XML 47 R17.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT  v2.3.0.11
Fair Value Measurements
12 Months Ended
Apr. 27, 2011
Fair Value Measurements [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements
 
10.   Fair Value Measurements
 
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The fair value hierarchy consists of three levels to prioritize the inputs used in valuations, as defined below:
 
Level 1: Observable inputs that reflect unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.
 
Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.
 
Level 3: Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.
 
As of April 27, 2011 and April 28, 2010, the fair values of the Company’s assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis are categorized as follows:
 
                                                                 
    April 27, 2011     April 28, 2010  
    Level 1     Level 2     Level 3     Total     Level 1     Level 2     Level 3     Total  
    (Thousands of Dollars)  
 
Assets:
                                                               
Derivatives(a)
  $     $ 115,705     $     $ 115,705     $     $ 133,773     $     $ 133,773  
                                                                 
Total assets at fair value
  $     $ 115,705     $     $ 115,705     $     $ 133,773     $     $ 133,773  
                                                                 
Liabilities:
                                                               
Derivatives(a)
  $     $ 43,007     $     $ 43,007     $     $ 36,036     $     $ 36,036  
Earn-out(b)
  $     $     $ 45,325     $ 45,325     $     $     $     $  
                                                                 
Total liabilities at fair value
  $     $ 43,007     $ 45,325     $ 88,332     $     $ 36,036     $     $ 36,036  
                                                                 
 
(a) Foreign currency derivative contracts are valued based on observable market spot and forward rates, and are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. Interest rate swaps are valued based on observable market swap rates, and are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. Cross-currency interest rate swaps are valued based on observable market spot and swap rates, and are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. There have been no transfers between Levels 1 and 2 in Fiscals 2011 and 2010.
 
(b) The fair value of the earn-out associated with the Foodstar acquisition was estimated using a discounted cash flow model. See Note 4 for further information regarding the Foodstar acquisition. This fair value measurement is based on significant inputs not observed in the market and thus represents a Level 3 measurement. Key assumptions in determining the fair value of the earn-out include the discount rate and revenue and EBITDA projections for Fiscals 2013 and 2014. As of April 27, 2011 there was no significant change to the fair value of the earn-out recorded for Foodstar at the acquisition date.
 
The Company recognized $12.6 million of non-cash asset write-offs during Fiscal 2010 related to two factory closures and the exit of a formula business in the U.K. These charges reduced the Company’s carrying value in the assets to net realizable value. The fair value of the assets was determined based on observable inputs.
 
As of April 27, 2011 and April 28, 2010, the aggregate fair value of the Company’s debt obligations, based on market quotes, approximated the recorded value, with the exception of the 7.125% notes issued as part of the dealer remarketable securities exchange transaction. The book value of these notes has been reduced as a result of the cash payments made in connection with the exchange, which occurred in Fiscal 2010. See Note 7.