HUBBELL INCORPORATED

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such report), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes þ No o

The approximate aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant as of June 28, 2002 was $1,820,119,721*. The number of shares outstanding of the Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock as of March 7, 2003 was 9,671,623 and 49,618,098, respectively.

The definitive proxy statement for the proposed annual meeting of stockholders to be held on May 5, 2003, filed with the Commission on March 24, 2003 — Part III.


*	Calculated by excluding all shares held by executive Officers and Directors of Registrant and the Roche Trust, the Hubbell Trust and the Harvey Hubbell Foundation, without conceding that all such persons are “affiliates” of registrant for purpose of the Federal Securities Laws.

Hubbell Incorporated (herein referred to as “Hubbell”, the “Company” or the “registrant”, which references shall include its divisions and subsidiaries as the context may require) was founded as a proprietorship in 1888, and was incorporated in Connecticut in 1905. Hubbell manufactures and sells high quality electrical and electronic products for a broad range of commercial, industrial, telecommunications, utility, and residential applications. Products are manufactured or assembled by subsidiaries in North America, Switzerland, Puerto Rico, Mexico, Italy, and the United Kingdom. Hubbell also participates in a joint venture in Taiwan, and maintains sales offices in Singapore, the People’s Republic of China, Mexico, Hong Kong, South Korea, and the Middle East.

Hubbell is primarily engaged in the engineering, manufacture and sale of electrical and electronic products. For management reporting and control, the businesses are divided into three operating segments: Electrical, Power and Industrial Technology, as described below. Reference is made to Note 17 — Industry Segments and Geographic Area Information under Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

In March 2002, Hubbell acquired the stock of Hawke Cable Glands Limited (“Hawke”). Based in Ashton-Under-Lyne, England, Hawke designs, manufactures and markets cable glands and cable connectors to provide a means to terminate cables at junction boxes, light fixtures, control centers, panel boards, motor control enclosures and electrical equipment, as well as a line of enclosures, cable transit, breathers, and field bus products, all for hazardous areas and industrial markets. Hawke is included in the Electrical Segment.

In April 2002, Hubbell acquired LCA Group, Inc. (“LCA”), the domestic lighting division of U.S. Industries, Inc. LCA manufactures and distributes a wide range of outdoor and indoor lighting products to the commercial, industrial, institutional and residential markets under various brand names. LCA is included in the Electrical Segment.

In September 2002, Hubbell acquired the assets of the pole line hardware business of Cooper Power Systems, Inc., a subsidiary of Cooper Industries, Inc. Now based in Centralia, Missouri, pole line hardware products include anchors and accessories, fasteners, pole and crossarm accessories, insulator pins, mounting brackets and related components used in the construction and maintenance of electric utility transmission and distribution lines. The pole line hardware business is included in the Power Segment.

The Company’s annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to those reports are made available free of charge through the Investor Relations section of the Company’s website at http://www.hubbell.com as soon as practicable after such material is electronically filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The Electrical Segment is comprised of businesses that primarily sell through distributors, lighting showrooms, home centers, telephone and telecommunication companies, and represents stock items including standard and special application wiring device products, lighting fixtures and controls, fittings, switches and outlet boxes, enclosures, wire management products and voice and data signal processing components. The products are typically used in and around industrial, commercial, and institutional facilities by electrical contractors, maintenance personnel, electricians, and telecommunication companies. Certain lighting fixtures and electrical products also have residential application.

Hubbell manufactures and sells highly durable and reliable wiring devices which are supplied principally to industrial, commercial and institutional customers. These products, comprising several thousand-catalog items, include plugs, dimmers, receptacles (including surge suppressor units), wall outlets, connectors, adapters, floor boxes, switches, occupancy sensors (including passive infrared and ultrasonic motion sensing

devices), lampholders, control switches, outlet strips, pendants, weatherproof enclosures, and wallplates. Pin-and-sleeve devices built to International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) and new UL standards have incorporated improved water and dust-tight construction and impact resistance. Switch and receptacle wall plates feature proprietary thermoplastic materials offering high impact resistance and durability, and are available in a variety of colors and styles. Delivery systems, including nonmetallic surface raceway systems for power, data and communications distribution, provide efficiency and flexibility in both initial installations and remodeling applications. Hubbell also sells wiring devices for use in certain environments requiring specialized products, such as signal and control connectors and cable assemblies for the connection of sensors in materials processing, modular cable protection systems, and portable power distribution units with ground fault protection for commercial and industrial applications. Some of the portable power distribution units contain a number of outlets to which electrically-powered equipment may be simultaneously connected for ground fault protection. Circuit Guard® ground fault units protect the user from electrical shock by interrupting the circuit to which they are connected when a fault to ground is detected. Hubbell also manufactures TVSS (transient voltage surge suppression) devices, under the Spikeshield® trademark, which are used to protect electronic equipment such as personal computers and other supersensitive electronic equipment. Hubbell also manufactures and/or sells components designed for use in local area networks (LANs) and other telecommunications applications supporting high-speed data and voice signals. Primary products include work station modular jacks, faceplates, surface housings, modular furniture plates, cross connect patch panels, connectorized cable assemblies, punch down blocks, free standing racks, enclosures and other products used for installation, testing and distribution of LANs. These products support unshielded, shielded and fiber optic media types and typically service commercial, institutional and industrial applications.

Hubbell manufactures and sells lighting fixtures and accessories for indoor and outdoor applications with four classifications of products: Outdoor, Industrial, Commercial/ Institutional and Residential. Outdoor products include poles, MiniLiter® and Sterner® Infranor® floodlights, Devine® Geometric 2000™ series fixtures, Kim® architectural fixtures and a line of pedestrian ³zone, path, landscape, building and area lighting products, Security™ outdoor and signage fixtures, Magnusquare® II Architectural fixtures, Spaulding™ fixtures, AAL™ flood and step lighting fixtures, sconces, bollards, poles and mounting arms in period, contemporary and customer designs, Moldcast® bollards, street lighting fixtures and wall mounted fixtures, and Whiteway™ canopy light fixtures, which are used to illuminate service stations, truck stops, outdoor display signs, parking lots, roadways, pedestrian areas, security areas, automobile dealerships, shopping centers, convenience stores, quick service restaurants, and similar areas, and Sportsliter® fixtures which are used to illuminate athletic and recreational fields. In addition, a line of Lightscaper® decorative outdoor fixtures is sold for use in landscaping applications such as pools, gardens and walkways. Industrial products include Superbay™ 2.0, Controlux® 2.0, Superwatt®, The Detector®, and Kemlux™ fixtures used to illuminate factories, work spaces, and similar areas, including specialty requirements such as paint rooms, clean rooms and warehouses. Commercial/ Institutional products include high intensity discharge (HID) fixtures, Alera™ architectural and Columbia Lighting® specification grade fluorescent fixtures, Pathfinder® emergency and exit, and Prescolite® recessed, surface mounted and track fixtures which are used for offices, schools, hospitals, airports, retail stores, and similar applications. The fixtures use HID lamps, such as mercury-vapor, high-pressure sodium, and metal-halide lamps, as well as quartz, fluorescent and incandescent lamps, all of which are purchased from other sources. Hubbell also manufactures a broad range of track and down lighting fixtures and accessories sold under the Marco® trademark, a line of life safety products, emergency lighting and exit signs and inverter power systems which are used in specialized safety applications under the Dual-Lite® and Prescolite Life Safety™ trademarks, a line of lighting products utilized in theaters, auditoriums, nightclubs and similar venues, and a line of IEC lighting fixtures designed for hazardous, hostile and corrosive applications sold under the Chalmit™ and Killark® trademarks. The Residential products are sold under the Progress Lighting® trademark and include residential decorative fixtures including chandeliers, hall and foyer, sconces, track, recessed and outdoor and landscape lighting fixtures.

Hubbell manufactures and/or sells: (a) under the Raco® trademark, steel and plastic boxes used at outlets, switch locations and junction points; (b) a broad line of metallic fittings, including rigid plastic conduit fittings, EMT (thinwall) fittings and liquid tight conduit fittings; (c) Bell Outdoor® outlet boxes; (d) a variety of electrical boxes, covers, combination devices, lampholders and lever switches manufactured under the Bell® trademark, with an emphasis on weather-resistant types suitable for outdoor applications; and (e) under the Wiegmann® trademark, a full-line of fabricated steel enclosures such as rainproof and dust-tight panels, consoles and cabinets, wireway and electronic enclosures and a line of non-metallic enclosures. Wiegmann® products are designed to enclose and protect electrical conductors, terminations, instruments, power distribution and control equipment.

Hubbell manufactures and sells a line of Kellems® and Bryant® mesh grips used to pull, support and create strain relief in elongated items such as cables, electrical cords, hoses and conduits, a line of Gotcha® cord connectors designed to prevent electrical conductors from pulling away from electrical terminals to which the conductors are attached, and wire management products including non-metallic surface raceway products for wiring and non-metallic liquid-tight flexible conduit for OEM applications. The grips are sold under the Dua-Pull® and Kellems® trademarks and range in size and strength to accommodate differing application needs. These products, which are designed to tighten around the gripped items, are sold to industrial, commercial, utility and microwave and cell phone tower markets.

Hubbell’s special application products, which are sold under the Killark® trademark, include weatherproof and hazardous location products suitable for standard, explosion-proof and other hostile area applications, include conduit raceway fittings, Disconex® switches, enclosures, HostileLite® lighting fixtures, electrical distribution equipment, standard and custom electrical motor controls, junction boxes, plugs and receptacles. Hubbell also manufactures and sells under the Hawke® trademark a line of cable glands and cable connectors, enclosures, cable transit, breathers and fieldbus products for the hazardous area and industrial markets. Hazardous locations are those areas where a potential for explosion and fire exists due to the presence of flammable gasses, fibers, vapors, dust or other easily ignitable materials and include such applications as refineries, petro-chemical plants, grain elevators and material processing areas.

Hubbell designs, manufactures and sells under the Pulsecom® trademark, voice and data signal processing components primarily used by telephone and telecommunications companies, and consisting of channel cards and banks for loop and trunk carriers, and racks and cabinets. These products provide a broad range of communications access solutions for use by the telephone and telecommunications industry including: (a) digital loop carrier solutions to multiplex traffic from many users over a single link using existing copper or fiber facilities providing easier and more cost-effective service to new users since fewer and smaller cables are required for providing expanded service; and (b) D4 solutions to provide delivery of integrated voice and data services. Customers of these product lines include various telecommunications companies, the Regional Bell Operating Companies (RBOCs), independent telephone companies, competitive local exchange carriers, companies with private networks, and internet service providers.

A majority of Hubbell’s Electrical Segment products are stock items and are sold through electrical and industrial distributors, home centers, some retail and hardware outlets, and lighting showrooms. Special application products are sold primarily through wholesale distributors to contractors, industrial customers and original equipment manufacturers. Voice and data signal processing equipment products are represented worldwide through a direct sales organization and by selected, independent telecommunications representa-

tives, primarily sold through datacom, electrical and catalogue distribution channels. Telecommunications products are sold primarily by direct sales to customers in the United States and internationally through sales personnel and sales representatives. Hubbell maintains a sales and marketing organization to assist potential users with the application of certain products to their specific requirements, and with architects, engineers, industrial designers, original equipment manufacturers and electrical contractors for the design of electrical systems to meet the specific requirements of industrial, institutional, commercial and residential users. Hubbell is also represented by sales agents for its lighting fixtures and electrical wiring devices, and boxes, enclosures, and fittings product lines. The sales of Electrical Segment products accounted for approximately 72% of Hubbell’s revenue in year 2002, 64% in year 2001 and 65% in 2000.

Power Segment operations design and manufacture a wide variety of construction, switching and protection products, hot line tools, grounding equipment, cover ups, fittings and fasteners, cable accessories, insulators, arresters, cutouts, sectionalizers, connectors and compression tools for the building and maintenance of overhead and underground power and telephone lines, as well as applications in the industrial, construction and pipeline industries.

Hubbell manufactures and sells, under the Ohio Brass® registered trademark, a complete line of polymer insulators and high-voltage surge arresters used in the construction of electrical transmission and distribution lines and substations. The primary focus in this product area are the Hi*Lite®, Hi*Lite®XL and Veri*Lite™ polymer insulator lines and the polymer housed metal-oxide varistor surge arrester lines. Electrical transmission products, primarily Hi*Lite® suspension and post insulators, are used in the expansion and upgrading of electrical transmission capability.

Hubbell manufactures and sells, under the Chance® trademark, products used in the electrical transmission and distribution and telecommunications industries, including overhead and underground electrical apparatus such as (a) distribution switches (to control and route the flow of power through electrical lines); (b) cutouts, sectionalizers, and fuses (to protect against faults and over-current conditions on power distribution systems); and (c) fiberglass insulation systems (pole framing and conductor insulation).

Hubbell manufactures and sells, under the Anderson® trademark, electrical connectors and associated hardware including pole line, line and tower hardware, compression crimping tools and accessories, mechanical and compression connectors, suspension clamps, terminals, supports, couplers, and tees for utility distribution and transmission systems, substations, and industry.

Hubbell manufactures and sells, under the Fargo® trademark, electrical power distribution and transmission products, principally for the utility industry. Distribution products include electrical connectors, automatic line splices, dead ends, hot line taps, wildlife protectors, and various associated products. Transmission products include splices, sleeves, connectors, dead ends, spacers and dampers. Products also consist of original equipment and resale products including substation fittings for cable, tube and bus as well as underground enclosures, wrenches, hydraulic pumps and presses, and coatings.

Hubbell manufactures and sells, under the Hubbell® trademark, cable accessories including loadbreak switching technology, deadbreak products, surge protection, cable splicing and cable termination products, as well as automation-ready overhead switches and aluminum transformer equipment mounts for transformers and equipment.

Hubbell manufactures and sells, under the Chance® trademark, (a) line construction materials including power-installed helical earth anchors and power-installed foundations to secure overhead power and communications line poles, guyed and self-supporting towers, streetlight poles and pipelines (Helical Pier® Foundation Systems are used to support homes and buildings, and earth anchors are used in a variety of farm,

home and construction projects including tie-back applications); (b) pole line hardware, including galvanized steel fixtures and extruded plastic materials used in overhead and underground line construction, connectors, fasteners, pole and crossarm accessories, insulator pins, mounting brackets and related components, and other accessories for making high voltage connections and linkages; (c) construction tools and accessories for building overhead and underground power and telephone lines; and (d) hot-line tools (all types of tools mounted on insulated poles used to construct and maintain energized high voltage lines) and other safety equipment.

Sales of Power Segment products are made through a Hubbell sales and marketing organization to distributors and directly to users such as electric utilities, mining operations, industrial firms, and engineering and construction firms. While Hubbell believes its sales in this area are not materially dependent upon any customer or group of customers, a decrease in purchases by public utilities does affect this category. The sale of Power segment products accounted for approximately 20% of Hubbell’s total revenue in year 2002, 25% in 2001 and 26% in 2000.

The Industrial Technology Segment consists of operations that design and manufacture test and measurement equipment, high voltage power supplies and variable transformers, industrial controls including motor speed controls, pendant-type push-button stations, overhead crane controls, Gleason Reel® electric cable and hose reels, and specialized communications systems such as intra-facility communications systems, telephone systems, and land mobile radio peripherals. Products are sold primarily to steel mills, industrial complexes, oil, gas and petrochemical industries, seaports, transportation authorities, the security industry (malls and colleges), and cable and electronic equipment manufacturers.

Hubbell manufactures and sells, under the Hipotronics®, Haefely Test™ and Tettex® trademarks, a broad line of high voltage test and measurement systems to test materials and equipment used in the generation, transmission and distribution of electricity, and high voltage power supplies and electromagnetic compliance equipment for use in the electrical and electronic industries. Principal products include AC/DC hipot testers and megohmmeters, cable fault location systems, oil testers and DC hipots, impulse generators, digital measurement systems and tan-delta bridges, AC series resonant and corona detection systems, DC test sets and power supplies, variable transformers, voltage regulators, and motor and transformer test sets.

Hubbell manufactures and sells a variety of heavy-duty electrical and radio control products which have broad application in the control of industrial equipment and processes. These products range from standard and specialized industrial control components to combinations of components that control industrial manufacturing processes. Standard products include motor speed controls, pendant-type push-button stations, power and grounding resistors and overhead crane controls. Also manufactured and sold are a line of transfer switches used to direct electrical supply from alternate sources, and a line of fire pump control products used in fire control systems.

Hubbell manufactures, under the Gleason Reel® trademark, industrial-quality cable management products including electric cable and hose reels, protective steel and nylon cable tracks (cable and hose carriers), cable festooning hardware, highly engineered container crane reels and festoons for the international market, slip rings, and a line of ergonomic tool support systems (workstation accessories and components such as balancers, retractors, torque reels, tool supports, boom and jib kits).

Hubbell manufactures and sells under the GAI-Tronics® trademark, specialized communications systems designed to withstand indoor and outdoor hazardous environments. Products include intra-facility

Hubbell’s Industrial Technology Segment products are sold primarily through direct sales and sales representatives to contractors, industrial customers and original equipment manufacturers, with the exception of high voltage test and measurement equipment which is sold primarily by direct sales to customers in the United States and in foreign countries through its sales engineers and independent sales representatives.

The sale of products in the Industrial Technology Segment accounted for approximately 8% of Hubbell’s total revenue in year 2002, 11% in 2001 and 9% in 2000.

Hubbell Ltd. in the United Kingdom manufactures and/or markets fuse switches, contactors, selected wiring device products, premise wiring products, specialized control gear, chart recording products, and industrial control products used in motor control applications such as fuse switches and contactors.

Hubbell Canada Inc. and Hubbell de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. manufacture and/or market wiring devices, premise wiring products, lighting fixtures and controls, grips, fittings, switches and outlet boxes, hazardous location products, electrical transmission and distribution products and earth anchoring systems. Industrial control products are sold in Canada through an independent sales agent. Hubbell Canada also designs and manufactures electrical outlet boxes, metallic wall plates, and related accessories.

Hawke Cable Glands Limited in the United Kingdom manufactures and/or markets a range of products used in hazardous locations including brass cable glands and cable connectors used in watertight terminations, cable transition devices, utility transformer breathers, enclosures and field bus connectivity components.

Harvey Hubbell S.E. Asia Pte. Ltd. markets wiring devices, lighting fixtures, hazardous location products and electrical transmission and distribution products.

Haefely Test AG in Switzerland designs and manufactures high voltage test and instrumentation systems, and GAI-Tronics in the United Kingdom and Italy designs and manufactures specialized communications systems including closed circuit television systems (CCTV).

Hubbell also manufactures lighting products, wiring devices, weatherproof outlet boxes, fittings, and power products in Juarez and Tijuana, Mexico. In addition, Hubbell has interests in various other international operations such as a joint venture in Taiwan, and maintains sales offices in Mexico, Singapore, the People’s Republic of China, Hong Kong, South Korea and the Middle East.

The wiring devices sold by Hubbell’s operations in the United Kingdom, Singapore, Canada and Mexico are similar to those sold in the United States, most of which are manufactured in the United States and Puerto Rico.

As a percentage of total sales, international shipments from foreign subsidiaries were 10% in 2002, 11% in 2001 and 10% in 2000, with the Canadian and United Kingdom markets representing approximately 39% and 29%, respectively, of the 2002 total.

Principal raw materials used in the manufacture of Hubbell products include steel, brass, copper, aluminum, bronze, plastics, phenolics, bone fiber, elastomers and petrochemicals. Hubbell also purchases certain electrical and electronic components, including solenoids, lighting ballasts, printed circuit boards, integrated circuit chips and cord sets, from a number of suppliers. Hubbell is not materially dependent upon

Hubbell has approximately 1,142 active United States and foreign patents covering many of its products, which expire at various times. While Hubbell deems these patents to be of value, it does not consider its business to be dependent upon patent protection. Hubbell licenses under patents owned by others, as may be needed, and grants licenses under certain of its patents.

Hubbell maintains sufficient inventory to enable it to provide a high level of service to its customers. The inventory levels, payment terms and return policies are in accord with the general practices of the electrical products industry and standard business procedures.

Backlog of orders believed to be firm at December 31, 2002 and 2001 were approximately $115.9 million and $91.5 million, respectively. Most of the backlog is expected to be shipped in the current year. Although this backlog is important, the majority of Hubbell’s revenues result from sales of inventoried products or products that have short periods of manufacture.

Hubbell experiences substantial competition in all categories of its business, but does not compete with the same companies in all of its product categories. The number and size of competitors vary considerably depending on the product line. Hubbell cannot specify with exactitude the number of competitors in each product category or their relative market position. However, some of its competitors are larger companies with substantial financial and other resources. Hubbell considers product performance, reliability, quality and technological innovation as important factors relevant to all areas of its business and considers its reputation as a manufacturer of quality products to be an important factor in its business. In addition, product price and other factors can affect Hubbell’s ability to compete.

Research, development and engineering expenditures represent costs incurred in the experimental or laboratory sense aimed at discovery and/or application of new knowledge in developing a new product, process, or in bringing about a significant improvement in an existing product or process. Research, development and engineering expenses are recorded as a component of cost of sales. Expenses for research, development and engineering were $8.9 million in 2002, $7.6 million in 2001 and $10.0 million in 2000. The increased expense in 2002 is attributable to the addition of acquired businesses.

The Company is subject to various federal, state and local government requirements relating to the protection of employee health and safety and the environment. The Company believes that, as a general matter, its policies, practices and procedures are properly designed to prevent unreasonable risk of environmental damage and personal injury to our employees and employees of our customers and that our handling, manufacture, use and disposal of hazardous or toxic substances are in accord with environmental laws and regulations.

Like other companies engaged in similar businesses, the Company has incurred remedial response and voluntary cleanup costs for site contamination and is a party to product liability and other lawsuits and claims associated with environmental matters, including past production of product containing toxic substances. Additional lawsuits, claims and costs involving environmental matters are likely to continue to arise in the future. However, considering our past experience, insurance coverage and reserves, we do not expect that these matters will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash

As of December 31, 2002, Hubbell had approximately 11,476 full-time employees, including salaried and hourly personnel. Approximately 51% of Hubbell’s United States employees are represented by twenty-three labor unions. Hubbell considers its labor relations to be satisfactory.

Hubbell’s principal manufacturing facilities, classified by segment are located in the following areas:

Additionally, the Company owns or leases warehouses and distribution centers containing approximately 2,089,900 square feet. The Company believes its manufacturing and warehousing facilities are adequate to carry on its business activities.

As described in Note 12 — Commitments and Contingencies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, the Company is involved in various legal proceedings, including workers’ compensation, product liability and environmental matters, including, for each, past production of product containing toxic substances, which have arisen in the normal course of its operations and with respect to which the Company is self-insured for certain incidents at various amounts. Management believes, considering our past experience, insurance coverage and reserves, that the final outcome of such matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position.

No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of 2002.

The Company’s Class A and Class B common stocks are principally traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbols “HUBA” and “HUBB”. The following tables provide information on market prices, dividends declared and number of common shareholders.

The following summary should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes contained herein (dollars and shares in millions, except per share amounts).

(1)

In 2002, the Company recorded pretax special charges of $13.7 million which include $5.4 million related to product line inventory write-offs recorded in Cost of goods sold and $8.3 million of other costs recorded as a Special charge. In total, $10.3 million of the charge relates to costs to integrate the lighting companies acquired in 2002. The remaining $3.4 million represents charges associated with the 2001-streamlining program recorded in 2002 as amounts were spent or specific actions were announced.


(2)	On January 1, 2002, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 142 “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”. As a result of adopting SFAS No. 142, the Company stopped recording goodwill amortization expense. In addition, the Company recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $25.4 million, net of tax, to write-off goodwill associated with one of the reporting units in the Industrial Technology segment. The impairment charge was reported as the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle.

(3)	In the fourth quarter of 2001, the Company recorded a special charge of $56.3 million, offset by a $3.3 million reversal relating to the 1997 streamlining program. A portion of the total pretax 2001 charge, $13.0 million, relates to product rationalization, which is classified in Cost of goods sold.

(4)	Special charge (credit) for 2000 reflects a special charge, offset by a reduction in the streamlining program accrual established in 1997. In addition, $20.3 million for product rationalization is included in Cost of goods sold.

(5)	Debt to total capitalization is defined as total debt as a percentage of total debt plus total shareholders’ equity.

The Company’s operations are classified into three segments: Electrical, Power, and Industrial Technology. Hubbell serves customers in the commercial and residential construction, industrial, utility, and telecommunications industries. Economic conditions in the commercial construction, industrial, and telecommunications markets had a negative impact on the Company’s 2002 results and are expected to continue to be below the levels of the 1998-2000 period in 2003.


	•	Be the preferred supplier of wiring systems, lighting fixtures and controls, rough-in electrical products, and power system components in North America.

	•	Position the Company to achieve greater profitability at lower levels of market activity.

	•	Pursue productivity improvements throughout the Company.

	•	Strengthen the Company’s competitive position in its core markets by pursuing acquisitions.

Full year 2002 operating results met management’s expectations despite continued weakness in industrial and commercial markets with satisfactory results being achieved in the following areas:


	–	Productivity improvement activities focused on product and component outsourcing and supplier cost reduction. With respect to outsourcing, management increased the dollar value of product procured from low cost sources of supply such as the Far East and expects this activity to increase 10% – 20% to in excess of $100 million in 2003. The Company expects supplier consolidation, reverse auctions and partnering will continue to shorten lead times, improve quality and delivery and lower costs.

	–	Actions associated with the 2001 streamlining and cost reduction program were completed. This program was primarily undertaken to reduce the fixed cost structure of the Company and realign employment to levels better matched with lower actual and forecast rates of incoming business. Further, the program resulted in improved operating margins in 2002 which reflect the following:


	•	Facility reductions

	•	Product rationalization and exiting certain product lines

	•	Outsourcing of non-core products and components to lower cost supply sources

	•	Workforce reductions

Looking ahead, improvements in profitability are expected to result from the following:


	–	In the fourth quarter of 2002, the Company recorded a restructuring charge of $10.3 million to provide for costs associated with integrating the recently acquired lighting businesses. This restructuring plan for facility consolidation, force reductions, and product rationalization will combine the Company’s original lighting business with the newly acquired LCA lighting business.

	–	The Company has invested significant resources in Lean Sigma initiatives related to factory and manufacturing process improvements through training, consulting and kaizen events. Management expects to begin realizing modest net savings from these initiatives beginning in 2003. The Company plans to invest even more time and resources in Lean Sigma initiatives in 2003.

Full year sales and operating income in 2002 benefited from the following acquisitions that were completed over the last five quarters.


	•	MyTech Corporation (“MyTech”), purchased in October 2001, specializes in technological innovation in occupancy sensor-based controls vital to the energy conservation capability of modern lighting systems. This business was added to the Company’s Electrical segment.

	•	LCA Group Inc., the domestic lighting fixture business of U.S. Industries, Inc., completed in April 2002. LCA manufactures and distributes a wide range of outdoor and indoor lighting products to commercial, industrial, institutional, and residential markets under various brand names. This business was added to the Company’s Electrical segment.

	•	Hawke, a U.K.-based global leader in brass cable glands and connectors, acquired in February 2002, was also added to the Company’s Electrical segment.

	•	The utility pole line hardware business of Cooper Power Systems, Inc., a subsidiary of Cooper Industries, Ltd., (“Cooper”) completed in September 2002. This business has been merged with complementary product lines within the Company’s Power segment.

MyTech, Hawke, and the LCA lighting companies are in businesses that expand the breadth of the current product and brand offerings of the Company’s Electrical segment. The Cooper pole line hardware business complements the existing product lines of the Company’s Power segment and also expands the breadth of the current products offered in this segment.

The Company’s growth strategy contemplates acquisitions in its core businesses. The rate and extent to which appropriate acquisition opportunities become available, acquired companies are integrated and anticipated cost savings are achieved can affect the Company’s results.

Consolidated net sales for the year ended December 31, 2002 were $1,587.8 million, an increase of 21% over the year ended December 31, 2001. This increase is attributed to the 2001 fourth quarter and 2002 acquisitions. Excluding the sales from the acquired businesses, consolidated net sales decreased approximately 10% compared with the prior year as demand from non-residential construction and industrial markets declined year over year. However, residential and consumer/home center demand grew during 2002. Refer to “Segment Results” within Management’s Discussion and Analysis for more detailed information on performance by segment.

The consolidated gross profit margin for 2002 was 25.8% compared to 23.9% in 2001. Approximately two-thirds of the year over year increase is due to improved efficiencies resulting from facility consolidations and lower operating costs, primarily as a result of actions associated with the 2001 streamlining and cost reduction program. The remaining increase is a result of lower costs being incurred in 2002 for inventory write-offs in

S&A expenses were 16.7% of net sales in 2002 compared with 16.9% in 2001. This improvement reflects the impact of S&A workforce reductions implemented in connection with the 2001 streamlining and cost reduction program as well as lower corporate overhead expenses as a percentage of sales.

In April 2000, the Company completed the sale of its WavePacer Digital Subscriber Line (“DSL”) assets to ECI Telecom Ltd. (“ECI”) for a purchase price of $61.0 million. The Company recognized a pretax gain on this sale of $36.2 million in 2000. At the time of sale, the Company retained a contractual obligation to supply product to the buyer at prices below manufacturing cost, resulting in an adverse commitment. In December 2001, management revised the remaining adverse commitment accrual to reflect lower known and projected orders through the contract expiration date and recorded an additional pretax gain on sale of business of $4.7 million.

In September 2002, the Company entered into an agreement modifying the original manufacturing contract. In accordance with the modification agreement, final quantities were shipped and the Company was released from all service and warranty obligations. In 2002, the total gain recognized from reduction of the contractual obligation provision was $3.0 million, pretax.

Operating income increased 145% due primarily to a reduction in special charges (including amounts charged to cost of goods sold) of approximately $39 million, the incremental profit from acquired businesses, and operating efficiencies and productivity gains in 2002 in connection with streamlining and cost reduction programs. In 2003, the Company expects to improve operating margin by approximately 100 basis points through further productivity improvements, as described above on page 13.

In 2002, investment income declined by $4.6 million versus 2001 due to lower average cash and investment balances and lower average interest rates received on cash and investments. Investment balances were lower in 2002 as excess cash was used to repay commercial paper. Interest expense increased by $2.3 million in 2002 compared to 2001 as a result of higher average debt as long-term debt and commercial paper borrowings increased due to the funding of the LCA and Hawke acquisitions. The weighted-average interest rate applicable to total debt outstanding during 2002 was 5.0% consistent with 2001. Other income, net, in 2002 was $0.4 million, a decrease of $3.9 million from 2001. Other income, net, in 2001 included $3.6 million of pretax gains recognized on the sale of leveraged lease investments.

The Company’s effective tax rate was 14.5% for 2002 compared to 13.4% for 2001. The 2002 rate reflects the impact of a tax benefit of $5.0 million recorded in the second quarter in connection with the settlement of a fully reserved tax issue with the U.S. Internal Revenue Service. The Company also recorded a reduction of tax expense of $5.8 million in the fourth quarter 2002 as a result of filing amended Federal income tax returns

for the years 1995 through 2000. The amended filings reflect refund claims resulting from an increase in the credit for research and development activities during each of these years. The actual receipt of cash from these claims is not expected to occur until after the IRS has approved the claims. The Company applied a tax rate of 38% to total 2002 special charges of $13.7 million, the effective rate for domestic operations where these charges were incurred. Excluding these items, the Company’s effective tax rate was 24% for 2002. In 2001, the Company’s effective tax rate was 13.4% as a result of recording the special charge in the fourth quarter of 2001, which substantially reduced the percentage of earnings derived from domestic operations, which have comparatively higher tax rates.

The Company expects its effective tax rate to increase in 2003 to approximately 27% as a result of an increase in overall earnings being derived from domestic operations.

Income and Earnings Per Share (Before Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change)

Income and diluted earnings per share before the cumulative effect of an accounting change in 2002 improved versus 2001 as a result of earnings accretion from acquired businesses and lower special charges in 2002 compared to 2001. In addition, the following items affect the comparability of the 2002 and 2001 net income and earnings per share before the cumulative effect of accounting change:

In accordance with SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”, the Company performed initial impairment tests of the recorded value of goodwill during 2002. As a result of this process the Company identified one reporting unit within the Industrial Technology segment with a book value, including goodwill, which exceeded its fair value. The Company recorded a non-cash charge of $25.4 million, net of tax, or $0.43 per share-diluted to write-down the full value of the reporting unit’s goodwill. This charge is reported as the cumulative effect of accounting change retroactive to January 1, 2002.

Full year operating results in 2002 reflect pretax special charges of $13.7 million, ($8.5 million net of tax), of which $12.4 million or 91% were recorded in the fourth quarter. These costs include an amount of $5.4 million related to product line inventory write-offs recorded in Cost of goods sold and $8.3 million of other costs recorded as a special charge.

In total, $10.3 million of the pretax charges relate to costs to integrate the lighting businesses acquired in 2002. This amount is comprised of $5.4 million of product line rationalization costs associated with the write-off of discontinued inventory, primarily of the Company’s legacy lighting operation. In addition, $4.9 million of costs were recorded to close and consolidate facilities. An additional $2.0 million of costs were accrued in purchase accounting related primarily to severance benefits at an LCA operation being exited and consolidated with other operations.


	Substantially all actions contemplated in the lighting integration are scheduled for completion by June 30, 2003. Cash expenditures under the program will approximate $4.5 million for severance and other costs associated with facility closures.

	The Company anticipates additional pretax costs in the range of $15 to $20 million to be charged against income in 2003 as additional lighting integration actions are finalized and announced or implemented. These future costs did not meet the criteria for accrual under generally accepted accounting principles as of December 31, 2002. In total, lighting restructuring actions are expected to provide $15 to $20 million in annual pretax savings when fully implemented. However, it is likely that a portion of these savings will be used to offset costs and other competitive pressures that arise in the future, rather than adding to reported results of operations in future years.

The 2002 special charges includes $3.4 million of costs related to the streamlining and cost reduction program (the “Plan”) announced at the end of 2001 and is comprised of a variety of individual program costs associated with actions undertaken to reduce the productive capacity of the Company and realign employment levels to better match with lower actual and forecast rates of incoming business. In total, the Plan required a cumulative charge to profit and loss of $52.0 million consisting of the 2002 special charges of $3.4 million and $48.6 million of charges recognized in 2001. The 2002 special charge of $3.4 million is net of $0.9 million of income resulting from a reversal of costs accrued at the end of 2001.

Further details of the special charges recorded and exit costs accrued in purchase accounting during 2002 are contained in Note 2 — Special and Non-recurring Charges in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Full year operating results in 2001 included special charges of $56.3 million offset by a $3.3 million reduction in the streamlining program accrual established in 1997. These net costs, which were recorded in the fourth quarter, total $53.0 million ($35.5 million net of tax), of which $40 million was reported as special charges and $13 million was included in Cost of goods sold. The total cost consists of the following (pretax, in millions):

Further details of actions and costs comprising the 2001 streamlining program are contained in Note 2 — Special and Non-recurring Charges in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Substantially all actions contemplated in the Plan were completed by December 31, 2002. Total cash expenditures will approximate $16 million for severance and other costs of facility closings, prior to an estimated $10.0 million in asset sale recoveries, of which $9.0 million in asset sale proceeds have been received. The Plan is expected to provide $20 million in ongoing annual savings primarily realized through lower manufacturing, selling and administrative costs which have been substantially achieved in 2002. Savings are expected to be realized approximately equally in each segment. The Electrical segment is expected to benefit from product outsourcing and reduced overhead in electrical products and lighting due to facility consolidation and headcount reductions. In the Power segment, a facility closure is expected to reduce the manufacturing cost of certain apparatus products and reduce administrative costs. In the Industrial Technology segment, the actions are expected to improve profitability by reducing overhead costs through facility consolidation and headcount reduction.

In 2001, non-recurring charges were incurred related to environmental remediation actions at two previously exited facilities in anticipation of their divestiture and costs associated with an acquisition that was not expected to be completed. Remediation of environmental contaminants at the two previously exited sites was estimated to cost $6.0 million. Remediation at one of the sites is a condition of the sale of the property negotiated in the fourth quarter of 2001. The remediation at the second site is a result of contaminates discovered for which environmental assessments were completed and amounts recorded in the fourth quarter of 2001. The amounts recorded are expected to be sufficient to restore the properties to acceptable environmental standards and prepare the sites for divestiture. The uncompleted acquisition costs relate to due diligence expenses of $1.7 million associated with an initial effort to purchase LCA, which was considered unsuccessful at December 31, 2001. All of these charges were recorded in the Electrical segment.

Operating results in 2000 included special charges of $34.2 million related primarily to inventory writedowns, asset impairments and severance charges reflecting management actions to streamline product offerings and consolidate operations. These charges were offset by a $10.5 million reduction in the streamlining program accrual established in 1997. These net charges, which were recorded in the first and second quarters of 2000, total $23.7 million ($17.8 million net of tax). Further detail of actions and the components comprising 2000 net special charges are contained in Note 2 — Special and Non-recurring Charges in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Electrical segment sales increased 36% primarily as a result of the addition of acquired businesses, with the acquired lighting business having the largest impact. The overall content of lighting fixture sales in the segment’s total sales increased from approximately 30% to 50%. Excluding the acquired businesses, Electrical segment sales decreased 12% as a result of sluggish industrial and non-residential construction markets which negatively affected sales in the wiring device and lighting businesses. Harsh and hazardous sales were essentially flat year over year. Partially offsetting these declines was an increase in market share at Raco/ Bell. Operating income in 2001 reflects a special charge of $25.0 million, compared to a special charge of $12.4 million in 2002. The segment’s operating profit margin, excluding special charges, improved due to the contribution of the acquired businesses at higher than average margins, as well as from productivity improvements at Raco/ Bell, both of which were aided by strong residential market conditions in 2002.

Power segment net sales declined 3% versus the prior year. The sales performance reflects lower demand due to ongoing uncertainty surrounding utility markets. Utility customers continued to delay capital investment programs as liquidity concerns, the collapse of energy trading, and the lack of a firm federal energy policy made new commitments difficult. Operating income in 2001 reflects a special charge of $21.3 million compared to a special charge of $0.5 million in 2002. Despite the lower sales volume, the 2002 operating margin, excluding special charges, improved by three percentage points. This improvement was the result of

Industrial Technology segment sales declined 14% versus 2001 as a result of weak demand for the test sets produced by the Company’s high voltage test and measurement businesses and reduced spending by customers in steel processing and heavy industry markets. This decline was partially offset by increased sales of specialty communications by the segment’s GAI-Tronics Corporation (“GAI-Tronics”) business, which manufactures communications systems designed for indoor, outdoor and hazardous environments. Operating income in 2001 reflects $6.7 million of special charges compared to $0.8 million of special charges in 2002. Excluding special charges, operating margins declined in 2002 as a result of lower volume and inventory write-downs associated with excess inventory due to declining demand and unrecoverable valuations.

Consolidated net sales declined 8% in 2001 compared to 2000 as a result of widespread economic weakness throughout the Company’s markets in 2001 and, in particular, the period following the terrorist events of September 11. Although depressed economic conditions negatively affected sales in a majority of the Company’s product lines, improvements in customer service and modest growth in oil & gas markets provided positive year-over-year comparisons in the Company’s electrical and harsh and hazardous product offerings. Sales and profits in 2001 also reflect a full year’s results of GAI-Tronics, which was acquired in July 2000.

The consolidated gross profit margin was 23.9% in 2001 compared with 25.9% in 2000. Inventory rationalization charges reflected in gross profit were $13.0 million and $20.3 million in 2001 and 2000. As such, on a comparative basis, excluding these costs, gross profit margin declined in excess of three percentage points. This decline is primarily a result of unabsorbed manufacturing costs incurred as a result of the steep volume declines and an unfavorable mix of sales. See discussion below under Operating Income.

S&A expenses increased as a percentage of sales in 2001 versus 2000 due to the full year inclusion of GAI-Tronics, which generates higher S&A costs than the Company’s average, the cost of senior management and employee severance actions and an increase in customer bad debt expense.

In April 2000, the Company completed the sale of its DSL assets to ECI for a purchase price of $61.0 million. The Company recognized a pretax gain on this sale of $36.2 million in the second quarter of 2000. At the time of sale, the Company retained a contractual obligation to supply product at prices below manufacturing cost, resulting in an adverse commitment. In December 2001, management revised the remaining adverse commitment accrual to reflect lower known and projected orders from ECI through the contract expiration date and recorded an additional pretax gain of $4.7 million.

Operating income in 2001 versus 2000 reflected an increase in special charges, net (including product rationalization costs) of approximately $32.8 million and a reduction in gains on sale of business of $31.5 million, as follows (pretax, in millions):

Operating income declined 69%, of which 31% related to the effects in both years of special charges and gains on sale of business. The remaining 38% decline exceeded the percentage decline in sales primarily due to the effect of unabsorbed fixed manufacturing costs and by having a larger proportion of lower margin sales in the overall sales mix. However, cost reduction actions, which began in the fourth quarter of 2000, contained the margin decline by reducing variable costs associated with lower sales and partly reducing fixed costs. To further these efforts, the Company completed development in December 2001 of a comprehensive plan to reduce manufacturing capacity and fixed costs and recorded a net $48.6 million pre-tax charge to cover the cost of facility closures, workforce reductions, outsourcing and other actions.

Investment income declined 34% in 2001 versus 2000 due to lower average cash and investments balances and lower average interest rates received on cash and investments. Similarly, year-over-year interest expense declined 21% due to lower average debt levels and lower average interest rates on the Company’s outstanding commercial paper borrowing. During the third quarter 2001, the Company repositioned a significant portion of its long-term investment portfolio to better match the maturity dates of the securities owned with investment requirements. Overall, this repositioning shortened the average maturity period of the portfolio. The repositioning resulted from revised investment requirements being agreed with the Puerto Rican government following passage of the 1998 Tax Incentives Act in Puerto Rico.

Other income, net, in 2001 and 2000 includes $3.6 million and $3.2 million, respectively, of pretax gains on sale of leveraged lease investments. In 2001, a leveraged lease investment was liquidated which no longer represented a tax/investment strategy consistent with the Company’s objectives. The prior year first quarter also included a gain on sale of similar leveraged lease investments in contemplation of their pending expiration. The 2001 transaction fully liquidated the Company’s portfolio of leveraged lease investments.

The Company’s effective tax rate for 2001 of 13.4% was significantly lower than the prior year rate of 25% as a result of recording the special charge in the fourth quarter of 2001, which substantially reduced the overall percentage of earnings being derived from domestic operations.

Net income declined in response to the decline in segment operating profit. The percentage decline in diluted earnings per share was lower than the percentage decline in net income as a result of a 2.5 million reduction in average diluted shares outstanding which occurred in connection with the 1997 share repurchase program.

Electrical segment sales declined 10% due to significantly lower orders in the segment’s wiring devices and lighting product lines and from a decline in demand from data/telecommunications customers affecting sales of premise wiring and the multiplexing products of Pulse Communications (“Pulse”). Partially offsetting these declines were improved sales of electrical boxes and fittings resulting from improvements in customer service, and stronger harsh/hazardous electrical products markets associated with an increase in energy exploration and processing projects. Operating income declined 61% in 2001 versus 2000 and included a special charge of $25 million compared to a special charge of $19.2 million in 2000. In addition, gains on sale of business were $4.7 million and $36.2 million in 2001 and 2000, respectively. Excluding special charges and gains on sale of business, the segment’s operating profits on a comparative basis fell by 39% in 2001 due to unabsorbed manufacturing expenses and the volume decline in higher margin industrial application products.

Power segment sales declined 10% on lower shipments across most product families including over-voltage, connectors, apparatus and tool & rod. Full year sales in this Segment reflect a slowing, which began in the second half of 2000, in order input from utility industry customers. Lower utility industry demand was attributable to generally weak economic conditions and the industry’s emphasis on investment in generating capacity as opposed to the segment’s distribution and transmission products. Operating income declined 91% in 2001 versus 2000 and included $21.3 million of special charges compared to $3.7 million in 2000. Excluding the special charges, operating income declined 39% in 2001 due to lower sales and unabsorbed fixed costs. In addition, the segment incurred an expense of $3 million in connection with a third quarter customer bankruptcy and a $3.8 million expense in the second quarter related to the impairment of surplus cast iron foundry equipment which was abandoned due to lower demand.

Industrial Technology segment sales increased 14% versus 2000 primarily as a result of the July 2000 acquisition of GAI-Tronics. However, excluding the contribution from the GAI-Tronics acquisition, sales fell 16% as a result of the segment’s reliance on domestic industrial markets including steel processing and industrial controls, which were in recession for most of 2001. In addition, worldwide demand fell sharply during the year for the test sets produced by the Segment’s high voltage test businesses. Operating income in 2001 reflects $6.7 million of special charges compared to $0.8 million of special charges in 2000. Operating

During 2002, the Company completed the acquisitions of LCA, Hawke, and a pole-line hardware business. Through December 31, 2002, these acquisitions resulted in cash outflows of approximately $270 million with financing coming from additional long-term borrowings and available cash. All of the Company’s 2002 acquisitions are consistent with the Company’s strategy to strengthen its competitive position in core markets.

In 2002, the Company spent approximately $22 million on additions to property, plant and equipment, a decline of approximately 23% from 2001 due to management’s emphasis on asset optimization and redeployment, as opposed to new capital investment, in connection with the Company’s lean manufacturing initiatives.

The Company continues to invest in process improvement through lean initiatives. Investments in training, consulting, and kaizen events have taken the Company through an initial phase of lean initiatives. Management estimates that the financial benefits of these activities, to date, essentially equal implementation costs and expects to begin realizing modest net savings from these initiatives beginning in 2003.

In December 2000, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized repurchase of $300 million of Class A and Class B shares. Through December 31, 2002 there have been no purchases under this authorization.

Cash provided by operations in 2002 declined approximately $20 million compared to 2001 due primarily to higher cash contributions to the Company’s defined benefit pension plans and cash paid out for tax settlements. These declines were partially offset by higher net income, adjusted for the non-cash charge of $25.4 million in connection with the adoption of SFAS 142. Cash provided by operations in 2001 included a tax refund of approximately $9 million. As a result of the declining equity investment markets during 2002, the Company made a cash contribution to its domestic, qualified, defined benefit pension plans totaling $25 million in the fourth quarter 2002. The Company also recorded a non-cash charge to equity of $12.4 million, after tax, in the fourth quarter 2002 to recognize an additional minimum pension liability. Additional information regarding the Company’s assumptions with respect to its pension plans is included under “Liquidity” within Management’s Discussion and Analysis.

Investing cash flows in 2002 primarily reflect the acquisitions of LCA, Hawke, and the pole-line hardware business for a total cash outlay of $270.2 million. Capital expenditures totaled $21.9 million for 2002 compared to $28.6 million in 2001. Purchases and maturities/sales of held-to-maturity investments in 2002 provided $44.5 million of cash flow in 2002 and $58 million in 2001. Investing cash flows in 2001 reflect the purchase of MyTech for $13.7 million and the liquidation of leveraged lease investments of approximately $13 million.

Financing cash flows reflect repayments of commercial paper of $67.7 million in 2002 compared to a repayment of $191.8 million in 2001. Dividend payments in 2002 and 2001 were $77.8 million and $77.4 million, respectively. Cash generated as a result of stock options exercised in 2002 and 2001 were $11.5 million and $5.8 million, respectively. Additionally, 2002 financing cash flows reflect the proceeds from $200 million of senior notes issued in May 2002. In 2001, investing cash flows included $9.9 million of cash utilized to repurchase Hubbell common stock.

Working capital increased approximately $117 million, or 52%, in 2002 compared to 2001. The increase was due to the addition of acquired businesses in 2002. The current ratio increased in 2002 as a result of having no outstanding commercial paper as of December 31, 2002 compared to a balance of approximately $68 million as of December 31, 2001. Working capital initiatives are in place at all Company locations, which emphasize improved inventory management and faster collections of accounts receivable. For the two year period ended December 31, 2002, inventory decreased by approximately $127 million, net of the effect on inventories of businesses acquired. As of December 31, 2002, the number of days of inventory on hand and the number of days sales outstanding in accounts receivable improved by 18 and 4 days, respectively, compared to December 31, 2001. In addition, as of December 31, 2002 accounts payable days outstanding increased by 6 days compared with December 31, 2001. Inventory management, accounts receivable days sales outstanding, and accounts payable days outstanding will continue to be a primary area of focus for management.

Hubbell’s total capitalization (consisting of total debt and shareholders’ equity) was $1,042.9 million at the end of 2002 compared to $904 million at the end of 2001.

As of December 31, 2002, the debt to capital ratio increased to 29% from 19% as of December 31, 2001. The increase in debt funded the 2002 acquisitions, which took place in the first half of 2002. Total debt increased approximately $131 million since December 31, 2001. Net debt (defined as total debt less cash and investment balances) increased approximately $169 million since December 31, 2001 as a result of increased debt to fund 2002’s acquisitions, partly offset by free cash flow after payment of dividends.

As of December 31, 2002, the Company’s debt consisted solely of long-term senior notes. These notes are fixed rate indebtedness, with $100 million and $200 million being due in 2005 and 2012, respectively. As of December 31, 2001, total debt consisted of one long-term senior note in the amount of $100 million due in 2005 and short term commercial paper totaling $67.7 million. In April 2002, the Company issued $250 million of commercial paper to fund the purchase of LCA. In May 2002, the Company sold $200 million in senior notes, the proceeds of which were used to partially repay the $250 million of commercial paper. Prior to the issuance of the notes, the Company entered into a forward interest rate lock to hedge its exposure to fluctuations in the treasury rates, which resulted in a loss of $1.3 million during the second quarter of 2002. This amount was recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income and will be amortized over the life of the notes. During the third and fourth quarters of 2002, the Company repaid the remaining outstanding balance of commercial paper using cash provided from operations.

Borrowings were also available from committed bank credit facilities during the year, although these facilities were not used in 2002. In July 2002, the Company terminated its existing $150 million credit facility and replaced it with a new, three-year $200 million credit facility. This credit facility serves as a backup to the Company’s commercial paper program. Borrowings under credit agreements generally are available with an interest rate equal to the prime rate or at a spread over the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR). Annual commitment fee requirements to support availability of the credit facility total approximately $0.2 million. The Company’s credit facility includes covenants that the Company’s shareholders’ equity will be greater than $524.6 million and total debt will not exceed $750 million. The Company was in compliance with all debt covenants at December 31, 2002.

Although not the principle source of liquidity for the Company, management believes these facilities are capable of providing significant financing at reasonable rates of interest. However, a significant deterioration in results of operations or cash flows, leading to deterioration in financial condition, could either increase the Company’s borrowing costs or restrict the Company’s ability to sell commercial paper in the open market. The Company has not entered into any other guarantees, commitments or obligations that could give rise to unexpected cash requirements.

The Company’s long-term notes are not callable and are only subject to accelerated payment prior to maturity if the Company fails to meet certain non-financial covenants, all of which were met at December 31, 2002 and 2001. The most restrictive of these covenants limits the Company’s ability to enter into mortgages and sale-leasebacks of property having a net book value in excess of $5 million without the approval of the Note holders.

Management measures the Company’s liquidity on the basis of its ability to meet short- term and long-term operational funding needs, fund additional investments, including acquisitions, and make dividend payments to shareholders. Significant factors affecting the management of liquidity are cash flows from operating activities, capital expenditures, access to bank lines of credit and the Company’s ability to attract long-term capital with satisfactory terms.

Strong internal cash generation together with currently available cash and investments, available borrowing facilities, and an ability to access credit lines if needed, are expected to be more than sufficient to fund operations, the current rate of dividends, capital expenditures, and any increase in working capital that would be required to accommodate a higher level of business activity. The Company actively seeks to expand by acquisition as well as through the growth of its present businesses. While a significant acquisition may require additional borrowings, the Company believes it would be able to obtain financing based on its favorable historical earnings performance and strong financial position.

The funded status of the Company’s pension plans is dependent upon many factors, including returns on invested assets and the level of market interest rates. Recent declines in the value of securities traded in equity markets coupled with declines in long-term interest rates have had a negative impact on the funded status of the plans. During 2002, the Company contributed $25.0 million to its domestic, qualified, defined benefit

In 2002, the Company estimated that the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets would be 9% based on the Company’s actual pension plan asset return, which averaged approximately 9% over the past 10 years. A one percentage point plus or minus change in the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets would have a pretax impact on 2003 pension expense of approximately $2.7 million. The Company decided to reduce its expected long-term plan asset rate of return to 8.5% beginning in 2003. The expected long-term rate of return on assets is applied to the fair market value of plan assets to produce the expected return on plan assets that is included in pension expense. The difference between this expected return and the actual return on plan assets is deferred. The net deferral of past asset gains (losses) ultimately affects future pension expense through the amortization of gains (losses).

At the end of each year, the Company determines the discount rate to be used to calculate the present value of pension plan liabilities. The discount rate is an estimate of the current interest rate at which the liabilities could effectively be settled at the end of the year. In estimating this rate, the Company looks to rates of return on high-quality, fixed-income investments with maturities that closely match the expected funding period of the Company’s liability. At December 31, 2002, the Company determined this rate to be 6.75%, a decrease of 50 basis points from the rate used at December 31, 2001. A change of plus or minus one percentage point in the discount rate would have a pretax impact on 2003 pension expense of approximately $2.0 million.

The Company’s shareholders’ equity is impacted by a variety of factors, including those items that are not reported in earnings but are reported directly in equity, such as foreign currency translation, minimum pension liability adjustments, unrealized holding gains and losses on available-for-sale securities and cash flow hedging transactions. The Corporation recorded a $12.4 million after-tax charge to equity, reflecting the increase in the additional minimum liability under its pension plans. See the Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity for additional information.

Debt ratings of the Company’s debt securities at December 31, 2002, appear below:

A summary of the timing of the Company’s contractual obligations during the next five years is as follows (in millions):

Note 1 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements describes the significant accounting policies used in the preparation of the Company’s financial statements.

The Company is required to make estimates and judgments in the preparation of its financial statements that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses and related disclosures. The Company continually reviews these estimates and their underlying assumptions to ensure they are appropriate for the circumstances. Changes in total estimates and assumptions used by management could have a significant impact on the Company’s financial results. The Company believes that the following are among its most significant accounting policies. They utilize estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain and therefore are based on management’s judgment.

The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101, “Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements.” Revenue is recognized when title to goods and risk of loss have passed to the customer, there is persuasive evidence of a purchase arrangement, delivery has occurred or services rendered and the price is determinable and collectibility reasonably assured. Revenue is typically recognized at time of shipment. Sales are recorded net of estimated returns, rebates and discounts. Refer also to Credit and Collections below.

Periodically the Company evaluates the carrying value of its inventories to ensure they are carried at the lower of cost or market. Such evaluation is based on management’s judgment and use of estimates, including sales forecasts, gross margins for particular product groupings, planned dispositions of product lines, technological events and trends and overall industry trends. In addition, the evaluation is based on changes in inventory management practices which may influence the timing of exiting products and method of disposing of excess inventory.

The Company maintains allowances for doubtful accounts receivable in order to reflect the potential uncollectibility of receivables related to purchases of products on open credit. If the financial condition of the Company’s customers were to deteriorate, resulting in their inability to make the required payments, the Company may be required to record additional allowances against income. Further, certain of the Company’s businesses deal with significant volumes of customer deductions and debits, as is customary in electrical products markets. These deductions primarily relate to pricing, quantity of shipment, item shipped and, in certain situations, quality corrections. This situation requires management to estimate at the time of sale the value of shipments that should not be recorded as revenue equal to the amount which is not expected to be collected in cash from customers. Management primarily relies upon historical trends to estimate these amounts at time of shipment.

The Company sponsors domestic and foreign defined benefit pension and defined contribution as well as other postretirement plans. Major assumptions used in the accounting for these employee benefit plans include the discount rate, expected return on the plan assets, rate of increase in employee compensation levels and health care cost increase projections. Assumptions are determined based on company data and appropriate market indicators, and are evaluated each year as of the plans’ measurement date. Further discussion on the assumptions used in the current year and plans for next year are included in “Liquidity” within Management’s Discussion and Analysis.

The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” which requires that deferred tax assets and liabilities be recognized using enacted tax rates for the effect of temporary differences between the book and tax bases of recorded assets and liabilities. SFAS

At December 31, 2002 and 2001, the Company had deferred tax assets of $43.1 million and $28.7 million, respectively. At December 31, 2001, management determined that these assets will be fully realized and, therefore, no valuation allowance was recorded against these balances. At December 31, 2002 management determined that a valuation allowance in the amount of $4 million should be provided for tax operating loss carryforward benefits of certain international locations because it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized in the future.

The factors used to assess the likelihood of realization are the forecast of future taxable income and available tax planning strategies that could be implemented to realize the net deferred tax assets. Failure to achieve forecasted taxable income can affect the ultimate realization of the net deferred tax assets.

In addition, the Company operates within multiple taxing jurisdictions and is subject to audit in these jurisdictions. The Internal Revenue Service and other tax authorities routinely review the Company’s tax returns. These audits can involve complex issues, which may require an extended period of time to resolve. Any additional impact as a result of these examinations on the Company’s liability for income taxes cannot be presently determined. In management’s opinion, adequate provision has been made for potential adjustments arising from these examinations.

The Company is subject to proceedings, lawsuits, and other claims or uncertainties related to environmental, legal, product and other matters. The Company assesses the likelihood of an adverse judgment or outcome to these matters, as well as the range of potential losses. A determination of the reserves required, if any, is made after careful analysis, including consultations with outside advisors, where applicable. The required reserves may change in the future due to new developments.

The Company’s long-lived assets include land, buildings, equipment, molds and dies, purchased software, goodwill and other intangible assets. Long-lived assets, other than goodwill and indefinite-lived intangibles, are depreciated over their estimated useful lives. Management reviews depreciable long-lived assets for impairment to assess recoverability from future operations using undiscounted cash flows. For these assets, no impairment charges were recorded in 2002, except for certain lighting assets affected by the integration of the LCA companies, as discussed under “Special Charges” within Management’s Discussion and Analysis.

Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are reviewed annually for impairment under the provisions of SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”. The identification and measurement of impairment of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets involves the estimation of the fair value of reporting units. The estimates of fair value of reporting units are based on the best information available as of the date of the assessment, which primarily incorporate management assumptions about discounted expected future cash flows. Future cash flows can be affected by changes in industry or market conditions or the rate and extent to which anticipated synergies or cost savings are realized with newly acquired entities. An impairment charge of $25.4 million related to goodwill was recorded in 2002 as the cumulative effect of an accounting change and charged against income. Refer to “Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change” within Management’s Discussion and Analysis.

In times of inflationary cost increases, the Company has historically been able to maintain its profitability by improvements in operating methods and cost recovery through price increases. In large measure, the reported operating results have absorbed the effects of inflation since the Company’s predominant use of the LIFO method of inventory accounting generally has the effect of charging operating results with costs (except for depreciation) that reflect current price levels.

In November 2001, FASB issued SFAS No. 143, “Accounting for Obligations Associated with the Retirement of Long-Lived Assets”. SFAS No. 143 establishes accounting standards for the recognition and measurement of asset retirement obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets that have indeterminate lives. SFAS No. 143 is effective for the Company January 1, 2003. However, it is not expected to have a material effect on financial position, results of operations or cash flows, as the Company does not currently have any such assets.

In July 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities”. This statement sets forth various modifications to existing accounting guidance which prescribes the conditions which must be met in order for costs associated with contract terminations, facility consolidations, employee relocations and terminations to be accrued and recorded as liabilities in financial statements. This statement is effective for exit or disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002 other than for actions initiated in connection with a business combination. This pronouncement is not expected to have any material effect on financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.

In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation — Transition and Disclosure — an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 123”. SFAS No. 148 amends SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”, to provide alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. In addition, SFAS No.148 amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123 to require prominent disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements about the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method used on reported results. The disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 148 are for those entities continuing with the Accounting Principles Board No. 25 “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” method and is effective for the Company as of December 31, 2002. Therefore, the Company has adopted the necessary disclosures in its Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included herein.

In November 2002, FASB Interpretation (“FIN”) No. 45, “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others”. The interpretation provides guidance on the guarantor’s accounting and disclosure requirements for guarantees, including indirect guarantees of indebtedness of others. The Company has adopted the disclosure requirements of the interpretation as of December 31, 2002. The accounting guidelines are applicable to guarantees issued after December 31, 2002 and require that the Company record a liability for the fair value of such guarantees in the balance sheet. The Company is reviewing the impact of this statement to determine its impact, if any, on future reporting periods, and does not expect any material effect due to the fact that the Company has historically had limited activity with respect to guarantees.

In January 2003, FIN No. 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities” was issued. The interpretation provides guidance on consolidating variable interest entities and applies immediately to variable interests created after January 31, 2003. The guidelines of the interpretation will become applicable for the Company in its third quarter 2003 financial statements for variable interest entities created before February 1, 2003. The interpretation requires variable interest entities to be consolidated if the equity investment at risk is not sufficient to permit an entity to finance its activities without support from other parties or the equity investors lack certain specific characteristics. The Company is reviewing FIN No. 46 to determine its impact, if any, on future reporting periods, and does not currently anticipate any material accounting or disclosure requirement under the provisions of the interpretation as the Company does not currently invest in any variable interest entities.

Certain statements made in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and elsewhere in this report and in the Annual Report attached hereto, which does not constitute part of this Form 10-K, are forward- looking and are based on the Company’s reasonable current expectations. These forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of words, such as “believe”, “expect”, “anticipate”, “intend”, “should”, “plan”, “estimated”, “could”, “may”, “subject to”, “purport”, “might”, “if”, “contemplate”, “potential”, “pending,” “target”, “goals”, and “scheduled”, among others. Such forward-looking statements involve numerous assumptions, known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other such factors, within the meaning of the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, that could cause actual and future performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to:


	•	Future sales levels of acquired companies.

	•	Projections of cost savings.

	•	Net cash expenditures and timing of actions in connection with the lighting integration.

	•	Expected levels of operating cash flow and uses of cash.

	•	General economic and business conditions in particular industries or markets.

	•	Tax rate forecasts.

	•	Expected benefits of process improvements and other lean initiatives.

	•	Anticipated operating margin improvements.

	•	The outcome of environmental or legal contingencies.

	•	Impact of productivity improvements on lead times, quality and delivery of product.

	•	Future levels of indebtedness and capital spending.

	•	Anticipated future contributions and assumptions with respect to pensions.

	•	Unexpected costs or charges, certain of which might be outside the control of the Company.

	•	Competition.

In the operation of its business, the Company has exposures to fluctuating foreign currency exchange rates, raw material prices and interest rates. Each of these risks and the Company’s strategies to manage the exposure is discussed below.

The Company manufactures its products in North America, Switzerland, Puerto Rico, Mexico, Italy, and the United Kingdom and sells products in those markets as well as through sales offices in Singapore, The Peoples Republic of China, Mexico, Hong Kong, South Korea and the Middle East. International shipments from foreign subsidiaries were 10% of the Company’ sales in 2002, 11% in 2001 and 10% in 2000. The Canadian market represents 39%, United Kingdom 29%, Mexico 14%, Switzerland 15% and all other areas 3% of the total international sales. As such, the Company’s operating results could be affected by changes in foreign currency exchange rates or weak economic conditions in the foreign markets in which the Company distributes its products. To manage this exposure, the Company closely monitors the working capital requirements of its international units and to the extent possible will maintain their monetary assets in U.S. dollar instruments. The Company views this exposure as not being material to its operating results and, therefore, does not actively hedge its foreign currency risk.

Raw materials used in the manufacture of the Company’s products include steel, brass, copper, aluminum, bronze, plastics, phenols, bone fiber, elastomers and petrochemicals as well as purchased electrical

The financial results of the Company are subject to interest rate fluctuations to the extent that there is a difference between the amount of the Company’s interest-earning assets and the amount of interest-bearing liabilities. The principal objective of the Company’s investment management activities is to maximize net investment income while maintaining acceptable levels of interest rate and liquidity risk and facilitating the funding needs of the Company. As part of its investment management strategy, the Company may use derivative financial products such as interest rate hedges and interest rate swaps. During 2002, the Company entered into one cash flow hedge which resulted in a loss of approximately $1.3 million and is being amortized in accumulated other comprehensive income within shareholders’ equity. Refer to further discussion under “Capital Structure” within Management’s Discussion and Analysis. There were no material derivative transactions in 2001.

The Company frequently issues commercial paper, which exposes the Company to changes in interest rates. The Company’s cash position includes amounts denominated in foreign currencies. The Company manages its worldwide cash requirements considering available funds held by its subsidiaries and the cost effectiveness with which these funds can be accessed.

The Company continually evaluates risk retention and insurance levels for product liability, property damage and other potential exposures to risk. The Company devotes significant effort to maintaining and improving safety and internal control programs, which are intended to reduce its exposure to certain risks. Management determines the amount of insurance and the likelihood of a loss and believes that the current levels of risk retention are consistent with those of comparable companies in the industries in which the Company operates. There can be no assurance that the Company will not incur losses beyond limits, or outside the coverage, of its insurance. However, the Company’s liquidity, financial position and profitability are not expected to be materially affected by the levels of risk retention that the Company accepts.

The following table presents information related to interest risk sensitive instruments by maturity at December 31, 2002 (dollars in millions):

The Company may use derivative financial instruments only if they are matched with a specific asset, liability, or proposed future transaction. The Company does not speculate or use leverage when trading a financial derivative product.

Hubbell is responsible for the preparation, integrity and fair presentation of its published financial statements. The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and include amounts based on informed judgments made by management.

We believe it is critical to provide investors and other users of our financial statements with information that is relevant, objective, understandable and timely, so that they can make informed decisions. As a result, we have established and we maintain accounting systems and practices and internal control processes designed to provide reasonable, but not absolute assurances that transactions are properly executed and recorded and that our policies and procedures are carried out appropriately. The concept of reasonable assurance is based on the recognition that the cost of maintaining a system of internal controls should not exceed related benefits.

We conduct our business in accordance with the Company’s Code of Ethics, which is distributed to employees across the Company. We have a program in place that allows employees to identify situations, on a confidential or anonymous basis, that may be in violation of the Company’s Code of Ethics.

Our internal controls are designed to ensure that assets are safeguarded, transactions are executed according to management authorization and that our financial systems and records can be relied upon for preparing our financial statements and related disclosures. Our system of internal controls includes continuous review of our financial policies and procedures to ensure accounting and regulatory issues have been appropriately addressed, recorded and disclosed. We execute periodic on-site accounting control and compliance reviews in each of our businesses to ensure policies and procedures are being followed. Our internal auditors test the adequacy of internal controls and compliance with policies, as well as perform a number of financial audits across the businesses throughout the year. The independent auditors perform audits of our financial statements, in which they examine evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in our financial statements, and also consider our system of internal controls and procedures in planning and performing their audits.

Our management team is committed to providing high-quality, relevant and timely information about our businesses. Management performs reviews of each of our businesses throughout the year, addressing issues ranging from financial performance and strategy to personnel and compliance. We require that each of our business unit general managers and controllers certify the accuracy of that business unit’s financial information and its systems of internal accounting and disclosure controls and procedures on a quarterly and annual basis.

Our Board of Directors normally meet five times per year to provide oversight, to review corporate strategies and operations, and to assess management’s conduct of the business. The Audit Committee of our Board of Directors is comprised of four individuals who are not employees or officers of the Company and normally meet five times per year. The Audit Committee is responsible for the appointment of the independent auditors and oversight of the audit work performed by the independent auditors, as well as overseeing our financial reporting practices and internal control systems. The Audit Committee meets regularly with our internal auditors and independent auditors, as well as management. Both the internal auditors and independent auditors have full, unlimited access to the Audit Committee.

Management is responsible for implementing and maintaining adequate systems of internal and disclosure controls and procedures and for monitoring their effectiveness. We strive to recruit, train and retain high performance individuals to ensure that our controls are designed, implemented and maintained in a high-quality, reliable manner. We evaluated the systems of internal and disclosure controls and procedures and, based on that evaluation, management believes the internal accounting controls provide reasonable assurance that the Company’s assets are safeguarded, transactions are executed in accordance with management’s authorizations, and the financial records are reliable for the purpose of preparing financial statements.

All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is shown in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the index on page 32 present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Hubbell Incorporated and Subsidiaries (the “Company”) at December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2002, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management; our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

As discussed in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142 “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” in 2002.

The consolidated financial statements include all subsidiaries; all significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. The Company has one joint venture, which is accounted for using the equity method. Certain reclassifications have been made in prior year financial statements and notes to conform to the current year presentation.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities and disclosures, if any, of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. Similarly, estimates and assumptions are required for the reporting of revenues and expenses. Actual results could differ from the estimates that were used.

Revenue is recognized when title to the goods sold and the risk of loss have passed to the customer, there is persuasive evidence of a purchase arrangement, delivery has occurred or services rendered, the price is determinable and collectibility reasonably assured. Revenue is typically recognized at time of shipment as the Company’s shipping terms are FOB shipping point. Sales are recorded net of estimated returns, rebates and discounts which are based on experience and recorded in the period in which the sale is recorded.

The assets and liabilities of international subsidiaries are translated to U.S. dollars at exchange rates in effect at the end of the year, and income and expense items are translated at average rates of exchange in effect during the year. The effects of exchange rate fluctuations on the translated amounts of foreign currency assets and liabilities are included as translation adjustments in accumulated other comprehensive income within shareholders’ equity. Gains and losses from foreign currency transactions are included in income of the period.

Temporary cash investments consist of liquid investments with maturities of three months or less when purchased. The carrying value of cash and temporary cash investments approximates fair value because of their short maturities.

Short-term investments are primarily bank obligations with a maturity of greater than three months. Investments in debt and equity securities are classified by individual security into one of three separate categories: trading, available-for-sale or held-to-maturity. Trading investments are bought and held principally for the purpose of selling them in the near term and are carried on the balance sheet at fair market value. Current period adjustments to the carrying value of trading investments are included in current period earnings. Available-for-sale investments are intended to be held for an indefinite period but may be sold in response to events not reasonably expected in the future. These investments are carried on the balance sheet at fair value with current period adjustments to carrying value recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income within shareholders’ equity, net of tax. Debt securities which the Company has the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity, are classified as held-to-maturity and carried on the balance sheet at amortized cost. The effects of amortizing these securities are recorded in current earnings. During 2001, the Company

sold a portion of its “held-to-maturity” investments. The sales resulted from revised investment requirements being agreed with the Puerto Rican government following passage of the 1998 Tax Incentives Act in Puerto Rico and do not reflect a change in the Company’s ability or intent to hold to maturity the remaining investments so classified. In 2002, the Company re-evaluated a portion of its investment portfolio and classified as available-for-sale $23 million of investments previously classified as held-to-maturity as the Company may no longer hold these securities to maturity.

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. The cost of substantially all domestic inventories, 84% of total inventory value, is determined utilizing the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method of inventory accounting. The cost of foreign inventories and certain domestic inventories is determined utilizing the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method of inventory accounting.

Property, plant, and equipment are stated at cost. Property, plant and equipment placed in service prior to January 1, 1999 are depreciated over their estimated useful lives, principally using accelerated methods. Assets placed in service subsequent to January 1, 1999 are depreciated over their estimated useful lives, using straight-line methods.

Goodwill represents costs in excess of fair values assigned to the underlying net assets of acquired companies. Effective July 1, 2001, the Company adopted SFAS No. 141 “Business Combinations” and SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” applicable to business combinations completed after June 30, 2001. In accordance with these standards, goodwill acquired after June 30, 2001 was not amortized.

As of January 1, 2002, the Company adopted the remaining provisions of SFAS No. 141 and SFAS No. 142 and stopped recording amortization on all goodwill. These standards require the use of the purchase method of accounting for business combinations, set forth the accounting for the initial recognition of acquired intangible assets and goodwill, and describe the accounting for intangible assets and goodwill subsequent to initial recognition. Under the provisions of these standards, intangible assets deemed to have indefinite lives and goodwill are no longer subject to amortization. All other intangible assets are to be amortized over their estimated useful lives. Intangible assets and goodwill are subject to annual impairment testing using the specific guidance and criteria described in the standards. This testing compares carrying values to estimated fair values and when appropriate, the carrying value of these assets will be reduced to estimated fair value. The Company expects to perform its annual impairment assessment in the second quarter of each year, unless circumstances dictate the need for a more frequent assessment.

The Company evaluates the potential impairment of other long-lived assets when appropriate. If the carrying value of assets exceeds the sum of the estimated future undiscounted cash flows, the carrying value of the asset is written down to estimated fair value. The Company continually evaluates estimated values of long- lived assets to determine whether events or circumstances warrant revised estimates of useful lives.

Deferred income taxes are recognized for the tax consequence of differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and tax bases of assets and liabilities by applying the currently enacted statutory tax rates. The effect of a change in statutory tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

Research and development and engineering expenditures represent costs to discover and/or apply new knowledge in developing a new product, process, or in bringing about a significant improvement in an existing product or process. Research, development and engineering expenses are recorded as a component of cost of sales. Expenses for research, development and engineering were $8.9 million in 2002, $7.6 million in 2001 and $10.0 million in 2000. The increase in expenses in 2002 is attributable to the addition of acquired businesses.

The Company’s policy is to fund pension costs within the ranges prescribed by applicable regulations. In addition to providing defined benefit pension benefits, the Company provides health care and life insurance benefits for some of its active and retired employees. The Company’s policy is to fund these benefits through insurance premiums or as actual expenditures are made.

Earnings per share are based on reported net income and the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding (basic) and the total of common stock outstanding and common stock equivalents (diluted).

Effective December 2002, the Company adopted the disclosure provisions as outlined in SFAS No. 148 “Accounting for Stock Based Compensation — Transition and Disclosure, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 123”. SFAS No. 123 — “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” permits, but does not require, a fair value based method of accounting for employee stock option and performance plans which results in compensation expense being recognized in the results of operations when awards are granted. The Company continues to use the current intrinsic value based method of accounting for such plans in accordance with APB 25 “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” where compensation expense is measured as the excess, if any, of the quoted market price of the Company’s stock at the measurement date over the exercise price.

The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 for stock options (in millions):

These pro forma disclosures may not be representative of the effects on reported net income for future years since options vest over several years and options granted prior to 1997 are not considered.

The following table summarizes the assumptions used in applying the Black-Scholes option pricing model:

Comprehensive income is a measure of net income and all other changes in shareholders’ equity of the Company that result from recognized transactions and other events of the period other than transactions with shareholders. See also Note 16 — Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

To limit financial risk in the management of its assets, liabilities and debt, the Company may use derivative financial instruments such as: foreign currency hedges, commodity hedges, interest rate hedges and interest rate swaps. Any derivative financial instruments are matched with an existing Company asset, liability or proposed transaction. Market value gains or losses on the derivative financial instrument are recognized in income when the effects of the related price changes of the related asset or liability are recognized in income. Prior to the issuance of the senior notes in 2002, the Company entered into a forward interest rate lock to hedge its exposure to fluctuations in treasury rates, which resulted in a loss of approximately $1.3 million. This amount has been recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income within shareholders’ equity and will be amortized over the life of the notes. There were no material derivative transactions, individually or in total for the three years ended December 31, 2002.

Full year operating results in 2002 reflect pretax special charges of $13.7 million. These costs, of which $12.4 million or 91% were recorded in the fourth quarter, include an amount of $5.4 million related to product line inventory write-offs recorded in Cost of goods sold and $8.3 million of other costs recorded as a special charge. In total, $10.3 million of the charge relates to costs to integrate the lighting businesses acquired in 2002. In addition, $3.4 million results from charges recognized in 2002 related to actions contemplated in the 2001 streamlining program. The 2002 special charge is comprised of the following:


	Lighting Integration — Product Line Inventory Rationalization — ($5.4 million)

	This program reflects management’s decision to streamline its product offering and rationalize overlapping product lines between Hubbell’s existing lighting business and the lighting businesses acquired in 2002. The cost of this program represents the write-down of the carrying cost of inventory to salvage value and is included in Cost of goods sold in the Consolidated Statement of Income. This rationalization of product is intended to facilitate improvements in manufacturing efficiencies and reduce working capital needs and does not represent the discontinuance of any major product line. This inventory has been, or is expected to be, scrapped or sold for a nominal value, which is considered in the write-down recorded. Product lines affected by this action include the Company’s commercial fluorescent, recessed, track, and life safety products. The majority of the inventory disposed relates to product of the Company’s legacy lighting operation, which brands will no longer be offered for sale.

	Lighting Integration — Special Charge — ($4.9 million)

	The 2002 special charge includes costs related to actions undertaken to integrate and reorganize the lighting businesses acquired in 2002. Specific actions being undertaken, all within the Electrical segment, include the following:


	•	Relocate San Leandro, CA office

	•	Close Martin, TN manufacturing facility

	•	Consolidate warehouses

	•	Rationalize product lines


	In addition to the $10.3 million in special charges discussed above, an additional $2.0 million of costs related to integration activities affecting acquired LCA operations were accrued in purchase accounting. The following table sets forth the components and status of the total lighting integration costs of $12.3 million at December 31, 2002:


	Substantially all actions contemplated are scheduled for completion by June 30, 2003. Cash expenditures under the integration program will be approximately $4.5 million for severance and other costs of facility closings. Estimated proceeds of $1.0 million related to asset sale recoveries were considered in determining the asset impairment charges.

	In total, $4.9 million was expensed in the 2002 fourth quarter related to severance ($1.8 million), asset write-offs ($2.4 million) and exit costs ($0.7 million).

	A facility in Martin, TN was closed and the carrying cost of this facility has been reduced to estimated realizable value. The asset write-offs include special charges related to this facility. The realizable value of equipment to be disposed of is nominal as the majority of the equipment is (A) proprietary, which would only be of value to competitors and which will not be sold; (B) designed specifically for the Company’s factories and therefore has limited or no marketability; or (C) equipment which the Company plans to scrap. A small amount of other equipment may be saleable if manufacturing equipment market conditions improve.

	Employee benefit costs include estimated severance benefits for approximately 222 employees of which 70 had left the company by December 31, 2002. The remaining terminations are expected to be completed by March 31, 2003.

	Exit costs include warehouse lease termination costs and postproduction maintenance and facility restoration costs associated with facilities to be closed, and the cost incurred in 2002 for moving equipment.

	The $2.0 million of costs accrued in purchase accounting for LCA related primarily to severance and employee relocation accruals ($1.7 million) in connection with the closure of the San Leandro, CA office. Separation benefits were provided for approximately 64 employees, none of whom had left the Company by December 31, 2002. These terminations are expected to be completed by June 30, 2003.


	The 2002 special charge includes $3.4 million of costs related to the streamlining and cost reduction program (the “Plan”) announced at the end of 2001 and is comprised of a variety of individual program costs associated with actions undertaken to reduce the productive capacity of the Company and realign employment levels to better match with lower actual and forecast rates of incoming business. In total, the Plan required a cumulative charge to profit and loss of $52.0 million consisting of the 2002 special charge of $3.4 million and $48.6 million of charges recognized in 2001. The 2002 special charge of $3.4 million is net of $0.9 million of income resulting from a reversal of costs accrued at the end of 2001 This income primarily resulted from excess severance accruals in the Power and Electrical segments as a result of natural attrition.

	Costs charged against income in 2002 related to the Plan primarily include the following:


	•	Severance costs of $1.2 million related to the closure of the Louisiana, MO manufacturing facility announced in the fourth quarter 2002 and included in the Electrical segment. This plan affects 53 employees, all of whom will have left the Company by June 30, 2003.

	•	Other severance costs of $0.6 million related to employee reduction actions, which were announced and paid in 2002 in the Electrical segment.

	•	Employee relocation and other exit costs of approximately $1.6 million incurred in connection with manufacturing and office facility closures announced at the end of 2001 (Electrical segment $0.3 million, Power segment $0.5 million, Industrial Technology segment $0.8 million).

Full year operating results in 2001 included special charges of $56.3 million offset by a $3.3 million reduction in the streamlining program accrual established in 1997. These net costs, which were recorded in the fourth quarter, total $53.0 million ($35.5 million net of tax), of which $40 million was reported as a special charge and $13 million was included in Cost of goods sold. The total cost consists of the following (in millions):

A breakdown of the major streamlining and cost reduction programs specified in the Plan and their attendant 2001 cost of $48.6 million is as follows:


	•	Capacity reduction and other impairment charges ($22.6 million expensed in 2001), include charges related to facility rationalizations and other capacity reduction actions:

Facility rationalization reflects management’s decision to permanently reduce the manufacturing space occupied by the Company and consolidate and eliminate office space in each Segment. 2001 charges cover costs to close six manufacturing facilities representing approximately 600,000 sq/ft, 11% of the Company’s approximately 5.6 million total active manufacturing square footage. In addition, three offices totaling approximately 100,000 sq./ft. were eliminated through consolidation. In all cases, the closed facilities were consolidated into existing Company facilities where management believes there is sufficient capacity to meet projected demand. All consolidation actions were completed by December 31, 2002. Specific actions undertaken by segment were as follows:

1. Juarez, Mexico — closure and sale of two manufacturing facilities and one office


	Owned facilities that are being closed are classified on the balance sheet as held for sale and where necessary the book values of such facilities have been reduced to estimated realizable amounts. Actual sales proceeds received through December 31, 2002 were approximately $9.9 million.

	Other capacity reductions include the write-off of surplus productive assets which will no longer be used. These assets (i.e., tools, dies, machinery) are located at facilities to be closed for which sufficient comparable equipment is available at the facility where the production is being moved, or relate to certain


	products that the Company will no longer manufacture based on its rationalization of product offerings or because the manufacturing has been outsourced. Outsourcing activities involve the movement of the production of a limited number of the Company’s products to outside suppliers to improve cost competitiveness.

	The realizable value of equipment being disposed of is nominal as the majority relates to (A) proprietary equipment which would only be of value to competitors and which will not be sold; (B) equipment that has been designed specifically for the Company’s factories and therefore has limited or no marketability; or (C) equipment which the Company plans to scrap. A small amount of other equipment may be saleable if manufacturing equipment market conditions improve.

	Impairment charges related to facilities and equipment recognized in 2001 were $6.1 million, $14.4 million and $0.6 million, for the Electrical, Power and Industrial Technology segments, respectively.

	Additionally, an impairment charge of $1.1 million was recognized in the Power segment for the value of a purchased patent related to products that will no longer be produced and a $0.4 million charge was recognized for the value of goodwill related to a product line being discontinued in the Electrical segment.


	•	Workforce reductions ($10.3 million expensed in 2001) — in addition to the 10% reduction in overall employment levels recorded through the first nine months of 2001, the Plan contemplated a further 9% reduction (approximately 830 employees) in overall employment levels through voluntary and involuntary termination, mainly focused on indirect manufacturing and salaried employees in each of the Company’s segments. Through December 31, 2001, 237 of the 762 employees covered by the 2001 charge had been terminated. All terminations were completed by June 30, 2002. Charges recorded in 2001 included $4.3 million for the Electrical segment, $2.7 million for the Power segment and $3.3 million for the Industrial Technology segment.

	•	Exit costs ($2.7 million expensed in 2001.) Exit costs included lease termination costs ($0.5 million), postproduction maintenance and facility restoration costs associated with facilities to be closed ($1.9 million) and the cost of moving equipment incurred in 2001 and other ($0.3 million). Charges recorded in 2001 included $1.3 million, $0.3 million and $1.1 million for the Electrical, Power and Industrial Technology segments, respectively.

	•	Exit product lines ($13.0 million expensed in 2001) — This program reflected management’s decision to streamline its product offering and eliminate non-strategic inventory across all business units. The cost of this program was included in Cost of goods sold in the Consolidated Statement of Income. This rationalization of product was intended to facilitate improvements in manufacturing efficiencies and lower working capital needs and did not represent the discontinuance of any major product line. This inventory has been scrapped. The 2001 charge included $8.5 million, $2.8 million and $1.7 million for the Electrical, Power and Industrial Technology segments, respectively.

The following table sets forth the components and status of the charges for the 2001 streamlining and cost reduction actions for the two years ended December 31, 2002:

Substantially all actions contemplated in the Plan were completed by December 31, 2002. Upon completion of the Plan, cash expenditures associated with the special charges will be approximately $16 million for severance and other costs of facility closings, prior to an estimated $10.0 million in asset sale recoveries.

In 2001, non-recurring charges were incurred related to environmental remediation actions at two previously exited facilities in anticipation of their divestiture and costs associated with an acquisition that was not expected to be completed. Remediation of environmental contaminants at the two previously exited sites is estimated to cost $6.0 million. Remediation at one of the sites is a condition of the sale of the property negotiated in the fourth quarter of 2001. The remediation at the second site is a result of contaminates discovered for which environmental assessments were completed and amounts recorded in the fourth quarter of 2001. The amounts recorded are expected to be sufficient to restore the properties to acceptable environmental standards and prepare the sites for divestiture. The uncompleted acquisition relates to due diligence costs of $1.7 million associated with an initial effort to purchase LCA, which was considered unsuccessful at December 31, 2001. All of these charges were recorded in the Electrical segment.

Operating results in 2000 included special and non-recurring charges offset by a reduction in the streamlining program accrual established in 1997. These net costs, which were recorded in the first and second quarters of 2000, total $23.7 million ($17.8 million, net of tax).

Net sales included a non-recurring charge of $3.5 million related to an increase in the reserve for customer returns and allowances primarily in response to higher customer credit activity associated with inaccurate/incomplete shipments from an electrical products central distribution warehouse that began operation in late 1999. Cost of goods sold reflected a special charge of $20.3 million in connection with management’s decision to streamline its product offering and eliminate non-strategic inventory across all business units. The charge represents the cost of inventories identified for discontinuance and disposal. In total, approximately 9% of the company’s total number of SKU’s were discontinued in connection with this program. This rationalization of product was intended to facilitate improvements in manufacturing efficiencies and reduce working capital needs. This action did not have any significant impact on service levels, sales or profitability in 2000 nor is it expected to in future years. This inventory was scrapped for nominal recovery value.

The 2000 special charge reflects the cost of first and second quarter 2000 cost reduction and streamlining actions of $10.4 million offset by a $10.5 million reversal, in connection with management’s ongoing review, of costs accrued in connection with the 1997 streamlining program. The 2000 special charge (expense) was comprised of asset impairments of $6.0 million, severance related to the termination of approximately 70 employees of $1.6 million and facility closures/ consolidation and other provisions of $2.8 million. Facilities closed or consolidated included a leased manufacturing facility in Puerto Rico, a lighting fixtures manufacturing plant and two sales offices in the U.K. The asset impairments primarily consisted of the write-off of an investment in a joint venture that the Company exited as a result of deteriorating financial performance ($1.4 million) and the write-off of the carrying cost of abandoned equipment primarily related to the facility closures and to discontinued product lines ($3.3 million). The 2000 charge included $4.8 million, $5.4 million and $0.2 million, for the Electrical, Power and Industrial Technology segments, respectively. All actions under the 2000 special charge were completed in the first quarter of 2001.

In 1997, the Company recorded a special charge of $52.0 million ($32.2 million net of tax) comprised of $32.4 million of accrued consolidation and streamlining costs, $9.5 million of facility asset impairments, a $7.4 million goodwill asset impairment, and other current employee and product line exit costs of $2.7 million. The Company’s consolidation and streamlining initiatives were undertaken to optimize the organization and cost structure primarily within the electrical and Power segments.

As part of management’s ongoing review of estimated program costs in connection with the plan, adjustments reducing accrued amounts totaling $10.5 million were made in the first and second quarters of 2000. The adjustments (income) reflected costs originally estimated as part of the 1997 plan which were deemed no longer required to complete certain actions in the Electrical and Power segments. The changes in estimate within the Electrical segment related to newly appointed management’s decision to terminate plans to close the St. Louis, MO and South Bend, IN manufacturing facilities and to not relocate a product line. The change in plans by new management resulted from a change in manufacturing strategy which emphasized a reduction in the commitment of resources to Mexico in favor of a larger proportion of domestic manufacturing.

In addition, an accrual was reduced by approximately $1.7 million related to underspending of severance and exit costs, principally in connection with a foundry consolidation and relocation of production to lower cost areas. The underspending of severance was due to increased natural attrition and the reassignment of affected employees. An additional accrual reduction of $3.5 million was recognized as a result of costs not being incurred at a business that was sold. The 2000 credit is comprised of $4.4 million and $6.1 million for the Electrical and Power segments, respectively.

Of the $4.5 million accrued under this program at December 31, 2000, $1.2 million was expended in 2001 and $3.3 million was reversed to income as a result of a change in plans by newly appointed management. The $3.3 million reversal occurred within the Electrical segment in connection with management’s decision to terminate plans related to closure of the Louisiana, MO manufacturing facility while alternative options were explored. As a result of this decision, severance and facility exits costs were no longer required to be accrued. All actions contemplated under the 1997 Streamlining Plan have been completed.

In April 2002, Hubbell completed the acquisition of LCA, the domestic lighting business of U.S. Industries, Inc. LCA’s results of operations have been included in the consolidated financial statements as of the acquisition date of April 26, 2002. The purchase price for the acquisition was approximately $234.6 million in cash, including fees and expenses.

LCA manufactures and distributes a wide range of outdoor and indoor lighting products to commercial, industrial and residential markets under various brand names, including Alera, Kim, Spaulding, Whiteway, Moldcast, Architectural Area Lighting, Columbia, Keystone, Prescolite, Dual-Lite and Progress. Hubbell financed the acquisition of LCA with available cash and through the issuance of $200.0 million of long-term notes in May, 2002 (See Note 9).

The following table summarizes the allocation of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at April 26, (in millions):

Goodwill related to the acquisition amounted to $55.1 million, representing the difference between the purchase price of $234.6 million and the net assets acquired of $179.5 million. In total, $75.8 million of the purchase price has been allocated to goodwill and identifiable intangible assets deemed to have indefinite lives (primarily trademarks/ trade names). The goodwill and intangible assets have been assigned to the Electrical segment, and are deductible for federal tax purposes.

The recorded allocation of purchase price and determination of goodwill related to the LCA acquisition at December 31, 2002 is subject to the finalization of plans related to the cost of facility rationalization and organizational realignment of the Company’s combined lighting businesses.

The following unaudited pro forma data summarize the results of operations for the periods indicated as if the acquisition of LCA had been completed as of the beginning of the periods presented. The pro forma data give effect to actual operating results prior to the acquisition and includes adjustments to interest expense and other costs associated with the combination. No effect has been given to cost reductions or operating synergies in this presentation. These pro forma amounts do not purport to be indicative of the results that would have

actually been obtained if the acquisition had occurred as of the beginning of the periods presented or that may be obtained in the future (in millions):

Management believes that the combination of the LCA brand names acquired and Hubbell’s existing lighting brands will create leading market positions in many sub-segments of the domestic lighting fixtures industry. Further, the acquisition adds complementary products to the Company’s current product offering and is expected to enhance the ability of the Company to attract stronger manufacturers’ representatives in key markets, which is the primary channel to market in the domestic lighting fixtures business. The Company expects its lighting operations to generate annual sales in excess of $800 million due to the combination of LCA with the Company’s existing lighting operations.

In March 2002, the Company completed the purchase of the common stock of Hawke for $27.3 million in cash, including fees and expenses. Based in the United Kingdom, Hawke is a leading supplier of products used in harsh and hazardous locations worldwide including brass cable glands and cable connectors, cable transition devices, utility transformer breathers, stainless steel and nonmetallic enclosures and field bus connectivity components. Hawke complements the product offering of the Company’s Killark brand electrical components and is included in the Electrical segment. Hawke is expected to add approximately $18-$20 million in net sales annually. Goodwill related to the acquisition amounted to $15.0 million, representing the difference between the purchase price and the net assets acquired of $12.3 million. In total, $15.9 million of the purchase price has been allocated to goodwill and intangible assets.

In April 2000, the Company completed the sale of its DSL assets, part of Pulse Communications, Inc., to ECI for a sales price of $61.0 million. The transaction resulted in a pretax gain on sale of $36.2 million in 2000. At the time of sale, the Company retained a contractual obligation to supply product to the buyer at prices below manufacturing cost, resulting in an adverse commitment. In December 2001, management revised the adverse commitment accrued to reflect lower known and projected orders through the contract expiration date and recorded an additional pretax gain on sale of business of $4.7 million.

In September 2002, the Company entered into an agreement modifying the original manufacturing contract. In accordance with the modification agreement, final quantities were shipped and the Company was released from all service and warranty obligations. In 2002, the total gain from reduction of the contractual obligation provision was $3.0 million, pretax.

The financial accounting basis of the LIFO inventories of acquired companies exceeds the tax basis by approximately $29.6 million at December 31, 2002.

The following table sets forth a reconciliation of net income and earnings per share for the three years ended December 31, reflecting the impact of adopting the goodwill amortization provisions of SFAS 142 on January 1, 2002 (in millions except per share data):

Changes in the carrying amounts of goodwill for the year ended December 31, 2002, by segment, were as follows:

During 2002, the Company completed the initial impairment tests of the recorded value of goodwill, as is required by the Standard. As a result of this process, the Company identified one reporting unit within the Industrial Technology segment with a book value, including goodwill, which exceeded its fair market value. Thereafter, the implied fair value of the goodwill for this reporting unit was calculated, which resulted in a non-cash charge of $25.4 million, net of tax, or $0.43 per share-diluted to write-down the full value of the

reporting unit’s goodwill. This non-cash charge was reported as the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle retroactive to January 1, 2002. Fair values were calculated using a range of estimated future operating results and primarily utilized a discounted cash flow model. The Company expects to perform its annual impairment assessment in the second quarter of each year, unless circumstances dictate the need for more frequent assessments.

Identifiable intangible assets as of December 31, 2002 are recorded in Intangible assets and other in the Consolidated Balance Sheet and total approximately $32.0 million, net of accumulated amortization of $2.4 million. These intangible assets primarily represent trademarks and patents. During 2002, the Company acquired a total of approximately $8.0 million of intangible assets with definite lives and $21.0 million of intangibles with indefinite lives through the acquisitions of LCA, Hawke and a utility pole line hardware business which relate to trademarks, patents, and customer lists. Amortization of intangible assets for 2002 was approximately $1.3 million. Amortization of intangible assets over the next five years is expected to approximate $1.1 million per year.

Investments consist primarily of U.S. Treasury Notes, municipal, corporate, and asset-backed bonds. Investments which are available for sale are stated at market values based on current quotes while investments which are being held-to-maturity are stated at amortized cost. There were no securities during 2002 and 2001 that were classified as trading investments. During 2001, the Company sold a portion of its “held-to-maturity” investments. The sales resulted from revised investment requirements being agreed with the Puerto Rican government following passage of the 1998 Tax Incentives Act in Puerto Rico. As of December 31, 2002, the Company had the positive intent and ability to hold the Puerto Rico investments to maturity in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investment in Debt and Equity Securities.”

In 2002, the Company reevaluated its investment portfolio and reclassified certain securities totaling approximately $23 million from held-to-maturity to available-for-sale effective January 1, 2002, as the Company may no longer hold these investments to maturity. As a result of this reclassification, the Company began to record these securities at their fair market value and, during 2002, recorded an unrealized gain of $0.5 million, after tax, in accumulated other comprehensive income within shareholders’ equity. Certain portfolio securities that are affected by changes in interest rates may be hedged with futures contracts for U.S. Treasury Notes and Bonds. Market value gains and losses on the futures contracts are recognized in income when the effects of the related price changes in the value of the hedged securities are recognized. At December 31, 2002 there were no open futures contracts.

The following table sets forth selected data with respect to the Company’s investments at December 31, (in millions):

Contractual maturities of investments in debt securities, available-for-sale and held-to-maturity at December 31, 2002 were as follows (in millions):

The change in net unrealized holding gain or loss on available-for-sale securities that has been included in the separate component of shareholders’ equity was $0.5 million in 2002 and zero in 2001 and 2000. The cost basis used in computing the gain or loss on these securities was through specific identification. Realized gains and losses were immaterial in 2002.

Other Non-Current Liabilities consists of the following at December 31, (in millions):

The Company and its subsidiaries have a number of non-contributory defined benefit pension plans and other non-pension retirement benefit plans. During 2002, the Company made an acquisition where defined benefit pension assets and liabilities of the acquired company were assumed. No acquisitions impacting defined benefit pension assets and liabilities occurred during 2001.

The following table sets forth the reconciliation of beginning and ending balances of the benefit obligations and the plan assets for the above plans at December 31, (in millions):

At December 31, 2002, approximately $210 million of the Company’s defined benefit pension plan assets were invested in common stocks, including Hubbell Incorporated common stock with a market value of $11.7 million. The balance of plan assets of $76.6 million were invested in short — term money market accounts, government and corporate bonds.

At December 31, 2002 and 2001, the Company had certain defined benefit plans where the accumulated benefit obligation exceeded plan assets. In total, the accumulated benefit obligation for these plans at December 31, 2002 was $290.5 million and the related plan assets were $208.7 million. An additional minimum liability of $20.4 million was recognized in 2002 for these plans. In total, the accumulated benefit obligation for these plans at December 31, 2001 was $29.4 million and there were no plan assets. No additional liability was required for any of these plans as of December 31, 2001.

The following table sets forth the components of defined benefit pension and other benefits cost for the years ended December 31, (in millions):

The Company and its subsidiaries have a number of health care and life insurance benefit plans covering eligible employees who reached retirement age while working for the Company. These other benefits were discontinued in 1991 for substantially all future retirees, with the exception of three operations acquired since 1991 with existing collective bargaining agreements which include benefits for future retirees. Some of the plans provide for retiree contributions which are periodically increased. The plans anticipate future cost-sharing changes that are consistent with the Company’s past practices. For measurement purposes, the annual rate of increase in the per capita cost of covered health care benefits for medical and prescription drugs was assumed to be 9% and 15%, respectively, for 2002. These rates were assumed to decrease gradually to 5% in 2012 and remain at that level thereafter. The impact of a 1 percentage point increase or decrease in these assumptions would not be material to the Company.

The Company also maintains five qualified defined contribution plans. The total cost of these plans was $3.1 million in 2002, $2.0 million in 2001 and $1.7 million in 2000. This cost is not included in the above net periodic benefit cost. Total pension expense (including defined benefit and defined contribution plans) as a percent of payroll was 3.3% in 2002, 2.1% in 2001 and 1.6% in 2000.

The following table sets forth the components of the Company’s debt structure at December 31, (in millions):

Interest paid for commercial paper borrowings, bank borrowings, and long-term debt totaled $17.6 million in 2002, $15.5 million in 2001, and $19.7 million in 2000. The Company maintains a bank credit agreement primarily to support commercial paper borrowings. At December 31, 2002 and through the date of filing this Form 10-K, the Company had total unused bank credit commitments of $200 million. The expiration date for the Company’s bank credit agreement is July 17, 2005. Borrowings under credit agreements generally are available at the prime rate or at a surcharge over the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR). Annual commitment fee requirements to support availability of the Company’s credit agreement at December 31, 2002, totaled approximately $200,000. In October, 1995, the Company issued ten year non-callable notes due in 2005 at a face value of $100 million and a fixed interest rate of 6.625%. The proceeds of the offering net of discount, were used to pay down commercial paper borrowings. In May 2002, the Company issued ten year non-callable notes due in 2012 at a face value of $200 million and a fixed rate of 6.375%. The proceeds of the offering, net of discount, were used to pay down commercial paper borrowings.

The following table sets forth selected data with respect to the Company’s income tax provisions for the years ended December 31, (in millions):

Deferred tax assets and liabilities result from differences in the basis of assets and liabilities for tax and financial statement purposes. At December 31, 2002 management determined that a valuation allowance in

the amount of $4 million should be provided for tax operating loss carryforward benefits of certain foreign locations because it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax asset will not be utilized in the future.

The components of the net deferred tax asset (liability) at December 31, were as follows (in millions):

At December 31, 2002, income and withholding taxes have not been provided on approximately $29.4 million of undistributed international earnings that are indefinitely reinvested in foreign operations. If such earnings were not indefinitely reinvested, a tax liability of approximately $3.0 million would be incurred. Cash payments of income taxes were $46.1 million in 2002, $24.3 million in 2001 and $33.4 million in 2000.

The consolidated effective income tax rates varied from the United States federal statutory income tax rate for the years ended December 31, as follows:

Concentrations of Credit Risk: Financial instruments which potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist of trade receivables and temporary cash investments. The Company grants credit terms in the normal course of business to its customers. Due to the diversity of its product lines, the Company has an extensive customer base including electrical distributors and wholesalers, electric utilities, equipment manufacturers, electrical contractors, telephone operating companies and retail and hardware outlets. As part of its ongoing procedures, the Company monitors the credit worthiness of its customers. Bad debt write-offs have historically been minimal. However, they increased in 2001 due to the generally weak economic conditions affecting U.S. industrial markets. The Company places its temporary cash investments with financial institutions and limits the amount of exposure to any one institution.

Fair Value: The carrying amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets for cash and temporary cash investments, short-term investments, receivables, commercial paper and bank borrowings, accounts payable and accruals approximate their fair values given the immediate or short-term nature of these items (see also Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — Investments).

The fair value of long-term debt was determined by reference to quoted market prices of securities with similar characteristics and approximated $334.3 million and $105.3 million at December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

The Company is subject to environmental laws and regulations which may require that it investigate and remediate the effects of potential contamination associated with past and present operations. The Company is also subject to various legal proceedings and claims, including those relating to workers’ compensation, product liability and environmental matters, including, for each, past production of product containing toxic substances, which have arisen in the normal course of its operations. Estimates of future liability with respect to such matters are based on an evaluation of currently available facts. Liabilities are recorded when it is probable that costs will be incurred and can be reasonably estimated. Given the nature of matters involved, it is possible that liabilities will be incurred in excess of amounts currently recorded; however based upon available information, including the Company’s past experience, insurance coverage and reserves, management believes that the ultimate liability with respect to these matters is not material to the consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.

Total rental expense under operating leases were $13.5 million in 2002, $10.7 million in 2001 and $9.4 million in 2000. The minimum annual rentals on non-cancelable, long-term, operating leases in effect at December 31, 2002 are expected to approximate $10.7 million in 2003, $6.4 million in 2004, $4.4 million in 2005, $3.0 million in 2006 and $22.4 million in 2007 and thereafter.

Share activity in the Company’s preferred and common stocks is set forth below for the three years ended December 31, 2002:

Treasury shares are retired when acquired and the purchase price is charged against par value and additional paid-in capital. Voting rights per share: Class A Common — twenty; Class B Common — one. In addition, the Company has 5,891,097 authorized shares of preferred stock; no preferred shares are outstanding.

The Company has a Stockholder Rights Agreement under which holders of Class A Common Stock have Class A Rights and holders of Class B Common Stock have Class B Rights. These Rights become exercisable after a specified period of time only if a person or group of affiliated persons acquires beneficial ownership of 20 percent or more of the outstanding Class A Common Stock of the Company or announces or commences a tender or exchange offer that would result in the offeror acquiring beneficial ownership of 20 percent or more of the outstanding Class A Common Stock of the Company. Each Class A Right entitles the holder to purchase from the Company one one-thousandth of a share of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock (“Series A Preferred Stock”), without par value, at a price of $175.00 per one one-thousandth of a share. Similarly, each Class B Right entitles the holder to purchase one one-thousandth of a share of Class B Junior Participating Preferred Stock (“Series B Preferred Stock”), without par value, at a price of $175.00 per one one-thousandth of a share. The Rights may be redeemed by the Company for one cent per Right prior to the day a person or group of affiliated persons acquires 20 percent or more of the outstanding Class A Common Stock of the Company. The Rights expire on December 31, 2008, unless earlier redeemed by the Company.

Shares of Series A Preferred Stock or Series B Preferred Stock purchasable upon exercise of the Rights will not be redeemable. Each share of Series A Preferred Stock or Series B Preferred Stock will be entitled, when, as and if declared, to a minimum preferential quarterly dividend payment of $10.00 per share but will be entitled to an aggregate dividend of 1,000 times the dividend declared per share of Common Stock. In the event of liquidation, the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock or Series B Preferred Stock will be entitled to a minimum preferential liquidation payment of $100 per share (plus any accrued but unpaid dividends) but will be entitled to an aggregate payment of 1,000 times the payment made per share of Class A Common Stock or Class B Common Stock, respectively. Each share of Series A Preferred Stock will have 20,000 votes and each share of Series B Preferred Stock will have 1,000 votes, voting together with the Common Stock. Finally, in the event of any merger, consolidation, transfer of assets or earning power or other transaction in which shares of Common Stock are converted or exchanged, each share of Series A Preferred Stock or

Series B Preferred Stock will be entitled to receive 1,000 times the amount received per share of Common Stock. These rights are protected by customary antidilution provisions.

Upon the occurrence of certain events or transactions specified in the Rights Agreement, each holder of a Right will have the right to receive, upon exercise, that number of shares of the Company’s common stock or the acquiring company’s shares having a market value equal to twice the exercise price.

Shares of the Company’s common stock were reserved at December 31, 2002 as follows:

The Company has granted options to officers and key employees to purchase the Company’s Class A and Class B Common Stock and the Company may grant to officers and key employees options to purchase the Company’s Class B Common Stock at not less than 100% of market prices on the date of grant with a ten year term and, generally, a three year vesting period. The Company accounts for these options under the recognition and measurement principles of APB 25. No stock-based employee compensation cost is reflected in net income as all options granted had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. Stock option activity for the three years ended December 31, 2002 is set forth below:

On December 31, 2002, outstanding options were comprised of 1,449,836 shares exercisable with an average remaining life of three years and an average price of $33.32 (range $25.15 — $41.69); 1,443,900 shares exercisable with an average remaining life of six years and an average price of $42.72 (range $39.34 — $47.13); 1,096,750 shares exercisable and 1,402,550 shares not vested with a remaining life of eight years and

an average price of $25.94 (range $24.59 — $27.66); and 3,185,100 shares not vested with an average remaining life of ten years and an average price of $32.50 (range $27.81 — $36.20).

The following table sets forth the computation of earnings per share for the three years ended December 31, (in millions):

A portion of the total options to purchase shares of common stock outstanding at year end were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the effect would be anti-dilutive. The number of anti-dilutive options outstanding were 2.0 million, 2.9 million and 5.1 million at December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.

The following table reflects the accumulated balances of other comprehensive income (in millions):

Hubbell Incorporated was founded as a proprietorship in 1888, and was incorporated in Connecticut in 1905. Hubbell manufactures and sells high quality electrical and electronic products for a broad range of commercial, industrial, telecommunications, utility and residential applications. Products are manufactured or assembled by subsidiaries in North America, Switzerland, Puerto Rico, Mexico, Italy and the United Kingdom. Hubbell also participates in a joint venture in Taiwan, and maintains sales offices in Singapore, the People’s Republic of China, Mexico, Hong Kong, South Korea and the Middle East.

The Company is primarily engaged in the engineering, manufacture and sale of electrical and electronic products. For management reporting and control, the businesses are divided into three operating segments: Electrical, Power, and Industrial Technology. Information regarding operating segments has been presented as required by SFAS No. 131 “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information”. At December 31, 2002 the operating segments were comprised as follows:

The Electrical Segment is comprised of businesses that primarily sell through distributors, lighting showrooms, home centers, telephone and telecommunication companies, and represents stock items including standard and special application wiring device products, lighting fixtures and controls, fittings, switches and outlet boxes, enclosures, wire management products and voice and data signal processing components. The products are typically used in and around industrial, commercial and institutional facilities by electrical contractors, maintenance personnel, electricians, and telecommunication companies. Certain lighting fixtures and electrical products also have residential application.

Power Segment businesses design and manufacture a wide variety of construction, switching and protection products, hot line tools, grounding equipment, cover ups, fittings and fasteners, cable accessories, insulators, arresters, cutouts, sectionalizers, connectors and compression tools for the building and maintenance of overhead and underground power and telephone lines, as well as applications in the industrial, construction and pipeline industries.

The Industrial Technology Segment consists of operations that design and manufacture test and measurement equipment, high voltage power supplies and variable transformers, industrial controls including motor speed controls, pendant-type push-button stations, overhead crane controls, electric cable and hose reels, and specialized communications systems such as intra-facility communications systems, telephone systems, and land mobile radio peripherals. Products are sold primarily to steel mills, industrial complexes, oil, gas and petro-chemical industries, seaports, transportation authorities, the security industry (malls and colleges), and cable and electronic equipment manufacturers.

On a geographic basis, the Company defines “international” as operations and subsidiaries based outside of the United States and its possessions. Sales of international units were 10% of total sales in 2002, 11% in 2001, and 10% in 2000, with the Canadian and United Kingdom markets representing approximately 68% collectively of the 2002 total. Net assets of international subsidiaries were 11% of the consolidated total in 2002, 11% in 2001, and 9% in 2000. Export sales directly to customers or through electric wholesalers from United States operations were $85.7 million in 2002, $88.4 million in 2001, and $74.8 million in 2000.

Financial information by industry segment and geographic area for the three years ended December 31, 2002, is summarized below (in millions). When reading the data the following items should be noted:


	•	Net sales comprise sales to unaffiliated customers—inter-segment and inter-area sales are immaterial.

	•	Segment operating income consists of net sales less operating expenses. Interest expense, and other income have not been allocated to segments.

	•	General corporate assets not allocated to segments are principally cash, investments and deferred taxes.

Amortization of goodwill recorded on a pretax basis in segment operating income for the year ended December 31, 2001 is $2.9 million in Electrical, $3.4 million in Power, and $1.9 million in Industrial Technology. Amortization of goodwill included on a pretax basis in segment operating income for the year ended December 31, 2001 is $3.3 million in Electrical, $3.4 million in Power, and $1.5 million in Industrial Technology.

The table below sets forth summarized quarterly financial data for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 (in millions, except per share amounts):


(1)	During 2002, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS 142 and recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $25.4 million, after tax, to write-off goodwill associated with the high voltage test businesses in the Industrial Technology segment. The impairment charge was reported as the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle.

(2)	In the first and third quarters of 2002, net income includes $0.9 million and $1.0 million, respectively, of pretax gain on sale of the Company’s WavePacer Digital Subscriber Line assets.

(3)	In the fourth quarter of 2002, the Company recorded special charges of $12.4 million pretax associated with the cost of streamlining and integrating the newly acquired LCA companies, which reduced net income by $7.7 million. A portion of the total 2002 charge, $5.4 million pretax, relates to product rationalization costs which are classified in Cost of goods sold.

(4)	In the second quarter of 2001, the Company recorded a non-recurring charge of $3.8 million pretax related to impaired foundry assets in the Power segment which were abandoned due to lower demand, which reduced net income by $2.4 million.

(5)

In the fourth quarter of 2001, the Company recorded special charges of $56.3 million, offset by a $3.3 million reversal relating to the 1997 streamlining program. The charge included the cost of streamlining and cost reduction programs of $48.6 million and $7.7 million of non-recurring costs. The cost reduction programs are intended to reduce the productive capacity of the Company and lower fixed costs. A portion of the total 2001 charge, $13.0 million, related to product rationalization costs which were classified in Cost of goods sold. The non-recurring charges included $6.0 million in costs associated with environmental remediation actions at two previously exited facilities in anticipation of their disposal and $1.7 million in costs associated with an acquisition that was not expected to be completed. These net charges reduced net income by $35.5 million.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

There is no family relationship between any of the above-named executive officers.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management⁽¹⁾

Within 90 days prior to the date of this report, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer and Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14. Based upon that evaluation, the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer and Senior

Vice President and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information relating to the Company (including its consolidated subsidiaries) required to be included in the Company’s periodic Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) filings. There have been no significant changes in the Company’s internal controls or in other factors which could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date the Company carried out its evaluation.

Financial statements and schedules listed in the Index to Financial Statements and Schedules appearing on Page 32 are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


†	This exhibit constitutes a management contract, compensatory plan, or arrangement

There were no reports on Form 8-K filed for the three months ended December 31, 2002.

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

I, Timothy H. Powers, President and Chief Executive Officer of Hubbell Incorporated, certify that:


	1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Hubbell Incorporated (the “Registrant”).

	2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

	3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

	4. The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Registrant and we have:


	a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

	b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the “Evaluation Date”); and

	c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;


	5. The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):


	a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

	b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal controls; and


	6. The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


	/s/ TIMOTHY H. POWERS

	Timothy H. Powers
	President and Chief Executive Officer

I, William T. Tolley, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Hubbell Incorporated, certify that:


	1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Hubbell Incorporated (the “Registrant”).

	2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

	3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

	4. The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Registrant and we have:


	a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

	b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the “Evaluation Date”); and

	c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;


	5. The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):


	a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

	b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal controls; and


	6. The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


	/s/ WILLIAM T. TOLLEY

	William T. Tolley
	Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Our audits of the consolidated financial statements referred to in our report dated January 21, 2003, appearing on page 33 of this Form 10-K also included an audit of the Financial Statement Schedule listed in the index on page 32 of this Form 10-K. In our opinion, this Financial Statement Schedule presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements.


*	Includes the cost of product line discontinuances of $5.4 million, $13.0 million, and $20.3 million at December 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000, respectively.

75 EX-10.I 3 y82446exv10wi.htm RETIREMENT PLAN FOR DIRECTORS RETIREMENT PLAN FOR DIRECTORS

1.1

The purpose of this Plan is to provide retirement benefits to Directors of Hubbell Incorporated (the “Company”) who meet the eligibility requirements of the Plan.

2.1		“Base Retainer” means the regular active service annual retainer in effect during the calendar year immediately preceding the year in which a Director retires from the Board of Directors, but in no event more than $40,000.

2.2		“Board of Directors” means the Board of Directors of Hubbell Incorporated.

2.3		“Chairman Retainer” means the retainer in effect for service as the Chairman of any committee of the Board of Directors during the calendar year immediately preceding the year in which a Director retires from the Board of Directors, but in no event more than $3,000.

2.4		“Committee Chairman” means an Eligible Director who for at least one year of any of the ten years immediately preceding his retirement from the Board of Directors was the Chairman of any committee of the Board of Directors.

2.5		“Company” means Hubbell Incorporated.

2.6		“Compensation Committee” means the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.

2.7		“Director” means a member of the Board of Directors who was duly elected as a Director on or prior to May 6, 2002.

2.8		“Early Retirement” means retirement from the Board of Directors prior to age 70.

2.9		“Eligible Director” means a Director with at least five (5) years of Service, who is not an Employee, and does not qualify to receive a retirement benefit under any pension plan of the Company or its subsidiaries. However, a Director who qualifies to receive a retirement benefit under any pension plan of the Company or its subsidiaries will nonetheless be considered a Director entitled to the Special Retirement Benefit described in Article 5.3 hereof.

2.10		“Employee” means a person employed by the Company or its subsidiaries in any capacity other than as a Director.

2.11		“Normal Retirement” means retirement from the Board of Directors at or after age 70.

2.12		“Plan” means this Retirement Plan for Directors.

2.13		“Service” means service as a non-Employee Director.

3.1

This Plan shall be effective as of April 1, 1984 (the “Effective Date”).

5.1

Normal Retirement Benefit. An Eligible Director’s annual Normal Retirement Benefit under this Plan shall be calculated as follows:


	(a) With respect to an Eligible Director with less than ten years of Service, the annual Normal Retirement Benefit shall be the sum of (i) fifty percent (50%) of the Eligible Director’s Base Retainer in respect to the first five full years of Service plus (ii) if applicable, ten percent (10%) of the Eligible Director’s Base Retainer for each full year of Service beyond five years up to a maximum of nine years.

	(b) With respect to an Eligible Director with ten or more years of Service, the annual Normal Retirement Benefit shall be the sum of (i) one hundred and ten percent (110%) of the Eligible Director’s Base Retainer plus, (ii) if applicable, the Chairman Retainer.

5.2		In no event shall the benefit calculated under Article 5.1 exceed one hundred percent (100%) of the Base Retainer (in the case of an Eligible Director with less than ten years of Service) or the sum of (x) one hundred ten percent (110%) of the Base Retainer and the Chairman Retainer (in the case of an Eligible Director with ten or more years of Service), as applicable.

5.3		Special Retirement Benefit. A Director who is not an Eligible Director is not otherwise entitled to the benefit provided under Section 5.1 (as limited by Section 5.2).

		Notwithstanding the foregoing, a Director who has at least five (5) years of Service as a Director subsequent to his retirement as an Employee, and who retires from the Board of Directors at or after 70, is eligible to receive a special retirement benefit hereunder equal to 25% of his Base Retainer.

5.4		Early Retirement Benefit. An Eligible Director who elects an Early Retirement shall receive a benefit computed in accordance with Article 5.1, except that such Early Retirement Benefit shall commence in accordance with Article VI hereof.

6.1		Payment of Benefits. Unless otherwise provided in Section 6.2, all retirement benefits hereunder shall be payable in monthly installments (on the fifteenth day of the month) equal to one-twelfth (l/12th) of the annual amounts determined under this Plan. A Director’s retirement benefit hereunder, if any, shall be payable for the life of the Director, commencing on the fifteenth day of the month coinciding with or next following the later to occur of (i) such Director’s 70th birthday and (ii) the date on which such Director retires from the Board of Directors; provided, however, that, with respect to an election to receive an Early Retirement Benefit, such Benefit shall commence on the fifteenth day of the month following the Director’s 70th birthday. The Director’s last payment of retirement benefits hereunder shall be made on the fifteenth day of the month in which he dies.

6.2		Payments Rounded to Next Higher Full Dollar. Each monthly payment which is computed in accordance with this Plan will, if not in whole dollars, be increased to the next whole dollar.

7.1

Death Benefit. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, in the event an Eligible Director dies prior to his actual retirement from the Board of Directors, no death benefit shall be paid hereunder. If an Eligible Director dies while receiving retirement benefits pursuant to Article VI, no death benefit shall be paid hereunder.

8.1

The Company shall enter into a trust agreement creating an irrevocable grantor trust for the holding of cash, annuity contracts and/or any other form of assets as shall be determined by the Board of Directors, for retirement benefits accrued by the Eligible

Directors (whether current or former) under the Plan; provided, however, that upon the occurrence of a Change of Control Transaction (as defined in Section 12.2), the Company shall transfer to the trustee of the foregoing trust the maximum amount of assets estimated to be necessary to satisfy the Company’s obligations hereunder, as in effect immediately prior to the Change of Control Transaction; provided, further, that in no event shall the amount transferred to the trustee of the foregoing trust be less than the amount of the accrued benefit determined under the same factors which would be used under the Company’s qualified retirement plan. Any assets of such trust shall be subject to the claims of creditors of the Company to the extent set forth in the trust. Eligible Directors’ (whether current or former) interests in benefits under this Plan shall only be those of unsecured creditors of the Company.

9.1

The general administration of this Plan and the responsibility for carrying out the provisions hereof shall be vested in the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee may adopt, subject to the approval of the Board of Directors, such rules and regulations as it may deem necessary for the proper administration of this Plan, and its decision in all matters shall be final, conclusive, and binding.

10.1		The Board of Directors reserves in its sole and exclusive discretion the right at any time and from time to time to amend this Plan in any respect or terminate this Plan without restriction and without the consent of any Eligible Director, provided, however, that no amendment or termination of this Plan shall impair the right of any Eligible Director to receive benefits earned and accrued hereunder prior to such amendment or termination. The Board of Directors shall not terminate this Plan solely to accelerate benefits earned and accrued hereunder. Any amounts not currently payable to an Eligible Director shall revert to the Company in the event of termination of the Plan.

11.1		This Plan does not in any way obligate the Company to continue to retain a Director on the Board of Directors, nor does this Plan limit the right of the Company to terminate a Director’s service on the Board of Directors.

11.2		Non-Alienation of Benefits. No retirement benefit payable hereunder may be assigned, pledged, mortgaged or hypothecated and to the extent permitted by law, no such

		retirement benefit shall be subject to legal process or attachment for the payment of any claims against any person entitled to receive the same.

11.3		Payment to Incompetents. If an Eligible Director entitled to receive any retirement benefit payments hereunder is deemed by the Compensation Committee or is adjudged by a court of competent jurisdiction to be legally incapable of giving valid receipt and discharge for such retirement benefit, such payments shall be paid to such person or persons as the Compensation Committee shall designate or to the duly appointed guardian of such Eligible Director. Such payments shall, to the extent made, be deemed a complete discharge for such payments under this Plan.

11.4		Loss of Benefits. At the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee, and after written notice to the Eligible Director, rights to receive any retirement benefit under this Plan may be forfeited, suspended, reduced or terminated in cases of gross misconduct by the Eligible Director, or of any conduct, activity or competitive occupation which is reasonably deemed to be prejudicial to the interests of the Company or a subsidiary of the Company, including but not limited to the utilization or disclosure of confidential information for gain or otherwise.

11.5		Noncompetition. An Eligible Director shall forfeit any and all retirement benefits pursuant to this Plan if said Eligible Director violates the notice provision of the next paragraph hereof or anywhere in the United States or outside of the United States, directly or indirectly, owns, manages, operates, joins or controls, or participates in the ownership, management, operation or control of, or becomes a director or an employee of, or a consultant to, any person, firm, or corporation which competes with the Company; provided, however, that the provisions of this Article 11.5 shall not apply to investments by the Eligible Director in shares of stock traded on a national securities exchange or on the national over-the-counter market which shall have an aggregate market value, at the time of acquisition, of less than two (2%) percent of the outstanding shares of such stock.

		An Eligible Director shall be obligated to give the Company at least sixty (60) days’ prior written notice, registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, addressed to the Secretary, Hubbell Incorporated, 584 Derby Milford Road, Orange, Connecticut, 06477, of his intention, directly or indirectly, to own, manage, operate, join or control, or participate in the ownership, management, operation or control of, or become a director or an employee of, or a consultant to, any person, firm, or corporation, following which, within a period of sixty (60) days from its receipt of such notice, the Company will mail to the Eligible Director by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, a statement of its opinion as to whether said intention of the Eligible Director violates this Article 11.5.

11.6		Withholding. Payments made by the Company under this Plan to any Eligible Director shall be subject to withholding as shall, at the time for such payment, be required under any income tax or other laws, whether of the United States or any other jurisdiction.

11.7		Expenses. All expenses and costs in connection with the operation of this Plan shall be borne by the Company.

11.8		Governing Law. The provisions of this Plan will be construed according to the laws of the State of Connecticut, excluding the provisions of any such laws that would require the application of the laws of another jurisdiction.

11.9		Gender and Number. The masculine pronoun wherever used herein shall include the feminine gender and the feminine the masculine and the singular number as used herein shall include the plural and the plural the singular unless the context clearly indicates a different meaning.

11.10		Titles and Headings. The titles to articles and headings of sections of this Plan are for convenience of reference only and in case of any conflict, the text of the Plan, rather than such titles and headings, shall control.

12.1		The provisions of Section 12.3 shall become effective immediately upon the occurrence of a Change of Control (as defined in Section 12.2(a)).

12.2		(a) “Change of Control” — shall mean any one of the following:

	(i)		Continuing Directors no longer constitute at least 2/3 of the Directors;

	(ii)		any person or group of persons (as defined in Rule 13d-5 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934), together with its affiliates, becomes the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of twenty (20%) percent or more of the voting power of the then outstanding securities of the Company entitled to vote for the election of the Company’s directors; provided that this Article XII shall not apply with respect to any holding of securities by (A) the trust under a Trust Indenture dated September 2, 1957 made by Louie E. Roche, (B) the trust under a Trust Indenture dated August 23, 1957 made by Harvey Hubbell, and (C) any employee benefit plan (within the meaning of Section 3(3) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended) maintained by the Company or any affiliate of the Company;

	(iii)		the approval by the Company’s stockholders of the merger or consolidation of the Company with any other corporation, the sale of substantially all of the assets of the Company or the liquidation or dissolution of the Company, unless, in the case of a merger or consolidation, the incumbent Directors in office immediately prior to such

			merger or consolidation will constitute at least 2/3 of the Directors of the surviving corporation of such merger or consolidation and any parent (as such term is defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) of such corporation; or

		(iv)	at least 2/3 of the incumbent Directors in office immediately prior to any other action proposed to be taken by the Company’s stockholders determines that such proposed action, if taken, would constitute a change of control of the Company and such action is taken.

	(b)	“Continuing Director” shall mean any individual who is a member of the Company’s Board of Directors on December 9, 1986 or was designated (before such person’s initial election as a Director) as a Continuing Director by 2/3 of the then Continuing Directors.

	(c)	“Change of Control Transaction” shall mean the closing of the transaction constituting the Change of Control, which shall include, for purposes of the events described in Section 12.2(a)(iii), above, the consummation of the merger or consolidation approved by the Company’s stockholders.

12.3	(a)	Section 9.1 is deleted and the following is inserted in lieu thereof:

		“The Plan shall be administered by the Compensation Committee which shall have full authority to interpret the Plan, to establish rules and regulations relating to the Plan, and to make all other determinations and take all other actions necessary or appropriate for the proper administration of the Plan. No member of the Compensation Committee, other than a Continuing Director, shall be eligible to participate in the Plan.”

	(b)	New Section 6.3 is inserted as follows:

		Payment of Benefits Upon the Occurrence of a Change of Control Transaction.

		(a)	Upon the occurrence of a Change of Control Transaction (as defined in Section 12.2(c) above), in the event that a Director retires or is otherwise separated from Service or a Director has previously retired or otherwise separated from Service and is, as of the date of the signing of any Change of Control Agreement (as hereinafter defined) receiving installment payments under the Plan, all retirement benefits hereunder shall, unless a Director has elected otherwise with respect to the time of payment in respect of a Change of Control, become payable in a lump sum on the 30th day after the later to occur of (i) the date of the Change of Control Transaction and (ii) the date of any such retirement or separation.

	(b)		During the period of ten days after the signing of any agreement (a “Change of Control Agreement”) by the Company that would, upon the consummation of the transactions contemplated therein, result in a Change of Control, a Director shall be provided with the opportunity to elect to receive payment of the amounts provided to him or her under this Plan in installment payments, payable in accordance with Section 6.1, above.

	(c)		In the event that a Director does not elect to receive the payment of his or her benefits in installment payments, the Director’s lump sum payment as provided for hereunder shall be calculated using the actuarial assumptions set forth on Exhibit A attached hereto.

	(c)		In Section 11.3, all references to “Compensation Committee” are deleted and in lieu thereof is inserted the phrase “trustee under the trust, created pursuant to Section 8.1”.

	(d)		Section 11.4 is deleted.

	(e)		Section 11.5 is deleted.

	(f)		New Section 11.11 is inserted as follows:

			“Notwithstanding any other provisions of the Plan to the contrary:

	(i)		the accrued benefit hereunder of any Eligible Director as of the date of a Change of Control may not be reduced;

	(ii)		any Service accrued by an Eligible Director as of the date of a Change of Control cannot be reduced;

	(iii)		no amendment or action of the Compensation Committee which affects any Eligible Director is valid and enforceable without the prior written consent of such Eligible Director; and

	(iv)		no termination of the Plan shall have the effect of reducing any benefits accrued under the Plan prior to such termination.”

Adopted by the Board of Directors on March 12, 1984 and amended on December 9, 1986, March 12, 1990, December 8, 1999 and December 3, 2002.

The assumptions to be used are those specified under Section 417(e) of the Internal Revenue Code of 186, as amended, which assumptions are the minimum lump sum factors permitted to be used for calculating pension benefits under qualified defined benefit plans.

This Agreement (the “Agreement”) is dated as of December 27, 1999 by and between HUBBELL INCORPORATED, a Connecticut corporation (the “Company”), and William R. Murphy (the “Executive”).

WHEREAS, the Company’s Board of Directors considers the continued services of key executives of the Company to be in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders; and

WHEREAS, the Company’s Board of Directors desires to assure, and has determined that it is appropriate and in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders to reinforce and encourage the continued attention and dedication of key executives of the Company to their duties of employment without personal distraction or conflict of interest in circumstances which could arise from the occurrence of a change in control of the Company; and

WHEREAS, the Company’s Board of Directors has authorized the Company to enter into continuity agreements with those key executives of the Company and any of its respective subsidiaries (all of such entities, with the Company hereinafter referred to as an “Employer”), such agreements to set forth the severance compensation which the Company agrees under certain circumstances to pay such executives; and

WHEREAS, the Executive is a key executive of an Employer and has been designated by the Board as an executive to be offered such a continuity compensation agreement with the Company.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Company and the Executive agree as follows:

1. Term. This Agreement shall become effective on the date hereof and remain in effect until the second anniversary thereof; provided, however, that, thereafter, this Agreement shall automatically renew on each successive anniversary, unless an Employer provides the Executive, in writing, at least 180 days prior to the renewal date, notice that this Agreement shall not be renewed. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event that a Change in Control occurs at any time prior to the termination of this Agreement in accordance with the preceding sentence, this Agreement shall not terminate until the second anniversary of the Change in Control (or, if later, until the second anniversary of the consummation of the transaction(s) contemplated in the Change in Control).

(a) No compensation or other benefit pursuant to Section 4 hereof shall be payable under this Agreement unless and until either (i) a Change in Control of the Company (as hereinafter defined) shall have occurred while the Executive is an employee of an Employer and

the Executive’s employment by an Employer thereafter shall have terminated in accordance with Section 3 hereof or (ii) the Executive’s employment by the Company shall have terminated in accordance with Section 3(a)(ii) hereof prior to the occurrence of the Change in Control.


	(B)	any person or group of persons (as defined in Rule 13d-5 under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934), together with its affiliates, becomes the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of twenty (20%) percent or more of the voting power of the then outstanding securities of the Company entitled to vote for the election of the Company’s directors; provided that this Section 2 shall not apply with respect to any holding of securities by (I) the trust under a Trust Indenture dated September 2, 1957 made by Louie E. Roche, (II) the trust under a Trust Indenture dated August 23, 1957 made by Harvey Hubbell, and (III) any employee benefit plan (within the meaning of Section 3(3) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended) maintained by the Company or any affiliate of the Company;

	(C)	the approval by the Company’s stockholders of the merger or consolidation of the Company with any other corporation, the sale of substantially all of the assets of the Company or the liquidation or dissolution of the Company, unless, in the case of a merger or consolidation, the incumbent Directors in office immediately prior to such merger or consolidation will constitute at least 2/3 of the Directors of the surviving corporation of such merger or consolidation and any parent (as such term is defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) of such corporation; or


	(D)	at least 2/3 of the incumbent Directors in office immediately prior to any other action proposed to be taken by the Company’s stockholders determine that such proposed action, if taken, would constitute a change of control of the Company and such action is taken.


	(ii)	“Continuing Director” shall mean any individual who is a member of the Company’s Board of Directors on December 9, 1986 or was designated (before such person’s initial election as a Director) as a Continuing Director by 2/3 of the then Continuing Directors.


	(iii)	“Director” shall mean any individual who is a member of the Company’s Board of Directors on the date the action in question was taken.


	(iv)		“Change in Control Transaction” shall mean a change in Control or, if later, the consummation of the transaction contemplated by the Change in Control.

	3.		Termination of Employment: Definitions.

	(a) Termination without Cause by the Company or for Good Reason by the Executive. (i) The Executive shall be entitled to the compensation provided for in Section 4 hereof, if within two years after a Change in Control Transaction, the Executive’s employment shall be terminated (A) by an Employer for any reason other than (I) the Executive’s Disability or Retirement, (II) the Executive’s death or (III) for Cause, or (B) by the Executive with Good Reason (as such terms are defined herein).

	(ii) In addition, the Executive shall be entitled to the compensation provided for in Section 4 hereof if, (A) in the event that an agreement is signed which, if consummated, would result in a Change of Control and the Executive is terminated without Cause by the Company or terminates employment with Good Reason prior to the Change in Control, (B) such termination is at the direction of the acquiror or merger partner or otherwise in connection with the anticipated Change in Control, and (C) such Change in Control actually occurs.

(b) Disability. For purposes of this Agreement, “Disability” shall mean the Executive’s absence from the full-time performance of the Executive’s duties (as such duties existed immediately prior to such absence) for 180 consecutive business days, when the Executive is disabled as a result of incapacity due to physical or mental illness.

(c) Retirement. For purposes of this Agreement, “Retirement” shall mean the Executive’s voluntary termination of employment pursuant to late, normal or early retirement under a pension plan sponsored by an Employer, as defined in such plan, but only if such retirement occurs prior to a termination by an Employer without Cause or by the Executive for Good Reason.

(d) Cause. For purposes of this Agreement, “Cause” shall mean:

		(i) the willful and continued failure of the Executive to perform substantially all of his or her duties with an Employer (other than any such failure resulting from incapacity due to physical or mental illness), after a written demand for substantial performance is delivered to such Executive by the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of the Company which specifically identifies the manner in which the Board believes that the Executive has not substantially performed his or her duties,

		(ii) the willful engaging by the Executive in gross misconduct which is materially and demonstrably injurious to the Company or any Employer; or

Termination of the Executive for Cause shall be made by delivery to the Executive of a copy of a resolution duly adopted by the affirmative vote of not less than a three-fourths majority of the non-employee Directors of the Company or of the ultimate parent of the entity which caused the Change in Control (if the Company has become a subsidiary) at a meeting of such Directors called and held for such purpose, after 30 days prior written notice to the Executive specifying the basis for such termination and the particulars thereof and a reasonable opportunity for the Executive to cure or otherwise resolve the behavior in question prior to such meeting, finding that in the reasonable judgment of such Directors, the conduct or event set forth in any of clauses (i) through (iii) above has occurred and that such occurrence warrants the Executive’s termination.

(e) Good Reason. For purposes of this Agreement, “Good Reason” shall mean the occurrence, within the Term of this Agreement, of any of the following without the Executive’s express written consent:


	(i) after a Change of Control, any reduction in the Executive’s base salary from that which was in effect immediately prior to the Change of Control, any reduction in the Executive’s annual cash bonus below such bonus paid or payable in respect of the calendar year immediately prior to the year in which the Change of Control occurs, or any reduction in the Executive’s aggregate annual cash compensation (including base salary and bonus) from that which was in effect immediately prior to the Change of Control; or

	(ii) after a Change of Control, the failure to increase (within 12 months of the last increase in base salary) the Executive’s salary in an amount which at least equals, on a percentage basis, the average percentage of increase in base salary effected in the preceding 12 months (which period may include some period of time prior to the Change of Control) for all senior executives of the Company (unless such reduction is offset by an increase in the amount of annual cash bonus that is paid to the Executive); or

	(iii) any material and adverse diminution in the Executive’s duties, responsibilities, status, position or authority with the Company or any of its affiliates following a Change of Control; or

	(iv) any relocation of the Executive’s primary workplace to a location that is more than 35 miles from the Executive’s primary workplace as of the date of this Agreement or the Company’s requiring the Executive to be based anywhere other than the location at which the Executive performed his duties prior to the commencement of the Term; or

	(v) any failure by the Company to obtain from any successor to the Company an agreement reasonably satisfactory to the Executive to assume and perform this Agreement, as contemplated by Section 10(a) hereof.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event Executive provides the Company with a Notice of Termination (as defined below) referencing this Section 3(e), the Company shall have 30 days thereafter in which to cure or resolve the behavior otherwise constituting Good Reason. Any good faith determination by Executive that Good Reason exists shall be presumed correct and shall be binding upon the Company.

(f) Notice of Termination. Any purported termination of the Executive’s employment (other than on account of Executive’s death) with an Employer shall be communicated by a Notice of Termination to the Executive, if such termination is by an Employer, or to an Employer, if such termination is by the Executive. For purposes of this Agreement, “Notice of Termination” shall mean a written notice which shall indicate the specific termination provision in this Agreement relied upon and shall set forth in reasonable detail the facts and circumstances claimed to provide a basis for termination of the Executive’s employment under the provisions so indicated. For purposes of this Agreement, no purported termination of Executive’s employment with an Employer shall be effective without such a Notice of Termination having been given.

Subject to Section 9 hereof, if within two years of a Change in Control Transaction, the Executive’s employment with an Employer shall be terminated in accordance with Section 3(a) (the “Termination”), the Executive shall be entitled to the following payments and benefits:


	(a) Severance. The Company shall pay or cause to be paid to the Executive a cash severance amount equal to three times the sum of (i) the Executive’s annual base salary on the date of the Change in Control (or, if higher, the annual base salary in effect immediately prior to the giving of the Notice of Termination) and (ii) the highest of the actual bonuses paid or payable to the Executive under the Company’s annual incentive Compensation plan in any of the three consecutive fiscal years prior to the year in which the Change in Control occurs. This cash severance amount shall be payable in a lump sum calculated without any discount.

	(b) Additional Payments and Benefits. The Executive shall also be entitled to:


		(i) a lump sum cash payment equal to the sum of (A) the Executive’s accrued but unpaid annual base salary through the date of Termination, (B) the unpaid portion, if any, of bonuses previously earned by the Executive pursuant to the Company’s annual incentive compensation plan, plus the pro rata portion of (I) the Bonus or (II) if payable, the target bonus to be paid for the year in which the date of Termination occurs, in either case (calculated through the date of Termination), and (C) an amount, if any, equal to compensation previously deferred (excluding any qualified plan deferral) and any accrued vacation pay, in each case, in full satisfaction of Executive’s rights thereto; and


	(d) Withholding. Payments and benefits provided pursuant to this Section 4 shall be subject to any applicable payroll and other taxes required to be withheld.

	5. Compensation Upon Termination for Death, Disability or Retirement.

If an Executive’s employment is terminated by reason of Death, Disability or Retirement prior to any other termination, Executive will receive:


	(a) the sum of (i) Executive’s accrued but unpaid salary through the date of Termination, (ii) the pro rata portion of the Executive’s target bonus for the year of Executive’s Death or Disability (calculated through the date of Termination), and (iii) an amount equal to any compensation previously deferred and any accrued vacation pay; and

	(b) other accrued or vested benefits in accordance with the terms of the applicable plan (with an offset for any amounts paid under item (a)(iii), above.

	6. Excess Parachute Excise Tax Payments.

(a)(i) If it is determined (as hereafter provided) that any payment or distribution by the Company or any Employer to or for the benefit of the Executive, whether paid or payable or distributed or distributable pursuant to the terms of this Agreement or otherwise pursuant to or by reason of any other agreement, policy, plan, program or arrangement, including without limitation any stock option, stock appreciation right or similar right, or the lapse or termination of any restriction on or the vesting or exercisability of any of the foregoing (a “Payment”), would be subject to the excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Code (or any successor provision thereto) by reason of being “contingent on a change in ownership or control” of the Company, within the meaning of Section 280G of the Code (or any successor provision thereto) or to any similar tax imposed by state or local law, or any interest or penalties with respect to such excise tax (such tax or taxes, together with any such interest and penalties, are hereafter collectively referred to as the “Excise Tax”), then the Executive shall be entitled to receive an additional payment or payments (a “Gross-Up Payment”) in an amount such that, after payment by the Executive of all taxes (including any interest or penalties imposed with respect to such taxes), including any Excise Tax, imposed upon the Gross-Up Payment, the Executive retains an amount of the Gross-Up Payment equal to the Excise Tax imposed upon the Payments; provided, however, if the Executive’s Payment is, when calculated on a net-after-tax basis, less than $50,000 in excess of the amount of the Payment which could be paid to the Executive under Section 280G of the Code without causing the imposition of the Excise Tax, then the Payment shall be limited to the largest amount payable (as described above) without resulting in the imposition of any Excise Tax (such amount, the “Capped Amount”).

(ii) Subject to the provisions of Section 6(a)(i) hereof, all determinations required to be made under this Section 6, including whether an Excise Tax is payable by the Executive and the amount of such Excise Tax and whether a Gross-Up Payment is required and the amount of such Gross-Up Payment, shall be made by the nationally recognized firm of certified public accountants (the “Accounting Firm”) used by the Company prior to the Change in

Control (or, if such Accounting Firm declines to serve, the Accounting Firm shall be a nationally recognized firm of certified public accountants selected by the Executive). The Accounting Firm shall be directed by the Company or the Executive to submit its preliminary determination and detailed supporting calculations to both the Company and the Executive within 15 calendar days after the Termination Date, if applicable, and any other such time or times as may be requested by the Company or the Executive. If the Accounting Firm determines that any Excise Tax is payable by the Executive and that the criteria for reducing the Payment to the Capped Amount (as described in Section 6(a)(i) above) is met, then the Company shall reduce the Payment by the amount which, based on the Accounting Firm’s determination and calculations, would provide the Executive with the Capped Amount, and pay to the Executive such reduced Payment. If the Accounting Firm determines that an Excise Tax is payable, without reduction pursuant to Section 6(a)(i), above, the Company shall pay the required Gross-Up Payment to, or for the benefit of, the Executive within five business days after receipt of such determination and calculations. If the Accounting Firm determines that no Excise Tax is payable by the Executive, it shall, at the same time as it makes such determination, furnish the Executive with an opinion that he has substantial authority not to report any Excise Tax on his/her federal, state, local income or other tax return. Any determination by the Accounting Firm as to the amount of the Gross-Up Payment shall be binding upon the Company and the Executive absent a contrary determination by the Internal Revenue Services or a court of competent jurisdiction; provided, however, that no such determination shall eliminate or reduce the Company’s obligation to provide any Gross-Up Payment that shall be due as a result of such contrary determination. As a result of the uncertainty in the application of Section 4999 of the Code (or any successor provision thereto) and the possibility of similar uncertainty regarding state or local tax law at the time of any determination by the Accounting Firm hereunder, it is possible that Gross-Up Payments that will not have been made by the Company should have been made (an “Underpayment”), consistent with the calculations required to be made hereunder. In the event that the Company exhausts or fails to pursue its remedies pursuant to Section 6(a) hereof and the Executive thereafter is required to make a payment of any Excise Tax, the Executive shall direct the Accounting Firm to determine the amount of the Underpayment that has occurred and to submit its determination and detailed supporting calculations to both the Company and the Executive as promptly as possible. Any such Underpayment shall be promptly paid by the Company to, or for the benefit of, the Executive within five business days after receipt of such determination and calculations.

(iii) The Company and the Executive shall each provide the Accounting Firm access to and copies of any books, records and documents in the possession of the Company or the Executive, as the case may be, reasonably requested by the Accounting Firm, and otherwise cooperate with the Accounting Firm in connection with the preparation and issuance of the determination contemplated by Section 6(a) hereof.

(iv) The federal, state and local income or other tax returns filed by the Executive (or any filing made by a consolidated tax group which includes the Company) shall be prepared and filed on a consistent basis with the determination of the Accounting Firm with respect to the Excise Tax payable by the Executive. The Executive shall make proper payment of the amount of any Excise Tax, and at the request of the Company, provide to the Company true and correct copies (with any amendments) of his/her federal income tax return as filed with the

Internal Revenue Service and corresponding state and local tax returns, if relevant, as filed with the applicable taxing authority, and such other documents reasonably requested by the Company, evidencing such payment. If prior to the filing of the Executive’s federal income tax return, or corresponding state or local tax return, if relevant, the Accounting Firm determines that the amount of the Gross-Up Payment should be reduced, the Executive shall within five business days pay to the Company the amount of such reduction.

(v) The fees and expenses of the Accounting Firm for its services in connection with the determinations and calculations contemplated by Sections 6(a)(ii) and (iv) hereof shall be borne by the Company. If such fees and expenses are initially advanced by the Executive, the Company shall reimburse the Executive the full amount of such fees and expenses within five business days after receipt from the Executive of a statement therefor and reasonable evidence of his/her payment thereof.

(b) In the event that the Internal Revenue Service claims that any payment or benefit received under this Agreement constitutes an “excess parachute payment,” within the meaning of Section 280G(b)(1) of the Code, the Executive shall notify the Company in writing of such claim. Such notification shall be given as soon as practicable but no later than 10 business days after the Executive is informed in writing of such claim and shall apprise the Company of the nature of such claim and the date on which such claim is requested to be paid. The Executive shall not pay such claim prior to the expiration of the 30 day period following the date on which the Executive gives such notice to the Company (or such shorter period ending on the date that any payment of taxes with respect to such claim is due). If the Company notifies the Executive in writing prior to the expiration of such period that it desires to contest such claim, the Executive shall (i) give the Company any information reasonably requested by the Company relating to such claim; (ii) take such action in connection with contesting such claim as the Company shall reasonably request in writing from time to time, including without limitation, accepting legal representation with respect to such claim by an attorney reasonably selected by the Company and reasonably satisfactory to the Executive; (iii) cooperate with the Company in good faith in order to effectively contest such claim; and (iv) permit the Company to participate in any proceedings relating to such claim; provided, however, that the Company shall bear and pay directly all costs and expenses (including, but not limited to, additional interest and penalties and related legal, consulting or other similar fees) incurred in connection with such contest and shall indemnify and hold the Executive harmless, on an after-tax basis, for and against any Excise Tax or other tax (including interest and penalties with respect thereto) imposed as a result of such representation and payment of costs and expenses.

(c) The Company shall control all proceedings taken in connection with such contest and, at its sole option, may pursue or forgo any and all administrative appeals, proceedings, hearings and conferences with the taxing authority in respect of such claim and may, at its sole option, either direct the Executive to pay the tax claimed and sue for a refund or contest the claim in any permissible manner, and the Executive agrees to prosecute such contest to a determination before any administrative tribunal, in a court of initial jurisdiction and in one or more appellate courts, as the Company shall determine; provided, however, that if the Company directs the Executive to pay such claim and sue for a refund, the Company shall

advance the amount of such payment to the Executive on an interest-free basis, and shall indemnify and hold the Executive harmless, on an after-tax basis, from any Excise Tax or other tax (including interest and penalties with respect thereto) imposed with respect to such advance or with respect to any imputed income with respect to such advance; and provided, further, that if the Executive is required to extend the statute of limitations to enable the Company to contest such claim, the Executive may limit this extension solely to such contested amount. The Company’s control of the contest shall be limited to issues with respect to which a corporate deduction would be disallowed pursuant to Section 280G of the Code and the Executive shall be entitled to settle or contest, as the case may be, any other issue raised by the Internal Revenue Service or any other taxing authority. In addition, no position may be taken nor any final resolution be agreed to by the Company without the Executive’s consent if such position or resolution could reasonably be expected to adversely affect the Executive (including any other tax position of the Executive unrelated to matters covered hereby).

(d) If, after the receipt by the Executive of an amount advanced by the Company in connection with the contest of the Excise Tax claim, the Executive becomes entitled to receive any refund with respect to such claim, the Executive shall promptly pay to the Company the amount of such refund (together with any interest paid or credited thereon after taxes applicable thereto); provided, however, if the amount of that refund exceeds the amount advanced by the Company or it is otherwise determined for any reason that additional amounts could be paid to the Named Executive without incurring any Excise Tax, any such amount will be promptly paid by the Company to the named Executive. If, after the receipt by the Executive of an amount advanced by the Company in connection with an Excise Tax claim, a determination is made that the Executive shall not be entitled to any refund with respect to such claim and the Company does not notify the Executive in writing of its intent to contest the denial of such refund prior to the expiration of 30 days after such determination, such advance shall be forgiven and shall not be required to be repaid and shall be deemed to be in consideration for services rendered after the date of the Termination.

7. Expenses. In addition to all other amounts payable to the Executive under this Agreement, the Company shall pay or reimburse the Executive for legal fees (including without limitation, any and all court costs and attorneys’ fees and expenses) incurred by the Executive in connection with or as a result of any claim, action or proceeding brought by the Company or the Executive with respect to or arising out of this Agreement or any provision hereof; provided, however, that in the case of an action brought by the Executive, the Company shall have no obligation for any such legal fees, if the Company is successful in establishing with the court that the Executive’s action was frivolous or otherwise without any reasonable legal or factual basis.

(a) The obligations of the Company to make the payment to the Executive, and to make the arrangements, provided for herein shall be absolute and unconditional and shall not be reduced by any circumstances, including without limitation any set-off, counterclaim,

recoupment, defense or other right which the Company may have against the Executive or any third party at any time.

(b) With respect to any employment agreement with the Executive in effect immediately prior to the Change in Control, nothing herein shall have any effect on the Executive’s rights thereunder; provided, however, that in the event of the Executive's termination of employment in accordance with Section 3 hereof, this Agreement shall govern solely for the purpose of providing the terms of all payments and additional benefits to which the Executive is entitled upon such termination and any payments or benefit provided thereunder shall reduce the corresponding type of payments or benefits hereunder. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event that the Executive's employment is terminated prior to the occurrence of a Change in Control under the circumstances provided for in Section 3(a)(ii) and such circumstances also entitle Executive to payments and benefits under any other employment or other agreement as in effect prior to the Change in Control (“Other Agreement”), then, until the Change in Control occurs, the Executive will receive the payments and benefits to which he/she is entitled under such Other Agreement. Upon the occurrence of the Change in Control, the Company will pay to the Executive in cash the amount to which he/she is entitled to under this Agreement (reduced by the amounts already paid under the Other Agreement) in respect of cash payments and shall provide or increase any other noncash benefits to those provided for hereunder (after taking into Account noncash benefits, if any, provided under such Other Agreement). Amounts which are vested benefits or which the Executive is otherwise entitled to receive under any plan or program of the Company or any other Employer shall be payable in accordance with such plan or program, except as explicitly modified by this Agreement.

such LSARs in the event that the Change in Control contemplated hereunder is intended to be, and is otherwise, eligible for pooling-of-interests accounting treatment under APB No. 16.

(a) The Company shall require any successor (whether direct or indirect, by purchase, merger, consolidation or otherwise) to all or substantially all of the business of the Company, by agreement to expressly, absolutely and unconditionally assume and agree to perform this Agreement in the same manner and to the same extent that the Company would be required to perform it if no such succession had taken place. Failure of the Company to obtain such agreement prior to the effectiveness of any such succession shall be a material breach of this Agreement and shall entitle the Executive to terminate the Executive’s employment with the Company or such successor for Good Reason immediately prior to or at any time after such succession. As used in this Agreement, ‘Company‘ shall mean (i) the Company as hereinbefore defined, and (ii) any successor to all the stock of the Company or to all or substantially all of the Company’s business or assets which executes and delivers an agreement provided for in this Section 10(a) or which otherwise becomes bound by all the terms and provisions of this Agreement by operation of law, including any parent or subsidiary of such a successor.

(b) This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be enforceable by the Executive’s personal or legal representatives, executors, administrators, successors, heirs, distributees, devisees, legatees. If the Executive should die while any amount would be payable to the Executive hereunder if the Executive had continued to live, all such amounts, unless otherwise provided herein, shall be paid in accordance with the terms of this Agreement to the Executive’s estate or designated beneficiary. Neither this Agreement nor any right arising hereunder may be assigned or pledged by the Executive.

11. Notice. For purpose of this Agreement, notices and all other communications provided for in this Agreement or contemplated hereby shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given when personally delivered, delivered by a nationally recognized overnight delivery service or when mailed United States certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, and addressed, in the case of the Company, to the Company at:


	Hubbell Incorporated 584 Derby Milford Road Orange, Connecticut 06477-4024 Attention: General Counsel

and in the case of the Executive, to the Executive at the address set forth on the execution page at the end hereof.

Either party may designate a different address by giving notice of change of address in the manner provided above, except that notices of change of address shall be effective only upon receipt.

12. Confidentiality. The Executive shall retain in confidence any and all confidential information concerning the Company and its respective business which is now known or hereafter becomes known to the Executive, except as otherwise required by law and except information (i) ascertainable or obtained from public information, (ii) received by the Executive at any time after the Executive’s employment by the Company shall have terminated, from a third party not employed by or otherwise affiliated with the Company or (iii) which is or becomes known to the public by any means other than a breach of this Section 12. Upon the Termination of employment, the Executive will not take or keep any proprietary or confidential information or documentation belonging to the Company.

13. Miscellaneous. No provision of this Agreement may be amended, altered, modified, waived or discharged unless such amendment, alteration, modification, waiver or discharge is agreed to in writing signed by the Executive and such officer of the Company as shall be specifically designated by the Committee or by the Board of Directors of the Company. No waiver by either party, at any time, of any breach by the other party of, or of compliance by the other party with, any condition or provision of this Agreement to be performed or complied with by such other party shall be deemed a waiver of any similar or dissimilar provision or condition of this Agreement or any other breach of or failure to comply with the same condition or provision at the same time or at any prior or subsequent time. No agreements or representations, oral or otherwise, express or implied, with respect to the subject matter hereof have been made by either party which are not expressly set forth in this Agreement.

14. Severability. If any one or more of the provisions of this Agreement shall be held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, the validity, legality and enforceability of the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall not be affected thereby. To the extent permitted by applicable law, each party hereto waives any provision of law which renders any provision of this Agreement invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect.

15. Governing Law; Venue. The validity, interpretation, construction and performance of this Agreement shall be governed on a non-exclusive basis by the laws of the State of Connecticut without giving effect to its conflict of laws rules. For purposes of jurisdiction and venue, the Company and each Employer hereby consents to jurisdiction and venue in any suit, action or proceeding with respect to this Agreement in any court of competent jurisdiction in the state in which Executive resides at the commencement of such suit, action or proceeding and waives any objection, challenge or dispute as to such jurisdiction or venue being proper.

16. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which shall be deemed to constitute one and the same instrument.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written.


HUBBELL INCORPORATED

By:	/s/ George Zurman

	Title:	Vice President


/s/ W. R. Murphy 3/22/00

Executive


23 Meadowbrook Road


Madison, CT 06443

Address

EX-10.CC 5 y82446exv10wcc.htm CONTINUITY AGREEMENT CONTINUITY AGREEMENT

This Agreement (the “Agreement”) is dated as of December 27, 1999 by and between HUBBELL INCORPORATED, a Connecticut corporation (the “Company”), and Gary N. Amato (the “Executive”).

WHEREAS, the Company’s Board of Directors considers the continued services of key executives of the Company to be in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders; and

WHEREAS, the Executive is a key executive of an Employer and has been designated by the Board as an executive to be offered such a continuity compensation agreement with the Company.

1. Term. This Agreement shall become effective on the date hereof and remain in effect until the second anniversary thereof; provided, however, that, thereafter, this Agreement shall automatically renew on each successive anniversary, unless an Employer provides the Executive, in writing, at least 180 days prior to the renewal date, notice that this Agreement shall not be renewed. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event that a Change in Control occurs at any time prior to the termination of this Agreement in accordance with the preceding sentence, this Agreement shall not terminate until the second anniversary of the Change in Control (or, if later, until the second anniversary of the consummation of the transaction(s) contemplated in the Change in Control).


	(B)	any person or group of persons (as defined in Rule 13d-5 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934), together with its affiliates, becomes the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of twenty (20%) percent or more of the voting power of the then outstanding securities of the Company entitled to vote for the election of the Company’s directors; provided that this Section 2 shall not apply with respect to any holding of securities by (I) the trust under a Trust Indenture dated September 2, 1957 made by Louie E. Roche, (II) the trust under a Trust Indenture dated August 23, 1957 made by Harvey Hubbell, and (III) any employee benefit plan (within the meaning of Section 3(3) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended) maintained by the Company or any affiliate of the Company;

	(C)	the approval by the Company’s stockholders of the merger or consolidation of the Company with any other corporation, the sale of substantially all of the assets of the Company or the liquidation or dissolution of the Company, unless, in the case of a merger or consolidation, the incumbent Directors in office immediately prior to such merger or consolidation will constitute at least 2/3 of the Directors of the surviving corporation of such merger or consolidation and any parent (as such term is defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) of such corporation; or


	(D)	at least 2/3 of the incumbent Directors in office immediately prior to any other action proposed to be taken by the Company’s stockholders determine that such proposed action, if taken, would constitute a change of control of the Company and such action is taken.


	(ii)	“Continuing Director” shall mean any individual who is a member of the Company’s Board of Directors on December 9, 1986 or was designated (before such person’s initial election as a Director) as a Continuing Director by 2/3 of the then Continuing Directors.


	(iii)	“Director” shall mean any individual who is a member of the Company’s Board of Directors on the date the action in question was taken.


	(iv)	“Change in Control Transaction” shall mean a Change in Control or, if later, the consummation of the transaction contemplated by the Change in Control.

(a) Termination without Cause by the Company or for Good Reason by the Executive. (i) The Executive shall be entitled to the compensation provided for in Section 4 hereof, if within two years after a Change in Control Transaction, the Executive’s employment shall be terminated (A) by an Employer for any reason other than (I) the Executive’s Disability or Retirement, (II) the Executive’s death or (III) for Cause, or (B) by the Executive with Good Reason (as such terms are defined herein).

(ii) In addition, the Executive shall be entitled to the compensation provided for in Section 4 hereof if, (A) in the event that an agreement is signed which, if consummated, would result in a Change of Control and the Executive is terminated without Cause by the Company or terminates employment with Good Reason prior to the Change in Control, (B) such termination is at the direction of the acquiror or merger partner or otherwise in connection with the anticipated Change in Control, and (C) such Change in Control actually occurs.


	(b) Disability. For purposes of this Agreement, “Disability” shall mean the Executive’s absence from the full-time performance of the Executive’s duties (as such duties existed immediately prior to such absence) for 180 consecutive business days, when the Executive is disabled as a result of incapacity due to physical or mental illness.

	(c) Retirement. For purposes of this Agreement, “Retirement” shall mean the Executive’s voluntary termination of employment pursuant to late, normal or early retirement under a pension plan sponsored by an Employer, as defined in such plan, but only if such retirement occurs prior to a termination by an Employer without Cause or by the Executive for Good Reason.

	(d) Cause. For purposes of this Agreement, “Cause” shall mean:


	(i) the willful and continued failure of the Executive to perform substantially all of his or her duties with an Employer (other than any such failure resulting from incapacity due to physical or mental illness), after a written demand for substantial performance is delivered to such Executive by the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of the Company which specifically identifies the manner in which the Board believes that the Executive has not substantially performed his or her duties,

	(ii) the willful engaging by the Executive in gross misconduct which is materially and demonstrably injurious to the Company or any Employer; or


	(i) after a Change of Control, any reduction in the Executive’s base salary from that which was in effect immediately prior to the Change of Control, any reduction in the Executive’s annual cash bonus below such bonus paid or payable in respect of the calendar year immediately prior to the year in which the Change of Control occurs, or any reduction in the Executive’s aggregate annual cash compensation (including base salary and bonus) from that which was in effect immediately prior to the Change of Control; or

	(ii) after a Change of Control, the failure to increase (within 12 months of the last increase in base salary) the Executive’s salary in an amount which at least equals, on a percentage basis, the average percentage of increase in base salary effected in the preceding 12 months (which period may include some period of time prior to the Change of Control) for all senior executives of the Company (unless such reduction is offset by an increase in the amount of annual cash bonus that is paid to the Executive); or

	(iii) any material and adverse diminution in the Executives’ duties, responsibilities, status, position or authority with the Company or any of its affiliates following a Change of Control; or

	(iv) any relocation of the Executive’s primary workplace to a location that is more than 35 miles from the Executive’s primary workplace as of the date of this Agreement or the Company’s requiring the Executive to be based anywhere other than the location at which the Executive performed his duties prior to the commencement of the Term; or

	(v) any failure by the Company to obtain from any successor to the Company an agreement reasonably satisfactory to the Executive to assume and perform this Agreement, as contemplated by Section 10(a) hereof.

(f) Notice of Termination. Any purported termination of the Executive’s employment (other than on account of Executive’s death) with an Employer shall be communicated by a Notice of Termination to the Executive, if such termination is by an Employer, or to an Employer, if such termination is by the Executive. For purposes of this Agreement, “Notice of Termination” shall mean a written notice which shall indicate the specific termination provision in this Agreement relied upon and shall set forth in reasonable detail the facts and circumstances claimed to provide a basis for termination of the Executives’s employment under the provisions so indicated. For purposes of this Agreement, no purported termination of Executive’s employment with an Employer shall be effective without such a Notice of Termination having been given.

Subject to Section 9 hereof, if within two years of a Change of Control Transaction, the Executive’s employment with an Employer shall be terminated in accordance with Section 3(a) (the “Termination”), the Executive shall be entitled to the following payments and benefits:

(a) Severance. The Company shall pay or cause to be paid to the Executive a cash severance amount equal to two times the sum of (i) the Executive’s annual base salary on the date of the Change in Control (or, if higher, the annual base salary in effect immediately prior to the giving of the Notice of Termination) and (ii) the highest of the actual bonuses paid or payable to the Executive under the Company’s annual incentive Compensation plan in any of the three consecutive fiscal years prior to the year in which the Change in Control occurs. This cash severance amount shall be payable in a lump sum calculated without any discount.

(b) Additional Payments and Benefits. The Executive shall also be entitled to:

(i) a lump sum cash payment equal to the sum of (A) the Executive’s accrued but unpaid annual base salary through the date of Termination, (B) the unpaid portion, if any, of bonuses previously earned by the Executive pursuant to the Company’s annual incentive compensation plan, plus the pro rata portion of (I) the Bonus or (II) if payable, the target bonus to be paid for the year in which the date of Termination occurs, in either case (calculated through the date of Termination), and (C) an amount, if any, equal to compensation previously deferred (excluding any qualified plan deferral) and any accrued vacation pay, in each case, in full satisfaction of Executive’s rights thereto; and


	(ii) an annual benefit under the Company’s Supplemental Retirement Plan (the “SERP”), calculated based on 8 1/3 years of service and unreduced for early retirement thereunder; provided, however, that this provision does not entitle the Executive, if he did not previously participate in the SERP, to participate in such Plan absent the occurrence of the contemplated Change of Control; and

	(iii) unless otherwise provided under the Key Man Supplemental Medical Plan, continued medical, dental, vision, and life insurance coverage (excluding accident, death, and disability insurance) for the Executive and the Executive’s eligible dependents or, to the extent such coverage is not commercially available, such other arrangements reasonably acceptable to the Executive, on the same basis as in effect prior to the Change in Control or the Executive’s Termination, whichever is deemed to provide for more substantial benefits, for a period ending on the earlier of (A) the end of the second anniversary of the date of the Executive’s Termination (B) the commencement of comparable coverage by the Executive with a subsequent employer (the “Continuation Period”); and

	(iv) during the Continuation Period, continuation of the Executive’s perquisites, including the provision of an automobile and payment of all related expenses (including maintenance, other than gas), annual social and/or health club dues, and tax and financial planning services, as in effect immediately prior to the Change of Control; and

	(iv) all other accrued or vested benefits in accordance with the terms of the applicable plan (with an offset for any amounts paid under Section 4(b)(i)(C), above).

	All lump sum payments under this Section 4 shall be paid within 10 business days after Executive’s date of Termination; provided, however, that with respect to the SERP benefit set forth in Section 4(b)(ii), above, unless the Executive, during the ten day period after the Company signs any agreement that would, upon the consummation of the transactions contemplated therein, result in a Change of Control, elects to receive a lump sum payment equal to the present value of his SERP benefit (as calculated in Section 4(b)(ii) and otherwise in accordance with Exhibit A, as attached hereto), the Executive shall be entitled to receive the SERP benefit in installment payments (payable in accordance with the terms of the SERP), beginning upon the later to occur of (i) the date on which the Executive achieves age 55 and (ii) the date on which Executive’s employment terminates in accordance with the terms hereunder.

(c) Outplacement. If so requested by the Executive, outplacement services shall be provided by a professional outplacement provider selected by Executive; provided, however, that such outplacement services shall be provided the Executive at a cost to the Company of not more than fifteen (15) percent of such Executive’s annual base salary.

(a)(i) If it is determined (as hereafter provided) that any payment or distribution by the Company or any Employer to or for the benefit of the Executive, whether paid or payable or distributed or distributable pursuant to the terms of this Agreement or otherwise pursuant to or by reason of any other agreement, policy, plan, program or arrangement, including without limitation any stock option, stock appreciation right or similar right, or the lapse or termination of any restriction on or the vesting or exercisability of any of the foregoing (a “Payment”), would be subject to the excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Code (or any successor provision thereto) by reason of being “contingent on a change in ownership or control” of the Company, within the meaning of Section 280G of the Code (or any successor provision thereto) or to any similar tax imposed by state or local law, or any interest or penalties with respect to such excise tax (such tax or taxes, together with any such interest and penalties, are hereafter collectively referred to as the “Excise Tax”), then the Executive shall be entitled to receive an additional payment or payments (a “Gross-Up Payment”) in an amount such that, after payment by the Executive of all taxes (including any interest or penalties imposed with respect to such taxes), including any Excise Tax, imposed upon the Gross-Up Payment, the Executive retains an amount of the Gross-Up Payment equal to the Excise Tax imposed upon the Payments; provided, however, if the Executive’s Payment is, when calculated on a net-after-tax basis, less than $50,000 in excess of the amount of the Payment which could be paid to the Executive under Section 280G of the Code without causing the imposition of the Excise Tax, then the Payment shall be limited to the largest amount payable (as described above) without resulting in the imposition of any Excise Tax (such amount, the “Capped Amount”).

Control (or, if such Accounting Firm declines to serve, the Accounting Firm shall be a nationally recognized firm of certified public accountants selected by the Executive). The Accounting Firm shall be directed by the Company or the Executive to submit its preliminary determination and detailed supporting calculations to both the Company and the Executive within 15 calendar days after the Termination Date, if applicable, and any other such time or times as may be requested by the Company or the Executive. If the Accounting Firm determines that any Excise Tax is payable by the Executive and that the criteria for reducing the Payment to the Capped Amount (as described in Section 6(a)(i) above) is met, then the Company shall reduce the Payment by the amount which, based on the Accounting Firm's determination and calculations, would provide the Executive with the Capped Amount, and pay to the Executive such reduced Payment. If the Accounting Firm determines that an Excise Tax is payable, without reduction pursuant to Section 6(a)(i), above, the Company shall pay the required Gross-Up Payment to, or for the benefit of, the Executive within five business days after receipt of such determination and calculations. If the Accounting Firm determines that no Excise Tax is payable by the Executive, it shall, at the same time as it makes such determination, furnish the Executive with an opinion that he has substantial authority not to report any Excise Tax on his/her federal, state, local income or other tax return. Any determination by the Accounting Firm as to the amount of the Gross-Up Payment shall be binding upon the Company and the Executive absent a contrary determination by the Internal Revenue Services or a court of competent jurisdiction; provided, however, that no such determination shall eliminate or reduce the Company's obligation to provide any Gross-Up Payment that shall be due as a result of such contrary determination. As a result of the uncertainty in the application of Section 4999 of the Code (or any successor provision thereto) and the possibility of similar uncertainty regarding state or local tax law at the time of any determination by the Accounting Firm hereunder, it is possible that Gross-Up Payments that will not have been made by the Company should have been made (an “Underpayment”), consistent with the calculations required to be made hereunder. In the event that the Company exhausts or fails to pursue its remedies pursuant to Section 6(a) hereof and the Executive thereafter is required to make a payment of any Excise Tax, the Executive shall direct the Accounting Firm to determine the amount of the Underpayment that has occurred and to submit its determination and detailed supporting calculations to both the Company and Executive as promptly as possible. Any such Underpayment shall be promptly paid by the Company to, or for the benefit of, the Executive within five business days after receipt of such determination and calculations.

(b) In the event that the Internal Revenue Service claims that any payment or benefit received under this Agreement constitutes an “excess parachute payment,” within the meaning of Section 280G(b)(1) of the Code, the Executive shall notify the Company in writing of such claim. Such notification shall be given as soon as practicable but no later than 10 business days after the Executive is informed in writing of such claim and shall apprise the Company of the nature of such claim and the date on which such claim is requested to be paid. The Executive shall not pay such claim prior to the expiration of the 30 day period following the date on which the Executive gives such notice to the Company (or such shorter period ending on the date that any payment of taxes with respect to such claim is due). If the Company notifies the Executive in writing prior to the expiration of such period that it desires to contest such claim, the Executive shall (i) give the Company any information reasonably requested by the Company relating to such claim; (ii) take such action in connection with contesting such claim as the Company shall reasonably request in writing from time to time, including without limitation, accepting legal representation with respect to such claim by an attorney reasonably selected by the Company and reasonably satisfactory to the Executive; (iii) cooperate with the Company in good faith in order to effectively contest such claim; and (iv) permit the Company to participate in any proceedings relating to such claim; provided, however, that the Company shall bear and pay directly all costs and expenses (including, but not limited to, additional interest and penalties and related legal, consulting or other similar fees) incurred in connection with such contest and shall indemnify and hold the Executive harmless, on an after-tax basis, for and against any Excise Tax or other tax (including interest and penalties with respect thereto) imposed as a result of such representation and payment of costs and expenses.

(c) The Company shall control all proceedings taken in connection with such contest and, at its sole option, may pursue or forgo any and all administrative appeals, proceedings, hearings and conferences with the taxing authority in respect of such claim and may, at its sole option, either direct the Executive to pay the tax claimed and sue for a refund or contest the claim in any permissible manner, and the Executive agrees to prosecute such contest to a determination before any administrative tribunal, in a court of initial jurisdiction and in one or more appellate courts, as the Company shall determine; provided, however, that if the Company directs the Executive to pay such claim and sue for a refund, the Company shall

advance the amount of such payment to the Executive on an interest-free basis, and shall indemnify and hold the Executive harmless, on an after-tax basis, from any Excise Tax or other tax (including interest and penalties with respect thereto) imposed with respect to such advance or with respect to any imputed income with respect to such advance; and provided, further, that if the Executive is required to extend the statute of limitations to enable the Company to contest such claim, the Executive may limit this extension solely to such contested amount. The Company’s control of the contest shall be limited to issues with respect to which a corporate deduction would be disallowed pursuant to Section 280G of the Code and the Executive shall be entitled to settle or contest, as the case may be, any other issue raised by the Internal Revenue Service or any other taxing authority. In addition, no position may be taken nor any final resolution be agreed to by the Company without the Executive’s consent if such position or resolution would reasonably be expected to adversely affect the Executive (including any other tax position of the Executive unrelated to matters covered hereby).

(d) If, after the receipt by the Executive of an amount advanced by the Company in connection with the contest of the Excise Tax claim, the Executive becomes entitled to receive any refund with respect to such claim, the Executive shall promptly pay to the Company the amount of such refund (together with any interest paid or credited thereon after taxes applicable thereto); provided, however, if the amount of that refund exceeds the amount advanced by the Company or it is otherwise determined for any reason that additional amounts could be paid to the Named Executive without incurring any Excise Tax, any such amount will be promptly paid by the Company in connection with an Excise Tax claim, a determination is made that the Executive shall not be entitled to any refund with respect to such claim and the Company does not notify the Executive in writing of its intent to contest the denial of such refund prior to the expiration of 30 days after such determination, such advance shall be forgiven and shall not be required to be repaid and shall be deemed to be in consideration for services rendered after the date of the Termination.

7. Expenses. In addition to all other amounts payable to the Executive under this Agreement, the Company shall pay or reimburse the Executive for legal fees (including without limitation, any and all court costs and attorneys’ fees and expenses) incurred by the Executive in connection with or as a result of any claim, action or proceeding brought by the Company or the Executive with respect to or arising out of this Agreement or any provision hereof; provided, however, that in the case of an action brought by the Executive, the Company shall have no obligation for any such legal fees, if the Company is successful in establishing with the court that the Executive’s action was frivolous or otherwise without any reasonable legal or factual basis.

recoupment, defense or other right which the Company may have against the Executive or any third party at any time.

(b) Nothing in this Agreement shall prevent or limit the Executive’s continuing or future participation in any benefit, bonus, incentive or other plan or program provided by the Company or any other Employer and for which the Executive may qualify, nor shall anything herein limit or reduce such rights as the Executive may have under any agreements with the Company or any other Employer.

(c) Each entity included in the definition of “Employer” and any successors or assigns shall be joint and severally liable with the Company under this Agreement.

(a) This Agreement is not, and nothing herein shall be deemed to create, a contract of employment between the Executive and the Company. Any Employer may terminate the employment of the Executive at any time, subject to the terms of this Agreement and/or any employment agreement or arrangement between the Employer and the Executive that may then be in effect.

(b) With respect to any employment agreement with the Executive in effect immediately prior to the Change in Control, nothing herein shall have any effect on the Executive’s rights thereunder; provided, however, that in the event of the Executive’s termination of employment in accordance with Section 3 hereof, this Agreement shall govern solely for the purpose of providing the terms of all payments and additional benefits to which the Executive is entitled upon such termination and any payments or benefit provided thereunder shall reduce the corresponding type of payments or benefits hereunder. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event that the Executive’s employment is terminated prior to the occurrence of a Change in Control under the circumstances provided for in Section 3(a)(ii) and such circumstances also entitle Executive to payments and benefits under any other employment or other agreement as in effect prior to the Change in Control (“Other Agreement”), then until the Change in Control occurs, the Executive will receive the payments and benefits to which he/she is entitled under such Other Agreement. Upon the occurrence of the Change in Control, the Company will pay to the Executive in cash the amount which he/she is entitled to under this Agreement (reduced by the amounts already paid under the Other Agreement) in respect of cash payments and shall provide or increase any other noncash benefits to those provided for hereunder (after taking into Account noncash benefits, if any, provided under such Other Agreement). Amounts which are vested benefits or which the Executive is otherwise entitled to receive under any plan or program of the Company or any other Employer shall be payable in accordance with such plan or program, except as explicitly modified by this Agreement.

(c) With respect to any limited stock appreciation rights (“LSARs”) granted to the Executive pursuant to the Company’s 1973 Stock Option Plan for Key Executives held, as of the date of this Agreement, by the Executive, the Executive hereby agrees to the cancellation of

such LSARs in the event that the Change in Control contemplated hereunder is intended to be, and is otherwise, eligible for pooling-of-interests accounting treatment under APB No. 16.

(a) The Company shall require any successor (whether direct or indirect, by purchase, merger, consolidation or otherwise) to all or substantially all of the business of the Company, by agreement to expressly, absolutely and unconditionally assume and agree to perform this Agreement in the same manner and to the same extent that the Company would be required to perform it if no such succession had taken place. Failure of the Company to obtain such agreement prior to the effectiveness of any such succession shall be a material breach of this Agreement and shall entitle the Executive to terminate the Executive’s employment with the Company or such successor for Good Reason immediately prior to or at any time after such succession. As used in this Agreement, “Company” shall mean (i) the Company as hereinbefore defined, and (ii) any successor to all the stock of the Company or to all or substantially all of the Company’s business or assets which executes and delivers an agreement provided for in this Section 10(a) or which otherwise becomes bound by all the terms and provisions of this Agreement by operation of law, including any parent or subsidiary of such a successor.

(b) This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be enforceable by the Executive’s personal or legal representatives, executors, administrators, successors, heirs, distributees, devisees and legatees. If the Executive should die while any amount would be payable to the Executive hereunder if the Executive had continued to live, all such amounts, unless otherwise provided herein, shall be paid in accordance with the terms of this Agreement to the Executive’s estate or designated beneficiary. Neither this Agreement nor any right arising hereunder may be assigned or pledged by the Executive.

11. Notice. For purpose of this Agreement, notices and all other communications provided for in this Agreement or contemplated hereby shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given when personally delivered, delivered by a nationally recognized overnight delivery service or when mailed United States certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, and addressed, in the case of the Company, to the Company at:


	Hubbell Incorporated
	584 Derby Milford Road
	Orange, Connecticut 06477-4024
	Attention: General Counsel

and in the case of the Executive, to the Executive at the address set forth on the execution page at the end hereof.

Either party may designate a different address by giving notice of change of address in the manner provided above, except that notices of change of address shall be effective only upon receipt.

12. Confidentiality. The Executive shall retain in confidence any and all confidential information concerning the Company and its respective business which is now known or hereafter becomes known to the Executive, except as otherwise required by law and except information (i) ascertainable or obtained from public information, (ii) received by the Executive at any time after the Executive’s employment by the Company shall have terminated, from a third party not employed by or otherwise affiliated with the Company or (iii) which is or becomes known to the public by any means other than a breach of this Section 12. Upon the Termination of employment, the Executive will not take or keep any proprietary or confidential information or documentation belonging to the Company.

13. Miscellaneous. No provision of this Agreement may be amended, altered, modified, waived or discharged unless such amendment, alteration, modification, waiver or discharge is agreed to in writing signed by the Executive and such officer of the Company as shall be specifically designated by the Committee or by the Board of Directors of the Company. No waiver by either party, at any time, of any breach by the other party of, or of compliance by the other party with, any condition or provision of this Agreement to be performed or complied with by such other party shall be deemed a waiver of any similar or dissimilar provision or condition of this Agreement or any other breach of or failure to comply with the same condition or provision at the same time or at any prior or subsequent time. No agreements or representations, oral or otherwise, express or implied, with respect to the subject matter hereof have been made by either party which are not expressly set forth in this Agreement.

14. Severability. If any one or more of the provisions of this Agreement shall be held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, the validity, legality and enforceability of the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall not be affected thereby. To the extent permitted by applicable law, each party hereto waives any provision of law which renders any provision of this Agreement invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect.

15. Governing Law; Venue. The validity, interpretation, construction and performance of this Agreement shall be governed on a non-exclusive basis by the laws of the State of Connecticut without giving effect to its conflict of laws rules. For purposes of jurisdiction and venue, the Company and each Employer hereby consents to jurisdiction and venue in any suit, action or proceeding with respect to this Agreement in any court of competent jurisdiction in the state in which Executive resides at the commencement of such suit, action or proceeding and waives any objection, challenge or dispute as to such jurisdiction or venue being proper.

16. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which shall be deemed to constitute one and the same instrument.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written.


HUBBELL INCORPORATED

By:	/s/ George Zurman

	Title:	Vice President


(ILLEGIBLE SIGNATURE) 3/13/00

Executive


4470 Sir-John Ave.


North Royalton, Ohio 44133

Address

EX-21 6 y82446exv21.htm LIST OF SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES LIST OF SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES


þ		ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

		FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002.

o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.


Connecticut		06-0397030
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
584 Derby Milford Road, Orange, Connecticut (Address of principal executive offices)		06477-4024 (Zip Code)


Title of each Class		Name of Exchange on which Registered

Class A Common — $.01 par value (20 votes per share)		New York Stock Exchange
Class B Common — $.01 par value (1 vote per share)		New York Stock Exchange
Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock Purchase Rights		New York Stock Exchange
Series B Junior Participating Preferred Stock Purchase Rights		New York Stock Exchange


PART I
	Item 1. Business
ELECTRICAL SEGMENT
POWER SEGMENT
INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGY SEGMENT
INFORMATION APPLICABLE TO ALL GENERAL CATEGORIES
	Item 2. Properties
	Item 3. Legal Proceedings
	Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
PART II
	Item 5. Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters
	Item 6. Selected Financial Data
	Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
2002 Compared to 2001
Special Charges
2001 Compared to 2000
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Contractual Obligations
Critical Accounting Policies
Inflation
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
Forward-Looking Statements
	Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risks
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULE
	Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
HUBBELL INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
HUBBELL INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
HUBBELL INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
HUBBELL INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
HUBBELL INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
	Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
PART III
	Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant(1)
	Item 11. Executive Compensation(1)
	Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management(1)
	Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions(1)
	Item 14. Controls and Procedures
PART IV
	Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS ON FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE
Schedule II
RETIREMENT PLAN FOR DIRECTORS
CONTINUITY AGREEMENT
CONTINUITY AGREEMENT
LIST OF SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES
CERTIFICATION
CERTIFICATION


				Approximate
		No. of		Floor Area in
Segment	Location	Facilities		Square Feet

Electrical Segment
	Arkansas		2		232,500	114,500 square feet leased
	California		4		399,700	306,700 square feet leased
	Canada		1		42,900
	Connecticut		3		245,700	32,200 square feet leased
	Georgia		1		57,100
	Indiana		1		314,800
	Illinois		2		318,800	95,700 square feet leased
	Mexico		2		277,000	Shared between Electrical and Power Segments
	Minnesota		1		108,300
	Missouri		2		266,000
	Ohio		1		280,000
	Pennsylvania		1		410,000
	Puerto Rico		3		419,500	256,900 square feet leased
	Tennessee		1		246,800
	Texas		2		13,300	Leased
	United Kingdom		4		191,400	105,500 square feet leased
	Virginia		2		471,400
	Washington		1		282,000	Leased
Power Segment
	Alabama		2		288,000
	Mexico		1		235,000	Shared between Electrical and Power Segments
	Missouri		1		804,900
	Ohio		1		90,000
	South Carolina		1		360,000
	Tennessee		1		74,000
Industrial Technology Segment
	Italy		1		27,000	Leased
	New York		1		84,400
	North Carolina		1		81,000	Leased
	Pennsylvania		1		104,900	Leased
	Switzerland		1		68,100	Leased
	United Kingdom		1		40,000	Leased
	Wisconsin		1		94,200	20,000 square feet leased


Item 4.	*Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders*


Item 5.	*Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters*



	Common A				Common B
Market Prices (Dollars Per Share)
Years Ended December 31,	High		Low		High		Low

2002 — First quarter		32.80		27.71		34.40		28.80
2002 — Second quarter		35.00		30.83		37.30		32.15
2002 — Third quarter		31.40		25.97		34.15		27.83
2002 — Fourth quarter		34.24		25.26		36.60		26.54

2001 — First quarter		29.40		23.90		30.45		23.30
2001 — Second quarter		29.50		23.59		30.98		23.50
2001 — Third quarter		29.75		23.70		30.95		23.40
2001 — Fourth quarter		28.95		26.15		30.16		26.83



	Common A				Common B
Dividends Declared (Cents Per Share)
Years Ended December 31,	2002		2001		2002		2001

First quarter		33		33		33		33
Second quarter		33		33		33		33
Third quarter		33		33		33		33
Fourth quarter		33		33		33		33


Number of Common Shareholders
At December 31,	2002		2001		2000		1999		1998

Class A		843		916		983		1,090		1,176
Class B		3,950		4,174		4,442		4,805		5,153


Item 7.	*Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations*


	2002			2001


	(After tax,
	in millions)

Gain on sale of business	$	(1.9	)	$	(2.9	)
Reduction in tax expense/tax benefit		(10.8	)		—
Special charges, net		8.5			35.5
Goodwill amortization		—			6.8


2001 streamlining and cost reduction program	$	48.6
Reversal: Excess 1997 streamlining cost accruals		(3.3	)
2001 non-recurring charges		7.7

Total	$	53.0



	Electrical Segment

	2002			2001


	(In millions)
Net Sales	$	1,142.5		$	837.7
Operating Income		103.1			54.9
Operating Margin		9.0	%		6.6	%



	Power Segment

	2002			2001


	(In millions)
Net Sales	$	325.8		$	335.0
Operating Income		32.9			3.1
Operating Margin		10.1	%		1.0	%


Item 3.	*Legal Proceedings*


			2002			2001			2000			1999			1998

OPERATIONS, years ended December 31,
Net sales			$	1,587.8			1,312.2			1,424.1			1,451.8			1,424.6
Gross profit			$	409.1	(1)		314.0	(3)		369.1	(4)		409.0			438.2
Special charges (credit), net			$	8.3	(1)		40.0	(3)		(0.1	)(4)		—			—
Gain on sale of business			$	(3.0	)		(4.7	)		(36.2	)		(8.8	)		—
Operating income			$	138.5			56.5			184.5			194.4			226.1
Operating income as % of sales				8.7	%		4.3	%		13.0	%		13.4	%		15.9	%
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax			$	25.4	(2)		—			—			—			—
Net income			$	83.2	(2)		48.3			138.2			145.8			169.4
Net income as a % of sales				5.2	%		3.7	%		9.7	%		10.0	%		11.9	%
Net income to common shareholders’ average equity				11.2	%		6.4	%		17.0	%		17.2	%		20.3	%
Earnings per share — Diluted:
		Before cumulative effect of accounting change	$	1.81			0.82			2.25			2.21			2.50
		After cumulative effect of accounting change	$	1.38	(2)		0.82			2.25			2.21			2.50
		Adjusted for goodwill amortization(2)		—			0.93	(2)		2.37	(2)		2.32	(2)		2.59	(2)
Cash dividends declared per common share			$	1.32			1.32			1.31			1.27			1.22
Average number of common shares outstanding — (diluted)				59.7			58.9			61.3			65.9			67.7
Operating cash flow			$	179.4			199.3			123.8			176.0			190.4
Additions to property, plant, and equipment			$	21.9			28.6			48.6			53.7			86.1
Cost of acquisitions, net of cash acquired			$	270.2			13.7			43.6			38.3			78.4
FINANCIAL POSITION, at year-end
Working capital			$	341.6			224.4			123.2			209.4			219.8
Property, plant and equipment (net)			$	320.6			264.2			305.3			308.9			310.1
Total assets			$	1,410.3			1,205.4			1,448.5			1,407.2			1,390.4
Total debt			$	298.7			167.5			359.2			226.7			212.9
Debt to total capitalization(5)				29	%		19	%		32	%		21	%		20	%
Total debt, net of cash and investments			$	167.2			(1.5	)		91.5			(4.0	)		(14.5	)
Common shareholders’ equity:
	Total		$	744.2			736.5			769.5			855.8			840.6
	Per share		$	12.47			12.50			12.55			13.00			12.42
NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES, at year-end				11,476			8,771			10,469			10,190			10,562


	*2001 Non-recurring Charge*



			Payments due by period

							More than
Contractual Obligations	Total		1-3 Years		4-5 Years		5 Years

Long-term debt obligations	$	298.7	$	99.8		—	$	198.9
Operating lease obligations		46.9		21.5	$	5.3		20.1

Total	$	345.6	$	121.3	$	5.3	$	219.0



	Industrial
	Technology
	Segment

	2002			2001


	(In millions)
Net Sales	$	119.5		$	139.5
Operating Income (Loss)		2.5			(1.5	)
Operating Margin		2.1	%		N/A


	2001			2000

Reported operating income	$	56.5		$	184.5

Special charges (credit), net		40.0			(0.1	)
Product rationalization costs		13.0			20.3
Gains on sale of businesses		(4.7	)		(36.2	)



		December 31,

		2002			2001


		(In millions)
Net cash provided by (used in):
	Operating activities	$	179.4		$	199.3
	Investing activities		(237.5	)		32.6
	Financing activities		64.7			(273.3	)

Net change in cash and temporary cash investments		$	6.6		$	(41.4	)



	December 31

	2002		2001


	(In millions)
Current Assets	$	596.3	$	508.3
Current Liabilities		254.7		283.9

Working Capital	$	341.6	$	224.4


Item 7A.	*Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risks*


																						Fair Value
	2003			2004			2005			2006			2007			Thereafter			Total			12/31/02

Assets
Available-for-sale Investments	$	7.4		$	8.4		$	6.5		$	7.8		$	5.2		$	1.7		$	37.0		$	37.0
Avg. Interest Rate		1.96	%		3.71	%		4.10	%		5.44	%		3.79	%		2.97	%		—			—
Held-to-maturity Investments	$	15.0		$	—		$	17.6		$	21.9		$	—		$	—		$	54.5		$	57.3
Avg. Interest Rate		3.35	%					4.30	%		4.35	%
Liabilities
Long-Term Debt	$	—		$	—		$	(99.8	)	$	—		$	—		$	(198.9	)	$	(298.7	)	$	(334.3	)
Avg. Interest Rate								6.63	%								6.38	%



Timothy H. Powers President & Chief Executive Officer		William T. Tolley Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer


		Form 10-K for
		2002, Page:

Financial Statements
	Report of Independent Accountants		33
	Consolidated Statement of Income for the three years ended December 31, 2002		34
	Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2002 and 2001		35
	Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the three years ended December 31, 2002		36
	Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity for the three years ended December 31, 2002		37
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		38
Financial Statement Schedule
	Report of Independent Accountants on Financial Statement Schedule		74
	Valuation and Qualifying Accounts and Reserves (Schedule II)		75



		Years Ended December 31

		2002			2001			2000


		(Dollars in millions except
		per share amounts)
Net sales		$	1,587.8		$	1,312.2		$	1,424.1
Cost of goods sold			1,178.7			998.2			1,055.0

Gross profit			409.1			314.0			369.1
Selling & administrative expenses			265.3			222.2			220.9
Special charges (credit), net			8.3			40.0			(0.1	)
Gain on sale of business			(3.0	)		(4.7	)		(36.2	)

Operating income			138.5			56.5			184.5

Other income (expense):
	Investment income		5.9			10.5			15.9
	Interest expense		(17.8	)		(15.5	)		(19.7	)
	Other income, net		0.4			4.3			3.6

	Total other income (expense)		(11.5	)		(0.7	)		(0.2	)

Income before income taxes and cumulative effect of accounting change			127.0			55.8			184.3
	Provision for income taxes		18.4			7.5			46.1

Income before cumulative effect of accounting change			108.6			48.3			138.2
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax			(25.4	)		—			—

Net income		$	83.2		$	48.3		$	138.2

Earnings per share — Basic
	Before cumulative effect of accounting change	$	1.83		$	0.83		$	2.26

	After cumulative effect of accounting change	$	1.40		$	0.83		$	2.26

Earnings per share — Diluted
	Before cumulative effect of accounting change	$	1.81		$	0.82		$	2.25

	After cumulative effect of accounting change	$	1.38		$	0.82		$	2.25

Average number of shares outstanding — Diluted			59.7			58.9			61.3

Cash dividends per common share		$	1.32		$	1.32		$	1.31



	For the Three Years Ended December 31, 2002

											Accumulated
	Class A		Class B		Additional						Other			Total
	Common		Common		Paid-In			Retained			Comprehensive			Shareholders’
	Stock		Stock		Capital			Earnings			Income (loss)			Equity

Balance at December 31, 1999	$	0.1	$	0.5	$	349.7		$	519.1		$	(13.6	)	$	855.8

Net income									138.2						138.2
Translation adjustments												(5.9	)		(5.9	)
Exercise of stock options						4.1									4.1
Acquisition of treasury shares						(142.8	)								(142.8	)
Cash dividends declared ($1.31 per share)									(79.9	)					(79.9	)

Balance at December 31, 2000	$	0.1	$	0.5	$	211.0		$	577.4		$	(19.5	)	$	769.5

Net income								$	48.3					$	48.3
Translation adjustments											$	0.2			0.2
Exercise of stock options					$	5.8									5.8
Acquisition of treasury shares						(9.9	)								(9.9	)
Cash dividends declared ($1.32 per share)									(77.4	)					(77.4	)

Balance at December 31, 2001	$	0.1	$	0.5	$	206.9		$	548.3		$	(19.3	)	$	736.5

Net income								$	83.2					$	83.2
Minimum pension liability adjustment, net of income tax benefits of $7.6 million											$	(12.4	)		(12.4	)
Translation adjustments												1.7			1.7
Unrealized gain (loss) on investments, net of tax												0.5			0.5
Exercise of stock options, including tax benefit of $2.2 million					$	13.7									13.7
Cash dividends declared ($1.32 per share)									(77.8	)					(77.8	)
Cash flow hedging loss, net of reclassification adjustment in accordance with SFAS 133												(1.2	)		(1.2	)

Balance at December 31, 2002	$	0.1	$	0.5	$	220.6		$	553.7		$	(30.7	)	$	744.2



		Year Ended December 31

		2002			2001			2000

Net income, as reported		$	83.2		$	48.3		$	138.2
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards granted since December, 1997, net of related tax effects			(3.9	)		(3.7	)		(3.6	)

Pro forma net income		$	79.3		$	44.6		$	134.6

Earnings per share after cumulative effect of accounting change:
	Basic — as reported	$	1.40		$	0.83		$	2.26

	Basic — pro forma	$	1.34		$	0.76		$	2.20

	Diluted — as reported	$	1.38		$	0.82		$	2.25

	Diluted — pro forma	$	1.33		$	0.76		$	2.20


							Risk					Weighted Avg.
							Free					Grant Date
	Dividend			Expected			Interest			Expected		Fair Value
	Yield			Volatility			Rate			Option Term		of 1 Option

2002		3.8	%		23.4	%		3.5	%		7 Years	$	6.48
2001		4.5	%		23.0	%		5.1	%		7 Years	$	5.01
2000		4.5	%		22.0	%		5.2	%		7 Years	$	4.36


		Employee			Asset			Exit
		Benefits			Impairments			Costs			Total

2002 accruals		$	3.5		$	7.8		$	1.0		$	12.3
Inventory write-offs			—			(5.4	)		—			(5.4	)
Other non-cash write-offs			—			(2.4	)		—			(2.4	)
Cash expenditures			(0.4	)		—			(0.3	)		(0.7	)

	Remaining accrual	$	3.1		$	—		$	0.7		$	3.8


	Special Charges — 2001 Streamlining Program — ($3.4 million)


2001 streamlining and cost reduction plan	$	48.6
Reversal: Excess 1997 streamlining cost accruals		(3.3	)
2001 non-recurring charges		7.7

Total	$	53.0


Current Assets:
	Cash		$	0.3
	Accounts receivable, net			77.2
	Inventories, net			77.2
	Deferred taxes and other			11.3

		Total current assets		166.0
	Property, plant and equipment, net			88.7
	Intangible assets and other			23.5

		Total assets acquired		278.2

Current Liabilities:
	Accounts payable			36.2
	Other current liabilities			31.2

		Total current liabilities		67.4
	Non-current liabilities			31.3

		Total liabilities assumed		98.7

	Net assets acquired		$	179.5



	Year Ended
	December 31

	2002		2001

Net sales	$	1,756.5	$	1,883.8
Income before taxes and effect of accounting change		131.1		74.4
Income before effect of accounting change		111.7		64.4
Earnings per share before effect of accounting change — diluted	$	1.86	$	1.10


	2002			2001

Raw material	$	87.2		$	77.1
Work in-process		67.5			68.4
Finished goods		142.8			135.3

		297.5			280.8
Excess of FIFO costs over LIFO cost basis		(39.5	)		(38.2	)

Total	$	258.0		$	242.6


					Industrial
	Electrical		Power		Technology			Total

Balance December 31, 2001	$	88.2	$	112.7	$	67.0		$	267.9
Additions to goodwill		70.1		—		—			70.1
Impairment losses		—		—		(25.4	)		(25.4	)
Translation adjustments		2.0		—		—			2.0

Balance December 31, 2002	$	160.3	$	112.7	$	41.6		$	314.6



	2002										2001

			Gross		Gross								Gross		Gross
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized		Fair		Carrying		Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized			Fair		Carrying
	Cost		Gains		Losses		Value		Value		Cost		Gains		Losses			Value		Value

Available-For-Sale Investments
U.S. Treasury Notes & Municipal, Corporate and Asset-Backed Bonds	$	36.3	$	0.7	$	—	$	37.0	$	37.0	$	14.8	$	0.1	$	(0.1	)	$	14.8	$	14.8

Held-To-Maturity Investments
U.S. Treasury Notes & Municipal, Corporate and Asset-Backed Bonds	$	54.5	$	2.8	$	—	$	57.3	$	54.5	$	120.8	$	2.2	$	—		$	123.0	$	120.8

Total Investments	$	90.8	$	3.5	$	—	$	94.3	$	91.5	$	135.6	$	2.3	$	(0.1	)	$	137.8	$	135.6