XML 74 R19.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
12 Months Ended
Dec. 29, 2013
Fair Value of Financial Instruments [Abstract]  
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
(12)            Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company measures certain assets at fair value in accordance with current accounting standards. The fair value hierarchy consists of three levels: Level 1 fair values are valuations based on quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the entity has the ability to access; Level 2 fair values are those valuations based on quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities; and Level 3 fair values are valuations based on inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. There have been no transfers between levels within the fair value hierarchy.

Current accounting standards permit entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value and establish presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between entities that choose different measurement attributes for similar assets and liabilities. The Company has elected the fair value option for certain investments. At December 29, 2013 and December 30, 2012, these investments totaled $28,048 and $24,091, respectively, and are included in prepaid expenses and other current assets in the consolidated balance sheets. The Company recorded net gains of $152, $2,504 and $61 on these investments in other (income) expense, net for the years ended December 29, 2013, December 30, 2012 and December 25, 2011, respectively, relating to the change in fair value of such investments.

At December 29, 2013 and December 30, 2012, the Company had the following assets and liabilities measured at fair value in its consolidated balance sheets:

 
 
  
Fair Value Measurements Using
 
 
 
Fair
Value
  
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
  
Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
  
Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
 
 
 
  
  
  
 
December 29, 2013
 
  
  
  
 
Assets:
 
  
  
  
 
Available-for-sale securities
 
$
28,048
   
-
   
22,564
   
5,484
 
Derivatives
  
4,627
   
-
   
4,627
   
-
 
Total assets
 
$
32,675
   
-
   
27,191
   
5,484
 
 
                
Liabilities:
                
Derivatives
 
$
12,330
   
-
   
12,330
   
-
 
 
                
December 30, 2012
                
Assets:
                
Available-for-sale securities
 
$
24,099
   
8
   
18,986
   
5,105
 
Derivatives
  
4,254
   
-
   
1,741
   
2,513
 
Total assets
 
$
28,353
   
8
   
20,727
   
7,618
 
 
                
Liabilities:
                
Derivatives
 
$
3,461
   
-
   
3,461
   
-
 

Certain available-for-sale securities held by the Company are valued at the net asset value which is quoted on a private market that is not active; however, the unit price is predominantly based on underlying investments which are traded on an active market. Investments valued at net asset value are redeemable within 45 days. In 2012 the Company purchased an available-for-sale investment which invests in hedge funds which contain financial instruments that are valued using certain estimates which are considered unobservable in that they reflect the investment manager's own assumptions about the inputs that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. The Company believes that these estimates are the best information available for use in the fair value of this investment. The Company's derivatives consist primarily of foreign currency forward and forward-starting interest rate contracts. The Company uses current forward rates of the respective foreign currencies and U.S. treasury interest rates to measure the fair value of these contracts. At December 30, 2012, derivative instruments also included warrants to purchase common stock of an unrelated company. The Company used the Black-Scholes model to value these warrants. One of the inputs used in the Black-Scholes model, historical volatility, is considered an unobservable input in that it reflects the Company's own assumptions about the inputs that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. The Company believed that this was the best information available for use in the fair value measurement. There were no changes in these valuation techniques during 2013.

The following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of the fair value measurements of the Company's financial instruments which use significant unobservable inputs (Level 3):
 
 
2013
  
2012
 
Balance at beginning of year
 
$
7,618
   
3,724
 
Purchases
  
-
   
5,000
 
Sales
  
(990
)
  
-
 
Loss from change in fair value
  
(1,144
)
  
(1,106
)
Balance at end of year
 
$
5,484
   
7,618