XML 56 R10.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.1.9
Property, Plant and Equipment
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2014
Property, Plant and Equipment [Abstract]  
Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, Plant and Equipment

(a) Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment includes the following:
 
Weighted Average Useful
 
December 31,
 
Lives (Years)
 
2014
 
2013
 
 
 
(in millions)
Transmission
41
 
$
2,057

 
$
1,926

Distribution
30
 
6,170

 
5,848

Other
15
 
1,166

 
967

Total
 
 
9,393

 
8,741

Accumulated depreciation
 
 
3,050

 
2,907

Property, plant and equipment, net
 
 
$
6,343

 
$
5,834



(b) Depreciation and Amortization

The following table presents depreciation and amortization expense for 2014, 2013 and 2012:
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
(in millions)
Depreciation expense
$
295

 
$
280

 
$
265

Amortization of securitized regulatory assets
441

 
383

 
442

Other amortization
32

 
22

 
22

Total depreciation and amortization
$
768

 
$
685

 
$
729



(c) Asset Retirement Obligations

A reconciliation of the changes in the asset retirement obligation (ARO) liability is as follows (in millions):
 
December 31,
 
2014
 
2013
Beginning balance
$
33

 
$
29

Accretion expense
1

 
1

Revisions in estimates of cash flows
2

 
3

Ending balance
$
36

 
$
33



CenterPoint Houston recorded asset retirement obligations associated with the removal of asbestos and asbestos-containing material in its buildings, including substation building structures. CenterPoint Houston also recorded asset retirement obligations relating to treated wood poles for electric distribution, distribution transformers containing PCB (also known as Polychlorinated Biphenyl), and underground fuel storage tanks. The estimates of future liabilities were developed using historical information, and where available, quoted prices from outside contractors.

The increase of $2 million in the ARO from the revision of estimate in 2014 is primarily attributable to an increase in the expected future cash flows for asbestos remediation. The increase of $3 million in the ARO from the revision of estimate in 2013 is primarily attributable to an increase in disposal costs. There were no material additions or settlements during the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013.