10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)
þ	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
	FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2014
OR
¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
	FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM  TO

Commission file number 1-3187

______________________________

CENTERPOINT ENERGY HOUSTON ELECTRIC, LLC

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Texas	22-3865106
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
1111 Louisiana
Houston, Texas 77002	(713) 207-1111
(Address and zip code of principal executive offices)	(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

______________________________

CenterPoint Energy Houston Electric, LLC meets the conditions set forth in General Instruction H(1)(a) and (b) of Form 10-Q and is therefore filing this Form 10-Q with the reduced disclosure format.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o	Accelerated filer o	Non-accelerated filer þ	Smaller reporting company o
		(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes o No þ

As of April 15, 2014, all 1,000 common shares of CenterPoint Energy Houston Electric, LLC were held by Utility Holding, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of CenterPoint Energy, Inc.

CENTERPOINT ENERGY HOUSTON ELECTRIC, LLC

QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2014

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements	1
	Condensed Statements of Consolidated Income
	Three Months Ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 (unaudited)	1
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
	March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 (unaudited)	2
	Condensed Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows
	Three Months Ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 (unaudited)	4
	Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	5
Item 2.	Management’s Narrative Analysis of Results of Operations	10
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	16
PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	16
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	16
Item 5.	Other Information	17
Item 6.	Exhibits	18

i

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

From time to time we make statements concerning our expectations, beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, strategies, future events or performance and underlying assumptions and other statements that are not historical facts. These statements are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by these statements. You can generally identify our forward-looking statements by the words “anticipate,” “believe,” “continue,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “forecast,” “goal,” “intend,” “may,” “objective,” “plan,” “potential,” “predict,” “projection,” “should,” “will” or other similar words.

We have based our forward-looking statements on our management’s beliefs and assumptions based on information available to our management at the time the statements are made. We caution you that assumptions, beliefs, expectations, intentions and projections about future events may and often do vary materially from actual results. Therefore, we cannot assure you that actual results will not differ materially from those expressed or implied by our forward-looking statements.

The following are some of the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in forward-looking statements:

• state and federal legislative and regulatory actions or developments affecting various aspects of our business, including, among others, energy deregulation or re-regulation, health care reform, financial reform, tax legislation and actions regarding the rates we charge;

• state and federal legislative and regulatory actions or developments relating to the environment, including those related to global climate change;

• timely and appropriate rate actions that allow recovery of costs and a reasonable return on investment;

• the timing and outcome of any audits, disputes and other proceedings related to taxes;

• industrial, commercial and residential growth in our service territory and changes in market demand, including the effects of energy efficiency measures and demographic patterns;

• weather variations and other natural phenomena, including the impact on operations and capital of severe weather events ;

• any direct or indirect effects on our facilities, operations and financial condition resulting from terrorism, cyber attacks, data security breaches or other attempts to disrupt our business or the businesses of third parties, or other catastrophic events;

• the impact of unplanned facility outages;

• timely and appropriate regulatory actions allowing securitization or other recovery of costs associated with any future hurricanes or natural disasters;

• changes in interest rates or rates of inflation;

• commercial bank and financial market conditions, our access to capital, the cost of such capital, and the results of our financing and refinancing efforts, including availability of funds in the debt capital markets;

• actions by credit rating agencies;

• inability of various counterparties to meet their obligations to us;

• non-payment for our services due to financial distress of our customers;

• the ability of GenOn Energy, Inc. (formerly known as RRI Energy, Inc., Reliant Energy, Inc. and Reliant Resources, Inc.), a wholly owned subsidiary of NRG Energy, Inc. (NRG) and its subsidiaries to satisfy their obligations to us, including indemnity obligations;

• the ability of retail electric providers (REPs), including REP affiliates of NRG, Energy Future Holdings Corp. and Just Energy Group, Inc., to satisfy their obligations to us and our subsidiaries;

ii

• the outcome of litigation brought by or against us;

• our ability to control costs;

• the investment performance of CenterPoint Energy, Inc.’s pension and postretirement benefit plans;

• our potential business strategies, including restructurings, acquisitions or dispositions of assets or businesses, which we cannot assure you will be completed or will have the anticipated benefits to us;

• acquisition and merger activities involving us or our competitors;

• future economic conditions in regional and national markets and their effect on sales, prices and costs; and

• other factors we discuss in “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of Part I of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, which is incorporated herein by reference, in Item 1A of Part II of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and other reports we file from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

You should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Each forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date of the particular statement.

iii

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

CENTERPOINT ENERGY HOUSTON ELECTRIC, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES

(AN INDIRECT WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARY OF CENTERPOINT ENERGY, INC.)

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED INCOME

(Millions of Dollars)

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2014			2013
Revenues	$	630		$	532
Expenses:
Operation and maintenance	290			239
Depreciation and amortization	176			154
Taxes other than income taxes	58			55
Total	524			448
Operating Income	106			84
Other Income (Expense):
Interest and other finance charges	(24		)	(30		)
Interest on transition and system restoration bonds	(30		)	(35		)
Other, net	3			9
Total	(51		)	(56		)
Income Before Income Taxes	55			28
Income tax expense	20			9
Net Income	$	35		$	19

See Notes to the Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

1

CENTERPOINT ENERGY HOUSTON ELECTRIC, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES

(AN INDIRECT WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARY OF CENTERPOINT ENERGY, INC.)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Millions of Dollars)

(Unaudited)

ASSETS

	March 31, 2014		December 31, 2013
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents ($149 and $207 related to VIEs, respectively)	$	348	$	207
Accounts and notes receivable, less bad debt reserve of $3 and $3, respectively ($69 and $60 related to VIEs, respectively)	252		261
Accounts and notes receivable—affiliated companies	114		5
Accrued unbilled revenues	74		87
Inventory	109		105
Deferred tax asset	3		3
Other ($42 and $41 related to VIEs, respectively)	50		65
Total current assets	950		733
Property, Plant and Equipment:
Property, plant and equipment	8,900		8,741
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization	2,949		2,907
Property, plant and equipment, net	5,951		5,834
Other Assets:
Regulatory assets ($3,084 and $3,179 related to VIEs, respectively)	2,926		2,999
Other	49		43
Total other assets	2,975		3,042
Total Assets	$	9,876	$	9,609

See Notes to the Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

2

CENTERPOINT ENERGY HOUSTON ELECTRIC, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES

(AN INDIRECT WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARY OF CENTERPOINT ENERGY, INC.)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Millions of Dollars)

(Unaudited)

LIABILITIES AND MEMBER’S EQUITY

	March 31, 2014		December 31, 2013
Current Liabilities:
Current portion of VIE transition and system restoration bonds long-term debt	$	362	$	354
Accounts payable	128		137
Accounts and notes payable—affiliated companies	87		80
Taxes accrued	93		144
Interest accrued	47		75
Other	86		128
Total current liabilities	803		918
Other Liabilities:
Accumulated deferred income taxes, net	2,008		2,035
Benefit obligations	226		227
Regulatory liabilities	529		509
Other	46		46
Total other liabilities	2,809		2,817
Long-term Debt:
VIE transition and system restoration bonds	2,908		3,046
Other	2,088		1,595
Total long-term debt	4,996		4,641
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 8)
Member’s Equity:
Common stock	—		—
Paid-in capital	1,232		1,232
Retained earnings	36		1
Total member’s equity	1,268		1,233
Total Liabilities and Member’s Equity	$	9,876	$	9,609

See Notes to the Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

3

CENTERPOINT ENERGY HOUSTON ELECTRIC, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES

(AN INDIRECT WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARY OF CENTERPOINT ENERGY, INC.)

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOWS

(Millions of Dollars)

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2014			2013
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net income	$	35		$	19
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	176			154
Amortization of deferred financing costs	4			4
Deferred income taxes	(29		)	(10		)
Changes in other assets and liabilities:
Accounts and notes receivable, net	22			5
Accounts receivable/payable - affiliated companies	(9		)	(69		)
Inventory	(4		)	(3		)
Accounts payable	—			1
Taxes receivable	—			7
Interest and taxes accrued	(79		)	(84		)
Net regulatory assets and liabilities	(8		)	15
Other current assets	17			14
Other current liabilities	(42		)	—
Other assets	3			3
Other, net	(6		)	1
Net cash provided by operating activities	80			57
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Capital expenditures	(196		)	(137		)
Decrease (increase) in notes receivable - affiliated companies	(90		)	256
Decrease (increase) in restricted cash of transition and system restoration bond companies	(2		)	1
Other, net	(11		)	(6		)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities	(299		)	114
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Proceeds from long-term debt	600			—
Payments of long-term debt	(231		)	(612		)
Decrease in short-term notes payable - affiliated companies	(3		)	—
Cash paid for debt retirement	(1		)	—
Debt issuance costs	(5		)	—
Other, net	—			1
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	360			(611		)
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents	141			(440		)
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period	207			646
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period	$	348		$	206
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:
Cash Payments:
Interest, net of capitalized interest	$	78		$	100
Income taxes, net	39			5
Non-cash transactions:
Accounts payable related to capital expenditures	$	41		$	50

See Notes to the Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

4

CENTERPOINT ENERGY HOUSTON ELECTRIC, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(1) Background and Basis of Presentation

General. Included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Form 10-Q) of CenterPoint Energy Houston Electric, LLC are the condensed consolidated interim financial statements and notes (Interim Condensed Financial Statements) of CenterPoint Energy Houston Electric, LLC and its subsidiaries (collectively, CenterPoint Houston). The Interim Condensed Financial Statements are unaudited, omit certain financial statement disclosures and should be read with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of CenterPoint Houston for the year ended December 31, 2013.

Background. CenterPoint Houston engages in the electric transmission and distribution business in the Texas Gulf Coast area that includes the city of Houston.  CenterPoint Houston is an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of CenterPoint Energy, Inc. (CenterPoint Energy), a public utility holding company.  At March 31, 2014, CenterPoint Houston had five subsidiaries, CenterPoint Energy Transition Bond Company, LLC, CenterPoint Energy Transition Bond Company II, LLC, CenterPoint Energy Transition Bond Company III, LLC, CenterPoint Energy Restoration Bond Company, LLC and CenterPoint Energy Transition Bond Company IV, LLC.  The transition and system restoration bond companies, which are classified as variable interest entities, are wholly owned bankruptcy remote special purpose entities that were formed specifically for the purpose of securitizing transition and system restoration property. Creditors of CenterPoint Houston have no recourse to any assets or revenues of the transition and system restoration bond companies. The bonds issued by these companies are payable only from and secured by transition and system restoration property, and the bondholders have no recourse to the general credit of CenterPoint Houston.

Basis of Presentation. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

CenterPoint Houston’s Interim Condensed Financial Statements reflect all normal recurring adjustments that are, in the opinion of management, necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the respective periods. Amounts reported in CenterPoint Houston’s Condensed Statements of Consolidated Income are not necessarily indicative of amounts expected for a full-year period due to the effects of, among other things, (a) seasonal fluctuations in demand for energy, (b) timing of maintenance and other expenditures and (c) acquisitions and dispositions of businesses, assets and other interests.

(2) New Accounting Pronouncements

Management believes that recently issued accounting standards, which are not yet effective, will not have a material impact on CenterPoint Houston’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows upon adoption.

(3) Employee Benefit Plans

CenterPoint Houston’s employees participate in CenterPoint Energy’s postretirement benefit plan. CenterPoint Houston’s net periodic cost includes the following components relating to postretirement benefits:

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2014			2013
	(in millions)
Interest cost	$	4		$	3
Expected return on plan assets	(1		)	(1		)
Amortization of loss	—			1
Amortization of transition obligation	1			1
Net periodic cost	$	4		$	4

CenterPoint Houston expects to contribute approximately $7 million to its postretirement benefit plan in 2014, of which $2 million was contributed during the three months ended March 31, 2014.

5

(4) Regulatory Accounting

As of March 31, 2014, CenterPoint Houston has not recognized an allowed equity return of $493 million because such return will be recognized as it is recovered in rates. During the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, CenterPoint Houston recognized approximately $15 million and $8 million, respectively, of the allowed equity return not previously recognized. 

(5) Fair Value Measurements

Assets and liabilities that are recorded at fair value in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets are categorized based upon the level of judgment associated with the inputs used to measure their value. Hierarchical levels, as defined below and directly related to the amount of subjectivity associated with the inputs to fair valuations of these assets and liabilities, are as follows:

Level 1: Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities at the measurement date. The types of assets carried at Level 1 fair value are investments listed in active markets.  At March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, CenterPoint Houston held Level 1 investments of $39 million and $38 million, respectively, which were primarily investments in money market funds and are included in cash and cash equivalents in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Level 2:  Inputs, other than quoted prices included in Level 1, are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, and inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability. CenterPoint Houston had no Level 2 assets or liabilities at either March 31, 2014 or December 31, 2013.

Level 3: Inputs are unobservable for the asset or liability, and include situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability. These inputs reflect management’s best estimate of the assumptions market participants would use in determining fair value.  CenterPoint Houston had no Level 3 assets or liabilities at either March 31, 2014 or December 31, 2013.

CenterPoint Houston determines the appropriate level for each financial asset and liability on a quarterly basis and recognizes transfers between levels at the end of the reporting period. For the three months ended March 31, 2014, there were no transfers between levels.

Estimated Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The fair values of cash and cash equivalents and short-term borrowings are estimated to be approximately equivalent to carrying amounts and have been excluded from the table below.  The fair value of each debt instrument is determined by multiplying the principal amount of each debt instrument by the market price. These assets and liabilities, which are not measured at fair value in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets but for which the fair value is disclosed, would be classified as Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy.

	March 31, 2014				December 31, 2013
	Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Fair Value
	(in millions)
Financial liabilities:
Long-term debt	$	5,358	$	5,620	$	4,995	$	5,165

(6) Related Party Transactions and Major Customers

(a) Related Party Transactions

CenterPoint Houston participates in a money pool through which it can borrow or invest on a short-term basis. Funding needs are aggregated, and external borrowing or investing is based on the net cash position. The net funding requirements of the money pool are expected to be met with borrowings under CenterPoint Energy’s revolving credit facility or the sale of CenterPoint Energy’s commercial paper.CenterPoint Houston had investments in the money pool of $90 million and borrowings from the money pool of $3 million at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, which are included in Accounts and notes receivable-affiliated companies and Accounts and notes payable-affiliated companies, respectively, in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.  

CenterPoint Houston had net interest expense of less than $1 million and net interest income of $5 million related to affiliate borrowings for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, included in Other Income.

6

CenterPoint Energy provides some corporate services to CenterPoint Houston. The costs of services have been charged directly to CenterPoint Houston using methods that management believes are reasonable. These methods include negotiated usage rates, dedicated asset assignment and proportionate corporate formulas based on operating expenses, assets, gross margin, employees and a composite of assets, gross margin and employees. These charges are not necessarily indicative of what would have been incurred had CenterPoint Houston not been an affiliate. Amounts charged to CenterPoint Houston for these services were $37 million and $36 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and are included primarily in operation and maintenance expenses.

(b) Major Customers

Sales to affiliates of NRG Energy, Inc. (NRG) in the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 represented approximately$166 million and $144 million, respectively, of CenterPoint Houston’s transmission and distribution revenues.  Sales to affiliates of Energy Future Holdings Corp. (Energy Future Holdings) in the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 represented approximately $40 million and $36 million, respectively, of CenterPoint Houston’s transmission and distribution revenues.

(7) Long-term Debt

On March 17, 2014, CenterPoint Houston issued $600 million principal amount of 4.50% General Mortgage Bonds due 2044.

Debt Repayments. Approximately $44 million aggregate principal amount of pollution control bonds issued on behalf of CenterPoint Houston were redeemed on March 3, 2014 at 101% of their principal amount plus accrued interest. The bonds had an interest rate of 4.25%, were scheduled to mature in 2017 and were collateralized by general mortgage bonds of CenterPoint Houston.

Approximately $56 million aggregate principal amount of pollution control bonds issued on behalf of CenterPoint Houston were purchased by CenterPoint Houston on March 3, 2014 at 101% of their principal amount plus accrued interest pursuant to the mandatory tender provisions of the bonds. The bonds had an interest rate of 5.60% prior to CenterPoint Houston's purchase and have a variable rate thereafter. The bonds mature in 2027 and are collateralized by general mortgage bonds of CenterPoint Houston. The purchased pollution control bonds may be remarketed. These bonds are not reflected in the consolidated financial statements.

In April 2014, approximately $84 million aggregate principal amount of pollution control bonds issued on behalf of CenterPoint Houston were called for redemption on June 2, 2014 at 100% of their principal amount plus accrued interest. The bonds have an interest rate of 4.25%, mature in 2017 and are collateralized by general mortgage bonds of CenterPoint Houston.

Revolving Credit Facility. As of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, CenterPoint Houston had the following revolving credit facility and utilization of such facility (in millions):

		March 31, 2014				December 31, 2013
Size of Facility		Loans		Letters of Credit		Loans		Letters of Credit
$	300	$	—	$	4	$	—	$	4

CenterPoint Houston’s$300 million credit facility, which is scheduled to terminate September 9, 2018, can be drawn at the London Interbank Offered Rate plus 112.5 basis points based on CenterPoint Houston’s current credit ratings. The revolving credit facility contains a financial covenant which limits CenterPoint Houston's consolidated debt (excluding transition and system restoration bonds) to an amount not to exceed 65% of its consolidated capitalization.

CenterPoint Houston was in compliance with all financial covenants in its revolving credit facility at March 31, 2014.

Other. As of both March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, CenterPoint Houston had issued $408 million of general mortgage bonds as collateral for long-term debt of CenterPoint Energy. These bonds are not reflected in the consolidated financial statements because of the contingent nature of the obligations.

7

(8) Commitments and Contingencies

Legal Matters

Gas Market Manipulation Cases.  CenterPoint Energy, CenterPoint Houston or their predecessor, Reliant Energy, Incorporated (Reliant Energy), and certain of their former subsidiaries have been named as defendants in certain lawsuits described below. Under a master separation agreement between CenterPoint Energy and a former subsidiary, Reliant Resources, Inc. (RRI), CenterPoint Energy and its subsidiaries are entitled to be indemnified by RRI and its successors for any losses, including certain attorneys’ fees and other costs, arising out of these lawsuits.  In May 2009, RRI sold its Texas retail business to a subsidiary of NRG and RRI changed its name to RRI Energy, Inc. In December 2010, Mirant Corporation merged with and became a wholly owned subsidiary of RRI, and RRI changed its name to GenOn Energy, Inc. (GenOn). In December 2012, NRG acquired GenOn through a merger in which GenOn became a wholly owned subsidiary of NRG. None of the sale of the retail business, the merger with Mirant Corporation, or the acquisition of GenOn by NRG alters RRI’s (now GenOn’s) contractual obligations to indemnify CenterPoint Energy and its subsidiaries, including CenterPoint Houston, for certain liabilities, including their indemnification obligations regarding the gas market manipulation litigation, nor does it affect the terms of existing guarantee arrangements for certain GenOn gas transportation contracts discussed below.

A large number of lawsuits were filed against numerous gas market participants in a number of federal and western state courts in connection with the operation of the natural gas markets in 2000-2002. CenterPoint Energy’s former affiliate, RRI, was a participant in gas trading in the California and Western markets. These lawsuits, many of which were filed as class actions, alleged violations of state and federal antitrust laws. Plaintiffs in these lawsuits sought a variety of forms of relief, including, among others, recovery of compensatory damages (in some cases in excess of $1 billion), a trebling of compensatory damages, full consideration damages and attorneys’ fees. CenterPoint Energy and/or Reliant Energy were named in approximately 30 of these lawsuits, which were instituted between 2003 and 2009. CenterPoint Energy and its affiliates have since been released or dismissed from all but one such case. CenterPoint Energy Services, Inc. (CES), a subsidiary of CenterPoint Energy Resources Corp., is a defendant in a case now pending in federal court in Nevada alleging a conspiracy to inflate Wisconsin natural gas prices in 2000-2002.  In July 2011, the court issued an order dismissing the plaintiffs’ claims against other defendants in the case, each of whom had demonstrated FERC jurisdictional sales for resale during the relevant period, based on federal preemption.  The plaintiffs appealed this ruling to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which reversed the trial court's dismissal of the plaintiffs' claims. In August 2013, the other defendants filed a petition for review with the U.S. Supreme Court. CenterPoint Energy believes that CES is not a proper defendant in this case and will continue to pursue a dismissal.  CenterPoint Houston does not expect the ultimate outcome of this matter to have a material impact on its financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Environmental Matters

Asbestos. Some facilities owned by CenterPoint Energy contain or have contained asbestos insulation and other asbestos-containing materials. CenterPoint Energy or its subsidiaries, including CenterPoint Houston, have been named, along with numerous others, as a defendant in lawsuits filed by a number of individuals who claim injury due to exposure to asbestos. Some of the claimants have worked at locations owned by CenterPoint Energy or CenterPoint Houston, but most existing claims relate to facilities previously owned by CenterPoint Energy’s other subsidiaries or CenterPoint Houston, but currently owned by NRG Texas LP. CenterPoint Energy anticipates that additional claims like those received may be asserted in the future. In 2004 and early 2005, CenterPoint Energy sold its generating business, to which most of these claims relate, to a company which is now an affiliate of NRG. Under the terms of the arrangements regarding separation of the generating business from CenterPoint Energy and its sale of that business, ultimate financial responsibility for uninsured losses from claims relating to the generating business has been assumed by the NRG affiliate, but CenterPoint Energy has agreed to continue to defend such claims to the extent they are covered by insurance maintained by CenterPoint Energy, subject to reimbursement of the costs of such defense by the NRG affiliate. Although their ultimate outcome cannot be predicted at this time, CenterPoint Houston or CenterPoint Energy, as appropriate, intends to continue vigorously contesting claims that are not considered to have merit and, based on its experience to date, CenterPoint Houston does not expect these matters, either individually or in the aggregate, to have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Other Environmental. From time to time, CenterPoint Houston identifies the presence of environmental contaminants on property where it conducts or has conducted operations.  Other such sites involving contaminants may be identified in the future.  CenterPoint Houston has and expects to continue to remediate identified sites consistent with its legal obligations. From time to time CenterPoint Houston has received notices from regulatory authorities or others regarding its status as a potentially responsible party in connection with sites found to require remediation due to the presence of environmental contaminants. In addition, CenterPoint Houston has been named from time to time as a defendant in litigation related to such sites. Although the ultimate outcome of such matters cannot

8

be predicted at this time, CenterPoint Houston does not expect, based on its experience to date, these matters, either individually or in the aggregate, to have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Other Proceedings

CenterPoint Houston is involved in other legal, environmental, tax and regulatory proceedings before various courts, regulatory commissions and governmental agencies regarding matters arising in the ordinary course of business. Some of these proceedings involve substantial amounts. CenterPoint Houston regularly analyzes current information and, as necessary, provides accruals for probable liabilities on the eventual disposition of these matters. CenterPoint Houston does not expect the disposition of these matters to have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

(9)       Income Taxes

The effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2014 was 36% compared to 32% for the same period in 2013. The lower effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2013 was primarily due to an income tax benefit recognized for a change in tax law in the first quarter of 2013. CenterPoint Houston reported no uncertain tax liability as of March 31, 2014 and expects no significant change to the uncertain tax liability over the next twelve months ending March 31, 2015. CenterPoint Energy’s consolidated federal income tax return filed for the year ended December 31, 2012 is currently under audit by the Internal Revenue Service.

9

ITEM 2.MANAGEMENT’S NARRATIVE ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following narrative analysis should be read in combination with our Interim Condensed Financial Statements contained in this Form 10-Q and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 (2013 Form 10-K).

We meet the conditions specified in General Instruction H(1)(a) and (b) to Form 10-Q and are therefore permitted to use the reduced disclosure format for wholly owned subsidiaries of reporting companies. Accordingly, we have omitted from this report the information called for by Item 2 (Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations) and Item 3 (Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk) of Part I and the following Part II items of Form 10-Q: Item 2 (Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds), Item 3 (Defaults Upon Senior Securities) and Item 4 (Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders). The following discussion explains material changes in our results of operations between the three months ended March 31, 2014 and the three months ended March 31, 2013. Reference is made to “Management’s Narrative Analysis of Results of Operations” in Item 7 of our 2013 Form 10-K.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Recent Events

Debt Matters. Approximately $44 million aggregate principal amount of pollution control bonds issued on our behalf were redeemed on March 3, 2014 at 101% of their principal amount plus accrued interest. The bonds had an interest rate of 4.25%, were scheduled to mature in 2017 and were collateralized by our general mortgage bonds.

Approximately $56 million aggregate principal amount of pollution control bonds issued on our behalf were purchased by us on March 3, 2014 at 101% of their principal amount plus accrued interest pursuant to the mandatory tender provisions of the bonds. The bonds had an interest rate of 5.60% prior to our purchase and have a variable rate thereafter. The bonds mature in 2027 and are collateralized by our general mortgage bonds. The purchased pollution control bonds may be remarketed.

On March 17, 2014, we issued $600 million principal amount of 4.50% General Mortgage Bonds due 2044. The proceeds from the sale of the bonds are expected to be used for general limited liability company purposes, including the repayment of short-term notes payable to affiliated companies.

In April 2014, approximately $84 million aggregate principal amount of pollution control bonds issued on our behalf were called for redemption on June 2, 2014 at 100% of their principal amount plus accrued interest. The bonds have an interest rate of 4.25%, mature in 2017 and are collateralized by our general mortgage bonds.

10

CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Our results of operations are affected by seasonal fluctuations in the demand for electricity. Our results of operations are also affected by, among other things, the actions of various governmental authorities having jurisdiction over rates we charge, debt service costs, income tax expense, our ability to collect receivables from retail electric providers (REPs) and our ability to recover our regulatory assets. For more information regarding factors that may affect the future results of operations of our business, please read “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of Part I of our 2013 Form 10-K and in Item 1A of Part II of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

The following table sets forth our consolidated results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, followed by a discussion of our consolidated results of operations based on operating income.

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2014			2013
	(in millions, except throughput and customer data)
Revenues:
Electric transmission and distribution utility	$	503		$	421
Transition and system restoration bond companies	127			111
Total revenues	630			532
Expenses:
Operation and maintenance, excluding transition and system restoration bond companies	288			238
Depreciation and amortization, excluding transition and system restoration bond companies	81			79
Taxes other than income taxes	58			55
Transition and system restoration bond companies	97			76
Total expenses	524			448
Operating income	106			84
Interest and other finance charges	(24		)	(30		)
Interest on transition and system restoration bonds	(30		)	(35		)
Other income, net	3			9
Income before income taxes	55			28
Income tax expense	20			9
Net income	$	35		$	19
Operating Income:
Electric transmission and distribution utility	$	76		$	49
Transition and system restoration bond companies (1)	30			35
Total operating income	$	106		$	84
Throughput (in gigawatt-hours (GWh)):
Residential	5,282			4,558
Total	17,719			16,361
Number of metered customers at end of period:
Residential	1,994,506			1,953,947
Total	2,257,065			2,211,481

___________

(1) Represents the amount necessary to pay interest on the transition and system restoration bonds.

Three months ended March 31, 2014 compared to three months ended March 31, 2013

We reported operating income of $106 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014, consisting of $76 million from the regulated electric transmission and distribution utility (TDU) and $30 million related to transition and system restoration bond companies (Bond Companies). For the three months ended March 31, 2013, operating income totaled $84 million, consisting of $49 million from the TDU and $35 million related to Bond Companies. TDU operating income increased $27 million due to increased usage ($20 million), primarily due to colder than normal weather, customer growth ($7 million) from the addition of over 45,000 new customers and increased right-of-way revenues ($6 million), partially offset by increased operating and maintenance expenses

11

($5 million, excluding $45 million of higher transmission costs largely offset by increased transmission revenue) and increased taxes other than income taxes ($3 million).

Income Tax Expense. Our effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2014 was 36% compared to 32% for the same period in 2013. The lower effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2013 was primarily due to an income tax benefit recognized for a change in tax law in the first quarter of 2013.

CERTAIN FACTORS AFFECTING FUTURE EARNINGS

For information on other developments, factors and trends that may have an impact on our future earnings, please read “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of Part I of our 2013 Form 10-K and “Management’s Narrative Analysis of Results of Operations - Certain Factors Affecting Future Earnings” in Item 7 of Part II of our 2013 Form 10-K, “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of Part II in this Form 10-Q and “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information” in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Our liquidity and capital requirements are affected primarily by our results of operations, capital expenditures, debt service requirements, tax payments and working capital needs. Substantially all of our capital expenditures are expected to be used for investment in infrastructure to maintain the reliability and safety of our operations. Our principal anticipated cash requirements for the remaining nine months of 2014 include approximately $594 million of capital expenditures, $224 million of scheduled principal payments on transition and system restoration bonds and an $84 million redemption payment on pollution control bonds.

We expect that borrowings under our credit facility, anticipated cash flows from operations and intercompany borrowings will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash needs in the remaining nine months of 2014. Cash needs or discretionary financing or refinancing may result in the issuance of debt securities in the capital markets or the arrangement of additional credit facilities. Issuances of debt in the capital markets and additional credit facilities may not, however, be available to us on acceptable terms.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Other than first mortgage bonds and general mortgage bonds issued as collateral for long-term debt of CenterPoint Energy as discussed below and operating leases, we have no off-balance sheet arrangements.

Regulatory Matters

Significant regulatory developments that have occurred since our 2013 Form 10-K was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) are discussed below.

In October 2009, the Public Utility Commission of Texas (Texas Utility Commission) issued an order disallowing recovery of a performance bonus of $2 million on approximately $10 million in 2008 energy efficiency costs expended pursuant to the terms of a settlement agreement in a prior rate case. We appealed the denial of the full 2008 performance bonus. We have also appealed similar orders by the Texas Utility Commission providing for the partial disallowance of performance bonuses totaling approximately $5.5 million relating to our 2009, 2010 and 2011 (only through August 2011) energy efficiency programs. These subsequent cases were abated pending the final outcome of the 2008 bonus appeal. In August 2013, the court of appeals reversed the Texas Utility Commission’s decision disallowing such bonuses and in January 2014, the Texas Supreme Court declined to hear the Texas Utility Commission's appeal. As a result of the Texas Supreme Court’s decision, we should be entitled on remand of the various orders to recover approximately $7.5 million plus carrying charges. Starting September 2011, our energy efficiency programs are no longer funded pursuant to the terms of the prior settlement, and performance bonus calculations subsequent to that date are not affected by the court’s decision.

Transmission Cost of Service (TCOS). On March 26, 2014, we filed an application with the Texas Utility Commission for an interim update of our TCOS seeking an increase in annual revenue of $13.6 million based on an increase in total rate base of $184.5 million. We anticipate approval from the Texas Utility Commission during the second quarter of 2014.

Houston Transmission Import Capacity Project. In July 2013, we and other parties submitted analyses and transmission proposals to the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) for an additional transmission path into the Houston Region (Houston Import Project). In April 2014, ERCOT’s Board of Directors voted to endorse the Houston Import Project and deemed the project critical for reliability.  ERCOT has estimated the costs for the entire project to be approximately $600 million. The project will consist of (i) construction of a new double-circuit 345 kilovolt line spanning 130 miles, (ii) upgrades to three substations to accommodate new

12

connections and additional capacity, and (iii) improvements to approximately 11 miles of an existing transmission line to increase its rating.  We have requested the right to construct, own, and maintain the entire project, except upgrades to the Gibbons Creek Substation; however, a decision has not been made on our share of the construction and ownership of the project. ERCOT anticipates that this project will be completed no later than June 2018. On April 30, 2014, ERCOT staff determined that we would be the designated transmission service provider for the portion of the project between our Zenith substation and Gibbons Creek substation owned by the Texas Municipal Power Agency consisting of approximately 60 miles of 345 kV transmission line, upgrades to the Limestone and Zenith substations, and upgrades to 11 miles of the 345 kV TH Wharton-Addicks transmission line.  As the owner of the originating and terminating substations of the entire project, we appealed that decision to the Texas Utility Commission and are seeking the right to construct, own, and maintain the entire project, except for necessary upgrades to the Gibbons Creek Substation.  We have requested an expedited decision schedule from the Texas Utility Commission with a desire for a decision later this summer.

Other Matters

Credit Facility

As of April 15, 2014, we had the following revolving credit facility and utilization of such facility (in millions):

Date Executed	Size of Facility		Amount Utilized			Termination Date
September 9, 2011	$	300	$	4	(1)	September 9, 2018

_________

(1) Represents outstanding letters of credit.

Our $300 million revolving credit facility can be drawn at the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus 112.5 basis points based on our current credit ratings. The revolving credit facility contains a financial covenant which limits our consolidated debt (excluding transition and system restoration bonds) to an amount not to exceed 65% of our consolidated capitalization.

Borrowings under our revolving credit facility are subject to customary terms and conditions. However, there is no requirement that we make representations prior to borrowings as to the absence of material adverse changes or litigation that could be expected to have a material adverse effect. Borrowings under our revolving credit facility are subject to acceleration upon the occurrence of events of default that we consider customary.  The revolving credit facility also provides for customary fees, including commitment fees, administrative agent fees, fees in respect of letters of credit and other fees. In our revolving credit facility, the borrowing spread to LIBOR and the commitment fees fluctuate based on our credit rating. We are currently in compliance with the various business and financial covenants contained in our revolving credit facility.

Securities Registered with the SEC

We have filed a shelf registration statement with the SEC registering an indeterminate principal amount of our general mortgage bonds.

Temporary Investments

As of April 15, 2014, we had temporary investments in a money market fund of $159 million.

Money Pool

We participate in a money pool through which we and certain of our affiliates can borrow or invest on a short-term basis. Funding needs are aggregated and external borrowing or investing is based on the net cash position. The net funding requirements of the money pool are expected to be met with borrowings under CenterPoint Energy’s revolving credit facility or the sale of CenterPoint Energy’s commercial paper. As of April 15, 2014, we had $151 million invested in the money pool. The money pool may not provide sufficient funds to meet our cash needs.

Long-term Debt  

Our long-term debt consists of our obligations and the obligations of our subsidiaries, including transition and system restoration bonds issued by wholly owned subsidiaries.  

13

As of March 31, 2014, our outstanding first mortgage bonds and general mortgage bonds aggregated approximately $2.6 billion, of which $464 million is not reflected in our consolidated financial statements. Of the $464 million, $408 million collateralized debt of CenterPoint Energy and is not reflected because of the contingent nature of the obligations and $56 million collateralized pollution control bonds that we hold for future remarketing. CenterPoint Energy held $290 million of its collateralized debt for future remarketing.

The lien of the general mortgage indenture is junior to that of the mortgage pursuant to which the first mortgage bonds are issued. We may issue additional general mortgage bonds on the basis of retired bonds, 70% of property additions or cash deposited with the trustee.  Approximately $3.5 billion of additional first mortgage bonds and general mortgage bonds could be issued on the basis of retired bonds and 70% of property additions as of March 31, 2014. However, we have contractually agreed that we will not issue additional first mortgage bonds, subject to certain exceptions.

At March 31, 2014, our subsidiaries had the following aggregate principal amount of transition and system restoration bonds outstanding. Amounts are expressed in millions.

Company	Aggregate Principal Amount Outstanding
Bond Company II	$	975
Bond Company III	296
Bond Company IV	1,515
Restoration Bond Company	484
Total	$	3,270

The transition bonds and system restoration bonds are paid through the imposition of “transition” or “system restoration” charges, as defined in the Texas Public Utility Regulatory Act, which are irrevocable, non-bypassable charges payable by most of our retail electric customers to the bond company subsidiaries in order to provide recovery of authorized qualified costs. The transition and system restoration bonds are reported as our long-term debt, although the holders of these bonds have no recourse to any of our assets or revenues, and our creditors have no recourse to any assets or revenues (including, without limitation, the transition or system restoration charges) of the bond companies. We have no payment obligations with respect to the transition and system restoration bonds except to remit collections of transition and system restoration charges as set forth in servicing agreements between us and the bond companies and in an intercreditor agreement among us, the bond companies and other parties.

Impact on Liquidity of a Downgrade in Credit Ratings

The interest on borrowings under our credit facility is based on our credit rating. As of April 15, 2014, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. (Moody’s), Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services (S&P), a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies, and Fitch, Inc. (Fitch) had assigned the following credit ratings to our senior debt.

	Moody’s		S&P		Fitch
Instrument	Rating	Outlook(1)	Rating	Outlook (2)	Rating	Outlook (3)
Senior Secured Debt	A1	Stable	A	Stable	A	Stable

____________

(1) A Moody’s rating outlook is an opinion regarding the likely direction of an issuer’s rating over the medium term.

(2) An S&P rating outlook assesses the potential direction of a long-term credit rating over the intermediate to longer term.

(3) A Fitch rating outlook encompasses a one- to two-year horizon as to the likely ratings direction.

We cannot assure you that the ratings set forth above will remain in effect for any given period of time or that one or more of these ratings will not be lowered or withdrawn entirely by a rating agency. We note that these credit ratings are included for informational purposes and are not recommendations to buy, sell or hold our securities and may be revised or withdrawn at any time by the rating agency. Each rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating. Any future reduction or withdrawal of one or more of our credit ratings could have a material adverse impact on our ability to obtain short- and long-term financing, the cost of such financings and the execution of our commercial strategies.

14

A decline in credit ratings could increase borrowing costs under our $300 million credit facility.  If our credit ratings had been downgraded one notch by each of the three principal credit rating agencies from the ratings that existed at March 31, 2014, the impact on the borrowing costs under our credit facility would have been immaterial.  A decline in credit ratings would also increase the interest rate on long-term debt to be issued in the capital markets and could negatively impact our ability to complete capital market transactions.

Cross Defaults

Under CenterPoint Energy’s $1.2 billion revolving credit facility, a payment default on, or a non-payment default that permits acceleration of, any indebtedness exceeding $75 million by us will cause a default. In addition, three outstanding series of CenterPoint Energy’s senior notes, aggregating $750 million in principal amount as of March 31, 2014, provide that a payment default by us in respect of, or an acceleration of, borrowed money and certain other specified types of obligations, in the aggregate principal amount of $50 million, will cause a default. A default by CenterPoint Energy would not trigger a default under our debt instruments or revolving credit facility.

Other Factors that Could Affect Cash Requirements

In addition to the above factors, our liquidity and capital resources could be affected by:

• increases in interest expense in connection with debt refinancings and borrowings under our credit facility;

• various legislative or regulatory actions;

• the ability of GenOn Energy, Inc. (GenOn) and its subsidiaries to satisfy their obligations in respect of GenOn’s indemnity obligations to us;

• the ability of REPs, including REP affiliates of NRG Energy, Inc., Energy Future Holdings Corp. and Just Energy Group, Inc., to satisfy their obligations to us and our subsidiaries;

• the outcome of litigation brought by and against us;

• restoration costs and revenue losses resulting from future natural disasters such as hurricanes and the timing of recovery of such restoration costs; and

• various other risks identified in “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of Part I of our 2013 Form 10-K and in Item 1A of Part II of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Certain Contractual Limits on Our Ability to Issue Securities and Borrow Money

Our revolving credit facility limits our consolidated debt (excluding transition and system restoration bonds) to an amount not to exceed 65% of our consolidated capitalization. Additionally, we have contractually agreed that we will not issue additional first mortgage bonds, subject to certain exceptions.

Relationship with CenterPoint Energy

We are an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of CenterPoint Energy. As a result of this relationship, the financial condition and liquidity of our parent company could affect our access to capital, our credit standing and our financial condition.

15

NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

See Note 2 to our Interim Condensed Financial Statements, incorporated herein by reference, for a discussion of new accounting pronouncements that affect us.

Item 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

On May 14, 2013, the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) issued an updated version of its Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013 Framework). Originally issued in 1992 (1992 Framework), the framework helps organizations design, implement and evaluate the effectiveness of internal control concepts and simplify their use and application. The 1992 Framework remains available during the transition period, which extends to December 15, 2014, after which time COSO will consider it as superseded by the 2013 Framework. As of March 31, 2014, CenterPoint Houston continues to utilize the 1992 Framework and will transition to the 2013 Framework by the end of 2014.

In accordance with Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 31, 2014 to provide assurance that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure.

There has been no change in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the three months ended March 31, 2014 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

For a discussion of certain legal and regulatory proceedings affecting us, please read Note 8 to our Interim Condensed Financial Statements and “Management’s Narrative Analysis of Results of Operations - Liquidity and Capital Resources - Regulatory Matters,” each of which is incorporated herein by reference. See also “Business - Regulation” and “- Environmental Matters” in Item 1 and “Legal Proceedings” in Item 3 of our 2013 Form 10-K.

Item 1A. RISK FACTORS

Other than with respect to the updated risk factor set forth below, there have been no material changes from the risk factors disclosed in our 2013 Form 10-K.

A substantial portion of our receivables is concentrated in a small number of REPs, and any delay or default in payment could adversely affect our cash flows, financial condition and results of operations.

Our receivables from the distribution of electricity are collected from REPs that supply the electricity we distribute to their customers. As of March 31, 2014, we did business with approximately 70 REPs. Adverse economic conditions, structural problems in the market served by ERCOT or financial difficulties of one or more REPs could impair the ability of these REPs to pay for our services or could cause them to delay such payments. We depend on these REPs to remit payments on a timely basis. Applicable regulatory provisions require that customers be shifted to another REP or a provider of last resort if a REP cannot make timely payments. Applicable Public Utility Commission of Texas (Texas Utility Commission) regulations significantly limit the extent to which we can apply normal commercial terms or otherwise seek credit protection from firms desiring to provide retail electric service in our service territory, and we thus remain at risk for payments not made prior to the shift to another REP or the provider of last resort. The Texas Utility Commission revised its regulations in 2009 to (i) increase the financial qualifications required of REPs that began selling power after January 1, 2009, and (ii) authorize utilities to defer bad debts resulting from defaults by REPs for recovery in a future rate case. A significant portion of our billed receivables from REPs are from affiliates of NRG, Just Energy Group, Inc. (Just Energy Group) and Energy Future Holdings Corp. (Energy Future Holdings). Our aggregate billed receivables balance from REPs as of March 31, 2014 was $184 million. Approximately 39%, 8% and 7% of this amount was owed by affiliates of NRG, Just Energy Group and Energy Future Holdings, respectively. In April 2014, Energy Future Holdings publicly disclosed that it and the substantial majority of its direct and indirect subsidiaries, excluding Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC and its subsidiaries,

16

filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware. Any delay or default in payment by REPs could adversely affect our cash flows, financial condition and results of operations. If a REP were unable to meet its obligations, it could consider, among various options, restructuring under the bankruptcy laws, in which event such REP might seek to avoid honoring its obligations, and claims might be made by creditors involving payments we had received from such REP.

Item 5.OTHER INFORMATION

Our ratio of earnings to fixed charges for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 was 1.91 and 1.39, respectively. We do not believe that the ratios for these three-month periods are necessarily indicative of the ratios for the twelve-month periods due to the seasonal nature of our business. The ratios were calculated pursuant to applicable rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

17

Item 6.EXHIBITS

The following exhibits are filed herewith:

Exhibits not incorporated by reference to a prior filing are designated by a cross (+); all exhibits not so designated are incorporated by reference to a prior filing of CenterPoint Houston or CenterPoint Energy as indicated.

Agreements included as exhibits are included only to provide information to investors regarding their terms. Agreements listed below may contain representations, warranties and other provisions that were made, among other things, to provide the parties thereto with specified rights and obligations and to allocate risk among them, and no such agreement should be relied upon as constituting or providing any factual disclosures about CenterPoint Energy Houston Electric, LLC, any other persons, any state of affairs or other matters.

Exhibit Number	Description	Report or Registration Statement	SEC File or Registration Number	Exhibit References
3.1	Restated Certificate of Formation of CenterPoint Houston	CenterPoint Houston’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011	1-3187	3.1
3.2	Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of CenterPoint Houston	CenterPoint Houston’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011	1-3187	3.2
4.1	$300,000,000 Credit Agreement, dated as of September 9, 2011, among CenterPoint Houston, as Borrower, and the banks named therein	CenterPoint Houston’s Form 8-K dated September 9, 2011	1-3187	4.2
4.2	First Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of September 9, 2013, among CenterPoint Houston, as Borrower, and the banks named therein	CenterPoint Houston’s Form 8-K dated September 9, 2013	1-3187	4.2
4.3	Twenty-Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 17, 2014, to the General Mortgage Indenture, dated as of October 10, 2002, between CenterPoint Houston and the Trustee	CenterPoint Energy’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014	1-31447	4.10
4.4	Officer’s Certificate, dated as of March 17, 2014, setting forth the form, terms and provisions of the Twenty-Third Series of General Mortgage Bonds	CenterPoint Energy’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014	1-31447	4.11
+12	Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges
+31.1	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Scott M. Prochazka
+31.2	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Gary L. Whitlock
+32.1	Section 1350 Certification of Scott M. Prochazka
+32.2	Section 1350 Certification of Gary L. Whitlock
+101.INS	XBRL Instance Document
+101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
+101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
+101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
+101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document
+101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

18

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	CENTERPOINT ENERGY HOUSTON ELECTRIC, LLC
By:	/s/ WALTER L. FITZGERALD
	Walter L. Fitzgerald
	Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer

Date: May 8, 2014

19

Index to Exhibits

The following exhibits are filed herewith:

Exhibits not incorporated by reference to a prior filing are designated by a cross (+); all exhibits not so designated are incorporated by reference to a prior filing of CenterPoint Houston or CenterPoint Energy as indicated.

Agreements included as exhibits are included only to provide information to investors regarding their terms. Agreements listed below may contain representations, warranties and other provisions that were made, among other things, to provide the parties thereto with specified rights and obligations and to allocate risk among them, and no such agreement should be relied upon as constituting or providing any factual disclosures about CenterPoint Energy Houston Electric, LLC, any other persons, any state of affairs or other matters.

Exhibit Number	Description	Report or Registration Statement	SEC File or Registration Number	Exhibit References
3.1	Restated Certificate of Formation of CenterPoint Houston	CenterPoint Houston’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011	1-3187	3.1
3.2	Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of CenterPoint Houston	CenterPoint Houston’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011	1-3187	3.2
4.1	$300,000,000 Credit Agreement, dated as of September 9, 2011, among CenterPoint Houston, as Borrower, and the banks named therein	CenterPoint Houston’s Form 8-K dated September 9, 2011	1-3187	4.2
4.2	First Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of September 9, 2013, among CenterPoint Houston, as Borrower, and the banks named therein	CenterPoint Houston’s Form 8-K dated September 9, 2013	1-3187	4.2
4.3	Twenty-Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 17, 2014, to the General Mortgage Indenture, dated as of October 10, 2002, between CenterPoint Houston and the Trustee	CenterPoint Energy’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014	1-31447	4.10
4.4	Officer’s Certificate, dated as of March 17, 2014, setting forth the form, terms and provisions of the Twenty-Third Series of General Mortgage Bonds	CenterPoint Energy’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014	1-31447	4.11
+12	Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges
+31.1	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Scott M. Prochazka
+31.2	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Gary L. Whitlock
+32.1	Section 1350 Certification of Scott M. Prochazka
+32.2	Section 1350 Certification of Gary L. Whitlock
+101.INS	XBRL Instance Document
+101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
+101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
+101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
+101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document
+101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

20

EX-12

Exhibit 12

CENTERPOINT ENERGY HOUSTON ELECTRIC, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES

(AN INDIRECT WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARY OF CENTERPOINT ENERGY, INC.)

COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

(Millions of Dollars)

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2014 (1)			2013 (1)
Net income	$	35		$	19
Income taxes	20			9
Capitalized interest	(3		)	(2		)
	52			26
Fixed charges, as defined:
Interest	54			65
Capitalized interest	3			2
Interest component of rentals charged to operating expense	—			—
Total fixed charges	57			67
Earnings, as defined	$	109		$	93
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges	1.91			1.39

  ____________

(1) Excluded from the computation of fixed charges for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 is interest expense of $6 million and interest income of less than $1 million, respectively, which is included in income tax expense.

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Scott M. Prochazka, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CenterPoint Energy Houston Electric, LLC;

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  May 8, 2014

/s/ Scott M. Prochazka

Scott M. Prochazka

Chairman (Principal Executive Officer)

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Gary L. Whitlock, certify that:

1.I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CenterPoint Energy Houston Electric, LLC;

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  May 8, 2014

/s/ Gary L. Whitlock

Gary L. Whitlock

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

EX-32.1

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CenterPoint Energy Houston Electric, LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2014 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Scott M. Prochazka, Chairman (Principal Executive Officer), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Scott M. Prochazka

Scott M. Prochazka

Chairman (Principal Executive Officer)

May 8, 2014

EX-32.2

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CenterPoint Energy Houston Electric, LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2014 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Gary L. Whitlock, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Gary L. Whitlock

Gary L. Whitlock

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

May 8, 2014

XML

Income Taxes (Details)	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2014	Mar. 31, 2013
Effective tax rate (in hundredths)	36.00%	32.00%

XML

Regulatory Accounting

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2014

regulatory accounting [Abstract]

Regulatory Matters [Text Block]

Regulatory Accounting

As of March 31, 2014, CenterPoint Houston has not recognized an allowed equity return of $493 million because such return will be recognized as it is recovered in rates. During the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, CenterPoint Houston recognized approximately $15 million and $8 million, respectively, of the allowed equity return not previously recognized.

XML

Employee Benefit Plans

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2014

Compensation and Retirement Disclosure [Abstract]

Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits Disclosure [Text Block]

Employee Benefit Plans

CenterPoint Houston’s employees participate in CenterPoint Energy’s postretirement benefit plan. CenterPoint Houston’s net periodic cost includes the following components relating to postretirement benefits:

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2014			2013
	(in millions)
Interest cost	$	4		$	3
Expected return on plan assets	(1		)	(1		)
Amortization of loss	—			1
Amortization of transition obligation	1			1
Net periodic cost	$	4		$	4

CenterPoint Houston expects to contribute approximately $7 million to its postretirement benefit plan in 2014, of which $2 million was contributed during the three months ended March 31, 2014.

XML

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED INCOME (Unaudited) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2014	Mar. 31, 2013
Revenues	$ 630	$ 532
Expenses:
Operation and maintenance	290	239
Depreciation and amortization	176	154
Taxes other than income taxes	58	55
Total	524	448
Operating Income	106	84
Other Income (Expense):
Interest and other finance charges	(24)	(30)
Interest on transition and system restoration bonds	(30)	(35)
Other, net	3	9
Total	(51)	(56)
Income Before Income Taxes	55	28
Income tax expense	20	9
Net Income	$ 35	$ 19

XML

Background and Basis of Presentation

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2014

Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract]

Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements Disclosure [Text Block]

Background and Basis of Presentation

General. Included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Form 10-Q) of CenterPoint Energy Houston Electric, LLC are the condensed consolidated interim financial statements and notes (Interim Condensed Financial Statements) of CenterPoint Energy Houston Electric, LLC and its subsidiaries (collectively, CenterPoint Houston). The Interim Condensed Financial Statements are unaudited, omit certain financial statement disclosures and should be read with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of CenterPoint Houston for the year ended December 31, 2013.

Background. CenterPoint Houston engages in the electric transmission and distribution business in the Texas Gulf Coast area that includes the city of Houston.  CenterPoint Houston is an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of CenterPoint Energy, Inc. (CenterPoint Energy), a public utility holding company.  At March 31, 2014, CenterPoint Houston had five subsidiaries, CenterPoint Energy Transition Bond Company, LLC, CenterPoint Energy Transition Bond Company II, LLC, CenterPoint Energy Transition Bond Company III, LLC, CenterPoint Energy Restoration Bond Company, LLC and CenterPoint Energy Transition Bond Company IV, LLC.  The transition and system restoration bond companies, which are classified as variable interest entities, are wholly owned bankruptcy remote special purpose entities that were formed specifically for the purpose of securitizing transition and system restoration property. Creditors of CenterPoint Houston have no recourse to any assets or revenues of the transition and system restoration bond companies. The bonds issued by these companies are payable only from and secured by transition and system restoration property, and the bondholders have no recourse to the general credit of CenterPoint Houston.

Basis of Presentation. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

CenterPoint Houston’s Interim Condensed Financial Statements reflect all normal recurring adjustments that are, in the opinion of management, necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the respective periods. Amounts reported in CenterPoint Houston’s Condensed Statements of Consolidated Income are not necessarily indicative of amounts expected for a full-year period due to the effects of, among other things, (a) seasonal fluctuations in demand for energy, (b) timing of maintenance and other expenditures and (c) acquisitions and dispositions of businesses, assets and other interests.

XML

Related Party Transactions and Major Customers (Details) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2014	Mar. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2013
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Investments in Money Pool	$ 90
Money Pool Borrowings			(3)
Interest Income (Expense) Net, Related Party	(1)	5
Corporate service charges	37	36
Sales to major customers	630	532
Affiliates of NRG Energy, Inc. [Member]
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Sales to major customers	166	144
Affiliates of Energy Future Holdings Corp. [Member]
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Sales to major customers	$ 40	$ 36

XML

Commitments and Contingencies (Details)	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2014
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Recovery of compensatory damages sought by plaintiffs	in excess of $1 billion
Approximate number of gas market manipulation lawsuits naming CenterPoint Energy and/or Reliant Energy (in number of lawsuits)	30
Number of gas market manipulation lawsuits pending for CenterPoint and its affiliates (in number of lawsuits)	1

XML

New Accounting Pronouncements

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2014

New Accounting Pronouncements and Changes in Accounting Principles [Abstract]

Description of New Accounting Pronouncements Not yet Adopted [Text Block]

New Accounting Pronouncements

Management believes that recently issued accounting standards, which are not yet effective, will not have a material impact on CenterPoint Houston’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows upon adoption.

XML

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Unaudited) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	Mar. 31, 2014	Dec. 31, 2013
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents ($149 and $207 related to VIEs at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively)	$ 348	$ 207
Accounts and notes receivable, less bad debt reserve of $3 and $3, respectively ($69 and $60 related to VIEs at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively)	252	261
Accounts and notes receivable—affiliated companies	114	5
Accrued unbilled revenues	74	87
Inventory	109	105
Deferred tax asset	3	3
Other ($42 and $41 related to VIEs at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively)	50	65
Total current assets	950	733
Property, Plant and Equipment:
Property, plant and equipment	8,900	8,741
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization	2,949	2,907
Property, plant and equipment, net	5,951	5,834
Regulatory assets ($3,084 and $3,179 related to VIEs at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively)	2,926	2,999
Other	49	43
Total other assets	2,975	3,042
Total Assets	9,876	9,609
Current Liabilities:
Current portion of VIE transition and system restoration bonds long-term debt	362	354
Accounts payable	128	137
Accounts and notes payable—affiliated companies	87	80
Taxes accrued	93	144
Interest accrued	47	75
Other	86	128
Total current liabilities	803	918
Other Liabilities:
Deferred Tax Liabilities, Net, Noncurrent	2,008	2,035
Benefit obligations	226	227
Regulatory liabilities	529	509
Other	46	46
Total other liabilities	2,809	2,817
Long-term Debt:
VIE transition and system restoration bonds	2,908	3,046
Other	2,088	1,595
Total long-term debt	4,996	4,641
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 8)
Member’s Equity:
Common stock	0	0
Paid-in capital	1,232	1,232
Retained earnings	36	1
Total member’s equity	1,268	1,233
Total Liabilities and Member’s Equity	$ 9,876	$ 9,609

XML

Long-term Debt (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2014

Line of Credit Facility [Line Items]

Schedule of Line of Credit Facilities [Table Text Block]

Revolving Credit Facility. As of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, CenterPoint Houston had the following revolving credit facility and utilization of such facility (in millions):

		March 31, 2014				December 31, 2013
Size of Facility		Loans		Letters of Credit		Loans		Letters of Credit
$	300	$	—	$	4	$	—	$	4

XML

Document and Entity Information Document (USD $) In Millions, except Share data, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2014	Apr. 15, 2014	Jun. 30, 2013
Entity Information [Line Items]
Entity Registrant Name	CENTERPOINT ENERGY HOUSTON ELECTRIC LLC
Entity Central Index Key	0000048732
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--12-31
Entity Filer Category	Non-accelerated Filer
Document Type	10-Q
Document Period End Date	Mar. 31, 2014
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2014
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q1
Amendment Flag	false
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		1,000
Entity Well-known Seasoned Issuer	No
Entity Voluntary Filers	No
Entity Current Reporting Status	Yes
Entity Public Float			$ 0

XML

Background and Basis of Presentation (Details)	Mar. 31, 2014
Number Of Vies Consolidated In Financial Statements	5

XML

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Unaudited) Balance Sheet Parenthetical (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	Mar. 31, 2014	Dec. 31, 2013
Cash and Cash Equivalents	$ 348	$ 207
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts Receivable, Current	3	3
Accounts and notes receivable, net	252	261
Other	50	65
Regulatory assets	2,926	2,999
Variable Interest Entity, Primary Beneficiary [Member]
Cash and Cash Equivalents	149	207
Accounts and notes receivable, net	69	60
Other	42	41
Regulatory assets	$ 3,084	$ 3,179

XML

Long-term Debt

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2014

Long-term Debt, Unclassified [Abstract]

Debt Disclosure [Text Block]

Long-term Debt

On March 17, 2014, CenterPoint Houston issued $600 million principal amount of 4.50% General Mortgage Bonds due 2044.

Debt Repayments. Approximately $44 million aggregate principal amount of pollution control bonds issued on behalf of CenterPoint Houston were redeemed on March 3, 2014 at 101% of their principal amount plus accrued interest. The bonds had an interest rate of 4.25%, were scheduled to mature in 2017 and were collateralized by general mortgage bonds of CenterPoint Houston.

Approximately $56 million aggregate principal amount of pollution control bonds issued on behalf of CenterPoint Houston were purchased by CenterPoint Houston on March 3, 2014 at 101% of their principal amount plus accrued interest pursuant to the mandatory tender provisions of the bonds. The bonds had an interest rate of 5.60% prior to CenterPoint Houston's purchase and have a variable rate thereafter. The bonds mature in 2027 and are collateralized by general mortgage bonds of CenterPoint Houston. The purchased pollution control bonds may be remarketed. These bonds are not reflected in the consolidated financial statements.

In April 2014, approximately $84 million aggregate principal amount of pollution control bonds issued on behalf of CenterPoint Houston were called for redemption on June 2, 2014 at 100% of their principal amount plus accrued interest. The bonds have an interest rate of 4.25%, mature in 2017 and are collateralized by general mortgage bonds of CenterPoint Houston.

Revolving Credit Facility. As of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, CenterPoint Houston had the following revolving credit facility and utilization of such facility (in millions):

		March 31, 2014				December 31, 2013
Size of Facility		Loans		Letters of Credit		Loans		Letters of Credit
$	300	$	—	$	4	$	—	$	4

CenterPoint Houston’s$300 million credit facility, which is scheduled to terminate September 9, 2018, can be drawn at the London Interbank Offered Rate plus 112.5 basis points based on CenterPoint Houston’s current credit ratings. The revolving credit facility contains a financial covenant which limits CenterPoint Houston's consolidated debt (excluding transition and system restoration bonds) to an amount not to exceed 65% of its consolidated capitalization.

CenterPoint Houston was in compliance with all financial covenants in its revolving credit facility at March 31, 2014.

Other. As of both March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, CenterPoint Houston had issued $408 million of general mortgage bonds as collateral for long-term debt of CenterPoint Energy. These bonds are not reflected in the consolidated financial statements because of the contingent nature of the obligations.

XML

Related Party Transactions and Major Customers

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2014

Related Party Transactions [Abstract]

Related Party Transactions Disclosure [Text Block]

Related Party Transactions and Major Customers

(a) Related Party Transactions

CenterPoint Houston participates in a money pool through which it can borrow or invest on a short-term basis. Funding needs are aggregated, and external borrowing or investing is based on the net cash position. The net funding requirements of the money pool are expected to be met with borrowings under CenterPoint Energy’s revolving credit facility or the sale of CenterPoint Energy’s commercial paper.CenterPoint Houston had investments in the money pool of $90 million and borrowings from the money pool of $3 million at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, which are included in Accounts and notes receivable-affiliated companies and Accounts and notes payable-affiliated companies, respectively, in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.  

CenterPoint Houston had net interest expense of less than $1 million and net interest income of $5 million related to affiliate borrowings for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, included in Other Income.

CenterPoint Energy provides some corporate services to CenterPoint Houston. The costs of services have been charged directly to CenterPoint Houston using methods that management believes are reasonable. These methods include negotiated usage rates, dedicated asset assignment and proportionate corporate formulas based on operating expenses, assets, gross margin, employees and a composite of assets, gross margin and employees. These charges are not necessarily indicative of what would have been incurred had CenterPoint Houston not been an affiliate. Amounts charged to CenterPoint Houston for these services were $37 million and $36 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and are included primarily in operation and maintenance expenses.

(b) Major Customers

Sales to affiliates of NRG Energy, Inc. (NRG) in the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 represented approximately$166 million and $144 million, respectively, of CenterPoint Houston’s transmission and distribution revenues.  Sales to affiliates of Energy Future Holdings Corp. (Energy Future Holdings) in the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 represented approximately $40 million and $36 million, respectively, of CenterPoint Houston’s transmission and distribution revenues.

XML

Long-term Debt (Details) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2014	Dec. 31, 2013
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
General mortgage bonds used as collateral	$ 408	$ 408
Bonds General Mortgage Due 2044 [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Debt Instrument, Face Amount	600
Debt Instrument, Interest Rate, Stated Percentage	4.50%
Debt Instrument, Maturity Date	Dec. 31, 2044
Line of Credit [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Line of Credit Facility, Maximum Borrowing Capacity	300	300
Line of Credit Facility, Interest Rate Description	London Interbank Offered Rate plus 112.5
Loans Outstanding	0	0
Letters Of Credit Outstanding	4	4
Percentage on limitation of debt to total capitalization under covenant (in hundredths)	65.00%
January 2014 [Member] | Bonds Pollution Control Due2017 [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Debt Instrument, Interest Rate, Stated Percentage	4.25%
Extinguishment Of Debt Purchase Price Percentage Of Principal	101.00%
Debt Instrument, Maturity Date	Dec. 31, 2017
Extinguishment of Debt, Amount	44
January 2014 [Member] | Bonds Pollution Control Due2027 [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Debt Instrument, Interest Rate, Stated Percentage	5.60%
Extinguishment Of Debt Purchase Price Percentage Of Principal	101.00%
Debt Instrument, Maturity Date	Dec. 31, 2027
Extinguishment of Debt, Amount	56
April 2014 [Member] | Bonds Pollution Control Due2017 [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Debt Instrument, Interest Rate, Stated Percentage	4.25%
Extinguishment Of Debt Purchase Price Percentage Of Principal	100.00%
Debt Instrument, Maturity Date	Dec. 31, 2017
Extinguishment of Debt, Amount	$ 84

XML

Employee Benefit Plans (Details) (Other Postretirement Benefit Plans, Defined Benefit [Member], USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2014	Mar. 31, 2013
Other Postretirement Benefit Plans, Defined Benefit [Member]
Defined Benefit Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Interest cost	$ 4	$ 3
Expected return on plan assets	(1)	(1)
Amortization of loss	0	1
Amortization of transition obligation	1	1
Net periodic cost	4	4
Expected contribution to postretirement benefit plan in current year	7
Total contribution to the plan during the period	$ 2

XML

Employee Benefit Plans (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2014

Defined Benefit Plan Disclosure [Line Items]

Schedule of Defined Benefit Plans Disclosures [Table Text Block]

CenterPoint Houston’s employees participate in CenterPoint Energy’s postretirement benefit plan. CenterPoint Houston’s net periodic cost includes the following components relating to postretirement benefits:

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2014			2013
	(in millions)
Interest cost	$	4		$	3
Expected return on plan assets	(1		)	(1		)
Amortization of loss	—			1
Amortization of transition obligation	1			1
Net periodic cost	$	4		$	4

XML

Commitments and Contingencies

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2014

Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]

Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Text Block]

Commitments and Contingencies

Legal Matters

Gas Market Manipulation Cases.  CenterPoint Energy, CenterPoint Houston or their predecessor, Reliant Energy, Incorporated (Reliant Energy), and certain of their former subsidiaries have been named as defendants in certain lawsuits described below. Under a master separation agreement between CenterPoint Energy and a former subsidiary, Reliant Resources, Inc. (RRI), CenterPoint Energy and its subsidiaries are entitled to be indemnified by RRI and its successors for any losses, including certain attorneys’ fees and other costs, arising out of these lawsuits.  In May 2009, RRI sold its Texas retail business to a subsidiary of NRG and RRI changed its name to RRI Energy, Inc. In December 2010, Mirant Corporation merged with and became a wholly owned subsidiary of RRI, and RRI changed its name to GenOn Energy, Inc. (GenOn). In December 2012, NRG acquired GenOn through a merger in which GenOn became a wholly owned subsidiary of NRG. None of the sale of the retail business, the merger with Mirant Corporation, or the acquisition of GenOn by NRG alters RRI’s (now GenOn’s) contractual obligations to indemnify CenterPoint Energy and its subsidiaries, including CenterPoint Houston, for certain liabilities, including their indemnification obligations regarding the gas market manipulation litigation, nor does it affect the terms of existing guarantee arrangements for certain GenOn gas transportation contracts discussed below.

A large number of lawsuits were filed against numerous gas market participants in a number of federal and western state courts in connection with the operation of the natural gas markets in 2000-2002. CenterPoint Energy’s former affiliate, RRI, was a participant in gas trading in the California and Western markets. These lawsuits, many of which were filed as class actions, alleged violations of state and federal antitrust laws. Plaintiffs in these lawsuits sought a variety of forms of relief, including, among others, recovery of compensatory damages (in some cases in excess of $1 billion), a trebling of compensatory damages, full consideration damages and attorneys’ fees. CenterPoint Energy and/or Reliant Energy were named in approximately 30 of these lawsuits, which were instituted between 2003 and 2009. CenterPoint Energy and its affiliates have since been released or dismissed from all but one such case. CenterPoint Energy Services, Inc. (CES), a subsidiary of CenterPoint Energy Resources Corp., is a defendant in a case now pending in federal court in Nevada alleging a conspiracy to inflate Wisconsin natural gas prices in 2000-2002.  In July 2011, the court issued an order dismissing the plaintiffs’ claims against other defendants in the case, each of whom had demonstrated FERC jurisdictional sales for resale during the relevant period, based on federal preemption.  The plaintiffs appealed this ruling to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which reversed the trial court's dismissal of the plaintiffs' claims. In August 2013, the other defendants filed a petition for review with the U.S. Supreme Court. CenterPoint Energy believes that CES is not a proper defendant in this case and will continue to pursue a dismissal.  CenterPoint Houston does not expect the ultimate outcome of this matter to have a material impact on its financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Environmental Matters

Asbestos. Some facilities owned by CenterPoint Energy contain or have contained asbestos insulation and other asbestos-containing materials. CenterPoint Energy or its subsidiaries, including CenterPoint Houston, have been named, along with numerous others, as a defendant in lawsuits filed by a number of individuals who claim injury due to exposure to asbestos. Some of the claimants have worked at locations owned by CenterPoint Energy or CenterPoint Houston, but most existing claims relate to facilities previously owned by CenterPoint Energy’s other subsidiaries or CenterPoint Houston, but currently owned by NRG Texas LP. CenterPoint Energy anticipates that additional claims like those received may be asserted in the future. In 2004 and early 2005, CenterPoint Energy sold its generating business, to which most of these claims relate, to a company which is now an affiliate of NRG. Under the terms of the arrangements regarding separation of the generating business from CenterPoint Energy and its sale of that business, ultimate financial responsibility for uninsured losses from claims relating to the generating business has been assumed by the NRG affiliate, but CenterPoint Energy has agreed to continue to defend such claims to the extent they are covered by insurance maintained by CenterPoint Energy, subject to reimbursement of the costs of such defense by the NRG affiliate. Although their ultimate outcome cannot be predicted at this time, CenterPoint Houston or CenterPoint Energy, as appropriate, intends to continue vigorously contesting claims that are not considered to have merit and, based on its experience to date, CenterPoint Houston does not expect these matters, either individually or in the aggregate, to have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Other Environmental. From time to time, CenterPoint Houston identifies the presence of environmental contaminants on property where it conducts or has conducted operations.  Other such sites involving contaminants may be identified in the future.  CenterPoint Houston has and expects to continue to remediate identified sites consistent with its legal obligations. From time to time CenterPoint Houston has received notices from regulatory authorities or others regarding its status as a potentially responsible party in connection with sites found to require remediation due to the presence of environmental contaminants. In addition, CenterPoint Houston has been named from time to time as a defendant in litigation related to such sites. Although the ultimate outcome of such matters cannot be predicted at this time, CenterPoint Houston does not expect, based on its experience to date, these matters, either individually or in the aggregate, to have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Other Proceedings

CenterPoint Houston is involved in other legal, environmental, tax and regulatory proceedings before various courts, regulatory commissions and governmental agencies regarding matters arising in the ordinary course of business. Some of these proceedings involve substantial amounts. CenterPoint Houston regularly analyzes current information and, as necessary, provides accruals for probable liabilities on the eventual disposition of these matters. CenterPoint Houston does not expect the disposition of these matters to have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

XML

Income Taxes

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2014

Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]

Income Tax Disclosure [Text Block]

Income Taxes

The effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2014 was 36% compared to 32% for the same period in 2013. The lower effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2013 was primarily due to an income tax benefit recognized for a change in tax law in the first quarter of 2013. CenterPoint Houston reported no uncertain tax liability as of March 31, 2014 and expects no significant change to the uncertain tax liability over the next twelve months ending March 31, 2015. CenterPoint Energy’s consolidated federal income tax return filed for the year ended December 31, 2012 is currently under audit by the Internal Revenue Service.

XML

Fair Value Measurements (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2014

Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring Basis [Line Items]

Fair Value, by Balance Sheet Grouping [Table Text Block]

The fair values of cash and cash equivalents and short-term borrowings are estimated to be approximately equivalent to carrying amounts and have been excluded from the table below.  The fair value of each debt instrument is determined by multiplying the principal amount of each debt instrument by the market price. These assets and liabilities, which are not measured at fair value in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets but for which the fair value is disclosed, would be classified as Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy.

	March 31, 2014				December 31, 2013
	Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Fair Value
	(in millions)
Financial liabilities:
Long-term debt	$	5,358	$	5,620	$	4,995	$	5,165

XML

Fair Value Measurements (Details) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	Mar. 31, 2014	Dec. 31, 2013
Fair Value, Inputs, Level 1 [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring Basis [Line Items]
Investments, including money market funds	$ 39	$ 38
Fair Value, Inputs, Level 2 [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring Basis [Line Items]
Investments, including money market funds	0	0
Fair Value, Inputs, Level 3 [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring Basis [Line Items]
Investments, including money market funds	0	0
Carrying Amount [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring Basis [Line Items]
Long-term debt	5,358	4,995
Fair Value [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring Basis [Line Items]
Long-term debt	$ 5,620	$ 5,165

XML

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOWS (Unaudited) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2014	Mar. 31, 2013
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net income	$ 35	$ 19
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	176	154
Amortization of deferred financing costs	4	4
Deferred income taxes	(29)	(10)
Changes in other assets and liabilities:
Accounts and notes receivable, net	22	5
Accounts receivable/payable - affiliated companies	(9)	(69)
Inventory	(4)	(3)
Accounts payable	0	1
Taxes receivable	0	7
Interest and taxes accrued	(79)	(84)
Net regulatory assets and liabilities	(8)	15
Other current assets	17	14
Other current liabilities	(42)	0
Other assets	3	3
Other, net	(6)	1
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	80	57
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Capital expenditures	(196)	(137)
Decrease in notes receivable - affiliated companies	(90)	256
Decrease (increase) in restricted cash of transition and system restoration bond companies	(2)	1
Other, net	(11)	(6)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities	(299)	114
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Proceeds from long-term debt	600	0
Payments of long-term debt	(231)	(612)
Decrease in short-term notes payable - affiliated companies	(3)	0
Cash paid for debt retirement	(1)	0
Debt issuance costs	(5)	0
Other, net	0	1
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	360	(611)
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents	141	(440)
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period	207	646
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period	348	206
Cash Payments:
Interest, net of capitalized interest	78	100
Income taxes, net	39	5
Non-cash transactions:
Accounts payable related to capital expenditures	$ 41	$ 50

XML

Fair Value Measurements

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2014

Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]

Fair Value Disclosures [Text Block]

Fair Value Measurements

Assets and liabilities that are recorded at fair value in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets are categorized based upon the level of judgment associated with the inputs used to measure their value. Hierarchical levels, as defined below and directly related to the amount of subjectivity associated with the inputs to fair valuations of these assets and liabilities, are as follows:

Level 1: Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities at the measurement date. The types of assets carried at Level 1 fair value are investments listed in active markets.  At March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, CenterPoint Houston held Level 1 investments of $39 million and $38 million, respectively, which were primarily investments in money market funds and are included in cash and cash equivalents in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Level 2:  Inputs, other than quoted prices included in Level 1, are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, and inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability. CenterPoint Houston had no Level 2 assets or liabilities at either March 31, 2014 or December 31, 2013.

Level 3: Inputs are unobservable for the asset or liability, and include situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability. These inputs reflect management’s best estimate of the assumptions market participants would use in determining fair value.  CenterPoint Houston had no Level 3 assets or liabilities at either March 31, 2014 or December 31, 2013.

CenterPoint Houston determines the appropriate level for each financial asset and liability on a quarterly basis and recognizes transfers between levels at the end of the reporting period. For the three months ended March 31, 2014, there were no transfers between levels.

Estimated Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The fair values of cash and cash equivalents and short-term borrowings are estimated to be approximately equivalent to carrying amounts and have been excluded from the table below.  The fair value of each debt instrument is determined by multiplying the principal amount of each debt instrument by the market price. These assets and liabilities, which are not measured at fair value in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets but for which the fair value is disclosed, would be classified as Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy.

	March 31, 2014				December 31, 2013
	Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Fair Value
	(in millions)
Financial liabilities:
Long-term debt	$	5,358	$	5,620	$	4,995	$	5,165

XML

Regulatory Accounting (Details) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2014	Mar. 31, 2013
Unrecognized Amount Of Allowed Equity Return	$ 493
Amount Of Allowed Equity Return Recognized In Period	$ 15	$ 8