XML 25 R14.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.7.0.1
Financial Instruments and Fair Value Measurement
9 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2017
Financial Instruments and Fair Value Measurement  
Financial Instruments and Fair Value Measurement

5.Financial Instruments and Fair Value Measurement

 

The estimated fair value of our available-for-sale securities, reflected on our Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets as Investments, is based on market quotes.  The following is a summary of available-for-sale securities, which excludes assets held in a Non-qualified Supplemental Savings Plan:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross

 

Gross

 

Estimated

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized

 

Unrealized

 

Fair

 

 

    

Cost

    

Gains

    

Losses

    

Value

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Equity Securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

June 30, 2017

 

$

38,473

 

$

27,067

 

$

(2,160)

 

$

63,380

 

September 30, 2016

 

$

38,473

 

$

33,051

 

$

 —

 

$

71,524

 

 

On an ongoing basis we evaluate the marketable equity securities to determine if any decline in fair value below cost is other-than-temporary.  If a decline in fair value below cost is determined to be other-than-temporary, an impairment charge is recorded and a new cost basis established.  We review several factors to determine whether a loss is other-than-temporary.  These factors include, but are not limited to, (i) the length of time a security is in an unrealized loss position, (ii) the extent to which fair value is less than cost, (iii) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer and (iv) our intent and ability to hold the security for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value. The cost of securities used in determining realized gains and losses is based on the average cost basis of the security sold.  One of our securities, Atwood Oceanics, Inc. (“Atwood”), was in an unrealized loss position for less than 30 days at June 30, 2017.  During the quarter, Ensco plc (“Ensco”) announced that it entered into a definitive merger agreement under which Ensco will acquire Atwood in an all-stock transaction. The definitive merger agreement was unanimously approved by each company’s Board of Directors.  Under the terms of the merger agreement, Atwood shareholders will receive 1.60 shares of Ensco for each share of Atwood common stock for a total value of $10.72 per Atwood share based on Ensco’s closing share price of $6.70 on May 26, 2017.  The merger is subject to shareholder approval from both companies (simple majority approval from Ensco shareholders and two-thirds majority approval from Atwood shareholders).  The votes for each respective company are currently pending and do not have an announced date. The transaction is reportedly expected to close as early as the third quarter of calendar year 2017.  Considering the factors above, including whether and when the security will recover in value and based on our ability and intent to hold these investments until the fair value recovers, impairment was not considered other-than-temporary at June 30, 2017. 

 

The assets held in the Non-qualified Supplemental Savings Plan are carried at fair value which totaled $13.6 million at June 30, 2017 and $13.4 million at September 30, 2016. The assets are comprised of mutual funds that are measured using Level 1 inputs.

 

Short-term investments include securities classified as trading securities. Both realized and unrealized gains and losses on trading securities are included in other income (expense) in the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Operations. The securities are recorded at fair value.

 

The majority of cash equivalents are invested in highly liquid money-market mutual funds invested primarily in direct or indirect obligations of the U.S. Government.  The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents approximates fair value due to the short maturity of those investments.

 

Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.  We use the fair value hierarchy established in ASC 820-10 to measure fair value to prioritize the inputs:

 

·

Level 1 — Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity can access at the measurement date.

 

·

Level 2 — Observable inputs, other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

 

·

Level 3 — Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.  This includes pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies and similar techniques that use significant unobservable inputs.

 

At June 30, 2017, our financial instruments utilizing Level 1 inputs include cash equivalents, equity securities with active markets, money market funds we have elected to classify as restricted assets that are included in other current assets and other assets.  Also included is cash denominated in a foreign currency that we have elected to classify as restricted to be used to settle the remaining liabilities of discontinued operations.  For these items, quoted current market prices are readily available.

 

At June 30, 2017, Level 2 inputs include U.S. Agency issued debt securities, municipal bonds and corporate bonds measured using broker quotations that utilize observable market inputs. Also included in level 2 inputs are bank certificate of deposits included in short-term investments or current assets.

 

Our financial instruments measured using Level 3 inputs consist of potential earnout payments associated with the MOTIVE acquisition during the third quarter of fiscal 2017.  The valuation techniques used for determining the fair value of the potential earnout payments are described further in Note 2.

 

The following table summarizes our assets and liabilities measured at fair value presented in our Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2017:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Fair Value

    

(Level 1)

    

(Level 2)

    

(Level 3)

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Recurring fair value measurements:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Short-term investments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Certificate of deposit

 

$

4,600

 

$

 —

 

$

4,600

 

$

 —

 

Corporate and municipal debt securities

 

 

13,877

 

 

 —

 

 

13,877

 

 

 —

 

U.S. government and federal agency securities

 

 

21,417

 

 

17,419

 

 

3,998

 

 

 —

 

Total short-term investments

 

 

39,894

 

 

17,419

 

 

22,475

 

 

 —

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

 

572,787

 

 

572,787

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Investments

 

 

63,380

 

 

63,380

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Other current assets

 

 

32,917

 

 

32,667

 

 

250

 

 

 —

 

Other assets

 

 

6,690

 

 

6,690

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Total assets measured at fair value

 

$

715,668

 

$

692,943

 

$

22,725

 

$

 —

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contingent earnout liability

 

$

14,509

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

14,509

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The following information presents the supplemental fair value information about long-term fixed-rate debt at June 30, 2017 and September 30, 2016:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

June 30, 

 

September 30, 

 

 

    

2017

    

2016

 

 

 

(in millions)

 

Carrying value of long-term fixed-rate debt

 

$

492.6

 

$

491.8

 

Fair value of long-term fixed-rate debt

 

$

527.2

 

$

529.6

 

 

The fair value for the $500 million fixed-rate debt was based on broker quotes at June 30, 2017.  The notes are classified within Level 2 as they are not actively traded in markets.