit monetary shopping incentive which offsets,
i.e. discounts, the transition charge" (ID. at 29). Also, AEP believes that the
statutory provision's goal is to prevent unjust discrimination among similarly
situated customers and that will not occur under the stipulation because all
residential customers will be eligible, but the discount ends when 20 percent
switch (ID. at 29-30). AEP and the staff question the consistency of Shell's
arguments thus far, stating that Shell should be welcoming this provision
because its intent is to provide additional encouragement to OP residential
customers to switch away from the standard offer after the MDP (ID. at 30; Staff
Reply Br. at 11).
AEP correctly points out that the "nonbypassable" restriction in Section
4928.37(A)(1)(b), Revised Code, is limited to the MDP. Thus, we do not find
that the reduced RTC for OP customers in 2006 and 2007 would violate that aspect
of SB 3. Additionally, Sections 4928.37(A)(1) and (3), Revised Code,
specifically state that the transition charges that an electric utility can
receive between the start of electric competition and the expiration of the MDP
shall not be discounted by any party. The stipulation before us would not allow
the discounting of the RTC to take place during the MDP. For that reason, we
also conclude that Section XVIII is not contrary to SB 3. Moreover, we believe
that the effect of this provision will provide OP residential customers another
sizable incentive, after the MDP, to consider switching their
99-1729-EL-ETP and 99-1730-EL-ETP -15-
generation supplier. For that reason, we find it to be consistent with the
pro-competitive goals of SB 3.
3. COMMISSION'S FUTURE ABILITY TO RESPOND TO THE MARKET
Shell contends that the stipulation (Sections VI and VII) unreasonably
restricts the Commission's authority to modify the shopping incentive and the
collection of RTCs or to carry out its market monitoring functions (Shell Ex. 7,
at 7-8; Shell Initial Br. at 30, 33-34). Shell points to Sections 4928.06,
4928.40(B)(1), and 4928.39, Revised Code, for support. Shell states that the
Commission's ability to respond to unanticipated market changes is very
important (particularly where a fixed shopping incentive regime applies during
the MDP) and the signatory parties cannot agree to rewrite that authority (Shell
Initial Br. at 31-32,33). Shell believes market participants need the assurance
that the Commission can and will take immediate action to safeguard the
continuing viability of retail competition (ID. at 32-33). As in Shell's earlier
recommendation, Shell suggests a tracking mechanism to adjust the shopping
credits or annual consideration of whether the credits are adequate or require
modification.
AEP and the staff do not agree that Sections VI and VII of the stipulation
violate SB 3. AEP states that the Commission may, but is not required to, make
adjustments to transition charges (AEP Reply Br. at 32). In AEP's view, the
Commission may exercise that discretion and should concur with the signatory
parties' conclusion that no such further reviews are necessary (ID.). Further,
AEP states that there is virtually nothing to which the Commission's
discretionary authority could be applied for three reasons: (1) the companies
have waived their claims for GTCs for the MDP; (2) RTCs can only be adjusted
prospectively and only after December 31, 2004; and (3) CSP's additional
shopping incentive more than eliminates those customers' RTCs for the MDP (ID.
at. 32-33). Staff states that there are a number of statutory obligations
imposed upon the Commission that are unaffected by the stipulation and the
Commission will assuredly fulfill its obligations under SB 3 (Staff Reply Br. at
12).
The Commission does not believe that Sections VI and VII of the stipulation
conflict with Chapter 4928, Revised Code. Section 4928.40(B)(1), Revised Code,
permits the Commission to conduct periodic reviews no more often than annually
and, as it determines necessary, adjust the transition charges of the electric
utility. It does not require such reviews or adjustments. We believe that the
stipulation establishes reasonable transition charges, shopping credits, and
incentives for customers to shop. We do not believe that Section VI or VII
negate the Commission's broad authority to safeguard retail competition during
the MDP. Various sections of SB 3 give the Commission continued oversight to
monitor the progress of competitive retail electric services, to take action
where necessary, and to promote the policies of the state of Ohio set forth in
Section 4928.02, Revised Code. The Commission is charged with analyzing the
efficacy of the market as it progresses over time and any evidence of the abuse
of market power will be a signal for a change in the process.
4. GENERATION TRANSITION CHARGES AND STRANDED GENERATION BENEFITS
As noted earlier, Section IV of the stipulation states that AEP will not
impose lost revenue charges or GTCs on any switching customer (Jt. Ex. 1, at 3).
AEP's original
99-1729-EL-ETP and 99-1730-EL-ETP -16-
transition plan proposal included a proposed GTC of $291.43 million,
representing above-market, stranded generation costs (AEP Ex. 9A at 12 and 9C at
5-6; Shell Ex. 6, at 39; Tr. III, 16). This calculation was based upon the
difference between the generation components of the historic rates and the
companies' projected market price of generation (Shell Ex. 6, at 38, 40-41; Tr.
III, 19-21, 22). Shell states that AEP's GTC approach allows it the opportunity
for a windfall because there should be no GTC so long as AEP's generating plants
are valued at a market value equal or greater than their net book value (Shell
Ex. 6, at 41,46-47; Tr. V, 114-115). For Shell, the correct generating plant
valuations imply that there will be no GTC or stranded costs, only stranded
benefits and, therefore, Section IV of the stipulation does not support a
finding that the stipulation is reasonable (ID. at 43-44; Shell Reply Br. at
24-25).
Shell argues that the stipulation and the proposed corporate separation
plan will result in the transfer of generation assets to an unregulated
affiliate at too low a value and harm ratepayers by denying them any share of
the "market premiums" associated with the generation assets (Shell Ex. 6, at
43-44, 46, 83; Shell Initial Br. at 36; Shell Reply Br. at 28-29). Shell
presented evidence that the more appropriate estimate of AEP's generating assets
is a market value of nearly $7 billion, as opposed to the book value of
approximately $2.2 billion (Shell Ex. 6, at 33-34; Tr. V, 114). Thus, in Shell's
view, AEP's agreement in the stipulation to forego the GTC is meaningless
because AEP had no such transition costs in the first place (Shell Initial Br.
at 43). In particular, Shell's witness Dr. Wilson argues that AEP utilized
overly optimistic, low market prices for power, citing to AEP's recent
higher-priced purchases in the wholesale market and third-party forecasts of
prices in the area (Shell Ex.6, at 15-18). Dr. Wilson noted that changing only
the estimated market price of energy, as he suggested, raised the estimated
value of the generation assets by more than $2 billion and resulted in an
estimate of $1.5 billion of stranded benefits (ID. at 21). Next, Dr. Wilson
noted that AEP improperly discounted by a full 12 months (rather than by six
months) and deducted office building and other nongeneration plant construction
costs from generation revenues (ID. at 22-23). Dr. Wilson then suggested that
AEP should have assumed a 10.5 percent equity cost and a capital structure of 40
percent equity and 60 percent debt (ID. at 24-27). With all five of those inputs
modified as suggested by Dr. Wilson, the value of AEP's generating plants would
raise to nearly $5 billion and exceed book value by more than $2.5 billion (ID.
at 27, 29, and JWW-5). Dr. Wilson noted that some other adjustments could be
made, but he did not attempt them (ID. at 24, 31, 36-37).
In addition, Shell contends that AEP will recover over $616 million in RTCs
and all off-system generation sales (Shell Initial Br. at 43-44). Moreover,
Shell takes issue with the fact that, under the stipulation, AEP ratepayers
continue to pay for the transferred generation assets through unbundled, frozen
generation rates, but not receive any benefit from the sales that the
unregulated generation affiliate might make to third parties (Shell Initial Br.
at 43; Shell Reply Br. at 20-21). Taken together, the book value transfer of
generation assets would not serve the public interest. Shell suggests that the
Commission provide AEP ratepayers a share by: (1) offsetting RTC recovery, and
(2) funding more generous shopping credits for residential ratepayers with
generation-related market premiums and third-party sales revenues (Shell Ex. 6,
at 46; Shell Ex. 7, at 12; Tr. V, 40-41; Shell Initial Br. at 44-45; Shell Reply
Br. at 29).
99-1729-EL-ETP and 99-1730-EL-ETP -17-
AEP disagrees with Shell's argument on this issue. AEP points out that its
corporate separation plan does not call for the transfer of its generation
assets to an unregulated affiliate. Rather, the corporate separation plan
involves the creation of new transmission and distribution subsidiaries; CSP and
OP will continue to own and operate the generation assets. AEP disagrees with
Shell's expert's estimate of AEP's generating assets and lists a number of
reasons why the analysis is flawed (AEP Reply Br. at 35-37, 42-43).
Specifically, AEP argues that the most accurate value of its generating assets
is not necessarily measured by selling price (ID. at 35). AEP contends that Dr.
Wilson's proposed substitute market price of electricity is too high and
constitutes an improperly averaged price at times only when the companies were
purchasing power, times of high demand and higher prices (ID. at 36-37). Next,
AEP takes issue with Shell's reliance upon the valuation report and methodology
of Research Data International (RDI) because it was a preliminary, working
document for the FirstEnergy transition proceedings(13), which contained
incorrect or non-comparable data (ID. at 42-42).
Moreover, AEP states that Section 4928.35(A), Revised Code, does not
entitle ratepayers to share in market premiums, even if there were any (AEP
Reply Br. at 43-44). AEP further argues that Shell's suggestion that any market
premiums fund larger shopping credits for switching customers is a violation of
Section 4928.35(A), Revised Code, because that provision prohibits adjusting the
utility's frozen unbundled rates during the MDP (AEP Reply Br. at 44). Likewise,
AEP argues that Shell's suggestion to reduce the RTC violates Section 4928.39,
Revised Code, because regulatory assets are a separate and distinct component of
transition costs that can be adjusted only on a prospective basis (ID. at
44-47).
Staff contends that Shell's GTC argument is inconsistent in saying that the
unbundled generation charges are above market (based on old rate case data) and
below market (based upon low market values) (Staff Reply Br. at 13-14). For this
reason, staff says that Shell's position should be rejected (ID.).
As noted earlier, if the stipulation is approved, AEP no longer seeks to
recover a GTC. Therefore, the remainder of Shell's concern here is the netting
of AEP's alleged stranded benefits/market premiums against transition costs. The
Commission is not convinced that Dr. Wilson's analysis for determining the
market value of the generating assets is fully correct. For instance, we believe
Dr. Wilson's use of market price of electricity was overstated because it relied
upon purchase data at times when electric prices were high and did not account
for such abnormality. It also appears to improperly average the prices. We think
AEP's criticisms, on these points, are valid. Changes to this one input in the
valuation methodology, as Dr. Wilson noted, has a significant impact on the
stranded benefits/market premiums. We also are unwilling to accept Dr. Wilson's
reliance upon the RDI generation asset valuation methodology as grounds for
rejecting AEP's valuation methodology. No RDI representative testified in this
proceeding and the document was apparently a work in progress. Moreover, only
parts of the working document are part of the record in these proceedings. Dr.
Wilson's apparent use of the same methodology (with some substituted figures)
does not convince us that we must
-----------------
(13) IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF FIRSTENERGY CORP. ON BEHALF OF OHIO
EDISON COMPANY, THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANY, AND THE TOLEDO
EDISON COMPANY FOR APPROVAL OF THEIR TRANSITION PLANS AND FOR AUTHORIZATION
TO COLLECT TRANSITION REVENUES, Case Nos. 99-1212-EL-ETP, 99-1213-EL-ATA,
and 99-1214-EL-AAM (July 19, 2000).
99-1729-EL-ETP and 99-1730-EL-ETP -18-
accept the methodology or the figures therein. In fact, AEP has raised doubt in
our minds as to the accuracy of some comparison figures contained in the working
document and relied upon by Dr. Wilson. For these reasons, we do not agree with
Dr. Wilson's analysis or his conclusion that any stranded benefits exceed the
amount of the GTC that AEP has agreed to forego as part of the stipulation.
Furthermore, we believe that the stipulation provides a reasonable and
equitable resolution on this issue. AEP has agreed to forego a claim of $291.43
million. The parties to the agreement have agreed, based on all of the terms and
conditions of the agreement that there is no further netting or adjustments to
the transition cost recovery during the MDP. Based upon the above findings, the
Commission concludes that there are no stranded generation benefits that should
either offset the RTCs or further fund the shopping incentives proposed by the
stipulation.
5. FROZEN GENERATION RATES
This next argument also relates to Section IV of the stipulation, wherein
neither company will impose any lost revenue charges (GTC) on any switching
customer (Jt.Ex.1, at 3). Shell argues that, for non-switching customers, the
frozen, unbundled GENERATION rates only allow AEP another opportunity to collect
excessive revenues since those rates will be uneconomic in a competitive market
(Shell Initial Br. at 45; Shell Reply Br. at 24).(14) Shell further believes
that the stipulation itself concedes an over-recovery of GENERATION revenues
because the signatory parties agree that RTC revenues and frozen rate revenues
are sufficient to recover regulatory assets (Shell Initial Br. at 47). Next,
Shell contends that these frozen generation rates represent a "DE FACTO second
RTC charge" because, under the stipulation, the companies will amortize and
recover the value of the regulatory assets in excess of the stipulated
regulatory asset rates (ID. at 48). Shell alleges that this is unlawful since
some customers will pay it, but not others, and it will discourage customer
switching (ID.)
AEP states that SB 3's framework allows customers who do not switch to pay
(as part of the unbundled generation component) generation costs that may be
uneconomic (AEP Reply Br. at 48). In AEP's view, the legislature specifically
chose to freeze rates at pre-SB 3 levels and did not allow, for instance, for
adjustments in current costs or sales levels when unbundling generation rates
(ID. at 49-50). Furthermore, AEP alleges that customers will pay the same
frozen, unbundled generation rates, regardless of whether the companies amortize
the regulatory assets over the MDP or expense them immediately (ID. at 51).
Thus, AEP believes Shell's issue is with the requirements of SB 3 and the
legislature has already disagreed with Shell's position (ID. at 52). Thus, there
is no statutory basis to contend that the stipulation is improper (ID.). AEP
further points out that it calculated the unbundled generation rates in
accordance with Section 4928.34, Revised Code, and Shell has not taken issue
with them. (ID. at 49).
We cannot agree with Shell's arguments on this point. We find that the
unbundling plan agreed to by stipulating parties to the transition plan
stipulation is reasonable and consistent with Section 4928.34, Revised Code. The
evidence of record shows that the
------------------
(14) Specifically, Shell contends that the frozen, unbundled generation rates
are uneconomic because they are not reflective of current or competitive
costs and demand (Shell Initial Br. at 46-47).
99-1729-EL-ETP and 99-1730-EL-ETP -19-
unbundling plan proposed by AEP follows the intent of Section 4928.34, Revised
Code. In unbundling the rates for each customer class, AEP had to follow the
requirements of SB 3, which not only dictated the manner in which the generation
component would be determined, but also necessitated the use of the AEP's
earlier cost-of-service studies. We find that AEP has followed the statutory
scheme in unblindling its rates. Further, one of the purposes of this proceeding
is to establish unbundled rates based on the already adopted cost-of-service
studies, not to alter those studies or to determine whether more appropriate
rates should be used when unbundling services. To do so would clearly be
inconsistent with the mandate of Section 4928.34(A)(6), Revised Code, which
requires the unbundling of the rates in effect on the day before the effective
date of SB 3. Therefore, we find the generation components to be reasonable.
6. DISTRIBUTION RATE FREEZE
Section V of the stipulation states, that, except in the event of certain
limited changes, all distribution rates in effect on December 31, 2005, will be
frozen for three years for CSP and two years for OP (Jt. Ex. 1, at 3). Shell
presents two very different arguments against this provision. First, Shell views
this provision as an anti-competitive albatross because, after the MDP, those
frozen rates will recover generation-related retail costs and subsidize the
post-MDP, "market-based" standard offer. Essentially, Shell contends that the
existence of the frozen distribution rates invites the creation of a
below-market rate for the standard offer and provides AEP an unfair competitive
advantage over other suppliers (Shell Initial Br. at 50). Second, Shell states
that the frozen distribution rates allow AEP additional opportunity for cost
over-recovery since the rates are based upon costs and sales levels from old
base rate cases, rather than the lower costs of a competitive market (ID. at
50-51). Shell also states that the rate freeze would again tie the Commission's
hands in achieving the pro-competitive policies of SB 3 (ID. at 51).
AEP first states in response that Shell's criticism here is inconsistent
with Shell's acceptance of a similar rate freeze provision in the FirstEnergy
transition cases (AEP Reply Br. at 53). AEP acknowledges that the frozen
distribution rates are unlikely to represent the items and levels of expense
that the companies are incurring today or will be incurring at the end of 2005
(ID. at 54). However, AEP states that it is speculative to conclude that the
companies will be over-recovering their distribution expenses in 2006, 2007 or
2008 (ID.). AEP notes that it and signatory consumer representatives have
weighed the risks of the agreed-upon rate freeze and determined that it is a
reasonable agreement as part of the overall stipulation, and the Commission
should reject Shell's claims (ID.).
We do not agree with Shell on this point either. We believe that the
distribution rate freeze will provide some certainty to customers in AEP's
service territory at a time when they are evaluating the competitive generation
market. That is to say, OP customers may be assured that competitive,
generation-related costs are not being shifted to non-competitive, distribution
charges after the MDP. Furthermore, to accept Shell's argument on this point, we
must assume that the 2005 distribution rates will include generation-related
costs and will not be reflective of distribution costs in 2006 through 2008. We
are not willing to accept those assumptions.
99-1729-EL-ETP and 99-1730-EL-ETP -20-
7. USF Rider and EERLF Rider
-------------------------
On July 13, 2000, as amended on July 17, 2000, ODOD submitted a motion for
approval of the USF and EERLF riders for AEP. ODOD states that the USF and EERLF
riders were required to be effective on July l, 2000 and January 1, 2001,
respectively. However, due to delays in the transfer of this program, ODOD
requested that the Commission make the USF rider effective September 1, 2000. On
August 4, 2000, IEU-Ohio filed a motion to disapprove those proposed riders.
ODOD, OCC, OPAE, APAC, and OEC filed a memorandum in support of those riders.
AEP recommended that the Commission adopt ODOD's calculations its reply brief
(AEP Reply Br. at 64). By entry issued August 17, 2000, we agreed with the rates
reflected in ODOD's motion. Accordingly, the USF rider rates proposed by ODOD
($0.0006240 for CSP and $0.0002998 for OP) became effective September 1, 2000.
The approved rates for the EERLF rider will be $0.00010758 for both operating
companies, effective January 1, 2001. A request for rehearing of our August 17,
2000 USF/EERLF ruling was then filed by IEU-Ohio, OMA, and OCRM. In a separate
ruling issued this same day, we have granted rehearing in order for the ODOD and
the Commission staff to provide additional data on various components of the USF
riders. AEP's effective USF riders shall remain in effect pending the
Commission's further review of this matter.
8. LOAD SHAPING SERVICE
--------------------
Section XIX of the stipulation states that AEP and the signatory marketers
will further negotiate an AEP load shaping service.(15) All such marketing
intervenors shall be notified of dates, times, and locations for such meetings
(Jt. Ex. 1, at 11).
Shell argues that the stipulation's terms relating to load shaping service
are discriminatory much in the same way as the consolidated billing terms, which
is fully addressed later (Shell Ex. 7, at 15; Shell Initial Br. at 58, footnote
160). Shell worries that, because negotiations will only take place with
signatory marketers, the resulting load shaping services could confer benefits
to only signatory parties (Tr. V, 119-120). Moreover, Shell argues that, since
the generation affiliate(s) providing the load shaping service will be outside
of the Commission's jurisdiction, there will be no means for curbing
discriminatory actions. Shell recommends that the Commission condition any
approval of the proposed corporate separation plan on the resulting unregulated
generation affiliate(s)' providing services like load shaping to all market
participants in a nondiscriminatory manner (Shell Initial Br. at 58-59, footnote
160).
We believe that Shell raises some valid points about the load shaping terms
in the stipulation. Obviously, by agreeing to negotiate with stipulating
marketers, AEP is not agreeing to negotiate with all marketers in its service
territory. It is possible that any resulting load shaping service could then
only confer benefits upon the negotiating marketers. However, we do not think
that the entire stipulation or this part must be rejected because of this
possibility. We believe that, as a condition of our approval of the stipulation
and the transition plans, any resulting load shaping service must be provided in
a nondiscriminatory manner. Furthermore, we direct AEP to open the negotiations
to all
------------------
(15) Load shaping service allows a marketer to better tailor its power purchases
to meet customer demands (Tr. III, 121-122).
99-1729-EL-ETP and 99-1730-EL-ETP -21-
interested parties, not just signatory marketers, so that it is possible to
develop a load shaping service that is based upon all interested persons' input.
Not only do we think it is the smarter approach to take, we also think it can
lead to a better end result.
9. REMAINING CONCERNS WITH THE UNBUNDLING PLAN AND TRANSITION COSTS
Section 4928.34(A)(l), Revised Code, requires the Commission to determine
whether the unbundled components for the electric transmission component of
retail electric service equal the FERC tariff rates in effect on the date of
approval of the transition plan. The unbundled transmission component must
include a sliding scale of charges to ensure that refunds determined or approved
by the FERC are flowed through to retail electric customers. After review of the
filings and testimony submitted by AEP, we find that the companies' transition
plans satisfy the requirements of Section 4928.34(A)(1), Revised Code.
Section 4928.34(A)(2), Revised Code, requires that the unbundled components
for retail electric distribution service in the rate unbundling plan equal the
difference between the costs attributable to the company's transmission and
distribution rates based on the company's most recent rate proceeding, and the
tariff rates for electric transmission service determined by the FERC under
division (A)(l) of that code section. We find that the companies' filings
satisfy this prerequisite. AEP's adjusted unbundled distribution component is
the sum of the transmission and distribution components of rates in effect on
October 5, 1999, less the revenue generated by the applicable OATT (AEP Ex. 24A
at 15). AEP stated that, in identifying the costs in the operating companies'
last rate cases, costs were assigned to functions where possible (ID. at 13-14).
We believe that the companies' allocations are reasonable and the companies'
filings, as amended by the stipulation (and subject to review in the companies'
compliance filings), satisfy prerequisite (A)(2) of Section 4928.34, Revised
Code.
Section 4928.34(A)(3), Revised Code, requires that all other unbundled
components required by the Commission in the rate unbundling plan must equal the
costs attributable to the particular service, as reflected in the company's
schedule of rates and charges. In accordance with this provision, AEP's existing
rates will be unbundled to separate out certain components that will be included
in several riders in the operating companies' tariffs. We note that the
stipulation provides for USF and EERLF riders for the companies (Jt. Ex. 1, at
11), which we fully discussed above. Based on the evidence presented in this
proceeding, we find that the companies' filings, as amended by the stipulation
(and subject to review of the companies' compliance filings), satisfy
prerequisite (A)(3).
Section 4928.34(A)(4), Revised Code, requires that the unbundled components
for retail electric generation service in the rate unbundling plan equal the
residual amount remaining after the determination of the transmission,
distribution, and other unbundled components, and after any tax related
adjustments as necessary to reflect the effects of the amendment of Section
5727.111, Revised Code. Upon review of AEP's transition filings, as amended by
the stipulation, we find that the companies have satisfied this prerequisite. In
Rule 4901:1-20-03, Appendix A, Part (C)(1), O.A.C., the Commission proposed a
formula for determining the residual generation component that includes
transition charges. However, the Commission left open the possibility that
companies could propose alternative formulations. RULES FOR ELECTRIC TRANSITION
PLANS, SUPRA, Opinion and Order at 16.
99-1729-EL-ETP and 99-1730-EL-ETP -22-
AEP proposed such an alternative in its transition filing, but has agreed in the
stipulation not to impose the GTC on any switching customer (AEP Exs. 2, at 15A
and 15B; Jt. Ex.1, at 3). In addition, Section 4928.4O(C), Revised Code,
requires a five-percent reduction in the unbundled generation component for
residential customers. Under the stipulation, the five-percent reduction is to
be applied to the generation component, including the RTC component (Jt. Ex. 1,
at 6). In addition, as described above, the settlement requires AEP to forego
its right to seek reduction of the discount for residential customers during the
MDP (ID.).
Section 4928.34(A)(5), Revised Code, requires that all unbundled components
in the rate unbundling plan must be adjusted to reflect any rate base reductions
on file with the Commission and as scheduled to be in effect by December 31,
2005, under rate settlements in effect on the effective date of this section.
However, all earnings obligations, restrictions, or caps approved prior to the
effective date of the statute are void. We find that the companies' filings, as
amended by the stipulation, satisfy prerequisite(A)(5).
Section 4928.34(A)(6), Revised Code, requires that the total of all
unbundled components is capped and, during the MDP, will equal the total of
rates in effect on the day before the effective date of SB 3. The cap will be
adjusted for changes in taxes, the universal service rider, and the temporary
rider under Section 4928.61, Revised Code. Under AEP's filings, the total of the
companies' unbundled rates is capped, with limited exceptions, during the MDP.
Further, under the stipulation, distribution rates are frozen for additional
years beyond the MDP, through the end of 2007 for OP and through 2008 for CSP
(Jt. Ex. 1, at 3). In addition, under the companies' filings, the total of all
unbundled components of existing rates and contracts equals the rates and
charges of the bundled components, except for adjustments to reflect taxation
changes under SB 3 and for the USF fund and EERLF riders (AEP Ex. 9A at 14-15).
AEP's transition filings, as amended by the stipulation and taking into
consideration our conclusion for the gross receipts/excise tax issue (discussed
below), satisfy prerequisite (A)(6).
Section 4928.34(A)(7), Revised Code, requires the rate unbundling plan to
comply with any rules adopted by the Commission under Section 4928.06(A),
Revised Code.(16) The rules adopted by the Commission regarding unbundling of
rates are set forth in Rule 4901:1-20-03, O.A.C., Appendix A. We find that the
transition filings, through the various schedules and testimony submitted in
this proceeding, satisfy Section 4928.34(A)(7), Revised Code.
Section 4928.34(A)(12), Revised Code, requires that the transition revenues
authorized under Sections 4928.31 to 4928.40, Revised Code, be the allowable
transition costs of the company pursuant to Section 4928.39, Revised Code, and
that the transition charges for customer classes and rate schedules are the
charges under Section 4928.40, Revised Code. Based upon the discussion above and
our consideration of the record, we find that AEP's filings, subject to the
modifications contained in the stipulation, satisfy the prerequisite set forth
in Section 4928.34(A)(12), Revised Code.
------------------
(16) Section 4928.06, Revised Code, directs the Commission to enact rules to
effectuate commencement of competitive retail electric service. The
Commission has enacted rules in compliance with this statute through
various generic rule proceedings.
99-1729-EL-ETP and 99-1730-EL-ETP -23-
Section 4928.34(A)(15), Revised Code, requires that all unbundled
components be adjusted to reflect the elimination of the gross receipt tax
imposed by Section 5727.30, Revised Code. The signatory parties agree that the
revenues from the agreed-upon RTCs and from existing frozen and unbundled rates
recovered during the MDP are sufficient to recover regulatory assets as of the
beginning of the MDP and to provide for the stipulation's obligations (Jt. Ex.
1, at 10). We believe that this agreement is envisioned by and consistent with
the requirements of Section 4928.34(A)(15), Revised Code, as well as Section
4928.34(A)(6), Revised Code. (17)
Section 4928.39, Revised Code, requires the Commission to determine the
total allowable amount of the company's transition costs to be received by the
company as transition revenues. Such transition costs must meet the following
criteria:
(1) The costs were prudently incurred.
(2) The costs are legitimate, net, verifiable, and directly assignable or
allocable to retail electric generation service provided to electric
consumers in this state.
(3) The costs are unrecoverable in a competitive market.
(4) The utility would otherwise be entitled an opportunity to recover the
costs.
We believe that, under the proposed transition plans as modified by the
proposed stipulation, the amount of transition costs has been determined and
that it meets the requirements for recovery through transition charges.
B. CORPORATE SEPARATION PLAN
Under AEP's corporate separation plan, the companies have proposed to move
the regulated transmission and distribution functions into newly created
affiliates (AEP Ex. 2, Part B). As a result, AEP acknowledges that the new
entities will own and operate all transmission and distribution assets and be
public utilities, as defined in Sections 4905.02 and 4905.03, Revised Code (AEP
Ex. 9A at 19; AEP Initial Br. at 47). AEP plans to seek the necessary federal
authorization for the transfer of assets in 2000 (AEP Ex. 9A at 21). The
corporate separation plan will take into consideration the overlapping financial
arrangements that currently exist and refinance substantially all of the
obligations over a period of time (AEP Ex. 20, at 3-7). In particular, the plan
involves: (1) assigning specific debt that can be identified to individual
assets and leaving the remaining debt and preferred stock obligations with the
generation company; (2) retire debt and preferred stock obligations; and (3)
replace debt and preferred stock obligations in a manner that does not create or
will eliminate future financial overlaps (ID. at 5-6). Nearly all service
offerings will remain the same; AEP identified one service (storage water heater
rental
------------------
(17) Section 4928.34(A)(6), Revised Code, provides that the effect on customer
rates from the tax overlap between the existing gross receipts tax and the
new franchise tax "shall be addressed by the Commission through accounting
procedures, refunds, or an annual surcharge or credit to customers, or
through other appropriate means, to avoid placing the financial
responsibility for the difference upon the electric utility or its
shareholders."
99-1729-EL-ETP and 99-1730-EL-ETP -24-
program) that will be phased out as inappropriate in a competitive market for
generation services (AEP Ex. 9A at 20). AEP's corporate separation plan and
supporting testimony address safeguards, separate accounting, financial
arrangements, complaint procedures, education and training, and a cost
allocation manual (AEP Ex. 2, Part B; AEP Exs. 9A at 22-23, 9B at 3, 13, 20).
AEP contends that the stipulation enhances the corporate separation plan
in three respects (AEP Initial Br. at 50). First, the cost allocation manual
(CAM) will definitively follow the uniform system of accounts, as well as the
generally accepted accounting principles. (Jt. Ex. 1, at 11). Second, effective
with the start of competition, the distribution affiliate will not provide
competitive non-electric products or services to retail customers on a
commercial basis, except under pre-existing contractual obligations or when
incidental to the provision of customer services and not on a commercial basis
(ID. at 11-12). Third, the stipulation requires that employees of the affiliates
not have access to any information about the transmission or distribution
systems that is not contemporaneously available in the same form and manner to
nonaffiliated competitors of retail electric services (ID.).
Shell raises two concerns with the corporate separation plan of AEP (Shell
Ex. 6, at 83-84, 86-87; Shell Initial Br. at 66-67). First, Shell states that
the corporate separation plan allows excessive sharing of accounting services
and management with affiliates (ID.). Second, Shell contends that "declared
emergencies" under the corporate separation plan will allow AEP to violate the
affiliate code of conduct (ID.).
Shell presented no evidence on either of these points. We are not convinced
that Shell's concerns about the language or the corporate separation plan
warrant its rejection. As for the sharing of accounting services and management,
we have previously explained that the corporate separation rules were not
intended to prohibit all sharing of employees between affiliated entities. RULES
FOR ELECTRIC TRANSITION PLANS, SUPRA, Second Entry on Rehearing at 21. Moreover,
we stated that certain centralized support functions may be permissable (ID.).
Specifically, our corporate separation rules are "intended to require
independent work/functions when the failure to maintain independent operations
may have the effect of harming customers or unfairly disadvantaging unaffiliated
suppliers of competitive retail electric service or non-electric products or
services" (ID.). Without any evidence presented, we are not convinced that the
AEP's plan could have the harmful effect we wish to avoid. Moreover, many
interested parties have agreed to the contrary. Additionally, we are not
convinced that AEP's corporate separation plan must contain a particular
definition of "declared emergency". The corporate separation plan complies with
Rule 4901:1-20-16(G)(4)(j), O.A.C., on this point and is acceptable.
Unlike the corporate separation plans proposed by the FirstEnergy
Corporation operating companies and Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company,(18) AEP
has presented a corporate separation plan that provides for structural
separation by January 1, 2001 (except for limited financial arrangements).
Therefore, this Commission need not evaluate an interim plan under Section
4928.17(C), Revised Code. Section 4928.17(A)(2), Revised
------------------
(18) IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF CINCINNATI GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY FOR
APPROVAL OF ITS ELECTRIC TRANSITION PLAN, APPROVAL OF TARIFF CHANGES AND
NEW TARIFFS, AUTHORITY TO MODIFY CURRENT ACCOUNTING PROCEDURES, AND
APPROVAL TO TRANSFER ITS GENERATING ASSETS TO ANY EXEMPT WHOLESALE
GENERATOR, CASE NOS. 99-1658-EL-ETP, et al. (August 31, 2000).
99-1729-EL-ETP and 99-1730-EL-ETP -25-
Code, requires that all plans satisfy the public interest in preventing unfair
competitive advantage and abuse of market power. The plan must also be
sufficient to ensure that no undue preference or advantage is extended to or
received by the competitive retail affiliate from the utility affiliate. Section
4928(A)(3), Revised Code. We find that AEP has constructed its plan in a manner
that achieves, to the extent reasonably practical, the structural separation
contemplated by Section 4928.17(A)(1), Revised Code, and the corresponding
Commission rules. However, the Commission reserves the right to invoke its
authority to preserve fair competition, for both interim and permanent
arrangements.
Section 4928.34(A)(8), Revised Code, states that the corporate separation
plan required under Section 4928.31(A), Revised Code, must comply with section
4928.17, Revised Code, and any rules adopted by the Commission pursuant to
Section 4928.06(A), Revised Code. We find that the proposed corporate separation
plan satisfies this prerequisite, for the reasons stated in the discussion
above. We reserve the right to closely monitor the implementation of the plan to
avoid competitive inequality, unfair competitive advantage or abuse of market
power. We believe that through the periodic Commission review (i.e., through
audits of the company's books and records, including the CAM) and the complaint
process, this Commission may ensure that the corporate separation plan is
implemented in accordance with the policy enunciated in SB 3.
C. OSP
Section 4928.34(A)(9), Revised Code, provides that the company's transition
plan must comply with Commission requirements and rules regarding operational
support systems and technical implementation issues pertaining to competitive
retail electric service. The Commission's rules regarding operational support
and technical implementation are set out in Appendix B of Rule 4901:1-20-03,
O.A.C. Additionally, on November 30, 1999, the Commission issued an entry in
Case No. 99-1141-EL-ORD, directing Ohio's investor-owned electric utilities and
interested stakeholders to participate in a taskforce for the development of
uniform business practices and electronic data interchange (EDI) standards.
Pursuant to this directive, the Commission staff created the OSP taskforce
(hereinafter referred to as OSPO). On May 15, 2000, numerous OSPO participants
filed a pro forma certified supplier tariff (pro forma tariff) and a stipulation
(hereinafter referred to as the OSPO stipulation) in each utility's transition
plan case. The pro forma tariff contains a number of service regulations on
which the parties were able to agree. These relate to: supplier registration and
credit requirements, end-use customer enrollment process, supplier registration
and credit requirements, end-use customer inquiries and requests for
information, service request process, metering services and obligations, load
profiling and scheduling, transmission scheduling agents, confidentiality of
information, voluntary withdrawal by a competitive retail electric service
provider, liability, and alternative dispute resolution. In the OSPO
stipulation, the parties specifically requested the Commission to resolve issues
in four general areas: (1) energy imbalance service, (2) minimum stay
requirements for residential and small commercial customers returning to
standard offer service, (3) consolidated billing and purchase of receivables,
and (4) adoption of EDI standards. On May 18, 2000, the Commission issued and
entry initiating a generic docket to establish procedures for parties desiring
to file comments and reply comments regarding the OSPO stipulation and pro forma
tariff. IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTABLISHMENT OF ELECTRONIC DATA EXCHANGE STANDARDS
AND UNIFORM BUSINESS PRACTICES FOR THE
99-1729-EL-ETP and 99-1730-EL-ETP -26-
ELECTRIC UTILITY INDUSTRY, Case No. 00-813-EL-EDI (hereinafter 00-813). On July
20, 2000, the Commission issued a finding and order approving the OSPO
stipulation and resolving the four issues left unresolved.
AEP's operational support and technical implementation plan is described in
the testimony of Jeffrey Laine (AEP Ex. l4A and 14B). The OSP specifically
addresses each requirement set forth in the Commission's rules (AEP Ex. 2, Part
C). Specifically, as required by Rule 4901:1-20-03, Appendix B, Part (A),
O.A.C., AEP's operational support plan addresses how the company intends to
utilize its existing systems and what changes will be made to implement customer
choice. Further, as required by Rule 4901:1-20-03, Appendix B, Part (B), O.A.C.,
the plan includes an electronic "clearinghouse" system that will provide
functionality such as service provider registration, enrollment and switching,
estimation and reconciliation, settlement, and bill data delivery (AEP Ex. 14B
at 2).
Under the transition plan stipulation in this case, AEP agrees to
incorporate into its transition plan, the OSPO stipulation and pro forma tariff
with the exception of certain terms that the stipulating parties have agreed
will apply to AEP. According to the companies, the settlement modifies the
companies' plans by providing minimum stay requirements and consolidated billing
credits (AEP Initial Br. at 55). AEP contends that these modifications bring
additional benefits to customers and, suppliers and, thus, encourage the
development of the competitive retail market (ID.). Shell takes issue with four
OSP-related items in the transition plans and stipulation: (1) supplier
consolidated billing credit; (2) residential customer switching period (3)
switching fee, and (4) additional certification requirements proposed by AEP.
1. SUPPLIER CONSOLIDATED BILLING CREDIT
AEP did not propose a supplier consolidated billing credit in the
transition plans. Section XIV of the stipulation states that AEP will provide a
$1.00 credit to suppliers for each consolidated bill issued by that provider
during the first year of the MDP (Jt. Ex. 1, at 9; Tr. III, 101). The signatory
parties agree to conduct further negotiations related to a similar future credit
(ID.). Finally, that provision states that AEP shall reasonably attempt to
implement supplier consolidated billing as soon as practicable (ID.).(19)
Shell believes that the stipulation's terms for a consolidated billing
credit are inadequate to spur effective competition (Shell Ex. 7, at 16-17;
Shell Initial Br. at 52). Shell, unlike most other marketers in these
proceedings, provides consolidated billing for customers in Georgia and intends
to do so in Ohio. First, Shell characterizes the stipulated credit amount as
"anemic" and as requiring Shell's customers to pay twice for the billing service
(once to Shell and a second time to AEP for costs not captured by the billing
credit) (Tr. III, 115-116; Shell Initial Br. at 53; Shell Reply Br. at 27).
Shell further states that the $1.00 is an arbitrary figure, while Shell's
evidence supports a conclusion that CSP and OP residential accounting
collections and services average $3.70 and $4.00 per customer per month,
respectively (Shell Ex. 7, at 20; Shell Intitial Br. at 54-55). For that reason,
Shell contends that the billing costs are virtually certain to be much higher
than $1.00 (Shell Ex. 7, at 21). Shell also presented evidence of other
utilities' billing costs, which were all quite a
-----------------
(19) AEP has established its target date for implementing the supplier
consolidated billing credit as January 1, 2001, the start of
competition in Ohio (Jt. Ex. 1, at 7; Tr. III, 102, 156).
99-1729-EL-ETP and 99-1730-EL-ETP -27-
bit higher than $1.00 (ID. at 23, JWW-1S, JWWW-2S). For these reasons, Shell
contends that the Commission should reject Section XIV and take one of two
actions. Those are: either adopt a higher figure, no lower than $2.00 per bill,
pending completion of a separate proceeding to determine actual costs, or
require AEP to establish a separate affiliate to perform billing functions (ID.
at 23-24; Shell Initial Br. 57).
Second, Shell also criticizes the stipulated process for modifying the
credit because only signatory parties may participate in those future
negotiations. Shell notes that even AEP acknowledged that, if none of the
signatory parties seek such negotiations, they will not take place (Tr. III;
106; Shell Initial Br. at 58). Shell believes that none of the signatory
marketers have an interest in performing consolidated billing and, therefore,
there is a great risk that no future consolidated bill credit negotiations will
take place. Shell also states that the stipulation's terms would have
anti-competitive consequences, by excluding certain market participants from
negotiations and by only allowing AEP to petition the Commission if negotiations
fail (Shell Initial Br. at 59). Lastly, Shell points out that the stipulation
also fails to provide a "fail-safe" credit in the event that future negotiations
are not completed in the 12-month period (Shell Ex. 7, at 24). In Shell's view,
not only does AEP not have an incentive to agree to a higher billing credit, but
the stipulation provides AEP with further incentive to let the 12 months expire
so that the stipulated credit expires (Shell Initial Br. at 59).
AEP states that the Commission should view the stipulated consolidated
billing credit as an extra bonus since AEP is not statutorily required to offer
such a credit and since not other Ohio utility will be offering one as early as
AEP (AEP Initial Br. at 54; AEP Reply BR. at 55). AEP also points out that the
Commission did not require utilities to offer consolidated billing credits in
consideration of the topic as part of the OSP issues (AEP Rely Br. at 55). Next,
AEP contends that there is evidence to support the reasonableness of the
stipulated credit amount. For instance, AEP's witness stated that the only
avoided costs of providing billing services would be postage and the envelope,
costs which are much less than $1.00 (Tr. III, 111-112, 149; AEP Reply Br. at
57). AEP also points out that Shell's witness acknowledged that other utilities
have credits in the $1.00 range (TR. V. 94). Next, AEP contends that there is no
basis in Ohio law for the Commission to adopt Shell's recommendation for a
separate billing affiliate. AEP next noted that it has agreed to keep Shell
involved and informed of the consolidated bill discussions (Tr. III,
106-108)(20), so that concern has already been addressed by the companies (AEP
Reply Br. at 58-59).
Staff contends that Shell's argument is premature because the stipulation
is providing a credit only as a temporary measure during the first year (Staff
Initial Br. at 9). Sine "fine-tuning" can and will be addressed in the future
and there are many more pressing items to address during the first phase of the
transition, Shell's concern should be not adopted according to the staff (ID.).
Additionally, the staff states that the consolidated billing credit is a unique
advantage of this stipulation since no other stipulation provide such a credit
(ID).
We established in 00-813 a target date for consolidated bill-ready billing
of no later than June 1, 2002, and a target date for supplier consolidated
billing of not later than July 1,
------------------
(20) AEP agreed to also allow participation by customer groups, such as the
OCC, the staff, industrials (TR. III, 16-107).
99-1729-EL-ETP and 99-1730-EL-ETP -28-
2002. The stipulation before us, however, includes a target date for supplier
consolidated billing that coincides with the start of competition. In this
respect, AEP is planning to be the first utility to implement the necessary
systematic changes for supplier consolidated billing. We find the stipulated
target date by AEP to be reasonable.(21) Nevertheless, the crux of Shell's
argument is not the start date, but the amount of the consolidated billing
credit. Shell presented evidence from which it contends that the $1.00 credit is
unreasonable. AEP presented evidence from which it contends that the $1.00
credit is reasonable. On balance, we conclude that, as part of an overall
settlement of nearly all issues in these proceedings, the stipulated credit
amount is acceptable. If this issue were fully litigated, we might very well
reach a conclusion that differs from $1.00, but we cannot say that this
provision (as part of a settlement reached with a broad range of interested
parties and with a target of having the credit immediately available with the
onset of competition) must be rejected. Additionally, AEP explained that, in the
event that the system changes for supplier-consolidated billing are not in place
at the start of competition on January 1, 2001, it would continue the
consolidated billing credit on a day-for-day basis so that it was offered for a
one-year period (Tr. 111, 156-157). Lastly, inasmuch as AEP has agreed to
include Shell in the future negotiations (as well as customer groups), we
believe that eliminates Shell's concern that those future negotiations might not
take place (Shell itself can ensure that the negotiations take place). For these
reasons, we do not accept either one of Shell's suggested approaches for this
issue.
2. RESIDENTIAL CUSTOMER SWITCHING/MINIMUM STAY REQUIREMENT
The transition plan filing provided that all customers returning to the
company from an alternative supplier be required to stay on the standard service
offer for 12 months or the MDP, whichever is longer (AEP Ex. 2, Part A, UNB-1,
Sheet Nos. 3-18D for OP and 3-14D for CSP; AEP Ex. 24A at 5-6). AEP has agreed
to mitigate this requirement in the settlement (Jt. Ex. 1, at 7-8). In Section
XII of the stipulation, the operating companies agree that, during the MDP,
customers who can take generation service from AEP between May 16 and September
15 must either remain a customer through April 15 of the following year or
choose a market-based tariff which will not be lower than the generation cost
embedded in the standard offer (ID. at 7). Under the stipulation, nonaggregated
residential customers will be permitted to shop three times during the MDP and
to return two times to the default tariff before being required to choose from
one of the above two options (ID. at 8).
Shell contends that AEP's proposed minimum stay requirement violates SB 3
because SB 3 contemplates no limitation on a residential customer's freedom of
movement between service options even if those movements involve a return to
standard offer service (Shell Ex. 6, at 64; Shell Initial Br. at 60). Shell also
claims that AEP's minimum stay provision could remove large numbers of such
consumers from the competitive market place for substantial periods of time and
reduce competition (Shell Initial Br. at 60).
AEP points out that Section 4928.31(A)(5), Revised Code, specifically
allows transition plans to create reasonable minimum stay requirements (AEP
Reply Br. at 60). Furthermore, AEP states that it is unrealistic for there to be
no restrictions placed on
-------------------------
(21) We note that, pursuant to Rule 4901:1-10-29(H)(1), O.A.C., the companies
are still required to make rate-ready, electric distribution
utility-consolidated billing available to suppliers on January 1, 2001.
99-1729-EL-ETP and 99-1730-EL-ETP -29-
residential switching (ID.). Also, AEP states that the Commission has already
rejected Shell's position in 00-813, there is no reason to alter that decision,
and the Commission should adopt Section XII of the stipulation (ID. at 60-61).
With respect to the issue of AEP's minimum stay requirements and Shell's
criticisms thereof, we defer to our rulings in 00-813. In that first order (page
13), we approved the use of minimum stay requirements conditioned upon the
development of a market-based "come and go" rate alternative service and only in
the event the customer voluntarily chooses to return to the standard offer
service. We prohibited the imposition of a mandatory stay when a customer
defaults to the utility's standard offer service due to the default of the
supplier of electricity. We also established a uniform penalty free return to
standard offer service policy and a uniform period throughout Ohio in which
companies can impose a summer/stay period of May 16th through September 15th. On
August 31, 2000, we granted rehearing with regard to the minimum stay ruling and
adopted the "first year exemption" proposal (as opposed to the two free returns
proposal) as the uniform rule in Ohio for residential and small commercial
customers. This uniform rule differs from what AEP agreed upon in its
stipulation, but AEP also agrees in that same stipulation to abide by our OSP
determinations. Having, addressed and considered Shell's arguments in 00-813, we
conclude that no further conclusions need be expressed at this time.
Accordingly, the Commission will modify the stipulation's treatment of minimum
stay requirements so that AEP's minimum stay requirements are in full compliance
with our orders in 00-813 and we reserve approval of any tariff provision
relating thereto.(22) We also note that, as stated in our entry on rehearing in
00-813, our approval of the minimum stay requirements is conditioned upon the
development of a uniform alternative, which will provide returning customers
with a method of avoiding the minimum stay or which may eliminate the need for
such requirement.
3. SWITCHING FEE AND ALTERNATIVE METERING CREDIT
As part of its OSP, AEP originally proposed a $5.00 switching fee each time
a customer authorized change in provider occurs, except under certain limited
circumstances (AEP Ex. 2, Part A, UNB-1, Sheet Nos. 3-3D and 3-18D for OP and
Sheet Nos. 3-3D and 3-14D for CSP). AEP later modified its switching fee
proposal, increasing it to $10.00 (AEP Ex. 24B at 4-5). AEP states that it
proposed the increased fee because of certain Commission rules(23) and the items
being discussed in the OSPO (AEP Ex. 24B at 4-
-------------------
(22) We note that the stipulation's minimum stay proposal was suggested to the
Commission, UNLESS the OSPO agreed upon other, less restrictive minimum
stay requirements. As noted above, the OSPO did not agree upon minimum
stay requirements and requested a Commission ruling. That has occurred
and, thus, Section XII's prefatory clause has not been triggered. We make
this statement so that all interested parties fully understand that we
expect that the conclusions we reached in 00-813 on the minimum stay issue
will be followed. We also make this statement in light of Mr. Forrester's
testimony, which would leave one to believe that the stipulation's minimum
stay provision would be triggered (and not the Commission's 00-813 minimum
stay conclusions) if the Commission's conclusion in 00-813 was more
restrictive than the stipulation (Tr. IV, 134-135). We do not, accept the
approach/interpretation set forth by Mr. Forrester and explicitly modify
the stipulation on this issue and we reserve approval of any tariff
provision relating thereto so that AEP's minimum stay requirements comply
with our decisions in 00-813.
(23) AEP specifically referred to the Commission's rules in IN THE MATTER OF
THE COMMISSION'S PROMULGATION OF RULES FOR MINIMUM COMPETITIVE RETAIL
ELECTRIC SERVICE STANDARDS PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 4928, REVISED CODE and IN
THE MATTER OF THE COMMISSION'S PROMULGATION OF AMENDMENTS TO RULES FOR
ELECTRIC SERVICE and
99-1729-EL-ETP and 99-1730-EL-ETP -30-
5). Shell argues that the switching fee proposed is excessive (Shell Ex. 6, at
66; Shell Initial Br. at 66-67).(24) AEP states that the Commission should deny
Shell's objection, when it is weighed against the reasonableness of the
stipulation as a package (AEP Reply Br. at 61-62).
Also as part of its OSP, AEP proposed an $0.11 monthly alternative metering
credit for CSP residential customers and a $0.12 monthly alternative metering
credit for OP residential customers (AEP Ex. 2, Part A, UNB-1, Sheet No. 10-1D).
Shell states that the proposed alternative metering credits are too low and
effectively amount to barriers for suppliers to undertake alternative metering
(Shell Ex. 6, at 78; Shell Initial Br. at 66-67). Shell wants the credits to
reflect the utilities' fall cost, not only avoided cost (Shell Ex. 6, at 78).
AEP states that the Commission should likewise deny Shell's objection, when it
is weighed against the reasonableness of the stipulation as a package (AEP Reply
Br. at 61-62).
Similar to our finding for the consolidated billing credit amount, we
conclude that the switching fee and alternative metering credit amounts are
acceptable. Although we might conclude, based upon a fully litigated record,
that other amounts are more appropriate, we have no evidence in the record to do
so. Shell presented no such evidence as to what it contends are appropriate
dollar amounts. Accordingly, we conclude that the modified switching fee and the
alternative metering credit amounts proposed by AEP are acceptable, in the
context of the overall settlement package presented to us.
4. SUPPLIER REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS
As part of the OSP, AEP proposed a two-step certification/registration
process. AEP stated that, along with the Commission's certification process, it
"proposes a registration process for its service territory" (AEP Ex. 2, Part A,
UNB-1, Sheet No. 3-15D - 3-16D for CSP and Sheet No. 3-19D - 3-20D for OP). The
registration process would require: (1) proof of certification, (2) $100 annual
fee; (3) financial instrument to ensure against defaults and a description of
the plan to meet requirements of firm service customers; (4) contact
information; (5) dispute resolution process for supplier customer complaints;
and (6) statement of adherence with tariffs and any agreements between AEP and
the supplier (ID.). Shell contends that approval of the OSP will allow AEP to
improperly impose additional certification requirements upon suppliers, beyond
the Commission's certification requirements (Shell Ex. 6, at 68-72; Shell
Initial Br. at 66-67).
As noted earlier, on July 19, 2000, we approved of the OSPO's proposed pro
forma tariff. That tariff contained (in Section V) the following language
associated with supplier registration process, beyond the Commission's
certification requirements:
The Company shall approve or disapprove the supplier's
registration within 30 calendar days of receipt of complete
registration information from the supplier. The 30 day time period
may be extended for up to 30 days for
---------------------
SAFETY STANDARDS PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 4928, REVISED CODE, Case Nos.
99-1611-EL-ORD and 99-1613-EL-ORD, respectively.
(24) Shell referred to the $5.00 switching fee proposal. We presume that Shell
considers the current, higher fee proposal to be excessive as well and,
therefore, shall address the argument.
99-1729-EL-ETP and 99-1730-EL-ETP -31-
good cause shown, or until such other time as is mutually agreed to
by the supplier and the Company.
The approval process shall include, but is not limited to:
successful completion of the credit requirements and receipt of the
required collateral if any by the Company, executed EDI Trading
Partner Agreement and Certified Supplier Service Agreement, payment
and receipt of any supplier registration fee and completion of EDI
testing for applicable transaction sets necessary to commence service.
The Company will notify the supplier of incomplete registration
information within ten (10) calendar days of receipt. The notice to
the supplier shall include a description of the missing or incomplete
information.
Thus, we have agreed, not only that the electric utilities can have
registration processes, but the registration processes can include some of the
very items that were proposed by AEF in its transition plan. However, we believe
that the stipulation before us resolves Shell's concerns over AEP's proposed
registration requirements. In Section XI, the companies agree to accept
resolution of issues by the OSP working group and to incorporate such in their
transition plans (Jt. Ex. 1, at 7). Registration procedures were mutually
resolved by the OSPO working group (as part of the pro forma tariff) after the
plan was proposed and we have also approved that uniform tariff. It appears to
us that AEP has accepted to modify supplier registration terms to comply with
what was adopted by the OSPO working group, to which Shell was also a supporting
party. We do not believe that there is any further disagreement on this issue.
Accordingly, the Commission will approve the stipulation's treatment of supplier
registration conditioned upon certain modifications so that AEP's supplier
registration requirements are in full compliance with our orders in 00-813.
5. OVERALL OSP CONCLUSION
While the settlement provides several express modifications to the
operational support aspects of the transition plan filing, which the company
argues benefit customers and suppliers alike, the settlement also states that
AEP will abide by Commission determinations related to OSP issues when not
resolved by the OSPO (Jt. Ex. 1, at 7). Thus, the settlement sets out not only
its own provisions enhancing the development of a competitive retail market, but
expressly encompasses such measures that the Commission has adopted to reach the
same goal. We believe the companies' OSP set forth in the stipulation, subject
to modifications to comply with 00-813, is reasonable and appropriately
addresses operational support systems and technical implementation procedures.
Accordingly, we find the transition plan meets the statutory requirements of
Section 4928.34(A)(9), Revised Code. The Commission directs its staff to
finalize a bill format that includes a "price to compare" (which is the price
for an electric supplier to beat in order for the customer to save money) for
residential and small commercial
99-1729-EL-ETP and 99-1730-EL-ETP -32-
customers.(25) As part of our approval of AEP's transition plans, the companies
must meet staff's requirements regarding billing format.
D. EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PLAN (EAP)
AEP's EAP was presented in the testimony of Melinda S. Ackerman, Vice
President of Human Resources for American Electric Power Service Corporation
(AEP Ex. 5). Ms. Ackerman stated that, in the event of job displacement due to
organizational restructuring, AEP's EAP consists of programs to help individuals
locate new positions, a relocation assistance program, an educational assistance
program, professional outplacement services, and a re-employment workshop (AEP
Ex. 5, at 2-3). Additionally, the EAP includes programs designed to help deal
with the emotional and financial issues associated with displacement, such as,
counseling, severance, extended medical and life benefits, and early retirement
(ID. at 3). Ms. Ackerman noted that the programs being sponsored as the EAP are
existing already and the companies have not identified any eligible employees
(ID.). Finally, Ms. Ackerman noted that the companies are not seeking cost
recovery in the transition charge of any costs associated with the EAP (ID.),
UWUA points out that the EAP is lacking a disparate/adverse impact
statement in accordance with Rule 4901:1-20-03, Appendix C, Part (C)(8), O.A.C.
UWUA assert that, to the extent AEP seeks to "downsize" during the MDP, the
Commission's regulations will require submission and approval of a
disparate/adverse impact statement (UWUA Br. 2 and 4). Despite the fact that AEP
has proposed no staffing changes and is not seeking any related transition cost,
UWUA states that the filing of the statement is necessary before any staff
downsizing takes place, not vice versa, so that the Commission can ensure the
availability of reliable, safe, and efficient electric service (ID. at 4).
Therefore, UWUA states that any approval of the transition plan (including the
EAP) should include a condition requiring AEP to file and obtain approval of a
disparate/adverse impact statement PRIOR to carrying out proposed staffing
changes during the MDP (ID. at 6-7). Additionally, UWUA states that the
Commission should clarify that "downsizing" during the MDP gives rise to the
requirement of advance filing and approval of a disparate/adverse impact
statement (ID. at 5-7).
AEP responds by stating that, since it did not identify any positions
affected by SB 3, no disparate/adverse impacts could be explained and,
therefore, its EAP filing satisfies the Commission's filing requirements (AEP
Reply Br. at 62). Next, AEP states that the UWUA would expand the requirement to
apply to any downsizing, rather than just for employees that are adversely and
directly affected by electric restructuring (ID. at 62-63). Lastly, AEP states
that the UWUA's suggestion should be rejected because the Commission should not
establish procedures for addressing speculative events; rather, the Commission
can determine what procedures, if any, are appropriate when such a change occurs
(ID.).
Section 4928.31(A)(4), Revised Code, requires a utility to file, as part of
its transition plan, an employee assistance plan "for providing severance,
retraining, early retirement,
-------------------
(25) We recognize that AEP already proposed a chart that reflects the
companies' prices to compare, but by tariff service (AEP Ex. 9D at Attach.
I). This information should be helpful for finalizing the bill format that
includes the "price to compare" information.
99-1729-EL-ETP and 99-1730-EL-ETP -33-
retention, outplacement, and other assistance for the utility's employees whose
employment is affected by electric industry restructuring..." Rule 4901:1-20-03,
O.A.C., Appendix C, Part (B)(3), defines "employee affected by restructuring" as
an employee who is "directly and adversely affected by electric restructuring
during the [MDP]...." Part (A) of the rule requires the utility to explain "how
it would mitigate any necessary reductions in the electric utility workforce."
Part (C) requires the EAP to provide the following components: notification of
employees; outplacement assistance; relocation assistance; employee assistance,
such as counseling; early retirement programs; severance packages; and "other
assistance."
To the extent UWUA argues that the EAP is deficient because no
disparate/adverse impact statement was included, we disagree. Since the
companies concluded that no employees would be directly and adversely affected
by electric restructuring during the MDP, we do not believe a disparate/adverse
impact statement was required in the filing. We find that AEP's EAP satisfies
the filing requirements of Rule 4901:1-20-03, O.A.C. UWUA does also seek a
further requirement for AEP. UWUA states that any approval of the transition
plan (including the EAP) should include a condition requiring AEP to file and
obtain Commission approval of a disparate/adverse impact statement prior to
carrying out proposed staffing changes during the MDP. On this point, UWUA is
seeking a Commission requirement upon AEP to file, during the MDP, statements
regarding what effect planned staffing changes will have on service delivery.
AEP is correct in noting that UWUA's request would apply to any staff changes,
not just those directly and adversely affected by electric restructuring. For
that reason, we agree that UWUA's request is somewhat over-broad. However, we do
not believe such a condition upon approval of the EAP is unwarranted. Rather, we
find it appropriate to require AEP to provide a disparate/adverse impact
statement (in this docket) should the company subsequently determine that a
reduction in the staffing level is necessary due to electric restructuring
during the MDP. Moreover, we will require AEP to provide the Commission with all
terms and conditions related to the sale of corporate assets (including the sale
of affiliate coal mines) that could have an impact on employment levels. We will
of course be monitoring the service delivery and will take all necessary steps
to ensure that just, reasonable, reliable and safe electric service is provided.
Pursuant to Section 4928.34(A)(10), Revised Code, the Commission finds that the
companies' EAP, with the above-noted conditions, sufficiently provides
severance, retraining, early retirement, retention, outplacement, and other
assistance for the company's employees whose employment is affected by electric
industry restructuring.
E. CONSUMER EDUCATION PLAN
Section 4928.31(A)(5), Revised Code, requires each utility's transition
plan to include a consumer education plan consistent with Section 4928.42,
Revised Code, and the applicable Commission rules. Section 4928.42, Revised
Code, provides that, prior to the starting date of competitive retail electric
service, the Commission shall prescribe and adopt a general plan by which each
electric utility shall provide during its MDP consumer education on electric
restructuring. Utilities are required to spend up to $16 million in the first
year on consumer education within their certified service territories and an
additional $17 million in decreasing amounts over the remaining years of the
MDP. As part of its transition plan, AEP filed an education plan (AEP Ex. 2,
Part E). AEP 's education plan targets residential customers, small and
mid-sized commercial customers, elected officials,
99-1729-EL-ETP and 99-1730-EL-ETP -34-
community leaders, civic organizations, trade associations, and consumer groups
(AEP Ex. 9A, at 25). Industrial customers' needs will be addressed on an
individual basis (ID.). A special effort will target low-income, special needs,
and hard-to-reach customers (ID.). The plan also describes the methods,
timelines, and spending that will be used for AEP's education campaign. Some
opposition to AEP's education plan was raised by the Coalition for Choice in
Electricity (CCE)(26) and OCC.
As noted earlier, on November 30, 1999, the Commission issued rules for the
electric transition plan proceedings. At that same time, the Commission adopted
in Case No. 99-1141-EL-ORD a general plan for the electric utilities' consumer
education. After the companies filed their transition plans, various intervenors
filed preliminary objections. Separate staff reports were filed in each of the
transition plan proceedings. In each staff report, the staff stated that the
consumer education plans are consistent with the requirements issued by the
Commission on November 30, 1999.(27) After reviewing all of the education plans
filed in all of the transition cases and after considering the objections and
comments submitted, we found in our July 19, 2000 Finding and Order in these
proceedings that AEP's education plan is in compliance with Section 4928.42,
Revised Code, and we approved AEP's education plan subject to a few
contingencies. First, we noted that, with regard to provisions for the funding
of local community-based organizations (CBO), although we did not require
funding of the CBOs, we did encourage AEP to provide CBO funding. Second, we
required AEP to include an unaffiliated energy marketer representative on the
advisory board (we allowed AEP's operating companies to have a combined advisory
group and a combined service territory-specific campaign). Third, we required
that the plans for AEP include further details on how the territory-specific
campaign will be managed and operated, how materials and information will be
disseminated, and how funds will be allocated to activities, as well as other
matters. Further, we conditioned our approval on the Commission staff's
continuing supervision of the general and territory-specific plans as further
details are developed for each of the consumer education programs. With the
conditions to AEP's education plan set forth in our July 19, 2000 order, we
find that AEP's transition plan complies with Section 4928.31(A)(5), Revised
Code. Additionally, the Commission finds that the companies' consumer education
plan sufficiently complies with Section 4928.34(A)(10), Revised Code,
F. INDEPENDENT TRANSMISSION PLAN
Section 4928.34(A)(13), Revised Code, requires that any transmission plan
included in the transition plan must reasonably comply with Section 4928.12,
Revised Code, and any rules adopted by the Commission unless the Commission, for
good cause shown, authorizes the company to defer compliance until an order is
issued under Section 4928.35(G), Revised Code.(28) Pursuant to Section
4928.12(A), Revised Code, no entity shall own or control transmission facilities
(as defined by federal law) in Ohio as of the date of competitive retail
electric service unless the entity is a member of, and transfers control of
----------------------
(26) The CCE group includes various marketers, low-income representatives, IEU,
OCRM, OPAE, city of Cleveland, AMP-Ohio, and OMA.
(27) The staff's only recommendation for the AEP consumer education plan was
the inclusion of an energy marketer representative in the advisory group.
(28) Section 4928.35(G), Revised Code, governs requirements for utilities that
do not have an independent transmission plan with respect to transfer of
control and operation of transmission facilities.
99-1729-EL-ETP and 99-1730-EL-ETP -35-
those facilities to, one or more qualifying transmission entities. Section
4928.12(B), Revised Code, sets forth the specifications that such entities must
meet.
Both existing federal(29) and state requirements are designed to achieve
the same key objectives for transmission service in the development of
competitive wholesale and retail energy markets. These shared objectives
include: corporate separation of generation and transmission, with decisions to
provide service, pricing, and expansion of facilities made on an independent
basis from the transmission provider's ownership of generation facilities;
creation of RTOs with sufficient scope and configuration to increase economic
supply options to customers; elimination of pancaked transmission charges
within a single RTO; and improved reliability of transmission service.
AEP's witness Craig Baker (AEP Exs. 6A, 6B, an d 6C) explained that the
company will satisfy the requirements of the Ohio statute by transferring
control and operation, and ultimately ownership, of its transmission facilities
to the Alliance RTO. The Alliance RTO is currently composed of FirstEnergy
Corporation, AEP, Consumers Energy Company, The Detroit Edison Company, and
Virginia Electric and Power Company (AEP Ex. 6A at 4).(30) As presently
configured, the Alliance RTO would serve a nine-state area with a population of
approximately 26 million people and a connected load of 67,000 megawatts (AEP
Ex. 2, Part G at 8). The Alliance transmission system has connected generation
capacity of 72,000 megawatts and will be one of the largest RTOs in the nation
(ID.). The FERC conditionally approved the Alliance RTO in December 1999, but
required that the participants modify certain aspects of the entity's
independence, governance configuration, and tariff design. 89 FERC paragraph
61,298 (1999). AEP claims that, upon final operational implementation, the
Alliance RTO will minimize pancaked transmission rates within Ohio to the extent
reasonably possible and be consistent with Section 4928.12(B)(3), Revised Code
(AEP Ex. 6C at 8). Until the Alliance RTO is operational and the transfer has
occurred, AEP proposes that retail customers or their suppliers use AEP's OATT
to transmit power and energy from alternative suppliers to the customers' load
(AEP Ex. 8B at 2). Thereafter, transmission service to retail customers will
cease under AEP's OATT, but be offered by the Alliance RTO OATT (ID.).
Additionally, in March 2000, the FERC conditionally approved the merger
between American Electric Power Corporation and Central and South West Company.
90 FERC paragraph 61,242 (2000). That merger transaction will also impact the
transferring of control, operation, and ultimately ownership of AEP's
transmission facilities to the Alliance RTO.
Although the Alliance RTO may not be operational before customer choice
commences in Ohio (January 1. 2001), AEP asserts that the settlement will
provide benefits to participants in the Ohio retail generation market (AEP
Initial Br. at 69-71). The stipulation obligates AEP to transfer control and
operation, and ultimately ownership, of AEP's transmission facilities to a
FERC-approved RTO no later than December 15, 2001 (Jt. Ex 1, at 5).
Additionally, AEP identified three transmission-related benefits of the
stipulation that are specific to the period of time before that RTO becomes
operational:
------------------
(29) Order No. 888, FERC Stats. & Regs. paragraph 31,089 (2000) and Order
No. 2000, FERC Stats. & Regs., paragraph 31,036 (1996).
(30) The Dayton Power & Light Company and Illinois Power Company have also
announced their intention to join the Alliance RTO.
99-1729-EL-ETP and 99-1730-EL-ETP -36-
(1) AEP will provide two full-time equivalent positions in the
System Control Center to assist transmission uses with
reservations, scheduling, and tagging;
(2) AEP or its affiliates will provide transmission services for
all power, including transmission of default service power
and power for affiliated and nonaffiliated energy service
providers only under the proposed PRO FORMA transmission
tariff; and
(3) AEP or its affiliates will comply with OASIS and conduct
requirements promulgated by FERC.
(ID. at 5, 8).
Next, AEP listed four other transmission-related benefits of the
stipulation. First, AEP will account for partial megawatt-hours when the load
served by imports across AEP interfaces does not result in whole megawatts (Jt.
Ex. 1, at 5). Second, AEP is required to make a unilateral filing at FERC to
extend rollover rights to retail customers or their supplier, requesting an
effective date of January 1, 2001 (ID.). Third, AEP will work with RTOs/ISOs and
transmission-level customers to develop and implement resolutions for
reciprocity and interface/seam issues and, if no other filing on this subject is
made by September 1, 2000, AEP will file a proposal with the FERC (ID. at 5).
Fourth, AEP will fund up to $10 million for costs imposed by PJM and/or the MISO
on generation originating in the MISO or PJM (Id. at 5-6).
In Shell's reply brief it argues that the $10 million fund will not promote
competition because the commitment may not reach $10 million in the short time
period and because the dollars are available for only certain transmission costs
(Shell Reply Br. at 30). Shell estimates that the fund will only (at best)
benefit 6 percent of the AEP load (Tr. III, 162-164; Shell Reply Br. at 31).
Pursuant to Section 4928.34(A)(13), Revised Code, as an alternative to
approving an independent transmission plan that complies with Section 4928.12,
Revised Code, the Commission may, for good cause shown, authorize a company "to
defer compliance until an order is issued under division (G) of section 4928.35
of the Revised Code." Because the Commission cannot determine, at this time,
whether the Alliance ISO (or any other FERC-approved RTO as allowed by the
stipulation) is compliant with the requirements of Section 4928.12, Revised
Code, (due to changes that will occur as a result of the FERC's ongoing
proceeding addressing the Alliance RTO, for instance), the Commission will
defer approval of AEP's independent transmission plan until the opportunity is
available to address the changes to the FERC-approved RTO. The Commission will
exercise this later decision process through an order issued under Section
4928.35(G), Revised Code. We will authorize AEP to defer compliance with this
provision until an order is issued pursuant to Section 4928.35(G), Revised Code.
We will, however, address Shell's arguments against Section VIII of the
stipulation ($10 million transmission fund). On balance, we find the $10 million
fund to be a unique benefit offered by the stipulation. It is one of several
beneficial aspects of the stipulation. While on its own, this term of the
stipulation may not create effective competition, it can (in conjunction with
all of the other terms of the plans and stipulation) collectively "jump
99-1729-EL-ETP and 99-1730-EL-ETP -37-
start" competition and spur the development of effective competition in AEP's
territory. For these reasons, we reject Shell's criticism of the $10 million
transmission fund.
G. SECTION 4928.34(A)(14), REVISED CODE
Section 4928.34(A)(14), Revised Code, states that one of the findings the
Commission must make in approving a utility's transition plan is that the
utility is in compliance with Sections 4928.01 through 4928.11, Revised Code,
and any rules or orders adopted or issued by the Commission under those
sections. We wish to make clear that we have a continuing obligation to ensure
that the transition plan and its implementation are in keeping with the policy
of the state, as set forth in these provisions of the statute. For example,
through the monitoring of markets and enforcement with fair standards of
competition, we intend to make, as a top priority, enforcement of the
overarching policies of SB 3 to ensure open markets. We believe that this
prerequisite is thereby satisfied.
H. ACCOUNTING AUTHORITIES
The signatory parties also seek from the Commission the authority to
implement various accounting entries on the regulatory books. These requested
accounting approvals have been identified either in the companies' filings or in
the transition plan settlement agreement and include:
(1) Requested amortization of regulatory assets during the MDP
and thereafter until such regulatory assets are fully
amortized.
(2) Requested amortization (on a per kilowatt-hour basis) of
regulatory assets as of the beginning of the MDP that exceed
the amounts on the attachment to the stipulation. Such
amortization will occur during the MDP and recovered through
existing frozen and unbundled rates.
(3) Requested deferral of certain new regulatory assets actual
costs, plus a carrying charge, as regulatory assets for
future recovery in future distribution rates.
(4) Addressing the issue of potential violations of Internal
Revenue Code normalization rules with respect to amortization
or regulatory liabilities of investment tax credits and
deferred income taxes. The signatory parties ask that the
Commission adopt certain specific language found in the
settlement.
(Jt. Ex. 1, at 4, 10).
The requested accounting authority is reasonable and shall be granted.
Additionally, we will approve the following language contained in the agreement:
The base rates in the [MDP] embodied in this opinion and
order include the amortization of regulatory liabilities related
to [investment tax credits] no more rapidly than ratably, and the
amortization of "excess
99-1729-EL-ETP and 99-1730-EL-ETP -38-
deferred taxes" using the Average Rate Assumption Method in order to
avoid any potential normalization violations.
IV. THREE-PART TEST FOR EVALUATING STIPULATIONS
Rule 4901-1-30, O.A.C., authorizes parties to Commission proceedings to
enter into stipulations. Although not binding on the Commission, the terms of
such agreements are accorded substantial weight. SEE, CONSUMERS COUNSEL V. PUB.
UTIL. COMM. (1992), 64 Ohio St.3d 123, at 125, citing AKRON V. PUB. UTIL. COMM.
(1978), 55 Ohio St.2d 155. This concept is particularly valid where the
stipulation is supported or unopposed by the vast majority of parties in the
proceeding in which it is offered.
The standard of review for considering the reasonableness of a stipulation
has been discussed in a number of prior Commission proceedings. SEE, E.G.,
OHIO-AMERICAN WATER CO., Case No. 99-1038-WW-AIR (June 29, 2000); CINCINNATI GAS
& ELECTRIC CO., Case No. 91-410-EL-AIR (April 14, 1994); WESTERN RESERVE
TELEPHONE CO., Case No. 93-230-TP-ALT (March 30, 1004); OHIO EDISON CO., Case
No. 91-698-EL-FOR et al. (December 30, 1993); CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUM. CO.,
Case No. 88-170-EL-AIR (January 30, 1989); RESTATEMENT OF ACCOUNTS AND RECORDS
(ZIMMER PLANT), Case No. 84-1187-EL-UNC (November 26,1985). The ultimate issue
for our consideration is whether the agreement, which embodies considerable time
and effort by the signatory parties, is reasonable and should be adopted. In
considering the reasonableness of a stipulation, the Commission has used the
following criteria:
(1) Is the settlement a product of serious bargaining among
capable, knowledgeable parties?
(2) Does the settlement, as a package, benefit ratepayers and the
public interest?
(3) Does the settlement package violate any important regulatory
principle or practice?
The Ohio Supreme Court has endorsed the Commission's analysis using these
criteria to resolve issues in a manner economical to ratepayers and public
utilities. INDUS. ENERGY CONSUMERS OF OHIO POWER CO. V. PUB. UTIL. COMM. (1994),
68 Ohio St.3d 547 (CITING CONSUMERS' COUNSEL, SUPRA, at 126). The court stated
in that case that the Commission may place substantial weight on the terms of a
stipulation, even though the stipulation does not bind the Commission. ID.
AEP, OCC, the staff, and IEU-OH all state that the stipulations comport
with this criteria (AEP Ex. 18, at 3; AEP Initial Br. at 9-14, AEP Reply Br. at
64; OCC Initial Br. at 12-13; Staff Initial Br. at 3-6; IEU-OH Br. at 3-4).
Shell argues the stipulations are not in the public interest (Shell Initial Br.
at 9-10).
Based on our three-prong standard of review, we find that the first
criterion, that the process involved serious bargaining by knowledgeable,
capable parties, is met. Counsel for the applicant and the staff, as well as the
numerous intervenors, have been involved in many cases before the Commission,
including a number of prior cases
99-1729-EL-ETP and 99-1730-EL-ETP -39-
involving rate issues. Further, there have been few settlements in major case
before this Commission in which the overwhelming majority of intervenors either
supported or did not oppose the resolution of issues presented by the
stipulations.
The stipulations also meet the second criterion. The stipulated resolution
of these proceedings advances the public interest by resolving the extensive and
complex issues raised in this proceeding without incurring the extensive time
and expense of litigation that would otherwise have been required. In the case
of the ANM stipulation, it will defer to an already pending proceeding the
debate of pole attachments. We believe that such an agreement is in the interest
of bringing the bigger restructuring issues to the forefront for resolution so
that competitive choice can effectively begin on January 1, 2001. For that
reason, we believe that the ANM stipulation advances the public interest.
Adoption of the stipulations also reduce significantly the number of
possible appeals, and provides additional lead time to put in place the
mechanisms necessary to get the customer choice program up and running.
Additional evidence that the public interest is served by the stipulations is
found in the support offered by representatives of residential, commercial, and
industrial customers, including OCC and the Commission's staff. As indicated
above, the agreement provides that certain rates will be decreased and the prior
rate plan freezes extended. Some of the stipulations' tangible benefits include:
(1) Freezing, for the most part, base distribution rates for an
additional 2 years beyond the MDP for OP and three
additional years beyond the MDP for CSP;
(2) Absorption by both companies of the first $40 million in
consumer education, customer choice implementation, and
transition plan filing costs;
(3) Providing an additional shopping incentive of 2.5 mills/
kilowatt-hour to the first 25 percent of the CSP residential
class load that switches during the MDP, with the unused
portion being credited to the RTC;
(4) Providing assistance to transmission users with
reservations, scheduling, and tagging for the period of time
before AEP transfers control and operation, and ultimately
ownership, of AEP's transmission facilities to an RTO;
(5) Accounting for partial megawatt-hours when load imports
across AEP interfaces does not result in whole
megawatt hours;
(6) Providing a fund (up to $10 million) for reimbursement of
certain transmission costs incurred by suppliers or
customers;
(7) Requiring the companies to reduce charges to residential
customers during the MDP by 5 percent of transition costs;
99-1729-EL-ETP and 99-1730-EL-ETP -40-
(8) Revising tariffs and schedules to equalize bill impacts
within the commercial class;
(9) Providing additional commitments to resolve interface, seam,
and reciprocity issues impacting transmission;
(10) Providing a credit to suppliers for consolidated bills
during the first year of the MDP;
(11) Providing commercial and industrial customers only a 90-day
advance notice Of intent to switch suppliers;
(12) For the first 20 percent of OP residential customers on its
standard service offer, charging no RTC when they switch
between 2006 and 2007; and
(13) Negotiating with signatory marketers (as well as Shell)
regarding a load shaping service.
(Jt. Ex. 1).
We believe that the terms of these agreements, considered in their
totality, provide a sufficient basis for concluding that the settlement is in
the public interest. Although it Will undoubtedly take some time for a fully
competitive electric retail market to develop, the stipulations presented in
this proceeding provide an opportunity to "jump start" the market by providing
the resources necessary for retail customers to begin to shop for competitive
generation services. For all these reasons, we find that the stipulations should
be approved, subject to the modifications and clarifications described above.
Finally, the stipulations meet the third criterion because they do not
violate any important regulatory principle or practice. Indeed, the agreements
balance the interests of a broad range of parties that represent a diverse
spectrum of views. As indicated in the description of stipulations provided
above, the stipulations provide substantial benefits to all customer classes and
shareholders. Further, the policies of the state embodied in SB 3 will be
implemented more quickly and efficiently than would otherwise be possible.
V. GROSS RECEIPTS/EXCISE TAX ISSUE
As part of their applications in these cases, the companies have included a
public utilities excise tax credit rider. The companies intend that the credit
rider become effective on April 30, 2002, the date on which the companies
contend that ratepayer liability for the public utility excise tax ends. Prior
to the effective date of the credit rider, the companies would collect through
their respective rates an amount, which specifically represents the ratepayers'
obligation for this tax. On the effective date of the public utilities excise
tax credit rider, each of the companies will begin crediting back to their
customers that amount included in their respective rates representing the public
utilities excise tax. The parties opposing the companies with regard to this
issue (staff, OCC, and IEU-Ohio) argue that the companies will have recovered
this tax expenditure fully by April 30, 2001. Therefore, it is the position of
these parties that the public utilities excise tax credit rider
99-1729-EL-ETP and 99-1730-EL-ETP -41
should become effective on April 30, 2001. As noted earlier, the parties signing
the stipulation in this case have reserved this issue for Commission decision.
The companies note that the public utilities excise tax is popularly
referred to as the "gross receipts tax". The companies state that, contrary to
this popular usage, the tax is not a "gross receipts" tax, but an "excise" tax.
That is, the tax is not a tax on the gross receipts of utility companies but an
assessment on the particular utility company for the privilege of doing business
in a particular year, referred to as the privilege year. The amount of the tax
is determined by the gross receipts of the particular utility for the year
immediately prior to the privilege year, referred to as the measurement year.
Because the amount of the gross revenues is not determined until the end of the
measurement year, the companies argue that it is not possible for the companies'
customers to have paid the tax for a particular privilege year until after the
measurement year has expired.
Earl Goldhammer, a witness for AEP, testified that SB 3 provides for the
final year for which electric utilities will be liable for the public utility
excise tax. Mr. Goldhammer further testified that, under SB 3, Ohio electric
companies' final annual public utility excise tax reports will be filed on or
before August 1, 2001. These reports are for the privilege year May 1, 2001
through April 30 2002. Mr. Goldhammer notes that the last public utility excise
tax lien attaches on May 1, 2001. According to Mr. Goldhammer, the report each
of the companies files will indicate that company's taxable gross receipts for
the preceding twelve months-May 1, 2000 through April 30, 2001. The tax the Tax
Commissioner assesses is 4.75 percent times the taxable gross receipts during
the measurement period - May 1, 2000 through April 30, 2001. In accordance with
statutory law, in December 2001, any tax deficiency or refund based on the
assessment will be paid by or to the companies (Tr. 11, 8).
Mr. Goldhammer argues that AEP does not become exempt from the public
utility excise tax until the end of the privilege year ending April 30, 2002.
Further. Mr. Goldhammer states the companies' tax liability for the last
privilege year is not fixed as the companies receive rate payments from
customers during the May 1, 2000 - April 30, 2001 measurement period. The intent
of the General Assembly that the electric companies public utility excise tax
obligation continues through April 30, 2002 is evidenced, Mr. Goldhammer
concludes, by the manner in which the liability for the new corporate franchise
tax was implemented. The companies contend that it is recognition of the fact
that electric utilities will be paying the existing public utility excise tax
for the privilege of doing business and owning property in Ohio through April
30, 2002, i.e. one third of the privilege year, that the payment the General
Assembly requires for the 2002 franchise tax year equals only two-thirds of the
tax liability for 2002. (ID. at 5).
As a corollary to the above arguments, the companies cite Section
4928.34(A)(6), Revised Code, as follows:
To the extent such total annual amount of the tax-related
adjustment is greater than or less than the comparable amount of
the total annual tax reduction experienced by the electric
utility as a result of the provisions of Sub. S.B. No. 3 of the
123rd General Assembly, such difference shall be addressed by the
Commission through accounting procedures, refunds, or an annual
surcharge or credit to customers, or through other appropriate
99-1729-EL-ETP and 99-1730-EL-ETP -42-
means TO AVOID PLACING THE FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE
DIFFERENCE UPON THE ELECTRIC UTILITY OR ITS SHAREHOLDERS (Emphasis
added.)
Because the companies are required to pay the public utility excise tax until
April 30, 2002, they argue, it is clear that the Ohio General Assembly intended
that their shareholders be held harmless for the amounts the companies owe after
April 30, 2001.
In their brief, the companies note that Sections 5727.33(A) and (B),
Revised Code, provide that the tax is based on "the entire gross receipts
actually received from all sources", excluding receipts derived wholly from
interstate commerce, from business done for or with the federal government, from
the sale of merchandise, and from sales to other public utilities. AEP argues
that not only are rentals and other operating and non operating receipts
includable gross receipts for purposes of calculating the public utility excise
tax, but not all of the gross receipts from Ohio jurisdictional utility service
derive from rates which are based, in part, on recovery of a test year level of
that tax expense. William Forrester, a witness for the companies, testified that
when the companies' electric fuel component (EFC) increases, that increase
causes an increase in the companies' public utility excise tax expense, but
there is no automatic change to base rates to compensate for this increased
public utility excise tax expense (AEP Ex. 9D at 5). Consequently, the
companies' note their EFC rates have fluctuated since a test year level of
public utility excise tax was determined in their most recent base rate cases,
there has been a breach in the relationship between gross receipts from
jurisdictional service and any assumed amount that customers pay in their rates
for this tax expense. The companies also argue that even the Staff recognized
that the disconnect caused by EFC revenues has an impact on the companies'
public utility excise tax obligation and is not built into base rates as part of
the test year excise tax expense (Tr. II, 83, 114).
Finally, the companies cite this Commission's decision in the FirstEnergy
transition plan cases for the proposition that this Commission has already
determined this issue in the companies' favor. In AEP's view, the Commission
adopted in FIRSTENERGY, SUPRA, a stipulation pursuant to which the companies can
recover from ratepayers amounts representing the public utilities excise tax
through April 30, 2002.
For the most part, the three parties opposing AEP with regard to this
issue, staff, OCC, and IEU-Ohio, find no fault with the facts as set forth
above. These parties agree that the tax is not in reality a "gross receipts
tax", but an excise tax. The parties also agree with the companies' description
of the method used to determine and assess the tax. The parties agree that the
tax is an appropriate expense in the privilege year. The parties further agree
that the companies' public utility excise tax obligation continues through April
30, 2002. The parties agree to the above, but consider these matters irrelevant
to the issue at hand. According to staff, OCC, and IEU-Ohio, the issue to be
resolved by the Commission in these proceedings is the liability of the
companies' ratepayers for payment of the public utility excise tax through April
30, 2002. These parties contend that the ratepayer's liability ends on April 30,
2001.
The issue as viewed by staff, OCC, And IEU-Ohio is primarily a question not
of tax law, but of regulatory law. These parties, looking at the Commission's
ratemaking process, argue that the ratepayers have paid through the rates
charged by the companies in the "measurement year" amounts representing the
companies' public utility excise tax
99-1729-EL-ETP and 99-1730-EL-ETP -43-
obligation for the subsequent privilege year. That is to say, the companies'
ratepayers have furnished the companies' monies in the year 2001 to reflect the
companies' public utility excise tax obligation in the privilege year ending
April 30, 2002. According to staff, if rates were intended merely to repay the
companies for current expenditures for the public utility excise tax, all that
would be required would be the inclusion of the current year's payments in the
cost of service. The ratemaking treatment could have stopped at that point. It
did not and so staff argues that the current payments for the tax were included
in the cost of service calculation, but the revenue increase was also "grossed
up" explicitly to reflect this tax. In fact, staff notes, the Commission, in
arriving at the rate to be charged by a company seeking a rate increase, also
calculates the "tax on tax" effect, i.e., the Commission recognizes that the
revenues provided to a company to pay the gross receipts tax will themselves be
subject to the tax (Staff Ex. 1, at 3). The Commission would not have made these
calculations, staff argues, if the Commission's only concern was to recompense
the company for the then-current (test year) tax expenditure since the test year
tax expenditure was not affected by the increase. Nor, staff argues, did the
Commission make these calculations to reflect the next year's tax expenditure
since the increased revenues the companies enjoyed in first year after an
increase did not have an impact on the companies' tax payments until the
following year. Staff contends that because the rates are calculated to meet a
company's cost of service and then grossed up to include the ultimate tax, the
rates provide not the return of a fixed dollar value, but rather a percentage of
whatever the revenues are. Each dollar, staff argues, includes the tax that will
ultimately be owed. Staff concludes, therefore, that the ratepayers' tax
obligation tracks the payments made dollar-for-dollar and in advance. Because
the companies' revenues, grossed up to include the ultimate tax increase before
the taxes increase, staff argues, it is clear, as a matter of fact that
ratepayers prepay this tax expense. OCC's analysis and conclusions with regard
to this coincide with those of staff in regard to the ultimate merits of the
companies' proposed specific recovery of the public utility excise tax
obligation through a tariff rider. IEU-Ohio states that, on balance, it believes
staff and OCC have the better of the argument.
Staff is not persuaded by the companies' arguments regarding the
Commission's decision in the FirstEnergy transition plan cases. Staff notes that
the FIRSTENERGY settlement is a so-called "blackbox" settlement. That is,
FirstEnergy will obtain certain cash flows without agreement as to what those
flows represent. In Staff's opinion, FirstEnergy could allocate more of these
cash flows to excise taxes and lower its earnings or not. Staff is indifferent
to FirstEnergy's choice because, as staff views the matter, there are no new
monies extracted from the ratepayers and the "blackbox" settlement values are
reasonable, in and of themselves, without any specific recovery of the public
utilities" excise tax. However, staff notes, in the AEP situation, the companies
seek additional cash, flows from the ratepayers specifically for this excise
tax. Staff opposes the companies recovering additional cash flows representing a
specific recovery of this excise tax as a double recovery of this expense item.
OCC argues that the companies' position regarding base rates not fully
recovering the gross receipts tax associated with fuel revenues or regarding
base rates not always fully recovering gross receipts tax expenses are not
relevant to the issue with regard to the date ratepayer funding of the Ohio
gross receipts tax must cease. OCC notes there is no dispute that the tax
expense embedded in base rates does not track changes in the companies'
respective EFC-related revenues or that base rates do not always fully recover
99-1729-EL-ETP and 99-1730-EL-ETP -44-
gross receipts tax expenses. However, if under-recoveries of the public
utilities excise tax had been a serious problem over the years since the
companies' last rate cases, OCC argues, they should have sought rate relief.
The issue before us is purely one of fact, i.e., when does the liability of
the companies' ratepayers for the public utility excise tax end. The companies'
position is that the obligation of ratepayers to fund this tax ends on April 30,
2002. Staff's position with regard to this question is that ratepayers'
obligation to fund the tax terminates on April 30, 2001. Of the two positions
before us, the Commission finds staff's position to be the more reasonable. As
staff argues the Commission's rate case process "grosses up" the revenues
awarded in a rate proceeding to include the tax effect of the rate increase
allowed by the Commission. Through the rate case process, the Commission even
accounts for the increase in gross revenues caused by the tax itself, the
so-called "tax on tax" effect. Thus, as argued by staff and OCC, the companies'
customers pay in the measurement year amounts representing the companies public
utilities tax obligation in the subsequent privilege year. For the purposes of
illustration, assume that the measurement year for the public utilities excise
tax is 2000 and the privilege year is 2001. If the Commission granted the
companies a rate increase effective January 1, 2000, the ratepayers would be
paying for the whole year of 2000, the measurement year, an amount that
represents the companies' public utilities tax obligation for the privilege year
of 2001. It is clear the ratepayers are not paying the companies' public
utilities tax obligation for the privilege year of 2000 in 2000. The measurement
year for privilege year 2000 is 1999. In 1999, the rate increase was not in
effect.
We do not find the companies' arguments related to our adoption of the
stipulation in the FirstEnergy transition plan cases to be relevant to the
resolution of any issue before us in these cases. Stipulations are filed in a
myriad of cases before this Commission for a number of different reasons.
Sometimes a party is unsure how a particular issue will be resolved by the
Commission so it will reach agreement with the other parties in the case on that
issue, often giving up something in return, through the vehicle of a
stipulation. Sometimes, in so-called "black box" stipulations, dollar figures
will be agreed to and each of the parties may claim victory as to the same
issue. Sometimes various issues are compromised just to reach settlement on
issues vital to one or more of the parties. In adopting stipulations, the
Commission views the stipulation as a whole; we do not, for the most part,
dissect the document approving some pieces and rejecting others. If we find that
the stipulation on balance is reasonable, we will generally adopt the
stipulation. In making our determination, we use the three-part test delineated
earlier.
In adopting the stipulation in the FirstEnergy transition plan cases, we
were not passing favorably or negatively on the resolution of any particular
issue contained in the stipulation. We found that the stipulation' as a whole
met the three-part and was reasonable. The, case before us is the first case
requiring a decision on the issue of ratepayer responsibility for a company's
public utility excise tax obligation beyond April 30, 2001. Contrary, to the
arguments of the companies, our decision with respect to this issue in the cases
now before us is not influenced by our decision in the FirstEnergy transition
plan cases. Based upon the above findings, we are directing the companies to
implement the public utilities excise tax credit rider in their respective
transition plans to be effective April 30, 2001.
99-1729-EL-ETP and 99-1730-EL-ETP -45-
VI. FILED MOD
A. MOTIONS TO REJECT TRANSITION PLANS AS INADEQUATE
On January 14 and 18, 2000, OCC and CCE each filed motions to reject the
transition plans of AEP. Both argued that the plans should be rejected, pursuant
to Section 4928.31(A), Revised Code, because the plans contain a number of
substantive deficiencies that needed to be corrected and/or require plan
refiling. Section 4928.31(A), Revised Code, grants the Commission authority to
reject a plan or to require refiling in whole or in part of any substantially
inadequate transition plan. Rule 4901:1-20-14, O.A.C., states that the
Commission shall conduct an adequacy review of transition plan filings within 30
days and notify the utility of any inadequacies or if refiling is deemed
necessary. If no ruling is issued in that 30-day period, the transition plan
application is deemed minimally adequate. In these proceedings, the Commission
did not require AEP to refile or notify it of inadequacies in the first 30-day
period. Thus, by virtue of the rule, the transition plan applications were
deemed minimally adequate. We, therefore, find that the motions to reject the
transition plans were, in effect, already ruled upon (and denied).
B. OCTA MOTION TO INTERVENE AND SUBSEQUENT CONDITIONAL WITHDRAWAL
As noted earlier, the OCTA filed a motion to intervene in these proceedings
on the ground that AEP proposed pole attachment tariffs that were improper.
However, OCTA filed two days later a notice of conditional withdrawal of its
intervention request, stating that, if the Commission accepts AEP's subsequent
request to withdraw its originally proposed pole attachment tariffs, OCTA will
withdraw its motion to intervene in these proceedings. OCTA stated grounds for
intervention in these proceedings. Inasmuch as we accept AEP's withdrawal of its
originally proposed pole attachment tariffs (by virtue of our acceptance of the
proposed stipulations and AEP's withdrawal of new pole attachment provisions),
we conclude that the condition precedent to OCTA's withdrawal from these
proceedings has taken place and, therefore, we grant OCTA's withdrawal from
these proceedings.
C. MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
On December 30, 1999, as supplemented on January 18, 2000, AEP filed a
motion for a protective order with respect to 70 pages of its transition plan
filing. AEP filed the information under seal with our docketing division. AEP
argues that the information is highly proprietary, competitively sensitive, and
confidential. Additionally, the companies state that the information is a trade
secret, as defined in Section 1333.61(D), Revised Code. They request a
protective order, pursuant to Rule 4901-1-24(D), O.A.C., for the following:
(1) Three pages of the direct testimony of Edward Kahn (AEP Ex. 12,
Attach. EPK-2). Those pages reveal: historic and forecasted
operation and maintenance expenses by generating unit and a
forecast of heat rates by generating unit.
(2) Projected emission allowance balances for the years ending 1999
and 2000 (AEP Ex. 2, Part F).
99-1729-EL-ETP and 99-1730-EL-ETP -46-
(3) Two attachments to the direct testimony of Oliver Sever (AEP Ex.
23, Attach. OJS-1 and QJS-2). Those pages address historic and
forecasted fixed and variable operating and maintenance expenses
by generating unit and projected fuel costs by generating unit.
(4) Study regarding customer switching (AEP Ex. 2, Part H).
At the hearing, the same information was placed into the record, as AEP
Exhibit 4. We find AEP's motion for a protective order to be reasonable. In
accordance with Rule 4901-1-24(F), O.A.C., our docketing Division shall maintain
these items under seal for a period of 18 months from the date of this decision.
Any party wishing to extend this confidential treatment should file an
appropriate motion at least 45 days in advance of the expiration of the
protective order.
D. MOTION FOR COMPLIANCE TARIFF REVIEW PROCESS
On June 27, 2000, CCE filed a motion for a "compliance tariff filing,
service, review, and comment procedures" in these transition plan proceedings,
as well as the other pending transition plan dockets. The motion states that,
because of the broad-sweeping changes that will be subject to the provisions of
the tariffs ultimately approved in these proceedings, it is necessary to allow
interested parties adequate time to review and comment of the proposed tariffs
prior to final approval. CCE requests that the Commission order each of the
applicants in the transition plan cases to serve tariffs and associated
workpapers simultaneous with their filing with the Commission. CCE asks that a
two-week period be provided after the date of receipt of the tariffs and
workpapers in order for intervenors to review the documents and submit comments
to the Commission for its consideration prior to approval of the tariffs.
CCE's motion shall be granted, subject to modification. We believe that,
instead of receiving formal filings with respect to FirstEnergy's compliance
tariffs, a more informal process will be beneficial to all interested parties.
Accordingly, the companies and other interested parties should observe the
following timelines for distributing, and reviewing AEP's proposed tariffs
pursuant to this decision: (1) within 14 days following the issuance of this
decision, AEP should distribute (via electronic mail, fax, or overnight
delivery) to all intervenors a working draft of its proposed compliance tariffs,
as well as associated workpapers and UNB schedules that reflect the rates
embodied in the compliance tariffs; (2) within 14 days thereafter, interested
parties should circulate (via electronic mail, fax, or overnight delivery)
comments to AEP and the staff regarding the working draft(3l); and (3) within
14 days thereafter, AEP shall formally file its proposed tariffs in the form of
an application for approval of compliance tariffs.
Finally, to the extent any other motions or objections have been raised and
they were not directly addressed above, they are denied.
--------------------
(31) Neither the working draft nor the informal comments are to be filed
formally in the dockets of these proceedings.
99-1729-EL-ETP and 99-1730-EL-ETP -47-
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
(1) On December 30, 1999, CSP and OP filed transition plan
applications, as well as applications for receipt of
transition revenues. AEP supplemented those filings on January
14 and February 28, 2000.
(2) A technical conference was conducted on January 10, 2000, and
preliminary objections were filed on February 10, 11, 14 and
15, 2000.
(3) A procedural/settlement conference was conducted on March 3,
2000. On March 28, 2000, the Staff Report of Exceptions and
Recommendations was filed. AEP made a supplemental filing on
April 18, 2000 in accordance with the attorney examiner's
directive. A second prehearing conference was conducted on
April 28, 2000.
(4) Intervention was granted to a number of parties. On May 8,
2000, a Stipulation and Recommendation was filed by AEP,
the Commission staff, APAC, Columbia Energy companies, Enron,
NewEnergy, WPS, Exelon, IEU-Ohio, Kroger, MAPSA, NEMA, OCC,
OCRM, OHA, OPAE, OREC, Strategic, WSOS, ODOD, and OMA. The
stipulation purports to resolve all issues in these
proceedings, except for one issue related to AEP's proposed
gross receipts/excise tax rider. Dynegy and OEC later stated
that they do not oppose the stipulation.
(5) Evidentiary hearings were conducted on May 9 and 31 and June
7, 8, and 12, 2000. Local public hearings were held on June 5,
2000, in East Liverpool and on June 22, 2000, in Columbus,
Ohio. AEP filed proof of the newspaper notices it provided
for the filing of the transition plan applications and for
the public hearings, in accordance with Commission directives.
(6) On June 19, 2000, AEP and ANM filed a second settlement
agreement in these dockets.
(7) AEP's transition plans, as modified by the settlement
agreement described above, satisfy the 15 prerequisites set
forth in Section 4928.34(A), Revised Code, to the extent set
forth herein.
(8) Under the stipulations, CSP can recover $191,156,000 as
transition costs during the MDP. OP can recover $425,230,000
as transition costs during the MDP.
99-1729-EL-ETP and 99-1730-EL-ETP -48-
(9) The stipulations provide appropriate shopping incentives to
achieve a 20 percent load switching as contemplated by Section
4928.40(A), Revised Code.
(10) AEP's transition plans, as modified by the settlement
agreements, satisfies the requirements of SB 3, and are
approved for the reasons and to the extent set forth herein.
(11) Our docketing division shall maintain the items filed under
seal on January 18, 2000, and AEP Exhibit 4 for a period of 18
months from the date of this decision. Any party wishing to
extend this confidential treatment should file an appropriate
motion at least 45 days in advance of the expiration of the
protective order.
ORDER:
It is, therefore,
ORDERED, That AEP's transition plans and the settlement agreements filed on
December 30, 1999 and May 8, 2000, respectively, are approved, to the exdent set
forth herein, and subject to final approval of AEP's compliance tariffs. It is,
further,
ORDERED, That the tariff amendments and accounting authority requested by
AEP are approved in accordance with the discussion set forth in this Opinion and
Order. It is, further,
ORDERED, That CCE's motion for a compliance tariff review process is
granted in part. AEP and other interested intervenors shall follow the timelines
for informal review and comments with respect to the companies' compliance
tariffs, and AEP shall file an application for approval of compliance tariffs in
accordance with the directives set forth in this Opinion and Order. It is,
further,
ORDERED, That AEP's request for a protective order is granted. It is,
further,
ORDERED, That our Docketing Division shall maintain the items filed under
seal on January 18, 2000, and AEP Exhibit 4 for a period of 18 months from the
date of this decision. Any party wishing to extend this confidential treatment
should file an appropriate motion at least 45 days in advance of the expiration
of the protective order. It is, further,
ORDERED, That OCTA's request to intervene and subsequent request to
withdraw from these proceedings are granted. It is, further,
99-1729-EL-ETP and 99-1730-EL-ETP -49-
ORDERED, That a copy of this Opinion and Order be served, upon all
parties of record.
THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF OHIO
/s/ Alan R. Schriber
---------------------------------
Alan R. Schriber, Chairman
/s/ Ronda Hartman Fergus
--------------------------------- ---------------------------------
Ronda Hartman Fergus Craig A. Glazer
Abstain - Not Voting
/s/ Judith A. Jones /s/ Donald L. Mason
--------------------------------- ---------------------------------
Judith A. Jones Donald L. Mason
GLP/SJD;geb
Entered in the Journal
SEP 28 2000
--------------------------
A True Copy
/s/ Gary E. Vigorito
--------------------------
Gary E. Vigorito
Secretary
BEFORE
THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF OHIO
In the Matter of the Application of Columbus )
Southern Power Company for Approval of Electric )
Transition Plan and Application for Receipt of ) Case No. 99-1729-EL-ETP
Transition Revenues )
)
In the Matter of the Application of Ohio Power )
Company for Approval of Electric Transition Plan ) Case No. 99-1730-EL-ETP
and Application for Receipt of Transition Revenues )
STIPULATION AND RECOMMENDATION
I. INTRODUCTION
Rule 4901-1-30, Ohio Administrative Code ("OAC") provides that any two or
more parties to a proceeding may enter into a written or oral stipulation
covering the issues presented in such a proceeding. The purpose of this document
is to set forth the understanding of the parties who have signed below (the
"Signatory Parties") and to recommend that the Public Utilities Commission of
Ohio (the "Commission") approve and adopt, as part of its Opinion and Order in
these proceedings, this Stipulation and Recommendation (the "Stipulation")
resolving all of the issues in the above-captioned proceedings except as
specified in paragraph XVI herein. This Stipulation is supported by adequate
data and information; represents a just and reasonable resolution of all issues
in these proceedings; violates no regulatory principle or precedent; and is the
product of lengthy, serious bargaining among knowledgeable and capable parties
in a cooperative process, encouraged by this Commission and undertaken by the
Signatory Parties to settle these cases. While this Stipulation is not binding
on the Commission, it is entitled to
careful consideration by the Commission, where, as here, it is sponsored by
parties representing a wide range of interests, including the Commission's
Staff. For purpose of resolving all issues raised by these proceedings, the
Signatory Parties stipulate, agree and recommend as set forth below.
II. PARTIES
This Stipulation is entered into by and among Columbus Southern Power
Company (CSP) and Ohio Power Company (OPCQ) (collectively, the "Companies") and
such other parties as are signatory hereto. All Signatory Parties fully support
this Stipulation and urge the Commission to accept and approve the terms hereof.
To the extent that the implementation of the provisions herein reasonably
require actions by the Companies' agents or affiliates, the Companies are
responsible for the performance of such actions.
III. RECITALS
WHEREAS, the State of Ohio enacted Am. Sub. S.B. No.3, which provides for
customer choice effective January I, 2001;
WHEREAS, the Companies on December 30, 1999, filed transition plans as
required by Am. Sub. S.B. No.3 and the Commission's rules adopted under the
authority of Am. Sub. S.B. No.3, and supplemented such plans through the date
hereof (the "Filing");
WHEREAS, the Signatory Parties have reviewed and discussed the transition
plan and the Filing of the Companies in detail and are fully aware of its
contents;
WHEREAS, the agreements herein represent a comprehensive solution to the
issues raised in these proceedings and more importantly create a unique and
substantial opportunity to bring real customer choice to Ohio. The issues and
concerns raised by the Signatory Parties have been addressed in the substantive
provisions of this agreement, and reflect as a result of such discussions
compromises by all parties to achieve an overall reasonable solution. This
2
Stipulation is the product of the discussions and negotiations of the Signatory
Parties, and is not intended to reflect the views or proposals which any
individual party may have advanced acting unilaterally. Accordingly, this
agreement represents an accommodation of the diverse interests represented by
the Signatory Parties, and is entitled to careful consideration by the
Commission;
WHEREAS, this Stipulation and Recommendation represents a serious
compromise of complex issues and involves substantial benefits that would not
otherwise have been achievable; and
WHEREAS, the Signatory Parties believe that the agreements herein
represent a solution to the issues raised in these proceedings that is designed
to facilitate customer choice consistent with state policy as set forth in
Section 4928.02 of the Revised Code and in compliance with Chapter 4928's
determination of transition costs.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Signatory Parties stipulate, agree and recommend that
the Commission make the following findings and issue its Opinion and Order in
these proceedings in accordance with the following:
IV. GENERATION TRANSITION CHARGE
Neither Company will impose any lost revenue charges (generation
transition charges (GTC)) on any switching customer.
V. DISTRIBUTION RATE FREEZE
The Companies agree to freeze all distribution rates in effect on
December 31, 2005 through December 31, 2007 for OPCO and through December 31,
2008 for CSP. The Companies can file an application, prior to the December 31,
2007 and December 31, 2008 dates to change their distribution rates. However,
the new rates will not become effective prior to those dates. After December 31,
2005 such frozen rates can be adjusted to reflect the cost of complying with
changes in environmental (distribution-related), tax and regulatory laws or
3
regulations, relief from storm damage expenses, or in the event of an emergency
under ss. 4909.16, R.C.
Further, the frozen distribution rate can be adjusted to reflect changes
in allocation of the transmission/distribution facilities under FERC's
seven-factor test. Such an adjustment will be made in a proceeding initiated by
the Companies to address only this adjustment.
As part of the freeze, the amortization of regulatory asset deferrals
agreed upon in paragraph VI will begin when new distribution rates go into
effect for each Company.
VI. REGULATORY ASSET TRANSITION CHARGE AND DEFERRAL OF CERTAIN
REGULATORY ASSETS
The Companies will recover their regulatory assets in accordance with
Attachment 1 hereto except as provided in paragraphs VII, XVII and XVIII. In
accordance with the Staff Report and as reflected in the attached schedules: CSP
will absorb the first $20 million of actual Consumer Education, Customer Choice
Implementation and Transition Plan Filing Costs, and will be permitted to defer
the remainder of its actual cost for such activities (currently estimated to be
$40.6 million), plus a carrying charge, as regulatory assets for recovery as a
cost of service, by a rider, in future distribution rates. OPCO will absorb the
first $20 million of actual Consumer Education, Customer Choice Implementation
and Transition Plan Filing Costs, and will be permitted to defer the remainder
of its actual costs for such activities (currently estimated to be $45.5
million), plus a carrying charge, as regulatory assets for recovery as a cost of
service, by a rider, in future distribution rates. Determination of the costs to
be recovered, including the carrying charge, will be subject to review by the
Commission.
4
VII. SHOPPING INCENTIVE
During the Market Development Period CSP will make available to the first
25% of residential class load that switches to a Competitive Retail Electric
Service (CRES) provider a shopping incentive of 2.5 mills/kWh. The unused
portion of the shopping incentive as measured at December 31, 2005 will be
credited by CSP to its regulatory transition cost (RTC) recovery for all
customers. For the entire Market Development Period, there will be no additional
shopping incentive for CSP and there will be no shopping incentive for OPCO.
VIII. TRANSMISSION MATTERS
From January 1,2001 through the time at which American Electric Power
Service Corporation (AEP) as agent for the Companies transfers administration of
its Open Access Transmission Tariff (OATT) to a regional transmission
organization (RTO), AEP will provide two full-time equivalent positions in the
AEP System Control Center to assist transmission users with the processes of
reservations, scheduling and tagging. Further AEP will provide a mechanism to
account for partial MWHs when the load served by imports across AEP interfaces
does not result in whole MWHs.
AEP will file with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) a
proposed amendment to its OATT to extend rollover rights under Section 2.2 of
the OATT to retail customers or their supplier. AEP will request an effective
date of January 1, 2001 for the amendment. AEP shall actively work with the
Alliance, the MISO, PJM and other RTO/ISOs and transmission-level customers in
the area to develop and implement specific proposals to address reciprocity and
interface/seam issues. In the event a filing is not made by the Alliance to deal
with these issues by September 1, 2000, AEP shall cause a filing at the FERC to
be made which will deal with these issues as to their respective areas and
interfaces. AEP recognizes that
5
resolution of these issues is critical to a fully functioning retail market in
Ohio and will endeavor to propose and resolve issues as promptly as possible.
AEP shall (by no later than December 15, 2001) transfer operational
control of their transmission facilities to an operating FERC-approved RTO.
The Companies will make available a fund of up to $10 million for costs
associated with transmission charges imposed by PJM and/or by the MISO, if the
MISO is fully operating on a single tariff, on generation originating in the
MISO or PJM as such cost may be incurred by:
1. Any supplier serving retail customers within their respective service
areas; or,
2. A customer or group of customers where the customer or group of
customers is securing and paying for the transmission service.
The transmission charges to be reimbursed will not include losses, redispatch
charges or other charges specifically impacting the transaction. Reimbursement
of such costs shall apply only until the AEP transmission system is within the
operational control of an operating FERC approved RTO. If any governmental
agency invalidates or imposes conditions associated with this paragraph which
would materially affect the obligation imposed by this paragraph, the paragraph
will be deemed withdrawn from the Stipulation and Recommendation and the parties
agree to negotiate in good faith to restore the value of this paragraph.
IX. 5% RESIDENTIAL GENERATION REDUCTION
Each Company will refile the unbundled residential tariffs contained in
the Filing so as to reflect a 5% reduction in the generation component.
including the RTC component, and will not seek to reduce such 5% generation
component rate reduction for residential customers during the market development
period.
6
X. COMMERCIAL CUSTOMER RATE DESIGN
Each Company's tariffs and UNB-8 schedules should be revised, in the
manner shown in Attachment 2 hereto, in order to achieve a revenue neutral rate
design and to equalize the bill impacts within the Commercial class of
customers.
XI. TRANSITION PLANS
The transition plans of the Companies as filed on December 30, 1999, and
as supplemented and corrected through the date herein, will be approved, except
as specifically modified herein or as is necessary to update tariff provisions
to reflect the agreements made herein and the attachments hereto through a
compliance filing.
The Signatory Parties recognize that the OSP working group is engaged in
discussions to resolve and/or address the issues arising in that area. The
Signatory Parties agree to accept any resolution of such issues agreed to by the
working group participants and to incorporate any such changes in the Companies'
transition plans. The Companies agree to abide by the determinations of the
Commission as they may relate to OSP issues that are not resolved by the working
group participants. In doing so, the Companies are not waiving their rights to
seek judicial review of such detenninations.
XII. CUSTOMER SWITCHING
Unless any agreed upon changes by the OSP working group are less
restrictive for customers than the terms of this Stipulation, the Companies
agree that during the market development period customers that take generation
services from the company during any part of May 16 through September 15 must
either: (1) remain a customer through April 15 of the following year before they
switch to another supplier (minimum stay) or (2) choose a market price based
tariff which has been filed with and approved by the Commission and which will
not be lower than the generation cost embedded in the standard offer (come and
go). Non-
7
aggregated residential customers will be permitted to shop three times during
the market development period and to return two times to the default tariff,
before being required to choose from the minimum stay or come and go tariff
options described above.
XIII. NONDISCRIMINATORY ACCESS TO TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION
SYSTEM
The Companies shall have the obligation to connect any retail customer
located within their service territories to their distribution facilities that
are used for delivery of retail electric energy, and to operate such facilities
in a manner that will reasonably allow for such customer to receive power supply
from the supplier of the customer's choice, subject to Commission Rules and
approved tariff provisions relating to connection of service.
Except as otherwise provided, the Companies shall provide distribution
service within their service territories on a basis which is just, reasonable,
and not unduly discriminatory to retail customers or suppliers of electric
energy, including suppliers of distributed generation. The distribution services
provided to each retail customer or supplier of electric energy shall be the
same in quality and price and subject to the same terms and conditions to those
services provided by the Companies to any similarly situated retail customer,
itself or any affiliate.
Prior to participation in a FERC-approved RTO:
a) the Companies and/or their affiliates will provide transmission
service for the delivery of all power, including transmission of
default service power and transmission of power for both affiliated
and nonaffiliated energy service providers, only under their proforma
transmission tariff;
b) the Companies and/or their affiliates will comply with the OASIS and
Standards of Conduct requirements promulgated by the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission for the delivery of all power.
Nothing in this paragraph XIII is intended to limit the Companies' right
to contend that matters related to transmission in interstate commerce are
subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission.
8
The Companies will provide distribution service for the delivery of
power, including default service and service provided by any affiliated or
nonaffiliated supplier, only under the applicable distribution tariff.
XIV. CONSOLIDATED BILLING CREDIT
The Companies will provide a credit to CRES providers equal to $1.00 for
each consolidated bill issued by the provider during the first year of the
Market Development Period. The Companies and the marketing intervenors who are
Signatory Parties agree that they will negotiate in good faith to determine a
consolidated billing credit to be effective after the first year of the Market
Development Period. The Companies reserve the right to petition the Commission
at any time to set a consolidated billing credit which would supersede any
credit then in effect. AEP will apply reasonable efforts to implement supplier
consolidated billing as soon as practicable in keeping with the January 1, 2001
start date to competition.
XV. COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS' NOTICE TO SHOP
Notwithstanding any provision in the Companies' terms and conditions for
service to Commercial and Industrial class customers, such customers need to
provide only 90 days notice to the Companies of their intent to purchase
electricity from a CRES provider. Such customers may provide the 90 days notice
prior to January 1,2001, so as to enable them to receive generation from a CRES
provider on or after the starting date for competitive retail electric service.
XVI. GROSS RECEIPTS TAX
The parties reserve for litigation the Companies' proposed gross receipts
tax rider. A procedural schedule will be set by the Commission for the filing
of testimony concerning this issue and for a hearing.
9
XVII. ACCOUNTING
The Signatory Parties agree that the Companies' revenues from Regulatory
Transition Charges during the transition period (see Attachment 1) and from
existing frozen and unbundled rates recovered from customers of OPCO and CSP
during the market development period are sufficient to recover regulatory assets
as of the beginning of the market development period and to provide for
obligations that are required by this Stipulation.
The Signatory Parties agree that the Commission will direct OPCO and CSP
to amortize such regulatory assets during the market development period and
thereafter until such regulatory assets are fully amortized. In addition,
recorded regulatory assets as of the beginning of the market development period,
December 31, 2000, which exceed the amounts in Attachment 1 should be amortized
on a per kWh basis during the market development period and recovered through
existing frozen and unbundled rates.
The Signatory Parties recommend that the Commission consider the concerns
raised by the Companies with respect to potential violations of the
normalization rules in the Internal Revenue Code relating to amortization of
regulatory liabilities related to investment tax credits (ITC) and excess
deferred income taxes. Accordingly, the Parties recommend that the Opinion and
Order in this case reflect the following language: "The base rates in the
market development period embodied in this Opinion and Order include the
amortization of regulatory liabilities related to ITC no more rapidly than
ratably, and the amortization of 'excess deferred taxes' using the Average Rate
Assumption Method in order to avoid any potential nonnalization violations."
XVIII. OPCO RESIDENTIAL CUSTOMERS' RTC
For the period January 1,2006 through December 31, 2007, the first 20% of
OPCO residential customer load that was on OPCO's standard service offer as of
December 31, 2005 which switches to a certified retail electric generation
service provider will not be charged the
10
Regulatory Transition Charge during that 2006-2007 two-year period. Customer
load which remains on the Companies' standard service offer under ss.4928.14(A)
or (B), Ohio Rev. Code, does not count as being load which switches to a
certified retail electric generation service provider.
Should the agreement embodied in the preceding paragraph be rejected by
the Commission or determined to be unlawful by a court of competent
jurisdiction, the remainder of this Stipulation and Recommendation will remain
in effect.
XIX. LOAD SHAPING
The Companies and the marketing intervenors who are Signatory Parties
agree to negotiate in good faith concerning a load shaping service which might
be provided by the Companies. The Companies shall notify all such marketing
intervenors of the place, dates and times of such meetings.
XX. UNIVERSAL SERVICE FUND RIDERS AND ENERGY EFFICIENCY FUND RIDERS
The Companies state that the rates for the Universal Service Fund Riders
and the Energy Efficiency Fund Riders will be as determined by the Ohio
Department of Development and approved by the Commission.
XXI. CODE OF CONDUCT
The Cost Allocation Manual (CAM) must follow the Uniform System of
Accounts as well as GAAP.
The Companies agree that effective January 1, 2001, their distribution
affiliate companies will not provide competitive non-electric products or
services to retail customers on a
11
commercial basis(1); provided, however, that the distribution affiliate
companies are not precluded from a) fulfilling any contractual obligations
existing prior to January 1, 2001; or b) providing to retail customers
non-electric products or services which are incidental to the provision of
customer service and not on a commercial basis. The distribution affiliate
companies will not condition the provision of such incidental services on the
basis of the customer's choice of retail electric supplier.
Employees of the Companies' affiliates shall not have access to any
information about their transmission or distribution systems (e.g., system
operations, capability, price, curtailments, and ancillary services) that is not
contemporaneously and in the same form and manner available to a nonaffiliated
competitor of retail electric service.
The Signatory Parties agree that by executing the Stipulation and
Recommendation that accepts the Companies' corporate separation plan, the
marketer intervenors(2) are not agreeing to the Companies' interpretation of the
Commission's rules on Code of Conduct, ss.4901:1-20-16(G)(4), Ohio Admin. Code,
and would recommend that the Commission recognize this in its Opinion and Order.
Further, the Signatory Parties agree that by adopting the Companies' electric
transition plans, the Companies' interpretation of the rules as set forth
therein will not have any precedential effect.
XXII. EFFECT OF STIPULATION
Nothing in this Stipulation shall be used or construed for any purpose to
imply, suggest or otherwise indicate that the results produced through the
compromise reflected herein represent fully the objectives of any Signatory
Party.
---------------
(1) Examples of such products or services are customer-owned substation design
and construction, customer-owned equipment maintenance, customer-owned
distribution equipment service upgrades, power quality maintenance and
improvement and power systems and safety training.
(2) Designated on the signature page as a "marketer intervenor."
12
This Stipulation is submitted for purposes of this proceeding only, and
is not deemed binding in any other proceeding, except as expressly provided
herein, nor is it to be offered or relied upon in any other proceedings, except
as necessary to enforce the terms of this Stipulation. In fact, none of the
Signatory parties have submitted the entirety of the case they would have
otherwise filed or will file if this Stipulation is rejected. The agreement of
the Signatory Parties reflected in this document is expressly conditioned upon
its acceptance in its entirety and without alteration by the Commission. The
parties agree that if the Commission rejects all or any part of this
Stipulation, or otherwise materially modifies its terms, any adversely affected
party shall have the right, within thirty (30) business days of the Commission's
order, either to file an application for rehearing or to terminate and withdraw
from the Stipulation by filing a notice with the Commission. If an application
for rehearing is filed, and if the Commission does not, on rehearing, accept the
Stipulation without material modification, any party may terminate and withdraw
from the Stipulation by filing a notice with the Commission within ten (10)
business days of the Commission's order or entry on rehearing. In such an event,
a hearing shall go forward, and the parties shall be afforded the opportunity to
present evidence through witnesses, to cross-examine all witnesses, to present
rebuttal testimony, and to file briefs on all issues.
The Signatory Parties agree and intend to support the reasonableness of
this Stipulation before the Commission, and to cause their counsel to do the
same, and in any appeal from the Commission's adoption and/or enforcement of
this Stipulation.
13
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Stipulation and Recommendation has been agreed
to as of this 5th day of May, 2000. The undersigned parties respectfully request
the Commission to issue its Opinion and Order approving and adopting this
Stipulation.
/s/ William J. Resnik * /s/ Samuel C. Randaggo/MR
------------------------------------- ------------------------------------
Ohio Power Company Industrial Energy Users-Ohio
/s/ William J. Resnik * /s/ Eric B. Stephens/MR
------------------------------------- ------------------------------------
Columbus Southern Power Company Ohio Consumers' Counsel
* /s/ Scott A. Campbell/MR * /s/ Sheldon A. Taft/MR
------------------------------------- ------------------------------------
Ohio Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc. Ohio Manufacturers' Association
and Buckeye Power, Inc.
* /s/ Craig G. Goodman/MR
------------------------------------- ------------------------------------
National Energy Marketers
Association
------------------------------------- ------------------------------------
------------------------------------- ------------------------------------
------------------------------------- ------------------------------------
------------------------------------- ------------------------------------
------------------------------------- ------------------------------------
------------------------------------- ------------------------------------
------------------------------------- ------------------------------------
*Per Telephone Authorization
14
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Stipulation and Recommendation has been agreed
to as of this 5th day of May, 2000. The undersigned parties respectfully request
the Commission to issue its Opinion and Order approving and adopting this
Stipulation.
/s/ Sally M. Bloomfield
-------------------------------- ------------------------------------------
Ohio Power Company Columbia Energy Power Marketing
Corporation
Columbia Energy Services Corporation
/s/ Sally M. Bloomfield
-------------------------------- ------------------------------------------
Columbus Southern Power Company Exelon Energy
/s/ Sally M. Bloomfield
-------------------------------- ------------------------------------------
Strategic Energy, LLC
/s/ Sally M. Bloomfield
-------------------------------- ------------------------------------------
Mid-Atlantic Power Supply Association
-------------------------------- ------------------------------------------
-------------------------------- ------------------------------------------
-------------------------------- ------------------------------------------
-------------------------------- ------------------------------------------
13
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Stipulation and Recommendation has been agreed
to as of this 5th day of May, 2000. The undersigned parties respectfully request
the Commission to issue its Opinion and Order approving and adopting this
Stipulation.
------------------------------------- ------------------------------------
Ohio Power Company
------------------------------------- ------------------------------------
Columbus Southern Power Company
/s/ Michael P. Kurtz
------------------------------------- ------------------------------------
Kroger Co.
------------------------------------- ------------------------------------
------------------------------------- ------------------------------------
------------------------------------- ------------------------------------
------------------------------------- ------------------------------------
------------------------------------- ------------------------------------
------------------------------------- ------------------------------------
------------------------------------- ------------------------------------
13
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Stipulation and Recommendation has been agreed
to as of this 5th day of May, 2000. The undersigned parties respectfully request
the Commission to issue its Opinion and Order approving and adopting this
Stipulation.
------------------------------------- ------------------------------------
Ohio Power Company
------------------------------------- ------------------------------------
Columbus Southern Power Company
/s/ [Signature]
------------------------------------- ------------------------------------
Public Utilities Commission of Ohio
Staff
------------------------------------- ------------------------------------
------------------------------------- ------------------------------------
------------------------------------- ------------------------------------
------------------------------------- ------------------------------------
------------------------------------- ------------------------------------
------------------------------------- ------------------------------------
------------------------------------- ------------------------------------
14
Attachment 1
Page 1 of 2
COLUMBUS SOUTHERN POWER COMPANY
REGULATORY ASSET RECOVERY
Class First 5 years Second 3 years Total
----- ------------- -------------- -----
R-R, R-R-1, RLM, $ 20,941,102 65,901,798 86,842,900
RS-ES, RS- TOD kWh 33,197,686,834 22,093,197,011 55,290,883,845
--- --------------- -------------- ---------------
Rate (c/kWh) 0.06308 0.29829 0.15707
GS-1 $ 926,570 2,911,661 3,838,231
kWh 1,675,837.432 1,113,615,927 2,789,453,359
--- --------------- -------------- ---------------
Rate (c/kWh) 0.05529 0.26146 0.13760
GS-2, GS-2 TOD $ 4,931,811 15,497,601 20,429,412
kWh 8,685,825,300 5,771,918,172 14,457,743,472
--- --------------- -------------- ---------------
Rate (c/kWh) 0.05678 0.26850 0.14130
GS-3 $ 15,798,814 49,312,920 65,111,734
kWh 34,631,330,709 22,858,629,291 57,489,960,000
--- --------------- -------------- ---------------
Rate (c/kWh) 0.04562 0.21573 0.11326
GS-4, IRP, IRP-OS $ 3,582,607 10,915,250 14,497,857
IRP-CDB, IRP-CDA, kWh 9,049,274,943 5,830, 172,873 14,879,447,816
IRP-OR --- --------------- -------------- ---------------
Rate (c/kWh) 0.03959 0.18722 0.09744
SL $ 40,443 117,902 158,345
kWh 153,712,091 94,761,175 248,473,266
--- --------------- -------------- ---------------
Rate (c/kWh) 0.02631 0.12442 0.06373
AL $ 67,015 211,052 278,067
kWh 277,495,044 184,808,520 462,303,564
--- --------------- -------------- ---------------
Rate (c/kWh) 0.02415 0.11420 0.06015
Total $ 46.288,362 144,868,184 191,156,546
kWh 871,671,162,353 57,947,102,969 145,618,265,322
--- --------------- -------------- ---------------
Rate (c/kWh) 0.05280 0.25000 0.13127
Attachment 1
Page 2 of 2
OHIO POWER COMPANY
REGULATORY ASSET RECOVERY
Class First 5 years Second 2 years Total
----- ------------- -------------- -----
RS, RS-ES, $ 90,870,362 44,986,337 135,856,699
R5-TOD, ROMS kWh 35,863,273,049 15,117,392.577 50,980,665,626
--- --------------- -------------- ---------------
Rate (c/kWh) 0.25338 0.29758 0.26649
GS-1 $ 4,522,232 2,220,837 6,743,069
kWh 2,023,369,948 846,032,994 2,869,402,942
--- --------------- -------------- ---------------
Rate (c/kWh) 0.22350 0.26250 0.23500
GS-2, GS-TOD $ 38,152,488 18,667,832 56,820,320
kWh 16,944,612,231 7,059,650,084 24,004,282,315
--- --------------- -------------- ---------------
Rate (c/kWh) 0.22516 0.26443 0.23671
GS-3 $ 67.272,273 32,741,340 100,013,613
kWh 33,897,144,370 14,047,253,781 47,944,398,151
--- --------------- -------------- ---------------
Rate (c/kWh) 0.19846 0.23308 0.20860
GS-4, IRP-OS, $ 82,090,566 39,698,955 121,789,521
IRP-CDB, IRP-CDA, kWh 44,248,903,810 16,219,723,194 62,468,627,004
IRP-OR --- --------------- -------------- ---------------
Rate (c/kWh) 0.18552 0.21789 0.19496
EHG $ 575,333 282,681 858,014
kWh 247,316,600 103,466,751 350,783,351
--- --------------- -------------- ---------------
Rate (c/kWh) 0.23263 0.27321 0.24460
EHS $ 27,232 13,399 40,631
kWh 10,537,916 4,414,710 14,952,626
--- --------------- -------------- ---------------
Rate (c/kWh) 0.25842 0.30351 0.27173
SS $ 1,193,923 587,463 1,781,386
kWh 504,851,145 211,500,194 716,351,339
--- --------------- -------------- ---------------
Rate (c/kWh) 0.23649 0.27776 0.24867
OL $ 435,742 214,297 650,039
kWh 286,596,826 120,007,036 406,603,862
--- --------------- -------------- ---------------
Rate (c/kWh) 0.15204 0.17857 0.15987
SL $ 459,850 217,443 677,293
kWh 304,394,105 122,558,679 426,952,784
--- --------------- -------------- ---------------
Rate (c/kWh) 0.15107 0.17742 0.15863
Total $ 285,600,001 139,630,584 425,230,585
kWh 134,331,000,000 55,852,000,000 190,183,000,000
--- --------------- -------------- ---------------
Rate (c/kWh) 0.21261 0.25000 0.22359
Attachment 2
Page 1 of 7
COLUMBUS SOUTHERN POWER Original Sheet No. 23-1
DISTRIBUTION COMPANY
P.U.C.O. NO.5
SCHEDULE GS-3
(General Service - Medium Load Factor)
MONTHLY RATE
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Generation Transmission Distribution Total
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SECONDARY VOLTAGE:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Customer Charge ($) -- -- 125.15 125.15
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Demand Charge ($ per KW) 8.641 1.673 3.208 13.522
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Off-Peak Excess Demand Charge
($ per KW) 1.125 -- -- 1.125
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Excess KVA Charge ($ per KVA) -- -- 0.907 0.907
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Energy Charge (cents per KWH) 2.34795 -- -- 2.34795
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maximum Energy Charge (cents per KWH) 4.56150 3.34600 6.41600 14.32350
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PRIMARY VOLTAGE:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Customer Charge ($) -- -- 278.90 278.90
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Demand Charge ($ per KW) 8.357 1.618 2.382 12.357
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Off-Peak Excess Demand Charge 1.088
($ per KW) -- -- 1.088
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Excess KVA Charge ($ per KVA) -- -- 0.878 0.878
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Energy Charge (cents per KWH) 2.31606 -- -- 2.31606
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maximum Energy Charge (cents per KWH) 6.32350 3.23600 4.76400 14.32350
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment 2
Page 2 of 7
OHIO POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY Original Sheet No. 23-1
P.U.C.O. NO.17
SCHEDULE GS-3
(General Service -Medium/High Load Factor)
MONTHLY RATE
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Schedule
Codes Generation Transmission Distribution Total
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
240, 242 SECONDARY VOLTAGE:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Demand Charge ($ per KW) 6.76 1.64 4.08 12.48
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Excess KVA Charge
($ per KVA) -- -- 4.00 4.00
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Off-Peak Excess Demand Charge
($ per KW) 2.14 -- -- 2.14
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Energy Charge (cents per KWH) 1.72947 -- -- 1.72947
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Customer Charge ($) -- -- 24.00 24.00
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maximum Energy Charge
(cents per KWH) 8.53733 1.64000 4.08000 14.25733
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
244,246 PRIMARY VOLTAGE:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Demand Charge ($ per KW) 6.53 1.56 3.25 11.34
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Excess KVA Charge
($ per KVA) -- -- 4.00 4.00
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Off-Peak Excess Demand Charge
($ per KW) 1.55 -- -- 1.55
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Energy Charge (cents per KWH) 1.71595 -- -- 1.71595
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Customer Charge ($) -- -- 100.00 100.00
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maximum Energy Charge
(cents per KWH) 9.44737 1.56000 3.25000 14.25737
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
248 SUBTRANSMISSION VOLTAGE:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Demand Charge ($ per KW) 6.34 1.52 2.85 10.71
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Excess KVA Charge
($ per KVA) -- -- 4.00 4.00
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Off-Peak Excess Demand Charge
($ per KW) 1.20 -- -- 1.20
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Energy Charge (cents per KWH) 1.70406 -- -- 1.70406
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Customer Charge ($) -- -- 285.00 285.00
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maximum Energy Charge
(cents per KWH) 9.88749 1.52000 2.85000 14.25749
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
245 TRANSMISSION VOLTAGE:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Demand Charge ($ per KW) 6.24 1.51 2.29 10.04
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Excess KVA Demand Charge
($ per KVA) -- -- 4.00 4.00
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Off-Peak Excess Demand Charge
($ per KW) 0.63 -- -- 0.63
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Energy Charge (cents per KWH) 1.69795 -- -- 1.69795
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Customer Charge ($) -- -- 560.00 560.00
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maximum Energy Charge
(cents per KWH) 10.45738 1.51000 2.29000 14.24738
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment 2
Page 3 of 7
Columbus Southern Power Company
Typical Bill Comparison
Level Level Current 10/04/99 Current Adjusted
Line Rate of of Base Fuel Cost Bill Incl. Unbundled Dollar Percent
No. Code Demand Usage Bill Revenue Fuel Costs Bill Increase Increase
(A) (B) (C) (D) (E)=(C+D) (F) (G)=(F-E) (H)=(G/E)
0.0137261
1 GS-3-Sec 50 17,500 975.23 240.21 1,215.44 1,238.69 23.25 1.91
2 50 22,500 1,037.70 308.84 1,346.54 1,372.17 25.63 1.90
3 50 27,500 1,100.16 377.47 1,477.63 1,505.66 28.03 1.90
4 100 35,000 1,825.31 480.41 2,305.72 2,349.00 43.28 1.88
5 100 45,000 1,950.24 617.67 2,567.91 2,615.98 48.07 1.87
6 100 55,000 2,075.17 754.94 2,830.11 2,882.94 52.83 1.87
7 250 87,500 4,375.54 1,201.03 5,576.57 5,679.97 103.40 1.85
8 250 112,500 4,687.87 1,544.19 6,232.06 6,347.39 115.33 1.85
9 250 137,500 5,000.19 1,887.34 6,887.53 7,014.82 127.29 1.85
10 500 175,000 8,625.93 2,402.07 11,028.00 11,231.55 203.55 1.85
11 500 225,000 9,250.58 3,088.37 12,338.95 12,566.42 227.47 1.84
12 500 275,000 9,875.23 3,774.68 13,649.91 13,901.27 251.36 1.84
13 1,000 350,000 17,126.70 4,804.14 21,930.84 22,334.75 403.91 1.84
14 1,000 450,000 18,376.00 6,176.75 24,552.75 25,004.47 451.72 1.84
15 1,000 550,000 19,625.30 7,549.36 27,174.66 27,674.19 499.53 1.84
16 2,000 700,000 34,128.25 9,608.27 43,736.52 44,541.12 804.60 1.84
17 2,000 900,000 36,626.85 12,353.49 48,980.34 49,880.56 900.22 1.84
18 2,000 1,100,000 39,125.45 15,098.71 54,224.16 55,220.00 995.84 1.84
19 3,000 1,050,000 51,129.80 14,412.41 65,542.21 66,747.51 1,205.30 1.84
20 3,000 1,350,000 54,877.70 18,530.24 73,407.94 74,756.67 1,348.73 1.84
21 3,000 1,650,000 58,625.60 22,648.07 81,273.67 82,765.83 1,492.16 1.84
22 4,500 1,575,000 76,632.13 21,618.61 98,250.74 100,057.06 1,806.32 1.84
23 4,500 2,025,000 82,253.98 27,795.35 110,049.33 112,070.81 2,021.48 1.84
24 4,500 2,475,000 87,875.83 33,972.10 121,847.93 124,084.54 2,236.61 1.84
Attachment 2
Page 4 of 7
Columbus Southern Power Company
Typical Bill Comparison
Level Level Current 10/04/99 Current Adjusted
Line Rate of of Base Fuel Cost Bill Incl. Unbundled Dollar Percent
No. Code Demand Usage Bill Revenue Fuel Costs Bill Increase Increase
(A) (B) (C) (D) (E)=(C+D) (F) (G)=(F-E) (H)=(G/E)
0.0137261
1 GS-3-Pri 50 17,500 1,065.47 240.21 1,305.68 1,324.22 18.54 1.42
2 50 22,500 1,126.03 308.84 1,434.87 1,456.18 21.31 1.49
3 50 27,500 1,186.57 377.47 1,564.04 1,588.16 24.12 1.54
4 100 35,000 1,852.06 480.41 2,332.47 2,373.82 41.35 1.77
5 100 45,000 1,973.16 617.67 2,590.83 2,637.76 46.93 1.81
6 100 55,000 2,094.26 754.94 2,849.20 2,901.69 52.49 1.84
7 250 87,500 4,211.77 1,201.03 5,412.80 5,522.63 109.83 2.03
8 250 112,500 4,514.53 1,544.19 6,058.72 6,182.47 123.75 2.04
9 250 137,500 4,817.27 1,887.34 6,704.61 6,842.32 137.71 2.05
10 500 175,000 8,144.66 2,402.07 10,546.73 10,770.64 223.91 2.12
11 500 225,000 8,750.16 3,088.37 11,838.53 12,090.33 251.80 2.13
12 500 275,000 9,355.66 3,774.68 13,130.34 13,410.02 279.68 2.13
13 1,000 350,000 16,010.40 4,804.14 20,814.54 21,266.66 452.12 2.17
14 1,000 450,000 17,221.40 6,176.75 23,398.15 23,906.05 507.90 2.17
15 1,000 550,000 18,432.40 7,549.36 25,981.76 26,545.43 563.67 2.17
16 2,000 700,000 31,741.90 9,608.27 41,350.17 42,258.69 908.52 2.20
17 2,000 900,000 34,163.90 12,353.49 46,517.39 47,537.47 1,020.08 2.19
18 2,000 1,100,000 36,585.90 15,098.71 51,684.61 52,816.24 1,131.63 2.19
19 4,000 1,400,000 63,204.90 19,216.54 82,421.44 84,242.78 1,821.34 2.21
20 4,000 1,800,000 68,048.90 24,706.98 92,755.88 94,800.32 2,044.44 2.20
21 4,000 2,200,000 72,892.90 30,197.42 103,090.32 105,357.86 2,267.54 2.20
22 8,000 2,800,000 126,130.90 38,433.08 164,563.98 168,210.94 3,646.96 2.22
23 8,000 3,600,000 135,818.90 49,413.96 185,232.86 189,326.02 4,093.16 2.21
24 8,000 4,400,000 145,506.90 60,394.84 205,901.74 210,441.11 4,539.37 2.20
25 10,000 3,500,000 157,593.90 48,041.35 205,635.25 210,195.02 4,559.77 2.22
26 10,000 4,500,000 169,703.90 61,767.45 231,471.35 238,588.88 5,117.53 2.21
27 10,000 5,500,000 181.813.90 75,493.55 257,307.45 262,982.73 5,675.28 2.21
Attachment 2
Page 5 of 7
Ohio Power Company
Typical Bill Comparison
Level Level Current 10/04/99 Current Adjusted
Line Rate of of Base Fuel Cost Bill Incl. Unbundled Dollar Percent
No. Code Demand Usage Bill Revenue Fuel Costs Bill Increase Increase
(A) (B) (C) (D) (E)=(C+D) (F) (G)=(F-E) (H)=(G/E)
0.0145654
1 GS-3-Sec 10 3,500 164.85 50.98 215.83 222.55 6.72 3.11
2 10 4,500 171.89 65.54 237.43 245.28 7.85 3.31
3 10 5,500 178.93 80.11 259.04 268.01 8.97 3.46
4 25 8,750 376.11 127.45 503.56 520.60 17.04 3.38
5 25 11,250 393.72 163.86 557.58 577.45 19.87 3.56
6 25 13,750 411.32 200.27 611.59 634.26 22.67 3.71
7 50 17,500 728.24 254.89 983.13 1,015.99 32.86 3.34
8 50 22,500 763.45 327.72 1,091.17 1,126.84 35.67 3.27
9 50 27,500 798.65 400.55 1,199.20 1,237.70 38.50 3.21
10 75 26,250 1,080.35 382.34 1,462.69 1,507.86 45.17 3.09
11 75 33,750 1,133.16 491.58 1,624.74 1,674.14 49.40 3.04
12 75 41,250 1,185.98 600.82 1,786.80 1,840.44 53.64 3.00
13 100 35,000 1,432.46 509.79 1,942.25 1,999.72 57.47 2.96
14 100 45,000 1,502.88 655.44 2,158.32 2,221.44 63.12 2.92
15 100 55,000 1,573.30 801.10 2,374.40 2,443.16 68.76 2.90
16 200 70,000 2,840.93 1,019.58 3,860.51 3,967.22 106.71 2.76
17 200 90,000 2,981.76 1,310.89 4,292.65 4,410.65 118.00 2.75
18 200 110,000 3,122.60 1,602.19 4,724.79 4,854.10 129.31 2.74
19 500 175,000 7,066.32 2,548.95 9,615.27 9,869.67 254.40 2.65
20 500 225,000 7,418.41 3,277.22 10,695.63 10,978.28 282.65 2.64
21 500 275,000 7,770.50 4,005.49 11,775.99 12,086.88 310.89 2.64
22 1,000 350,000 14,108.63 5,097.89 19,206.52 19,707.13 500.61 2.61
23 1,000 450,000 14,812.81 6,554.43 21,367.24 21,924.33 557.09 2.61
24 1,000 550,000 15,516.99 8,010.97 23,527.96 24,141.54 613.58 2.61
25 3,000 1,050,000 42,277.89 15,293.67 57,571.56 59,056.90 1,485.34 2.58
26 3,000 1,350,000 44,390.43 19,663.29 64,053.72 65,708.52 1,654.80 2.58
27 3,000 1,650,000 46,502.97 24,032.91 70,535.88 72,360.14 1,824.26 2.59
28 7,000 2,450,000 98,616.41 35,685.23 134,301.64 137,756.46 3,454.82 2.57
29 7,000 3,150,000 103,545.67 45,881.01 149,426.68 153,276.90 3,850.22 2.58
30 7,000 3,850,000 108,474.93 56,076.79 164,551.72 168,797.35 4,245.63 2.58
Attachment 2
Page 6 of 7
Ohio Power Company
Typical Bill Comparison
Level Level Current 10/04/99 Current Adjusted
Line Rate of of Base Fuel Cost Bill Incl. Unbundled Dollar Percent
No. Code Demand Usage Bill Revenue Fuel Costs Bill Increase Increase
(A) (B) (C) (D) (E)=(C+D) (F) (G)=(F-E) (H)=(G/E)
0.0145654
1 GS-3-Pri 10 3,500 229.08 50.98 280.06 283.77 3.71 1.32
2 10 4,500 235.93 65.54 301.47 306.38 4.91 1.63
3 10 5.500 242.78 80.11 322.89 328.98 6.09 1.89
4 25 8,750 422.70 127.45 550.15 564.83 14.68 2.67
5 25 11,250 439.83 163.86 603.69 621.33 17.64 2.92
6 25 13,750 456.96 200.27 657.23 677.83 20.60 3.13
7 50 17,500 745.41 254.89 1,000.30 1,031.86 31.56 3.16
8 50 22,500 779.67 327.72 1,107.39 1,142.08 34.69 3.13
9 50 27,500 813.92 400.55 1,214.47 1,252.30 37.83 3.11
10 75 26,250 1,068.11 382.34 1,450.45 1,495.40 44.95 3.10
11 75 33,750 1,119.50 491.58 1,611.08 1,660.71 49.63 3.08
12 75 41,250 1,170.89 600.82 1,771.71 1,826.04 54.33 3.07
13 100 35,000 1,390.81 509.79 1,900.60 1,958.92 58.32 3.07
14 100 45,000 1,459.33 655.44 2,114.77 2,179.36 64.59 3.05
15 100 55,000 1,527.85 801.10 2,328.95 2,399.78 70.83 3.04
16 200 70,000 2,681.63 1,019.58 3,701.21 3,813.07 111.86 3.02
17 200 90,000 2,818.66 1,310.89 4,129.55 4,253.92 124.37 3.01
18 200 110,000 2,955.70 1,602.19 4,557.89 4,694.79 136.90 3.00
19 500 175,000 6,554.07 2,548.95 9,103.02 9,375.46 272.44 2.99
20 500 225,000 6,896.66 3,277.22 10,173.88 10,477.62 303.74 2.99
21 500 275,000 7,239.25 4,005.49 11,244.74 11,579.76 335.02 2.98
22 1000 350,000 13,008.13 5,097.89 18,106.02 18,646.15 540.13 2.98
23 1000 450,000 13,693.31 6,554.43 20,247.74 20,850.45 602.71 2.98
24 1000 550,000 14,378.49 8,010.97 22,389.46 23,054.75 665.29 2.97
25 3000 1,050,000 38,824.39 15,293.67 54,118.06 55,728.85 1,610.79 2.98
26 3000 1,350,000 40,879.93 19,663.29 60,543.22 62,341.75 1,798.53 2.97
27 3000 1,650,000 42,935.47 24,032.91 66,968.38 68,954.65 1,986.27 2.97
28 7000 2,450,000 90,458.91 35,685.23 126,142.14 129,894.27 3,752.13 2.97
29 7000 3,150,000 95,253.17 45,881.01 141,134.18 145,324.36 4,190.18 2.97
30 7000 3,850,000 100,049.43 56,076.79 156,126.22 160,754.45 4,628.23 2.96
Attachment 2
Page 7 of 7
Ohio Power Company
Typical Bill Comparison
Level Level Current 10/04/99 Current Adjusted
Line Rate of of Base Fuel Cost Bill Incl. Unbundled Dollar Percent
No. Code Demand Usage Bill Revenue Fuel Costs Bill Increase Increase
(A) (B) (C) (D) (E)=(C+D) (F) (G)=(F-E) (H)=(G/E)
0.0145654
1 GS-3-Sub 10 3,500 407.49 50.98 458.47 453.98 (4.49) (0.98)
2 10 4,500 414.20 65.54 479.74 476.46 (3.28) (0.68)
3 10 5,500 420.91 80.11 501.02 498.95 (2.07) (0.41)
4 25 8,750 591.23 127.45 718.68 725.42 6.74 0.94
5 25 11,250 608.01 163.86 771.87 781.65 9.78 1.27
6 25 13,750 624.79 200.27 825.06 837.86 12.80 1.55
7 50 17,500 897.46 254.89 1,152.35 1,176.42 24.07 2.09
8 50 22,500 931.02 327.72 1,258.74 1,286.06 27.32 2.17
9 50 27,500 964.57 400.55 1,365.12 1,395.72 30.60 2.24
10 75 26,250 1,203.69 382.34 1,586.03 1,623.93 37.90 2.39
11 75 33,750 1,254.03 491.58 1,745.61 1,788.39 42.78 2.45
12 75 41,250 1,304.37 600.82 1,905.19 1,952.86 47.67 2.50
13 100 35,000 1,509.91 509.79 2,019.70 2,071.43 51.73 2.56
14 100 45,000 1,577.03 655.44 2,232.47 2,290.73 58.26 2.61
15 100 55,000 1,644.15 801.10 2,445.25 2,510.01 64.76 2.65
16 200 70,000 2,734.83 1,019.58 3,754.41 3,861.44 107.03 2.85
17 200 90,000 2,869.06 1,310.89 4,179.95 4,300.03 120.08 2.87
18 200 110,000 3,003.30 1,602.19 4,605.49 4,738.63 133.14 2.89
19 500 175,000 6,409.57 2,548.95 8,958.52 9,231.50 272.98 3.05
20 500 225,000 6,745.16 3,277.22 10,022.38 10,327.97 305.59 3.05
21 500 275,000 7,080.75 4,005.49 11,086.24 11,424.44 338.20 3.05
22 1000 350,000 12,534.13 5,097.89 17,632.02 18,181.57 549.55 3.12
23 1000 450,000 13,205.31 6,554.43 19,759.74 20,374.52 614.78 3.11
24 1000 550,000 13,876.49 8,010.97 21,887.46 22,567.47 680.01 3.11
25 3000 1,050,000 37,032.39 15,293.67 52,326.06 53,981.89 1,655.83 3.16
26 3000 1,350,000 39,045.93 19,663.29 58,709.22 60,560.74 1,851.52 3.15
27 3000 1,650,000 41,059.47 24,032.91 65,092.38 67,139.58 2,047.20 3.15
28 7000 2,450,000 86,028.91 35,685.23 121,714.14 125,582.54 3,868.40 3.18
29 7000 3,150,000 90,727.17 45,881.01 136,608.18 140,933.17 4,324.99 3.17
30 7000 3,850,000 95,425.43 56,076.79 151,502.22 156,283.81 4,781.59 3.16
EX-99.D5
7
c22015_ex99-d5.txt
TESTIMONY
Exhibit 99.D5
BEFORE THE
LOUISIANA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
LPSC DOCKET NOS. U-21453,
U-20925, U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C)
SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY'S
BUSINESS SEPARATION PLAN
DIRECT TESTIMONY OF
JOHN O. AARON
FOR
SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY
SEPTEMBER 2001
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U-20925, JOHN O. AARON
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
1
TESTIMONY INDEX
SUBJECT PAGE
I. INTRODUCTION........................................................3
II. PURPOSE OF TESTIMONY................................................5
III. OVERALL BUSINESS SEPARATION ACCOUNTING..............................5
A. Books, Records and Asset Transfers..............................6
B. Corporate Support Services.....................................11
IV. TRANSACTION AND TRANSITION COSTS INCLUDING THE PHYSICAL
WORKFORCE SEPARATION COSTS.........................................12
V. CONCLUSION.........................................................13
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U-20925, JOHN O. AARON
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
2
1 BEFORE THE
2 LOUISIANA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
3 LPSC DOCKET NOS. U-21453,
4 U-20925, U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C)
5
6 SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY'S
7 BUSINESS SEPARATION PLAN
8
9 DIRECT TESTIMONY OF
10 JOHN O. AARON
11
12 FOR
13 SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY
14
15 SEPTEMBER 2001
16
17 I. INTRODUCTION
18 Q. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME, POSITION AND BUSINESS ADDRESS.
19 A. My name is John O. Aaron and I am employed as a Regulatory Accounting Consultant
20 by American Electric Power Service Corporation (AEPSC), a subsidiary of American
21 Electric Power Company, Inc. (AEP). My business address is Williams Tower II, 2
22 W. Second St., Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74103-3102.
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U-20925, JOHN O. AARON
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
3
1 Q. WHAT ARE YOUR PRINCIPAL AREAS OF RESPONSIBILITY?
2 I am responsible for the preparation and coordination of accounting-related schedules
3 and other accounting information for regulatory filings made by the four domestic
4 electric operating companies of the western portion of AEP: Central Power and Light
5 Company (CPL), Southwestern Electric Power Company (SWEPCO), Public Service
6 Company of Oklahoma (PSO) and West Texas Utilities Company (WTU).
7 Q. PLEASE SUMMARIZE YOUR EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND AND
8 PROFESSIONAL BACKGROUND.
9 A. I received a Bachelor of Science in Accounting from Louisiana State University in
10 Shreveport in May 1980. I am a Certified Public Accountant (CPA) in the State of
11 Oklahoma and a member of the American Institute of CPAs and the Oklahoma Society
12 of CPAs. Upon graduation from college, I was employed as an Internal Auditor for a
13 multi-state wholesale appliance and electrical supplier in Shreveport, Louisiana. In
14 May 1984, I accepted employment with SWEPCO as an accountant in the Property
15 Accounting Department. From 1985 through 1995, I held various positions in the
16 Accounting, Internal Auditing and Rate Departments, including Supervisor of
17 Regulatory Accounting Support and Supervisor of Wholesale Marketing Support. My
18 responsibilities at SWEPCO included preparing property accounting closing reports
19 and journal entries, conducting financial audits, and providing accounting support for
20 regulatory filings made in SWEPCO's retail jurisdictions and at the Federal Energy
21 Regulatory Commission (FERC). In April 1995, I assumed the position of Regulatory
22 Accounting Consultant at Central and South West Services, Inc. (CSWS) the service
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U-20925, JOHN O. AARON
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
4
1 company for the former Central and South West Corporation (CSW). As of January
2 1, 2001, AEPSC became the successor to CSWS.
3 Q. HAVE YOU PREVIOUSLY SPONSORED TESTIMONY BEFORE THIS OR
4 OTHER COMMISSIONS?
5 A. Yes. I have sponsored written testimony on behalf of WTU and CPL before the
6 Public Utility Commission of Texas but not before the Louisiana Public Service
7 Commission (LPSC).
8
9 II. PURPOSE OF TESTIMONY
10 Q. WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF YOUR TESTIMONY IN THIS FILING?
11 A. The purpose of my testimony is to address accounting implications associated with
12 SWEPCO's business separation plan resulting from the restructuring of the electric
13 industry in SWEPCO's Texas service territory.
14 Q. IS THIS TESTIMONY TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF YOUR
15 KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF?
16 A. Yes.
17
18 III. OVERALL BUSINESS SEPARATION ACCOUNTING
19 Q. BRIEFLY DESCRIBE THE PROPOSED BUSINESS SEPARATION PLAN FOR
20 SWEPCO.
21 A. As discussed in the direct testimony of Mr. J. Craig Baker, SWEPCO's assets will be
22 split between SWEPCO and the SWEPCO Texas Energy Delivery Company
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U-20925, JOHN O. AARON
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
5
1 (SWEPCO Texas EDC). The SWEPCO Texas EDC will be comprised of SWEPCO's
2 transmission and distribution assets physically located in Texas and any related general
3 plant. SWEPCO will continue to own all of SWEPCO's other assets, including all
4 generation assets, the transmission assets and distribution assets physically located in
5 Arkansas and Louisiana, and any related general plant assets.
6
7 A. BOOKS. RECORDS AND ASSET TRANSFERS
8 Q. HOW WILL THE TRANSFERS OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES BETWEEN THE
9 LEGAL ENTITIES BE VALUED?
10 A. The transfers of assets and liabilities to accomplish the structural separation will be
11 valued at net book value. Net book value is defined as original cost less accumulated
12 depreciation. This is in compliance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange
13 Commission (SEC) as they pertain to holding companies registered under the Public
14 Utility Holding Company Act of 1935 (PUHCA), and is consistent with Texas
15 restructuring legislation and rules.
16 Q. HOW WILL THE ASSET SEPARATIONS OR TRANSFERS BE CONDUCTED?
17 A. Asset ownership will be detem1ined on the basis of the predominant use of the asset
18 and its physical location. FERC Account 101, Electric Plant in Service, contains most
19 of the assets to be separated. In general, generation assets recorded in FERC plant
20 accounts 310-346 will be functionally separated into generation and will stay on
21 SWEPCO's books.
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U-20925, JOHN O. AARON
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
6
1 Transmission assets recorded in FERC plant accounts 350-359 and physically
2 located in Texas will be transferred to the SWEPCO Texas EDC. Transmission assets
3 recorded in FERC plant accounts 350-359 and physically located in Arkansas and
4 Louisiana will stay with SWEPCO. In addition, all generator step-up transformers and
5 related breaker equipment, regardless of physical location, will be transferred to the
6 generation function and remain on SWEPCO's books.
7 Distribution assets recorded in FERC plant accounts 360-373 and physically
8 located in Texas will be transferred to the SWEPCO Texas EDC. Distribution assets
9 recorded in FERC plant accounts 360-373 and physically located in Arkansas and
10 Louisiana will stay with SWEPCO. This follows the current treatment of distribution
11 costs that are maintained on a situs basis.
12 General plant assets recorded in FERC plant accounts 389-399 that can be
13 identified to a specific function (e.g., generation, transmission, distribution) will be
14 assigned to that function. The general plant assets that cannot be directly assigned will
15 be allocated based on functional gross plant balances. The SWEPCO Texas EDC
16 amount will be detern1ined based on the ratio of Texas transmission and distribution
17 situs plant balances to total transmission and distribution assets.
18 Q. HOW WILL SWEPCO IDENTIFY THE ASSETS TO BE TRANSFERRED?
19 A. For transmission and distribution assets, SWEPCO's books and records specify the
20 state in which the plant in service asset is located. Appropriate personnel are currently
21 reviewing the general plant assets to determine the assignment of the general plant
22 assets to be transferred to the SWEPCO Texas EDC.
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U-20925, JOHN O. AARON
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
7
1 Q. HAS AN ESTIMATE OF THE SEPARATE SWEPCO AND SWEPCO TEXAS
2 EDC BALANCE SHEETS BEEN MADE?
3 A. Yes. Please refer to the July 24,2001 FERC filing in Docket No. ECO1-130-000 for a
4 balance sheet providing the estimated amounts for SWEPCO and the SWEPCO Texas
5 EDC at December 31, 2000. This balance sheet provides a reasonable estimate of the
6 expected assets, liabilities and capitalization for the separate SWEPCO entities. The
7 actual balances at the time of separation will be different and the methods used to
8 separate the assets more detailed and precise.
9 Q. WHEN WILL THE ASSETS AND LIABILITIES BE TRANSFERRED?
10 A. The asset and liability transfer will be effective January 1, 2002.
11 Q. ARE THERE ANY ASSETS WHICH WILL BE TRANSFERRED THAT HAVE A
12 ZERO BOOK VALUE BUT ARE STILL USEFUL?
13 A. No, for the most part. SWEPCO depreciates assets utilizing "mass asset" accounting.
14 In this type of accounting, assets with similar characteristics are grouped and
15 depreciation is recorded as a group instead of being recorded on an asset-by-asset
16 basis. In mass asset accounting, depreciation rates are adjusted to reflect the average
17 service life of the group as a whole. When an individual asset is no longer useful, that
18 asset is retired and removed from the group. Capitalized computer software is one
19 exception to the mass asset accounting method. For these types of assets, SWEPCO
20 identifies individual computer software systems and amortizes each software system
21 individually. Thus, at December 31, 2001, there is the possibility that a particular
22 system still in use will have a net book value of zero.
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U-20925, JOHN O. AARON
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
8
1 Q. WILL SEPARATE BOOKS AND RECORDS BE MAINTAINED FOR SWEPCO AND
2 THE SWEPCO TEXAS EDC?
3 A. Yes. Separate books and records will be maintained.
4 Q. FOR RATE PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE LPSC, WHERE WILL THE
5 FINANCIAL DATA UTILIZED TO DEVELOP TOTAL COSTS FOR SERVICES
6 PROVIDED TO SWEPCO'S REGULATED LOUISIANA CUSTOMERS RESIDE?
7 A. The financial data will reside both on SWEPCO's and the SWEPCO Texas EDC's
8 books and records. The SWEPCO Texas EDC's books and records will be used to
9 provide asset and cost data associated with assets that are used to provide electric
10 service to SWEPCO's regulated Louisiana customers. For example, the transmission
11 facilities physically located in Texas are utilized to transmit power from the SWEPCO
12 power plants physically located in Texas to SWEPCO's regulated Louisiana
13 customers. Because the financial data associated with the transmission facilities
14 physically located in Texas resides on SWEPCO Texas EDC's books and records,
15 SWEPCO Texas EDC's books and records must be used to develop total transmission
16 costs for SWEPCO's regulated Louisiana customers. For total SWEPCO
17 transmission cost determination, the appropriate financial data from these two
18 companies will be combined. Ms. Hargus provides an example of this concept as it
19 relates to cost of capital in her testimony.
20 Q. WILL THE CREATION OF THE SWEPCO TEXAS EDC RESULT IN
21 ADDITIONAL DATA BEING AVAILABLE TO DEVELOP PROPER
22 LOUISIANA RETAIL COSTS?
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U-20925, JOHN O. AARON
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
9
1 A. Yes, it will. Previously, SWEPCO did not track separately Texas T&D cost data such
2 as operation and maintenance (O & M) expense. With the creation of the SWEPCO
3 Texas EDC, more accurate Texas T&D cost data will be available (e.g., Texas specific
4 distribution O & M and Texas specific transmission and distribution ad valorem taxes).
5 With this data, a more precise allocation of costs to SWEPCO's Louisiana retail
6 customers can be made. Because this more precise data was not available for
7 ratemaking purposes in the past, SWEPCO does not know if Louisiana retail costs will
8 increase or decrease. No matter which direction the costs go, the Louisiana retail
9 customer cost allocation will be more accurate. Mr. Chris Potter discusses the proper
10 allocation of the financial data to SWEPCO's Louisiana retail customers.
11 Q. DOES SWEPCO ANTICIPATE THERE WILL BE ANY MATERIAL EFFECT ON
12 LOUISIANA'S RETAIL CUSTOMERS AS A RESULT OF THE TRANSFER OF
13 ASSETS TO THE SWEPCO TEXAS EDC?
14 A. No, it does not. The assets to be transferred to the SWEPCO Texas EDC will be
15 accomplished at book value, which is consistent with the methodology used to set
16 rates. Therefore, no material effect is expected from the transfer. To the extent
17 additional more precise information, such as O & M, is available with the creation of
18 the SWEPCO Texas EDC, such information will be used, but is not expected to
19 significantly change Louisiana customers' costs. For information concerning the
20 implications of the cost of capital for these transfers, please see Ms. Hargus'
21 testimony.
22
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U-20925, JOHN O. AARON
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
10
1 B. Corporate Support Services
-----------------------------
2 Q. PLEASE DISCUSS HOW THE CORPORATE SUPPORT SERVICES PROVIDED
3 BY THE AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE CORPORATION (AEPSC)
4 WILL BE SHARED AMONG THE BUSINESS UNITS.
5 A. AEP will continue to make use of corporate support services provided by AEPSC to
6 retain the efficiencies of central management that promote cost savings. Such services
7 will be provided by AEPSC to a larger number of AEP companies.
8 Q. HOW WILL COSTS RELATED TO SHARED SERVICES BE ACCOUNTED
9 FOR?
10 A. Costs related to services provided by corporate and shared services support will be
11 accounted for utilizing a work order type system as required by the SEC.
12 Expenditures for shared and support services will be accumulated in the work order
13 type system and ultimately billed to the AEP subsidiaries, including AEP's
14 non-regulated companies that benefit from the service. Accounting within each
15 activity or project will be in accordance with the FERC system of accounts. This
16 facilitates a clearer understanding of the specific service provided and simplifies the
17 recording of these charges on the benefiting companies' books.
18 Q. HOW ARE THESE EXPENDITURES ALLOCATED TO THE BENEFITING
19 COMPANIES?
20 A. Costs will be directly assigned to a specific company to the maximum extent possible.
21 When costs cannot be directly billed, appropriate SEC approved allocation factors will
22 be used. A volume-driven formula is used in cases where the cost driver is volume-
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U-20925, JOHN O. AARON
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
11
1 based and the data is available. If a volume-based formula is not available, the most
2 representative factor will be used based on cost-causative criteria that are indicators of
3 the amount of activity within the companies that gives rise to the costs that are to be
4 allocated. Being based on the activity that gives rise to the costs, the factors assure
5 that costs are allocated on the basis of specific company cost-causative criteria, which
6 appropriately reflects the service recipients' activity level and use of equipment or
7 assets.
8 It is expected that the existing or similar allocation factors will be used to
9 allocate shared support services after the business separation. Although many of the
10 allocation factors will be the same as those used today, it is possible that additional
11 allocation factors may be required as a result of the business separations. AEPSC will
12 seek approval of any new allocation factors from the SEC.
13
14 IV. TRANSITION COSTS INCLUDING
15 THE PHYSICAL WORKFORCE SEPARATION COSTS
16 Q. WILL SWEPCO INCUR TRANSITION COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE
17 RESTRUCTURING OF THE ELECTRIC INDUSTRY IN TEXAS?
18 A. Yes. SWEPCO will place in service additional assets (such as load profiling system
19 and transmission metering at power plants) and will incur additional O & M related to
20 the restructuring of the electric industry in Texas.
21 Q. HOW DOES SWEPCO PROPOSE TO HANDLE THESE TRANSITION COSTS
22 WITH REGARD TO SWEPCO'S LOUISIANA RETAIL CUSTOMERS?
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U-20925, JOHN O. AARON
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
12
1 A. SWEPCO proposes to identify transition costs in its accounting records and not
2 charge any of these costs to its Louisiana retail customers unless and until such time
3 such assets and costs are utilized in the provision of electric service to Louisiana retail
4 customers. New assets will be identified with a special code that will designate them
5 as restructuring assets. O & M costs will also be identified with a special code that
6 will also designate these costs as restructuring costs. The restructuring assets and
7 O & M data will thus be separated from the jurisdictional allocations so that these
8 costs will not be charged to Louisiana retail customers. At some time in the future,
9 should the Louisiana retail customers benefit from these assets, they will be assigned a
10 portion of the costs. Additional information about cost allocation can be found in the
11 direct testimony of Mr. Chris Potter.
12
13 V. CONCLUSION
-------------
14 Q. PLEASE BRIEFLY SUMMARIZE YOUR TESTIMONY.
15 A. SWEPCO's assets and liabilities required by the Texas restructuring initiative will be
16 transferred between entities at net book value. Separate books and records for the
17 separate legal entities will be maintained. For transmission rate making purposes, the
18 books and records of SWEPCO and the SWEPCO Texas EDC will be utilized to
19 develop total SWEPCO costs. Other costs such as distribution will be charged
20 separately to both entities. Corporate support service costs will be directly assigned to
21 the company benefiting from the service or allocated to the company benefiting from
22 the service on a cost-causative allocation basis. The transition costs associated with
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U-20925, JOHN O. AARON
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
13
1 the restructuring in Texas will be identified and not charged to SWEPCO's Louisiana
2 retail customers until such time as those assets or costs are utilized
3 to provide service to SWEPCO's Louisiana retail customers.
4 Q. DOES THIS CONCLUDE YOUR DIRECT TESTIMONY?
5 A. Yes, it does.
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U-20925, JOHN O. AARON
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
14
BEFORE THE
LOUISIANA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
LPSC DOCKET NOS. U-21453,
U-20925, U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C)
SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY'S
BUSINESS SEPARATION PLAN
DIRECT TESTIMONY OF
J. CRAIG BAKER
FOR
SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY
AUGUST 2001
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U-20925, J. CRAIG BAKER
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
1
TESTIMONY INDEX
SUBJECT PAGE
------- ----
I. INTRODUCTION .......................................................3
II. PURPOSE OF FILING AND TESTIMONY ....................................4
III. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF REQUIRED TRANSFERS AS PART OF
THE, SEPARATION PLAN .............................................7
IV. PROPOSED BUSINESS SEPARATION PLAN ..................................8
V. STATUS OF STATE RESTRUCTURING IN SWEPCO'S SERVICE
TERRITORY .......................................................13
VI. FERC RTO ISSUES IN RESTRUCTURING ..................................18
VII. SWEPCO BSP EFFECT ON COST STRUCTURE . .............................21
VIII. FERC FILINGS CONCERNING SWEPCO'S BSP ..............................24
IX. OTHER REGULATORY APPROVALS ........................................31
X. CONCLUSION ........................................................32
EXHIBITS
--------
EXHIBIT JCB- I Organizational Charts
EXHIBIT JCB-2 AEP WEST Comparison of 4 Company versus 2
Company Agreements
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U-20925, J. CRAIG BAKER
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
2
1 BEFORE THE
2 LOUISIANA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
3 LPSC DOCKET NOS. U-21453,
4 U-20925, U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C)
5
6 SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY'S
7 BUSINESS SEPARATION PLAN
8
9 DIRECT TESTIMONY OF
10 J. CRAIG BAKER
11
12 FOR
13 SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY
14
15 AUGUST 2001
16
17 1. INTRODUCTION
---------------
18 Q. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND POSITION.
19 A. My name is J. Craig Baker, Senior Vice President-Regulation and Public Policy,
20 American Electric Power Service Corporation (AEPSC), 1 Riverside Plaza,
21 Columbus, Ohio 43215.
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U-20925, J. CRAIG BAKER
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
3
1 Q. BRIEFLY DESCRIBE YOUR EDUCATIONAL AND PROFESSIONAL
2 QUALIFICATIONS AND YOUR BUSINESS EXPERIENCE.
3 A. I received a Bachelor's Degree in Business Administration from Walsh College in
4 1970 and a Masters Degree in Business Administration in Finance from Akron
5 University in 1980. I joined the American Electric Power (AEP) System in 1968 and
6 through 1979 held various positions in the Computer Applications Division. I
7 transferred to the System Operation Division in 1979 and held positions of
8 Administrative Assistant and Assistant Manager. In 1985, I took the position of Staff
9 Analyst in the Controller's Department and, in 1987, I became Manager-Power
10 Marketing the System Power Markets Department. In 1991, I became Director,
11 Interconnection Agreements and Marketing. I became Vice President-Power
12 Marketing for AEPSC and Senior Vice President of Energy Marketing for AEP
13 Energy Services, Inc. in November 1996 and August 1997, respectively. On July 1,
14 1998, I became Vice President of Transmission Policy for AEPSC. In June 2000, I
15 became Senior Vice President of Public Policy for AEPSC.
16
17 II. PURPOSE OF FILING AND TESTIMONY
-----------------------------------
18 Q. WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THIS FILING?
19 A. The purpose of this filing is to comply with the information request of the Louisiana
20 Public Service Commission (LPSC or Commission) in Docket Nos, U-21453,
21 U-20925, and U-22092 (Subdocket C) requiring Southwestern Electric Power
22 Company (SWEPCO or Company) to identify the changes in its corporate structure,
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U-20925, J. CRAIG BAKER
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
4
1 and their potential impact on Louisiana retail ratepayers, resulting from SWEPCO's
2 restructuring activities in Texas and anticipated restructuring activities in Arkansas.
3 The filing requests LPSC approval of the of the transfer by SWEPCO of transmission
4 and distribution (T&D) and related general plant (GP) assets located in Texas to a
5 separate Energy Delivery Company (EDC), in order to comply with Texas
6 restructuring statutes. I believe that approval of the requested transfers consistent
7 with the SWEPCO Business Separation Plan (BSP) will constitute all LPSC actions
8 required as a prerequisite to the structural unbundling of SWEPCO as required by the
9 Public Utility Commission of Texas (PUCT) restructuring initiative.
10 Q. HAS SWEPCO PREVIOUSLY PRESENTED INFORMATION REGARDING ITS
11 PROPOSED CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING?
12 A. Yes. On May 25, 2001, SWEPCO made a preliminary filing with the LPSC
13 addressing the SWEPCO BSP. This filing was supplemented on June 29, 2001
14 with drafts of changes to existing AEP agreements and new AEP agreements necessary to
15 implement corporate restructuring. On July 26, 2001, the LPSC was also provided
16 copies of the Application of American Electric Power Service Corporation for
17 Authorization to Transfer Jurisdictional Assets (Docket No. EC0 1 - 130-000) and the
18 Application of American Electric Power Company, Inc. for Approval of Rate
19 Schedules Related to Corporate Restructuring (Docket No. ER01-2668-000) filed
20 before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) on July 24, 2001
21 (collectively, the "FERC filings"). The FERC filings contain the latest versions of
22 the agreements necessary to implement the SWEPCO BSP. On August 6, SWEPCO
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U-20925, J. CRAIG BAKER
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
5
1 provided the LPSC "redlined" versions of the agreements comparing the agreements
2 filed at FERC with those previously filed at the LPSC. This filing (along with the
3 related agreements filed at FERC) replaces in their entirety the previous SWEPCO
4 BSP filings of May 25, 2001 and June 29, 2001.
5 Q. WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF YOUR TESTIMONY IN THIS PROCEEDING?
6 A. The purpose of my testimony is to provide an overview of the SWEPCO BSP and
7 discuss the following matters:
8 1. SWEPCO's plan for transferring its Texas T&D and related GP assets
9 to a new EDC and the associated ratemaking issues;
10 2. The restructuring requirements thus far adopted in Texas and the
11 impact those requirements will have on SWEPCO's BSP;
12 3. The status of the proceedings in Texas and Arkansas related to the
13 SWEPCO BSP;
14 4. A detailed summary of the transactions that are anticipated as a result
15 of the Texas business separation plan and a description of the Restated
16 and Amended AEP-West Operating Agreement (AEP West Operating
17 Agreement), Restated and Amended System Integration Agreement
18 (AEP SIA), Unit Power Sales Agreement between SWEPCO and
19 Power Marketing Affiliate (SWEPCO UPSA), and the Second Unit
20 Power Sales Agreement between Power Marketing Affiliate (PMA)
21 and SWEPCO (Second UPSA); and,
22 5. The cost implications of SWEPCO's restructuring activities in Texas
23 for SWEPCO and for Louisiana.
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U-20925, J. CRAIG BAKER
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
6
1 III. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF REQUIRED
-------------------------------------
2 TRANSFERS AS PART OF THE SEPARATION PLAN
----------------------------------------
3 Q. SHOULD THE LPSC APPROVE SWEPCO'S PROPOSED PLAN TO TRANSFER
4 ITS TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION ASSETS INTO A SEPARATE
5 COMPANY?
6 A. Yes. SWEPCO's BSP permits SWEPCO to comply with completely divergent state
7 laws and policies regarding restructuring in Texas, Arkansas, and Louisiana with no
8 disruption of and no material adverse effect on its ability to provide continuing
9 bundled retail utility service to Louisiana retail customers. The BSP will permit
10 compliance with the applicable statutes in each state with regulatory authority over
11 SWEPCO, thereby avoiding lengthy litigation which would result if state laws
12 required conflicting actions. The BSP, as structured, will not materially affect the
13 cost structure or rates of the SWEPCO Louisiana retail customers. By only
14 separating the Texas T&D and related GP assets of SWEPCO, the physical assets that
15 are utilized to serve Louisiana customers will be essentially unchanged. SWEPCO
16 remains committed to achieving the reliability and service quality standards which are
17 in effect in Louisiana with the same assets that are in place today. The BSP is in the
18 public interest of Louisiana customers, since it provides a path for resolution of
19 jurisdictional conflicts with a minimum of future litigation.
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U-20925, J. CRAIG BAKER
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
7
1 IV. PROPOSED BUSINESS SEPARATION PLAN
-------------------------------------
2 Q. PLEASE DESCRIBE THE PROPOSED SWEPCO BSP.
3 A. In accordance with the legislative requirements discussed previously, the SWEPCO
4 T&D and related GP assets that are physically located in Texas will be transferred to
5 a separate wholly-owned subsidiary of AEP, the SWEPCO TEXAS EDC. In
6 addition, the SWEPCO generation assets and employees currently utilized to provide
7 generation services will remain the assets and employees of SWEPCO. The provision
8 of generation services and wholesale electricity sales currently supplied by SWEPCO
9 will be under the direction, management, and control of a separate wholly-owned
10 subsidiary of AEP, the Regulated Holdco, with the coordination, planning, operation
11 and maintenance responsibilities of its power supply resources delegated to AEPSC
12 pursuant to the AEP West Operating Agreement, continuing the practice currently in
13 effect. The T&D assets physically located in Arkansas and Louisiana and employees
14 currently utilized to provide service in Arkansas and Louisiana will remain assets and
15 employees of SWEPCO. However, SWEPCO and the SWEPCO TEXAS EDC
16 intend to turn over operational control of their FERC jurisdictional transmission
17 facilities to a regional transmission organization (RTO). AEP has also established a
18 retail energy provider (Mutual Energy SWEPCO, LP or "SWEPCO REP") under the
19 Texas REP Holdco discussed below that will provide retail electric services in Texas
20 as required by the restructuring rules of that state.
21 The proposed SWEPCO BSP is being carried out as part of AEP's overall corporate
22 restructuring to respond to the movement toward further competition in the
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U-20925, J. CRAIG BAKER
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
8
1 electric power industry and to comply with the restructuring statutes in Texas and
2 Ohio.
3 Q. PLEASE DISCUSS THE OVERALL AEF RESTRUCTURING.
4 A. EXHIBIT JCB-1 provides the planned and current corporate structures for SWEPCO
5 and AEP resulting from the restructuring activities in Texas as described in the July
6 24 FERC filing. To accomplish its overall corporate restructuring (including
7 SWEPCO's BSP) AEP has established or will establish several intermediate holding
8 companies that will be used to reorganize its businesses in the following manner.
9 AEP will hold all of the common stock of three relevant first-tier subsidiaries:
10 (1) Regulated Holdco, which will be the holding company for AEP's regulated
11 businesses, including vertically integrated electric utilities in states the continue to
12 regulate electric utilities in the traditional manner (including SWEPCO) and
13 transmission and distribution (energy delivery) companies that result from the
14 corporate separation of Central Power and Light Company (CPL), West Texas
15 Utilities Company (WTU), SWEPCO, Ohio Power Company (OPCo) and Columbus
16 Southern Power Company (CSP); (2) AEP Texas REP Holdco, a first-tier AEP
17 subsidiary that will be the holding company for AEP's competitive retail energy
18 marketing businesses in Texas; and (3) AEP Enterprises, Inc., which, among other things,
19 will be the holding company for AEP's unregulated or lightly regulated
20 foreign and domestic power generation and marketing businesses, including the
21 power generation companies that will result from the corporate separation of CPL,
22 WTU, OPCo, and CSP to comply with Texas and Ohio electric utility restructuring
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U -20925, J. CRAIG BAKER
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
9
1 laws. AEP Enterprises has established or will establish a second-tier holding
2 company, AEP Wholesale Holding Company, Inc. (Wholesale Holdco), that will
3 control the common stock of a third-tier holding company, AEP Domestic Generation
4 Holding Company, Inc. (Domestic Genco), that will hold the common stock of the
5 power generating companies that result from the corporate separation of CPL, WTU,
6 OPCo and CSP. AEP Texas REP Holdco, Inc., AEP Enterprises, Inc., AEP
7 Wholesale Holdco, Inc., AEP Domestic Generation Holding Company, Inc. and the
8 other corporate names used for affiliates of the existing AEP operating companies are
9 all placeholder names, which are being used for descriptive convenience pending
10 implementation of AEP's business reorganization plans.
11 Q. PLEASE DISCUSS THE FORMATION OF THE SWEPCO TEXAS EDC.
12 A. To comply with the Texas electric restructuring statute (Senate Bill 7), by January 1,
13 2002, SWEPCO will transfer title to its T&D and related GP assets, including
14 interconnection agreements with neighboring utility systems, located in Texas and
15 related business operations to a newly formed wholly owned subsidiary, SWEPCO
16 TEXAS EDC, in exchange for 100% of the capital stock of such subsidiary and then
17 contribute or dividend the shares of SWEPCO TEXAS EDC to SWEPCO's parent,
18 Regulated Holdco. Regulated Holdco will continue to hold all of the common stock
19 of SWEPCO. SWEPCO will retain title to its T&D assets located in Louisiana and
20 Arkansas and all of its generating plants.
21 Q. WHY WILL SWEPCO CONTINUE TO RETAIN TITLE TO ITS GENERATING
22 ASSETS?
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U -20925, J. CRAIG BAKER
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
10
1 A. SWEPCO will continue to retain title to its generating assets because it provides
2 bundled retail electric service in Louisiana, which to date has not adopted a retail
3 Competition policy or legislation, and in Arkansas, where SWEPCO is not obliged
4 to separate ownership of its generating assets from its transmission and distribution
5 assets. SWEPCO also will retain its existing wholesale electric sales contracts, but
6 will sell to AEP's PMA proportionate rights to capacity in each SWEPCO generating
7 unit and certain capacity purchase agreements equal to the ratio of the sum of the
8 demands of the SWEPCO-Texas retail native load and the SWEPCO wholesale
9 contract native load at the time of the four Year 2000 coincident monthly summer
10 (June through September) SWEPCO peak demands to the sum of the same four
11 coincident peak demands of the total SWEPCO native load. As discussed later in this
12 testimony, such capacity and associated energy will be made available to PMA under
13 the SWEPCO UPSA. To enable SWEPCO to continue to supply its wholesale
14 requirements customers, PMA will sell back to SWEPCO under the Second UPSA
15 the capacity and associated energy needed for that purpose.
16 Q. PLEASE DISCUSS THE NEW SWEPCO REP ORGANIZATION,
17 A. As discussed earlier, AEP established the SWEPCO REP as a subsidiary with the
18 primary purpose of providing retail electric service to end-use customers in Texas, including
19 the procurement of generation services and competitive customer services
20 components. SWEPCO may also assign to the affiliated SWEPCO REP the
21 responsibility to provide the standard service package offering in Arkansas once retail
22 competition begins in that state. The SWEPCO REP will acquire wholesale energy
supply and necessary transmission and distribution services to meet the needs of the
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U -20925, J. CRAIG BAKER
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
11
1 remaining Texas retail customers. The SWEPCO REP anticipates acquiring energy
2 supplies from one or more of the following: its affiliate power generation company,
3 non-affiliate power generation companies, and power marketers.
4 Q. PLEASE DISCUSS THE TRANSFERS OF SWEPCO ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
5 ANTICIPATED UNDER THE SWEPCO BSP.
6 A. The only change in ownership of existing SWEPCO assets pertains to T&D assets
7 located in Texas and related general plant assets. The transfers of assets and
8 liabilities related to the transmission and distribution utility located in Texas will be
9 valued at net book value. Further, to functionally separate all of SWEPCO's assets
10 into generation, transmission, distribution, and customer services functions, assets
11 will be valued at net book value. Net book value is defined as original cost less
12 accumulated depreciation. This treatment complies with the rules of the Securities
13 and Exchange Commission (SEC) for holding companies registered under the Public
14 Utility Holding Company Act of 1935, such as AEP. Mr. John Aaron will be filing
15 testimony in this proceeding and will discuss the transfer of assets in more detail in
16 that testimony.
17 Q. WILL THERE BE A MATERIAL EFFECT ON LOUISIANA'S RETAIL
18 RATEPAYERS AS A RESULT OF THESE TRANSFERS?
19 A. No. As will be discussed in more detail by Ms. Wendy Hargus (who will also be
20 filing testimony in this proceeding), the SWEPCO Texas assets that are transferred to
21 the SWEPCO TEXAS EDC will be financed by the SWEPCO TEXAS EDC or
22 Regulated Holdco and will not be subject to any existing SWEPCO indentures or
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U -20925, J. CRAIG BAKER
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
12
1 other form of lien or pledge. Because the transfer of the SWEPCO Texas assets can
2 be accomplished without violating the terms of SWEPCO's indentures or the terms of
3 other securities contracts, SWEPCO's capital costs are not expected to change
4 significantly.
5
6 V. STATUS OF STATE RESTRUCTURING
7 IN SWEPCO'S SERVICE TERRITORY
8 Q. WHAT IS THE STATE OF RETAIL COMPETITION POLICY IN LOUISIANA,
9 ARKANSAS, AND TEXAS?
10 A. The LPSC is currently evaluating the merits of a transition to retail competition. No
11 final decision has been reached regarding whether a transition to competition is
12 appropriate; therefore, SWEPCO remains obligated to provide bundled utility service,
13 at tariffed rates, to retail customers in Louisiana.
14 In Arkansas, legislation has been passed which requires SWEPCO to provide
15 retail customer choice no sooner than October 1, 2003, and no later than October 1,
16 2005. The statute requires SWEPCO to functionally separate its generation and
17 energy delivery functions, but does not require any structural separation of assets.
18 The requirements of this legislation could be met with organizational changes, and no
19 structural changes.
20 In Texas, the restructuring statute (Senate Bill 7 or SB7) requires SWEPCO to
21 offer retail customer choice on January 1, 2002 to Texas retail customers. The statute
22 also contains language that requires SWEPCO to undertake some form of structural
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U -20925, J. CRAIG BAKER
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
13
1 separation of assets. As discussed later in this testimony, on August 3, 2001, the
2 PUCT Staff petitioned the PUCT to determine whether market institutions and
3 participants are ready for retail competition to begin within SWEPCO's Texas
4 jurisdiction, which is located in the Southwest Power Pool (SPP).
5 Because these policy directions are all different, considerable time and effort
6 was required to develop SWEPCO's BSP. Discussions with the affected state
7 regulatory commissions proved extremely valuable in developing a plan that best
8 meets the needs of each state,
9 Q. HAS THE SWEPCO BSP BEEN APPROVED BY EITHER Of THE
10 REGULATORY AGENCIES IN TEXAS AND ARKANSAS?
11 A. Yes. The proposed Texas business separation plan was subject to a settlement
12 agreement between AEP and the various intervenors in that case. The settlement was
13 approved by the PUCT on July 7, 2000. In Arkansas, SWEPCO filed a business
14 separation plan pursuant to the Arkansas Public Service Commission (APSC)
15 Affiliate Rules. That plan (APSC Docket No. 00-249-U) is pending before the APSC
16 at this time.
17 Q. PLEASE DISCUSS THE ARKANSAS RESTRUCTURING REQUIREMENTS
18 THAT IMPACT SWEPCO.
19 A. The State of Arkansas originally ordered retail customer choice to be implemented on
20 January 1, 2002. However, that date has been delayed at least until October 1, 2003,
21 with the possibility of further delays until October 1, 2005, based on APSC
22 determinations as to market readiness and quantifiable benefits to customers.
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U -20925, J. CRAIG BAKER
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
14
1 Arkansas restructuring statutes require utilities to functionally separate the energy
2 delivery and generation businesses, but do not require separation of the energy
3 delivery, generation, and retail businesses into separate companies. In Arkansas, Ark.
4 Code Ann. ss. 23-19-205 (b) and (c) require that:
5 (b) Each electric utility shall functionally unbundle its business
6 activities from one another as follows:
7 (1) Generation facilities, operations, services, and rates;
8 (2) Transmission facilities, operations, services, and rates;
9 and
10 (3) Distribution and customer services facilities, operations,
11 services, and rates.
12 (c) An electric utility shall accomplish this functional separation
13 through creation of separate divisions or departments,
14 nonaffiliated companies, separate affiliated companies owned
15 by a common holding company, or through a sale of assets to a
16 third party.
17 In addition, APSC Affiliate Rule 3.01.A. provides that "[a]t a minimum, each electric
18 utility shall functionally unbundle its business activities as required by Ark. Code
19 Ann. ss. ss. 23-19-205 (b) and (c)."
20 Q. WHICH PROVISION OF THE TEXAS RESTRUCTURING STATUTE
21 REQUIRES SOME CHANGE IN THE STRUCTURE OF SWEPCO?
22 A. SB7 requires that any company that owns generation in the state may not own
23 transmission and distribution plant located in the state. Specifically, Section
24 39.051 (b) of the Texas Public Utility Regulatory Act (PURA) states:
25 (b) "Not later than January 1, 2002, each electric utility shall separate its business
26 activities from one another into the following units:
27 (1) a power generation company;
28 (2) a retail electric provider; and
29 (3) a transmission and distribution utility."
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U -20925, J. CRAIG BAKER
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
15
14 Q. DO LOUISIANA RETAIL CUSTOMERS RECEIVE SERVICE FROM SWEPCO
15 GENERATORS THAT ARE LOCATED IN TEXAS?
16 A. Yes. SWEPCO Louisiana customers receive service from SWEPCO generation
17 assets that are located in Louisiana, Arkansas, and Texas. The generation assets are
18 dispatched in a least-cost manner, along with resources from affiliated companies and
19 the outside market, in order to achieve lowest reasonable cost for customers.
20 Q. DOES SWEPCO's PLAN MEET THE STRUCTURAL SEPARATION
21 REQUIREMENTS OF THE TEXAS STATUTE WITH MINIMAL STRUCTURAL
22 CHANGE TO THE ASSETS UTILIZED TO SERVE LOUISIANA CUSTOMERS?
23 A. Yes. Since only the Texas T&D and related GP assets of SWEPCO are to be
24 separated, the SWEPCO assigned capacity under the UPSA will come from the same
25 SWEPCO generation asset mix and will be available to meet the needs of Louisiana
26 customers. As discussed later in this testimony, the SWEPCO UPSA assigns rights to
27 the capacity in SWEPCO's generating units between SWEPCO's regulated operations
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U -20925, J. CRAIG BAKER
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
16
1 and PMA unregulated operations. However, SWEPCO will continue to own, operate,
2 and maintain its power plants and its assigned capacity will continue to be dispatched
3 by AEPSC, which has performed this function since the merger of Central and South
4 West Corporation (CSW) with AEP. Further, although ownership of SWEPCO's
5 Texas transmission assets will change, use of those assets for Louisiana jurisdictional
6 customers will not change.
7 Currently, SWEPCO takes transmission service under the AEP Open Access
8 Transmission Tariff (AEP OATT) under a pricing zone which includes all AEP
9 transmission assets in the SPP and Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT).
10 Due to the changes required by Texas legislation and their effects on the AEP West
11 Operating Agreement, AEP anticipates filing changes to die AEP OATT that provide
12 for separate pricing zones for the SPP and ERCOT regions to be effective on January
13 1, 2002. Even though the SWEPCO transmission assets currently being utilized to
14 provide transmission service will not be changed, it is anticipated that SWEPCO's
15 future transmission costs will reflect the average cost of the AEP SPP transmission
16 system rather than the average costs of the AEP SPP and ERCOT transmission
17 systems. Louisiana customers will still be served by the same mix of SWEPCO
18 generation, transmission, and distribution assets that are utilized today. Most
19 importantly, the rate commitments currently in effect for SWEPCO limit the ability of
20 SWEPCO to request non-fuel rate changes for a significant period of time.
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U -20925, J. CRAIG BAKER
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
17
1 VI. FERC RTO ISSUES IN RESTRUCTURING
2 Q. PLEASE DISCUSS THE FERC'S REJECTION OF THE SPP RTO.
3 A. On April 27, 2001, as supplemented on May 29, 2001, SWEPCO, WTU (for its
4 Northern Region, which is located in the SPP), and Public Service Company of
5 Oklahoma (PSO) (collectively, the AEP SPP Operating Companies) filed an
6 application with FERC to transfer operational control of their transmission facilities
7 located in the SPP to the SPP RTO. By order issued July 12, 2001 (Docket Nos.
8 RT01-34-000, et al.), FERC rejected the application as premature because it found
9 that the proposed SPP RTO did not meet the scope and configuration requirements of
10 Order No. 2000. The AEP SPP Operating Companies are currently participating in
11 the mediation (involving several entities for the purpose of forming a RTO in the
12 southeastern United States) being conducted under FERC auspices, and support the
13 participation of the SPP transmission owners in a large RTO that will meet the scope
14 requirements of Order No. 2000.
15 Q. HOW DOES THE FERC'S REJECTION Of THE SPP RTO AFFECT SWEPCO'S
16 PATH TO COMPETITION IN TEXAS?
17 A. On August 3, 2001, the PUCT Staff petitioned the PUCT to determine whether
18 market institutions and participants are ready for retail competition to begin within
19 SWEPCO's Texas jurisdiction, which is located in the SPP. There are two sets of
20 contingencies related to retail restructuring under the Texas PURA.
21 First, if the PUCT has not certified the "power region" in which SWEPCO is
22 located as a "qualifying power region" (QPR) at the time that retail customer choice
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U -20925, J. CRAIG BAKER
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
18
1 begins, the SWEPCO REP will have a continuing Obligation to serve certain large
2 customers (1 MW or more) at rates that are no higher than the rates that, on a bundled
3 basis, were in effect on January 1, 1999, subject to certain adjustments provided for in
4 Section 39.202(m) of PURA. At this time, the PUCT has not yet certified
5 SWEPCO's power region as a "qualifying power region" under the Texas statute.
6 Second, if the PUCT determines that a power region is unable to offer fair
7 competition and reliable service to all retail customer classes on January 1, 2002, the
8 PUCT is to delay customer choice for the power region, in which case SWEPCO
9 would continue to have a public utility obligation to serve Texas retail customers at
10 cost-based rates. The PUCT Staff's August 3 petition also requests the PUCT to
11 suspend further activity on SWEPCO's required capacity auction until the PUCT
12 issues a final order in that proceeding. The Staff requests that the PUCT issue that
13 final order before November 1, 2001.
14 Q. WILL THIS DETERMINATION AFFECT SWEPCO's PROPOSED BUSINESS
15 SEPARATION?
16 A. No, it should not. On August 23, the PUCT voted not to delay SWEPCO's required
17 capacity auction in Texas at this time. Further, the PUCT directed its staff to develop
18 a list of required milestones necessary to achieve retail competition by January 1,
19 2002. The PUCT also stated that the absolute last resort should be a decision to delay
20 competition. As such, the LPSC's approval of the required T&D transfers should
21 proceed.
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U -20925, J. CRAIG BAKER
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
19
1 Q. DOES THE REJECTION Of THE SPP RTO AFFECT THE STATUS OF THE
2 SWEPCO BSP FILING IN ARKANSAS?
3 A. No. On August 8, 2000, SWEPCO filed its business separation plan in Arkansas to
4 accomplish the required functional unbundling in APSC Docket No. 00-249-U. At
5 the present time, there have been no interventions and no APSC action. However, in
6 Arkansas Docket No. 00-010-U, the Show Cause Order relating to SWEPCO's
7 request to transfer operational control of certain SWEPCO transmission facilities to
8 the SPP RTO, due to FERC's rejection of the SPP RTO and the mandated mediation,
9 the APSC has suspended all activities in the docket, until such time as the direction of
10 a southeastern RTO is more clear.
11 Ark. Code Ann. ss. 23-19-107(a) requires the APSC to periodically report to the
12 Arkansas General Assembly on the progress of the development of competition in
13 electric markets and the impact, if any, of competition and industry restructuring on
14 retail customers in Arkansas. The APSC is to make the second such report before
15 January 15, 2002. The APSC, through Docket No. 00-190-U, will gather information
16 from electric utilities and the APSC General Staff to be used in its report to the
17 General Assembly. The issues pertaining to the FERC's SPP RTO order and its
18 effect on Arkansas' market readiness will be addressed in this docket. Initial filings
19 in this docket are due September 4, 2001.
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U -20925, J. CRAIG BAKER
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
20
1 VII. SWEPCO BSP EFFECT ON COST STRUCTURE
2 Q. WHAT RATE COMMITMENTS HAS SWEPCO MADE THAT WILL PROTECT
3 LOUISIANA CUSTOMERS?
4 A. In the settlement related to the AEP-CSW merger, SWEPCO agreed to not seek an
5 increase in non-fuel rates prior to January 1, 2005, subject to certain force majeure
6 conditions and riders for the impact of purchased power costs. These restrictions will
7 significantly impact the ability of SWEPCO to request recovery of any additional cost
8 increases, and will provide customers a predictable path for SWEPCO future rates.
9 Q. WILL THE COST STRUCTURE OF SWEPCO LOUISIANA CUSTOMERS
10 CHANGE MATERIALLY AS A RESULT OF THE TEXAS T&D SEPARATION?
11 A. No. The cost structure for SWEPCO Louisiana retail customers is not expected to
12 change materially. In addition, SWEPCO witnesses Ms. Wendy Hargus, Mr. Chris
13 Potter and Mr. John Aaron will file testimony discussing the changes in more detail.
14 Q. WHAT CHANGES ARE EXPECTED IN THE COST STRUCTURE OF THE
15 PRODUCTION FUNCTION?
16 A. The changes in the costs of SWEPCO's production function should not be material,
17 because SWEPCO will continue to own the same production assets that it owns
18 today. The output of SWEPCO's generating capacity that is currently used to serve
19 existing wholesale and Texas retail customers will be sold to PMA pursuant to the
20 UPSA and sold back in part to SWEPCO under the SECOND UPSA. As will be
21 discussed by Mr. Potter in his testimony, the sale of the generation on this basis is
22 essentially equivalent to the jurisdictional allocation (4 Coincident Peak method) used
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U -20925, J. CRAIG BAKER
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
21
1 in SWEPCO's last Louisiana retail rate case to allocate production costs among
2 SWEPCO's jurisdictions. Therefore, there should not be a material change in
3 production costs allocated to the Louisiana jurisdiction as a result of the UPSA.
4 As shown in the FERC filing, the changes related to the AEP West Operating
5 Agreement and the AEP SIA result in cost impacts that are DE MINIMIS for
6 SWEPCO's native load customers. An except from Attachment 12 from the July 24,
7 2001 FERC filing in Docket No. ER01-2668-000, which provides a comparison of
8 the AEP West Operating Companies moving from the existing four-company to a
9 two-company operating agreement, is included as EXHIBIT JCB-2. It should be
10 noted that the UPSA, SECOND UPSA, AEP SIA and AEP West Operating
11 Agreement replace the versions that were filed on June 29, 2001 with the LPSC.
12 Q. WHAT CHANGES ARE EXPECTED IN THE COST STRUCTURE OF THE
13 TRANSMISSION FUNCTION AS A RESULT OF THE TRANSFER OF THE
14 TEXAS TRANSMISSION ASSETS?
15 A. The changes in the costs of transmission service to SWEPCO Louisiana customers
16 should not be material, since they will be served from the same SWEPCO
17 transmission assets that serve those customers today. The Louisiana retail customers
18 will be charged rates based upon taking transmission service under a tariff that
19 reflects all transmission assets currently owned by SWEPCO, as well as the
20 transmission assets owned by other AEP subsidiaries in the SPP. The transmission
21 asset base of AEP in SPP will not change due to the transfer of SWEPCO's Texas
22 assets,
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U -20925, J. CRAIG BAKER
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
22
1 After the transfer of Texas T&D assets from SWEPCO to the SWEPCO
2 TEXAS EDC, the SPP transmission system will still be operated as an integrated
3 system. In other words, even though the SWEPCO TEXAS EDC will own the
4 transmission assets physically located in Texas, SWEPCO will still require use of the
5 entire SPP transmission system (including those Texas assets) to serve customers in
6 Louisiana.
7 Q. WHAT CHANGES ARE EXPECTED IN THE COST STRUCTURE OF THE
8 DISTRIBUTION FUNCTION?
9 A. The changes in the costs of distribution service to SWEPCO Louisiana customers
10 should not be material, because the Louisiana distribution assets will continue to be
11 owned by SWEPCO, and will continue to be assigned to Louisiana customers. There
12 may be some minor allocation factor differences for O&M and common costs, which
13 will be addressed in the testimony of Mr. Potter. However, these differences are not
14 expected to produce any material cost changes.
15 Q. WHAT COST CHANGES ARE EXPECTED IN THE COST LEVELS FOR
16 ADMINISTRATIVE AND GENERAL MANAGEMENT EXPENSE?
17 A. The changes in the costs of administrative and general management expense for
18 SWEPCO Louisiana customers should not be material. SWEPCO is already managed
19 as part of a multi-state holding company system. The addition of more companies to
20 the eleven utilities already utilized for assignment of administrative costs should not
21 cause any material additional costs to be incurred. Mr. Aaron will address these
22 issues in more detail.
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U -20925, J. CRAIG BAKER
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
23
1 Q. WHAT COST CHANCES ARE EXPECTED IN THE COST OF CAPITAL FOR
2 SWEPCO?
3 A. No material changes are expected to the capital costs of SWEPCO, because
4 SWEPCO's debt to be retired as a result of the removal of Texas T&D and related
5 GP assets is a relatively small part of SWEPCO's total outstanding debt. The capital
6 structure policy of SWEPCO is not expected to change materially as a result of the
7 separation of the Texas transmission and distribution assets. The effects of separation
8 on the cost of debt will be discussed in the testimony of Ms. Hargus.
9 Q. IN SUMMARY, DOES THIS PLAN CREATE ANY MATERIAL CHANGES IN
10 THE COST STRUCTURE OR ASSET MIX OF SWEPCO?
11 A. No. After separation of the Texas transmission and distribution assets, SWEPCO
12 Louisiana customers will still receive utility service from the same workforce using
13 the same physical assets and capital structure policy. Because the plan minimizes the
14 structural changes required to comply with Texas law, it produces a minimum of
15 possible cost changes for SWEPCO. Since compliance with Texas statutes will
16 minimize the potential for further litigation for SWEPCO, the plan is in the public
17 interest, and should be approved.
18
19 VIII. FERC FILINGS CONCERNING SWEPCO'S BSP
20 Q. PLEASE GENERALLY DESCRIBE AEP'S RECENT FERC FILINGS.
21 A. On July 24, 2001, AEP filed its Application of American Electric Power Service
22 Corporation for Authorization to Transfer Jurisdictional Assets (Docket: No. EC01-
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U -20925, J. CRAIG BAKER
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
24
1 130-000) and Application of American Electric Power Company, Inc. for Approval of
2 Rate Schedules Related to Corporate Restucturing (Docket No. ER01-2668-000) at
3 the FERC. The applications request the approval of asset transfers and rate schedule
4 changes related to AEP's corporate restructuring that are required for AEP to comply
5 with the restructuring laws of Ohio and Texas and to foster the development of
6 competitive electric markets consistent with such state laws. In addition to
7 authorization to transfer SWEPCO's Texas T&D assets to the SWEPCO TEXAS
8 EDC, AEP seeks approval of the following agreements related to the SWEPCO BSP
9 AEP West Operating Agreement, AEP SIA, UPSA and the SECOND UPSA.
10 Q. PLEASE DESCRIBE THE CHANGES TO THE AEP WEST OPERATING
11 AGREEMENT.
12 A. The primary change in the Restated and Amended Operating Agreement for the AEP
13 West Operating Companies is the withdrawal of those companies that are undergoing
14 restructuring and corporate separation of their generation functions - WTU, CPL, and
15 the portion of SWEPCO's generation attributable to its Texas retail load. The Texas
16 companies will no longer have native load obligations. If they were to continue to
17 participate in the arrangement, the other participants would have first call on all of
18 their generation, defeating the purposes of deregulation in Texas and imposing
19 excessive burdens on Texas consumers. To The extent that the most economic
20 deregulated generation is burdened with obligations under the Operating Agreement,
21 the intent of the Texas restructuring legislation may be frustrated. Finally, the call on
22 Texas generation under the existing Operating Agreement would impede and distort
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U -20925, J. CRAIG BAKER
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
25
1 the efforts of the deregulated companies to recover stranded costs, as permitted by the
2 Texas restructuring legislation.
3 The Restated and Amended Operating Agreement makes several other
4 substantive changes going forward. First, the provisions for joint planning of future
5 generation capacity and provisions for capacity sharing among the participating
6 companies are being modified so that the planning function recognizes and takes
7 account of possible restructuring in any of the three remaining jurisdictions
8 (Louisiana, Oklahoma and Arkansas). Oklahoma, served by PSO, has enacted
9 legislation to plan for deregulation but has so far not implemented any plan.
10 Arkansas has enacted deregulation but has deferred the effective date. Louisiana
11 continues to consider a transition to competition plan that would permit retail access
12 for certain large customers as soon as January 1, 2003. Planning of future capacity
13 additions must take account of the likelihood that deregulation will proceed - or
14 not - on a state-by-state basis, and not system-wide.
15 Second, energy purchases from other members continue to be priced at the
16 midpoint between the seller's incremental cost and the purchaser's decremental cost.
17 These provisions, which are in the existing AEP West Operating Agreement,
18 correctly reflect the economic costs of the options available to a member, while
19 permitting the use of the most economic energy by the member companies.
20 Third, the hourly net margins for off-system energy sales will continue to be
21 shared in proportion to each member's generation for sales, but that generation will
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U -20925, J. CRAIG BAKER
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
26
1 now include economy sales. Economy purchases from other members will continue
2 to be subtracted from the allocation, with the result not less than zero.
3 AEP's cost studies show that PSO and SWEPCO can effectively operate a
4 "two-company system," incorporating the changes described above as well as the
5 changes in the SIA described below, without material adverse economic impact on
6 their native load customers. The overall effects on SWEPCO for years 2002-2004 are
7 DE MINIMIS. An except from Attachment 12 from the July 24, 2001 FERC filing in
8 Docket No. ER01-2668-000, which provides a comparison of the AEP West
9 Operating Companies moving from the existing four-company to a two-company
10 operating agreement, is included as EXHIBIT JCB-2. There are small cost reductions
11 for PSO; SWEPCO shows a small cost increase in the initial years, moving to a small
12 decrease by 2004.
13 Q. PLEASE DESCRIBE THE CHANGES TO THE AEP SIA.
14 A. The primary change in the Restated and Amended AEP SIA is the withdrawal of the
15 deregulated companies - OPCo, CSP, CPL, and WTU. For the same reasons
16 discussed previously, it no longer is appropriate in the inter-zone arrangements for the
17 deregulated companies to integrate and coordinate their power supply resources with
18 the regulated Operating Companies. The deregulated generation companies and the
19 remaining Operating Companies have disparate goals; having them continue to
20 coordinate and integrate their power supplies would cause inappropriate cost-shifting
21 and impede competition.
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U -20925, J. CRAIG BAKER
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
27
1 The other principal change in the Restated and Amended AEP SIA is that non-
2 physical trading and marketing will not be part of the coordinated activities of the
3 parties. The AEP SIA, however, will continue to provide for centralization of off-
4 system purchases and off-system sales. This is consistent with AEP's overall
5 objective of charging the regulated merchant organization with minimizing the cost of
6 power through off-system sales and purchases.
7 In addition, the Restated and Amended AEP SIA provides that off-system
8 sales margins will be shared in proportion to owned generating capacity in the two
9 zones. This change will eliminate the historic threshold for the sharing of benefits
10 between the West and East Zones. In light of the departure of the Ohio and Texas
11 Operating Companies from the AEP SIA (as well as from their respective system
12 agreements), elimination of the previous threshold provides a better mechanism for
13 the sharing of benefits between the AEP East and West Zones.
14 Q. PLEASE DESCRIBE THE SWEPCO UPSA.
15 A. In order to comply with the Texas requirement to separate the generation function
16 from transmission and distribution functions, SWEPCO proposes to enter into a
17 SWEPCO UPSA with PMA and AEPSC. Effective January 1, 2002, SWEPCO will
18 separate its existing generation capacity into SWEPCO-assigned capacity
19 (representing that portion of SWEPCO's generation attributable to the continued
20 regulated requirements of Louisiana and Arkansas retail customers) and PMA-
21 assigned capacity (representing that portion of SWEPCO's generation attributable to
22 its current Texas retail native load and its wholesale requirements load). Under Texas
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U -20925, J. CRAIG BAKER
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
28
1 law, the former capacity must be operated in the wholesale market on a deregulated
2 basis and may not be sold directly to Texas retail customers. The assignment of
3 capacity to PMA will be based on the ratio of the sum of the demands of the
4 SWEPCO-Texas retail native load and the SWEPCO wholesale contract native load
5 at the time of the four Year 2000 coincident monthly summer (June through
6 September) SWEPCO peak demands to the sum of the same four coincident peak
7 demands of the total SWEPCO native load.
8 This approach proportionally assigns rights to the capacity in SWEPCO's
9 generating units between SWEPCO's deregulated and regulated operations and
10 thereby facilitates the onset of competition in Texas and at the same time reasonably
11 maintains the status quo for the states that have not enacted restructuring statutes.
12 SWEPCO will continue to own, operate, and maintain its power plants and its
13 assigned capacity will continue to be dispatched by AEPSC, which has performed this
14 function since the merger of CSW with AEP.
15 Q. PLEASE DESCRIBE THE SECOND UPSA.
16 A. The SECOND UPSA (among PMA, SWEPCO, and AEPSC) provides SWEPCO
17 with access to a proportionate share of the assigned capacity received by PMA under
18 the SWEPCO UPSA so that SWEPCO can continue supplying its existing wholesale
19 contract customers for the remaining terms of their respective contracts. The
20 proportion of PMA's assigned capacity to be assigned to SWEPCO under the
21 SECOND UPSA will be based on the ratio of the sum of the four coincident peak
22 demands of native load for each wholesale contract to the sum of the same four
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U -20925, J. CRAIG BAKER
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
29
1 coincident peaks demands of the total SWEPCO native load. Because SWEPCO's
2 wholesale contracts expire or may terminate at different times, the proportion of
3 PMA's assigned capacity that is assigned to SWEPCO under the SECOND UPSA
4 will change as each wholesale contract expires or is terminated. A portion of the
5 monthly costs that SWEPCO charges to PMA will be netted out based on the share of
6 capacity that is assigned to SWEPCO during that month and the energy dispatched
7 from SWEPCO out of the capacity assigned under the SECOND UPSA.
8 Q. PREVIOUSLY, YOU ADDRESSED TWO SETS OF REGULATORY
9 CONTINGENCIES RELATED TO RETAIL RESTRUCTURING IN SWEPCO'S
10 TEXAS SERVICE TERRITORY. DO THE UPSAS ADDRESS THOSE
11 CONTINGENCIES?
12 A. Yes. To address the contingencies discussed previously, the SECOND UPSA
13 provides that PMA will assign back to SWEPCO a proportionate share of the
14 assigned capacity it receives under the SWEPCO UPSA so that SWEPCO can furnish
15 part of the resources needed for the SWEPCO REP to fulfill the obligations imposed
16 under Section 39.202(m) of PURA, or if the PUCT delays retail customer choice in
17 SWEPCO's territory, that PMA will assign back to SWEPCO a proportionate share of
18 the assigned capacity it receives under the SWEPCO UPSA so that SWEPCO can
19 continue to furnish regulated electric service. As in the case of the wholesale
20 contracts, to the extent that the statutory obligations are reduced or eliminated, the
21 assignment back from PMA to SWEPCO will decrease by a corresponding
22 percentage.
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U -20925, J. CRAIG BAKER
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
30
1 IX. OTHER REGULATORY APPROVALS
2 Q. IS THIS FILING THE ONLY FILING BEFORE ANY REGULATORY
3 AUTHORITY WHICH WOULD BE REQUIRED TO IMPLEMENT THE SWEPCO
4 BSP?
5 A. No. Implementation of the SWEPCO BSP requires a number of regulatory filings
6 before several other jurisdictions which have the authority to approve or disapprove
7 the necessary structural changes and/or transfers of assets.
8 At the SEC, an application for approval to create the new entities, retire
9 securities and issue new refinancing securities, transfer assets into the new entities,
10 and for certain affiliate transactions has been filed. The SEC has jurisdiction over
11 these transactions pursuant to the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935.
12 As discussed previously, applications were filed at FERC on July 24, 2001 for
13 approval of (1) the transfer of the T&D facilities to the energy delivery subsidiaries,
14 (2) transfer of generation assets to newly created legal entities owned by the Domestic
15 Genco, (4) UPSA and Second UPSA, and (5) modifications to the AEP West
16 Operating Agreement and AEP SIA to recognize the changing relationships between
17 deregulated generation business units and regulated generation divisions of utilities.
18 Approvals of the following will also be filed at the FERC: (1) revised open
19 access transmission tariff reflecting the new energy delivery subsidiaries and the
20 anticipated zonal pricing for the SPP and ERCOT transmission systems, (2) network
21 transmission agreements and network operating agreements for the Domestic Genco
22 and/or its generation subsidiaries to take transmission service from the transmission
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U -20925, J. CRAIG BAKER
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
31
1 subsidiaries, (3) service agreements between the SWEPCO REP and the energy
2 delivery and/or generation subsidiaries, (4) interconnection agreements between the
3 generation entities and the energy delivery subsidiaries, and (5) modifications to the
4 CSW Transmission Coordination Agreement and AEP System Transmission
5 Integration Agreement to delegate to the energy delivery company the responsibility
6 and authority to act as the transmission provider as agent for and on behalf of the
7 transmission subsidiaries.
8
9 X. CONCLUSION
10 Q. WILL THE PROPOSED SWEPCO BSP ADVERSELY AFFECT THE CURRENT
11 PROVISION OF BUNDLED SERVICE FOR THE RETAIL RATEPAYERS OF
12 LOUISIANA?
13 A. No. Because SWEPCO's current operations in Louisiana will remain substantially
14 unchanged, retail ratepayers in Louisiana will continue to enjoy the same level of
15 service and low rates that SWEPCO has provided in the past.
16 Q. PLEASE SUMMARIZE THE RELIEF REQUESTED BY THE COMPANY IN
17 THIS FILING.
18 A. SWEPCO is requesting the Commission to approve the proposed asset transfers
19 necessary to fulfill the requirements of the industry restructuring in Texas as
20 described in the SWEPCO BSP. Because the SWEPCO Texas transmission assets are
21 utilized to provide utility service to Louisiana retail customers and are partially
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U -20925, J. CRAIG BAKER
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
32
1 included in their rate base, approval from the LPSC will be required before the
2 requested assets can be transferred out of SWEPCO.
3 Q. PLEASE SUMMARIZE YOUR TESTIMONY.
4 A. The SWEPCO BSP separates the wires, generation, and retail businesses in order to
5 achieve compliance with the restructuring activities in Texas. It is anticipated that the
6 Louisiana retail rates will not be materially affected by the restructuring activities in
7 Texas. In addition, operations in Louisiana will not be affected by the restructuring
8 activities in Texas.
9 Q. DOES THIS CONCLUDE YOUR DIRECT TESTIMONY?
10 A. Yes, it does.
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U -20925, J. CRAIG BAKER
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
33
SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY Exhibit WGH-1
WEIGHTED COST OF CAPITAL Page 1 of 5
December 31, 2000
BEFORE ASSET TRANSFER
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Percent of Cost of Weighted
Page Amount Total Capital Average
Line Description Reference Per Books Capitalization Rate Cost of Capital
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 Long-Term Debt WGH-1, p. 4 $722,437,699 51.54% 7.93% 4.09%
2 Preferred Stock WGH-1, p. 2 $2,697,319 0.19% 12.83% 0.02%
3 Common Stock Equity na $676,655,920 48.27% 11.10% 5.36%
-------------------- -------------------- --------------------
4 $1,401,790,938 100.00% 9.47%
==================== ==================== ====================
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY Exhibit WGH-1
WEIGHTED COST OF PREFERRED STOCK Page 2 of 5
December 31, 2000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mandatory Premium
Series Dividend Redemption Par Value or
Date Rate (Y/N) at Issuance (Discount)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOT SUBJECT TO MANDATORY REDEMPTION
5.00% 2/12/40 5.00% N $7,500,000
4.65% 6/19/49 4.65% N $2,500,000 8,250
4.28% 6/9/55 4.28% N $6,000,000 24,300
----------------
Sub-Totals $16,000,000
SUBJECT TO MANDATORY REDEMPTION
6.95% 4/1/87 6.95% 4/1/18 $40,000,000 $0
----------------
Sub-Totals $40,000,000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL $56,000,000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LOSS ON REDEEMED STOCK
A. Annual Requirement = Preferred Stock Balance x Weighted Cost of
Preferred Stock
B. Adjusted Annual Requirement = Annual Requirement + Amortization of Loss
on Redeemed Stock
(S. Kerry monthly amortization schedule less gain on reacquired
preferred stock (monthly a/c 1860.1213-.1220))
C. Adjusted Preferred Stock Balance = Preferred Stock Balance - Unamortized
Loss on Redeemed Stock
D. Adjusted Cost of Preferred Stock = Adjusted Annual Requirement / Adjusted
Preferred Stock Balance
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTES
* Redeemed subsequent to the end of the test-year. See Adjustment 1.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(G) (H) (I) (J) (S, p.2) (K) (L) (M)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under- Gain Net Book Value Issue
Writing (Loss) on Net Proceeds Including as % Weighted
Fees and Redeemed Proceeds as % Scheduled Total Cost of Average
Issuance Exp. Stock at Issuance of Par Redemptions Book Value Money Cost
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7,500,000 100.00% $3,771,500 80.17% 5.000% 4.008%
2,508,250 100.33% $191,330 4.07% 4.635% 0.188%
6,024,300 100.41% $741,591 15.76% 4.263% 0.672%
---------------
Sub-Totals $4,704,421
$342,315 $0 39,657,685 99.14% $0 0.00% 7.018% 0.000%
---------------
Sub-Totals $0
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL $4,704,421 100.00% 4.869%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preferred Stock Balance $4,704,421
x Weighted Cost of Preferred 4.87%
---------------
= Annual Requirement $229,055
Annual Requirement $229,055
+ Amortization of Loss/(Gain) on Redeemed Stock $117,132
---------------
= Adjusted Annual Requirement $346,187
Preferred Stock Balance $4,704,421
- Unamortized Loss/(Gain) on Redeemed Stock $2,007,102
---------------
= Adjusted Preferred Stock Balance $2,697,319
Adjusted Annual Requirement $346,187
/ Adjusted Preferred Stock Balance $2,697,319
---------------
= Adjusted Cost of Preferred 12.830%
---------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note 1. Previously redeemed preferred.
Series 6.95% Amortization schedule provided by S.Kerry $84,227
Series 8.16% " " " $685,376
Series 8.84% " " " $501,551
Series 9.72% " " " $1,593,507
Series 4.28% Gain on reacq'd Pref St - a/c1860.1214 ($1,189,073)
Series 4.65% Gain on reacq'd Pref St - a/c1860.1216 ($433,769)
Series 5.00% Gain on reacq'd Pref St - a/c 1860.1218 ($625,402)
Series6.95% Gain(loss) on reacq'd Pref St - a/c 1860.1220 $1,390,685
---------------
$2,007,102
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit WGH-1
Page 3 of 5
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(A,p.1) (N) (O) (P) (Q) (R) (S)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Par Value Book Value
Excluding Unamortized Unamortized Unamortized Including
Par Value Scheduled Premium or Issuance Gain (Loss) on Scheduled
Series Outstanding Redemptions (Discount) Expense Redeemed Stock Redemptions
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOT SUBJECT TO MANDATORY REDEMPTION
5.00% $3,771,500 $3,771,500 $3,771,500
4.65% $190,700 $190,700 630 $191,330
4.28% $738,600 $738,600 $2,991 $0 $0 $741,591
------------------------------ --------------------
Sub-Totals $4,700,800 $4,700,800 $4,704,421
SUBJECT TO MANDATORY REDEMPTION
6.95% $0 $0 $0 $0
------------------------------
Sub-Totals $0 $0 $0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL $4,700,800 $4,700,800 BALANCE OF PREFERRED STOCK $4,704,421
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTES
(O) Scheduled redemptions to be excluded reflect those amounts to be redeemed prior to the anticipated
effective date for the rates being requested.
(P), (Q), and (R) Consistent with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Uniform System of Accounts
Order 390, SWEPCO records its preferred stock issuances net of any issuance expenses, premiums, or
discounts. Gains or losses on preferred stock redemptions are not amortized. The entire gain or loss is
immediately recognized as an adjustment to retained earnings.
For rate making purposes these are recovered through amortization in rates.
(Q) Unamortized balance of underwriter fees should also be provided here.
(S) = (N) + (P) - (Q) + (R)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY Exhibit WGH-1
WEIGHTED COST OF DEBT Page 4 of 5
December 31, 2000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (T, p.2)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under- Gain
Writing (Loss) Net Book Value
Sinking Principal Premium Fees and on Reac- Net Proceeds Including
Series Issuance Maturity Interest Fund Amount or Issuance quired Proceeds as % Scheduled
Date Date Rate (Y/N) at Issuance (Discount) Exp. Debt at Issuance of Par Maturities
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FIRST MORTGAGE BONDS
A 11/1/76 11/1/06 6.200% N 7,100,000 (118,925) 177,704 0 6,803,371 95.82% 5,738,896
B 11/1/76 11/1/06 6.200% N 1,000,000 (16,750) 25,028 0 958,222 95.82% 991,827
V 6/1/92 6/1/04 7.750% N 40,000,000 (270,000) 152,214 0 39,577,786 98.94% 39,874,716
W 9/1/92 9/1/99 6.125% N 40,000,000 (474,800) 34,619 0 39,490,581 98.73% 0
X 9/1/92 9/1/07 7.000% N 90,000,000 (1,688,400) 77,893 0 88,233,707 98.04% 89,177,023
Y 2/1/93 2/1/03 6.625% N 55,000,000 (573,650) 493,115 0 53,933,235 98.06% 54,863,939
Z 7/1/93 7/1/23 7.250% N 45,000,000 (506,702) 498,787 0 43,994,511 97.77% 44,245,042
AA 10/1/93 4/1/00 5.250% N 45,000,000 (110,250) 308,273 0 44,581,477 99.07% 0
BB 10/1/93 10/1/25 6.875% N 80,000,000 (565,600) 748,041 0 78,686,359 98.36% 78,907,196
------------ --------------
Sub-Totals 403,100,000 Sub-Totals 313,798,639
TRUST PREFERRED SECURITIES
7.875% 4/30/97 4/30/37 7.875% N 110,000,000 3,768,900 0 106,231,100 96.57% 106,576,385
SENIOR UNSECURED FLOATING RATE NOTES
3/1/00 3/1/02 6.970% N 150,000,000 0 640,237 0 149,359,763 99.57% 149,577,392
POLLUTION CONTROL BONDS
1978A 1/1/78 1/1/08 6.000% 16,200,000 (194,400) 314,650 0 15,690,950 96.86% 13,414,233
1991A 5/3/91 8/1/11 8.200% 17,125,000 0 417,265 0 16,707,735 97.56% 16,906,907
1991B 7/17/91 11/1/04 6.900% 12,290,000 0 363,824 0 11,926,176 97.04% 12,159,381
1992 11/24/92 1/1/19 7.600% 53,500,000 0 1,014,193 0 52,485,807 98.10% 52,797,903
1996 7/11/96 4/1/18 6.100% 81,700,000 (408,500) 1,945,305 0 79,346,195 97.12% 79,833,189
------------ --------------
Sub-Totals 180,815,000 Sub-Totals 175,111,613
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL $693,915,000 TOTAL $745,064,029
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LOSS ON REACQUIRED DEBT NOT ASSOCIATED WITH A SPECIFIC REFUNDING ISSUE
A. Annual Requirement = Debt Balance x Weighted Cost of Debt Debt Balance $745,064,029
x Weighted Cost of Debt 7.30%
-------------
Annual Requirement $54,389,674
B. Adjusted Annual Requirement = Annual Requirement (see Adjustment 2A) + Amortization of Loss on Reacquired Debt
Annual Requirement $54,389,674
((a/c 189;257;1810.7307;2260.7307)X12) + Amortization of Loss on Reacquired Debt 2,900,340
-------------
= Adjusted Annual Requirement $57,290,014
C. Adjusted Balance = Debt Balance - Unamortized Loss on Reacquired Debt
Debt Balance $745,064,029
(a/c 189;257;1810.7307;2260.7307) - Unamortized Loss on Reacquired Debt 22,626,330
-------------
= Adjusted Debt Balance $722,437,699
D. Adjusted Cost of Debt = Adjusted Annual Requirement
(see Adjustment 2B) / Adjusted Debt Balance (see Adjustment 2C)
= Adjusted Annual Requirement $57,290,014
/ Adjusted Debt Balance $722,437,699
-------------
= Adjusted Cost of Debt 7.930%
-------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------
(L) (M) (N)
-----------------------------
Issue as % Weighted
of Total Cost of Average
Book Value Debt Cost
-----------------------------
0.770% 6.519% 0.050%
0.133% 6.519% 0.010%
5.352% 7.888% 0.420%
0.000% 6.353% 0.000%
11.969% 7.216% 0.860%
7.364% 6.897% 0.510%
5.938% 7.437% 0.440%
0.000% 5.422% 0.000%
10.591% 7.004% 0.740%
14.304% 8.167% 1.170%
20.076% 7.203% 1.450%
1.800% 6.233% 0.110%
2.269% 8.451% 0.190%
1.632% 7.249% 0.120%
7.086% 7.770% 0.550%
10.715% 6.345% 0.680%
-----------------------------
100.000% 7.300%
-----------------------------
SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY Exhibit WGH-1
WEIGHTED COST OF DEBT Page 5 of 5
December 31, 2000
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(O) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Principal 226 181 189/257 Book Value
Principal Excluding Unamortized Unamortized Unamortized Including
Amount Scheduled Premium or Fees and Gain (Loss) on Scheduled
Series Outstanding Maturities (Discount) Expenses Reacquired Debt Maturities
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FIRST MORTGAGE BONDS
A 5,795,000 5,650,000 (22,422) 33,682 0 5,738,896
B 1,000,000 1,000,000 (3,300) 4,873 0 991,827
V 40,000,000 40,000,000 0 125,284 0 39,874,716
W 0 0 0 0 0 0
X 90,000,000 90,000,000 (453,403) 369,574 0 89,177,023
Y 55,000,000 55,000,000 (21,894) 114,167 0 54,863,939
Z 45,000,000 45,000,000 (379,980) 374,978 0 44,245,042
AA 0 0 0 0 0
BB 80,000,000 80,000,000 (437,449) 655,355 0 78,907,196
0
------------ ------------- ----------- ---------- ---- -------------
Sub-Totals $316,795,000 $316,650,000 ($1,318,448) $1,677,913 $0 $313,798,639
7.875% 110,000,000 110,000,000 3,423,615 106,576,385
150,000,000 150,000,000 422,608 149,577,392
POLLUTION CONTROL REVENUE BONDS
1978A 13,520,000 13,070,000 (40,417) 65,350 0 13,414,233
1991A 17,125,000 17,125,000 0 218,093 0 16,906,907
1991B 12,290,000 12,290,000 0 130,619 0 12,159,381
1992 53,500,000 53,500,000 0 702,097 0 52,797,903
1996 81,700,000 81,700,000 (323,982) 1,542,829 0 79,833,189
------------ ------------- ----------- ---------- ---- -------------
Sub-Totals $178,135,000 $177,685,000 ($364,399) $2,658,988 $0 $175,111,613
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS $754,930,000 $754,335,000 ($1,682,847) $8,183,124 $0 $745,064,029
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY Exhibit WGH-2
WEIGHTED COST OF CAPITAL Page 1 of 3
December 31, 2000
AFTER ASSET TRANSFER
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(A) (B) (C) (D)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated
Page Amount Asset
Line Description Reference Per Books Transfer
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 Long-Term Debt WGH-2, p. 2 $722,437,699 ($150,000,000)
2 Preferred Stock WGH-1, p. 2 $2,697,319 $0
3 Common Stock Equity na $676,655,920 ($180,000,000)
------------------
4 $1,401,790,938
==================
5 Short-Term Debt ($127,590,000)
-----------------
6 ($457,590,000)
=================
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(E) (F) (G) (H)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Percent of Cost of Weighted
Adjusted Total Capital Average
Amount Capitalization Rate Cost of Capital
------------------------------------------------------------------------
$572,860,307 53.43% 8.13% 4.34%
$2,697,319 0.25% 12.83% 0.03%
$496,655,920 46.32% 11.10% 5.14%
--------------------------------------- ------------------
$1,072,213,546 100.00% 9.52%
======================================= ==================
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) The retirement of $150M of Senior Unsecured Floating Rate Note results
in a $149.6M reduction to Long-Term Debt due to unamortized discount and
issuance expense balances.
SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY Exhibit WGH-2
WEIGHTED COST OF DEBT Page 2 of 3
December 31, 2000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under-
Sinking Principal Premium Writing
Series Issuance Maturity Interest Fund Amount or Fees and
Date Date Rate (Y/N) at Issuance (Discount) Issuance Exp.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FIRST MORTGAGE BONDS
A 11/1/76 11/1/06 6.200% N 7,100,000 (118,925) 177,704
B 11/1/76 11/1/06 6.200% N 1,000,000 (16,750) 25,028
V 6/1/92 6/1/04 7.750% N 40,000,000 (270,000) 152,214
W 9/1/92 9/1/99 6.125% N 40,000,000 (474,800) 34,619
X 9/1/92 9/1/07 7.000% N 90,000,000 (1,688,400) 77,893
Y 2/1/93 2/1/03 6.625% N 55,000,000 (573,650) 493,115
Z 7/1/93 7/1/23 7.250% N 45,000,000 (506,702) 498,787
AA 10/1/93 4/1/00 5.250% N 45,000,000 (110,250) 308,273
BB 10/1/93 10/1/25 6.875% N 80,000,000 (565,600) 748,041
----------------
Sub-Totals 403,100,000
TRUST PREFERRED SECURITIES
7.875% 4/30/97 4/30/37 7.875% N 110,000,000 3,768,900
SENIOR UNSECURED FLOATING RATE NOTES
3/1/00 Retired 6.970% N
POLLUTION CONTROL BONDS
1978A 1/1/78 1/1/08 6.000% 16,200,000 (194,400) 314,650
1991A 5/3/91 8/1/11 8.200% 17,125,000 0 417,265
1991B 7/17/91 11/1/04 6.900% 12,290,000 0 363,824
1992 11/24/92 1/1/19 7.600% 53,500,000 0 1,014,193
1996 7/11/96 4/1/18 6.100% 81,700,000 (408,500) 1,945,305
----------------
Sub-Totals 180,815,000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL $693,915,000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LOSS ON REACQUIRED DEBT NOT ASSOCIATED WITH A SPECIFIC REFUNDING ISSUE
A. Annual Requirement = Debt Balance x Weighted Cost of Debt
B. Adjusted Annual Requirement = Annual Requirement (see Adjustment 2A) + Amortization of
Loss on Reacquired Debt
((a/c 189;257;1810.7307;2260.7307)X12)
C. Adjusted Balance = Debt Balance - Unamortized Loss on Reacquired Debt
(a/c 189;257;1810.7307;2260.7307)
D. Adjusted Cost of Debt = Adjusted Annual Requirement (see Adjustment 2B) / Adjusted Debt
Balance (see Adjustment 2C)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(I) (J) (K) (T, p.2) (L) (M) (N)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gain Book Value
(Loss) on Net Net Including Issue as % Weighted
Reacquired Proceeds Proceeds Scheduled of Total Cost of Average
Debt at Issuance as % of Par Maturities Book Value Debt Cost
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 6,803,371 95.82% 5,738,896 0.964% 6.519% 0.060%
0 958,222 95.82% 991,827 0.167% 6.519% 0.010%
0 39,577,786 98.94% 39,874,716 6.696% 7.888% 0.530%
0 39,490,581 98.73% 0 0.000% 6.353% 0.000%
0 88,233,707 98.04% 89,177,023 14.975% 7.216% 1.080%
0 53,933,235 98.06% 54,863,939 9.213% 6.897% 0.640%
0 43,994,511 97.77% 44,245,042 7.430% 7.437% 0.550%
0 44,581,477 99.07% 0 0.000% 5.422% 0.000%
0 78,686,359 98.36% 78,907,196 13.251% 7.004% 0.930%
----------------
Sub-Totals 313,798,639
0 106,231,100 96.57% 106,576,385 17.897% 8.167% 1.460%
0 15,690,950 96.86% 13,414,233 2.253% 6.233% 0.140%
0 16,707,735 97.56% 16,906,907 2.839% 8.451% 0.240%
0 11,926,176 97.04% 12,159,381 2.042% 7.249% 0.150%
0 52,485,807 98.10% 52,797,903 8.866% 7.770% 0.690%
0 79,346,195 97.12% 79,833,189 13.406% 6.345% 0.850%
----------------
Sub-Totals 175,111,613
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL $595,486,637 100.000% 7.330%
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debt Balance $595,486,637
x Weighted Cost of Debt 7.33%
----------------
Annual Requirement $43,649,170
Annual Requirement $43,649,170
+ Amortization of Loss on Required Debt 2,900,340
----------------
= Adjusted Annual Requirement $46,549,510
Debt Balance $595,486,637
- Unamortized Loss on Reacquired Debt 22,626,330
----------------
= Adjusted Debt Balance $572,860,307
= Adjusted Annual Requirement $46,549,510
/ Adjusted Debt Balance $572,860,307
----------------
= Adjusted Cost of Debt 8.130%
----------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit WGH-2
Page 3 of 3
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(O) (P) (Q)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
226
Principal Principal Unamortized
Amount Excluding Scheduled Premium or
Series Outstanding Maturities (Discount)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FIRST MORTGAGE BONDS
A 5,795,000 5,650,000 (22,422)
B 1,000,000 1,000,000 (3,300)
V 40,000,000 40,000,000 0
W 0 0 0
X 90,000,000 90,000,000 (453,403)
Y 55,000,000 55,000,000 (21,894)
Z 45,000,000 45,000,000 (379,980)
AA 0 0
BB 80,000,000 80,000,000 (437,449)
0
---------------------- --------------------- ------------------
Sub-Totals $316,795,000 $316,650,000 ($1,318,448)
7.875% 110,000,000 110,000,000
POLLUTION CONTROL REVENUE BONDS
1978A 13,520,000 13,070,000 (40,417)
1991A 17,125,000 17,125,000 0
1991B 12,290,000 12,290,000 0
1992 53,500,000 53,500,000 0
1996 81,700,000 81,700,000 (323,982)
---------------------- --------------------- ------------------
Sub-Totals $178,135,000 $177,685,000 ($364,399)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS $604,930,000 $604,335,000 ($1,682,847)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(R) (S) (T)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
181 189/257 Book Value
Unamortized Unamortized Including
Fees and Gain (Loss) on Scheduled
Expenses Reacquired Debt Maturities
------------------------------------------------------------------------
33,682 0 5,738,896
4,873 0 991,827
125,284 0 39,874,716
0 0 0
369,574 0 89,177,023
114,167 0 54,863,939
374,978 0 44,245,042
0 0 0
655,355 0 78,907,196
--------------------- --------------------- ---------------------
$1,677,913 $0 $313,798,639
3,423,615 106,576,385
65,350 0 13,414,233
218,093 0 16,906,907
130,619 0 12,159,381
702,097 0 52,797,903
1,542,829 0 79,833,189
--------------------- --------------------- ---------------------
$2,658,988 $0 $175,111,613
------------------------------------------------------------------------
$7,760,516 $0 $595,486,637
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit WGH-3
Page 1 of 1
SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY
BLENDED COST OF CAPITAL FOR COMBINED SWEPCO AND
SWEPCO TEXAS EDC AFTER ASSET TRANSFER
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2000
(A) (B) (C)
BEFORE ASSET TRANSFER
---------------------------------------------
Cost of
Amount % Capital
---------------------------------------------
(000's)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SWEPCO INTEGRATED UTILITY
Common Stock Equity 676,656 48.27% 11.10%
Preferred Stock 2,697 0.19% 12.83%
Long-term Debt 722,438 51.54% 7.93%
------------------------------------------------
Total 1,401,791 100.00%
===============================
Short-term Debt
WACC 9.47%
===========
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SWEPCO Texas EDC
Common Stock Equity
Preferred Stock
Long-term Debt
Total
WACC
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BLENDED SWEPCO AFTER ASSET TRANSFER
Common Stock Equity
Preferred Stock
Long-term Debt
Total
BLENDED WACC
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(D) (E) (F) (G)
AFTER ASSET TRANSFER
-------------------------------------------------
Capital Cost of
Reductions Amount % Capital
-------------- -------------------------------------------------
(000's) (000's)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
(180,000) 496,656 46.32% 11.10%
2,697 0.25% 12.83%
(150,000) 572,861 53.43% 8.13%
---------------- -----------------------------------------------
(330,000) 1,072,214 100.00%
==============================
(127,590)
----------------
(457,590)
================
9.52%
=============
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
183,036 40.00% 11.25%
- 0.00% 0.00%
274,554 60.00% 8.12%
-----------------------------------------------
457,590 100.00%
==============================
9.37%
=============
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
679,692 44.43% 11.14%
2,697 0.18% 12.83%
847,415 55.39% 8.13%
-----------------------------------------------
1,529,804 100.00%
==============================
9.47%
=============
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
BEFORE THE
LOUISIANA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
LPSC DOCKET NOS. U-21453,
U-20925, U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C)
SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY'S
BUSINESS SEPARATION PLAN
DIRECT TESTIMONY OF
WENDY G. HARGUS
FOR
SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY
SEPTEMBER 2001
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U-20925, WENDY G. HARGUS
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
1
TESTIMONY INDEX
SUBJECT PAGE
I. INTRODUCTION...............................................................3
II. PURPOSE OF TESTIMONY......................................................6
III. CAPITAL STRUCTURE AND COST OF CAPITAL....................................6
IV. OTHER FINANCIAL ISSUES...................................................14
EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT WGH-1 SWEPCO Weighted Cost of Capital at
December 31, 2000
EXHIBIT WGH-2 SWEPCO Pro Forma Weighted Cost of Capital
EXHIBIT WGH-3 Blended Cost of Capital for Combined
SWEPCO and SWEPCO Texas EDC after
Asset Transfer
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U-20925, WENDY G. HARGUS
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
2
1 BEFORE THE
2 LOUISIANA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
3 LPSC DOCKET NOS. U-21453,
4 U-20925, U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C)
5
6 SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY'S
7 BUSINESS SEPARATION PLAN
8
9 DIRECT TESTIMONY OF
10 WENDY G. HARGUS
11
12 FOR
13 SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY
14
15 SEPTEMBER 2001
16
17 I. INTRODUCTION
18 Q. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND BUSINESS ADDRESS.
19 A. My name is Wendy G. Hargus. My business address is 1616 Woodall Rodgers
20 Freeway, Dallas, Texas 75202.
21 BY WHOM ARE YOU EMPLOYED AND IN WHAT CAPACITY?
22 I am employed by American Electric Power Service Corporation (AEPSC), a
23 subsidiary of American Electric Power Company, Inc. (AEP) as Assistant Treasurer
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U-20925, WENDY G. HARGUS
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
3
1 and Vice President, Treasury Operations of AEP and its subsidiaries including
2 Southwestern Electric Power Company (SWEPCO or Company). Prior to the merger
3 with AEP, I was Treasurer of Central and South West Corporation (CSW) and its
4 subsidiaries.
5 Q. PLEASE DESCRIBE YOUR RESPONSIBILITIES IN YOUR PRESENT
6 POSITION WITH THE COMPANY.
7 A. As AEP's Assistant Treasurer, I am responsible for treasury operations including
8 short-term funding and cash management. In addition, I will continue to be involved
9 in the completion of the required structural and functional unbundling
10 of the former CSW subsidiaries.
11 Q. PLEASE GIVE A BRIEF STATEMENT OF YOUR PROFESSIONAL AND
12 EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATIONS.
13 A. I have a Bachelor of Business Administration degree with a concentration in
14 Accounting from McMurry University and a Master of Science degree with a
15 concentration in Accounting from Texas Tech University.
16 I have worked for the AEP and CSW for 21 years in a variety of positions in
17 the finance and accounting areas. I began at West Texas Utilities Company (WTU)
18 with responsibility for financial planning and analysis. While at WTU I also held the
19 positions of Assistant to the Treasurer with additional responsibilities of testimony
20 preparation for rate filing applications and issuance of long-term debt and preferred
21 stock, and Assistant to the Controller with responsibility for all financial reporting,
22 planning and analysis for the company.
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U-20925, WENDY G. HARGUS
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
4
1 In 1986, I transferred to Central and South West Services, Inc. (CSWS) in the
2 Financial Accounting area and was responsible for preparing consolidated financial
3 statements for CSW and benefit plan accounting. I have also held positions as
4 Strategic Planning Analyst, Director of Investor Relations, Director of Strategic
5 Planning and Controller for CSW. Until June 2000, I was Treasurer for CSW and its
6 subsidiaries. As a result of the merger with AEP, I am Assistant Treasurer for AEP
7 and its subsidiaries, including SWEPCO.
8 I am a Certified Public Accountant licensed to practice in the State of Texas
9 and a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, the Texas
10 Society of Certified Public Accountants, the American Women's Society of Certified
11 Public Accountants, the Association for Financial Professionals and the Financial
12 Executives Institute.
13 Q. HAVE YOU PREVIOUSLY FILED TESTIMONY?
14 A. Yes. I have filed testimony in the following cases in Texas: Docket Nos. 22352,
15 22353 and 22354, the unbundled cost of service filings for the three AEP operating
16 companies in Texas; and Docket No. 21953, the business separation plan in Texas. I
17 also testified in Docket No. 21528, CPL's stranded cost securitization filing and in
18 Docket No. 12700, the CSW/El Paso Electric merger.
19 Q. DO YOU HAVE ANY EXHIBITS TO YOUR TESTIMONY THAT YOU
20 SPONSOR IN THIS FILING?
21 A. Yes. I sponsor the following exhibits:
22 EXHIBIT WGH-1 SWEPCO Weighted Cost of Capital at December 31, 2000
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U-20925, WENDY G. HARGUS
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
5
1 EXHIBIT WGH-2 SWEPCO Pro Forma Weighted Cost of Capital
2 EXHIBIT WGH-3 Blended Cost of Capital for Combined SWEPCO and
3 SWEPCO Texas EDC after Asset Transfer
4 Q. ARE THE TESTIMONY AND THE RELATED EXHIBITS TRUE AND
5 CORRECT TO THE BEST OF YOUR KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF?
6 A. Yes, they are.
7
8 II. PURPOSE OF TESTIMONY
9 Q. PLEASE DESCRIBE THE PURPOSE OF YOUR TESTIMONY.
10 A. The purpose of my testimony is to describe the financial aspects of SWEPCO's
11 proposed business separation plan. I will discuss the impact of SWEPCO's proposed business
12 separation plan on SWEPCO's capital structure and cost of capital. In addition,
13 I will discuss the treatment of SWEPCO's existing securities.
14
15 III. CAPITAL STRUCTURE AND COST OF CAPITAL
16 Q. PLEASE DESCRIBE THE EXISTING CAPITAL STRUCTURE AND BOND
17 RATINGS OF SWEPCO.
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U-20925, WENDY G. HARGUS
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
6
1 A. Shown below are the historical capital structures and current bond ratings for
2 SWEPCO:
Year Year Year
Ended Ended Ended Average
12/31/00 12/31/99 12/31/98 98 to 00
-------- -------- -------- --------
Common Equity 48.3% 52.3% 50.9% 50.5%
Preferred Stock 0.2% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3%
Long-Term Debt 51.5% 47.4% 48.8% 49.2%
------ ------ ------ ------
Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
3 SENIOR SECURED BOND RATINGS
4 S&P MOODY'S FITCH/D&P
5 A A1 A+
6 Q. WHAT IS SWEPCO'S CAPITAL STRUCTURE GOAL?
7 A. AEP's goal is to manage the capital structures and financial performance of its utility
8 subsidiaries to maintain strong bond ratings. AEP targets capital structures that help
9 our subsidiaries maintain these ratings, so as to minimize capital costs.
10 Q. WILL ANY OF SWEPCO'S OUTSTANDING DEBT OR PREFERRED STOCK
11 HAVE TO BE RETIRED AS A RESULT OF THE ASSET TRANSFERS
12 NECESSARY TO COMPLY WITH TEXAS RESTRUCTURING
13 REQUIREMENTS?
14 A. Yes. A portion of SWEPCO's existing securities will be retired as part of this
15 transaction. When SWEPCO transfers Texas transmission and distribution (T &D)
16 assets to the SWEPCO Texas Energy Delivery Company (SWEPCO Texas EDC), the
17 SWEPCO Texas EDC will transfer cash equal to the total capitalization of those assets
18 to SWEPCO. That cash will be used to retire a portion of SWEPCO's current debt
19 and common equity, generally in the same proportion as the existing capital structure.
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U-20925, WENDY G. HARGUS
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
7
1 However, SWEPCO's Texas T&D assets make up a small enough portion of
2 SWEPCO's total assets so that they can be transferred without violating any of the
3 restrictive covenants of SWEPCO's securities. In other words, the transfer of assets
4 will not require SWEPCO to retire all of its existing first mortgage bonds and
5 pollution control bonds.
6 Q. WHAT WILL BE THE IMPACT ON SWEPCO'S CAPITAL STRUCTURE AND
7 COST OF CAPITAL AS A RESULT OF STRUCTURAL UNBUNDLING
8 REQUIRED IN TEXAS?
9 A. It is not possible at this time to precisely know the impact on SWEPCO's capital
10 structure and cost of capital. EXHIBITS WGH-l and WGH-2 show the expected
11 minimal impact on the capital structure and weighted average cost of capital (WACC)
12 of SWEPCO as a result of structural unbundling in Texas. As shown in EXHIBIT
13 WGH-2 the transfer of Texas T&D assets from SWEPCO to SWEPCO Texas EDC
14 will result in the retirement of a portion of both the existing debt and equity supporting
15 those assets. SWEPCO plans to retire capital in the most prudent manner so that there
16 will be virtually no change from its then current capital structure mix or cost of capital.
17 Q. WHAT CAPITAL DO YOU EXPECT TO RETIRE AS A RESULT OF THE
18 ASSET TRANSFER?
19 A. SWEPCO currently expects to retire a combination of debt and equity to minimize the
20 impact on capital structure and cost of capital. There are a number of factors to
21 consider when determining which of the multiple debt issues to retire. Overall cost is
22 the primary factor that will be used to determine which securities to retire. Overall
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U-20925, WENDY G. HARGUS
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
8
1 cost includes any one-time transaction costs required to retire securities (such as call
2 premiums or the cost to tender or defease). These one-time costs are sometimes very
3 large and are impacted by the then current debt markets. In order to minimize the
4 cost of restructuring, SWEPCO expects to retire only unsecured debt and short-term
5 debt that can be redeemed without one-time transaction costs (as shown in EXHIBIT
6 WGH-2).
7 Q. HOW DID YOU DETERMINE THAT THERE WOULD BE ONLY MINIMAL
8 IMPACT ON SWEPCO'S CAPITAL STRUCTURE AND WACC?
9 A. I used the existing December 31, 2000 capital structure and WACC to demonstrate
10 the costs both before and after the asset transfers. The table below shows SWEPCO's
11 last approved WACC in Docket No. U-23029-A and the estimated WACC before and
12 after the asset transfer:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
WACC Source
---- ------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Docket No. U-23029-A 9.61% December 29, 1999 Order
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Before Asset Transfer 9.47% Exhibit WGH-1
---------------------------------------------------------------------
After Asset Transfer 9.52% Exhibit WGH-2
---------------------------------------------------------------------
13 The supporting detail and calculations are shown in EXHIBITS WGH-l and WGH-2
14 and demonstrate that there will be minimal impact on SWEPCO's capital structure and
15 WACC.
16 Q. DESCRIBE SWEPCO'S CAPITAL STRUCTURE AND WACC BEFORE THE
17 ASSET TRANSFER.
18 A. EXHIBIT WGH-1 presents the actual capital structure and WACC as of December
19 31, 2000 before the asset transfer. The summary table on page 1 provides the
20 calculation for the actual WACC of 9.47% and pages 2-5 provide the detail for the
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U-20925, WENDY G. HARGUS
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
9
1 actual cost of debt and preferred stock. The cost of equity used for this calculation is
2 the last allowed return on equity approved by the Louisiana Public Service
3 Commission in Docket No. U-23029-A.
4 Q. HOW DID YOU ESTIMATE THE PRO FORMA WACC AFTER ASSETS ARE
5 TRANSFERRED TO THE SWEPCO TEXAS EDC?
6 A. The detailed calculations are presented in EXHIBIT WGH-2. To estimate the pro
7 forma WACC after the asset transfer, I used the estimated total capitalization of
8 $457.6 million (as presented in Attachment H-8 of the July 24, 2001 FERC filing in
9 Docket No. EC01-130-000. This amount is an estimate and is subject to change as
10 the actual amounts to transfer are finalized) as the amount of capital necessary to be
11 retired. The only long-term debt that can currently be retired without one-time
12 transaction costs is the $150 million floating rate note. Accordingly, long-term debt
13 was reduced by $150 million and equity was reduced by $180 million. The remainder
14 was used to pay down short-term debt.
15 These reductions result in minimal change in capital structure and WACC. The
16 capital structure ratios change slightly as a result of these changes with a 48% equity
17 ratio before the asset transfers and 46% after the asset transfers. The cost of debt
18 increases slightly from 7.93% to 8.13% as a result of these changes, but the overall
19 WACC only changes by a very minimal amount as can be seen in the comparison table
20 on the previous page.
21 Q. WHY IS THE WEIGHTED COST OF DEBT PROJECTED TO INCREASE
22 SLIGHTLY WHEN YOU RETIRE THE ESTIMATED AMOUNT OF DEBT?
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U-20925, WENDY G. HARGUS
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
10
1 A. The weighted cost of debt can be impacted by three factors: the interest rate of the
2 debt issue retired; any one-time transaction costs of the debt issue retired; and the
3 smaller remaining balance of debt. First, if the interest rate on the retired debt is lower
4 than the average cost of debt, the new average cost of debt will increase. Likewise, if
5 the interest rate on the retired debt is higher than the average cost of debt, the new
6 average cost of debt will decrease. Second, if there are one-time costs to retire the
7 securities, those costs are included in the unamortized loss on reacquired debt, and the
8 overall cost of debt is also increased. Third, the amortization of the loss on reacquired
9 debt and the unamortized balance become a larger percent of the reduced amount of
10 outstanding debt.
11 As shown in EXHIBIT WGH-2, the weighted cost of debt is projected to
12 increase slightly from 7.93% to 8.12% as a result of the first and third reasons
13 described above - the interest rate on this debt is slightly under the average and the
14 resulting debt balance is smaller. None of the changes described results in a significant
15 change in the cost of debt or WACC as demonstrated in EXHIBIT WGH-2.
16 Q. WILL SWEPCO'S PROJECTED CAPITAL STRUCTURE AND WACC CHANGE
17 OVER TIME?
18 A. Yes. As mentioned above, as debt issues mature, they must be retired or replaced with
19 new securities which may be higher or lower cost depending on the financial markets
20 at the time. Also, any new capital needs must be financed with new securities and any
21 excess cash generated by operations will be used to retire securities and pay dividends.
22 All of these items are part of ongoing operations and will impact the capital structure
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U-20925, WENDY G. HARGUS
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
11
1 and WACC over time. In the past, SWEPCO has done a good job of managing its
2 capital structure and WACC and has taken advantage of good financial markets by
3 refinancing higher cost securities to reduce the overall capital costs. EXHIBIT WGH-
4 2 simply provides an estimate of the WACC at a point in time. In the normal course of
5 business, this cost will change over time as the Company's capitalization and securities
6 outstanding change.
7 Q. IS SWEPCO'S WEIGHTED COST OF PREFERRED STOCK IMPACTED BY
8 THE ASSET TRANSFER?
9 A. No, the weighted cost of preferred stock is not affected by the asset transfer because
10 the amount of preferred stock outstanding does not change. The calculation of the
11 weighted cost of preferred stock is shown in EXHIBIT WGH-1, pages 2 and 3.
12 Q. WHAT WILL BE THE REGULATED WACC FOR THE NEW SWEPCO TEXAS
13 EDC?
14 A. The settlement order in the SWEPCO Texas EDC Unbundled Cost of Service
15 proceeding mandates that the cost of capital be based on a capital structure of 60%
16 debt and 40% equity for Texas regulatory purposes. The allowed return on equity is
17 11.25% and the cost of debt is 8.12%. These requirements result in the following
18 WACC:
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U-20925, WENDY G. HARGUS
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
12
1
2 Capital Weighted
3 Structure Cost Cost
--------- ---- ----
4 Equity 40% 11.25% 4.50%
5 Debt 60% 8.12% 4.87%
---- -----
6 Total 100% 9.37%
==== =====
7 Q. HOW DOES THIS COMPARE TO THE WACC FOR THE REMAINING
8 INTEGRATED SWEPCO?
9 A. The regulated WACC for the SWEPCO Texas EDC of 9.37% is lower than the
10 WACC expected for the remaining integrated SWEPCO of 9.52% outlined earlier in
11 this testimony primarily because of the lower percentage of equity in the SWEPCO
12 Texas EDC approved capital structure. There are also slight differences in the cost of
13 debt and the cost of equity that impact the calculated WACC.
14 Q. WILL THE ACTUAL CAPITAL STRUCTURE AND COST OF CAPITAL FOR
15 THE NEW SWEPCO TEXAS EDC BE THE SAME AS THE STRUCTURE
16 APPROVED BY THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS (PUCT)?
17 A. Not necessarily. However, when the new company is financed we will attempt to
18 balance the requirements to maintain solid credit quality with the 60% debt ratio
19 required by the PUCT. One of the overall goals for the SWEPCO Texas EDC will be
20 to minimize the cost of capital while maintaining good credit quality. Over time we
21 would expect that SWEPCO Texas EDC's actual financing would be able to reach the
22 capital structure required by the PUCT. In addition, the actual cost of debt will also
23 differ from the approved amount depending on the capital market conditions when we
24 actually issue the new debt.
25 Q. FOR THE PURPOSE OF SETTING TOTAL TRANSMISSION COSTS FOR
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U-20925, WENDY G. HARGUS
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
13
1 SWEPCO'S TRANSMISSION ASSETS, WHAT COST OF CAPITAL SHOULD
2 BE CONSIDERED?
3 A. Mr. Potter's testimony explains that total transmission costs are determined by
4 combining the transmission of SWEPCO and SWEPCO Texas EDC. The cost of
5 capital that will be used is a blended cost of capital for the two companies. The table
6 below and EXHIBIT WGH-3 show the current estimate for the blended cost for the
7 combined capital of the remaining integrated SWEPCO and SWEPCO Texas EDC.
8 As you can see, the blended WACC is equal to the WACC for SWEPCO before the
9 asset transfer.
10 WACC
11 Before Asset Transfer: ----
12 SWEPCO 9.47%
13 After Asset Transfer:
14 SWEPCO 9.52%
15 SWEPCO Texas EDC 9.37%
16 SWEPCO Total (Blended) 9.47%
17
18 IV. OTHER FINANCIAL ISSUES
19 Q. WILL SWEPCO ALLOCATE DEBT BETWEEN REGULATED AND
20 UNREGULATED ENTITIES?
21 A. No, SWEPCO does not anticipate the need to allocate any of its current outstanding
22 debt or preferred stock to any other affiliated entities. SWEPCO will remain an
23 integrated electric utility in order to continue to meet its obligation to serve in
24 Louisiana. The business separation plan will result in the transfer of Texas T&D assets
25 to the SWEPCO Texas EDC. SWEPCO will retain its generation assets and
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U-20925, WENDY G. HARGUS
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
14
1 substantially all of its outstanding capital. As mentioned above, as a result of the
2 transfer of the Texas T&D assets, the total amount of capital outstanding at SWEPCO
3 is expected to be reduced by retiring specific securities.
4 Q. PLEASE SUMMARIZE YOUR TESTIMONY.
5 A. SWEPCO's proposed business separation plan will not materially impact SWEPCO's
6 Louisiana retail customers. As discussed above, SWEPCO will remain an integrated
7 electric utility serving in Louisiana and will retain most of its outstanding debt and
8 preferred securities. The only capital structure impact will be the transfer of Texas
9 T&D assets to the SWEPCO Texas EDC and the resulting retirement of a portion of
10 SWEPCO's outstanding debt and common equity.
11 Q. DOES THIS CONCLUDE YOUR DIRECT TESTIMONY?
12 A. Yes, it does.
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U-20925, WENDY G. HARGUS
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
15
BEFORE THE
LOUISIANA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
LPSC DOCKET NOS. U-21453,
U-20925, U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C)
SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY'S
BUSINESS SEPARATION PLAN
DIRECT TESTIMONY OF
CHRIS POTTER
FOR
SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY
SEPTEMBER 2001
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U-20925, CHRIS POTTER
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
1
TESTIMONY INDEX
SUBJECT PAGE
1. INTRODUCTION .......................................................... 3
II. PURPOSE OF TESTIMONY .................................................. 5
III. COST ALLOCATION ISSUES ................................................ 6
IV. CONCLUSION ............................................................ 14
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U-20925, CHRIS POTTER
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
2
1 BEFORE THE
2 LOUISIANA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
3 LPSC DOCKET NOS. U-21453,
4 U-20925, U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C)
5
6 SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY'S
7 BUSINESS SEPARATION PLAN
8
9 DIRECT TESTIMONY OF
10 CHRIS POTTER
11
12 FOR
13 SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY
14
15 SEPTEMBER 2001
16
17 I. INTRODUCTION
18 Q. WOULD YOU PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME, POSITION, AND BUSINESS
19 ADDRESS?
20 A. My name is Chris Potter. My position is Principal Regulatory Consultant in the
21 Regulated Pricing & Analysis department for American Electric Power Service
22 Corporation (AEPSC), a subsidiary of American Electric Power Company, Inc.
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U-20925, CHRIS POTTER
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
3
1 (AEP). My business address is Williams Tower II, Two West Second Street, Tulsa,
2 Oklahoma (74103-3102.)
3 Q. WHAT ARE YOUR PRINCIPAL AREAS OF RESPONSIBILITY AS PRINCIPAL
4 REGULATORY CONSULTANT?
5 A. My responsibilities as Principal Regulatory Consultant are to manage pricing and
6 costing resources for rate cases, regulatory filings and rulemakings, as well as provide
7 pricing and costing services to AEP and its subsidiary electric utility operating
8 companies in the areas of regulatory analysis, cost-of-service studies and rate design. I
9 am also responsible for assisting the AEP electric utility operating subsidiaries in the
10 preparation and coordination of filings before the Louisiana Public Service
11 Commission (LPSC or Commission), the Arkansas Public Service Commission
12 (APSC), the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), the Oklahoma
13 Corporation Commission (OCC), and the Public Utility Commission of Texas
14 (PUCT).
15 Q. WHAT IS YOUR EDUCATIONAL AND PROFESSIONAL BACKGROUND?
16 A. I received my Bachelor of Business Administration degree from Corpus Christi State
17 University (CCSU). While attending CCSU I was employed by Central Power and
18 Light Company (CPL) as an intern in the Budgeting section of Accounting. In
19 November of 1991 I accepted the position of General Ledger coordinator for CPL.
20 My duties as General Ledger coordinator included monthly closing of CPL's financial
21 books, preparation of external financial statements and implementation of various
22 mainframe systems used in the day to day operations of CPL. In July of 1994 I
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U-20925, CHRIS POTTER
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
4
1 transferred to Central and South West Services, Inc. (CSWS), as the Closing
2 Coordinator of CPL and Southwestern Electric Power Company (SWEPCO or
3 Company). In February of 1995 I was promoted to Accounting Consultant for CSWS
4 but maintained the same Closing Coordinator responsibilities. In March of 1995 I
5 transferred to the CSWS Pricing/Costing department as a Pricing/Costing Consultant.
6 In October of 1996 I was promoted to Project Manager in the Pricing/Costing
7 department and in May of 1999 I was promoted to Senior Project Manager. In June
8 of 2000, with the conclusion of the AEP/CSW merger, I accepted my current position
9 as Principal Regulatory Consultant for AEP.
10 Q. HAVE YOU PREVIOUSLY SPONSORED TESTIMONY BEFORE A
11 REGULATORY COMMISSION?
12 A. Yes. I have sponsored testimony before the LPSC, APSC and PUCT for SWEPCO,
13 before the OCC for Public Service Company of Oklahoma (PSO) and, before the
14 PUCT for CPL and West Texas Utilities Company.
15
16 II. PURPOSE OF TESTIMONY
17 Q. BRIEFLY OUTLINE THE PURPOSE OF YOUR TESTIMONY.
18 A. My testimony addresses the potential impact to Louisiana ratepayers resulting from the
19 anticipated restructuring and deregulation in Texas with regard to the traditional cost
20 of service studies and the impact on jurisdictional and retail allocation factors.
21 Q. WILL THE RESTRUCTURING IN TEXAS HAVE A MATERIAL IMPACT ON
22 THE LOUISIANA JURISDICTIONAL COST OF SERVICE STUDY?
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U-20925, CHRIS POTTER
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
5
1 A. No. The Louisiana Commission has a legitimate concern to ensure compliance with
2 Texas industry restructuring rules and regulations does not materially affect the costs
3 SWEPCO incurs in providing services to the Louisiana jurisdiction. However, the
4 SWEPCO Business Separation Plan (SWEPCO BSP) does not contemplate that
5 SWEPCO's retail customers in Louisiana will be materially affected by the
6 restructuring activities in Texas. The SWEPCO BSP allows the Company to
7 implement restructuring in Texas without materially affecting the costs paid by
8 SWEPCO's other retail jurisdictions.
9
10 III. COST ALLOCATION ISSUES
11 Q. HOW DID SWEPCO ALLOCATE PRODUCTION RELATED COSTS TO THE
12 JURISDICTIONS IN THE LAST LPSC RATE PROCEEDING?
13 A. In SWEPCO's last cost of service study filed in Louisiana (Docket No. U-23029),
14 production demand related costs were allocated to the jurisdictions utilizing the Four
15 Coincident Peak (4CP) methodology. The 4CP methodology was also utilized in the
16 allocation of production costs in SWEPCO's last rate review before the APSC,
17 (Docket No. 98-339-U), as well as in the Unbundled Cost of Service proceeding
18 before the PUCT (Docket No. 22353).
19 Q. HOW DID SWEPCO ALLOCATE NON-PRODUCTION RELATED COSTS TO
20 THE JURISDICTIONS IN THE LAST LPSC RATE PROCEEDING?
21 A. In SWEPCO's last cost of service study filed in Louisiana, transmission demand
22 related costs were allocated to the jurisdictions utilizing the 4CP methodology.
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U-20925, CHRIS POTTER
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
6
1 Distribution related investment was directly assigned to the jurisdictions based on the
2 physical location of the assets (situs basis). Customer related costs were allocated on
3 the basis of either year-end number of customers or a weighted year-end number of
4 customers. While many allocation factors are utilized in a cost of service study, these
5 allocation factors allocate the vast majority of costs.
6 Q. WHY DID SWEPCO UTILIZE THESE JURISDICTIONAL ALLOCATION
7 METHODOLOGIES IN THE LAST LOUISIANA COST OF SERVICE STUDY?
8 A. The 4 CP method used for production and transmission demand allocation accurately
9 reflects the system peak demands that are considered in the planning and construction
10 of those facilities. The SWEPCO system load has consistently been characterized by
11 pronounced summer peak demands in the four summer months of June through
12 September. Therefore, it is most appropriate to allocate these costs based upon the 4
13 CP methodology. The situs basis for assigning distribution costs allows facilities
14 located in Louisiana to be directly assigned to the Louisiana jurisdiction, where the
15 facilities are actually located and utilized in the provision of distribution-related
16 services. Likewise, the situs basis ensures that distribution facilities not located in
17 Louisiana are assigned to either Texas or Arkansas and not to the Louisiana retail
18 customers. Customer-related costs vary with the number of customers served and
19 should therefore be allocated based upon the number of customers served.
20 Q. HOW DOES THE PRODUCTION JURISDICTIONAL ALLOCATION
21 METHODOLOGY USED IN THE LAST SWEPCO LOUISIANA COST STUDY
22 CHANGE AS A RESULT OF THE UNBUNDLING INITIATIVES IN TEXAS?
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U-20925, CHRIS POTTER
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
7
1 A. While the production allocation methodology does not change, as part of its BSP
2 SWEPCO is proposing a one time allocation of the production related investment and
3 costs (operation and maintenance, depreciation, etc.) between the regulated
4 jurisdictions of Arkansas and Louisiana and the competitive Texas retail and wholesale
5 jurisdictions.
6 Q. PLEASE EXPLAIN SWEPCO's PROPOSED FIXED ALLOCATION OF
7 GENERATION RELATED COSTS.
8 A. As discussed in Sections 4.1.1 and 4.1.2 of the Unit Power Sales Agreement between
9 SWEPCO and the AEP Power Marketing Affiliate (PMA) as filed in FERC Docket
10 No. ER01-2668-000 on July 24, 2001, the capacity assigned to the PMA will be based
11 on the 4CP calculation for the year 2000, the most recent data available. As discussed
12 above the 4CP allocation is consistent with the allocation methodology used in
13 SWEPCO's most recent rate reviews for all three of its retail jurisdictions. Based
14 upon the 2000 4CP data, regulated SWEPCO will be responsible for 45.54% of the
15 non-fuel related generation costs and the PMA will be responsible for the remaining
16 54.46% of those costs. SWEPCO proposes to freeze this allocation percentage for
17 future cost allocation purposes.
18 Q. WHY IS IT APPROPRIATE TO SET THE ALLOCATION OF GENERATION
19 RELATED COSTS AND INVESTMENTS AS A FIXED PERCENTAGE FOR THE
20 TEXAS RETAIL AND WHOLESALE CUSTOMERS?
21 A. By setting the allocation at a fixed percentage of SWEPCO's current generation
22 related assets the Louisiana and Arkansas retail customers will be isolated from the
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U-20925, CHRIS POTTER
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
8
1 effect competition may have on the demand for SWEPCO's generation facilities.
2 Establishing the jurisdictional percentage split based on load data prior to retail
3 competition will ensure that the Louisiana and Arkansas retail customers will not be
4 responsible for any more nor any less than their fair share of SWEPCO's generation
5 costs.
6 Q. PLEASE DISCUSS THE COMPANY'S PROPOSAL TO ALLOCATE NON-FUEL
7 PRODUCTION-RELATED COSTS BETWEEN THE ARKANSAS AND
8 LOUISIANA RETAIL JURISDICTIONS AND THE PMA.
9 A. As mentioned previously, the allocation of non-fuel production costs to the Louisiana
10 and Arkansas retail jurisdictions will be set at 45.54%. Likewise, 54.46% of total non-
11 fuel production costs will be assigned to the PMA. Until such time as either Arkansas
12 or Louisiana decides to implement competition, the jurisdictional allocation of 45.54%
13 of SWEPCO's total non-fuel production-related costs between the Arkansas and
14 Louisiana retail jurisdictions will be based on the 4CP methodology utilizing
15 appropriate test year load data. However, when either Arkansas or Louisiana
16 implements competition, SWEPCO will propose the same methodology for
17 determining the fixed percentage split for the assignment of non-fuel
18 production-related costs to the remaining regulated jurisdiction.
19 Q. HOW WILL THE NON-PRODUCTION JURISDICTIONAL ALLOCATION
20 METHODOLOGIES USED IN THE LAST SWEPCO COST STUDY CHANGE AS
21 A RESULT OF THE UNBUNDLING INITIATIVES IN ARKANSAS AND
22 TEXAS?
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U-20925, CHRIS POTTER
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
9
1 A. Industry restructuring should have minimal impact on the Company's non-production
2 jurisdictional allocation methodologies. However, there may be instances where
3 specific items can be directly assigned to a particular jurisdiction as a result of
4 restructuring requirements. AEP witness John Aaron discusses the accounting
5 changes resulting from restructuring in his direct testimony. SWEPCO intends to
6 utilize the same or similar allocation methodologies, including those utilized to allocate
7 costs between the retail and wholesale jurisdictions, used in the last LPSC filing unless
8 direct assignment is available or cost causation changes. If the cost causation factors
9 indicate that a change in allocation methodologies is warranted, SWEPCO will fully
10 support any such methodology change, which will be reviewed by the Commission in
11 SWEPCO's next rate filing. If a specific service is no longer provided in the Texas
12 jurisdiction as a result of restructuring, but continues to be provided to regulated
13 customers, the costs associated with that particular service will be directly assigned or
14 allocated to only the regulated jurisdictions. For example, if the SWEPCO Texas
15 Energy Delivery Company (SWEPCO Texas EDC) is no longer responsible for
16 issuing individual customer bills, the Company's expense incurred for postage
17 associated with mailing regulated customers' bills would be allocated only to the
18 remaining regulated jurisdictions.
19 Q. WILL RETAIL CUSTOMERS CHOOSING DIFFERENT SUPPLIERS IN TEXAS
20 DUE TO INDUSTRY RESTRUCTURING MATERIALLY AFFECT THE
21 AMOUNT OF NON-PRODUCTION RELATED COSTS JURISDICTIONALLY
22 ALLOCATED TO THE LOUISIANA RETAIL CUSTOMERS?
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U-20925, CHRIS POTTER
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
10
1 A. No. Consistent with prior practice, SWEPCO proposes to continue to use the total
2 loads in the current SWEPCO service territories in the development of its non-
3 production jurisdictional allocation factors, regardless of whether a customer receives
4 energy from SWEPCO or a Retail Energy Provider (REP) in Texas. Loads
5 traditionally included in the development of the non-production jurisdictional
6 allocation factors will still be accounted for in the development of these factors,
7 regardless of whether a customer has a different supplier for their generation needs.
8 Q. WILL THE TRANSMISSION PORTION OF SWEPCO's COST STUDY CHANGE
9 AS A RESULT OF RESTRUCTURING INITIATIVES IN OTHER
10 JURISDICTIONS?
11 A. No. As discussed in the testimony of Mr. Baker, the SWEPCO transmission assets
12 and employees located in Texas will be transferred to the SWEPCO Texas EDC.
13 Also, as discussed in the testimony of Mr. John Aaron, the financial data from the
14 books of the SWEPCO Texas EDC and SWEPCO will be combined to obtain the total
15 transmission costs of the entire SWEPCO system. Combining the transmission
16 investments and costs will result in the calculation of total SWEPCO transmission
17 costs on a basis substantially the same as SWEPCO used in its last proceeding. As a
18 result, the potential for material effects on SWEPCO's jurisdictional allocation of
19 transmission-related costs to the Louisiana retail customers is minimized.
20 Q. WILL THE ASSIGNMENT OF DISTRIBUTION-RELATED INVESTMENT TO
21 THE LOUISIANA JURISDICTION BE AFFECTED AS A RESULT OF
22 RESTRUCTURING EFFORTS IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS?
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U-20925, CHRIS POTTER
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
11
1 A. No. As discussed earlier in my testimony, SWEPCO jurisdictionally assigns
2 distribution-related investment to each of the three states in which SWEPCO operates
3 on a situs basis. Restructuring will not change the physical location of the distribution-
4 related investments; and as such, there should be little change in the amount of
5 distribution-related investment allocated to the Louisiana retail jurisdiction.
6 Q. WILL THERE BE AN EFFECT ON THE DISTRIBUTION-RELATED O&M
7 EXPENSES ASSIGNED TO THE LOUISIANA JURISDICTION?
8 A. Yes. Previously, distribution-related O&M costs were allocated to the jurisdictions
9 based on the respective plant accounts assigned to each jurisdiction. Because of
10 restructuring, certain O&M costs will now be directly assigned to the Texas
11 jurisdiction. As a result, the remaining O&M expenses will be allocated to the
12 Arkansas and Louisiana jurisdictions, consistent with past ratemaking treatment, based
13 upon the respective plant in each of the jurisdictions.
14 Q. WILL GENERAL PLANT, ADMINISTRATIVE AND GENERAL COSTS, AND
15 OTHER COMMON COSTS CONTINUE TO BE ALLOCATED BASED UPON
16 THE METHODOLOGIES UTILIZED IN THE LAST LPSC FILING?
17 A. Not necessarily. As a result of the restructuring initiatives, SWEPCO will be required
18 to keep more precise, jurisdictional-specific data to separate the bookkeeping of the
19 SWEPCO Texas EDC from the other SWEPCO jurisdictions. This separate
20 bookkeeping will allow SWEPCO to directly assign many of the costs, including
21 payroll and some O&M expenses to specific jurisdictions. Mr. Aaron discusses this
22 separation of costs in his direct testimony. If direct assignment is not available,
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U-20925, CHRIS POTTER
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
12
1 SWEPCO intends to allocate these costs consistent with previously used
2 methodologies unless cost causation principles support a change. If the cost causation
3 factors indicate that a change in allocation methodologies is warranted, SWEPCO will
4 fully support any such methodology change, which will be reviewed by the
5 Commission in SWEPCO's next rate filing.
6 Q. WILL THE ALLOCATION OF COSTS TO THE LOUISIANA RETAIL
7 CUSTOMERS CHANGE AS A RESULT OF RESTRUCTURING ACTIVITIES IN
8 OTHER JURISDICTIONS?
9 A. No. Once the allocation of SWEPCO total company cost has been made to each of
10 the various jurisdictions, the same retail transmission and distribution allocation
11 methodologies used in the last LPSC filing would be used, unless the cost causation of
12 a particular item changes, requiring that a more appropriate allocator be used. If the
13 cost causation factors indicate that a change in allocation methodologies is warranted,
14 SWEPCO will fully support any such methodology change, which will be reviewed by
15 the Commission in SWEPCO's next rate filing.
16 Q. WHAT WILL THE IMPACT BE TO THE LOUISIANA JURISDICTION AS A
17 RESULT OF THE PROPOSED CHANGES OUTLINED ABOVE?
18 A. At this time, the exact dollar amount impact of the proposed changes in jurisdictional
19 allocation methodologies cannot be quantified. However, none of these allocation
20 methodologies changes are expected to have a material impact on the cost SWEPCO's
21 Louisiana retail customers will pay for electricity.
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U-20925, CHRIS POTTER
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
13
1 Q. HOW DOES SWEPCO INTEND TO TREAT TRANSITION AND
2 TRANSACTION COSTS RESULTING FROM RESTRUCTURING ACTIVITIES
3 IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS?
4 A. It is the Company's intent to directly assign restructuring costs to the states that are
5 implementing restructuring, thereby adhering to cost causation principles. Since
6 Louisiana has not at this time determined that retail competition is in the public
7 interest, no costs from restructuring activities will be allocated to the Louisiana
8 jurisdiction, unless that cost provides a used and useful service to the Louisiana retail
9 customers. If Louisiana implements competition for generation and other services in
10 the future, SWEPCO will allocate an appropriate amount of transition costs to the
11 Louisiana jurisdiction.
12
13 IV. CONCLUSION
14 Q. WILL THE RATEPAYERS OF LOUISIANA BE MATERIALLY AFFECTED AS
15 A RESULT OF IMPLEMENTING COMPETITION IN OTHER SWEPCO
16 JURISDICTIONS?
17 A. No. By establishing the jurisdictional percentage split on a pre-competition load basis
18 for generation related costs, Louisiana retail customers will be protected from any
19 effect competition might have on the jurisdictional allocation of SWEPCO's
20 generation related costs. It is SWEPCO's intent to allocate Louisiana retail customers
21 non-production related costs, except as discussed in earlier in my testimony, in the
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U-20925, CHRIS POTTER
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
14
1 same manner as if restructuring was not occurring in Texas. As a result, the effect on
2 SWEPCO's Louisiana customers should be minimal.
3 Q. DOES THIS CONCLUDE YOUR DIRECT TESTIMONY?
4 A. Yes, it does.
15
DOCKET NOS. U-21453, U-20925, CHRIS POTTER
U-22092 (SUBDOCKET C) DIRECT TESTIMONY
EX-99.D7
8
c22015_ex99-d7.txt
APPLICATION TO TRANSFER JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS
Exhibit 99.D-7
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
BEFORE THE
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
American Electric Power Service Corporation ) Docket No. EC01-________________
APPLICATION OF
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE CORPORATION FOR
AUTHORIZATION TO TRANSFER JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS
Pursuant to Section 203 of the Federal Power Act (Act), 16 U.S.C. ss. 824b
(1994), and Part 33 of the Regulations of the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission (Commission), as revised pursuant to Order No. 642, FERC Stats. &
Regs. Paragraph 31,111 (2000), American Electric Power Service Corporation
(AEPSC), acting on behalf of its affiliates, Central Power and Light Company
(CPL), West Texas Utilities Company (WTU), Southwestern Electric Power Company
(SWEPCO), Columbus Southern Power Company (CSP) and Ohio Power Company (OPCo),
respectfully requests authority for CPL, WTU, SWEPCO, CSP and OPCo to transfer
certain jurisdictional facilities to implement their respective plans to
separate their generation and power marketing businesses from their transmission
and distribution businesses in the states of Texas and Ohio. Acting on behalf of
its affiliates, Appalachian Power Company (APCo) and Indiana Michigan Power
Company (I&M), AEPSC further requests authority for the transfer by APCo and
I&M(1) to a power marketing affiliate (PMA)(2) of their contractual rights and
obligations under certain power supply agreements. Acting on behalf of I&M,
APCo, OPCo, CSP and Kentucky Power Company (KPCo), AEPSC further requests
authority for the transfer by AEPSC, as agent
----------
(1) AEPSC, CPL, WTU, SWEPCO, CSP, OPCo, APCo and I&M are hereinafter referred
to collectively as the Applicants.
(2) Throughout this Application names are used for affiliates of the Applicants
that are intended to be descriptive of the functions such affiliates will
serve after the reorganization of the AEP system to comply with the state
restructuring laws of Ohio and Texas is completed. Such
2
for I&M, APCo, OPCo, CSP and KPCo, to PMA of certain wholesale power sales
agreements with certain wholesale customers. All such transfers of
jurisdictional facilities are hereinafter referred to collectively as the
Transfers.
The Transfers involve wholesale electricity sales contracts, or rights
therein, that APCo, CSP, OPCo, I&M and AEPSC, as agent for certain American
Electric Power Company, Inc. (AEP) operating companies, plan to assign to
PMA,(3) a wholesale electricity sales contract that APCo will assign to OPCo,
wholesale electricity sales contracts, or rights therein, that CPL and WTU will
assign to power generation company (PGC affiliates, step-up transformers,
circuit breakers, interconnection facilities and related facilities associated
with generating units that CPL and WTU will transfer to such PGC affiliates, and
transmission lines, interconnection agreements and other interstate transmission
facilities that SWEPCO, CSP and OPCo will transfer to newly formed energy
delivery company (EDC) affiliates that will be chartered to own, maintain and
operate transmission and distribution facilities located in the states of Texas
and Ohio.
Exhibit C to this Application contains diagrams of the pre-Transfer and
post-Transfer organizations of Applicants and their relevant affiliates. Exhibit
G to this Application contains schedules that list the interconnection
facilities associated with generating stations that CPL and WTU will transfer to
their PGC affiliates and schedules that list the transmission facilities and
interconnection agreements that SWEPCO, CSP and OPCo will transfer to newly
formed EDC affiliates. Exhibit G also contains schedules that list the wholesale
power sales contracts that
----------
(continued...)
names are fictitious and used as a matter of descriptive convenience. The
actual legal names of such affiliates will be determined as part of the
implementation of such reorganization.
(3) The assignment of such contracts is subject to A determination that such
assignment will not result in adverse tax consequences to AEP.
3
CSP, OPCo, APCo, I&M and AEPSC, as agent for certain AEP operating companies,
respectively, will assign to PMA and schedules that list the wholesale power
sales contracts that CPL and WTU will assign to their newly formed PGC
affiliates.
1. REASONS FOR THE TRANSFERS
CPL, WTU and SWEPCO will make their Transfers to comply with the provisions
of a Texas statute commonly referred to as S.B. 7.(4) S.B. 7 requires vertically
integrated electric utilities to separate ownership of their generating and
other power supply assets from ownership of their transmission and distribution
assets no later than January 1, 2002. Under S.B. 7, vertically integrated
utilities are generally obligated to disaggregate into at least three separate
corporate units: (1) a PGC that will sell power and energy at wholesale; (2) an
EDC that will own transmission and local distribution facilities, but is
prohibited from owning power supply facilities or selling electricity; and (3) a
Retail Electric Provider (REP) that will sell electricity to retail customers.
By order issued July 7, 2000, the Public Utility Commission of Texas (PUCT)
approved corporate separation plans CPL, WTU and SWEPCO filed to explain how
they will comply with S.B. 7 (see Exhibit L to this Application). In their
corporate separation plans, CPL and WTU proposed to transfer their respective
generating facilities and associated jurisdictional facilities to separate,
newly formed PGC affiliates and SWEPCO proposed to transfer its transmission and
distribution facilities located in Texas to an EDC affiliate.
CSP and OPCo will make their Transfers to comply with the provisions of an
Ohio statute that provides for Competitive Retail Electric Service, commonly
referred to as S.B.3.(5) The statute directs vertically integrated electric
utilities that offer retail electric service in Ohio to separate their
generating and other competitive operations (such as aggregation, marketing, and
----------
(4) Tex. Util. Code Ann. ss. ss. 39.001-909 (Vernon Supp. 2000).
4
brokering) and related assets from their transmission and distribution
operations and assets. On September 28, 2000, the Public Utilities Commission of
Ohio (PUCO) approved corporate separation plans CSP and OPCo filed to explain
how they will comply with S.B. 3 (see Exhibit L to this Application). In their
approved corporate separation plans, CSP and OPCo proposed, subject to receipt
of federal regulatory approvals, to transfer their transmission and distribution
assets and operations to EDC affiliates.
The Transfers, which are described in more detail below and in Exhibit I,
require the Commission's approval under Section 203 of the Act. As explained in
Exhibit J, the Transfers and proposed restructuring of the Applicants will have
no material adverse effect on the service provided to their respective wholesale
customers, will not diminish competition, and will not hamper the ability of
state or federal utility regulatory agencies to regulate the Applicants, or
their newly formed affiliates that are subject to utility regulation under state
or federal law. By separate filing (Section 205 Filing), the Applicants are
submitting for Commission review under Section 205 of the Act certain power
sales agreements pursuant to which OPCo, CSP and SWEPCO will sell power and
energy to PMA.
The restructuring of the operating company subsidiaries of AEP in Ohio and
Texas and the related Transfers of jurisdictional assets are part of a
continuing movement toward further competition in the electric power industry, a
movement that AEP has supported at both federal and state levels. Separating the
ownership and operation of generating facilities of the AEP operating companies
that serve Ohio and Texas from ownership and operation of their transmission and
distribution assets and the related public utility functions makes such
generating capacity fully available to developing wholesale markets and thereby
advances the
----------
(continued...)
(5) Ohio Rev. Code Ann. ss. ss. 4928.01-67 (Anderson 2000).
5
electric utility restructuring policies of Ohio and Texas and the competition
policies of this Commission. Combined with the development of Regional
Transmission Organizations (RTOs), the corporate separation of the power supply
and energy delivery businesses of AEP's Ohio and Texas operating companies will
foster the establishment of a robust wholesale electricity market and
concomitant production efficiencies that will benefit all consumers.
The Transfers are part of AEP's continuing effort to promote competitive
electricity markets. The AEP companies have long been leaders in the development
of RTOs, strong advocates for competitive electric markets before federal and
state policymakers, and active partners in state efforts to restructure retail
markets. AEP operating companies have previously filed to transfer control of
their transmission facilities to the Alliance and the Southwest Power Pool (SPP)
RTO. Consistent with the Commission's recent orders concerning RTO development,
the AEP operating companies are supporting the implementation of the Alliance on
schedule and will advocate and support the SPP's participation in a larger RTO,
as the Commission has recommended.
A. REORGANIZATION OF THE AEP TEXAS OPERATING COMPANIES
To comply with S.B. 7, CPL and WTU will contribute their respective
generating assets to newly formed PGC affiliates, WTU PGC and CPL PGC.(6)
Through a series of transactions described in Exhibit I, the stock of WTU PGC
and CPL PGC will be contributed to Domestic Genco, a subsidiary of a new
intermediate holding company subsidiary of AEP, Wholesale
----------
(6) CPL has committed to divest by June 2002 its Lon Hill Units 1-4, which have
an aggregate generating capability of 546 MW, its Nueces Bay plant, which
has a generating capability of 559 MW, and its Joslin Unit 1, which has a
generating capability of 249 MW, subject to certain recall rights with
respect to CPL's obligation to serve retail customers in the Electric
Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT). CPL made this commitment in
connection with the PUCT proceedings brought to consider the merger of
Central and South West Corporation (CSW) and AEP.
6
Holdco, which will own the common stock of AEP subsidiaries that are engaged in
"unregulated" activities in competitive wholesale electricity markets.(7) CPL
and WTU also will assign their existing contracts for wholesale electric sales
to CPL PGC and WTU PGC, respectively. This will result in the customers served
under such contracts being served from the same basic set of power supply
resources that CPL or WTU would have used to serve such customers if S.B. 7 had
not required CPL and WTU to disaggregate. The contracts to be assigned contain
fuel adjustment clauses and transferring the contracts to the PGCs will enable
the accurate tracking of actual fuel costs.
SWEPCO will retain title to its generating assets because it provides
bundled retail electric service in Louisiana, which to date has not adopted a
retail competition policy or legislation, and in Arkansas, where SWEPCO is not
obligated to separate ownership of its generating assets from its transmission
and distribution assets.(8) SWEPCO also will retain its existing wholesale
electric sales contracts, but will sell to PMA proportionate rights to capacity
in each SWEPCO generating unit and certain capacity purchase agreements equal to
the ratio to SWEPCO's calendar year 2000 summer month peak loads of the sum of
the coincident loads represented by retail customers served in Texas and
SWEPCO's wholesale requirements customers. Such capacity and associated energy
will be made available to PMA under a Unit Power Sales Agreement that is being
submitted for Commission review as part of the Section 205 Filing. To enable
SWEPCO to continue to supply its wholesale requirements customers PMA will sell
back to SWEPCO under a second Unit Power Sales Agreement the capacity and
----------
(7) CPL and WTU may delay the transfer of their stock in CPL PGC and WTU PGC
until sometime after June 15, 2002, in order to avoid adverse tax
consequences relating to intracorporate transfers after a merger.
(8) The Arkansas legislature recently postponed the start of retail electric
competition in Arkansas to a date no earlier than October 1, 2003 and no
later than October 1, 2005.
7
associated energy needed for that purpose, which also is being submitted for
Commission review as part of the Section 205 Filing.(9)
CPL and WTU will retain their respective transmission and distribution
assets and after transfer of their generating assets to CPL PGC and WTU PGC, CPL
and WTU will operate as EDCs. On or before January 1, 2002, SWEPCO will
contribute its transmission and distribution assets located in Texas and related
business operations to a wholly owned EDC subsidiary, SWEPCO EDC, the stock of
which will be transferred in a series of transactions described in Exhibit I to
CSW, which now holds all of the common stock of CPL and WTU. As illustrated by
the post-Transfer organizational chart contained in Exhibit C, CSW also will
hold the common stock of other regulated subsidiaries of AEP.
The transmission facilities of CPL and WTU that are located in the ERCOT
region will be operated as part of the ERCOT network and a single control area
under the supervision of ERCOT, which the PUCT has found meets the requirements
of an independent transmission organization under Section 39.151 of S.B. 7. The
transmission facilities that SWEPCO will transfer to SWEPCO EDC, as well as the
transmission facilities located in Arkansas and Louisiana that SWEPCO will
retain, and the non-ERCOT transmission facilities of WTU, are expected to be
operated as part of a RTO.(10)
----------
(9) Until such time as the PUCT determines the power market in which SWEPCO
operates to be competitive, SWEPCO REP will retain an obligation to
continue to offer power supply to such large commercial and industrial
customers at cost-based rates. The second Unit Power Sales Agreement
contains provisions for the sale back to SWEPCO of capacity that will
enable SWEPCO to furnish to SWEPCO REP the capacity it will need to meet
this obligation. In the event the PUCT delays retail choice in SWEPCO's
Texas service area altogether, the second Unit Power Sales Agreement
further provides for the sale back to SWEPCO of capacity it will need to
fulfill its continuing responsibility to serve Texas retail customers.
(10) On April 27, 2001, as supplemented on May 29, 2001, SWEPCO, WTU and Public
Service Company of Oklahoma (PSO) filed an application under Section 203 of
the Act in Docket
8
Under S.B. 7, retail customers served by CPL, WTU and SWEPCO in Texas will
become eligible for direct access to competing sellers of retail electricity
supply by January 1, 2002. As illustrated on the post-Transfer organizational
chart contained in Exhibit C to this Application, AEP will establish as a
first-tier subsidiary an intermediate holding company, Retail Holdco, that will
own the controlling interests in retail electric marketing entities (REPs)
established to provide competitive retail electric services in Texas. Retail
Holdco will control three REPs that on and after January 1, 2002, will offer
retail electric service to the residential and small commercial customers
formerly served by CPL, WTU and SWEPCO at rates that on a bundled basis are six
percent less than the residential and small commercial customer rates in effect
on December 31, 1999 (the "price to beat"). As a part of the Texas retail access
program, the currently effective Texas retail rates of CPL, WTU and SWEPCO are
frozen until December 31, 2001. On and after January 1, 2002, retail
residential and small commercial customers formerly served by CPL, WTU and
SWEPCO will be served either by the REPs associated with CPL, WTU and SWEPCO,
respectively, at the "price to beat" established by the PUCT for their
respective Texas service areas or by an alternative retail electric supplier not
affiliated with the Applicants.
----------
(continued ... )
No. EC01-94-000, to transfer operational control of their transmission
facilities located in the SPP to the SPP RTO. By order issued July 12, 2001
in Docket Nos. RT01-34-000, et al., 96 FERC paragraph 61,062 (2001), the
Commission rejected such application because it found that the proposed SPP
RTO did not meet the scope and configuration requirements of Order No.
2000. The AEP operating companies that own transmission facilities in the
SPP region are currently participating in the mediation being conducted
under Commission auspices. PSO, SWEPCO, and WTU support the participation
of the SPP transmission owners in a larger RTO that will meet the scope
requirements of Order No. 2000, as the Commission has recommended.
9
B. REORGANIZATION OF THE OHIO AEP OPERATING COMPANIES
To comply with S.B. 3, CSP and OPCo will contribute their transmission and
distribution assets to new EDC subsidiaries (CSP EDC and OPCo EDC).(11) The
common stock of OPCo EDC and CSP EDC will be contributed to AEP. AEP, in turn,
will contribute such common stock to CSW. Surviving CSP and OPCo will be PGCs
whose common stock AEP will contribute to Domestic Genco through a series of
transactions described in Exhibit I. CSP PGC will retain its contracts to serve
wholesale requirements customers because such contracts contain fuel adjustment
clauses that require the tracking of CSP PGC fuel costs. OPCo PGC will retain
its contracts with Buckeye Power, Inc., under which OPCo, among other things,
provides back-up and supplemental power to Buckeye, and with Buckeye's affiliate
National Power Cooperative, Inc., under which OPCo provides similar power supply
services. OPCo will, however, assign to APCo the contract under which OPCo
supplies the power and energy requirements of Wheeling Power Company, an
affiliated transmission and distribution utility that serves retail customers
in West Virginia. APCo serves retail and wholesale customers in Virginia and
West Virginia. Wheeling Power has agreed with the West Virginia Public Service
Commission to modify its rates for retail service over a four-year period to
make them equal to APCo's West Virginia retail rates, which are lower than
Wheeling Power's currently effective retail rates. Assigning the Wheeling Power
contract to APCo will result in Wheeling Power's obtaining its requirements for
electricity from the same portfolio of power supply resources that underlie
APCo's West Virginia retail rates.
----------
(11) The transmission facilities of CSP include Transmission Agreements among
owners of certain Ohio generating facilities jointly owned by CSP, Dayton
Power and Light Company and Cincinnati Gas and Electric Company, which are
listed in Exhibit G.
10
Under S.B. 3, CSP EDC and OPCo EDC must serve as default suppliers to
retail customers that do not choose an alternative power supplier. The rates
Ohio retail residential customers will pay for default power supply after
January 1, 2001 have been reduced by five percent from the power supply
component of bundled rates in effect prior to that date. The rates for power
supply that OPCo EDC and CSP EDC will charge all Ohio retail customers that do
not choose an alternative supplier will be frozen for the first five years of
retail competition, unless the PUCO finds that effective competition with
respect to particular retail customer classes is occurring before the end of a
five-year market development period. CSP and OPCo are participants in the
Alliance Regional Transmission Organization and CSP EDC and OPCo EDC will take
on the Alliance responsibilities of CSP and OPCo, respectively. (12)
II. DESCRIPTION OF POWER SUPPLY ARRANGEMENTS
The Transfers will necessitate new power supply arrangements to enable PMA
to continue to serve the existing wholesale requirements customers of AEPSC, as
agent for certain AEP operating companies, under the terms of the rate schedules
listed on Exhibit G to this Application and to provide CSP EDC and OPCo EDC
capacity and energy that they require to serve Ohio retail customers that are
entitled to service at frozen rates during the Ohio market development period.
PMA also plans to bid to supply capacity and energy needed by CPL REP, WTU REP
and SWEPCO REP to serve Texas customers that do not choose alternative
suppliers. If those bids are successful, PMA will enter into power supply
agreements with its affiliated Texas REPs.
----------
(12) The Commission has approved the Alliance as an RTO in most respects.
ALLIANCE COMPANIES, ET AL., 89 FERC paragraph 61,298 (1999); ALLIANCE
COMPANIES, ET AL., 91 FERC paragraph 61,152 (2000); ALLIANCE COMPANIES, ET
AL., 94 FERC paragraph 61,070 (2001); ALLIANCE COMPANIES, ET AL., 95 FERC
paragraph 61,182(2001); ALLIANCE COMPANIES, ET AL., 96 FERC paragraph
61,052 (2001).
11
A. POWER SUPPLY AGREEMENTS BETWEEN PGCS AND PMA
PMA will enter into a Power Supply Agreement (PSA) with each of Domestic
Genco's PGC subsidiaries, CPL PGC, WTU PGC, OPCo PGC and CSP PGC. Such PSAs will
entitle PMA to schedule and purchase the entire output of the PGCs' respective
generating stations not needed to serve wholesale customers under contracts
assigned to or retained by the PGCs. The PSAs under which PMA will purchase
capacity and energy from CSP PGC and OPCo PGC are being submitted for Commission
review as part of the Section 205 Filing.
B. PMA'S SALES TO WHOLESALE CUSTOMERS OF AEPSC
After the wholesale requirements power supply agreements of AEPSC, as agent
for certain AEP operating companies, are assigned to PMA, PMA will provide
service to the wholesale customers served under such contracts in accordance
with the terms and conditions of and at the rates contained in such power supply
agreements.
C. PMA'S SALES TO RETAIL AFFILIATES
In order to supply OPCo EDC and CSP EDC with capacity and energy required
to serve Ohio retail customers that are entitled to service at frozen rates
(default service) during the Ohio market development period, PMA will enter into
default service supply agreements with OPCo EDC and CSP EDC, respectively. The
contracts will be in place during the time that OPCo EDC and CSP EDC retain a
default service obligation at frozen rates (through 2005 unless the PUCO ends
the market development period earlier). These contracts will insure cost-based
service to OPCo EDC and CSP EDC for forecasted default service demand and will
be filed with the Commission in the near future. PMA also will bid to supply
capacity and energy needed by the Texas REPs to meet their obligations to supply
"price to beat" customers.
12
D. INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENTS
Each of Domestic Genco's PGC subsidiaries that takes, or retains, title to
generating stations formerly owned by a vertically integrated AEP operating
company will enter into an Interconnection Agreement with the EDC subsidiary of
AEP that owns the transmission system to which the PGC subsidiary's stations are
connected. Such Interconnection Agreements will govern the operation and
maintenance of the station interconnections. Such Interconnection Agreements
will follow in substantial part the standard forms currently used by AEPSC, as
agent for the AEP operating companies, and AEPSC plans to file such agreements
with the Commission prior to December 31, 2001.
E. ASSIGNMENT OF CERTAIN OTHER AGREEMENTS
As part of the reorganization of the AEP system to implement the retail
choice laws of Texas and Ohio, I&M, APCo, OPCo, and CSP will assign to PMA their
rights and obligations under the Inter-Company Power Agreement, dated July 10,
1953 (OVEC Agreement), to PMA and I&M will assign to PMA its rights and
obligations under a Unit Power Agreement between I&M and AEP Generating Company,
dated March 31, 1982 (Rockport Agreement). AEP and CSP own interests in Ohio
Valley Electric Corporation (OVEC), which supplies the power requirements of a
U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) uranium enrichment plant located near
Portsmouth, Ohio. APCo, OPCo, CSP and I&M are entitled by contract to receive
from OVEC, and are obligated to pay for, power not required by DOE. The costs of
such DOE power are not reflected in rates charged by APCo, OPCo, CSP and I&M to
their retail or wholesale customers.(13) I&M is contractually entitled to 455 MW
of AEP Generating Company's interest in Rockport Unit No. 1, which AEP
Generating Company had previously committed to sell to an
----------
(13) In MONONGAHELA POWER COMPANY, 93 FERC Paragraph 62,117 (2000), the
Commission approved a similar assignment of interests in the OVEC
Agreement.
13
unaffiliated purchaser in a transaction that recently ended. Beginning January
1, 2005, I&M is also contractually entitled to receive from AEP Generating
Company 195 MW of capacity from Rockport Unit No. 1 and associated energy and an
additional 195 MW of capacity from Rockport Unit No. 2 and associated energy,
all of which capacity is currently committed to a sale by AEP Generating Company
to KPCo. The costs of I&M's entitlement to capacity and energy from such
interests in Rockport Unit Nos. 1 and 2 are not reflected in I&M's rates to its
retail or wholesale customers. The Transfers by APCo, CSP, OPCo and I&M to PMA
of such rights to OVEC and Rockport Unit No. 1 output will serve to separate
system power supply resources that are appropriately dedicated to the supply of
traditional public utility customers from power supply resources that should be
dedicated to competitive wholesale power markets.
North Carolina Electric Membership Corporation (NCEMC) currently purchases
capacity and energy from the AEP-East system under a Power Supply Agreement
dated August 22, 1994, which terminates in 2010. Such sale is made from the
system resources of APCo, KPCo, OPCo, CSP and I&M after their native load
requirements are met. APCo will assign the NCEMC contract to OPCo, which after
the reorganization of OPCo and CSP to comply with S.B. 3, will control power
supply resources adequate to serve NCEMC.
III. INFORMATION REQUIRED BY SECTIONS 33.2 AND 33.3 OF THE COMMISSION'S
REGULATIONS
Information required by Sections 33.2 and 33.3 of the Commission's
regulations is set out below and in the referenced exhibits. To the extent
necessary, AEPSC requests waiver of the Commission's regulations to permit the
Commission to accept this Application as in sufficient compliance with the
Commission's regulations.
14
A. NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF PRINCIPAL BUSINESS OFFICES
American Electric Power Service Corporation
1 Riverside Plaza
Columbus, Ohio 43215
Appalachian Power Company
P.O. Box 2021
Roanoke, Virginia 24022
Columbus Southern Power Company
1 Riverside Plaza
Columbus, Ohio 43215
Ohio Power Company
301 Cleveland Avenue, SW
Canton, Ohio 44702
Indiana Michigan Power Company
One Summit Square
P.O. Box 60
Fort Wayne, Indiana 46801
Central Power and Light Company
539 North Caranchua
Corpus Christi, Texas 78403
West Texas Utilities Company
301 Cypress
Abilene, Texas 79601
Southwestern Electric Power Company
428 Travis Street
P.O. Box 21106
Shreveport, Louisiana 71101
15
B. NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF PERSONS AUTHORIZED TO RECEIVE NOTICES AND
COMMUNICATIONS WITH RESPECT TO THE APPLICATION
Edward J. Brady, Esq. J. A. Bouknight
Kevin F. Duffy, Esq. Douglas G. Green
American Electric Power Service Steptoe & Johnson
Corporation 1330 Connecticut Avenue, NW
1 Riverside Plaza Washington, DC 20036-1795
Columbus, Ohio 43215 202-429-3000 - voice
614-223-1617 - voice 202-429-3902 - fax
614-223-1687 - fax jbouknight@steptoe.com
ejbrady@aep.com dgreen@steptoe.com
kfduffy@aep.com
Clark Evans Downs
Shelby L. Provencher
Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue
51 Louisiana Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001
202-879-3939 - voice
202-626-1700 - fax
cedowns@jonesday.com
slprovencher@jonesday.com
C. PROPOSED ACCOUNTING ENTRIES
Proposed accounting entries for the Transfers are included with Exhibit H
hereto.
D. FORM OF NOTICE
A form of notice, in both hard copy and on diskette, suitable for
publication in the Federal Register is included with this Application.
E. EXHIBITS
In accordance with Part 33 of the Commission's regulations, Exhibits A
through L are attached to this Application.
16
IV. RELIEF REQUESTED
For the reasons set forth herein, AEPSC respectfully requests waiver of the
Commission's filing requirements as deemed necessary and that the Commission
issue an order authorizing the Transfers no later than December 31, 2001.
Respectfully submitted,
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE CORPORATION
By: /s/ Edward J. Brady
----------------------------------------
Edward J. Brady, Esq.
Kevin F. Duffy, Esq.
American Electric Power Service Corporation
1 Riverside Plaza
Columbus, Ohio 43215
614-223-1617 - voice
614-223-1687 - fax
Clark Evans Downs
Shelby L. Provencher
Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue
51 Louisiana Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001
202-879-3939 - voice
202-626-1700 - fax
J. A. Bouknight
Douglas G. Green
Steptoe & Johnson LLP
1330 Connecticut Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20036-1795
202-429-3000 - voice
202-429-3902 - fax
Submitted: July 24, 2001
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
BEFORE THE
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
American Electric Power Service Corporation ) Docket No. ECO1- -000
VERIFICATION
STATE OF NEW YORK )
)
COUNTY OF NEW YORK )
NOW, BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, personally came and appeared,
J. Craig Baker, who, after first being duly sworn by me, did depose and say:
That he is Senior Vice President - Regulation and Public Policy of American
Electric Power Service Corporation, the Applicant in the above proceeding; that
he has the authority to verify the foregoing Application on behalf of American
Electric Power Service Corporation; that he has read said Application and knows
the contents thereof; and that all of the statements contained in said
Application are true and correct to the best of his knowledge and belief.
/s/ J. Craig Baker
-------------------------
J. Craig Baker
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO before me this 20th day of July, 2001.
/s/ Karen Shelton
----------------------
Notary Public KAREN SHELTON
NOTARY PUBLIC, STATE OF NEW York
My Commission Expires: NO-01SH6018418
County of Residence: QUALIFIED IN NEW YORK COUNTY
COMMISSION EXPIRES JAN. 11, 2003
[SEAL]
NOTICE
UNITED STATES OF AM[ERICA
BEFORE THE
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
American Electric Power Service Corporation ) Docket No. ECO1- -000
NOTICE OF FILING
Take notice that on July 24, 200 1, American Electric Power Service
Corporation (AEPSC), acting on behalf of certain electric utility subsidiaries
of American Electric Power Company, Inc., (AEP) submitted an application for
approval for the transfer of certain jurisdictional facilities among AEP
subsidiaries, pursuant to Section 203 of the Federal Power Act (Act), 16 U.S.C.
ss. 824b (1994), and Part 33 of the Regulations of the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission (Commission), as reviscd pursuant to Order No. 642, FERC Stats. &
Regs. paragraph 31,111 (2000). Such transfers are proposed to be made to comply
with electric utility restructuring laws of Ohio and Texas and to foster the
development of competitive electric markets consistent with such state laws.
AEPSC states that a copy of the filing has been served on the public
service commissions of Ohio, Texas, Arkansas, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana,
Michigan, Tennessee, Virginia, West Virginia and Oklahoma.
Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should file a
motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
888 First Street, N.E., Washington D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rules
211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211
and 385.214). All such motions and protests should be filed on or before .
Protests will be considered by the Commission to detennine the appropriate
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are
available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet
at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims/htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).
David P. Boergers
Secretary
EXHIBIT A
BUSINESS ACTIVITIES OF THE APPLICANTS
A. CSP is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the
state of Ohio, and has its principal office in Columbus, Ohio. CSP is a wholly
owned subsidiary of AEP. CSP is engaged in generating, transmitting and
distributing electric energy to the public in central and southern Ohio and is
a public utility under Section 201 of the Act. CSP owns 2,595 MW of coal-fired
generating capacity, which includes 1,330 MW in generating facilities jointly
owned with two unaffiliated utilities. CSP serves approximately 668,000 retail
customers in Ohio. CSP also sells electricity to wholesale customers.
B. OPCo is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the
state of Ohio, and has its principal office in Canton, Ohio. OPCo is a wholly
owned subsidiary of AEP. OPCo is engaged in generating, transmitting and
distributing electric energy to the public in northwestern, east central,
eastern and southern Ohio and is a public utility under Section 201 of the Act.
OPCo owns 8,464 MW of coal-fired generating capacity and 48 MW of hydroelectric
generating capacity. OPCo serves approximately 696,000 retail customers in
Ohio. OPCo also sells electricity to wholesale customers.
C. APCo is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the
Commonwealth of Virginia, and has its principal office in Roanoke, Virginia.
APCo is a wholly owned subsidiary of AEP. APCo is engaged in generating,
transmitting and distributing electric energy to the public in southwestern
Virginia and southern West Virginia and is a public utility under Section 201
of the Act. APCo owns 5,081 MW of coal-fired generating capacity and 777 MW of
hydroelectric generating capacity. APCo supplies electricity at retail to
approximately 909,000 customers. Approximately 53% of APCo's retail sales are
to customers in Virginia and
approximately 47% of such sales are to customers in West Virginia. APCo also
sells electricity to wholesale customers.
D. CPL is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the
state of Texas, and has its principal office in Corpus Christi, Texas. CPL is a
wholly owned subsidiary of CSW, and an indirect subsidiary of AEP. CPL is
engaged in generating, transmitting and distributing electric energy to the
public in south Texas and is a public utility under Section 201 of the Act. CPL
also owns an undivided 25.2% interest in STP Nuclear Operating Company, which
operates and maintains the South Texas Project nuclear generating station
(STP), of which CPL owns an undivided 25.2% interest, or approximately 630 MW.
In addition to its undivided interest in STP, CPL owns 3,867 MW of coal- and
gas-fired and hydroelectric generating capacity. CPL serves approximately
680,000 retail customers. CPL also sells electricity to wholesale customers.
E. WTU is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the
state of Texas, and has its principal office in Abilene, Texas. WTU is a wholly
owned subsidiary of CSW, and an indirect subsidiary of AEP. WTU is engaged in
generating, transmitting and distributing electric energy to the public in west
and central Texas and is a public utility under Section 201 of the Act. WTU
owns 1,376 MW of coal- and gas-fired generating capacity, and 16 MW of wind and
oil-fired generating capacity. WTU serves approximately 190,000 retail
customers. WTU also sells electricity to wholesale customers.
F. SWEPCO is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the
state of Delaware, and has its principal office in Shreveport, Louisiana.
SWEPCO is a wholly owned subsidiary of CSW, and an indirect subsidiary of AEP.
SWEPCO is engaged in generating, transmitting and distributing electric energy
to the public in northeastern Texas, northwestern
2
Louisiana and western Arkansas and is a public utility under Section 201 of the
Act. SWEPCO owns 3,645 MW of coal- and gas-fired generating capacity and 842 MW
of lignite-fired generating capacity. SWEPCO serves approximately 428,000
retail customers. SWEPCO also sells electricity to wholesale customers.
G. I&M is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the
state of Indiana, and has its principal office in Fort Wayne, Indiana. I&M is a
wholly owned subsidiary of AEP. I&M is engaged in generating, transmitting and
distributing electric energy to the public in northern and eastern Indiana and
a portion of southwestern Michigan and is a public utility under Section 201 of
the Act. I&M owns or leases 2,295 MW of coal-fired generating capacity and
2,110 MW of nuclear generating capacity and 11 MW of hydroelectric generating
capacity. I&M serves approximately 565,000 retail customers. I&M also sells
electricity to wholesale customers.
H. KPCo is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of
Kentucky. KPCo is a wholly owned subsidiary of AEP. KPCo is engaged in
generating, transmitting and distributing electric energy to the public in
eastern Kentucky and is a public utility under Section 201 of the Act. KPCo
owns 1,060 MW of coal-fired generating capacity. KPCo serves approximately
172,000 retail customers. KPCo also sells electricity to wholesale customers.
3
EXHIBIT B
LIST OF ENERGY SUBSIDIARIES AND ENERGY AFFILIATES
AND THEIR BUSINESS ACTIVITIES
There is attached to this Exhibit B a list of energy subsidiaries and
energy affiliates and a general description of their business interests.
EXHIBIT B
Page 1 of 8
LIST OF ENERGY SUBSIDIARIES AND ENERGY AFFILIATES
AND THEIR BUSINESS ACTIVITIES
NAME OF COMPANY PERCENTAGE BUSINESS ACTIVITY
OF
OWNERSHIP
AEP Generating Company 100 Generation
AEP Power Marketing, Inc. 100 Power marketing
AEP Pro Serv, Inc. 100 Consulting, projects and other
non-regulated energy-related
services
AEP Retail Energy LLC 100 Retail and wholesale electricity
American Electric Power
Service Corporation 100 Management, professional and
technical services
Appalachian Power Company 98.7 Domestic electric utility
Cedar Coal Co. 100 Coal Mining (inactive)
Central Appalachian Coal Company 100 Coal Mining (inactive)
Central Coal Company 100 Coal Mining (inactive)
Southern Appalachian Coal Company 100 Coal Mining (inactive)
West Virginia Power Company 100 Inactive
Columbus Southern Power Company 100 Domestic electric utility
Colomet, Inc. 100 Inactive
Conesville Coal Preparation Company 100 Coal preparation
Simco Inc. 100 Inactive
Ohio Valley Electric Corporation 44.2 Generation
EXHIBIT B
PAGE 2 OF 8
Indiana Michigan Power Company 100 Domestic electric utility
Blackhawk Coal Company 100 Coal mining (inactive)
Price River Coal Company 100 Coal mining (inactive)
Kentucky Power Company 100 Domestic electric utility
Kingsport Power Company 100 Domestic electric utility
Ohio Power Company 99.2 Domestic electric utility
Indiana-Kentucky Electric Corporation 44.2 Generation
Central and South West Corporation 100 Subsidiary holding company
Central Power and Light Company 100 Domestic electric utility
Public Service Company of Oklahoma 100 Domestic electric utility
Ash Creek Mining Company 100 Inactive
Southwestern Electric Power Company 100 Domestic electric utility
The Arklahoma Corporation 47.6 Electric Transrnission
Southwest Arkansas Utilities
Corporation 100 Inactive
West Texas Utilities Company 100 Domestic electric utility
CSW Energy, Inc. 100 Independent Power
CSW Development-I, Inc. 100 Independent Power
Polk Power GP II, Inc. 50 Independent Power
Polk Power GP, Inc. 50 Independent Power
Polk Power Partners, LP 50 Independent Power
EXHIBIT B
Page 3 of 8
CSW Mulberry II, Inc. 100 Independent Power
CSW Mulberry, Inc. 100 Independent Power
Noah I Power GP, Inc. 100 Independent Power
Noah I Power Partners, LP 95.5 Independent Power
Brush Cogeneration Partners 50 Independent Power
Orange Cogeneration GP II, Inc. 50 Independent Power
Orange Cogeneration GP Inc. 50 Independent Power
Orange Cogeneration
Limited Partnership 50 Independent Power
CSW Orange II, Inc. 100 Independent Power
CSW Orange, Inc. 100 Independent Power
Orange Cogen Funding Corp. 100 Independent Power
Orange Holdings, Inc. 100 Inactive
CSW Development -II, Inc. 100 Inactive
CSW Ft. Lupton, Inc. 100 Independent Power
Thermo Cogeneration Partnership, LP 50 Independent Power
Newgulf Power Venture, Inc. 100 Independent Power
CSW Sweeny GP I, Inc. 100 Independent Power
CSW Sweeny GP II, Inc. 100 Independent Power
CSW Sweeny LP I, Inc. 100 Independent Power
CSW Sweeny LP II, Inc. 100 Independent Power
EXHIBIT B
PAGE 4 OF 8
Sweeny Cogeneration
Limited Partnership 50 Independent Power
CSW Development-3, Inc. 100 Inactive
CSW Northwest GP, Inc. 100 Inactive
CSW Northwest LP, Inc. 100 Inactive
CSW Power Marketing, Inc. 100 Power Marketing
CSW Nevada, Inc. 100 Inactive
Diversified Energy Contractors
Company, LLC 90 Consulting, projects and other
non-regulated energy-related
services
DECCO II LLC 100 Consulting, projects and other
non-regulated energy-related
services
Diversified Energy Contractors, LP 100 Consulting, projects and other
non-regulated energy-related
services
Industry and Energy Associates, LLC 100 Consulting, projects and other
non-regulated energy-related
services
CSW Frontera GP I, Inc. 100 Independent Power (inactive)
CSW Frontera GP II, Inc. 100 Independent Power (inactive)
CSW Frontera LP I, Inc. 100 Independent Power (inactive)
CSW Frontera LP II, Inc. 100 Independent Power (inactive)
CSW Eastex GP I, Inc. 100 Independent Power
CSW Eastex GP II, Inc. 100 Independent Power
Eastex Cogeneration Limited
Partnership 100 Independent Power
CSW Eastex LP I, Inc. 100 Independent Power
EXHIBIT B
PAGE 5 OF 8
CSW Eastex LP II, Inc. 100 Independent Power
Southwestern Electric
Wholesale Company 100 Inactive
Enershop, Inc. 100 Consulting, projects and other
non-regulated energy-related
services
Envirotherm, Inc. 100 Consulting, projects and other
non-regulated energy-related
services
CSW Energy Services, Inc. 100 Consulting, projects and other
non-regulated energy-related
services
Nuvest, L.L.C. 92.9 Consulting, projects and other
non-regulated energy-related
services
National Temporary Services, Inc. 92.9 Consulting, projects and other
non-regulated energy-related
services
Octagon Inc. 92.9 Consulting, projects and other
non-regulated energy-related
services
Numanco, L.L.C. 92.9 Consulting, projects and other
non-regulated energy-related
services
Power Systems Energy Services, Inc. 92.9 Consulting, projects and other
non-regulated energy-related
services
NuSun, Inc. 92.9 Consulting, projects and other
non-regulated energy-related
services
Sun Technical Services, Inc. 92.9 Consulting, projects and other
non-regulated energy-related
services
Calibration Testing Corporation 92.9 Consulting, projects and other
non-regulated energy-related
services
ESG Technical Services, L.L.C. 92.9 Consulting, projects and other
non-regulated energy-related
services
EXHIBIT B
PAGE 6 OF 8
ESG Manufacturing, L.L.C. 92.9 Consulting, projects and other
non-regulated energy-related
services
National Environmental Services
Technology L.L.C. 92.9 Consulting, projects and other
non-regulated energy-related
services
ESG Indonesia, L.L.C. 92.9 Consulting, projects and other
non-regulated energy-related
services
Advance Shielding
Technologies, L.L.C. 92.9 Consulting, projects and other
non-regulated energy-related
services
ESG, L.L.C. 50 Consulting, projects and other
non-regulated energy-related
services
Wheeling Power Company 100 Domestic electric utility
AEP C&I Company LLC 100 Retail wholesale electricity
AEP Energy Management, LLC 100 Worldwide energy related
investments, energy trading and
other projects
AEP Gas Power GP, LLC 100 Consulting, projects and other
non-regulated energy-related
services
AEP Gas Power Systems, LLC 75 Consulting, projects and other
non-regulated energy-related
services
AEP Ohio Commercial & Industrial
Retail Company, LLC 100 Retail wholesale electricity
AEP Ohio Retail Energy, LLC 100 Retail wholesale electricity
AEP T&D Services, LLC 100 Consulting, projects and other
non-regulated energy-related
services
AEP Texas Commercial & Industrial
Retail GP, LLC 100 Retail wholesale electricity
AEP Texas Commercial & Industrial
Retail Limited Partnership 100 Retail wholesale electricity
EXHIBIT B
PAGE 7 OF 8
AEP Texas Retail GP, LLC 100 Retail wholesale electricity
AEP Wind GP, LLC 100 Independent Power
AEP Wind LP, LLC 100 Independent Power
Dolet Hills Lignite Company, LLC 100 Coal mine operation
Lectrix LLC 33.33 Worldwide energy related
investments, energy trading and
other projects
Mutual Energy LLC 100 Retail wholesale electricity
Mutual Energy Service Company, LLC 100 Retail wholesale electricity
Mutual Energy CPL L.P. 100 Retail wholesale electricity
Mutual Energy SWEPCO L.P. 100 Retail wholesale electricity
Mutual Energy WTU L.P. 100 Retail wholesale electricity
REP General Partner L.L.C. 100 Retail wholesale electricity
REP Holdco Inc. 100 Retail wholesale electricity
RC Training, LLC 48 Inactive
RIKA Management Company, LLC 50 Substation Automation Systems
Trent Wind Farm, L.P. 100 Independent Power
Universal Power Products Company, LLC 48 Substation automation systems
Cardinal Operating Company 50 Generation
Automated Substation Development
Company LLC 71 Substation automation systems
Powerspan Corp. 9.8 Pollution Control Technology
Development
EXHIBIT B
PAGE 8 OF 8
Houston Pipe Line Company 100 Gas
LIG Pipeline Company 100 Gas
EXHIBIT C
ORGANIZATIONAL CHARTS
There are attached to this Exhibit C Pre-Transfer and Post-Transfer
organizational charts.
Target Organizational Structure
EXHIBIT C
PAGE 1 OF 2
-----------------
AEP
-----------------
|
+-------------------+-----------------------+------------------------+---------------------+
| | | | |
----------------- ----------------- ----------------- ----------------- -----------------
Regulated
Texas AEP AEP Holdco AEP Resources/
REP Holdco Enterprises Service Corp (CSW) CSW International
----------------- ----------------- ----------------- ----------------- -----------------
| |
+-------------------+-------------------+ +-----------------------------------+
| | | | |
------------- ----------------- ------------- | ------------- ------------- |
+-- OPCo EDC APCo --+
Retail Wholesale Comm | ------------- ------------- |
Holdco | |
------------- ----------------- ------------- | ------------- ------------- |
| +-- CSP EDC I&M --+
+-----------------+--------------+---------------+ | ------------- ------------- |
| | | | | |
------------- ------------ ----------- ------------- | ------------- ------------- |
Marketing +-- CPL EDC KPCo --+
& Trading Domestic Gasco Pro Serv | ------------- ------------- |
PMA Genco | |
------------- ------------ ----------- ------------- | ------------- ------------- |
| +-- WTU EDC PSO --+
------------- | ------------- | ------------- ------------- |
WTU PGC --+-- OPCo PGC | |
------------- | ------------- | ------------- ------------- |
| +-- KGSPT SWEPCO --+
------------- | ------------- | ------------- ------------- |
CPL PGC --+-- CSP PGC | |
------------- ------------- | ------------- ------------- |
+-- WPCo AEG --+
| ------------- -------------
|
| -------------
+-- SWEPCO
Texas EDC
-------------
Current Organizational Structure
EXHIBIT C
PAGE 2 OF 2
----------
AEP
----------
|
+------------------------+-----------------------+
| | |
------------ | ----------- ---------------- -------------
|
APCo --+-- CSP AEP Service Corp CSW Parent
------------ | ----------- ---------------- -------------
| |
------------ | ----------- |
| ------------- | -------------
I&M --+-- KPCo |
------------ | ----------- CPL --+-- PSO
| ------------- | -------------
------------ | ----------- |
| ------------- | -------------
KGSPT --+-- OPCo |
------------ | ----------- SWEPCO --+-- WTU
| ------------- | -------------
------------ | ----------- |
| ------------- | -------------
WPCo --+-- AEG CSW | CSW
------------ | ----------- International--+-- Energy
| ------------- | -------------
------------ | ----------- |
AEP Energy | ------------- | -------------
Services --+-- Comm |
------------ | ----------- C3 Comm --+-- Credit
| ------------- | -------------
------------ | ----------- |
AEP | -------------
Resources --+-- Pro Serv Texas
------------ | ----------- REP Holdco
| -------------
| -----------
|
+-- Retail
-----------
EXHIBIT D
OTHER BUSINESS ARRANGEMENTS
The Transfers will not affect the business interests of the Applicants or
their affiliates because they will effectuate an internal reorganization that
will have no effect on external transactions except with respect to the
provision of service under agreements that will be assigned as part of the
Transfers. No new joint ventures, strategic alliances, tolling arrangements or
other business arrangement with non-affiliated persons will be effected or
affected in connection with the Transfers.
See Exhibit J for a description of the Applicants' participation in
regional transmission organizations.
EXHIBIT E
COMMON OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS
Because the corporate reorganization for which approval is sought is
internal and does not involve previously unaffiliated entities, Applicants
request waiver of the requirement to file Exhibit E. Good cause exists for such
waiver because the information to be reported on Exhibit E is not germane to
the Commission's analysis of the Transfers. Applicants and their affiliates
that will take title to jurisdictional facilities as the result of the
Transfers are members of a registered public utility holding company system
and, therefore, their officers and directors have automatic authorization to
hold interlocking positions within the registered holding company system
pursuant to 18 C.F.R.ss.45.9 (2000).
EXHIBIT F
DESCRIPTION OF CUSTOMERS
There is attached to this Exhibit F a list of the wholesale customers that
are served by the AEP operating companies.
AEP WHOLESALE CUSTOMER LIST
FERC 203 APPLICATION
EXHIBIT F
Page 1 of 3
CURRENTLY TO BE
CUSTOMER LOCATION SERVED BY ASSIGNED TO TYPE
-------------------------------------------- -------- ---------- ------------- ----
Arcadia Ohio AEPSC(c) PM AFFILIATE 1
Bloomdale Ohio AEPSC(c) PM AFFILIATE 1
Bryan Ohio AEPSC(c) PM AFFILIATE 1
Carey Ohio AEPSC(c) PM AFFILIATE 1
Clyde Ohio AEPSC(c) PM AFFILIATE 1
Cygnet Ohio AEPSC(c) PM AFFILIATE 1
Deshler Ohio AEPSC(c) PM AFFILIATE 1
Greenwich Ohio AEPSC(c) PM AFFILIATE 1
Ohio City Ohio AEPSC(c) PM AFFILIATE 1
Plymouth Ohio AEPSC(c) PM AFFILIATE 1
Republic Ohio AEPSC(c) PM AFFILIATE 1
St. Clairsville Ohio AEPSC(c) PM AFFILIATE 1
Shiloh Ohio AEPSC(c) PM AFFILIATE 1
Sycamore Ohio AEPSC(c) PM AFFILIATE 1
Wapakoneta Ohio AEPSC(c) PM AFFILIATE 1
Wharton Ohio AEPSC(c) PM AFFILIATE 1
City of Sturgis Michigan AEPSC(c) PM AFFILIATE 1
Radford Virginia AEPSC(c) PM AFFILIATE 1
North Carolina Electric Membership Co-op North Carolina APCO OPCO PGC 2
City of Weatherford (effective 1/1/02) Texas WTU WTU PGC 2
Brazos Electric Cooperative Texas WTU WTU PGC 2
City of Hearne Texas WTU WTU PGC 2
Coleman County Electric Cooperative(a) Texas WTU WTU PGC 2
Taylor Electric Cooperative(a) Texas WTU WTU PGC 2
Concho Valley Electric Cooperative(a) Texas WTU WTU PGC 2
Golden Spread Valley Electric Cooperative(a) Texas WTU WTU PGC 2
Pedernales Electric Cooperative (Formerly Kimble)(a) Texas WTU WTU PGC 2
Lighthouse Electric Cooperative(a) Texas WTU WTU PGC 2
Midwest Electric Cooperative(a) Texas WTU WTU PGC 2
Rio Grande Electric Cooperative-WPC(a) Texas WTU WTU PGC 2
Southwest Texas Electric Cooperative(a) Texas WTU WTU PGC 2
Stamford Electric Cooperative(a) Texas WTU WTU PGC 2
City of Robstown Texas CPL CPL PGC 3
South Texas Electric Cooperative Texas CPL CPL PGC 3
Pedernales Electric Cooperative (Formerly Kimble) Texas CPL CPL PGC 3
Wheeling Electric Power Company West Virginia OPCO APCO 3
Texas-New Mexico Power Company Texas WTU WTU PGC 3
City of Coleman Texas WTU WTU PGC 3
Rio Grande Electric Cooperative-TR1 Texas WTU WTU PGC 3
Tex-La Electric Cooperative Texas WTU WTU PGC 3
Western Farmers Electric Cooperative Texas WTU WTU PGC 3
City of Brady Texas WTU WTU PGC 3
Buckeye Power Ohio CSP CSP EDC 5
Buckeye Power Ohio OPCO OPCO EDC 5
Ohio Edison Ohio OPCO OPCO EDC 5
ACTUAL OR EARLIEST
POSSIBLE NOTICE DATE NOTICE
TERMINATION DATE REQUIREMENTS CAN BE PROVIDED FERC RATE SCHEDULE
------------------ ----------------- ----------------- ----------------------------------------------
12/31/2005 Set Term N/A AEP FERC ELECT. TARIFF, VOL. NO. 5, SA NO. 153
12/31/2005 Set Term N/A AEP FERC ELECT. TARIFF, VOL. NO. 5, SA NO. 154
12/31/2005 Set Term N/A AEP FERC ELECT. TARIFF, VOL. NO. 5, SA NO. 155
12/31/2005 Set Term N/A AEP FERC ELECT. TARIFF, VOL. NO. 5, SA NO. 156
12/31/2005 Set Term N/A AEP FERC ELECT. TARIFF, VOL. NO. 5, SA NO. 157
12/31/2005 Set Term N/A AEP FERC ELECT. TARIFF, VOL. NO. 5, SA NO. 158
12/31/2005 Set Term N/A AEP FERC ELECT. TARIFF, VOL. NO. 5, SA NO. 159
12/31/2005 Set Term N/A AEP FERC ELECT. TARIFF, VOL. NO. 5, SA NO. 160
12/31/2005 Set Term N/A AEP FERC ELECT. TARIFF, VOL. NO. 5, SA NO. 161
12/31/2005 Set Term N/A AEP FERC ELECT. TARIFF, VOL. NO. 5, SA NO. 162
12/31/2005 Set Term N/A AEP FERC ELECT. TARIFF, VOL. NO. 5, SA NO. 163
12/31/2005 Set Term N/A AEP FERC ELECT. TARIFF, VOL. NO. 5, SA NO. 164
12/31/2005 Set Term N/A AEP FERC ELECT. TARIFF, VOL. NO. 5, SA NO. 165
12/31/2005 Set Term N/A AEP FERC ELECT. TARIFF, VOL. NO. 5, SA NO. 166
12/31/2005 Set Term N/A AEP FERC ELECT. TARIFF, VOL. NO. 5, SA NO. 167
12/31/2005 Set Term N/A AEP FERC ELECT. TARIFF, VOL. NO. 5, SA NO. 168
7/31/2004 Set Term N/A AEP FERC ELECT. TARIFF, VOL. NO. 5, SA NO. 233
6/30/2005 1 Year Notice 6/30/2004 AEP FERC ELECT. TARIFF, VOL. NO. 5, RS NO. 103
12/31/2010 Set Term N/A APCO FERC RS NO. 135
12/31/02 Evergreen 1 Year Notice 12/31/2001 CSW FERC ELECT. TARIFF, FIRST REV.
12/31/02 - per notice Notice Given to VOL. NO. 8, SA NO. 25
Terminate Effective 12/31/02
3/31/03 Evergreen 1 Year Notice Notice Given CSW FERC ELECT. TARIFF, FIRST REV.
VOL. NO. 8, SA NO. 26
12/31/07 Evergreen 3 Years Notice 3/31/2002 WTU RS NO. 76
12/31/07 Evergreen 3 Years Notice 12/31/2004 WTU TARIFF NO. 9, FIRST REVISED SA NO. 1
12/31/07 Evergreen 3 Years Notice 12/31/2004 WTU TARIFF NO. 9, FIRST REVISED SA NO. 10
12/31/07 Evergreen 3 Years Notice 12/31/2004 WTU TARIFF NO. 9, FIRST REVISED SA NO. 2
12/31/07 Evergreen 3 Years Notice 12/31/2004 WTU TARIFF NO. 9, FIRST REVISED SA NO. 3
12/31/07 Evergreen 3 Years Notice 12/31/2004 WTU TARIFF NO. 9, FIRST REVISED SA NO. 4
12/31/07 Evergreen 3 Years Notice 12/31/2004 WTU TARIFF NO. 9, FIRST REVISED SA NO. 5
12/31/07 Evergreen 3 Years Notice 12/31/2004 WTU TARIFF NO. 9, FIRST REVISED SA NO. 6
12/31/07 Evergreen 3 Years Notice 12/31/2004 WTU TARIFF NO. 9, SA NO. 7
12/31/07 Evergreen 3 Years Notice 12/31/2004 WTU TARIFF NO. 9, SA NO. 8
4/15/03 - per notice Notice Given to 12/31/2004 WTU TARIFF NO. 9, SA NO. 9
Terminate Effective 4/15/03 Notice Given CPL RATE SCHEDULE NO. 70
Evergreen 5 Years Notice Anytime CPL TARIFF NO. 1, SA NO. 10
1/31/2002 - per notice Notice Given to
Terminate Effective 1/31/02 Notice Given CPL TARIFF NO. 1, SA NO. 8
12/31/04 Evergreen 3 Years Notice 12/31/2001 OPCO FERC RS NO. 18
12/31/04 Evergreen 5 Year Rollover
Provision w/3 Year Notification 12/31/2001 WTU RS NO. 39
7/11/02 Evergreen 1 Year Notice
Before End of 5 Yr Extension 10/10/2001 WTU RS NO. 40
5/31/07 Evergreen 5 Years Notice 5/31/2002 WTU TARIFF NO. 1, FIRST REVISED SA NO. 19
12/31/09 Evergreen 5 Years Notice 12/31/2004 WTU TARIFF NO. 1, FIRST REVISED SA NO. 18
Evergreen 5 Years Notice Anytime WTU TARIFF NO. 1, SA NO. 13
12/16/2002 Notice Given to
Terminate Effective Notice Given WTU TARIFF NO. 1, SA NO. 17
12/16/02
6/30/2003 Set Term N/A CSP FERC RS NO. 17
6/30/2003 Set Term N/A OPCO FERC RS NO. 70
8/1/2005 Set Term N/A OPCO FERC RS NO. 71
Types of Contracts:
(1) Fixed Base Rates, No Fuel Clause
(2) Fixed Base Rates, With Fuel Clause
(3) Base Rates Subject to Change, With Fuel Clause
(4) Formula Rate
(5) Transmission Service
AEP WHOLESALE CUSTOMER LIST
FERC 203 APPLICATION
EXHIBIT F
Page 2 of 3
CURRENTLY TO BE
CUSTOMER LOCATION SERVED BY ASSIGNED TO TYPE
-------------------------------------------- -------- ---------- ------------- ----
West Va Power Company-subsidiary of Utiliticorp West Virginia AEPSC(c) N/A 1
Cleveland Public Power Ohio OPCO N/A 1
Hoosier Energy Indiana I&M N/A 1
AMP-Ohio Ohio OPCO N/A 1
Kingsport Power Company Tennessee APCO No Assignment 3
Central Virginia Electric Cooperative Virginia APCO No Assignment 3
Craig-Botetourt Electric Cooperative Virginia APCO No Assignment 3
Elk West Virginia APCO No Assignment 3
Elkhorn West Virginia APCO No Assignment 3
Kimball West Virginia APCO No Assignment 3
United West Virginia APCO No Assignment 3
War West Virginia APCO No Assignment 3
Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University Virginia APCO No Assignment 3
Old Dominion Electric Cooperative-Whitehouse Virginia APCO No Assignment 3
Old Dominion Electric Cooperative-Lynch Virginia APCO No Assignment 3
Old Dominion Electric Cooperative-Evington Virginia APCO No Assignment 3
Union West Virginia APCO No Assignment 3
Black Diamond West Virginia APCO No Assignment 3
Magic Valley Electric Cooperative Texas CPL N/A 3
Medina Electric Cooperative Texas CPL N/A 3
Jackson Ohio CSP No Assignment 3
Westerville Ohio CSP No Assignment 3
Glouster Ohio CSP No Assignment 3
Mishawaka Indiana I&M No Assignment 3
Bluffton Indiana I&M No Assignment 3
Columbia City Indiana I&M No Assignment 3
Auburn Indiana I&M No Assignment 3
Avila Indiana I&M No Assignment 3
Garrett Indiana I&M No Assignment 3
Gas City Indiana I&M No Assignment 3
New Carlisle Indiana I&M No Assignment 3
Niles Michigan I&M No Assignment 3
Warren Indiana I&M No Assignment 3
South Haven Michigan I&M No Assignment 3
Paw Paw Michigan I&M No Assignment 3
United REMC-Wabash Indiana I&M No Assignment 3
Richmond Power & Light Indiana I&M No Assignment 3
Anderson Indiana I&M No Assignment 3
Frankton Indiana I&M No Assignment 3
Carolina Power & Light-Rockport Indiana I&M No Assignment 3
Olive Hill Kentucky KPCO No Assignment 3
Vanceburg Kentucky KPCO No Assignment 3
Western Farmers Electric Cooperative Oklahoma PSO No Assignment 3
City of South Coffeyville Oklahoma PSO No Assignment 3
City of Collinsville Oklahoma PSO No Assignment 3
Northeastern Oklahoma Electric Cooperative Oklahoma PSO No Assignment 3
City of Minden Louisiana SWEPCO No Assignment 3
City of Weatherford (through 12/31/01) Texas WTU N/A 3
ACTUAL OR EARLIEST
POSSIBLE NOTICE DATE NOTICE
TERMINATION DATE REQUIREMENTS CAN BE PROVIDED FERC RATE SCHEDULE
------------------ ----------------- ----------------- ----------------------------------------------
12/31/2001 Set Term N/A AEP FERC ELECTRIC TARIFF VOL. NO. 5, SA NO. 144
8/31/2001 Set Term N/A AEPC FERC ELECTRIC TARIFF ORIGINAL VOL. NO. 2
SA NO. 101
12/31/2001 Set Term N/A I&M FERC ELECTRIC TARIFF NO. 6, SA NO. 2
12/31/2001 Set Term N/A OPCO FERC RS NO. 74
12/31/04 Evergreen 3 Years Notice 12/31/2001 APCO FERC RS NO. 0023
Notice given to Terminate
5/21/2002 Effective 5/21/02 Notice Given APCO FERC RS NO. 0099
2/27/03 Evergreen 1 Year Notice 2/27/2002 APCO FERC RS NO. 0102
12/1/2004 Evergreen 3 Years Notice 12/1/2001 APCO FERC RS NO. 0106/0114 (2 DELIVERY PTS)
12/1/2004 Evergreen 3 Years Notice 12/1/2001 APCO FERC RS NO. 0107/0108 (2 DELIVERY PTS)
12/1/2004 Evergreen 3 Years Notice 12/1/2001 APCO FERC RS NO. 0109
12/1/2004 Evergreen 3 Years Notice 12/1/2001 APCO FERC RS NO. 0110
12/1/2004 Evergreen 3 Years Notice 12/1/2001 APCO FERC RS NO. 0113
7/1/2007 Evergreen 3 Years Notice 7/1/2004 APCO FERC RS NO. 0119
Notice given to Terminate
11/17/2003 Effective 11/17/03 Notice Given APCO FERC RS NO. 0126
8/1/01 Evergreen 3 Years Notice 8/1/2001 APCO FERC RS NO. 0127
Notice given to Terminate
11/16/2003 Effective 11/16/03 Notice Given APCO FERC RS NO. 0136
12/1/2004 Evergreen 3 Years Notice 12/1/2001 APCO FERC RS NOS. 0111/0112 (2 DELIVERY PTS)
12/1/2004 Evergreen 3 Years Notice 12/1/2001 APCO FERC TARIFF WS-9, RS NOS. 0103/0104/0105
(3 DELIVERY PTS)
Notice Given to Terminate
7/23/2001-per notice Effective 7/23/2001 Notice Given CPL TARIFF NO. 1, FIRST REVISED SA NO. 7
Notice Given to Terminate
10/1/2001-per notice Effective 10/01/01 Notice Given CPL TARIFF NO.1, SA NO. 9
Evergreen 90 Day Notice Anytime CSP FERC ELECTRIC TARIFF VOL. NO. 5, SA 02
12/31/04 Evergreen 3 Years Notice 12/31/2001 CSP FERC ELECTRIC TARIFF VOL. NO. 5, SA 03
Evergreen 90 Day Notice Anytime CSP FERC ELECTRIC TARIFF VOL. NO. 5, SA 04
12/31/03 Evergreen 18 Months Notice 6/30/2002 I&M FERC ELECTRIC TAFIFF ORIGINAL VOL. NO. 5,
SA NO. 002
Prior to 6/30/02 for 12/31/03
12/31/03 Evergreen Termination 6/30/2002 I&M FERC ELECTRIC TARIFF ORIGINAL VOL. NO. 7,
SA NO.003
12/31/02 Evergreen 1 Year Notice 12/31/2001 I&M FERC ELECTRIC TARIFF ORIGINAL VOL. NO. 7,
SA NO. 004
11/23/09 Evergreen 3 Years Notice 11/23/2006 I&M FERC ELECTRIC TARIFF ORIGINAL VOL. NO. 7,
SA NO. 013
12/31/03 Evergreen 18 Months Notice 6/30/2002 I&M FERC ELECTRIC TARIFF ORIGINAL VOL. NO. 7,
SA NO. 014
12/31/03 Evergreen 18 Months Notice 6/30/2002 I&M FERC ELECTRIC TARIFF ORIGINAL VOL. NO. 7,
SA NO. 016
12/31/03 Evergreen 18 Months Notice 6/30/2002 I&M FERC ELECTRIC TARIFF ORIGINAL VOL. NO. 7,
SA NO. 017
12/31/03 Evergreen 18 Months Notice 6/30/2002 I&M FERC ELECTRIC TARIFF ORIGINAL VOL. NO. 7,
SA NO. 018
12/31/03 Evergreen 18 Months Notice 6/30/2002 I&M FERC ELECTRIC TARIFF ORIGINAL VOL. NO. 7,
SA NO. 019
12/31/03 Evergreen 18 Months Notice 6/30/2002 I&M FERC ELECTRIC TARIFF ORIGINAL VOL. NO. 7,
SA NO. 020
12/31/03 Evergreen 18 Months Notice 6/30/2002 I&M FERC ELECTRIC TARIFF ORIGINAL VOL. NO. 7,
SA NO. 021
12/31/03 Evergreen 18 Months Notice 6/30/2002 I&M FERC ELECTRIC TARIFF ORIGINAL VOL. NO. 9,
SA NO. 003
1 Year Notice prior to 3 year
8/8/2010 Evergreen extension 8/8/2009 I&M FERC ELECTRIC TARIFF REVISED VOL. NO. 8,
SA NO. 016
12/31/02 Evergreen 1 Years Notice 12/31/2001 I&M FERC RS NO. 70
12/31/02 Evergreen 1 Years Notice 12/31/2001 I&M FERC RS NO. 74
12/31/02 Evergreen 1 Years Notice 12/31/2001 I&M FERC RS NO. 74
12/31/2009 Set Term N/A I&M FERC RS NO. 77, APCO FERC RS NO. 24
12/31/05 Evergreen 4 Years Notice 12/31/2001 KPCO FERC ELECTRIC TARIFF ORIGINAL VOL. NO. 1
SA NO. 1
12/31/05 Evergreen 4 Years Notice 12/31/2001 KPCO FERC ELECTRIC TARIFF ORIGINAL VOL. NO. 2
SA NO. 2
5/31/2002 6 Months Notice 11/30/2001 PSO RS NO. 197
1/20/2003 1 Year Notice 1/20/2002 PSO RS NO. 234
9/30/2005 1 Year Notice 9/30/2001 PSO RS NO. 237
5/25/2005 Set Term N/A PSO RS NO. 240
4/30/05 Evergreen 3 Years Notice 4/30/2002 SWEPCO RS NO. 116
12/31/2001 Set Term N/A WTU RS NO. 73
Types of Contracts:
(1) Fixed Base Rates, No Fuel Clause
(2) Fixed Base Rates, With Fuel Clause
(3) Base Rates Subject to Change, With Fuel Clause
(4) Formula Rate
(5) Transmission Service
AEP WHOLESALE CUSTOMER LIST
FERC 203 APPLICATION
EXHIBIT F
Page 3 of 3
CURRENTLY TO BE
CUSTOMER LOCATION SERVED BY ASSIGNED TO TYPE
-------------------------------------------- -------- ---------- ------------- ----
Bentonville Arkansas SWEPCO No Assignment 4
East Texas Electric Cooperative Texas SWEPCO No Assignment 4
Rayburn County Electric Cooperative(b) Texas SWEPCO No Assignment 4
Northeast Texas Electric Cooperative Texas SWEPCO No Assignment 4
Tex-La Electric Cooperative Texas SWEPCO No Assignment 4
Tex-La Electric Cooperative (ERCOT) Texas SWEPCO No Assignment 4
Hope Arkansas SWEPCO No Assignment 4
Buckeye Power Ohio OPCO No Assignment 4(d)
Bedford Virginia AEPSC(c) No Assignment 5
Danville Virginia AEPSC(c) No Assignment 5
Martinsville Virginia AEPSC(c) No Assignment 5
Richlands Virginia AEPSC(c) No Assignment 5
Salem Virginia AEPSC(c) No Assignment 5
Oklahoma Municipal Power Authority Oklahoma PSO No Assignment 5
KAMO Electric Cooperative Oklahoma PSO No Assignment 5
Western Farmers Electric Cooperative Oklahoma PSO No Assignment 5
City of Lafayette Louisiana SWEPCO No Assignment 5
Arkansas Electric Cooperative Arkansas SWEPCO No Assignment 5
ACTUAL OR EARLIEST
POSSIBLE NOTICE DATE NOTICE
TERMINATION DATE REQUIREMENTS CAN BE PROVIDED FERC RATE SCHEDULE
------------------ ----------------- ----------------- ----------------------------------------------
12/31/10 Evergreen 5 Years Notice 12/31/2005 SWEPCO FIRST REVISED RS NO. 109
12/31/17 Evergreen 5 Years Notice 12/31/2012 SWEPCO FIRST REVISED RS NO. 113
12/31/10 Evergreen 7 Years Notice 12/31/2003 SWEPCO RS NO. 111
12/31/2013 1 Year Notice 12/31/2012 SWEPCO RS NO. 119
12/31/17 Evergreen 5 Years Notice 12/31/2012 SWEPCO RS NO. 120
12/31/17 Evergreen 5 Years Notice 12/31/2012 SWEPCO RS NO. 120
12/31/07 Evergreen 3 Years Notice 12/31/2004 SWEPCO RS NO. 86
9/30/2012 Set Term N/A OPCO FERC RS NOS. 3, 69, 17
6/30/05 Evergreen 1 Year Notice 6/30/2004 AEP FERC ELECT. TARIFF, SECOND REV., VOL. NO. 6
SA NO. 181
6/30/05 Evergreen 1 Year Notice 6/30/2004 AEP FERC ELECT. TARIFF, SECOND REV., VOL. NO. 6
SA NO. 181
6/30/05 Evergreen 1 Year Notice 6/30/2004 AEP FERC ELECT. TARIFF, SECOND REV., VOL. NO. 6
SA NO. 181
6/30/05 Evergreen 1 Year Notice 6/30/2004 AEP FERC ELECT. TARIFF, SECOND REV., VOL. NO. 6
SA NO. 181
6/30/05 Evergreen 1 Year Notice 6/30/2004 AEP FERC ELECT. TARIFF, SECOND REV., VOL. NO. 6
SA NO. 181
Notice Given to Terminate
12/31/2003-per notice Effective 12/31/03 Notice Given PSO RS NO. 230
12/31/06 Evergreen 5 Years Notice 12/31/2001 PSO RS NO. 233
5/31/2004 2 Years Notice 5/31/2002 PSO RS NO. 238
Evergreen 45 Days Notice Anytime SWEPCO RS NO. 115
Notice Given to Terminate
12/31/2007-per notice Effective 12/31/07 Notice Given SWEPCO RS NO. 72
(a) customer, but not WTU, has right to terminate Dec. 31, 2004 upon 3 years
notice
(b) customer, but not SWEPCO, has right to terminate Dec. 31, 2008 upon 5 years
notice
(c) AEPSC acts as agent on behalf of its operating
companies
(d) Part owners of Cardinal Plant-Pricing Based on
Cost
Types of Contracts:
(1) Fixed Base Rates, No Fuel Clause
(2) Fixed Base Rates, With Fuel Clause
(3) Base Rates Subject to Change, With Fuel Clause
(4) Formula Rate
(5) Transmission Service
EXHIBIT G
DESCRIPTION OF JURISDICTIONAL FACILITIES OF
APPLICANTS, THEIR SUBSIDIARIES AND AFFILIATES
The jurisdictional facilities of Applicants and their affiliates that will
be affected by the Transfers consist of interstate transmission facilities,
rate schedules for the sale of electric energy for resale in interstate
commerce and for the transmission of energy in interstate commerce, accounts,
books and records related to such sales, and step-up transformers, generating
leads and other interconnection facilities necessary for interconnection to
interstate transmission networks of generating facilities that are the subject
of the Transfers.
There are attached to this Exhibit G schedules that list the rate
schedules to be transferred, schedules that describe the interconnection
facilities associated with the generating stations that are the subject of the
Transfers to be made by CPL and WTU and schedules that describe the interstate
transmission facilities that are owned or controlled by SWEPCO, CSP, and OPCo
and are the subject of the Transfers. Because the Transfers will not affect
other jurisdictional facilities owned or controlled by the AEP operating
companies, Applicants request waiver of the requirements of Exhibit G to
describe such other jurisdictional facilities.
EXHIBIT G - SCHEDULES
Schedule G-1 Columbus Southern Power Company,
Transfer of Jurisdictional Assets to CSP EDC
Transmission Lines 132 kV and Above
Schedule G-2 Columbus Southern Power Company,
Transfer of Jurisdictional Assets to CSP EDC
Transmission Lines Less Than 132 kV
Schedule G-3 Columbus Southern Power Company,
Transfer of Jurisdictional Assets to CSP EDC
Transmission Substations
Schedule G-4 Ohio Power Company,
Transfer of Jurisdictional Assets to OPCo EDC
Transmission Lines 132 kV and Above
Schedule G-5 Ohio Power Company,
Transfer of Jurisdictional Assets to OPCo EDC
Transmission Lines Less Than 132 kV
Schedule G-6 Ohio Power Company,
Transfer of Jurisdictional Assets to OPCo EDC
Transmission Substations
Schedule G-7 Central Power and Light Company,
Transfer of Jurisdictional Assets to CPL PGC
Generation Related Equipment
Schedule G-8 West Texas Utilities Company,
Transfer of Jurisdictional Assets to WTU PGC
Generation Related Equipment
Schedule G-9 Southwestern Electric Power Company,
Transfer of Jurisdictional Assets to SWEPCO EDC
Transmission Substations
Schedule G-10 Southwestern Electric Power Company,
Transfer of Jurisdictional Assets to SWEPCO
Texas EDC Transmission Lines
Schedule G-11 American Electric Power Service Corporation,
Power Sales/Service Agreements to be Assigned
to Power Marketing Affiliate
Schedule G-12 Appalachian Power Company,
Power Sales/Service Agreements
to be Assigned to OPCo PGC
Schedule G-13 Central Power and Light,
Power Sales/Service Agreements
to be Assigned to CPL PGC
Schedule G-14 Ohio Power Company,
Power Sales/Service Agreements
to be Assigned to APCo
Schedule G-15 West Texas Utilities Company,
Power Sales/Service Agreements
to be Assigned to WTU PGC
Schedule G-16 Columbus Southern Power Company,
Interconnection and Transmission Agreements
to be Assigned to CSP EDC
Schedule G-17 Ohio Power Company,
Interconnection and Transmission Agreements
to be Assigned to OPCo EDC
Schedule G-18 Southwestern Electric Power Company,
Interconnection Agreements
to be Assigned to SWEPCO EDC
Schedule G-19 Indiana and Michigan Power Company,
Transfer of Interests in Rockport Steam Electric
Generating Plant Units Nos. 1 and 2
to Power Marketing Affiliate
Schedule G-1
Page 1 of 5
COLUMBUS SOUTHERN POWER COMPANY
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS TO CSP EDC
TRANSMISSION LINES 132 KV AND ABOVE
-----------------------------------
================================================================================
DESIGNATION VOLTAGE
-------------------------------------------------------------------- LENGTH
FROM TO OPERATING DESIGNED POLE MILES
================================================================================
LINES 132 KV AND ABOVE
FULLY OWNED TRANS. LINES:
BEATTY HAYDEN 345 345 0
BEATTY HAYDEN 345 345 17
BIXBY-CORRIDOR KIRK (TAP) 345 345 1
CONESVILLE CORRIDOR 345 345 54
HAYDEN HYATT 345 345 0
HAYDEN HYATT 345 345 0
HAYDEN HYATT 345 345 12
HAYDEN ROBERTS 345 345 6
HYATT POINT Z 345 345 0
HYATT POINT Z 345 345 0
HYATT POINT Z 345 345 0
POINT Z CORRIDOR 345 345 13
COMMONLY OWNED LINES: (A)
BECKJORD PIERCE 345 345 0
PIERCE FOSTER 345 345 24
SUGARCREEK GREENE 345 345 8
SUGARCREEK GREENE 345 345 0
GREENE BEATTY 345 345 49
MARQUIS POINT X 345 345 46
STUART GREENE 345 345 79
STUART GREENE 345 345 1
STUART GREENE 345 345 1
STUART POINT M-KILLEN 345 345 13
STUART FOSTER 345 345 55
STUART FOSTER 345 345 1
FOSTER SUGARCREEK 345 345 27
STUART ZIMMER 345 345 35
ZIMMER PORT UNION 345 345 10
POINT O-KILLEN MARQUIS 345 345 32
POINT Y BEATTY 345 345 15
POINT Y BEATTY 345 345 0
0 0 0
COMMONLY OWNED LINES: (B) 0 0 0
BEATTY BIXBY 345 345 13
BIXBY TOWER 71 345 345 15
TOWER 71 CORRIDOR 345 345 22
STUART TOWER 2 345 345 0
TOWER 2 POINT Y 345 345 75
CONESVILLE TOWER 71 345 345 51
Schedule G-1
Page 2 of 5
COLUMBUS SOUTHERN POWER COMPANY
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS TO CSP EDC
TRANSMISSION LINES 132 KV AND ABOVE
-----------------------------------
================================================================================
DESIGNATION VOLTAGE
-------------------------------------------------------------------- LENGTH
FROM TO OPERATING DESIGNED POLE MILES
================================================================================
TOWER 71 BIXBY 345 345 0
POINT X TOWER 27 345 345 17
TOWER 27 BIXBY 345 345 0
0 0 0
COMMONLY OWNED LINES: (C) 0 0 0
CONESVILLE POINT Z 345 345 57
0 0 0
COMMONLY OWNED LINES: (D) 0 0 0
POINT Z HYATT 345 345 9
POINT Z HYATT 345 345 2
POINT Z HYATT 345 345 0
0 0 0
COMMONLY OWNED LINES: (E) 0 0 0
STUART ZIMMER 345 345 1
ZIMMER RED BANK 345 345 33
RED BANK TERMINAL 345 345 7
ZIMMER PIERCE 345 345 1
ROBERTS BETHEL 138 138 0
ROBERTS BETHEL 138 138 5
ROBERTS KENNY 138 138 1
ROBERTS KENNY 138 138 3
BETHEL LINWORTH 138 138 0
BETHEL LINWORTH 138 138 2
PICWAY HARRISON 138 138 1
GROVES BEXLEY 138 138 4
BEXLEY ST. CLAIR 138 138 4
BIXBY LSII 138 138 1
BIXBY LSII 138 138 2
BIXBY LSII 138 138 0
BIXBY W.LANCASTER 138 138 18
BIXBY W.LANCASTER 138 138 0
BIXBY W.LANCASTER 138 138 1
POSTON ROSS 138 138 42
POSTON ROSS 138 138 1
ROSS DELANO 138 138 5
CIRCLEVILLE HARRISON 138 138 14
CIRCLEVILLE HARRISON 138 138 1
LSII MARION 138 138 2
LSII MARION 138 138 3
MARION CANAL 138 138 4
ST. CLAIR CLINTON 138 138 4
HARRISON MARION 138 138 7
HARRISON MARION 138 138 0
BIXBY GROVES-ASTOR 138 138 13
POSTON HARRISON 138 138 54
Schedule G-1
Page 3 of 5
COLUMBUS SOUTHERN POWER COMPANY
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS TO CSP EDC
TRANSMISSION LINES 132 KV AND ABOVE
-----------------------------------
================================================================================
DESIGNATION VOLTAGE
-------------------------------------------------------------------- LENGTH
FROM TO OPERATING DESIGNED POLE MILES
================================================================================
BEATTY WILSON (EAST) 138 138 7
BEATTY WILSON (WEST) 138 138 0
BEATTY WILSON (WEST) 138 138 0
WAVERLY SARGENTS 138 138 16
WAVERLY ADAMS-SEAMAN 138 138 25
WAVERLY ADAMS-SEAMAN 138 138 11
CIRCLEVILLE SCIPPO 138 138 2
CIRCLEVILLE SCIPPO 138 138 1
POSTON LICK 138 138 0
POSTON LICK 138 138 35
WAVERLY LICK 138 138 0
WAVERLY LICK 138 138 16
WAVERLY LICK 138 138 11
MORSE GENOA-KARL 138 138 4
MORSE GENOA-KARL 138 138 5
MORSE GENOA-KARL 138 138 2
OSU HESS 138 138 1
WILSON FIFTH-NESS 138 138 3
WILSON FIFTH-NESS 138 138 2
WILSON ROBERTS 138 138 5
WILSON ROBERTS 138 138 0
WILSON ROBERTS 138 138 1
BIXBY BUCKEYE STEEL 138 138 3
BIXBY BUCKEYE STEEL 138 138 2
BIXBY BUCKEYE STEEL 138 138 1
GAY VINE 138 138 2
EAST BROAD GAHANNA 138 138 0
EAST BROAD GAHANNA 138 138 1
EAST BROAD GAHANNA 138 138 3
HYATT SAWMILL 138 138 0
HYATT SAWMILL 138 138 5
GAHANNA MORSE 138 138 5
GAHANNA MORSE 138 138 0
CORRIDOR MORSE-BLENDON 138 138 0
CORRIDOR MORSE-BLENDON 138 138 1
CORRIDOR MORSE 138 138 7
KIRK EAST BROAD 138 138 10
KIRK EAST BROAD 138 138 0
CANAL MOUND 138 138 2
CONESVILLE TRENT 138 138 52
CONESVILLE TRENT 138 138 0
TRENT DELAWARE 138 138 13
TRENT DELAWARE 138 138 0
ST. CLAIR MIFFLIN STELZER 138 138 7
KENNY KARL 138 138 1
Schedule G-1
Page 4 of 5
COLUMBUS SOUTHERN POWER COMPANY
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS TO CSP EDC
TRANSMISSION LINES 132 KV AND ABOVE
-----------------------------------
================================================================================
DESIGNATION VOLTAGE
-------------------------------------------------------------------- LENGTH
FROM TO OPERATING DESIGNED POLE MILES
================================================================================
KENNY KARL 138 138 3
KENNY KARL 138 138 3
MORSE CLINTON 138 138 0
MORSE CLINTON 138 138 0
MORSE HUNTLEY-CLINTON 138 138 3
BIXBY GROVES 138 138 3
BIXBY GROVES 138 138 1
BIXBY GROVES 138 138 0
BIXBY GROVES 138 138 0
POSTON STROUDS RUN-CROOKSVILLE 138 138 0
POSTON STROUDS RUN-CROOKSVILLE 138 138 7
HYATT DELAWARE 138 138 4
BEATTY CANAL 138 138 11
CONESVILLE OHIO CENTRAL 138 138 12
EAST BROAD ASTOR 138 138 3
HARRISON BEATTY 138 138 8
HARRISON S. CENTRAL REA 138 138 0
BEATTY MCCOMB 138 138 2
MORSE STELZER 138 138 2
HUNTLEY LINWORTH 138 138 3
HYATT GENOA 138 138 5
BUCKEYE STEEL GAY 138 138 3
BUCKEYE STEEL GAY 138 138 1
POSTON ELLIOT-DEXTER 138 138 0
POSTON ELLIOT-DEXTER 138 138 7
HYATT HUNTLEY 138 138 12
LICK ADDISON 138 138 29
LICK ADDISON 138 138 0
SCIPPO SCIOTO TRAIL-DUPONT 138 138 1
SCIPPO SCIOTO TRAIL-DUPONT 138 138 0
SCIPPO SCIOTO TRAIL-DUPONT 138 138 1
DELANO SCIOTO TRAIL 138 138 11
DELANO SCIOTO TRAIL 138 138 1
SAWMILL BETHEL 138 138 0
SAWMILL BETHEL 138 138 5
MOUND ST. CLAIR 138 138 2
WAVERLY MULBERRY 138 138 12
WAVERLY MULBERRY 138 138 2
MCCOMB SULLIVANT-GAY 138 138 8
MULBERRY ROSS 138 138 0
MULBERRY ROSS 138 138 3
MULBERRY ROSS 138 138 1
EAST BROAD BEXLEY 138 138 6
HYATT ROSS 138 138 1
CORRIDOR GENOA 138 138 0
Schedule G-1
Page 5 of 5
COLUMBUS SOUTHERN POWER COMPANY
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS TO CSP EDC
TRANSMISSION LINES 132 KV AND ABOVE
-----------------------------------
================================================================================
DESIGNATION VOLTAGE
-------------------------------------------------------------------- LENGTH
FROM TO OPERATING DESIGNED POLE MILES
================================================================================
CORRIDOR GAHANNA 138 138 1
KIRK W. MILLERSPORT 138 138 0
KIRK W. MILLERSPORT 138 138 0
CONESVILLE KIRK 138 138 0
CONESVILLE KIRK 138 138 38
CONESVILLE KIRK 138 138 8
HESS VINE 138 138 2
VINE CITY OF COLUMBUS EAST 138 138 1
POSTON W.LANCASTER 138 138 12
POSTON W.LANCASTER 138 138 0
POSTON W.LANCASTER 138 138 23
VINE CITY OF COLUMBUS WEST 138 138 1
ST. CLAIR VINE 138 138 1
ST. CLAIR VINE 138 138 1
CLINTON OSU 138 138 4
OSU HESS 138 138 1
SCIPPO HARGUS 138 138 1
SCIPPO EAST SCIPPO 138 138 0
EAST BROAD BEXLEY 138 138 0
DAVIDSON RD. ROBERTS-BETHEL 138 138 0
MORSE STELZER 138 138 2
(A) CSP OWNS 35%
(B) CSP OWNS 33 1/3%
(C) CSP OWNS 66.28%
(D) CSP OWNS 83.14%
(E) CSP OWNS 36%
Schedule G-2
Page 1 of 2
COLUMBUS SOUTHERN POWER COMPANY
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS TO CSP EDC
TRANSMISSION LINES LESS THAN 132 KV
-----------------------------------
LINE NAME VOLTAGE MILES
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Elliott - Lee 34 8.00
Floodwood - Berlin 34 32.13
Rutland - Buckeye Co-op 34 0.12
Bexley - Rockwell No. 2 40 0.58
Consolidated Stores Ext. 40 0.23
General Motors Ext. - South 40 0.38
Genoa Ext. 40 0.34
Groves Road - Livingston Avenue 40 2.89
Livingston - Bexley 40 2.28
McComb - Briggsdale 40 1.70
Parsons - Marion Road 40 5.16
Picway - Briggsdale 40 11.56
Picway - Parsons 40 5.42
Wilson - Briggsdale 40 5.20
Wilson - West 40 10.08
Rockwell Tie Line 40 0.46
Adams - Rarden 69 7.76
Ashley - Pedro 69 12.55
Bashan - Ravenswood 69 11.87
Beatty - Ballah Road 69 7.47
Beatty - Galloway 69 8.59
Berlin - Ross 69 32.42
Bethel - Dublin 69 3.21
Big Darby - South Central Co-op, Darbyville 69 0.37
Bloom Tap 69 1.32
Busch - Worthington Industries 69 0.81
Camden Avenue - Dyneer 69 0.07
Camp Sherman - Circleville 69 18.09
Coalton - Lick 69 4.40
Davon Ext. 69 0.95
Dow Chemical Ext. 69 0.13
Dublin - Sawmill 69 12.65
East Broad Street - Bexley 69 6.24
East Peebles - Adams Co-op 69 1.73
Echo Valley - Buckeye Co-op 69 0.28
Elliott - Meigs 69 20.00
Elliott - OU - Clark 69 2.25
Etna Ext. 69 1.63
Gahanna - Morse Road 69 5.05
Gavin - Addison 69 7.59
Gavin - DWAS 69 0.90
Gavin - Generator Lead No. 1 69 0.38
Schedule G-2
Page 2 of 2
COLUMBUS SOUTHERN POWER COMPANY
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS TO CSP EDC
TRANSMISSION LINES LESS THAN 132 KV
-----------------------------------
LINE NAME VOLTAGE MILES
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
General Motors Ext. - North 69 0.30
Ginger Tap 69 0.04
Greene - Beatty 69 19.98
Griffin Wheel Ext. 69 0.23
Huntley - Busch 69 0.39
Jackson Lake - Jefferson 69 0.52
Kirk - Watkins Road 69 1.22
Lazelle - Busch 69 1.16
Lick - Pedro 69 29.94
Marlon Road - Jenkins East 69 0.99
Marion Road - Jenkins West 69 1.64
Millbrook - Grace 69 0.62
North Galloway - West Jefferson 69 0.84
Pedro - Superior 69 0.16
Picway - Harrison 69 0.00
Picway - Madison 69 21.58
Poplar Flat - Bentonville 69 0.74
Poston - Floodwood 69 2.12
Poston - Trimble 69 9.71
Ross - Camp Sherman 69 3.43
Ross - Highland 69 41.58
Salisbury Extension 69 0.46
Sawmill - Lazelle 69 4.24
Seaman - Adams 69 8.38
Seaman - Sardinia 69 11.89
South Coshocton - Coshocton 69 0.82
South Fork - General Electric Hebron 69 0.62
South Seaman - Bentonville 69 15.12
South Stockport - Washington Co-op 69 5.09
South Webster - Buckeye Co-op 69 0.99
Strouds Run - Clark 69 3.90
Trent - Delaware Co-op, Lott 69 2.14
Waverly - Idaho 69 9.15
West Union - Copeland 69 1.38
Westerville - City of Westerville 69 0.03
Westerville - Genoa 69 1.91
Westerville - Huntley 69 3.83
Westerville Tap 69 0.04
Worthington Tap 69 0.02
Schedule G-3
Page 1 of 3
COLUMBUS SOUTHERN POWER COMPANY
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS TO CSP EDC
VOLTAGE (IN MVA)
CHARACTER OF ----------------------------
TRANSMISSION SUBSTATIONS SUBSTATION PRIMARY SECONDARY TERTIARY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WHOLLY OWNED SUBSTATIONS
#66 CONESVILLE PLANT/CONESVILLE, OH ATTENDED-T 138 69 13
ATTENDED-T 138 69 4
UNATTENDED-T 138 69 12
#5 CORRIDOR/FRANKLIN CO., OH UNATTENDED-T 345 138 13
UNATTENDED-T 345 138 34.5
UNATTENDED-T 138 34 13
UNATTENDED-T 14 0 0
#7 MARION ROAD/COLUMBUS, OH UNATTENDED-T 138 40 13
UNATTENDED-T 13 13 0
UNATTENDED-T 40 13 0
#10 BEXLEY/COLUMBUS, OH UNATTENDED-T 138 40 13.8
UNATTENDED-T 138 13.8 13.8
UNATTENDED-T 13 13 0
UNATTENDED-T 13 0 0
#14 EAST BROAD ST/COLUMBUS, OH UNATTENDED-T 138 40 13.8
UNATTENDED-T 13.8 13 0
#19 HYATT/DELAWARE CO., OH UNATTENDED-T 345 138 13
#20 WILSON RD/COLUMBUS, OH UNATTENDED-T 138 40 13.8
UNATTENDED-T 138 13.8 13.8
UNATTENDED-T 13 13 0
#26 BETHEL RD/COLUMBUS, OH UNATTENDED-T 134.5 69.5 13.09
UNATTENDED-T 138 13.8 13.8
#31 SAWMILL/FRANKLIN, CO., OH UNATTENDED-T 13 0 0
UNATTENDED-T 13.8 0 0
UNATTENDED-T 138 34.5 13.8
UNATTENDED-T 134.5 34.5 13.8
UNATTENDED-T 135.4 69 13
#31 SAWMILL/FRANKLIN CO., OH UNATTENDED-T 138 69 13
#35 POSTON/ATHENS CO., OH UNATTENDED-T 138 69 13.39
UNATTENDED-T 69 13.2 0
#38 GROVES RD/COLUMBUS, OH UNATTENDED-T 138 13.8 0
UNATTENDED-T 138 13.8 13.8
UNATTENDED-T 40 13.8 0
UNATTENDED-T 34.5 13.8 0
UNATTENDED-T 138 40 13.8
#39 GENOA/WESTERVILLE, OH UNATTENDED-T 138 69 13
UNATTENDED-T 138 34.5 13.8
UNATTENDED-T 34.5 13 4
UNATTENDED-T 13 13 13
UNATTENDED-T 40 14.5 0
#41 ROBERTS/HILLIARD, OH UNATTENDED-T 138 13 0
UNATTENDED-T 345 138 13.8
UNATTENDED-T 13.2 0 0
#71 BIXBY/GROVEPORT, OH UNATTENDED-T 345 138 13
Schedule G-3
Page 2 of 3
COLUMBUS SOUTHERN POWER COMPANY
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS TO CSP EDC
VOLTAGE (IN MVA)
CHARACTER OF ----------------------------
TRANSMISSION SUBSTATIONS SUBSTATION PRIMARY SECONDARY TERTIARY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UNATTENDED-T 138 13.8 13.8
UNATTENDED-T 138 13.8 0
UNATTENDED-T 13 13 0
UNATTENDED-T 345 138 34.5
UNATTENDED-T 345 138 35
UNATTENDED-T 40 4 0
UNATTENDED-T 69 13.8 0
UNATTENDED-T 13.19 4 0
UNATTENDED-T 40 14.5 0
#74 BEATTY RD/GROVE CITY, OH UNATTENDED-T 345 138 13.8
UNATTENDED-T 138 13.8 13.8
UNATTENDED-T 138 69 13.8
UNATTENDED-T 13 0 0
UNATTENDED-T 345 138 34.5
#75 MCCOMB/GROVE CITY, OH UNATTENDED-T 138 40 13
UNATTENDED-T 13 13 0
#80 KIRK/PATASKALA, OH UNATTENDED-T 345 138 13
UNATTENDED-T 138 34.5 13
UNATTENDED-T 138 69 34
#247 WAVERLY/ WAVERLY OH UNATTENDED-T 138 69 13.19
UNATTENDED-T 13 13 0
UNATTENDED-T 138 69 13
UNATTENDED-T 69 12 0
#109 SLATE MILLS/CHILLICOTHE, OH UNATTENDED-T 69 13 0
#113 ELLIOT/ATHENS, OH UNATTENDED-T 138 69 13
UNATTENDED-T 13 13 0
#132 ADDISON/KANAUGA, OH UNATTENDED-T 69 13 0
UNATTENDED-T 138 69 13
#69 HARRISON/ PICKAWAY CTY, OH UNATTENDED-T 138 69 13.8
#149 CIRCLEVILLE/CIRCLEVILLE, OH UNATTENDED-T 138 69 13.19
UNATTENDED-T 138 13 0
UNATTENDED-T 13 13 0
#12 HUNTLEY/COLUMBUS, OH UNATTENDED-T 138 13.8 0
UNATTENDED-T 69 13.8 0
UNATTENDED-T 138 13.8 0
#158 SEAMAN/SEAMAN, OH UNATTENDED-T 69 13.8 0
UNATTENDED-T 69 13 0
UNATTENDED-T 138 69 13.2
UNATTENDED-T 40 13 0
#226 ROSS/CHILLICOTHE, OH UNATTENDED-T 138 69 13.19
UNATTENDED-T 13 13 0
UNATTENDED-T 138 13 0
UNATTENDED-T 69 13 0
UNATTENDED-T 13 13 0
#230 STROUDS RUN/ATHENS, OH UNATTENDED-T 138 69 13.19
UNATTENDED-T 138 69 12
Schedule G-3
Page 3 of 3
COLUMBUS SOUTHERN POWER COMPANY
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS TO CSP EDC
VOLTAGE (IN MVA)
CHARACTER OF ----------------------------
TRANSMISSION SUBSTATIONS SUBSTATION PRIMARY SECONDARY TERTIARY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UNATTENDED-T 13 13 0
#238 ADAMS/PEEBLES, OH UNATTENDED-T 138 69 13.2
UNATTENDED-T 13 13 0
#242 LICK/JACKSON, OH UNATTENDED-T 138 69 13.19
UNATTENDED-T 13 13 0
UNATTENDED-T 13.19 4.16 0
UNATTENDED-T 69 13.2 0
UNATTENDED-T 69 13 0
UNATTENDED-T 34.5 12 0
COMMONLY OWNED SUBSTATIONS
#5 CORRIDOR/FRANKLIN CO., OH - NOTE A UNATTENDED-T 345 0 0
#52 STUART/ADAMS CO., OH - NOTE A SUPERVISORY 0 0 0
CONTROL-T 345 138 0
SEE NOTE E SUPERVISORY 0 0 0
CONTROL-T 345 0 0
#53 PIERCE/CLERMONT CO., OH - NOTE B ATTENDED-T 345 0 0
#59 GREENE/DAYTON, OH - NOTE B SUPERVISORY 0 0 0
CONTROL-T 345 0 0
#61 FOSTER/WARREN CO., OH - NOTE B UNATTENDED-T 345 0 0
#71 BIXBY/GROVEPORT, OH - NOTE A UNATTENDED-T 345 0 0
#74 BEATTY/GROVE CITY, OH - NOTES A & B UNATTENDED-T 345 0 0
#241 TERMINAL/CINCINNATI, OH - NOTE C ATTENDED-T 345 0 0
#243 PORT UNION/BUTLER CO., OH - NOTE C ATTENDED-T 345 0 0
#245 DON MARQUIS/PIKE CO, OH - NOTE B UNATTENDED-T 345 0 0
Schedule G-4
Page 1 of 7
OHIO POWER COMPANY
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS TO OPCO EDC
TRANSMISSION LINES 132 KV AND ABOVE
-----------------------------------
================================================================================
DESIGNATION VOLTAGE
-------------------------------------------------------------------- LENGTH
FROM TO OPERATING DESIGNED POLE MILES
================================================================================
0168 BAKER DON MARQUIS 765 765 26.41
0168 BAKER DON MARQUIS 765 765 10.32
0171 KAMMER DUMONT 765 765 100.19
0171 KAMMER DUMONT 765 765 126.14
0194 AMOS NORTH PROCTORVILLE 765 765 5.3
0195 GAVIN MARYSVILLE 765 765 124.4
0232 AMOS GAVIN 765 765 0.49
0233 GAVIN KAMMER 765 765 2.62
0263 KAMMER SOUTH CANTON 765 765 0.24
0263 KAMMER SOUTH CANTON 765 765 78.44
0269 NORTH PROCTORVILLE HANGING ROCK 765 765 25.99
0270 HANGING ROCK JEFFERSON 765 765 6.14
0047 SPORN MUSKINGUM 345 345 46.52
0048 MUSKINGUM CENTRAL 345 345 28.1
0048 MUSKINGUM CENTRAL 345 345 53.94
0052 CENTRAL EAST LIMA 0 345 2.68
0052 CENTRAL EAST LIMA 345 345 71.36
0070 EAST LIMA SORENSON 345 345 42.99
0079 MUSKINGUM TIDD 345 345 83.57
0088 KAMMER EXT. NO. 1 345 345 0.2
0088 KAMMER EXT. NO. 1 (WV) 345 345 0.38
0104 TIDD CANTON CENTRAL 345 345 37.29
0104 TIDD CANTON CENTRAL 345 345 14.21
0106 CANTON CENTRAL JUNIPER 345 345 4.06
0106 CANTON JUNIPER 345 345 1.36
0106 CANTON JUNIPER 345 345 0.55
0119 MUSKINGUM OHIO CENTRAL 345 345 30.75
0119 MUSKINGUM OHIO CENTRAL 345 345 12.51
0142 KAMMER EXT. NO. 2 345 345 0.15
0142 KAMMER EXT. NO. 2 (WV) 345 345 0.3
0161 OHIO CENTRAL FOSTORIA CENTRAL 345 345 100.53
0161 OHIO CENTRAL FOSTORIA CENTRAL 345 345 5.99
0162 FOSTORIA CENTRAL EAST LIMA 345 345 34.47
0162 FOSTORIA CENTRAL EAST LIMA 345 345 5.35
0163 FOSTORIA CENTRAL PEMBERVILLE 345 345 19.29
0166 SOUTH CANTON SAMMIS 345 345 0.74
0167 SOUTH CANTON STAR 345 345 0.69
0172 SOUTHWEST LIMA EXTEN 345 345 14.68
0173 SOUTHWEST LIMA MIAMI 345 345 18.04
0173 SOUTHWEST LIMA MIAMI 345 345 0.97
0208 TIDD COLLIER 345 345 0.31
0248 MARYSVILLE EXT.NO. 345 345 4.22
0249 MARYSVILLE EXT.NO. 345 345 4.84
0279 SOUTH CANTON CANTON CENTRAL 345 345 8.16
Schedule G-4
Page 2 of 7
OHIO POWER COMPANY
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS TO OPCO EDC
TRANSMISSION LINES 132 KV AND ABOVE
-----------------------------------
================================================================================
DESIGNATION VOLTAGE
-------------------------------------------------------------------- LENGTH
FROM TO OPERATING DESIGNED POLE MILES
================================================================================
0001 LIMA FT. WAYNE 138 138 0.1
0001 LIMA FT. WAYNE 138 138 43.58
0004 HOWARD ASHLAND 138 138 6.15
0004 HOWARD ASHLAND 138 138 1.84
0005 WINDSOR CANTON 138 138 54.38
0005 WINDSOR CANTON 138 138 0.08
0006 WINDSOR CANTON(WV) 138 138 0.32
0007 PHILO HOWARD 138 138 0.05
0007 PHILO HOWARD 138 138 80.73
0010 FOSTORIA PEMBERVILLE 138 138 18.49
0010 FOSTORIA PEMBERVILLE 138 138 0.06
0010 FOSTORIA PEMBERVILLE 138 138 0
0011 PHILO RUTLAND 138 138 65.7
0016 SOUTH POINT TURNER 138 138 0.48
0018 PHILO TORREY 138 138 70.73
0019 CROOKSVILLE WEST LANCASTER 138 138 30.7
0020 PHILO CANTON 138 138 74.04
0025 TIDD WAGENHALS 138 138 53.45
0028 PORTSMOUTH TRENTON NO. 2 138 138 76.97
0028 PORTSMOUTH TRENTON NO. 2 138 138 0.24
0028 PORTSMOUTH TRENTON NO. 2 138 138 0.45
0032 TRENTON MUNCIE 138 138 23.92
0033 RUTLAND SPORN 138 138 4.81
0034 SPORN SOUTH POINT 138 138 9.22
0034 SPORN SOUTH POINT 138 138 40.41
0036 SPORN PORTSMOUTH 138 138 0.05
0036 SPORN PORTSMOUTH 138 138 48.76
0037 HILLSBORO MAYSVILLE 138 138 33.55
0038 CROOKSVILLE NORTH NEWARK 138 138 30.67
0038 CROOKSVILLE NORTH NEWARK 138 138 0.58
0039 WEST LANCASTER SOUTH BALTIMORE 138 138 9.82
0041 NORTH NEWARK WEST MT. VERNON 138 138 20.28
0041 NORTH NEWARK WEST MT. VERNON 138 138 1.48
0042 SOUTH BALTIMORE NORTH NEWARK 138 138 21.04
0042 SOUTH BALTIMORE NORTH NEWARK 138 138 0.05
0042 SOUTH BALTIMORE NORTH NEWARK 138 138 0.08
0043 BELLEFONTE EXT. 138 138 2.8
0044 SUMMERFIELD NATRIUM 138 138 27.07
0045 PHILO MUSKINGUM 138 138 23.16
0046 MUSKINGUM SUMMERFIELD 138 138 25.31
0049 FOSTORIA EAST LIMA 138 138 0.06
0049 FOSTORIA EAST LIMA 138 138 40.77
0050 EAST LIMA LIMA 138 138 4.43
0055 TORREY WOOSTER 138 138 28.69
0056 WEST MT. VERNON SOUTH KENTON 138 138 59.06
0057 SOUTH KENTON STERLING 138 138 0
0057 SOUTH KENTON STERLING 138 138 28.4
Schedule G-4
Page 3 of 7
OHIO POWER COMPANY
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS TO OPCO EDC
TRANSMISSION LINES 132 KV AND ABOVE
-----------------------------------
================================================================================
DESIGNATION VOLTAGE
-------------------------------------------------------------------- LENGTH
FROM TO OPERATING DESIGNED POLE MILES
================================================================================
0058 SOUTH POINT PORTSMOUTH 138 138 0.04
0058 SOUTH POINT PORTSMOUTH 138 138 34.57
0059 PHILO CROOKSVILLE 138 138 15.37
0060 LIMA STERLING 138 138 5.96
0061 EAST LIMA WEST LIMA 138 138 0.15
0061 EAST LIMA WEST LIMA 138 138 11.19
0061 EAST LIMA WEST LIMA 138 138 1.05
0063 TORREY MASSILLON 138 138 0.29
0066 WAGENHALS WEST CANTON 138 138 9.16
0066 WAGENHALS WEST CANTON 138 138 0.85
0067 TORREY AKRON 138 138 0.28
0069 TIDD SOUTH CADIZ 138 138 16.59
0071 AKRON CANTON 138 138 3.75
0072 TIDD WEIRTON NO. 2 138 138 6.21
0072 TIDD WEIRTON NO. 2 138 138 0.05
0073 WEIRTON SOUTH TORONTO 69 138 0.48
0073 WEIRTON SOUTH TORONTO 138 138 0.14
0075 SPORN KAISER NO. 1 138 138 4.25
0076 LUCASVILLE SARGENTS 138 138 11.88
0078 TIDD WINDSOR JCT. 138 138 3.77
0080 NEWCOMERSTOWN SOUTH COSHOCTON 138 138 14.33
0081 FORD MOTOR EXT. 138 138 0.25
0086 SPORN KAISER NO. 2 138 138 5.67
0087 WINDSOR JUNCTION TILTONVILLE 138 138 3.81
0087 WINDSOR JUNCTION TILTONVILLE 138 138 0.3
0089 WEST PHILO EXT. NO. 1 138 138 0.05
0090 WEST PHILO EXT. NO. 1 138 138 0.13
0091 KAMMER OHIO FERRO ALLOWS 138 138 2.45
0091 KAMMER OHIO FERRO ALLOWS (WV) 138 138 0.71
0095 PORTSMOUTH TRENTON NO. 1 138 138 97.31
0095 PORTSMOUTH TRENTON NO. 1 138 138 1.04
0095 PORTSMOUTH TRENTON NO. 1 138 138 0.24
0096 THIVENER BUCKEYE CO-OP 138 138 6.16
0097 MERCERVILLE APPLE GROVE 138 138 5.11
0098 MILLWOOD EXT. 138 138 0.1
0101 THIVENER EXT. 138 138 0.09
0102 MEIGS EXT. NO. 1 138 138 0.1
0103 MEIGS EXT. NO. 2 138 138 0.17
0108 OHIO CENTRAL NORTH NEWARK 138 138 0.33
0108 OHIO CENTRAL NORTH NEWARK 138 138 21.3
0110 NORTH STRASBURG EXT. 138 138 0.06
0111 NORTH STRASBURG EXT. 138 138 0.06
0112 ZANESVILLE EXT. 138 138 6.48
0113 HOWARD BUCYRUS CENTER 138 138 16.3
0113 HOWARD BUCYRUS CENTER 138 138 0.27
0114 SOUTH PEMBERVILLE FREEMONT 138 138 14.18
0114 SOUTH PEMBERVILLE FREEMONT 138 138 1.29
Schedule G-4
Page 4 of 7
OHIO POWER COMPANY
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS TO OPCO EDC
TRANSMISSION LINES 132 KV AND ABOVE
-----------------------------------
================================================================================
DESIGNATION VOLTAGE
-------------------------------------------------------------------- LENGTH
FROM TO OPERATING DESIGNED POLE MILES
================================================================================
0115 SUMMERFIELD BERNE 138 138 3.46
0118 SOUTH COSHOCTON WOOSTER 138 138 39.51
0120 OHIO CENTRAL COSHOCTON JCT. 138 138 0.2
0120 OHIO CENTRAL COSHOCTON JCT. 138 138 14.52
0122 KAMMER ORMET NO. 1 138 138 1.71
0123 FINDLAY CENTER EXT. 138 138 6.66
0125 TIDD WEIRTON NO. 1 138 138 0.41
0126 ARROYO EAST LIVERPOOL 138 138 0.15
0128 TIDD NATRIUM 138 138 0.26
0129 HOWARD FOSTORIA 138 138 0.5
0129 HOWARD FOSTORIA 138 138 44.38
0130 EAST WHEELERSBURG TEXAS EASTERN 138 138 1.99
0131 KAMMER ORMET NO. 2 138 138 1.55
0133 SUNNYSIDE WAGENHALS NO. 1 138 138 1.44
0133 SUNNYSIDE WAGENHALS NO. 1 138 138 2.23
0134 TIDD WHEELING STEEL 138 138 5.12
0141 MILLBROOK SILOAM 138 138 1.6
0141 MILLBROOK SILOAM 138 138 0.05
0143 ZANESVILLE OHIO CENTRAL 138 138 10.33
0143 ZANESVILLE OHIO CENTRAL 138 138 1.87
0144 TORREY TIMKEN 138 138 0.8
0144 TORREY TIMKEN 138 138 0.86
0145 CANTON CENTRAL TIMKEN 138 138 0.74
0145 CANTON CENTRAL TIMKEN 138 138 5.52
0146 EAST LIMA WESTMINSTER 138 138 8.38
0147 SUINNYSIDE WAGENHALS NO. 2 138 138 2.21
0149 CANTON CENTRAL WAGENHALS 138 138 2.02
0151 SOUTH CANTON TORREY 138 138 1.26
0151 SOUTH CANTON TORREY 138 138 1.6
0152 MALAGA SPEIDEL 69 138 11.99
0153 BRIDGEVILLE EXT. 138 138 1.88
0156 TIFFIN CENTER EXT. 138 138 5.34
0156 TIFFIN CENTER EXT. 69 138 1.81
0158 ROBINSON PARK RICHLAND 138 138 14.94
0159 EAST LIMA RICHLAND 138 138 27.74
0164 FOSTORIA CENTRAL FOSTORIA 138 138 0.08
0164 FOSTORIA CENTRAL FOSTORIA 138 138 1.48
0169 SOUTH CALDWELL SOUTH CUMBERLAND 138 138 10.86
0170 HANGING ROCK EXT. 138 138 4.33
0174 CANTON CENTRAL BLUEBELL 138 138 0.36
0175 CANTON CENTRAL CLOVERDALE 138 138 0.38
0176 TIDD STEUBENVILLE 138 138 7.3
0177 SOUTHWEST LIMA STERLING 138 138 5.14
0177 SOUTHWEST LIMA STERLING 34 138 0.18
0177 SOUTHWEST LIMA STERLING 138 138 0.02
0177 SOUTHWEST LIMA STERLING 138 138 0.03
0178 SOUTHWEST LIMA WEST LIMA 138 138 0.88
Schedule G-4
Page 5 of 7
OHIO POWER COMPANY
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS TO OPCO EDC
TRANSMISSION LINES 132 KV AND ABOVE
-----------------------------------
================================================================================
DESIGNATION VOLTAGE
-------------------------------------------------------------------- LENGTH
FROM TO OPERATING DESIGNED POLE MILES
================================================================================
0180 OHIO CENTRAL EXT NO. 1 138 138 0.46
0181 OHIO CENTRAL EXT NO. 2 138 138 0.45
0182 SOUTH CANTON WEST CANTON 138 138 5.2
0182 SOUTH CANTON WEST CANTON 138 138 2.59
0182 SOUTH CANTON WEST CANTON 138 138 2.26
0183 KAMMER WEST BELLAIRE 138 138 12.85
0183 KAMMER WEST BELLAIRE 69 138 0.33
0186 EAST ZANESVILLE EXT. 138 138 0.04
0187 WEST BELLAIRE BRUES 138 138 4.26
0188 WEST BELLAIRE TILTONVILLE 138 138 11.49
0188 WEST BELLAIRE TILTONVILLE 138 138 0.5
0189 CROOKSVILLE TIE 138 138 0.2
0190 SOUTHWEST LIMA WEST MOULTON 138 138 13.33
0193 TIFFIN CENTER FREMONT CENTER 138 138 11.84
0193 TIFFIN CENTER FREMONT CENTER 138 138 0.7
0193 TIFFIN CENTER FREMONT CENTER 138 138 0.04
0196 FREMONT CENTER FREMONT 138 138 3.02
0196 FREMONT CENTER FREMONT 138 138 2.68
0198 N. PROCTORVILLE EAST HUNTINGTON 138 138 3.86
0198 N. PROCTORVILLE EAST HUNTINGTON 34 138 0.08
0200 CAMPBELL ROAD MIDWEST CO-OP 138 138 0.15
0201 N. PROCTORVILLE SOUTH POINT 138 138 0.04
0201 N. PROCTORVILLE SOUTH POINT 138 138 10.83
0202 MUSKINGUM WOLF CREEK 138 138 4.37
0202 MUSKINGUM WOLF CREEK 138 138 0.34
0203 SWITZER EXT. NO. 1 138 138 0.04
0204 SWITZER EXT. NO. 2 138 138 0.06
0210 BUCKLEY ROAD EXT. 138 138 0.09
0210 BUCKLEY ROAD EXT. 138 138 2.62
0213 WINDSOR EXT. NO. 2 0 138 0.11
0221 DARRAH NORTH PROCTORVILLE 138 138 3.51
0223 DEXTER MEIGS NO. 2 138 138 5.53
0224 NORTH RUTLAND MEIGS NO. 1 138 138 3.84
0225 AMITY ACADEMIA 138 138 0.14
0225 AMITY ACADEMIA 138 138 6.33
0226 ACADEMIA WEST MT. VERNON 138 138 0.15
0226 ACADEMIA WEST MT. VERNON 138 138 5.95
0229 CANNELVILLE GURNSEY MUSKINGUM C 138 138 0.11
0230 FAIRCREST EXT. 138 138 0.04
0235 WEST MILLERSPORT HEATH 138 138 11.85
0235 WEST MILLERSPORT HEATH 138 138 0.16
0238 NORTH PROCTORVILLE E 138 138 3.54
0240 NORTH CROWN CITY EXT. 138 138 0.24
0241 NORTH CROWN CITY EXT. 138 138 0.24
0242 HEATH EXT. NO. 2 138 138 1.29
0243 HEATH EXT, NO. 1 138 138 1.29
0244 EAST SIDE EXT. 138 138 0.24
Schedule G-4
Page 6 of 7
OHIO POWER COMPANY
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS TO OPCO EDC
TRANSMISSION LINES 132 KV AND ABOVE
-----------------------------------
================================================================================
DESIGNATION VOLTAGE
-------------------------------------------------------------------- LENGTH
FROM TO OPERATING DESIGNED POLE MILES
================================================================================
0244 EAST SIDE EXT. 138 138 0.08
0245 SOUTHEAST CANTON SUNNYSIDE 138 138 2.31
0247 SOUTHEAST CANTON WACO 138 138 2.12
0252 WEST DOVER EXT. NO. 138 138 0.1
0253 WEST DOVER EXT. NO. 138 138 0.09
0254 BUCKEYE CO-OP EXT. A 138 138 0.21
0257 GREENLAWN EXT. 138 138 1.09
0260 EAST PROCTORVILLE EX. 138 138 0.13
0264 FREMONT SANDUSKY BAY 69 138 12.13
0265 WEST DOVER SUGARCREEK 138 138 4.07
0267 NORTH PORTSMOUTH CENTRAL PORTSMOUTH 138 138 6.04
0273 BUCKLEY ROAD FREMONT CENTER 69 138 0.9
0274 WAYVIEW HOOVER NORTH 69 138 0.02
0274 WAYVIEW HOOVER NORTH 69 138 1.04
0275 WEST CANTON JCT. WAYVIEW 138 138 1.11
0275 WEST CANTON JCT. WAYVIEW 138 138 1.8
0275 WEST CANTON JCT. WAYVIEW 138 138 1.89
0276 BELDEN VILLAGE EXT. 138 138 1.51
0280 EAST AMSTERDAM CARROLL CO-OP 69 138 7.98
0282 SOUTH POINT TIE 138 138 0.09
0286 WEST CANTON TIE 138 138 0.07
0289 OHIO CENTRAL EXT. NO. 138 138 0.27
0290 SOUTH CANTON EXT. NO. 138 138 0.71
0294 SOUTH CANTON EXT. NO. 138 138 0.31
0295 BROADACRE EXT. 138 138 0.04
0307 WEST VAN WERT DELPHOS CENTER 69 138 1.7
0313 BUCKEYE COPOP EXT. W 138 138 0.85
0316 ORDANANCE JCT. EXT. 138 138 0.1
0317 GUERNSEY MUSKINGUM CO-OP EXT. 138 138 0.12
0318 BUCKEYE CO-OP EXT. M 138 138 0.15
0320 HEDDING ROAD MORROW CO-OP 138 138 0.09
0324 WEST MILLERSPORT SOUTH CENTRAL POWER 138 138 0.2
0325 SHELBY MUNICIPAL EXT. 138 138 0.53
0326 BLOOMFIELD GUERNSEY MUSKINGUM C 138 138 0.41
0327 NORTH CENTRAL CO-OP 138 138 0.45
0329 TYCOON EXT. 138 138 0.29
0331 LICKING CO-OP EXT. 138 138 0.04
0333 ASHLEY EXT. 69 138 0.62
0334 NORTH CHESHIRE EXT. N 138 138 0.38
0336 SHUFFEL ROAD TIMKEN RESEARCH 69 138 0.66
0337 TIMKEN, RICHVILLE EX 138 138 1.11
0338 CONESVILLE COAL PREP 138 138 0.63
0339 A.G.A. GAS EXT. 138 138 0.16
0342 EAST WOOSTER EXT. NO. 138 138 5.15
0343 EAST WOOSTER EXT. 138 138 0.18
0343 EAST WOOSTER EXT. 138 138 0.43
0344 WAGENHALS LTV STEEL NO. 1 138 138 0.65
Schedule G-4
Page 7 of 7
OHIO POWER COMPANY
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS TO OPCO EDC
TRANSMISSION LINES 132 KV AND ABOVE
-----------------------------------
================================================================================
DESIGNATION VOLTAGE
-------------------------------------------------------------------- LENGTH
FROM TO OPERATING DESIGNED POLE MILES
================================================================================
0345 WAGENHALS LTV STEEL NO. 2 138 138 0.68
0346 FOSTORIA TIE 138 138 0.02
0347 FOSTORIA CENTRAL EXT. 138 138 0.1
0348 FOSTORIA CENTRAL EXT. 138 138 0.1
0349 FOSTORIA POWER EXT. 138 138 0.1
0350 HANCOCK WOOD CO-OP 138 138 0.03
0351 EAST LEIPSIC EXT. 138 138 6.57
0352 BUCKEYE CO-OP EXT. 138 138 0.09
0353 STERLING FOUNDRY PARK 138 138 0.91
0354 GAVIN EXT. NO. 1 138 138 3.1
0355 GAVIN EXT. NO. 2 138 138 3.01
0358 LICKING REC. EXT. A 138 138 0.24
0359 BUCKHORN HOLMES 138 138 0.98
0360 ADAMS RUAL ELECTRIC 138 138 0.8
0361 RILEY CREEK PAULDING PUTNAM 138 138 1.2
0363 MEIGS NO. 2 WILKESVILLE 138 138 1.6
Schedule G-5
Page 1 of 17
OHIO POWER COMPANY
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS TO OPCO EDC
TRANSMISSION LINES LESS THAN 132 KV
-----------------------------------
LINE NAME VOLTAGE MILES
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Allen Avenue - Hercules 23 0.78
Allen Avenue - Hercules (Cust. Owned) 23 0.14
Bush Place - Bonnot 23 0.17
Cannelsville - Guernsey - Muskingum Co-op 23 0.12
Distillery Road - Rubbermaid 23 0.35
Dunkirk - Arlington 23 6.54
East Sparta - Zoarville 23 7.02
East Street - General Electric 23 0.04
East Wheelersburg - Texas Eastern 23 1.99
Forest - North Forest 23 0.89
Fort Brown - Paulding Putnam Co-op - Roselms 23 8.20
Hancock Wood Co-op Ext. - Arlington 23 0.02
International Paper Ext. 23 0.12
James Meter - James Coal 23 1.25
Larry Toth Extension 23 0.48
LTV Steel South Div. Ext. 23 0.13
Nineteenth Street - Canton Drop Forge 23 1.29
Palmer - Wooster Rubber 23 0.06
Park Avenue Extension. Timken 23 0.25
Pekin - Augusta 23 10.67
Schroyer Avenue - Piedmont 23 1.35
Sparta - Sparta Pumping 23 0.42
Stanley Court - Piedmont 23 1.13
Sunnyside - Bryan Avenue 23 4.13
Sunnyside - Stanley Court 23 2.63
Sunnyside - Third Street East 23 1.42
Sunnyside - Third Street West 23 1.74
Timken Extension, Wooster 23 0.07
Timken - Gambrinus Line No. 1 23 1.38
Timken - Park Avenue 23 0.53
Timken - Timken Furnace No. 2 23 0.15
Timken - Timken Melt 23 0.27
Torrey - Bryan Avenue 23 0.64
Torrey - LTV Steel South Division 23 0.98
Torrey - Nineteenth Street 23 0.76
Torrey - Timken Gambrinus 23 1.06
Torrey - Timken Line No. 2 23 0.77
Torrey - Timken No. 3 23 1.40
Union Metal Junction - Union Metal 23 0.06
Wagenhals - Georgetown No. 1 23 0.16
Schedule G-5
Page 2 of 17
OHIO POWER COMPANY
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS TO OPCO EDC
TRANSMISSION LINES LESS THAN 132 KV
-----------------------------------
LINE NAME VOLTAGE MILES
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wagenhals - Georgetown No. 2 23 0.21
Waynesburg - Malvern 23 2.95
Wooster - Timken 23 0.18
Atlantic Avenue - Saint Ritas 34 0.76
Augusta - Ashland Pipeline 34 0.17
Bakersville - Frontier Power 34 0.69
Beaver - Buckeye Co-op 34 5.16
Belden Brick Ext. No. 1 34 0.10
Belden Brick Extension No. 2 34 0.18
Betz Ext. 34 0.18
Bolivar Tap 34 0.02
Brookfield - Central Ohio Coal 34 0.24
Cable Road - Lima Register 34 0.08
Caldwell - Cumberland 34 11.36
Cambridge - water Street 34 2.03
Cambridge Hospital Ext. 34 1.05
Cambridge Hospital Extn. 34 0.09
Charles Street Ext. 34 0.17
Cherry Street - Brown 34 0.01
Dana Corporation Tap 34 1.11
Derwent - Senecaville 34 2.62
Eagle Crusher Ext. 34 0.10
East Cambridge Ext. 34 0.26
East Coshocton - North Coshocton 34 1.58
East Delphos - Kossuth 34 15.63
East Logan - Lancaster 34 18.72
Elizabeth Street - Central Avenue 34 0.80
Fairdale - South Cambridge 34 3.53
Findlay - North Findlay 34 3.95
Findlay Center - Findlay Reservoir 34 6.00
Findlay Reservoir Pumping No. 1 Tap 34 0.01
Fort Steuben - Hammondsville 34 20.28
Franklin Furnace - Grays Branch 34 0.35
Frontier Power Ext. - Empire Coal 34 0.88
Goshen - Timken 34 3.06
Granville - Heath 34 0.77
Guernsey - Muskingum Co-op Ext. - Mount Sterling 34 0.04
Hammansburg - Buckeye Pipe 34 1.76
Hammondsville - Salineville 34 9.15
Hancock Wood Co-op Ext. - Airport 34 0.93
Hancock Wood Co-op Ext. - East Findlay 34 0.11
Schedule G-5
Page 3 of 17
OHIO POWER COMPANY
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS TO OPCO EDC
TRANSMISSION LINES LESS THAN 132 KV
-----------------------------------
LINE NAME VOLTAGE MILES
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hancock Wood Co-op Ext. - Henry 34 0.11
Harpster - DeCliff 34 11.98
Killbuck Junction - Glenmont 34 5.37
Killbuck Junction Extension 34 0.08
Lima - Elizabeth 34 2.00
Lima - South Side 34 5.24
Lima Pumping Ext. 34 0.39
Mcintosh Ext. 34 0.20
Metham - Frontier Power 34 0.39
Michael Avenue - Metokote 34 0.26
Mineral Siding - Antrim 34 10.18
Mix Plant Extension 34 0.08
Morgan's Run - Allegheny Pipe 34 6.41
Muskingum Mine School Ext. 34 0.07
N & W Railroad Ext. 34 0.02
N. & W. Railroad Ext. 34 0.16
National Lime and Stone Ext. 34 0.22
National Milling Ext. 34 0.28
New Boston Coke Ext. 34 0.02
New Liberty - Findlay 34 3.61
New Liberty - Findlay Center 34 7.69
New Liberty - McComb 34 6.92
New Liberty - North Baltimore 34 10.26
New Philadelphia - Dover 34 3.25
New Philadelphia - West New Philadelphia 34 2.55
Newcomerstown - Baltic 34 30.78
Newcomerstown - Cambridge 34 19.72
Newcomerstown - East Coshocton 34 12.83
North Baltimore - Portage 34 10.54
North Findlay - North Baltimore No. 2 34 7.95
North Portsmouth - Oertels Corners 34 4.73
Plaza - Eastman 34 1.77
Pleasant Street -Allied Chemical 34 1.00
Portage Extension 34 0.08
Robb Avenue - Spencerville Road 34 2.80
Robb Avenue Tie Line 34 0.06
Rockhill - Robb Avenue 34 1.00
Rutland - Hobson 34 3.35
Rutland - Pomeroy 34 7.57
Shawtown - Hancock Wood Co-op 34 0.01
Sixth Street - Hantech 34 1.10
Schedule G-5
Page 4 of 17
OHIO POWER COMPANY
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS TO OPCO EDC
TRANSMISSION LINES LESS THAN 132 KV
-----------------------------------
LINE NAME VOLTAGE MILES
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
South Belle Valley - Washington Co-op 34 4.68
South Coshocton - General Electric 34 1.05
South Coshocton - Killbuck, 34KV 34 1.61
South Killbuck - Holmes Wayne Co-op 34 0.05
South Mount Corey - Hancock Wood Co-op 34 0.01
South Point - Ethanol No. 1 34 0.95
South Point - Ethanol No. 2 34 1.80
South Warsaw - Frontier Power 34 3.73
Southside - Eaton 34 0.20
Southwest Lafayette - Frontier Power 34 0.25
Sterling - South Side 34 1.31
Sterling Ext. 34 0.35
Sugar Refinery Ext. 34 0.12
Sugarcreek - Baltic 34 5.68
Superior Metals Ext. 34 0.24
Totten Ext. 34 0.53
Viaduct - South Portsmouth 34 2.02
Vine Street - Central Avenue 34 1.32
Warner - Swasey Ext. 34 0.77
West Berlin - Benton 34 3.01
West Broadway - Norbalt Rubber 34 0.08
West Cambridge - Water Street 34 3.96
West Lafayette - Penn Michigan 34 0.73
West Melrose - Whirlpool 34 2.99
Wright Ext. 34 0.51
Yakley Road - Walnut Creek 34 0.32
Harvard Avenue - Owen Illinois 34 0.10
Shawnee Road - Midwest Co-op 34 4.94
South Coshocton - Banner 34 2.15
South Dover - Ridge Tool 34 1.22
Ash Avenue Tap 34.5 0.01
Poe Avenue Tap 34.5 0.01
East Cadiz - Cadiz 40 1.00
Euclid - Toronto 40 0.46
Guernsey - Muskingum Co-op Ext. - Chandlersville 40 0.12
Academia - Gambier 69 4.14
Alikanna - Steubenville Pumping 69 0.35
Allegheny Pipe 69kV Ext., Hopedale 69 0.71
Allendale - East End 69 1.51
Allendale - Fremont Center 69 17.39
Amsden - North Central Co-op 69 0.12
Schedule G-5
Page 5 of 17
OHIO POWER COMPANY
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS TO OPCO EDC
TRANSMISSION LINES LESS THAN 132 KV
-----------------------------------
LINE NAME VOLTAGE MILES
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amsterdam - Wolf Run 69 1.79
Anchor Hocking Ext. No. 2 69 0.04
Antrim - Londonderry 69 6.05
Arbor Street Ext. 69 0.26
ARCO Ext. - Marion 69 0.22
Armco 69kV Ext. 69 0.01
Ashland Pipe Ext., Kenton 69 2.89
Auglaze - Mark Center 69 14.51
Augusta - Summitville 69 3.93
Avondale Tap 69 0.02
Baltimore - Fairfield 69 0.30
Bannock Road - Flushing 69 7.72
Barmet Ext. 69 0.09
Barnsville - Summerfield 69 15.81
Bauer Road - East Wooster 69 0.70
Beall Avenue - Riffle Road 69 1.25
Beartown - West Wilmont 69 10.56
Belden - Lock Seventeen 69 1.64
Bellaire - Glencoe 69 16.55
Belmont Co-op Ext. - Beallsville 69 0.62
Belmont Co-op Ext. - Jewett 69 0.01
Belmont Co-op Ext. - Pipe Creek 69 0.45
Bernard Street - Northeast Findlay 69 2.85
Berwick Tap 69 0.01
Bethel - Hilliard 69 7.29
Billiar - West Wilmot 69 6.18
Birchard Avenue - West Fremont 69 0.11
Bliss Park Ext. 69 0.10
Blue Lick - Midwest Co-op 69 0.10
Bowerston - Leesville 69 1.80
Bowman Street Ext. 69 0.08
Bremen Bus 69 0.02
Brues - Bellaire 69 0.71
Brues - Martins Ferry 69 7.24
Brues - West Bellaire 69 0.54
Buckeye Road - Hover Park 69 3.41
Bucyrus - Swan Rubber 69 1.54
Bucyrus - Upper Sandusky 69 21.50
Bucyrus Center - Sandusky Avenue 69 4.29
Burns Ext. 69 0.78
Byesville - Glenwood 69 9.63
Schedule G-5
Page 6 of 17
OHIO POWER COMPANY
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS TO OPCO EDC
TRANSMISSION LINES LESS THAN 132 KV
-----------------------------------
LINE NAME VOLTAGE MILES
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Byesville Tap 69 0.01
Cairo Tap 69 0.01
Calcutta - East Liverpool 69 3.75
Cambridge - East Cambridge 69 0.92
Cameron - Belmont Co-op 69 2.32
Canal Road - Wooster Jct. 69 7.34
Canton Alloys Ext. 69 0.19
Carroll Co-op Ext., Mohawk 69 0.40
Carrothers - Willard 69 16.23
Cassell Jct. - Guernsey Muskingum Co-op 69 0.07
Cavett - Paulding Putnam Co-op 69 7.62
Cecil Tap 69 0.01
Central Portsmouth - South Portsmouth 69 1.26
Central Portsmouth - Sugarhill 69 2.90
Central Portsmouth Ext. 69 0.06
Cessna - United Co-op 69 0.03
Chatfield - Carrothers 69 2.92
Chatfield Ext. 69 0.07
Chatham - Licking Co-op 69 0.04
Circle Green - Carroll Co-op Springfield 69 4.41
City of Saint Marys Tap 69 0.02
Clegg - South Glencoe 69 0.87
Conotton - Carroll Co-op 69 6.02
Coopermill - Norval Park 69 1.42
Coopermill - South Fultonham 69 8.43
Coopermill Ext. 69 0.04
Coshocton - North Coshocton 69 1.64
County Hospital - West Louisville 69 4.34
Crawfis College - Pandora 69 5.24
Crooksville - Somerset 69 10.07
Crooksville - South Fultonham 69 7.41
Cyclops - Ohio Central 69 13.67
D.T.R. Industries Ext. 69 0.40
Davis Street - Atlas Industries 69 0.42
Dayton Lane Ext. 69 0.50
Delphos - South Van Wert 69 14.44
Delphos Junction - East Delphos 69 2.32
Dennison - New Philadelphia 69 9.86
Dennison - Scio 69 15.54
Derwent Ext. 69 0.63
Diamond Specialty Ext. 69 0.32
Schedule G-5
Page 7 of 17
OHIO POWER COMPANY
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS TO OPCO EDC
TRANSMISSION LINES LESS THAN 132 KV
-----------------------------------
LINE NAME VOLTAGE MILES
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Diamond Street - County Hospital 69 4.94
Dilles Bottom - Bellaire 69 10.49
Dillonvale - Amsterdam 69 21.01
Dillonvale - Boich Mining 69 7.92
Dillonvale - Robyville 69 5.80
Dover - Beartown 69 9.50
Dover - Sugarcreek 69 8.24
Dow Chemical Ext., Granville 69 0.58
Dueber Avenue - Eighth Street 69 1.99
Dueber Industry - Liquid Carbonic 69 0.06
Dunkirk - Ada 69 10.80
Dunkirk - Kenton 69 11.46
East Amsterdam - Carroll Co-op 69 7.96
East Berlin - Owens Illinois 69 0.58
East Cambridge - Byesville 69 3.03
East Cambridge - Senecaville 69 11.47
East Coshocton - Frontier Power 69 0.19
East Dover - Carroll Co-op 69 30.56
East Dover Ext. 69 1.36
East End Tap 69 0.01
East Fredericktown - Fredericktown 69 4.27
East Fredericktown - Licking Co-op - Mount Vernon 69 0.12
East Leipsic Ext. 69 6.57
East Lima - Lafayette 69 6.30
East Lima - Lima 69 4.42
East Logan - Southeast Logan 69 1.55
East Newark - North Newark 69 3.67
East Ottawa - Crawfis College 69 4.14
East Ottawa - Leipsic 69 5.33
East Ottoville - Paulding Putnam Co-op 69 0.03
East Proctorville Ext. 69 0.00
East Side Ext. 69 0.32
East Tiffin - Holmes Street 69 3.44
East Union Jct. - East Union 69 1.32
East Wooster Ext. No. 1 69 5.13
East Zanesville - Oakland 69 2.05
Eighth Street - Stadium Park 69 1.31
Elizabeth Ext. 69 0.72
Engineered Wire Products 69 0.45
Enterprise - South Central Power 69 0.03
Euclid - Toronto Paper 69 0.05
Schedule G-5
Page 8 of 17
OHIO POWER COMPANY
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS TO OPCO EDC
TRANSMISSION LINES LESS THAN 132 KV
-----------------------------------
LINE NAME VOLTAGE MILES
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Evergreen - Licking Co-op 69 0.03
Excello Ext., Buckeye Road 69 0.09
Findlay - Fifth Street 69 1.79
Findlay - Woodcock 69 16.16
Findlay Center - Eastman 69 1.53
Flex Products Ext. 69 0.79
Fontaine - Kenton 69 2.40
Ford Motor Ext. 69 0.37
Forest - Dunkirk 69 7.99
Forest - McVitty 69 1.21
Fort Shawnee - Buckeye Pipe 69 0.45
Fort Steuben - High Street 69 0.55
Fort Steuben - Wheeling Steel 69 0.10
Fostoria - Central Extension No. 1 69 0.10
Fostoria - Hatton 69 6.01
Fostoria - North Belt 69 2.55
Fostoria North End - Bendix 69 0.23
Fostoria - Pemberville 69 18.68
Fostoria Central - East Lima 69 39.85
Franklin School - Holmes Wayne Co-op - Moreland 69 0.50
Fremont - North Fremont 69 2.68
Fremont - Sandusky Bay 69 12.25
Fremont Center - East Fremont 69 2.26
Fremont Center - Fremont 69 5.75
Frontier Power Co-op Ext. - Manning 69 1.39
Ginat Creek - Plymouth Heights 69 0.29
Glencoe - Norton 69 8.86
Glencoe - Speidel 69 25.36
Glenmont Jct. - Holmes Wayne Co-op - Stillwell 69 7.05
Granville - West Granville 69 4.36
Greely Ext. 69 1.75
Greer Steel Ext. No. 1 69 0.13
Greer Steel Ext. No. 2 69 0.10
Gros-Jean - South Wooster 69 0.07
Guernsey - Muskingum Co-op Ext. - Senecaville 69 0.01
Hammondsville - Carroll Co-Op 69 4.47
Hancock Wood Co-op - Townwood 69 0.02
Hancock Wood Co-op Ext. 69 0.02
Hancock Wood Co-op Ext. - Hatton 69 0.03
Hanging Rock - North Haverhill 69 2.77
Hanging Rock 69kV Ext. 69 0.18
Schedule G-5
Page 9 of 17
OHIO POWER COMPANY
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS TO OPCO EDC
TRANSMISSION LINES LESS THAN 132 KV
-----------------------------------
LINE NAME VOLTAGE MILES
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Harmont Road - Mahoning Road 69 0.07
Harpster Pumping - Waldo 69 24.96
Harrisburg Road - Stadium Park 69 3.82
Harrisville - Pleasant Grove 69 1.87
Haverhill - East Haverhill 69 0.10
Haviland - Paulding 69 10.72
Haviland - South Hicksville 69 26.38
Haviland - West Van Wert 69 14.60
Haysport - K. O. Ext. 69 1.32
Heath - Southgate 69 2.04
High Street - Steubenville 69 3.85
High Street - West Alikanna 69 3.99
Hillndale Ext. 69 0.66
Hover Park - South Side 69 1.62
Howard - Bucyrus No.1 69 17.75
Howard - Bucyrus No. 2 69 18.77
Howard - Willard 69 13.72
Hunt - Licking Co-op 69 0.02
Ireland Mine 69 0.00
Ironton - Portsmouth 69 26.74
Jacksontown - Licking Co-op 69 0.11
Janet Court - Third Street 69 0.55
Kaiser Junction - Dow Chemical 69 4.10
Kaiser Junction - Heath 69 2.90
Kalida - Auglaize 69 23.60
Kalida - East Ottawa 69 10.37
Kalida - Ottoville 69 8.34
Kammer - West Powhatan 69 2.08
Kammer - West Powhatan No. 1 69 0.66
Kammer - West Powhatan No. 2 69 0.65
Lafayette - Ada 69 9.73
Lancaster - Anchor Hocking 69 1.11
Lancaster Junction - Ralston 69 3.07
Latty Junction - Paulding Putnam Co-op 69 0.03
Leatherwood - North Cambridge 69 0.63
Leipsic - McComb 69 11.65
Licking Co-op Extension - Hebron 69 0.16
Licking Co-op, Jelloway 69 0.03
Lima - Kalida 69 17.23
Linden Avenue Ext. 69 1.52
Londonderry - Smyrna 69 4.21
Schedule G-5
Page 10 of 17
OHIO POWER COMPANY
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS TO OPCO EDC
TRANSMISSION LINES LESS THAN 132 KV
-----------------------------------
LINE NAME VOLTAGE MILES
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Longley - West Longley 69 0.39
Louisville Junction - Louisville 69 0.25
Mahoning Road - Cliftmont 69 1.01
Mahoning Road Ext. 69 0.03
Malvern - Pekin 69 5.28
Mansfield Road - Holmes Wayne Co-op 69 2.39
Mark Center - South Hicksville 69 8.83
Martin's Ferry - Tiltonville 69 5.04
Martin's Ferry - Wheeling Steel 69 0.11
McLuney - Rose Farm 69 1.73
Meigs - Coolville 69 24.31
Meigs - Gavin 69 7.09
Memorial Drive - Lancaster Junction 69 2.38
Mid Ohio Ext. 69 0.10
Midland - Plaza 69 1.54
Midway - Glencoe 69 6.51
Mill Street - Ridge Tool 69 1.08
Millbrook - Ashley 69 0.08
Millbrook - Offnere, 69 3.43
Millbrook - Siloam Tie Line 69 0.12
Millbrook Park - Scioto Trails 69 4.29
Miller - Jewett 69 4.92
Millersburg - South Millersburg 69 2.91
Moreland Junction - Billiar 69 21.66
Moreland Junction - Shreve 69 6.50
Moscow - Frontier Power 69 1.24
Mound - Rockwell 69 0.07
Moundsville - Dilles Bottom 69 4.07
Mount Vernon - Howard 69 25.86
Mount Vernon - North Newark 69 22.60
Moxahala Avenue - Hughes Street 69 1.53
Muskingum River - South Rokeby 69 21.28
New Lexington - Crooksville 69 8.55
New Lexington - Shawnee 69 8.58
Newark - East Newark 69 2.15
Newark - Kaiser Junction 69 2.64
Newark - Owens 69 0.97
Newark - Seroco Ave 69 1.44
Newark - Thornville 69 10.51
Newark Center - Licking Co-op 69 3.18
Newark Center - Southeast Newark 69 3.21
Schedule G-5
Page 11 of 17
OHIO POWER COMPANY
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS TO OPCO EDC
TRANSMISSION LINES LESS THAN 132 KV
-----------------------------------
LINE NAME VOLTAGE MILES
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newark Center Extension 69 0.04
Newcomerstown - Dennison 69 20.38
Newcomerstown - West New Philadelphia 69 35.02
No. 10 Station Extension 69 4.20
No. 25 Station Extension 69 0.01
No. 8 Station Extension 69 0.33
North Antwerp - East Antwerp 69 1.75
North Bloomville - North Central Co-op 69 8.07
North Byesville - South Cambridge 69 0.44
North Canton - Hoover 69 0.60
North Canton Ext. 69 2.97
North Columbus Grove - Paulding Putnam Co-op 69 0.10
North Continental - Paulding Putnam Co-op 69 7.72
North Coshocton - Cyclops 69 6.51
North Coshocton Tie Line 69 0.07
North Crestwood - Tall Timbers 69 0.96
North Crown City - Crown City 69 3.02
North Crown City - Crown City Mining 69 0.05
North Delphos - Ottoville 69 2.84
North Delphos - South Delphos 69 5.20
North Dillon - Dillon Road 69 0.19
North Findlay - North Baltimore No. 1 69 7.77
North Findlay - North Main 69 0.90
North Findlay Extension 69 0.05
North Fremont - East Fremont 69 2.91
North Galion - West Galion 69 3.62
North Hicksville - Northwestern Co-Op 69 1.41
North Hicksville Extension 69 0.10
North Ironton Extension 69 0.25
North Kalida - Paulding Putnam Co-op 69 0.04
North McConnelsville - South Rokeby 69 0.24
North Minford - Minford 69 1.69
North Mount Vernon Extension 69 0.71
North Muskingum - Muskingum Mine 69 1.01
North Muskingum - West Malta 69 8.38
North Newark - Owens 69 1.14
North Newark - South Grandville 69 8.15
North Newport Ext. 69 0.02
North Portsmouth - Sugarhill 69 6.91
North Stone Creek - Frontier Power 69 0.05
North Waldo - Waldo 69 3.95
Schedule G-5
Page 12 of 17
OHIO POWER COMPANY
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS TO OPCO EDC
TRANSMISSION LINES LESS THAN 132 KV
-----------------------------------
LINE NAME VOLTAGE MILES
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
North Wellsville - Calcutta 69 6.44
North Wellsville - Hammondsville 69 6.82
North Wellsville - Second Street 69 3.65
North Wharton - Hancock Wood Co-op 69 4.57
North Wintersville - Two Ridge 69 1.77
North Woodcock - Pandora 69 6.37
North Woodcock - Woodcock 69 7.30
North Wooster Tap 69 0.03
Northeast Canton - Diamond Street 69 3.45
Norton - Cravat 69 0.05
Norton - Somerton 69 25.00
Oak Hill - Holmes Wayne Co-op 69 7.48
Oakland Extension 69 0.06
Oertels Comers - Beaver 69 12.31
Oneida - Colfor 69 0.51
Orrville Road - North Wayne 69 4.71
Ottawa - Columbus Grove 69 6.92
Ottawa - East Ottawa 69 1.56
Owens Corning Extension - Grandville 69 0.39
Parlett - East Cadiz 69 7.48
Paulding - Mark Center 69 11.84
Paulding Putnam Co-op Extension - Antwerp 69 0.35
Pittsburgh Avenue Extension 69 0.21
Plaza Extension 69 0.04
Pleasant City - Cumberland 69 6.95
Pleasantville - Baltimore 69 6.06
Pratt - Phillips 69 0.09
Pratt Extension 69 0.28
Provident - Bannock Road 69 3.68
R&F Coal Extension, Georgetown 69 0.12
R.S.S. Extension 69 0.39
Raceland - Dow Chemical 69 5.55
Racine Hydro Extension 69 4.08
Ralston - North Logan 69 15.24
Randell Bearing Extension 69 0.13
Rawson - Standard Oil 69 0.03
Reedurban Extension 69 0.47
Ripley - Licking Co-op 69 12.81
Robyville - Midway 69 6.72
Robyville - South Cadiz 69 5.71
Rockhill - Industrial 69 1.12
Schedule G-5
Page 13 of 17
OHIO POWER COMPANY
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS TO OPCO EDC
TRANSMISSION LINES LESS THAN 132 KV
-----------------------------------
LINE NAME VOLTAGE MILES
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rockhill - Woodcock 69 14.49
Rosemount Extension 69 0.24
Royal Avenue - Wean United 69 0.13
S.B.C. Ext. 69 0.51
Saint Clair Avenue - State Line 69 3.25
Saint Stephens - North Central Co-op 69 0.02
Salineville - Summitville 69 5.36
Salt Fork - Guernsey Muskingum Co-Op 69 1.20
Saltillo - South Fultonham 69 5.92
Schoenbrunn Extension 69 0.56
Schroyer Avenue - Cherry Avenue 69 1.52
Scio - Jewett 69 6.72
Scioto Trail - Offnere 69 1.96
Second Street - Saint Clair Avenue 69 1.26
Seneca Wire 69kV Extension 69 0.26
Sharp Road - Range Road 69 1.43
Sharp Road Extention 69 0.02
Shawnee Road - Buckeye Road 69 2.10
Shawnee Road - Wapakoneta 69 8.92
Shelby Copperweld Steel 69 0.42
Sheridan - Buckeye Co-op 69 3.51
Shie Hill - Holmes Wayne Co-op 69 4.10
Shinnick Street - Oakland 69 2.14
Shreve - Big Prairie 69 3.07
Shreve - Holmes Wayne Co-op 69 4.13
Sidle Road - South Van Wert 69 1.89
Sifco Extension, Byesville 69 0.22
Somerset - Texas Eastern 69 1.27
Somerton Extension 69 0.04
South Amsterdam - Carroll Co-op 69 0.13
South Baltimore - Baltimore 69 2.19
South Cadiz - Consolidation Coal 69 1.20
South Cadiz - East Cadiz 69 1.99
South Cambridge - Chapman 69 1.57
South Cambridge - Sheild Alloy 69 0.03
South Carey - North Central Co-op 69 2.52
South Cecil - General Portland 69 0.33
South Coshocton - Killbuck 69 22.50
South Cumberland - Dragline 69 2.44
South Cumberland - Renrock Tie Line 69 7.86
South Delphos - Delphos 69 1.96
Schedule G-5
Page 14 of 17
OHIO POWER COMPANY
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS TO OPCO EDC
TRANSMISSION LINES LESS THAN 132 KV
-----------------------------------
LINE NAME VOLTAGE MILES
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
South Fultonham - Mount Sterling 69 7.18
South Gambrinus Road - Luntz 69 0.61
South Granville - West Granville 69 1.98
South Hicksville - North Hicksville 69 1.38
South Hicksville - Robison Park Tie Line 69 2.40
South Kenton - Fontaine 69 2.54
South Kenton - Kenton 69 2.83
South Kenton - United Co-op 69 3.81
South Kossuth - West Moulton 69 7.95
South Lancaster - East Lancaster 69 1.49
South Lancaster - Ralston 69 3.94
South Lancaster Extension 69 0.52
South Malvern - Carroll Co-Op 69 2.65
South Point - East Huntington 69 9.42
South Point - Ironton 69 10.33
South Rokeby - Gould No. 1 69 0.04
South Rokeby - Gould No. 2 69 0.05
South Tiffin - Carey 69 13.03
South Toronto - Euclid 69 1.13
South Toronto - Toronto 69 1.92
South Toronto Extension No. 1 69 1.05
South Upper Sandusky - Guardian 69 0.46
South Vanlue Extension 69 0.23
Southgate - Newark 69 3.57
Southgate - Seroco Avenue 69 1.89
Southwest Van Wert - South Convoy 69 3.48
Speidel - Barnesville 69 3.51
Sporn 69kV Start Up 69 0.54
Standard Oil Extension Fostoria 69 0.27
Standard Oil Extension, Lima 69 0.12
Stanley Court - Northeast Canton 69 3.15
Steubenville - Wintersville 69 3.02
Stone Street - North Fremont 69 0.71
Stony Hollow Ext. 69 0.09
Stratton Ext. 69 0.21
Stratton Juction - Stratton 69 1.08
Sugarcreek - Millersburg 69 17.06
Sugarhill - Friendship 69 6.57
Summerfield - Derwent 69 13.80
Summerfield - Texas Eastern 69 2.54
Sunnyside - East Sparta 69 9.47
Schedule G-5
Page 15 of 17
OHIO POWER COMPANY
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS TO OPCO EDC
TRANSMISSION LINES LESS THAN 132 KV
-----------------------------------
LINE NAME VOLTAGE MILES
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Switzer - Belmont Co-op, Powhatan 69 0.05
Switzer - Belmont Co-op, Woodsfield 69 13.83
Thornville - Lancaster 69 19.21
Thornville - New Lexington (Newark) 69 5.89
Thornville - New Lexington (Zanesville) 69 11.25
Tidd - Fort Steuben 69 7.09
Tidd - Tiltonsville 69 8.32
Tiffin - Fostoria 69 12.83
Tiffin - Fremont Center 69 19.38
Tiffin - Howard 69 36.12
Tiffin - South Tiffin 69 3.51
Tiffin Center - Maule Road 69 3.30
Tiffin Center Ext. 69kV 69 0.15
Tiffin Tap Off Extension No. 1 69 0.02
Tiffin Tap Off Extension No. 2 69 0.02
Tiltonville - Dillonvale 69 4.73
Tiltonville - Wheeling Steel No. 1 69 0.49
Tiltonville - Wheeling Steel No. 2 69 0.59
Tipple - Renrock 69 10.62
Torrey - Deuber Avenue 69 2.62
Torrey - Myers Lake 69 2.81
Unionvale - Nelms No. 1 69 0.41
United Co-op Extension Ada 69 0.00
Upper Sandusky - Forest 69 11.27
Upper Sandusky - Harpster Pumping 69 9.65
Van Wert - Haviland 69 10.05
Van Wert - South Van Wert 69 1.12
Van Wert Ext. 69 1.94
Wagenhals - Cherry Avenue 69 3.33
Wagenhals - Pekin 69 15.55
Wagenhals - Stanley Court 69 2.51
Wagenhals - West Louisville 69 4.61
Wakefield - Beaver 69 10.98
Waller - Central Portsmouth 69 0.83
Wapakoneta - West Moulton 69 8.40
Warwood - Glenns Run 69 1.13
Washington - Dilles Bottom 69 1.41
Wayview - North Canton 69 2.86
Wayview Tie Line 69 0.12
Welsh - Sharon Valley 69 0.93
West Alikanna - Wintersville 69 3.22
Schedule G-5
Page 16 of 17
OHIO POWER COMPANY
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS TO OPCO EDC
TRANSMISSION LINES LESS THAN 132 KV
-----------------------------------
LINE NAME VOLTAGE MILES
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
West Bellaire Ext. 69 0.51
West Bellville - Bellville 69 1.87
West Bowerstown - Carroll Co-op 69 0.60
West Brilliant - Weirton Construction 69 0.12
West Byesville Ext. 69 0.88
West Caldwell - Noble Correctional 69 0.65
West Cambridge - Fairdale 69 6.70
West Canton - Thirtieth Street 69 1.99
West Coshocton - North Coshocton 69 2.85
West Dover Ext. 69 0.20
West Granville - Etna 69 9.08
West Hebron - Dow Chemical 69 2.51
West Lancaster - Anchor Hocking 69 1.29
West Lancaster - Memorial Drive 69 3.11
West Malta - North McConnelsville 69 2.07
West Monroe Street - Monroe Street 69 1.69
West Moreland - South Moreland 69 1.16
West Mount Vernon - Mount Vernon 69 2.87
West Nashville - Holmes Wayne Co-op 69 1.35
West New Philadelphia - Dover 69 1.96
West New Philadelphia - East Dover 69 3.92
West New Philadelphia - New Philadelphia 69 2.36
West New Philadelphia Ext. 69 0.05
West Ottawa - Paulding Putnam Co-op 69 5.41
West Powhatan - North American No. 1 69 0.03
West Powhatan - North American No. 2 69 0.04
West Rockaway - North Central Co-op 69 8.32
West Roseville - Roseville 69 0.18
West Shadyside - Shadyside 69 1.76
West Smithville - Smithville 69 0.06
West Upper Sandusky - North Upper Sandusky 69 1.83
West Van Wert - Ohio City 69 5.42
West Wilmont - Holmes Wayne Co-op 69 0.02
West Wooster - East Wooster 69 10.62
Whirlpool Ext. 69 0.14
Willard - Greenwich 69 10.21
Williston Avenue Tap 69 0.01
Willowgrove - Belmont Co-op 69 0.09
Windsor - Glencoe 69 18.92
Windsor - Wilson Avenue 69 4.99
Windsor Ext. 69 0.40
Schedule G-5
Page 17 of 17
OHIO POWER COMPANY
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS TO OPCO EDC
TRANSMISSION LINES LESS THAN 132 KV
-----------------------------------
LINE NAME VOLTAGE MILES
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wolf Run - East Springfield 69 1.85
Wooster - Beall Ave 69 1.70
Wooster - Canal Road 69 3.08
Wooster - Moreland Jct. 69 4.73
Wooster -West Wooster 69 2.71
Yellowcreek - East Leipsic 69 1.09
Zanesville - Coopermill 69 1.78
Zanesville - Linden Avenue 69 2.80
Zanesville - Shinnick 69 1.26
Zion - Glass Rock 69 4.80
Blackjack Road Ext. 69 0.05
East Lansing - Lansing 69 3.53
East Logan - Shawnee 69 13.72
South Coshocton - Clow 69 0.25
South Cumberland - Cumberland 69 3.96
South Millersburg - Killbuck Junction 69 2.29
Fish Creek - McElroy 69 0.53
South Central Co-op - Deer Creek 69 2.44
North Hicksville - Butler 69 2.33
Schedule G-6
Page 1 of 6
OHIO POWER COMPANY
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS TO OPCO EDC
VOLTAGE (IN MVA)
CHARACTER OF ----------------------------
TRANSMISSION SUBSTATIONS SUBSTATION PRIMARY SECONDARY TERTIARY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CARDINAL PLANT/BRILLIANT, OH ATTENDED-T 138 23 0
ATTENDED-T 13.19 4 0
ATTENDED-T 24 4 0
ATTENDED-T 24 4 4
ATTENDED-T 345 24 0
ATTENDED-T 345 23 0
ATTENDED-T 138 6.9 0
ATTENDED-T 26 6.9 0
ATTENDED-T 13.8 0.6 0
GAVIN 1 AAS ATTENDED-T 138 13.8 0
ATTENDED-T 138 4 0
GAVIN 138KV ATTENDED-T 138 69 12
KAMMER 345KV/MOUNDSVILLE, WV ATTENDED-T 345 138 13.8
ATTENDED-T 345 138 12
KAMMER 400 YARD ATTENDED-T 765 345 34.5
ATTENDED-T 34.5 34.5 3
ATTENDED-T 34.5 12 0
KAMMER 765KV/MOUNDSVILLE, WV ATTENDED-T 765 500 34.5
ATTENDED-T 765 765 0
ATTENDED-T 34.5 34.5 0
ATTENDED-T 13.8 12 0
MUSKINGUM 138KV/ZANESVILLE, OH ATTENDED-T 345 138 12
ATTENDED-T 138 69 12
ACADEMIA/MT VERNON, OH UNATTENDED-T 138 69 12
UNATTENDED-T 23 12 0
ADA UNATTENDED-T 68.8 13.09 0
BUCYRUS CENTER/BUCYRUS, OH UNATTENDED-T 135.4 69.5 13.09
UNATTENDED-T 68.8 13.09 0
CALDWELL/MCCONNELSVILLE, OH UNATTENDED-T 138 34.5 0
UNATTENDED-T 138 12 0
UNATTENDED-T 34.5 4 0
CANAL RD/WOOSTER, OH UNATTENDED-T 138 69 23
UNATTENDED-T 23 4 0
CANTON CENTRAL/CANTON, OH UNATTENDED-T 345 138 12
CENTRAL PORTSMOUTH/PORTSMOUTH, OH UNATTENDED-T 69 12 0
UNATTENDED-T 138 69 34.5
UNATTENDED-T 34.5 7.2 0
CHATFIELD/BUCYRUS, OH UNATTENDED-T 135.4 69.5 13.09
CLIFMONT AVE. UNATTENDED-T 69 12 0
CROOKSVILLE/ZANESVILLE, OH UNATTENDED-T 69 4 0
UNATTENDED-T 138 69 12
DENNISON/CANTON, OH UNATTENDED-T 69 34.5 7.5
UNATTENDED-T 69 12 0
UNATTENDED-T 34.5 4 0
DON MARQUIS (OP) (OVEC) UNATTENDED-T 765 345 34.5
Schedule G-6
Page 2 of 6
OHIO POWER COMPANY
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS TO OPCO EDC
VOLTAGE (IN MVA)
CHARACTER OF ----------------------------
TRANSMISSION SUBSTATIONS SUBSTATION PRIMARY SECONDARY TERTIARY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UNATTENDED-T 345 34.5 0
DUNKIRK/LIMA, OH UNATTENDED-T 69 23 0
UNATTENDED-T 66 13.2 0
UNATTENDED-T 69.3 25 0
UNATTENDED-T 69 12 0
EAST AMSTERDAM/STEUBENVILLE, OH UNATTENDED-T 138 69 12
EAST CAMBRIDGE/ZANESVILLE, OH UNATTENDED-T 69 34.5 0
EAST CANTON UNATTENDED-T 69 12 0
EAST FREMONT UNATTENDED-T 67 13.09 0
UNATTENDED-T 67 4.36 0
EAST LIMA/LIMA, OH UNATTENDED-T 138 69 12
UNATTENDED-T 345 138 12
UNATTENDED-T 13 5.6 0
EAST LIVERPOOL/STEUBENVILLE, OH UNATTENDED-T 138 69 12
EAST OTTAWA /LIMA, OH UNATTENDED-T 70 35 0
EAST WOOSTER/WOOSTER, OH UNATTENDED-T 138 69 12
UNATTENDED-T 138 23 0
UNATTENDED-T 23 12 0
EAST ZANESVILLE/ZANESVILLE, OH UNATTENDED-T 138 69 12
FINDLAY CENTER/FOSTORIA, OH UNATTENDED-T 135.4 69.5 35
UNATTENDED-T 36.37 2.4 0
FOREST UNATTENDED-T 65.85 23.99 4.16
UNATTENDED-T 65.85 23.99 4.65
UNATTENDED-T 67 13.09 0
FOSTORIA CENTRAL UNATTENDED-T 345 138 13.8
UNATTENDED-T 339 137.5 13.8
FREMONT CENTER UNATTENDED-T 135.4 40.17 13.09
UNATTENDED-T 69 12 0
FREMONT/FOSTORIA, OH UNATTENDED-T 135.4 69.5 13.09
UNATTENDED-T 23.5 13.09 0
GREENLAWN/FOSTORIA, OH UNATTENDED-T 138 69 12
GREER/CANTON, OH UNATTENDED-T 34.5 12 0
UNATTENDED-T 69 34.5 0
HAMMONDSVILLE/STEUBENVILLE, OH UNATTENDED-T 69 23 0
UNATTENDED-T 69 12 0
HANGING ROCK/PORTSMOUTH, OH UNATTENDED-T 138 69 34.5
HANGING ROCK 765KV UNATTENDED-T 765 765 0
HARPSTER/BUCYRUS, OH UNATTENDED-T 70 35 0
HAVILAND/LIMA, OH UNATTENDED-T 135.4 69.5 13.09
UNATTENDED-T 132 69 34.65
UNATTENDED-T 135.6 13.09 0
HEATH/LANCASTER, OH UNATTENDED-T 138 69 12
UNATTENDED-T 138 34.5 0
UNATTENDED-T 69 4 0
HOWARD/BUCYRUS, OH UNATTENDED-T 69 12 0
UNATTENDED-T 138 69 11
KALIDIA UNATTENDED-T 68.8 13.09 0
Schedule G-6
Page 3 of 6
OHIO POWER COMPANY
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS TO OPCO EDC
VOLTAGE (IN MVA)
CHARACTER OF ----------------------------
TRANSMISSION SUBSTATIONS SUBSTATION PRIMARY SECONDARY TERTIARY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UNATTENDED-T 70 35 0
MALVERN/CANTON, OH UNATTENDED-T 138 69 12
UNATTENDED-T 138 23 12
UNATTENDED-T 23 12 0
MARYSVILLE 765KV UNATTENDED-T 765 345 34.5
UNATTENDED-T 765 765 0
UNATTENDED-T 765 345 12
MILLBROOK PARK/PORTSMOUTH, OH UNATTENDED-T 138 69 34.5
UNATTENDED-T 138 34.5 11
UNATTENDED-T 138 34.5 0
UNATTENDED-T 138 12 0
UNATTENDED-T 34.5 12 0
UNATTENDED-T 34.5 34.5 0
NEW LIBERTY UNATTENDED-T 132 34.5 0
UNATTENDED-T 34.4 7.2 0
UNATTENDED-T 138 7.55 0
NEWARK/ZANESVILLE, OH UNATTENDED-T 69 4 0
NEWARK CENTER/ZANESVILLE, OH UNATTENDED-T 138 69 12
NEWCOMERSTOWN/COSHOCTON, OH UNATTENDED-T 69 34.5 12
UNATTENDED-T 138 69 12
UNATTENDED-T 23 12 0
UNATTENDED-T 69 34.5 0
UNATTENDED-T 138 34.5 0
UNATTENDED-T 23 4 0
NORTH COSHOCTON/COSHOCTON, OH UNATTENDED-T 69 12 0
UNATTENDED-T 69 34.5 12
NORTH CROWN CITY-GAVIN/CHESHIRE, OH UNATTENDED-T 138 69 13.2
UNATTENDED-T 35 12 0
NORTH DELPHOS/LIMA, OH UNATTENDED-T 138 69 35
NORTH FINDLAY/FOSTORIA, OH UNATTENDED-T 135.4 35 0
UNATTENDED-T 135.4 69.5 0
UNATTENDED-T 35.86 4.33 0
NORTH MUSKINGUM/MCCONNELSVILLE, OH UNATTENDED-T 138 69 12
NORTH NEWARK/ZANESVILLE, OH UNATTENDED-T 138 69 4
UNATTENDED-T 69 4 0
UNATTENDED-T 69 12 0
NORTH PORTSMOUTH/PORTSMOUTH, OH UNATTENDED-T 138 69 34.5
NORTH PROCTORVILLE/PORTSMOUTH, OH UNATTENDED-T 765 138 13.8
NORTH WALDO/WALDO, OH UNATTENDED-T 67 13.9 0
UNATTENDED-T 132 69 7.2
NORTH WOODCOCK/LIMA, OH UNATTENDED-T 135.4 69.5 35.5
UNATTENDED-T 35.3 4.16 0
NORTHEAST CANTON/CANTON, OH UNATTENDED-T 23 12 0
UNATTENDED-T 138 69 12
NORTHEAST FINDLAY/FOSTORIA, OH UNATTENDED-T 135.6 36.2 0
OHIO CENTRAL/ZANESVILLE, OH UNATTENDED-T 345 138 12
OHIO CENTRAL/ZANESVILLE, OH UNATTENDED-T 138 69 12
Schedule G-6
Page 4 of 6
OHIO POWER COMPANY
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS TO OPCO EDC
VOLTAGE (IN MVA)
CHARACTER OF ----------------------------
TRANSMISSION SUBSTATIONS SUBSTATION PRIMARY SECONDARY TERTIARY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OHIO CENTRAL UNATTENDED-T 138 69 4
UNATTENDED-T 34.5 12 0
UNATTENDED-T 69 34.5 0
UNATTENDED-T 23 12 0
UNATTENDED-T 138 12 0
UNATTENDED-T 23 4 0
PEKIN/CANTON, OH UNATTENDED-T 69 12 0
UNATTENDED-T 69 23 0
PLEASANT ST/PORTSMOUTH, OH UNATTENDED-T 69 12 0
UNATTENDED-T 69 34.5 0
REEDURBAN/CANTON, OH UNATTENDED-T 138 12 0
UNATTENDED-T 138 69 12
UNATTENDED-T 69 4 0
ROCKHILL UNATTENDED-T 132 34.65 11
UNATTENDED-T 132 19.05 6.35
UNATTENDED-T 34.4 13.09 0
UNATTENDED-T 139.2 35 13.2
UNATTENDED-T 34.4 4.36 0
UNATTENDED-T 135.4 69.5 35
RUTLAND-GAVIN/CHESHIRE, OH UNATTENDED-T 138 34.5 0
SCHROYER AVE/CANTON, OH UNATTENDED-T 69 4 0
UNATTENDED-T 69 23 12
UNATTENDED-T 69 12 0
SHARP RD/MT VERNON, OH UNATTENDED-T 138 69 12
SHAWNEE RD/LIMA, OH UNATTENDED-T 138 69 34.5
UNATTENDED-T 132 13.09 0
UNATTENDED-T 34.4 2.52 0
SOMERTON/BELMONT, OH UNATTENDED-T 138 69 12
SOUTH BALTIMORE/LANCASTER, OH UNATTENDED-T 138 69 4
SOUTH CADIZ/STEUBENVILLE, OH UNATTENDED-T 69 12 0
UNATTENDED-T 138 69 12
SOUTH CAMBRIDGE UNATTENDED-T 69 34.5 0
UNATTENDED-T 69 34.5 12
SOUTH CANTON/CANTON, OH UNATTENDED-T 345 138 34.5
UNATTENDED-T 138 12 0
UNATTENDED-T 765 345 34.5
UNATTENDED-T 34.5 12 0
SOUTH COSHOCTON/COSHOCTON, OH UNATTENDED-T 138 69 12
UNATTENDED-T 69 34.5 12
UNATTENDED-T 138 34.5 0
UNATTENDED-T 34.5 12 0
SOUTH CUMBERLAND/MCCONNELSVILLE, OH UNATTENDED-T 138 69 34.5
UNATTENDED-T 138 25 0
UNATTENDED-T 34.5 4 0
SOUTH HICKSVILLE/LIMA, OH UNATTENDED-T 135.4 69.5 13.09
SOUTH KENTON UNATTENDED-T 135 70 24.6
UNATTENDED-T 22 2.4 0
Schedule G-6
Page 5 of 6
OHIO POWER COMPANY
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS TO OPCO EDC
VOLTAGE (IN MVA)
CHARACTER OF ----------------------------
TRANSMISSION SUBSTATIONS SUBSTATION PRIMARY SECONDARY TERTIARY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UNATTENDED-T 132 45 0
SOUTH LANCASTER/LANCASTER, OH UNATTENDED-T 138 69 12
UNATTENDED-T 138 69 34.5
SOUTH MILLERSBURG/WOOSTER, OH UNATTENDED-T 138 34.5 7.2
SOUTH POINT/PORTSMOUTH, OH UNATTENDED-T 138 69 34.5
UNATTENDED-T 138 34.5 0
UNATTENDED-T 34.5 12 0
SOUTH TIFFIN UNATTENDED-T 132 69.3 6.9
SOUTH TORONTO STEUBENVILLE, OH UNATTENDED-T 138 69 12
SOUTHEAST CANTON/CANTON, OH UNATTENDED-T 345 138 34.5
STANLEY COURT/CANTON, OH UNATTENDED-T 69 12 0
UNATTENDED-T 69 23 4
STERLING/LIMA, OH UNATTENDED-T 138 34.5 0
UNATTENDED-T 138 34.5 11
STEUBENVILLE/STEUBENVILLE, OH UNATTENDED-T 138 69 12
UNATTENDED-T 23 12 0
SUMMERFIELD/BELMONT, OH UNATTENDED-T 138 69 6.9
SUNNYSIDE/CANTON, OH UNATTENDED-T 138 12 0
UNATTENDED-T 138 23 0
UNATTENDED-T 138 23 6.9
SWITZER/BELMONT, OH UNATTENDED-T 138 69 12
TIFFIN CENTER/FOSTORIA, OH UNATTENDED-T 135.4 69.5 13.09
TILTONSVILLE/BELMONT, OH UNATTENDED-T 138 69 12
UNATTENDED-T 69 12 0
TIMKEN/CANTON, OH UNATTENDED-T 138 23 0
UNATTENDED-T 138 23 12
TIMKEN MERCY UNATTENDED-T 69 4 0
TORREY UNATTENDED-T 138 23 12
UNATTENDED-T 138 23 11
UNATTENDED-T 138 69 12
UNATTENDED-T 69 12 0
UNATTENDED-T 23 12 0
WAGENHALS UNATTENDED-T 138 69 23
WAKEFIELD UNATTENDED-T 34.5 4 0
UNATTENDED-T 138 34.5 12
WAYVIEW/CANTON, OH UNATTENDED-T 138 12 0
UNATTENDED-T 138 69 12
WEST BELLAIRE/BELMONT, OH UNATTENDED-T 138 69 12
UNATTENDED-T 345 138 12
WEST CAMBRIDGE/ZANESVILLE, OH UNATTENDED-T 138 69 12
UNATTENDED-T 138 34.5 0
WEST CANTON/CANTON,OH UNATTENDED-T 138 34.5 0
UNATTENDED-T 138 12 0
UNATTENDED-T 138 69 12
UNATTENDED-T 69 34.5 0
WEST COSHOCTON/COSHOCTON,OH UNATTENDED-T 138 69 12
WEST DOVER/DOVER,OH UNATTENDED-T 138 69 12
Schedule G-6
Page 6 of 6
OHIO POWER COMPANY
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS TO OPCO EDC
VOLTAGE (IN MVA)
CHARACTER OF ----------------------------
TRANSMISSION SUBSTATIONS SUBSTATION PRIMARY SECONDARY TERTIARY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WEST END FOSTORIA/FOSTORIA,OH UNATTENDED-T 71.73 4.33 0
UNATTENDED-T 67 4.36 0
UNATTENDED-T 135.4 69.5 13.09
WEST HEBRON/LANCASTER,OH UNATTENDED-T 138 69 34.5
UNATTENDED-T 34.5 34.5 0
WEST LANCASTER/LANCASTER,OH UNATTENDED-T 138 69 12
UNATTENDED-T 138 69 7.10
WEST LIMA/LIMA,OH UNATTENDED-T 135.4 35 0
WEST MELROSE/FOSTORIA,OH UNATTENDED-T 34.4 13.09 0
WEST MILLERSPORT/LANCASTER,OH UNATTENDED-T 345 138 12
WEST MOUTON/LIMA,OH UNATTENDED-T 135.4 69.5 13.09
UNATTENDED-T 23.9 4.33 0
WEST MT VERNON/MT VERNON,OH UNATTENDED-T 138 69 4
WEST NEW PHILADELPHIA/CANTON,OH UNATTENDED-T 138 69 7.19
UNATTENDED-T 138 69 12
UNATTENDED-T 138 12 0
UNATTENDED-T 138 34.5 4
WEST VAN WERT/LlMA,OH UNATTENDED-T 70 35 0
WOOSTER/WOOSTER,OH UNATTENDED-T 23 4 0
UNATTENDED-T 138 69 12
UNATTENDED-T 23 12 0
UNATTENDED-T 138 23 0
ZANESVILLE/ZANESVILLE,OH UNATTENDED-T 138 23 0
UNATTENDED-T 138 69 12
UNATTENDED-T 23 12 0
UNATTENDED-T 69 34.5 0
Schedule G-7
Page 1 of 2
CENTRAL POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS TO CPL PGC
GENERATION RELATED EQUIPMENT
T REGION POWER PLANT UNIT # EQUIPMENT TO BE TRANSFERRED DEVICE #
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Corpus Christi Coleto Creek 1 Generator Step-up Transformer (GSU)
GSU leads to breaker
Circuit Breaker 9880
1 Res. Aux. Leads
Circuit Breaker 9870
Corpus Christi Barney Davis 1 GSU
GSU leads to breaker
Circuit Breaker 9510
2 GSU
GSU leads to breaker
Circuit Breaker 9700
1 & 2 Res. Aux. Leads
Circuit Breaker 9520
Corpus Christi J.L. Bates 1 GSU
GSU leads to breaker
Circuit Breaker 4440
2 GSU
GSU leads to breaker
Circuit Breaker 4700
1 & 2 Res. Aux. Leads
Circuit Breaker 4450
Corpus Christi La Palma 2 GSU (auto)
GSU leads to breaker
Circuit Breaker 40
4 GSU
GSU leads to breaker
Circuit Breaker 80
5 GSU
GSU leads to breaker
Circuit Breaker 110
6 GSU
GSU leads to breaker
Circuit Breaker 4940
7 GSU
GSU leads to breaker
Circuit Breaker 5805
All Res. Aux. Leads
Circuit Breaker 4840
Corpus Christi Laredo 1 GSU
GSU leads to breaker
Circuit Breaker 2410
2 GSU
GSU leads to breaker
Circuit Breaker 985
3 GSU
GSU leads to breaker
Circuit Breaker 9415
3 Res. Aux. leads
Circuit Breaker 9435
1 & 2 Res. Aux. Leads
Circuit Breaker 2430
Corpus Christi Lon Hill 1 GSU
Schedule G-7
Page 2 of 2
CENTRAL POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS TO CPL PGC
GENERATION RELATED EQUIPMENT
T REGION POWER PLANT UNIT # EQUIPMENT TO BE TRANSFERRED DEVICE #
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GSU leads to breaker
Circuit Breaker 5810
2 GSU
GSU leads to breaker
Circuit Breaker 5790
1 & 2 Res. Aux. Leads
Circuit Breaker 5680
3 GSU
GSU leads to breaker
Circuit Breaker 5690
4 GSU
GSU leads to breaker
Circuit Breaker 7055
3 & 4 Res. Aux. Leads
Circuit Breaker 8130
Corpus Christi Nueces Bay 5 GSU
GSU leads to breaker
Circuit Breaker 2130
6 GSU
GSU leads to breaker
Circuit Breaker 9210
7 GSU
GSU leads to breaker
Circuit Breaker 9355
6 & 7 Res. Aux. Leads
Circuit Breaker 9190
Corpus Christi Victoria 3 GSU
GSU leads to breaker
Circuit Breaker 5150
4 GSU
GSU leads to breaker
Circuit Breaker 6880
5 GSU
GSU leads to breaker
Circuit Breaker 6120
6 GSU
GSU leads to breaker
Circuit Breaker 6555
5 & 6 Res. Aux. Leads
Circuit Breaker 7000
Corpus Christi Eagle Pass Hydro 1 GSU leads to breaker
Circuit Breaker 160A
2 GSU leads to breaker
Circuit Breaker 170A
3 GSU leads to breaker
Circuit Breaker 180A
Corpus Christi E.S. Joslin 1 GSU
GSU leads to breaker
Circuit Breaker 8365
1 Res. Aux. Leads
Circuit Breaker 8355
Schedule G-8
Page 1 of 2
WEST TEXAS UTILITIES COMPANY
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS TO WTU PGC
GENERATION RELATED EQUIPMENT
T REGION POWER PLANT UNIT # EQUIPMENT TO BE TRANSFERRED DEVICE #
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Corpus Christi Abilene Plant 3 Unit leads to breaker
Circuit Breaker 1540
4 Unit leads to breaker
Circuit Breaker 1560
3 Res. Aux. Leads
Circuit Breaker 430
4 Res. Aux. Leads
Circuit Breaker 431
Corpus Christi Ft. Phantom 1 GSU
GSU leads to breaker
Circuit Breaker 4750
2 GSU
GSU leads to breaker
Circuit Breaker 4980
1 Res. Aux. Leads
Disconnect Switch 4753
Corpus Christi Lk. Pauline 1 GSU
GSU leads to breaker
Circuit Breaker 2545
2 GSU
GSU leads to breaker
Circuit Breaker 1435
1 & 2 Disconnect Switch 2547
Circuit Breaker 2580
Circuit Breaker 3705
Corpus Christi Oak Creek 1 GSU
GSU leads to breaker
Circuit Breaker 3200
1 Res. Aux. Leads
Disconnect Switch 3222
Corpus Christi Oklaunion 1 GSU
GSU leads to breaker
Disconnect Switch 5608
Circuit Breaker 5600
1 Res. Aux. leads
Corpus Christi Paint Creek 1 GSU
GSU leads to breaker
Circuit Breaker 1660
2 Circuit Breaker 1785
3 GSU
GSU leads to breaker
Circuit Breaker 1880
4 GSU
GSU leads to breaker
Circuit Breaker 4475
All Res. Aux. Leads
Circuit Breaker 1650
Corpus Christi Rio Pecos 4 GSU
GSU leads to breaker
Circuit Breaker 640
5 GSU
GSU leads to breaker
Schedule G-8
Page 2 of 2
WEST TEXAS UTILITIES COMPANY
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS TO WTU PGC
GENERATION RELATED EQUIPMENT
T REGION POWER PLANT UNIT # EQUIPMENT TO BE TRANSFERRED DEVICE #
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Circuit Breaker 3000
6 GSU
GSU leads to breaker
Circuit Breaker 4000
All Res. Aux. Leads
Fuses and Disconnect Switch 3003
Corpus Christi San Angelo PS 1 GSU
GSU leads to breaker
Circuit Breaker 3600
2 GSU
GSU leads to breaker
Disconnect Switch 3601
Circuit Breaker 6105
All Res. Aux. Leads
Disconnect Switch 3607
Schedule G-9
Page 1 of 1
SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS TO SWEPCO EDC
VOLTAGE (IN MVA)
CHARACTER OF ----------------------------
TRANSMISSION SUBSTATIONS SUBSTATION PRIMARY SECONDARY TERTIARY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BANN TRANSMISSION 138 69 0
CROCKETT TRANSMISSION 345 138 13.8
DIANA TRANSMISSION 345 138 13.8
LAKE LAMOND TRANSMISSION 138 69 12.5
LONE STAR SOUTH TRANSMISSION 138 69 0
MARSHALL TRANSMISSION 138 69 13.2
N.W. HENDERSON TRANSMISSION 138 69 0
N.W. TEXARKANA TRANSMISSION 345 138 0
NORTH MINEOLA TRANSMISSION 138 69 7.2
NORTH NEW BOSTON TRANSMISSION 138 69 0
OVERTON TRANSMISSION 138 69 13.2
PERDUE TRANSMISSION 138 69 0
PETTY TRANSMISSION 138 69 0
PIRKEY PLANT TRANSMISSION 345 138 13.8
PITTSBURG TRANSMISSION 138 69 0
ROCK HILL TRANSMISSION 138 69 13.2
TENASKA-RUSK COUNTY -SWITCHES/ TRANSMISSION 345 0 0
BREAKERS -SERVES INTERCONNECTION
FOR INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCER
WELSH PLANT SWITCHING STATION TRANSMISSION 34.5 34.5 0
WELSH HVDC TRANSMISSION 345 0 0
WEST ATLANTA TRANSMISSION 138 69 0
WHITNEY * (ATTENDED) 138 69 12.5
WILKES PLANT TRANSMISSION 345 138 13.8
TENAHA TRANSMISSION 138 0 0
SCHEDULE G-10
PAGE 1 OF 2
SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS TO SWEPCO TEXAS EDC
TRANSMISSION LINES kV LINE # MILES STATE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Atlanta-Hughes Sprngs 69 201 29.1 TX
Beckville-Carthage 69 202 8.9 TX
Carthage-Murvall Tap 69 202 3.8 TX
Bloomburg-Atlanta 69 203 8.0 TX
Karnack Switching Station-Woodlawn 69 205 9.6 TX
Jefferson Sub-Tex/La state line toward Superior 69 205 21.3 TX
Perdue-Gilmer 69 206 11.4 TX
Perdue-Clarksville North circuit 69 206 7.0 TX
Kilgore-Clarksville 69 207 14.1 TX
Longview-Clarksville 69 208 18.3 TX
Hughes Spngs-Dngerfld-Mt Plsnt 69 209 23.3 TX
Whitney-Overton 69 210 28.6 TX
Perdue-Mineola 69 211 29.8 TX
Perdue-Clarksville South circuit 69 211 7.3 TX
Mineola-Quitman-Mt. Pleasant 69 212 85.0 TX
New Boston-Mt. Pleasant 69 213 46.9 TX
Hooks-Bann 69 213 7.1 TX
Taylor St-39th-Bann 69 213 14.7 TX
Grand Saline-Quitman 69 214 24.4 TX
Mineola-Grand Saline 69 214 14.0 TX
Overton-Turnertown (from tap off conc str to south) 69 215 8.3 TX
Rockbill to N.W. Henderson 69 215 30.8 TX
Marshall-Blocker Tap 69 215 5.3 TX
Blocker Tap-Rockhill 69 215 12.4 TX
Hughes Springs-Lone Star-Jenkins 69 216 18.5 TX
Evenside to Sawmill,etc. 69 217 12.7 TX
Pittsburg-Gilmer 69 218 24.5 TX
Mt Plsnt-Petty 69 218 2.1 TX
Lake Lamond-SE L'view-Whitney 69 219 13.6 TX
Rockhill to Carthage 69 221 16.0 TX
Lake Lamond-Airline-L'view Hts 69 222 13.7 TX
Bann-Taylor St 69 223 7.0 TX
Winnfield-Mt.Vernon 69 224 7.4 TX
Waskom-Karnack Swtchng 69 225 17.4 TX
S.E. Longview-Knox Lee 69 226 5.9 TX
Eylau-Bann 69 227 4.3 TX
Pittsburg-Winnsboro 69 229 20.0 TX
Evenside to Poynter 69 231 3.9 TX
Evenside to N. W. Henderson 69 233 6.4 TX
Burford Survey-Naples 69 234 6.1 TX
N.Mineola-Rayburn Country 138 198 16.6 TX
Center-Carthage T 138 200 29.1 TX
Center-Texas state line-to Logansport 138 204 16.8 TX
NW Henderson-Overton 138 215 13.2 TX
Pittsburg-Petty 138 218 9.7 TX
Lone Star So-Pittsburg 138 220 17.7 TX
Bann-N. New Boston 138 228 17.9 TX
Rockhill-Tx/La state line toward Logansport 138 230 35.7 TX
NW Texarkana-Ark/Tx state line toward Sugarhill 138 235 11.1 TX
Perdue-North Mineola 138 236 30.4 TX
Perdue-Knox Lee 138 237 37.9 TX
Diana-Perdue 138 238 21.9 TX
Knox Lee-NW Henderson 138 239 17.9 TX
SCHEDULE G-10
PAGE 2 OF 2
SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS TO SWEPCO TEXAS EDC
TRANSMISSION LINES kV LINE # MILES STATE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wilkes-Jefferson Sw Sta 138 240 11.1 TX
Ark/Tex state line-NW Tex-Bann-W.Atl-Wilkes 138 241 65.3 TX
Jefferson Sw Sta-Marshall-Pirkey-Knox Lee 138 241 38.9 TX
Knox Lee-Overton 138 241 23.9 TX
Jefferson Sw Sta-Tex/La state
line toward Lieberman 138 242 28.1 TX
Knox Lee-Whitney 138kv 138 243 13.4 TX
Whitney-Pirkey-Marshall 138 243 24.4 TX
Pirkey-S.E. Marshall 138 244 10.5 TX
SE Marshall-Scottsville-Tex/La state line
toward Longwood 138 244 18.8 TX
Rockhill-Knox Lee 138 245 16.3 TX
Rockhill to Tex-La state line toward Spngridge 138 245 27.4 TX
Wilkes-Bryan's Mill 138 246 27.0 TX
Bryan's Mill-N.New Boston 138 246 19.8 TX
N.New Boston-Ark/Tx state line toward Patterson 138 246 5.9 TX
Wilkes-rear of Jeff Sw Sta toward W. Atlanta 138 247 32.0 TX
Lone Star So-Wilkes 138 248 11.0 TX
Whitney-Pliler-Diana-Lone Star So 138 249 36.2 TX
Wilkes-Petty 138 250 34.1 TX
Eastex-Harrison Rd 138 277 9.6 TX
Diana-Springhill-Lake Lamond 138 278 23.0 TX
Welsh-Monticello 345 199 15.9 TX
Lydia-NW Texarkana 345 270 32.2 TX
Wilkes-Tex/La State line toward Longwood 345 271 38.4 TX
Diana-Tex/La state line toward SW Shreveport 345 272 57.3 TX
Pirkey-Diana 345 273 24.8 TX
Pirkey-Walker Co 345 274 129.2 TX
TOTAL LINE MILES IN TEXAS 1698.9
Schedule G-11
Page 1 of 1
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE CORPORATION
POWER SALES/SERVICE AGREEMENTS
TO BE ASSIGNED TO
PMA
AGREEMENT NAME FERC RATE SCHEDULE DESIGNATION
Service Agreement With The City Of AEP Electric Tariff Vol. No. 5,
Radford, Virginia, Dated January 12, 1998 Service Agreement No. 103
Power Sales Service Agreement With AEP Electric Tariff Vol. No. 5,
The Village Of Arcadia, Dated August 3, 1998 Service Agreement No. 153
Power Sales Service Agreement With The Village AEP Electric Tariff Vol. No. 5,
Of Bloomdale, Dated March 24, 1998 Service Agreement No. 154
Power Sales Service Agreement With The City Of AEP Electric Tariff Vol. No. 5,
Bryan, Dated August 3, 1998 Service Agreement No. 155
Power Sales Service Agreement With The Village AEP Electric Tariff Vol. No. 5,
Of Carey, Dated March 2, 1998 Service Agreement No. 156
Power Sales Service Agreement With The City Of AEP Electric Tariff Vol. No. 5,
Clyde, Dated March 4, 1998 Service Agreement No. 157
Power Sales Service Agreement With The Village AEP Electric Tariff Vol. No. 5,
Of Cygnet, Dated August 3, 1998 Service Agreement No. 158
Power Sales Service Agreement With The Village AEP Electric Tariff Vol. No. 5,
Of Deshler, Dated March 9, 1998 Service Agreement No. 159
Power Sales Service Agreement With The Village AEP Electric Tariff Vol. No. 5,
Of Greenwich, Dated April 21, 1998 Service Agreement No. 160
Power Sales Service Agreement With The Village AEP Electric Tariff Vol. No. 5,
Of Ohio City, Dated August 3, 1998 Service Agreement No. 161
Power Sales Service Agreement With The Village AEP Electric Tariff Vol. No. 5,
Of Plymouth, Dated August 3, 1998 Service Agreement No. 162
Power Sales Service Agreement With The Village AEP Electric Tariff Vol. No. 5,
Of Republic, Dated March 15, 1998 Service Agreement No. 163
Power Sales Service Agreement With The City Of AEP Electric Tariff Vol. No. 5,
Saint Clairsville, dated August 3, 1998 Service Agreement No. 164
Power Sales Service Agreement With The Village AEP Electric Tariff Vol. No. 5,
Of Shiloh, Dated August 3, 1998 Service Agreement No. 165
Power Sales Service Agreement With The Village AEP Electric Tariff Vol. No. 5,
Of Sycamore, Dated August 3, 1998 Service Agreement No. 166
Power Sales Service Agreement With The City Of AEP Electric Tariff Vol. No. 5,
Wapakoneta, Dated June 24, 1998 Service Agreement No. 167
Power Sales Service Agreement With The Village AEP Electric Tariff Vol. No. 5,
Of Wharton, Dated March 16, 1998 Service Agreement No. 168
Service Agreement With City Of Sturgis, AEP Electric Tariff Vol. No. 5,
Dated July 14, 1999 Service Agreement No. 233
Schedule G-12
Page 1 of 1
APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY
POWER SALES/SERVICE AGREEMENTS
TO BE ASSIGNED TO
OPCO PGC
AGREEMENT NAME FERC RATE SCHEDULE DESIGNATION
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Power Supply Agreement Between Appalachian APCO Rate Schedule No. 135
Power Company And North Carolina Electric
Membership Corporation, Dated August 22, 1994
Schedule G-13
Page 1 of 1
CENTRAL POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY
POWER SALES/SERVICE AGREEMENTS
TO BE ASSIGNED TO
CPL PGC
AGREEMENT NAME FERC RATE SCHEDULE DESIGNATION
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Electric Service Contract By And Between
Central Power And Light Company And
City of Robstown, Texas, Dated May 14, 1984 CPL Rate Schedule No. 70
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Service Agreement Between Central Power
And Light Company And Pedernales CPL Tariff No. 1,
Electric Cooperative, Inc. Service Agreement No. 8
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Service Agreement Between Central Power
And Light Company and South Texas CPL Tariff No. 1,
Electric Cooperative, Inc. Service Agreement No. 10
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Schedule G-14
Page 1 of 1
OHIO POWER COMPANY
POWER SALES/SERVICE AGREEMENTS
TO BE ASSIGNED TO
APCO
AGREEMENT NAME FERC RATE SCHEDULE DESIGNATION
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interconnection Agreement Between The Ohio OPCO Rate Schedule No. 18
Power Company And Wheeling Electric Company,
Dated February 24, 1949
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Schedule G-15
Page 1 of 1
WEST TEXAS UTILITIES COMPANY
POWER SALES/SERVICE AGREEMENTS
TO BE ASSIGNED TO
WTU PGC
FERC RATE SCHEDULE
AGREEMENT NAME DESIGNATION
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
First Revised Agreement For Sale And Purchase
Of Power And Associated Energy And Responsive
Reserves Between West Texas Utilities Company CSW FERC Electric Tariff,
And Brazos Electric Cooperative, Inc. Under First Revised Volume No. 8,
Market-Based Rate Power Sales Tariff Of West First Revised Service
Texas Utilities Company, Dated August 29, 2000 Agreement No. 26
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Power Supply Agreement Between West Texas
Utilities Company And The City Of
Hearne, Texas, Dated August 25, 1997 WTU Rate Schedule No. 76
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Service Agreement Between West Texas Utilities WTU Tariff No. 9,
Company And Coleman County Electric First Revised Service
Cooperative, Inc., Dated September 30, 1997 Agreement No. 1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Service Agreement Between West Texas Utilities WTU Tariff No. 9,
Company And Concho Valley Electric First Revised Service
Cooperative, Inc., Dated September 18, 1997 Agreement No. 2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Service Agreement Between West Texas Utilities WTU Tariff No. 9,
Company And Golden Spread Valley Electric First Revised Service
Cooperative, Inc., Dated September 30, 1997 Agreement No. 3
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Service Agreement Between West Texas Utilities WTU Tariff No. 9,
Company And Lighthouse Electric First Revised Service
Cooperative, Inc., Dated September 25, 1997 Agreement No. 5
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Service Agreement Between West Texas Utilities WTU Tariff No. 9,
Company and Midwest Electric Cooperative, Inc., First Revised Service
Dated September 16, 1997 Agreement No. 6
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Service Agreement Between West Texas Utilities WTU Tariff No. 9,
Company And Pedernales Electric Cooperative, Inc. First Revised Service
(formerly Kimble), Dated September 24, 1997 Agreement No. 4
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Service Agreement Between West Texas Utilities
Company And Rio Grande Electric Cooperative, Inc., WTU Tariff No. 9,
Dated September 30, 1997 Service Agreement No. 7
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Service Agreement Between West Texas Utilities
Company And Southwest Texas Electric WTU Tariff No. 9,
Cooperative, Inc., Dated September 30, 1997 Service Agreement No. 8
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Service Agreement Between West Texas Utilities
Company And Stamford Electric Cooperative, Inc., WTU Tariff No. 9,
Dated September 30, 1997 Service Agreement No. 9
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Service Agreement Between West Texas Utilities WTU Tariff No. 9,
Company And Taylor Electric Cooperative, Inc., First Revised Service
Dated September 30, 1997 Agreement No. 10
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Service Agreement Between West Texas Utilities WTU Tariff No. 1,
Company And City of Brady, Dated July 22, 1993 Service Agreement No. 17
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Agreement For Electric Service With The City of
Coleman, Texas, dated March 28, 1977 WTU Rate Schedule No. 40
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Power Supply Agreement Between West Texas Utilities CSW FERC Electric Tariff,
Company And The City of Weatherford, Texas, First Revised Volume No. 8,
Dated June 21, 1996 First Revised Service
Agreement No. 25
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Service Agreement Between West Texas Utilities
Company and Rio Grande Electric Cooperative, Inc., WTU Tariff No. 1,
Dated April 8, 1994 Service Agreement No. 19
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Restated And Amended Service Agreement Between
West Texas Utilities Company and Tex-La Electric WTU Tariff No. 1,
Cooperative of Texas, Inc., Dated June 15, 2000 Service Agreement No. 18
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Agreement Between West Texas Utilities Company
And Texas-New Mexico Power Company WTU Rate Schedule No. 39
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Service Agreement Between West Texas Utilities
Company And Western Farmers Electric WTU Tariff No. 1,
Cooperative, Inc. Service Agreement No. 13
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Schedule G-16
Page 1 of 1
COLUMBUS SOUTHERN POWER COMPANY
INTERCONNECTION AND TRANSMISSION AGREEMENTS
TO BE ASSIGNED TO
CSP EDC
FERC RATE SCHEDULE
AGREEMENT NAME DESIGNATION
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interconnection Agreement Between City of Columbus,
Ohio and Columbus Southern Power Company,
Dated January 1, 1988 FERC Rate Schedule No. 37
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interconnection Agreement Between The Cincinnati
Gas & Electric Company and Columbus Southern
Power Company, Dated April 1, 1977 FERC Rate Schedule No. 26
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interconnection Agreement Between The Dayton
Power & Light Company and Columbus Southern Power
Company, Dated March 1, 1977 FERC Rate Schedule No. 29
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interconnection Agreement Between Ohio Edison
Company and Columbus Southern Power Company,
Dated May 15, 1977 FERC Rate Schedule No. 27
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Power Delivery Agreement Between Buckeye Power,
Inc., The Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company,
Columbus and Southern Ohio Electric Company,
The Dayton Power and Light Company, Monongahela
Power Company, Ohio Power Company and The Toleda
Edison Company, Dated January 1, 1968 FERC Rate Schedule No. 17(1)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic Transmission Agreement Between the
Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company, the Dayton
Power and Light Company and Columbus and
Southern Ohio Electric Company Re Beckjord-Greene
Line, Dated October 1, 1964, as supplemented
and amended
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic Transmission Agreement No. 2 (Stuart
Transmission) Between the Cincinnati Gas & Electric
Company, Columbus and Southern Ohio Electric
Company and the Dayton Power and Light Company,
Dated December 29, 1966, as supplemented and amended
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic Transmission Agreement No. 3 (Conesville
Unit 4 Transmission) Between the Cincinnati Gas &
Electric Company, Columbus and Southern Ohio
Electric Company and the Dayton Power and Light
Company, Dated March 1, 1973, as supplemented
and amended
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic Transmission Agreement No. 4 (Zimmer
Transmission) Between the Cincinnati Gas & Electric
Company, Columbus and Southern Ohio Electric
Company and the Dayton Power and Light Company,
Dated January 1, 1982, as supplemented and amended
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Pre-888 Network Transmission Service
Schedule G-17
Page 1 of 1
OHIO POWER COMPANY
INTERCONNECTION AND TRANSMISSION AGREEMENTS
TO BE ASSIGNED TO
OPCO EDC
FERC RATE SCHEDULE
AGREEMENT NAME DESIGNATION
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Agreement Between Monongahela Power Company,
West Penn Power Company and Appalachian Power
Company, Ohio Power Company, Wheeling Power
Company, Dated June 1, 1971 FERC Rate Schedule No. 73
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Agreement Between American Municipal Power-Ohio,
Inc and Ohio Power Company, Dated April 1, 1974 FERC Rate Schedule No. 74
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Agreement Between The Cleveland Electric
Illuminating Company and Ohio Power Company,
Dated June 14, 1962 FERC Rate Schedule No. 31
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Modification No. 5 to Facilities and Operating
Agreement Dated as of May 1, 1967 Between The
Dayton Power and Light Company and Ohio Power
Company, Dated January 15, 1976 FERC Rate Schedule No. 36
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Agreement Between Duquesne Light Company and
Ohio Power Company, Dated September 6, 1962 FERC Rate Schedule No. 33
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Agreement Between Kentucky Utilities Company and
Ohio Power Company, Dated January 17, 1950 FERC Rate Schedule No. 22
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Agreement Between Ohio Edison Company and Ohio
Power Company, Dated January 1, 1952 FERC Rate Schedule No. 25
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Agreement Between Toledo Edison Company and Ohio
Power Company, Dated December 1, 1965 FERC Rate Schedule No. 35
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Power Delivery Agreement Between Buckeye Power,
Inc, The Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company,
Columbus and Southern Ohio Electric Company,
The Dayton Power and Light Company, Monongahela
Power Company, Ohio Power Company and The Toleda
Edison Company, Dated January 1, 1968 FERC Rate Schedule No. 70(1)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Agreement Between Ohio Edison Company and Ohio
Power Company, Dated June 20, 1968 FERC Rate Schedule No. 71(1)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Agreement Between Wheeling Power Company and Ohio Wheeling Power Company
Power Company, Dated December 7, 1966 FERC Rate Schedule No. 6(2)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Transmission Facilities Agreement Between Wheeling FERC Rate Schedule No. 30
Power Company and Ohio Power Company, and Wheeling Power Company
Dated March 1, 1963 FERC Rate Schedule No. 4
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Pre-888 Network Transmission Service
(2) Transmission Facilities Agreements
Schedule G-18
Page 1 of 1
SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY
INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENTS
TO BE ASSIGNED TO
SWEPCO EDC
FERC RATE SCHEDULE
AGREEMENT NAME DESIGNATION
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Restated And Amended Interconnection Agreement
Between Gulf States Utilities Company And
Southwestern Electric Power Company,
Dated January 1, 1989 SWEPCO Rate Schedule No. 106
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Transmission And Interconnection Agreement Among
Southwestern Electric Power Company And Rayburn Rayburn Country Electric
Country Electric Cooperative, Inc. And East Texas Cooperative, Inc.,
Electric Cooperative, Inc., Dated July 13, 1994 Rate Schedule No. 2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Schedule G-19
Page 1 of 1
INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY
TRANSFER OF INTERESTS IN ROCKPORT STEAM ELECTRIC
GENERATING UNITS NOS. 1 AND 2 TO PMA
INTERESTS TO BE ASSIGNED
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As of the date of execution of the related Assignment Agreement, 70% of I&M's
rights, interests, duties and obligations to the power (and energy associated
therewith) from the Rockport Unit No. 1 to which I&M shall be entitled from AEP
Generating Company (AEG) under the Unit Power Agreement between I&M and AEG
dated March 31, 1982.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As of January 1, 2005, 30% of its rights, interests, duties and obligations in
and to the power (and energy associated therewith) from the Rockport Plant to
which I&M shall be entitled from AEG under the Unit Power Agreement between I&M
and AEG dated March 31, 1982.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EXHIBIT H
JURISDICTIONAL FACILITIES AND SECURITIES ASSOCIATED
WITH OR AFFECTED BY THE TRANSFERS, CONSIDERATION
FOR THE TRANSFERS, AND EFFECT OF THE TRANSFERS
ON JURISDICTIONAL FACILITIES AND SECURITIES
See Exhibit G for a description of the jurisdictional facilities that will
be affected by the Transfers.
The Transfers do not involve a sale or disposition to an unaffiliated
purchaser and therefore do not raise any issue of consideration for the
transaction. The Transfers will be made to comply with state laws and the
jurisdictional facilities to be transferred will be transferred at book value.
The transactions that will be effected to accomplish the Transfers of
jurisdictional assets are detailed in the Description of Jurisdictional
Transfers submitted as Exhibit I. Proposed accounting entries for the Transfers
are attached to this Exhibit H.
Applicants request waiver of the requirement to provide information
regarding the effect of the Transfers on securities issued or to be issued by
the Applicants or their affiliates in connection with the Transfers. Under
Section 318 of the Act, the Securities and Exchange Commission has jurisdiction
over such matters pursuant to Sections 6, 9 and 10 of the 1935 Act and as
reported in Exhibit L, Applicants and their affiliates have filed an
Application-Declaration on Form U-1 with the SEC seeking authority and approval
for the securities transactions that are incident to the Transfers.
EXHIBIT H - SCHEDULES
Narrative, Pages 1-7 Narrative Supporting the Determination of Assets and
Liability Account Balances to be Corporately Separated
Schedule H-1 Central Power and Light Company, Unbundled Balance
Sheet -- Estimated and Unaudited Assets, December 31, 2000
Schedule H-2 Central Power and Light Company, Unbundled Balance
Sheet - Estimated and Unaudited Capital & Liabilities, December 31, 2000
Schedule H-3 Columbus Southern Power Company, Unbundled Balance
Sheet -- Estimated and Unaudited Assets, December 31, 2000
Schedule H-4 Columbus Southern Power Company, Unbundled Balance
Sheet -- Estimated and Unaudited Capital & Liabilities, December 31, 2000
Schedule H-5 Ohio Power Company, Unbundled Balance Sheet -
Estimated and Unaudited Assets, December 31, 2000
Schedule H-6 Ohio Power Company, Unbundled Balance Sheet -
Estimated and Unaudited Capital & Liabilities, December 31, 2000
Schedule H-7 Southwestern Electric Power Company, Unbundled
Balance Sheet -- Estimated and Unaudited Assets, December 31, 2000
Schedule H-8 Southwestern Electric Power Company, Unbundled
Balance Sheet -- Estimated and Unaudited Capital & Liabilities, December 31, 2000
Schedule H-9 West Texas Utilities Company, Unbundled
Balance Sheet -- Estimated and Unaudited Assets, December 31, 2000
Schedule H-10 West Texas Utilities Company, Unbundled Balance
Sheet -- Estimated and Unaudited Capital & Liabilities, December 31, 2000
Schedule H-11 Section 5, Part C -- Journal Entries, Transfer of Central
Power and Light Company Assets to be Recorded on the
Books of Central Power and Light Company
Schedule H-12 Section 5, Part C -- Journal Entries, Transfer of Central
Power and Light Company Assets to be Recorded on the
Books of Central and South West Corporation
Schedule H-13 Section 5, Part C -- Journal Entries, Transfer of Central
Power and Light Company Assets to be Recorded on the
Books of Central Power and Light Genco
Schedule H-14 Section 5, Part C -- Journal Entries, Transfer of Central Power
and Light Company Assets to be Recorded on the Books of AEP Company, Inc.
Schedule H-15 Section 5, Part C -- Journal Entries, Transfer of Central Power
and Light Company Assets to be Recorded on the Books of AEP Non-Regulated
Holdco
Schedule H-16 Section 5, Part C -- Journal Entries, Transfer of Columbus
Southern Power Company Assets to be Recorded on the
Books of Columbus Southern Power Company
Schedule H-17 Section 5, Part C -- Journal Entries, Transfer of Columbus
Southern Power Company Assets to be Recorded on the
Books of Columbus Southern Wiresco
Schedule H-18 Section 5, Part C -- Journal Entries, Transfer of Columbus
Southern Power Company Assets to be Recorded on the Books of AEP Company, Inc.
Schedule H-19 Section 5, Part C -- Journal Entries, Transfer of Columbus
Southern Power Company Assets to be Recorded on the
Books of Central and South West Corporation
Schedule H-20 Section 5, Part C -- Journal Entries, Transfer of Columbus
Southern Power Company Assets to be Recorded on the
Books of AEP Non-Regulated Holdco
Schedule H-21 Section 5, Part C -- Journal Entries, Transfer of Ohio Power
Company Assets to be Recorded on the Books of Ohio
Power Company
Schedule H-22 Section 5, Part C -- Journal Entries, Transfer of Ohio Power
Company Assets to be Recorded on the Books of Ohio
Power Wiresco
Schedule H-23 Section 5, Part C -- Journal Entries, Transfer of Ohio Power
Company Assets to be Recorded on the Books of AEP Company, Inc.
Schedule H-24 Section 5, Part C -- Journal Entries, Transfer of Ohio Power
Company Assets to be Recorded on the Books of Central
and South West Corporation
Schedule H-25 Section 5, Part C -- Journal Entries, Transfer of Ohio Power
Company Assets to be Recorded on the Books of AEP
Non-Regulated Holdco
Schedule H-26 Section 5, Part C -- Journal Entries, Transfer of
Southwestern Electric Power Company Assets to be
Recorded on the Books of Southwestern Electric Power Company
Schedule H-27 Section 5, Part C -- Journal Entries, Transfer of
Southwestern Electric Power Company Assets to be
Recorded on the Books of Southwestern Electric Power
Texas Wiresco
Schedule H-28 Section 5, Part C -- Journal Entries, Transfer of
Southwestern Electric Power Company Assets to be
Recorded on the Books of Central and South West Corporation
Schedule H-29 Section 5, Part C -- Journal Entries, Transfer of West Texas
Utilities Company Assets to be Recorded on the Books of
West Texas Utilities Company
Schedule H-30 Section 5, Part C -- Journal Entries, Transfer of West Texas
Utilities Company Assets to be Recorded on the Books of
Central and South West Corporation
Schedule H-31 Section 5, Part C -- Journal Entries, Transfer of West Texas
Utilities Company Assets to be Recorded on the Books of
West Texas Utilities Genco
Schedule H-32 Section 5, Part C -- Journal Entries, Transfer of West Texas
Utilities Company Assets to be Recorded on the Books of
AEP Company, Inc.
Schedule H-33 Section 5, Part C--Journal Entries, Transfer of West Texas
Utilities Company Assets to be Recorded on the Books of
AEP Non-Regulated Holdco
NARRATIVE SUPPORTING THE DETERMINATION OF ASSETS AND LIABILITY
ACCOUNT BALANCES TO BE CORPORATELY SEPARATED
INTRODUCTION
Presented in this filing as Exhibit H are the unbundled Balance Sheets for Ohio
Power Company, Columbus Southern Power Company, Central Power and Light
Company, West Texas Utilities Company and Southwestern Electric Power Company.
The balance sheet asset and liability account balances at December 31, 2000
were separated into estimated amounts applicable to the generation function and
amounts applicable to the wires function. For Southwestern Electric Power
Company, a further separation was made to assign the wires applicable to the
Texas operations apart from the wires applicable to the Louisiana and Arkansas
operations. While these estimated balances reasonably represent the expected
assets, liabilities and total capitalization of the separate entities, the
actual account balances at the time of corporate separation will be different
and the methods employed will be more detailed and precise. This document
describes the approach AEP intends to take when it separates the balance sheet
account balances for Ohio Power Company, Columbus Southern Power Company,
Central Power and Light Company, West Texas Utilities Company and Southwestern
Electric Power Company at the time those companies legally separate.
ACCOUNTS 101-106
Owned electric plant has been recorded in plant accounts which identify it as
production, transmission, distribution or general plant. The production,
transmission and distribution plant account balances will be directly assigned
to the Generation Company or the Wires Company as appropriate. General plant
account balances will be analyzed in detail and, whenever possible, directly
assigned based on the function and/or location of the asset. General plant
account balances, which cannot be directly assigned, will be allocated based on
the relationship of the owned asset balances directly assigned to the
Generation Company and the Wires Company.
Similarly, leased electric plant account balances will be either directly
assigned based on the function and/or location of the asset or allocated if not
directly assignable.
An exception is generation step-up transformers (GSUs) and the associated
circuit breakers, which were recorded as transmission assets on the books of
the Company at December 31, 2000. The balances related to GSUs and the
associated circuit breakers will be assigned to the Generation Company.
ACCOUNT 107
Construction Work in Progress will be segregated according to the function
and/or location associated with each individual construction project.
ACCOUNTS 108, 111 AND 115
Accumulated Provision for Depreciation and Accumulated Provision for
Amortization of Electric Utility Plant, except for General Plant related
balances, will be directly assigned based on historical functional balances.
Accumulated Provision for Depreciation and Accumulated Provision for
Amortization of Electric Utility Plant related to General Plant will be
allocated based on the final assignment of General Plant balances.
ACCOUNTS 120.1 THROUGH 120.5
Nuclear Fuel will be directly assigned to the Generation Company.
ACCOUNTS 121 AND 122
Non-utility Plant and the associated Accumulated Provision for Depreciation and
Amortization will be assigned based on the function to which the non-utility
plant pertains.
ACCOUNTS 123 AND 123.1
Investments in Associated Companies and Subsidiary Companies will be directly
assigned to the function which that investment serves. Currently, Ohio Power
Company and Columbus Southern Power Company Investments in Associated Companies
and Subsidiary Companies relate predominantly to coal mining and coal
preparation facilities, which are generation related. Currently, Investments in
Associated Companies and Subsidiary Companies for Southwestern Electric Power
Company relate predominantly to non-Texas transmission and distribution
facilities.
ACCOUNT 124
Other Investments will be directly assigned or allocated based on an
appropriate allocation factor such as employee count or plant in service.
ACCOUNT 125-128
Special Funds will be directly assigned or allocated based on an appropriate
allocation factor such as employee count or plant in service.
2
ACCOUNT 131
The allocation of Cash and other finance and capital related accounts will be
determined at the time of corporate separation and will depend on, among other
things, the amount of other assets and liabilities assigned to each company.
Hereafter, such allocations will be referred to as a "finance/capital" related
allocation.
ACCOUNTS 132-135
Special Deposits and Working Funds will be directly assigned or allocated based
on an appropriate allocation factor such as finance/capital (see Account 131),
employee count, or plant in service.
ACCOUNT 141
Employee-related notes receivable will be assigned to the companies for which
the employees work. Other notes receivable will be allocated in conjunction
with the finance/capital allocation method (see Account 131).
ACCOUNT 142 -
Customer Accounts Receivable related to wholesale sales will be assigned to the
Generation Company for the generation component and the Wires Company for the
transmission component. Customer Accounts Receivable related to transmission
sales will be directly assigned to the Wires Company. Customer Accounts
Receivable related to retail electric sales will be allocated to both the
Generation Company and the Wires Company based on unbundled tariffs.
ACCOUNT 143
Other Accounts Receivable will be directly assigned as appropriate.
ACCOUNT 144
Accumulated Provision for Uncollectible Accounts related to retail electric
sales will be allocated to the Generation Company and Wires Company based on
the allocation of Customer Accounts Receivable related to retail electric sales
(see Account 142). Any provision related directly to wholesale trading will be
assigned to the Generation Company.
ACCOUNT 146
Accounts Receivable from Associated Companies will be directly assigned as
appropriate.
3
ACCOUNTS 151 AND 152
Fuel Stock and Fuel Stock Expenses Undistributed will be directly assigned to
the Generation Company.
ACCOUNT 154
Plant Materials and Operating Supplies will be directly assigned to the
Generation Company and Wires Company according to their storeroom functional
affiliation.
ACCOUNT 158
Allowances will be directly assigned to the Generation Company.
ACCOUNT 163
Stores Expense Undistributed will be directly assigned according to the related
storeroom functional affiliation.
ACCOUNT 165
Prepayments will be directly assigned as appropriate or allocated based on an
appropriate allocation factor such as employee count or plant in service.
ACCOUNT 172
Rents Receivable will be directly assigned to the same company assigned the
related asset.
ACCOUNT 173
Accrued Utility Revenue will be allocated to the Generation Company and Wires
Company based on unbundled tariffs.
ACCOUNT 174
Miscellaneous Current and Accrued Assets will be directly assigned or allocated
based on an appropriate allocation factor such as employee count or plant in
service.
ACCOUNT 181
Unamortized Debt Expenses will be assigned in the same manner as the allocation
of debt.
4
ACCOUNT 182.3
Regulatory Assets will be assigned to the Wires Company.
ACCOUNTS 183-186
Preliminary Survey and Investigation Charges, Clearing Accounts, Temporary
Facilities and Miscellaneous Deferred Debits will be directly assigned or
allocated based on an appropriate allocation factor such as employee count or
plant in service.
ACCOUNT 189
Unamortized Loss on Reacquired Debt will be assigned to the Wires Company.
ACCOUNT 190
Accumulated Deferred Income Taxes will be directly assigned based on the
assignment of the balance sheet account associated with each book/tax temporary
difference.
ACCOUNTS 201-226
Common Stock Issued, Preferred Stock Issued, Premium on Capital Stock, Other
Paid-in Capital, Bonds, Advances from Associated Companies, Other Long Term
Debt and Unamortized Discount on Long Term Debt will be determined based on the
actual financing of the companies. Retained Earnings for the existing companies
will be reduced by the amount of the dividend that is declared in the formation
of the new companies. The new companies will start with zero Retained Earnings.
ACCOUNT 227
Obligations Under Capital Lease - Noncurrent will be directly assigned based on
the functionalization of the corresponding leased assets less accumulated
amortization.
ACCOUNT 228.2
Accumulated Provision for Injuries and Damages will be directly assigned or
allocated based on an appropriate allocation factor such as employee count or
plant in service.
5
ACCOUNT 228.3
Accumulated Provision for Pensions and Benefits will be directly assigned based
on actuarial studies or other appropriate methods.
ACCOUNT 228.4
Accumulated Miscellaneous Operating Provisions will be directly assigned or
allocated based on an appropriate allocation factor such as employee count or
plant in service.
ACCOUNTS 232, 233 AND 234
Accounts Payable, Notes Payable to Associated Companies and Accounts Payable to
Associated Companies will be directly assigned or allocated based on an
appropriate allocation factor such as employee count or plant in service.
ACCOUNT 235
Customer Deposits related to retail electric sales will be directly assigned to
the Wires Company. Deposits related to wholesale trading will be directly
assigned to the Generation Company.
ACCOUNT 236
Taxes Accrued will be directly assigned or allocated based on an appropriate
allocation factor such as employee count or plant in service.
ACCOUNT 237
Interest Accrued will be directly assigned in accordance with the debt.
ACCOUNT 238
Dividends Declared will be directly assigned to the company that declared the
dividend.
ACCOUNT 241
Tax Collections Payable will be directly assigned or allocated based on an
appropriate allocation factor such as employee count or electric sales.
6
ACCOUNT 242
Miscellaneous Current and Accrued Liabilities will be directly assigned or
allocated based on an appropriate allocation factor such as employee count,
electric sales, leased assets, finance/capital (see Account 131), or plant in
service.
ACCOUNT 243
Obligations Under Capital Lease - Current will be assigned based on the
functionalization of the corresponding leased assets.
ACCOUNT 252
Customer Advances for Construction will be directly assigned to the Wires
Company.
ACCOUNT 253
Other Deferred Credits will be directly assigned or allocated based on an
appropriate allocation factor such as employee count, electric sales,
finance/capital (see Account 131), or plant in service.
ACCOUNT 254
Other Regulatory Liabilities will be directly assigned to the Wires Company.
ACCOUNT 255
Accumulated Deferred Investment Tax Credits will be allocated based on the
functionalization of the property that generated the investment tax credits.
ACCOUNTS 281-283
Accumulated Deferred Income Taxes will be directly assigned based on the
assignment of the balance sheet account associated with each book/tax temporary
difference.
7
Schedule H-1
Page 1 of 1
CENTRAL POWER AND LIGHT
UNBUNDLED BALANCE SHEET - ESTIMATED AND UNAUDITED
ASSETS
DECEMBER 31, 2000
IN THOUSANDS
CENTRAL POWER AND LIGHT PRO FORMA PRO FORMA
TOTAL COMPANY GENERATION WIRES
PER FERC FORM 1 COMPANY COMPANY
-------------------------------------------------------
UTILITY PLANT
Utility Plant (101-106,114) 5,217,312 2,938,285 2,279,027
Construction Work in Progress (107) 138,273 27,359 110,914
TOTAL Utility Plant (Enter Total of lines 2 and 3) 5,355,585 2,965,644 2,389,941
(Less) Accum. Prov. for Depr. Amort. Depl. (108, 111, 115) 2,108,937 1,445,891 663,046
Net Utility Plant (Enter Total of line 4 less 5) 3,246,648 1,519,753 1,726,895
Nuclear Fuel (120.1-120.4, 120.6) 236,859 236,859 0
(Less) Accum. Prov. for Amort. of Nucl. Fuel Assemblies (120.5) 204,952 204,952 0
NET NUCLEAR FUEL (ENTER TOTAL OF LINE 7 LESS 8) 31,907 31,907 0
NET UTILITY PLANT (ENTER TOTAL OF LINES 6 AND 9) 3,278,555 1,551,660 1,726,895
OTHER PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS
Nonutility Property (121) 3,535 3,535 0
(Less) Accum. Prov. for Depr. and Amort. (122) 1,197 1,197 0
Other Investments (124) 70,890 69,496 1,394
Special Funds (125-128) 93,592 93,592 0
TOTAL Other Property and Investments (Total of lines 14-17,19-21) 166,820 165,426 1,394
CURRENT AND ACCRUED ASSETS
Cash (131) 4,094 2,844 1,250
Special Deposits (132-134) 3,487 3,487 0
Working Fund (135) 79 77 2
Temporary Cash Investments (136) 6,594 4,443 2,151
Notes Receivable (141) 261 224 37
Customer Accounts Receivable (142) 62,991 7,576 55,415
Other Accounts Receivable (143) 2,435 757 1,678
Accounts Receivable from Assoc. Companies (146) 31,272 1,208 30,004
Fuel Stock (151) 22,684 22,684 0
Fuel Stock Expenses Undistributed (152) 158 158 0
Plant Materials and Operating Supplies (154) 52,428 43,335 9,093
Stores Expense Undistributed (163) 680 680 0
Prepayments (165) 44,882 11,451 33,431
Rents Receivable (172) 425 0 425
Accrued Utility Revenues (173) 49,760 0 49,760
Miscellaneous Current and Accrued Assets (174) 481,204 481,204 0
TOTAL Current and Accrued Assets (Enter Total of lines 24 thru 51) 763,434 580,188 183,246
DEFERRED DEBITS
Unamortized Debt Expenses (181) 12,177 9,760 2,417
Other Regulatory Assets (182.3) 1,265,559 0 1,265,559
Clearing Accounts (184) 1,945 132 1,813
Miscellaneous Deferred Debits (186) 131,575 3,291 128,284
Unamortized Loss on Reaquired Debt (189) 12,790 0 12,790
Accumulated Deferred Income Taxes (190) 67,184 55,796 11,388
TOTAL Deferred Debits (Enter Total of lines 64 thru 67) 1,491,230 68,979 1,422,251
TOTAL Assets and Other Debits (Enter Total of lines
10,11,12,22,52,68) 5,700,039 2,366,253 3,333,786
Schedule H-2
Page 1 of 1
CONTRAL POWER AND LIGHT
UNBUNDLED BALANCE SHEET - ESTIMATED AND UNAUDITED
CAPITAL & LIABILITIES
DECEMBER 31, 2000
IN THOUSANDS
CENTRAL POWER AND LIGHT PRO FORMA PRO FORMA
TOTAL COMPANY GENERATION WIRES
PER FERC FORM 1 COMPANY COMPANY
-------------------------------------------------------
PROPRIETARY CAPITAL
Common Stock Issued (201) 168,888
Preferred Stock Issued (204) 5,951
Premium on Capital Stock (207) 15
Other Paid-In Capital (208-211) 408,086
Retained Earnings (215, 215.1, 216) 789,133
TOTAL Proprietary Capital (Enter Total of lines 2 thru 13) 1,372,073
LONG-TERM DEBT
Bonds(221) 1,104,820
Advances from Associated Companies (223) 153,139
Other Long-Term Debt (224) 350,000
(Less) Unamortized Discount on Long-Term Debt-Debit (226) 261
TOTAL Long-Term Debt (Enter Total of lines 16 thru 21) 1,607,698
TOTAL Capitalization 2,979,771 386,126 2,593,645
OTHER NONCURRENT LIABILITIES
Accumulated Provision for Property Insurance (228.1) 3,264 1,814 1,449
Accumulated Provision for Pensions and Benefits (228.3) 3,579 788 2,791
Accumulated Miscellaneous Operating Provisions (228.4) 2,683 2,683 0
TOTAL OTHER Noncurrent LIABILITIES (ENTER TOTAL OF LINES 24 THRU 29) 9,526 5,286 4,240
CURRENT AND ACCRUED LIABILITIES
Accounts Payable (232) 128,967 114,139 14,818
Notes Payable to Associated Companies (233) 269,712 186,059 83,653
Accounts Payable to Associated Companies (234) 90,722 42,649 48,073
Customer Deposits (235) 17,617 0 17,617
Taxes Accrued (236) 55,526 36,458 19,068
Interest Accrued (237) 26,217 19,252 6,965
Dividends Declared (238) 40 0 40
Matured Long-Term Debt (239) 0 0 0
Tax Collections Payable (241) 4,869 34 4,835
Miscellaneous Current and Accrued Liabilities (242) 504,728 494,983 9,745
TOTAL Current & Accrued Liabilities (Enter Total of lines 32 thru 44) 1,098,388 893,573 204,815
DEFERRED CREDITS
Customer Advances for Construction (252) 2,059 0 2,059
Accumulated Deferred Investment Tax Credits (255) 128,099 113,531 14,568
Other Deferred Credits (253) 66,254 65,907 347
Other Regulatory Liabilities (254) 105,944 0 105,944
Unamortized Gain on Reaquired Debt (257) 17 0 17
Accumulated Deferred Income Taxes (281-283) 1,309,981 901,830 408,151
TOTAL DEFERRED CREDITS (ENTER TOTAL OF LINES 47 THRU 53) 1,612,354 1,081,268 531,086
TOTAL Liab and Other Credits (Enter Total of lines 14,22,30,45,54) 5,700,039 2,366,253 3,333,786
Schedule H-3
Page 1 of 1
COLUMBUS SOUTHERN POWER COMPANY
UNBUNDLED BALANCE SHEET - ESTIMATED AND UNAUDITED
ASSETS
DECEMBER 31, 2000
IN THOUSANDS
COLUMBUS SOUTHERN PRO FORMA PRO FORMA
TOTAL COMPANY GENERATION WIRES
PER FERC FORM 1 COMPANY COMPANY
--------------------------------------------------
UTILITY PLANT
Utility Plant (101-106, 114) 3,149,130 1,606,488 1,542,642
Construction Work in Progress (107) 89,297 19,582 69,715
TOTAL Utility Plant (Enter Total of lines 2 and 3) 3,238,427 1,626,070 1,612,357
(Less) Accum. Prov. for Depr. Amort. Depl. (108, 111, 115) 1,272,776 650,581 622,195
NET UTILITY PLANT (ENTER TOTAL OF LINE 4 LESS 5) 1,965,651 975,489 990,162
NET UTILITY PLANT (ENTER TOTAL OF LINES 6 AND 9) 1,965,651 975,489 990,162
OTHER PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS
Nonutility Property (121) 18,517 9,531 8,986
(Less) Accum. Prov. for Depr. and Amort. (122) 3,333 2,798 535
Investments in Associated Companies (123) 430 430 0
Investment in Subsidiary Companies (123.1) 4,275 4,275 0
Other Investments (124) 194,472 181,611 12,861
Special Funds (125-128) 27 14 13
TOTAL Other Property and Investments (Total of lines 14-17,19-21) 214,388 193,063 21,325
CURRENT AND ACCRUED ASSETS
Cash (131) 10,103 6,373 3,730
Special Deposits (132-134) 26 16 10
Working Fund (135) 1,464 921 543
Notes Receivable (141) 2 1 1
Customer Accounts Receivable (142) 73,710 71,721 1,989
Other Accounts Receivable (143) 18,632 13,170 5,462
(Less) Accum. Prov. for Uncollectible Acct.-Credit (144) 659 635 24
Notes Receivable from Associated Companies (145) 0 0 0
Accounts Receivable from Assoc. Companies (146) 55,426 48,483 6,943
Fuel Stock (151) 12,976 12,976 0
Fuel Stock Expenses Undistributed (152) 150 150 0
Plant Materials and Operating Supplies (154) 18,345 13,322 5,023
Allowances (158.1 and 158.2) 18,809 18,809 0
Stores Expense Undistributed (163) (34) (34) 0
Prepayments (165) 31,419 16,329 15,090
Rents Receivable (172) 78 0 78
Accrued Utility Revenues (173) 9,638 7,365 2,273
Miscellaneous Current and Accrued Assets (174) 1,101,301 1,090,116 11,185
TOTAL CURRENT AND ACCRUED ASSETS (ENTER TOTAL OF LINES 24 THRU 51) 1,351,386 1,299,083 52,303
DEFERRED DEBITS
Unamortized Debt Expenses (181) 1,978 1,741 237
Other Regulatory Assets (182.3) 301,764 0 301,764
Prelim. Survey and Investigation Charges (Electric) (183) 10 5 5
Clearing Accounts (184) 676 284 392
Temporary Facilities (185) 23 12 11
Miscellaneous Deferred Debits (186) 74,997 41,582 33,415
Unamortized Loss on Reaquired Debt (189) 8,339 0 8,339
Accumulated Deferred Income Taxes (190) 67,107 54,646 32,461
TOTAL Deferred Debits (Enter Total of lines 54 thru 67) 474,894 98,270 376,624
TOTAL ASSETS AND OTHER DEBITS (ENTER TOTAL OF LINES 10,11,12,22,52,68) 4,006,319 2,565,905 1,440,414
COLUMBUS SOUTHERN POWER COMPANY SCHEDULE H-4
UNBUNDLED BALANCE SHEET -- ESTIMATED AND UNAUDITED PAGE 1 OF 2
CAPITAL & LIABILITIES
DECEMBER 31, 2000
IN THOUSANDS
COLUMBUS SOUTHERN PRO FORMA PRO FORMA
TOTAL COMPANY GENERATION WIRES
PER FERC FORM 1 COMPANY COMPANY
--------------------------------------------------
PROPRIETARY CAPITAL
Common Stock Issued (201) 41,026
Preferred Stock Issued (204) 15,000
Premium on Capital Stock (207) 257,892
Other Paid-In Capital (208-211) 315,461
Retained Earnings (215, 215.1, 216) 97,173
Unappropriated Undistributed Subsidiary Earnings (216.1) 1,896
TOTAL Proprietary Capital (Enter Total of lines 2 thru 13) 728,448
LONG-TERM DEBT
Bonds(221) 654,000
Other Long-Term Debt (224) 252,245
(Less) Unamortized Discount on Long-Term Debt-Debit (226) 6,629
TOTAL LONG-TERM DEBT (ENTER TOTAL OF LINES 16 THRU 21) 899,616
TOTAL CAPITALIZATION 1,628,064 612,480 1,015,584
OTHER NONCURRENT LIABILITIES
Obligations Under Capital Leases - Noncurrent (227) 35,034 12,660 22,374
Accumulated Provision for Pensions and Benefits (228.3) 5,527 1,522 4,005
Accumulated Miscellaneous Operating Provisions (228.4) 4,815 0 4,815
TOTAL OTHER Noncurrent Liabilities (Enter Total of lines 24 thru 29) 45,376 14,182 31,194
COLUMBUS SOUTHERN POWER COMPANY SCHEDULE H-4
UNBUNDLED BALANCE SHEET -- ESTIMATED AND UNAUDITED PAGE 2 OF 2
CAPITAL & LIABILITIES
DECEMBER 31, 2000
IN THOUSANDS
COLUMBUS SOUTHERN PRO FORMA PRO FORMA
TOTAL COMPANY GENERATION WIRES
PER FERC FORM 1 COMPANY COMPANY
--------------------------------------------------
CURRENT AND ACCRUED LIABILITIES
Accounts Payable (232) 89,465 80,226 9,239
Notes Payable to Associated Companies (233) 90,959 57,376 33,583
Accounts Payable to Associated Companies (234) 80,054 55,103 24,951
Customer Deposits (235) 4,851 0 4,851
Taxes Accrued (236) 162,217 92,067 70,150
Interest Accrued (237) 13,332 8,002 5,330
Dividends Declared (238) 262 262 0
Tax Collections Payable (241) 879 239 640
Miscellaneous Current and Accrued Liabilities (242) 1,161,654 1,141,345 20,309
Obligations Under Capital Leases-Current (243) 7,522 2,718 4,804
TOTAL CURRENT & Accrued Liabilities (Enter Total of lines 32 thru 44) 1,611,195 1,437,338 173,857
DEFERRED CREDITS
Customer Advances for Construction (252) 775 0 775
Accumulated Deferred Investment Tax Credits (255) 41,212 27,126 14,086
Other Deferred Credits (253) 138,536 138,444 92
Other Regulatory Liabilities (254) 30,384 0 30,384
Accumulated Deferred Income Taxes (281-283) 510,777 336,335 174,442
TOTAL Deferred Credits (Enter Total of lines 47 thru 53) 721,684 501,905 219,779
TOTAL LIAB AND OTHER CREDITS (ENTER TOTAL OF LINES 14,22,30,45,54) 4,006,319 2,565,905 1,440,414
OHIO POWER COMPANY SCHEDULE H-5
UNBUNDLED BALANCE SHEET -- ESTIMATED AND UNAUDITED PAGE 1 OF 1
ASSETS
DECEMBER 31, 2000
IN THOUSANDS
OHIO POWER PRO FORMA PRO FORMA
TOTAL COMPANY GENERATION WIRES
PER FERC FORM 1 COMPANY COMPANY
--------------------------------------------------
UTILITY PLANT
Utility Plant (101-106,114) 4,865,894 2,880,858 1,985,036
Construction Work in Progress (107) 195,086 153,637 41,449
TOTAL Utility Plant (Enter Total of lines 2 and 3) 5,060,980 3,034,495 2,026,485
(Less) Accum. Prov. for Depr. Amort. Depl. (108, 111, 115) 2,297,082 1,600,041 697,041
Net Utility Plant (Enter Total of line 4 less 5) 2,763,897 1,434,454 1,329,443
NET UTILITY PLANT (ENTER TOTAL OF LINES 6 AND 9) 2,763,897 1,434,454 1,329,443
OTHER PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS
Nonutility Property (121) 23,561 19,489 4,072
(Less) Accum. Prov. for Depr. and Amort. (122) 12,419 10,153 2,266
Investment in Subsidiary Companies (123.1) 56,254 56,254 0
Other Investments (124) 299,987 290,199 9,788
Special Funds (125-128) 39 23 16
TOTAL OTHER PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS (TOTAL OF LINES 14-17,19-21) 367,422 355,812 11,610
CURRENT AND ACCRUED ASSETS
Cash (131) 8,585 6,456 2,129
Special Deposits (132-134) 16,301 16,149 152
Working Fund (135) 5,101 5,090 11
Notes Receivable (141) 72 54 18
Customer Accounts Receivable (142) 139,732 131,293 8,439
Other Accounts Receivable (143) 26,299 20,120 6,179
(Less) Accum. Prov. for Uncollectible Acct.-Credit (144) 1,054 1,022 32
Notes Receivable from Associated Companies (145) 0 0 0
Accounts Receivable from Assoc. Companies (146) 125,253 107,115 18,138
Fuel Stock (151) 79,452 79,452 0
Fuel Stock Expenses Undistributed (152) 1,668 1,668 0
Plant Materials and Operating Supplies (154) 43,005 33,325 9,680
Allowances (158.1 and 158.2) 32,201 32,201 0
Stores Expense Undistributed (163) 786 786 0
Prepayments (165) 29,061 17,261 11,800
Rents Receivable (172) 98 0 98
Accrued Utlilty Revenues (173) 263 215 48
Miscellaneous Current and Accrued Assets (174) 1,620,188 1,618,484 1,704
TOTAL CURRENT AND ACCRUED ASSETS (ENTER TOTAL OF LINES 24 THRU 51) 2,127,011 2,068,647 58,364
DEFERRED DEBITS
Unamortized Debt Expenses (181) 3,963 3,701 262
Other Regulatory Assets (182.3) 748,089 0 748,089
Prelim. Survey and Investigation Charges (Electric) (183) 2 1 1
Clearing Accounts (184) 856 504 352
Temporary Facilities (185) 12 7 5
Miscellaneous Deferred Debits (186) 91,701 52,305 39,396
Unamortized Loss on Reaquired Debt (189) 6,106 0 6,106
Accumulated Deferred Income Taxes (190) 131,018 93,114 37,904
TOTAL DEFERRED DEBITS (ENTER TOTAL OF LINES 54 THRU 67) 981,747 149,632 832,115
TOTAL ASSETS AND OTHER DEBITS (ENTER TOTAL OF LINES 10,11,12,22,52,68) 6,240,077 4,008,545 2,231,532
OHIO POWER COMPANY SCHEDULE H-6
UNBUNDLED BALANCE SHEET -- ESTIMATED AND UNAUDITED PAGE 1 OF 1
CAPITAL & LIABILITIES
DECEMBER 31, 2000
IN THOUSANDS
OHIO POWER PRO FORMA PRO FORMA
TOTAL COMPANY GENERATION WIRES
PER FERC FORM 1 COMPANY COMPANY
--------------------------------------------------
PROPRIETARY CAPITAL
Common Stock Issued (201) 321,201
Preferred Stock Issued (204) 25,498
Premium on Capital Stock (207) 729
Other Paid-in Capital (208-211) 461,753
Retained Earnings (215, 215.1, 216) 387,393
Unappropriated Undistributed Subsidiary Earnings (216.1) 10,694
TOTAL PROPRIETARY CAPITAL (ENTER TOTAL OF LINES 2 THRU 13) 1,207,268
LONG-TERM DEBT
Bonds(221) 452,485
Other Long-Term Debt (224) 710,225
(Less) Unamortized Discount on Long-Term Debt-Debit (226) 9,723
TOTAL LONG-TERM DEBT (ENTER TOTAL OF LINES 16 THRU 21) 1,152,987
TOTAL CAPITALIZATION 2,360,255 665,279 1,694,976
OTHER NONCURRENT LIABILITIES
Obligations Under Capital Leases - Noncurrent (227) 80,267 70,043 10,224
Accumulated Provision for Injuries and Damages (228.2) 24 14 10
Accumulated Provision for Pensions and Benefits (228.3) 13,862 6,912 6,950
Accumulated Miscellaneous Operating Provisions (228.4) 5,191 74 5,117
TOTAL OTHER NONCURRENT LIABILITIES (ENTER TOTAL OF LINES 24 THRU 29) 99,344 77,043 22,301
CURRENT AND ACCRUED LIABILITIES
Accounts Payable (232) 165,206 144,509 20,697
Notes Payable to Associated Companies (233) 167,190 125,719 41,471
Accounts Payable to Associated Companies (234) 207,626 147,272 60,354
Customer Deposits (235) 39,736 35,113 4,623
Taxes Accrued (236) 174,643 100,563 74,080
Interest Accrued (237) 17,599 13,143 4,456
Tax Collections Payable (241) 1,856 903 953
Miscellaneous Current and Accrued Liabilities (242) 1,765,328 1,733,241 32,087
Obligations Under Capital Leases-Current (243) 14,224 12,412 1,812
TOTAL CURRENT & ACCRUED LIABILITIES (ENTER TOTAL OF LINES 32 THRU 44) 2,553,408 2,312,875 240,533
DEFERRED CREDITS
Accumulated Deferred Investment Tax Credits (255) 25,214 15,164 10,050
Other Deferred Credits (253) 218,126 217,261 865
Other Regulatory Liabilities (254) 39,497 0 39,497
Accumulated Deferred Income Taxes (281-283) 944,233 720,923 223,310
TOTAL Deferred Credits (Enter Total of lines 47 thru 53) 1,227,070 953,348 273,722
TOTAL LIAB AND OTHER CREDITS (ENTER TOTAL OF LINES 14,22,30,45,54) 6,240,077 4,008,545 2,231,532
SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY SCHEDULE H-7
UNBUNDLED BALANCE SHEET -- ESTIMATED AND UNAUDITED PAGE 1 OF 2
ASSETS
DECEMBER 31, 2000
IN THOUSANDS
SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER PRO FORMA SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER
TOTAL COMPANY TEXAS WIRES EXCLUDING
PER FERC FORM 1 COMPANY TEXAS WIRES COMPANY
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Utility Plant (101-106,114) 3,261,028 809,018 2,452,010
Construction Work in Progress (107) 57,995 17,683 40,312
TOTAL Utility Plant (Enter Total of lines 2 and 3) 3,319,023 826,701 2,492,322
(Less) Accum. Prov. for Depr. Amort. Depl. (108, 111, 115) 1,457,005 278,417 1,178,588
Net Utility Plant (Enter Total of line 4 less 5) 1,862,018 548,284 1,313,734
Nuclear Fuel (120.1-120.4, 120.6) 0 0 0
(Less) Accum. Prov. for Amort. of Nucl. Fuel Assemblies (120.5) 0 0 0
NET NUCLEAR FUEL (ENTER TOTAL OF LINE 7 LESS 8) 0 0 0
NET UTILITY PLANT (ENTER TOTAL OF LINES 6 AND 9) 1,862,018 548,284 1,313,734
Utility Plant Adjustments (116) 0 0 0
Gas Stored Underground - Noncurrent (117) 0 0 0
OTHER PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS 0
Nonutility Property (121) 4,233 113 4,120
(Less) Accum. Prov. for Depr. and Amort. (122) 0 0 0
Investments in Associated Companies (123) 0 0 0
Investment in Subsidiary Companies (123.1) 196 0 196
(For Cost of Account 123.1, See Footnote Page 224, line 42) 0 0 0
Noncurrent Portion of Allowances 0 0 0
Other Investments (124) 67,726 845 66,831
Special Funds (125-128) 0 0 0
TOTAL OTHER PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS (TOTAL OF LINES 14-17,19-21) 72,155 958 71,197
CURRENT AND ACCRUED ASSETS
Cash (131) 673 110 563
Special Deposits (132-134) 1,027 315 712
Working Fund (135) 207 35 172
Temporary Cash Investments (136) 0 0 0
Notes Receivable (141) 85 0 85
Customer Accounts Receivable (142) 22,704 2,314 20,390
Other Accounts Receivable (143) 18,127 1,022 17,105
(Less) Accum. Prov. for Uncollectible Acct.-Credit (144) 0 0 0
Notes Receivable from Associated Companies (145) 0 0 0
Accounts Receivable from Assoc. Companies (146) 11,419 0 11,419
Fuel Stock (151) 39,480 0 39,480
Fuel Stock Expenses Undistributed (152) 544 0 544
SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY SCHEDULE H-7
UNBUNDLED BALANCE SHEET -- ESTIMATED AND UNAUDITED PAGE 2 OF 2
ASSETS
DECEMBER 31, 2000
IN THOUSANDS
SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER PRO FORMA SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER
TOTAL COMPANY TEXAS WIRES EXCLUDING
PER FERC FORM 1 COMPANY TEXAS WIRES COMPANY
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Residuals (Elec) and Extracted Products (153) 0 0 0
Plant Materials and Operating Supplies (154) 25,137 2,427 22,710
Merchandise (155) 0 0 0
Other Materials and Supplies (156) 0 0 0
Nuclear Materials Held for Sale (157) 0 0 0
Allowances (158.1 and 158.2) 0 0 0
(Less) Noncurrent Portion of Allowances 0 0 0
Stores Expense Undistributed (163) 0 0 0
Gas Stored Underground - Current (164.1) 0 0 0
Liquefied Natural Gas Stored and Held for Processing (164.2-164.3) 0 0 0
Prepayments (165) 50,684 13,768 36,916
Advances for Gas (166-167) 0 0 0
Interest and Dividends Receivable (171) 225 95 130
Rents Receivable (172) 257 109 148
Accrued Utility Revenues (173) 12,283 1,186 11,097
Miscellaneous Current and Accrued Assets (174) 460,019 0 460,019
TOTAL CURRENT AND ACCRUED ASSETS (ENTER TOTAL
OF LINES 24 THRU 51) 642,871 21,381 621,490
DEFERRED DEBITS
Unamortized Debt Expenses (181) 8,183 1,326 6,857
Extraordinary Property Losses (182.1) 0 0 0
Unrecovered Plant and Regulatory Study Costs (182.2) 0 0 0
Other Regulatory Assets (182.3) 94,839 16,654 78,185
Prelim. Survey and Investigation Charges (Electric) (183) 0 0 0
Prelim. Sur. and Invest. Charges (Gas) (183.1, 183.2) 0 0 0
Clearing Accounts (184) 1,195 436 759
Temporary Facilities (185) 0 0 0
Miscellaneous Deferred Debits (186) 34,715 20,237 14,478
Def. Losses from Disposition of Utility Plt. (187) 0 0 0
Research, Devel. and Demonstration Expend. (188) 0 0 0
Unamortized Loss on Reaquired Debt (189) 23,059 10,314 12,745
Accumulated Deferred Income Taxes (190) 47,615 11,981 35,634
Unrecovered Purchased Gas Costs (191) 0 0 0
TOTAL DEFERRED DEBITS (ENTER TOTAL OF LINES 54 THRU 67) 209,606 60,948 148,658
TOTAL ASSETS AND OTHER DEBITS (ENTER TOTAL OF LINES
10,11,12,22,52,68) 2,786,650 631,571 2,155,079
SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY SCHEDULE H-8
UNBUNDLED BALANCE SHEET -- ESTIMATED AND UNAUDITED PAGE 1 OF 1
CAPITAL & LIABILITIES
DECEMBER 31, 2000
IN THOUSANDS
SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER PRO FORMA SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER
TOTAL COMPANY TEXAS WIRES EXCLUDING
PER FERC FORM 1 COMPANY TEXAS WIRES COMPANY
--------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPRIETARY CAPITAL
Common Stock Issued (201) 135,660
Preferred Stock Issued (204) 4,701
Premium on Capital Stock (207) 4
Other Paid-in Capital (208-211) 247,475
Retained Earnings (215, 215.1, 216) 291,356
Unappropriated Undistributed Subsidiary Earnings (216.1) 158
TOTAL PROPRIETARY CAPITAL (ENTER TOTAL OF LINES 2 THRU 13) 679,354
LONG-TERM DEBT
Bonds (221) 494,930
Advances from Associated Companies (223) 113,402
Other Long-Term Debt (224) 150,000
Unamortized Premium on Long-Term Debt (225) 2,716
(Less) Unamortized Discount on Long-Term Debt-Debit (226) 1,683
TOTAL LONG-TERM DEBT (ENTER TOTAL OF LINES 16 THRU 21) 759,365
TOTAL CAPITALIZATION 1,438,719 457,590 981,129
OTHER NONCURRENT LIABILITIES 0 0 0
Accumulated Provision for Pensions and Benefits (228.3) 3,612 1,012 2,600
Accumulated Provision for Rate Refunds (229) 0 0 0
TOTAL OTHER Noncurrent Liabilities (Enter Total of lines 24 thru 29) 3,612 1,012 2,600
CURRENT AND ACCRUED LIABILITIES
Accounts Payable (232) 107,748 5,978 101,770
Notes Payable to Associated Companies (233) 16,822 4,381 12,441
Accounts Payable to Associated Companies (234) 48,305 7,096 41,209
Customer Deposits (235) 16,432 6,648 9,784
Taxes Accrued (236) 11,223 6,887 4,336
Interest Accrued (237) 13,198 4,820 8,378
Dividends Declared (238) 57 0 57
Tax Collections Payable (241) 3,950 712 3,238
Miscellaneous Current and Accrued Liabilities (242) 488,545 2,987 485,558
TOTAL CURRENT & ACCRUED LIABILITIES (ENTER TOTAL OF LINES 32 THRU 44) 706,280 39,509 666,771
DEFERRED CREDITS
Accumulated Deferred Investment Tax Credits (255) 53,167 12,778 40,389
Other Deferred Credits (253) 68,597 0 68,597
Other Regulatory Liabilities (254) 69,023 19,016 50,007
Unamortized Gain on Reaquired Debt (257) 433 151 282
Accumulated Deferred Income Taxes (281-283) 446,819 101,516 345,303
TOTAL DEFERRED CREDITS (ENTER TOTAL OF LINES 47 THRU 53) 638,039 133,461 504,578
TOTAL LIAB AND OTHER CREDITS (ENTER TOTAL OF LINES 14,22,30,45,54) 2,786,650 631,571 2,155,079
WEST TEXAS UTILTIES SCHEDULE H-9
UNBUNDLED BALANCE SHEET -- ESTIMATED AND UNAUDITED PAGE 1 OF 1
ASSETS
DECEMBER 31, 2000
IN THOUSANDS
WEST TEXAS UTILTIES PRO FORMA PRO FORMA
TOTAL COMPANY GENERATION WIRES
PER FERC FORM 1 COMPANY COMPANY
--------------------------------------------------------------------
UTILITY PLANT
Utility Plant (101-106, 114) 1,194,515 442,607 751,908
Construction Work in Progress (107) 34,824 16,846 17,978
TOTAL Utility Plant (Enter Total of lines 2 and 3) 1,229,339 459,453 769,886
(Less) Accum. Prov. for Depr. Amort. Depl. (108, 111, 115) 515,041 210,985 304,056
NET UTILITY PLANT (ENTER TOTAL OF LINE 4 LESS 5) 714,298 248,468 465,830
NET UTILITY PLANT (ENTER TOTAL OF LINES 6 AND 9) 714,298 248,468 465,830
OTHER PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS
Nonutility Property (121) 1,163 310 853
(Less) Accum. Prov. for Depr. and Amort. (122) 296 0 296
Other Investments (124) 20,944 20,944 0
TOTAL OTHER PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS (TOTAL OF LINES 14-17,19-21) 21,811 21,254 557
CURRENT AND ACCRUED ASSETS
Cash (131) 2,796 1,352 1,444
Special Deposits (132-134) 4,143 1,628 2,515
Working Fund (135) 2 2 0
Customer Accounts Receivable (142) 33,109 5,116 27,993
Other Accounts Receivable (143) 3,000 1,550 1,450
(Less) Accum. Prov. for Uncollectible Acct.-Credit (144) 180 0 180
Accounts Receivable from Assoc. Companies (146) 16,095 12,740 3,355
Fuel Stock (151) 12,104 12,104 0
Fuel Stock Expenses Undistributed (152) 70 70 0
Plant Materials and Operating Supplies (154) 10,510 6,646 3,864
Stores Expense Undistributed (163) 0 0 0
Prepayments (165) 23,138 7,205 15,933
Rents Receivable (172) 0 0 0
Accrued Utility Revenues (173) 9,011 0 9,011
Miscellaneous Current and Accrued Assets (174) 152,174 152,174 0
TOTAL CURRENT AND ACCRUED ASSETS (ENTER TOTAL OF LINES 24 THRU 51) 265,972 200,587 65,385
DEFERRED DEBITS
Unamortized Debt Expenses (181) 1,520 1,110 410
Other Regulatory Assets (182.3) 27,573 0 27,573
Clearing Accounts (184) 706 69 637
Miscellaneous Deferred Debits (186) 68,827 48 68,779
Unamortized Loss on Reaquired Debt (189) 11,298 0 11,298
Accumulated Deferred Income Taxes (190) 16,604 12,525 4,079
TOTAL DEFERRED DEBITS (ENTER TOTAL OF LINES 54 THRU 67) 126,528 13,752 112,776
TOTAL ASSETS AND OTHER DEBITS (ENTER TOTAL OF LINES 10,11,12,22,52,68) 1,128,609 484,061 644,548
WEST TEXAS UTILTIES SCHEDULE H-10
UNBUNDLED BALANCE SHEET -- ESTIMATED AND UNAUDITED PAGE 1 OF 1
ASSETS
DECEMBER 31, 2000
IN THOUSANDS
WEST TEXAS UTILTIES PRO FORMA PRO FORMA
TOTAL COMPANY GENERATION WIRES
PER FERC FORM 1 COMPANY COMPANY
--------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPRIETARY CAPITAL
Common Stock Issued (201) 137,214
Preferred Stock Issued (204) 2,367
Premium on Capital Stock (207) 115
Other Paid-in Capital (208-211) 3,321
Retained Earnings (215, 215.1, 216) 121,502
TOTAL PROPRIETARY CAPITAL (ENTER TOTAL OF LINES 2 THRU 13) 264,519
LONG-TERM DEBT
Bonds (221) 256,310
Advances from Associated Companies (223) 0
Other Long-Term Debt (224) 0
(Less) Unamortized Discount on Long-Term Debt-Debit (226) 466
TOTAL LONG-TERM DEBT (ENTER TOTAL OF LINES 16 THRU 21) 255,844
TOTAL CAPITALIZATION 520,363 150,622 369,741
OTHER NONCURRENT LIABILITIES
Accumulated Provision for Pensions and Benefits (228.3) 3,440 1,218 2,222
Accumulated Provision for Rate Refunds (229) 0 0 0
TOTAL OTHER NONCURRENT LIABILITIES (ENTER TOTAL OF LINES 24 THRU 29) 3,440 1,218 2,222
CURRENT AND ACCRUED LIABILITIES
Accounts Payable (232) 45,562 21,590 23,972
Notes Payable to Associated Companies (233) 58,578 16,774 41,804
Accounts Payable to Associated Companies (234) 51,223 20,218 31,005
Customer Deposits (235) 2,659 0 2,659
Taxes Accrued (236) 18,901 6,718 12,183
Interest Accrued (237) 3,717 1,274 2,443
Dividends Declared (238) 26 0 26
Tax Collections Payable (241) 937 231 706
Miscellaneous Current and Accrued Liabilities (242) 161,861 157,789 4,072
TOTAL CURRENT & ACCRUED LIABILITIES (ENTER TOTAL OF LINES 32 THRU 44) 343,464 224,594 118,870
DEFERRED CREDITS
Accumulated Deferred Investment Tax Credits (255) 24,052 9,237 14,815
Other Deferred Credits (263) 20,992 20,800 192
Other Regulatory Liabilities (254) 42,562 0 42,562
Unamortized Gain on Reaquired Debt (257) 94 9 85
Accumulated Deferred Income Taxes (281-283) 173,642 77,581 96,061
TOTAL DEFERRED CREDITS (ENTER TOTAL OF LINES 47 THRU 53) 261,342 107,627 153,715
TOTAL LIAB AND OTHER CREDITS (ENTER TOTAL OF LINES 14,22,30,45,54) 1,128,609 484,061 644,548
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE CORPORATION Schedule H-11
FERC DOCKET NO. EC01-________ Page 1 of 2
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS
SECTION 5, PART C
JOURNAL ENTRIES
TRANSFER OF CENTRAL POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY ASSETS (IN
$ THOUSANDS BASED ON 12/31/2000 ESTIMATED AMOUNTS)
A. TO BE RECORDED ON THE BOOKS OF CENTRAL POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY:
---------------------------------------------------------------
CREATE GENCO SUBSIDIARY
-----------------------
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION DR CR
------- ----------- -- --
108 ACCUM PROVISION FOR DEPRECIATION AND DEPL 1,445,891
120.5 ACCUM PROVISION FOR AMORTIZATION OF NUCLEAR FUEL 204,952
122 ACCUM PROVISION FOR DEPRECIATION AND DEPL 1,197
123.1&221-226 INV IN SUBS COS & LONG-TERM DEBT 386,126
228.1 ACCUM PROVISION FOR PROPERTY INSURANCE 1,814
228.3 ACCUM PROVISION FOR PENSIONS AND BENEFITS 788
228.4 ACCUM MISCELLANEOUS OPERATING PROVISIONS 2,683
232 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE l14,139
233 NOTES PAYABLE TO ASSOCIATED COMPANIES 186,059
234 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE TO ASSOCIATED COMPANIES 42,649
236 TAXES ACCRUED 36,458
237 INTEREST ACCRUED 19,252
241 TAX COLLECTIONS PAYABLE 34
242 MISC CURRENT AND ACCRUED LIABILITIES 494,983
253 OTHER DEFERRED CREDITS 65,907
255 ACCUMULATED DEFERRED INVESTMENT TAX CREDITS 113,531
281-283 ACCUMULATED DEFERRED INCOME TAXES 901,830
101-106,114 UTILITY PLANT 2,938,285
107 CONSTRUCTION WORK IN PROGRESS 21,359
120.1-120.4 NUCLEAR FUEL 236,859
121 NONUTILITY PROPERTY 3,535
124 OTHER INVESTMENTS 69,496
125-128 SPECIAL FUNDS 93,592
131 CASH 2,844
132-134 SPECIAL DEPOSITS 3,487
135 WORKING FUND 77
136 TEMPORARY CASH INVESTMENTS 4,443
141 NOTES RECEIVABLE 224
142 CUSTOMER ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE 7,576
143 OTHER ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE 757
146 ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE FROM ASSOCIATED COS 1,268
151 FUEL STOCK 22,684
152 FUEL STOCK EXPENSES UNDISTRIBUTED 158
154 PLANT MATERIALS AND OPERATING SUPPLIES 43,335
163 STORES EXPENSE UNDISTRIBUTED 680
165 PREPAYMENTS 11,451
174 MISCELLANEOUS CURRENT AND ACCRUED ASSETS 481,204
181 UNAMORTIZED DEBT EXPENSE 9,760
184 CLEARING ACCOUNTS 132
186 MISCELLANEOUS DEFERRED DEBITS 3,291
190 ACCUMULATED DEFERRED INCOME TAXES 55,796
TO RECORD THE CREATION OF A GENCO SUBSIDIARY OF CENTRAL POWER
AND LIGHT COMPANY.
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE CORPORATION Schedule H-11
FERC DOCKET NO. EC01-________ Page 2 of 2
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS
SECTION 5, PART C
JOURNAL ENTRIES
TRANSFER OF CENTRAL POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY ASSETS (IN
$ THOUSANDS BASED ON 12/31/2000 ESTIMATED AMOUNTS)
A. TO BE RECORDED ON THE BOOKS OF CENTRAL POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY:
---------------------------------------------------------------
DIVIDEND GENCO SUBSIDIARY TO CENTRAL AND SOUTH WEST CORPORATION
---------------------------------------------------------------
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION DR CR
------- ----------- -- --
438 DIVIDENDS DECLARED - RET EARNINGS XXX,XXX
238 DIVIDENDS DECLARED - LIABILITY XXX,XXX
TO RECORD THE DECLARATION OF A DIVIDEND FROM CENTRAL POWER AND
LIGHT COMPANY TO CENTRAL AND SOUTH WEST CORPORATION FOR THE NET
ASSETS OF THE CENTRAL POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY GENCO SUBSIDIARY.
TRANSFER GENCO INVESTMENT TO CENTRAL AND SOUTH WEST CORPORATION
---------------------------------------------------------------
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION DR CR
------- ----------- -- --
238 DIVIDENDS DECLARED - LIABILITY
123.1 INVESTMENT IN SUBSIDIARY COS - CPL GENCO XXX,XXX
TO RECORD THE TRANSFER OF THE INVESTMENT OF CENTRAL POWER AND
LIGHT COMPANY IN GENCO TO CENTRAL AND SOUTH WEST CORPORATION TO
SATISFY THE DIVIDEND DECLARATION.
CLOSE DIVIDEND TO RETAINED EARNINGS
-----------------------------------
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION DR CR
------- ----------- -- --
216 RETAINED EARNINGS XXX,XXX
438 DIVIDENDS DECLARED XXX,XXX
TO CLOSE THE DIVIDEND DECLARATION ON CENTRAL POWER AND LIGHT
COMPANY TO RETAINED EARNINGS.
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE CORPORATION Schedule H-12
FERC DOCKET NO. EC01-________ Page 1 of 1
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS
SECTION 5, PART C
JOURNAL ENTRIES
TRANSFER OF CENTRAL POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY ASSETS (IN
$ THOUSANDS BASED ON 12/31/2000 ESTIMATED AMOUNTS)
AA. TO BE RECORDED ON THE BOOKS OF CENTRAL AND SOUTH WEST CORPORATION:
------------------------------------------------------------------
DIVIDEND GENCO SUBSIDIARY TO AEP, INC
-------------------------------------
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION DR CR
------- ----------- -- --
438 DIVIDENDS DECLARED - RET EARNINGS XXX,XXX
238 DIVIDENDS DECLARED - LIABILITY XXX,XXX
TO RECORD THE DECLARATION OF A DIVIDEND FROM CENTRAL AND SOUTH
WEST CORPORATION TO THE AEP CO., INC. FOR THE NET ASSETS OF THE
CENTRAL POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY GENCO SUBSIDIARY.
TRANSFER GENCO INVESTMENT TO AEP, INC
-------------------------------------
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION DR CR
------- ----------- -- --
238 DIVIDENDS DECLARED - LIABILITY XXX,XXX
123.1 INVESTMENT IN SUBSIDIARY COS - CPL GENCO XXX,XXX
TO RECORD THE TRANSFER OF THE INVESTMENT OF CENTRAL AND SOUTH
WEST CORPORATION IN GENCO TO AEP, CO., INC. TO SATISFY THE
DIVIDEND DECLARATION.
CLOSE DIVIDEND TO RETAINED EARNINGS
-----------------------------------
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION DR CR
------- ----------- -- --
216 RETAINED EARNINGS XXX,XXX
438 DIVIDENDS DECLARED XXX,XXX
TO CLOSE THE DIVIDEND DECLARATION ON CENTRAL AND SOUTH WEST
CORPORATION TO RETAINED EARNINGS.
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE CORPORATION Schedule H-13
FERC DOCKET NO. EC01-________ Page 1 of 1
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS
SECTION 5, PART C
JOURNAL ENTRIES
TRANSFER OF CENTRAL POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY ASSETS (IN
$ THOUSANDS BASED ON 12/31/2000 ESTIMATED AMOUNTS)
B. TO BE RECORDED ON THE BOOKS OF CENTRAL POWER AND LIGHT GENCO:
-------------------------------------------------------------
CREATE GENCO SUBSIDIARY
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION DR CR
-------- --------------- --- ---
101-106,114 UTILITY PLANT 2,938,285
107 CONSTRUCTION WORK IN PROGRESS 27,359
120.1-120.4 NUCLEAR FUEL 236,859
121 NONUTILITY PROPERTY 3,535
124 OTHER INVESTMENTS 69,496
125-128 SPECIAL FUNDS 93,592
131 CASH 2,844
132-134 SPECIAL DEPOSITS 3,487
135 WORKING FUND 77
136 TEMPORARY CASH INVESTMENTS 4,443
141 NOTES RECEIVABLE 224
142 CUSTOMER ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE 7,576
143 OTHER ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE 757
146 ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE FROM ASSOCIATED COS 1,268
151 FUEL STOCK 22,684
152 FUEL STOCK EXPENSES UNDISTRIBUTED 158
154 PLANT MATERIALS AND OPERATING SUPPLIES 43,335
163 STORES EXPENSE UNDISTRIBUTED 680
165 PREPAYMENTS 11,451
174 MISCELLANEOUS CURRENT AND ACCRUED ASSETS 481,204
181 UNAMORTIZED DEBT EXPENSE 9,760
184 CLEARING ACCOUNTS 132
186 MISCELLANEOUS DEFERRED DEBITS 3,291
190 ACCUMULATED DEFERRED INCOME TAXES 55,796
108 ACCUM PROVISION FOR DEPRECIATION AND DEPL l,445,891
120.5 ACCUM PROVISION FOR AMORTIZATION OF NUCLEAR FUEL 204,952
122 ACCUM PROVISION FOR DEPRECIATION AND DEPL 1,197
201-226 COMMON STOCK/OTH PAID IN CAPITAL/LONG-TERM DEBT 386,126
228.1 ACCUM PROVISION FOR PROPERTY INSURANCE 1,814
228.3 ACCUM PROVISION FOR PENSIONS AND BENEFITS 788
228.4 ACCUM MISCELLANEOUS OPERATING PROVISIONS 2,683
232 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 114,139
233 NOTES PAYABLE TO ASSOCIATED COMPANIES 186,059
234 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE TO ASSOCIATED COMPANIES 42,649
236 TAXES ACCRUED 36,458
237 INTEREST ACCRUED 19,252
241 TAX COLLECTIONS PAYABLE 34
242 MISC CURRENT AND ACCRUED LIABILITIES 494,983
253 OTHER DEFERRED CREDITS 65,907
255 ACCUMULATED DEFERRED INVESTMENT TAX CREDITS 113,531
281-283 ACCUMULATED DEFERRED INCOME TAXES 901,830
TO RECORD THE CREATION OF A GENCO SUBSIDIARY OF CENTRAL POWER
AND LIGHT COMPANY.
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE CORPORATION Schedule H-14
FERC DOCKET NO. EC01-________ Page 1 of 1
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS
SECTION 5, PART C
JOURNAL ENTRIES
TRANSFER OF CENTRAL POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY ASSETS (IN
$ THOUSANDS BASED ON 12/31/2000 ESTIMATED AMOUNTS)
C. TO BE RECORDED ON THE BOOKS OF AEP COMPANY, INC.:
-------------------------------------------------
DIVIDEND OF GENCO
-----------------
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION DR CR
------- ----------- -- --
171 DIVIDENDS RECEIVABLE - AFFILIATED XXX,XXX
123.1 INVESTMENT IN SUB COS - CSW CORP XXX,XXX
TO RECORD A DIVIDEND RECEIVABLE FROM CENTRAL AND SOUTH WEST
CORPORATION EQUAL TO THE NET ASSETS OF THE CENTRAL POWER AND
LIGHT COMPANY GENCO SUBSIDIARY.
INVESTMENT IN GENCO
-------------------
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION DR CR
------- ----------- -- --
123.1 INVESTMENT IN SUBSIDIARY COS - CPL GENCO XXX,XXX
171 DIVIDENDS RECEIVABLE XXX,XXX
TO RECORD THE INVESTMENT IN CENTRAL POWER AND LIGHT GENCO IN
SETTLEMENT OF THE DIVIDEND PAYABLE FROM CENTRAL AND SOUTH WEST
CORPORATION.
CONTRIBUTE GENCO TO NON-REGULATED HOLDCO
----------------------------------------
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION DR CR
------- ----------- -- --
123.1 INVESTMENT IN SUBSIDIARY COS - AEP NON-REG HOLDCO XXX,XXX
123.1 INVESTMENT IN SUBSIDIARY COS - CPL GENCO XXX,XXX
TO RECORD CONTRIBUTION OF CENTRAL POWER AND LIGHT GENCO TO THE
NON-REGULATED HOLDCO.
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE CORPORATION Schedule H-15
FERC DOCKET NO. EC01-________ Page 1 of 1
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS
SECTION 5, PART C
JOURNAL ENTRIES
TRANSFER OF CENTRAL POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY ASSETS (IN
$ THOUSANDS BASED ON 12/31/2000 ESTIMATED AMOUNTS)
D. TO BE RECORDED ON THE BOOKS OF AEP NON-REGULATED HOLDCO:
-------------------------------------------------------
CONTRIBUTION OF GENCO
---------------------
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION DR CR
------- ----------- -- --
123-1 INVESTMENT IN SUBSIDIARY COS - CPL GENCO XXX,XXX
201,208-211 COMMON STOCK - OTHER PAID IN CAPITAL XXX,XXX
TO RECORD AEP'S CONTRIBUTION OF ITS INVESTMENT IN THE CENTRAL
POWER AND LIGHT GENCO TO AEFS NON-REGULATED HOLDCO.
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE CORPORATION Schedule H-16
FERC DOCKET NO. EC01-__________ Page 1 of 2
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS
SECTION 5, PART C
JOURNAL ENTRIES
TRANSFER OF COLUMBUS SOUTHERN POWER COMPANY ASSETS (IN
$ THOUSANDS BASED ON 12/31/2000 ESTIMATED AMOUNTS)
A. TO BE RECORDED ON THE BOOKS OF COLUMBUS SOUTHERN POWER COMPANY:
---------------------------------------------------------------
CREATE WIRESCO SUBSIDIARY
-------------------------
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION DR CR
------- ----------- -- --
108 ACCUM PROVISION FOR DEPRECIATION AND DEPL
122 ACCUM PROVISION FOR DEPRECIATION AND DEPL 535
123.1&221-226 INV IN SUBS COS & LONG-TERM DEBT 1,015,584
144 ACCUM PROVISION FOR UNCOLLECTIBLE ACCOUNTS 24
227 OBLIGATIONS UNDER CAPITAL LEASE 22,374
228.2 ACCUM PROVISION FOR INJURIES AND DAMAGES 0
228.3 ACCUM PROVISION FOR PENSIONS AND BENEFITS 4,005
228.4 ACCUM MISCELLANEOUS OPERATING PROVISIONS 4,815
232 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 9,239
233 NOTES PAYABLE TO ASSOCIATED COMPANIES 33,583
234 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE TO ASSOCIATED COMPANIES 24,951
235 CUSTOMER DEPOSITS 4,851
236 TAXES ACCRUED 70,150
237 INTEREST ACCRUED 5,330
241 TAX COLLECTIONS PAYABLE 640
242 MISC CURRENT AND ACCRUED LIABILITIES 20,309
243 OBLIGATIONS UNDER CAPITAL LEASE - CURRENT 4,804
252 CUSTOMER ADVANCES FOR CONSTRUCTION 775
253 OTHER DEFERRED CREDITS 92
254 OTHER REGULATORY LIABILITIES 30,384
255 ACCUMULATED DEFERRED INVESTMENT TAX CREDITS 14,086
281-283 ACCUMULATED DEFERRED INCOME TAXES 174,442
101-106,114 UTILITY PLANT 1,542,642
107 CONSTRUCTION WORK IN PROGRESS 69,715
121 NONUTILITY PROPERTY 8,986
124 OTHER INVESTMENTS 12,861
125-128 SPECIAL FUNDS 13
131 CASH 3,730
132-134 SPECIAL DEPOSITS 10
135 WORKING FUND 543
141 NOTES RECEIVABLE 1
142 CUSTOMER ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE 1,989
143 OTHER ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE 5,462
146 ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE FROM ASSOCIATED COS 6,943
154 PLANT MATERIALS AND OPERATING SUPPLIES 5,023
165 PREPAYMENTS 15,090
172 RENTS RECEIVABLE 78
173 UNBILLED REVENUE 2,273
174 MISCELLANEOUS CURRENT AND ACCRUED ASSETS 11,185
181 UNAMORTIZED DEBT EXPENSE 237
182.3 OTHER REGULATORY ASSETS 301,764
183 PRELIM SURVEY AND INVESTIGATION CHARGES 5
184 CLEARING ACCOUNTS 392
185 TEMPORARY FACILITIES 11
186 MISCELLANEOUS DEFERRED DEBITS 33,415
189 UNAMORTIZED LOSS ON REACQUIRED DEBT 8,339
190 ACCUMULATED DEFERRED INCOME TAXES 32,461
TO RECORD THE CREATION OF A WIRESCO SUBSIDIARY OF COLUMBUS
SOUTHERN POWER COMPANY.
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE CORPORATION Schedule H-16
FERC DOCKET NO. EC01-________ Page 2 of 2
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS
SECTION 5, PART C
JOURNAL ENTRIES
TRANSFER OF COLUMBUS SOUTHERN POWER COMPANY ASSETS (IN
$ THOUSANDS BASED ON 12/31/2000 ESTIMATED AMOUNTS)
A. TO BE RECORDED ON THE BOOKS OF COLUMBUS SOUTHERN POWER COMPANY.
--------------------------------------------------------------
DIVIDEND WIRESCO SUBSIDIARY TO AEP, INC
---------------------------------------
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION DR CR
-------- ----------- -- --
207 PREMIUM ON CAPITAL STOCK XXX,XXX
208-211 PAID-IN CAPITAL XXX,XXX
438 DIVIDENDS DECLARED - RET EARNINGS XXX,XXX
238 DIVIDENDS DECLARED - LIABILITY XXX,XXX
TO RECORD THE DECLARATION OF A DIVIDEND FROM COLUMBUS SOUTHERN
POWER COMPANY TO THE AEP CO., INC. FOR THE NET ASSETS OF THE
COLUMBUS SOUTHERN POWER COMPANY WIRESCO SUBSIDIARY.
TRANSFER WIRESCO INVESTMENT TO AEP. INC
---------------------------------------
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION DR CR
-------- ----------- -- --
238 DIVIDENDS DECLARED - LIABILITY XXX,XXX
123.1 INVESTMENT IN SUBSIDIARY COS - CSP WIRESCO XXX,XXX
TO RECORD THE TRANSFER OF THE INVESTMENT OF COLUMBUS SOUTHERN
POWER COMPANY IN WIRESCO TO AEP, CO., INC. TO SATISFY THE DIVIDEND
DECLARATION.
CLOSE DIVIDEND TO RETAINED EARNINGS
-----------------------------------
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION DR CR
-------- ----------- -- --
216 RETAINED EARNINGS XXX,XXX
438 DIVIDENDS DECLARED XXX,XXX
TO CLOSE THE DIVIDEND DECLARATION ON COLUMBUS SOUTHERN POWER
COMPANY TO RETAINED EARNINGS.
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE CORPORATION Schedule H-17
FERC DOCKET NO. EC01-_________ Page 1 of 1
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS
SECTION 5, PART C
JOURNAL ENTRIES
TRANSFER OF COLUMBUS SOUTHERN POWER COMPANY ASSETS (IN
$ THOUSANDS BASED ON 12/31/2000 ESTIMATED AMOUNTS)
B. TO BE RECORDED ON THE BOOKS OF COLUMBUS SOUTHERN WIRESCO:
---------------------------------------------------------
CREATE WIRESCO SUBSIDIARY
-------------------------
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION DR CR
-------- ----------- -- --
101-406,114 UTILITY PLANT 1,542,642
107 CONSTRUCTION WORK IN PROGRESS 69,715
121 NONUTILITY PROPERTY 81986
124 OTHER INVESTMENTS 12,881
125-128 SPECIAL FUNDS 13
131 CASH 3,730
132-134 SPECIAL DEPOSITS 10
135 WORKING FUND 543
141 NOTES RECEIVABLE 1
142 CUSTOMER ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE 1,989
143 OTHER ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE 5,462
146 ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE FROM ASSOCIATED COS 6,943
154 PLANT MATERIALS AND OPERATING SUPPLIES 5,023
165 PREPAYMENTS 15,090
172 RENTS RECEIVABLE 78
173 UNBILLED REVENUE 2,273
174 MISCELLANEOUS CURRENT AND ACCRUED ASSETS 11,135
181 UNAMORTIZED DEBT EXPENSE 237
182.3 OTHER REGULATORY ASSETS 301,764
183 PRELIM SURVEY AND INVESTIGATION CHARGES 5
184 CLEARING ACCOUNTS 392
185 TEMPORARY FACILITIES 11
186 MISCELLANEOUS DEFERRED DEBITS 33,415
189 UNAMORTIZED LOSS ON REACQUIRED DEBT 8,339
190 ACCUMULATED DEFERRED INCOME TAXES 32,461
108 ACCUM PROVISION FOR DEPRECIATION AND DEPL 622,195
122 ACCUM PROVISION FOR DEPRECIATION AND DEPL 535
144 ACCUM PROVISION FOR UNCOLLECTIBLE ACCOUNTS 24
201-226 COMMON STOCK/OTH PAID IN CAPITAL/LONG-TERM DEBT 1,015,584
227 OBLIGATIONS UNDER CAPITAL LEASE 22,374
228.2 ACCUM PROVISION FOR INJURIES AND DAMAGES 0
228.3 ACCUM PROVISION FOR PENSIONS AND BENEFITS 4,005
228.4 ACCUM MISCELLANEOUS OPERATING PROVISIONS 4,815
232 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 9,239
233 NOTES PAYABLE TO ASSOCIATED COMPANIES 33,583
234 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE TO ASSOCIATED COMPANIES 24,951
235 CUSTOMER DEPOSITS 4,051
236 TAXES ACCRUED 70,150
237 INTEREST ACCRUED 5,330
241 TAX COLLECTIONS PAYABLE 640
242 MISC CURRENT AND ACCRUED LIABILITIES 20,309
243 OBLIGATIONS UNDER CAPITAL LEASE - CURRENT 4,804
252 CUSTOMER ADVANCES FOR CONSTRUCTION 775
253 OTHER DEFERRED CREDITS 92
254 OTHER REGULATORY LIABILITIES 30,384
255 ACCUMULATED DEFERRED INVESTMENT TAX CREDITS 14,086
281-283 ACCUMULATED DEFERRED INCOME TAXES 174,442
TO RECORD THE CREATION OF A WIRESCO SUBSIDIARY OF COLUMBUS
SOUTHERN POWER COMPANY.
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE CORPORATION Schedule H-18
FERC DOCKET NO. EC01-__________ Page 1 of 1
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS
SECTION 5, PART C
JOURNAL ENTRIES
TRANSFER OF COLUMBUS SOUTHERN POWER COMPANY ASSETS (IN
$ THOUSANDS BASED ON 12/31/2000 ESTIMATED AMOUNTS)
C. TO BE RECORDED ON THE BOOKS OF AEP COMPANY, INC.:
-------------------------------------------------
DIVIDEND OF WIRESCO
-------------------
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION DR CR
------- ----------- -- --
171 DIVIDENDS RECEIVABLE - AFFILIATED XXX,XXX
123.1 INVESTMENT IN SUB COS - COLUMBUS SOUTHERN POWER XXX,XXX
TO RECORD A DIVIDEND RECEIVABLE FROM COLUMBUS SOUTHERN POWER
COMPANY EQUAL TO THE NET ASSETS OF THE COLUMBUS SOUTHERN POWER
COMPANY WIRESCO, SUBSIDIARY.
INVESTMENT IN WIRESCO
---------------------
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION DR CR
------- ----------- -- --
123.1 INVESTMENT IN SUBSIDIARY COS - CSP WIRESCO XXX,XXX
171 DIVIDENDS RECEIVABLE XXX,XXX
TO RECORD THE INVESTMENT IN COLUMBUS SOUTHERN POWER WIRESCO IN
SETTLEMENT OF THE DIVIDEND PAYABLE FROM COLUMBUS SOUTHERN POWER
COMPANY.
CONTRIBUTE WIRESCO TO CENTRAL SOUTH WEST CORPORATION
----------------------------------------------------
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION DR CR
------- ----------- -- --
123.1 INVESTMENT IN SUBSIDIARY COS - CSW CORP XXX,XXX
123.1 INVESTMENT IN SUBSIDIARY COS - CSP WIRESCO XXX,XXX
TO RECORD CONTRIBUTION OF COLUMBUS SOUTHERN POWER WIRESCO TO THE
REGULATED HOLDING COMPANY, CENTRAL AND SOUTH WEST CORPORATION.
CONTRIBUTE GENCO TO NON-REGULATED HOLDCO
----------------------------------------
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION DR CR
------- ----------- -- --
123.1 INVESTMENT IN SUBSIDIARY COS - AEP NON-REG HOLDCO XXX,XXX
123.1 INVESTMENT IN SUBSIDIARY COS - CSP GENCO XXX,XXX
TO RECORD CONTRIBUTION OF COLUMBUS SOUTHERN POWER GENCO TO
THE NON-REGULATED HOLDCO.
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE CORPORATION Schedule H-19
FERC DOCKET NO. EC01-_________ Page 1 of 1
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS
SECTION 5, PART C
JOURNAL ENTRIES
TRANSFER OF COLUMBUS SOUTHERN POWER COMPANY ASSETS (IN
$ THOUSANDS BASED ON 12/31/2000 ESTIMATED AMOUNTS)
D. TO BE RECORDED ON THE BOOKS OF CENTRAL AND SOUTH WEST CORPORATION:
------------------------------------------------------------------
CONTRIBUTION OF WIRESCO
-----------------------
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION DR CR
------- ----------- -- --
123.1 INVESTMENT IN SUBSIDIARY COS - CSP WIRESCO XXX,XXX
201,208-211 COMMON STOCK - OTHER PAID IN CAPITAL XXX,XXX
TO RECORD AEP'S CONTRIBUTION OF ITS INVESTMENT IN THE COLUMBUS
SOUTHERN POWER WIRES COMPANY TO AEP'S REGULATED HOLDING COMPANY,
CENTRAL AND SOUTH WEST CORPORATION.
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE CORPORATION Schedule H-20
FERC DOCKET NO. EC01-__________ Page 1 of 1
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS
SECTION 5, PART C
JOURNAL ENTRIES
TRANSFER OF COLUMBUS SOUTHERN POWER COMPANY ASSETS (IN
$ THOUSANDS BASED ON 12/31/2000 ESTIMATED AMOUNTS)
E. TO BE RECORDED ON THE BOOKS OF AEP NON-REGULATED HOLDCO:
--------------------------------------------------------
CONTRIBUTION OF GENCO
---------------------
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION DR CR
------- ----------- -- --
123.1 INVESTMENT IN SUBSIDIARY COS - CSP GENCO XXX,XXX
201,208-211 COMMON STOCK - OTHER PAID IN CAPITAL XXX,XXX
TO RECORD AEP'S CONTRIBUTION OF ITS INVESTMENT IN THE COLUMBUS
SOUTHERN POWER GENCO TO AEP'S NON-REGULATED HOLDCO.
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE CORPORATION Schedule H-21
FERC DOCKET NO. EC01-________ Page 1 of 2
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS
SECTION 5, PART C
JOURNAL ENTRIES
TRANSFER OF OHIO POWER COMPANY ASSETS (IN $ MILLIONS
$ THOUSANDS BASED ON 12/31/2000 ESTIMATED AMOUNTS)
A. TO BE RECORDED ON THE BOOKS OF OHIO POWER COMPANY:
--------------------------------------------------
CREATE WIRESCO SUBSIDIARY
-------------------------
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION DR CR
------- ----------- -- --
108 ACCUM PROVISION FOR DEPRECIATION AND DEPL 697,041
122 ACCUM PROVISION FOR DEPRECIATION AND DEPL 2,266
123.1&221-226 INV IN SUBS COS & LONG-TERM DEBT 1,694,976
144 ACCUM PROVISION FOR UNCOLLECTIBLE ACCOUNTS 32
227 OBLIGATIONS UNDER CAPITAL LEASE 10,224
228.2 ACCUM PROVISION FOR INJURIES AND DAMAGES 10
228.3 ACCUM PROVISION FOR PENSIONS AND BENEFITS 61950
228.4 ACCUM MISCELLANEOUS OPERATING PROVISIONS 5.117
232 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 20,697
233 NOTES PAYABLE TO ASSOCIATED COMPANIES 41,471
234 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE TO ASSOCIATED COMPANIES 60,364
235 CUSTOMER DEPOSITS 4,623
236 TAXES ACCRUED 74,080
237 INTEREST ACCRUED 4,456
241 TAX COLLECTIONS PAYABLE 953
242 MISC CURRENT AND ACCRUED LIABILITIES 32,087
243 OBLIGATIONS UNDER CAPITAL LEASE - CURRENT 1,812
252 CUSTOMER ADVANCES FOR CONSTRUCTION 0
253 OTHER DEFERRED CREDITS 865
254 OTHER REGULATORY LIABILITIES 39,497
255 ACCUMULATED DEFERRED INVESTMENT TAX CREDITS 10,050
281-283 ACCUMULATED DEFERRED INCOME TAXES 223,310
101-106,114 UTILITY PLANT 1,985,035
107 CONSTRUCTION WORK IN PROGRESS 41,449
121 NONUTILITY PROPERTY 4,072
124 OTHER INVESTMENTS 9,788
125-128 SPECIAL FUNDS 16
131 CASH 2,129
132-134 SPECIAL DEPOSITS 152
135 WORKING FUND 11
141 NOTES RECEIVABLE 18
142 CUSTOMER ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE 8,439
143 OTHER ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE 6,179
146 ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE FROM ASSOCIATED COS 18,138
154 PLANT MATERIALS AND OPERATING SUPPLIES 9,680
165 PREPAYMENTS 11,800
172 RENTS RECEIVABLE 98
173 UNBILLED REVENUE 48
174 MISCELLANEOUS CURRENT AND ACCRUED ASSETS 1,704
181 UNAMORTIZED DEBT EXPENSE 262
182.3 OTHER REGULATORY ASSETS 748,089
183 PRELIM SURVEY AND INVESTIGATION CHARGES 1
184 CLEARING ACCOUNTS 352
185 TEMPORARY FACILITIES 5
186 MISCELLANEOUS DEFERRED DEBITS 39,396
189 UNAMORTIZED LOSS ON REACQUIRED DEBT 6,106
190 ACCUMULATED DEFERRED INCOME TAXES 37,904
TO RECORD THE CREATION OF A WIRESCO SUBSIDIARY OF OHIO
POWER COMPANY.
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE CORPORATION Schedule H-21
FERC DOCKET NO. EC01-_________ Page 2 of 2
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS
SECTION 5, PART C
JOURNAL ENTRIES
TRANSFER OF OHIO POWER COMPANY ASSETS (IN $ MILLIONS
$ THOUSANDS BASED ON 12/31/2000 ESTIMATED AMOUNTS)
A. TO BE RECORDED ON THE B0OKS OF OHIO POWER COMPANY:
---------------------------------------------------
DIVIDEND WIRESCO SUBSIDIARY TO AEP, INC
---------------------------------------
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION DR CR
------- ------------ -- --
208-211 PAID-IN CAPITAL XXX,XXX
438 DIVIDENDS DECLARED - RET EARNINGS XXX,XXX
238 DIVIDENDS DECLARED - LIABILITY XXX,XXX
TO RECORD THE DECLARATION OF A DIVIDEND FROM OHIO POWER COMPANY
TO THE AEP CO., INC. FOR THE NET ASSETS OF THE OHIO POWER COMPANY
WIRESCO SUBSIDIARY.
TRANSFER WIRESCO INVESTMENT TO AEP, INC
---------------------------------------
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION DR CR
------- ------------ -- --
238 DIVIDENDS DECLARED - LIABILITY XXX,XXX
123.1 INVESTMENT IN SUBSIDIARY COS - OPCO WIRESCO XXX,XXX
TO RECORD THE TRANSFER OF THE INVESTMENT OF OHIO POWER COMPANY IN
WIRESCO TO AEP, CO., INC. TO SATISFY THE DIVIDEND DECLARATION.
CLOSE DIVIDEND TO RETAINED EARNINGS
-----------------------------------
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION DR CR
------- ------------ -- --
216 RETAINED EARNINGS XXX,XXX
438 DIVIDENDS DECLARED XXX,XXX
TO CLOSE THE DIVIDEND DECLARATION ON OHIO POWER COMPANY TO
RETAINED EARNINGS.
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE CORPORATION Schedule H-22
FERC DOCKET NO. EC01-____________ Page 1 of 1
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS
SECTION 5, PART C
JOURNAL ENTRIES
TRANSFER OF OHIO POWER COMPANY ASSETS (IN $ MILLIONS
$ THOUSANDS BASED ON 12/31/2000 ESTIMATED AMOUNTS)
B. TO BE RECORDED ON THE BOOKS OF OHIO POWER WIRESCO:
--------------------------------------------------
CREATE WIRESCO SUBSIDIARY
-------------------------
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION DR CR
------- ----------- -- --
101-106, 114 UTILITY PLANT 1,985,035
107 CONSTRUCTION WORK IN PROGRESS 41,449
121 NONUTILITY PROPERTY 4,072
124 OTHER INVESTMENTS 9,788
125-128 SPECIAL FUNDS 16
131 CASH 2,129
132-134 SPECIAL DEPOSITS 152
135 WORKING FUND 11
141 NOTES RECEIVABLE 18
142 CUSTOMER ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE 8,439
143 OTHER ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE 6,179
146 ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE FROM ASSOCIATED COS 18,138
154 PLANT MATERIALS AND OPERATING SUPPLIES 9,680
165 PREPAYMENTS 11,800
172 RENTS RECEIVABLE 98
173 UNBILLED REVENUE 48
174 MISCELLANEOUS CURRENT AND ACCRUED ASSETS 1,704
181 UNAMORTIZED DEBT EXPENSE 262
182.3 OTHER REGULATORY ASSETS 748,089
183 PRELIM SURVEY AND INVESTIGATION CHARGES 1
184 CLEARING ACCOUNTS 352
185 TEMPORARY FACILITIES 5
186 MISCELLANEOUS DEFERRED DEBITS 39,396
189 UNAMORTIZED LOSS ON REACQUIRED DEBT 6,106
190 ACCUMULATED DEFERRED INCOME TAXES 37,904
108 ACCUM PROVISION FOR DEPRECIATION AND DEPL 697,041
122 ACCUM PROVISION FOR DEPRECIATION AND DEPL 2,266
144 ACCUM PROVISION FOR UNCOLLECTIBLE ACCOUNTS 32
201-226 COMMON STOCK/OTH PAID IN CAPITAL/LONG-TERM DEBT 1,694,976
227 OBLIGATIONS UNDER CAPITAL LEASE 10,224
228.2 ACCUM PROVISION FOR INJURIES AND DAMAGES 10
228.3 ACCUM PROVISION FOR PENSIONS AND BENEFITS 6,950
228.4 ACCUM MISCELLANEOUS OPERATING PROVISIONS 5,117
232 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 20,697
233 NOTES PAYABLE TO ASSOCIATED COMPANIES 41,471
234 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE TO ASSOCIATED COMPANIES 60,354
235 CUSTOMER DEPOSITS 4,523
236 TAXES ACCRUED 74,080
237 INTEREST ACCRUED 4,456
241 TAX COLLECTIONS PAYABLE 953
242 MISC CURRENT AND ACCRUED LIAABILITIES 32,087
243 OBLIGATIONS UNDER CAPITAL LEASE - CURRENT 1,812
252 CUSTOMER ADVANCES FOR CONSTRUCTION 0
253 OTHER DEFERRED CREDITS 865
254 OTHER REGULATORY LIABILITIES 39,497
255 ACCUMULATED DEFERRED INVESTMENT TAX CREDITS 10,050
281-283 ACCUMULATED DEFERRED INCOME TAXES 223,310
TO RECORD THE CREATION OF A WIRESCO SUBSIDIARY OF OHIO
POWER COMPANY.
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE CORPORATION Schedule H-23
FERC DOCKET NO. EC01-________ Page 1 of 1
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS
SECTION 5, PART C
JOURNAL ENTRIES
TRANSFER OF OHIO POWER COMPANY ASSETS (IN $ MILLIONS
$ THOUSANDS BASED ON 12/31/2000 ESTIMATED AMOUNTS)
C. TO BE RECORDED ON THE BOOKS OF AEP COMPANY, INC.:
-------------------------------------------------
DIVIDEND OF WIRESCO
-------------------
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION DR CR
------- ----------- -- --
171 DIVIDENDS RECEIVABLE - AFFILIATED XXX,XXX
123.1 INVESTMENT IN SUB COS - OHIO POWER XXX,XXXX
TO RECORD A DIVIDEND RECEIVABLE FROM OHIO POWER
COMPANY EQUAL TO THE NET ASSETS OF THE OHIO POWER
COMPANY WIRESCO SUBSIDIARY.
INVESTMENT IN WIRESCO
---------------------
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION DR CR
------- ----------- -- --
123.1 INVESTMENT IN SUBSIDIARY COS - OPCO WIRESCO XXX,XXX
171 DIVIDENDS RECEIVABLE XXX,XXX
TO RECORD THE INVESTMENT IN OHIO POWER WIRESCO
IN SETTLEMENT OF THE DIVIDEND PAYABLE FROM OHIO POWER COMPANY.
CONTRIBUTE WIRESCO TO CENTRAL AND SOUTH WEST CORPORATION
--------------------------------------------------------
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION DR CR
------- ----------- -- --
123.1 INVESTMENT IN SUBSIDIARY COS - CSW CORP XXX,XXX
123.1 INVESTMENT IN SUBSIDIARY COS - OPCO WIRESCO XXX,XXX
TO RECORD CONTRIBUTION OF OHIO POWER WIRESCO TO THE
REGULATED HOLDING COMPANY, CENTRAL AND SOUTH WEST CORPORATION.
CONTRIBUTE GENCO TO NON-REGULATED HOLDCO
----------------------------------------
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION DR CR
------- ----------- -- --
123.1 INVESTMENT IN SUBSIDIARY COS - AEP NON-REG HOLDCO XXX,XXX
123.1 INVESTMENT IN SUBSIDIARY COS - OPCO GENCO XXX,XXX
TO RECORD CONTRIBUTION OF OHIO POWER GENCO TO THE NON-REGULATED
HOLDCO
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE CORPORATION Schedule H-24
FERC DOCKET NO. EC01-________ Page 1 of 1
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS
SECTION 5, PART C
JOURNAL ENTRIES
TRANSFER OF OHIO POWER COMPANY ASSETS (IN $ MILLIONS
$ THOUSANDS BASED ON 12/31/2000 ESTIMATED AMOUNTS)
D. TO BE RECORDED ON THE BOOKS OF CENTRAL AND SOUTH WEST CORPORATION:
------------------------------------------------------------------
CONTRIBUTION OF WIRESCO
-----------------------
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION DR CR
------- ----------- -- --
123.1 INVESTMENT IN SUBSIDIARY COS - OPCO WIRESCO XXX,XXX
201,208-211 COMMON STOCK - OTHER PAID IN CAPITAL XXX,XXX
TO RECORD AEP'S CONTRIBUTION OF ITS INVESTMENT IN THE OHIO POWER
WIRES COMPANY TO AEP'S REGULATED HOLDING COMPANY, CENTRAL AND
SOUTH WEST CORPORATION.
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE CORPORATION Schedule H-25
FERC DOCKET NO. EC01-________ Page 1 of 1
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS
SECTION 5, PART C
JOURNAL ENTRIES
TRANSFER OF OHIO POWER COMPANY ASSETS (IN $ MILLIONS
$ THOUSANDS BASED ON 12/31/2000 ESTIMATED AMOUNTS)
E. TO BE RECORDED ON THE BOOKS OF AEP NON-REGULATED HOLDCO:
--------------------------------------------------------
CONTRIBUTION OF GENCO
---------------------
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION DR CR
------- ------------ -- --
123.1 INVESTMENT IN SUBSIDIARY COS - OPCO GENCO XXX,XXX
201,208-211 COMMON STOCK - OTHER PAID IN CAPITAL XXX,XXX
TO RECORD AEP'S CONTRIBUTION OF ITS INVESTMENT IN THE OHIO POWER
GENCO TO AEP'S NON-REGULATED HOLDCO.
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE CORPORATION Schedule H-26
FERC DOCKET NO. EC01 -__________ Page 1 of 2
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS
SECTION 5, PART C
JOURNAL ENTRIES
TRANSFER OF SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY ASSETS
(IN $ THOUSANDS BASED ON 12/31/2000 ESTIMATED AMOUNTS)
A. TO 13E RECORDED ON THE BOOKS OF SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY:
--------------------------------------------------------------------
CREATE TEXAS WIRESCO SUBSIDIARY
-------------------------------
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION DR CR
------- ----------- -- --
108 ACCUM PROVISION FOR DEPRECIATION AND DEPL 278,417
123.1&221-228 INV IN SUBS COS & LONG-TERM DEBT 457,590
228.3 ACCUM PROVISION FOR PENSIONS AND BENEFITS 1,012
232 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 59,713
233 NOTES PAYABLE TO ASSOCIATED COMPANIES 4,381
234 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE TO ASSOCIATED COMPANIES 7,098
235 CUSTOMER DEPOSITS 6,648
236 TAXES ACCRUED 6,887
237 INTEREST ACCRUED 4,820
241 TAX COLLECTIONS PAYABLE 712
242 MISC CURRENT AND ACCRUED LIABILITIES 2,986
254 OTHER REGULATORY LIABILITIES 19,016
255 ACCUMULATED DEFERRED INVESTMENT TAX CREDITS 12,778
257 UNAMORTIZED GAIN ON REACQUIRED DEBT 151
281-283 ACCUMULATED DEFERRED INCOME TAXES 101,516
101-106,114 UTILITY PLANT 809,018
107 CONSTRUCTION WORK IN PROGRESS 17,683
121 NONUTILITY PROPERTY 113
124 OTHER INVESTMENTS 845
131 CASH 110
132-134 SPECIAL DEPOSITS 315
135 WORKING FUND 35
142 CUSTOMER ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE 2,314
143 OTHER ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE 1,022
146 ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE FROM ASSOCIATED COS 0
154 PLANT MATERIALS AND OPERATING SUPPLIES 2,427
165 PREPAYMENTS 13,768
171 INTEREST AND DIVIDENDS RECEIVABLE 95
172 RENTS RECEIVABLE 109
173 UNBILLED REVENUE 1,186
174 MISCELLANEOUS CURRENT AND ACCRUED ASSETS 0
181 UNAMORTIZED DEBT EXPENSE 1,326
182.3 OTHER REGULATORY ASSETS 16,654
184 CLEARING ACCOUNTS 436
186 MISCELLANEOUS DEFERRED DEBITS 20,237
189 UNAMORTIZED LOSS ON REACQUIRED DEBT 10,314
190 ACCUMULATED DEFERRED INCOME TAXES 11,981
TO RECORD THE CREATION OF A WIRESCO SUBSIDIARY OF SOUTHWESTERN
ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY.
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE CORPORATION Schedule H-26
FERC DOCKET NO. EC01 -_____________ Page 2 of 2
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS
SECTION 5, PART C
JOURNAL ENTRIES
TRANSFER OF SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY ASSETS
(IN $ THOUSANDS BASED ON 12/31/2000 ESTIMATED AMOUNTS)
A. TO BE RECORDED ON THE BOOKS OF SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY:
-------------------------------------------------------------------
DIVIDEND TEXAS WIRESCO SUBSIDIARY TO CENTRAL AND SOUTH WEST CORPORATION
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION DR CR
------- ----------- -- --
438 DIVIDENDS DECLARED - RET EARNINGS XXX,XXX
238 DIVIDENDS DECLARED - LIABILITY XXX,XXX
TO RECORD THE DECLARATION OF A DIVIDEND FROM SOUTHWESTERN
ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY TO CENTRAL AND SOUTH WEST CORPORATION FOR
THE NET ASSETS OF THE SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY TEXAS
WIRESCO SUBSIDIARY.
TRANSFER TEXAS WIRESCO, INVESTMENT TO CENTRAL AND SOUTH WEST CORPORATION
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION DR CR
------- ----------- -- --
238 DIVIDENDS DECLARED - LIABILITY XXX,XXX
123.1 INVESTMENT IN SUBSIDIARY COS - SWEPCO TEXAS WIRESCO XXX,XXX
TO RECORD THE TRANSFER OF THE INVESTMENT OF SOUTHWESTERN
ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY TEXAS WIRESCO TO CENTRAL AND SOUTH WEST
CORPORATION TO SATISFY THE DIVIDEND DECLARATION.
CLOSE-DIVIDEND TO RETAINED EARNINGS
-----------------------------------
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION DR CR
------- ----------- -- --
216 RETAINED EARNINGS XXX,XXX
438 DIVIDENDS DECLARED XXX,XXX
TO CLOSE THE DIVIDEND DECLARATION ON SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC
POWER COMPANY TO RETAINED EARNINGS.
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE CORPORATION Schedule H-27
FERC DOCKET NO. EC01-_________ Page 1 of 1
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS
SECTION 5, PART C
JOURNAL ENTRIES
TRANSFER OF SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY ASSETS
(IN $ THOUSANDS BASED ON 12/31/2000 ESTIMATED AMOUNTS)
B. TO BE RECORDED ON THE BOOKS OF SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER
----------------------------------------------------------
TEXAS WIRESCO:
--------------
CREATE TEXAS WIRESCO SUBSIDIARY
-------------------------------
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION DR CR
------- ----------- -- --
101-106, 114 UTILITY PLANT 809,018
107 CONSTRUCTION WORK IN PROGRESS 17,683
121 NONUTILITY PROPERTY 113
124 OTHER INVESTMENTS 845
131 CASH 110
132-134 SPECIAL DEPOSITS 315
135 WORKING FUND 35
142 CUSTOMER ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE 2,314
143 OTHER ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE 1,022
146 ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE FROM ASSOCIATED COS 0
154 PLANT MATERIALS AND OPERATING SUPPLIES 2,427
165 PREPAYMENTS 13,768
171 INTEREST AND DIVIDENDS RECEIVABLE 95
172 RENTS RECEIVABLE 109
173 UNBILLED REVENUE 1,186
174 MISCELLANEOUS CURRENT AND ACCRUED ASSETS 0
181 UNAMORTIZED DEBT EXPENSE 1,326
182.3 OTHER REGULATORY ASSETS 16,654
184 CLEARING ACCOUNTS 436
186 MISCELLANEOUS DEFERRED DEBITS 20,237
189 UNAMORTIZED LOSS ON REACQUIRED DEBT 10,314
190 ACCUMULATED DEFERRED INCOME TAXES 11,981
108 ACCUM PROVISION FOR DEPRECIATION AND DEPL 278,417
201-226 COMMON STOCK/OTH PAID IN CAPITAL/LONG-TERM DEBT 457,590
228.3 ACCUM PROVISION FOR PENSIONS AND BENEFITS 1,012
232 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 5,978
233 NOTES PAYABLE TO ASSOCIATED COMPANIES 4,381
234 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE TO ASSOCIATED COMPANIES 7,096
235 CUSTOMER DEPOSITS 6,648
236 TAXES ACCRUED 6,887
237 INTEREST ACCRUED 4,820
241 TAX COLLECTIONS PAYABLE 712
242 MISC CURRENT AND ACCRUED LIABILITIES 2,986
254 OTHER REGULATORY LIABILITIES 19,016
255 ACCUMULATED DEFERRED INVESTMENT TAX CREDITS 12,778
257 UNAMORTIZED GAIN ON REACQUIRED DEBT 151
281-283 ACCUMULATED DEFERRED INCOME TAXES 101,516
TO RECORD THE CREATION OF A TEXAS WIRESCO SUBSIDIARY OF SOUTHWESTERN
ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY.
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE CORPORATION Schedule H-28
FERC DOCKET NO. EC01-________ Page 1 of 1
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS
SECTION 5, PART C
JOURNAL ENTRIES
TRANSFER OF SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY ASSETS
(IN $ THOUSANDS BASED ON 12/31/2000 ESTIMATED AMOUNTS)
C. TO BE RECORDED ON THE BOOKS OF CENTRAL AND SOUTH WEST CORPORATION:
------------------------------------------------------------------
DIVIDEND OF TEXAS WIRESCO
-------------------------
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION DR CR
------- ----------- -- --
171 DIVIDENDS RECEIVABLE -AFFILIATED XXX,XXX
123.1 INVESTMENT IN SUBSIDIARY COS - SWEPCO XXX,XXX
TO RECORD A DIVIDEND RECEIVABLE FROM SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER
COMPANY EQUAL TO THE NET ASSETS OF THE SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER
COMPANY TEXAS WIRESCO SUBSIDIARY.
INVESTMENT IN WIRESCO
----------------------
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION DR CR
------- ----------- -- --
123.1 INVESTMENT IN SUBSIDIARY COS - SWEPCO TEXAS WIRESCO XXX,XXX
171 DIVIDENDS RECEIVABLE XXX,XXX
TO RECORD THE INVESTMENT IN SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER TEXAS
WIRESCO IN SETTLEMENT OF THE DIVIDEND PAYABLE FROM SOUTHWESTERN
ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY.
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE CORPORATION Schedule H-29
FERC DOCKET NO. EC01-________ Page 1 of 2
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS
SECTION 5, PART C
JOURNAL ENTRIES
TRANSFER OF WEST TEXAS UTILITIES COMPANY ASSETS (IN
$ THOUSANDS BASED ON 12/31/2000 ESTIMATED AMOUNTS)
A. TO BE RECORDED ON THE BOOKS OF WEST TEXAS UTILITIES COMPANY:
------------------------------------------------------------
CREATE GENCO SUBSIDIARY
-----------------------
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION DR CR
------- ----------- --- ---
108 ACCUM PROVISION FOR DEPRECIATION AND DEPL 210,985
123.1&221-228 INV IN SUBS COS & LONG-TERM DEBT 150,669
228.3 ACCUM PROVISION FOR PENSIONS AND BENEFITS 1,218
232 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 21,590
233 NOTES PAYABLE TO ASSOCIATED COMPANIES 18,774
234 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE TO ASSOCIATED COMPANIES 20,218
236 TAXES ACCRUED 6,718
237 INTEREST ACCRUED 1,274
241 TAX COLLECTION$ PAYABLE 231
242 MISC CURRENT AND ACCRUED LIABILITIES 157,789
253 OTHER DEFERRED CREDITS 20,800
255 ACCUMULATED DEFERRED INVESTMENT TAX CREDITS 9,237
257 UNAMORTIZED GAIN ON REACQUIRED DEBT 9
281-283 ACCUMULATED DEFERRED INCOME TAXES 77,581
101-108,114 UTILITY PLANT 442,607
107 CONSTRUCTION WORK IN PROGRESS 16,846
121 NONUTILITY PROPERTY 310
124 OTHER INVESTMENTS 20,944
131 CASH 1,352
132-134 SPECIAL DEPOSITS 1,628
135 WORKING FUND 2
142 CUSTOMER ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE 5,116
143 OTHER ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE 1,550
146 ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE FROM ASSOCIATED COS 12,740
151 FUEL STOCK 12,104
152 FUEL STOCK EXPENSES UNDISTRIBUTED 70
154 PLANT MATERIALS AND OPERATING SUPPLIES 6,546
165 PREPAYMENTS 7,205
174 MISCELLANEOUS CURRENT AND ACCRUED ASSETS 152,174
181 UNAMORTIZED DEBT EXPENSE 1,110
184 CLEARING ACCOUNTS 69
186 MISCELLANEOUS DEFERRED DEBITS 48
190 ACCUMULATED DEFERRED INCOME TAXES 12,525
226 UNAMORTIZED PREMIUM ON LONG TERM DEBT 47
TO RECORD THE CREATION OF A GENCO SUBSIDIARY OF WEST TEXAS
UTILITIES COMPANY.
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE CORPORATION Schedule H-29
FERC DOCKET NO. EC01-_______________ Page 2 of 2
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS
SECTION 5, PART C
JOURNAL ENTRIES
TRANSFER OF WEST TEXAS UTILITIES COMPANY ASSETS (IN
$ THOUSANDS BASED ON 12/31/2000 ESTIMATED AMOUNTS)
A. TO BE RECORDED ON THE BOOKS OF WEST TEXAS UTILITIES COMPANY:
------------------------------------------------------------
DIVIDEND GENCO SUBSIDIARY TO CSW, INC
-------------------------------------
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION DR CR
------- ----------- -- --
207-211 PAID-IN CAPITAL XXX,XXX
438 DIVIDENDS DECLARED - RET EARNINGS XXX,XXX
238 DIVIDENDS DECLARED - LIABILITY XXX,XXX
TO RECORD THE DECLARATION OF A DIVIDEND FROM WEST TEXAS UTILITIES
COMPANY TO THE CSW, INC. FOR THE NET ASSETS OF THE WEST TEXAS
UTILITIES COMPANY GENCO SUBSIDIARY.
TRANSFER GENCO INVESTMENT TO CSW, INC
-------------------------------------
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION DR CR
------- ----------- -- --
238 DIVIDENDS DECLARED - LIABILITY XXX,XXX
123.1 INVESTMENT IN SUBSIDIARY COS - WTU GENCO XXX,XXX
TO RECORD THE TRANSFER OF THE INVESTMENT OF WEST TEXAS UTILITIES
COMPANY IN GENCO TO CSW, INC. TO SATISFY THE DIVIDEND
DECLARATION.
CLOSE DIVIDEND TO RETAINED EARNINGS
-----------------------------------
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION DR CR
------- ----------- -- --
216 RETAINED EARNINGS XXX,XXX
438 DIVIDENDS DECLARED XXX,XXX
TO CLOSE THE DIVIDEND DECLARATION ON WEST TEXAS UTILITIES COMPANY
TO RETAINED EARNINGS.
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE CORPORATION Schedule H-30
FERC DOCKET NO. EC01-_____________ Page 1 of 1
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS
SECTION 5, PART C
JOURNAL ENTRIES
TRANSFER OF WEST TEXAS UTILITIES COMPANY ASSETS (IN
$ THOUSANDS BASED ON 12/31/2000 ESTIMATED AMOUNTS)
AA. TO BE RECORDED ON THE BOOKS OF CENTRAL AND SOUTH WEST CORPORATION:
------------------------------------------------------------------
DIVIDEND GENCO SUBSIDIARY TO AEP, INC
-------------------------------------
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION DR CR
------- ----------- -- --
438 DIVIDENDS DECLARED - RET EARNINGS XXX,XXX
238 DIVIDENDS DECLARED - LIABILITY XXX,XXX
TO RECORD THE DECLARATION OF A DIVIDEND FROM CENTRAL AND SOUTH
WEST CORPORATION TO THE AEP CO., INC. FOR THE NET ASSETS OF THE
WEST TEXAS UTILITIES COMPANY GENCO SUBSIDIARY.
TRANSFER GENCO INVESTMENT TO AEP, INC
-------------------------------------
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION DR CR
------- ----------- -- --
238 DIVIDENDS DECLARED - LIABILITY XXX,XXX
123.1 INVESTMENT IN SUBSIDIARY COS - WTU GENCO XXX,XXX
TO RECORD THE TRANSFER OF THE INVESTMENT OF CENTRAL AND SOUTH
WEST CORPORATION IN GENCO TO AEP, CO., INC. TO SATISFY THE
DIVIDEND DECLARATION.
CLOSE DIVIDEND TO RETAINED EARNINGS
-----------------------------------
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION DR CR
------- ----------- -- --
216 RETAINED EARNINGS XXX,XXX
438 DIVIDENDS DECLARED XXX,XXX
TO CLOSE THE DIVIDEND DECLARATION ON CENTRAL AND SOUTH WEST
CORPORATION TO RETAINED EARNINGS.
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE CORPORATION Schedule H-31
FERC DOCKET NO. EC01-________ Page 1 of 1
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS
SECTION 5, PART C
JOURNAL ENTRIES
TRANSFER OF WEST TEXAS UTILITIES COMPANY ASSETS (IN
$ THOUSANDS BASED ON 12/31/2000 ESTIMATED AMOUNTS)
B. TO BE RECORDED ON THE BOOKS OF WEST TEXAS UTILITIES GENCO:
----------------------------------------------------------
CREATE GENCO SUBSIDIARY
-----------------------
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION DR CR
------- ----------- -- --
101-106,114 UTILITY PLANT 442,607
107 CONSTRUCTION WORK IN PROGRESS 16,846
121 NONUTILITY PROPERTY 310
124 OTHER INVESTMENTS 20,944
131 CASH 1,352
132-134 SPECIAL DEPOSITS 1,628
135 WORKING FUND 2
142 CUSTOMER ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE 5,116
143 OTHER ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE 1,550
146 ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE FROM ASSOCIATED COS 12,740
151 FUEL STOCK 12,104
152 FUEL STOCK EXPENSES UNDISTRIBUTED 70
154 PLANT MATERIALS AND OPERATING SUPPLIES 6,646
165 PREPAYMENTS 7,205
174 MISCELLANEOUS CURRENT AND ACCRUED ASSETS 152,174
181 UNAMORTIZED DEBT EXPENSE 1,110
184 CLEARING ACCOUNTS 69
186 MISCELLANEOUS DEFERRED DEBITS 48
190 ACCUMULATED DEFERRED INCOME TAXES 12,525
226 UNAMORTIZED PREMIUM ON LONG TERM DEBT 47
108 ACCUM PROVISION FOR DEPRECIATION AND DEPL 210,985
201-226 COMMON STOCK/OTH PAID IN CAPITAL/LONG-TERM DEBT 150,669
228.3 ACCUM PROVISION FOR PENSIONS AND BENEFITS 1,218
232 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 21,590
233 NOTES PAYABLE TO ASSOCIATED COMPANIES 16,774
234 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE TO ASSOCIATED COMPANIES 20,218
236 TAXES ACCRUED 6,718
237 INTEREST ACCRUED 1,274
241 TAX COLLECTIONS PAYABLE 231
242 MISC CURRENT AND ACCRUED LIABILITIES 157,789
253 OTHER DEFERRED CREDITS 20,800
255 ACCUMULATED DEFERRED INVESTMENT TAX CREDITS 9,237
257 UNAMORTIZED GAIN ON REACQUIRED DEBT 9
281-283 ACCUMULATED DEFERRED INCOME TAXES 77,581
TO RECORD THE CREATION OF A GENCO SUBSIDIARY OF WEST TEXAS UTILITIES COMPANY.
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE CORPORATION Schedule H-32
FERC DOCKET NO. EC01-________ Page 1 of 1
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS
SECTION 5, PART C
JOURNAL ENTRIES
TRANSFER OF WEST TEXAS UTILITIES COMPANY ASSETS (IN
$ THOUSANDS BASED ON 12/31/2000 ESTIMATED AMOUNTS)
C. TO BE RECORDED ON THE BOOKS OF AEP COMPANY, INC:
------------------------------------------------
DIVIDEND OF GENCO
-----------------
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION DR CR
------- ----------- -- --
171 DIVIDENDS RECEIVABLE -AFFILIATED XXX,XXX
123.1 INVESTMENT IN SUB COS - CSW CORP XXX,XXX
TO RECORD A DIVIDEND RECEIVABLE FROM CENTRAL AND
SOUTH WEST CORPORATION EQUAL TO THE NET ASSETS OF
THE WEST TEXAS UTILITIES COMPANY GENCO SUBSIDIARY.
INVESTMENT IN GENCO
-------------------
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION DR CR
------- ----------- -- --
123.1 INVESTMENT IN SUBSIDIARY COS - WTU GENCO XXX,XXX
171 DIVIDENDS RECEIVABLE XXX,XXX
TO RECORD THE INVESTMENT IN WEST TEXAS UTILITIES GENCO IN
SETTLEMENT OF THE DIVIDEND PAYABLE FROM CENTRAL AND SOUTH WEST
CORPORATION.
CONTRIBUTE GENCO TO NON-REGULATED HOLDCO
----------------------------------------
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION DR CR
------- ----------- -- --
123.1 INVESTMENT IN SUBSIDIARY COS - AEP NON-REG HOLDCO XXX,XXX
123.1 INVESTMENT IN SUBSIDIARY COS - WTU GENCO XXX,XXX
TO RECORD CONTRIBUTION OF WEST TEXAS UTILITIES GENCO TO THE
NON-REGULATED HOLDCO.
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE CORPORATION Schedule H-33
FERC DOCKET NO. EC01-______________ Page 1 of 1
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTIONAL ASSETS
SECTION 5, PART C
JOURNAL ENTRIES
TRANSFER OF WEST TEXAS UTILITIES COMPANY ASSETS (IN
$ THOUSANDS BASED ON 12/31/2000 ESTIMATED AMOUNTS)
D. TO BE RECORDED ON THE BOOKS OF AEP NON-REGULATED HOLDCO:
--------------------------------------------------------
CONTRIBUTION OF GENCO
---------------------
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION DR CR
------- ----------- -- --
123.1 INVESTMENT IN SUBSIDIARY COS - WTU GENCO XXX,XXX
201,208-211 COMMON STOCK - OTHER PAID IN CAPITAL XXX,XXX
TO RECORD AEP'S CONTRIBUTION OF ITS INVESTMENT IN THE WEST TEXAS
UTILITIES GENCO TO AEP'S NON-REGULATED HOLDCO.
EXHIBIT I
DESCRIPTION OF TRANSFERS
This Description of Transfers describes the transactions that will be
carried out in order to accomplish the required separation of the generating
assets and transmission and distribution assets of CPL, WTU, SWEPCO, OPCo and
CSP to comply with the electric utility restructuring laws of Texas and Ohio and
associated assignments of jurisdictional rate schedules. Generally, because such
transactions involve asset transfers within the AEP registered electric holding
company system, no agreements are necessary to accomplish such transactions
other than counter-party consents to assignments.
Such transactions will be accomplished upon receipt of all necessary
regulatory approvals and any required counter-party consents as part of an
overall plan of AEP to separate its regulated utility businesses from
generating, power marketing and related businesses that are either unregulated
or subject to light-handed regulation by the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission (FERC) from its regulated energy delivery (transmission and
distribution) businesses. AEP has established or will establish several
intermediate holding companies that will be used to reorganize its businesses in
this manner.
AEP will hold all of the common stock of three relevant first-tier
subsidiaries: (1) Central and South West Corporation (CSW), which will be the
holding company for AEP's regulated businesses, including vertically integrated
electric utilities in states that continue to regulate electric utilities in the
traditional manner and transmission and distribution (energy delivery) companies
that result from the corporate separation of CPL, WTU, SWEPCO, OPCo
and CSP; (2) AEP Retail Holdco, Inc., a first-tier AEP subsidiary that will be
the holding company for AEP's competitive retail energy marketing businesses in
Texas; and (3) AEP Enterprises, Inc., which, among other things, will be the
holding company for AEP's unregulated or lightly regulated foreign and domestic
power generation and marketing businesses, including the power generation
companies that will result from the corporate separation of CPL, WTU, OPCo and
CSP. AEP has established or will establish a second-tier holding company, AEP
Wholesale Holding Company, Inc. (Wholesale Holdco), that will control the common
stock of a third-tier holding company, AEP Domestic Generation Holding Company,
Inc. (Domestic Genco), that will hold the common stock of the power generating
companies that result from the corporate separation of CPL, WTU, OPCo and CSP.
AEP Retail Holdco, Inc., AEP Enterprises, Inc., AEP Wholesale Holdco, Inc., AEP
Domestic Generation Holding Company, Inc. and the other corporate names used in
this Description of Transfers for affiliates of the existing AEP operating
companies are all placeholder names, which are being used for descriptive
convenience pending implementation of AEP's business reorganization plans.
A.I. CORPORATE SEPARATION OF CPL
To comply with the Texas electric restructuring law, by January 1, 2002
CPL will transfer title to its generating station assets to a newly formed
wholly owned subsidiary, CPL Generation Company (CPL Genco), in exchange for
100% of the capital stock of such subsidiary. CPL will then contribute or
dividend the shares of CPL Genco to its parent, CSW, which will in turn
contribute or dividend the shares to its parent, AEP. AEP will contribute the
CPL Genco shares to AEP Enterprises in exchange for a portion of AEP
Enterprises' capital stock. AEP Enterprises will contribute the shares to
Wholesale Holdco in exchange for a portion of Wholesale Holdco's capital stock,
which in turn will contribute the shares to Domestic Genco
2
in exchange for a portion of Domestic Genco's capital stock. The transfer by CPL
of the shares of CPL Genco to CSW (and the contemplated subsequent Transfers)
may be delayed until sometime after June 15, 2002 in order to avoid adverse tax
consequences relating to intra-corporate transfers of assets following a merger.
CPL Genco will form a wholly owned limited liability company (CPL
General Partner LLC) which, in turn, will form a limited partnership (CPL Genco
LP) of which it will be the general partner. CPL Genco will transfer title to
all of its generating assets to CPL Genco LP in exchange for all of the limited
partnership interests of CPL Genco LP.
CPL will continue to hold title to its transmission and distribution
assets and will function as an EDC after corporate separation is complete. CSW
will continue to own all of the common stock of CPL.
CPL will also transfer certain regulatory assets to a newly formed
subsidiary, CPL Securitization Company (Securico), in exchange for 100% of the
capital stock of Securico. Securico will issue bonds that will be amortized
directly from the cash flow resulting from transition charges collected by CPL
EDC related to regulatory assets held by Securico. Bond proceeds will be
distributed to CPL EDC, which will retire debt with a portion of such proceeds
and dividend the remainder to CSW, which in turn will dividend such funds to
AEP.
AEP has established (as a wholly owned subsidiary of Retail Holdco) a
Retail Electric Provider (CPL REP) that will offer retail electric service to
"price to beat" customers formerly served by CPL.
A.II. POWER SUPPLY AGREEMENTS
Subject to obtaining regulatory approval and any necessary
counter-party consents, CPL will assign to CPL Genco its existing wholesale
power supply agreements. Once the corporate
3
separation of CPL has occurred, CPL Genco, the unbundled generation company,
will enter into a power supply agreement with PMA to sell capacity and energy
from its generating facilities not needed to serve wholesale customers under the
assigned contracts. CPL REP may enter into a contract with PMA for capacity and
energy to serve Texas "price-to-beat" customers in CPL's service territory.
B.I. CORPORATE SEPARATION OF WTC
To comply with the Texas electric restructuring law, by January 1, 2002
WTU will transfer title to its generating station assets to a newly formed
wholly owned subsidiary, WTU Generation Company (WTU Genco), in exchange for
100% of the capital stock of such subsidiary. WTU will then contribute or
dividend the shares of WTU Genco to its parent, CSW, which will in turn
contribute or dividend the shares to its parent, AEP. AEP will contribute the
WTU Genco shares to AEP Enterprises in exchange for a portion of AEP
Enterprises' capital stock. AEP Enterprises will contribute the shares to
Wholesale Holdco in exchange for a portion of Wholesale Holdco's capital stock,
which in turn will contribute the shares to Domestic Genco in exchange for a
portion of Domestic Genco's capital stock. The transfer by CPL of the shares of
CPL Genco to CSW (and the contemplated subsequent Transfers) may be delayed
until sometime after June 15, 2002 in order to avoid adverse tax consequences
relating to intra-corporate transfers of assets following a merger.
WTU Genco, will form a wholly owned limited liability company (WTU
General Partner LLC) which, in turn, will form a limited partnership (WTU Genco
LP) of which it will be the general partner. WTU Genco will transfer title to
all of its generating assets to WTU Genco LP in exchange for all of the limited
partnership interests of WTU Genco LP.
4
WTC will continue to hold title to its transmission and distribution
assets and will function as an EDC after corporate separation is complete. CSW
will continue to hold the common stock of WTU.
AEP has established (as a wholly owned subsidiary of Retail Holdco) a
Retail Electric Provider (WTU REP) that will offer retail electric service to
"price to beat" customers formerly served by WTU.
B.II. POWER SUPPLY AGREEMENTS;
Subject to obtaining regulatory approval and any necessary
counter-party consents, WTU will assign to WTU Genco its existing wholesale
power supply agreements. Once the corporate separation of WTU has occurred, WTU
Genco, the unbundled generation company will enter into a power supply agreement
with PMA to sell capacity and energy from its generating facilities not needed
to serve wholesale customers under the assigned contracts. WTU REP may enter
into a contract with PMA for capacity and energy to serve Texas "price to beat"
customers in WTU's service territory.
C.I. FORMATION OF SWEPCO EDC
To comply with the Texas electric restructuring statute, by January 1,
2002 SWEPCO will transfer title to its transmission and distribution assets,
including interconnection agreements with neighboring utility systems, located
in Texas and related business operations to a newly formed wholly owned
subsidiary, SWEPCO EDC, in exchange for 100% of the capital stock of such
subsidiary and then contribute or dividend the shares of SWEPCO EDC to SWEPCO's
parent, CSW. CSW will continue to hold all of the common stock of SWEPCO.
SWEPCO will retain title to its transmission and distribution assets
located in Louisiana and Arkansas and all of its generating plants. SWEPCO
provides bundled retail electric service
5
in Louisiana, which to date has not adopted a retail competition policy or
legislation, and in Arkansas, where SWEPCO is not obligated to separate
ownership of its generating assets from its transmission and distribution
assets. SWEPCO will also retain its existing contracts with wholesale
requirements customers.
AEP has established (as a wholly owned subsidiary of Retail Holdco) a
Retail Electric Provider (SWEPCO REP) that will offer retail electric service to
Texas retail customers formerly served by SWEPCO.
C.II. POWER SUPPLY AGREEMENTS
Once the corporate separation of SWEPCO has occurred, SWEPCO, the
integrated utility, will enter into power supply agreements with PMA. SWEPCO
will make capacity and associated energy available to PMA under a Unit Power
Sales Agreement that is being submitted for Commission review as part of the
Section 205 Filing. To enable SWEPCO or SWEPCO REP to continue to serve its
wholesale requirements customers and its Texas retail customers having loads of
1 MW or more during the transition to full retail competition in SWEPCO's Texas
service area PMA will sell back to SWEPCO under a second Unit Power Sales
Agreement the capacity and associated energy needed for those purposes, which
also is being submitted for Commission review as part of the Section 205 Filing.
SWEPCO REP may enter into a contract with PMA to procure power and energy needed
to serve Texas "price to beat" customers in SWEPCO's Texas service territory. If
and when such an affiliate contract is developed, it will be filed with the
Commission.
D.I. CORPORATE SEPARATION OF OPCO
OPCo will transfer its transmission and distribution assets, including
interconnection agreements with neighboring utility systems, to a newly formed
wholly owned subsidiary, OPCo Energy Deliver Company (OPCo EDC), in exchange for
100% of the capital stock of such
6
subsidiary and then contribute or dividend the shares of OPCo EDC to its parent,
AEP. AEP will contribute all of the capital stock of the OPCo EDC to CSW.
OPCo will retain title to its generating station assets. AEP will
contribute the common stock of OPCo, all of which AEP now owns, to AEP
Enterprises in exchange for a portion of AEP Enterprises' capital stock. AEP
Enterprises will contribute the OPCo stock to Wholesale Holdco in exchange for
capital stock of Wholesale Holdco and Wholesale Holdco will contribute the
shares to Domestic Genco in exchange for capital stock of Domestic Genco.
D.II. POWER SUPPLY AGREEMENTS
Once the corporate separation of OPCo has occurred, OPCo PGC (the
unbundled generation company) will enter into a power supply agreement with PMA
to sell capacity and energy from its generating facilities not needed to serve
Buckeye Power, Inc. or its affiliate National Power Cooperative, Inc. OPCo EDC
will enter into several power supply agreements with PMA to provide to OPCo EDC
capacity and energy needed to provide default service to retail customers.
A. DEFAULT SUPPLY AGREEMENT
TERM: January 1, 2002 through December 31, 2005 or the end of the Ohio
Market Development Period, whichever occurs sooner.
BUYER: OPCo EDC
SELLER: PMA
GENERAL PURPOSE: To ensure a reliable supply of electric power for
cost-based default retail electric service provided by the OPCo EDC to
retail customers that do not choose alternate electric power suppliers
during the Ohio Market Development Period.
B. INTERRUPTIBLE POWER AGREEMENT
7
TERM: January 1, 2002 through December 31, 2005 or the end of the Ohio
Market Development Period, whichever occurs sooner.
BUYER: OPCo EDC
SELLER: PMA
GENERAL PURPOSE: To ensure a reliable supply of wholesale power for
cost-based default interruptible retail electric service provided by
OPCo EDC to retail interruptible service customers that do not choose
alternate electric power suppliers during the Ohio Market Development
Period.
C. CENTURY POWER AGREEMENT
TERM: January 1, 2002 through July 31, 2003
BUYER: OPCo EDC
SELLER: PMA
GENERAL PURPOSE: To ensure a supply of electric power for service by
OPCo EDC to Century Aluminum, a retail customer of OPCo EDC, through
July 31, 2003, OPCo EDC will enter into an Agreement to purchase
wholesale power and related products from PMA.
E.I. CORPORATE SEPARATION OF CSP
CSP will transfer its transmission and distribution assets, including
interconnection agreements with neighboring utility systems, to a newly formed
wholly owned subsidiary, CSP Energy Delivery Company (CSP EDC), in exchange for
100% of the capital stock of such subsidiary and then contribute or dividend the
shares of CSP EDC to its parent, AEP. AEP will contribute all of the capital
stock of the CSP EDC to CSW.
CSP will retain title to its generation station assets. AEP will
contribute the common stock of CSP, all of which AEP now owns, to AEP
Enterprises in exchange for a portion of AEP
8
Enterprises' capital stock. AEP Enterprises will contribute the CSP stock to
Wholesale Holdco in exchange for capital stock of Wholesale Holdco and Wholesale
Holdco will contribute the shares to Domestic Genco in exchange for capital
stock of Domestic Genco.
E.II. POWER SUPPLY AGREEMENTS
Once the corporate separation of CSP has occurred, CSP (the unbundled
generation company) will enter into a power supply agreement with PMA to sell
capacity and energy from its generating facilities not needed to serve CSP's
wholesale customers. CSP EDC will enter into several power supply agreements
with PMA to provide to CSP EDC capacity and energy needed to provide default
service to retail customers.
A. DEFAULT SUPPLY AGREEMENT
TERM: January 1, 2002 through December 31, 2005 or the end of the Ohio
Market Development Period, whichever occurs sooner.
BUYER: CSP EDC
SELLER: PMA
GENERAL PURPOSE: To ensure a reliable supply of electric power for
cost-based default retail electric service provided by CSP EDC to
retail customers that do not choose alternate electric power suppliers
during the Ohio Market Development Period.
B. INTERRUPTIBLE POWER AGREEMENT
TERM: January 1, 2002 through December 31, 2005 or the end of the Ohio
Market Development Period, whichever occurs sooner.
BUYER: CSP EDC
SELLER: PMA
9
GENERAL PURPOSE: To ensure a reliable supply of wholesale power for
cost-based default interruptible retail electric service provided by
CSP EDC to retail interruptible customers that do not choose alternate
electric power suppliers during the Ohio Market development period.
F. OTHER TRANSFERS
OPCo will assign to APCo the power sales agreement under which OPCo
currently supplies its affiliate Wheeling Power Company its requirements for
electricity needed to serve retail customers in West Virginia using the form of
Assignment attached as Annex 1 to this Exhibit I. APCo will assign to OPCo PGC
its Power Supply Agreement with the North Carolina Electric Membership
Cooperative using the form of assignment attached as Annex 2 to this Exhibit I.
I&M will assign its interests to generating capacity in Rockport Unit
Nos. 1 and 2 owned by AEP Generating Company to PMA using the form of Assignment
attached as Annex 3 to this Exhibit I.
APCo, OPCo, CSP and I&M will assign to PMA their interests in the OVEC
Agreement using the form of Assignment attached as Annex 4 to this Exhibit I.
AEPSC will assign to PMA its contracts to serve the wholesale customers
listed on Exhibit G using the form of Assignment attached as Annex 5 to this
Exhibit I, a form that will be also be used by CPL and WTU to assign their
wholesale agreements to CPL PGC and WTU PGC, respectively.
10
Exhibit I
Annex 1
Page 1 of 3
WHEELING ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT
THIS WHEELING ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT ("Assignment Agreement") is made and
entered into as of this _________________ day of ______________ by and between
The Ohio Power Company ("OPCo"), a corporation organized under the laws of the
State of Ohio, and Appalachian Power Company ("APCo'), a corporation organized
under the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia (hereinafter referred to
collectively as the "Parties" and individually as "Party"). Wheeling Electric
Company ("Wheeling"), a corporation organized under the laws of the State of
West Virginia, is also executing this Assignment Agreement to evidence its
consent thereto.
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, OPCo and Wheeling have entered into an Interconnection
Agreement, dated as of February 24, 1949, as modified and supplemented through
Supplement No. 21 ("Interconnection Agreement"), pursuant to which OPCo provides
firm and curtailable power and associated energy, and back-up and maintenance
service, in amounts as required by Wheeling;
WHEREAS, OPCo desires to assign, transfer, and delegate to APCo and
APCo is willing to accept assignment, transfer, and delegation from OPCo, of all
of OPCo's rights, interests, duties, and obligations under the Interconnection
Agreement, pursuant to the terms of this Assignment Agreement;
WHEREAS, Article 17 of the Interconnection Agreement provides that the
Interconnection Agreement may be assigned; and
WHEREAS, Wheeling desires to give its consent to the assignment,
transfer, and delegation of OPCO's rights, interests, duties, and obligations
under the Interconnection Agreement to APCo.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants
set forth herein, the Parties agree as follows:
1. OPCo hereby assigns, transfers, and delegates to APCo all of OPCo's
rights, interests, duties, and obligations under the Interconnection Agreement.
Effective as of the date this Assignment Agreement is executed by the Parties,
APCo agrees to assume all of the rights, interests, duties, and obligations
under the Interconnection Agreement.
2. Each of the Parties warrants and represents that the execution and
delivery of this Assignment Agreement has been duly authorized, and upon
execution and delivery by such Party, shall be a valid and binding agreement,
enforceable according to its terms.
3. This Assignment Agreement supersedes all previous representations,
understandings, negotiations, and agreements, either written or oral, between
the Parties or their representatives
Exhibit I
Annex 1
Page 2 of 3
with respect to the subject matter hereof, and constitutes the entire agreement
of the Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof.
4. This Assignment Agreement is made subject to all existing and future
applicable federal, state, and local laws and to all existing and future duly
promulgated orders or other duly authorized actions of governmental authorities
having jurisdiction over the matters set forth in this Assignment Agreement.
5. The interpretation and performance of this Assignment Agreement
shall be in accordance with the laws of the State of Ohio, excluding conflicts
of law principles that would require the application of the laws of a different
jurisdiction.
6. The numbered paragraphs contained in this Assignment Agreement are
solely for the convenience of the Parties and should not be used or relied upon
in any manner in the construction or interpretation of this Assignment
Agreement.
7. If any provision of this Assignment Agreement is found to be
invalid, illegal, or unenforceable by reason of any existing or subsequently
enacted legislation or by decree of a court of competent jurisdiction, such
legislation or decree shall not impair, invalidate, or nullify the remainder of
this Assignment Agreement, which shall remain in full force and effect. In such
circumstances, the Parties agree to negotiate in good faith to replace such
provision and restore the relative allocation of economic risks and benefits
between the Parties as reflected herein.
8. This Assignment Agreement may be executed in any number of
counterparts, each of which shall be an original, but all of which together
shall constitute one and the same instrument.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Assignment Agreement
as of the date set forth at the beginning of this Assignment Agreement.
THE OHIO POWER COMPANY
BY:____________________________
APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY
BY:____________________________
-2-
Exhibit I
Annex 1
Page 3 of 3
CONSENT BY WHEELING
Wheeling is executing this Assignment Agreement to evidence its consent
to the assignment, transfer, and delegation from OPCo to APCo of all of OPCo's
rights, interests, duties, and obligations under the Interconnection Agreement,
pursuant to the terms of this Assignment Agreement, effective as of the date set
forth at the beginning of this Assignment Agreement, and that from and after
such date OPCo shall be relieved of its obligations under the Interconnection
Agreement, which shall be assumed by APCo.
WHEELING ELECTRIC COMPANY
BY:______________________________
-3-
Exhibit I
Annex 2
Page 1 of 3
NCEMC ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT
THIS NCEMC ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT ("Assignment Agreement") is made and
entered into as of this ____________________ day of ________________ by and
between The Ohio Power Company ("OPCo"), a corporation organized under the laws
of the State of Ohio, and Appalachian Power Company ("APCo"), a corporation
organized under the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia (hereinafter referred
to collectively as the "Parties" and individually as "Party"). North Carolina
Electric Membership Corporation ("NCEMC"), a corporation organized under the
laws of the State of North Carolina, also is executing this Assignment Agreement
to evidence its consent thereto.
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, APCo and NCEMC have entered into a Power Supply Agreement,
dated as of August 22, 1994, as heretofore amended, modified and supplemented,
pursuant to which APCo provides up to 205 MW of capacity and associated energy
in amounts scheduled by NCEMC;
WHEREAS, APCo desires to assign, transfer, and delegate to OPCo and
OPCo is willing to accept assignment, transfer, and delegation from APCo of all
of APCo's rights, interests, duties, and obligations under the Power Supply
Agreement, pursuant to the terms of this Assignment Agreement;
WHEREAS, Article 10 of the Power Supply Agreement provides that the
Power Supply Agreement may be assigned; and
WHEREAS, NCEMC desires to give its consent to the assignment, transfer,
and delegation of APCo's rights, interests, duties, and obligations under the
Power Supply Agreement to OPCo.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants
set forth herein, the Parties agree as follows:
1. APCo hereby assigns, transfers, and delegates to OPCo all of APCo's
rights, interests, duties, and obligations under the Power Supply Agreement.
Effective as of January 1, 2002, OPCo agrees to assume all of the rights,
interests, duties, and obligations of APCo under the Power Supply Agreement.
2. Each of the Parties warrants and represents that the execution and
delivery of this Assignment Agreement has been duly authorized, and upon
execution and delivery by such Party, shall be a valid and binding agreement,
enforceable according to its terms.
3. This Assignment Agreement supersedes all previous representations,
understandings, negotiations, and agreements, either written or oral, between
the Parties or their representatives
Exhibit I
Annex 2
Page 2 of 3
with respect to the subject matter hereof, and constitutes the entire agreement
of the Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof.
4. This Assignment Agreement is made subject to all existing and future
applicable federal, state, and local laws and to all existing and future duly
promulgated orders or other duly authorized actions of governmental authorities
having jurisdiction over the matters set forth in this Assignment Agreement.
5. The interpretation and performance of this Assignment Agreement
shall be in accordance with the laws of the State of Ohio, excluding conflicts
of law principles that would require the application of the laws of a different
jurisdiction.
6. The numbered paragraphs contained in this Assignment Agreement are
solely for the convenience of the Parties and should not be used or relied upon
in any manner in the construction or interpretation of this Assignment
Agreement.
7. If any provision of this Assignment Agreement is found to be
invalid, illegal, or unenforceable by reason of any existing or subsequently
enacted legislation or by decree of a court of competent jurisdiction, such
legislation or decree shall not impair, invalidate, or nullify the remainder of
this Assignment Agreement, which shall remain in full force and effect. In such
circumstances, the Parties agree to negotiate in good faith to replace such
provision and restore the relative allocation of economic risks and benefits
between the Parties as reflected herein.
8. This Assignment Agreement may be executed in any number of
counterparts, each of which shall be an original, but all of which together
shall constitute one and the same instrument.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Assignment Agreement
as of the date set forth at the beginning of this Assignment Agreement.
THE OHIO POWER COMPANY
BY:____________________________
APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY
BY:____________________________
Exhibit I
Annex 2
Page 3 of 3
CONSENT BY NCEMC
NCEMC is executing this Assignment Agreement to evidence its consent to the
assignment, transfer, and delegation from APCo to OPCo of all of APCo's rights,
interests, duties, and obligations under the Power Supply Agreement, pursuant to
the terms of this Assignment Agreement, effective as of January 1, 2002, and
that from and after such date APCo shall be relieved of its obligations under
the Power Supply Agreement, which shall be assumed by OPCo.
NORTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC MEMBERSHIP CORPORATION
BY:______________________________
Exhibit I
Annex 3
Page l of 3
ASSIGNMENT OF RIGHT TO POWER AND ENERGY ASSOCIATED THEREWITH
FROM THE ROCKPORT PLANT
THIS ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT, is made and entered into as of this ______
day of ____________, 2001, by and between INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY ("I&M")
and POWER MARKETING AFFILIATE ("PMA"), and acknowledged by AEP GENERATING
COMPANY ("AEG"),
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, AEG and I&M, are both subsidiaries of American Electric Power
Company, Inc., and own equal shares of the Rockport Steam Electric Generating
Plant Units No. 1 and 2, which are each 1300 MW steam electric generating units
located near the town of Rockport, Indiana (both generating units collectively
referred to as the "Rockport Plant");
WHEREAS, I&M entered into a Unit Power Agreement with AEG, dated March
31, 1982, wherein AEG agreed to make available to I&M all of the power (and
energy associated therewith) available to AEG at the Rockport Plant;
WHEREAS, I&M entered into a Unit Power Agreement with Virginia Electric
Power Company ("VEPCO"), which has since terminated, whereby I&M assigned to
VEPCO 455 MW, or 70%, from Rockport Unit No. 1 to which I&M was entitled from
AEG under the Unit Power Agreement between I&M and AEG dated. March 31, 1982;
WHEREAS, AEG, I&M and Kentucky Power Company ("KPCO") entered into an
Assignment of Right to Power and Energy Associated Therewith from the Rockport
Plant, dated August 1, 1984 and which will terminate on December 31, 2004,
wherein I&M agreed to make available to KPCO 30% of its right, title and
interest in and to the power (and energy associated therewith) from the Rockport
Plant to which I&M was entitled from AEG under the Unit Power Agreement between
I&M and AEG dated March 31, 1982;
WHEREAS, I&M and KPCO entered into a Unit Power Agreement, dated August
1, 1984 and which will terminate on December 31, 2004, wherein KPCO agreed to
pay the power bills that I&M would have paid for that 30% of AEG's share of the
capacity of the Rockport Plant;
WHEREAS, I&M desires to assign, transfer, and delegate to PMA and PMA
is willing to accept assignment, transfer, and delegation from I&M the following
assignment, transfer and delegation of I&M's rights, interests, duties, and
obligations to the Rockport Plant under the Unit Power Agreements, pursuant to
the terms of this Assignment Agreement;
Exhibit I
Annex 3
Page 2 of 3
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants
set forth herein, the Parties agree as follows:
1.1 I&M assigns, transfers, and delegates to PMA and PMA is willing to
accept the assignment, transfer and delegation from I&M:
1.1.1 70% of its rights, interests, duties and obligations to the
power (and energy associated therewith) from the Rockport Unit
No. 1 to which I&M shall be entitled from AEG under the Unit
Power Agreement between I&M and AEG dated March 31, 1982;
1.1.2 As of January 1, 2005, 30% of its rights, interests, duties
and obligations in and to the power (and energy associated
therewith) from the Rockport Plant to which I&M shall be
entitled from AEG under the Unit Power Agreement between I&M
and AEG dated March 31, 1982;
1.2 PMA agrees to pay to AEG those amounts which I&M would have paid to AEG
under the terms of the Unit Power Agreements, for PMA's entitlement in
this agreement.
1.3 This agreement shall become effective as of the date this Assignment
Agreement is executed by the Parties.
1.4 Subsequent to the effective date of this Assignment Agreement I&M shall
be relieved of any responsibility for the obligations and duties under
the Unit Power Agreement that are transferred herein to PMA and shall
have no rights to the power (and energy associated therewith) available
to AEG at Rockport Unit No. 1 that is assigned hereby.
2. The performance of the obligations of I&M and PMA hereunder shall be
subject to the receipt and continued effectiveness of all necessary
authorizations of governmental regulatory authorities. The parties
shall use their best efforts to secure and maintain all such
authorizations.
3. This Assignment Agreement is made subject to all existing and
applicable federal, state, and local laws and to all existing and
future duly promulgated orders or the duly authorized actions of
governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the matters set forth
in this Assignment Agreement.
4. The interpretation and performance of this Assignment Agreement shall
be in accordance with the laws of the State of Michigan, excluding
conflicts of law principles that would require the application of the
laws of a different jurisdiction.
-2-
Exhibit I
Annex 3
Page 3 of 3
5. If any provision of this Assignment Agreement is found to be invalid,
illegal, or unenforceable by reason of any existing or subsequently
enacted legislation or by decree of court of competent jurisdiction,
such legislation or decree shall not impair, invalidate, or nullify the
remainder of this Assignment Agreement, which shall remain in full
force and effect. In such circumstances, the Parties agree to negotiate
in good faith to replace such provision and restore the relative
allocation of economic risks and benefits between the Parties as
reflected herein.
6. The agreements herein set forth have been made for the benefit of I&M
and PMA and their respective successors and assigns, and no other
person shall acquire or have any right under or by virtue of this
Agreement.
7. This Assignment Agreement may be executed in any number of
counterparts, each of which shall be an original, but all of which
together shall constitute one and the same instrument.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
duly executed as of the day and year first above written.
INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY
By ________________________________
POWER MARKETING AFFILIATE
By ________________________________
The undersigned hereby acknowledges the above Assignment.
AEP GENERATING COMPANY
By ________________________________
-3-
Exhibit I
Annex 4
Page 1 of 5
ASSIGNMENT OF INTER-COMPANY POWER AGREEMENTS
Appalachian Power Company, Columbus Southern Power Company, Indiana
Michigan Power Company, and Ohio Power Company (referred to collectively as the
"AEP Operating Companies") hereby assign to Power Marketing Affiliate ("PMA")
all of AEP Operating Companies' right, title and interest in and to the
Inter-Company Power Agreement among Ohio Valley Electric Corporation ("OVEC"),
Appalachian Power Company, The Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company, Columbus
Southern Power Company, The Dayton Power and Light Company, Indiana Michigan
Power Company, Kentucky Utilities Company, Louisville Gas and Electric Company,
Monongahela Power Company, Ohio Edison Company, Pennsylvania Power Company, The
Potomac Edison Company, Southern Indiana Gas and Electric Company, The Toledo
Edison Company and West Penn, dated July 10, 1953, as amended from time to time
(the "Agreement"), which sets forth the terms and conditions under which the
Sponsoring Companies, as defined in the Agreement, are obligated to deliver
supplemental energy to OVEC, or are entitled to receive surplus energy from
OVEC, as the case may be.
AEP Operating Companies acknowledge that the Agreement is a rate
schedule on file with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC"), and
that this Assignment shall be duly filed with FERC. AEP Operating Companies
agree to pay PMA ten dollars ($10.00) in consideration for the assignment of the
Agreement by AEP Operating Companies to PMA.
AEP Operating Companies warrant that the Agreement is valid and
enforceable, that it is in full force and effect and has not been breached by
AEP Operating Companies and that there
Exhibit I
Annex 4
Page 2 of 5
are no offsets or counter-claims against AEP Operating Companies by any party to
the Agreement.
PMA agrees to perform all of the obligations and duties of AEP
Operating Companies under the Agreement. AEP Operating Companies, however, shall
remain responsible for performance of any obligations that arise under the
Agreement in the event PMA is for any reason unable to perform those
obligations.
Accepted and agreed to this ________ day of _______________, 2001.
APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY
_________________________________
Name:
Title:
COLUMBUS SOUTHERN POWER COMPANY
_________________________________
Name:
Title:
INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY
_________________________________
Name:
Title:
-2-
Exhibit I
Annex 4
Page 3 of 5
OHIO POWER COMPANY
_________________________________
Name:
Title:
POWER MARKETING AFFILIATE
_________________________________
Name:
Title:
-3-
Exhibit I
Annex 4
Page 4 of 5
CONSENT TO ASSIGNMENT
The undersigned on behalf of the indicated principal consents to the
attached assignment, in the form attached, from Appalachian Power Company,
Columbus Southern Power Company, Indiana Michigan Power Company or Ohio Power
Company (referred to collectively as the "AEP Operating Companies") to Power
Marketing Affiliate, in the form attached, of all AEP Operating Companies'
right, title and interest in the inter-company power agreement among Ohio Valley
Electric Corporation et al. dated July 10, 1953 as amended from time to time.
Appalachian Power Company The Cincinnati Gas and Electric Company
By:______________________________ By:____________________________________
Ohio Valley Electric Corporation Columbus Southern Power Company
By:______________________________ By:____________________________________
The Dayton Power and Light Company Indiana Michigan Power Company
By:______________________________ By:____________________________________
Kentucky Utilities Company Louisville Gas and Electric Company
By:______________________________ By:____________________________________
Monongahela Power Company Ohio Edison Company
By:______________________________ By:____________________________________
-4-
Exhibit I
Annex 4
Page 5 of 5
Pennsylvania Power Company The Potomac Edison Company
By:______________________________ By:_______________________________
Southern Indiana Gas and Electric Company The Toledo Edison Company
By:______________________________ By:_______________________________
West Penn Power Company
By:______________________________
-5-
Exhibit I
Annex 5
Page 1 of 3
ASSIGNMENT OF WHOLESALE SERVICE AGREEMENT
THIS ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT ("Assignment Agreement") is made and entered
into as of this __________________ day of _____________ [YEAR] by and between
[NAME OF SELLER UNDER SERVICE AGREEMENT TO BE ASSIGNED] ("Seller"), a
corporation organized under the laws of the State of ______________ and Power
Marketing Affiliate ("PMA"), a corporation organized under the laws of the State
of ______________ (hereinafter referred to collectively as the "Parties" and
individually as "Party"). [NAME OF WHOLESALE CUSTOMER UNDER SERVICE AGREEMENT TO
BE ASSIGNED] ("Customer"), a corporation organized under the laws of the State
of _________ also is executing this Assignment Agreement to evidence its consent
thereto.
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, Seller and Customer have entered into a [NAME OF AGREEMENT]
("ELECTRIC SERVICE AGREEMENT"), dated as of [DATE], as heretofore amended,
modified and supplemented, pursuant to which Seller provides to Customer
capacity and associated energy;
WHEREAS, Seller desires to assign, transfer, and delegate to [ASSIGNEE]
and [ASSIGNEE] is willing to accept assignment, transfer, and delegation from
Seller of all of Seller's rights, interests, duties, and obligations under the
Electric Service Agreement, pursuant to the terms of this Assignment Agreement;
WHEREAS, the Electric Service Agreement provides that the Electric
Service Agreement may be assigned; and
WHEREAS, Customer desires to give its consent to the assignment,
transfer, and delegation of Seller's rights, interests, duties, and obligations
under the Electric Service Agreement to Assignee;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants
set forth herein, the Parties agree as follows:
1. Seller hereby assigns, transfers, and delegates to Assignee all of
Seller's rights, interests, duties, and obligations under the Electric Service
Agreement. Effective as of January 1, 2002, Assignee agrees to assume all of the
rights, interests, duties, and obligations of Seller under the Electric Service
Agreement.
2. Each of the Parties warrants and represents that the execution and
delivery of this Assignment Agreement has been duly authorized, and upon
execution and delivery by such Party, shall be a valid and binding agreement,
enforceable according to its terms.
3. This Assignment Agreement supersedes all previous representations,
understandings, negotiations, and agreements, either written or oral, between
the Parties or their representatives with respect to the subject matter hereof,
and constitutes the entire agreement of the Parties with respect to the subject
matter hereof.
Exhibit I
Annex 5
Page 2 of 3
4. This Assignment Agreement is made subject to all existing and future
applicable federal, state, and local laws and to all existing and future duly
promulgated orders or other duly authorized actions of governmental authorities
having jurisdiction over the matters set forth in this Assignment Agreement.
5. The interpretation and performance of this Assignment Agreement shall
be in accordance with the laws of the State of _____________ excluding conflicts
of law principles that would require the application of the laws of a different
jurisdiction.
6. The numbered paragraphs contained in this Assignment Agreement are
solely for the convenience of the Parties and should not be used or relied upon
in any manner in the construction or interpretation of this Assignment
Agreement.
7. If any provision of this Assignment Agreement is found to be invalid,
illegal, or unenforceable by reason of any existing or subsequently enacted
legislation or by decree of a court of competent jurisdiction, such legislation
or decree shall not impair, invalidate, or nullify the remainder of this
Assignment Agreement, which shall remain in full force and effect. In such
circumstances, the Parties agree to negotiate in good faith to replace such
provision and restore the relative allocation of economic risks and benefits
between the Parties as reflected herein.
8. This Assignment Agreement may be executed in any number of
counterparts, each of which shall be an original, but all of which together
shall constitute one and the same instrument.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Assignment Agreement
as of the date set forth at the beginning of this Assignment Agreement.
[SELLER]
By:____________________________
[ASSIGNEE]
By:____________________________
Exhibit I
Annex 5
Page 3 of 3
CONSENT BY [CUSTOMER]
Customer is executing this Assignment Agreement to evidence its consent to the
assignment, transfer, and delegation from Seller to Customer of all of Seller's
rights, interests, duties, and obligations under the Power Supply Agreement,
pursuant to the terms of this Assignment Agreement, effective as of January 1,
2002, and that from and after such date Seller shall be relieved of its
obligations under the Electric Service Agreement, which shall be assumed by
Assignee.
[CUSTOMER]
By:___________________________
EXHIBIT J
STATEMENT CONCERNING CONSISTENCY OF THE
TRANSFERS WITH THE PUBLIC INTEREST; EFFECT OF THE
TRANSFERS ON COMPETITION, RATES AND REGULATION
The Commission has applied its Merger Policy Statement(14) when
evaluating similar asset transfers. The Transfers do not raise any issues under
the Merger Policy Statement that should require a trial-type hearing or even
lengthy or detailed review. In particular:
o The Transfers will not raise any market power issues because they are
strictly internal in nature and will not result in any increase in
concentration of the markets in which APCo, I&M, CSP, OPCo, KPCO, CPL,
WTU or SWEPCO, or any other AEP affiliate, participates, or in the
control by the AEP System of transmission facilities.
o The Transfers will not have any material adverse effect on the rates
paid by the wholesale customers of APCo, I&M, CSP, OPCo, KPCO, CPL, WTU
and SWEPCO.
o The Transfers will not unreasonably impair effective federal or state
regulation of CSP, OPCo, CPL, WTU and SWEPCO, or any of their
affiliates that are subject to utility regulation.
The proposed Transfers and corporate separation plans of CSP, OPCo,
CPL, WTU and SWEPCO are similar to restructurings the Commission has authorized
for other public utilities that have reorganized the ownership of their utility
assets in order to comply with state restructuring laws. FIRST ENERGY CORP., 94
FERC Paragraph 61,179 (2001); PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW MEXICO, 93 FERC
Paragraph 61,213 (2000); COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY, 93 FERC Paragraph 61,020
(2000); CENTRAL ILLINOIS PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY, ET AL., 89 FERC Paragraph
62,125 (1999); ILLINOIS POWER COMPANY, ET AL., 88 FERC Paragraph 62,229 (1999);
NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION, 89 FERC Paragraph 61,124 (1999); and JERSEY
CENTRAL POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, 87 FERC Paragraph 61,104 (1999).
----------
(14) INQUIRY CONCERNING THE COMMISSION'S MERGER POLICY UNDER THE FEDERAL
POWER ACT: POLICY STATEMENT, ORDER NO. 592, III FERC Stats. & Regs.
Paragraph 31,044 (1996) (codified at 18 C.F.R.ss. 2.26) (hereinafter,
the "Merger Policy Statement").
A. THE TRANSFERS WILL NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT COMPETITION
Neither the Transfers of the generating assets of CPL and WTU to
subsidiaries of Domestic Genco nor the assignment to PMA of the interests of
APCo, OPCo, CSP and I&M in the OVEC Agreement and the Rockport Agreement will
result in any change in ultimate control of such assets. Such generating assets
and contract rights to other power supply resources will be controlled by AEP
both before and after the Transfers. Accordingly, market concentration data and
market shares will remain as they were before the Transfers and will improve
when a substantial part of CPL's generating fleet is divested to new owners in
2002.
The AEP operating companies are committed to participation in RTOs. CSP
EDC and OPCo EDC will participate in the Alliance RTO, which the Commission has
approved in most respects, and will thereby carry out the commitments made by
AEP in connection with its merger with CSW in Docket No. EC98-40-000 to join a
Commission-approved RTO by December 15, 2001. SWEPCO and PSO have been leaders
in the development of the SPP RTO, and are committed to the establishment of a
Commission-approved RTO. PSO and SWEPCO support the participation of SPP
transmission owners in a larger RTO, as the Commission has recommended. CPL EDC
and WTU EDC will operate under the supervision of the ERCOT independent
transmission organization approved by the PUCT. These RTO commitments of the AEP
operating companies will ensure the availability of non-discriminatory access to
transmission facilities and related ancillary services in accordance with the
access policies enunciated by the Commission in Order No. 2000.
B. THE TRANSFERS WILL NOT IMPAIR EFFECTIVE REGULATION
The Transfers cannot impair effective regulation because the new
affiliates of CSP, OPCo, CPL, WTU and SWEPCO that take title to jurisdictional
facilities by means of the Transfers will be subject to regulation by this
Commission after the Transfers except with respect
2
to intrastate sales of electricity in ERCOT. The Applicants are already members
of a registered public utility holding company system and in connection with the
AEP/CSW merger committed to this Commission's review of affiliate dealings.
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, INC. AND CENTRAL AND SOUTHWEST CORPORATION, 85
FERC Paragraph 61,201 at 61,821-22 (1998). Consequently, the Transfers do not
present OHIO POWER concerns.
After the corporate separation is completed, OPCo PGC, CSP PGC, CPL PGC
and WTU PGC will no longer be subject to rate regulation by state regulatory
commissions; however, this is the necessary result of implementing the electric
utility regulatory laws of Ohio and Texas. Also, after corporate separation,
intrastate sales made by CPL PGC, WTU PGC and PMA to purchasers in ERCOT will
not be subject to regulation by the Commission. TXU TRADING COMPANY, 91 FERC
Paragraph 61, 242 (2000) ("sales for re-sale within ERCOT are governed by Texas
LAW"); DESTEC POWER SERVICES, INC., 72 FERC Paragraph 61,277 (1995). Again, this
is the result of a state policy to establish a competitive wholesale power
market that is subject to safeguards that are consistent with the standards
employed by the Commission in establishing market-based rates. Under Section
39.154 OF S.B. 7, no PGC operating in ERCOT may own or control more than 20
percent of the installed generating capacity located in, or capable of
delivering electricity to, ERCOT. In addition, under Section 39.153 OF S.B. 7,
at least 60 days before the start of retail choice in Texas, CPL and WTU (as
well as SWEPCO) must auction off entitlements to at least 15 percent of their
installed generation. Such entitlements must continue in effect for at least
five years after the start of retail competition in ERCOT, or in the case of CPL
PGC until it completes its planned divestiture of generating units in 2002.
Under Sections 39.155, 39.156 and 39.157 of S.B. 7, the PUCT has been given
broad authority to monitor and address market power problems that may develop
after the start of retail choice.
3
Applicants' EDC affiliates will continue to be subject to regulation of
electric delivery and default power supply services by the PUCT and the PUCO and
regulation of interstate transmission services by the Commission. Further, the
Applicants' corporate separation plans have been reviewed and approved by state
utility regulators in Texas and Ohio (see Exhibit L).
C. THE TRANSFERS WILL NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT RATES
The rates at which the Applicants now provide wholesale requirements
services are set forth in the power supply agreements and related tariffs that
will be assigned and transferred. The wholesale requirements contracts that
AEPSC will assign to PMA are not subject to fuel adjustment clauses and the
Transfers will not affect the rates stated in such agreements, which are not
subject to unilateral change. OPCo PGC, CSP PGC and SWEPCO will retain their
existing wholesale requirements contracts with unaffiliated purchasers. Although
such contracts do not entitle the purchasers to have their requirements supplied
from particular power supply resources, customers served under such contracts
will generally continue to be served from the same power supply resources that
are currently used to serve them and, hence, such customers will not be
materially adversely affected by the Transfers.(15) The existing wholesale
requirements of CPL and WTU will be assigned to CPL PGC and WTU PGC,
respectively, resulting in such customers continuing to be served from the same
generation that is currently used to
----------
(15) SEE ATLANTIC CITY ELECTRIC CO., 90 FERC Paragraph 61,268 at 61,899 (2000)
(holding that a customer had "no contractual right to receive service from
specific generating resources ... nor does the contract prevent the
acquisition or sale of facilities[.]"); PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC AND GAS
CO., 88 FERC Paragraph 61,299 at 61,917 (1999) (rejecting intervenor's
arguments that it had a right to service from specific generating resources
and therefore the contract should not be assigned to an affiliate power
marketer and explaining that the agreement did not specify generating
resources or a specific price); NEW YORK STATE ELECTRIC & GAS CORP., ORDER
DENYING REH'G., 86 FERC Paragraph 61,284 at 62,023 (1999) (rejecting
intervenor's arguments that the sale of a low cost generating unit would
impermissibly increase rates and holding that such arguments should be
raised in a Section 206 complaint alleging that rates are no longer just
and reasonable); JERSEY CENTRAL POWER &.LIGHT CO., 87 FERC Paragraph
61,014 (1999).
4
serve them even though such customers have no rights to be served from
particular power supply resources. CPL and WTU make full and partial
requirements wholesale power sales to the cooperative and municipal customers
listed on Exhibit F. Such sales are generally made at stated base rates, which
are subject to adjustment pursuant to a fuel adjustment clause that is
consistent with Section 35.14 of the Commission's regulations. The rates
applicable to such sales are subject to unilateral rate change filings made
pursuant to Section 205 of the Federal Power Act, except in the case of WTU's
full requirements sales to customers served under WTU's Wholesale Power Choice
Tariff, WTU FERC Electric Tariff No. 9, which are made at stated base rates that
are fixed until December 31, 2007, WTU's-full requirements sales to the City of
Hearne, Texas, WTU FERC Rate Schedule No. 25, which are made at base customer,
demand and energy rates that are fixed until March 31, 2003 and WTU's partial
requirements sale to Brazos Electric Power Cooperative, Inc., which is made at
base customer, demand and energy rates that are fixed through December 31, 2002,
when that sale will end.
With the exception of North Carolina Electric Membership Corporation
(NCEMC), all wholesale requirements customers of the AEP operating companies
listed on Exhibit F are hereby offered an "open season" to contract with other
power suppliers for service beginning no later than January 1, 2003, by giving
180 days' prior written notice to terminate their existing contracts. NCEMC's
contract with APCo, which continues in effect through 2010, contains fixed
demand charges that were back-end loaded. An open season enables customers, if
they so choose, to avoid any increased costs incurred by their suppliers as the
result of the Transfers.(16) If NCEMC were permitted to abandon the contract
now, it would receive a windfall from having paid demand charges from the
beginning of the contract term in 1996 until the present that were
----------
(16) NEW YORK STATE ELECTRIC & GAS CORP., 86 FERC Paragraph 61,284 at 62,023
(1999).
5
substantially less than the agreed upon demand-related revenue requirement.
Because the demand charges are fixed by contract, they will not be affected by
APCo's assigning the NCEMC contract to OPCo.
CPL and WTU hereby offer to freeze through the earlier of the
termination dates of such contracts, or december 31, 2004, the base rates set
forth in those of their existing wholesale requirements contracts listed in
Exhibit F that they will assign to CPL PGC or WTU PGC that are subject to
unilateral rate change filings.
Rates for transmission services and rates for generation-based
ancillary services will also be unaffected by the Transfers. CPL EDC and WTU EDC
will continue to provide new transmission service in accordance with the
transmission pricing and access rules of the PUCT as memorialized in open access
transmission tariffs filed with this Commission consistent with PUCT
transmission policies and ERCOT Protocols. SWEPCO EDC will provide new
transmission service under the open access transmission tariff of the Southwest
Power Pool (or its successor in function) and will continue existing
transactions under the AEP open access transmission tariff (OATT).(17) CSP EDC
and OPCo EDC will provide new transmission service under the open access
transmission tariff of the Alliance RTO, and will continue existing transactions
under the AEP OATT. Generation-based ancillary services will be available from
the ERCOT ISO, the Southwest Power Pool or other RTO in which SWEPCO EDC, SWEPCO
and PSO participate, and the Alliance RTO, as the case may be, and the
generation controlled by Domestic Genco will be subject to redispatch orders of
the Alliance RTO, the SPP RTO (or its
----------
(17) At a time closer to completion of the Transfers, AEPSC will file changes in
the AEP OATT to reflect changes in the ownership of the transmission
facilities that will occur as the result of the Transfers.
6
successor in function) and the ERCOT ISO, as the case may be, in order to clear
transmission constraints.
Retail rates in Texas are frozen until January 1, 2002. On and after
January 1, 2002, all Texas retail customers now served by CPL, WTU and SWEPCO
will have choice in their retail providers, except for certain large retail
customers whose contracts have terms that extend beyond January 1, 2002. The
rates at which CPL REP, WTU REP and SWEPCO REP may furnish retail electric
service to residential and small commercial customers on and after that date
will be limited to a "price to beat" set by the PUCT, which will be
approximately 6% lower than the frozen retail rates now in effect. The rates
Ohio retail residential customers will pay for power supply costs have been
reduced by five percent, and retail rates in Ohio will be frozen for all retail
customers for the first five years of retail competition, unless the PUCO finds
that effective competition for one or more customer classes is in place before
the end of the five-year period.
7
EXHIBIT K
MAPS
Attached hereto are system maps for CPL, WTU, SWEPCO, CSP, and OPCo
that show the location of their respective generating stations and high voltage
transmission lines.
[MAPS OMITTED]
EXHIBIT L
REGULATORY ORDERS
The SEC must approve the Transfers under the 1935 Act. The Nuclear
Regulatory Commission must approve the transfer of the operating licenses for
CPL's interest in the South Texas Project Nuclear Generating Station. SWEPCO
must obtain authority from the Louisiana Public Service Commission to transfer
its transmission assets to SWEPCO EDC. The PUCT has already approved the
Transfers to be made by CPL, WTU and SWEPCO, and the PUCO has already approved
the Transfers to be made by CSP and OPCo. Copies of the orders of the PUCO and
the PUCT, together with the stipulations that underlie such orders, are
attached.
ATTACHMENT 1
RESTATED AND AMENDED AEP-EAST INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENT
Original Sheet No. 1
First Revised Appalachian Power Company Rate Schedule No. FPC No. 20
First Revised Kentucky Power Company Rate Schedule No. FPC No. 11
First Revised Indiana Michigan Power Company Rate Schedule No. FPC No. 17
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RESTATED AND AMENDED INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENT
APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY,
KENTUCKY POWER COMPANY,
INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY
AND
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE CORPORATION
AS AGENT
EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2002
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Issued by: J. Craig Baker Effective: January 1, 2002
Senior Vice President, Regulation & Public Policy
Issued on: July 24, 2001
Original Sheet No. 2
First Revised Appalachian Power Company Rate Schedule No. FPC No. 20
First Revised Kentucky Power Company Rate Schedule No. FPC No. 11
First Revised Indiana Michigan Power Company Rate Schedule No. FPC No. 17
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RESTATED AND AMENDED INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENT
THIS RESTATED AND AMENDED INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENT
is made and entered into as of this _ day________________, of 2001, by and among
Appalachian Power Company ("APC"), Kentucky Power Company ("KPC"), Indiana
Michigan Power Company ("I&M") and American Electric Power Service Corporation
(as defined below, "AEPSC") as agent to the other parties (as defined below,
"Agent"). Ohio Power Company ("OPC") and Columbus Southern Power Company ("CSP")
are executing this Agreement solely for the purposes of Section 13.7.
WHEREAS, APC, KPC, I&M, OPC, and CSP (collectively the "Utility
Signatories") own and operate interconnected electric generation, transmission
and distribution facilities with which they are engaged in the business of
generating, transmitting and selling electric power and energy to the general
public and to other electric utilities;
WHEREAS, the Utility Signatories and the Agent coordinate the planning,
construction, operation and maintenance of the Utility Signatories' electric
supply facilities on an integrated basis pursuant to an Interconnection
Agreement dated July 6, 1951, as subsequently modified and supplemented (the
"AEP Interconnection Agreement");
WHEREAS, the Utility Signatories' electric facilities are now and have
been for many years interconnected through their respective transmission
facilities and transmission facilities of third parties at a number of points
(hereby designated and hereinafter called "Interconnection Points");
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Issued by: J. Craig Baker Effective: January 1, 2002
Senior Vice President, Regulation & Public Policy
Issued on: July 24, 2001
Original Sheet No. 3
First Revised Appalachian Power Company Rate Schedule No. FPC No. 20
First Revised Kentucky Power Company Rate Schedule No. FPC No. 11
First Revised Indiana Michigan Power Company Rate Schedule No. FPC No. 17
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WHEREAS, OPC and CSP are required under Ohio law to separate the
ownership of their power supply assets and operations from their energy delivery
assets and obligations by January 1, 2002;
WHEREAS, on and after January 1, 2002, OPC and CSP will no longer have
public utility obligations to Ohio retail customers and the power supply assets
formerly owned by OPC and CSP will be operated in an unregulated Ohio
competitive power supply market while APC, KPC and I&M will continue to have
public utility obligations to retail customers in Tennessee, Virginia, West
Virginia, Kentucky, Indiana, and Michigan;
WHEREAS, APC, KPC, and I&M believe that they can continue to achieve
efficiencies and economic benefits through the coordinated planning and
operation of their respective power supply resources;
WHEREAS, the Utility Signatories and the Agent wish to amend and
restate the existing AEP Interconnection Agreement, in accordance with the terms
hereof, in order to (a) remove OPC and CSP as parties and (b) provide for the
dispatch on an integrated basis of the power supply assets of APC, KPC and I&M
and to provide for internal energy transactions among APC, KPC and I&M on a
basis that fosters economic operations and can accommodate implementation of
future deregulation initiatives;
WHEREAS, the achievement of the foregoing will be facilitated by the
performance of certain services by an agent;
WHEREAS, AEPSC is the service company affiliate of APC, KPC and I&M and
as such performs a variety of services on their behalf in accordance with
applicable rules and
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Issued by: J. Craig Baker Effective: January 1, 2002
Senior Vice President, Regulation & Public Policy
Issued on: July 24, 2001
Original Sheet No. 4
First Revised Appalachian Power Company Rate Schedule No. FPC No. 20
First Revised Kentucky Power Company Rate Schedule No. FPC No. 11
First Revised Indiana Michigan Power Company Rate Schedule No. FPC No. 17
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission promulgated under the
Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935; and
WHEREAS, AEPSC is willing to serve as Agent to APC, KPC and I&M under
this Agreement with respect to generation-related activities.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual
covenants and agreements herein set forth, the Parties mutually agree as
follows:
ARTICLE I
DEFINITIONS
1.1 AEP INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENT has the meaning set forth in the
second recital clause.
1.2 AEPSC means American Electric Power Service Corporation, a wholly-
owned subsidiary of American Electric Power Company, Inc. and a service company
affiliate of APC, KPC and I&M.
1.3 AGENT means the Parties' designated representative for the purposes
specified in Article V and elsewhere in this Agreement. The Agent will be AEPSC.
1.4 AGREEMENT means this Restated and Amended Operating Agreement,
including all Service Schedules and attachments hereto, as it may be amended
from time to time.
1.5 APC means Appalachian Power Company.
1.6 CSP means Columbus Southern Power Company.
1.7 DECREMENTAL COST means the costs avoided by an Operating Company
solely by reason of its purchase of an incremental amount of energy from another
Operating Company, including but not limited to costs for fuel, reactive power,
labor, operation, maintenance, start-up, fuel handling, taxes, emission
allowances, and transmission and ancillary
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Issued by: J. Craig Baker Effective: January 1, 2002
Senior Vice President, Regulation & Public Policy
Issued on: July 24, 2001
Original Sheet No. 5
First Revised Appalachian Power Company Rate Schedule No. FPC No. 20
First Revised Kentucky Power Company Rate Schedule No. FPC No. 11
First Revised Indiana Michigan Power Company Rate Schedule No. FPC No. 17
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
service charges and losses. Such costs may also include costs that otherwise
would have been paid for energy to third parties if such costs would have been
less than the Operating Company's own cost of generating the same amount of
energy or such purchases would have been required to serve load requirements.
1.8 FERC means the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission or any
successor agency having jurisdiction over this Agreement.
1.9 I&M means Indiana Michigan Power Company.
1.10 INCREMENTAL COST means any costs incurred by an Operating Company
solely by reason of its provision of an incremental amount of energy to supply
to another Operating Company, including but not limited to costs for fuel,
reactive power, labor, operation, maintenance, start-up, fuel handling, taxes,
emission allowances, and transmission and ancillary service charges and losses,
and charges for any power and energy purchased that is reasonably allocated by
the Agent to such supply, and other expenses incurred that would not have been
incurred if the supply had not been provided to the other Operating Company.
1.11 INDUSTRY STANDARDS means those principles, guides, criteria,
standards, and practices referred to in Article XI.
1.12 INTERCONNECTION POINTS shall have the meaning set forth in the
fourth recital clause.
1.13 KPC means Kentucky Power Company.
1.14 OFF-SYSTEM SALES means all sales of power and energy to customers
of the Operating Companies other than Retail Customers, Wholesale Requirements
Customers, and affiliates of American Electric Power Company, Inc.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Issued by: J. Craig Baker Effective: January 1, 2002
Senior Vice President, Regulation & Public Policy
Issued on: July 24, 2001
Original Sheet No. 6
First Revised Appalachian Power Company Rate Schedule No. FPC No. 20
First Revised Kentucky Power Company Rate Schedule No. FPC No. 11
First Revised Indiana Michigan Power Company Rate Schedule No. FPC No. 17
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.15 OFF-SYSTEM PURCHASES means purchases from a third party of
capacity and/or energy to reduce power supply costs, to provide reliability of
supply for the Operating Companies, or to engage in Off-System Sales.
1.16 OPC means Ohio Power Company.
1.17 OPERATING COMMITTEE means the administrative body established
pursuant to Article V1 for the purposes therein specified.
1.18 OPERATING COMPANIES means APC, KPC and I&M, collectively.
1.19 OPERATING COMPANY means APC, KPC or I&M, individually.
1.20 PARTY or PARTIES means one or more of the following, individually
or collectively, as the context warrants: APC, KPC, I&M, and Agent.
1.21 RETAIL CUSTOMER for purposes of this Agreement means a retail
power customer on whose behalf an Operating Company has undertaken an obligation
to obtain power supply resources so as to supply electricity to reliably meet
the electric need of such customer, either directly or through affiliates having
retail load obligations.
1.22 SERVICE SCHEDULES means the Service Schedules attached to this
Agreement and those that later may be agreed to by the Parties and accepted for
filing by FERC, as they may be amended from time to time.
1.23 SYSTEM EMERGENCY means a condition which, if not promptly
corrected, threatens to cause imminent harm to persons or property, including
the equipment of a Party or a third party, or threatens the reliability of
electric service provided by an Operating Company to Retail Customers or
Wholesale Requirements Customers.
1.24 UTILITY SIGNATORIES has the meaning set forth in the first recital
clause.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Issued by: J. Craig Baker Effective: January 1, 2002
Senior Vice President, Regulation & Public Policy
Issued on: July 24, 2001
Original Sheet No. 7
First Revised Appalachian Power Company Rate Schedule No. FPC No. 20
First Revised Kentucky Power Company Rate Schedule No. FPC No. 11
First Revised Indiana Michigan Power Company Rate Schedule No. FPC No. 17
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.25 WHOLESALE REQUIREMENTS CUSTOMER means a customer whose loads are
served from an Operating Company's transmission system and that such Operating
Company has undertaken, by contract, to serve with respect to such customer's
partial or full requirements at cost-based rates and to acquire power supply
resources and other resources necessary to meet such requirements.
ARTICLE 11
TERM OF AGREEMENT
2.1 TERM; WITHDRAWAL
Subject to FERC approval or acceptance for filing, this
Agreement shall take effect on January 1, 2002, and shall continue in full force
and effect until terminated: (a) by mutual agreement; (b) upon twelve (12)
months' written notice by one Party to each of the other Parties; or (c) if one
of the Operating Companies has withdrawn as a Party in accordance with the
immediately following sentence, as of the date that either of the remaining
Operating Companies no longer has Retail Customers other than default service
customers that an Operating Company serves as a provider of last resort in a
state whose regulatory policy requires competition in retail power supply. An
Operating Company may, upon twelve (12) months' written notice to the other
Parties, withdraw as a Party to this Agreement if under state law it will no
longer have Retail Customers other than default service customers that such
Operating Company serves as a provider of last resort in a state whose
regulatory policy requires competition in retail power supply. An Operating
Company that serves Retail Customers in more than one state may, upon twelve
(12) months' written notice to the other Parties, terminate the applicability of
this Agreement to its operations in any such state if under state law it will no
longer have Retail Customers in such state, other than default service customers
that such
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Issued by: J. Craig Baker Effective: January 1, 2002
Senior Vice President, Regulation & Public Policy
Issued on: July 24, 2001
Original Sheet No. 8
First Revised Appalachian Power Company Rate Schedule No. FPC No. 20
First Revised Kentucky Power Company Rate Schedule No. FPC No. 11
First Revised Indiana Michigan Power Company Rate Schedule No. FPC No. 17
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Operating Company serves as the provider of last resort in light of such state's
policy requiring competition in retail power supply.
2.2 PERIODIC REVIEW
This Agreement will be reviewed periodically by the Operating
Committee to determine whether revisions are necessary or appropriate.
ARTICLE III
OBJECTIVES
3.1 PURPOSE
The purpose of this Agreement is to provide a contractual
basis for coordinating the planning, operation, and maintenance of the power
supply resources of the Operating Companies to achieve economies and
efficiencies consistent with the provision of reliable electric service and an
equitable sharing of the benefits and costs of such coordinated arrangements.
ARTICLE IV
SCOPE AND RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER AGREEMENTS
AND SERVICES
4.1 SCOPE
The transactions governed by this Agreement are subject to,
and may be limited from time to time by, applicable state and federal laws, and
the regulations, rules, and orders of applicable regulatory agencies regarding
the purchase and sale of energy and/or capacity among affiliates. This Agreement
is not intended to preclude the Parties from entering into other arrangements
between or among themselves or with third parties.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Issued by: J. Craig Baker Effective: January 1, 2002
Senior Vice President, Regulation & Public Policy
Issued on: July 24, 2001
Original Sheet No. 9
First Revised Appalachian Power Company Rate Schedule No. FPC No. 20
First Revised Kentucky Power Company Rate Schedule No. FPC No. 11
First Revised Indiana Michigan Power Company Rate Schedule No. FPC No. 17
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4.2 TRANSMISSION
This Agreement is intended to apply to the coordination of the
power supply resources of, and loads served by, the Operating Companies. It is
not intended to apply to the coordination of transmission facilities owned or
operated by the Operating Companies.
ARTICLE V
AGENT
5.1 AGENT'S FUNCTIONS
Subject to the direction of the Operating Committee, Agent
agrees to:
(a) evaluate and make recommendations concerning power supply
resources additions to be installed or acquired to meet the
load requirements of the Operating Companies or to make
Off-System Sales;
(b) coordinate the operation and maintenance of the Operating
Companies' power supply resources;
(c) coordinate the economic dispatch of power supply resources for
the Operating Companies;
(d) conduct Off-System Purchases and Off-System Sales on behalf of
the Operating Companies;
(e) prepare and deliver to the Parties all bills and billing
information relating to transactions pursuant to this
Agreement;
(f) acquire and coordinate transmission and ancillary services
from affiliated and non-affiliated transmission providers for
use with respect to transactions between or among Operating
Companies under this Agreement, Off-System Purchases and
Off-System Sales;
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Issued by: J. Craig Baker Effective: January 1, 2002
Senior Vice President, Regulation & Public Policy
Issued on: July 24, 2001
Original Sheet No. 10
First Revised Appalachian Power Company Rate Schedule No. FPC No. 20
First Revised Kentucky Power Company Rate Schedule No. FPC No. 11
First Revised Indiana Michigan Power Company Rate Schedule No. FPC No. 17
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(g) reassign transmission services obtained for wholesale merchant
purposes on behalf of any Operating Company;
(h) coordinate the Operating Companies' procurement of fuel and
transportation services; and
(i) perform such other activities and duties as may be assigned
from time to time by the Operating Committee.
5.2 APPOINTMENT AND ACCEPTANCE OF AUTHORITY; DELEGATION OF DUTIES
5.2(A) APPOINTMENT OF AGENT
As of January 1, 2002, the Operating Companies delegate to
AEPSC as the Agent and AEPSC, as the Agent, hereby accepts responsibility and
authority for the duties listed in Section 5.1 and elsewhere in this Agreement.
Except as herein expressly established otherwise, the Agent shall perform each
of those duties in consultation with the Operating Committee.
5.2(B) DELEGATION OF DUTIES
With the prior written consent of the other Parties, AEPSC may
assign all or a part of its responsibilities under this Agreement to another
entity.
ARTICLE VI
COMPOSITION AND DUTIES OF
THE OPERATING COMMITTEE
6.1 OPERATING COMMITTEE
The Operating Committee is the administrative body created to
administer this Agreement and shall consist of four (4) members. One member
shall be a representative of APC, one member shall be a representative of KPC,
one member shall be a representative of I&M, and the fourth member shall be a
representative of the Agent. With respect to all duties and
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Issued by: J. Craig Baker Effective: January 1, 2002
Senior Vice President, Regulation & Public Policy
Issued on: July 24, 2001
Original Sheet No. 11
First Revised Appalachian Power Company Rate Schedule No. FPC No. 20
First Revised Kentucky Power Company Rate Schedule No. FPC No. 11
First Revised Indiana Michigan Power Company Rate Schedule No. FPC No. 17
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
decisions, the Operating Committee will take such action as reasonably necessary
to permit each of the Operating Companies to fulfill its reliability
obligations.
6.2 MEETING DATES
The Operating Committee shall hold meetings at such times,
means, and places as the members shall determine from time to time. Minutes of
each Operating Committee meeting shall be prepared and maintained.
6.3 DECISIONS
All decisions of the Operating Committee shall be by a
majority vote of the members present or voting by proxy at the meeting at which
the vote is taken. As necessary, recommendations will be made to the President
of each Operating Company, the Chief Executive Officer of American Electric
Power Company, Inc., or such other officer(s) or directors as may be
appropriate.
6.4 DUTIES
The Operating Committee shall have the following duties,
unless such duties are otherwise assigned by a vote of the Operating Committee
to the Agent, in which case the Agent shall perform such duties. The Operating
Committee will be responsible for:
(a) overseeing deployment of the power supply resources of the
Operating Companies;
(b) reviewing and making recommendations concerning the
proportional sharing of costs and benefits under this
Agreement among the Operating Companies;
(c) administering this Agreement and recommending any amendments
hereto, including such amendments that are proposed in
response to a change in regulatory requirements applicable to
one or more of the Operating Companies;
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Issued by: J. Craig Baker Effective: January 1, 2002
Senior Vice President, Regulation & Public Policy
Issued on: July 24, 2001
Original Sheet No. 12
First Revised Appalachian Power Company Rate Schedule No. FPC No. 20
First Revised Kentucky Power Company Rate Schedule No. FPC No. 11
First Revised Indiana Michigan Power Company Rate Schedule No. FPC No. 17
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(d) reviewing and, if necessary, amending the duties and
responsibilities of the Agent; and
(e) ensuring coordination for other matters not specifically
provided for herein that the Operating Committee considers
necessary to the reliable and economic use of the Operating
Companies' power supply resources.
ARTICLE VII
COORDINATED PLANNING AND OPERATIONS
7.1 COORDINATED SYSTEM PLANNING
The Agent, under the direction of the Operating Committee,
will, on an annual basis, or more frequently if circumstances dictate, assess
the adequacy of the power supply resources of the Operating Companies from the
perspective of each Operating Company and the Operating Companies collectively,
taking into account reserve requirements, state integrated resource plans, as
applicable, each Operating Company's load forecast, changing regulatory
structures and requirements and all other criteria applicable by law or
regulation to each Operating Company, and make a recommendation whether to
acquire additional power supply resources for the benefit of such Operating
Company. In making this evaluation, the Agent will assess whether economies and
efficiencies may be achieved by selecting common power supply resources for more
than one Operating Company, subject to regulatory, transmission, economic, and
operational constraints. The Agent will determine also whether an Operating
Company's resource needs could be met by the sale of capacity on a temporary
basis pursuant to Section 7.3 or through purchase from a non-affiliated utility.
Based on the Agent's evaluation, the Operating Committee will
decide whether or not to add power supply resources for the benefit of more than
one Operating Company. If it
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Issued by: J. Craig Baker Effective: January 1, 2002
Senior Vice President, Regulation & Public Policy
Issued on: July 24, 2001
Original Sheet No. 13
First Revised Appalachian Power Company Rate Schedule No. FPC No. 20
First Revised Kentucky Power Company Rate Schedule No. FPC No. 11
First Revised Indiana Michigan Power Company Rate Schedule No. FPC No. 17
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
decides to add such resources, the costs associated with such power supply
resources will be allocated to the Operating Companies in proportion to their
need for such power supply resources.
Similarly, the Agent, under the direction of the Operating
Committee, will, on an annual basis, or more frequently if circumstances
dictate, assess whether an Operating Company has power supply resources in
excess of its needs (short-term or long-term) that should be made available to
the other Operating Companies or third parties. Notwithstanding any of the
foregoing, the actual addition or disposition of power supply resources will be
conditioned on compliance with all applicable state and other regulatory
requirements; in no event will the Operating Committee or Agent acquire, assign,
reassign, or dispose of power supply resources for an Operating Company in
contravention of such requirements.
7.2 COORDINATED SYSTEM DISPATCH
It is the intent of the Operating Companies to dispatch their
combined power supply resources on a coordinated basis in real time to minimize
total power supply costs for the Operating Companies.
7.3 CAPACITY SALES
Whenever any Operating Company has surplus capacity and any
other Operating Company has insufficient capacity, the Agent shall evaluate the
feasibility of a capacity transaction between the Operating Companies. Such
evaluation shall take into account the availability of transmission capacity,
state resource procurement policies, and alternative opportunities for sales and
purchases. The terms of any such transaction shall be set out in separate
agreements or Service Schedules, which shall be subject to any necessary FERC
approval. Notwithstanding the foregoing, an Operating Company will not enter
into an
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Issued by: J. Craig Baker Effective: January 1, 2002
Senior Vice President, Regulation & Public Policy
Issued on: July 24, 2001
Original Sheet No. 14
First Revised Appalachian Power Company Rate Schedule No. FPC No. 20
First Revised Kentucky Power Company Rate Schedule No. FPC No. 11
First Revised Indiana Michigan Power Company Rate Schedule No. FPC No. 17
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
agreement to purchase capacity from another Operating Company if, at the time of
agreement, the purchaser could acquire like amounts of capacity from a third
party at lower cost.
7.4 ENERGY SALES
An Operating Company will make energy available from its power
supply resources to another Operating Company for the purposes and to the extent
provided by this Agreement.
7.5 EMERGENCY RESPONSE
In the event of a System Emergency, no adverse distinction
shall be made between the customers of any of the Operating Companies. Each
Operating Company shall, when so instructed by the Agent, make its power supply
resources available in response to a System Emergency. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, it is understood that transmission constraints may limit the ability
of one Operating Company to respond to a System Emergency of another Operating
Company.
ARTICLE VIII
ASSIGNMENT OF COSTS AND BENEFITS
OF COORDINATED OPERATIONS
8.1 SERVICE SCHEDULES
The costs and revenues associated with coordinated operations
as described in Article VII shall be distributed in the manner provided from
time to time in the Service Schedules. It is understood and agreed that all such
Service Schedules are intended to establish an equitable sharing of costs and/or
benefits among the Parties, and that circumstances may, from time to time,
require a reassessment of the relative benefits and burdens of this Agreement,
or of the methods used to apportion benefits and burdens or of the Service
Schedules. Upon a
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Issued by: J. Craig Baker Effective: January 1, 2002
Senior Vice President, Regulation & Public Policy
Issued on: July 24, 2001
Original Sheet No. 15
First Revised Appalachian Power Company Rate Schedule No. FPC No. 20
First Revised Kentucky Power Company Rate Schedule No. FPC No. 11
First Revised Indiana Michigan Power Company Rate Schedule No. FPC No. 17
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
recommendation of the Operating Committee and agreement among the Parties, any
of the Service Schedules may be amended as of any date agreed to by the Parties,
subject to receipt of any necessary regulatory authorizations.
ARTICLE IX
BILLING PROCEDURES
9.1 RECORDS
The Agent shall maintain such records as may be necessary to
determine the assignment of costs and benefits of coordinated operations
pursuant to this Agreement. Such records shall be made available to the Parties
upon request.
9.2 MONTHLY STATEMENTS
As promptly as practicable after the end of each calendar
month, the Agent shall prepare a statement setting forth the monthly summary of
costs and revenues allocated or assigned to the Parties in sufficient detail as
may be needed for settlements under the provisions of this Agreement. As
required, the Agent may provide such statements on an estimated basis and then
adjust those statements for actual results.
9.3 BILLINGS AND PAYMENTS
The Agent shall handle all billing between the Operating
Companies and other entities with which they engage in Off-System Purchases and
Off-System Sales pursuant to this Agreement. Payments among the Parties shall be
made by remittance of the net amount billed or by making appropriate accounting
entries on the books of the Parties.
9.4 TAXES
Should any federal, state, or local tax, surcharge or similar
assessment, in addition to those that may now exist, be levied upon the electric
capacity, energy, or services to be
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Issued by: J. Craig Baker Effective: January 1, 2002
Senior Vice President, Regulation & Public Policy
Issued on: July 24, 2001
Original Sheet No. 16
First Revised Appalachian Power Company Rate Schedule No. FPC No. 20
First Revised Kentucky Power Company Rate Schedule No. FPC No. 11
First Revised Indiana Michigan Power Company Rate Schedule No. FPC No. 17
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
provided in connection with this Agreement, or upon the provider of service as
measured by the electric capacity, energy, or services, or the revenue
therefrom, such additional amount shall be included in the net billing described
in Section 9.3.
ARTICLE X
FORCE MAJEURE
10.1 EVENTS EXCUSING PERFORMANCE
No Party shall be liable to another Party for or on account of
any loss, damage, injury, or expense resulting from or arising out of a delay or
failure to perform, either in whole or in part, any of the agreements,
covenants, or obligations made by or imposed upon the Parties by this Agreement,
by reason of or through strike, work stoppage of labor, failure of contractors
or suppliers of materials (including fuel), failure of equipment, environmental
restrictions, riot, fire, flood, ice, invasion, civil war, commotion,
insurrection, military or usurped power, order of any court or regulatory agency
granted in any BONA FIDE legal proceedings or action, or of any civil or
military authority either DE FACTO or DE JURE, explosion, Act of God or the
public enemies, or any other cause reasonably beyond its control and not
attributable to its neglect. A Party experiencing such a delay or failure to
perform shall use due diligence to remove the cause or causes thereof; however,
no Party shall be required to add to, modify or upgrade any facilities, or to
settle a strike or labor dispute except when, according to its own best
judgment, such action is advisable.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Issued by: J. Craig Baker Effective: January 1, 2002
Senior Vice President, Regulation & Public Policy
Issued on: July 24, 2001
Original Sheet No. 17
First Revised Appalachian Power Company Rate Schedule No. FPC No. 20
First Revised Kentucky Power Company Rate Schedule No. FPC No. 11
First Revised Indiana Michigan Power Company Rate Schedule No. FPC No. 17
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ARTICLE XI
INDUSTRY STANDARDS
11.1 ADHERENCE TO RELIABILITY CRITERIA
The Parties agree to conform to all applicable national and
regional electric reliability council principles, guides, criteria, and
standards and industry standard practices (collectively, "Industry Standards")
as they affect the implementation of this Agreement.
ARTICLE XII
DELIVERY POINTS
12.1 DELIVERY POINTS
All electric energy delivered under this Agreement shall be of
the character commonly known as three-phase sixty-cycle energy, and shall be
delivered at the various Interconnection Points where the transmission systems
of the Operating Companies are interconnected, either directly or through
transmission facilities of third parties, at the nominal unregulated voltage
designated for such points, and at such other points and voltages as may be
determined and agreed upon by the Operating Companies.
ARTICLE XIII
GENERAL
13.1 NO THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES
This Agreement does not create rights of any character
whatsoever in favor of any person, corporation, association, entity or power
supplier, other than the Parties, and the obligations herein assumed by the
Parties are solely for the use and benefit of the Parties. Nothing in this
Agreement shall be construed as permitting or vesting, or
attempting to permit or vest, in any person, corporation, association, entity or
power supplier, other than the Parties, any
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Issued by: J. Craig Baker Effective: January 1, 2002
Senior Vice President, Regulation & Public Policy
Issued on: July 24, 2001
Original Sheet No. 18
First Revised Appalachian Power Company Rate Schedule No. FPC No. 20
First Revised Kentucky Power Company Rate Schedule No. FPC No. 11
First Revised Indiana Michigan Power Company Rate Schedule No. FPC No. 17
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
rights hereunder or in any of the resources or facilities owned or controlled by
the Parties or the use thereof.
13.2 WAIVERS
Any waiver at any time by a Party of its rights with respect
to a default under this Agreement, or with respect to any other matter arising
in connection with this Agreement, shall not be deemed a waiver with respect to
any subsequent default or matter. Any delay, short of the statutory period of
limitation, in asserting or enforcing any right under this Agreement, shall not
be deemed a waiver of such right.
13.3 SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS
This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding
upon the Parties only, and their respective successors and assigns, and shall
not be assignable by any Party without the written consent of the other Parties
except to a successor in the operation of its properties by reason of a
reorganization to comply with state or federal restructuring requirements, or a
merger, consolidation, sale or foreclosure whereby substantially all such
properties are acquired by or merged with those of such a successor.
13.4 LIABILITY AND INDEMNIFICATION
Subject to any applicable state or federal law that may
specifically restrict limitations on liability, each Party shall release,
indemnify, and hold harmless the other Parties, their directors, officers and
employees from and against any and all liability for loss, damage or expense
alleged to arise from, or be incidental to, injury to persons and/or damage to
property in connection with its facilities or the production or transmission of
electric energy by or through such facilities, or related to performance or
non-performance of this Agreement, including any negligence arising hereunder.
In no event shall any Party be liable to another Party for any
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Issued by: J. Craig Baker Effective: January 1, 2002
Senior Vice President, Regulation & Public Policy
Issued on: July 24, 2001
Original Sheet No. 19
First Revised Appalachian Power Company Rate Schedule No. FPC No. 20
First Revised Kentucky Power Company Rate Schedule No. FPC No. 11
First Revised Indiana Michigan Power Company Rate Schedule No. FPC No. 17
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages with respect to any
claim arising out of this Agreement.
13.5 SECTION HEADINGS
The descriptive headings of the Articles and Sections of this
Agreement are used for convenience only, and shall not modify or restrict any of
the terms and provisions thereof.
13.6 NOTICE
Any notice or demand for performance required or permitted
under any of the provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed to have been given
on the date such notice, in writing, is deposited in the U.S. mail, postage
prepaid, certified or registered mail, addressed to the Parties at the addresses
specified below:
Appalachian Power Company
1 Riverside Plaza
Columbus, Ohio 43215
Kentucky Power Company
1 Riverside Plaza
Columbus, Ohio 43215
Indiana Michigan Power Company
1 Riverside Plaza
Columbus, Ohio 43215
AGENT
1 Riverside Plaza
Columbus, Ohio 43215
or in such other form or to such other address as the Parties may stipulate.
13.7 EFFECT ON OTHER AGREEMENTS
This Agreement supersedes and replaces the AEP Interconnection
Agreement, effective as of the date this Agreement is made effective as set out
in Section 2.1. In light of the reorganization of OPC and CSP in accordance with
state law, OPC and CSP withdrew as parties to the AEP
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Issued by: J. Craig Baker Effective: January 1, 2002
Senior Vice President, Regulation & Public Policy
Issued on: July 24, 2001
Original Sheet No. 20
First Revised Appalachian Power Company Rate Schedule No. FPC No. 20
First Revised Kentucky Power Company Rate Schedule No. FPC No. 11
First Revised Indiana Michigan Power Company Rate Schedule No. FPC No. 17
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interconnection Agreement as of midnight December 31, 2001 and are not parties
to this Agreement.
ARTICLE XIV
REGULATORY APPROVAL
14.1 REGULATORY AUTHORIZATION
This Agreement is subject to and conditioned upon its approval
or acceptance for filing without material condition or modification by the FERC.
In the event that this Agreement is not so approved or accepted for filing in
its entirety without modification, or the FERC subsequently modifies this
Agreement upon complaint or upon its own initiative, any Party may, irrespective
of the notice provisions in Section 2.1, terminate this Agreement or the AEP
Interconnection Agreement by giving thirty (30) days' advance written notice to
the other Parties.
14.2 CHANGES
It is contemplated by the Parties that it may be appropriate
from time to time to change, amend, modify, or supplement this Agreement,
including the Service Schedules and any other attachments that may be made a
part of this Agreement, to reflect changes in operating practices or costs of
operations or for other reasons. Any such changes to this Agreement shall be in
writing executed by the Parties and subject to approval or acceptance for filing
by the FERC.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Issued by: J. Craig Baker Effective: January 1, 2002
Senior Vice President, Regulation & Public Policy
Issued on: July 24, 2001
Original Sheet No. 21
First Revised Appalachian Power Company Rate Schedule No. FPC No. 20
First Revised Kentucky Power Company Rate Schedule No. FPC No. 11
First Revised Indiana Michigan Power Company Rate Schedule No. FPC No. 17
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Agreement to
be executed and attested by their duly authorized officers on the day and year
first above written.
APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY
By: ____________________________________
Title: _________________________________
KENTUCKY POWER COMPANY
By: ____________________________________
Title: _________________________________
INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY
By: ____________________________________
Title: _________________________________
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE CORPORATION
By: ____________________________________
Title: _________________________________
The undersigned are executing this Agreement solely for the
purpose of Section 13.7 hereof.
OHIO POWER COMPANY
By: ____________________________________
Title: _________________________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Issued by: J. Craig Baker Effective: January 1, 2002
Senior Vice President, Regulation & Public Policy
Issued on: July 24, 2001
Original Sheet No. 22
First Revised Appalachian Power Company Rate Schedule No. FPC No. 20
First Revised Kentucky Power Company Rate Schedule No. FPC No. 11
First Revised Indiana Michigan Power Company Rate Schedule No. FPC No. 17
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COLUMBUS SOUTHERN POWER COMPANY
By: ____________________________________
Title: _________________________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Issued by: J. Craig Baker Effective: January 1, 2002
Senior Vice President, Regulation & Public Policy
Issued on: July 24, 2001
Original Sheet No. 23
First Revised Appalachian Power Company Rate Schedule No. FPC No. 20
First Revised Kentucky Power Company Rate Schedule No. FPC No. 11
First Revised Indiana Michigan Power Company Rate Schedule No. FPC No. 17
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SERVICE SCHEDULE A
ENERGY SALES
A1 - DURATION This Service Schedule A shall become effective and binding when
the Agreement of which it is a part becomes effective, and shall continue in
full force and effect throughout the duration of the Agreement unless terminated
or suspended.
A2 - AVAILABILITY OF SERVICE This Service Schedule A governs sales of energy
made pursuant to Section 7.4 of the Agreement, which are sales of energy not
associated with sales of capacity.
A3 - ENERGY TRANSFER PRICES A purchasing Operating Company ("Purchaser") shall
pay a selling Operating Company ("Seller") the following amount for energy
purchased under this Schedule A ("Transfer Price"):_
(1) The Seller's Incremental Costs plus
(2) One-half the difference between:
(a) the Purchaser's Decremental Costs; and
(b) the Seller's Incremental Costs.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Issued by: J. Craig Baker Effective: January 1, 2002
Senior Vice President, Regulation & Public Policy
Issued on: July 24, 2001
Original Sheet No. 24
First Revised Appalachian Power Company Rate Schedule No. FPC No. 20
First Revised Kentucky Power Company Rate Schedule No. FPC No. 11
First Revised Indiana Michigan Power Company Rate Schedule No. FPC No. 17
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SERVICE SCHEDULE B
OFF-SYSTEM SALES AND OFF-SYSTEM PURCHASES
B1 - DURATION This Service Schedule B shall become effective and binding when
the Agreement of which it is a part becomes effective, and shall continue in
full force and effect throughout the duration of the Agreement unless terminated
or suspended.
B2 - APPLICABILITY Agent shall undertake Off-System Sales and Off-System
Purchases on behalf of the Operating Companies. Where Agent undertakes these
activities, revenues and expenses shall be allocated or arranged in accordance
with this Service Schedule B.
B3 - ALLOCATION OF SYSTEM PURCHASES AND SALES
A. Off-System Purchases. Any expenses for an Off-System Purchase
during an hour shall be distributed to the Operating
Company(ies) receiving energy from the purchase to cover an
energy deficiency during the hour. Any remaining expenses for
an Off-System Purchase during such hour shall be distributed
to the Operating Companies in proportion to the megawatt-hours
of energy that would have been provided from the respective
Operating Companies' other power supply resources that were
displaced during such hour.
B. Off-System Sales. Any revenues from Off-System Sales in an
hour shall first be applied to reimburse the Incremental Costs
of the Operating Companies that contributed to the sales in
such hour. Net revenues remaining after such reimbursement
shall be distributed to the Operating Companies in proportion
to each Operating Company's generation for sales (including
economy energy sales) less the amount of energy such Operating
Company purchased from the other Operating Companies in such
hour pursuant to Section 7.4 of this Agreement and Schedule A
(but not less than zero).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Issued by: J. Craig Baker Effective: January 1, 2002
Senior Vice President, Regulation & Public Policy
Issued on: July 24, 2001
ATTACHMENT 2
RESTATED AND AMENDED AEP-WEST OPERATING AGREEMENT
Original Sheet No. 1
Public Service Company of Oklahoma, Rate schedule FERC No. 345
Southwestern Electric Power Company, Rate Schedule FERC No. 346
RESTATED AND AMENDED OPERATING AGREEMENT
PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF OKLAHOMA,
SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY,
AND
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE CORPORATION
AS AGENT
EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2002
Issued by: J. Craig Baker Effective: January 1, 2002
Senior Vice President,
Regulation & Public Policy
Issued on: July 24, 2001
Original Sheet No. 2
Public Service Company of Oklahoma, Rate schedule FERC No. 345
Southwestern Electric Power Company, Rate Schedule FERC No. 346
RESTATED AND AMENDED OPERATING AGREEMENT
THIS RESTATED AND AMENDED OPERATING AGREEMENT is made and entered into
as of this __ day of _______________, 2001, by and among Public Service Company
of Oklahoma ("PSO"), Southwestern Electric Power Company ("SWEPCO") and American
Electric Power Service Corporation ("AEPSC") as agent to the other parties
("Agent").
WHEREAS, PSO and SWEPCO own and operate interconnected electric
generation, transmission, and distribution facilities with which they are
engaged in the business of generating, transmitting, and selling electric power
and energy to the general public and to other electric utilities;
WHEREAS, PSO and SWEPCO are parties to the Restated and Amended
Operating Agreement among Central Power and Light Company (CPL), PSO, SWEPCO,
West Texas Utilities Company (WTU) and Central and South West Services, Inc.
(CSWS) dated January 1, 1997;
WHEREAS, CSWS has been merged into AEPSC as of June 15, 2001 and CPL
and WTU are required under Texas law to separate the ownership of their power
supply assets and operations from their energy delivery assets and operations by
January 1, 2002;
WHEREAS, on and after January 1, 2002, CPL and WTU will no longer have
public utility obligations to Texas retail customers and the power supply assets
formerly owned by CPL and WTU will be operated in an unregulated Texas
competitive power supply market while PSO and SWEPCO will continue to have
public utility obligations to retail customers in Oklahoma, Arkansas and
Louisiana;
Issued by: J. Craig Baker Effective: January 1, 2002
Senior Vice President,
Regulation & Public Policy
Issued on: July 24, 2001
Original Sheet No. 3
Public Service Company of Oklahoma, Rate schedule FERC No. 345
Southwestern Electric Power Company, Rate Schedule FERC No. 346
WHEREAS, PSO, and SWEPCO believe that they can continue to achieve
efficiencies and economic benefits through the coordinated planning and
operation of their respective power supply resources;
WHEREAS, the achievement of the foregoing will be facilitated by the
performance of certain services by an agent; and
WHEREAS, AEPSC is the service company affiliate of PSO and SWEPCO and
as such performs a variety of services on their behalf in accordance with
applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission
promulgated under the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935; and
WHEREAS, AEPSC is willing to serve as Agent to PSO and SWEPCO under
this Agreement with respect to generation-related activities; and
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual
covenants and agreements herein set forth, the Parties mutually agree as
follows:
ARTICLE I
DEFINITIONS
1.1 AEPSC means American Electric Power Service Corporation, a
wholly owned subsidiary of American Electric Power Company, Inc. and a service
company affiliate of PSO and SWEPCO.
1.2 AGENT means the Parties' designated representative for the
purposes specified in Article V and elsewhere in this Agreement. The Agent will
be AEPSC.
1.3 AGREEMENT means this Restated and Amended Operating Agreement,
including all Service Schedules and attachments hereto, as it may be amended
from time to time.
1.4 DECREMENTAL COST means the costs avoided by an Operating
Company solely by reason of its purchase of an incremental amount of energy from
another Operating
Issued by: J. Craig Baker Effective: January 1, 2002
Senior Vice President,
Regulation & Public Policy
Issued on: July 24, 2001
Original Sheet No. 4
Public Service Company of Oklahoma, Rate schedule FERC No. 345
Southwestern Electric Power Company, Rate Schedule FERC No. 346
Company, including but not limited to costs for fuel, reactive power, labor,
operation, maintenance, start-up, fuel handling, taxes, emission allowances, and
transmission and ancillary service charges and losses. Such costs may also
include costs that otherwise would have been paid for energy to third parties if
such costs would have been less than the Operating Company's own cost of
generating the same amount of energy or such purchases would have been required
to serve load requirements.
1.5 FERC means the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission or any
successor agency having jurisdiction over this Agreement.
1.6 INCREMENTAL COST means any costs incurred by an Operating
Company solely by reason of its provision of an incremental amount of energy to
supply to the other Operating Company, including but not limited to costs for
fuel, reactive power, labor, operation, maintenance, start-up, fuel handling,
taxes, emission allowances, and transmission and ancillary service charges and
losses, and charges for any power and energy purchased that is reasonably
allocated by the Agent to such supply, and other expenses incurred that would
not have been incurred if the supply had not been provided to the other
Operating Company.
1.7 INDUSTRY STANDARDS means those principles, guides, criteria,
standards, and practices referred to in Article XI.
1.8 OFF-SYSTEM SALES means all sales of power and energy to
customers of the Operating Companies other than Retail Customers, Wholesale
Requirements Customers, and affiliates of American Electric Power Company, Inc.
1.9 OFF-SYSTEM PURCHASES means purchases from a third party of
capacity and/or energy to reduce power supply costs, to provide reliability of
supply for the Operating Companies or to engage in Off-System Sales.
Issued by: J. Craig Baker Effective: January 1, 2002
Senior Vice President,
Regulation & Public Policy
Issued on: July 24, 2001
Original Sheet No. 5
Public Service Company of Oklahoma, Rate schedule FERC No. 345
Southwestern Electric Power Company, Rate Schedule FERC No. 346
1.10 OPERATING COMMITTEE means the administrative body established
pursuant to Article VI for the purposes therein specified.
1.11 OPERATING COMPANIES means PSO and SWEPCO.
1.12 OPERATING COMPANY means either PSO or SWEPCO.
1.13 PARTY OR PARTIES means one or more of the following,
individually or collectively, as the context warrants: PSO, SWEPCO, and Agent.
1.14 PSO means Public Service Company of Oklahoma.
1.15 RETAIL CUSTOMER for purposes of this Agreement means a retail
power customer on whose behalf an Operating Company has undertaken an obligation
to obtain power supply resources so as to supply electricity to reliably meet
the electric need of such customer, either directly or through affiliates having
retail load obligations.
1.16 SERVICE SCHEDULES means the Service Schedules attached to this
Agreement and those that later may be agreed to by the Parties and accepted for
filing by FERC, as they may be amended from time to time.
1.17 SWEPCO means Southwestern Electric Power Company.
1.18 SYSTEM EMERGENCY means a condition which, if not promptly
corrected, threatens to cause imminent harm to persons or property, including
the equipment of a Party or a third party, or threatens the reliability of
electric service provided by an Operating Company to Retail Customers or
Wholesale Requirements Customers.
1.19 WHOLESALE REQUIREMENTS CUSTOMER means a customer whose loads
are served from an Operating Company's transmission system and that such
Operating Company has undertaken, by contract, to serve with respect to such
customer's partial or full requirements at
Issued by: J. Craig Baker Effective: January 1, 2002
Senior Vice President,
Regulation & Public Policy
Issued on: July 24, 2001
Original Sheet No. 6
Public Service Company of Oklahoma, Rate schedule FERC No. 345
Southwestern Electric Power Company, Rate Schedule FERC No. 346
cost-based rates and to acquire power supply resources and other resources
necessary to meet such requirements.
ARTICLE II
TERM OF AGREEMENT
2.1 TERM
Subject to FERC approval or acceptance for filing, this
Agreement shall take effect on January 1, 2002, and shall continue in full force
and effect until terminated: (a) by mutual agreement; (b) as of the date that
either Operating Company no longer has Retail Customers other than default
service customers that an Operating Company serves as the provider of last
resort in a state whose regulatory policy requires competition in retail power
supply; or (c) upon twelve (12) months' written notice by one Party to each of
the other Parties. An Operating Company that serves Retail Customers in more
than one state may, upon written notice to the other Parties, terminate the
applicability of this Agreement to its operations in any such state when it no
longer has Retail Customers in such state, other than default service customers
that such Operating Company serves as the provider of last resort in light of
such state's regulatory policy requiring competition in retail power supply.
2.2 PERIODIC REVIEW
This Agreement will be reviewed periodically by the Operating
Committee to determine whether revisions are necessary or appropriate.
Issued by: J. Craig Baker Effective: January 1, 2002
Senior Vice President,
Regulation & Public Policy
Issued on: July 24, 2001
Original Sheet No. 7
Public Service Company of Oklahoma, Rate schedule FERC No. 345
Southwestern Electric Power Company, Rate Schedule FERC No. 346
ARTICLE III
OBJECTIVES
3.1 PURPOSE
The purpose of this Agreement is to provide a contractual
basis for coordinating the planning, operation, and maintenance of the power
supply resources of the Operating Companies to achieve economies and
efficiencies consistent with the provision of reliable electric service and an
equitable sharing of the benefits and costs of such coordinated arrangements.
ARTICLE IV
SCOPE AND RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER AGREEMENTS
AND SERVICES
4.1 SCOPE
The transactions governed by this Agreement are subject to,
and may be limited from time to time by, applicable state and federal laws, and
the regulations, rules, and orders of applicable regulatory agencies regarding
the purchase and sale of energy and/or capacity among affiliates. This Agreement
is not intended to preclude the Parties from entering into other arrangements
between or among themselves or with third parties.
4.2 TRANSMISSION
This Agreement is intended to apply to the coordination of the
power supply resources of, and loads served by, the Operating Companies. It is
not intended to apply to the coordination of transmission facilities owned or
operated by the Operating Companies.
Issued by: J. Craig Baker Effective: January 1, 2002
Senior Vice President,
Regulation & Public Policy
Issued on: July 24, 2001
Original Sheet No. 8
Public Service Company of Oklahoma, Rate schedule FERC No. 345
Southwestern Electric Power Company, Rate Schedule FERC No. 346
ARTICLE V
AGENT
5.1 AGENT'S FUNCTIONS
Subject to the direction of the Operating Committee, Agent
agrees to:
(a) evaluate and make recommendations concerning power supply
resources additions to be installed or acquired to meet the
load requirements of the Operating Companies or to make
Off-System Sales;
(b) coordinate the operation and maintenance of the Operating
Companies' power supply resources;
(c) coordinate the economic dispatch of power supply resources for
the Operating Companies;
(d) conduct Off-System Purchases and Off-System Sales on behalf of
the Operating Companies;
(e) prepare and deliver to the Parties all bills and billing
information relating to transactions pursuant to this
Agreement;
(f) acquire and coordinate transmission and ancillary services
from affiliated and non-affiliated transmission providers for
use with respect to transactions between or among Operating
Companies under this Agreement, Off-System Purchases and
Off-System Sales;
(g) reassign transmission services obtained for wholesale merchant
purposes on behalf of any Operating Company;
(h) coordinate the Operating Companies' procurement of fuel and
fuel transportation services; and
Issued by: J. Craig Baker Effective: January 1, 2002
Senior Vice President,
Regulation & Public Policy
Issued on: July 24, 2001
Original Sheet No. 9
Public Service Company of Oklahoma, Rate schedule FERC No. 345
Southwestern Electric Power Company, Rate Schedule FERC No. 346
(i) perform such other activities and duties as may be assigned
from time to time by the Operating Committee.
5.2 APPOINTMENT AND ACCEPTANCE OF AUTHORITY; DELEGATION OF DUTIES
5.2(A) APPOINTMENT OF AGENT
As of January 1, 2002, the Operating Companies delegate to
AEPSC as the Agent and AEPSC, as the Agent, hereby accepts responsibility and
authority for the duties listed in Section 5.1 and elsewhere in this Agreement.
Except as herein expressly established otherwise, the Agent shall perform each
of those duties in consultation with the Operating Committee.
5.2(B) DELEGATION OF DUTIES
With the prior written consent of the other Parties, AEPSC may
assign all or a part of its responsibilities under this Agreement to another
entity.
ARTICLE VI
COMPOSITION AND DUTIES OF
THE OPERATING COMMITTEE
6.1 OPERATING COMMITTEE
The Operating Committee is the administrative body created to
administer this Agreement and shall consist of three (3) members. One member
shall be a representative of PSO, one member shall be a representative of
SWEPCO, and the third member shall be a representative of the Agent. With
respect to all duties and decisions, the Operating Committee will take such
action as reasonably necessary to permit each of the Operating Companies to
fulfill its reliability obligations.
6.2 MEETING DATES
Issued by: J. Craig Baker Effective: January 1, 2002
Senior Vice President,
Regulation & Public Policy
Issued on: July 24, 2001
Original Sheet No. 10
Public Service Company of Oklahoma, Rate schedule FERC No. 345
Southwestern Electric Power Company, Rate Schedule FERC No. 346
The Operating Committee shall hold meetings at such times,
means, and places as the members shall determine from time to time. Minutes of
each Operating Committee meeting shall be prepared and maintained.
6.3 DECISIONS
All decisions of the Operating Committee shall be by a
majority vote of the members present or voting by proxy at the meeting at which
the vote is taken. As necessary, recommendations will be made to the President
of each Operating Company, the Chief Executive Officer of American Electric
Power Company, Inc., or such other officer(s) or directors as may be
appropriate.
6.4 DUTIES
The Operating Committee shall have the following duties,
unless such duties are otherwise assigned by a vote of the Operating Committee
to the Agent, in which case the Agent shall perform such duties. The Operating
Committee will be responsible for:
(a) overseeing deployment of the power supply resources of the
Operating Companies;
(b) reviewing and making recommendations concerning the
proportional sharing of costs and benefits under this
Agreement among the Operating Companies;
(c) administering this Agreement and recommending any amendments
hereto, including such amendments that are proposed in
response to a change in regulatory requirements applicable to
one or more of the Operating Companies;
(d) reviewing and, if necessary, amending the duties and
responsibilities of the Agent; and
Issued by: J. Craig Baker Effective: January 1, 2002
Senior Vice President,
Regulation & Public Policy
Issued on: July 24, 2001
Original Sheet No. 11
Public Service Company of Oklahoma, Rate schedule FERC No. 345
Southwestern Electric Power Company, Rate Schedule FERC No. 346
(e) ensuring coordination for other matters not specifically
provided for herein that the Operating Committee considers
necessary to the reliable and economic use of the Operating
Companies' power supply resources.
ARTICLE VII
COORDINATED PLANNING AND OPERATIONS
7.1 COORDINATED SYSTEM PLANNING
The Agent, under the direction of the Operating Committee
will, on an annual basis, or more frequently if circumstances dictate, assess
the adequacy of the power supply resources of the Operating Companies from the
perspective of each Operating Company and the Operating Companies collectively,
taking into account reserve requirements, state integrated resource plans, as
applicable, each Operating Company's load forecast, changing regulatory
structures and requirements and all other criteria applicable by law, regulation
or agreement to each Operating Company, and make a recommendation whether to
acquire additional power supply resources for the benefit of such Operating
Company. In making this evaluation, the Agent will assess whether economies and
efficiencies may be achieved by selecting common power supply resources for more
than one Operating Company, subject to regulatory, transmission, economic, and
operational constraints. The Agent will determine also whether an Operating
Company's resource needs could be met by the sale of capacity on a temporary
basis pursuant to Section 7.3 or through purchase from a non-affiliated utility.
Based on Agent's evaluation the Operating Committee will
decide whether or not to add power supply resources for the benefit of more than
one Operating Company. If it decides to add such resources, the costs associated
with such power supply resources will be allocated to the Operating Companies in
proportion to their need for such power supply resources.
Issued by: J. Craig Baker Effective: January 1, 2002
Senior Vice President,
Regulation & Public Policy
Issued on: July 24, 2001
Original Sheet No. 12
Public Service Company of Oklahoma, Rate schedule FERC No. 345
Southwestern Electric Power Company, Rate Schedule FERC No. 346
Similarly, the Agent, under the direction of the Operating
Committee, will, on an annual basis, or more frequently if circumstances
dictate, assess whether an Operating Company has power supply resources in
excess of its needs (short-term or long-term) that should be made available to
the other Operating Company or third parties. Notwithstanding any of the
foregoing, the actual addition or disposition of power supply resources will be
conditioned on compliance with all applicable state and other regulatory
requirements; in no event will the Operating Committee or Agent acquire, assign,
reassign, or dispose of power supply resources for an Operating Company in
contravention of such requirements.
7.2 COORDINATED SYSTEM DISPATCH
It is the intent of the Operating Companies to dispatch their
combined power supply resources on a coordinated basis in real time to minimize
total power supply costs for the Operating Companies.
7.3 CAPACITY SALES
Whenever any Operating Company has surplus capacity and the
other Operating Company has insufficient capacity, the Agent shall evaluate the
feasibility of a capacity transaction between the Operating Companies. Such
evaluation shall take into account the availability of transmission capacity,
state resource procurement policies, and alternative opportunities for sales and
purchases. The terms of any such transaction shall be set out in separate
agreements or Service Schedules, which shall be subject to any necessary FERC
approval. Notwithstanding the foregoing, an Operating Company will not enter
into an agreement to purchase capacity from the other Operating Company if, at
the time of agreement, the purchaser could acquire like amounts of capacity from
a third party at lower cost.
Issued by: J. Craig Baker Effective: January 1, 2002
Senior Vice President,
Regulation & Public Policy
Issued on: July 24, 2001
Original Sheet No. 13
Public Service Company of Oklahoma, Rate schedule FERC No. 345
Southwestern Electric Power Company, Rate Schedule FERC No. 346
7.4 ENERGY SALES
An Operating Company will make energy available from its power
supply resources to the other Operating Company for the purposes and to the
extent provided by this Agreement.
7.5 EMERGENCY RESPONSE
In the event of a System Emergency, no adverse distinction
shall be made between the customers of either Operating Company. Each Operating
Company shall, when so instructed by the Agent, make its power supply resources
available in response to a System Emergency. Notwithstanding the foregoing, it
is understood that transmission constraints may limit the ability of one
Operating Company to respond to a System Emergency of the other.
ARTICLE VIII
ASSIGNMENT OF COSTS AND BENEFITS
OF COORDINATED OPERATIONS
8.1 SERVICE SCHEDULES
The costs and revenues associated with coordinated operations
as described in Article VII shall be distributed in the manner provided from
time to time in the Service Schedules. It is understood and agreed that all such
Service Schedules are intended to establish an equitable sharing of costs and/or
benefits among the Parties, and that circumstances may, from time to time,
require a reassessment of the relative benefits and burdens of this Agreement,
of the methods used to apportion benefits and burdens or of the Service
Schedules. Upon a recommendation of the Operating Committee and agreement among
the Parties, any of the Service Schedules may be amended as of any date agreed
to by the Parties, subject to receipt of any necessary regulatory
authorizations.
Issued by: J. Craig Baker Effective: January 1, 2002
Senior Vice President,
Regulation & Public Policy
Issued on: July 24, 2001
Original Sheet No. 14
Public Service Company of Oklahoma, Rate schedule FERC No. 345
Southwestern Electric Power Company, Rate Schedule FERC No. 346
ARTICLE IX
BILLING PROCEDURES
9.1 RECORDS
The Agent shall maintain such records as may be necessary to
determine the assignment of costs and benefits of coordinated operations
pursuant to this Agreement. Such records shall be made available to the Parties
upon request.
9.2 MONTHLY STATEMENTS
As promptly as practicable after the end of each calendar
month, the Agent shall prepare a statement setting forth the monthly summary of
costs and revenues allocated or assigned to the Parties in sufficient detail as
may be needed for settlements under the provisions of this Agreement. As
required, the Agent may provide such statements on an estimated basis and then
adjust those statements for actual results.
9.3 BILLINGS AND PAYMENTS
The Agent shall handle all billing between the Operating
Companies and other entities with which they engage in Off-System Purchases and
Off-System Sales pursuant to this Agreement. Payments among the Parties shall be
made by remittance of the net amount billed or by making appropriate accounting
entries on the books of the Parties.
9.4 TAXES
Should any federal, state, or local tax, surcharge or similar
assessment, in addition to those that may now exist, be levied upon the electric
capacity, energy, or services to be provided in connection with this Agreement,
or upon the provider of service as measured by the electric capacity, energy, or
services, or the revenue therefrom, such additional amount shall be included in
the net billing described in Section 9.3.
Issued by: J. Craig Baker Effective: January 1, 2002
Senior Vice President,
Regulation & Public Policy
Issued on: July 24, 2001
Original Sheet No. 15
Public Service Company of Oklahoma, Rate schedule FERC No. 345
Southwestern Electric Power Company, Rate Schedule FERC No. 346
ARTICLE X
FORCE MAJEURE
10.1 EVENTS EXCUSING PERFORMANCE
No Party shall be liable to another Party for or on account of
any loss, damage, injury, or expense resulting from or arising out of a delay or
failure to perform, either in whole or in part, any of the agreements,
covenants, or obligations made by or imposed upon the Parties by this Agreement,
by reason of or through strike, work stoppage of labor, failure of contractors
or suppliers of materials (including fuel), failure of equipment, environmental
restrictions, riot, fire, flood, ice, invasion, civil war, commotion,
insurrection, military or usurped power, order of any court or regulatory agency
granted in any BONA FIDE legal proceedings or action, or of any civil or
military authority either DE FACTO or DE JURE, explosion, Act of God or the
public enemies, or any other cause reasonably beyond its control and not
attributable to its neglect. A Party experiencing such a delay or failure to
perform shall use due diligence to remove the cause or causes thereof; however,
no Party shall be required to add to, modify or upgrade any facilities, or to
settle a strike or labor dispute except when, according to its own best
judgment, such action is advisable.
ARTICLE XI
INDUSTRY STANDARDS
11.1 ADHERENCE TO RELIABILITY CRITERIA
The Parties agree to conform to all applicable national and
regional electric reliability council principles, guides, criteria, and
standards and industry standard practices (collectively, "Industry Standards")
as they affect the implementation of this Agreement.
Issued by: J. Craig Baker Effective: January 1, 2002
Senior Vice President,
Regulation & Public Policy
Issued on: July 24, 2001
Original Sheet No. 16
Public Service Company of Oklahoma, Rate schedule FERC No. 345
Southwestern Electric Power Company, Rate Schedule FERC No. 346
ARTICLE XII
GENERAL
12.1 NO THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES
This Agreement does not create rights of any character
whatsoever in favor of any person, corporation, association, entity or power
supplier, other than the Parties, and the obligations herein assumed by the
Parties are solely for the use and benefit of the Parties. Nothing in this
Agreement shall be construed as permitting or vesting, or attempting to permit
or vest, in any person, corporation, association, entity or power supplier,
other than the Parties, any rights hereunder or in any of the resources or
facilities owned or controlled by the Parties or the use thereof.
12.2 WAIVERS
Any waiver at any time by a Party of its rights with respect
to a default under this Agreement, or with respect to any other matter arising
in connection with this Agreement, shall not be deemed a waiver with respect to
any subsequent default or matter. Any delay, short of the statutory period of
limitation, in asserting or enforcing any right under this Agreement, shall not
be deemed a waiver of such right.
12.3 SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS
This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding
upon the Parties only, and their respective successors and assigns, and shall
not be assignable by any Party without the written consent of the other Parties
except to a successor in the operation of its properties by reason of a
reorganization to comply with state or federal restructuring requirements, or a
merger, consolidation, sale or foreclosure whereby substantially all such
properties are acquired by or merged with those of such a successor.
Issued by: J. Craig Baker Effective: January 1, 2002
Senior Vice President,
Regulation & Public Policy
Issued on: July 24, 2001
Original Sheet No. 17
Public Service Company of Oklahoma, Rate schedule FERC No. 345
Southwestern Electric Power Company, Rate Schedule FERC No. 346
12.4 LIABILITY AND INDEMNIFICATION
Subject to any applicable state or federal law that may
specifically restrict limitations on liability, each Party shall release,
indemnify, and hold harmless the other Parties, their directors, officers and
employees from and against any and all liability for loss, damage or expense
alleged to arise from, or be incidental to, injury to persons and/or damage to
property in connection with its facilities or the production or transmission of
electric energy by or through such facilities, or related to performance or
non-performance of this Agreement, including any negligence arising hereunder.
In no event shall any Party be liable to another Party for any indirect,
special, incidental, or consequential damages with respect to any claim arising
out of this Agreement.
12.5 SECTION HEADINGS
The descriptive headings of the Articles and Sections of this
Agreement are used for convenience only, and shall not modify or restrict any of
the terms and provisions thereof.
12.6 NOTICE
Any notice or demand for performance required or permitted
under any of the provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed to have been given
on the date such notice, in writing, is deposited in the U.S. mail, postage
prepaid, certified or registered mail, addressed to:
AGENT PSO SWEPCO
1 Riverside Plaza 212 E. Sixth Street 428 Travis Street
Columbus, OH 43215 Tulsa, OK 74119 Shreveport, LA 71156
or in such other form or to such other address as the Parties may stipulate.
12.7 EFFECT ON OTHER AGREEMENTS
This Agreement supersedes and replaces the Restated and
Amended Operating Agreement among PSO, SWEPCO, West Texas Utilities Company and
Central Power and Light Company
Issued by: J. Craig Baker Effective: January 1, 2002
Senior Vice President,
Regulation & Public Policy
Issued on: July 24, 2001
Original Sheet No. 18
Public Service Company of Oklahoma, Rate schedule FERC No. 345
Southwestern Electric Power Company, Rate Schedule FERC No. 346
and Central and South West Services, Inc. dated January 1, 1997, effective as of
the date this Agreement is to be made effective as set out in Section 2.1.
ARTICLE XIII
REGULATORY APPROVAL
13.1 REGULATORY AUTHORIZATION
This Agreement is subject to and conditioned upon its approval
or acceptance for filing without material condition or modification by the FERC.
In the event that this Agreement is not so approved or accepted for filing in
its entirety without modification, or the FERC subsequently modifies this
Agreement upon complaint or upon its own initiative, any Party may, irrespective
of the notice provisions in Section 2.1, terminate this Agreement or the
Restated and Amended Operating Agreement referred to in Section 12.7, by giving
thirty days' advance written notice to the other Parties.
13.2 CHANGES
It is contemplated by the Parties that it may be appropriate
from time to time to change, amend, modify, or supplement this Agreement,
including the Service Schedules and any other attachments that may be made a
part of this Agreement, to reflect changes in operating practices or costs of
operations or for other reasons. Any such changes to this Agreement shall be in
writing executed by the Parties and subject to approval or acceptance for filing
by the FERC.
Issued by: J. Craig Baker Effective: January 1, 2002
Senior Vice President,
Regulation & Public Policy
Issued on: July 24, 2001
Original Sheet No. 19
Public Service Company of Oklahoma, Rate schedule FERC No. 345
Southwestern Electric Power Company, Rate Schedule FERC No. 346
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Agreement to
be executed and attested by their duly authorized officers on the day and year
first above written.
PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF OKLAHOMA
By:
-------------------------------------
Title:
-------------------------------------
SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY
By:
-------------------------------------
Title:
-------------------------------------
By: Title:
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE CORPORATION
By:
-------------------------------------
Title:
-------------------------------------
Issued by: J. Craig Baker Effective: January 1, 2002
Senior Vice President,
Regulation & Public Policy
Issued on: July 24, 2001
Original Sheet No. 20
Public Service Company of Oklahoma, Rate schedule FERC No. 345
Southwestern Electric Power Company, Rate Schedule FERC No. 346
SERVICE SCHEDULE A
ENERGY SALES
A1 - DURATION This Service Schedule A shall become effective and binding when
the Agreement of which it is a part becomes effective, and shall continue in
full force and effect throughout the duration of the Agreement unless terminated
or suspended.
A2 - AVAILABILITY OF SERVICE This Service Schedule A governs sales of energy
made pursuant to Section 7.4 of the Agreement, which are sales of energy not
associated with sales of capacity.
A3 - ENERGY TRANSFER PRICES, A purchasing Operating Company ("Purchaser") shall
pay a selling Operating Company ("Seller") the following amount for energy
purchased under this Schedule A ("Transfer Price"):
(1) The Seller's Incremental Costs plus
(2) One-half the difference between:
(a) the Purchaser's Decremental Costs; and
(b) the Seller's Incremental Costs.
Issued by: J. Craig Baker Effective: January 1, 2002
Senior Vice President,
Regulation & Public Policy
Issued on: July 24, 2001
Original Sheet No. 21
Public Service Company of Oklahoma, Rate schedule FERC No. 345
Southwestern Electric Power Company, Rate Schedule FERC No. 346
SERVICE SCHEDULE B
OFF-SYSTEM SALES AND OFF-SYSTEM PURCHASES
B1 - DURATION This Service Schedule B shall become effective and binding when
the Agreement of which it is a part becomes effective, and shall continue in
full force and effect throughout the duration of the Agreement unless terminated
or suspended.
B2 - APPLICABILITY Agent shall undertake Off-System Sales and Off-System
Purchases on behalf of the Operating Companies. Where Agent undertakes these
activities, revenues and expenses shall be allocated or arranged in accordance
with this Service Schedule B.
B3 - ALLOCATION OF OFF-SYSTEM PURCHASES AND SALES
A. Off-System Purchases. Any expenses for an Off-System Purchase
during an hour shall be distributed to the Operating
Company(ies) receiving energy from the purchase to cover an
energy deficiency during the hour. Any remaining expenses for
an Off-System Purchase during such hour shall be distributed
to the Operating Companies in proportion to the megawatt-hours
of energy that would have been provided from the respective
Operating Companies' other power supply resources that were
displaced during such hour.
B. Off-System Sales. Any revenues from Off-System Sales in an
hour shall first be applied to reimburse the Incremental Costs
of the Operating Companies that contributed to the sales in
such hour. Net revenues remaining after such reimbursement
shall be distributed to the Operating Companies in proportion
to each Operating Company's generation for sales (including
economy energy sales) less the amount of energy such Operating
Company purchased from the other Operating Company in such
hour pursuant to Section 7.4 of this Agreement and Schedule A
(but not less than zero).
Issued by: J. Craig Baker Effective: January 1, 2002
Senior Vice President,
Regulation & Public Policy
Issued on: July 24, 2001
ATTACHMENT 3
SYSTEM INTEGRATION AGREEMENT
American Electric Power Service Corporation Original Sheet No. 1
Second Substitute Rate Schedule FERC No. 20
RESTATED AND AMENDED
SYSTEM INTEGRATION AGREEMENT
AMONG
APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY
KENTUCKY POWER COMPANY
INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY
PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF OKLAHOMA
SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY
AND
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE CORPORATION,
AS AGENT
Issued by: J. Craig Baker Effective: January 1, 2002
Senior Vice President,
Regulation & Public Policy
Issued on: July 24, 2001
American Electric Power Service Corporation Original Sheet No. 2
Second Substitute Rate Schedule FERC No. 20
RESTATED AND AMENDED SYSTEM INTEGRATION AGREEMENT
THIS RESTATED AND AMENDED SYSTEM INTEGRATION AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is
made and entered into as of the __ day of _____________, 2001 by and among
Appalachian Power Company ("APC"), Kentucky Power Company ("KPC"), Indiana
Michigan Power Company ("I&M"), Public Service Company of Oklahoma ("PSO"), and
Southwestern Electric Power Company ("SWEPCO"); and their agent American
Electric Power Service Corporation ("AEPSC"). The foregoing companies are
referred to herein collectively as the Parties and individually as a Party.
WHEREAS, APC, KPC, and I&M (collectively, the "AEP East Operating
Companies") own and operate interconnected electric generation, transmission and
distribution facilities with which they are engaged in the business of
generating, transmitting and selling electric power and energy to the general
public and to other electric utilities; and
WHEREAS, the AEP East Operating Companies coordinate the planning,
construction, operation and maintenance of their electric supply facilities on
an integrated basis pursuant to an Interconnection Agreement, restated and
amended on 2001; and
WHEREAS, PSO and SWEPCO (collectively, the "AEP West Operating
Companies") own and operate interconnected electric generation, transmission and
distribution facilities with which they are engaged in the business of
generating, transmitting and selling electric power and energy to the general
public and to other electric utilities; and
WHEREAS, the AEP West Operating Companies coordinate the planning,
construction, operation and maintenance of their electric supply facilities on
an
Issued by: J. Craig Baker Effective: January 1, 2002
Senior Vice President,
Regulation & Public Policy
Issued on: July 24, 2001
American Electric Power Service Corporation Original Sheet No. 3
Second Substitute Rate Schedule FERC No. 20
integrated basis pursuant to an Operating Agreement, restated and amended on
_____________, 2001; and
WHEREAS, following the consummation of a merger between their parent
companies on June 15, 2000, the AEP East Operating Companies and the AEP West
Operating Companies are electrically and operationally integrated to the extent
practicable while preserving the basic terms and conditions of the AEP East
Interconnection Agreement and the AEP West Operating Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the Parties desire to maintain a framework under which the
power supply resources of the AEP East Operating Companies and the AEP West
Operating Companies will to the extent practicable be planned, operated,
maintained and dispatched on a coordinated basis;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual
covenants and agreements herein set forth, the Parties mutually agree as
follows:
ARTICLE I
DEFINITIONS
1.1 AEP EAST INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENT means the Restated and
Amended Interconnection Agreement among AEPSC and the AEP East Operating
Companies dated _____________, 2001, as the same may be subsequently modified
and supplemented.
1.2 AEP EAST OPERATING COMPANIES for purposes of this Agreement
means the following operating companies of American Electric Power Company, Inc.
which, together with AEPSC, are parties to the AEP East Interconnection
Agreement: APC, KPC, and I&M, collectively.
1.3 AEP EAST ZONE means the electric generation, transmission and
distribution facilities of the AEP East Operating Companies.
Issued by: J. Craig Baker Effective: January 1, 2002
Senior Vice President,
Regulation & Public Policy
Issued on: July 24, 2001
American Electric Power Service Corporation Original Sheet No. 4
Second Substitute Rate Schedule FERC No. 20
1.4 AEPSC means American Electric Power Service Corporation.
1.5 AEP WEST OPERATING AGREEMENT means the Restated and Amended
Operating Agreement among AEPSC and the AEP West Operating Companies dated
_____________, 2001, as the same may be subsequently modified or supplemented.
1.6 AEP WEST OPERATING COMPANIES means PSO and SWEPCO,
collectively.
1.7 AEP WEST ZONE means the electric generation, transmission and
distribution facilities of the AEP West Operating Companies.
1.8 AGENT means the Parties' designated representative for the
purposes specified in Section 5.1 and elsewhere in this Agreement.
1.9 AGREEMENT means this Restated and Amended System Integration
Agreement, including all Service Schedules and attachments hereto.
1.10 APC means Appalachian Power Company.
1.11 COMBINED SYSTEM means the AEP East Zone and the AEP West Zone.
1.12 DECREMENTAL CAPACITY COST in the recipient zone means the
lower of the recipient's cost of capacity installation or capacity purchase
price in its own zonal market, i.e., Market Price. The determination of Market
Price shall be based on actual purchases of similar characteristics from
unaffiliated third parties. In the event that no such purchases are available,
documentable offers from unaffiliated third parties shall determine the Market
Price. In the event that no such offers are available, a published index of
capacity market price shall determine the Market Price.
1.13 ERCOT means the Electric Reliability Council of Texas.
Issued by: J. Craig Baker Effective: January 1, 2002
Senior Vice President,
Regulation & Public Policy
Issued on: July 24, 2001
American Electric Power Service Corporation Original Sheet No. 5
Second Substitute Rate Schedule FERC No. 20
1.14 FERC means the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission or a
successor agency having jurisdiction over this Agreement.
1.15 FOREGONE OPPORTUNITY COST as it relates to capacity exchanges
means what the supplier could have sold the capacity for in its own zonal market
if the capacity exchange did not take place, i.e., Market Price. The
determination of Market Price shall be based on actual sales of similar
characteristics to unaffiliated third parties. In the event that no such sales
are available, documentable offers from unaffiliated third parties shall
determine the Market Price. In the event that no such offers are available, a
published index of capacity market price shall determine the Market Price.
1.16 GENERATING RESOURCE means the electric power generating
facilities or capacity owned by or under contract to a Party or Parties to meet
the capacity and energy needs of the Party or Parties.
1.17 I&M means Indiana Michigan Power Company.
1.18 INCREMENTAL TRANSMISSION COSTS means any costs for
transmission service to effect system energy exchange other than the 250 MW of
firm transmission service purchased from Ameren Corporation prior to the Merger.
1.19 INDUSTRY STANDARDS means those principles, guides, criteria,
standards and practices referred to in Section 12.1.
1.20 INTERCONNECTION CONSTRAINTS has the meaning ascribed to that
term in Section 7.2.
1.21 KPC means Kentucky Power Company.
1.22 MERGER means the merger of Central and South West Corporation
into a merger subsidiary of American Electric Power Company, Inc., effective
June 15, 2000.
Issued by: J. Craig Baker Effective: January 1, 2002
Senior Vice President,
Regulation & Public Policy
Issued on: July 24, 2001
American Electric Power Service Corporation Original Sheet No. 6
Second Substitute Rate Schedule FERC No. 20
1.23 NATIVE LOAD CUSTOMER for purposes of this Agreement means a
wholesale or retail power customer on whose behalf a Party, by statute,
franchise, regulatory requirement, or firm power supply contract, has undertaken
an obligation to supply electricity at cost-of-service rates to reliably meet
the electric needs of such customer. The term "Native Load Customer" for
purposes of this Agreement excludes customers and that portion of a customer's
load served pursuant to contracts that do not obligate the supplier to install
capacity to meet the customer's load requirements.
1.24 OFF-SYSTEM PURCHASES means purchases from a third party of
energy and/or capacity to reduce costs or to provide reliability for the
Combined System or to engage in Off-System Sales.
1.25 OFF-SYSTEM SALES means all sales of power and energy to
non-Native Load Customers of the Parties to this Agreement.
1.26 OPERATING COMMITTEE means the administrative body established
pursuant to Article VI for the purposes therein specified.
1.27 OPERATING COMPANY means APC, KPC, I&M, PSO, or SWEPCO,
individually.
1.28 OUT-OF-POCKET COST, unless otherwise specified, means all
expenses incurred that would not otherwise have been incurred if the
corresponding service had not been arranged. Such expenses will include, but are
not limited to, fuel, reactant, operation, maintenance, tax, S02 and other
atmospheric emission allowances, transmission losses, margins associated with
foregone sales opportunities and charges for any power and energy purchased
which is reasonably allocated by the Agent to such service, and other expenses
incurred which would not have been incurred if the service had not been
arranged. In such cases where foregone sales opportunities are included, the
Agent will be responsible for
Issued by: J. Craig Baker Effective: January 1, 2002
Senior Vice President,
Regulation & Public Policy
Issued on: July 24, 2001
American Electric Power Service Corporation Original Sheet No. 7
Second Substitute Rate Schedule FERC No. 20
maintaining adequate documentation of these opportunities. This support may
include but is not limited to actual sales during that period, regional market
indices and/or logs of offers received.
1.29 OWNED GENERATING CAPACITY is the aggregate capacity of the
electric power sources of the zone, in Kilowatts, that is normally expected to
be available to carry load. Such capacity shall include (i) the capacity
installed at the generating stations owned by the operating companies in the
zone and (ii) the capacity available to the operating companies of the zone
through arrangements with affiliated companies or unaffiliated companies, if so
designated by the Operating Committee with the approval of the operating
companies.
1.30 PARTY OR PARTIES means one or more of the following
individually or collectively, as the context warrants: APC, KPC, I&M, AEPSC,
PSO, and SWEPCO.
1.31 PSO means Public Service Company of Oklahoma.
1.32 SERVICE SCHEDULES means the Service Schedules attached to this
Agreement and those that later may be agreed to by the Parties and accepted for
filing by the FERC.
1.33 SPP means the Southwest Power Pool reliability council.
1.34 SWEPCO means Southwestern Electric Power Company.
1.35 SYSTEM EMERGENCY means a condition which, if not promptly
corrected, threatens to cause imminent harm to persons or property, including
the equipment of a Party or a third party, or threatens the reliability of
electric service provided by a Party to Native Load Customers.
1.36 SYSTEM SALES REALIZATION means the difference between (i)
revenues collected from Off-System Sales and (ii) the Out-of-Pocket Cost of such
Off-System Sales and any transmission cost related to such activities.
Issued by: J. Craig Baker Effective: January 1, 2002
Senior Vice President,
Regulation & Public Policy
Issued on: July 24, 2001
American Electric Power Service Corporation Original Sheet No. 8
Second Substitute Rate Schedule FERC No. 20
ARTICLE II
TERM OF AGREEMENT
2.1 TERM
Subject to FERC approval or acceptance for filing, this Agreement shall
take effect on January 1, 2002, and shall continue in full force and effect
until terminated: (a) by mutual agreement; (b) as of the date that any Operating
Company no longer has retail Native Load Customers other than default service
customers that an Operating Company serves as the provider of last resort in a
state whose regulatory policy requires competition in retail power supply; or
(c) upon twelve (12) months' written notice by one Party to each of the other
Parties.
2.2 PERIODIC REVIEW
This Agreement will be reviewed periodically by the Operating Committee
to determine whether revisions are necessary or appropriate.
Issued by: J. Craig Baker Effective: January 1, 2002
Senior Vice President,
Regulation & Public Policy
Issued on: July 24, 2001
American Electric Power Service Corporation Original Sheet No. 9
Second Substitute Rate Schedule FERC No. 20
ARTICLE III
OBJECTIVES
3.1 PURPOSE
The purpose of this Agreement is to provide the contractual basis for
coordinated planning, operation and maintenance of the power supply resources of
the Combined System to achieve economies consistent with the provision of
reliable electric service and an equitable sharing of the benefits and costs of
such coordinated arrangements.
Issued by: J. Craig Baker Effective: January 1, 2002
Senior Vice President,
Regulation & Public Policy
Issued on: July 24, 2001
American Electric Power Service Corporation Original Sheet No. 10
Second Substitute Rate Schedule FERC No. 20
ARTICLE IV
RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER AGREEMENTS
AND SERVICES
4.1 GOVERNING PROVISIONS
This Agreement is intended to apply in addition to and not in lieu of
the AEP East Interconnection Agreement and the AEP West Operating Agreement. The
provisions of this Agreement shall, to the extent practicable, be construed and
applied in a manner that is consistent with the AEP East Interconnection
Agreement and the AEP West Operating Agreement. In the event of any
inconsistency, however, the provisions of this Agreement shall control. This
Agreement is further intended to apply to the power supply resources and loads
served by the Combined System. It does not apply to the transmission facilities
owned or operated by the AEP East Operating Companies and the AEP West Operating
Companies.
Issued by: J. Craig Baker Effective: January 1, 2002
Senior Vice President,
Regulation & Public Policy
Issued on: July 24, 2001
American Electric Power Service Corporation Original Sheet No. 11
Second Substitute Rate Schedule FERC No. 20
ARTICLE V
AGENT
5.1 AGENT'S FUNCTIONS
The Parties hereby designate AEPSC as their Agent for the purposes of:
(a) coordinating the planning and design of generation to be
installed for the Combined System and the acquisition of power supply resources;
(b) coordinating the operation and maintenance of the Combined
System power supply resources;
(c) coordinating the economic dispatch for the power supply
resources of the Combined System;
(d) conducting the Combined System's Off-System Purchases and
Sales;
(e) providing and or acquiring any additional power supply
services for the loads served and sales made on behalf of the Combined System;
(f) developing all bills and billing information among the Parties
pursuant to this Agreement; and
(g) such other activities and duties as may be assigned from time
to time by the Operating Committee.
5.2 DELEGATION AND ACCEPTANCE OF AUTHORITY
The Parties hereby delegate to the Agent and the Agent hereby accepts
responsibility and authority for the duties listed in Section 5.1 and elsewhere
in this Agreement. Except as herein expressly established otherwise, the Agent
shall perform each of those duties in consultation with the Operating Committee.
Issued by: J. Craig Baker Effective: January 1, 2002
Senior Vice President,
Regulation & Public Policy
Issued on: July 24, 2001