10-K/A

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K/A

(Amendment No. 1)

x Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012

or

¨ Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the transition period from                      to                     

Commission File No. 1-2691

AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	13-1502798
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

4333 Amon Carter Blvd.

Fort Worth, Texas 76155

(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

(817) 963-1234

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of Each Class	Name of Exchange on Which Registered
NONE	NONE

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer	¨	Accelerated filer	¨
Non-accelerated filer	x	Smaller reporting company	¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act):    Yes  ¨    No  x

American Airlines, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of AMR Corporation, and there is no market for the registrant’s common stock. As of February 13, 2013, 1,000 shares of the registrant’s common stock were outstanding.

EXPLANATORY NOTE

This Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) amends the Annual Report on Form 10-K of American Airlines, Inc. (American or the Company) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, which the Company originally filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) on February 20, 2013 (the Original Filing). The Company is filing this Amendment No. 1 to provide the information required pursuant to instruction G(3) to Form 10-K for Part III, Items 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14 of the Original Filing. Part IV of the Original Filing has been amended to contain currently dated certifications as required by Rules 12b-15, 15d-14(a), and 15d-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) with respect to this Amendment No. 1. Additionally, this Amendment No. 1 corrects certain technical and formatting errors within its Interactive Data File included in the Original Filing as Exhibit 101.

This Amendment No. 1 speaks as of the original filing date of the Original Filing and reflects only the changes to the cover page, Items 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14 of Part III, Item 15 of Part IV, the signature page, and Exhibits 31.1, 31.2, 32, and 101. No other information included in the Original Filing, including the information set forth in Part I and Part II, has been modified or updated in any way. The Company has made no attempt in this Amendment No. 1 to modify or update the disclosures presented in the Original Filing other than as noted above. Also, this Amendment No. 1 does not reflect events occurring after the filing of the Original Filing. Accordingly this Amendment No. 1 should be read in conjunction with Original Filing.

Additional Information and Where To Find It

This communication does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any securities or a solicitation of any vote or approval. The proposed merger transaction between AMR Corporation (“AMR”) (the parent company of American) and US Airways Group, Inc. (alone or together with its subsidiaries, US Airways Group) will be submitted to the stockholders of US Airways Group for their consideration. AMR has filed with the SEC a registration statement on Form S-4, which includes a preliminary proxy statement of US Airways Group and also constitutes a prospectus of AMR. US Airways Group expects to file with the SEC a definitive proxy statement on Schedule 14A, and AMR and US Airways Group also plan to file other documents with the SEC regarding the proposed transaction. INVESTORS AND SECURITY HOLDERS OF US AIRWAYS GROUP ARE URGED TO READ THE PRELIMINARY PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS AND OTHER RELEVANT DOCUMENTS THAT WILL BE FILED WITH THE SEC (INCLUDING THE DEFINITIVE PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS) CAREFULLY AND IN THEIR ENTIRETY WHEN THEY BECOME AVAILABLE BECAUSE THEY CONTAIN IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT THE PROPOSED TRANSACTION. Investors and security holders may obtain free copies of the preliminary proxy statement/prospectus and other documents containing important information about AMR and US Airways Group (including the definitive proxy statement/prospectus), once such documents are filed with the SEC, through the website maintained by the SEC at http://www.sec.gov. Copies of the documents filed with the SEC by US Airways Group, when and if available, can be obtained free of charge on US Airways Group’s website at www.usairways.com or by directing a written request to US Airways Group, Inc., 111 West Rio Salado Parkway, Tempe, Arizona 85281, Attention: Vice President, Legal Affairs. Copies of the documents filed with the SEC by AMR, when and if available, can be obtained free of charge on AMR’s website at www.aa.com or by directing a written request to AMR Corporation, P.O. Box 619616, MD 5675, Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport, Texas 75261-9616, Attention: Investor Relations or by emailing investor.relations@aa.com.

US Airways Group, AMR and certain of their respective directors, executive officers and certain members of management may be deemed to be participants in the solicitation of proxies from the stockholders of US Airways Group in connection with the proposed transaction. Information about the directors and executive officers of US Airways Group is set forth in its Annual Report on Form 10-K/A, which was filed with the SEC on April 15, 2013, and the preliminary proxy statement/prospectus related to the proposed transaction, which was filed with the SEC on April 15, 2013. Information about the directors and executive officers of AMR is set forth in its Annual Report on Form 10-K/A, which was filed with the SEC on April 15, 2013, and the preliminary proxy statement/prospectus related to the proposed transaction, which was filed with the SEC on April 15, 2013. These documents can be obtained free of charge from the sources indicated above. Other information regarding the participants in the proxy solicitation may also be included in the definitive proxy statement/prospectus and other relevant materials when and if filed with the SEC in connection with the proposed transaction.

Forward-Looking Information

This document includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements may be identified by words such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “plan,” “project,” “could,” “should,” “would,” “continue,” “seek,” “target,” “guidance,” “outlook,” “forecast” and other similar words. These forward-looking statements are based on AMR’s and US Airways Group’s current objectives, beliefs and expectations, and they are subject to significant risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results and financial position and timing of certain events to differ materially from the information in the forward-looking statements. The following factors, among others, could cause actual results and financial position and timing of certain events to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements: failure of a proposed transaction to be implemented; the challenges and costs of closing, integrating, restructuring and achieving anticipated synergies; the ability to retain key

1

employees; AMR’s operations and financial condition, including changes in capacity, revenues, and costs; future financing plans and needs; the amounts of its unencumbered assets and other sources of liquidity; fleet plans; overall economic and industry conditions; plans and objectives for future operations; regulatory approvals and actions; and the impact on AMR of its results of operations in recent years and the sufficiency of its financial resources to absorb that impact; and other economic, business, competitive, and/or regulatory factors affecting the businesses of US Airways Group and AMR generally, including those set forth in the filings of US Airways Group and AMR with the SEC, especially in the “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” sections of their respective annual reports on Form 10-K and quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, their current reports on Form 8-K and other SEC filings, including the registration statement and the proxy statement/prospectus related to the proposed transaction. Any forward-looking statements speak only as of the date hereof or as of the dates indicated in the statements. Neither AMR nor US Airways Group assumes any obligation to publicly update or supplement any forward-looking statement to reflect actual results, changes in assumptions or changes in other factors affecting these forward-looking statements except as required by law.

PART III

Explanatory Note. American is a wholly-owned subsidiary of AMR. The members of the board of directors of AMR described below are also members of the board of American. The named executive officers of AMR described below are also the named executive officers of American. References to “AMR” below mean and include AMR and American unless other noted.

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Directors

Set forth below is a brief biography of each of the current members of AMR’s board of directors.

Thomas W. Horton (Age 51). Director since 2011. Mr. Horton was named chairman and chief executive officer of AMR and American, in November 2011, and also continues to serve as president of AMR and American. Previously, Mr. Horton served as executive vice president—finance and planning and chief financial officer of AMR and American starting in March 2006 upon returning to American from AT&T. He was promoted to president in July 2010. At AT&T, he served as vice chairman and chief financial officer. Mr. Horton initially joined American in 1985 and held a range of senior financial positions with American. From 1998 to 2000, he was vice president responsible for the airline’s Europe business, based in London. In January 2000, Mr. Horton became senior vice president and chief financial officer of AMR. Mr. Horton serves on the board of directors of Qualcomm Incorporated. He therefore brings to the board extensive and unique company and industry experience. Since he is responsible for, and familiar with, AMR’s day-to-day operations and implementation of AMR’s strategy, his insights into AMR’s performance and the airline industry are critical to board discussions and AMR’s success.

John W. Bachmann (Age 74). Director since 2001. Mr. Bachmann began his career at Edward Jones, one of the world’s largest retail brokerage firms, in 1959. He has served in many capacities at the firm, including as its managing partner from 1980 to 2003. He has been senior partner at Edward Jones since January 2004. With his long history at Edward Jones and as its leader for many years, Mr. Bachmann has extensive financial, capital markets, strategic, and executive leadership experience. He is also senior council board member of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. He previously served as a director of the Monsanto Company and the National Association of Securities Dealers. His experience as a director and member of board committees of these and other companies provides important insights into corporate governance and board functions. He is a resident of St. Louis, Missouri, one of AMR’s important markets. His background and experience make him an effective member of AMR’s board of directors and its audit and diversity committees, and a strong chairman of the audit committee.

Stephen M. Bennett (Age 59). Director since 2011. Mr. Bennett has served as chairman of the board (since October 2011) and president and chief executive officer (since July 2012) of Symantec Corporation, one of the world’s largest software companies providing security, storage, and systems management solutions. From 2000 until his retirement in December 2007, Mr. Bennett was president

2

and chief executive officer of Intuit, Inc., a provider of innovative business and financial management solutions. Prior to Intuit, Mr. Bennett held several significant leadership positions at General Electric Company for more than 23 years, including executive vice president and member of the board of directors for GE Capital, the financial services subsidiary of General Electric. Mr. Bennett has served as a director of Symantec since 2010 and also serves as a director of Qualcomm Incorporated. Mr. Bennett brings to AMR’s board of directors extensive leadership, consumer industry, and technical experience through his former role as chief executive officer of Intuit, executive management positions at General Electric, and service on technology boards. His background and experience make him an effective member of AMR’s board of directors.

Armando M. Codina (Age 66). Director since 1995. Since January 1, 2011, Mr. Codina has been the chairman and chief executive officer of Codina Partners, LLC, a real estate investment and development firm based in Coral Gables, Florida. Mr. Codina formed Codina Partners in 2009 and through this entity and its affiliates is engaged in multiple real estate development and investment activities. Previously, he led the growth of Codina Group, a large South Florida-based commercial real estate firm, for 26 years as its founder, chairman, and chief executive officer. In 2006, Codina Group merged with Florida East Coast Industries (FECI) and became FECI’s full-service real estate business, Flagler Development Group. He served as Flagler’s chairman, chief executive officer, and president until September 2008, and as its chairman until December 2010. Prior to founding Codina Group, he served as president of Professional Automated Services, Inc., which provided data processing services to physicians. Mr. Codina’s extensive experience in commercial real estate and business provides significant insight into the real estate, business, strategic, and other issues AMR faces. He is also a director of The Home Depot, Inc., and he previously served as a director of Bell South Corporation, General Motors Corporation, Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., and FECI. His experience as a director and member of board committees of these and other companies provides important insights into corporate governance and board functions. His deep roots in Florida also provide important perspective of one of AMR’s largest and most important markets. His background and experience make him an effective member of AMR’s board of directors and its nominating/corporate governance committee, and a strong lead director.

Alberto Ibargüen (Age 69). Director since 2008. Mr. Ibargüen has served as president and chief executive officer of the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation since July 2005. In this role, he has led the foundation’s support of journalism and civic advancement in 26 U.S. communities. Previously, Mr. Ibargüen served as chairman of Miami Herald Publishing Co. from 1998 to 2005, a Knight Ridder subsidiary, and as publisher of The Miami Herald and of El Nuevo Herald. He therefore brings extensive media, philanthropic, strategic, and executive leadership experience to AMR’s board of directors. He is a director of PepsiCo, Inc., AOL Inc., and the World Wide Web Foundation (based in Switzerland). He previously served as a director of NCL Corporation Ltd. and on the advisory committee of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. He is also a former chairman of the board of the Public Broadcasting Service and the Newseum in Washington, D.C. His experience as a director and member of board committees of these and other companies provides important insights into corporate governance and board functions. He is a resident of Miami, Florida, one of AMR’s largest and most important markets. His background and experience make him an effective member of AMR’s board of directors and its audit and diversity committees.

Ann M. Korologos (Age 71). Director since 1990. Mrs. Korologos has held several important posts in the U.S. government, including U.S. Secretary of Labor from 1987 to 1989, and Under Secretary of the U.S. Department of Interior and Assistant Secretary of the Treasury before that. She most recently served as chairman of the board of trustees of RAND Corporation, an international public policy research organization, from April 2004 to April 2009. From September 1989 until May 1990, Mrs. Korologos served as chairman of the President’s Commission on Aviation Security and Terrorism. She has served as chairman emeritus of The Aspen Institute since August 2004, where she has served on its board of trustees since 1989. She also was senior adviser for Benedetto, Gartland & Company from 1996 to 2005. With her leadership roles in political, financial, and other fields, Mrs. Korologos brings to AMR’s board of directors extensive public policy, financial, strategic, and executive leadership experience.

3

Mrs. Korologos is also a director of Harman International Industries, Incorporated, Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (formerly, Host Marriott Corporation), Vulcan Materials Company, Kellogg Company, and Michael Kors Holdings Limited. Her experience as a director and member of board committees of these and other companies provides important insights into corporate governance and board functions. She is also a resident of Washington, D.C., one of AMR’s most important markets. Her background and experience make her an effective member of the board and its diversity committee.

Michael A. Miles (Age 73). Director since 2000. Since 1995, Mr. Miles has been a special limited partner and a member of the advisory board of Forstmann Little & Co., a New York-based private equity firm. Previously, he was chairman and chief executive officer of Philip Morris Companies Inc. from 1991 until his retirement in 1994, and he served as chairman and chief executive officer of Kraft Foods, Inc. before that. With roles at these and other companies, he brings extensive business, financial, strategic, and executive leadership experience to AMR’s board of directors. Mr. Miles is also a director of Time Warner Inc., and he previously served as a director of Citadel Broadcasting Corporation and Dell Inc. His experience as a director and member of board committees of these and other companies provides important insights into corporate governance and board functions. He also resides in the Chicago area, one of AMR’s largest and most important markets. His background and experience make him an effective member of AMR’s board of directors and its compensation committee and a strong chairman of that committee.

Philip J. Purcell (Age 69). Director since 2000. Mr. Purcell became president and chief operating officer of Dean Witter Discover & Co. in 1982. He became chairman and chief executive officer of Dean Witter Discover in 1986 until it acquired Morgan Stanley Group, Inc. in 1997. He then served as chairman and chief executive officer of Morgan Stanley until he retired in July 2005. Mr. Purcell has been the president of private equity firm Continental Investors, LLC since January 2006. With his leadership roles at major financial services companies and a private equity firm, Mr. Purcell has extensive financial, capital markets, strategic, and executive leadership experience. He also previously served as a director of the New York Stock Exchange (the NYSE), including as its vice chairman during 1995 and 1996. His experience as a chairman and director of these and other companies provides important insights into corporate governance and board functions. He also resides in the Chicago area, one of AMR’s largest and most important markets. His background and experience make him an effective member of AMR’s board of directors and its compensation and nominating/corporate governance committees.

Ray M. Robinson (Age 65). Director since 2005. Mr. Robinson started his career at AT&T in 1968, and prior to his retirement in 2003, he held several executive positions, including president of the Southern Region, its largest region, president and chief executive officer of AT&T Tridom, vice president of operations for AT&T Business Customer Care, senior vice president of AT&T Outbound Services, and vice president of AT&T Public Relations. Since 2003, Mr. Robinson has served as chairman of Citizens Trust Bank of Atlanta, Georgia, the largest African American-owned bank in the Southeastern U.S. and the nation’s second largest. With his numerous executive leadership positions, Mr. Robinson has extensive technology, banking, communications, strategic, and executive leadership experience. Mr. Robinson is also a director of Aaron’s, Inc., Acuity Brands, Inc., Avnet, Inc., and RailAmerica Inc., and he previously served as a director of ChoicePoint Inc. His experience as a director and member of board committees of these and other companies provides important insights into corporate governance and board functions. He resides in the Atlanta, Georgia area, an important business center, where he has been vice chairman of the East Lake Community Foundation since November 2003. His background and experience make him an effective member of AMR’s board of directors and its audit and nominating/corporate governance committees.

Dr. Judith Rodin (Age 68). Director since 1997. Dr. Rodin has served as president of The Rockefeller Foundation since March 2005. The foundation, founded in 1913, supports efforts to combat global social, economic, health, and environmental challenges. From 1994 to 2004, Dr. Rodin led the University of Pennsylvania through a period of significant growth as its president. Before that, at Yale University, she chaired the Department of Psychology, served as dean of the Graduate School of Arts and

4

Sciences and provost, and she was a faculty member for 22 years. As the leader of important philanthropic and higher learning institutions, Dr. Rodin has extensive educational, philanthropic, strategic, and executive leadership experience. Dr. Rodin is also a director of Citigroup Inc. and Comcast Corporation. Her experience as a director and member of board committees of these and other companies provides important insights into corporate governance and board functions. She is a resident of New York City, one of AMR’s most important markets. Her background and experience make her an effective member of AMR’s board of directors and its compensation committee.

Matthew K. Rose (Age 54). Director since 2004. Mr. Rose has been chairman and chief executive officer of BNSF Railway Company, one of the largest freight rail systems in North America, since 2000. He has also served as the chairman and chief executive officer of its parent, Burlington Northern Santa Fe, LLC (a subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway Inc.) or its predecessors since 2002, and served as its president until November 2010. Before serving as its chairman, Mr. Rose held several leadership positions there and at its predecessors, including president and chief executive officer from 2000 to 2002, president and chief operating officer from 1999 to 2000, and senior vice president and chief operations officer from 1997 to 1999. As the chairman and chief executive officer of a major transportation company, Mr. Rose brings to AMR’s board of directors extensive business, financial, strategic, and executive leadership experience in the transportation industry. He is also a director of AT&T Inc., and he previously served as a director of Centex Corporation. His experience as a director and member of board committees of these and other companies provides important insights into corporate governance and board functions. He lives in the Dallas-Fort Worth area, where AMR’s headquarters, principal hub, and largest employee base are located. His background and experience make him an effective member of AMR’s board of directors and its compensation committee.

Roger T. Staubach (Age 71). Director since 2001. Mr. Staubach founded The Staubach Company, a large commercial real estate firm until its merger with Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated in July 2008. He has served as a director and as executive chairman, Americas, of Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated since the merger with The Staubach Company. Prior to that, he served as executive chairman of The Staubach Company from July 2007 to July 2008, and chairman and chief executive officer from 1982 to June 2007. A graduate of the U.S. Naval Academy in 1965, Mr. Staubach served four years as an officer in the U.S. Navy, and he played professional football from 1969 to 1979 with the Dallas Cowboys. Through his service as chairman and/or chief executive officer of two large commercial real estate firms, Mr. Staubach has extensive real estate, business, strategic, and executive leadership experience. Mr. Staubach is also a director of Cinemark Holdings, Inc. and Cyrus One, Inc., and he previously served as a director of McLeod USA Incorporated. His experience as a director of these and other companies provides important insights into corporate governance and board functions. He lives in the Dallas-Fort Worth area, where AMR’s headquarters, principal hub, and largest employee base are located. His background and experience make him an effective member of AMR’s board of directors and the diversity committee, and a strong chairman of that committee.

Executive Officers

Set forth below is a brief biography of each of AMR’s current executive officers. Information relating to Mr. Horton, AMR’s chairman and chief executive officer, is set forth above under “Directors”.

Daniel P. Garton (Age 55). Mr. Garton was named president and chief executive officer of AMR Eagle Holding Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of AMR (AMR Eagle), in June 2010. He is also an executive vice president of AMR and American. Mr. Garton served as executive vice president—marketing of American from September 2002 to June 2010. He served as executive vice president—customer services of American from January 2000 to September 2002 and senior vice president—customer Services of American from 1998 to January 2000. Prior to that, he served as president of AMR Eagle from 1995 to 1998. Except for two years as senior vice president and chief financial officer of Continental Airlines between 1993 and 1995, he has been with AMR in various management positions since 1984.

5

Isabella D. Goren (Age 53). Ms. Goren was named senior vice president and chief financial officer of AMR and American in July 2010. She served as senior vice president—customer relationship marketing from March 2006 to July 2010. Prior to that, she served as vice president—interactive marketing and reservations from July 2003 to March 2006, and as vice president—customer services planning from October 1998 to July 2003. She has been with AMR in various management positions since 1986.

Gary F. Kennedy (Age 57). Mr. Kennedy was elected senior vice president and general counsel of AMR and American in January 2003. He is also the chief compliance officer of AMR and American. He served as vice president—corporate real estate of American from 1996 to January 2003. Prior to that, he served as an attorney and in various management positions at American since 1984.

James B. Ream (Age 57). Mr. Ream was named senior vice president of operations of American in January 2012. He previously served as American’s senior vice president of maintenance and engineering starting December 2009. Before that, Mr. Ream was president and chief executive officer of Express Jet Airlines, Inc. beginning in 2001, having been president and chief operating officer of Continental Express Airlines prior to that. He began his airline management career in 1987 as a financial analyst with American.

There are no family relationships among the directors or executive officers of AMR.

Other than the voluntary petitions for relief under the Bankruptcy Code filed by AMR and certain of its direct and indirect domestic subsidiaries (the Debtors) in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (the Bankruptcy Court) and jointly administered as Case No. 11-15463 (SHL), as described more fully in Part I, Item 1 of the Original Filing (the Chapter 11 Cases), none of the directors or executive officers has been a general partner or executive officer of a debtor in, or personally the subject of, a bankruptcy or similar proceeding during the past ten years.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Because American does not have a class of equity securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act, no reports are required to be filed under Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act.

Standards of Business Conduct for Employees and Directors

AMR has adopted a written code of ethics (the Standards of Business Conduct) that applies to all of the American employees. AMR designed the Standards of Business Conduct to help employees resolve ethical issues in an increasingly complex business environment. The standards apply to all of American’s employees, including the chief executive officer and president, chief financial officer, general counsel and chief compliance officer, controller, treasurer, corporate secretary, and general auditor. They cover several topics, including conflicts of interest, full, fair, accurate, timely, and understandable disclosure in SEC filings, confidentiality of information, and accountability for adherence to the Standards of Business Conduct, as well as prompt internal reporting of violations and compliance with laws and regulations. A copy of the Standards of Business Conduct is available on the Investor Relations section of AMR’s website located at www.aa.com/investorrelations by clicking on the “Corporate Governance” link.

AMR’s board of directors has adopted a Code of Ethics and Conflicts of Interest Policy. It is designed to help the directors recognize and resolve ethical issues and to identify and avoid conflicts of interest. A copy of the Code of Ethics and Conflicts of Interest Policy is available on the Investor Relations section of AMR’s website located at www.aa.com/investorrelations by clicking on the

6

“Corporate Governance” link. AMR may post amendments or waivers of the provisions of the Standards of Business Conduct and the Code of Ethics and Conflicts of Interest Policy for any director or executive officer on this website.

Audit Committee

American, as a wholly-owned subsidiary of AMR, does not have an audit committee.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

This section provides an overview and analysis of the material elements and objectives of AMR’s executive compensation program for 2012.

AMR’s named executive officers for 2012 were:

7

• Thomas W. Horton, chairman, president, and chief executive officer of AMR and American;

• Daniel P. Garton, president and chief executive officer of AMR Eagle and executive vice president of AMR and American;

• Isabella D. Goren, senior vice president and chief financial officer of AMR and American;

• Gary F. Kennedy, senior vice president, general counsel, and chief compliance officer of AMR and American; and

• James B. Ream, senior vice president of operations of American.

Please read this section with the “Executive Compensation” section that follows.

Executive Summary

On November 29, 2011, AMR and the other Debtors filed voluntary petitions for relief under chapter 11 (Chapter 11) of title 11 of the U.S. Code, 11 U.S.C. sections 101, et seq, as amended (the Bankruptcy Code). Because of the bankruptcy filings, AMR’s executive compensation program in fiscal year 2012 varied significantly from the program AMR used in previous years. The information provided below provides a description of AMR’s executive compensation processes, programs, and decisions during 2012, but does not in many cases fully take into account the impact of the Chapter 11 Cases, as much of the impact of the Chapter 11 Cases is not yet known.

On February 13, 2013, AMR Corporation entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Merger Agreement) with US Airways Group, Inc. (alone or together with its subsidiaries, US Airways Group) and AMR Merger Sub, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of AMR Corporation, providing for the merger of AMR Merger Sub, Inc. with and into US Airways Group, with US Airways Group continuing as the surviving entity in such merger as a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of AMR Corporation (the Merger). The execution and delivery of the Merger Agreement has been approved by the Bankruptcy Court; however, certain transactions contemplated thereby are to be effected pursuant to the plan of reorganization proposed by the Debtors under Chapter 11 pursuant to which, among other things, the Debtors will emerge from the Chapter 11 Cases and the Merger will be consummated (the Plan), which has been filed with and remains subject to confirmation by the Bankruptcy Court in accordance with the requirements of the Bankruptcy Code. The transactions to be effected pursuant to the Plan are subject to consummation, which is subject to other events or conditions, including approval of the Merger by the stockholders of US Airways Group. Actions AMR has taken or plans to take in 2013 pursuant to or in contemplation of the Merger impact some of its executive compensation programs or policies in effect in 2012 and prior years. AMR has briefly described the impact of those actions below where appropriate or possible.

Historically, AMR’s executive compensation program has been designed to support its business strategy, link pay with performance, promote long-term growth, and align its leaders’ decisions with the long-term interests of its stockholders. Due to circumstances relating to AMR’s continued restructuring under Chapter 11, during 2012:

• AMR did not increase the base salary of any of its named executive officers;

• AMR did not grant any stock-based compensation or other long-term incentive awards;

• AMR did not make any payments under the financial component of AMR’s 2012 Annual Incentive Plan (the AMR 2012 AIP); and

8

• AMR did not distribute any stock that vested in 2012 under outstanding stock-based awards to its named executive officers.

Since AMR Corporation, the parent of American, was in Chapter 11 for all of 2012, it did not hold an annual meeting of stockholders. Therefore it did not have an advisory vote on executive compensation in 2012.

AMR’s Compensation Objectives and Philosophy

The principal objectives of AMR’s executive compensation program are to:

• provide compensation that enables it to attract, motivate, reward, and retain talented leaders;

• reward achievement of its goals;

• sustain a pay-for-performance approach in which variable or “at risk” compensation is a substantial portion of each leader’s compensation; and

• align its compensation programs with the interests of its stockholders and other stakeholders through long-term stock-based incentives.

Due to circumstances relating to the Chapter 11 Cases, in 2012 AMR determined to suspend all stock-based compensation and other long-term incentive compensation programs and freeze the base salaries of its five named executive officers. AMR initially approved the AMR 2012 AIP that included a financial component and an operational component, but AMR later cancelled the AMR 2012 AIP, and no payment was made under the financial component of the AMR 2012 AIP. While AMR and its compensation committee recognized that these actions would lead to further substantial loss of compensation opportunities for its named executive officers, AMR also recognized that, due to their essential role in the restructuring, it would be appropriate to normalize their compensation later in AMR’s restructuring subject to any requirements arising in connection with the Chapter 11 Cases. AMR encouraged its named executive officers to continue their employment during its restructuring based on the prospect that their compensation might be appropriately addressed in the near future, but without any assurances as to what that might be.

The Process AMR Uses to Determine Compensation

As American is a wholly-owned subsidiary of AMR, the American board of directors does not have a compensation committee. The compensation decisions for the named executive officers described below are approved by the compensation committee of the AMR board of directors.

Since the compensation committee decided not to increase base salaries or grant stock-based compensation or other long-term incentive awards in 2012, AMR did not conduct a formal annual compensation review in 2012 as in prior years. Instead, AMR retained Towers Watson, a consultant with substantial experience with executive compensation practices of airlines and other Debtors during the course of the Chapter 11 Cases, to review its compensation program in the context of the Chapter 11 Cases. During 2012, Towers Watson worked closely with Mr. Horton, as well as American’s senior vice president of people and other members of American’s executive compensation team, and updated and supplemented some of the compensation information AMR used in its 2011 annual compensation review.

Also, in connection with Mr. Horton’s promotion to chief executive officer and chairman, in January 2012 the compensation committee reviewed his compensation with assistance from its independent consultant, Meridian Compensation Partners (Meridian), and one of AMR’s compensation consultants, Deloitte LLP. While the data presented suggested Mr. Horton’s compensation was below market, Mr. Horton declined to accept an increase in his compensation.

9

The Primary Components of AMR’s Compensation Program

AMR’s executive compensation program has principally consisted of the following components:

• base salary;

• short-term incentive compensation;

• long-term incentive compensation; and

• retirement benefits.

In addition, as is customary in the airline industry, AMR provides unlimited personal flight and other perquisites both during and following employment of its named executive officers. AMR describes these further in the tables and footnotes following this Compensation Discussion and Analysis.

Due to circumstances relating to the continuing Chapter 11 Cases, the compensation of AMR’s named executive officers during 2012 did not include any stock-based or long-term incentive compensation, or any meaningful short-term incentive compensation, and their base salaries were not increased to offset the loss of such incentive compensation opportunities. While recognizing the substantial reduction in their total compensation and the potential impact on AMR’s ability to retain its key executives, AMR’s compensation committee decided not to address the loss of such compensation until greater progress could be made in AMR’s restructuring under Chapter 11.

Prior to AMR’s Chapter 11 filings, however, it generally allocated compensation to its named executive officers as follows:

General Compensation Allocation

Base Salary

AMR’s compensation committee continues to believe it is important to provide a secure, consistent amount of cash compensation. Prior to the commencement of the Chapter 11 Cases in 2011, the committee established base salary levels that reflected each officer’s position, qualifications, and experience. In 2012, in recognition of AMR’s ongoing restructuring efforts, none of the named executive officers received a base salary increase.

Short-Term Incentive Compensation—The AMR Annual Incentive Plan

All employees of American, including the named executive officers (other than Mr. Garton), participated in the AMR 2012 AIP. The AMR 2012 AIP pays cash incentives upon the achievement of customer service and financial goals. The customer service component of the AMR 2012 AIP provides for payments of up to $100 per month for each person if AMR achieves one or more of its customer service targets for any fiscal quarter. AMR’s employees (including the named executive officers other than Mr. Garton) can also earn awards annually under the financial component of the AMR 2012 AIP. Under this component, awards are paid as a percentage of base salary, customarily called “bonus,” if American has at least a 5% pre-tax earnings margin. The financial component under American’s annual incentive plan has not been paid since 2001. AMR’s compensation committee determines the percentage of base salary that each named executive officer is eligible to receive. Although the compensation committee initially approved the establishment of the AMR 2012 AIP, it subsequently cancelled the AMR

10

2012 AIP in its entirety in September 2012, and no payments were made under its financial component. Each eligible employee, including AMR’s named executive officers (other than Mr. Garton), earned $633 under the overall customer service component of the AMR 2012 AIP prior to its termination.

Mr. Garton participated in the AMR Eagle Annual Incentive Plan, which is described in the section entitled “Executive Compensation—Short-Term and Long-Term Incentives” beginning on page 18.

Long-Term Incentive Compensation—Performance Shares, SARs, and Deferred Shares

Long-term incentive compensation has historically been a critical and substantial component of AMR’s executive compensation program prior to the commencement of the Chapter 11 Cases. AMR typically designed its long-term incentive compensation to align leaders’ compensation to the interests of its stockholders and used long-term incentive compensation as an important retention tool by awarding shares that only vested if the recipient remained with AMR for a period of time. AMR’s compensation committee used performance shares, stock appreciation rights (SARs), and deferred shares in an effort to achieve these goals. As stated above, as a result of the Chapter 11 Cases, AMR determined to suspend all stock-based compensation and other long-term incentive compensation programs and, accordingly, AMR’s compensation committee did not approve any stock-based compensation in 2012 due to the continuing Chapter 11 Cases and did not approve any long-term incentive compensation for its named executive officers in lieu of stock-based compensation. However, to best preserve the value of AMR’s business enterprise in contemplation of completing the Merger and combining the two airlines, with the assistance of Towers Watson, in February 2013 AMR agreed to employee protection, severance, and other compensation programs as part of the Merger Agreement. AMR’s compensation committee, together with its consultant, Meridian, reviewed and analyzed the proposed changes to its compensation program. In addition, the proposed changes were shared and discussed with US Airways Group and the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of AMR (and its compensation consultant) to reach a mutual agreement that was incorporated in the Merger Agreement.

Below is a summary of each equity-based instrument that AMR’s compensation committee awarded to AMR’s named executive officers prior to the commencement of the Chapter 11 Cases, why AMR’s compensation committee chose to pay each type of award, and when and how each type of award vested. As stated above, AMR’s compensation committee did not approve any long-term incentive compensation awards in 2012 due to the continuing Chapter 11 Cases, and the information provided below does not take into account the impact of the Chapter 11 Cases on awards made in prior years. In accordance with the Merger Agreement, none of the outstanding equity-based awards will be assumed if the Merger is consummated. The discussion of outstanding equity awards below is qualified in its entirety by the treatment of such awards in the Chapter 11 Cases.

Performance Shares. In 2011 and prior years, AMR’s compensation committee used performance shares to reward AMR’s named executive officers when AMR’s stock performed better than the stock of its primary competitors. Performance shares are contractual rights to receive shares of AMR’s common stock at the end of a three-year measurement period. The actual number of performance shares ultimately distributed to the named executive officers was based on AMR’s total stockholder return (TSR) compared to that of its primary competitors over that three-year period. AMR’s compensation committee selected the airlines used to determine its relative TSR, based on their market capitalization, revenue, and airline seat capacity and determined the percentages of the original award to be paid based on AMR’s relative TSR rank during the measurement period. AMR’s compensation committee did not approve any performance share awards in 2012 due to the continuing Chapter 11 Cases.

SARs. In 2011 and prior years, AMR’s compensation committee awarded SARs to AMR’s named executive officers. AMR’s SARs are contractual rights to receive shares of AMR’s common stock over a ten-year exercise period. Since they provide compensation only if the market value of AMR’s common stock appreciates from the date of grant, SARs would reward AMR’s executives for its stock price appreciation during that period. AMR’s compensation committee did not approve any SAR awards in 2012 due to the continuing Chapter 11 Cases.

11

Deferred Shares. Prior to the Chapter 11 Cases, AMR’s compensation committee each year also awarded deferred shares to AMR’s named executive officers. Deferred shares are contractual rights to receive shares of AMR’s common stock upon the completion of three years of service following the grant date. Since deferred shares are not subject to the achievement of performance objectives, the value of the deferred shares at the time of vesting would depend entirely on the value of AMR’s common stock at that time. AMR’s compensation committee believed that deferred shares were important for the long-term retention of AMR’s named executive officers because they provided a guaranteed award for their continued service through the three-year service period. AMR’s compensation committee did not approve any deferred share awards in 2012 due to the continuing Chapter 11 Cases.

Flight Perquisites and Other Benefits

The named executive officers also participate in a variety of health and welfare and other benefits that AMR provides to its U.S.-based employees. AMR’s compensation committee believes it is important to provide a limited number of additional perquisites and benefits to AMR’s named executive officers to attract and retain them. For example, as is common in the airline industry, AMR provides unlimited personal flight privileges on American and American Eagle Airlines, Inc., an indirectly wholly-owned subsidiary of AMR (American Eagle), in any available class of service. Instead of providing automobile lease payments, club memberships, financial planning fees, and other perquisites other companies often provide to their executives, AMR provides personal allowances to its named executive officers. AMR describes these and other perquisites in footnote (e) to the “Executive Compensation—Fiscal Year 2010, 2011, and 2012 Summary Compensation Table” beginning on page 16. No changes were made to the perquisites and benefits offered to AMR’s named executive officers in 2012.

Post-Employment and Change in Control Benefits

The information below does not fully take into account the impact of the Chapter 11 Cases.

Following their employment with AMR, AMR’s named executive officers are eligible for the post-employment benefits, perquisites, and privileges that AMR generally provides to all of its salaried employees. These include severance, pro-rated incentive compensation and equity distributions, and a limited number of other benefits. AMR also provides other post-employment perquisites to them, such as unlimited personal flight privileges on American and American Eagle in any available class of service. AMR’s compensation committee has determined that it is important to provide these post-termination benefits, perquisites, and privileges to AMR’s named executive officers to attract and retain them. AMR describes these benefits further in the narrative discussion under the section entitled “Executive Compensation—Post-Employment Compensation” beginning on page 25.

AMR’s named executive officers also participate in the AMR Retirement Benefit Plan of American Airlines, Inc. for Agents, Management, Specialists, Support Personnel, and Officers (the AMR Retirement Benefit Plan). This is a defined benefit plan that provides compensation to all of AMR’s eligible employees during their retirement. As part of the Chapter 11 Cases, all benefits under the AMR Retirement Benefit Plan were frozen for all employees, including AMR’s named executive officers, as of October 31, 2012.

AMR also offers eligible employees (including its named executive officers) the SuperSaver 401K Capital Accumulation Plan for Employees of Participating AMR Corporation Subsidiaries, a defined contribution plan (the AMR SuperSaver Plan), to help them plan for their retirement. Eligible employees who are not accruing additional benefits under the AMR Retirement Benefit Plan are eligible to receive dollar-for-dollar employer matching contributions under the AMR SuperSaver Plan, up to 5.5% of eligible earnings. Mr. Ream is not eligible to receive additional accruals under the AMR Retirement Benefit Plan. Since he returned to American in 2009, he has instead received matching contributions

12

under the AMR SuperSaver Plan. Effective upon the freeze of benefit accruals under the AMR Retirement Benefit Plan on October 31, 2012, AMR began making matching contributions under the AMR SuperSaver Plan to the accounts of the other named executive officers and AMR’s other eligible employees, up to 5.5% of eligible earnings.

AMR’s named executive officers are also eligible to participate in AMR’s Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the AMR Non-Qualified Plan). The AMR Non-Qualified Plan is designed to address limits on benefits AMR can pay or contribute under the AMR Retirement Benefit Plan and AMR SuperSaver Plan pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA). Like the AMR Retirement Benefit Plan, as of October 31, 2012, the defined benefits portion of the AMR Non-Qualified Plan was frozen for AMR’s named executive officers.

For further details regarding AMR’s retirement plans, see the sections entitled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Executive Compensation—2012 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table” beginning on page 25 and “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Executive Compensation—2012 Pension Benefits Table” beginning on page 22 and the accompanying narrative discussion and footnotes that follow those tables.

Under the terms of AMR’s long-term incentive awards granted before the Chapter 11 Cases, outstanding awards vest following a transaction that is considered a change in control under those awards. The AMR Non-Qualified Plan also provides for payments upon a qualifying change in control. The Merger does not constitute a change in control for purposes of these outstanding long-term incentive awards or the AMR Non-Qualified Plan.

Prior to the commencement of the Chapter 11 Cases, AMR also entered into executive termination benefit agreements with its named executive officers for terminations associated with a change in control (the AMR Existing Severance Agreements). AMR’s compensation committee believes it is important to provide severance and other benefits following a change in control for several reasons. The airline industry may undergo further consolidation and economic challenges, and these agreements are common in the industry. The AMR Existing Severance Agreements encourage AMR’s named executive officers to work for the best interests of the stockholders during a potential change in control by guaranteeing some financial security if their employment is terminated after a change in control. Finally, these agreements help AMR attract senior leaders. The AMR Existing Severance Agreements have a “double trigger,” meaning that for the benefits to be paid, the change in control must be followed by a termination of the applicable employee’s employment. The double trigger is intended to encourage the leader to remain with AMR for a period of time following a change in control to help smooth the transition to new management. The Merger does not constitute a change in control for purposes of the AMR Existing Severance Agreements, and the above description of those agreements does not take into account the impact of the Chapter 11 Cases on these prepetition executory contracts or the waivers described below.

In connection with the Merger and as contemplated by the Merger Agreement, AMR plans to enter into severance agreements with each of its named executive officers (the AMR Merger Severance Agreements). As further described in the subsection entitled “Merger Agreement” directly below, these agreements will only be effective upon the consummation of the Merger (the Closing), and AMR’s named executive officers will waive their rights under the AMR Existing Severance Agreements in exchange for their rights under the AMR Merger Severance Agreements.

Merger Agreement

As described above, on February 13, 2013, AMR entered into the Merger Agreement with US Airways Group. Actions AMR has taken or plans to take pursuant to or in connection with the Merger in 2013 impact some of its executive compensation programs or policies in effect in 2012 and prior years. AMR has described the impact below where appropriate.

13

Because of the nature of any merger transaction of this magnitude, including the necessity for a smooth transition, the employment uncertainty and insecurity faced by AMR’s named executive officers, and the critical role each plays in the maintenance and preservation of AMR’s enterprise value, the Merger Agreement requires that the following employee compensation and benefit arrangements applicable to AMR’s named executive officers be implemented to assure that the Merger will be effected as seamlessly as possible.

In connection with the entry into the Merger Agreement, on February 13, 2013, AMR entered into a letter agreement with Mr. Horton governing his continued service to AMR, as renamed American Airlines Group Inc. (alone or together with its subsidiaries, AAG), following the Merger. Pursuant to this letter agreement, Mr. Horton’s employment with American will end effective upon the Closing. Effective as of the Closing, Mr. Horton will serve as chairman of the board of AAG until the earlier of (i) one year after the Closing, (ii) the day immediately prior to the first annual meeting of stockholders of AAG (which will in no event occur prior to May 1, 2014), and (iii) the election of a new chairman by the affirmative vote of at least 75% of the members of the board of directors (rounded up to the next full director), which must include at least one director who was designated as a director by AMR pursuant to the Merger Agreement. Effective upon the Closing, Mr. Horton will receive a severance payment equal to $9,937,500 in cash and $9,937,500 in shares of common stock of AAG. In addition, Mr. Horton will continue to receive lifetime flight and other travel privileges to which he is currently entitled, as well as an office and office support for a period of two years after the Closing. In determining the form and amount of compensation, AMR’s board of directors agreed that the amount to be paid is reasonable and appropriate given, among other things, Mr. Horton’s long service to AMR, the success of the restructuring, and the value created for AMR’s financial stakeholders pursuant to the Merger and restructuring.

The letter agreement with Mr. Horton will become binding on AMR upon its approval by the Bankruptcy Court. These arrangements are subject to the occurrence of the Merger and will terminate if the Merger does not occur.

• 2013 Short-Term Incentive Plan. AMR will reinstate AMR’s 2013 short-term incentive plan (AMR STI) for 2013. Eighty percent of the AMR STI will be based on 2013 pre-tax profit margin (excluding restructuring expenses, change in control transaction expenses, and other extraordinary items). The target performance objective will be a pre-tax profit margin of two percent, with the minimum performance threshold being a positive pre-tax margin and the maximum performance objective being a pre-tax margin of four percent. The remainder of the AMR STI will be based on one or more operational performance metrics to be determined by AMR’s compensation committee. Under the AMR STI, AMR’s named executive officers (other than Mr. Horton) will have an opportunity to earn 100% of base salary at target and 200% of base salary at maximum. Between the minimum, target, and maximum objectives, awards will be earned and payable on a straight-line interpolated basis.

• 2013 Equity Awards. AMR will award long-term incentive awards (the 2013 Equity Awards) in the form of stock-settled restricted stock units (RSUs), which awards will be granted under the new American Airlines Group Inc. 2013 Incentive Award Plan to be effected pursuant to the Plan (the AAG 2013 IAP). The amount to be awarded to AMR’s named executive officers is consistent with and not more than the 2013 equity awards granted to the named executive officers of US Airways Group. Under the AAG 2013 IAP, the 2013 Equity Awards will vest in equal amounts in April of 2014, 2015, and 2016. A pro rata amount will vest upon any termination of employment other than a termination of employment for cause or resignation by the executive without good reason.

• Alignment Awards. AMR will award additional stock-settled RSUs to its named executive officers (other than Mr. Horton), which awards will be granted under the AAG

14

2013 IAP in an amount equal to 1.5 times the long-term incentive value awarded AMR’s executive vice presidents in 2011 (the AMR Alignment Awards). One-third of the AMR Alignment Awards will vest on each of (i) the date on which the Closing occurs, (ii) 12 months after the date on which the Closing occurs, and (iii) 24 months after the date on which the Closing occurs. The AMR Alignment Awards will fully vest on a termination of employment for which the executive becomes entitled to severance under the AMR Merger Severance Agreements, or vest pro rata upon a termination as a result of retirement, death, or disability.

• Severance Arrangements. AMR expects to enter into AMR Merger Severance Agreements with each named executive officer (other than Mr. Horton). The agreements will be contingent on the Closing. The AMR Merger Severance Agreements are similar to the terms of the severance agreements covering similarly-situated US Airways Group executives. Under the AMR Merger Severance Agreements, if the executive is terminated without cause or resigns for good reason within two years of the Closing, he or she will be entitled to a severance payment equal to two times the sum of his or her (i) annual base salary, (ii) target short-term incentive award, and (iii) target long-term incentive award under an applicable long-term incentive program in effect on the termination date or a target award that would become payable to a similarly situated US Airways Group employee under a US Airways Group Long-Term Incentive Performance Program. In addition, all of his or her AMR Alignment Awards and a pro rata amount of the 2013 Equity Awards will vest. The period of exercisability of any outstanding vested options or SARs will be extended for up to 18 months (but not beyond the original expiration date). Further, if the executive is eligible for continued medical coverage pursuant to the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985, as amended (COBRA), under AMR’s plans, he or she will receive a lump sum payment equal to the cost of two years’ of such coverage for the executive and his or her covered dependents and, under separate arrangements, the executive will become fully vested in his or her accrued benefits under the AMR Retirement Benefit Plan and the AMR Non-Qualified Plan.

• Flight Privileges. Consistent with the treatment of flight privileges for similarly situated executives of US Airways Group, each of AMR’s named executive officers will be entitled to continuation of flight privileges he or she currently possesses following the Closing for his or her lifetime.

AMR’s compensation committee and board of directors believe the arrangements described above are reasonable and appropriate in the context of the Merger and to preserve the integrity and value of AMR’s enterprise in contemplation of the Merger. Further, these arrangements take into account the treatment of similarly-situated executives of US Airways Group to encourage a smooth and orderly integration following the Closing and to maximize value. Meridian, AMR’s compensation committee’s independent consultant, reviewed the arrangements and concurred. Also, in the Chapter 11 Cases, the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of AMR, after a thorough review, including by its retained compensation experts, fully supports implementation of these arrangements and also believes they are reasonable and appropriate.

Recoupment Policy

AMR’s recoupment policy allows it to recoup compensation paid to AMR’s chief executive officer and each of his direct reports if AMR restates its financial statements due to that officer’s intentional misconduct. The recoupment policy applies to annual incentive or equity compensation awards to the extent the awards were paid due to metrics impacted by the misstated financial information.

15

Stock Ownership Guidelines

Effective March 2011, AMR’s compensation committee adopted stock ownership guidelines for its chief executive officer, its president, and its executive and senior vice presidents. Due to the Chapter 11 Cases, AMR’s compensation committee has suspended compliance with these guidelines.

Consideration of Tax and Accounting Consequences in Determining Compensation

Typically, AMR considers tax and accounting consequences when reviewing compensation awards to its named executive officers. While AMR believes these considerations are important, AMR believes it should balance the tax and accounting considerations against both the need to retain executive talent and AMR’s long-term strategies and goals.

Compensation Committee Report

As stated above, American’s board of directors does not have a compensation committee.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

As stated above, American’s board of directors does not have a compensation committee.

Executive Compensation

Fiscal Year 2010, 2011, and 2012 Summary Compensation Table

The following table contains information regarding compensation paid to AMR’s named executive officers during 2012. The table does not take into account the impact of the Chapter 11 Cases, but some of the potential effects resulting from the Chapter 11 Cases are summarized in the footnotes. Also, the table does not reflect compensation for Mr. Ream in 2010 or 2011 since he was not a named executive officer in those years.

Name and Principal Position	Year		Salary ($)		Bonus ($)		Stock Awards(a) ($)		Options Awards(b) ($)		Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation(c) ($)		Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings(d) ($)		All Other Compensation(e) ($)		Total ($)
Thomas W. Horton		2012		618,135		0		0		0		633		1,092,937		37,458		1,749,163
Chairman, President, and Chief		2011		618,135		0		2,220,421		441,045		83		871,138		31,978		4,182,800
Executive Officer,		2010		618,135		0		1,831,548		661,628		467		553,539		30,305		3,695,621
AMR and American
Isabella D. Goren		2012		540,385		0		0		0		633		771,956		36,823		1,349,797
Senior Vice President and Chief		2011		508,007		0		883,694		175,511		83		561,082		31,939		2,160,316
Financial Officer		2010		423,993		0		912,643		329,848		467		316,129		28,571		2,011,650
AMR and American
Gary F. Kennedy		2012		522,000		0		0		0		633		817,644		37,414		1,377,691
Senior Vice President, General Counsel, and Chief Compliance		2011		522,000		0		883,694		175,511		83		682,007		29,894		2,293,189
Officer, AMR and American		2010		502,543		0		912,643		329,848		467		403,457		30,568		2,179,526
Daniel P. Garton		2012		530,478		0		0		0		0		1,112,837		34,282		1,677,597
President and Chief Executive Officer, AMR Eagle, Executive		2011		530,478		0		1,639,078		308,187		0		892,917		31,708		3,402,368
Vice President, AMR and American		2010		530,478		0		1,353,982		458,222		250		535,950		29,208		2,908,090
James B. Ream		2012		569,800		0		0		0		633		15,060		56,054		641,547
Senior Vice President of Operations, American

16

(a) AMR did not grant any stock awards in 2012 due to the continuing Chapter 11 Cases. The amounts shown for 2011 and 2010 were not actually paid to AMR’s named executive officers. As required by the rules of the SEC, the amounts instead represent the aggregate grant date fair value of the performance shares and deferred shares awarded to each of them in 2010 and 2011. The grant date fair value of the performance share and career performance share awards for those years is based on AMR’s estimate on the grant date of the probable outcome of meeting the performance conditions of these awards. See note 10 to the AMR 2012 consolidated financial statements included in AMR’s annual report on Form 10-K for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2012, respectively, for the assumptions AMR used to determine the aggregate grant date fair value of these awards. The aggregate grant date fair values of the 2010/2012 performance share awards assuming AMR meets the highest level (or 175%) of the performance conditions of these awards are: Mr. Horton ($1,766,274), Ms. Goren ($880,425), Mr. Garton ($1,221,230), Mr. Kennedy ($880,425). The aggregate grant date fair values of the 2011/2013 performance share awards assuming AMR meets the highest level (or 175%) of the performance conditions of these awards are: Mr. Horton ($1,749,129), Ms. Goren ($696,082), Mr. Garton ($1,222,317), Mr. Kennedy ($696,082). The amounts reported do not include any reduction in the value of the awards for the possibility of forfeiture or as a result of the Chapter 11 Cases.

(b) AMR did not grant any options or SARs in 2012 due to the continuing Chapter 11 Cases. The amounts shown for 2011 and 2010 were not actually paid to its named executive officers. As required by the rules of the SEC, the amounts instead represent the aggregate grant date fair value of the SARs granted to each of them in 2010 and 2011 determined in accordance with ASC Topic 718. See note 10 to the consolidated financial statements included in AMR’s annual report on Form 10-K for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2012, respectively, for the assumptions it used to determine the aggregate grant date fair value of these awards for those years. These amounts do not include any reduction in the value of the awards for the possibility of forfeiture or as a result of the Chapter 11 Cases.

(c) The amounts shown are payments earned under the customer service component of the 2012 AMR AIP through September 2012, when the AMR 2012 AIP was terminated. AMR made no payments in 2010, 2011, or 2012 under the financial component of the AMR annual incentive plan or the AMR Eagle annual incentive plan because AMR did not meet the minimum performance level required to earn a payout.

(d) The amounts shown for the officers are the change in the actuarial present value of the accumulated benefit under both the AMR Retirement Benefit Plan and the AMR Non-Qualified Plan from January 1 to December 31 of each year. The present value of the accumulated benefits increased from December 31, 2011 to December 31, 2012 because the discount rate decreased from 5.2% at December 31, 2011 to 4.2% at December 31, 2012. For Mr. Horton, the amounts also include additional years of credited service under the AMR Non-Qualified Plan. There were no above-market or preferential earnings on non-qualified deferred compensation. The change in actuarial present value of the accumulated benefit under both the AMR Retirement Benefit Plan and the AMR Non-Qualified Plan has not been reduced for the possibility that the benefits will not be paid in full as a result of the Chapter 11 Cases in November 2011. The amounts reflect that the benefit accruals under the AMR Retirement Benefit Plan and the AMR Non-Qualified Plan were frozen as of October 31, 2012. The amount shown for Mr. Ream is the change in the actuarial present value of the accumulated benefit under the AMR Retirement Benefit Plan he earned for his seven years of service until he resigned from American in 1994. Mr. Ream does not have a defined benefit in the AMR Non-Qualified Plan.

(e) The amounts shown include a personal allowance of $27,000 paid each year to AMR’s named executive officers. The amounts also include the estimated aggregate incremental cost to AMR of providing perquisites and other personal benefits to its named executive officers. As is customary in the airline industry, AMR provides them and their spouses or companions and dependent children unlimited personal air travel on American and American Eagle in any available class of service. However, they are required to pay all taxes and fees associated with the air travel. The amounts shown include AMR’s estimated aggregate incremental cost for the air travel AMR provided them in 2012, including the estimated cost of incremental fuel, catering, and insurance, but exclude the associated fees and taxes they paid. Amounts in this column also include reimbursement for: (i) the cost of one annual medical exam, (ii) the premium for a term life insurance policy (with a policy amount equal to the base salary of the named executive officer), (iii) a portion of the premium for long-term disability insurance, and (iv) broker fees associated with the exercise of stock options by the named executive officer. Each AMR named executive officer and his or her spouse were also provided an Admirals Club^® membership (American’s travel clubs located at large U.S. and international airports), and airport parking. Some of them were provided access to events or venues sponsored by AMR or received reduced cost air travel on other airlines, at no incremental cost to AMR. For Mr. Ream, the amounts also include matching contributions AMR made to his AMR SuperSaver Plan account and the defined contribution portion of the AMR Non-Qualified Plan of $11,250 and $14,423, respectively.

Fiscal Year 2012 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

The table below lists each grant or award made in 2012 to AMR’s named executive officers under its equity and non-equity incentive plans. AMR did not grant any equity-incentive awards in 2012 to its named executive officers, so the table does not reflect any such awards.

17

Name	Grant Date		Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(a)						Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards						All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units (#)		All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options (#)		Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards ($/Sh)		Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards ($)
			Threshold ($)		Target ($)		Maximum ($)		Threshold (#)		Target (#)		Maximum (#)
Horton		—		—		900		900		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Goren		—		—		900		900		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Garton (b)		—		—		5,305		15,914		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Kennedy		—		—		900		900		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Ream		—		—		900		900		—		—		—		—		—		—		—

(a) The amounts shown for AMR’s named executive officers (other than Mr. Garton) are the target and maximum amounts each could have earned under the overall customer service component of the AMR 2012 AIP prior to its termination. As reported in the Summary Compensation Table, AMR’s named executive officers (other than Mr. Garton) earned $633 under the overall customer service component of the AMR 2012 AIP. The AMR 2012 AIP was terminated in September 2012. There will be no future payout under the AMR 2012 AIP. As president of American Eagle, Dan Garton did not participate in the AMR 2012 AIP.

(b) The amount shown was not actually paid to Mr. Garton. The amount instead is the payment AMR would have made to Mr. Garton if American Eagle had met the minimum payment level of the AMR Eagle Annual Incentive Plan. Since American Eagle did not meet the threshold for payment under the AMR Eagle Annual Incentive Plan in 2012, no amount was actually paid to Mr. Garton.

Discussion regarding Fiscal Year 2010, 2011 and 2012 Summary Compensation Table and Fiscal Year 2012 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

As stated above, on November 29, 2011, the Debtors filed the Chapter 11 Cases. The information provided below does not fully take into account the impact of the Chapter 11 Cases. Due to the Chapter 11 Cases, AMR did not grant any equity-based awards to its named executive officers in 2012, and, in accordance with the terms of the Merger Agreement, AMR will not assume any of the outstanding awards upon emergence from the Chapter 11 Cases.

Short-Term and Long-Term Incentives. As stated above, AMR did not grant any long-term or equity incentive awards to its named executive officers in 2012 due to the continuing Chapter 11 Cases.

AMR’s compensation committee approved in January 2012 the AMR 2012 AIP for all eligible employees of American. As president of American Eagle, Mr. Garton did not participate in that plan. The AMR 2012 AIP was a short term non-equity incentive plan that included a financial component and an operational component. In connection with AMR’s restructuring efforts, AMR cancelled the AMR 2012 AIP in September 2012. No payment was earned or made under the financial component of the AMR 2012 AIP. A total of $633 was earned and paid to all of the named executive officers in 2012, based on the achievement of quarterly overall operational results under the overall operational component of the AMR 2012 AIP. Due to its cancellation in September 2012, there are no remaining overall amounts earned or unearned under the AMR 2012 AIP.

Mr. Garton participated in the AMR Eagle Annual Incentive Plan in 2012. No other named executive officer participated in the AMR Eagle Annual Incentive Plan. The AMR Eagle Annual Incentive Plan provides cash payments upon the achievement of pre-tax earnings targets at AMR Eagle. For Mr. Garton, the actual dollar amount paid under the AMR Eagle Annual Incentive Plan is capped at a maximum of 3% of base salary. AMR Eagle did not meet the pre-tax earnings targets, so no amounts were paid to him or earned under the plan in 2012.

Employment Agreement with Mr. Horton. To encourage Mr. Horton to return to American in 2006, AMR entered into an employment agreement with him. Under the employment agreement, Mr. Horton was entitled to an annual base

18

salary of no less than $600,000 and an annual personal allowance of at least $27,000. His annual target bonus was at least 108% of his salary (this has not been paid in any year since his return). He is also eligible to participate in AMR’s benefit programs, including the AMR Retirement Benefit Plan and the AMR Non-Qualified Plan. The agreement granted Mr. Horton additional years of credited service under the AMR Non-Qualified Plan described in “2012 Pension Benefits Table” below. It also provided post-employment and change in control benefits described in “Post-Employment Compensation” and “Change In Control.” The agreement expired in March 2012.

Assignment Agreement with Mr. Garton. On June 10, 2010, AMR entered into an assignment agreement with Mr. Garton to encourage him to serve as the president and chief executive officer of AMR Eagle and to lead efforts for its possible divestiture. Unless the assignment agreement is terminated, under the agreement he is entitled to total annual compensation substantially similar to his compensation prior to accepting his new position. If AMR divests AMR Eagle and Mr. Garton remains in his current or a comparable position with AMR Eagle, AMR will pay his pro-rated target bonus under the applicable annual incentive plan (if AMR meets the applicable performance criteria). If he was not 55 at the time of a divestiture (and Mr. Garton has since reached age 55), AMR agreed to continue his employment or place him on leave until he reached age 55 (facilitating his retirement from American), or provide the economic equivalent of the retirement and welfare benefits that he would have received had his employment by American continued until he turned age 55. AMR will also provide the same rights in his outstanding equity awards as though he had remained employed by American. The agreement provides that in case AMR has not divested AMR Eagle by June 10, 2012, or if it is divested and either (i) he is not offered a comparable position with AMR Eagle or (ii) he does not continue to work for American, Mr. Garton is entitled to seek re-assignment to American or to receive severance equal to two times his base salary and target annual bonus under the applicable annual incentive plan and COBRA coverage for 18 months. AMR Eagle was not divested by June 10, 2012, and Mr. Garton requested re-assignment to American pursuant to the terms of the assignment agreement. In view of the uncertainty relating to AMR’s restructuring under the Chapter 11 Cases, American requested an extension of time to consider Mr. Garton’s request for re-assignment during which he continues in his current positions and his rights under the assignment agreement remain in effect.

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2012 Fiscal Year-End Table

The following table lists all of the outstanding stock and stock option/SAR awards held on December 31, 2012 by each of AMR’s named executive officers. The table also includes, where applicable, the value of these awards based on the closing price of AMR’s common stock on December 31, 2012, which was $0.80. Each award listed in the “Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Unexercisable” column with an expiration date prior to July 24, 2016 is a stock option with a tandem SAR. The other awards listed in this column are SARs. The table does not take into account the impact of the Chapter 11 Cases. In accordance with the terms of the Merger Agreement, AMR will not assume any of the outstanding awards upon emergence from the Chapter 11 Cases.

19

	Option/Stock Appreciation Awards									Stock Awards
Name	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable (#)		Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Unexercisable (#)			Option Exercise Price ($)		Option Expiration Date		Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)			Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)		Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units, or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)			Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units, or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)
Horton		59,200		—			26.70		03/29/2016		81,100	(g)		64,880		151,900	(m)		121,520
		38,500		—			23.21		07/24/2016		34,950	(h)		27,960		—			—
		34,800		—			28.59		07/23/2017		185,550	(j)		148,440		—			—
		88,440		22,110	(a)		8.20		05/20/2018		85,470	(l)		68,376		—			—
		87,510		58,340	(b)		4.53		07/20/2019		—			—		—			—
		46,520		69,780	(c)		7.01		05/19/2020		—			—		—			—
		20,040		30,060	(d)		7.26		07/26/2020		—			—		—			—
		24,300		97,200	(e)		6.58		05/18/2021		—			—		—			—
Goren		11,200		—			10.68		07/21/2013		46,150	(g)		36,920		60,450	(m)		48,360
		16,500		—			8.88		07/26/2014		11,850	(h)		9,480		—			—
		14,000		—			13.67		07/25/2015		73,850	(j)		59,080		—			—
		11,500		—			26.70		03/29/2016		21,330	(k)		17,064		—			—
		21,800		—			23.21		07/24/2016		42,750	(l)		34,200		—			—
		19,800		—			28.59		07/23/2017		—			—		—			—
		50,360		12,590	(a)		8.20		05/20/2018		—			—		—			—
		49,830		33,220	(b)		4.53		07/20/2019		—			—		—			—
		26,480		39,720	(c)		7.01		05/19/2020		—			—		—			—
		6,800		10,200	(d)		7.26		07/26/2020		—			—		—			—
		9,670		38,680	(e)		6.58		05/18/2021		—			—		—			—
Garton		16,800		—			10.68		07/21/2013		93,600	(g)		74,880		106,150	(m)		84,920
		30,000		—			8.88		07/26/2014		142,950	(j)		114,360		—			—
		35,520		—			13.67		07/25/2015		99,540	(k)		79,632		—			—
		38,500		—			23.21		07/24/2016		59,730	(l)		47,784		—			—
		34,800		—			28.59		07/23/2017		—			—		—			—
		88,440		22,110	(a)		8.20		05/20/2018		—			—		—			—
		87,510		58,340	(b)		4.53		07/20/2019		—			—		—			—
		46,520		69,780	(c)		7.01		05/19/2020		—			—		—			—
		16,980		67,920	(e)		6.58		05/18/2021		—			—		—			—
Kennedy		6,000		—			3.26		01/27/2013		46,150	(g)		36,920		60,450	(m)		48,360
		12,800		—			10.68		07/21/2013		11,850	(h)		9,480		—			—
		34,800		—			8.88		07/26/2014		73,850	(j)		59,080		—			—
		23,100		—			13.67		07/25/2015		42,660	(k)		34,128		—			—
		21,800		—			23.21		07/24/2016		42,750	(l)		34,200		—			—
		19,800		—			28.59		07/23/2017		—			—		—			—
		50,360		12,590	(a)		8.20		05/20/2018		—			—		—			—
		49,830		33,220	(b)		4.53		07/20/2019		—			—		—			—
		26,480		39,720	(c)		7.01		05/19/2020		—			—		—			—
		6,800		10,200	(d)		7.26		07/26/2020		—			—		—			—
		9,670		38,680	(e)		6.58		05/18/2021		—			—		—			—
Ream		33,220		49,830	(f)		7.72		01/04/2020		46,150	(g)		36,920		60,450	(m)		48,360
		26,480		39,720	(c)		7.01		05/19/2020		64,800	(i)		51,840		—			—
		9,670		38,680	(e)		6.58		05/18/2021		73,850	(j)		59,080		—			—
		—		—			—		—		34,020	(l)		27,216		—			—

(a) Award becomes exercisable on May 20 of 2013.

(b) Award becomes exercisable in two equal installments on each of July 20 of 2013 and 2014. The number of shares in each installment is: Mr. Horton, 29,170; Ms. Goren, 16,610; Mr. Garton, 29,170; and Mr. Kennedy, 16,610.

(c) Award becomes exercisable in three equal installments on each of May 19 of 2013, 2014, and 2015. The number of shares in each installment is: Mr. Horton, 23,260, Ms. Goren, 13,240; Mr. Garton, 23,260; Mr. Kennedy, 13,240; and Mr. Ream, 13,240.

(d) Award becomes exercisable in three installments on each of July 26 of 2013, 2014, and 2015. The number of shares in each installment is: Mr. Horton, 10,020; Ms. Goren, 3,400; and Mr. Kennedy, 3,400.

(e) Award becomes exercisable in four equal installments on each of May 18 of 2013, 2014, 2015, and 2016. The number of shares in each installment is: Mr. Horton, 24,300; Ms. Goren, 9,670; Mr. Garton, 16,980; Mr. Kennedy, 9,670; and Mr. Ream, 9,670.

(f) Award becomes exercisable in three installments on each of January 4 of 2013, 2014, and 2015. The number of shares in each installment is 16,610.

(g) These deferred shares vest on May 19, 2013, generally subject to the recipient’s continued employment through that date.

20

(h) These deferred shares vest on July 26, 2013, generally subject to the recipient’s continued employment through that date.

(i) These deferred shares vested on January 4, 2013, generally subject to the recipient’s continued employment through that date.

(j) These deferred shares vest on May 18, 2014, generally subject to the recipient’s continued employment through that date.

(k) These career equity shares will vest upon retirement after age 60, or upon a qualifying early retirement under the AMR Retirement Benefit Plan, in each case, generally subject to continued employment through that date. If the named executive officer retires earlier than age 60, there is a 3% reduction in the total number of shares that will vest for each year the officer’s retirement date precedes age 60.

(l) These performance shares were granted under the 2010/2012 Performance Share Plan, with a vesting date of April 17, 2013. Vesting is subject to the satisfaction of the applicable performance criteria and is generally subject to the recipient’s continued employment through that date.

(m) These performance shares were granted under the 2011/2013 Performance Share Plan with a vesting date of April 16, 2014. Vesting is subject to the satisfaction of the applicable performance criteria and is generally subject to the recipient’s continued employment through that date. As required by the SEC’s disclosure rules, the number of performance shares shown assumes that target levels of performance (100%) will be achieved.

2012 Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table

The following table summarizes stock awards that vested for the named executive officers in 2012. No stock options or SARs were exercised during 2012. The table does not fully take into account the Chapter 11 Cases. While the table reflects that awards vested in 2012 under outstanding awards granted prior to the commencement of the Chapter 11 Cases, AMR did not distribute any stock in settlement of any stock awards to AMR’s named executive officers in 2012. In accordance with the terms of the Merger Agreement, AMR will not assume any of the outstanding awards upon emergence from the Chapter 11 Cases.

	Option Awards				Stock Awards
Name	Number of Shares Acquired On Exercise (#)		Value Realized On Exercise ($)		Number of Shares Acquired On Vesting(a) (#)		Value Realized On Vesting(b) ($)
Horton		0		0		197,620		101,686
Goren		0		0		112,530		57,902
Garton		0		0		215,151		111,152
Kennedy		0		0		112,530		57,902
Ream		0		0		47,730		22,910

(a) The numbers shown are the number of shares that vested in April 2012 under the 2009/2011 Performance Share Plan and the number of deferred shares that vested in July 2012 under the 2009 deferred share award agreements. As stated above, AMR did not distribute any stock awards to its named executive officers in 2012 due to the Chapter 11 Cases. AMR does not plan to assume any of those awards.

(b) Amounts shown are the fair market value of AMR’s stock on the date of vesting, multiplied by the number of shares shown in the column entitled “Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting” for the named executive officer. As stated above, AMR did not distribute any stock awards to its named executive officers in 2012 due to the Chapter 11 Cases. AMR does not plan to assume any of those awards.

Discussion regarding 2012 Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table

Under the terms of the 2009/2011 Performance Share Plan, the performance shares awarded in April 2009 referenced in the above table would have vested in April 2012. For the 2009 – 2011 measurement period, AMR had a 7th place TSR rank under the terms of the 2009/2011 Performance Share Plan, which would result in a vesting of 60% of the shares originally awarded under such plan. Those shares are reflected in the above table. In addition, under the terms of the 2009 deferred shares award agreements, the shares awarded under those agreements in July 2009 vested in July 2012, and those shares are reflected in the above table. While AMR is required to reflect the value of the performance and deferred share awards on the date of vesting in the above table, as stated above, AMR did not distribute any of stock under these awards to AMR’s named executive officers due to the Chapter 11 Cases, and AMR does not plan to assume any of those awards.

As reflected in the table, no options or SARs were exercised in 2012 by AMR’s named executive officers. The exercise prices of all of their outstanding awards were below AMR’s stock price in all of 2012.

21

2012 Pension Benefits Table

The following table summarizes the present value of the accumulated pension benefits of the named executive officers who participated in the AMR Retirement Benefit Plan and AMR Non-Qualified Plan as of December 31, 2012.

Name	Plan Name	Number of Years of Credited Service (#)			Present Value of Accumulated Benefit ($)(a)		Payments During Last Fiscal Year ($)
Horton	AMR Retirement Benefit Plan		22.573	(b)		1,039,975		0
	AMR Non-Qualified Plan		26.473	(b)		4,463,321		0
Goren	AMR Retirement Benefit Plan		25.283			1,122,225		0
	AMR Non-Qualified Plan		25.283			1,795,050		0
Garton	AMR Retirement Benefit Plan		25.286			1,211,372		0
	AMR Non-Qualified Plan		25.286			4,580,898		0
Kennedy	AMR Retirement Benefit Plan		27.465			1,428,605		0
	AMR Non-Qualified Plan		27.465			2,941,038		0
Ream	AMR Retirement Benefit Plan		6.456			74,412		0
	AMR Non-Qualified Plan		0			0		0

(a) Prior to the commencement of the Chapter 11 Cases, AMR partially funded the benefits under the AMR Non-Qualified Plan into a trust as described in “AMR Non-Qualified Plan.” Assets in the trust are separate from AMR’s operating assets and become payable to the named executive officer only upon normal or early retirement. The amounts listed in this column for the AMR Non-Qualified Plan reflect the present value of the total benefit payable under the AMR Non-Qualified Plan to each of the named executive officers, without any reduction for amounts contributed to the trust. Tax laws treat the contributions made to the trust under the AMR Non-Qualified Plan as taxable income to the named executive officers, requiring them to pay applicable federal, state, and local income taxes. AMR did not reduce the AMR Non-Qualified Plan amounts shown in this column to reflect the contributions to the trust or the tax liabilities since AMR will not know the impact of the tax liabilities until normal or early retirement. AMR, therefore, does not consider such amounts as paid from the AMR Non-Qualified Plan until that time. No contributions to the trust under the AMR Non-Qualified Plan were made in 2012 or at any time after the commencement of the Chapter 11 Cases.

(b) As of December 31, 2012, Mr. Horton had 22.573 years of credited service under the AMR Retirement Benefit Plan and 26.473 years of credited service under the AMR Non-Qualified Plan. Mr. Horton left AMR in 2002 and rejoined it in 2006. Under the terms of the AMR Retirement Benefit Plan and the AMR Non-Qualified Plan, Mr. Horton’s prior credited service in each plan was reinstated when he rejoined AMR. In addition, under his employment agreement, Mr. Horton had earned an additional 3.9 years of age and service credit under the AMR Non-Qualified Plan with an estimated value of $1,716,332.

Discussion regarding 2012 Pension Benefits Table

As stated above, AMR and the other Debtors filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 on November 29, 2011. The information provided below does not fully take into account the impact of the Chapter 11 Cases.

AMR Retirement Benefit Plan. AMR provides the AMR Retirement Benefit Plan to assist its named executive officers and most of AMR’s other salaried employees during their retirement. AMR has similar defined benefit plans for other American employees, including those covered by collectively bargained labor agreements. The AMR Retirement Benefit Plan is only available to employees hired prior to January 1, 2002 who had also completed 1,000 hours of eligible service in one year prior to that date. To vest in the plan’s benefits, a participant must also (i) complete at least five years of eligible service, (ii) reach age 65, or (iii) be permanently and totally disabled. After becoming a participant in the AMR Retirement Benefit Plan, each participant earns one year of credited service for each plan year in which at least 1,900 hours of service are completed.

Normal retirement age under the plan is 65. However, participants with at least ten years of retirement eligible service may retire at age 60 and receive unreduced benefits. Participants with at least 15 years of retirement eligible service may retire at age 55, but their benefits are reduced 3% for each year that the participant’s age is below age 60. Participants who retire before age 60 with more than ten but less than 15 years of retirement eligible service may receive reduced retirement benefits starting at age 60. These benefits are reduced 3% for each year that the participant’s age is below age 65. AMR Retirement Benefit Plan benefits are paid as a monthly annuity and the participant may elect the form of annuity payments. Payment options include single life, joint, and survivor guaranteed period or level income. For the level income payment option, AMR reduces the monthly payments for the receipt of social security benefits.

22

The AMR Retirement Benefit Plan complies with ERISA and qualifies for an exemption from federal income tax under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code). As a qualified plan, it is subject to various restrictions under the Code and ERISA that limit the maximum annual benefit payable under the plan. The limit was $200,000 in 2012. The Code also limits the maximum amount of annual compensation that AMR may take into account under the AMR Retirement Benefit Plan. The limit was $250,000 in 2012. As described further in “AMR Non-Qualified Plan” below, AMR maintains the AMR Non-Qualified Plan to address these limits on benefit payments to AMR’s named executive officers.

AMR determines the benefit payable to all participants (including its named executive officers) under the AMR Retirement Benefit Plan and the AMR Non-Qualified Plan using the four formulas described below. As required by the plans, AMR uses the formula that provides the participant the greatest benefit. For purposes of the table above, AMR therefore assumed that Mr. Horton, Ms. Goren, Mr. Garton, and Mr. Kennedy will each receive benefits under the AMR Retirement Benefit Plan pursuant to the “Final Average Retirement Benefit Formula,” and under the AMR Non-Qualified Plan pursuant to the “Social Security Offset Formula.” Mr. Ream’s benefit under the AMR Retirement Benefit Plan was calculated pursuant to the “Career Average Benefit Formula.” Mr. Ream does not have a defined benefit in the AMR Non-Qualified Plan. Each formula is described below.

• Final Average Retirement Benefit Formula. Under this formula, a participant’s annual benefit at normal retirement will equal the product of (i) 1.667% of his or her final average compensation times (ii) his or her years of credited service. Final average compensation is the average of the participant’s “pensionable pay” during the four highest paid consecutive years during the last ten years of employment. Pensionable pay includes regular pay, but excludes bonuses, expenses, and equity-based compensation.

• Career Average Benefit Formula. A participant’s annual benefit at normal retirement under this formula will equal the sum of the following amounts, determined for each year the participant is a member of the AMR Retirement Benefit Plan: (i) 1.25% times the participant’s pensionable pay (as described above) for each year up to $6,600 and (ii) 2% times the participant’s pensionable pay for each such year over $6,600.

• Social Security Offset Formula. A participant’s annual benefit at normal retirement under this formula will equal the difference between (i) the product of (a) 2% of the participant’s final average compensation (as described above) times (b) the participant’s years of credited service, and (ii) the product of (a) 1.5% of the participant’s estimated annual Social Security benefit times (b) the participant’s years of credited service, up to a maximum of 33.3 years of service.

• Minimum Retirement Benefit Formula. Under this formula, a participant’s annual benefit at normal retirement will equal the product of (i) 12, times (ii)(a) $23.50 for participants whose final average compensation (as described above) is less than $15,000 or (b) $24.00 for participants whose final average compensation is at least $15,000, times (iii) the number of years of the participant’s credited service.

Benefit accruals under the AMR Retirement Benefit Plan were frozen for all AMR employees, including its named executive officers, as of October 31, 2012. Effective upon the freeze of benefit accruals, those employees received a replacement benefit under the AMR SuperSaver Plan in the form of matching employee contributions up to 5.5% of eligible earnings.

AMR Non-Qualified Plan. The AMR Non-Qualified Plan supplements the AMR Retirement Benefit Plan and the AMR SuperSaver Plan for AMR’s named executive officers because their compensation exceeds the maximum recognizable compensation limit allowed under the Code.

23

The AMR Non-Qualified Plan has two components: (i) a defined benefit component for Mr. Horton, Mr. Garton, Ms. Goren, Mr. Kennedy, and other eligible officers who participated in the AMR Retirement Benefit Plan before it was frozen, and (ii) a defined contribution component for the named executive and other officers who participate in the AMR SuperSaver Plan. Mr. Ream is not entitled to a benefit under the defined benefit component of the AMR Non-Qualified Plan. The defined contribution component is discussed below under “2012 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table” and the accompanying narrative.

Under the defined benefit component, eligibility requirements and the formulas used to calculate benefits are generally the same as those under the AMR Retirement Benefit Plan. However, under the AMR Non-Qualified Plan, benefit calculations for the named executive officers also include: (i) the average of the four highest short-term incentive payments made since 1985, (ii) any additional years of credited service that may have been granted to the named executive officer, and (iii) the average of the four highest performance return payments made since 1989. “Performance return payments” are dividend equivalent payments AMR made between 1989 and 1999 on outstanding career equity shares. Performance return payments were calculated using: (a) the number of shares granted, (b) the grant price, (c) individual performance, and (d) a rolling three-year return on investment. Income received from long-term incentive compensation payments (such as stock option/SAR exercises, and performance share, deferred share, and career performance share payments) is not used to calculate benefits in the AMR Non-Qualified Plan. In addition, AMR granted additional years of credited service for Mr. Horton and as reflected in the footnotes to the “2012 Pension Benefits Table” above.

Prior to the commencement of the Chapter 11 Cases, benefits payable under the defined benefit component of the AMR Non-Qualified Plan were periodically funded in a trust to give AMR Non-Qualified Plan participants a certainty of payment of their plan benefits that is comparable to that offered by the AMR Retirement Benefit Plan and AMR SuperSaver Plan. Payments to the trust result in taxable income to the participants. As they are participants in the AMR Non-Qualified Plan, the “2012 Pension Benefits Table” above reflects amounts the named executive officers accrued under the AMR Non-Qualified Plan (whether or not funded under the trust). No contributions to the trust under the Non-Qualified Plan were made in 2012 or at any time following the commencement of the Chapter 11 Cases.

As of December 31, 2012, Mr. Kennedy and Mr. Garton were eligible for early retirement under both the AMR Retirement Benefit Plan and the AMR Non-Qualified Plan, but as described above, their benefits would be reduced 3% for each year their respective retirement age precedes age 60.

As with the AMR Retirement Benefit Plan, all benefit accruals under the defined benefit portion of the AMR Non-Qualified Plan were frozen as of October 31, 2012.

Present Value Calculations. The values of accrued benefits under the AMR Retirement Benefit Plan are determined using a 4.2% interest rate and the sex-distinct RP2000 Mortality Tables projected to 2020. The lump sums payable under the AMR Non-Qualified Plan are calculated using the December 2012 segment rates and the unisex mortality table prescribed by the IRS in the Pension Protection Act of 2006. Retirement benefits for both plans are then discounted to December 31, 2012 using an interest-only discount of 4.2%. At December 31, 2011, the same assumptions were used, except that the lump sums under the AMR Non-Qualified Plan were calculated using December 2011 segment rates and the values of accrued benefits under both plans were calculated using a 5.2% interest rate. The present value is the amount today that, with fixed interest earned over time, will equal the employees’ accrued retirement benefit at retirement. The present values generally assume retirement at age 60, which is the age when unreduced benefits may be available. Mr. Horton will be eligible to receive an unreduced AMR Non-Qualified Plan benefit when he reaches age 56.

24

2012 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table

The following table provides information with respect to the nonqualified deferred compensation earned by AMR’s named executive officers for 2012.

Name	Executive Contributions in Last Fiscal Year ($)		Company Contributions in Last Fiscal Year ($)			Aggregate Earnings in Last Fiscal Year ($)		Aggregate Withdrawals / Distributions in Last Fiscal Year ($)		Aggregate Balance at December 31, 2012 ($)
Horton		0		0			0		0		0
Goren		0		0			0		0		0
Garton		0		0			0		0		0
Kennedy		0		0			0		0		0
Ream		0		14,423	(a)		89		0		29,765

(a) This company matching contribution amount is also reflected in the “All Other Compensation” column of the “Fiscal Year 2010, 2011, and 2012 Summary Compensation Table” on page 16.

Discussion regarding 2012 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table

AMR maintains the AMR SuperSaver Plan, a tax-qualified defined contribution plan, to help its named executive officers and other eligible employees plan for their retirement. All regular full-time and part-time employees on the U.S. payroll are eligible to participate in the AMR SuperSaver Plan. Under that plan, AMR matches eligible employee contributions to the plan dollar-for-dollar, up to 5.5% of eligible earnings. Following the freeze of benefit accruals under the AMR Retirement Benefit Plan on October 31, 2012, AMR began to make these matching contributions to the accounts of all eligible employees (including all of its named executive officers) under the AMR SuperSaver Plan. The AMR SuperSaver Plan allows employees to select the investment options for their distributions from a variety of third-party managed investment funds.

The AMR Non-Qualified Plan supplements the AMR SuperSaver Plan for AMR’s named executive officers because their compensation exceeds the maximum recognizable compensation limit allowed under the Code. After one year of service, an officer is eligible for matching contributions to the defined contribution component of the AMR Non-Qualified Plan. While there is no annual limit on the size of the matching contributions under the AMR Non-Qualified Plan, employee contributions to the AMR Non-Qualified Plan are not permitted. Contributions vest after three years of service, and participants are entitled to a distribution of their accounts upon a separation from AMR. Investment elections for the AMR Non-Qualified Plan mirror the AMR SuperSaver Plan investment options available to all participating employees, and the investment elections by each named executive officer in the AMR SuperSaver Plan are used in the AMR Non-Qualified Plan.

Post-Employment Compensation. This section describes the payments, benefits, and perquisites AMR may provide to its named executive officers following termination of their employment. Except as otherwise stated below, these are in addition to the payments, benefits, and perquisites that AMR generally provides to all of its salaried employees following termination of their employment. The information provided below does not fully take into account the impact of the Chapter 11 Cases.

• Retirement. AMR provides retirement benefits to its employees (including its named executive officers) who retire after they reach normal retirement age or meet the requirements for early retirement. As described in “Discussion regarding 2012 Pension Benefits Table” above, Mr. Kennedy and Mr. Garton are eligible for early retirement under AMR’s pension plans, but their benefits would be reduced 3% for each year they retire before age 60.

In addition, upon normal retirement at age 65 or early retirement at age 60 or 55, AMR’s long-term incentive plans generally require pro-rata payments of stock awards granted under those plans. Under those plans, Mr. Garton and Mr. Kennedy were eligible for

25

stock awards due to retirement as of December 31, 2012. Since Mr. Horton and Ms. Goren were not age 55 or older as of December 31, 2012, and Mr. Ream was not age 60 as of the date, they were not eligible for any stock award payments as of that date due to retirement. This does not fully take into account the impact of the Chapter 11 Cases.

Upon retirement, AMR will also continue to provide to each named executive officer, his or her spouse or companion, and any dependent children the flight perquisite AMR provided to them during employment. Mr. Kennedy and Mr. Ream vested in this perquisite when they reached age 55, and under a policy AMR discontinued for officers elected after 1996, AMR will provide this perquisite to Mr. Horton and Mr. Garton upon retirement or any other termination of their employment. In January 2011, however, AMR discontinued a policy that would have reimbursed some named executive officers for taxes and fees associated with their flight. The estimated aggregate incremental cost to AMR of providing the air travel perquisites to each named executive officer is listed under their names in the table below under “Voluntary Separation.” In addition, AMR will provide lifetime Admirals Club^® memberships to each named executive officer and his or her spouse or companion, at no incremental cost to AMR.

• Voluntary Separation and Termination for Cause. In the event that a named executive officer resigns or voluntarily terminates his or her employment (other than a normal or early retirement), or AMR terminates his or her employment for cause, under AMR’s equity plans the named executive officer will forfeit all outstanding stock-based awards. For these purposes, “for cause” means a felony conviction, failure to contest prosecution of a felony, or willful misconduct or dishonesty of a named executive officer that is directly and materially harmful to AMR’s business or reputation. In addition, AMR will discontinue his or her salary, perquisites, and benefits, except as provided below. As described above under “Retirement,” if vested in the AMR Retirement Benefit Plan and AMR Non-Qualified Plan, he or she is also entitled to the benefits under those plans. Mr. Garton and Mr. Kennedy were eligible for benefits under those plans as of December 31, 2012. As stated above, however, this does not fully take into account the impact of the Chapter 11 Cases. Assuming a separation of service as of December 31, 2012, under AMR’s plans and policies AMR would also continue to provide Mr. Horton, Mr. Garton, Mr. Kennedy, and Mr. Ream the flight perquisite it provided during their employment.

• Involuntary Termination Other Than for Cause. Under AMR’s current practices and policies for all salaried U.S.-based employees, if AMR terminates a named executive officer’s employment other than for cause, he or she would receive up to one year’s annual salary (based on the officer’s years of service with AMR). In addition, under AMR’s long-term incentive plans, performance shares, and deferred shares would vest on a pro-rata basis as if the named executive officer had instead retired on the date of termination. The named executive officer would immediately forfeit all unvested stock options and SARs and would have 90 days to exercise vested stock options and SARs. Career equity awards previously awarded would immediately vest (at a rate of 10% per year for each year of service following the date of grant), and would become payable following the separation. This does not fully take into account the impact of the Chapter 11 Cases.

• Termination Due to Death or Disability. According to the terms of AMR’s long-term incentive plans, upon the death or disability of a named executive officer, all of his or her outstanding performance shares and deferred shares would vest on a pro-rata basis. Their stock options and SARs would continue to be exercisable. All outstanding career equity awards would vest at a rate of 20% per year for each year of service following the date of grant and would become payable. In the event of death, his or her unvested stock options and SARs would immediately vest, and AMR would continue to provide to his or her surviving spouse and dependent children the flight perquisite AMR provided during employment. This does not fully take into account the impact of the commencement of the Chapter 11 Cases.

26

The following table quantifies the severance payments, long-term incentives, and flight perquisites each named executive officer would have received had there been a termination of his or her employment on December 31, 2012 in the situations described above. As of December 31, 2012, Mr. Kennedy and Mr. Garton were eligible for early retirement. None of the other named executive officers were eligible for retirement as of that date. For further details regarding payments to AMR’s named executive officers upon a change in control, please see the section entitled “Change In Control” beginning on page 27. In calculating the amounts in the table, AMR used a stock price of $0.80 per share, which was the closing price of AMR’s common stock on December 31, 2012. The amounts shown have not been reduced for the possibility that the benefits will not be paid in full as a result of the commencement of the Chapter 11 Cases.

Name		Retirement ($)		Voluntary Separation ($)		Death ($)		Disability ($)		Termination Other Than For Cause ($)
Horton	Cash Severance Benefits		—		—		—		—		618,135
	Long-Term Incentives		—		0		231,814		231,814		309,656
	Pension Benefits (a)		0		5,503,296		5,503,296		5,503,296		5,503,296
	Flight Privileges (b)		6,540		6,540		6,540		6,540		6,540
	Total		6,540		5,509,836		5,741,650		5,741,650		6,437,627
Goren	Cash Severance Benefits		—		—		—		—		540,385
	Long-Term Incentives		—		0		124,804		124,804		124,804
	Pension Benefits (a)		0		2,917,275		2,917,275		2,917,275		2,917,275
	Flight Privileges (b)		5,789		5,789		6,594		6,594		6,594
	Total		5,789		2,923,064		3,048,673		3,048,673		3,589,058
Garton	Cash Severance Benefits		—		—		—		—		530,479
	Long-Term Incentives		246,958		0		257,509		257,509		257,509
	Pension Benefits (a)		6,541,364		6,541,364		6,541,364		6,541,364		6,541,364
	Flight Privileges (b)		6,094		6,094		6,094		6,094		6,094
	Total		6,794,416		6,547,458		6,804,967		6,804,967		7,335,446
Kennedy	Cash Severance Benefits		—		—		—		—		522,000
	Long-Term Incentives		139,394		0		141,868		141,868		141,868
	Pension Benefits (a)		4,691,311		4,691,311		4,691,311		4,691,311		4,691,311
	Flight Privileges (b)		5,851		5,851		5,851		5,851		5,851
	Total		4,836,556		4,697,162		4,839,030		4,839,030		5,361,030
Ream	Cash Severance Benefits		0		0		0		0		438,308
	Long-Term Incentives		0		0		164,040		164,040		164,040
	Pension Benefits (a)		0		74,412		74,412		74,412		74,412
	Flight Privileges (b)		5,935		5,935		5,935		5,935		5,935
	Total		5,935		80,347		244,387		244,387		682,695

(a) The amounts for Mr. Horton, Ms. Goren, and Mr. Ream are also reported in the “2012 Pension Benefits Table” beginning on page 22 and are paid at retirement age. The amounts for Mr. Garton and Mr. Kennedy are based on early retirement at December 31, 2012.

(b) These amounts are based on figures that include the estimated average aggregate incremental cost to AMR of providing the flight perquisite described above to its named executive officers generally in 2012. For each named executive officer, AMR estimated these costs by using the average of the estimated annual incremental cost to AMR of providing their air travel for the number of years of the named executive officer’s projected life expectancy (according to the mortality tables AMR used to determine the present value of his or her retirement benefits in the “2012 Pension Benefits Table”).

Change In Control

If there is a change in control of AMR, its named executive officers are entitled to benefits under its long-term incentive plans and the AMR Non-Qualified Plan described below. AMR’s named executive officers were also entitled to benefits under the AMR Existing Severance Agreements. However, in connection with the Merger Agreement, AMR agreed to enter into AMR Merger Severance Agreements with each of its named executive officers, each of which is subject to and contingent upon the Closing, and each named executive officer will waive his or her rights under the AMR Existing Severance Agreements. The description below pertains to the rights and benefits under the AMR Existing Severance Agreements only as of December 31, 2012. See the section entitled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—The Primary Components of AMR’s Compensation Program—Merger Agreement” beginning on page 13 for a description of the AMR Merger Severance Agreements that AMR will enter into with its named executive officers prior to the Merger. The information provided below does not fully take into account the impact of the Chapter 11 Cases, including statutory limits on the amount of severance pay the named executive officers can receive during the course of the Chapter 11 Cases.

27

Under the terms of AMR’s long-term incentive plans, the AMR Non-Qualified Plan, and the AMR Existing Severance Agreements, a change in control of AMR is deemed to occur if: (i) over a 12-month period, a third party or group acquires beneficial ownership of 30% or more of its common stock, or the members of its board of directors (or their approved successors) no longer constitute a majority of the board; or (ii) its stockholders approve a complete liquidation or dissolution of AMR. Also, a reorganization, merger, or consolidation, or a sale or other disposition of all of AMR’s assets, is considered a change in control of AMR unless: (a) AMR’s stockholders prior to the transaction hold at least 50% of the voting securities of the successor company, (b) no one person owns more than 30% of the successor company, and (c) the members of its board of directors prior to the transaction constitute at least a majority of the board of the successor company. The event must also meet the change in control requirements of Section 409A of the Code. The Merger does not constitute a change in control for purposes of these plans or agreements.

Under the terms of AMR’s long-term incentive plans and agreements, following a change in control all outstanding stock options and SARs become immediately exercisable, all outstanding career equity and deferred shares vest, and all performance shares vest and will be paid at target levels (or 100%) of the original award. Each named executive officer will also receive a payment under the AMR Non-Qualified Plan equal to the present value of the accrued annual retirement benefit to be paid to him or her under that plan.

As described under the section entitled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—The Primary Components of AMR’s Compensation Program—Post-Employment and Change in Control Benefits” beginning on page 12, the AMR Existing Severance Agreements had a double trigger. Termination benefits under those agreements were therefore payable to a named executive officer in the event of a change of control only if: (i) within two years following a change in control, AMR (or a successor) terminated the named executive officer’s employment for any reason (other than his or her death, disability, felony conviction, or willful misconduct or dishonesty that materially harmed AMR’s business or reputation); (ii) within two years following a change in control, the named executive officer terminated his or her employment for good reason; (iii) the named executive officer terminated his or her employment for any reason during the 30 days following the first anniversary of the change in control; or (iv) the named executive officer’s employment was terminated following the commencement of change in control discussions and the change of control occurred within 180 days after the termination. Mr. Ream and Ms. Goren were only entitled to the termination benefits described above if his or her employment was terminated under clause (i), (ii), or (iv). For purposes of these agreements, “good reason” included any of the following after the change in control: (a) failure to maintain the executive in a substantially equivalent position; (b) a significant adverse change in the nature or scope of his or her position; (c) a reduction in his or her salary or incentive compensation target, or a reduction of his or her benefits; (d) a change in the executive’s employment circumstances, such as a change in responsibilities that hindered the executive’s ability to perform his or her duties; (e) the successor company breached the agreement or did not assume AMR’s obligations under such agreement; or (f) AMR relocated its headquarters or required the person to relocate more than 50 miles from AMR’s current location.

Under the AMR Existing Severance Agreements, if there was a change in control and termination of his or her employment in the situations described above, the named executive officer would have been entitled to the following additional benefits:

• AMR would have paid a cash payment of three times (or two times in the case of each of Mr. Horton, Ms. Goren, and Mr. Ream) the sum of his or her annual base salary and the target annual award paid under AMR’s incentive compensation plan (or the largest incentive award paid under that plan during the prior three years, if greater);

28

• For three years following the termination of employment (or two years for Ms. Goren and Mr. Ream), AMR would have provided all perquisites and benefits provided to him or her prior to the change in control, including health and welfare, insurance, and other perquisites and benefits described above;

• AMR would have provided a one-time reimbursement for relocation expenses and outplacement services;

• AMR would have provided the named executive officer, his or her spouse or companion and any dependent children unlimited personal flight privileges on American or American Eagle in any available class of service until age 55 (at age 55, AMR would provide the flight perquisite it would have provided during their employment);

• Except for Ms. Goren and Mr. Ream, AMR would have reimbursed the named executive officer for any excise taxes payable under Sections 280G and 4999 of the Code as a result and any federal income, employment, or excise taxes payable on the excise tax reimbursement;

• AMR would have treated the named executive officer as fully vested in his or her currently accrued benefits under the AMR Retirement Benefit Plan and the AMR Non-Qualified Plan. AMR would have calculated benefits under the plans as though his or her compensation rate equaled the sum of his or her base pay and incentive pay and credited the executive with three additional years of service; and

• AMR would have paid the named executive officer’s legal fees if there was a disagreement related to the agreement, and it would have established a trust to assure payment.

As stated above, however, the named executive officers will waive their rights under the AMR Existing Severance Agreements, so none of the benefits described above and in the table below will be paid to them. Also, the above benefits description does not fully take into account the impact of the Chapter 11 Cases, including statutory limits on the amount of allowed severance pay.

The following table lists the estimated payments and values that would have been due to each named executive officer serving on that date had a change in control occurred on December 31, 2012 and the named executive officer’s employment was terminated on that date. The amounts shown in the following table have not been reduced for the possibility that the benefits would not be paid in full as a result of the Chapter 11 Cases.

Name	Cash Severance ($)		Value of Stock Option/ SARs Vesting ($)		Value of Vesting of Non- Performance- Based Stock Awards ($)		Value of Vesting of Performance- Based Stock Awards ($)		Value of Additional Pension Benefits ($)		Outplacement, Relocation, and Continuing Perquisites and Benefits ($)		Flight Privileges ($)		Gross-up Payment for 280G Excise Taxes ($)		Total Change in Control Benefits ($)
Horton		2,967,048		0		241,280		235,480		7,364,305		438,107		0		4,085,917		15,332,137
Goren		1,891,348		0		122,544		105,360		3,356,876		383,160		859		0		5,860,147
Garton		3,310,182		0		268,872		164,560		2,299,888		423,486		0		2,345,920		8,812,908
Kennedy		2,740,500		0		139,608		105,360		3,188,500		423,473		0		2,566,211		9,163,652
Ream		1,994,300		0		147,840		93,720		0		342,616		0		0		2,578,476

In the above table, AMR based the stock values on a price of $.80 per share, which was the closing price of its common stock on December 31, 2012. The value of the additional pension benefits estimated in the table was determined using the same actuarial assumptions and mortality tables used to determine the present value of retirement benefits shown in the “2012 Pension Benefits Table” on page 22. These figures assume all payments are made at the time provided under Section 409A of the Code. For the flight perquisite, since Mr. Horton, Mr. Garton, Mr. Kennedy, and Mr. Ream vested in this

29

perquisite as of December 31, 2012 (regardless of whether a change in control has occurred), the aggregate incremental cost of this perquisite for them is reflected in the table in “Post-Employment Compensation” above. Since Ms. Goren is not entitled to the flight perquisite under AMR’s retirement policies until age 55, this table includes the estimate of the aggregate incremental cost to AMR for the flight perquisite she would receive under the agreement until her 55th birthday. AMR estimated the costs for Ms. Goren by using the average of the estimated annual incremental cost to AMR of providing this flight perquisite to the named executive officers in 2012 for the number of years until she was eligible for the perquisite under AMR’s retirement policies.

Director Compensation

As stated above, AMR and the other Debtors filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 on November 29, 2011. The information provided below provides a description of AMR’s historical compensation process, programs, and decisions prior to the commencement of the Chapter 11 Cases and does not fully take their impact into account. The amounts shown below have not been reduced for the possibility that pension and retirement benefits would not be paid as a result of the Chapter 11 Cases.

The nominating/corporate governance committee of the AMR board of directors reviews annually the overall compensation of the directors in consultation with AMR’s board of directors and with the assistance of its management. As American is a wholly-owned subsidiary of AMR, the American board of directors does not have a nominating or corporate governance committee. In doing so, the committee retained Meridian to assist the committee. AMR’s board of directors approves any changes to director compensation. There were no changes to AMR’s director compensation program in 2012 due to the commencement of the Chapter 11 Cases. The directors do not receive any compensation for their service as directors of American.

The following is a description of AMR’s director compensation program for 2012. Mr. Horton did not receive any compensation as a director or as chairman of the board because AMR compensated him instead as an employee. AMR describes his compensation in the section entitled “Executive Compensation” beginning on page 16.

Elements of Director Compensation

Retainers/Fees. For 2012, the compensation for AMR’s non-employee directors included:

• an annual retainer of $20,000 for service on its board;

• an additional annual retainer of $3,000 for service as lead director or for service on one or more of its board’s standing committees; and

• $1,000 for participating in a regular or special board or committee meeting (the maximum payment for meeting participation is $1,000 per day).

Annual Grants of Deferred Units. Each non-employee director is entitled to an annual award of 2,610 deferred units each July under the terms of the AMR 2004 Directors Unit Incentive Plan. However, AMR did not make any such award in 2012 due to the continuing Chapter 11 Cases.

As described below under “Pension and Other Retirement Benefits,” non-employee directors elected after May 15, 1996 are not eligible to participate in AMR’s director pension plan. Prior to the commencement of the Chapter 11 Cases, AMR instead provided them an additional annual grant of 710 deferred units, which were paid on the same terms as the annual deferred units described above. AMR did not award any such awards in 2012 due to the continuing Chapter 11 Cases.

Other Compensation. Under AMR’s prepetition director compensation programs, as is common in the airline industry, each non-employee director and his or her spouse or companion and dependent children also received unlimited complimentary personal air travel on American and American Eagle in any available class of service, and AMR reimbursed them for any related taxes. AMR provided

30

membership in its Admirals Club^® airport lounges and all of the benefits and privileges American gives to its best frequent flyers, including class of service upgrade credits, travel assistance, and fee waivers. AMR also reimbursed them for their expenses incurred in attending AMR’s meetings. AMR provided other perquisites and personal benefits, which are described in footnote (e) to the “Director Compensation Table For Fiscal Year 2012” below.

Pension and Other Retirement Benefits. Under AMR’s prepetition director compensation programs, each non-employee director elected to the board before May 15, 1996 and who serves on the board until age 62 is entitled to a pension benefit of $20,000 per year. The benefit is paid until the death of the director and the director’s spouse. Upon retirement, Mr. Codina and Mrs. Korologos are eligible to receive this benefit, although it is not known if the pension will be impacted by the Chapter 11 Cases.

Under AMR’s prepetition programs, each director is also entitled to the Admirals Club^® membership, frequent flyer benefits, complimentary air travel, and tax reimbursements described above following the non-employee director’s retirement. For each non-employee director who has served on AMR’s board of directors for at least ten years and retires at or following age 70, AMR continues to provide the complimentary air travel until the death of the director and his or her spouse. For directors who either do not serve until age 70 or do not serve for at least ten years, AMR continues to provide the complimentary air travel for the number of years the director served on its board of directors. If the Bankruptcy Court approves the Merger Agreement, under the terms of the agreement, at Closing each current non-employee director will be entitled to unlimited complimentary flight privileges until the later of the death of the director or such director’s spouse or life partner. Like members of the US Airways Group board of directors, they also would receive 12 round-trip or 24 one-way passes each year for free transportation on American and US Airways, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of US Airways Group, that they may distribute to non-eligible family and non-family members.

Stock Ownership Guidelines

Effective March 2011, AMR’s board of directors adopted stock ownership guidelines for AMR’s directors. Due to the Chapter 11 Cases, AMR’s board of directors has suspended compliance with these guidelines.

Director Compensation Table for Fiscal Year 2012

The following table contains information regarding compensation paid to AMR’s non-employee directors in 2012. The table does not fully take into account the impact of the Chapter 11 Cases.

Name	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash(a) ($)		Stock Awards(b) ($)		Option Awards(c) ($)		Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)		Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings(d) ($)		All Other Compensation(e) ($)		Total ($)
John W. Bachmann		48,000		0		0		0		0		1644		49,644
Stephen M. Bennett		46,000		0		0		0		0		892		46,892
Armando M. Codina		49,000		0		0		0		39,346		771		89,117
Alberto Ibargüen		46,000		0		0		0		0		1542		47,542
Ann M. Korologos		46,000		0		0		0		32,920		1453		80,373
Michael A. Miles		46,000		0		0		0		0		795		46,795
Philip J. Purcell		48,000		0		0		0		0		686		48,686
Ray M. Robinson		50,000		0		0		0		0		1788		51,788
Judith Rodin		42,000		0		0		0		0		7887		49,887
Matthew K. Rose		47,000		0		0		0		0		419		42,419
Roger T. Staubach		47,000		0		0		0		0		951		47,951

(a) The amounts represent the aggregate dollar amount of all fees the directors earned or were paid in 2012 for service as a director, including annual retainer, committee, meeting, and lead director fees.

(b) As a result of the Chapter 11 Cases, AMR did not grant any stock awards to its directors in 2012.

31

The chart below reflects the aggregate number of outstanding stock-based compensation awards each director held as of December 31, 2012. The table does not take into account the impact of the commencement of the Chapter 11 Cases.

Name	1994 Directors Stock Incentive Plan Shares (#)		2004 Directors Unit Incentive Plan Units (#)		Directors Fees Deferred Units (#)
Bachmann		4,266		25,373		43,982
Bennett		0		3,320		0
Codina		12,322		19,692		49,839
Ibargüen		0		13,280		25,705
Korologos		13,270		19,692		22,113
Miles		6,399		25,373		22,865
Purcell		8,532		25,373		29,433
Robinson		0		19,920		12,397
Rodin		12,798		25,373		13,692
Rose		0		23,240		17,918
Staubach		4,266		25,373		29,009

(c) Prior to 2006, AMR granted directors SARs under the 1999 directors’ stock appreciation rights plan. As of December 31, 2012, the aggregate number of outstanding SARs each director held was as follows: Mr. Bachmann (2,370), Mr. Bennett (0), Mr. Codina (2,370), Mr. Ibargüen (0), Mrs. Korologos (2,370), Mr. Miles (2,370), Mr. Purcell (2,370), Mr. Robinson (0), Dr. Rodin (2,370), Mr. Rose (0), and Mr. Staubach (2,370). AMR did not grant SARs to any directors in 2012.

(d) Since Mr. Codina and Mrs. Korologos were elected prior to May 15, 1996, each is entitled to receive a pension benefit of $20,000 per year from the date of retirement until the later of the death of the director or his or her spouse. The present value of their accumulated retirement benefits increased from December 31, 2011 to December 31, 2012 because the discount rate decreased from 5.20% at December 31, 2011 to 4.20% at December 31, 2012. The amounts have not been reduced for the possibility that the benefits will not be paid in full as a result of the Chapter 11 Cases.

(e) Amounts shown include: (i) the estimated aggregate incremental cost to AMR of the complimentary personal air travel on American and American Eagle that AMR provided to the directors and their respective family members in 2012 and (ii) the dollar value of insurance premiums AMR paid in 2012 for a $50,000 life insurance policy for the benefit of each director. The amounts also include the following tax reimbursements that AMR paid to its directors in 2012 for complimentary air travel AMR provided them in 2011: Mr. Bachmann ($93), Mr. Ibargüen ($180), Mr. Robinson ($890), and Dr. Rodin ($5,834). AMR also provided to some of its non-employee directors access to events or venues sponsored by AMR, at no incremental cost.

Compensation Risk Assessment

AMR assessed whether its employee compensation policies and practices create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse impact on it. In doing so, AMR considered that its executive compensation programs were designed with what it believed was an appropriate focus on both its short-term and long-term performance. AMR also considered risk mitigation elements of these programs. For example, its incentive plans were tied to broad measures of its performance that cannot be directly influenced by individual employees, such as pre-tax earnings and stockholder return. Also, AMR’s short-term incentive awards were capped, and its long-term awards vested over periods of three to five years. AMR has also adopted a recoupment policy (described in the section entitled “The Primary Components of AMR’s Compensation Program—Recoupment Policy” beginning on page 15). The results of that assessment were that AMR’s employee compensation policies and practices do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on AMR. With the assistance of its consultants, its chief executive officer, and its senior vice president of human resources, AMR discussed the assessment’s findings with its compensation committee.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

AMR is the sole shareholder of American, and holds all 1,000 shares of American’s outstanding common stock.

32

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Director Independence

AMR’s board of directors has determined that each director, other than Mr. Horton, is independent as defined by the NYSE listing standards and the AMR board’s governance policies. As an employee, Mr. Horton is not considered independent under the NYSE rules and the AMR’s board governance policies.

33

The board of directors of AMR Corporation has standing audit, compensation, diversity, and nominating/corporate governance committees. All members of the audit committee are independent under SEC and NYSE rules and the board’s governance policies. All members of AMR’s compensation, diversity, and nominating/corporate governance committees are also independent under NYSE rules and AMR’s board governance policies. Although AMR’s securities were delisted from the NYSE, AMR continues to determine the independence of directors under the NYSE listing standards. No member of its audit, compensation, diversity, or nominating/corporate governance committees is a current or former employee or officer of AMR or any of its affiliates. A copy of the governance policies of AMR’s board of directors is available on the Investor Relations section of AMR’s website located at www.aa.com/investorrelations by clicking on the “Corporate Governance” link.

In making these determinations, AMR’s board of directors considered information provided by the directors, information from AMR’s records, and advice from counsel.

Transactions with Related Persons

AMR’s board of directors has adopted a written policy for the review, approval, or ratification of related party transactions. Under AMR’s policy, a related party transaction is defined as a transaction or series of related transactions with AMR totaling $120,000 or more and in which any of its executive officers, directors, director nominees, persons owning five percent or more of AMR’s outstanding common stock, or any of their immediate family members has a direct or indirect material interest. Certain interests and transactions are by their nature not material and are not subject to the policy. AMR’s nominating/corporate governance committee considers related party transactions under the policy with the assistance of AMR’s general counsel and chief compliance officer or corporate secretary. In doing so, the committee considers: (i) the size of the transaction, including the amount of compensation payable to or receivable by the related party; (ii) the nature of the related party’s interest; and (iii) whether the transaction may involve a conflict of interest, among other factors. In 2012, AMR did not report any transactions with related persons.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

Fees for professional services rendered by American’s independent auditors in each of the last two fiscal years, in each of the following categories, including related expenses are:

	(amounts in thousands)
	2012		2011
Audit Fees	$	3,754	$	2,481
Audit-Related Fees		869		845
Tax Fees		77		64
All Other Fees		0		0
Total Fees	$	4,700	$	3,390

“Audit Fees” are fees for (i) the audit of American’s consolidated financial statements; (ii) the audit of internal control over financial reporting; (iii) the review of the interim condensed consolidated financial statements included in quarterly reports; (iv) services that are normally provided by Ernst & Young LLP (Ernst & Young) in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements and attest services, except those not required by statute or regulation; and (v) consultations related to financial accounting and reporting standards.

“Audit-Related Fees” are fees for assurance and other services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of American’s consolidated financial statements and are not reported under Audit Fees. These services include (i) employee benefit plan audits; (ii) fees for services provided on proposed transactions; (iii) attest services that are not required by statute or regulation; and (iv) consultations related to financial accounting and reporting standards that do not impact the annual audit.

“Tax Fees” are tax compliance/preparation and other tax services. Tax compliance/preparation consists of fees for professional services related to (i) federal, state, and international tax compliance; (ii) assistance with tax audits and appeals; (iii) expatriate tax services; (iv) assistance related to the impact of Mergers, acquisitions, and divestitures on tax return preparation; and (v) miscellaneous tax consulting and planning.

There were no fees for other services not included above.

In selecting Ernst & Young as American’s independent auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2012, AMR’s audit committee considered whether services other than audit and audit-related services provided by Ernst & Young are compatible with the firm’s independence.

34

AMR’s audit committee pre-approves all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by Ernst & Young, including audit services, audit-related services, tax services, and other services. Pre-approval is generally provided for up to one year, and any pre-approval is detailed as to the particular service or category of services and includes an anticipated budget. In addition, the committee may also pre-approve particular services on a case-by-case basis. The committee has delegated pre-approval authority to its chairman. Under this delegation, the chairman must report any pre-approval decision by him to the committee. The committee pre-approved all such audit, audit-related, and permissible non-audit services in 2011 and 2012 in accordance with these procedures.

35

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

Exhibit Number	Description of Exhibits
31.1	Certification of the Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of Securities Exchange Act of 1934
31.2	Certification of the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of Securities Exchange Act of 1934
32	Certifications of the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b)/15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and18 U.S.C. Section 1350
101	The following materials from American Airlines, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Statements of Operations, (ii) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity (Deficit) and (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of text.*

* Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the Interactive Data Files on Exhibit 101 hereto are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, are deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise are not subject to liability under those sections.

36

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC.
By:	/s/ Isabella D. Goren
	Isabella D. Goren
	Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
	(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Date: April 15, 2013

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

I, Thomas W. Horton, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of American Airlines, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: April 15, 2013	/s/ Thomas W. Horton
	Thomas W. Horton
	Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

I, Isabella D. Goren, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of American Airlines, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: April 15, 2013	/s/ Isabella D. Goren
	Isabella D. Goren
	Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

EX-32

Exhibit 32

AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC.

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of American Airlines, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 (the Form 10-K) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: April 15, 2013	/s/ Thomas W. Horton
	Thomas W. Horton
	Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Date: April 15, 2013	/s/ Isabella D. Goren
	Isabella D. Goren
	Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.

XML

Intangible Assets (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Goodwill And Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]

Summary Of Amortization Of Intangible Assets

The following tables provide information relating to the Company’s amortized intangible assets as of December 31 (in millions):

	2012
	Cost		Accumulated Amortization		Net Book  Value
Amortized intangible assets:
Airport operating rights	$	515	$	385	$	130
Gate lease rights	155		124		31
Total	$	670	$	509	$	161

	2011
	Cost		Accumulated Amortization		Net Book Value
Amortized intangible assets:
Airport operating rights	$	509	$	361	$	148
Gate lease rights	160		125		35
Total	$	669	$	486	$	183

XML

Investments And Fair Value Measurements (Assets And Liabilities Measured At Fair Value On A Recurring Basis) (Detail) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2012		Dec. 31, 2011
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Available-for-sale Securities, Fair Value Disclosure	$ 3,408	[1]
Restricted Cash and Investments, Current	850		738
Cash Flow Hedge Derivative Instrument Assets at Fair Value	65
Fair value of assets and liabilities measured on recurring basis	4,323
Level 1 [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Available-for-sale Securities, Fair Value Disclosure	436	[1]
Restricted Cash and Investments, Current	850	[1]
Cash Flow Hedge Derivative Instrument Assets at Fair Value	0	[1]
Fair value of assets and liabilities measured on recurring basis	1,286
Level 2 [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Available-for-sale Securities, Fair Value Disclosure	2,972	[1]
Restricted Cash and Investments, Current	0	[1]
Cash Flow Hedge Derivative Instrument Assets at Fair Value	65	[1]
Fair value of assets and liabilities measured on recurring basis	3,037
Level 3 [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Available-for-sale Securities, Fair Value Disclosure	0	[1]
Restricted Cash and Investments, Current	0	[1]
Cash Flow Hedge Derivative Instrument Assets at Fair Value	0	[1]
Fair value of assets and liabilities measured on recurring basis	0
Money Market Funds [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Available-for-sale Securities, Fair Value Disclosure	436	[1],[2]
Money Market Funds [Member] | Level 1 [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Available-for-sale Securities, Fair Value Disclosure	436	[1],[2]
Money Market Funds [Member] | Level 2 [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Available-for-sale Securities, Fair Value Disclosure	0	[1],[2]
Money Market Funds [Member] | Level 3 [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Available-for-sale Securities, Fair Value Disclosure	0	[1],[2]
Government Agency Investments [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Available-for-sale Securities, Fair Value Disclosure	545	[1],[2]
Government Agency Investments [Member] | Maturity Dates Exceeding One Year [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Available-for-sale Securities, Fair Value Disclosure	545
Government Agency Investments [Member] | Level 1 [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Available-for-sale Securities, Fair Value Disclosure	0	[1],[2]
Government Agency Investments [Member] | Level 2 [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Available-for-sale Securities, Fair Value Disclosure	545	[1],[2]
Government Agency Investments [Member] | Level 3 [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Available-for-sale Securities, Fair Value Disclosure	0	[1],[2]
Repurchase Agreements [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Available-for-sale Securities, Fair Value Disclosure	304	[1],[2]
Repurchase Agreements [Member] | Level 1 [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Available-for-sale Securities, Fair Value Disclosure	0	[1],[2]
Repurchase Agreements [Member] | Level 2 [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Available-for-sale Securities, Fair Value Disclosure	304	[1],[2]
Repurchase Agreements [Member] | Level 3 [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Available-for-sale Securities, Fair Value Disclosure	0	[1],[2]
Corporate Obligations [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Available-for-sale Securities, Fair Value Disclosure	1,519	[1],[2]
Corporate Obligations [Member] | Maturity Dates Exceeding One Year [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Available-for-sale Securities, Fair Value Disclosure	405
Corporate Obligations [Member] | Level 1 [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Available-for-sale Securities, Fair Value Disclosure	0	[1],[2]
Corporate Obligations [Member] | Level 2 [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Available-for-sale Securities, Fair Value Disclosure	1,519	[1],[2]
Corporate Obligations [Member] | Level 3 [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Available-for-sale Securities, Fair Value Disclosure	0	[1],[2]
Bank Notes/Certificates Of Deposit/Time Deposits [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Available-for-sale Securities, Fair Value Disclosure	604	[1],[2]
Bank Notes/Certificates Of Deposit/Time Deposits [Member] | Maturity Dates Exceeding One Year [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Available-for-sale Securities, Fair Value Disclosure	200
Bank Notes/Certificates Of Deposit/Time Deposits [Member] | Level 1 [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Available-for-sale Securities, Fair Value Disclosure	0	[1],[2]
Bank Notes/Certificates Of Deposit/Time Deposits [Member] | Level 2 [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Available-for-sale Securities, Fair Value Disclosure	604	[1],[2]
Bank Notes/Certificates Of Deposit/Time Deposits [Member] | Level 3 [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Available-for-sale Securities, Fair Value Disclosure	$ 0	[1],[2]

[1] Unrealized gains or losses on short-term investments, restricted cash and short-term investments and derivatives qualifying for hedge accounting are recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) at each measurement date.

[2] The Company's short-term investments mature in one year or less except for $200 million of Bank notes/Certificates of deposit/Time deposits, $545 million of U.S. Government agency investments and $405 million of Corporate obligations which have maturity dates exceeding one year.

XML

Summary Of Accounting Policies (Narrative) (Detail) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Airport operating and gate lease rights, amortized life (in years)	25
Airport operating and gate lease rights, residual value	$ 0
Unrecognized revenue	4,524,000,000	4,223,000,000
Advertising expense	153,000,000	186,000,000	165,000,000
Aadvantage Miles [Member]
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Deferred amortization period of revenue for air transportation sold at fair value (in months)	28
Unrecognized revenue	$ 1,700,000,000	$ 1,600,000,000
Minimum [Member]
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Residual value percentage of equipment and properties	5.00%
Minimum [Member] | Aircraft [Member]
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Amortized period of equipment and property under capital leases, in years	6
Minimum [Member] | Other Leased Equipment And Property [Member]
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Amortized period of equipment and property under capital leases, in years	7
Maximum [Member]
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Residual value percentage of equipment and properties	10.00%
Maximum [Member] | Aircraft [Member]
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Amortized period of equipment and property under capital leases, in years	25
Maximum [Member] | Other Leased Equipment And Property [Member]
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Amortized period of equipment and property under capital leases, in years	40

XML

Income Taxes (Narrative) (Detail) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Tax benefit resulting from OCI allocation	$ 569	$ 0	$ 0
Income Tax Expense Credit from Elections Under Tax Relief Act of 2010 and And Recovery Act of 2008	29		30
Valuation Allowance, Deferred Tax Asset, Change in Amount	(282)	(1,100)	(120)
Unrecognized tax benefit	5	5	5
Alternative minimum tax credit carryforward	493	493
Cash payments (refunds) for income taxes	5.0	(0.5)	(32.0)
Percentage of cumulative stock ownership changes among material shareholders limited for company's future use of NOLs	50.00%
Section 382 Limitation Test Period	three year
Internal Revenue Service (IRS) [Member]
Unrealized benefit related to the implementation of share-based compensation accounting guidance	666
Deferred Tax Assets, Operating Loss Carryforwards, Subject to Expiration	6,800
State and Local Jurisdiction [Member]
Deferred Tax Assets, Operating Loss Carryforwards, Subject to Expiration	3,100
Minimum [Member] | Internal Revenue Service (IRS) [Member]
Operating Loss Carryforwards, Expiration Dates	2022
Minimum [Member] | State and Local Jurisdiction [Member]
Operating Loss Carryforwards, Expiration Dates	2013
Maximum [Member] | State and Local Jurisdiction [Member]
Operating Loss Carryforwards, Expiration Dates	2027
One Year from Balance Sheet Date [Member] | State and Local Jurisdiction [Member]
Deferred Tax Assets, Operating Loss Carryforwards, Subject to Expiration	$ 105

XML

Commitments, Contingencies And Guarantees (Aircraft Acquisition Commitments) (Detail)	Jan. 23, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Property Subject to or Available for Operating Lease [Line Items]
Current, Purchase	39	39
Current, Lease	20	20
Year Two, Purchase	13	11
Year Two, Lease	50	50
Year Three, Purchase	13	2
Year Three, Lease	50	50
Year Four, Purchase	15	2
Year Four, Lease	45	45
Year Five, Purchase	19	10
Year Five, Lease	40	40
Year Six and beyond, Purchase	227	120
Year Six and beyond, Lease	0	0
Total, Purchase	326	184
Total, Lease	205	205
Boeing 737 Family [Member]
Property Subject to or Available for Operating Lease [Line Items]
Current, Purchase	31	31
Current, Lease	0	0
Year Two, Purchase	5	5
Year Two, Lease	15	15
Year Three, Purchase	0
Year Three, Lease	20	20
Year Four, Purchase	0	0
Year Four, Lease	20	20
Year Five, Purchase	0	0
Year Five, Lease	20	20
Year Six and beyond, Purchase	0	0
Year Six and beyond, Lease	0	0
Total, Purchase	36	36
Total, Lease	75	75
Boeing 777-200 ER Aircraft [Member]
Property Subject to or Available for Operating Lease [Line Items]
Current, Purchase		0
Current, Lease		0
Year Two, Purchase		1
Year Two, Lease		0
Year Three, Purchase		2
Year Three, Lease		0
Year Four, Purchase		2
Year Four, Lease		0
Year Five, Purchase		0
Year Five, Lease		0
Year Six and beyond, Purchase		0
Year Six and beyond, Lease		0
Total, Purchase		5
Total, Lease		0
Boeing 777-300 ER Aircraft [Member]
Property Subject to or Available for Operating Lease [Line Items]
Current, Purchase	8	8
Current, Lease	0	0
Year Two, Purchase	6	5
Year Two, Lease	0	0
Year Three, Purchase	2	0
Year Three, Lease	0	0
Year Four, Purchase	2	0
Year Four, Lease	0	0
Year Five, Purchase	0	0
Year Five, Lease	0	0
Year Six and beyond, Purchase	0	0
Year Six and beyond, Lease	0	0
Total, Purchase	18	13
Total, Lease	0	0
Airbus A320 Family [Member]
Property Subject to or Available for Operating Lease [Line Items]
Current, Purchase	0	0
Current, Lease	20	20
Year Two, Purchase	0	0
Year Two, Lease	35	35
Year Three, Purchase	0	0
Year Three, Lease	30	30
Year Four, Purchase	0	0
Year Four, Lease	25	25
Year Five, Purchase	0	0
Year Five, Lease	20	20
Year Six and beyond, Purchase	0	0
Year Six and beyond, Lease	0	0
Total, Purchase	0	0
Total, Lease	130	130
NEO [Member]
Property Subject to or Available for Operating Lease [Line Items]
Current, Purchase		0
Current, Lease		0
Year Two, Purchase		0
Year Two, Lease		0
Year Three, Purchase		0
Year Three, Lease		0
Year Four, Purchase		0
Year Four, Lease		0
Year Five, Purchase		10
Year Five, Lease		0
Year Six and beyond, Purchase		120
Year Six and beyond, Lease		0
Total, Purchase		130
Total, Lease		0

XML

Retirement Benefits (Narrative) (Detail) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		12 Months Ended					3 Months Ended	9 Months Ended	12 Months Ended					3 Months Ended	9 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012	Sep. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2012 International Companies [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 International Companies [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 International Companies [Member] Unitized Mutual Funds [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 International Companies [Member] Unitized Mutual Funds [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Pension Plans [Member]	Sep. 30, 2012 Pension Plans [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Pension Plans [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Pension Plans [Member]	Dec. 31, 2010 Pension Plans [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Pension Plans [Member] Invested In Certain Mutual Funds [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Pension Plans [Member] Invested In Certain Mutual Funds [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Other Postretirement Benefit Plans [Member]	Sep. 30, 2012 Other Postretirement Benefit Plans [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Other Postretirement Benefit Plans [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Other Postretirement Benefit Plans [Member]	Dec. 31, 2010 Other Postretirement Benefit Plans [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Other Postretirement Benefit Plans [Member] Invested In Certain Mutual Funds [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Other Postretirement Benefit Plans [Member] Invested In Certain Mutual Funds [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Other Postretirement Benefit Plans [Member] Unitized Mutual Funds [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Other Postretirement Benefit Plans [Member] Unitized Mutual Funds [Member]
Super Saver 401(k) Company Match	5.50%		5.50%
Pilot Super Saver 401k Company Match	14.00%		14.00%
Employer contributions			$ 272,000,000							$ 277,000,000	$ 525,000,000						$ 97,000,000	$ 121,000,000
Recognized Unamortized Prior Service Cost		(58,000,000)
Retiree Medical Plan, Plan Amendment Gain		1,900,000,000
Amortization period in years	8
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost, Discount rate								4.10%	5.20%		5.80%				3.80%	4.89%		5.69%
Retiree Medical Plan, Net Gain Loss at Remeasurement		124,000,000
Recognized Unamortized Prior Service Cost - Retiree Medical		157,000,000
Defined Benefit Plans, Actuarial Loss at Remeasurement		(1,900,000,000)
Defined Benefit Plan, Recognized Net Gain (Loss) Due to Settlements and Curtailments		1,800,000,000
Defined Benefit Plan, Expected Long-term Return on Assets			8.00%							8.25%	8.50%						8.25%	8.50%
Defined Benefit Plan, Actual Plan Asset Allocations				16.00%	18.00%	28.00%	27.00%
Fair value of plan assets								9,065,000,000		9,065,000,000	8,132,000,000	7,773,000,000	259,000,000	143,000,000	211,000,000		211,000,000	205,000,000	234,000,000	208,000,000	203,000,000	202,000,000	201,000,000
The estimated net loss and prior service cost for the defined benefit pension plans										77,000,000							(9,000,000)
Annualized ten-year rate of return on plan assets			10.15%
Define benefit plan obligation to return collateral on loaned securities, net	0		0
Receivables And Payables for Foreign Currency Contracts, Net, Not Included in Fair Value of Plan Assets	2,000,000		2,000,000
Retiree Medical Plan, Curtailment Gain Loss		$ (33,000,000)

XML

Reorganization (Components Of Long-Term Debt) (Detail) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Liabilities Subject to Compromise, Debt and Accrued Interest	$ 358	$ 1,642
Secured Variable And Fixed Rate Indebtedness Due Through 2023 [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Liabilities Subject to Compromise, Debt and Accrued Interest	172	1,456
Effective interest rate percentage - minimum	1.00%
Effective interest rate percentage - maximum	13.00%
Debt Instrument, Maturity Date Range, End	2023
6.00% - 8.50% Special Facility Revenue Bonds Due Through 2036 [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Liabilities Subject to Compromise, Debt and Accrued Interest	$ 186	$ 186
Debt Instrument, Maturity Date Range, End	2036
Percentage of debt instrument interest rate - minimum	6.00%
Percentage of debt instrument interest rate - maximum	8.50%

XML

Leases (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Leases [Abstract]

Future Minimum Lease Payments Under Capital Leases

The future minimum lease payments required under capital leases, together with the present value of such payments, and future

minimum lease payments required under operating leases that have initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of December 31, 2012, were (in millions):

	Capital Leases			Operating Leases
Year Ending December 31,
2013	$	82		$	1,031
2014	69			961
2015	63			891
2016	56			815
2017	52			776
2018 and thereafter	360			4,531
	$	682		$	9,005	(2)
Less amount representing interest	251
Present value of net minimum lease payments	$	431	(1)

⁽¹⁾As of December 31, 2012, included in Liabilities Subject to Compromise on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet is approximately $19 million relating to ground capital leases.

⁽²⁾ As of December 31, 2012, $201 million and $160 million are included on the accompanying balance sheet in Liabilities Subject to Compromise and Accrued liabilities and other liabilities and deferred credits, respectively, relating to rent expense being recorded in advance of future operating lease payments.

XML

Retirement Benefits (Schedule Of Changes In Pension, Retiree Medical, Other Benefit Obligations And Fair Value Assets) (Detail) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Defined Benefit Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Employer contributions	$ 272
Pension Plans [Member]
Defined Benefit Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Obligation at January 1	14,568	12,968
Service cost	341	386	366
Interest cost	729	757	737
Actuarial (gain) loss	2,345	1,237
Plan amendments	301	0
Defined Benefit Plan, Curtailments	(1,841)	0
Benefit payments	(548)	(780)
Obligation at December 31	15,895	14,568	12,968
Fair Value at January 1	8,132	7,773
Actual return on plan assets	1,204	614
Employer contributions	277	525
Fair Value at December 31	9,065	8,132	7,773
Funded status at December 31	(6,830)	(6,436)
Other Postretirement Benefit Plans [Member]
Defined Benefit Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Obligation at January 1	3,122	3,097
Service cost	46	61	60
Interest cost	128	174	165
Actuarial (gain) loss	104	(63)
Plan amendments	(1,904)	(3)
Defined Benefit Plan, Curtailments	33	0
Benefit payments	(117)	(144)
Obligation at December 31	1,412	3,122	3,097
Fair Value at January 1	205	234
Actual return on plan assets	26	(6)
Employer contributions	97	121
Fair Value at December 31	211	205	234
Funded status at December 31	$ (1,201)	$ (2,917)

XML

Share Based Compensation (Narrative) (Detail) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Total charge for share-based compensation expense	$ 26,000,000	$ 40,000,000	$ 49,000,000
Cash used to settle equity instruments granted under share-based compensation plans	0	2,000,000	2,000,000
Aggregate intrinsic value of vested options/SARs	0
Cash received from exercise of stock options		1,000,000	1,000,000
Tax benefit realized on stock options/SARs exercised	0
1998 Plan [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Number for common shares authorized for distribution	23,700,000
2009 Plan [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Number for common shares authorized for distribution	4,000,000
2003 Plan [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Number for common shares authorized for distribution	42,680,000
LTIP Plans And 2003 Plan [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Weighted-average grant date fair value of options/SARs granted		$ 3.59	$ 3.97
Total intrinsic value of options/SARs			1,000,000
Unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock options/SARs granted	6,000,000
Term of unrecognized compensation cost expected to be recognized (in years)	2.5
Fair value of stock options/SARs vested	5,000,000	7,000,000	11,000,000
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Equity Instruments Other than Options, Nonvested, Number	4,658,406	7,468,019
Weighted-average grant date fair value of share	$ 0.00
LTIP Plans And 2003 Plan [Member] | Maximum [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Total intrinsic value of options/SARs		1,000,000
Performance Award [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock options/SARs granted	2,000,000
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Equity Instruments Other than Options, Nonvested, Number	6,144,000	6,341,695
Weighted-average grant date fair value of share		$ 6.58	$ 7.01
Requisite service period for deferred share awards granted (in months)	36
Aggregate Intrinsic Value - Outstanding at December 31	4,915,200
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term - Outstanding at December 31 (in years)	0.2
Performance Award [Member] | Maximum [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Relative stock price performance range	175.00%
Performance Award [Member] | Minimum [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Relative stock price performance range	0.00%
Deferred Award [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Weighted-average grant date fair value of options/SARs granted		$ 6.29	$ 7.05
Unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock options/SARs granted	6,000,000
Term of unrecognized compensation cost expected to be recognized (in years)	2.3
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Equity Instruments Other than Options, Nonvested, Number	6,765,057	7,271,021
Requisite service period for deferred share awards granted (in months)	36 months
Fair value of awards settled for deferred awards		1,000,000	3,000,000
Aggregate Intrinsic Value - Outstanding at December 31	5,412,045
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term - Outstanding at December 31 (in years)	0.9
Other Award [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock options/SARs granted	1,000,000
Term of unrecognized compensation cost expected to be recognized (in years)	1.3
Fair value of awards settled for deferred awards	0	2,000,000	2,000,000
Aggregate Intrinsic Value - Outstanding at December 31	$ 2,000,000
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term - Outstanding at December 31 (in years)	1.3

XML

Retirement Benefits (Schedule of Health Care Cost Trend Rates) (Detail)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Compensation And Retirement Disclosure [Abstract]
Health care cost trend rate assumed for next year	7.00%	7.50%
Rate to which the cost trend rate is assumed to decline (the ultimate trend rate)	4.50%	4.50%
Year that the rate reaches the ultimate trend rate	2018	2018

XML

Leases (Future Minimum Lease Payments Under Capital and Operating Leases) (Detail) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2012
Leases [Abstract]
Capital Leases, Future Minimum Payments Due, Current	$ 82
Capital Leases, Future Minimum Payments Due in Two Years	69
Capital Leases, Future Minimum Payments Due in Three Years	63
Capital Leases, Future Minimum Payments Due in Four Years	56
Capital Leases, Future Minimum Payments Due in Five Years	52
Capital Leases, Future Minimum Payments Due Thereafter	360
Future minimum lease payment under Capital leases - Total	682
Less amount representing interest	251
Present value of net minimum lease payments	431	[1]
Operating Leases, Future Minimum Payments Due, Current	1,031
Operating Leases, Future Minimum Payments, Due in Two Years	961
Operating Leases, Future Minimum Payments, Due in Three Years	891
Operating Leases, Future Minimum Payments, Due in Four Years	815
Operating Leases, Future Minimum Payments, Due in Five Years	776
Operating Leases, Future Minimum Payments, Due Thereafter	4,531
Future minimum lease payment under Operating Leases - Total	$ 9,005	[2]

[1] As of December 31, 2012, included in Liabilities Subject to Compromise on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet is approximately $19 million relating to ground capital leases.

[2] As of December 31, 2012, $201 million and $160 million are included on the accompanying balance sheet in Liabilities Subject to Compromise and Accrued liabilities and other liabilities and deferred credits, respectively, relating to rent expense being recorded in advance of future operating lease payments.

XML

Share Based Compensation (Status And Changes Of Non-Vested Options/SARs) (Detail) (LTIP Plans And 2003 Plan [Member], USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012
LTIP Plans And 2003 Plan [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Outstanding at January 1	7,468,019
Granted	0
Vested	(2,022,036)
Forfeited	(787,577)
Outstanding at December 31	4,658,406
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value - Outstanding at January 1	$ 3.59
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value - Granted	$ 0.00
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value - Vested	$ 3.89
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value - Forfeited	$ 3.54
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value - Outstanding at December 31	$ 3.47

XML

Retirement Benefits (Schedule Of Fair Values Of Pension Plan Assets By Asset Category) (Detail) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	12 Months Ended																																12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2012 Corporate Debt With Standard And Poor's (S&P) Rating Lower Than A [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Corporate Debt With Standard And Poor's (S&P) Rating Lower Than A [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Corporate Debt With Standard And Poor's (S&P) Rating A Or Higher [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Corporate Debt With Standard And Poor's (S&P) Rating A Or Higher [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 U.S. Companies [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 U.S. Companies [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 International Companies [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 International Companies [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Emerging Market Companies [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Emerging Market Companies [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Domestic Government Securities [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Domestic Government Securities [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Emerging Market Government Securities [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Emerging Market Government Securities [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 U.S. Buyout Opportunities [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 U.S. Buyout Opportunities [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 European Buyout Opportunities [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 European Buyout Opportunities [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Emerging Market 103-12 Investment Trust [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Emerging Market 103-12 Investment Trust [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Canadian Segregated Balanced Value [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Canadian Segregated Balanced Value [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Common/Collective Trust [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Common/Collective Trust [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Private Equity Partnerships [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Private Equity Partnerships [Member]	Dec. 31, 2010 Private Equity Partnerships [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Insurance Group Annuity Contracts [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Insurance Group Annuity Contracts [Member]	Dec. 31, 2010 Insurance Group Annuity Contracts [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Minimum [Member] Private Equity Partnerships [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Minimum [Member] Private Equity Partnerships [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Maximum [Member] Private Equity Partnerships [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Maximum [Member] Private Equity Partnerships [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Pension Plans [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Pension Plans [Member]	Dec. 31, 2010 Pension Plans [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Pension Plans [Member] Cash and Cash Equivalents [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Pension Plans [Member] Cash and Cash Equivalents [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Pension Plans [Member] International Markets [Member]		Dec. 31, 2011 Pension Plans [Member] International Markets [Member]		Dec. 31, 2012 Pension Plans [Member] Large-Cap Companies [Member]		Dec. 31, 2011 Pension Plans [Member] Large-Cap Companies [Member]		Dec. 31, 2012 Pension Plans [Member] Mid-Cap Companies [Member]		Dec. 31, 2011 Pension Plans [Member] Mid-Cap Companies [Member]		Dec. 31, 2012 Pension Plans [Member] Small-Cap Companies [Member]		Dec. 31, 2011 Pension Plans [Member] Small-Cap Companies [Member]		Dec. 31, 2012 Pension Plans [Member] Corporate Bonds [Member]		Dec. 31, 2011 Pension Plans [Member] Corporate Bonds [Member]		Dec. 31, 2012 Pension Plans [Member] Government Securities [Member]		Dec. 31, 2011 Pension Plans [Member] Government Securities [Member]		Dec. 31, 2012 Pension Plans [Member] U.S. Municipal Securities [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Pension Plans [Member] U.S. Municipal Securities [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Pension Plans [Member] Private Equity Partnerships [Member]		Dec. 31, 2011 Pension Plans [Member] Private Equity Partnerships [Member]		Dec. 31, 2012 Pension Plans [Member] Common/Collective And 103-12 Investment Trusts [Member]		Dec. 31, 2011 Pension Plans [Member] Common/Collective And 103-12 Investment Trusts [Member]		Dec. 31, 2012 Pension Plans [Member] Insurance Group Annuity Contracts [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Pension Plans [Member] Insurance Group Annuity Contracts [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Pension Plans [Member] Dividend And Interest Receivable [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Pension Plans [Member] Dividend And Interest Receivable [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Pension Plans [Member] Due To/From Brokers For Sale Of Securities [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Pension Plans [Member] Due To/From Brokers For Sale Of Securities [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Pension Plans [Member] Other Assets [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Pension Plans [Member] Other Assets [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Pension Plans [Member] Level 1 [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Pension Plans [Member] Level 1 [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Pension Plans [Member] Level 1 [Member] Cash and Cash Equivalents [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Pension Plans [Member] Level 1 [Member] Cash and Cash Equivalents [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Pension Plans [Member] Level 1 [Member] International Markets [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Pension Plans [Member] Level 1 [Member] International Markets [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Pension Plans [Member] Level 1 [Member] Large-Cap Companies [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Pension Plans [Member] Level 1 [Member] Large-Cap Companies [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Pension Plans [Member] Level 1 [Member] Mid-Cap Companies [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Pension Plans [Member] Level 1 [Member] Mid-Cap Companies [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Pension Plans [Member] Level 1 [Member] Small-Cap Companies [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Pension Plans [Member] Level 1 [Member] Small-Cap Companies [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Pension Plans [Member] Level 1 [Member] Dividend And Interest Receivable [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Pension Plans [Member] Level 1 [Member] Dividend And Interest Receivable [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Pension Plans [Member] Level 1 [Member] Due To/From Brokers For Sale Of Securities [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Pension Plans [Member] Level 1 [Member] Due To/From Brokers For Sale Of Securities [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Pension Plans [Member] Level 1 [Member] Other Assets [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Pension Plans [Member] Level 1 [Member] Other Assets [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Pension Plans [Member] Level 2 [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Pension Plans [Member] Level 2 [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Pension Plans [Member] Level 2 [Member] Corporate Bonds [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Pension Plans [Member] Level 2 [Member] Corporate Bonds [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Pension Plans [Member] Level 2 [Member] Government Securities [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Pension Plans [Member] Level 2 [Member] Government Securities [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Pension Plans [Member] Level 2 [Member] U.S. Municipal Securities [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Pension Plans [Member] Level 2 [Member] U.S. Municipal Securities [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Pension Plans [Member] Level 2 [Member] Common/Collective And 103-12 Investment Trusts [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Pension Plans [Member] Level 2 [Member] Common/Collective And 103-12 Investment Trusts [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Pension Plans [Member] Level 3 [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Pension Plans [Member] Level 3 [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Pension Plans [Member] Level 3 [Member] Private Equity Partnerships [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Pension Plans [Member] Level 3 [Member] Private Equity Partnerships [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Pension Plans [Member] Level 3 [Member] Insurance Group Annuity Contracts [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Pension Plans [Member] Level 3 [Member] Insurance Group Annuity Contracts [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 United Kingdom [Member] International Markets [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 United Kingdom [Member] International Markets [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Japan [Member] International Markets [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Japan [Member] International Markets [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Netherlands [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Netherlands [Member] International Markets [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Republic Of Korea [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Republic Of Korea [Member] International Markets [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Germany [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Germany [Member] International Markets [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 France [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 France [Member] International Markets [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Switzerland [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Switzerland [Member] International Markets [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Emerging Markets [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Emerging Markets [Member] International Markets [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 No Concentration Greater Than Five Percent In Any One Country [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 No Concentration Greater Than Five Percent In Any One Country [Member] International Markets [Member]
Defined Benefit Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Fair value of plan assets																											$ 914	$ 920	$ 795	$ 2	$ 2	$ 3					$ 9,065	$ 8,132	$ 7,773	$ 275	$ 160	$ 2,443	[1],[2]	$ 1,939	[1],[3]	$ 1,601	[1]	$ 1,462	[1]	$ 216	[1]	$ 221	[1]	$ 21	[1]	$ 17	[1]	$ 2,094	[4]	$ 1,866	[5]	$ 1,172	[6]	$ 1,205	[7]	$ 57	$ 52	$ 914	[8]	$ 920	[9]	$ 229	[10]	$ 172	[11]	$ 2	$ 2	$ 38	$ 42	$ 1	$ 72	$ 2	$ 2	$ 4,597	$ 3,915	$ 275	$ 160	$ 2,443	$ 1,939	$ 1,601	$ 1,462	$ 216	$ 221	$ 21	$ 17	$ 38	$ 42	$ 1	$ 72	$ 2	$ 2	$ 3,552	$ 3,295	$ 2,094	$ 1,866	$ 1,172	$ 1,205	$ 57	$ 52	$ 229	$ 172	$ 916	$ 922	$ 914	$ 920	$ 2	$ 2
Defined Benefit Plan, Actual Plan Asset Allocations			79.00%	83.00%	21.00%	17.00%	81.00%	80.00%	16.00%	18.00%	3.00%	2.00%	88.00%	89.00%	12.00%	11.00%	92.00%	92.00%	8.00%	8.00%	74.00%	71.00%	14.00%	16.00%	12.00%	13.00%																																																																																												20.00%	22.00%	9.00%	10.00%	5.00%	5.00%	5.00%	5.00%	6.00%	8.00%	9.00%	9.00%	7.00%	8.00%	13.00%	15.00%	23.00%	22.00%
Estimated year of liquidation of underlying assets																																	1	1	10	10
Defined benefit plan master trust future funding commitments	$ 331	$ 335
Master Trust Future Funding Commitments Period	10	10

[1] There are no significant concentration of holdings by company or industry.

[2] Holdings are diversified as follows: 20 percent United Kingdom, 9 percent Japan, 9 percent France, 8 percent Switzerland, 8 percent Germany, 5 percent Netherlands, 5 percent Republic of Korea, 15 percent emerging markets and the remaining 22 percent with no concentration greater than 5 percent in any one country.

[3] Holdings are diversified as follows: 22 percent United Kingdom, 10 percent Japan, 9 percent France, 7 percent Switzerland, 6 percent Germany, 5 percent Netherlands, 5 percent Republic of Korea, 13 percent emerging markets and the remaining 23 percent with no concentration greater than 5 percent in any one country.

[4] Includes approximately 79 percent investments in corporate debt with a Standard and Poor's (S&P) rating lower than A and 21 percent investments in corporate debt with an S&P rating A or higher. Holdings include 81 percent U.S. companies, 16 percent international companies and 3 percent emerging market companies.

[5] Includes approximately 83 percent investments in corporate debt with a Standard and Poor's (S&P) rating lower than A and 17 percent investments in corporate debt with an S&P rating A or higher. Holdings include 80 percent U.S. companies, 18 percent international companies and 2 percent emerging market companies.

[6] Includes approximately 88 percent investments in U.S. domestic government securities and 12 percent in emerging market government securities. There are no significant foreign currency risks within this classification.

[7] Includes approximately 89 percent investments in U.S. domestic government securities and 11 percent in emerging market government securities. There are no significant foreign currency risks within this classification.

[8] Includes limited partnerships that invest primarily in U.S. (92 percent) and European (8 percent) buyout opportunities of a range of privately held companies. The Master Trust does not have the right to redeem its limited partnership investment at its net asset value. Instead, the Master Trust receives distributions as the underlying assets are liquidated. It is estimated that the underlying assets of these funds will be gradually liquidated over the next 1 to 10 years. Additionally, the Master Trust has future funding commitments of approximately $331 million over the next 10 years.

[9] Includes limited partnerships that invest primarily in U.S. (92 percent) and European (8 percent) buyout opportunities of a range of privately held companies. The Master Trust does not have the right to redeem its limited partnership investment at its net asset value. Instead, the Master Trust receives distributions as the underlying assets are liquidated. It is estimated that the underlying assets of these funds will be gradually liquidated over the next 1 to 10 years. Additionally, the Master Trust has future funding commitments of approximately $335 million over the next 10 years.

[10] Investment includes 74 percent in an emerging market 103-12 investment trust with investments in emerging country equity securities, 14 percent in Canadian segregated balanced value, income growth and diversified pooled funds and 12 percent in a common/collective trust investing in securities of smaller companies located outside the U.S., including developing markets. Requests for withdrawals must meet specific requirements with advance notice of redemption preferred.

[11] Investment includes 71 percent in an emerging market 103-12 investment trust with investments in emerging country equity securities, 16 percent in Canadian segregated balanced value, income growth and diversified pooled funds and 13 percent in a common/collective trust investing in securities of smaller companies located outside the U.S., including developing markets. Requests for withdrawals must meet specific requirements with advance notice of redemption preferred.

XML

Retirement Benefits (Schedule Of Amounts Recognized In Other Comprehensive Loss) (Detail) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Pension Plans [Member]
Defined Benefit Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Net actuarial loss (gain)	$ 3,943	$ 4,179
Prior service cost (credit)	301	68
Amounts recognized in other comprehensive loss	4,244	4,247
Other Postretirement Benefit Plans [Member]
Defined Benefit Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Net actuarial loss (gain)	(78)	(181)
Prior service cost (credit)	(1,844)	(179)
Amounts recognized in other comprehensive loss	$ (1,922)	$ (360)

XML

Retirement Benefits (Changes In Fair Value Measurements Of Level 3 Investments) (Detail) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Private Equity Partnerships [Member]
Defined Benefit Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Fair Value at January 1	$ 920	$ 795
Relating to assets still held at the reporting date	20	53
Relating to assets sold during the period	102	48
Purchases	96	146
Sales	224	122
Fair Value at December 31	914	920
Insurance Group Annuity Contracts [Member]
Defined Benefit Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Fair Value at January 1	2	3
Sales		1
Fair Value at December 31	$ 2	$ 2

XML

Share Based Compensation (Schedule Of Stock-Based Activities) (Detail) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012
Performance Award [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Outstanding at January 1	6,341,695
Granted	0
Settled	0
Forfeited or Expired	(197,695)
Outstanding at December 31	6,144,000
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term - Outstanding at December 31 (in years)	0.2
Aggregate Intrinsic Value - Outstanding at December 31	$ 4,915,200
Deferred Award [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Outstanding at January 1	7,271,021
Granted	0
Settled	(24,840)
Forfeited or Expired	(481,124)
Outstanding at December 31	6,765,057
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term - Outstanding at December 31 (in years)	0.9
Aggregate Intrinsic Value - Outstanding at December 31	$ 5,412,045

XML

Income Taxes (Deferred Tax Assets And Liabilities) (Detail) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]
Postretirement benefits other than pensions	$ 442	$ 1,075
Rent expense	60	257
Alternative minimum tax credit carryforwards	493	493
Operating loss carryforwards	2,296	2,271
Pensions	2,455	2,337
Frequent flyer obligation	657	680
Gains from lease transactions	5	26
Reorganization items	863	0
Other	963	885
Total deferred tax assets	8,234	8,024
Valuation allowance	(5,084)	(4,802)
Net deferred tax assets	3,150	3,222
Accelerated depreciation and amortization	(2,960)	(3,045)
Other	(190)	(177)
Total deferred tax liabilities	(3,150)	(3,222)
Net deferred tax asset	$ 0	$ 0

XML

Subsequent Events

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Subsequent Events [Abstract]

Subsequent Events

17.         Subsequent Events

Restructuring of Agreements with The Boeing Company and Amendment of Agreement with Airbus S.A.S.

American entered into an agreement on January 11, 2013 (the Restructuring Agreement) with Boeing that provides for the assumption and restructuring of certain existing aircraft purchase agreements (the Restructured Aircraft Purchase Agreements) between Boeing and American, the entering into of a definitive purchase agreement (the MAX purchase agreement) with respect to Boeing 737 MAX aircraft (the MAX aircraft), certain financing commitments for the Boeing 787 aircraft (the 787 aircraft) and certain Boeing 737-8 aircraft (the 737 aircraft), the assumption of certain other aircraft spare parts, support and services agreements, and a comprehensive settlement of the relationship among American and its affiliates and Boeing and certain affiliates of Boeing, including all claims asserted by Boeing and such affiliates in the Chapter 11 Cases, with certain limited exceptions.

The Bankruptcy Court issued an order on January 23, 2013 approving the Restructuring Agreement, assumption of the Restructured Aircraft Purchase Agreements, and the MAX purchase agreement.

The Restructured Aircraft Purchase Agreements provide for the substitution of up to 20 787-8 aircraft for 787-9 aircraft, an accelerated delivery schedule for the 787 aircraft with deliveries scheduled to commence in November 2014 and continue in each calendar year through September 2018, and the confirmation of the purchase of the Boeing 787 aircraft, which previously had been subject to certain reconfirmation rights. Under the Restructured Aircraft Purchase Agreements, American will have the option to purchase 40 737 aircraft, 13 777 aircraft and 58 787 aircraft.

Pursuant to the Restructuring Agreement, American entered into the MAX purchase agreement pursuant to which American will acquire 100 MAX aircraft, equipped with new, more fuel efficient engines. The MAX purchase agreement constitutes the definitive purchase agreement contemplated by and supersedes the agreement entered into by American and Boeing on July 19, 2011 (the 2011 MAX order) that provided for the commitment of American to purchase such MAX aircraft (referred to in the 2011 MAX order as 737RE aircraft). The 2011 MAX order was subject to a number of contingencies, including the parties entering into a definitive purchase agreement and Boeing's approval of the launch of the Boeing 737 re-engined aircraft program, which was approved in August, 2011. Under the MAX purchase agreement, the MAX aircraft are scheduled to be delivered in each of the years 2018 through 2022. In addition, under the MAX purchase agreement, American will have the option to purchase 60 additional MAX aircraft in the years 2020-2025.

American also, on January 11, 2013, entered into an amendment to the A320 Family Aircraft Purchase Agreement with Airbus, dated July 20, 2011 (the Airbus Amendment) specifying the scheduled delivery months of certain aircraft and revising the date by which American must notify Airbus of the engine selection of certain aircraft types. The Airbus Amendment became effective on January 23, 2013, when the Court entered an order approving assumption of the A320 Family Purchase Agreement. Agreements pursuant to which Airbus agreed to providing financing for the purchase of certain aircraft also were assumed.

Reflecting the above transactions, American had total aircraft acquisition commitments as follows:

		Boeing				Airbus
		737 Family	737 MAX	777-300 ER	787 Family	A320  Family	A320 NEO	Total
2013	Purchase	31	—	8	—	—	—	39
	Lease	—	—	—	—	20	—	20
2014	Purchase	5	—	6	2	—	—	13
	Lease	15	—	—	—	35	—	50
2015	Purchase	—	—	2	11	—	—	13
	Lease	20	—	—	—	30	—	50
2016	Purchase	—	—	2	13	—	—	15
	Lease	20	—	—	—	25	—	45
2017	Purchase	—	—	—	9	—	10	19
	Lease	20	—	—	—	20	—	40
2018 and beyond	Purchase	—	100	—	7	—	120	227
	Lease	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Total	Purchase	36	100	18	42	—	130	326
	Lease	75	—	—	—	130	—	205

Subject to assumption of certain of the related agreements, payments for the above purchase commitments and certain engines will approximate $2.3 billion in 2013, $1.5 billion in 2014, $1.7 billion in 2015, $2.1 billion in 2016, $2.1 billion in 2017 and $12.8 billion for 2018 and beyond. These amounts are net of purchase deposits currently held by the manufacturers. American has granted Boeing a security interest in American's purchase deposits with Boeing.

New Capacity Purchase Agreement

On January 23, 2013, American entered into a 12 year capacity purchase agreement with Republic Airline Inc. (Republic), a subsidiary of Republic Airways Holdings, to provide large regional jet flying. Through the agreement, which is subject to approval by the Bankruptcy Court, Republic will acquire 53 Embraer E-175 aircraft featuring a two-class cabin with 12 first class seats and 64 seats in the main cabin. The aircraft, which will fly under the American Eagle brand, will phase into operation at approximately two to three aircraft per month beginning in mid-2013. All 53 aircraft are expected to be in operation by the first quarter of 2015. 

Reflecting the above transaction, American's minimum fixed obligations under its capacity purchase agreements with third party regional airlines will approximate $353 million in 2013, $589 million in 2014, $739 million in 2015, $736 million in 2016, $580 million in 2017 and $4.8 billion in 2018 and beyond. These obligations contemplate minimum levels of flying by the third party airlines under the respective agreements and also reflect assumptions regarding certain costs associated with the minimum levels of flying such as the cost of fuel, insurance, catering, property tax and landing fees. Accordingly, actual payments under these agreements could differ materially from the minimum fixed obligations set forth above.

EETC Transactions

The Company filed a motion with the Bankruptcy Court on October 9, 2012, requesting entry of an order authorizing American to, among other things: (i) obtain postpetition financing in an amount of up to $1.5 billion secured on a first priority basis by, among other things, up to 41 Boeing 737-823 aircraft, 14 Boeing 757-223 aircraft, one Boeing 767-323ER aircraft and 19 Boeing 777-223ER aircraft as part of a new enhanced equipment trust certificate (EETC) financing (the Refinancing EETC) to be offered pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933 as amended, and (ii) use cash on hand (including proceeds of the Refinancing EETC) to indefeasibly repay the existing prepetition obligations secured by such aircraft, as applicable, which are currently financed through, as the case may be, an EETC financing entered into by American in July 2009 (the Series 2009-1 Pass Through Certificates), a secured notes financing entered into by American in July 2009 (the 2009-2 Senior Secured Notes) and an EETC financing entered into by American in October 2011 (the Series 2011-2 Pass Through Certificates and, together with the Series 2009-1 Pass Through Certificates and the 2009-2 Senior Secured Notes, the Existing Financings), in each case without the payment of any make-whole amount or other premium or prepayment penalty. American expects the Refinancing EETC structure to be substantially similar to the structure of the Series 2011-2 Pass Through Certificates, other than the economic terms (such as the interest rate) and certain terms and conditions to be in effect during its current Chapter 11 bankruptcy case.

The Bankruptcy Court approved the motion on January 17, 2013 and entered an order pursuant to such effect on February 1, 2013. The trustees for the Existing Financings have filed notice of appeal of such order of the Bankruptcy Court. The Company intends to continue to assert vigorously its rights to repay the Existing Financings without the payment of any make-whole amount or other premium or prepayment penalty, and the Company is considering all of its options, including the payment of the Existing Financings and closing the Refinancing EETC notwithstanding such appeal.

The Company filed a motion with the Bankruptcy Court on January 24, 2013, requesting entry of an order authorizing American to, among other things, (i) obtain postpetition financing in an amount of up to $750 million secured on a first priority basis by, among other things, up to eight Boeing 737-823 aircraft, one Boeing 777-223ER aircraft, and four Boeing 777-300ER aircraft as part of a new EETC financing (the New EETC) to be offered pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933 as amended, and (ii) use cash on hand (including proceeds of the New EETC) to indefeasibly repay the existing prepetition obligations secured by certain of the Boeing 737-823 and Boeing 777-223ER aircraft, as applicable, which are currently financed through, as the case may be, prepetition mortgage loan facilities that are scheduled to mature in May 2013 and July 2013. American expects the New EETC structure to be substantially similar to other American EETCs, other than the economic terms (such as the interest rate) and certain terms and conditions to be in effect during its current Chapter 11 bankruptcy case.

The Bankruptcy Court entered an order approving the motion on February 15, 2013. There can be no assurance that either the Refinancing EETC or the New EETC will be able to be effected on acceptable terms, or at all.

Merger Agreement

Description of Agreement and Plan of Merger

On February 13, 2013, AMR Corporation (AMR), US Airways Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (US Airways), and AMR Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of AMR (Merger Sub), entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Merger Agreement), providing for a business combination of AMR and US Airways. The Merger Agreement provides that, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, Merger Sub will merge with and into US Airways (the Merger), with US Airways as the surviving corporation and as a wholly owned subsidiary of AMR, Following the Merger, AMR will own, directly or indirectly, all of the equity interests of American Airlines, Inc. (American), US Airways and their direct and indirect subsidiaries (herein, the New American) The Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the Merger, are subject to the approval of the Bankruptcy Court (as defined below), and are to be effected pursuant to a plan of reorganization (the Plan) of the Company and certain of its direct and indirect domestic subsidiaries (the Debtors) in connection with their currently pending cases under chapter 11 of title 11 of the United States Code, 11 U.S.C. Sections 101 et seq. (the Bankruptcy Code) in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (the Bankruptcy Court). The Plan is subject to confirmation and consummation in accordance with the requirements of the Bankruptcy Code.

Subject to the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement, which has been approved by the boards of directors of the respective parties, if the Merger is completed, US Airways stockholders will receive one share of common stock of New American (New American Common Stock) for each share of US Airways common stock. The aggregate number of shares of New American Common Stock issuable to holders of US Airways equity instruments (including stockholders, holders of convertible notes, optionees and holders of restricted stock units) will represent 28% of the diluted capitalization of AMR after giving effect to the Plan. The remaining 72% diluted equity ownership of AMR will be distributable, pursuant to the Plan, to the Debtors' stakeholders, labor unions and certain employees.

All of the equity interests in New American will be issued solely pursuant to the Merger Agreement or the Plan. All existing AMR common stock and other equity interests in AMR will be cancelled pursuant to the Plan, although, as set forth below, holders of such equity interests are expected to receive a recovery in the form of New American Common Stock.

The Merger is intended to qualify, for federal income tax purposes, as a reorganization under the provisions of Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

The Merger Agreement provides that, upon consummation of the Merger, the board of directors of the combined company will initially consist of 12 members, composed of (i) Thomas W. Horton, AMR's current chairman, chief executive officer and president, who will serve as chairman of New American until the earlier of (A) one year after the closing of the Merger and (B) the day immediately prior to the first annual meeting of stockholders of the combined company (provided that such meeting will not occur prior to May 1, 2014), (ii) W. Douglas Parker, US Airways' current chief executive officer, who will serve as chief executive officer of New American and will serve as chairman of New American following the end of Mr. Horton's term, (iii) two independent directors designated by AMR, (iv) three independent directors designated by US Airways, and (iv) five independent directors designated by a search committee consisting of representatives of the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of the Debtors and certain representatives of creditors signatory to the support agreements with AMR referred to below, one of whom will serve

as lead independent director. Subject to applicable law, prior to the Merger, Messrs. Horton and Parker will engage in a planning process for integration purposes.  

AMR and US Airways have each made customary representations, warranties and covenants in the Merger Agreement, including, among others, covenants (i) to conduct their businesses in the ordinary and usual course between the execution of the Merger Agreement and the consummation of the Merger and (ii) not to solicit alternative business combination transactions. In addition, the Merger Agreement contains “no shop” provisions that restrict each party's ability to initiate, solicit or knowingly encourage or facilitate competing third-party proposals for any transaction involving a merger of such party or the acquisition of a significant portion of its stock or assets, although each party may consider competing, unsolicited proposals and enter into discussions or negotiations regarding such proposals, if its board of directors determines that any such acquisition proposal constitutes, or is reasonably likely to lead to, a superior proposal and that the failure to take such action is reasonably likely to be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties under applicable law.

US Airways has agreed to certain additional customary covenants in the Merger Agreement, including, among others, subject to certain exceptions, (i) to cause a stockholder meeting to be held to consider adoption of the Merger Agreement and (ii) for its board of directors to recommend adoption of the Merger Agreement by US Airways' stockholders. AMR has also agreed to certain additional customary covenants in the Merger Agreement, including, among others, subject to certain exceptions, (i) to pursue confirmation of the Plan and (ii) for its board of directors to recommend adoption of the Merger Agreement by the Debtors' stakeholders.

Consummation of the Merger is subject to customary conditions, including, among others: (i) approval of the stockholders of US Airways; (ii) expiration or termination of the applicable waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 and the receipt of certain other regulatory approvals; (iii) absence of any order or injunction prohibiting the consummation of the Merger; (iv) Bankruptcy Court confirmation of the Plan, which must contain certain specified provisions defined in the Merger Agreement; (v) subject to certain exceptions, the accuracy of representations and warranties with respect to the business of AMR or US Airways, as applicable; (vi) each of AMR and US Airways having performed their respective obligations pursuant to the Merger Agreement; and (vii) receipt by each of the Company and US Airways of a customary tax opinion.

The Merger Agreement contains certain termination rights for AMR and US Airways, and further provides that, upon termination of the Merger Agreement under specified circumstances, (i) AMR may be required to pay US Airways a termination fee of $135 million in the event it terminates the agreement to enter into a superior proposal and $195 million if US Airways terminates the Merger Agreement in the event of a knowing and deliberate breach of the Merger Agreement by AMR and (ii) US Airways may be required to pay AMR a termination fee of $55 million in the event it terminates the agreement to enter into a superior proposal and $195 million if AMR terminates the Merger Agreement in the event of a knowing and deliberate breach of the Merger Agreement by US Airways.

Support Agreement and Term Sheet

On February 13, 2013, AMR and the other Debtors entered into a Support and Settlement Agreement (the Support Agreement) with certain holders of certain prepetition claims against one or more of the Debtors (such holders of claims, the Consenting Creditors), aggregating approximately $1.2 billion of prepetition unsecured claims. Pursuant to the terms of the Support Agreement, each Consenting Creditor has agreed, among other things, and subject to certain conditions, to (a) vote in favor of a Plan, which includes certain terms specified in a Term Sheet attached to the Support Agreement (the Term Sheet), (b) generally support confirmation and consummation of the Plan and (c) not to support or solicit any plan in opposition to the Plan. Confirmation and consummation of the Plan are subject to compliance with the provisions of the Bankruptcy Code and to the closing of the Merger.

The Support Agreement may be terminated upon the occurrence of certain events, including: (a) certain breaches by the Debtors or Consenting Creditors under the Support Agreement; (b) termination of the Merger Agreement or the announcement by AMR or US Airways of their intent to terminate the Merger Agreement (in which case the Support Agreement would terminate automatically); (c) the failure to meet certain milestones with respect to achieving confirmation and consummation of the Plan; (d) the filing, amendment or modification of certain documents, including the Plan, in a manner materially inconsistent with the Support Agreement and materially adverse to a Consenting Creditor (in which case the Support Agreement can be terminated by such Consenting Creditor solely with respect to itself); (e) the amendment or modification of the Merger Agreement in a manner that is materially adverse to a Consenting Creditor (in which case the Support Agreement can be terminated by such Consenting Creditor solely with respect to itself); and (f) if the volume weighted average price of US Airways' common stock for the thirty trading days ending on the last trading day immediately prior to the date of termination is less than $10.40. Termination of the Support Agreement would give the Consenting Creditors the right to withdraw their support of the Plan.

As described in the Term Sheet, the Plan implements the Merger, incorporates a compromise and settlement of certain intercreditor and intercompany claim issues, and is to contain the following provisions relating to the treatment of prepetition unsecured claims against the Debtors and equity interests in AMR:

• Unless they elect to receive alternative treatment, holders of prepetition unsecured claims against AMR or American that also are guaranteed by either such company (Double-Dip Unsecured Claims) will receive shares of preferred stock of New American (the New American Preferred Stock) that will be mandatorily convertible into shares of New American Common Stock on each of the 30th, 60th, 90th and 120th day after the effective date of the Plan. Upon the conversion of the New American Preferred Stock on the 120th day after the effective date of the Plan, all New American Preferred Stock will have been converted to New American Common Stock and no New American Preferred Stock will remain outstanding. The conversion price of the New American Preferred Stock will vary on each conversion date, based on the volume weighted average price of the shares of the New American Common Stock on the five trading days immediately preceding each conversion date, at a 3.5% discount, subject to a cap and a floor price. The New American Preferred Stock allocable to the Double-Dip Unsecured Claims will have a face amount equal to the allowed amount of their claims, including post-petition interest at the non-default rate;

• Holders of prepetition unsecured claims that are not Double-Dip Unsecured Claims (and holders of Double-Dip Unsecured Claims that elect to receive such treatment) will receive shares of New American Preferred Stock, as well as shares of New American Common Stock;

• Holders of existing AMR equity interests (including stock, warrants, restricted stock units and options) will receive a distribution of shares of New American Common Stock representing 3.5% of the total number of shares of New American Common Stock (on an as-converted basis) in addition to the potential to receive shares of New American Common Stock above such amount; and

• The satisfaction of certain labor-related claims through the allocation to such claims of shares of New American Common Stock representing 23.6% of the total number of such shares of New American Common Stock ultimately distributed to holders of prepetition general unsecured creditors against the Debtors.

In each case, the distributions made to each of the foregoing stakeholders will be adjusted to take into account any reserves made for disputed claims under the Plan.

XML

Special Charges And Restructuring Activities (Narrative) (Detail) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Restructuring Cost and Reserve [Line Items]
Principal Term Of New Business Plan, Headcount Reduction		10,500
Restructuring Reserve, Period Expense		$ 384
Impairment charge	725		713
Insurance proceeds from partial settlement of claims			576
Other assets	2,738	2,995	2,738
Other liabilities and deferred credits	10,784	8,471	10,784
Catastrophic Liability [Member]
Restructuring Cost and Reserve [Line Items]
Other assets		1,100
Other liabilities and deferred credits		1,100
Employee Charges [Member]
Restructuring Cost and Reserve [Line Items]
Restructuring Reserve, Period Expense		$ 360

XML

Quarterly Financial Data (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Quarterly Financial Information Disclosure [Abstract]

Summarized Financial Data

Unaudited summarized financial data by quarter for 2012 and 2011 (in millions, except per share amounts):

	First     Quarter			Second     Quarter			Third     Quarter			Fourth     Quarter
2012
Operating revenues	$	6,031		$	6,447		$	6,422		$	5,925
Operating income (loss)	(101		)	122			27			(7		)
Net earnings (loss)	(1,676		)	(264		)	(257		)	271
2011
Operating revenues	$	5,527		$	6,109		$	6,371		$	5,950
Operating income (loss)	(266		)	(116		)	10			(798		)
Net earnings (loss)	(431		)	(284		)	(153		)	(1,097		)

XML

Share Based Compensation (Schedule Of Stock Options/SARs Activity) (Detail) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012
Long-Term Incentive Plan [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Options/SARs - Outstanding at January 1	13,809,841
Options/SARs - Granted	0
Options/SARs - Exercised	0
Options/SARs - Forfeited or Expired	(2,539,779)
Options/SARs - Outstanding at December 31	11,270,062
Options/SARs - Exercisable at December 31	6,611,656
Options/SARs - Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term of Options Outstanding (in years)	6.3
Options/SARs - Aggregate Intrinsic Value of Options Outstanding	$ 0
Weighted Average Exercise Price - Outstanding at January 1	$ 10.31
Weighted Average Exercise Price - Granted	$ 0.00
Weighted Average Exercise Price - Exercised	$ 0.00
Weighted Average Exercise Price - Forfeited or Expired	$ 17.22
Weighted Average Exercise Price - Outstanding at December 31	$ 8.75
Weighted Average Exercise Price - Exercisable at December 31	$ 10.44
2003 Plan [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Options/SARs - Outstanding at January 1	13,082,905
Options/SARs - Granted	0
Options/SARs - Exercised	0
Options/SARs - Forfeited or Expired	(403,549)
Options/SARs - Outstanding at December 31	12,679,356
Options/SARs - Exercisable at December 31	12,679,356
Options/SARs - Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term of Options Outstanding (in years)	0.4
Options/SARs - Aggregate Intrinsic Value of Options Outstanding	$ 0
Weighted Average Exercise Price - Outstanding at January 1	$ 5.66
Weighted Average Exercise Price - Granted	$ 0.00
Weighted Average Exercise Price - Exercised	$ 0.00
Weighted Average Exercise Price - Forfeited or Expired	$ 9.02
Weighted Average Exercise Price - Outstanding at December 31	$ 5.55
Weighted Average Exercise Price - Exercisable at December 31	$ 5.55

XML

Quarterly Financial Data (Summarized Financial Data By Quarter) (Detail) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended								12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012	Sep. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2012	Mar. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Sep. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2011	Mar. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Quarterly Financial Information Disclosure [Abstract]
Operating revenues	$ 5,925	$ 6,422	$ 6,447	$ 6,031	$ 5,950	$ 6,371	$ 6,109	$ 5,527	$ 24,825	$ 23,957	$ 22,150
Operating income (loss)	(7)	27	122	(101)	(798)	10	(116)	(266)	41	(1,170)	151
Net earnings (loss)	$ 271	$ (257)	$ (264)	$ (1,676)	$ (1,097)	$ (153)	$ (284)	$ (431)	$ (1,926)	$ (1,965)	$ (469)

XML

Share Based Compensation (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Stock-Based Compensation Awards, Expected Fair Value Assumptions

	20121		2011		2010
Expected volatility	—		73.5% to  75.4%		74.4% to  75.9%
Expected term (in years)	—		4.0		4.0
Risk-free rate	—		0.90% to 2.11%		1.18% to 2.58%
Annual forfeiture rate	—	%	10.0	%	10.0	%

¹ No options/SARs were granted in 2012.

Schedule Of Stock Options/SARs Activity

A summary of stock option/SARs activity under the LTIP Plans and the 2003 Plan as of December 31, 2012, and changes during

the year then ended is presented below:

	LTIP Plans					The 2003 Plan
	Options/SARs			Weighted Average Exercise Price		Options			Weighted Average Exercise Price
Outstanding at January 1	13,809,841			$	10.31	13,082,905			$	5.66
Granted	—			—		—			—
Exercised	—			—		—			—
Forfeited or Expired	(2,539,779		)	17.22		(403,549		)	9.02
Outstanding at December 31	11,270,062			$	8.75	12,679,356			$	5.55
Exercisable at December 31	6,611,656			$	10.44	12,679,356			$	5.55
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term of Options Outstanding (in years)	6.3					0.4
Aggregate Intrinsic Value of Options Outstanding	$	—				$	—

Status And Changes Of Non-Vested Options/SARs

A summary of the status of the Company’s non-vested options/SARs under all plans as of December 31, 2012, and changes during the year ended December 31, 2012, is presented below:

	Options/SARs		Weighted Average Grant Date  Fair Value
Outstanding at January 1	7,468,019		$	3.59
Granted	—		—
Vested	(2,022,036	)	3.89
Forfeited	(787,577	)	3.54
Outstanding at December 31	4,658,406		$	3.47

Performance Award [Member]

Schedule Of Stock-Based Activities

Activity during 2012 for performance awards accounted for as equity awards was:

	Awards		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term	Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at January 1	6,341,695
Granted	—
Settled	—
Forfeited or Expired	(197,695	)
Outstanding at December 31	6,144,000		0.2	$	4,915,200

Deferred Award [Member]

Schedule Of Stock-Based Activities

Activity during 2012 for deferred awards accounted for as equity awards was:

	Shares		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term	Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at January 1	7,271,021
Granted	—
Settled	(24,840	)
Forfeited or Expired	(481,124	)
Outstanding at December 31	6,765,057		0.9	$	5,412,045

XML

Investments And Fair Value Measurements (Short-Term Investments) (Detail) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Schedule of Investments [Line Items]
Short-term investments	$ 3,408	$ 3,714
Overnight Investments, Time Deposits And Repurchase Agreements [Member]
Schedule of Investments [Line Items]
Short-term investments	306	130
Corporate And Bank Notes [Member]
Schedule of Investments [Line Items]
Short-term investments	2,121	1,808
U.S. Government Agency Mortgages [Member]
Schedule of Investments [Line Items]
Short-term investments	545	502
U.S. Government Agency Notes [Member]
Schedule of Investments [Line Items]
Short-term investments		0
Commingled Funds [Member]
Schedule of Investments [Line Items]
Short-term investments	435	1,274
Other [Member]
Schedule of Investments [Line Items]
Short-term investments	$ 1	$ 0

XML

Financial Instruments And Risk Management (Summary Of Carrying Value And Estimated Fair Values Of Long-Term Debt) (Detail) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Carrying Value	$ 8,150	$ 8,247
Secured Variable And Fixed Rate Indebtedness Due Through 2023 [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Carrying Value	3,297	2,952
Enhanced Equipment Trust Certificates Due Through 2021 [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Carrying Value	1,741	1,942
6.00% - 8.50% Special Facility Revenue Bonds Due Through 2036 [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Carrying Value	1,313	1,436
7.50% Senior Secured Notes Due 2016 [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Carrying Value	1,000	1,000
AAdvantage Miles Advance Purchase [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Carrying Value	772	890
Other LT Debt [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Carrying Value	27	27
Classified As Subject To Compromise [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Carrying Value	358	1,642
Fair Value	340	1,160
Classified As Subject To Compromise [Member] | Secured Variable And Fixed Rate Indebtedness Due Through 2023 [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Carrying Value	172	1,456
Fair Value	154	1,123
Classified As Subject To Compromise [Member] | Enhanced Equipment Trust Certificates Due Through 2021 [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Carrying Value	0	0
Fair Value	0	0
Classified As Subject To Compromise [Member] | 6.00% - 8.50% Special Facility Revenue Bonds Due Through 2036 [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Carrying Value	186	186
Fair Value	186	37
Classified As Subject To Compromise [Member] | 7.50% Senior Secured Notes Due 2016 [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Carrying Value	0	0
Fair Value	0	0
Classified As Subject To Compromise [Member] | AAdvantage Miles Advance Purchase [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Carrying Value	0	0
Fair Value	0	0
Classified As Subject To Compromise [Member] | Other LT Debt [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Carrying Value	0	0
Fair Value	0	0
Not Classified As Subject to Compromise[Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Carrying Value	8,150	8,247
Fair Value	8,142	7,444
Not Classified As Subject to Compromise[Member] | Secured Variable And Fixed Rate Indebtedness Due Through 2023 [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Carrying Value	3,297	2,952
Fair Value	3,143	2,647
Not Classified As Subject to Compromise[Member] | Enhanced Equipment Trust Certificates Due Through 2021 [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Carrying Value	1,741	1,942
Fair Value	1,811	1,927
Not Classified As Subject to Compromise[Member] | 6.00% - 8.50% Special Facility Revenue Bonds Due Through 2036 [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Carrying Value	1,313	1,436
Fair Value	1,308	1,230
Not Classified As Subject to Compromise[Member] | 7.50% Senior Secured Notes Due 2016 [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Carrying Value	1,000	1,000
Fair Value	1,074	711
Not Classified As Subject to Compromise[Member] | AAdvantage Miles Advance Purchase [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Carrying Value	772	890
Fair Value	779	902
Not Classified As Subject to Compromise[Member] | Other LT Debt [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Carrying Value	27	27
Fair Value	$ 27	$ 27

XML

Indebtedness (Schedule Of Maturities Of Long Term Debt And Operating Lease Payments) (Detail) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2012
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Next Twelve Months	$ 1,481
Year Two	1,009
Year Three	764
Year Four	1,756
Year Five	534
Principal Not Subject To Compromise [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Next Twelve Months	1,388
Year Two	857
Year Three	758
Year Four	1,751
Year Five	492
Principal Subject To Compromise [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Next Twelve Months	93
Year Two	152
Year Three	6
Year Four	5
Year Five	$ 42

XML

Reorganization (Schedule Of Reorganization Items) (Detail) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012		Dec. 31, 2011		Dec. 31, 2010
Reorganizations [Abstract]
Pension and postretirement benefits	$ (66)		$ 0
Rejection of facility bond related obligations	1,951	[1],[2]	102	[1],[2]
Professional fees	227		14
Debtor Reorganization Items, Other Expense (Income)	67		0
Total reorganization items, net	$ 2,179		$ 116		$ 0

[1] Amounts include allowed claims (claims approved by the Bankruptcy Court) and estimated allowed claims relating to entry of orders treating as unsecured claims with respect to facility agreements supporting certain issuances of special facility revenue bonds. The Debtors record an estimated claim associated with the treatment of claims with respect to facility agreements when the applicable motion is filed with the Bankruptcy Court and the Debtors believe that it is probable that the motion will be approved, and there is sufficient information to estimate the claim. See above, "Rejection of Executory Contracts," for further information.

[2] Amounts include allowed claims (claims approved by the Bankruptcy Court) and estimated allowed claims relating to the rejection or modification of financings related to aircraft. The Debtors record an estimated claim associated with the rejection or modification of a financing when the applicable motion is filed with the Bankruptcy Court to reject or modify such financing and the Debtors believe that it is probable the motion will be approved, and there is sufficient information to estimate the claim. Modifications of the financings related to aircraft remain subject to conditions, including reaching agreement on definitive documentation. See above, "Special Protection Applicable to Leases and Secured Financing of Aircraft and Aircraft Equipment," for further information.

XML

Reorganization

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Reorganizations [Abstract]

Reorganization

1.        Chapter 11 Reorganization

Overview

On November 29, 2011 (the Petition Date) AMR, American, AMR’s principal subsidiary, and certain of American and AMR’s direct and indirect domestic subsidiaries (collectively, the Debtors) filed voluntary petitions for relief (the Chapter 11 Cases) under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code (the Bankruptcy Code), in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (the Bankruptcy Court). The Chapter 11 Cases are being jointly administered under the caption “In re AMR Corporation, et al, Case No. 11-15463-SHL.”

The Company and the other Debtors are operating as “debtors in possession” under the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court and the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code. In general, as debtors in possession under the Bankruptcy Code, we are authorized to continue to operate as an ongoing business but may not engage in transactions outside the ordinary course of business without the prior approval of the Bankruptcy Court. The Bankruptcy Code enables the Company to continue to operate its business without interruption, and the Bankruptcy Court has granted additional relief covering, among other things, obligations to (i) employees, (ii) taxing authorities, (iii) insurance providers, (iv) independent contractors for improvement projects, (v) foreign vendors, (vi) other airlines pursuant to certain interline agreements, and (vii) certain vendors deemed critical to the Debtors’ operations.

While operating as debtors in possession under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, the Debtors may sell or otherwise dispose of or liquidate assets or settle liabilities, subject to the approval of the Bankruptcy Court or otherwise as permitted in the ordinary course of business. The Debtors have not yet prepared or filed with the Bankruptcy Court a plan of reorganization. The Debtors have the exclusive right to file a plan of reorganization through and including April 15, 2013, subject to the ability of third parties to file motions to terminate the Debtors' exclusivity period. If the Debtors file a plan of reorganization on or prior to such date, the Debtors will have an exclusive period to solicit and obtain acceptances for such plan through and including June 17, 2013. The Debtors have the right to seek further extensions of such exclusivity periods, subject to a statutory limit of 18 months from the Petition Date in the case of filing a plan of reorganization, and 20 months from the Petition Date in the case of soliciting and obtaining acceptances. The ultimate plan of reorganization, which would be subject to acceptance by the requisite majorities of empowered creditors under the Bankruptcy Code and approval by the Bankruptcy Court, could materially change the amounts and classifications in the consolidated financial statements.

The Company’s Chapter 11 Cases followed an extended effort by the Company to restructure its business to strengthen its competitive and financial position. However, the Company’s substantial cost disadvantage compared to its larger competitors, all of which restructured their costs and debt through Chapter 11, became increasingly untenable given the accelerating impact of global economic uncertainty and resulting revenue instability, volatile and rising fuel prices, and intensifying competitive challenges.

No assurance can be given as to the value, if any, that may be ascribed to the Debtors’ various prepetition liabilities and other securities. The Company cannot predict what the ultimate value of any of its or the other Debtors' securities may be.

General Information

Notices to Creditors; Effect of Automatic Stay. The Debtors have notified all known current or potential creditors that the Chapter 11 Cases were filed. Subject to certain exceptions under the Bankruptcy Code, the filing of the Debtors’ Chapter 11 Cases automatically enjoined, or stayed, the continuation of most judicial or administrative proceedings or filing of other actions against the Debtors or their property to recover on, collect or secure a claim arising prior to the Petition Date. Thus, for example, most creditor actions to obtain possession of property from the Debtors, or to create, perfect or enforce any lien against the property of the Debtors, or to collect on monies owed or otherwise exercise rights or remedies with respect to a prepetition claim, are enjoined unless and until the Bankruptcy Court lifts the automatic stay as to any such claim. Vendors are being paid for goods furnished and services provided after the Petition Date in the ordinary course of business.

Appointment of Creditors’ Committee. On December 5, 2011, the U.S. Trustee appointed the Creditors’ Committee (Creditors' Committee) for the Chapter 11 Cases.

Retirement and Life Insurance Benefits. See Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements for information regarding modifications to retirement and life insurance benefits.

Rejection of Executory Contracts. Under section 365 and other relevant sections of the Bankruptcy Code, the Debtors may assume, assume and assign, or reject certain executory contracts and unexpired leases, including, without limitation, agreements relating to aircraft and aircraft engines (collectively, Aircraft Property) and leases of real property, subject to the approval of the Bankruptcy

Court and certain other conditions.  As of December 31, 2012, the Bankruptcy Court had entered orders granting the Debtors' motions to assume 526 and reject 10 unexpired leases of non-residential real property and had entered various orders extending, by the Debtors' agreement with certain landlords, the date by which the Debtors must assume or reject an additional 37 unexpired leases of non-residential real property. As of December 31, 2012, the Company had also entered into stipulations or agreed orders providing that the claims with respect to special facility revenue bonds at Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport, Fort Worth Alliance Airport and Luis Muñoz Marín International Airport in San Juan, Puerto Rico were general unsecured claims.

In general, rejection of an executory contract or unexpired lease is treated as a prepetition breach of the executory contract or unexpired lease in question and, subject to certain exceptions, relieves the Debtors from performing their future obligations under such executory contract or unexpired lease but entitles the contract counterparty or lessor to a prepetition general unsecured claim for damages caused by such deemed breach. Counterparties to such rejected contracts or leases have the right to file claims against the Debtors’ estate for such damages. Generally, the assumption of an executory contract or unexpired lease requires the Debtors to cure existing defaults under such executory contract or unexpired lease.

Any description of an executory contract or unexpired lease elsewhere in these Notes or in the report to which these Notes are attached, including where applicable the Debtors’ express termination rights or a quantification of their obligations, must be read in conjunction with, and is qualified by, any rights the Debtors or counterparties have under section 365 of the Bankruptcy Code.

The Debtors expect that liabilities subject to compromise and resolution in the Chapter 11 Cases will arise in the future as a result of damage claims created by the Debtors’ rejection of various executory contracts and unexpired leases. Due to the uncertain nature of many of the potential rejection claims, the magnitude of such claims is not reasonably estimable at this time. Such claims may be material (see “Liabilities Subject to Compromise” in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements).

Special Protection Applicable to Leases and Secured Financing of Aircraft and Aircraft Equipment. Notwithstanding the general discussion above of the impact of the automatic stay, under section 1110 of the Bankruptcy Code, beginning 60 days after filing a petition under Chapter 11, certain secured parties, lessors and conditional sales vendors may have a right to take possession of certain qualifying Aircraft Property that is leased or subject to a security interest or conditional sale contract, unless the Debtors, subject to approval by the Bankruptcy Court, agree to perform under the applicable agreement, and cure any defaults as provided in section 1110 (other than defaults of a kind specified in section 365(b)(2) of the Bankruptcy Code). Taking such action does not preclude the Debtors from later rejecting the applicable lease or abandoning the Aircraft Property subject to the related security agreement, or from later seeking to renegotiate the terms of the related financing.

The Debtors may extend the 60-day period by agreement of the relevant financing party, with Bankruptcy Court approval. In the absence of an agreement or cure as described above or such an extension, the financing party may take possession of the Aircraft Property and enforce its contractual rights or remedies to sell, lease or otherwise retain or dispose of such equipment.

The 60-day period under section 1110 in the Chapter 11 Cases expired on January 27, 2012. In accordance with the Bankruptcy Court’s Order Authorizing the Debtors to (i) Enter into Agreements Under Section 1110(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, (ii) Enter into Stipulations to Extend the Time to Comply with Section 1110 of the Bankruptcy Code and (iii) File Redacted Section 1110(b) Stipulations, dated December 23, 2011, the Debtors have entered into agreements to extend the automatic stay or agreed to perform and cure defaults under financing agreements with respect to certain aircraft in their fleet and other Aircraft Property. With respect to certain Aircraft Property, the Debtors have reached agreements on, or agreements on key aspects of, renegotiated terms of the related financings, and the Debtors are continuing to negotiate terms with respect to certain of their other Aircraft Property financings. The ultimate outcome of these negotiations cannot be predicted with certainty. To the extent the Debtors are unable to reach definitive agreements with Aircraft Property financing parties, those parties may seek to repossess the subject Aircraft Property. The loss of a significant number of aircraft could result in a material adverse effect on the Debtors’ financial and operating performance.

In accordance with section 1110 of the Bankruptcy Code, as of December 31, 2012, the Company had (i) rejected 40 leases relating to 21 MD-80 aircraft, four Fokker 100 aircraft, seven Boeing 757-200 aircraft and eight spare engines; (ii) relinquished one Airbus A300-600R aircraft that was subject to a mortgage; and (iii) made elections under section 1110(a) of the Bankruptcy Code to retain 340 aircraft and 87 spare engines, including Boeing 737-800, Boeing 757-200, Boeing 767-300ER, Boeing 777-200ER, Bombardier CRJ-700, and McDonnell Douglas MD-80 aircraft, on the terms provided in the related financing documents. In addition, as of December 31, 2012, the Company had reached agreement on revised economic terms of the financings of 155 aircraft, comprising 83 MD-80 aircraft, nine Boeing 737-800 aircraft, 36 Boeing 757-200 aircraft, 11 Boeing 767-200ER aircraft, 13 Boeing 767-300ER aircraft and three Boeing 777-200ER aircraft (which agreements are subject to certain conditions, including reaching agreement on definitive documentation). Those 155 aircraft are substantially all of the mainline aircraft in the Company's fleet for which it expects to negotiate revised economic terms in the Chapter 11 Cases. In addition, the Company reached an agreement with the lessor to modify the leases of 39 Super ATR aircraft. As of December 31, 2012, 30 of the Super ATR aircraft had been returned to the lessor as allowed under the modified agreement. The remaining 9 Super ATR aircraft are expected to be returned to the

lessor in 2013. 

Lastly, the Company entered into a series of agreements with the lender with respect to its 216 Embraer RJ aircraft and certain other interested parties pursuant to which the Company (i) surrendered 18 Embraer RJ 135 aircraft on June 21, 2012, (ii) subject to certain conditions (including reaching agreement on definitive documentation), will restructure the mortgage debt encumbering 59 Embraer 140 aircraft and 68 Embraer 145 aircraft and (iii) transferred and leased back its remaining 21 Embraer RJ 135 aircraft. The debt encumbering 50 Embraer 145 aircraft will not be reduced. The Company's entry into these transactions was approved by the Bankruptcy Court on November 8, 2012.

Magnitude of Potential Claims. On February 27, 2012, the Debtors filed with the Bankruptcy Court schedules and statements of financial affairs setting forth, among other things, the assets and liabilities of the Debtors, subject to the assumptions filed in connection therewith. All of the schedules are subject to further amendment or modification.

Bankruptcy Rule 3003(c)(3) requires the Bankruptcy Court to fix the time within which proofs of claim must be filed in a Chapter 11 case pursuant to section 501 of the Bankruptcy Code. This Bankruptcy Rule also provides that any creditor who asserts a claim against the Debtors that arose prior to the Petition Date and whose claim (i) is not listed on the Debtors' schedules or (ii) is listed on the schedules as disputed, contingent, or unliquidated, must file a proof of claim. On May 4, 2012, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order that established July 16, 2012 at 5:00 p.m. (Eastern Time) as the deadline to file proofs of claim against any Debtor. More information regarding the filing of proofs of claim can be obtained at www.amrcaseinfo.com. Information on this website is not incorporated into or otherwise made a part of this report.

As of February 13, 2013, approximately 13,366 claims totaling about $290.0 billion have been filed with the Bankruptcy Court against the Debtors. Of those claims, approximately 350 claims aggregating approximately $59 million were filed after the Bar Date. We expect new and amended claims to be filed in the future, including claims amended to assign values to claims originally filed with no designated value. We have identified, and we expect to continue to identify, many claims that we believe should be disallowed by the Bankruptcy Court because they are duplicative, are without merit, are overstated or for other reasons. As of February 13, 2013, the Bankruptcy Court has disallowed approximately $100.2 billion of claims and has not yet ruled on our other objections to claims, the disputed portions of which aggregate to an additional $14.8 billion. We expect to continue to file objections in the future. Because the process of analyzing and objecting to claims is ongoing, the amount of disallowed claims may increase significantly in the future. The Debtors have recorded amounts for claims for which there was sufficient information to estimate the claim.

Differences between amounts scheduled by the Debtors and claims by creditors will be investigated and resolved in connection with the claims resolution process. In light of the expected number of creditors, the claims resolution process may take considerable time to complete. Accordingly, the ultimate number and amount of allowed claims is not presently known, nor can the ultimate recovery with respect to allowed claims be presently ascertained.

Collective Bargaining Agreements. The Bankruptcy Code provides a process for the modification and/or rejection of collective bargaining agreements (CBAs). In particular, section 1113(c) of the Bankruptcy Code permits a debtor to reject its CBAs if the debtor satisfies a number of statutorily prescribed substantive and procedural prerequisites and obtains the Bankruptcy Court's approval to reject the CBAs. The section 1113(c) process requires that a debtor must make proposals to its unions to modify existing CBAs based on the most complete and reliable information available at the time the proposals are made. The proposed modifications must be necessary to permit the reorganization of the debtor and must assure that all the affected parties are treated fairly and equitably. The debtor must provide the unions with all information necessary to evaluate the proposals, and meet at reasonable times and confer in good faith with the unions in an effort to reach mutually agreeable modifications to the CBAs. American commenced the section 1113(c) process with its unions (APA, APFA and TWU) on February 1, 2012, and negotiated in good faith with the unions for consensual agreements that achieve the necessary level of labor cost savings. Because consensual agreements had not been reached, and given American's need to restructure its labor costs expeditiously, the Debtors filed a motion with the Bankruptcy Court on March 27, 2012 requesting approval to reject the CBAs.

The Court hearing on the Debtors' request to reject the CBAs began on April 23, 2012 and concluded the week of May 21, 2012. After the filing of its request to reject its CBAs, American and the unions continued to negotiate in good faith toward consensual agreements. Those negotiations resulted in ratified agreements with all seven TWU-represented groups (Fleet Service Clerks, Dispatchers, Ground School Instructors, Maintenance Control Technicians, Simulator Technicians, Mechanics and Related (M&R), and Stores), all of which have been approved by the Bankruptcy Court. On July 20, 2012, APFA sent American's proposed Last Best and Final Offer (LBFO) to its membership for a ratification vote, and on August 19, 2012 APFA announced the LBFO was ratified by the membership.  This new agreement was approved by the Bankruptcy Court on September 12, 2012. Having secured Court approval of the APFA and all seven TWU agreements, American has begun implementing the terms of all of its new agreements.

In August 2012, APA announced that its membership did not ratify a tentative agreement reached by the parties in June.  Following its initial decision denying American's request to reject the APA CBA, the Bankruptcy Court granted American's renewed motion to reject that agreement and entered an order on September 5, 2012 authorizing American to reject the pilot CBA. In accordance with the Bankruptcy Court's ruling, American began implementing certain terms and conditions of employment for pilots that the Bankruptcy Court determined were fair and necessary for the Debtors' successful restructuring. American and APA continued to negotiate in good faith toward a new pilot agreement, and on November 9, 2012, the parties reached a tentative agreement on a new comprehensive CBA. On December 7, 2012, the APA announced the tentative agreement was ratified. The new CBA was approved by the Bankruptcy Court on December 19, 2012, and American has begun implementing the terms of its new agreement with the APA. A small group of American pilots is appealing the Bankruptcy Court's decisions granting American's renewed motion to reject the pilot CBA and approving the new pilot CBA, and those appeals are pending in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.

AMR Eagle commenced the Section 1113(c) process with its unions on March 21, 2012. On July 27, 2012, AMR Eagle reached a tentative agreement with the Association of Flight Attendants. That tentative agreement was ratified by the flight attendants on September 7, 2012.  On August 8, 2012, AMR Eagle reached an agreement-in-principle with the Air Line Pilots Association ("ALPA").  The ALPA Master Executive Council accepted the terms of the agreement-in-principle on September 12, 2012 and the tentative agreement was ratified by the pilot group on October 8, 2012.  On July 20, 2012, AMR Eagle and the TWU reached a tentative agreement with the Mechanics and Related and Fleet Service Clerks groups.  On August 24, 2012, the TWU announced that the Fleet Service Clerks group ratified its tentative agreement and that the Mechanics and Related group did not ratify its tentative agreement.  Because consensual agreements had not been reached with the TWU represented Mechanics, Ground School Instructors and Dispatchers, AMR Eagle filed a motion with the Bankruptcy Court on September 7, 2012 requesting approval to reject those CBAs. AMR Eagle continued to negotiate in good faith with the TWU with respect to each of those work groups. On October 3, 2012, AMR Eagle and the TWU reached tentative agreements with the Mechanics and Related and the Ground School Instructors groups.  On October 8, 2012, AMR Eagle reached a tentative agreement with the TWU represented Dispatch group.  The tentative agreements for Mechanics, Ground School Instructors and Dispatchers were sent to those work groups for a ratification vote. On October 26, 2012, AMR Eagle's Mechanics and Ground School Instructors voted to ratify their tentative agreements, and the Dispatchers did not ratify their tentative agreement.  A hearing on AMR Eagle’s Section 1113 motion to reject the Dispatchers CBA, originally scheduled to begin on November 14, 2012, was continued until December 10, 2012. On December 3, 2012, AMR Eagle reached a second tentative agreement with the TWU represented Dispatchers and the membership ratified the tentative agreement on December 18, 2012. All of the new AMR Eagle CBAs were approved by the Bankruptcy Court on December 21, 2012. AMR Eagle has begun implementing the terms of all the new CBAs.

Availability and Utilization of Net Operating Losses. The availability and utilization of net operating losses (and utilization of alternative minimum tax credits) after the Debtors’ emergence from Chapter 11 is uncertain at this time and will be highly influenced by the composition of the plan of reorganization that is ultimately pursued. On January 27, 2012, the Bankruptcy Court issued a Final Order Establishing Notification Procedures for Substantial Claimholders and Equityholders and Approving Restrictions on Certain Transfers of Interests in the Debtors’ Estates, which restricts trading in AMR's common stock and establishes certain procedures and potential restrictions with respect to the transfer of claims. The order is intended to prevent certain transfers of the Company’s common stock and certain transfers of claims against the Debtors that could impair the ability of one or more of the Debtors’ estates to use their net operating loss carryovers and certain other tax attributes currently or on a reorganized basis. Any acquisition, disposition, or other transfer of equity or claims on or after November 29, 2011 in violation of the restrictions set forth in the order will be null and void ab initio and/or subject to sanctions as an act in violation of the automatic stay under sections 105(a) and 362 of the Bankruptcy Code. The order applies to (i) “Substantial Equityholders,” i.e., persons who are, or as a result of a transaction would become, the beneficial owner of approximately 4.5 percent of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock and (ii) “Substantial Claimholders,” i.e., persons who are, or as a result of a transaction become, the beneficial owner of unsecured claims in excess of a threshold amount of unsecured claims (initially $190 million of unsecured claims, but which may be subsequently increased or decreased under certain circumstances in connection with the Debtors’ filing of a Chapter 11 plan). In the case of Substantial Equityholders, the order imposes current restrictions with respect to the acquisition or disposition of the Company’s stock, and certain notifications may be required. In the case of Substantial Claimholders, the order imposes a procedure pursuant to which, under certain circumstances, the claims acquired during the Chapter 11 Cases may have to be resold, and certain notifications may be required. The Merger Agreement provides that the procedures of the order, as in effect or as amended with the reasonable approval of US Airways, will be used to obtain ownership information from Substantial Claimholders. See discussion in Item 1A, "Risk Factors - Chapter 11 Reorganization Risks" regarding the potential impact of these rules on the company's utilization of its net operating losses post emergence from bankruptcy and in Item 1A, "Risk Factors - Common Stock Risks" regarding the establishing of limitations on the transfer of AMR's common stock post emergence from bankruptcy.

Liabilities Subject to Compromise

The following table summarizes the components of liabilities subject to compromise included on the Consolidated Balance Sheet

as of December 31, 2012 and 2011:

(in millions)
	2012		2011
Long-term debt	$	358	$	1,642
Estimated allowed claims on aircraft lease and debt obligations and facility lease and bond obligations	3,716		1,868
Pension and postretirement benefits	1,250		—
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities	370		438
Other	—		4
Total liabilities subject to compromise	$	5,694	$	3,952

Long-term debt, including undersecured debt, classified as subject to compromise as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 consisted of (in millions):

	2012		2011
Secured variable and fixed rate indebtedness due through 2023 (effective rates from 1.00%-13.00% at December 31, 2012)	172		1,456
6.00%—8.50% special facility revenue bonds due through 2036	186		186
	$	358	$	1,642

Liabilities subject to compromise refers to prepetition obligations which may be impacted by the Chapter 11 reorganization process. These amounts represent the Debtors’ current estimate of known or potential prepetition obligations to be resolved in connection with the Chapter 11 Cases.

In accordance with ASC 852, substantially all of the Company’s unsecured debt has been classified as liabilities subject to compromise. Additionally, certain of the Company’s undersecured debt instruments have also been classified as liabilities subject to compromise.

As a result of the modifications to the retirement benefits as discussed in Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements, a portion of the pension and postretirement benefits liability, primarily relating to retiree medical and other benefits, was classified as liabilities subject to compromise as of December 31, 2012.

Differences between liabilities the Debtors have estimated and the claims filed, or to be filed, will be investigated and resolved in connection with the claims resolution process. The Company will continue to evaluate these liabilities throughout the Chapter 11 Cases and adjust amounts as necessary. Such adjustments may be material. In light of the expected number of creditors, the claims resolution process may take considerable time to complete. Accordingly, the ultimate number and amount of allowed claims is not presently known.

Reorganization Items, net

Reorganization items refer to revenues, expenses (including professional fees), realized gains and losses and provisions for losses that are realized or incurred in the Chapter 11 Cases. The following table summarizes the components included in reorganization items, net on the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011:

(in millions)
	2012			2011
Pension and postretirement benefits	$	(66	)	$	—
Aircraft and facility financing renegotiations and rejections (1)(2)	1,951			102
Professional fees	227			14
Other	$	67		—
Total reorganization items, net	$	2,179		$	116

(1) Amounts include allowed claims (claims approved by the Bankruptcy Court) and estimated allowed claims relating to the rejection or modification of financings related to aircraft. The Debtors record an estimated claim associated with the rejection or modification of a financing when the applicable motion is filed with the Bankruptcy Court to reject or modify such financing and the Debtors believe that it is probable the motion will be approved, and there is sufficient information

to estimate the claim. Modifications of the financings related to aircraft remain subject to conditions, including reaching agreement on definitive documentation. See above, “Special Protection Applicable to Leases and Secured Financing of Aircraft and Aircraft Equipment,” for further information.

(2) Amounts include allowed claims (claims approved by the Bankruptcy Court) and estimated allowed claims relating to entry of orders treating as unsecured claims with respect to facility agreements supporting certain issuances of special facility revenue bonds. The Debtors record an estimated claim associated with the treatment of claims with respect to facility agreements when the applicable motion is filed with the Bankruptcy Court and the Debtors believe that it is probable that the motion will be approved, and there is sufficient information to estimate the claim. See above, “Rejection of Executory Contracts,” for further information.

Claims related to reorganization items are reflected in liabilities subject to compromise on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2012 and 2011.

XML

Indebtedness (Narrative) (Detail) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010	Dec. 31, 2009
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Bankruptcy Claims, Amount of Claims Filed	$ 290,000,000,000
Amount paid by Citibank for miles				1,000,000,000
Collateral Already Posted, Aggregate Fair Value	600,000
Interest Paid, Net	498,000,000	628,000,000	627,000,000
Principal Not Subject To Compromise [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Payments Not Made Due to Chapter 11 Proceedings	1,000,000
Principal Subject To Compromise [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Payments Not Made Due to Chapter 11 Proceedings	50,000,000
Secured Debt, Tax Exempt [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Guarantor Obligations, Maximum Exposure, Undiscounted	1,500,000,000
Secured Debt [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Guarantor Obligations, Maximum Exposure, Undiscounted	4,200,000,000
Unsecured Debt [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Guarantor Obligations, Maximum Exposure, Undiscounted	842,000,000
Lease [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Guarantor Obligations, Maximum Exposure, Undiscounted	6,300,000
Pass Through Trust Certificates Series 2011-1 [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Debt Instrument, Face Amount		657,000,000
Debt Instrument, Issuance Date		January 25, 2011
Pass Through Trust Certificates Series 2011-1 [Member] | Series A Equipment Notes [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Percentage of debt instrument, interest rate	5.25%
Pass Through Trust Certificates Series 2011-1 [Member] | Series B Equipment Notes [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Percentage of debt instrument, interest rate	7.00%
7.50% Senior Secured Notes Due 2016 [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Debt Instrument, Face Amount		1,000,000,000
Debt Instrument, Issuance Date		March 2011
Percentage of debt instrument, interest rate	7.50%
Pass Throught Trust Certificates Series 2011-2 [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Debt Instrument, Face Amount		726,000,000
Debt Instrument, Issuance Date		October 4, 2011
Percentage of debt instrument, interest rate		8.625%
AAdvantage Miles Advance Purchase [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Loans Payable				890,000,000
Deferred Revenue, Additions				110,000,000
10.5% Senior Secured Notes Due 2012 [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Collateral Already Posted, Aggregate Fair Value	41,000,000
Debt Instrument Number Of Aircraft Collateralized	143
Maximum Redemption Date March 15, 2013 [Member] | 7.50% Senior Secured Notes Due 2016 [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Redemption Price	100.00%
Maximum Redemption Date March 15, 2014 [Member] | 7.50% Senior Secured Notes Due 2016 [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Redemption Price	103.00%
Proceeds redeemable from equity offerings, percentage	35.00%
Redemption price with equity proceeds	107.50%
Maximum Redeemable During Twelve Month Period	10.00%
Embraer RJ [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Reached Agreement with Aircraft Lender	216
Troubled Debt Restructuring Debtor, Current Period, Gain (Loss) on Restructuring	380,000,000
Troubled Debt Restructuring, Debtor, Current Period, Gain (Loss) on Restructuring, Per Share, Net	$ 1.13
Bankruptcy Claims, Amount of Claims Filed	(592,000,000)
Troubled Debt Restructuring, Debtor, Current Period, Gain (Loss) on Transfer of Assets, Net of Tax	(64,000,000)
Debtor Reorganization Items, Net Loss on Claims and Troubled Debt Restructuring	$ (276,000,000)
Embraer Rj One Three Five [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Airplanes Surrendered to Lender	18
Aircraft to be Transferred to Lender and Leased Back	21
Embraer One Four Zero [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Mortgage Debt to be Resturctured Aircraft	59
Embraer One Four Five [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Mortgage Debt to be Resturctured Aircraft	68
Aircraft for which debt wil not be reduced	50

XML

Subsequent Events (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Subsequent Events [Abstract]

Subsequent Events Schedule Of Aircraft Acquisition Commitments [Table Text Block] [Table Text Block]

Reflecting the above transactions, American had total aircraft acquisition commitments as follows:

		Boeing				Airbus
		737 Family	737 MAX	777-300 ER	787 Family	A320  Family	A320 NEO	Total
2013	Purchase	31	—	8	—	—	—	39
	Lease	—	—	—	—	20	—	20
2014	Purchase	5	—	6	2	—	—	13
	Lease	15	—	—	—	35	—	50
2015	Purchase	—	—	2	11	—	—	13
	Lease	20	—	—	—	30	—	50
2016	Purchase	—	—	2	13	—	—	15
	Lease	20	—	—	—	25	—	45
2017	Purchase	—	—	—	9	—	10	19
	Lease	20	—	—	—	20	—	40
2018 and beyond	Purchase	—	100	—	7	—	120	227
	Lease	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Total	Purchase	36	100	18	42	—	130	326
	Lease	75	—	—	—	130	—	205

XML

Summary of Accounting Policies (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Property, Plant and Equipment [Table Text Block]

The depreciable lives used for the principal depreciable asset classifications are:

	Depreciable Life
American jet aircraft and engines	20 - 30 years
Other regional aircraft and engines	16 - 20 years
Major rotable parts, avionics and assemblies	Life of equipment to which applicable
Improvements to leased flight equipment	Lesser of remaining lease term or expected useful life
Buildings and improvements (principally on leased land)	5 - 30 years or term of lease, including estimated renewal options when renewal is economically compelled at key airports
Furniture, fixtures and other equipment	3 - 10 years
Capitalized software	5 - 10 years

XML

Reorganization (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Reorganizations [Abstract]

Schedule Liabilities Subject to Compromise [Table Text Block]

Liabilities Subject to Compromise

The following table summarizes the components of liabilities subject to compromise included on the Consolidated Balance Sheet

as of December 31, 2012 and 2011:

(in millions)
	2012		2011
Long-term debt	$	358	$	1,642
Estimated allowed claims on aircraft lease and debt obligations and facility lease and bond obligations	3,716		1,868
Pension and postretirement benefits	1,250		—
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities	370		438
Other	—		4
Total liabilities subject to compromise	$	5,694	$	3,952

Schedule of Liabilities Subject to Compromise, Debt [Table Text Block]

Long-term debt, including undersecured debt, classified as subject to compromise as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 consisted of (in millions):

	2012		2011
Secured variable and fixed rate indebtedness due through 2023 (effective rates from 1.00%-13.00% at December 31, 2012)	172		1,456
6.00%—8.50% special facility revenue bonds due through 2036	186		186
	$	358	$	1,642

Schedule Of Reorganization Items [Table Text Block]

Reorganization Items, net

Reorganization items refer to revenues, expenses (including professional fees), realized gains and losses and provisions for losses that are realized or incurred in the Chapter 11 Cases. The following table summarizes the components included in reorganization items, net on the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011:

(in millions)
	2012			2011
Pension and postretirement benefits	$	(66	)	$	—
Aircraft and facility financing renegotiations and rejections (1)(2)	1,951			102
Professional fees	227			14
Other	$	67		—
Total reorganization items, net	$	2,179		$	116

(1) Amounts include allowed claims (claims approved by the Bankruptcy Court) and estimated allowed claims relating to the rejection or modification of financings related to aircraft. The Debtors record an estimated claim associated with the rejection or modification of a financing when the applicable motion is filed with the Bankruptcy Court to reject or modify such financing and the Debtors believe that it is probable the motion will be approved, and there is sufficient information

to estimate the claim. Modifications of the financings related to aircraft remain subject to conditions, including reaching agreement on definitive documentation. See above, “Special Protection Applicable to Leases and Secured Financing of Aircraft and Aircraft Equipment,” for further information.

(2) Amounts include allowed claims (claims approved by the Bankruptcy Court) and estimated allowed claims relating to entry of orders treating as unsecured claims with respect to facility agreements supporting certain issuances of special facility revenue bonds. The Debtors record an estimated claim associated with the treatment of claims with respect to facility agreements when the applicable motion is filed with the Bankruptcy Court and the Debtors believe that it is probable that the motion will be approved, and there is sufficient information to estimate the claim. See above, “Rejection of Executory Contracts,” for further information.

XML

Subsequent Events Subsequent Events (Aircraft Purchase Commitments) (Detail)	Jan. 23, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Property Subject to or Available for Operating Lease [Line Items]
Current, Purchase	39	39
Current, Lease	20	20
Year Two, Purchase	13	11
Year Two, Lease	50	50
Year Three, Purchase	13	2
Year Three, Lease	50	50
Year Four, Purchase	15	2
Year Four, Lease	45	45
Year Five, Purchase	19	10
Year Five, Lease	40	40
Year Six and beyond, Purchase	227	120
Year Six and beyond, Lease	0	0
Total, Purchase	326	184
Total, Lease	205	205
Boeing 737 Family [Member]
Property Subject to or Available for Operating Lease [Line Items]
Current, Purchase	31	31
Current, Lease	0	0
Year Two, Purchase	5	5
Year Two, Lease	15	15
Year Three, Purchase	0
Year Three, Lease	20	20
Year Four, Purchase	0	0
Year Four, Lease	20	20
Year Five, Purchase	0	0
Year Five, Lease	20	20
Year Six and beyond, Purchase	0	0
Year Six and beyond, Lease	0	0
Total, Purchase	36	36
Total, Lease	75	75
Boeing 737 MAX Aircraft [Member]
Property Subject to or Available for Operating Lease [Line Items]
Current, Purchase	0
Current, Lease	0
Year Two, Purchase	0
Year Two, Lease	0
Year Three, Purchase	0
Year Three, Lease	0
Year Four, Purchase	0
Year Four, Lease	0
Year Five, Purchase	0
Year Five, Lease	0
Year Six and beyond, Purchase	100
Year Six and beyond, Lease	0
Total, Purchase	100
Total, Lease	0
Boeing 777-300 ER Aircraft [Member]
Property Subject to or Available for Operating Lease [Line Items]
Current, Purchase	8	8
Current, Lease	0	0
Year Two, Purchase	6	5
Year Two, Lease	0	0
Year Three, Purchase	2	0
Year Three, Lease	0	0
Year Four, Purchase	2	0
Year Four, Lease	0	0
Year Five, Purchase	0	0
Year Five, Lease	0	0
Year Six and beyond, Purchase	0	0
Year Six and beyond, Lease	0	0
Total, Purchase	18	13
Total, Lease	0	0
Boeing 787 Family [Member]
Property Subject to or Available for Operating Lease [Line Items]
Current, Purchase	0
Current, Lease	0
Year Two, Purchase	2
Year Two, Lease	0
Year Three, Purchase	11
Year Three, Lease	0
Year Four, Purchase	13
Year Four, Lease	0
Year Five, Purchase	9
Year Five, Lease	0
Year Six and beyond, Purchase	7
Year Six and beyond, Lease	0
Total, Purchase	42
Total, Lease	0
Airbus A320 Family [Member]
Property Subject to or Available for Operating Lease [Line Items]
Current, Purchase	0	0
Current, Lease	20	20
Year Two, Purchase	0	0
Year Two, Lease	35	35
Year Three, Purchase	0	0
Year Three, Lease	30	30
Year Four, Purchase	0	0
Year Four, Lease	25	25
Year Five, Purchase	0	0
Year Five, Lease	20	20
Year Six and beyond, Purchase	0	0
Year Six and beyond, Lease	0	0
Total, Purchase	0	0
Total, Lease	130	130
NEO Airbus Aircraft [Member]
Property Subject to or Available for Operating Lease [Line Items]
Current, Purchase	0
Current, Lease	0
Year Two, Purchase	0
Year Two, Lease	0
Year Three, Purchase	0
Year Three, Lease	0
Year Four, Purchase	0
Year Four, Lease	0
Year Five, Purchase	10
Year Five, Lease	0
Year Six and beyond, Purchase	120
Year Six and beyond, Lease	0
Total, Purchase	130
Total, Lease	0

XML

Commitments, Contingencies And Guarantees (Narrative) (Detail) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended	12 Months Ended				12 Months Ended		12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2012 Capital Additions [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Information Technology Support [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Capacity Purchase Arrangements [Member]	Jan. 23, 2013 Capacity Purchase Arrangements [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Capacity Purchase Arrangements [Member] Embraer RJ [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Capacity Purchase Arrangements [Member] Minimum [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Capacity Purchase Arrangements [Member] Maximum [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Purchase Commitment [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Lease [Member]
Long-term Purchase Commitment [Line Items]
Unrecorded Unconditional Purchase Obligations Due within One Year				$ 52	$ 80	$ 249	$ 353				$ 2,100	$ 727
Unrecorded Unconditional Purchase Obligations Due within Two Years				10	70	188	589				1,000	889
Unrecorded Unconditional Purchase Obligations Due within Three Years				17		179	739				314	1,100
Unrecorded Unconditional Purchase Obligations Due within Four Years						170	736				355	1,400
Unrecorded Unconditional Purchase Obligations Due within Five Years						11	580				745	1,600
Unrecorded Unconditional Purchase Obligations Due after Five Years						0	4,800				6,600	11,300
Deposits on Flight Equipment	710	710	746
Maximum Amount Required To Paid By Company Under The JAL Guarantee In Each Year	100	100
Maximum Amount Of JAL Guarantee Each Year Based on Current Capacity	75	75
Unrecorded Unconditional Purchase Obligation				79
Purchase Commitment Expiration Year									2014	2017
Leased Aircraft Put to American Upon Termination of Contract								15
Annual Lease Payment Obligation Upon Termination Contract						20
Annual Lease Payment Obligation Under Termination of Contract Expiration Date									2018	2019
Indebtedness and operating leases with event risk covenants	497	497
Debt Instrument, Covenant Description		These covenants permit the holders of such obligations to receive a higher rate of return (between 100 and 600 basis points above the stated rate) if a designated event, as defined, should occur and the credit ratings of such obligations are downgraded below certain levels within a certain period of time.
Benefit from Settlement of Commercial Dispute	$ 280

XML

Reorganization (Narrative) (Detail) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012
Reorganization [Line Items]
Assumed Non-Residential Real Property Leases	526
Ground Leases Rejected	10
Ground Leases Which Must Be Assumed or Rejected by an Extended Date	37
Aircraft And Or Engine Leases Rejected	40
Reached agreement to modify leases	155
Bankruptcy Claims, Number Claims Filed	13,366
Bankruptcy Claims, Amount of Claims Filed	$ 290,000,000,000
Bankruptcy Claims, Amount of Claims Expunged by Bankruptcy Court	100,200,000,000
Bankruptcy Claims, Amount of Claims under Review by Management	14,800,000,000
Unsecured Claims Threshold	190,000,000
Claims Filed After Bar Date [Member]
Reorganization [Line Items]
Bankruptcy Claims, Number Claims Filed	350
Bankruptcy Claims, Amount of Claims Filed	59,000,000
MD-80 Aircraft [Member]
Reorganization [Line Items]
Aircraft And Or Engine Leases Rejected	21
Reached agreement to modify leases	83
Fokker 100 Aircraft [Member]
Reorganization [Line Items]
Aircraft And Or Engine Leases Rejected	4
Boeing Seven Five Seven To Two Zero Zero Aircraft [Member]
Reorganization [Line Items]
Aircraft And Or Engine Leases Rejected	7
Reached agreement to modify leases	36
Spare Engines [Member]
Reorganization [Line Items]
Aircraft And Or Engine Leases Rejected	8
Aircraft leases retained	87
Airbus Three Zero Zero To Six Zero Zero R Aircraft [Member]
Reorganization [Line Items]
Relinquished Aircraft Subject to Mortgage	1
Boeing 737-800, 757-200, 767-300ER And 777-200ER Models, Bombardier CRJ-700, And McDonnell Douglas MD-80 Aircraft [Member]
Reorganization [Line Items]
Aircraft leases retained	340
Boeing Seven Three Seven Eight Zero Zero [Member]
Reorganization [Line Items]
Reached agreement to modify leases	9
Boeing767200er Aircraft [Member]
Reorganization [Line Items]
Reached agreement to modify leases	11
Boeing767300er Aircraft [Member]
Reorganization [Line Items]
Reached agreement to modify leases	13
Boeing 777-200 ER Aircraft [Member]
Reorganization [Line Items]
Reached agreement to modify leases	3
Super Atr Aircraft [Member]
Reorganization [Line Items]
Reached agreement to modify leases	39
Aircraft returned to lessor	30
Airplanes To Be Returned to Lessor	9
Embraer RJ [Member]
Reorganization [Line Items]
Reached Agreement with Aircraft Lender	216
Bankruptcy Claims, Amount of Claims Filed	$ (592,000,000)
Embraer One Four Zero [Member]
Reorganization [Line Items]
Mortgage Debt to be Resturctured Aircraft	59
Embraer One Four Five [Member]
Reorganization [Line Items]
Mortgage Debt to be Resturctured Aircraft	68
Aircraft for which debt wil not be reduced	50
Embraer Rj One Three Five [Member]
Reorganization [Line Items]
Aircraft to be Transferred to Lender and Leased Back	21
Airplanes Surrendered to Lender	18

XML

Special Charges and Restructuring Activities (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Restructuring And Related Activities [Abstract]

Components Of Company's Special Charges

The following table summarizes the components of the Company’s special charges, the remaining accruals for these charges and the capacity reduction related charges (in millions) as of December 31, 2012:

	Aircraft Charges			Facility Exit Costs			Employee Charges			Total
Remaining accrual at January 1, 2010	$	153		$	20		$	—		$	173
Non-cash charges	—			—			—			—
Adjustments	(8		)	11			—			3
Payments	(86		)	(4		)	—			(90		)
Remaining accrual at December 31, 2010	$	59		$	27		$	—		$	86
Non-cash charges	(725		)	1			—			(724		)
Adjustments	751			(8		)	—			743
Payments	(36		)	(4		)	—			(40		)
Remaining accrual at December 31, 2011	$	49		$	16		$	—		$	65
Special charges	11			13			360			384
Non-cash charges	(11		)	(13		)	—			(24		)
Adjustments	(47		)	(11		)	—			(58		)
Payments	(2		)	(1		)	(168		)	(171		)
Remaining accrual at December 31, 2012	$	—		$	4		$	192		$	196

XML

Investments and Fair Value Measurements (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Text Block [Abstract]

Short-Term Investments

Short-term investments consisted of (in millions):

	December  31,
	2012		2011
Overnight investments, time deposits and Repurchase agreements	$	306	$	130
Corporate and bank notes	2,121		1,808
U. S. government agency mortgages	545		502
U.S. government agency notes			—
Commingled funds	435		1,274
Other	1		—
	$	3,408	$	3,714

Short-Term Investments By Contractual Maturity

Short-term investments at December 31, 2012, by contractual maturity included (in millions):

Due in one year or less	$	2,258
Due between one year and three years	605
Due after three years	545
	$	3,408

Summary Of Assets And Liabilities Measured At Fair Value On Recurring Basis

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below:

(in millions)	Fair Value  Measurements as of December 31, 2012
Description	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Short-term investments 1, 2
Money market funds	$	436	$	436	$	—	$	—
Government agency investments	545		—		545		—
Repurchase agreements	304		—		304		—
Corporate obligations	1,519		—		1,519		—
Bank notes / Certificates of deposit / Time deposits	604		—		604		—
	3,408		436		2,972		—
Restricted cash and short-term investments 1	850		850		—		—
Fuel derivative contracts, net 1	65		—		65		—
Total	$	4,323	$	1,286	$	3,037	$	—

¹ Unrealized gains or losses on short-term investments, restricted cash and short-term investments and derivatives qualifying for hedge accounting are recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) at each measurement date.

² The Company’s short-term investments mature in one year or less except for $200 million of Bank notes/Certificates of deposit/Time deposits, $545 million of U.S. Government agency investments and $405 million of Corporate obligations which have maturity dates exceeding one year.

XML

Consolidated Statements Of Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) (USD $) In Millions	Total	Common Stock [Member]	Additional Paid-In Capital [Member]	Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) [Member]	Retained Earnings (Accumulated Deficit) [Member]
Beginning Balance at Dec. 31, 2009	$ (5,878)	$ 0	$ 3,938	$ (2,833)	$ (6,983)
Net loss	(469)				(469)
Changes in pension, retiree medical and other liability	(247)			(247)
Net changes in fair value of derivative financial instruments	216			216
Unrealized gain on investments	(1)			(1)
Non-cash tax provision	0
Comprehensive Income (Loss)	(501)
Reclassification and amortization of stock compensation plans	43		43
Ending Balance at Dec. 31, 2010	(6,336)	0	3,981	(2,865)	(7,452)
Net loss	(1,965)				(1,965)
Changes in pension, retiree medical and other liability	(1,086)			(1,086)
Net changes in fair value of derivative financial instruments	(123)			(123)
Unrealized gain on investments	(1)			(1)
Non-cash tax provision	0
Comprehensive Income (Loss)	(3,175)
Reclassification and amortization of stock compensation plans	24		24
Intercompany equity transfer	450		450
Ending Balance at Dec. 31, 2011	(9,037)	0	4,455	(4,075)	(9,417)
Net loss	(1,926)				(1,926)
Changes in pension, retiree medical and other liability	1,565			1,565
Net changes in fair value of derivative financial instruments	(15)			(15)
Non-cash tax provision	(569)			(569)
Unrealized gain on investments	6			6
Comprehensive Income (Loss)	(939)
Reclassification and amortization of stock compensation plans	14		14
Ending Balance at Dec. 31, 2012	$ (9,962)	$ 0	$ 4,469	$ (3,088)	$ (11,343)

XML

Commitments, Contingencies And Guarantees (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Commitments And Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]

Schedule Of Aircraft Acquisition Commitments [Table Text Block]

American had total aircraft acquisition commitments as of December 31, 2012 as follows:

		Boeing			Airbus
		737  Family	777-200ER	777-300ER	A320  Family	A320 NEO	Total
2013	Purchase	31	—	8	—	—	39
	Lease	—	—	—	20	—	20
2014	Purchase	5	1	5	—	—	11
	Lease	15	—	—	35	—	50
2015	Purchase		2	—	—	—	2
	Lease	20	—	—	30	—	50
2016	Purchase	—	2	—	—	—	2
	Lease	20	—	—	25	—	45
2017	Purchase	—	—	—	—	10	10
	Lease	20	—	—	20	—	40
2018 and beyond	Purchase	—	—	—	—	120	120
	Lease	—	—	—	—	—	—
Total	Purchase	36	5	13	—	130	184
	Lease	75	—	—	130	—	205

XML

Retirement Benefits (Components Of Net Periodic Benefit Cost) (Detail) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Defined Benefit Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Defined contribution plans	$ (202)	$ (162)	$ (152)
Defined Benefit Plan and Defined Contribution Plan Periodic Benefit Cost	875	815	829
Other Postretirement Benefit Plans [Member]
Defined Benefit Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Service cost	46	61	60
Interest cost	128	174	165
Expected return on assets	(17)	(20)	(18)
Amortization of prior service cost	(82)	(28)	(19)
Defined Benefit Plan, Recognized Net Gain (Loss) Due to Curtailments	(124)	0	0
Amortization of unrecognized net (gain) loss	(9)	(9)	(10)
Net periodic benefit cost	(58)	178	178
Pension Plans [Member]
Defined Benefit Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Service cost	341	386	366
Interest cost	729	757	737
Expected return on assets	(676)	(657)	(593)
Amortization of prior service cost	10	13	13
Defined Benefit Plan, Recognized Net Gain (Loss) Due to Curtailments	58	0	0
Amortization of unrecognized net (gain) loss	211	154	154
Net periodic benefit cost	$ 673	$ 653	$ 677

XML

Comprehensive Income (Loss) Note (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Equity [Abstract]

Components Of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The components of Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) are as follows (in millions):

	Pension and Retiree Medical Liability			Unrealized Gain/(Loss) on Investments			Derivative Financial Instruments			Income Tax Benefit/ (Expense)			Total
Balance at December 31, 2011	$	(3,887	)	$	(4	)	$	28		$	(212	)	$	(4,075	)
Current year change	(1,910		)	6									(1,904		)
Amortization of actuarial loss and prior service cost	130			—			—			—			130
Benefit plan modifications	3,345												3,345
Reclassification of derivative financial instruments into earnings	—			—			(3		)	—			(3		)
Change in fair value of derivative financial instruments	—			—			(12		)	—			(12		)
Non-cash tax provision	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	(569	)	$	(569	)
Balance at December 31, 2012	$	(2,322	)	$	2		$	13		$	(781	)	$	(3,088	)

XML

Investments And Fair Value Measurements (Short-Term Investments By Contractual Maturity) (Detail) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Schedule of Investments [Line Items]
Short-term investments	$ 3,408	$ 3,714
Due In One Year Or Less [Member]
Schedule of Investments [Line Items]
Short-term investments	2,258
Due Between One Year And Three Years [Member]
Schedule of Investments [Line Items]
Short-term investments	605
Due After Three Years [Member]
Schedule of Investments [Line Items]
Short-term investments	$ 545

XML

Income Taxes (Reconciliation Of Unrecognized Tax Benefit) (Detail) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]
Unrecognized Tax Benefit at January 1	$ 5	$ 5
No Activity	0	0
Unrecognized Tax Benefit at December 31	$ 5	$ 5

XML

Consolidated Statements Of Operations (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Revenues
Passenger - American Airlines	$ 18,743	$ 17,947	$ 16,760
- Regional Affiliates	2,914	2,724	2,327
Cargo	669	703	672
Other revenues	2,499	2,583	2,391
Total operating revenues	24,825	23,957	22,150
Expenses
Aircraft fuel	8,717	7,434	5,731
Wages, salaries and benefits	6,242	6,385	6,227
Regional payments to AMR Eagle	1,142	2,418	2,227
Other rentals and landing fees	1,286	1,305	1,284
Maintenance, materials and repairs	1,133	1,020	1,056
Commissions, booking fees and credit card expense	1,050	1,062	976
Depreciation and amortization	999	950	935
Aircraft rentals	550	673	592
Food service	535	518	490
Special charges	386	725	0
Other operating expenses	2,744	2,637	2,481
Total operating expenses	24,784	25,127	21,999
Operating Income (Loss)	41	(1,170)	151
Other Income (Expense)
Interest income	25	25	25
Interest expense	(662)	(689)	(654)
Interest capitalized	50	40	29
Related party	(13)	(14)	(13)
Miscellaneous - net	243	(41)	(42)
Other Income (Expense)	(357)	(679)	(655)
Income (Loss) Before Reorganization Items, Net	(316)	(1,849)	(504)
Reorganization Items, Net	(2,179)	(116)	0
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes	(2,495)	(1,965)	(504)
Income tax (benefit)	(569)	0	(35)
Net Earnings (Loss)	$ (1,926)	$ (1,965)	$ (469)

XML

Reorganization (Schedule Of Liabilities Subject To Compromise) (Detail) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Reorganizations [Abstract]
Liabilities Subject to Compromise, Debt and Accrued Interest	$ 358	$ 1,642
Aircraft lease and facility bond related obligations	3,716	1,868
Pension and postretirement benefits	1,250	0
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities	370	438
Other	0	4
Total liabilities subject to compromise	$ 5,694	$ 3,952

XML

Segment Reporting (Operating Revenues By Geographic Region) (Detail) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended								12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012	Sep. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2012	Mar. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Sep. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2011	Mar. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Airline services in number of cities									250
Number of countries in which entity operates	50								50
Number of flights per day									3,400
Number of aircraft in fleet									900
Total consolidated revenues	$ 5,925	$ 6,422	$ 6,447	$ 6,031	$ 5,950	$ 6,371	$ 6,109	$ 5,527	$ 24,825	$ 23,957	$ 22,150
DOT Domestic [Member]
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Total consolidated revenues									14,257	13,782	13,062
DOT Latin America [Member]
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Total consolidated revenues									5,813	5,460	4,619
DOT Atlantic [Member]
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Total consolidated revenues									3,411	3,499	3,365
DOT Pacific [Member]
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Total consolidated revenues									$ 1,344	$ 1,216	$ 1,104

XML

Consolidated Balance Sheets (Parenthetical) (USD $) In Millions, except Share data, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Current Assets
Allowance for uncollectible accounts	$ 43	$ 51
Allowance for obsolescence	503	530
Other Assets
Accumulated amortization on domestic slots and airport operating and gate lease rights	$ 508	$ 486
Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)
Common stock, par value	$ 1	$ 1
Common stock, shares authorized	1,000	1,000
Common stock, shares issued	1,000	1,000
Common Stock, Shares, Outstanding	1,000	1,000

XML

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) (Components Of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)) (Detail) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income Loss Net Of Tax [Line Items]
Beginning balance	$ (4,075)
Current year change	(1,904)
Amortization of actuarial loss and prior service cost	130
Benefit plan modifications	3,345
Reclassification of derivative financial instruments into earnings	(3)
Change in fair value of derivative financial instruments	(12)
Non-cash tax provision	(569)	0	0
Ending balance	(3,088)	(4,075)
Tax benefit resulting from OCI allocation	569	0	0
Derivative Instruments, Gain (Loss) Reclassification from Accumulated OCI to Income, Estimated Net Amount to be Transferred	15
Pension And Retiree Medical Liability [Member]
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income Loss Net Of Tax [Line Items]
Beginning balance	(3,887)
Current year change	(1,910)
Amortization of actuarial loss and prior service cost	130
Benefit plan modifications	3,345
Reclassification of derivative financial instruments into earnings	0
Change in fair value of derivative financial instruments	0
Non-cash tax provision	0
Ending balance	(2,322)
Unrealized Gain (Loss) On Investments [Member]
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income Loss Net Of Tax [Line Items]
Beginning balance	(4)
Current year change	6
Amortization of actuarial loss and prior service cost	0
Benefit plan modifications
Reclassification of derivative financial instruments into earnings	0
Change in fair value of derivative financial instruments	0
Non-cash tax provision	0
Ending balance	2
Derivative Financial Instruments [Member]
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income Loss Net Of Tax [Line Items]
Beginning balance	28
Current year change
Amortization of actuarial loss and prior service cost	0
Benefit plan modifications
Reclassification of derivative financial instruments into earnings	(3)
Change in fair value of derivative financial instruments	(12)
Non-cash tax provision	0
Ending balance	13
Income Tax Benefit (Expense) [Member]
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income Loss Net Of Tax [Line Items]
Beginning balance	(212)
Current year change
Amortization of actuarial loss and prior service cost	0
Benefit plan modifications
Reclassification of derivative financial instruments into earnings	0
Change in fair value of derivative financial instruments	0
Non-cash tax provision	(569)
Ending balance	$ (781)

XML

Leases (Narrative) (Detail) (USD $)	12 Months Ended					3 Months Ended			12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010	Dec. 31, 2012 Revenue Bonds [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Containing Mandatory Tender Provisions [Member] Revenue Bonds [Member]	Mar. 31, 2011 Aircraft And Gates [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Jet Aircraft [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Turboprop Aircraft [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Boeing 737-800 NG Aircraft [Member]	Dec. 31, 2010 Boeing 737-800 NG Aircraft [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Boeing 777-300 ER Aircraft [Member]
Operating Leased Assets [Line Items]
Number of Aircraft Included in Sale-Leaseback Arrangement									26		1
Number of aircrafts deliveries under sale leaseback transactions									30	36	2
Non Recurring Charges Under Sale Leaseback Transaction						$ 31,000,000
Number of aircraft committed to operating leases							215	9
Number of aircraft committed to capital leases							33
Special Facility Revenue Bond Claims Expected to Be Treated as General Unsecured Claims	1,100,000,000
Operating Leases, Future Minimum Payments, Due in Two Years	961,000,000				112,000,000
Special facility revenue bonds				486,000,000
Operating lease future payments to repurchase bonds				822,000,000
Operating Leases, rent expense	1,400,000,000	1,600,000,000	1,400,000,000
Number of aircraft operating leased under trusts	19
Operating leases future minimum payments due leased under trusts	$ 98,000,000

XML

Subsequent Events Narrative (Detail) (USD $)		1 Months Ended				1 Months Ended								1 Months Ended				3 Months Ended
	Feb. 14, 2013	Jan. 23, 2013 Capacity Purchase Arrangements [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Capacity Purchase Arrangements [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Purchase Commitment [Member]	Jan. 23, 2013 Purchase Commitment [Member] American Jet Aircraft And Engines [Member]	Jan. 23, 2013 Boeing Seven Eight Seven Eight For Boeing Seven Eight Seven Nine [Member]	Jan. 23, 2013 Boeing 737 Family [Member]	Jan. 23, 2013 Boeing Seven Seven Seven Family [Member]	Jan. 23, 2013 Boeing 787 Family [Member]	Jan. 23, 2013 Boeing 737 MAX Aircraft [Member]	Jan. 23, 2013 Embraer One Seven Five [Member]	Jan. 23, 2013 Embraer One Seven Five [Member] Maximum [Member]	Jan. 23, 2013 Embraer One Seven Five [Member] Minimum [Member]	Jan. 24, 2013 New Eetc [Member]	Jan. 24, 2013 New Eetc [Member] Boeing 737-823 [Member]	Jan. 24, 2013 New Eetc [Member] Boeing 777-223ER [Member]	Jan. 24, 2013 New Eetc [Member] Boeing 777-300 ER Aircraft [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Refinancing Eetc [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Refinancing Eetc [Member] Boeing 737-823 [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Refinancing Eetc [Member] Boeing 777-223ER [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Refinancing Eetc [Member] Boeing 757-223 [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Refinancing Eetc [Member] Boeing 767-323ER [Member]
Subsequent Event [Line Items]
Restructured Aircraft Purhase Agreement Aircraft Substitution						20
Option to Purchase Aircraft							40	13	58	60
Aircraft to be acquired										100
Unrecorded Unconditional Purchase Obligation, Due within Two Years		$ 589,000,000	$ 188,000,000	$ 1,000,000,000	$ 1,500,000,000
Unrecorded Unconditional Purchase Obligation, Due within Three Years		739,000,000	179,000,000	314,000,000	1,700,000,000
Unrecorded Unconditional Purchase Obligation, Due within Four Years		736,000,000	170,000,000	355,000,000	2,100,000,000
Unrecorded Unconditional Purchase Obligation, Due within Five Years		580,000,000	11,000,000	745,000,000	2,100,000,000
Aircraft to be acquired by Republic Airlines											53
Unrecorded Unconditional Purchase Obligation, Due within One Year		353,000,000	249,000,000	2,100,000,000	2,300,000,000
First Class Seats											12
Main Cabin Seats											64
Aircraft phased into operation each month												3	2
Unrecorded Unconditional Purchase Obligation, Due after Five Years		4,800,000,000	0	6,600,000,000	12,800,000,000
Amount of Refinancing EETC to be offered pursuant to Rule 144A																		1,500,000,000
Term of Unrecorded Unconditional Purchase Obligation		12
Number of Aircraft to be Collateralized															8	1	4		41	19	14	1
Amount of New EETC to be offered pursuant to Rule 144A														750,000,000
Merger - Portion of Shares to US Air Stakeholders	28.00%
Merger - Portion of Shares to AMR Stakeholders	72.00%
Merger - AMR Termination Fee	135,000,000
Merger - US Air Termination Fee	55,000,000
Merger - Termination Fee in Event of Breach	$ 195,000,000
Merger - Claims Held by Claimholders in Support Agreement	1,200,000,000
Merger - Price per Share US Air Stock at Close	$ 10.4
Merger - Discount on Conversion Price of New American Stock	3.50%
Merger - Portion to Existing Stockholders	3.50%
Merger - Portion to Labor Related Claimholders	23.60%

XML

Financial Instruments and Risk Management (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Derivative Instruments And Hedging Activities Disclosure [Abstract]

Effect Of Cash Flow Hedges On Financial Statements

The impact of cash flow hedges on the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the years ending December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, is depicted below (in millions):

Fair Value of Aircraft Fuel Derivative Instruments (all cash flow hedges)
Asset Derivatives as of December 31,						Liability Derivatives as of December 31,
2012			2011			2012			2011
Balance Sheet Location	Fair Value		Balance Sheet Location	Fair Value		Balance Sheet Location	Fair Value		Balance Sheet Location	Fair Value
Fuel derivative contracts	$	65	Fuel derivative contracts	$	97	Accrued liabilities	$	—	Accrued liabilities	$	2

Effect Of Derivative Instruments On Statements Of Operations

Effect of Aircraft Fuel Derivative Instruments on Statements of Operations (all cash flow hedges)

Amount of  Gain (Loss) Recognized in OCI on Derivative1				Location of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income 1	Amount of  Gain (Loss)  Reclassified from  Accumulated OCI into Income  1					Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized  in Income on Derivative 2	Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative 2
2012		2011			2012			2011			2012			2011
$	12	$	190	Aircraft  Fuel	$	(3	)	$	277	Aircraft  Fuel	$	(1	)	$	24

¹ Effective portion of gain (loss)

² Ineffective portion of gain (loss)

Summary Of Carrying Value And Estimated Fair Values Of Long-Term Debt

The carrying value and estimated fair values of the Company’s long-term debt, including current maturities, not classified as subject to compromise, were (in millions):

	December  31, 2012				December  31, 2011
	Carrying Value		Fair Value		Carrying Value		Fair Value
Secured variable and fixed rate indebtedness	$	3,297	$	3,143	$	2,952	$	2,647
Enhanced equipment trust certificates	1,741		1,811		1,942		1,927
6.0% - 8.5% special facility revenue bonds	1,313		1,308		1,436		1,230
7.50% senior secured notes	1,000		1,074		1,000		711
AAdvantage Miles advance purchase	772		779		890		902
Other	27		27		27		27
	$	8,150	$	8,142	$	8,247	$	7,444

The carrying value and estimated fair value of the Company’s long-term debt, including current maturities, classified as subject to compromise, were (in millions):

	December  31, 2012				December  31, 2011
	Carrying Value		Fair Value		Carrying Value		Fair Value
Secured variable and fixed rate indebtedness	$	172	$	154	$	1,456	$	1,123
Enhanced equipment trust certificates	—		—		—		—
6.0% - 8.5% special facility revenue bonds	186		186		186		37
7.50% senior secured notes	—		—		—		—
AAdvantage Miles advance purchase	—		—		—		—
Other	—		—		—		—
	$	358	$	340	$	1,642	$	1,160

All of the Company’s long term debt classified as subject to compromise is classified as Level 2.

XML

Financial Instruments And Risk Management (Effect Of Cash Flow Hedges On Financial Statements) (Detail) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Derivatives, Fair Value [Line Items]
Cash Flow Hedge Derivative Instrument Assets at Fair Value	$ 65	$ 97
Fuel Derivative Contracts [Member]
Derivatives, Fair Value [Line Items]
Cash Flow Hedge Derivative Instrument Assets at Fair Value	65	97
Accrued Liabilities [Member]
Derivatives, Fair Value [Line Items]
Fuel derivative liability, Fair Value	$ 0	$ 2

XML

Related Party Transactions Disclosure [Text Block]

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Related Party Transactions [Abstract]

Related Party Transactions Disclosure [Text Block]

14.          Transactions with Related Parties

American invests funds, including funds of certain affiliates, if any, in a combined short-term investment portfolio and passes through interest income on such funds at the average rate earned on the portfolio. These amounts are classified as Payable to affiliate on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

Pursuant to a capacity purchase agreement between American and the American Eagle carriers, American receives all passenger revenue from flights performed for it by the American Eagle carriers and pays the American Eagle carriers a fee for each flight. The capacity purchase agreement reflects what the Company believes are current market rates received by other regional carriers for similar flying. Amounts paid to the American Eagle carriers under the capacity purchase agreement are available to pay for various operating expenses of the American Eagle carriers, such as crew expenses, maintenance, and other aircraft related expenses. As of December 31, 2012, the American Eagle carriers operated approximately 1,500 daily departures, offering scheduled passenger

service to over 175 destinations in North America, Mexico and the Caribbean. On a separate company basis, AMR Eagle reported $1.2 billion in revenue in 2012. However, this historical financial information is not indicative of what AMR Eagle’s future revenues might be if AMR Eagle were a stand-alone entity.

In 2012 and 2011, American made payments to the American Eagle carriers of approximately $1.1 billion and $2.4 billion, respectively, related to the capacity purchase agreement. In addition, American incurred costs associated with generating Regional Affiliates revenue for flights on AMR Eagle of $128 million and $132 million in 2012 and 2011, respectively, recorded in Commissions, booking fees and credit card expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. American also incurred other costs in connection with its affiliate relationship with AMR Eagle totaling approximately $1.6 billion and $350 million in 2012 and 2011, respectively, primarily recorded in Other operating expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

In consideration for certain services provided, the AMR Eagle carriers paid American approximately $16 million in 2012, $18 million in 2011 and $18 million in 2010.

American recognizes compensation expense associated with certain AMR common stock-based awards for employees of American (see Note 10). In addition, American incurs pension and postretirement benefit expense for American employees working at affiliates of the Company. American transfers pension and postretirement benefit expense for these employees to its affiliates based on a percentage of salaries and cost per employee, respectively (see Note 11).

XML

Income Taxes (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]

Components Of Income Tax Provision (Benefit)

The significant components of the income tax provision (benefit) were (in millions):

	Year Ended  December 31,
	2012			2011			2010
Current	$	—		$	(25	)	$	(5	)
Deferred	(569		)	25			(30		)
Income tax benefit	$	(569	)	$	—		$	(35	)

Computation Of Income Tax Expense (Benefit)

The income tax expense (benefit) differed from amounts computed at the statutory federal income tax rate as follows (in millions):

	Year Ended  December 31,
	2012			2011			2010
Statutory income tax provision expense/(benefit)	$	(873	)	$	(686	)	$	(177	)
State income tax expense/(benefit), net of federal tax effect	(35		)	(32		)	(2		)
Meal expense	6			6			6
Bankruptcy administration expenses	26			—			—
Change in valuation allowance	858			697			127
Tax benefit resulting from OCI allocation	(569		)	—			—
Other, net	18			15			11
Income tax benefit	$	(569	)	$	—		$	(35	)

Deferred Tax Assets And Liabilities

The components of the Company's deferred tax assets and liabilities were (in millions):

	December  31,
	2012			2011
Deferred tax assets:
Postretirement benefits other than pensions	$	442		$	1,075
Rent expense	60			257
Alternative minimum tax credit carryforwards	493			493
Operating loss carryforwards	2,296			2,271
Pensions	2,455			2,337
Frequent flyer obligation	657			680
Gains from lease transactions	5			26
Reorganization items	863			—
Other	963			885
Total deferred tax assets	8,234			8,024
Valuation allowance	(5,084		)	(4,802		)
Net deferred tax assets	3,150			3,222
Deferred tax liabilities:
Accelerated depreciation and amortization	(2,960		)	(3,045		)
Other	(190		)	(177		)
Total deferred tax liabilities	(3,150		)	(3,222		)
Net deferred tax asset	$	—		$	—

Reconciliation Of Unrecognized Tax Benefit

The reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of unrecognized tax benefit are (in millions):

	2012		2011
Unrecognized Tax Benefit at January 1	$	5	$	5
No Activity	—		—
Unrecognized Tax Benefit at December 31	$	5	$	5

XML

Quarterly Financial Data (Narrative) (Detail) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended				12 Months Ended	3 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012	Sep. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2011	Mar. 31, 2011 Aircraft And Gates [Member]
Quarterly Financial Data [Line Items]
Severance Related Charges and Write Off of Leasehold Improvements	$ 360	$ 211	$ 106
Benefit from Settlement of Commercial Dispute	280
Non Recurring Charges Under Sale Leaseback Transaction						31
Restructuring charges and special items				768
Impairment charge				725	713
Revenue reduction as a result of changes in assumptions				$ 43

XML

Quarterly Financial Data

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Quarterly Financial Information Disclosure [Abstract]

Quarterly Financial Data

16.         Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)

Unaudited summarized financial data by quarter for 2012 and 2011 (in millions, except per share amounts):

	First     Quarter			Second     Quarter			Third     Quarter			Fourth     Quarter
2012
Operating revenues	$	6,031		$	6,447		$	6,422		$	5,925
Operating income (loss)	(101		)	122			27			(7		)
Net earnings (loss)	(1,676		)	(264		)	(257		)	271
2011
Operating revenues	$	5,527		$	6,109		$	6,371		$	5,950
Operating income (loss)	(266		)	(116		)	10			(798		)
Net earnings (loss)	(431		)	(284		)	(153		)	(1,097		)

The Company's fourth quarter 2012 performance reflects restructuring charges and special items consisting of $360 million of severance related charges and write off of lease hold improvements on aircraft and at airport facilities that were rejected during the Chapter 11 process and a $280 million benefit from a settlement of a commercial dispute. The second and third quarters of 2012 reflect $106 million and $211 million of such items, respectively.

The Company’s fourth quarter 2011 performance reflects restructuring charges and special items consisting of $768 million, including $725 million related to the impairment of certain aircraft and gates and a $43 million revenue reduction as a result of a decrease in the breakage assumption related to the AAdvantage frequent flier liability.

The first quarter 2011 results include a loss of $31 million in non-recurring non-cash charges related to certain sale/leaseback transactions.

XML

Income Taxes (Components Of Income Tax Provision (Benefit)) (Detail) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]
Current	$ 0	$ (25)	$ (5)
Deferred	(569)	25	(30)
Income tax benefit	$ (569)	$ 0	$ (35)

XML

Consolidated Statements Of Cash Flows (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Cash Flow from Operating Activities:
Net earnings (loss)	$ (1,926)	$ (1,965)	$ (469)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided (used) by operating activities:
Depreciation	901	819	814
Amortization	98	131	121
Equity based stock compensation	26	35	49
Special charges, non-cash	214	725	0
Reorganization items, non-cash	2,037	118	0
Pension and postretirement	287	180	236
OCI tax benefits	(569)	0	0
Change in assets and liabilities:
Decrease (increase) in receivables	(222)	(164)	24
Increase (Decrease) in Other Current Assets	(134)	(129)	(104)
Decrease (increase) in inventories	16	(80)	(67)
Decrease (increase) in derivative collateral and unwound derivative contracts	(1)	(73)	87
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued liabilities	349	201	(91)
Increase (decrease) in air traffic liability	301	567	225
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities and deferred credits	3	654	159
Other, net	(232)	(322)	66
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	1,148	697	1,050
Cash Flow from Investing Activities:
Capital expenditures, including purchase deposits on flight equipment	(1,870)	(1,432)	(1,608)
Net decrease (increase) in short-term investments	306	608	(70)
Net decrease (increase) in restricted cash and short-term investments	(112)	(288)	0
Proceeds from sale of equipment, property and investments/subsidiaries	124	(4)	(14)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities	(1,552)	(1,116)	(1,692)
Cash Flow from Financing Activities:
Payments on long-term debt and capital lease obligations	(1,288)	(2,240)	(918)
Proceeds from:
Reimbursement from construction reserve account	0	0	6
Issuance of long-term debt	268	2,382	215
Sale leaseback transactions	1,509	703	1,408
Funds transferred from affiliates, net	109	(311)	(53)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	598	534	658
Net increase (decrease) in cash	194	115	16
Cash at beginning of year	280	165	149
Cash at end of year	$ 474	$ 280	$ 165

XML

Consolidated Statements Of Operations (Parenthetical) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Income Statement [Abstract]
Contractual interest expense	$ (686)	$ (691)

XML

Income Taxes

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]

Income Taxes

9.          Income Taxes

The significant components of the income tax provision (benefit) were (in millions):

	Year Ended  December 31,
	2012			2011			2010
Current	$	—		$	(25	)	$	(5	)
Deferred	(569		)	25			(30		)
Income tax benefit	$	(569	)	$	—		$	(35	)

The income tax expense (benefit) differed from amounts computed at the statutory federal income tax rate as follows (in millions):

	Year Ended  December 31,
	2012			2011			2010
Statutory income tax provision expense/(benefit)	$	(873	)	$	(686	)	$	(177	)
State income tax expense/(benefit), net of federal tax effect	(35		)	(32		)	(2		)
Meal expense	6			6			6
Bankruptcy administration expenses	26			—			—
Change in valuation allowance	858			697			127
Tax benefit resulting from OCI allocation	(569		)	—			—
Other, net	18			15			11
Income tax benefit	$	(569	)	$	—		$	(35	)

The Company recorded a $569 million non-cash income tax benefit from continuing operations during the fourth quarter of 2012. Under current accounting rules, the Company is required to consider all items (including items recorded in other comprehensive income) in determining the amount of tax benefit that results from a loss from continuing operations and that should be allocated to continuing operations. As a result, the Company recorded a tax benefit on the loss from continuing operations for the year, which will be exactly offset by income tax expense on other comprehensive income. However, while the income tax benefit from continuing operations is reported on the income statement, the income tax expense on other comprehensive income is recorded directly to Accumulated other comprehensive income, which is a component of stockholders’ equity. Because the income tax expense on other comprehensive income is equal to the income tax benefit from continuing operations, the Company’s year-end net deferred tax position is not impacted by this tax allocation.

The change in the valuation allowance reflects the recording by the Company in 2010 of an income tax expense credit of approximately $30 million resulting from the Company’s elections under applicable sections of the Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization, and Job Creation Act of 2010 and the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 (as extended by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009), allowing corporations to accelerate utilization of certain research and alternative minimum tax (AMT) credit carryforwards in lieu of applicable bonus depreciation on certain qualifying capital investments. These provisions were extended by passage of the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012, providing the potential for the Company to realize up to an additional $29 million in credits during 2013.

In addition to the changes in the valuation allowance from operations described in the table above, the valuation allowance was also impacted by the changes in the components of Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), described in Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements. The total increase in the valuation allowance was $282 million, $1.1 billion, and $120 million in 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively.

The Company provides a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that some portion, or all of its deferred tax assets, will not be realized. In assessing the realizability of the deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion, or all of the deferred tax assets, will be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income (including reversals of deferred tax liabilities) during the periods in which those temporary differences will become deductible.

The components of the Company's deferred tax assets and liabilities were (in millions):

	December  31,
	2012			2011
Deferred tax assets:
Postretirement benefits other than pensions	$	442		$	1,075
Rent expense	60			257
Alternative minimum tax credit carryforwards	493			493
Operating loss carryforwards	2,296			2,271
Pensions	2,455			2,337
Frequent flyer obligation	657			680
Gains from lease transactions	5			26
Reorganization items	863			—
Other	963			885
Total deferred tax assets	8,234			8,024
Valuation allowance	(5,084		)	(4,802		)
Net deferred tax assets	3,150			3,222
Deferred tax liabilities:
Accelerated depreciation and amortization	(2,960		)	(3,045		)
Other	(190		)	(177		)
Total deferred tax liabilities	(3,150		)	(3,222		)
Net deferred tax asset	$	—		$	—

At December 31, 2012, the Company had available for federal income tax purposes an AMT credit carryforward of approximately $493 million, which is available for an indefinite period, and federal net operating losses of approximately $6.8 billion for regular tax purposes, which will expire, if unused, beginning in 2022. These net operating losses include an unrealized benefit of approximately $666 million related to the implementation of share-based compensation accounting guidance that will be recorded in equity when realized. The Company had available for state income tax purposes net operating losses of $3.1 billion, which expire, if unused, in years 2013 through 2027. The amount that will expire in 2013 is $105 million if not used.

The Company files its tax returns as prescribed by the tax laws of the jurisdictions in which it operates. The Company’s 2004 through 2011 tax years are still subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service. Various state and foreign jurisdiction tax years remain open to examination and the Company is under examination, in administrative appeals, or engaged in tax litigation in certain jurisdictions. The Company believes that the effect of any additional assessment(s) will be immaterial to its consolidated financial statements.

Cash payments (refunds) for income taxes were $5 million, $(0.5) million and $(32) million for 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Under special tax rules (the Section 382 Limitation), cumulative stock ownership changes among material shareholders exceeding 50 percent during a three year period can potentially limit a company’s future use of net operating losses and tax credits. Chapter 11 proceedings could impact the availability and utilization of net operating losses and tax credits. Based on available information, the Company believes it is not currently subject to the Section 382 Limitation.

Under special tax rules (the Section 382 Limitation), cumulative stock ownership changes among material shareholders exceeding 50 percent during a rolling three year period can potentially limit a company’s future use of net operating losses and tax credits. See discussion under Item 1A, "Risk Factors - Chapter 11 Reorganization Risks" regarding the potential impact of these rules on the company's utilization of its net operating losses.

The Company has an unrecognized tax benefit of approximately $5 million, which did not change during the twelve months ended December 31, 2012. Changes in the unrecognized tax benefit have no impact on the effective tax rate due to the existence of the valuation allowance. Accrued interest on tax positions is recorded as a component of interest expense but was not significant at December 31, 2012.

The reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of unrecognized tax benefit are (in millions):

	2012		2011
Unrecognized Tax Benefit at January 1	$	5	$	5
No Activity	—		—
Unrecognized Tax Benefit at December 31	$	5	$	5

The Company estimates that the unrecognized tax benefit will not significantly change within the next twelve months.

XML

Intangible Assets (Summary Of Amortization Of Intangible Assets) (Detail) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Cost	$ 670	$ 669
Accumulated Amortization	509	486
Net Book Value	161	183
Airport Operating Rights [Member]
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Cost	515	509
Accumulated Amortization	385	361
Net Book Value	130	148
Gate Lease Rights [Member]
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Cost	155	160
Accumulated Amortization	124	125
Net Book Value	$ 31	$ 35

XML

Retirement Benefits (Benefit Payments Of Expected Future Service ) (Detail) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2012
Pension Plans [Member]
Defined Benefit Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Year One	$ 620
Year Two	620
Year Three	645
Year Four	663
Year Five	699
Five Years Thereafter	4,011
Other Postretirement Benefit Plans [Member]
Defined Benefit Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Year One	135
Year Two	131
Year Three	124
Year Four	117
Year Five	110
Five Years Thereafter	$ 450

XML

Document and Entity Information (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012	Feb. 13, 2013	Jun. 30, 2012
Document And Entity Information [Abstract]
Document Type	10-K
Amendment Flag	true
Amendment Description	Resubmit Interactive Data files for the sole purpose of correcting certain technical and formatting errors.
Document Period End Date	Dec. 31, 2012
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2012
Document Fiscal Period Focus	FY
Entity Registrant Name	AMERICAN AIRLINES INC
Entity Central Index Key	0000004515
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--12-31
Entity Well-known Seasoned Issuer	No
Entity Current Reporting Status	Yes
Entity Voluntary Filers	No
Entity Filer Category	Non-accelerated Filer
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		1,000
Entity Public Float			$ 0

XML

Share Based Compensation

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Disclosure Of Compensation Related Costs Sharebased Payments [Abstract]

Share Based Compensation

10.          Share Based Compensation

Prior to the Petition Date, AMR adopted certain plans which provide for the issuance of common stock in connection with the exercise of stock options and for other stock-based awards. AMR has granted stock compensation under three plans: the 1998 Long Term Incentive Plan (the 1998 Plan), the 2003 Employee Stock Incentive Plan (the 2003 Plan) and the 2009 Long Term Incentive Plan (the 2009 Plan). Collectively, the 1998 Plan and the 2009 Plan are referred to as the LTIP Plans.

The Company believes that all of its stock options could be cancelled as part of the emergence of AMR and its subsidiaries, including the Company, from Chapter 11. The following includes additional information about these plans as of December 31, 2012. No awards were made under these plans in 2012, and it is expected that no future awards will be made under these existing plans.

Under the LTIP Plans, officers and key people of AMR and its subsidiaries, including the Company, were granted certain types of stock or performance based awards. At December 31, 2012, AMR had AMR stock option awards, stock appreciation right (SAR) awards, performance share awards, deferred share awards and other awards outstanding under these plans. The total number of common shares authorized for distribution under the 1998 Plan and the 2009 Plan is 23,700,000 and 4,000,000 shares, respectively. The 1998 Plan expired by its terms in 2008.

AMR established the 2003 Plan to provide equity awards to employees. Under the 2003 Plan, employees may be granted stock options, restricted stock and deferred stock. At December 31, 2012, the AMR had stock options and deferred awards outstanding under this plan. The total number of shares authorized for distribution under the 2003 Plan is 42,680,000 shares.

In 2012, 2011 and 2010, the total charge for share-based compensation expense included in Wages, salaries and benefits expense was $26 million, $40 million and $49 million, respectively. In 2012, 2011 and 2010, the amount of cash used to settle equity instruments granted under share-based compensation plans was $0 million, $2 million and $2 million, respectively.

Stock Options/SARs During 2006, the AMR Board of Directors approved an amendment covering all of the outstanding stock options previously granted under the 1998 Plan. The amendment added to each of the outstanding options an additional SAR in tandem with each of the then outstanding stock options. The addition of the SAR did not impact the fair value of the stock options, but simply allowed the Company to settle the exercise of the option by issuing the net number of shares equal to the in-the-money value of the option. This amendment is estimated to make available enough shares to permit the Company to settle all outstanding performance and deferred share awards under the 1998 Plan in stock rather than cash.

Options/SARs granted under the LTIP Plans and the 2003 Plan are awarded with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of AMR stock on date of grant, become exercisable in equal annual installments over periods ranging from three to five years and expire no later than ten years from the date of grant. Expense for the options is recognized on a straight-line basis. The fair value of each award is estimated on the date of grant using the modified Black-Scholes option valuation model and the assumptions noted in the following table. Expected volatilities are based on implied volatilities from traded options on AMR's stock, historical volatility of AMR's stock, and other factors. The Company uses historical employee exercise data to estimate the expected term of awards granted used in the valuation model. The risk-free rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. The dividend yield is assumed to be zero based on AMR's history and expectation of not paying dividends.

	20121		2011		2010
Expected volatility	—		73.5% to  75.4%		74.4% to  75.9%
Expected term (in years)	—		4.0		4.0
Risk-free rate	—		0.90% to 2.11%		1.18% to 2.58%
Annual forfeiture rate	—	%	10.0	%	10.0	%

¹ No options/SARs were granted in 2012.

A summary of stock option/SARs activity under the LTIP Plans and the 2003 Plan as of December 31, 2012, and changes during

the year then ended is presented below:

	LTIP Plans					The 2003 Plan
	Options/SARs			Weighted Average Exercise Price		Options			Weighted Average Exercise Price
Outstanding at January 1	13,809,841			$	10.31	13,082,905			$	5.66
Granted	—			—		—			—
Exercised	—			—		—			—
Forfeited or Expired	(2,539,779		)	17.22		(403,549		)	9.02
Outstanding at December 31	11,270,062			$	8.75	12,679,356			$	5.55
Exercisable at December 31	6,611,656			$	10.44	12,679,356			$	5.55
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term of Options Outstanding (in years)	6.3					0.4
Aggregate Intrinsic Value of Options Outstanding	$	—				$	—

There is no intrinsic value of vested options/SARs at December 31, 2012. The weighted-average grant date fair value of options/SARs granted during 2011 and 2010 was $3.59 and $3.97, respectively. The total intrinsic value of options/SARs exercised 2011 and 2010 was less than $1 million and $1 million, respectively.

A summary of the status of the Company’s non-vested options/SARs under all plans as of December 31, 2012, and changes during the year ended December 31, 2012, is presented below:

	Options/SARs		Weighted Average Grant Date  Fair Value
Outstanding at January 1	7,468,019		$	3.59
Granted	—		—
Vested	(2,022,036	)	3.89
Forfeited	(787,577	)	3.54
Outstanding at December 31	4,658,406		$	3.47

As of December 31, 2012, there was $6 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock options/SARs granted under the LTIP Plans and the 2003 Plan that is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.5 years. The total fair value of stock options/SARs vested during the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, was $5 million, $7 million and $11 million, respectively.

The Company received no cash from exercise of stock options for the year ended December 31, 2012 and received $1 million for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010. No tax benefit was realized as a result of stock options/SARs exercised in 2012 due to the tax valuation allowance discussed in Note 9.

Performance Share Awards Performance share awards are granted under the LTIP Plans, generally vest pursuant to a three year measurement period and are settled on the vesting date. The number of awards ultimately issued under performance share awards is contingent on AMR’s relative stock price performance compared to certain of its competitors over a three year period and can range from zero to 175 percent of the awards granted. The fair value of performance awards is calculated by multiplying the stock price on the date of grant by the expected payout percentage and the number of shares granted.

Activity during 2012 for performance awards accounted for as equity awards was:

	Awards		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term	Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at January 1	6,341,695
Granted	—
Settled	—
Forfeited or Expired	(197,695	)
Outstanding at December 31	6,144,000		0.2	$	4,915,200

The aggregate intrinsic value represents the Company’s current estimate of the number of shares (6,144,000 shares at December 31, 2012) that will ultimately be distributed for outstanding awards computed using the market value AMR's common stock at December 31, 2012. The weighted-average grant date fair value per share of performance share awards granted during 2011 and 2010 was $6.58 and $7.01, respectively. As of December 31, 2012, there was $2 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to performance share awards that is expected to be recognized during 2013.

Deferred Share Awards The distribution of deferred share awards granted under the LTIP Plans is based solely on a requisite service period (generally 36 months). Career equity awards granted to certain employees of the Company vest upon the retirement of those individuals. The fair value of each deferred award is based on AMR’s stock price on the measurement date.

Activity during 2012 for deferred awards accounted for as equity awards was:

	Shares		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term	Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at January 1	7,271,021
Granted	—
Settled	(24,840	)
Forfeited or Expired	(481,124	)
Outstanding at December 31	6,765,057		0.9	$	5,412,045

The weighted-average grant date fair value per share of deferred awards granted during 2011 and 2010 was $6.29 and $7.05, respectively. The total fair value of awards settled during the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 was $1 million and $3 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2012, there was $6 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to deferred awards that is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.3 years.

Other Awards As of December 31, 2012, certain performance share agreements and deferred share award agreements were accounted for as a liability, or as equity, as appropriate, in the consolidated balance sheet as the plans only permit settlement in cash or the awards required that the employee meet certain performance conditions which were not subject to market measurement. As a result, awards under these agreements are marked to current market value. As of December 31, 2012, the aggregate intrinsic value of these awards was $2 million and the weighted average remaining contractual term of these awards was 1.3 years. The total fair value of awards settled during the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 was $0 million, $2 million, and $2 million respectively. As of December 31, 2012, there was $1 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to other awards that is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.3 years.

The Company does not intend to assume any equity-based awards that were outstanding at the commencement date of its Chapter 11 Case.

XML

Retirement Benefits (Schedule Of Amounts Recognized In Consolidated Balance Sheets) (Detail) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Defined Benefit Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Noncurrent liability	$ 6,780	$ 9,204
Pension Plans [Member]
Defined Benefit Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Current liability	21	2
Noncurrent liability	6,809	6,434
Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets	6,830	6,436
Other Postretirement Benefit Plans [Member]
Defined Benefit Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Current liability	0	147
Noncurrent liability	1,201	2,770
Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets	$ 1,201	$ 2,917

XML

Retirement Benefits (Schedule Of One Percentage Point Change In Assumed Health Care Cost Trend Rates) (Detail) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012
Compensation And Retirement Disclosure [Abstract]
Defined Benefit Plan, Effect of One Percentage Point Increase on Service and Interest Cost Components	$ 15
Impact on service and interest cost, One Percent Decrease	(16)
Impact on postretirement benefit obligation as of December 31, One Percent Increase	60
Impact on postretirement benefit obligation as of December 31, One Percent Decrease	$ (63)

XML

Consolidated Statements Of Comprehensive Income (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Statement Of Income And Comprehensive Income [Abstract]
Net earnings (loss)	$ (1,926)	$ (1,965)	$ (469)
Defined benefit pension plans and retiree medical:
Amortization of actuarial loss and prior service cost	130	130	138
Current year change	(1,910)	(1,216)	(385)
Benefit plan modifications	3,345
Derivative financial instruments:
Change in fair value	(12)	190	72
Reclassification into earnings	(3)	(313)	144
Unrealized gain (loss) on investments
Net change in value	6	(1)	(1)
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Before Tax	1,556	(1,210)	(32)
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Tax, Portion Attributable to Parent	569	0	0
Comprehensive Income (Loss)	$ (939)	$ (3,175)	$ (501)

XML

Investments and Fair Value Measurements

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Text Block [Abstract]

Investments and Fair Value Measurements

4.       Investments and Fair Value Measurements

Short-term investments consisted of (in millions):

	December  31,
	2012		2011
Overnight investments, time deposits and Repurchase agreements	$	306	$	130
Corporate and bank notes	2,121		1,808
U. S. government agency mortgages	545		502
U.S. government agency notes			—
Commingled funds	435		1,274
Other	1		—
	$	3,408	$	3,714

Short-term investments at December 31, 2012, by contractual maturity included (in millions):

Due in one year or less	$	2,258
Due between one year and three years	605
Due after three years	545
	$	3,408

All short-term investments are classified as available-for-sale and stated at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses are reflected as a component of Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).

The Company utilizes the market approach to measure fair value for its financial assets and liabilities. The market approach uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities. The Company’s short-term investments classified as Level 2 primarily utilize broker quotes in a non-active market for valuation of these securities. The Company’s fuel derivative contracts, which consist primarily of call options, collars (consisting of a purchased call option and a sold put option) and call spreads (consisting of a purchased call option and a sold call option), are valued using energy and commodity market data which is derived by combining raw inputs with quantitative models and processes to generate forward curves and volatilities. Heating oil, jet fuel and crude oil are the primary underlying commodities in the hedge portfolio. No changes in valuation techniques or inputs occurred during the year ended December 31, 2012.

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below:

(in millions)	Fair Value  Measurements as of December 31, 2012
Description	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Short-term investments 1, 2
Money market funds	$	436	$	436	$	—	$	—
Government agency investments	545		—		545		—
Repurchase agreements	304		—		304		—
Corporate obligations	1,519		—		1,519		—
Bank notes / Certificates of deposit / Time deposits	604		—		604		—
	3,408		436		2,972		—
Restricted cash and short-term investments 1	850		850		—		—
Fuel derivative contracts, net 1	65		—		65		—
Total	$	4,323	$	1,286	$	3,037	$	—

¹ Unrealized gains or losses on short-term investments, restricted cash and short-term investments and derivatives qualifying for hedge accounting are recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) at each measurement date.

² The Company’s short-term investments mature in one year or less except for $200 million of Bank notes/Certificates of deposit/Time deposits, $545 million of U.S. Government agency investments and $405 million of Corporate obligations which have maturity dates exceeding one year.

No significant transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 occurred during the year ended December 31, 2012. The Company’s policy regarding the recording of transfers between levels is to record any such transfers at the end of the reporting period.

As of December  31, 2012, the Company had no exposure to European sovereign debt.

XML

Special Charges and Restructuring Activities

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Restructuring And Related Activities [Abstract]

Special Charges and Restructuring Activities

3.        Special Charges and Restructuring Activities

Employee Charges

The Company's business plan as announced on February 1, 2012 contemplates, among other things, significantly reducing the number of positions. Based on agreements reached with various workgroups we now expect to reduce a total of approximately 10,500 positions. During the second quarter, the Company commenced both voluntary and involuntary employee separations from the Company. Consequently, during 2012, the Company recorded charges of approximately $360 million for severance related costs associated with the voluntary and involuntary reductions in certain work groups. The severance charges will be paid through the end of 2013.

Aircraft Charges

In connection with the Boeing and Airbus aircraft agreements entered into by American in the second quarter of 2011, and the Company’s anticipated acceleration of its fleet renewal and replacement plan, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $713 million in 2011 to write its Boeing 757 aircraft and certain related long-lived assets down to their estimated fair values. For further information regarding the Boeing and Airbus agreements, see Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements.

In 2008 and 2009, the Company announced capacity reductions due to unprecedented high fuel costs at that time and the other challenges facing the industry. In connection with these capacity reductions, the Company incurred special charges related to aircraft and certain other charges.

The following table summarizes the components of the Company’s special charges, the remaining accruals for these charges and the capacity reduction related charges (in millions) as of December 31, 2012:

	Aircraft Charges			Facility Exit Costs			Employee Charges			Total
Remaining accrual at January 1, 2010	$	153		$	20		$	—		$	173
Non-cash charges	—			—			—			—
Adjustments	(8		)	11			—			3
Payments	(86		)	(4		)	—			(90		)
Remaining accrual at December 31, 2010	$	59		$	27		$	—		$	86
Non-cash charges	(725		)	1			—			(724		)
Adjustments	751			(8		)	—			743
Payments	(36		)	(4		)	—			(40		)
Remaining accrual at December 31, 2011	$	49		$	16		$	—		$	65
Special charges	11			13			360			384
Non-cash charges	(11		)	(13		)	—			(24		)
Adjustments	(47		)	(11		)	—			(58		)
Payments	(2		)	(1		)	(168		)	(171		)
Remaining accrual at December 31, 2012	$	—		$	4		$	192		$	196

Cash outlays related to the accruals for facility exit costs will occur through 2017. However, these cash outlays could be modified in the Chapter 11 proceedings.

Other

As a result of the Terrorist Attacks and the subsequent liability protections provided for by the Air Transportation Safety and System Stabilization Act (the Stabilization Act), the Company recorded a liability for the Terrorist Attacks claims equal to the related insurance receivable due to American. The Stabilization Act provides that, notwithstanding any other provision of law, liability for all claims, whether compensatory or punitive, arising from the Terrorist Attacks, against any air carrier shall not exceed the liability coverage maintained by the air carrier. In the second quarter of 2011, the Company received $576 million in insurance

proceeds as partial settlement of claims related to the Terrorist Attacks. The Company used these funds to pay a portion of its share of the associated liability. Reflecting this settlement, the remaining liability, and the amount of the offsetting receivable as of December 31, 2012, were each $1.1 billion.

XML

Segment Reporting

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Segment Reporting [Abstract]

Segment Reporting

15.         Segment Reporting

The Company’s operations of American and AMR Eagle are treated as an integrated route network and the route scheduling system maximizes the operating results of the Company. The Company’s chief operating decision maker makes resource allocation decisions to maximize the Company’s consolidated financial results. Based on the way the Company treats the network and the manner in which resource allocation decisions are made, the Company has only one operating segment for financial reporting purposes consisting of the operations of American and AMR Eagle.

American, together with the American Eagle carriers and the third party carriers that provide regional feed to American, serves more than 250 cities in approximately 50 countries with, on average, 3,400 daily flights. The combined network fleet numbers approximately 900 aircraft. American is also one of the largest scheduled air freight carriers in the world, providing a wide range of freight and mail services to shippers throughout its system onboard American’s passenger fleet.

Revenues from other segments are below the quantitative threshold for determining reportable segments and consist primarily of revenues from Americas Ground Services, Inc. The difference between the financial information of the Company’s one reportable segment and the financial information included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and balance sheets as a result of these entities is not material.

The Company’s operating revenues by geographic region (as defined by DOT) are summarized below (in millions):

	Year Ended December 31,
	2012		2011		2010
DOT Domestic	$	14,257	$	13,782	$	13,062
DOT Latin America	5,813		5,460		4,619
DOT Atlantic	3,411		3,499		3,365
DOT Pacific	1,344		1,216		1,104
Total consolidated revenues	$	24,825	$	23,957	$	22,150

The Company attributes operating revenues by geographic region based upon the origin and destination of each flight segment. The Company’s tangible assets consist primarily of flight equipment, which are mobile across geographic markets and, therefore, have not been allocated.

XML

Retirement Benefits

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Compensation And Retirement Disclosure [Abstract]

Retirement Benefits

11.         Retirement Benefits

The Company sponsors defined benefit and defined contribution pension plans for eligible employees. The defined benefit plans provide benefits for participating employees based on years of service and average compensation for a specified period of time before retirement. The Company uses a December 31 measurement date for all of its defined benefit plans.

Modifications to Retirement and Life Insurance Benefits

On March 7, 2012, the Company announced that, in working with Creditors' Committee and the Pension Benefit Guarantee

Corporation (PBGC), it developed a solution that would allow the Company to pursue a freeze of its defined benefit pension plans for non-pilot employees instead of seeking termination. On September 14, 2012, the Company sent formal legal notice to all defined benefit plan participants and beneficiaries announcing that it was freezing each of the defined benefit pension plans. The freeze of these plans became effective as scheduled on November 1, 2012. Eligible non-pilot employees began to receive a replacement benefit under the $uper $aver 401(k) Plan on November 1, 2012, with the Company matching employee contributions up to 5.5 percent of eligible earnings. With the ratification of a new collective bargaining agreement by pilots on December 7, 2012, pilots began to receive a replacement benefit in the form of a Company contribution to the $uper $aver 401(k) Plan of 14 percent of eligible earnings for work performed beginning on November 1, 2012.

Effective November 8, 2012, the U.S. Treasury Department and the Internal Revenue Service published a Final Regulation establishing the process by which the Company could seek to amend certain structural aspects of the Pilot A Plan, a defined benefit plan. Under that process, the Company applied to the PBGC for a determination that it met the standard to amend the Plan to remove the lump-sum benefit feature and other similar optional forms of benefit. On December 13, 2012, the PBGC issued its determination that the Company has met the standard for amendment set forth in the Final Regulation. On November 23, 2012, the Company filed a motion in the Bankruptcy Court seeking approval of the A Plan amendment. After a hearing on December 19, 2012, the Court granted the motion.  On December 21, 2012, the Company amended the A Plan to remove the lump-sum and other similar optional forms of benefit for commencements after December 31, 2012. A small group of American pilots is appealing the Bankruptcy Court's decision authorizing American to eliminate the lump sum and other similar optional forms of benefit. This is the same group of pilots that is appealing the Bankruptcy Court's decisions authorizing American to reject the pilot CBA and approving the new pilot CBA. All of these appeals have been consolidated, and are pending in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.

The Company also terminated the Pilot B Plan, a defined contribution plan, on November 30, 2012. Plan B assets will be distributed to pilots in mid-2013.

On September 14, 2012, the Company notified active employees of its plans to modify its subsidized retiree medical coverage on November 1, 2012.  Those who initiate retiree medical coverage on or after November 1, 2012 will go into a new retiree medical program. For those who retire before age 65, two medical options will be available, but the Company will not be subsidizing them. Those who retire at age 65 and over may purchase a guaranteed-issue Medicare supplement plan. Flight attendants and TWU-represented employees will receive a refund of their prefunding retiree medical contributions within 120 days of November 1, 2012.

On March 23, 2012, the Bankruptcy Court entered a Stipulation and Order providing for the appointment of a committee of retired independent and unionized AMR employees (the "Retiree Committee"), and on May 3, 2012 appointed five members to the Retiree Committee.  On August 15, 2012, the Company filed a proceeding in the Bankruptcy Court seeking a determination on the issue of vesting for former employees who retired and initiated retiree medical coverage before November 1, 2012.  The Court held a hearing on January 23, 2013 and has not ruled on this matter as of the date of this report. On September 20, 2012, the Company opened negotiations with the Retiree Committee, seeking a consensual agreement to terminate subsidized retiree medical coverage and life insurance coverage. Those negotiations are continuing. 

As a result of the modifications to the retirement benefits as discussed above, a portion of the pension and postretirement benefits liability, primarily relating to retiree medical and other benefits, was classified as liabilities subject to compromise as of December 31, 2012.

Curtailment and Plan Amendment in the Third Quarter of 2012

In accordance with ASC 715 “Retirement Benefits” (ASC 715), in the third quarter of 2012 the Company remeasured its defined benefit pension and retiree medical plans as a result of modifications to its retirement plans and reductions in certain work groups (see above and Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements). The Company updated its significant actuarial assumptions used for the remeasurements including the discount rate, which was lowered to 4.10 percent and 3.80 percent for the defined benefit pension plans and retiree medical plans, respectively.

The remeasurement of the defined benefit plans resulted in an actuarial loss of $1.9 billion offset by a curtailment gain of $1.8 billion. In addition, a loss of $58 million, representing unamortized prior service cost as of the remeasurement date of the frozen defined benefit plans, is included as a component of reorganization items, net.

Further, as a result of modifications to its retiree medical plans, the Company recognized a negative plan amendment of $1.9 billion, which is included as a component of actuarial gain arising in current year in other comprehensive income and will be amortized over the future service life of the active plan participants for whom the benefit was eliminated, or approximately 8 years.

In addition, a net credit of $124 million, representing unamortized prior service credits of $157 million offset by a curtailment loss of $33 million, is included as a component of reorganization items, net.

Year End Information

The following table provides a reconciliation of the changes in the pension and retiree medical and other benefit obligations and fair value of assets for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, and a statement of funded status as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 (in millions):

	Pension Benefits						Retiree  Medical and Other Benefits
	2012			2011			2012			2011
Reconciliation of benefit obligation
Obligation at January 1	$	14,568		$	12,968		$	3,122		$	3,097
Service cost	341			386			46			61
Interest cost	729			757			128			174
Actuarial (gain) loss	2,345			1,237			104			(63		)
Plan amendments	301			—			(1,904		)	(3		)
Curtailments	(1,841		)	—			33			—
Benefit payments	(548		)	(780		)	(117		)	(144		)
Obligation at December 31	$	15,895		$	14,568		$	1,412		$	3,122

Reconciliation of fair value of plan assets
Fair value of plan assets at January 1	$	8,132		$	7,773		$	205		$	234
Actual return on plan assets	1,204			614			26			(6		)
Employer contributions	277			525			97			121
Benefit payments	(548		)	(780		)	(117		)	(144		)
Fair value of plan assets at December 31	$	9,065		$	8,132		$	211		$	205
Funded status at December 31	$	(6,830	)	$	(6,436	)	$	(1,201	)	$	(2,917	)

Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets
Current liability	$	21	$	2	$	—	$	147
Noncurrent liability	6,809		6,434		1,201		2,770
	$	6,830	$	6,436	$	1,201	$	2,917

Amounts recognized in other comprehensive loss
Net actuarial loss (gain)	$	3,943	$	4,179	$	(78	)	$	(181	)
Prior service cost (credit)	301		68		(1,844		)	(179		)
	$	4,244	$	4,247	$	(1,922	)	$	(360	)

For plans with accumulated benefit obligations exceeding the fair value of plan assets	Pension Benefits				Retiree Medical and Other Benefits
	2012		2011		2012		2011
Projected benefit obligation (PBO)	$	15,895	$	14,568	$	—	$	—
Accumulated benefit obligation (ABO)	15,866		12,935		—		—
Accumulated postretirement benefit obligation (APBO)	—		—		1,412		3,122
Fair value of plan assets	9,065		8,132		211		205
ABO less fair value of plan assets	6,801		4,803		—		—

At December 31, 2012 and 2011, pension benefit plan assets of $259 million and $143 million, respectively, and retiree medical and other benefit plan assets of $208 million and $203 million, respectively, were invested in shares of certain mutual funds.

The following tables provide the components of net periodic benefit cost for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 (in millions):

	Pension Benefits
	2012			2011			2010
Components of net periodic benefit cost
Defined benefit plans:
Service cost	$	341		$	386		$	366
Interest cost	729			757			737
Expected return on assets	(676		)	(657		)	(593		)
Curtailments	58			—			—
Amortization of:
Prior service cost	10			13			13
Unrecognized net loss	211			154			154
Net periodic benefit cost for defined benefit plans	673			653			677
Defined contribution plans	202			162			152
	$	875		$	815		$	829

The estimated net loss for the defined benefit pension plans that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive income into net periodic benefit cost over the next fiscal year is $77 million.

	Retiree  Medical and Other Benefits
	2012			2011			2010
Components of net periodic benefit cost
Service cost	$	46		$	61		$	60
Interest cost	128			174			165
Expected return on assets	(17		)	(20		)	(18		)
Curtailments	(124		)	—			—
Amortization of:
Prior service cost	(82		)	(28		)	(19		)
Unrecognized net loss (gain)	(9		)	(9		)	(10		)
Net periodic benefit cost	$	(58	)	$	178		$	178

The estimated net gain for the retiree medical and other postretirement plans that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive income into net periodic benefit cost over the next fiscal year is $9 million.

	Pension  Benefits				Retiree  Medical and Other Benefits
	2012		2011		2012		2011
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations as of December 31
Discount rate	4.20	%	5.20	%	3.80	%	4.89	%
Salary scale (ultimate)	—		3.78		—		—

	Pension  Benefits				Retiree  Medical and Other Benefits
	2012		2011		2012		2011
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost for the years ended December 31
Discount rate 1/1/2012 - 9/30/2012	5.20	%	5.80	%	4.89	%	5.69	%
Discount rate 10/1/2012 - 12/31/2012	4.10	%	5.80	%	3.80	%	5.69	%
Salary scale (ultimate) 1/1 - 9/30/2012	3.78		3.78		—		—
Salary scale (ultimate) 10/1/2012 - 12/31/2012	—		3.78		—		—
Expected return on plan assets	8.25		8.50		8.25		8.50

As of December 31, 2012, the Company’s estimate of the long-term rate of return on plan assets was 8.00 percent based on the target asset allocation. Expected returns on longer duration bonds are based on yields to maturity of the bonds held at year-end. Expected returns on other assets are based on a combination of long-term historical returns, actual returns on plan assets achieved over the last ten years, current and expected market conditions, and expected value to be generated through active management, currency overlay and securities lending programs. The Company’s annualized ten-year rate of return on plan assets as of December 31, 2012, was approximately 10.15 percent.

The objectives of the Company’s investment policies are to: maintain sufficient income and liquidity to pay retirement benefits; produce a long-term rate of return that meets or exceeds the assumed rate of return for plan assets; limit the volatility of asset performance and funded status; and diversify assets among asset classes and investment managers.

Based on these investment objectives, a long-term strategic asset allocation has been established. This strategic allocation seeks to balance the potential benefit of improving funded position with the potential risk that the funded position would decline. The current strategic target asset allocation is as follows:

Asset Class/Sub-Class	Allowed  Range
Equity	60	%	-	70%
Public:
U.S. Value	18	%	-	33%
International Value	14	%	-	24%
Emerging Markets	5	%	-	11%
Alternative Investments	0	%	-	18%
Fixed Income	30	%	-	40%
U.S. Long Duration	30	%	-	40%
Other	0	%	-	5%
Cash Equivalents	0	%	-	5%

Each asset class is actively managed and, historically, the plans’ assets have produced returns, net of management fees, in excess of the expected rate of return over the last ten years. Stocks and emerging market bonds are used to provide diversification and are expected to generate higher returns over the long-term than longer duration U.S. bonds. Public stocks are managed using a value investment approach in order to participate in the returns generated by stocks in the long-term, while reducing year-over-year volatility. Longer duration U.S. bonds are used to partially hedge the assets from declines in interest rates. Alternative (private) investments are used to provide expected returns in excess of the public markets over the long-term. Additionally, the Company engages currency overlay managers in an attempt to increase returns by protecting non-U.S. dollar denominated assets from a rise in the relative value of the U.S. dollar. The Company also participates in securities lending programs to generate additional income by loaning plan assets to borrowers on a fully collateralized basis. These programs are subject to market risk.

Investments in securities traded on recognized securities exchanges are valued at the last reported sales price on the last business day of the year. Securities traded in the over-the-counter market are valued at the last bid price. The money market fund is valued at fair value which represents the net asset value of the shares of such fund as of the close of business at the end of the period. Investments in limited partnerships are carried at estimated net asset value as determined by and reported by the general partners of the partnerships and represent the proportionate share of the estimated fair value of the underlying assets of the limited partnerships. Common/collective trusts are valued at net asset value based on the fair values of the underlying investments of the

trusts as determined by the sponsor of the trusts. The 103-12 investment trust is valued at net asset value which is determined by the issuer at the end of each month and is based on the aggregate fair value of trust assets less liabilities, divided by the number of units outstanding. No changes in valuation techniques or inputs occurred during the period.

The fair values of the Company’s pension plan assets at December 31, 2012 and 2011, by asset category are as follows:

	Fair Value  Measurements at December 31, 2012 (in millions)
	Quoted Prices in Active Markets  for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Total
Asset Category
Cash and cash equivalents	$	275	$	—	$	—	$	275
Equity securities
International markets (a)(b)	2,443		—		—		2,443
Large-cap companies (b)	1,601		—		—		1,601
Mid-cap companies (b)	216		—		—		216
Small-cap companies(b)	21		—		—		21
Fixed Income
Corporate bonds (c)	—		2,094		—		2,094
Government securities (d)	—		1,172		—		1,172
U.S. municipal securities	—		57		—		57
Alternative investments
Private equity partnerships (e)	—		—		914		914
Common/collective and 103-12 investment trusts (f)	—		229		—		229
Insurance group annuity contracts	—		—		2		2
Dividend and interest receivable	38		—		—		38
Due to/from brokers for sale of securities - net	1		—		—		1
Other assets – net	2		—		—		2
Total	$	4,597	$	3,552	$	916	$	9,065

a) Holdings are diversified as follows: 20 percent United Kingdom, 9 percent Japan, 9 percent France, 8 percent Switzerland, 8 percent Germany, 5 percent Netherlands, 5 percent Republic of Korea, 15 percent emerging markets and the remaining 22 percent with no concentration greater than 5 percent in any one country.

b) There are no significant concentration of holdings by company or industry.

c) Includes approximately 79 percent investments in corporate debt with a Standard and Poor’s (S&P) rating lower than A and 21 percent investments in corporate debt with an S&P rating A or higher. Holdings include 81 percent U.S. companies, 16 percent international companies and 3 percent emerging market companies.

d) Includes approximately 88 percent investments in U.S. domestic government securities and 12 percent in emerging market government securities. There are no significant foreign currency risks within this classification.

e) Includes limited partnerships that invest primarily in U.S. (92 percent) and European (8 percent) buyout opportunities of a range of privately held companies. The Master Trust does not have the right to redeem its limited partnership investment at its net asset value. Instead, the Master Trust receives distributions as the underlying assets are liquidated. It is estimated that the underlying assets of these funds will be gradually liquidated over the next 1 to 10 years. Additionally, the Master Trust has future funding commitments of approximately $331 million over the next 10 years.

f) Investment includes 74 percent in an emerging market 103-12 investment trust with investments in emerging country equity securities, 14 percent in Canadian segregated balanced value, income growth and diversified pooled funds and 12 percent in a common/collective trust investing in securities of smaller companies located outside the U.S., including developing markets. Requests for withdrawals must meet specific requirements with advance notice of redemption preferred.

	Fair Value  Measurements at December 31, 2011 (in millions)
	Quoted Prices in Active Markets  for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Total
Asset Category
Cash and cash equivalents	$	160	$	—	$	—	$	160
Equity securities
International markets (a)(b)	1,939		—		—		1,939
Large-cap companies (b)	1,462		—		—		1,462
Mid-cap companies (b)	221		—		—		221
Small-cap companies(b)	17		—		—		17
Fixed Income
Corporate bonds (c)	—		1,866		—		1,866
Government securities (d)	—		1,205		—		1,205
U.S. municipal securities	—		52		—		52
Alternative investments
Private equity partnerships (e)	—		—		920		920
Common/collective and 103-12 investment trusts (f)	—		172		—		172
Insurance group annuity contracts	—		—		2		2
Dividend and interest receivable	42		—		—		42
Due to/from brokers for sale of securities - net	72		—		—		72
Other assets – net	2		—		—		2
Total	$	3,915	$	3,295	$	922	$	8,132

a) Holdings are diversified as follows: 22 percent United Kingdom, 10 percent Japan, 9 percent France, 7 percent Switzerland, 6 percent Germany, 5 percent Netherlands, 5 percent Republic of Korea, 13 percent emerging markets and the remaining 23 percent with no concentration greater than 5 percent in any one country.

b) There are no significant concentration of holdings by company or industry.

c) Includes approximately 83 percent investments in corporate debt with a Standard and Poor’s (S&P) rating lower than A and 17 percent investments in corporate debt with an S&P rating A or higher. Holdings include 80 percent U.S. companies, 18 percent international companies and 2 percent emerging market companies.

d) Includes approximately 89 percent investments in U.S. domestic government securities and 11 percent in emerging market government securities. There are no significant foreign currency risks within this classification.

e) Includes limited partnerships that invest primarily in U.S. (92 percent) and European (8 percent) buyout opportunities of a range of privately held companies. The Master Trust does not have the right to redeem its limited partnership investment at its net asset value. Instead, the Master Trust receives distributions as the underlying assets are liquidated. It is estimated that the underlying assets of these funds will be gradually liquidated over the next 1 to 10 years. Additionally, the Master Trust has future funding commitments of approximately $335 million over the next 10 years.

f) Investment includes 71 percent in an emerging market 103-12 investment trust with investments in emerging country equity securities, 16 percent in Canadian segregated balanced value, income growth and diversified pooled funds and 13 percent in a common/collective trust investing in securities of smaller companies located outside the U.S., including developing markets. Requests for withdrawals must meet specific requirements with advance notice of redemption preferred.

Not included in the above tables are receivables and payables for foreign currency forward contracts and futures contracts which net to approximately $2 million and collateral held on loaned securities and the obligation to return collateral on loaned securities which effectively net to zero.

Changes in fair value measurements of Level 3 investments during the year ended December 31, 2012, were as follows:

	Private Equity Partnerships			Insurance Group Annuity Contracts
Beginning balance at December 31, 2011	$	920		$	2
Actual return on plan assets:
Relating to assets still held at the reporting date	20
Relating to assets sold during the period	102
Purchases	96
Sales	(224		)
Ending balance at December 31, 2012	$	914		$	2

Changes in fair value measurements of Level 3 investments during the year ended December 31, 2011, were as follows:

	Private Equity Partnerships			Insurance Group Annuity Contracts
Beginning balance at December 31, 2010	$	795		$	3
Actual return on plan assets:
Relating to assets still held at the reporting date	53
Relating to assets sold during the period	48
Purchases	146
Sales	(122		)	(1		)
Ending balance at December 31, 2011	$	920		$	2

The fair values of the Company’s other postretirement benefit plan assets at December 31, 2012 by asset category were as follows:

	Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2012 (in millions)
	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical  Assets (Level 1)		Significant Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Total
Asset Category
Money market fund	$	9	$	—	$	—	$	9
Unitized mutual funds	—		202		—		202
Total	$	9	$	202	$	—	$	211

The fair values of the Company’s other postretirement benefit plan assets at December 31, 2011 by asset category were as follows:

	Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2011 (in millions)
	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical  Assets (Level 1)		Significant Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Total
Asset Category
Money market fund	$	4	$	—	$	—	$	4
Unitized mutual funds	—		201		—		201
Total	$	4	$	201	$	—	$	205

Investments in the unitized mutual funds are carried at the per share net asset value and include approximately 28 percent of investments in non-U.S. common stocks in 2012 and approximately 27 percent of investments in non-U.S. common stocks in 2011. Net asset value is based on the fair market value of the funds’ underlying assets and liabilities at the date of determination. Investments in the money market fund are valued at fair value which represents the net assets value of the shares of such fund as of the close of business at the end of the period.

	2012		2011
Assumed health care trend rates at December 31
Health care cost trend rate assumed for next year	7.0	%	7.5	%
Rate to which the cost trend rate is assumed to decline (the ultimate trend rate)	4.5	%	4.5	%
Year that the rate reaches the ultimate trend rate	2018		2018

A one percentage point change in the assumed health care cost trend rates would have the following effects (in millions):

	One  Percent Increase	One  Percent Decrease
Impact on 2012 service and interest cost	$15	$(16)
Impact on postretirement benefit obligation as of December 31, 2012	60	(63)

The Company is required to make minimum contributions to its defined benefit pension plans under the minimum funding requirements of ERISA, the Pension Funding Equity Act of 2004, the Pension Protection Act of 2006, and the Pension Relief Act of 2010.

As a result of the Chapter 11 Cases, AMR contributed $272 million to its US defined benefit pension plans in 2012 to cover post-petition periods. As a result of only contributing the post-petition portion of the required contribution, the PBGC filed a lien against certain assets of the Company. The Company’s 2013 contribution to its defined benefit pension plans is subject to the Chapter 11 proceedings.

The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future service as appropriate, are expected to be paid:

	Pension	Retiree  Medical and Other
2013	$620	$135
2014	620	131
2014	645	124
2016	663	117
2017	699	110
2018 – 2022	4,011	450

XML

Retirement Benefits (Schedule Of Assumption Used Calculating Benefit Obligation) (Detail)	3 Months Ended	9 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012	Sep. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Defined Benefit Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost, Expected return on plan assets			8.00%
Pension Plans [Member]
Defined Benefit Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations, Discount rate	4.20%		4.20%	5.20%
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations, Salary scale (ultimate)	0.00%		0.00%	3.78%
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost, Discount rate	4.10%	5.20%		5.80%
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost, Salary scale (ultimate)	0.00%	3.78%		3.78%
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost, Expected return on plan assets			8.25%	8.50%
Other Postretirement Benefit Plans [Member]
Defined Benefit Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations, Discount rate	3.80%		3.80%	4.89%
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost, Discount rate	3.80%	4.89%		5.69%
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost, Expected return on plan assets			8.25%	8.50%

XML

Indebtedness

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Debt Disclosure [Abstract]

Indebtedness

7.         Indebtedness

Long-term debt classified as not subject to compromise consisted of (in millions):

	December 31, 2012		December 31, 2011
Secured variable and fixed rate indebtedness due through 2023 (effective rates from 1.00%—13.00% at December 31, 2012)	$	3,297	$	2,952
Enhanced equipment trust certificates due through 2021 (rates from 5.10%—10.375% at December 31, 2012)	1,741		1,942
6.00%—8.50% special facility revenue bonds due through 2036	1,313		1,436
7.50% senior secured notes due 2016	1,000		1,000
AAdvantage Miles advance purchase (net of discount of $53 million) (effective rate 8.3%)	772		890
Other	27		27
	8,150		8,247
Less current maturities	1,388		1,518
Long-term debt, less current maturities	$	6,762	$	6,729

The financings listed in the table above are considered not subject to compromise. For information regarding the liabilities subject to compromise, see Note 1 and Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements.

The Company’s future long-term debt and operating lease payments have changed as its ordered aircraft are delivered and such deliveries have been financed. As of December 31, 2012, maturities of long-term debt (including sinking fund requirements) for the next five years are:

Years Ending December 31 (in millions)	Principal Not Subject to Compromise		Principal Subject to Compromise		Total Principal Amount
2013	$	1,388	$	93	$	1,481
2014	857		152		1,009
2015	758		6		764
2016	1,751		5		1,756
2017	492		42		534

Principal Not Subject to Compromise and Subject to Compromise includes payments not made due to the Chapter 11 Cases of $1 million and $50 million respectively.

As of December 31, 2012, AMR had issued guarantees covering approximately $1.5 billion of American’s tax-exempt bond debt (and interest thereon) and $4.2 billion of American’s secured debt (and interest thereon). American had issued guarantees covering approximately $842 million of AMR’s unsecured debt (and interest thereon). AMR also guarantees $6.3 million of American’s leases of certain Super ATR aircraft and certain Embraer RJ-135 aircraft, which are subleased to AMR Eagle.

During 2012, the Company entered into a series of agreements with the lender with respect to its 216 Embraer RJ aircraft and certain other interested parties pursuant to which the Company (i) surrendered 18 Embraer RJ 135 aircraft on June 21, 2012, (ii) subject to certain conditions (including reaching agreement on definitive documentation), will restructure the mortgage debt encumbering 59 Embraer 140 aircraft and 68 Embraer 145 aircraft and (iii) transferred and leased back its remaining 21 Embraer RJ 135 aircraft. The debt encumbering 50 Embraer 145 aircraft will not be reduced. The Company's entry into these transactions was approved by the Bankruptcy Court on November 8, 2012. The modifications to the financing arrangement for the Embraer RJ-140, RJ-145, and RJ-135 aircraft meet the definition of troubled debt restructurings per ASC 470-60 "Troubled Debt Restructurings by Debtors", and resulted in a gain of approximately $380 million, or $1.13 gain per share, offset by estimated claims filed by the creditor of approximately $592 million and a loss on the asset transfer of approximately $64 million.  The estimated net loss of $276 million is included as a component of reorganization items, net.

On January 25, 2011, American closed on a $657 million offering of Class A and Class B Pass Through Trust Certificates, Series 2011-1 (the 2011-1 Certificates).  Interest of 5.25% and 7.00% per annum on the issued and outstanding Series A equipment notes and Series B equipment notes, respectively, will be payable semiannually on January 31 and July 31 of each year, commencing

on July 31, 2011, and principal on such equipment notes is scheduled for payment on January 31 and July 31 of certain years, commencing on July 31, 2011. The payment obligations of American under the equipment notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by AMR. All proceeds from the sale of the Series 2011-1 Certificates have been received by American.

In March 2011, American issued $1.0 billion aggregate principal amount of senior secured notes due 2016 (the Senior Secured Notes) guaranteed by the Company. The Senior Secured Notes bear interest at a rate of 7.50% per annum, payable semi-annually on March 15 and September 15 of each year, beginning September 15, 2011. As is customary for financings of this nature, the indebtedness evidenced by the Senior Secured Notes may be accelerated upon the occurrence of events of default under the related indenture. The Senior Secured Notes are senior secured obligations of American and are unconditionally guaranteed on an unsecured basis by the Company. Subject to certain limitations and exceptions, the Senior Secured Notes are secured by certain route authorities, airport landing and takeoff slots, and rights to use or occupy space in airport terminals, in each case that American uses to operate non-stop services between certain airports in the United States and London’s Heathrow Airport, and between certain airports in the United States and certain airports in Japan and China.

American, at its option, may redeem some or all of the Senior Secured Notes at any time on or after March 15, 2013, at specified redemption prices, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any. In addition, at any time prior to March 15, 2013, American, at its option, may redeem some or all of the Senior Secured Notes at a redemption price equal to 100% of their principal amount plus a “make-whole” premium and accrued and unpaid interest, if any. In addition, at any time prior to March 15, 2014, American, at its option, may redeem (1) up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the Senior Secured Notes with the proceeds of certain equity offerings at a redemption price of 107.5% of their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, and (2) during any 12-month period, up to 10% of the original aggregate principal amount of the Senior Secured Notes at a redemption price of 103% of their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any. If American sells certain assets or if a “change of control” (as defined in the indenture) occurs, American must offer to repurchase the Senior Secured Notes at prices specified in the indenture.

The indenture for the Senior Secured Notes includes covenants that, among other things, limit the ability of the Company and its subsidiaries to merge, consolidate, sell assets, incur additional indebtedness, issue preferred stock, make investments and pay dividends.

On October 4, 2011, American closed on a $726 million offering of Class A Pass Through Trust Certificates, Series 2011-2 (the 2011-2 Certificates).  Interest of 8.625% per annum on the issued and outstanding 2011-2 Certificates will be payable semiannually on April 15 and October 15 of each year, commencing on April 15, 2012, and principal on such equipment notes is scheduled for payment on April 15 and October 15 of certain years, commencing on April 15, 2012. The payment obligations of American under the equipment notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by AMR. All proceeds from the sale of the Series 2011-2 Certificates have been received by American.

In 2009, American entered into an arrangement under which Citibank paid to American $1 billion in order to pre-purchase AAdvantage Miles (the Advance Purchase Miles) under American’s AAdvantage frequent flier loyalty program (the Advance Purchase). Approximately $890 million of the Advance Purchase proceeds was accounted for as a loan from Citibank with the remaining $110 million recorded as Deferred Revenue in Other liabilities and deferred credits.

To effect the Advance Purchase, American and Citibank entered into an Amended and Restated AAdvantage Participation (as so amended and restated, the Amended Participation Agreement). Under the Amended Participation Agreement, American agreed that it would apply in equal monthly installments, over a five year period beginning on January 1, 2012, the Advance Purchase Miles to Citibank cardholders’ AAdvantage accounts.

Pursuant to the Advance Purchase, Citibank has been granted a first-priority lien on certain of American’s AAdvantage program assets, and a second lien on the collateral that secures the Senior Secured Notes. Commencing on December 31, 2011, American has the right to repurchase, without premium or penalty, any or all of the Advance Purchase Miles that have not then been posted to Citibank cardholders’ accounts. American is also obligated, in certain circumstances (including certain specified termination events under the Amended Participation Agreement, certain cross defaults and cross acceleration events, and if any Advance Purchase Miles remain at the end of the term) to repurchase for cash all of the Advance Purchase Miles that have not then been used by Citibank.

The Amended Participation Agreement includes provisions that grant Citibank the right to use Advance Purchase Miles on an accelerated basis under specified circumstances. American also has the right under certain circumstances to release, or substitute other comparable collateral for, the Heathrow and Narita route and slot related collateral.

Certain of the American’s debt financing agreements contain loan to value ratio covenants and require American to periodically appraise the collateral. Pursuant to such agreements, if the loan to value ratio exceeds a specified threshold, American is required, as applicable, to subject additional qualifying collateral (which in some cases may include cash collateral), or pay down such financing, in whole or in part, with premium (if any), or pay additional interest on the related indebtedness, as described below.

Specifically, American is required to meet certain collateral coverage tests on a periodic basis on two financing transactions: (1) 10.5% $450 million Senior Secured Notes due 2012, (the 10.5% Notes) and (2) Senior Secured Notes, as described below:

	(1) 10.5% Notes		(2) Senior Secured Notes
Frequency of     Appraisals	Semi-Annual (April and October, ending April 2011)		Semi-Annual (June and December)
LTV Requirement	43%; failure to meet collateral test requires posting of additional collateral		1.5x Collateral valuation to amount of debt outstanding (67% LTV); failure to meet collateral test results in American paying 2% additional interest until the ratio is at least 1.5x; additional collateral can be posted to meet this requirement
LTV as of Last Measurement     Date	47.5%		38.8%
			Generally, certain route authorities, take-off and landing slots, and rights to airport facilities used by American to operate certain services between the U.S. and London Heathrow, Tokyo Narita/Haneda, and China
Collateral Description	143 aircraft consisting of:
	Type	# of Aircraft
	MD-80	74
	B757-200	41
	B767-200ER	3
	B767-300ER	25
	TOTAL	143

At December 31, 2012, the Company was in compliance with the most recently completed collateral coverage tests for the Senior Secured Notes. As of December 31, 2012, American had $41 million of cash collateral posted with respect to the 10.5% Notes but was not in compliance with the most recently completed collateral coverage test for that transaction. The Company has not remedied its non-compliance with that test due to the ongoing Chapter 11 Cases. On October 1, 2012, the indebtedness underlying the 2005 Spare Engine EETC with respect to which American was required to comply with a collateral coverage test was paid in full, so American is no longer required to comply with a collateral coverage test for that transaction.

Cash payments for interest, net of capitalized interest, were $498 million, $628 million and $627 million for 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Almost all of the Company’s aircraft assets (including aircraft and aircraft-related assets eligible for the benefits of section 1110 of the Bankruptcy Code) are encumbered, and the Company has a very limited quantity of assets which could be used as collateral in financing.

The Chapter 11 Cases triggered defaults on substantially all debt and lease obligations of the Debtors. However, under section 362 of the Bankruptcy Code, the commencement of a Chapter 11 case automatically stays most creditor actions against the Debtors’ estates.

The Debtors cannot predict the impact, if any, that the Chapter 11 Cases might have on these obligations. For further information

regarding the Chapter 11 Cases, see Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements.

XML

Indebtedness (Components Of Long-Term Debt) (Detail) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Long-term debt	$ 8,150	$ 8,247
Less current maturities	1,388	1,518
Long-term debt, less current maturities	6,762	6,729
Secured Variable And Fixed Rate Indebtedness Due Through 2023 [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Long-term debt	3,297	2,952
Effective interest rate percentage - minimum	1.00%
Effective interest rate percentage - maximum	13.00%
Debt Instrument, Maturity Date Range, End	2023
Enhanced Equipment Trust Certificates Due Through 2021 [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Long-term debt	1,741	1,942
Percentage of debt instrument interest rate - minimum	5.10%
Percentage of debt instrument interest rate - maximum	10.375%
Debt Instrument, Maturity Date Range, End	2021
6.00% - 8.50% Special Facility Revenue Bonds Due Through 2036 [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Long-term debt	1,313	1,436
Percentage of debt instrument interest rate - minimum	6.00%
Percentage of debt instrument interest rate - maximum	8.50%
Debt Instrument, Maturity Date Range, End	2036
7.50% Senior Secured Notes Due 2016 [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Long-term debt	1,000	1,000
Debt Instrument, Maturity Date Range, End	2016
Percentage of debt instrument, interest rate	7.50%
AAdvantage Miles Advance Purchase [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Long-term debt	772	890
Debt Instrument, Interest Rate, Effective Percentage	8.30%
Debt instrument discount, net	53
Other LT Debt [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Long-term debt	$ 27	$ 27

XML

Commitments, Contingencies And Guarantees

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Commitments And Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]

Commitments, Contingencies And Guarantees

5.       Commitments, Contingencies and Guarantees

American had total aircraft acquisition commitments as of December 31, 2012 as follows:

		Boeing			Airbus
		737  Family	777-200ER	777-300ER	A320  Family	A320 NEO	Total
2013	Purchase	31	—	8	—	—	39
	Lease	—	—	—	20	—	20
2014	Purchase	5	1	5	—	—	11
	Lease	15	—	—	35	—	50
2015	Purchase		2	—	—	—	2
	Lease	20	—	—	30	—	50
2016	Purchase	—	2	—	—	—	2
	Lease	20	—	—	25	—	45
2017	Purchase	—	—	—	—	10	10
	Lease	20	—	—	20	—	40
2018 and beyond	Purchase	—	—	—	—	120	120
	Lease	—	—	—	—	—	—
Total	Purchase	36	5	13	—	130	184
	Lease	75	—	—	130	—	205

The assumption of certain agreements related to the Company's aircraft commitments is subject to collaboration with the Company's key stakeholders and, in some instances, approval of the Bankruptcy Court. The Company cannot predict what the outcome of these discussions and the Bankruptcy Court process will be.

As of December 31, 2012, and subject to assumption of certain of the related agreements, payments for the above purchase commitments and certain engines will approximate $2.1 billion in 2013, $1.0 billion in 2014, $314 million in 2015, $355 million in 2016, $745 million in 2017 and $6.6 billion for 2018 and beyond. These amounts are net of purchase deposits currently held by the manufacturers. American has granted Boeing a security interest in American’s purchase deposits with Boeing. The Company’s purchase deposits totaled $710 million as of December 31, 2012.

As of December 31, 2012, and subject to assumption of certain of the related agreements, total future lease payments for all leased aircraft, including aircraft not yet delivered, will approximate $727 million in 2013, $889 million in 2014, $1.1 billion in 2015, $1.4 billion in 2016, $1.6 billion in 2017 and $11.3 billion in 2018 and beyond. Certain leases provide for rent adjustments based on forumulae tied to changes in interest rates.

In February 2013, American entered into agreements with Boeing that provide for, among other things, the assumption and restructuring of certain existing aircraft purchase agreements, the entering into of a definitive purchase agreement with respect to Boeing 737 MAX aircraft, the confirmation of the purchase of the Boeing 787 aircraft (which previously had been subject to certain reconfirmation rights) and certain financing commitments. American also entered into an amendment to its agreement with Airbus S.A.S. in January 2013. The Bankruptcy Court approved assumption of these agreements, as amended, in January 2013. See Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements for further information regarding these agreements, including the changes to the Company's aircraft acquisition commitments, payments and options.

In 2010, American and Japan Airlines (JAL) entered into a Joint Business Agreement (JBA) under which, amongst other things, American provided JAL a guarantee of certain minimum incremental revenue resulting from the successful operation of the joint business for the first three years following its implementation, subject to certain terms and conditions. The amount required to be

paid by the Company under the guarantee in any one of such years may not exceed $100 million, and is reduced if capacity for one of such years is less than a defined base year period capacity. Based on current Trans-Pacific capacity, the guarantee in any one of such years may not exceed approximately $75 million. As of December 31, 2012, based on an expected probability model, American had recorded a guarantee liability that is not material.

The Company has contracts related to facility construction or improvement projects, primarily at airport locations. The contractual obligations related to these projects totaled approximately $79 million as of December 31, 2012. The Company expects to make payments on these obligations of $52 million, $10 million, and $17 million, in 2013, 2014, and 2015, respectively. In addition, the Company has an information technology support related contract that requires minimum annual payments of $80 million in 2013 and declining to $70 million in 2014 through 2019.

Capacity Purchase Agreements with Third Party Regional Airlines

On September 11, 2012, American entered into capacity purchase agreements with SkyWest Airlines, Inc. (SkyWest) and with ExpressJet Airlines, Inc. (ExpressJet), both wholly owned subsidiaries of SkyWest, Inc., to provide 50-seat regional jet feed.  Both airlines will operate the services under the American Eagle brand. SkyWest began service from Los Angeles International Airport on November 15, 2012, and ExpressJet is scheduled to begin service from Dallas-Ft. Worth International Airport on February 14, 2013. In addition, Chautauqua continued to operate under the brand AmericanConnection^® during 2012 under a capacity purchase agreement with American, which capacity purchase agreement was extended on November 1, 2012 to provide that Chautauqua will continue to operate in the American network into 2014.

As of December 31, 2012, American's capacity purchase agreements with third party regional airlines had expiration dates ranging from 2014 to 2017, with rights of American to extend the respective terms of each agreement. See Item 2, “Properties” for information on the aircraft contractually obligated to American under such capacity purchase agreements with third party regional airlines.

Under these agreements, the third party regional airlines operate certain of their aircraft using American's flight designator codes, and American controls the scheduling, pricing, reservations, ticketing and seat inventories of those aircraft and retains all revenues associated with revenue flights by those aircraft. American pays the third party regional airlines an amount, as defined in the applicable agreement, based on the airlines' costs of operating those flights and other factors intended to approximate market rates for those services.

As of December 31, 2012, American's minimum fixed obligations under its capacity purchase agreements with third party regional airlines were approximately $249 million in 2013, $188 million in 2014, $179 million in 2015, $170 million in 2016, $11 million in 2017 and $0 million in 2018 and beyond. These obligations contemplate minimum levels of flying by the third party airlines under the respective agreements and also reflect assumptions regarding certain costs associated with the minimum levels of flying such as the cost of fuel, insurance, catering, property tax and landing fees. Accordingly, actual payments under these agreements could differ materially from the minimum fixed obligations set forth above.

If American terminates the Chautauqua contract without cause, Chautauqua has the right to put its 15 Embraer aircraft to American. If this were to happen, American would take possession of the aircraft and become liable for lease obligations totaling approximately $20 million per year with lease expirations in 2018 and 2019.

See Note 17 for additional information on the Company's capacity purchase agreements.

Other

The Company is a party to many routine contracts in which it provides general indemnities in the normal course of business to third parties for various risks. The Company is not able to estimate the potential amount of any liability resulting from the indemnities. These indemnities are discussed in the following paragraphs.

In its aircraft financing agreements, the Company generally indemnifies the financing parties, trustees acting on their behalf and other relevant parties against liabilities (including certain taxes) resulting from the financing, manufacture, design, ownership, operation and maintenance of the aircraft regardless of whether these liabilities (or taxes) relate to the negligence of the indemnified parties.

The Company’s loan agreements and other London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR)-based financing transactions (including certain leveraged aircraft leases) generally obligate the Company to reimburse the applicable lender for incremental costs due to a change in law that imposes (i) any reserve or special deposit requirement against assets of, deposits with or credit extended by such lender related to the loan, (ii) any tax, duty or other charge with respect to the loan (except standard income tax) or (iii) capital adequacy requirements. In addition, the Company’s loan agreements, derivative contracts and other financing arrangements typically contain a withholding tax provision that requires the Company to pay additional amounts to the applicable lender or

other financing party, generally if withholding taxes are imposed on such lender or other financing party as a result of a change in the applicable tax law.

These increased cost and withholding tax provisions continue for the entire term of the applicable transaction, and there is no limitation on the maximum additional amounts the Company could be obligated to pay under such provisions. Any failure to pay amounts due under such provisions generally would trigger an event of default and, in a secured financing transaction, would entitle the lender to foreclose on the collateral to realize the amount due.

In certain transactions, including certain aircraft financing leases and loans and derivative transactions, the lessors, lenders and/or other parties have rights to terminate the transaction based on changes in foreign tax law, illegality or certain other events or circumstances. In such a case, the Company may be required to make a lump sum payment to terminate the relevant transaction.

The Company has general indemnity clauses in many of its airport and other real estate leases where the Company as lessee indemnifies the lessor (and related parties) against liabilities related to the Company’s use of the leased property. Generally, these indemnifications cover liabilities resulting from the negligence of the indemnified parties, but not liabilities resulting from the gross negligence or willful misconduct of the indemnified parties. In addition, the Company provides environmental indemnities in many of these leases for contamination related to the Company’s use of the leased property.

Under certain contracts with third parties, the Company indemnifies the third party against legal liability arising out of an action by the third party, or certain other parties. The terms of these contracts vary and the potential exposure under these indemnities cannot be determined. The Company has liability insurance protecting the Company for some of the obligations it has undertaken under these indemnities.

AMR and American have event risk covenants in approximately $497 million of indebtedness and operating leases as of December 31, 2012. These covenants permit the holders of such obligations to receive a higher rate of return (between 100 and 600 basis points above the stated rate) if a designated event, as defined, should occur and the credit ratings of such obligations are downgraded below certain levels within a certain period of time. No designated event, as defined, had occurred as of December 31, 2012.

The Company is involved in certain claims and litigation related to its operations. The Company is also subject to regulatory assessments in the ordinary course of business. AMR establishes reserves for litigation and regulatory matters when those matters present loss contingencies that are both probable and can be reasonably estimated. In the opinion of management, liabilities, if any, arising from these regulatory matters, claims and litigation will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows, after consideration of available insurance.

In the fourth quarter of 2012, the Company entered into a settlement agreement resolving a commercial dispute.  The settlement agreement includes two elements which were valued at relative fair value and will be recognized when earned.  The Company determined that the settlement includes a litigation gain of $280 million, which was valued using future cash flows and recognized in the fourth quarter of 2012.  The settlement also includes an incentive which is contingent upon signing a future contract and will be recognized over the term of the future contract, when and if signed.

As a result of the filing of the Chapter 11 Cases, attempts to prosecute, collect, secure or enforce remedies with respect to prepetition claims against the Debtors are subject to the automatic stay provisions of section 362(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, except in such cases where the Bankruptcy Court has entered an order modifying or lifting the automatic stay. Notwithstanding the general application of the automatic stay described above, governmental authorities, both domestic and foreign, may determine to continue actions brought under their regulatory powers. Therefore, the automatic stay may have no effect on certain matters, and the Debtors cannot predict the impact, if any, that its Chapter 11 Cases might have on its commitments and obligations.

XML

Leases

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Leases [Abstract]

Leases

6.      Leases

AMR’s subsidiaries lease various types of equipment and property, primarily aircraft and airport facilities. As allowed under section 365 and other relevant sections of the Bankruptcy Code, the Debtors may assume, assume and assign, or reject certain executory contracts and unexpired leases, including, without limitation, leases of real property, aircraft, and aircraft engines, subject to the approval of the Bankruptcy Court and other conditions, including compliance with section 1110 with respect to aircraft and aircraft-related assets. As of December 31, 2012, the Company had completed substantially all of its expected activities under section 365 of the Bankruptcy Code, including negotiating revised economic terms for its mainline aircraft in the Company's fleet. The Company's liabilities pertaining to leases may still change significantly in the future as differences between amounts scheduled by the Debtors and claims by creditors are investigated. See Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements for further information on the Company's Chapter 11 process, including the section 365 process and the magnitude of potential claims.

The future minimum lease payments required under capital leases, together with the present value of such payments, and future

minimum lease payments required under operating leases that have initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of December 31, 2012, were (in millions):

	Capital Leases			Operating Leases
Year Ending December 31,
2013	$	82		$	1,031
2014	69			961
2015	63			891
2016	56			815
2017	52			776
2018 and thereafter	360			4,531
	$	682		$	9,005	(2)
Less amount representing interest	251
Present value of net minimum lease payments	$	431	(1)

⁽¹⁾As of December 31, 2012, included in Liabilities Subject to Compromise on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet is approximately $19 million relating to ground capital leases.

⁽²⁾ As of December 31, 2012, $201 million and $160 million are included on the accompanying balance sheet in Liabilities Subject to Compromise and Accrued liabilities and other liabilities and deferred credits, respectively, relating to rent expense being recorded in advance of future operating lease payments.

American has entered into sale-leaseback arrangements with certain leasing companies to finance 26 Boeing 737-800 scheduled to be delivered from January 2013 through 2014 and one Boeing 777-300ER aircraft scheduled to be delivered in 2013 The financings of each aircraft under these arrangements are subject to certain terms and conditions. In addition, in some instances, they are also subject to collaboration with the Creditors' Committee and other key stakeholders and to the approval of the Bankruptcy Court.

During 2012, American financed 30 Boeing 737-800 and two 777-300ER aircraft under sale-leaseback arrangements, which are accounted for as operating leases. These sale-leaseback transactions resulted in gains which are being amortized over the respective remaining lease terms. During 2011, the Company incurred approximately $31 million in non-recurring non-cash charges related to certain sale-leaseback transactions. During 2010, the Company financed 36 deliveries of Boeing 737-800 aircraft through sale-leaseback transactions resulting in gains which are being amortized over the respective remaining lease terms.

At December 31, 2012, the Company was operating 215 jet aircraft and 9 turboprop aircraft under operating leases and 33 jet aircraft under capital leases. Leases can generally be renewed at rates based on fair market value at the end of the lease term for a number of additional years.

Special facility revenue bonds have been issued by certain municipalities primarily to improve airport facilities and purchase equipment. To the extent these transactions were committed to prior to May 21, 1998, they are accounted for as operating leases under U.S. GAAP. In accordance with various orders of the Bankruptcy Court, special facility revenue bond claims (totaling approximately $1.1 billion) in connection with the Alliance Airport, Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport and Luis Munoz Marin International Airport in San Juan are expected to be treated as general unsecured claims.  Approximately $486 million of the special facility revenue bonds that had not been compromised as of December 31, 2012 (with total future payments of approximately $822 million as of December 31, 2012) are guaranteed by American, AMR, or both. Approximately $112 million of these special facility revenue bonds contain mandatory tender provisions that require American to make operating lease payments sufficient to repurchase the bonds in 2014. Although American has the right to remarket the bonds, there can be no assurance that these bonds will be successfully remarketed. Any payments to redeem or purchase bonds that are not remarketed would generally reduce existing rent leveling accruals or be considered prepaid facility rentals and would reduce future operating lease commitments. The special facility revenue bonds that contain mandatory tender provisions are listed in the table above at their ultimate maturity date rather than their mandatory tender provision date.

Rent expense, excluding landing fees, was $1.4 billion, $1.6 billion and $1.4 billion in 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

American has determined that it holds a significant variable interest in, but is not the primary beneficiary of, certain trusts that are the lessors under 19 of its aircraft operating leases. These leases contain a fixed price purchase option, which allows American to

purchase the aircraft at a predetermined price on a specified date. However, American does not guarantee the residual value of the aircraft. As of December 31, 2012, future lease payments required under these leases totaled $98 million.

XML

Financial Instruments and Risk Management

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Derivative Instruments And Hedging Activities Disclosure [Abstract]

Financial Instruments and Risk Management

8.     Financial Instruments and Risk Management

Fuel Price Risk Management     As part of the Company’s risk management program, it uses a variety of financial instruments, primarily heating oil, jet fuel, and Brent crude option and collar contracts, as cash flow hedges to mitigate commodity price risk. The Company does not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading purposes. As of December 31, 2012, the Company had fuel derivative contracts outstanding covering 16 million barrels of jet fuel that will be settled over the next twelve months. A deterioration of the Company’s liquidity position and its Chapter 11 filing may negatively affect the Company’s ability to hedge fuel in the future.

In accordance with U.S. GAAP, the Company assesses, both at the inception of each hedge and on an ongoing basis, whether the derivatives that are used in its hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in cash flows of the hedged items. Derivatives that meet the requirements are granted special hedge accounting treatment, and the Company’s hedges generally meet these requirements. Accordingly, the Company’s fuel derivative contracts are accounted for as cash flow hedges, and the fair value of the Company’s hedging contracts is recorded in Current Assets or Current Liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets until the underlying jet fuel is purchased. The Company determines the ineffective portion of its fuel hedge contracts by comparing the cumulative change in the total value of the fuel hedge contract, or group of fuel hedge contracts, to the cumulative change in a hypothetical jet fuel hedge. If the total cumulative change in value of the fuel hedge contract more than offsets the total cumulative change in a hypothetical jet fuel hedge, the difference is considered ineffective and is immediately recognized as a component of Aircraft fuel expense. Effective gains or losses on fuel hedging contracts are deferred in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and are recognized in earnings as a component of Aircraft fuel expense when the underlying jet fuel being hedged is used.

Ineffectiveness is inherent in hedging jet fuel with derivative positions based in crude oil or other crude oil related commodities. In assessing effectiveness, the Company uses a regression model to determine the correlation of the change in prices of the commodities used to hedge jet fuel (e.g., NYMEX Heating oil) to the change in the price of jet fuel. The Company also monitors the actual dollar offset of the hedges’ market values as compared to hypothetical jet fuel hedges. The fuel hedge contracts are generally deemed to be “highly effective” if the R-squared is greater than 80 percent and dollar offset correlation is within 80 percent to 125 percent. The Company discontinues hedge accounting prospectively if it determines that a derivative is no longer expected to be highly effective as a hedge or if it decides to discontinue the hedging relationship. Subsequently, any changes in the fair value of these derivatives are marked to market through earnings in the period of change.

For the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, the Company recognized net gains/(losses) of approximately $4 million, $297 million and $(124) million, respectively, as a component of Aircraft fuel expense on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations related to its fuel hedging agreements, including the ineffective portion of the hedges. The net fair value of the Company’s fuel hedging agreements at December 31, 2012 and 2011, representing the amount the Company would receive upon termination of the agreements (net of settled contract assets), totaled $62 million and $80 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2012, the Company estimates that during the next twelve months it will reclassify from Accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) into earnings approximately $15 million in net gains (based on prices as of December 31, 2012) related to its fuel derivative hedges.

The impact of cash flow hedges on the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the years ending December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, is depicted below (in millions):

Fair Value of Aircraft Fuel Derivative Instruments (all cash flow hedges)
Asset Derivatives as of December 31,						Liability Derivatives as of December 31,
2012			2011			2012			2011
Balance Sheet Location	Fair Value		Balance Sheet Location	Fair Value		Balance Sheet Location	Fair Value		Balance Sheet Location	Fair Value
Fuel derivative contracts	$	65	Fuel derivative contracts	$	97	Accrued liabilities	$	—	Accrued liabilities	$	2

Effect of Aircraft Fuel Derivative Instruments on Statements of Operations (all cash flow hedges)

Amount of  Gain (Loss) Recognized in OCI on Derivative1				Location of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income 1	Amount of  Gain (Loss)  Reclassified from  Accumulated OCI into Income  1					Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized  in Income on Derivative 2	Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative 2
2012		2011			2012			2011			2012			2011
$	12	$	190	Aircraft  Fuel	$	(3	)	$	277	Aircraft  Fuel	$	(1	)	$	24

¹ Effective portion of gain (loss)

² Ineffective portion of gain (loss)

The Company is also exposed to credit losses in the event of non-performance by counterparties to these financial instruments, and although no assurances can be given, the Company does not expect any of the counterparties to fail to meet its obligations. The credit exposure related to these financial instruments is represented by the fair value of contracts with a positive fair value at the reporting date, reduced by the effects of master netting agreements. To manage credit risks, the Company selects counterparties based on credit ratings, limits its exposure to a single counterparty under defined guidelines, and monitors the market position of the program and its relative market position with each counterparty. The Company also maintains industry-standard security agreements with a number of its counterparties which may require the Company or the counterparty to post collateral if the value of selected instruments exceed specified mark-to-market thresholds or upon certain changes in credit ratings.

As of December 31, 2012, the Company had posted cash collateral of approximately $0.6 million which is included in other assets.

Fair Values of Financial Instruments The fair values of the Company’s long-term debt classified as Level 2 were estimated using quoted market prices or discounted cash flow analyses, based on the Company’s current estimated incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements. All of the Company’s long term debt not classified as subject to compromise is classified as Level 2.

The carrying value and estimated fair values of the Company’s long-term debt, including current maturities, not classified as subject to compromise, were (in millions):

	December  31, 2012				December  31, 2011
	Carrying Value		Fair Value		Carrying Value		Fair Value
Secured variable and fixed rate indebtedness	$	3,297	$	3,143	$	2,952	$	2,647
Enhanced equipment trust certificates	1,741		1,811		1,942		1,927
6.0% - 8.5% special facility revenue bonds	1,313		1,308		1,436		1,230
7.50% senior secured notes	1,000		1,074		1,000		711
AAdvantage Miles advance purchase	772		779		890		902
Other	27		27		27		27
	$	8,150	$	8,142	$	8,247	$	7,444

The carrying value and estimated fair value of the Company’s long-term debt, including current maturities, classified as subject to compromise, were (in millions):

	December  31, 2012				December  31, 2011
	Carrying Value		Fair Value		Carrying Value		Fair Value
Secured variable and fixed rate indebtedness	$	172	$	154	$	1,456	$	1,123
Enhanced equipment trust certificates	—		—		—		—
6.0% - 8.5% special facility revenue bonds	186		186		186		37
7.50% senior secured notes	—		—		—		—
AAdvantage Miles advance purchase	—		—		—		—
Other	—		—		—		—
	$	358	$	340	$	1,642	$	1,160

All of the Company’s long term debt classified as subject to compromise is classified as Level 2.

XML

Financial Instruments And Risk Management (Narrative) (Detail) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Derivative Instruments And Hedging Activities Disclosure [Abstract]
Derivative Instruments, Gain (Loss) Reclassification from Accumulated OCI to Income, Estimate of Time to Transfer	twelve
Collateral Already Posted, Aggregate Fair Value	$ 0.6
Derivative, Nonmonetary Notional Amount	16,000,000
Derivative, Higher Remaining Maturity Range	twelve
Derivative Instruments, Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income, Net	4	297	(124)
Price Risk Cash Flow Hedge Derivative, at Fair Value	62	80
Derivative Instruments, Gain (Loss) Reclassification from Accumulated OCI to Income, Estimated Net Amount to be Transferred	$ 15
Minimum R-squared percentage in fuel hedge contracts	80.00%
Minimum dollar offset correlation	80.00%
Maximum dollar offset correlation	125.00%

XML

Retirement Benefits (Summary Of Target Assets Allocation) (Detail)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012
Equity [Member]
Defined Benefit Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Percentage of target assets allocation, Equity - minimum	60.00%
Percentage of target assets allocation, Equity - maximum	70.00%
U.S. Value [Member]
Defined Benefit Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Percentage of target assets allocation, Equity - minimum	18.00%
Percentage of target assets allocation, Equity - maximum	33.00%
International Value [Member]
Defined Benefit Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Percentage of target assets allocation, Equity - minimum	14.00%
Percentage of target assets allocation, Equity - maximum	24.00%
Emerging Markets [Member]
Defined Benefit Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Percentage of target assets allocation, Equity - minimum	5.00%
Percentage of target assets allocation, Equity - maximum	11.00%
Alternative Investment [Member]
Defined Benefit Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Percentage of target assets allocation, Equity - minimum	0.00%
Percentage of target assets allocation, Equity - maximum	18.00%
Fixed Income [Member]
Defined Benefit Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Percentage of target assets allocation, Debt - minimum	30.00%
Percentage of target assets allocation, Debt - maximum	40.00%
U.S. Long Duration [Member]
Defined Benefit Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Percentage of target assets allocation, Debt - minimum	30.00%
Percentage of target assets allocation, Debt - maximum	40.00%
Other [Member]
Defined Benefit Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Percentage of target assets allocation, Other - minimum	0.00%
Percentage of target assets allocation, Other - maximum	5.00%
Cash Equivalents [Member]
Defined Benefit Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Percentage of target assets allocation, Other - minimum	0.00%
Percentage of target assets allocation, Other - maximum	5.00%

XML

Financial Instruments And Risk Management (Effect Of Derivative Instruments On Statements Of Operations) (Detail) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012		Dec. 31, 2011
Derivative Instruments And Hedging Activities Disclosure [Abstract]
Gain (Loss) on Cash Flow Hedge Ineffectiveness, Net	$ (1)		$ 24	[1]
Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income	(3)		277	[2]
Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in OCI on Derivative	$ 12		$ 190	[2]
Location of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income	Aircraft Fuel	[2]
Location Of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative	Aircraft Fuel	[1]

[1] Ineffective portion of gain (loss)

[2] Effective portion of gain (loss)

XML

Indebtedness (Schedule Of Collateral Coverage Tests) (Detail)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012
7.50% Senior Secured Notes Due 2016 [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
LTV Requirement Description	1.5x Collateral valuation to amount of debt outstanding (67% LTV); failure to meet collateral test results in American paying 2% additional interest until the ratio is at least 1.5x; additional collateral can be posted to meet this requirement
Collateral Description	Generally, certain route authorities, take-off and landing slots, and rights to airport facilities used by American to operate certain services between the U.S. and London Heathrow, Tokyo Narita/Haneda, and China
LTV as of Last Measurement Date	38.80%
10.5% Senior Secured Notes Due 2012 [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
LTV Requirement Description	43%; failure to meet collateral test requires posting of additional collateral
LTV as of Last Measurement Date	47.50%
Number of aircraft collateralized	143
Md Eight Zero [Member] | 10.5% Senior Secured Notes Due 2012 [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Number of aircraft collateralized	74
B757-200 [Member] | 10.5% Senior Secured Notes Due 2012 [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Number of aircraft collateralized	41
B767-200ER [Member] | 10.5% Senior Secured Notes Due 2012 [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Number of aircraft collateralized	3
B767-300ER [Member] | 10.5% Senior Secured Notes Due 2012 [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Number of aircraft collateralized	25

XML

Intangible Assets (Narrative) (Detail) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Goodwill And Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]
Indefinite-Lived International Slots and Routes	$ 708,000,000	$ 708,000,000
Airport operating and gate lease rights, amortized life (in years)	25
Airport operating and gate lease rights, residual value	0
Amortization expense	25,000,000	27,000,000	28,000,000
Average annual amortization expense next five years	$ 19,000,000

XML

Indebtedness (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Debt Disclosure [Abstract]

Components Of Long-Term Debt

Long-term debt classified as not subject to compromise consisted of (in millions):

	December 31, 2012		December 31, 2011
Secured variable and fixed rate indebtedness due through 2023 (effective rates from 1.00%—13.00% at December 31, 2012)	$	3,297	$	2,952
Enhanced equipment trust certificates due through 2021 (rates from 5.10%—10.375% at December 31, 2012)	1,741		1,942
6.00%—8.50% special facility revenue bonds due through 2036	1,313		1,436
7.50% senior secured notes due 2016	1,000		1,000
AAdvantage Miles advance purchase (net of discount of $53 million) (effective rate 8.3%)	772		890
Other	27		27
	8,150		8,247
Less current maturities	1,388		1,518
Long-term debt, less current maturities	$	6,762	$	6,729

Schedule Of Maturities Of Long-Term Debt Payments

As of December 31, 2012, maturities of long-term debt (including sinking fund requirements) for the next five years are:

Years Ending December 31 (in millions)	Principal Not Subject to Compromise		Principal Subject to Compromise		Total Principal Amount
2013	$	1,388	$	93	$	1,481
2014	857		152		1,009
2015	758		6		764
2016	1,751		5		1,756
2017	492		42		534

Schedule Of Collateral Coverage Tests

Specifically, American is required to meet certain collateral coverage tests on a periodic basis on two financing transactions: (1) 10.5% $450 million Senior Secured Notes due 2012, (the 10.5% Notes) and (2) Senior Secured Notes, as described below:

	(1) 10.5% Notes		(2) Senior Secured Notes
Frequency of     Appraisals	Semi-Annual (April and October, ending April 2011)		Semi-Annual (June and December)
LTV Requirement	43%; failure to meet collateral test requires posting of additional collateral		1.5x Collateral valuation to amount of debt outstanding (67% LTV); failure to meet collateral test results in American paying 2% additional interest until the ratio is at least 1.5x; additional collateral can be posted to meet this requirement
LTV as of Last Measurement     Date	47.5%		38.8%
			Generally, certain route authorities, take-off and landing slots, and rights to airport facilities used by American to operate certain services between the U.S. and London Heathrow, Tokyo Narita/Haneda, and China
Collateral Description	143 aircraft consisting of:
	Type	# of Aircraft
	MD-80	74
	B757-200	41
	B767-200ER	3
	B767-300ER	25
	TOTAL	143

XML

Special Charges And Restructuring Activities (Components Of Company's Special Charges) (Detail) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Restructuring Reserve [Roll Forward]
Remaining accrual, beginning	$ 65,000,000	$ 86,000,000	$ 173,000,000
Capacity reduction charges	384,000,000
Non-cash charges	(24,000,000)	(724,000,000)	0
Adjustments	(58,000,000)	743,000,000	3,000,000
Payments	(171,000,000)	(40,000,000)	(90,000,000)
Remaining accrual, ending	196,000,000	65,000,000	86,000,000
Aircraft Charges [Member]
Restructuring Reserve [Roll Forward]
Remaining accrual, beginning	49,000,000	59,000,000	153,000,000
Capacity reduction charges	11,000,000
Non-cash charges	(11,000,000)	(725,000,000)	0
Adjustments	(47,000,000)	751,000,000	(8,000,000)
Payments	(2,000,000)	(36,000,000)	(86,000,000)
Remaining accrual, ending	0	49,000,000	59,000,000
Facility Exit Costs [Member]
Restructuring Reserve [Roll Forward]
Remaining accrual, beginning	16,000,000	27,000,000	20,000,000
Capacity reduction charges	13,000,000
Non-cash charges	(13,000,000)	1,000,000	0
Adjustments	(11,000,000)	(8,000,000)	11,000,000
Payments	(1,000,000)	(4,000,000)	(4,000,000)
Remaining accrual, ending	4,000,000	16,000,000	27,000,000
Employee Charges [Member]
Restructuring Reserve [Roll Forward]
Remaining accrual, beginning	0	0	0
Capacity reduction charges	360,000,000
Non-cash charges	0	0	0
Adjustments	0	0	0
Payments	(168,000,000)	0	0
Remaining accrual, ending	$ 192,000,000	$ 0	$ 0

XML

Comprehensive Income (Loss) Note

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Equity [Abstract]

Comprehensive Income (Loss) Note

13.          Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The components of Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) are as follows (in millions):

	Pension and Retiree Medical Liability			Unrealized Gain/(Loss) on Investments			Derivative Financial Instruments			Income Tax Benefit/ (Expense)			Total
Balance at December 31, 2011	$	(3,887	)	$	(4	)	$	28		$	(212	)	$	(4,075	)
Current year change	(1,910		)	6									(1,904		)
Amortization of actuarial loss and prior service cost	130			—			—			—			130
Benefit plan modifications	3,345												3,345
Reclassification of derivative financial instruments into earnings	—			—			(3		)	—			(3		)
Change in fair value of derivative financial instruments	—			—			(12		)	—			(12		)
Non-cash tax provision	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	(569	)	$	(569	)
Balance at December 31, 2012	$	(2,322	)	$	2		$	13		$	(781	)	$	(3,088	)

As of December 31, 2012, the Company estimates that during the next twelve months it will reclassify from Accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) into earnings approximately $15 million in net gains (based on prices as of December 31, 2012) related to its fuel derivative hedges.

The Company recognized a $569 million non-cash income tax benefit, offset by a $569 million charge to other comprehensive income, during the fourth quarter of 2012 related to gains in other comprehensive income. See Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements for further information.

Amounts allocated to other comprehensive income for income taxes as further described in Note 9 will remain in Accumulated other comprehensive income until the Company ceases all related activities, such as termination of the pension plan.

XML

Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts and Reserves

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Valuation And Qualifying Accounts [Abstract]

Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts and Reserves

Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts and Reserves

(in millions)

	Balance at beginning of year		Changes charged to statement of operations accounts			Payments			Write-offs (net of recoveries)			Sales, retire- ments and transfers			Balance at end of year
Year ended December 31, 2012
Allowance for obsolescence of inventories	$	530	$	18		$	—		$	(45	)	$	—		$	503
Allowance for uncollectible accounts	51		3			—			(11		)	—			43
Reserves for environmental remediation costs	14		(1		)	—			—			—			13
Year ended December 31, 2011
Allowance for obsolescence of inventories	$	479	$	31		$	—		$	—		$	20		$	530
Allowance for uncollectible accounts	57		4			—			(10		)	—			51
Reserves for environmental remediation costs	17		(2		)	(1		)	—			—			14
Year ended December 31, 2010
Allowance for obsolescence of inventories	$	457	$	30		$	—		$	—		$	(8	)	$	479
Allowance for uncollectible accounts	57		5			—			(5		)	—			57
Reserves for environmental remediation costs	18		—			(1		)	—			—			17

XML

Transactions with Related Parties Transactions with Related Parties (Detail) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Passenger Revenue, Regional	$ 2,914	$ 2,724	$ 2,327
Regional payments to affiliate company	1,142	2,418	2,227
Related Party Transaction, Other Revenues from Transactions with Related Party	16	18	18
AMR Eagle [Member]
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Number of Daily Departures	1,500
Number of Destinations in North America	175
Passenger Revenue, Regional	1,200
Selling Expense [Member]
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Related Party Transaction, Expenses from Transactions with Related Party	128	132
Other Operating Expense [Member]
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Related Party Transaction, Expenses from Transactions with Related Party	$ 1,600	$ 350

XML

Summary Of Accounting Policies (Schedule Of Depreciable Lives Used For Principal Depreciable Asset Classifications) (Detail)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012
American Jet Aircraft And Engines [Member]
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Depreciable Life - Minimum (in years)	20
Depreciable Life - Maximum (in years)	30
Other Regional Aircraft And Engines [Member]
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Depreciable Life - Minimum (in years)	16
Depreciable Life - Maximum (in years)	20
Major Rotable Parts, Avionics and Assemblies [Member]
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Property, Plant and Equipment, Estimated Useful Lives	Life of equipment to which applicable
Leasehold Improvements [Member]
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Property, Plant and Equipment, Estimated Useful Lives	Lesser of remaining lease term or expected useful life
Buildings And Improvements (Principally On Leased Land) [Member]
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Depreciable Life - Minimum (in years)	5
Depreciable Life - Maximum (in years)	30
Furniture and Fixtures [Member]
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Depreciable Life - Minimum (in years)	3
Depreciable Life - Maximum (in years)	10
Capitalized Software [Member]
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Depreciable Life - Minimum (in years)	5
Depreciable Life - Maximum (in years)	10

XML

Segment Reporting (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Segment Reporting [Abstract]

Operating Revenues By Geographic Region

The Company’s operating revenues by geographic region (as defined by DOT) are summarized below (in millions):

	Year Ended December 31,
	2012		2011		2010
DOT Domestic	$	14,257	$	13,782	$	13,062
DOT Latin America	5,813		5,460		4,619
DOT Atlantic	3,411		3,499		3,365
DOT Pacific	1,344		1,216		1,104
Total consolidated revenues	$	24,825	$	23,957	$	22,150

XML

Consolidated Balance Sheets (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Current Assets
Cash	$ 474	$ 280
Short-term investments	3,408	3,714
Restricted cash and short-term investments	850	738
Receivables, less allowance for uncollectible accounts	1,105	883
Inventories, less allowance for obsolescence	550	583
Fuel derivative contracts	65	97
Other current assets	559	401
Total current assets	7,011	6,696
Equipment and Property
Flight equipment, at cost	17,687	17,890
Less accumulated depreciation	7,502	6,981
Flight equipment, net	10,185	10,909
Purchase deposits for flight equipment	710	746
Other equipment and property, at cost	4,993	5,012
Less accumulated depreciation	2,912	2,904
Other equipment and property, net	2,081	2,108
Equipment and property, net	12,976	13,763
Equipment and Property Under Capital Leases
Flight equipment	287	641
Other equipment and property	200	199
Equipment and Property Under Capital Leases, gross	487	840
Less accumulated amortization	205	448
Equipment and property under capital leases, net	282	392
Other Assets
International slots and route authorities	708	708
Domestic slots and airport operating and gate lease rights, less accumulated amortization (2012 - $508; 2011 - $486)	161	183
Other assets	2,126	1,847
Other assets, total	2,995	2,738
Total Assets	23,264	23,589
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable	1,212	981
Accrued salaries and wages	631	489
Accrued liabilities	1,379	1,306
Air traffic liability	4,524	4,223
Payable to affiliates	2,753	2,644
Current maturities of long-term debt	1,388	1,518
Current obligations under capital leases	31	0
Total current liabilities	11,918	11,161
Long-term debt, less current maturities	6,762	6,729
Obligations Under Capital Leases, Less Current Obligations	381	0
Other Liabilities and Credits
Deferred gains	223	110
Pension and postretirement benefits	6,780	9,204
Other liabilities and deferred credits	1,468	1,470
Other Liabilities and Credits Total	8,471	10,784
Liabilities Subject to Compromise	5,694	3,952
Stockholder's Equity (Deficit)
Common stock - $1 par value	0	0
Additional paid-in capital	4,469	4,455
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(3,088)	(4,075)
Accumulated deficit	(11,343)	(9,417)
Total stockholders' equity	(9,962)	(9,037)
Total Liabilities and Stockholder's Equity (Deficit)	$ 23,264	$ 23,589

XML

Retirement Benefits (Fair Values Of Company's Other Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets) (Detail) (Other Postretirement Benefit Plans [Member], USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Defined Benefit Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Fair value of plan assets	$ 211	$ 205	$ 234
Money Market Funds [Member]
Defined Benefit Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Fair value of plan assets	9	4
Unitized Mutual Funds [Member]
Defined Benefit Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Fair value of plan assets	202	201
Level 1 [Member]
Defined Benefit Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Fair value of plan assets	9	4
Level 1 [Member] | Money Market Funds [Member]
Defined Benefit Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Fair value of plan assets	9	4
Level 2 [Member]
Defined Benefit Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Fair value of plan assets	202	201
Level 2 [Member] | Unitized Mutual Funds [Member]
Defined Benefit Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Fair value of plan assets	$ 202	$ 201

XML

Summary of Accounting Policies

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Summary of Accounting Policies

2.       Summary of Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation The accompanying consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2012 and for the three years ended December 31, 2012 include the accounts of AMR and its wholly owned subsidiaries, including (i) its principal subsidiary, American Airlines, Inc. (American) and (ii) its regional airline subsidiary, AMR Eagle Holding Corporation (AMR Eagle), which has two primary subsidiaries, American Eagle Airlines, Inc. and Executive Airlines, Inc. . The consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries as well as variable interest entities (VIEs) for which the Company is the primary beneficiary. All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), including the provisions of ASC 852 “Reorganizations” (ASC 852). ASC 852 requires that the financial statements of the Company, for periods subsequent to the filing of the Chapter 11 Cases, distinguish transactions and events that are directly associated with the reorganization from the ongoing operations of the business. Accordingly, certain revenues, expenses (including professional fees), realized gains and losses and provisions for losses that are realized or incurred in the Chapter 11 Cases are recorded in reorganization items, net on the accompanying Consolidated Statement of Operations. In addition, prepetition obligations that may be impacted by the Chapter 11 reorganization process have been classified on the Consolidated Balance Sheet in liabilities subject to compromise. These liabilities are reported at the amounts expected to be allowed by the Bankruptcy Court, even if they may be settled for lesser amounts.

Certain of our non-U.S. subsidiaries are not part of the Chapter 11 Cases. Since the non-US subsidiaries not part of the bankruptcy filing do not have significant transactions, we do not separately disclose the condensed combined financial statements of such non-U.S. subsidiaries s in accordance with the requirements of reorganization accounting.

The Company has also prepared these consolidated financial statements on a going concern basis, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the ordinary course of business. Accordingly, the Company’s consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability of assets and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

As a result of the Chapter 11 proceedings, the satisfaction of our liabilities and funding of ongoing operations are subject to uncertainty and, accordingly, there is a substantial doubt of the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not purport to reflect or provide for the consequences of the Chapter 11 Cases, other than as set forth under “liabilities subject to compromise” on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets and “income (loss) before reorganization items, net” and “reorganization items, net” on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations (see Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements). In particular, the financial statements do not purport to show (1) as to assets, their realizable value on a liquidation basis or their availability to satisfy liabilities; (2) as to prepetition liabilities, the amounts that may be allowed for claims or contingencies, or the status and priority thereof; (3) as to shareowners’ equity accounts, the effect of any changes that may be made to the Debtors' capitalization; or (4) as to operations, the effect of any changes that may be made to the Debtors' business.

While operating as debtors-in-possession under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, the Debtors may sell or otherwise dispose of or liquidate assets or settle liabilities, subject to the approval of the Bankruptcy Court or otherwise as permitted in the ordinary course of business. Moreover, the ultimate plan of reorganization for the Debtors could materially change the amounts and classifications in the historical consolidated financial statements.

New Accounting Pronouncements In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-11, “Disclosures About Offsetting Assets and

Liabilities.”  This update creates new disclosure requirements about the nature of an entity’s rights of setoff and related arrangements associated with its financial instruments and derivative instruments. The disclosure requirements in this update are effective for annual reporting periods, and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after January 1, 2013.  The Company is currently evaluating the impact this update will have on its disclosures.

In July 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-02, “Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment.” This update amends ASC 350, “Intangibles—Goodwill and Other” to allow entities an option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform the quantitative impairment test.  Under that option, an entity no longer would be required to calculate the fair value of the intangible asset unless the entity determines, based on that qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying amount.  The amendments in this update are effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012.  The Company is currently evaluating the impact this update may have on its indefinite-lived intangibles impairment testing.

In August of 2012, the SEC issued a final rule implementing Section 1502 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act that imposes reporting requirements on issuers who use or may use “Conflict Minerals,” defined as columbite-tantalite (the metal ore from which tantalum is extracted), cassiterite (the metal ore from which tin is extracted), gold, and wolframite (the metal ore from which tungsten is extracted), or their derivatives, originating from the Democratic Republic of the Congo and neighboring countries (collectively, “covered countries”). The rule was mandated in response to humanitarian concerns that trade in conflict minerals are used to finance armed groups in the covered countries. The rule describes assessment and reporting requirements for all issuers for which conflict minerals originating in a covered country are necessary to the functionality or production of a product manufactured, or contracted to be manufactured, by the issuer. Such issuers are required to file a newly created Form SD annually by May 31 for the prior calendar year. Initial Form SDs are required to be filed by May 31, 2014 for the calendar year 2013. The Company is currently in the process of assessing whether it will be required to file a Form SD for calendar year 2013 and determining necessary processes and procedures to collect information necessary to make any required filing. The Company does not anticipate that any requirement to file this new Form SD will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the accompanying consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Restricted Cash and Short-term Investments The Company has restricted cash and short-term investments related primarily to collateral held to support projected workers’ compensation obligations and funds held for certain tax obligations.

Inventories Spare parts, materials and supplies relating to flight equipment are carried at average acquisition cost and are expensed when used in operations. Allowances for obsolescence are provided—over the estimated useful life of the related aircraft and engines—for spare parts expected to be on hand at the date aircraft are retired from service. Allowances are also provided for spare parts currently identified as excess and obsolete. These allowances are based on management estimates, which are subject to change.

Maintenance and Repair Costs Maintenance and repair costs for owned and leased flight equipment are charged to operating expense as incurred, except costs incurred for maintenance and repair under flight hour maintenance contract agreements, which are accrued based on contractual terms when an obligation exists.

Intangible Assets Route acquisition costs and airport operating and gate lease rights represent the purchase price attributable to route authorities (including international airport take-off and landing slots), domestic airport take-off and landing slots and airport gate leasehold rights acquired. Indefinite-lived intangible assets (route acquisition costs and international slots and related international take-off and landing slots) are tested for impairment annually on December 31, rather than amortized, or when a triggering event occurs, in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Such triggering events may include significant changes to the Company’s network or capacity, or the implementation of open skies agreements in countries where the Company operates flights. Airport operating and gate lease rights are being amortized on a straight-line basis over 25 years to a zero residual value.

Statements of Cash Flows Short-term investments, without regard to remaining maturity at acquisition, are not considered as cash equivalents for purposes of the statements of cash flows.

Measurement of Asset Impairments The Company records impairment charges on long-lived assets used in operations when events and circumstances indicate that the assets may be impaired. An asset or group of assets is considered impaired when the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by the asset are less than the carrying amount of the asset and the net book value of the asset exceeds its estimated fair value. In making these determinations, the Company uses certain assumptions, including, but not limited to: (i) estimated fair value of the asset; and (ii) estimated future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset,

which are based on additional assumptions such as asset utilization, length of service the asset will be used in the Company’s operations and estimated salvage values.

Equipment and Property The provision for depreciation of operating equipment and property is computed on the straight-line method applied to each unit of property, except that major rotable parts, avionics and assemblies are depreciated on a group basis. The depreciable lives used for the principal depreciable asset classifications are:

	Depreciable Life
American jet aircraft and engines	20 - 30 years
Other regional aircraft and engines	16 - 20 years
Major rotable parts, avionics and assemblies	Life of equipment to which applicable
Improvements to leased flight equipment	Lesser of remaining lease term or expected useful life
Buildings and improvements (principally on leased land)	5 - 30 years or term of lease, including estimated renewal options when renewal is economically compelled at key airports
Furniture, fixtures and other equipment	3 - 10 years
Capitalized software	5 - 10 years

Residual values for aircraft, engines, major rotable parts, avionics and assemblies are generally five to ten percent, except when guaranteed by a third party for a different amount.

Equipment and property under capital leases are amortized over the term of the leases or, in the case of certain aircraft, over their expected useful lives. Lease terms vary but are generally six to 25 years for aircraft and seven to 40 years for other leased equipment and property.

Regional Affiliates Revenue from ticket sales is generally recognized when service is provided. Regional Affiliates revenues for flights connecting to American flights are based on industry standard proration agreements.

Passenger Revenue Passenger ticket sales are initially recorded as a component of Air traffic liability. Revenue derived from ticket sales is recognized at the time service is provided. However, due to various factors, including the complex pricing structure and interline agreements throughout the industry, certain amounts are recognized in revenue using estimates regarding both the timing of the revenue recognition and the amount of revenue to be recognized, including breakage. These estimates are generally based upon the evaluation of historical trends, including the use of regression analysis and other methods to model the outcome of future events based on the Company’s historical experience, and are recorded at the scheduled time of departure.

Various taxes and fees assessed on the sale of tickets to end customers are collected by the Company as an agent and remitted to taxing authorities. These taxes and fees have been presented on a net basis in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations and recorded as a liability until remitted to the appropriate taxing authority.

Frequent Flyer Program The estimated incremental cost of providing free travel awards is accrued for mileage credits earned by using American’s service that are expected to be redeemed in the future. American also accrues a frequent flyer liability for the mileage credits that are expected to be used for travel on participating airlines based on historical usage patterns and contractual rates. American sells mileage credits and related services to companies participating in its frequent flyer program. The portion of the revenue related to the sale of mileage credits, representing the revenue for air transportation sold, is valued at fair value and is deferred and amortized over 28 months, which approximates the expected period over which the mileage credits are used. Breakage of sold miles is recognized over the estimated period of usage. The remaining portion of the revenue, representing the marketing services sold and administrative costs associated with operating the AAdvantage program, is recognized upon sale as a component of Other revenues, as the related services have been provided. The Company’s total liability for future AAdvantage award redemptions for free, discounted or upgraded travel on American, American Eagle or participating airlines as well as unrecognized revenue from selling AAdvantage miles was approximately $1.7 billion (and is recorded as a component of Air traffic liability on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets) at December 31, 2012 and $1.6 billion as of December 31, 2011.

Income Taxes The Company generally believes that the positions taken on previously filed income tax returns are more likely than not to be sustained by the taxing authorities. The Company has recorded income tax and related interest liabilities where the Company believes its position may not be sustained or where the full income tax benefit will not be recognized. Thus, the effects of potential income tax benefits resulting from the Company’s unrecognized tax positions are not reflected in the tax balances of the financial statements. Recognized and unrecognized tax positions are reviewed and adjusted as events occur that affect the Company’s judgment about the recognizability of income tax benefits, such as lapsing of applicable statutes of limitations, conclusion of tax audits, release of administrative guidance, or rendering of a court decision affecting a particular tax position.

Advertising Costs The Company expenses on a straight-line basis the costs of advertising as incurred throughout the year. Advertising expense was $153 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, $186 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 and $165 million for the year ended December 31, 2010.

Subsequent Events In connection with preparation of the consolidated financial statements and in accordance U.S. GAAP, the Company evaluated subsequent events after the balance sheet date of December 31, 2012 and identified items as set forth in Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements.

XML

Leases (Future Minimum Lease Payments Under Capital and Operating Leases) (Parenthetical) (Detail) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2012
Lease payments, Type [Line Items]
Present value of net minimum lease payments	$ 431	[1]
Liabilities Subject To Compromise [Member]
Lease payments, Type [Line Items]
Present value of net minimum lease payments	19
Deferred Rent Credit	201
Accrued Liabilities And Other Liabilities And Deferred Credits [Member]
Lease payments, Type [Line Items]
Deferred Rent Credit	$ 160

[1] As of December 31, 2012, included in Liabilities Subject to Compromise on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet is approximately $19 million relating to ground capital leases.

XML

Retirement Benefits (Schedule Of Accumulated Benefit Obligations Exceeding Fair Value Of Plan Assets) (Detail) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Pension Plans [Member]
Defined Benefit Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Projected benefit obligation (PBO)	$ 15,895	$ 14,568
Accumulated benefit obligation (ABO)	15,866	12,935
Defined Benefit Plan, Benefit Obligation	15,895	14,568	12,968
Fair value of plan assets	9,065	8,132	7,773
ABO less fair value of plan assets	6,801	4,803
Other Postretirement Benefit Plans [Member]
Defined Benefit Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Projected benefit obligation (PBO)	0	0
Accumulated benefit obligation (ABO)	0	0
Defined Benefit Plan, Benefit Obligation	1,412	3,122	3,097
Fair value of plan assets	211	205	234
ABO less fair value of plan assets	$ 0	$ 0

XML

Income Taxes (Computation Of Income Tax Expense (Benefit)) (Detail) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]
Statutory income tax provision expense/(benefit)	$ (873)	$ (686)	$ (177)
State income tax expense/(benefit), net of federal tax effect	(35)	(32)	(2)
Meal expense	6	6	6
Bankruptcy administration expenses	26	0	0
Change in valuation allowance	858	697	127
Tax benefit resulting from OCI allocation	(569)	0	0
Income Tax Reconciliation, Other Adjustments	18	15	11
Income tax benefit	$ (569)	$ 0	$ (35)

XML

Summary of Accounting Policies (Policies)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Presentation of Financial Statements [Text Block]

Basis of Presentation The accompanying consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2012 and for the three years ended December 31, 2012 include the accounts of AMR and its wholly owned subsidiaries, including (i) its principal subsidiary, American Airlines, Inc. (American) and (ii) its regional airline subsidiary, AMR Eagle Holding Corporation (AMR Eagle), which has two primary subsidiaries, American Eagle Airlines, Inc. and Executive Airlines, Inc. . The consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries as well as variable interest entities (VIEs) for which the Company is the primary beneficiary. All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), including the provisions of ASC 852 “Reorganizations” (ASC 852). ASC 852 requires that the financial statements of the Company, for periods subsequent to the filing of the Chapter 11 Cases, distinguish transactions and events that are directly associated with the reorganization from the ongoing operations of the business. Accordingly, certain revenues, expenses (including professional fees), realized gains and losses and provisions for losses that are realized or incurred in the Chapter 11 Cases are recorded in reorganization items, net on the accompanying Consolidated Statement of Operations. In addition, prepetition obligations that may be impacted by the Chapter 11 reorganization process have been classified on the Consolidated Balance Sheet in liabilities subject to compromise. These liabilities are reported at the amounts expected to be allowed by the Bankruptcy Court, even if they may be settled for lesser amounts.

Certain of our non-U.S. subsidiaries are not part of the Chapter 11 Cases. Since the non-US subsidiaries not part of the bankruptcy filing do not have significant transactions, we do not separately disclose the condensed combined financial statements of such non-U.S. subsidiaries s in accordance with the requirements of reorganization accounting.

The Company has also prepared these consolidated financial statements on a going concern basis, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the ordinary course of business. Accordingly, the Company’s consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability of assets and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

As a result of the Chapter 11 proceedings, the satisfaction of our liabilities and funding of ongoing operations are subject to uncertainty and, accordingly, there is a substantial doubt of the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not purport to reflect or provide for the consequences of the Chapter 11 Cases, other than as set forth under “liabilities subject to compromise” on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets and “income (loss) before reorganization items, net” and “reorganization items, net” on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations (see Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements). In particular, the financial statements do not purport to show (1) as to assets, their realizable value on a liquidation basis or their availability to satisfy liabilities; (2) as to prepetition liabilities, the amounts that may be allowed for claims or contingencies, or the status and priority thereof; (3) as to shareowners’ equity accounts, the effect of any changes that may be made to the Debtors' capitalization; or (4) as to operations, the effect of any changes that may be made to the Debtors' business.

While operating as debtors-in-possession under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, the Debtors may sell or otherwise dispose of or liquidate assets or settle liabilities, subject to the approval of the Bankruptcy Court or otherwise as permitted in the ordinary course of business. Moreover, the ultimate plan of reorganization for the Debtors could materially change the amounts and classifications in the historical consolidated financial statements.

New Accounting Pronouncements In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-11, “Disclosures About Offsetting Assets and

Liabilities.”  This update creates new disclosure requirements about the nature of an entity’s rights of setoff and related arrangements associated with its financial instruments and derivative instruments. The disclosure requirements in this update are effective for annual reporting periods, and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after January 1, 2013.  The Company is currently evaluating the impact this update will have on its disclosures.

In July 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-02, “Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment.” This update amends ASC 350, “Intangibles—Goodwill and Other” to allow entities an option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform the quantitative impairment test.  Under that option, an entity no longer would be required to calculate the fair value of the intangible asset unless the entity determines, based on that qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying amount.  The amendments in this update are effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012.  The Company is currently evaluating the impact this update may have on its indefinite-lived intangibles impairment testing.

In August of 2012, the SEC issued a final rule implementing Section 1502 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act that imposes reporting requirements on issuers who use or may use “Conflict Minerals,” defined as columbite-tantalite (the metal ore from which tantalum is extracted), cassiterite (the metal ore from which tin is extracted), gold, and wolframite (the metal ore from which tungsten is extracted), or their derivatives, originating from the Democratic Republic of the Congo and neighboring countries (collectively, “covered countries”). The rule was mandated in response to humanitarian concerns that trade in conflict minerals are used to finance armed groups in the covered countries. The rule describes assessment and reporting requirements for all issuers for which conflict minerals originating in a covered country are necessary to the functionality or production of a product manufactured, or contracted to be manufactured, by the issuer. Such issuers are required to file a newly created Form SD annually by May 31 for the prior calendar year. Initial Form SDs are required to be filed by May 31, 2014 for the calendar year 2013. The Company is currently in the process of assessing whether it will be required to file a Form SD for calendar year 2013 and determining necessary processes and procedures to collect information necessary to make any required filing. The Company does not anticipate that any requirement to file this new Form SD will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

Use Of Estimates

Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the accompanying consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Restricted Cash And Short-Term Investments

Restricted Cash and Short-term Investments The Company has restricted cash and short-term investments related primarily to collateral held to support projected workers’ compensation obligations and funds held for certain tax obligations.

Inventories

Inventories Spare parts, materials and supplies relating to flight equipment are carried at average acquisition cost and are expensed when used in operations. Allowances for obsolescence are provided—over the estimated useful life of the related aircraft and engines—for spare parts expected to be on hand at the date aircraft are retired from service. Allowances are also provided for spare parts currently identified as excess and obsolete. These allowances are based on management estimates, which are subject to change.

Maintenance And Repair Costs

Maintenance and Repair Costs Maintenance and repair costs for owned and leased flight equipment are charged to operating expense as incurred, except costs incurred for maintenance and repair under flight hour maintenance contract agreements, which are accrued based on contractual terms when an obligation exists.

Intangible Assets

Intangible Assets Route acquisition costs and airport operating and gate lease rights represent the purchase price attributable to route authorities (including international airport take-off and landing slots), domestic airport take-off and landing slots and airport gate leasehold rights acquired. Indefinite-lived intangible assets (route acquisition costs and international slots and related international take-off and landing slots) are tested for impairment annually on December 31, rather than amortized, or when a triggering event occurs, in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Such triggering events may include significant changes to the Company’s network or capacity, or the implementation of open skies agreements in countries where the Company operates flights. Airport operating and gate lease rights are being amortized on a straight-line basis over 25 years to a zero residual value.

Statements Of Cash Flows

Statements of Cash Flows Short-term investments, without regard to remaining maturity at acquisition, are not considered as cash equivalents for purposes of the statements of cash flows.

Measurement Of Asset Impairments

Measurement of Asset Impairments The Company records impairment charges on long-lived assets used in operations when events and circumstances indicate that the assets may be impaired. An asset or group of assets is considered impaired when the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by the asset are less than the carrying amount of the asset and the net book value of the asset exceeds its estimated fair value. In making these determinations, the Company uses certain assumptions, including, but not limited to: (i) estimated fair value of the asset; and (ii) estimated future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset,

which are based on additional assumptions such as asset utilization, length of service the asset will be used in the Company’s operations and estimated salvage values.

Equipment And Property

Equipment and Property The provision for depreciation of operating equipment and property is computed on the straight-line method applied to each unit of property, except that major rotable parts, avionics and assemblies are depreciated on a group basis. The depreciable lives used for the principal depreciable asset classifications are:

	Depreciable Life
American jet aircraft and engines	20 - 30 years
Other regional aircraft and engines	16 - 20 years
Major rotable parts, avionics and assemblies	Life of equipment to which applicable
Improvements to leased flight equipment	Lesser of remaining lease term or expected useful life
Buildings and improvements (principally on leased land)	5 - 30 years or term of lease, including estimated renewal options when renewal is economically compelled at key airports
Furniture, fixtures and other equipment	3 - 10 years
Capitalized software	5 - 10 years

Residual values for aircraft, engines, major rotable parts, avionics and assemblies are generally five to ten percent, except when guaranteed by a third party for a different amount.

Equipment and property under capital leases are amortized over the term of the leases or, in the case of certain aircraft, over their expected useful lives. Lease terms vary but are generally six to 25 years for aircraft and seven to 40 years for other leased equipment and property.

Regional Affiliates

Regional Affiliates Revenue from ticket sales is generally recognized when service is provided. Regional Affiliates revenues for flights connecting to American flights are based on industry standard proration agreements.

Passenger Revenue

Passenger Revenue Passenger ticket sales are initially recorded as a component of Air traffic liability. Revenue derived from ticket sales is recognized at the time service is provided. However, due to various factors, including the complex pricing structure and interline agreements throughout the industry, certain amounts are recognized in revenue using estimates regarding both the timing of the revenue recognition and the amount of revenue to be recognized, including breakage. These estimates are generally based upon the evaluation of historical trends, including the use of regression analysis and other methods to model the outcome of future events based on the Company’s historical experience, and are recorded at the scheduled time of departure.

Various taxes and fees assessed on the sale of tickets to end customers are collected by the Company as an agent and remitted to taxing authorities. These taxes and fees have been presented on a net basis in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations and recorded as a liability until remitted to the appropriate taxing authority.

Frequent Flyer Program

Frequent Flyer Program The estimated incremental cost of providing free travel awards is accrued for mileage credits earned by using American’s service that are expected to be redeemed in the future. American also accrues a frequent flyer liability for the mileage credits that are expected to be used for travel on participating airlines based on historical usage patterns and contractual rates. American sells mileage credits and related services to companies participating in its frequent flyer program. The portion of the revenue related to the sale of mileage credits, representing the revenue for air transportation sold, is valued at fair value and is deferred and amortized over 28 months, which approximates the expected period over which the mileage credits are used. Breakage of sold miles is recognized over the estimated period of usage. The remaining portion of the revenue, representing the marketing services sold and administrative costs associated with operating the AAdvantage program, is recognized upon sale as a component of Other revenues, as the related services have been provided. The Company’s total liability for future AAdvantage award redemptions for free, discounted or upgraded travel on American, American Eagle or participating airlines as well as unrecognized revenue from selling AAdvantage miles was approximately $1.7 billion (and is recorded as a component of Air traffic liability on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets) at December 31, 2012 and $1.6 billion as of December 31, 2011.

Income Taxes

Income Taxes The Company generally believes that the positions taken on previously filed income tax returns are more likely than not to be sustained by the taxing authorities. The Company has recorded income tax and related interest liabilities where the Company believes its position may not be sustained or where the full income tax benefit will not be recognized. Thus, the effects of potential income tax benefits resulting from the Company’s unrecognized tax positions are not reflected in the tax balances of the financial statements. Recognized and unrecognized tax positions are reviewed and adjusted as events occur that affect the Company’s judgment about the recognizability of income tax benefits, such as lapsing of applicable statutes of limitations, conclusion of tax audits, release of administrative guidance, or rendering of a court decision affecting a particular tax position.

Advertising Costs

Advertising Costs The Company expenses on a straight-line basis the costs of advertising as incurred throughout the year. Advertising expense was $153 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, $186 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 and $165 million for the year ended December 31, 2010.

Subsequent Events

Subsequent Events In connection with preparation of the consolidated financial statements and in accordance U.S. GAAP, the Company evaluated subsequent events after the balance sheet date of December 31, 2012 and identified items as set forth in Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements.

XML

Share Based Compensation (Stock Based Compensation Awards, Expected Fair Value Assumptions) (Detail)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012		Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Disclosure Of Compensation Related Costs Sharebased Payments [Abstract]
Expected volatility, minimum	0.00%	[1]	73.50%	74.40%
Expected volatility, maximum	0.00%	[1]	75.40%	75.90%
Expected term (in years)	0.0	[1]	4.0	4.0
Risk-free rate, minimum	0.00%	[1]	0.90%	1.18%
Risk-free rate, maximum	0.00%	[1]	2.11%	2.58%
Annual forfeiture rate	0.00%	[1]	10.00%	10.00%

[1] No options/SARs were granted in 2012.

XML

Retirement Benefits (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Schedule of Changes in Projected Benefit Obligations [Table Text Block]

	Pension Benefits						Retiree  Medical and Other Benefits
	2012			2011			2012			2011
Reconciliation of benefit obligation
Obligation at January 1	$	14,568		$	12,968		$	3,122		$	3,097
Service cost	341			386			46			61
Interest cost	729			757			128			174
Actuarial (gain) loss	2,345			1,237			104			(63		)
Plan amendments	301			—			(1,904		)	(3		)
Curtailments	(1,841		)	—			33			—
Benefit payments	(548		)	(780		)	(117		)	(144		)
Obligation at December 31	$	15,895		$	14,568		$	1,412		$	3,122

Schedule of Changes in Fair Value of Plan Assets

Reconciliation of fair value of plan assets
Fair value of plan assets at January 1	$	8,132		$	7,773		$	205		$	234
Actual return on plan assets	1,204			614			26			(6		)
Employer contributions	277			525			97			121
Benefit payments	(548		)	(780		)	(117		)	(144		)
Fair value of plan assets at December 31	$	9,065		$	8,132		$	211		$	205
Funded status at December 31	$	(6,830	)	$	(6,436	)	$	(1,201	)	$	(2,917	)

Schedule Of Amounts Recognized In Consolidated Balance Sheets

Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets
Current liability	$	21	$	2	$	—	$	147
Noncurrent liability	6,809		6,434		1,201		2,770
	$	6,830	$	6,436	$	1,201	$	2,917

Schedule Of Amounts Recognized In Other Comprehensive Loss

Amounts recognized in other comprehensive loss
Net actuarial loss (gain)	$	3,943	$	4,179	$	(78	)	$	(181	)
Prior service cost (credit)	301		68		(1,844		)	(179		)
	$	4,244	$	4,247	$	(1,922	)	$	(360	)

Schedule Of Accumulated Benefit Obligations Exceeding Fair Value Of Plan Assets

For plans with accumulated benefit obligations exceeding the fair value of plan assets	Pension Benefits				Retiree Medical and Other Benefits
	2012		2011		2012		2011
Projected benefit obligation (PBO)	$	15,895	$	14,568	$	—	$	—
Accumulated benefit obligation (ABO)	15,866		12,935		—		—
Accumulated postretirement benefit obligation (APBO)	—		—		1,412		3,122
Fair value of plan assets	9,065		8,132		211		205
ABO less fair value of plan assets	6,801		4,803		—		—

Schedule of Net Benefit Costs [Table Text Block]

The following tables provide the components of net periodic benefit cost for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 (in millions):

	Pension Benefits
	2012			2011			2010
Components of net periodic benefit cost
Defined benefit plans:
Service cost	$	341		$	386		$	366
Interest cost	729			757			737
Expected return on assets	(676		)	(657		)	(593		)
Curtailments	58			—			—
Amortization of:
Prior service cost	10			13			13
Unrecognized net loss	211			154			154
Net periodic benefit cost for defined benefit plans	673			653			677
Defined contribution plans	202			162			152
	$	875		$	815		$	829

The estimated net loss for the defined benefit pension plans that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive income into net periodic benefit cost over the next fiscal year is $77 million.

	Retiree  Medical and Other Benefits
	2012			2011			2010
Components of net periodic benefit cost
Service cost	$	46		$	61		$	60
Interest cost	128			174			165
Expected return on assets	(17		)	(20		)	(18		)
Curtailments	(124		)	—			—
Amortization of:
Prior service cost	(82		)	(28		)	(19		)
Unrecognized net loss (gain)	(9		)	(9		)	(10		)
Net periodic benefit cost	$	(58	)	$	178		$	178

Schedule Of Assumption Used

	Pension  Benefits				Retiree  Medical and Other Benefits
	2012		2011		2012		2011
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations as of December 31
Discount rate	4.20	%	5.20	%	3.80	%	4.89	%
Salary scale (ultimate)	—		3.78		—		—

	Pension  Benefits				Retiree  Medical and Other Benefits
	2012		2011		2012		2011
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost for the years ended December 31
Discount rate 1/1/2012 - 9/30/2012	5.20	%	5.80	%	4.89	%	5.69	%
Discount rate 10/1/2012 - 12/31/2012	4.10	%	5.80	%	3.80	%	5.69	%
Salary scale (ultimate) 1/1 - 9/30/2012	3.78		3.78		—		—
Salary scale (ultimate) 10/1/2012 - 12/31/2012	—		3.78		—		—
Expected return on plan assets	8.25		8.50		8.25		8.50

Schedule Of Target Asset Allocation [Table Text Block]

The current strategic target asset allocation is as follows:

Asset Class/Sub-Class	Allowed  Range
Equity	60	%	-	70%
Public:
U.S. Value	18	%	-	33%
International Value	14	%	-	24%
Emerging Markets	5	%	-	11%
Alternative Investments	0	%	-	18%
Fixed Income	30	%	-	40%
U.S. Long Duration	30	%	-	40%
Other	0	%	-	5%
Cash Equivalents	0	%	-	5%

Changes In Fair Value Measurements Of Level 3 Investments

Changes in fair value measurements of Level 3 investments during the year ended December 31, 2012, were as follows:

	Private Equity Partnerships			Insurance Group Annuity Contracts
Beginning balance at December 31, 2011	$	920		$	2
Actual return on plan assets:
Relating to assets still held at the reporting date	20
Relating to assets sold during the period	102
Purchases	96
Sales	(224		)
Ending balance at December 31, 2012	$	914		$	2

Changes in fair value measurements of Level 3 investments during the year ended December 31, 2011, were as follows:

	Private Equity Partnerships			Insurance Group Annuity Contracts
Beginning balance at December 31, 2010	$	795		$	3
Actual return on plan assets:
Relating to assets still held at the reporting date	53
Relating to assets sold during the period	48
Purchases	146
Sales	(122		)	(1		)
Ending balance at December 31, 2011	$	920		$	2

Schedule of Health Care Cost Trend Rates

	2012		2011
Assumed health care trend rates at December 31
Health care cost trend rate assumed for next year	7.0	%	7.5	%
Rate to which the cost trend rate is assumed to decline (the ultimate trend rate)	4.5	%	4.5	%
Year that the rate reaches the ultimate trend rate	2018		2018

Schedule Of One Percentage Point Change In Assumed Health Care Cost Trend Rates

A one percentage point change in the assumed health care cost trend rates would have the following effects (in millions):

	One  Percent Increase	One  Percent Decrease
Impact on 2012 service and interest cost	$15	$(16)
Impact on postretirement benefit obligation as of December 31, 2012	60	(63)

Schedule of Expected Benefit Payments

The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future service as appropriate, are expected to be paid:

	Pension	Retiree  Medical and Other
2013	$620	$135
2014	620	131
2014	645	124
2016	663	117
2017	699	110
2018 – 2022	4,011	450

Pension Plans [Member]

Schedule of Allocation of Plan Assets [Table Text Block]

The fair values of the Company’s pension plan assets at December 31, 2012 and 2011, by asset category are as follows:

	Fair Value  Measurements at December 31, 2012 (in millions)
	Quoted Prices in Active Markets  for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Total
Asset Category
Cash and cash equivalents	$	275	$	—	$	—	$	275
Equity securities
International markets (a)(b)	2,443		—		—		2,443
Large-cap companies (b)	1,601		—		—		1,601
Mid-cap companies (b)	216		—		—		216
Small-cap companies(b)	21		—		—		21
Fixed Income
Corporate bonds (c)	—		2,094		—		2,094
Government securities (d)	—		1,172		—		1,172
U.S. municipal securities	—		57		—		57
Alternative investments
Private equity partnerships (e)	—		—		914		914
Common/collective and 103-12 investment trusts (f)	—		229		—		229
Insurance group annuity contracts	—		—		2		2
Dividend and interest receivable	38		—		—		38
Due to/from brokers for sale of securities - net	1		—		—		1
Other assets – net	2		—		—		2
Total	$	4,597	$	3,552	$	916	$	9,065

a) Holdings are diversified as follows: 20 percent United Kingdom, 9 percent Japan, 9 percent France, 8 percent Switzerland, 8 percent Germany, 5 percent Netherlands, 5 percent Republic of Korea, 15 percent emerging markets and the remaining 22 percent with no concentration greater than 5 percent in any one country.

b) There are no significant concentration of holdings by company or industry.

c) Includes approximately 79 percent investments in corporate debt with a Standard and Poor’s (S&P) rating lower than A and 21 percent investments in corporate debt with an S&P rating A or higher. Holdings include 81 percent U.S. companies, 16 percent international companies and 3 percent emerging market companies.

d) Includes approximately 88 percent investments in U.S. domestic government securities and 12 percent in emerging market government securities. There are no significant foreign currency risks within this classification.

e) Includes limited partnerships that invest primarily in U.S. (92 percent) and European (8 percent) buyout opportunities of a range of privately held companies. The Master Trust does not have the right to redeem its limited partnership investment at its net asset value. Instead, the Master Trust receives distributions as the underlying assets are liquidated. It is estimated that the underlying assets of these funds will be gradually liquidated over the next 1 to 10 years. Additionally, the Master Trust has future funding commitments of approximately $331 million over the next 10 years.

f) Investment includes 74 percent in an emerging market 103-12 investment trust with investments in emerging country equity securities, 14 percent in Canadian segregated balanced value, income growth and diversified pooled funds and 12 percent in a common/collective trust investing in securities of smaller companies located outside the U.S., including developing markets. Requests for withdrawals must meet specific requirements with advance notice of redemption preferred.

	Fair Value  Measurements at December 31, 2011 (in millions)
	Quoted Prices in Active Markets  for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Total
Asset Category
Cash and cash equivalents	$	160	$	—	$	—	$	160
Equity securities
International markets (a)(b)	1,939		—		—		1,939
Large-cap companies (b)	1,462		—		—		1,462
Mid-cap companies (b)	221		—		—		221
Small-cap companies(b)	17		—		—		17
Fixed Income
Corporate bonds (c)	—		1,866		—		1,866
Government securities (d)	—		1,205		—		1,205
U.S. municipal securities	—		52		—		52
Alternative investments
Private equity partnerships (e)	—		—		920		920
Common/collective and 103-12 investment trusts (f)	—		172		—		172
Insurance group annuity contracts	—		—		2		2
Dividend and interest receivable	42		—		—		42
Due to/from brokers for sale of securities - net	72		—		—		72
Other assets – net	2		—		—		2
Total	$	3,915	$	3,295	$	922	$	8,132

a) Holdings are diversified as follows: 22 percent United Kingdom, 10 percent Japan, 9 percent France, 7 percent Switzerland, 6 percent Germany, 5 percent Netherlands, 5 percent Republic of Korea, 13 percent emerging markets and the remaining 23 percent with no concentration greater than 5 percent in any one country.

b) There are no significant concentration of holdings by company or industry.

c) Includes approximately 83 percent investments in corporate debt with a Standard and Poor’s (S&P) rating lower than A and 17 percent investments in corporate debt with an S&P rating A or higher. Holdings include 80 percent U.S. companies, 18 percent international companies and 2 percent emerging market companies.

d) Includes approximately 89 percent investments in U.S. domestic government securities and 11 percent in emerging market government securities. There are no significant foreign currency risks within this classification.

e) Includes limited partnerships that invest primarily in U.S. (92 percent) and European (8 percent) buyout opportunities of a range of privately held companies. The Master Trust does not have the right to redeem its limited partnership investment at its net asset value. Instead, the Master Trust receives distributions as the underlying assets are liquidated. It is estimated that the underlying assets of these funds will be gradually liquidated over the next 1 to 10 years. Additionally, the Master Trust has future funding commitments of approximately $335 million over the next 10 years.

f) Investment includes 71 percent in an emerging market 103-12 investment trust with investments in emerging country equity securities, 16 percent in Canadian segregated balanced value, income growth and diversified pooled funds and 13 percent in a common/collective trust investing in securities of smaller companies located outside the U.S., including developing markets. Requests for withdrawals must meet specific requirements with advance notice of redemption preferred.

Other Postretirement Benefit Plans [Member]

Schedule of Allocation of Plan Assets [Table Text Block]

The fair values of the Company’s other postretirement benefit plan assets at December 31, 2012 by asset category were as follows:

	Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2012 (in millions)
	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical  Assets (Level 1)		Significant Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Total
Asset Category
Money market fund	$	9	$	—	$	—	$	9
Unitized mutual funds	—		202		—		202
Total	$	9	$	202	$	—	$	211

The fair values of the Company’s other postretirement benefit plan assets at December 31, 2011 by asset category were as follows:

	Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2011 (in millions)
	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical  Assets (Level 1)		Significant Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Total
Asset Category
Money market fund	$	4	$	—	$	—	$	4
Unitized mutual funds	—		201		—		201
Total	$	4	$	201	$	—	$	205

XML

Intangible Assets

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Goodwill And Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]

Intangible Assets

12.         Intangible Assets

The Company has recorded international slot and route authorities of $708 million as of December 31, 2012 and 2011. The Company considers these assets indefinite life assets and as a result, they are not amortized but instead are tested for impairment annually or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. Such triggering events may include significant changes to the Company’s network or capacity, or the implementation of open skies agreements in countries where the Company operates flights.

As there is minimal market activity for the valuation of routes and international slots and landing rights, the Company measures fair value with inputs using the income approach. The income approach uses valuation techniques, such as future cash flows, to convert future amounts to a single present discounted amount. The inputs utilized for these valuations are unobservable and reflect the Company’s assumptions about market participants and what they would use to value the routes and accordingly are considered Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. The Company’s unobservable inputs are developed based on the best information available as of December 31, 2012.

The following tables provide information relating to the Company’s amortized intangible assets as of December 31 (in millions):

	2012
	Cost		Accumulated Amortization		Net Book  Value
Amortized intangible assets:
Airport operating rights	$	515	$	385	$	130
Gate lease rights	155		124		31
Total	$	670	$	509	$	161

	2011
	Cost		Accumulated Amortization		Net Book Value
Amortized intangible assets:
Airport operating rights	$	509	$	361	$	148
Gate lease rights	160		125		35
Total	$	669	$	486	$	183

Airport operating and gate lease rights are being amortized on a straight-line basis over 25 years to a zero residual value. The Company recorded amortization expense related to these intangible assets of approximately $25 million, $27 million, and $28 million for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The Company expects to record annual amortization expense averaging approximately $19 million in each of the next five years related to these intangible assets.

XML

Schedule II - Valuation And Qualifying Accounts And Reserves (Detail) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Allowance For Obsolescence Of Inventories [Member]
Valuation and Qualifying Accounts Disclosure [Line Items]
Balance at beginning of year	$ 530	$ 479	$ 457
Changes charged to statement of operations accounts	18	31	30
Payments	0	0	0
Write-offs (net of recoveries)	(45)	0	0
Sales, retirements and transfers	0	20	(8)
Balance at end of year	503	530	479
Allowance For Uncollectible Accounts [Member]
Valuation and Qualifying Accounts Disclosure [Line Items]
Balance at beginning of year	51	57	57
Changes charged to statement of operations accounts	3	4	5
Payments	0	0	0
Write-offs (net of recoveries)	(11)	(10)	(5)
Sales, retirements and transfers	0	0	0
Balance at end of year	43	51	57
Reserves For Environmental Remediation Costs [Member]
Valuation and Qualifying Accounts Disclosure [Line Items]
Balance at beginning of year	14	17	18
Changes charged to statement of operations accounts	(1)	(2)	0
Payments	0	(1)	(1)
Write-offs (net of recoveries)	0	0	0
Sales, retirements and transfers	0	0	0
Balance at end of year	$ 13	$ 14	$ 17