-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, SGkjDsOvK8SmrKVknicz7qOIfemQEjyTp2VgJ9ilut43Hf/Gkz+CWnQXVfPsL/IG lMG2VEDq/DAuU6eaguFaWA== 0001043039-10-000112.txt : 20110120 0001043039-10-000112.hdr.sgml : 20110120 20101201113511 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0001043039-10-000112 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: CORRESP PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 1 FILED AS OF DATE: 20101201 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: HERLEY INDUSTRIES INC /NEW CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000047035 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: SEARCH, DETECTION, NAVIGATION, GUIDANCE, AERONAUTICAL SYS [3812] IRS NUMBER: 232413500 STATE OF INCORPORATION: DE FISCAL YEAR END: 0909 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: CORRESP BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 3061 INDUSTRY DRIVE CITY: LANCASTER STATE: PA ZIP: 17603-4092 BUSINESS PHONE: 7173972777 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 3061 INDUSTRY DRIVE CITY: LANCASTER STATE: PA ZIP: 17603-4092 FORMER COMPANY: FORMER CONFORMED NAME: HERLEY MICROWAVE SYSTEMS INC DATE OF NAME CHANGE: 19900510 FORMER COMPANY: FORMER CONFORMED NAME: HERLEY INDUSTRIES INC DATE OF NAME CHANGE: 19831103 CORRESP 1 filename1.htm corres.htm




Kimberly J. Decker, Esquire
 
Direct Dial Number: 717-399-1506
 
E-mail: kdecker@barley.com
 


 

November 29, 2010


via Fax:  703-813-6967
 
John Dana Brown, Staff Attorney
Division of Corporation Finance
United States Securities And Exchange Commission
Washington D.C. 20549-3561
  

 
Re:
Herley Industries, Inc.
 
Preliminary Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A
 
Filed November 19, 2010

Dear Mr. Brown:
 
We received the Securities and Exchange Commission’s comment letter, dated November 24, 2010, on the above referenced filing.  We have set forth below our response to the four points raised in your letter.  In addition, we attach our proposed revision to Proposal 2 of the above referenced filing.
 
 
1.
Please tell us why you have not presented the individual matters reflected in Proposal 2 as separate proposals.
 
 
Originally, we deemed the proposals inter-related, as most of them related to the terms of a May 2010 settlement of certain derivative litigation against Herley.  However, in light of the SEC’s concern regarding presentation of the proposed Bylaws amendment as a single item, we have broken that proposal down into four separate items upon which a vote will be taken.  Please see the attached, revised Proposal 2, which now is broken into four sub-proposals (a-d).
 
 
2.
If you revise to present the individual matters reflected in proposal 2 as separate proposals, please revise to indicate what the voting standard will be for each proposal.
 
 
A two-thirds vote will be required to approve each of the four separate matters into which Proposal 2 has been split.

 
3.           Please revise to discuss the reasons for each individual matter proposed.
 
We made the requested revisions.  Please see the attached, revised Proposal 2.
 
4.           Please revise to discuss the effects of each individual matter proposed.
 
We made the requested revisions.  Please see the attached, revised Proposal 2.
 
We would appreciate if the staff could review the revisions to Proposal 2, attached, at its earliest convenience.  Monday, November 29 is the deadline for Herley to file its definitive proxy statement in order to incorporate by reference such information into Part III of its Form 10-K.  As a result, it is of great importance to Herley to have communication with you on Monday regarding the timing of your review of revised Proposal 2 so that a decision can be made whether to file an amendment to Herley’s Form 10-K.
 
On behalf of our client, Herley Industries, we represent that Herley acknowledges that:
 
*  Herley is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in the filing;
 
*  staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to staff comments do no foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the filing; and
 
*  the company may not assert staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States.
 
       Sincerely,

       /s/Kimberly J. Decker

       Kimberly J. Decker


 

cc:           Paul G. Mattaini
Kimberly J. Decker
Richard Poirier


 -----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----