8-K

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 8-K

CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 OR 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): May 27, 2010

GREIF, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	001-00566	31-4388903
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)	(Commission File Number)	(IRS Employer Identification No.)

425 Winter Road, Delaware, Ohio	43015
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (740) 549-6000

Not Applicable

(Former name or former address, if changed since last report.)

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:

o Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)

o Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)

o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))

o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))

Section 8 — Other Events  

Item 8.01. Other Events.

Greif, Inc. (the “Company”) is filing this Current Report on Form 8-K (this “Form 8-K”) to update the financial information in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2009 (the “2009 Form 10-K”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on December 23, 2009, to reflect revised financial information and disclosures resulting from the application of a change in an accounting principle from using a combination of the last-in, first-out (“LIFO”) and the first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) inventory accounting methods to the FIFO method for all the Company’s businesses effective November 1, 2009.   The Company is revising the following sections of the 2009 Form 10-K to reflect the change in an accounting principle described above:

• Item 6. Selected Financial Data;

• Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations; and

• Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

The information included with and in this Form 8-K is presented for information purposes only in connection with the change in an accounting principle described above. All other information in the 2009 Form 10-K has not been updated for events or developments that occurred subsequent to the filing of the 2009 Form 10-K with the SEC. For developments since the filing of the 2009 Form 10-K, please see the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended January 31, 2010 and its current reports on Form 8-K filed subsequent thereto. The information in this Form 8-K, including the exhibits hereto, should be read in conjunction with the 2009 Form 10-K and the Company’s subsequent SEC filings.

Section 9 — Financial Statements and Exhibits

Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits.

(d) Exhibits.

Exhibit No.	Description
23.1	Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
99.1	Item 6. Selected Financial Data.
99.2	Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
99.3	Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

	GREIF, INC.
Date: May 27, 2010	By	/s/ Donald S. Huml
		Donald S. Huml,
		Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit No.	Description
23.1	Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
99.1	Item 6. Selected Financial Data.
99.2	Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
99.3	Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

EX-23.1

EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated December 23, 2009, except for Note 1, as to which the date is May 27, 2010 with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Greif, Inc. and subsidiaries included in this Form 8-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2009.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Columbus, Ohio
May 27, 2010

EX-99.1

EXHIBIT 99.1

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The five-year selected financial data is as follows (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) ⁽¹⁾ :

As of and for the years ended October 31,	2009		2008		2007		2006		2005
Net sales	$	2,792,217	$	3,790,531	$	3,331,597	$	2,630,337	$	2,424,297
Net income	$	110,646	$	241,748	$	156,457	$	144,531	$	100,276
Total assets	$	2,823,929	$	2,792,749	$	2,687,537	$	2,222,683	$	1,913,882
Long-term debt, including current portion of long-term debt	$	738,608	$	673,171	$	622,685	$	481,408	$	430,400
Basic earnings per share:
Class A Common Stock	$	1.91	$	4.16	$	2.70	$	2.51	$	1.74
Class B Common Stock	$	2.86	$	6.23	$	4.04	$	3.76	$	2.61
Diluted earnings per share:
Class A Common Stock	$	1.91	$	4.11	$	2.65	$	2.46	$	1.71
Class B Common Stock	$	2.86	$	6.23	$	4.04	$	3.76	$	2.61
Dividends per share:
Class A Common Stock	$	1.52	$	1.32	$	0.92	$	0.60	$	0.40
Class B Common Stock	$	2.27	$	1.97	$	1.37	$	0.89	$	0.59

(1) All share information presented in this table has been adjusted to reflect a 2-for-1 stock split of our shares of Class A and Class B Common Stock as of the close of business on March 19, 2007 distributed on April 11, 2007.

The results of operations include the effects of pretax restructuring charges of $66.6 million, $43.2 million, $21.2 million, $33.2 million, and $35.7 million for 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively; pretax debt extinguishment charges of $0.8 million, $23.5 million and $2.8 million for 2009, 2007 and 2005, respectively; restructuring-related inventory charges of $10.8 million for 2009; and large timberland gains of $41.3 million and $56.3 million for 2006 and 2005, respectively.

EX-99.2

EXHIBIT 99.2

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussions should be read in conjunction with the other sections of our Annual Report on 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2009 (the “Form 10-K”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on December 23, 2009,, including the revised, consolidated financial statements and related notes contained within the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 27, 2010.

The purpose of this section is to discuss and analyze our consolidated financial condition, liquidity and capital resources and results of operations. This analysis should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes, which appear elsewhere in this Form 10-K. The terms “Greif,” “our company,” “we,” “us,” and “our” as used in this discussion refer to Greif, Inc. and subsidiaries.

Business Segments

We operate in three business segments: Industrial Packaging; Paper Packaging; and Land Management (formerly referred to as Timber).

We are a leading global provider of industrial packaging products, such as steel, fibre and plastic drums, intermediate bulk containers, closure systems for industrial packaging products, transit protection products and polycarbonate water bottles, and services, such as blending, filling and other packaging services, logistics and warehousing. We seek to provide complete packaging solutions to our customers by offering a comprehensive range of products and services on a global basis. We sell our industrial packaging products to customers in industries such as chemicals, paint and pigments, food and beverage, petroleum, industrial coatings, agricultural, pharmaceutical and mineral, among others.

We sell our containerboard, corrugated sheets, other corrugated products and multiwall bags to customers in North America in industries such as packaging, automotive, food and building products. Our corrugated container products are used to ship such diverse products as home appliances, small machinery, grocery products, building products, automotive components, books and furniture, as well as numerous other applications. Our industrial and consumer multiwall bag products are used to ship a wide range of industrial and consumer products, such as seed, fertilizers, chemicals, concrete, flour, sugar, feed, pet foods, popcorn, charcoal and salt, primarily for the agricultural, chemical, building products and food industries.

As of October 31, 2009, we owned approximately 256,700 acres of timber properties in the southeastern United States, which were actively managed, and approximately 25,050 acres of timber properties in Canada. Our land management team is focused on the active harvesting and regeneration of our timber properties to achieve sustainable long-term yields on our timberland. While timber sales are subject to fluctuations, we seek to maintain a consistent cutting schedule, within the limits of available merchantable acreage of timber, market and weather conditions. We also sell, from time to time, timberland and special use land, which consists of surplus land, HBU land, and development land.

Greif Business Systems

In 2003, we began a transformation to become a leaner, more market-focused, performance-driven company — what we call the “Greif Business System.” We believe the Greif Business System has and will continue to generate productivity improvements and achieve permanent cost reductions. The Greif Business System continues to focus on opportunities such as improved labor productivity, material yield and other manufacturing efficiencies, along with further plant consolidations. In addition, as part of the Greif Business System and contingency actions, we have launched a strategic sourcing initiative to more effectively leverage our global spending and lay the foundation for a world-class sourcing and supply chain capability. In response to the current economic slowdown, we accelerated the implementation of certain Greif Business System initiatives.

Critical Accounting Policies

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”). The preparation of these consolidated financial statements, in accordance with these principles, require us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of our consolidated financial statements.

A summary of our significant accounting policies is included in Note 1 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K. We believe that the consistent application of these policies enables us to provide readers of the consolidated financial statements with useful and reliable information about our results of operations and financial condition. The following are the accounting policies that we believe are most important to the portrayal of our results of operations and financial condition and require our most difficult, subjective or complex judgments.

Allowance for Accounts Receivable. We evaluate the collectability of our accounts receivable based on a combination of factors. In circumstances where we are aware of a specific customer’s inability to meet its financial obligations to us, we record a specific allowance for bad debts against amounts due to reduce the net recognized receivable to the amount we reasonably believe will be collected. In addition, we recognize allowances for bad debts based on the length of time receivables are past due with allowance percentages, based on our historical experiences, applied on a graduated scale relative to the age of the receivable amounts. If circumstances change (e.g., higher than expected bad debt experience or an unexpected material adverse change in a major customer’s ability to meet its financial obligations to us), our estimates of the recoverability of amounts due to us could change by a material amount.

Inventory Reserves. Reserves for slow moving and obsolete inventories are provided based on historical experience, inventory aging and product demand. We continuously evaluate the adequacy of these reserves and make adjustments to these reserves as required. We also evaluate reserves for losses under firm purchase commitments for goods or inventories.

Net Assets Held for Sale. Net assets held for sale represent land, buildings and land improvements less accumulated depreciation. We record net assets held for sale in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 144, “Accounting for Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” (codified under Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 360 “Property, Plant, and Equipment”), at the lower of carrying value or fair value less cost to sell. Fair value is based on the estimated proceeds from the sale of the facility utilizing recent purchase offers, market comparables and/or data obtained from our commercial real estate broker. Our estimate as to fair value is regularly reviewed and subject to changes in the commercial real estate markets and our continuing evaluation as to the facility’s acceptable sale price.

Properties, Plants and Equipment. Depreciation on properties, plants and equipment is provided on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of our assets.

We own timber properties in the southeastern United States and in Canada. With respect to our United States timber properties, which consisted of approximately 256,700 acres at October 31, 2009, depletion expense is computed on the basis of cost and the estimated recoverable timber acquired. Our land costs are maintained by tract. Merchantable timber costs are maintained by five product classes, pine sawtimber, pine chip-n-saw, pine pulpwood, hardwood sawtimber and hardwood pulpwood, within a “depletion block,” with each depletion block based upon a geographic district or subdistrict. Currently, we have eight depletion blocks. These same depletion blocks are used for pre-merchantable timber costs. Each year, we estimate the volume of our merchantable timber for the five product classes by each depletion block. These estimates are based on the current state in the growth cycle and not on quantities to be available in future years. Our estimates do not include costs to be incurred in the future. We then project these volumes to the end of the year. Upon acquisition of a new timberland tract, we record separate amounts for land, merchantable timber and pre-merchantable timber allocated as a percentage of the values being purchased. These acquisition volumes and costs acquired during the year are added to the totals for each product class within the appropriate depletion block(s). The total of the beginning, one-year growth and acquisition volumes are divided by the total undepleted historical cost to arrive at a depletion rate, which is then used for the current year. As timber is sold, we multiply the volumes sold by the depletion rate for the current year to arrive at the depletion cost. Our Canadian timber properties, which consisted of approximately 25,050 acres at October 31, 2009, did not have any depletion expense since they were not actively managed at this time.

We believe that the lives and methods of determining depreciation and depletion are reasonable; however, using other lives and methods could provide materially different results.

Derivative Financial Instruments. In accordance with SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (codified under ASC 815 “Derivatives and Hedging”), we record all derivatives in the consolidated balance sheets as either assets or liabilities measured at fair value. Dependent on the designation of the derivative instrument, changes in fair value are recorded to earnings or shareholders’ equity through other comprehensive income (loss).

Restructuring Reserves. Restructuring reserves are determined in accordance with appropriate accounting guidance, including SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities” (codified under ASC 420 “Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations”), and Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 100, “Restructuring and Impairment Charges,” depending upon the facts and circumstances surrounding the situation. Restructuring reserves are further discussed in Note 5 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

Pension and Postretirement Benefits. Pension and postretirement benefit expenses and liabilities are determined by our actuaries using assumptions about the discount rate, expected return on plan assets, rate of compensation increase and health care cost trend rates. Further discussion of our pension and postretirement benefit plans and related assumptions is contained in Notes 12 and 13 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K. The results would be different using other assumptions.

Income Taxes. Our effective tax rate is based on income, statutory tax rates and tax planning opportunities available to us in the various jurisdictions in which we operate. Significant judgment is required in determining our effective tax rate and in evaluating our tax positions.

In the first quarter of fiscal 2008, we adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation “FIN” 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (codified under ASC 740 “Income Taxes”). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” (codified under ASC 740 “Income Taxes”). This standard provides that a tax benefit from uncertain tax position may be recognized when it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including resolutions of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits. The amount recognized is measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon settlement. Our effective tax rate includes the impact of reserve provisions and changes to reserves that we consider appropriate as well as related interest and penalties.

A number of years may elapse before a particular matter, for which we have established a reserve, is audited and finally resolved. The number of years with open tax audits varies depending on the tax jurisdiction. While it is often difficult to predict the final outcome or the timing of resolution of any particular tax matter, we believe that our reserves reflect the probable outcome of known tax contingencies. Unfavorable settlement of any particular issue would require use of our cash. Favorable resolution would be recognized as a reduction to our effective tax rate in the period of resolution.

Valuation allowances are established where expected future taxable income does not support the realization of the deferred tax assets.

We have estimated the reasonably possible expected net change in unrecognized tax benefits through October 31, 2010 based on lapses of the applicable statutes of limitations of unrecognized tax benefits. The estimated net decrease in unrecognized tax benefits for the next 12 months ranges from $2.2 million to $2.4 million. Actual results may differ materially from this estimated range.

Environmental Cleanup Costs. We expense environmental expenditures related to existing conditions caused by past or current operations and from which no current or future benefit is discernable. Expenditures that extend the life of the related property, or mitigate or prevent future environmental contamination, are capitalized. The capitalized cost at October 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007 was immaterial.

Environmental expenses were $(2.1) million, $0.4 million, and $0.2 million in 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively. In 2009, we reduced the environmental liability at our blending facility in Chicago, Illinois, by $3.2 million due to a revised third party estimate which reduced our total estimated cleanup costs. Environmental cash expenditures were $3.4 million, $3.2 million, and $1.6 million in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Our reserves for environmental liabilities at October 31, 2009 amounted to $33.4 million, which included a reserve of $17.9 million related to our blending facility in Chicago, Illinois, $10.9 million related to our European drum facilities and $3.4 million related to our facility in Lier, Belgium. The remaining reserves were for asserted and unasserted environmental litigation, claims and/or assessments at manufacturing sites and other locations where we believe it is probable the outcome of such matters will be unfavorable to us, but the environmental exposure at any one of those sites was not individually material. We cannot determine either the timing or the amount of payments for our environmental exposure beyond 2009. Reserves for large environmental exposures are principally based on environmental studies and cost estimates provided by third parties, but also take into account management estimates. Reserves for less significant environmental exposures are principally based on management estimates.

We anticipate that expenditures for remediation costs at most of the sites will be made over an extended period of time. Given the inherent uncertainties in evaluating environmental exposures, actual costs may vary from those estimated at October 31, 2009. Our exposure to adverse developments with respect to any individual site is not expected to be material. Although environmental remediation could have a material effect on results of operations if a series of adverse developments occur in a particular quarter or fiscal year, we believe that the chance of a series of adverse developments occurring in the same quarter or fiscal year is remote. Future information and developments will require us to continually reassess the expected impact of these environmental matters.

Self-Insurance. We are self-insured for certain of the claims made under our employee medical and dental insurance programs. We had recorded liabilities totaling $4.0 million and $4.1 million for estimated costs related to outstanding claims at October 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. These costs include an estimate for expected settlements on pending claims, administrative fees and an estimate for claims incurred but not reported. These estimates are based on our assessment of outstanding claims, historical analyses and current payment trends. We record an estimate for the claims incurred but not reported using an estimated lag period based upon historical information. This lag period assumption has been consistently applied for the periods presented. If the lag period was hypothetically adjusted by a period equal to a half month, the impact on earnings would be approximately $1.0 million. However, we believe the reserves recorded are adequate based upon current facts and circumstances.

We have certain deductibles applied to various insurance policies including general liability, product, auto and workers’ compensation. Deductible liabilities are insured through our captive insurance subsidiary, which had recorded liabilities totaling $21.5 million and $20.6 million for anticipated costs related to general liability, product, auto and workers’ compensation at October 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. These costs include an estimate for expected settlements on pending claims, defense costs and an estimate for claims incurred but not reported. These estimates are based on our assessment of outstanding claims, historical analysis, actuarial information and current payment trends.

Contingencies. Various lawsuits, claims and proceedings have been or may be instituted or asserted against us, including those pertaining to environmental, product liability, and safety and health matters. While the amounts claimed may be substantial, the ultimate liability cannot currently be determined because of the considerable uncertainties that exist.

All lawsuits, claims and proceedings are considered by us in establishing reserves for contingencies in accordance with SFAS No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies” (codified under ASC 450 “Contingencies”). In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 5, we accrue for a litigation-related liability when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Based on currently available information known to us, we believe that our reserves for these litigation-related liabilities are reasonable and that the ultimate outcome of any pending matters is not likely to have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results from operations.

Goodwill, Other Intangible Assets and Other Long-Lived Assets. We account for goodwill in accordance with SFAS No. 142 “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (codified under ASC 350 “Intangibles — Goodwill and Other”). Under SFAS No. 142, purchased goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives are not amortized, but instead are tested for impairment annually or when indicators of impairment exist. Intangible assets with finite lives, primarily customer relationships and patents and trademarks, continue to be amortized over their useful lives. In conducting the impairment test, the estimated fair value of our reporting units is compared to its carrying amount including goodwill. If the estimated fair value exceeds the carrying amount, then no impairment exists. If the carrying amount exceeds the estimated fair value, further analysis is performed to assess impairment.

Our determination of estimated fair value of the reporting units is based on a discounted cash flow analysis, a multiple of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) and, if available, a review of the price/earnings ratio for publicly traded companies similar in nature, scope and size of the applicable reporting unit. The discount rates used for impairment testing are based on the risk-free rate plus an adjustment for risk factors. The EBITDA multiples used for impairment testing are judgmentally selected based on factors such as the nature, scope and size of the applicable reporting unit. The use of alternative estimates, peer groups or changes in the industry, or adjusting the discount rate, EBITDA multiples or price earnings ratios used could affect the estimated fair value of the assets and potentially result in impairment. Any identified impairment would result in an adjustment to our results of operations.

We performed our annual impairment tests in fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007, which resulted in no impairment charges. Decreasing the price/earnings ratio of competitors used for impairment testing by one point or increasing the discount rate in the discounted cash flow analysis used for impairment testing by 1% would not have indicated impairment for any of our reporting units for fiscal 2009, 2008 or 2007. Refer to Note 4 of the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this form 10-K for additional information regarding goodwill and other intangibles.

Revenue Recognition. We recognize revenue when title passes to customers or services have been rendered, with appropriate provision for returns and allowances. Revenue is recognized in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, “Revenue Recognition” (codified under ASC 605 “Revenue Recognition”).

Timberland disposals, timber and special use property revenues are recognized when closings have occurred, required down payments have been received, title and possession have been transferred to the buyer, and all other criteria for sale and profit recognition have been satisfied.

We report the sale of surplus and higher and better use (“HBU”) property in our consolidated statements of income under “gain on disposals of properties, plants, and equipment, net” and report the sale of development property under “net sales” and “cost of products sold.” All HBU and development property, together with surplus property is used by us to productively grow and sell timber until sold.

Other Items. Other items that could have a significant impact on the financial statements include the risks and uncertainties listed in Item 1A under “Risk Factors.” Actual results could differ materially using different estimates and assumptions, or if conditions are significantly different in the future.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Historically, revenues and earnings may or may not be representative of future operating results due to various economic and other factors.

The non-GAAP financial measure of operating profit before the impact of restructuring charges, restructuring-related inventory charges, and timberland disposals, net is used throughout the following discussion of our results of operations (except with respect to the segment discussions for Industrial Packaging and Paper Packaging, where timberland disposals, net are not applicable and except with respect to Land Management where restructuring-related inventory charges are not applicable). Operating profit before the impact of restructuring charges, restructuring-related inventory charges, and timberland disposals, net is equal to operating profit plus restructuring charges, and restructuring-related inventory charges less timberland gains plus timberland losses. We use operating profit before the impact of restructuring charges, restructuring-related inventory charges, and timberland disposals, net because we believe that this measure provides a better indication of our operational performance because it excludes restructuring charges and restructuring-related inventory charges, which are not representative of ongoing operations, and timberland disposals, net which are volatile from period to period, and it provides a more stable platform on which to compare our historical performance.

The following table sets forth the net sales and operating profit for each of our business segments for 2009, 2008 and 2007 (Dollars in thousands):

For the year ended October 31,	2009		2008		2007
Net Sales
Industrial Packaging	$	2,266,890	$	3,074,834	$	2,662,949
Paper Packaging		504,687		696,902		653,734
Land Management		20,640		18,795		14,914
Total net sales	$	2,792,217	$	3,790,531	$	3,331,597
Operating Profit
Operating profit, before the impact of restructuring charges, restructuring-related inventory changes, and timberland disposals, net:
Industrial Packaging	$	210,908	$	325,956	$	228,848
Paper Packaging		44,114		78,646		68,382
Land Management		22,237		20,571		14,373
Total operating profit before the impact of restructuring charges, restructuring-related inventory changes, and timberland disposals, net		277,259		425,173		311,603
Restructuring charges:
Industrial Packaging		65,742		33,971		16,010
Paper Packaging		685		9,155		5,219
Land Management		163		76		—
Total restructuring charges		66,590		43,202		21,229
Restructuring-related inventory charges:
Industrial Packaging		10,772		—		—
Paper Packaging		—		—		—
Timberland disposals, net:
Land Management		—		340		(648	)
Operating profit:
Industrial Packaging		134,394		291,985		212,838
Paper Packaging		43,429		69,491		63,163
Land Management		22,074		20,835		13,725
Total operating profit	$	199,897	$	382,311	$	289,726

Year 2009 Compared to Year 2008

Overview

Net sales decreased 26.3% on a year over year basis to $2,792.2 million in 2009 from $3,790.5 million in 2008. The $998.3 million decrease was due to lower sales volumes (16.7%), foreign currency translation (6.0%), and lower selling prices (3.6%). The 20.3% constant-currency decrease was primarily due to lower sales volumes resulting from the sharp decline in the global economy and lower selling prices primarily resulting from the pass-through of lower raw material costs.

Operating profit was $199.9 million and $382.3 million in 2009 and 2008, respectively. Operating profit before the impact of restructuring charges, restructuring-related inventory charges and timberland disposals, net was $277.3 million for 2009 compared to $425.2 million for 2008. The $147.9 million decrease in operating profit before the impact of restructuring charges, restructuring-related inventory charges and timberland disposals, net was principally due to decreases in Industrial Packaging ($115.1 million) and Paper Packaging ($34.5 million) and an increase in Land Management ($1.7 million). Operating profit, expressed as a percentage of net sales, decreased to 7.2% for 2009 from 10.1% in 2008. Operating profit before restructuring charges, restructuring-related inventory charges, and the impact of timberland disposals, net, expressed as a percentage of net sales, decreased to 9.9% for 2009 from 11.2% in 2008.

Segment Review

Industrial Packaging

Our Industrial Packaging segment offers a comprehensive line of industrial packaging products and services, such as steel, fibre and plastic drums, intermediate bulk containers, closure systems for industrial packaging products, transit protection products, and polycarbonate water bottles, and services, such as blending, filling and other packaging services, logistics and warehousing. The key factors influencing profitability in the Industrial Packaging segment are:

• Selling prices, customer demand and sales volumes;

• Raw material costs and avaliability, primarily steel, resin and containerboard;

• Energy and transportation costs;

• Benefits from executing the Greif Business System;

• Restructuring charges and restructuring-related inventory charges;

• Contributions from recent acquisitions;

• Divestiture of business units and disposals of assets and facilities; and

• Impact of foreign currency translation.

In this segment, net sales decreased 26.3% to $2,266.9 million in 2009 compared to $3,074.8 million in 2008 due to lower sales volume, foreign currency translation, and lower selling prices. The Industrial Packaging segment was directly impacted by lower sales volumes resulting from the sharp decline in the global economy and lower selling prices primarily resulting from the pass-through of lower raw material costs.

Gross profit margin for the Industrial Packaging segment was 17.9% in 2009 compared to 18.8% in 2008, primarily due to the continued implementation of the Greif Business System and specific contingency actions (lower labor, transportation, and other manufacturing costs).

Operating profit was $134.4 million in 2009 compared to $292.0 million in 2008. Operating profit before the impact of restructuring charges and restructuring-related inventory charges decreased to $210.9 million in 2009 compared to $326.0 million in 2008. The decrease in operating profit was primarily due to lower net sales which were partially offset net gains on asset disposals, lower material costs, partially offset by lower of cost or market steel inventory write-downs early in the year and by increased supply chain costs caused by temporary spot steel shortages in some of our markets later in the year.

Paper Packaging

Our Paper Packaging segment sells containerboard, corrugated sheets, corrugated containers and multiwall bags in North America. The key factors influencing profitability in the Paper Packaging segment are:

• Selling prices, customer demand and sales volumes;

• Raw material costs, primarily old corrugated containers;

• Energy and transportation costs;

• Benefits from executing the Greif Business System; and

• Restructuring charges.

In this segment, net sales decreased 27.6% to $504.7 million in 2009 from $696.9 million in 2008. The $192.2 million decrease was primarily due to lower sales volumes and lower selling prices.

Gross profit margin for the Paper Packaging segment was 16.6% in 2009 compared to 17.1% in 2008. The Paper Packaging segment’s cost of products sold continue to benefit from the Greif Business System and specific contingency initiatives.

Operating profit was $43.4 million and $69.5 million in 2009 and 2008, respectively. Operating profit before the impact of restructuring charges decreased to $44.1 million in 2009 compared to $78.6 million in 2008. The decrease in operating profit before the impact of restructuring charges was primarily due to lower net sales, partially offset by lower raw material costs, especially for old corrugated containers. In addition, labor, transportation and energy costs were lower in 2009 as compared to 2008.

Land Management (formerly Timber)

As of October 31, 2009, our Land Management segment consisted of approximately 256,700 acres of timber properties in the southeastern United States, which are actively harvested and regenerated, and approximately 25,050 acres in Canada. The key factors influencing profitability in the Land Management segment are:

• Planned level of timber sales;

• Selling prices and customer demand;

• Gains (losses) on sale of timberland; and

• Sale of special use properties (surplus, HBU, and development properties).

In this segment, net sales were $20.6 million in 2009 compared to $18.8 million in 2008. While timber sales are subject to fluctuations, we seek to maintain a consistent cutting schedule, within the limits of market and weather conditions.

Operating profit was $22.1 million and $20.8 million in 2009 and 2008, respectively. Operating profit before the impact of restructuring charges and timberland disposals, net was $22.2 million in 2009 compared to $20.6 million in 2008. Included in these amounts were profits from the sale of special use properties of $14.8 million in 2009 and $16.8 million in 2008.

In order to maximize the value of our timber property, we continue to review our current portfolio and explore the development of certain of these properties in Canada and the United States. This process has led us to characterize our property as follows:

• Surplus property, meaning land that cannot be efficiently or effectively managed by us, whether due to parcel size, lack of productivity, location, access limitations or for other reasons.

• HBU property, meaning land that in its current state has a higher market value for uses other than growing and selling timber.

• Development property, meaning HBU land that, with additional investment, may have a significantly higher market value than its HBU market value.

• Timberland, meaning land that is best suited for growing and selling timber.

We report the sale of surplus and HBU property in our consolidated statements of income under “gain on disposals of properties, plants and equipment, net” and report the sale of development property under “net sales” and “cost of products sold.” All HBU and development property, together with surplus property, continues to be used by us to productively grow and sell timber until sold.

Whether timberland has a higher value for uses other than growing and selling timber is a determination based upon several variables, such as proximity to population centers, anticipated population growth in the area, the topography of the land, aesthetic considerations, including access to lakes or rivers, the condition of the surrounding land, availability of utilities, markets for timber and economic considerations both nationally and locally. Given these considerations, the characterization of land is not a static process, but requires an ongoing review and re-characterization as circumstances change.

At October 31, 2009, we estimated that there were approximately 58,900 acres in Canada and the United States of special use property, which we expect will be available for sale in the next five to seven years.

Other Income Statement Changes

Cost of Products Sold

Cost of products sold, as a percentage of net sales, increased to 82.1% in 2009 from 81.4% in 2008 primarily as a result of lower raw material costs and contributions from further execution of incremental and accelerated Greif Business System initiatives and specific contingency actions. These positive factors were partially offset by $10.8 million of restructuring-related inventory charges.

Selling, General and Administrative (“SG&A”) Expenses

SG&A expenses were $267.6 million, or 9.6% of net sales, in 2009 compared to $339.2 million, or 9.0% of net sales, in 2008. The dollar decrease in our SG&A expense was primarily due to the reduction in personnel on a period over period basis, tighter controls over SG&A expenses, and accelerated Greif Business System and specific contingency initiatives including reductions on both travel related programs and professional fees. SG&A expense as a percentage of net sales increased as a result of decreased net sales in 2009 as compared to 2008.

Restructuring Charges

Restructuring charges were $66.6 million and $43.2 million in 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Restructuring charges for 2009 consisted of $28.4 million in employee separation costs, $19.6 million in asset impairments, and $18.6 million in other restructuring costs. The focus of the 2009 restructuring activities was on business realignment due to the economic downturn and further implementation of the Greif Business System. Nineteen company-owned plants in the Industrial Packaging were closed. A total of 1,294 employees were severed during 2009. In addition, we recorded $10.8 million of restructuring-related inventory charges as a cost of products sold in our Industrial Packaging segment related to excess inventory adjustments of closed facilities.

Restructuring charges for 2008 consisted of $20.6 million in employee separation costs, $12.3 million in asset impairments, $0.4 million in professional fees and $9.9 million in other restructuring costs, primarily consisting of facility consolidation and lease termination costs. Six company-owned plants in the Industrial Packaging segment and four company-owned plants in the Paper Packaging segment were closed. Additionally, severance costs were incurred due to the elimination of certain operating and administrative positions throughout the world. A total of 630 employees were severed during 2008.

See Note 5 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional disclosures regarding our restructuring activities.

Timberland Disposals, Net

For 2009, we recorded no net gain on sale of timberland property compared to a net gain of $0.3 million in 2008.

Gain on Disposal of Properties, Plants and Equipment, Net

For 2009, we recorded a gain on disposal of properties, plants and equipment, net of $34.4 million, primarily consisting of a $17.2 million pre-tax net gain on the sale of specific Industrial Packaging segment assets and facilities in North America and $14.8 million in net gains from the sale of surplus and HBU timber properties. During 2008, gain on disposal of properties, plants and equipment, net was $59.5 million, primarily consisting of a $29.9 million pre-tax net gain on the divestiture of business units in Australia and our controlling interest in a Zimbabwean operation, and $15.2 million in net gains from the sale of surplus and HBU timber properties.

Interest Expense, Net

Interest expense, net, was $53.6 million and $49.6 million in 2009 and 2008, respectively. The increase was primarily due to higher outstanding debt as a result of our new $700 million senior secured credit facility and the issuance of our new $250 million Senior Notes due 2019 at 7.75%

Debt Extinguishment Charges

In 2009, we completed a new $700 million senior secured credit facility. This facility replaced an existing $450 million revolving credit facility that was scheduled to mature in March 2010. As a result of this transaction, a debt extinguishment charge of $0.8 million related to the write-off of unamortized capitalized debt issuance costs was recorded.

Other Expense, Net

Other expense, net was $7.2 million in 2009 compared to $8.8 million in 2008. The decrease was primarily due to foreign exchange losses of $0.1 million in 2009 as compared to losses of $1.7 million in 2008.

Income Tax Expense

During 2009, the effective tax rate was 17.4% compared to 24.2% in 2008. The decrease in the effective tax rate was primarily due a change in the mix of income in the United States compared to regions outside of the United States, where tax rates were lower, among other factors. The effective tax rate may fluctuate based on the mix of income inside and outside the United States and other factors.

Equity in Earnings of Affiliates and Minority Interests

For equity in earnings of affiliates and minority interests, we recorded a loss of $3.6 million in 2009 compared to a loss of $3.9 million in 2008. We have majority interests in various companies, and the minority interests in the respective net income of these companies have been recorded as an expense. These expenses were partially offset by equity earnings of our unconsolidated affiliates.

Net Income

Based on the foregoing, net income decreased $131.1 million to $110.6 million in 2009 from $241.7 million in 2008.

Year 2008 Compared to Year 2007

Overview

Net sales increased 14% (10% excluding the impact of foreign currency translation) to $3,790.5 million in 2008 compared to $3,331.6 million in 2007. The $458.9 million increase was due to Industrial Packaging ($411.8 million), Paper Packaging ($43.2 million) and Land Management ($3.9 million). Strong organic sales growth for industrial packaging products and higher selling prices, principally in response to higher raw material costs, drove the 10% constant-currency increase.

Operating profit was $382.3 million and $289.7 million in 2008 and 2007, respectively. Operating profit before the impact of restructuring charges and timberland disposals, net was $425.2 million for 2008 compared to $311.6 million for 2007. The $113.6 million increase was principally due to higher operating profit in Industrial Packaging ($97.1 million), Paper Packaging ($10.3 million) and Land Management ($6.2 million). Operating profit, expressed as a percentage of net sales, increased to 10.1% for 2008 from 8.7% in 2007. Operating profit before restructuring charges and the impact of timberland disposals, net, expressed as a percentage of net sales, increased to 11.2% for 2008 from 9.4% in 2007.

Segment Review

Industrial Packaging

Our Industrial Packaging segment offers a comprehensive line of industrial packaging products and services, such as steel, fibre and plastic drums, intermediate bulk containers, closure systems for industrial packaging products, transit protection products, and polycarbonate water bottles, and services, such as blending, filling and other packaging services, logistics and warehousing. The key factors influencing profitability in the Industrial Packaging segment are:

• Selling prices, customer demand and sales volumes;

• Raw material costs, primarily steel, resin and containerboard;

• Energy and transportation costs;

• Benefits from executing the Greif Business System;

• Restructuring charges;

• Contributions from recent acquisitions;

• Divestiture of business units; and

• Impact of foreign currency translation.

In this segment, net sales increased 16% to $3,074.8 million in 2008 compared to $2,662.9 million in 2007 — an increase of 10% excluding the impact of foreign currency translation. Higher sales volumes across all regions, with particular strength in emerging markets, in addition to higher selling prices in response to higher raw material costs, continued to drive the segment’s organic growth.

Gross profit margin for the Industrial Packaging segment was 18.8% in 2008 compared to 18.3% in 2007, primarily due to the continued implementation of the Greif Business System (lower labor, transportation and other manufacturing costs).

Operating profit was $292.0 million in 2008 compared to $212.8 million in 2007. Operating profit before the impact of restructuring charges increased to $326.0 million in 2008 compared to $228.8 million in 2007. The increase in operating profit was primarily due to improvement in sales volumes, higher selling prices and contributions from the Greif Business System, which were partially offset by higher input costs.

Paper Packaging

Our Paper Packaging segment sells containerboard, corrugated sheets, corrugated containers and multiwall bags in North America. The key factors influencing profitability in the Paper Packaging segment are:

• Selling prices, customer demand and sales volumes;

• Raw material costs, primarily old corrugated containers;

• Energy and transportation costs;

• Benefits from executing the Greif Business System; and

• Restructuring charges.

In this segment, net sales were $696.9 million in 2008 compared to $653.7 million in 2007. The increase in net sales was principally due to higher selling prices, including a containerboard price increase implemented in the fourth quarter of 2007 and the realization of a containerboard price increase implemented in the fourth quarter of 2008.

Gross profit margin for the Paper Packaging segment was 17.1% in 2008 compared to 17.5% in 2007. This decrease was primarily due to higher input costs, including energy and transportation, partially offset by higher selling prices from the containerboard increase implemented in the fourth quarter of 2007 and the partial realization of an increase implemented in the fourth quarter of 2008.

Operating Profit was $69.5 million and $63.2 million in 2008 and 2007, respectively. Operating profit before the impact of restructuring charges increased to $78.6 million in 2008 compared to $68.4 million in 2007. The increase was primarily due to higher selling prices from containerboard increases, partially offset by higher input costs, including increased energy costs and increased transportation costs.

Land Management (formerly Timber)

As of October 31, 2008, our Land Management segment consisted of approximately 268,700 acres of timber properties in the southeastern United States, which are actively harvested and regenerated, and approximately 27,450 acres in Canada. The key factors influencing profitability in the Land Management segment are:

• Planned level of timber sales;

• Selling prices and customer demand

• Gains (losses) on sale of timberland; and

• Sale of special use properties (surplus, HBU, and development properties).

Net sales were $18.8 million in 2008 compared to and $14.9 million in 2007. While timber sales are subject to fluctuations, we seek to maintain a consistent cutting schedule, within the limits of market and weather conditions.

Operating profit was $20.8 million and $13.7 million in 2008 and 2007, respectively. Operating profit before the impact of restructuring charges and timberland disposals, net was $20.6 million in 2008 compared to $14.4 million in 2007. Included in these amounts were profits from the sale of special use properties of $16.8 million in 2008 and $9.5 million in 2007.

At October 31, 2008, we estimated that there were approximately 61,600 acres in Canada and the United States of special use property, which will be available for sale in the next five to seven years.

Other Income Statement Changes

Cost of Products Sold

Cost of products sold, as a percentage of net sales, decreased to 81.4% in 2008 from 81.8% in 2007. Cost of products sold, as a percentage of net sales, primarily decreased as a result of the improvement in net sales and positive contributions from the Greif Business System. These positive factors were partially offset by higher raw material, transportation and energy costs compared to 2007.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

SG&A expenses were $339.2 million, or 9.0% of net sales, in 2008 compared to $313.4 million, or 9.4% of net sales, in 2007. The dollar increase in our SG&A expense was primarily due to acquisition synergies and the impact of foreign currency translation, partially offset by tighter controls over SG&A expenses.

Restructuring Charges

Restructuring charges were $43.2 million and $21.2 million in 2008 and 2007, respectively.

Restructuring charges for 2008 consisted of $20.6 million in employee separation costs, $12.3 million in asset impairments, $0.4 million in professional fees and $9.9 million in other restructuring costs, primarily consisting of facility consolidation and lease termination costs. Six company-owned plants in the Industrial Packaging segment and four company-owned plants in the Paper Packaging segment were closed. Additionally, severance costs were incurred due to the elimination of certain operating and administrative positions throughout the world. A total of 630 employees were severed during 2008.

Restructuring charges for 2007 consisted of $9.2 million in employee separation costs, $0.9 million in asset impairments, $1.0 million in professional fees, and $10.1 million in other restructuring costs, primarily consisting of facility consolidation and lease termination costs. Two company-owned plants in the Industrial Packaging segment were closed. Additionally, severance costs were incurred due to the elimination of certain operating and administrative positions throughout the world. A total of 303 employees were severed in 2007.

See Note 5 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional disclosures regarding our restructuring activities.

Gain on Disposal of Properties, Plants and Equipment, Net

For 2008, we recorded a gain on disposal of properties, plants and equipment, net of $59.5 million, primarily consisting of $29.9 million pre-tax net gain on divestiture of business units in Australia and our controlling interest in a Zimbabwean operation, and $15.2 million in net gains from the sale of surplus and HBU timber properties. During 2007, gain on disposals of properties, plants and equipment, net was $19.4 million, including $8.9 million in gains from the sale of surplus and HBU timber properties.

Interest Expense, Net

Interest expense, net, was $49.6 million and $45.5 million in 2008 and 2007, respectively. The increase was primarily due to higher outstanding debt, a larger mix of debt outside of the United States and Europe with higher interest rates, and interest received on lower cash balances.

Other Income (Expense), Net

Other expense, net was $8.8 million in 2008 compared to $9.0 million in 2007. The decrease was primarily due to the recording of $1.7 million in net expense related to losses on foreign currency transactions in 2008 compared to $2.2 million in 2007 and other infrequent non-operating items recorded in 2007.

Income Tax Expense

During 2008, the effective tax rate was 24.2% compared to 25.3% in 2007. The effective tax rate decreased due to a change in the mix of income in the United States compared to regions outside of the United States, where tax rates were lower. In future years, the effective tax rate may fluctuate based on the mix of income inside and outside the United States and other factors.

Equity in Earnings of Affiliates and Minority Interests

Equity in earnings of affiliates and minority interests was $3.9 million in 2008 compared to $1.7 million for 2007. We have majority holdings in various companies, and the minority interests of other persons in the respective net income of these companies have been recorded as an expense. These expenses were partially offset by equity in the earnings of three of our subsidiaries under the equity method, one in India and two in North America.

Net Income

Based on the foregoing, net income increased $85.2 million to $241.7 million in 2008 from $156.5 million in 2007.

BALANCE SHEET CHANGES

The $34.3 million increase in cash and cash equivalents was primarily due to cash flows from operations, partially offset by the cost of 2009 North America, South America, and Asia acquisitions, capital expenditures, debt repayments, and dividends paid.

The $55.5 million decrease in trade accounts receivable was primarily related to lower 2009 sales as compared to 2008 sales.

The $112.0 million decrease in inventories was mainly driven by lower raw material prices, steel costs, and lower overall business activity levels.

The $10.3 million increase in net assets held for sale was related to various facility closures in the Industrial Packaging segment.

The $79.1 million increase in goodwill primarily related to the North America, South America, and Asia acquisitions. Refer to Note 4 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

The $26.9 million increase in other intangibles primarily related to the North America, South America, and Asia acquisitions. Refer to Note 4 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for our intangible asset detail by asset class.

Other long-term assets increased $23.5 million primarily due to an increase in deferred financing costs associated with our new senior secured credit facility and the senior notes issuance.

Accounts payable decreased $48.8 million primarily due to lower raw material costs, especially steel, timing of payments and foreign currency translation.

Short-term borrowings decreased $7.2 million primarily due to payment of debt incurred in connection with our continued expansion and working capital needs of our China subsidiaries, as well as the payment of debt acquired in the South America acquisition in 2008.

Long-term debt and the current portion of long-term debt increased by $47.9 million primarily due to acquisitions, purchases of properties, plants and equipment, reduction of short term borrowings, higher cash and cash equivalent balances, partially offset by strong operating cash flows.

Pension liabilities increased by $36.5 million primariliy due to a reduction to the discount rate, which contributed to an increase in the projected benefit obligation.

Other long-term liabilities increased by $50.9 million and primarily consist of a fair value adjustment of $38.6 million related to foreign currency swaps and an increase to other statutory pension plans of $7.4 million.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Our primary sources of liquidity are operating cash flows, the proceeds from our trade accounts receivable credit facility, proceeds from the sale of our non-United States accounts receivable and borrowings under our Credit Agreement and Senior Notes, further discussed below. We have used these sources to fund our working capital needs, capital expenditures, cash dividends, common stock repurchases and acquisitions. We anticipate continuing to fund these items in a like manner. We currently expect that operating cash flows, the proceeds from our trade accounts receivable credit facility, proceeds from the sale of our non-United States accounts receivable and borrowings under our Credit Agreement and Senior Notes will be sufficient to fund our currently anticipated working capital, capital expenditures, debt repayment, potential acquisitions of businesses and other liquidity needs for at least 12 months.

Capital Expenditures and Business Acquisitions and Divestitures

During 2009, 2008 and 2007, we invested $124.7 million (excluding $1.0 million for timberland properties), $143.1 million (excluding $2.5 million for timberland properties), and $112.6 million (excluding $2.3 million for timberland properties) in capital expenditures, respectively. We anticipate future capital expenditures, excluding the potential purchase of timberland properties, of approximately $125 million through October 31, 2010. These expenditures will be primarily to replace and improve equipment.

During 2009, we acquired five industrial packaging companies and one paper packaging company and made a contingent purchase price payment related to a 2005 acquisition for an aggregate purchase price of $90.8 million. These six acquisitions consisted of the acquisition of two North American industrial packaging companies in February 2009, a North American industrial packaging company in June 2009, an Asian industrial packaging company in July 2009, a South American industrial packaging company in October 2009, and a 75% interest in a North American paper packaging company in October 2009. See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional disclosures regarding our acquisitions.

During 2009, we sold specific Industrial Packaging segment assets and facilities in North America. The net gain from these sales was $17.1 million and is included in gain on disposal of properties, plants, and equipment, net in the accompanying consolidated statement of income.

During 2008, we acquired four small industrial packaging companies and one paper packaging company and made a contingent purchase price payment related to a 2005 acquisition for an aggregate purchase price of $90.3 million. These five acquisitions, one in South America (70% interest), one in the Middle East (51% interest), one in Asia, and two in North America, complemented our current businesses. During 2008, we sold our Australian drum operations, sold our 51% interest in a Zimbabwean operation, sold three North American paper packaging operations and sold a North American industrial packaging operation. The proceeds from these divestitures were $36.5 million resulting in a net gain of $31.6 million. The 2007 sales and net income from these operations were not material to our overall operations. See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional disclosures regarding our acquisitions.

Borrowing Arrangements

Credit Agreements

On February 19, 2009, we and one of our international subsidiaries, as borrowers, and a syndicate of financial institutions, as lenders, entered into a $700 million Senior Secured Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”). The Credit Agreement replaced our then existing Credit Agreement (the “Prior Credit Agreement”) that provided us with a $450.0 million revolving multicurrency credit facility due 2010. The revolving multicurrency credit facility under the Prior Credit Agreement was available to us for ongoing working capital and general corporate purposes and provided for interest based on a euro currency rate or an alternative base rate that reset periodically plus a calculated margin amount.

The Credit Agreement provides us with a $500.0 million revolving multicurrency credit facility and a $200.0 million term loan, both maturing in February 2012, with an option to add $200.0 million to the facilities with the agreement of the lenders. The $200 million term loan is scheduled to amortize by $2.5 million per quarter for the first four quarters, $5.0 million per quarter for the next eight quarters and $150.0 million on the maturity date. There was $192.5 million outstanding under the Credit Agreement at October 31, 2009. The Credit Agreement is available to fund ongoing working capital and capital expenditure needs, for general corporate purposes, and to finance acquisitions. Interest is based on either an Eurodollar rate or a base rate that resets periodically plus a calculated margin amount. On February 19, 2009, $325.3 million was borrowed under the Credit Agreement and used to pay the outstanding obligations under the Prior Credit Agreement and certain costs and expenses incurred in connection with the Credit Agreement. The Prior Credit Agreement was terminated on February 19, 2009.

The Credit Agreement contains certain covenants, which include financial covenants that require us to maintain a certain leverage ratio and a fixed charge coverage ratio. The leverage ratio generally requires that at the end of any fiscal quarter we will not permit the ratio of (a) our total consolidated indebtedness, to (b) our consolidated net income plus depreciation, depletion and amortization, interest expense (including capitalized interest), income taxes, and minus certain extraordinary gains and non-recurring gains (or plus certain extraordinary losses and non-recurring losses) and plus or minus certain other items for the preceding twelve months (“EBITDA”) to be greater than 3.5 to 1. The fixed charge coverage ratio generally requires that at the end of any fiscal quarter we will not permit the ratio of (a) (i) consolidated EBITDA, less (ii) the aggregate amount of certain cash capital expenditures, and less (iii) the aggregate amount of Federal, state, local and foreign income taxes actually paid in cash (other than taxes related to Asset Sales not in the ordinary course of business), to (b) the sum of (i) consolidated interest expense to the extent paid or payable in cash during such period and (ii) the aggregate principal amount of all regularly scheduled principal payments or redemptions or similar acquisitions for value of outstanding debt for borrowed money, but excluding any such payments to the extent refinanced through the incurrence of additional indebtedness, to be less than 1.5 to 1. At October 31, 2009, we were in compliance with the covenants under the Credit Agreement.

The terms of the Credit Agreement limit our ability to make “restricted payments,” which includes dividends and purchases, redemptions and acquisitions of our equity interests. The repayment of this facility is secured by a security interest in our personal property and the personal property of our United States subsidiaries, including equipment and inventory and certain intangible assets, as well as a pledge of the capital stock of substantially all of our United States subsidiaries and, in part, by the capital stock of international borrowers. The payment of outstanding principal under the Credit Agreement and accrued interest thereon may be accelerated and become immediately due and payable upon the default in our payment or other performance obligations or our failure to comply with the financial and other covenants in the Credit Agreement, subject to applicable notice requirements and cure periods as provided in the Credit Agreement

As discussed below, during the third quarter 2009, we issued $250.0 million of our 7.75% Senior Notes due 2019. In connection with the issuance of these new Senior Notes, we obtained a waiver from the lenders under the Credit Agreement. Under the Credit Agreement, we would have been required to use the proceeds of the new Senior Notes first to make a mandatory prepayment to our term loan facility, then to make a mandatory prepayment to certain letter of credit borrowings and finally to cash collateralize letter of credit obligations. The lenders waived this mandatory prepayment requirement and allowed us instead, on a one-time basis, to use the proceeds of the new Senior Notes to repay borrowings under the revolving credit facility.

See Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional disclosures regarding the Credit Agreement.

New Senior Notes

We have issued $300.0 million of our 6.75% Senior Notes due February 1, 2017. Proceeds from the issuance of these Senior Notes were principally used to fund the purchase of our previously outstanding senior subordinated notes and for general corporate purposes. These Senior Notes are general unsecured obligations of Greif, provide for semi-annual payments of interest at a fixed rate of 6.75%, and do not require any principal payments prior to maturity on February 1, 2017. These Senior Notes are not guaranteed by any of our subsidiaries and thereby are effectively subordinated to all of our subsidiaries’ existing and future indebtedness. The Indenture pursuant to which these Senior Notes were issued contains covenants, which, among other things, limit our ability to create liens on our assets to secure debt and to enter into sale and leaseback transactions. These covenants are subject to a number of limitations and exceptions as set forth in the Indenture. At October 31, 2009, we were in compliance with these covenants.

During the third quarter 2009, we issued $250.0 million of our 7.75% Senior Notes due August 1, 2019. Proceeds from the issuance of these Senior Notes were principally used for general corporate purposes, including the repayment of amounts outstanding under our revolving multicurrency credit facility under the Credit Agreement, without any permanent reduction of the commitments. These Senior Notes are general unsecured obligations of Greif, provide for semi-annual payments of interest at a fixed rate of 7.75%, and do not require any principal payments prior to maturity on August 1, 2019. These Senior Notes are not guaranteed by any of our subsidiaries and thereby are effectively subordinated to all of our subsidiaries’ existing and future indebtedness. The Indenture pursuant to which these Senior Notes were issued contains covenants, which, among other things, limit our ability to create liens on our assets to secure debt and to enter into sale and leaseback transactions. These covenants are subject to a number of limitations and exceptions as set forth in the Indenture. At October 31, 2009, we were in compliance with these covenants.

See Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional disclosures regarding the Senior Notes discussed above.

United States Trade Accounts Receivable Credit Facility

We have a $135.0 million trade accounts receivable facility (the “Receivables Facility”) with a financial institution and its affiliate (the “Purchasers”). The Receivables Facility matures in December 2013, subject to earlier termination by the Purchasers of their purchase commitment in December 2010. In addition, we can terminate the Receivables Facility at any time upon five days prior written notice. The Receivables Facility is secured by certain of our United States trade receivables and bears interest at a variable rate based on the commercial paper rate, or alternatively, the London InterBank Offered Rate, plus a margin. Interest is payable on a monthly basis and the principal balance is payable upon termination of the Receivables Facility. The Receivables Facility contains certain covenants, including financial covenants for a leverage ratio identical to the Credit Agreement. Proceeds of the Receivables Facility are available for working capital and general corporate purposes. At October 31, 2009, there were no outstanding amounts under the Receivables Facility and $120 million outstanding at October 31, 2008 under the prior receivables facility that was terminated in connection with the Receivables Facility. See Note 7 of the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional disclosures regarding the Receivable Facility.

Sale of Non-United States Accounts Receivable

Certain of our international subsidiaries have entered into discounted receivables purchase agreements and factoring agreements (the “RPAs”) pursuant to which trade receivables generated from certain countries other than the United States and which meet certain eligibility requirements are sold to certain international banks or their affiliates. The structure of these transactions provide for a legal true sale, on a revolving basis, of the receivables transferred from our various subsidiaries to the respective banks. The banks fund an initial purchase price of a certain percentage of eligible receivables based on a formula with the initial purchase price approximating 75% to 90% of eligible receivables. The remaining deferred purchase price is settled upon collection of the receivables. At the balance sheet reporting dates, we remove from accounts receivable the amount of proceeds received from the initial purchase price since they meet the applicable criteria of SFAS No. 140, “Accounting for Transfer and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities” (codified under ASC 860 “Transfers and Servicing”), and continue to recognize the deferred purchase price in our accounts receivable. The receivables are sold on a non-recourse basis with the total funds in the servicing collection accounts pledged to the respective banks between the settlement dates. The maximum amount of aggregate receivables that may be sold under our various RPAs was $185.3 million at October 31, 2009. At October 31, 2009 and 2008, total accounts receivable of $127.4 million and $147.6 million, respectively, were sold under the various RPAs, respectively.

At the time the receivables are initially sold, the difference between the carrying amount and the fair value of the assets sold are included as a loss on sale and classified as “other expense” in the consolidated statements of income. Expenses associated with the various RPAs totaled $6.5 million for the year ended October 31, 2009. Additionally, we perform collections and administrative functions on the receivables sold similar to the procedures we use for collecting all of our receivables. The servicing liability for these receivables is not material to the consolidated financial statements.

See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding these various RPAs.

Other

In addition to the amounts borrowed under the Credit Agreement and proceeds from the Senior Notes and the United States and Non-United States trade accounts receivable credit facility, at October 31, 2009, we had outstanding other debt of $24.0 million, comprised of $4.4 million in long-term debt and $19.6 million in short-term borrowings.

At October 31, 2009, annual maturities of our long-term debt under our various financing arrangements were $21.9 million in 2010, $24.4 million in 2011, $155.0 million in 2012, and $541.7 million thereafter. The current portion of the long term debt is $17.5 million.

At October 31, 2009 and October 31, 2008, we had deferred financing fees and debt issuance costs of $14.9 million and $4.6 million, respectively, which are included in other long-term assets.

Contractual Obligations

As of October 31, 2009, we had the following contractual obligations (Dollars in millions):

			Payments Due by Period
	Total		Less than 1 year		1- 3 years		3-5 years		After 5 years
Long-term debt	$	1,064.7	$	—	$	311.6	$	79.3	$	673.8
Current portion of long-term debt		17.5		17.5		—		—		—
Short-term borrowing		20.8		20.8		—		—		—
Capital lease obligations		0.5		0.2		0.2		0.1		—
Operating leases		86.4		18.3		29.6		17.8		20.7
Liabilities held by special purpose entities		69.5		2.2		4.5		4.5		58.3
Total	$	1,259.4	$	59.0	$	345.9	$	101.7	$	752.8

Amounts presented in the contractual obligation table include interest

Our unrecognized tax benefits under FIN 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (codified under ASC 740 “Income Taxes”) have been excluded from the contractual obligations table because of the inherent uncertainty and the inability to reasonably estimate the timing of cash outflows.

Stock Repurchase Program and Other Share Acquisitions

Our Board of Directors has authorized us to purchase up to four million shares of Class A Common Stock or Class B Common Stock or any combination of the foregoing. During 2009, we repurchased no shares of Class A Common Stock, and we repurchased 100,000 shares of Class B Common Stock (see Item 5 to this Form 10-K for additional information regarding these repurchases). As of October 31, 2009, we had repurchased 2,833,272 shares, including 1,416,752 shares of Class A Common Stock and 1,416,520 shares of Class B Common Stock, under this program. The total cost of the shares repurchased from November 1, 2006 through October 31, 2009 was $36.0 million.

Effects of Inflation

The effects of inflation did not have a material impact on our operations during 2009, 2008 or 2007.

Recent Accounting Standards

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), “Business Combinations” (codified under ASC 805 “Business Combinations”), which replaces SFAS No. 141. The objective of SFAS No. 141(R) is to improve the relevance, representational faithfulness and comparability of the information that a reporting entity provides in its financial reports about a business combination and its effects. SFAS No. 141(R) establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree; recognizes and measures the goodwill acquired in the business combination or a gain from a bargain purchase; and determines what information to disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. SFAS No.141(R) applies to all transactions or other events in which an entity (the acquirer) obtains control of one or more businesses (the acquiree), including those sometimes referred to as “true mergers” or “mergers of equals” and combinations achieved without the transfer of consideration. SFAS No. 141(R) will apply to any acquisition entered into on or after November 1, 2009, but will have no effect on our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ending October 31, 2009 incorporated herein. Refer to Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for the financial impact on adoption of SFAS No. 141(R) as of November 1, 2009.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (codified under ASC 820 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures”). SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value within GAAP and expands required disclosures about fair value measurements. In November 2007, the FASB provided a one year deferral for the implementation of SFAS No. 157 for nonfinancial assets and liabilities. We adopted SFAS No. 157 on February 1, 2008, as required. The adoption of SFAS No. 157 did not have a material impact on our financial condition and results of operations. Refer to Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for our fair value hierarchy provisions of SFAS No. 157.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (codified under ASC 825 “Financial Instruments”). SFAS No. 159 permits companies to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value at specified election dates. SFAS No. 159 was effective for us on November 1, 2008. Since we have not utilized the fair value option for any allowable items, the adoption of SFAS No. 159 did not have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Accounting and Reporting of Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51” (codified under ASC 810 “Consolidation”). The objective of SFAS No.160 is to improve the relevance, comparability and transparency of the financial information that a reporting entity provides in its consolidated financial statements. SFAS No. 160 amends Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51 to establish accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. SFAS No. 160 also changes the way the consolidated financial statements are presented, establishes a single method of accounting for changes in a parent’s ownership interest in a subsidiary that do not result in deconsolidation, requires that a parent recognize a gain or loss in net income when a subsidiary is deconsolidated and expands disclosures in the consolidated financial statements that clearly identify and distinguish between the parent’s ownership interest and the interest of the noncontrolling owners of a subsidiary. The provisions of SFAS No. 160 are to be applied prospectively as of the beginning of the fiscal year in which SFAS No. 160 is adopted, except for the presentation and disclosure requirements, which are to be applied retrospectively for all periods presented. SFAS No. 160 will be effective for our financial statements for the fiscal year beginning November 1, 2009. We are in the process of evaluating the impact that the adoption of SFAS No. 160 may have on our consolidated financial statements. However do not anticipate a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

In December 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position FAS 132(R)-1, “Employers’ Disclosures About Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets” (“FSP FAS 132(R)-1”) (codified under ASC 715 “Compensation — Retirement Benefits”), to provide guidance on employers’ disclosures about assets of a defined benefit pension or other postretirement plan. FSP FAS 132(R)-1 requires employers to disclose information about fair value measurements of plan assets similar to SFAS 157. The objectives of the disclosures are to provide an understanding of: (a) how investment allocation decisions are made, including the factors that are pertinent to an understanding of investment policies and strategies, (b) the major categories of plan assets, (c) the inputs and valuation techniques used to measure the fair value of plan assets, (d) the effect of fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs on changes in plan assets for the period and (e) significant concentrations of risk within plan assets. The disclosures required by FSP FAS 132(R)-1 will be effective for our financial statements for the fiscal year beginning

November 1, 2009. We are in the process of evaluating the impact that the adoption of FAS 132(R)-1 may have on our consolidated financial statements. However, we do not anticipate a material impact on out financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 166, “Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140” (not yet codified). The Statement amends SFAS No. 140 to improve the information provided in financial statements concerning transfers of financial assets, including the effects of transfers on financial position, financial performance and cash flows, and any continuing involvement of the transferor with the transferred financial assets. The provisions of SFAS 166 are effective for our financial statements for the fiscal year beginning November 1, 2010. We are in the process of evaluating the impact, if any, that the adoption of SFAS 166 may have on our consolidated financial statements. However, we do not anticipate a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167, “Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)” (not yet codified). SFAS 167 amends Interpretation 46(R) to require an enterprise to perform an analysis to determine whether the enterprise’s variable interest or interests give it a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity. It also amends Interpretation 46(R) to require enhanced disclosures that will provide users of financial statements with more transparent information about an enterprise’s involvement in a variable interest entity. The provisions of SFAS 167 are effective for our financial statements for the fiscal year beginning November 1, 2010. We are in the process of evaluating the impact, if any, that the adoption of SFAS 167 may have on our consolidated financial statements. However, we do not anticipate a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, “The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.” This standard replaces SFAS No. 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles,” and establishes two levels of GAAP, authoritative and non-authoritative. The FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the “Codification”) will become the source of authoritative, nongovernmental GAAP, except for rules and interpretive releases of the SEC, which are sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. All other non-grandfathered, non-SEC accounting literature not included in the Codification will become non-authoritative. We have adopted the codification standards which do not have a financial impact other than references to authoritative literature incorporated herein.

EX-99.3

EXHIBIT 99.3

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

GREIF, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

For the years ended October 31,	2009			2008			2007
Net sales	$	2,792,217		$	3,790,531		$	3,331,597
Costs of products sold		2,292,573			3,085,735			2,726,051
Gross profit		499,644			704,796			605,546
Selling, general and administrative expenses		267,589			339,157			313,377
Restructuring charges		66,590			43,202			21,229
Timberland disposals, net		—			340			(648	)
(Gain) on disposal of properties, plants and equipment, net		(34,432	)		(59,534	)		(19,434	)
Operating profit		199,897			382,311			289,726
Interest expense, net		53,593			49,628			45,512
Debt extinguishment charge		782			—			23,479
Other expense, net		7,193			8,751			8,956
Income before income tax expense and equity in earnings of affiliates and minority interests		138,329			323,932			211,779
Income tax expense		24,061			78,241			53,599
Equity in earnings of affiliates and minority interests		(3,622	)		(3,943	)		(1,723	)
Net income	$	110,646		$	241,748		$	156,457
Basic earnings per share:
Class A Common Stock	$	1.91		$	4.16		$	2.70
Class B Common Stock	$	2.86		$	6.23		$	4.04
Diluted earnings per share:
Class A Common Stock	$	1.91		$	4.11		$	2.65
Class B Common Stock	$	2.86		$	6.23		$	4.04

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

GREIF, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Dollars in thousands)

As of October 31,	2009			2008
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	111,896		$	77,627
Trade accounts receivable, less allowance of $12,510 in 2009 and $13,532 in 2008		337,054			392,537
Inventories		238,851			350,845
Deferred tax assets		19,901			33,206
Net assets held for sale		31,574			21,321
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		105,904			93,965
		845,180			969,501
Long-term assets
Goodwill		592,117			512,973
Other intangible assets, net of amortization		131,370			104,424
Assets held by special purpose entities (Note 6)		50,891			50,891
Other long-term assets		112,092			88,563
		886,470			756,851
Properties, plants and equipment
Timber properties, net of depletion		197,114			199,701
Land		120,667			119,679
Buildings		380,816			343,702
Machinery and equipment		1,148,406			1,046,347
Capital projects in progress		70,489			91,549
		1,917,492			1,800,978
Accumulated depreciation		(825,213	)		(734,581	)
		1,092,279			1,066,397
	$	2,823,929		$	2,792,749

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

GREIF, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Dollars in thousands)

As of October 31,	2009			2008
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities
Accounts payable	$	335,816		$	384,648
Accrued payroll and employee benefits		74,475			91,498
Restructuring reserves		15,315			15,147
Short-term borrowings		37,084			44,281
Other current liabilities		99,407			136,227
		562,097			671,801
Long-term liabilities
Long-term debt		721,108			673,171
Deferred tax liabilities		161,152			201,063
Pension liabilities		77,942			14,456
Postretirement benefit obligations		25,396			25,138
Liabilities held by special purpose entities (Note 6)		43,250			43,250
Other long-term liabilities		126,392			75,521
		1,155,240			1,032,599
Minority Interest		6,997			3,729
Shareholders’ equity
Common stock, without par value		96,504			86,446
Treasury stock, at cost		(115,277	)		(112,931	)
Retained earnings		1,206,614			1,183,925
Accumulated other comprehensive loss:
— foreign currency translation		(6,825	)		(39,693	)
— interest rate derivatives		(1,484	)		(1,802	)
— energy and other derivatives		(391	)		(4,299	)
— minimum pension liabilities		(79,546	)		(27,026	)
		1,099,595			1,084,620
	$	2,823,929		$	2,792,749

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

GREIF, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Dollars in thousands)

For the years ended October 31,	2009			2008			2007
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	110,646		$	241,748		$	156,457
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation, depletion and amortization		102,627			106,378			102,295
Asset impairments		19,516			12,325			1,108
Deferred income taxes		(13,167	)		9,116			(8,439	)
Gain on disposals of properties, plants and equipment, net		(34,432	)		(59,534	)		(19,434	)
Timberland disposals, net		—			(340	)		648
Equity in earnings (losses) of affiliates, net of dividends received, and minority interests		3,622			3,943			1,723
Loss on extinguishment of debt		782			—			23,479
Increase (decrease) in cash from changes in certain assets and liabilities:
Trade accounts receivable		73,358			(65,877	)		42,876
Inventories		127,188			(89,288	)		23,976
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		(151	)		(3,467	)		(11,403	)
Other long-term assets		(19,674	)		13,240			(49,861	)
Accounts payable		(92,449	)		39,827			29,051
Accrued payroll and employee benefits		(20,511	)		6,584			13,475
Restructuring reserves		168			(629	)		5,772
Other current liabilities		(50,117	)		16,310			55,194
Pension and postretirement benefit liabilities		63,744			(13,281	)		(12,136	)
Other long-term liabilities		50,871			(43,659	)		41,692
Other		(55,497	)		(33,560	)		(4,472	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		266,524			139,836			392,001
Cash flows from investing activities:
Acquisitions of companies, net of cash acquired		(90,816	)		(99,962	)		(346,629	)
Purchases of properties, plants and equipment		(124,671	)		(143,077	)		(112,600	)
Purchases of timber properties		(1,000	)		(2,500	)		(2,300	)
Receipt (issuance) of notes receivable		—			33,178			(32,248	)
Proceeds from the sale of properties, plants, equipment and other assets		50,279			60,333			22,218
Purchases of land rights and other		(4,992	)		(9,289	)		(3,765	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(171,200	)		(161,317	)		(475,324	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt		3,285,343			2,293,751			2,040,111
Payments on long-term debt		(3,218,665	)		(2,243,482	)		(1,918,807	)
(Payments of) proceeds from short-term borrowings, net		(25,749	)		23,020			(14,486	)
Dividends paid		(87,957	)		(76,524	)		(53,335	)
Acquisitions of treasury stock and other		(3,145	)		(21,483	)		(11,409	)
Exercise of stock options		2,015			4,540			19,415
Debt issuance costs		(13,588	)		—			(2,839	)
Settlement of derivatives		(3,574	)		—			(33,935	)
Payments for premium for debt extinguishment		—			—			(14,303	)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities		(65,320	)		(20,178	)		10,412
Effects of exchange rates on cash		4,265			(4,413	)		9,509
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		34,269			(46,072	)		(63,402	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year		77,627			123,699			187,101
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year	$	111,896		$	77,627		$	123,699

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

GREIF, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share amounts)

															Accumulated Other
	Capital Stock					Treasury Stock						Retained			Comprehensive			Shareholders’
	Shares			Amount		Shares			Amount			Earnings			Income (Loss)			Equity
As of October 31, 2006		46,300		$	56,765		30,542		$	(81,643	)	$	922,593		$	(32,378	)	$	865,337
Net income													156,457						156,457
Other comprehensive income (loss):
— foreign currency translation																41,735			41,735
— interest rate derivative, net of income tax expense of $466																864			864
— minimum pension liability adjustment, net of income tax expense of $7,232																17,360			17,360
— energy derivatives, net of income tax expense of $361																1,171			1,171
Comprehensive income																			217,587
Adjustment to initially apply SFAS No. 158, net of income tax benefit of $7,769																(16,268	)		(16,268	)
Dividends paid (Note 10):
Class A — $0.92													(21,716	)					(21,716	)
Class B — $1.37													(31,619	)					(31,619	)
Treasury shares acquired		(204	)				204			(11,409	)								(11,409	)
Stock options exercised		559			7,732		(559	)		949									8,681
Tax benefit of stock options					8,076														8,076
Long-term incentive shares issued		38			2,104		(38	)		64									2,168
Directors shares issued		6			479		(6	)		11									490
As of October 31, 2007		46,699		$	75,156		30,143		$	(92,028	)	$	1,025,715		$	12,484		$	1,021,327
Net income													241,748						241,748
Other comprehensive income (loss):
— foreign currency translation																(82,953	)		(82,953	)
— interest rate derivative, net of income tax benefit of $433																(805	)		(805	)
— minimum pension liability adjustment, net of income tax expense of $920																2,979			2,979
— energy derivatives, net of income tax benefit of $1,954																(3,629	)		(3,629	)
— commodity hedge, net of income tax benefit of $482																(896	)		(896	)
Comprehensive income																			156,444
Adjustment to initially apply FIN 48													(7,015	)					(7,015	)
Dividends paid:
Class A — $1.32													(31,591	)					(31,591	)
Class B — $1.97													(44,933	)					(44,933	)
Treasury shares acquired		(382	)				382			(21,476	)								(21,476	)
Stock options exercised		283			3,949		(283	)		484									4,433
Tax benefit of stock options					4,709														4,709
Long-term incentive shares issued		44			2,633		(44	)		89									2,722
As of October 31, 2008		46,644		$	86,446		30,198		$	(112,931	)	$	1,183,925		$	(72,820	)	$	1,084,620
Net income													110,646						110,646
Other comprehensive income (loss):
— foreign currency translation																32,868			32,868
— interest rate derivative, net of income tax expense of $128																318			318
— minimum pension liability adjustment, net of income tax benefit of $28,580																(51,092	)		(51,092	)
— energy derivatives, net of income tax expense of $1,579																3,908			3,908
Comprehensive income																			96,648
Change in pension measurement date, net of income																(1,428	)		(1,428	)
tax benefit of $590
Dividends paid:
Class A — $1.52													(36,967	)					(36,967	)
Class B — $2.27													(50,990	)					(50,990	)
Treasury shares acquired		(100	)				100			(3,145	)								(3,145	)
Stock options exercised		133			1,749		(133	)		266									2,015
Tax benefit of stock options					575														575
Long-term incentive shares issued		260			7,734		(260	)		533									8,267
As of October 31, 2009		46,937		$	96,504		29,905		$	(115,277	)	$	1,206,614		$	(88,246	)	$	1,099,595

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

GREIF, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1 — DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The Business

Greif, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, “Greif”, “our”, or the “Company”) principally manufacture industrial packaging products, complemented with a variety of value-added services, including blending, packaging, logistics and warehousing, and containerboard and corrugated products that it sells to customers in many industries throughout the world. The Company has operations in over 45 countries. In addition, the Company owns timber properties in the southeastern United States, which are actively harvested and regenerated, and also owns timber properties in Canada.

Due to the variety of its products, the Company has many customers buying different products and, due to the scope of the Company’s sales, no one customer is considered principal in the total operations of the Company.

Because the Company supplies a cross section of industries, such as chemicals, food products, petroleum products, pharmaceuticals and metal products, and must make spot deliveries on a day-to-day basis as its products are required by its customers, the Company does not operate on a backlog to any significant extent and maintains only limited levels of finished goods. Many customers place their orders weekly for delivery during the same week.

The Company’s raw materials are principally steel, resin, containerboard, old corrugated containers for recycling and pulpwood.

There are approximately 8,200 employees of the Company at October 31, 2009.

Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Greif, Inc. and all wholly-owned and majority-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. Investments in unconsolidated affiliates are accounted for using the equity method.

The Company’s consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”). Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

The Company’s fiscal year begins on November 1 and ends on October 31 of the following year. Any references to the year 2009, 2008 or 2007, or to any quarter of those years, relates to the fiscal year ending in that year.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make certain estimates, judgments, and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. The most significant estimates are related to the allowance for doubtful accounts, inventory reserves, expected useful lives assigned to properties, plants and equipment, goodwill and other intangible assets, restructuring reserves, environmental liabilities, pension and postretirement benefits, income taxes, derivatives, net assets held for sale, self-insurance reserves and contingencies. Actual amounts could differ from those estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The carrying value of cash equivalents approximates fair value.

Receivables

Trade receivables represent amounts owed to us through our operating activities and are presented net of allowance for doubtful accounts. The allowance for doubtful accounts totaled $12.5 million and $13.5 million at October 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The Company evaluates the collectability of its accounts receivable based on a combination of factors. In circumstances where the Company is aware of a specific customer’s inability to meet its financial obligations to the Company, the Company records a specific allowance for bad debts against amounts due to reduce the net recognized receivable to the amount the Company reasonably believes will be collected. In addition, the Company recognizes allowances for bad debts based on the length of time receivables are past due with allowance percentages, based on its historical experiences, applied on a graduated scale relative to the age of the receivable amounts. If circumstances such as higher than expected bad debt experience or an unexpected material adverse change in a major customer’s ability to meet its financial obligations to the Company were to occur, the Company estimates of the recoverability of amounts due to the Company could change by a material amount. Amounts deemed uncollectible are written-off against an established allowance for doubtful accounts.

Concentration of Credit Risk and Major Customers

The Company maintains cash depository accounts with major banks throughout the world and invests in high quality short-term liquid instruments. Such investments are made only in instruments issued or enhanced by high quality institutions. These investments mature within three months and the Company has not incurred any related losses.

Trade receivables can be potentially exposed to a concentration of credit risk with customers or in particular industries. Such credit risk is considered by management to be limited due to the Company’s many customers, none of which are considered principal in the total operations of the Company and doing business in a variety of industries throughout the world. The Company does not have an individual customer that exceeds 10% of total revenue. In addition, the Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of our customers’ financial conditions and maintains reserves for credit losses. Such losses historically have been within our expectations.

Inventories

On November 1, 2009, the Company elected to adopt the FIFO method of inventory valuation for all locations, whereas in all prior years inventory for certain U.S. locations was valued using the LIFO method. The Company believes that the FIFO method of inventory valuation is preferable because 1) the change conforms to a single method of accounting for all of the Company’s inventories on a U.S. and global basis, 2) the change simplifies financial disclosures, 3) financial statement comparability and analysis for investors and analysts is improved, and 4) the majority of the Company’s key competitors use FIFO. The comparative consolidated financial statements of prior periods presented have been adjusted to apply the new accounting method retrospectively. The change in accounting principle is reported through retrospective application as described in ASC 250, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections.”

The following consolidated statement of operations line items for the year ended October 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 were affected by the change in accounting principle:

	Year ended October 31, 2009
	As Reported		Adjustments			As Adjusted
Cost of products sold	$	2,257,141		35,432		$	2,292,573
Gross profit		535,076		(35,432	)		499,644
Operating profit (Loss)		235,329		(35,432	)		199,897
Debt extinguishment charge		782		—			782
Income before income tax expense and equity in earnings (losses) of affiliates		173,761		(35,432	)		138,329
Income tax (benefit) expense		37,706		(13,645	)		24,061
Net income (loss) attributable to Greif Inc.	$	132,433	$	(21,787	)	$	110,646

	Year ended October 31, 2008
	As Reported		Adjustments			As Adjusted
Cost of products sold	$	3,097,760		(12,025	)	$	3,085,735
Gross profit		692,771		12,025			704,796
Operating profit (Loss)		370,286		12,025			382,311
Income before income tax expense and equity in earnings (losses) of affiliates		311,907		12,025			323,932
Income tax (benefit) expense		73,610		4,631			78,241
Net income (loss) attributable to Greif Inc.	$	234,354	$	7,394		$	241,748

	Year ended October 31, 2007
	As Reported		Adjustments			As Adjusted
Cost of products sold	$	2,726,195		(144	)	$	2,726,051
Gross profit		605,402		144			605,546
Operating profit (Loss)		289,582		144			289,726
Debt extinguishment charge		23,479		—			23,479
Income before income tax expense and equity in earnings (losses) of affiliates		211,635		144			211,779
Income tax (benefit) expense		53,544		55			53,599
Net income (loss) attributable to Greif Inc.	$	156,368	$	89		$	156,457

The following consolidated balance sheet line items for the year ended October 31, 2009 and 2008 were affected by the change in accounting principle:

	For the period ended October 31, 2009
	As Reported		Adjustments		As Adjusted
Inventory	$	227,432		11,419	$	238,851
Total Assets		2,812,510		11,419		2,823,929
Deferred tax liabilities		156,755		4,397		161,152
Total liabilities		1,712,939		4,397		1,717,336
Retained earnings		1,199,592		7,022		1,206,614
ities and shareholders’ equity	$	2,812,510		11,419	$	2,823,929

	For the period ended October 31, 2008
	As Reported		Adjustments		As Adjusted
Inventory	$	303,994		46,851	$	350,845
Total Assets		2,745,898		46,851		2,792,749
Deferred tax liabilities		183,021		18,042		201,063
Total liabilities		1,686,358		18,042		1,704,400
Retained earnings		1,155,116		28,809		1,183,925
ities and shareholders’ equity	$	2,745,898		46,851	$	2,792,749

The Company also evaluates reserves for inventory obsolescence and losses under firm purchase commitments for goods or inventories.

The inventories are comprised as follows at October 31 for the year indicated (Dollars in thousands):

	2009		2008
Finished goods	$	57,304	$	71,659
Raw materials and work-in process		181,547		279,186
	$	238,851	$	350,845

Net Assets Held for Sale

Net assets held for sale represent land, buildings and land improvements for locations that have met the criteria of “held for sale” accounting, as specified by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 144, “Accounting for Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” (codified under ASC 360 “Property, Plant, and Equipment”). As of October 31, 2009, there were fourteen locations held for sale (twelve in the Industrial Packaging segment and two in the Paper Packaging segment). In 2009, the Company recorded net sales of $5.5 million and net loss before taxes of $3.9 million associated with these properties, primarily related to the Industrial Packaging segment. For 2008, the Company recorded net sales of $15.4 million and net loss before taxes of $8.2 million, primarily related to the Industrial Packaging segment. The effect of suspending depreciation on the facilities held for sale is immaterial to the results of operations. The properties classified within net assets held for sale have been listed for sale and it is the Company’s intention to complete these sales within the upcoming year.

Goodwill and Other Intangibles

Goodwill is the excess of the purchase price of an acquired entity over the amounts assigned to assets and liabilities assumed in the business combination. The Company accounts for purchased goodwill and other intangible assets in accordance with SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (codified under ASC 350 “Intangibles — Goodwill and Other”). Under SFAS 142, purchased goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives are not amortized, but instead are tested for impairment at least annually. Intangible assets with finite lives, primarily customer relationships, patents and trademarks, continue to be amortized over their useful lives. The Company tests for impairment during the fourth quarter of each fiscal year, or more frequently if certain indicators are present or changes in circumstances suggest that impairment may exist.

SFAS No. 142 requires that testing for goodwill impairment be conducted at the reporting unit level using a two-step approach. The first step requires a comparison of the carrying value of the reporting units to the estimated fair value of these units. If the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value, the Company performs the second step of the goodwill impairment to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. The second step of the goodwill impairment test compares the estimated implied fair value of a reporting unit’s goodwill to its carrying value. The estimated implied fair value of goodwill is determined in the same manner that the amount of goodwill recognized in a business combination is determined. The Company allocates the estimated fair value of a reporting unit to all of the assets and liabilities in that unit, including intangible assets, as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination. Any excess of the estimated fair value of a reporting unit over the amounts assigned to its assets and liabilities is the implied fair value of goodwill.

The Company’s determination of estimated fair value of the reporting units is based on a combination of a discounted cash flow analysis and a multiple of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”). The discount rates used for impairment testing are based on the risk-free rate plus an adjustment for risk factors and is reflective of a typical market participant. The use of alternative estimates, peer groups or changes in the industry, or adjusting the discount rate, or EBITDA multiples used could affect the estimated fair value of the reporting units and potentially result in goodwill impairment. Any identified impairment would result in an expense to the Company’s results of operations. The Company performed its annual impairment test in fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007, which resulted in no impairment charges. See Note 4 for additional information regarding goodwill and other intangible assets.

Acquisitions

From time to time, we acquire businesses and/or assets that augment and complement our operations. These acquisitions are accounted for under the purchase method of accounting. The consolidated financial statements include the results of operations from these business combinations as of the date of acquisition. Additional disclosure related to our acquisitions is provided in Note 2.

Internal Use Software

Internal use software is accounted for under Statement of Position 98-1 “Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use” (codified under ASC 985 “Software”). Internal use software is software that is acquired, internally developed or modified solely to meet the Company’s needs and for which, during the software’s development or modification, a plan does not exist to market the software externally. Costs incurred to develop the software during the application development stage and for upgrades and enhancements that provide additional functionality are capitalized and then amortized over a three- to ten- year period.

Properties, Plants and Equipment

Properties, plants and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation on properties, plants and equipment is provided on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets as follows:

	Years
Buildings		30-45
Machinery and equipment		3-19

Depreciation expense was $88.6 million, $92.9 million, $89.6 million, in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred. When properties are retired or otherwise disposed of, the cost and accumulated depreciation are eliminated from the asset and related allowance accounts. Gains or losses are credited or charged to income as incurred.

For 2009, the Company recorded a gain on disposal of properties, plants and equipment, net of $34.4 million, primarily consisting of a $17.2 million pre-tax net gain on the sale of specific Industrial Packaging segment assets and locations in North America and $14.8 million in net gains from the sale of surplus and HBU timber properties.

The Company owns timber properties in the southeastern United States and in Canada. With respect to the Company’s United States timber properties, which consisted of approximately 256,700 acres at October 31, 2009, depletion expense on timber properties is computed on the basis of cost and the estimated recoverable timber. Depletion expense was $2.9 million, $4.2 million and $4.3 million in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The Company’s land costs are maintained by tract. The Company begins recording pre-merchantable timber costs at the time the site is prepared for planting. Costs capitalized during the establishment period include site preparation by aerial spray, costs of seedlings, planting costs, herbaceous weed control, woody release, labor and machinery use, refrigeration rental and trucking for the seedlings. The Company does not capitalize interest costs in the process. Property taxes are expensed as incurred. New road construction costs are capitalized as land improvements and depreciated over 20 years. Road repairs and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred. Costs after establishment of the seedlings, including management costs, pre-commercial thinning costs and fertilization costs, are expensed as incurred. Once the timber becomes merchantable, the cost is transferred from the pre-merchantable timber category to the merchantable timber category in the depletion block.

Merchantable timber costs are maintained by five product classes, pine sawtimber, pine chip-n-saw, pine pulpwood, hardwood sawtimber and hardwood pulpwood, within a depletion block, with each depletion block based upon a geographic district or subdistrict. Currently, the Company has eight depletion blocks. These same depletion blocks are used for pre-merchantable timber costs. Each year, the Company estimates the volume of the Company’s merchantable timber for the five product classes by each depletion block. These estimates are based on the current state in the growth cycle and not on quantities to be available in future years. The Company’s estimates do not include costs to be incurred in the future. The Company then projects these volumes to the end of the year. Upon acquisition of a new timberland tract, the Company records separate amounts for land, merchantable timber and pre-merchantable timber allocated as a percentage of the values being purchased. These acquisition volumes and costs acquired during the year are added to the totals for each product class within the appropriate depletion block(s). The total of the beginning, one-year growth and acquisition volumes are divided by the total undepleted historical cost to arrive at a depletion rate, which is then used for the current year. As timber is sold, the Company multiplies the volumes sold by the depletion rate for the current year to arrive at the depletion cost.

The Company’s Canadian timber properties, which consisted of approximately 25,050 acres at October 31, 2009, are not actively managed at this time, and therefore, no depletion expense is recorded.

Variable Interest Entities

Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Interpretation (“FIN”) 46(R), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an Interpretation of Accounting Research Board (“ARB”) No. 51”, (codified under ASC 810 “Consolidation”), provides a framework for identifying variable interest entities (“VIE’s”) and determining when a company should include the assets, liabilities, noncontrolling interests and results of operations of a VIE in its consolidated financial statements. In general, a VIE is a corporation, partnership, limited liability company, trust or any other legal structure used to conduct activities or hold assets that either (1) has an insufficient amount of equity to carry out its principal activities without additional subordinated financial support, (2) has a group of equity owners that are unable to make significant decisions about its activities or (3) has a group of equity owners that do not have the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive returns generated by its operations. FIN 46(R) requires a VIE to be consolidated if a party with an ownership, contractual or other financial interest in the VIE (a variable interest holder) is obligated to absorb a majority of the risk of loss from the VIE’s activities, is entitled to receive a majority of the VIE’s residual returns (if no party absorbs a majority of the VIE’s losses), or both.

The Company has consolidated the assets and liabilities of STA Timber LLC (“STA Timber”) in accordance with FIN 46(R), Consolidation. Because STA Timber is a separate and distinct legal entity from Greif, Inc. and its other subsidiaries, the assets of STA Timber are not available to satisfy the liabilities and obligations of these entities and the liabilities of STA Timber are not liabilities or obligations of these entities. The Company has also consolidated the assets and liabilities of the buyer-sponsored purpose entity (the “Buyer SPE”) involved in these transaction as the result of FIN 46(R). However, because the Buyer SPE is a separate and distinct legal entity from Greif, Inc. and its other subsidiaries, the assets of the Buyer SPE are not available to satisfy the liabilities and obligations of the Company and the liabilities of the Buyer SPE are not liabilities or obligations of the Company.

Asset Retirement Obligations

The Company accounts for asset retirement obligations in accordance with SFAS No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations,” and FIN 47, “Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations” (codified under ASC 410 “Asset Retirement and Environmental Obligations”). A liability and an asset are recorded equal to the present value of the estimated costs associated with the retirement of long-lived assets where a legal or contractual obligation exists and the liability can be reasonably estimated. The liability is accreted over time and the asset is depreciated over the remaining life of the related asset. Upon settlement of the liability, the Company will recognize a gain or loss for any difference between the settlement amount and the liability recorded. Asset retirement obligations with indeterminate settlement dates are not recorded until such dates can be reasonably estimated.

Environmental Cleanup Costs

The Company expenses environmental expenditures related to existing conditions resulting from past or current operations and from which no current or future benefit is discernable. Expenditures that extend the life of the related property or mitigate or prevent future environmental contamination are capitalized. The Company determines its liability on a site-by-site basis and records a liability at the time when it is probable and can be reasonably estimated. The Company’s estimated liability is reduced to reflect the anticipated participation of other potentially responsible parties in those instances where it is probable that such parties are legally responsible and financially capable of paying their respective shares of the relevant costs.

Self-Insurance

The Company is self-insured with respect to certain of its medical and dental claims and certain of its workers’ compensation claims. The Company has recorded an estimated liability for self-insured medical and dental claims incurred but not reported and workers’ compensation claims and claims incurred but not reported of $4.0 million and $21.5 million, respectively, at October 31, 2009 and $4.1 million and $20.6 million, respectively, at October 31, 2008.

Income Taxes

Income taxes are accounted for under SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” (codified under ASC 740 “Income Taxes”). In accordance with this Statement, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases, as measured by enacted tax rates that are expected to be in effect in the periods when the deferred tax assets and liabilities are expected to be settled or realized. Valuation allowances are established where expected future taxable income does not support the realization of the deferred tax assets.

The Company’s effective tax rate is based on income, statutory tax rates and tax planning opportunities available to the Company in the various jurisdictions in which the Company operates. Significant judgment is required in determining the Company’s effective tax rate and in evaluating its tax positions.

In the first quarter of fiscal 2008, the Company adopted the provisions of FIN 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (codified under ASC 740 “Income Taxes”) which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” (codified under ASC 740 “Income Taxes”). This standard provides that a tax benefit from uncertain tax position may be recognized when it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including resolutions of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits. The amount recognized is measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon settlement. The Company’s effective tax rate includes the impact of reserve provisions and changes to reserves that it considers appropriate as well as related interest and penalties.

A number of years may elapse before a particular matter, for which the Company has established a reserve, is audited and finally resolved. The number of years with open tax audits varies depending on the tax jurisdiction. While it is often difficult to predict the final outcome or the timing of resolution of any particular tax matter, the Company believes that its reserves reflect the probable outcome of known tax contingencies. Unfavorable settlement of any particular issue would require use of the Company’s cash. Favorable resolution would be recognized as a reduction to the Company’s effective tax rate in the period of resolution.

Restructuring Charges

We account for all exit or disposal activities in accordance with SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities” (codified under ASC 420 “Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations”). Under SFAS No. 146, a liability is measured at its fair value and recognized as incurred. Additional disclosure related to our restructuring charges is provided in Note 5.

Stock-Based Compensation Expense

On November 1, 2005, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment” (codified under ASC 718 “Compensation — Stock Compensation.”) This standard requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense, based on estimated fair values, for all share-based awards made to employees and directors, including stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units and participation in the Company’s employee stock purchase plan. In adopting this guidance, the Company used the modified prospective application transition method, as of November 1, 2005, the first day of the Company’s fiscal year 2006.

SFAS No. 123(R) guidance requires companies to estimate the fair value of share-based awards on the date of grant using an option-pricing model. The value of the portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as expense in the Company’s consolidated statements of income over the requisite service periods. Share-based compensation expense recognized in the Company’s consolidated statements of income for 2007 includes compensation expense for share-based awards granted prior to, but not yet vested as of November 1, 2005, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the guidance of the standard. No options were granted in 2009, 2008, and 2007. For any options granted in the future, compensation expense will be based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the guidance of the standard. There was no share-based compensation expense recognized under the standard for 2009 and 2008 and $0.1 million was recognized for 2007.

The Company uses the straight-line single option method of expensing stock options to recognize compensation expense in its consolidated statements of income for all share-based awards. Because share-based compensation expense is based on awards that are ultimately expected to vest, share-based compensation expense will be reduced to account for estimated forfeitures. SFAS No. 123(R) guidance requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates.

Equity Earnings and Minority Interests

Equity earnings represent investments in affiliates in which the Company does not exercise control and has a 20% or more voting interest. Such investments in affiliates are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. If the fair value of an investment in an affiliate is below its carrying value and the difference is deemed to be other than temporary, the difference between the fair value and the carrying value is charged to earnings. The Company has an equity interest in six affiliates, and the equity earnings of these interests were recorded in net income. Equity earnings (losses) for 2009, 2008, and 2007 were ($0.4) million, $1.6 million and $0.3 million, respectively. Dividends received from our equity method subsidiaries were $0.5 million, $0.1 million, and $0.2 million for the years ending October 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively.

The Company records minority interest expense which reflects the portion of the earnings of majority-owned operations which are applicable to the minority interest partners. The Company has majority holdings in various companies, and the minority interests of other persons in the respective net income of these companies were recorded as an expense. Minority interest expense for 2009, 2008, and 2007 was $3.2 million, $5.6 million, and $1.7 million, respectively.

Earnings per Share

The Company has two classes of common stock and, as such, applies the “two-class method” of computing earnings per share as prescribed in SFAS No. 128, “Earnings Per Share” (codified under ASC 260 “Earnings Per Share”). In accordance with the Statement, earnings are allocated first to Class A and Class B Common Stock to the extent that dividends are actually paid and the remainder allocated assuming all of the earnings for the period have been distributed in the form of dividends.

The following is a reconciliation of the shares used to calculate basic and diluted earnings per share ⁽¹⁾ :

For the years ended October 31,	2009		2008		2007
Class A Common Stock:
Basic earnings per share		24,328,724		23,932,045		23,594,814
Assumed conversion of stock options		328,353		441,611		577,794
Diluted earnings per share		24,657,077		24,373,656		24,172,608
Class B Common Stock:
Basic and diluted earnings per share		22,475,707		22,797,825		22,994,494

(1) All share information presented in this table has been adjusted to reflect a 2-for-1 stock split of the Company’s shares of Class A and Class B Common Stock distributed on April 11, 2007.

There were no Class A options that were antidilutive for 2009, 2008 and 2007.

The Company calculates Class A EPS as follows: (i) multiply 40% times the average Class A shares outstanding, then divide that amount by the product of 40% of the average Class A shares outstanding plus 60% of the average Class B shares outstanding to get a percentage, (ii) undistributed net income divided by the average Class A shares outstanding, (iii) multiply item (i) by item (ii), (iv) add item (iii) to the Class A cash dividend. Diluted shares are factored into calculation.

The Company calculates Class B EPS as follows: (i) multiply 60% times the average Class B shares outstanding, then divide that amount by the product of 40% of the average Class A shares outstanding plus 60% of the average Class B shares outstanding to get a percentage, (ii) undistributed net income divided by the average Class B shares outstanding, (iii) multiply item (i) by item (ii), (iv) add item (iii) to the Class B cash dividend. Class B diluted EPS is identical to Class B basic EPS.

(In millions except for per share data)	2009		2008		2007
Numerator
Numerator for basic and diluted EPS —
Net Income	$	110.6	$	241.7	$	156.5
Cash dividends		88.0		76.5		53.3
Undistributed net income	$	22.6	$	165.2	$	103.2
Denominator
Denominator for basic EPS —
Class A Common Stock		24.3		23.9		23.6
Class B Common Stock		22.5		22.8		23.0
Denominator for diluted EPS —
Class A Common Stock		24.7		24.4		24.2
Class B Common Stock		22.5		22.8		23.0
EPS Basic
Class A Common Stock	$	1.91	$	4.16	$	2.70
Class B Common Stock	$	2.86	$	6.23	$	4.04
EPS Diluted
Class A Common Stock	$	1.91	$	4.11	$	2.65
Class B Common Stock	$	2.86	$	6.23	$	4.04

Restricted Stock

Under the Company’s Long-Term Incentive Plan and the 2005 Outside Directors Equity Award Plan, the Company granted 243,107 and 16,568 shares of restricted stock with a weighted average grant date fair value of $32.03 and $28.96, respectively, in 2009. The Company granted 35,938 and 7,664 shares of restricted stock with a weighted average grant date fair value of $62.38 and $62.58, under the Company’s Long-Term Incentive Plan and the 2005 Outside Directors Equity Award Plan, respectively, in 2008. All restricted stock awards are fully vested upon being awarded.

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue when title passes to customers or services have been rendered, with appropriate provision for returns and allowances. Revenue is recognized in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, “Revenue Recognition” (codified under ASC 605 “Revenue Recognition”).

Timberland disposals, timber and special use property revenues are recognized when closings have occurred, required down payments have been received, title and possession have been transferred to the buyer, and all other criteria for sale and profit recognition have been satisfied.

The Company reports the sale of surplus and higher and better use (“HBU”) property in our consolidated statements of income under “gain on disposals of properties, plants and equipment, net” and reports the sale of development property under “net sales” and “cost of products sold.” All HBU and development property, together with surplus property, is used by the Company to productively grow and sell timber until sold.

Shipping and Handling Fees and Costs

The Company includes shipping and handling fees and costs in cost of products sold.

Other Expense, Net

Other expense, net primarily represents Non-United States trade receivables program fees, currency translation and remeasurement gains and losses and other infrequent non-operating items.

Currency Translation

In accordance with SFAS No. 52, “Foreign Currency Translation” (codified under ASC 830 “Foreign Currency Matters”), the assets and liabilities denominated in a foreign currency are translated into United States dollars at the rate of exchange existing at year-end, and revenues and expenses are translated at average exchange rates.

The cumulative translation adjustments, which represent the effects of translating assets and liabilities of the Company’s international operations, are presented in the consolidated statements of changes in shareholders’ equity in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). The transaction gains and losses are credited or charged to income. The amounts included in other income (expense) related to transaction gain and losses, net of tax were $(0.7) million $(1.3) million, and $(2.8) million in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

Derivative Financial Instruments

In accordance with SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (codified under ASC 815 “Derivatives and Hedging”), the Company records all derivatives in the consolidated balance sheets as either assets or liabilities measured at fair value. Dependent on the designation of the derivative instrument, changes in fair value are recorded to earnings or shareholders’ equity through other comprehensive income (loss).

The Company uses interest rate swap agreements for cash flow hedging purposes. For derivative instruments that hedge the exposure of variability in interest rates, designated as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of the net gain or loss on the derivative instrument is reported as a component of other comprehensive income (loss) and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings.

Interest rate swap agreements that hedge against variability in interest rates effectively convert a portion of floating rate debt to a fixed rate basis, thus reducing the impact of interest rate changes on future interest expense. The Company uses the “variable cash flow method” for assessing the effectiveness of these swaps. The effectiveness of these swaps is reviewed at least every quarter. Hedge ineffectiveness has not been material during any of the years presented herein.

The Company enters into currency forward contracts to hedge certain currency transactions and short-term intercompany loan balances with its international businesses. In addition, the Company uses cross-currency swaps to hedge a portion of its net investment in its European subsidiaries. Such contracts limit the Company’s exposure to both favorable and unfavorable currency fluctuations. These contracts are adjusted to reflect market value as of each balance sheet date, with the resulting changes in fair value being recognized in other comprehensive income (loss).

The Company uses derivative instruments to hedge a portion of its natural gas. These derivatives are designated as cash flow hedges. The effective portion of the net gain or loss is reported as a component of other comprehensive income (loss) and reclassified into earnings in the same period during which the hedged transaction affects earnings.

Any derivative contract that is either not designated as a hedge, or is so designated but is ineffective, is adjusted to market value and recognized in earnings immediately. If a cash flow hedge ceases to qualify for hedge accounting or is terminated, the contract would continue to be carried on the balance sheet at fair value until settled and future adjustments to the contract’s fair value would be recognized in earnings immediately. If a forecasted transaction were no longer probable to occur, amounts previously deferred in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) would be recognized immediately in earnings.

Recent Accounting Standards

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), (codified under ASC 805 “Business Combinations”), which replaces SFAS No. 141. The objective of SFAS No. 141(R) is to improve the relevance, representational faithfulness and comparability of the information that a reporting entity provides in its financial reports about a business combination and its effects. SFAS No. 141(R) establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree; recognizes and measures the goodwill acquired in the business combination or a gain from a bargain purchase; and determines what information to disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. SFAS No. 141(R) applies to all transactions or other events in which an entity (the acquirer) obtains control of one or more businesses (the acquiree), including those sometimes referred to as “true mergers” or “mergers of equals” and combinations achieved without the transfer of consideration. SFAS No. 141(R) will apply to any acquisition entered into on or after November 1, 2009, but will have no effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ending October 31, 2009 incorporated herein. Refer to Note 17 for the financial impact on adoption of SFAS No. 141(R) as of November 1, 2009.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (codified under ASC 820 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures”). SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value within GAAP and expands required disclosures about fair value measurements. In November 2007, the FASB provided a one year deferral for the implementation of SFAS No. 157 for nonfinancial assets and liabilities. The Company adopted SFAS No. 157 on February 1, 2008, as required. The adoption of SFAS No. 157 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations. Refer to Note 8 for the fair value hierarchy provisions of SFAS No. 157.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (codified under ASC 825 “Financial Instruments”). SFAS No. 159 permits companies to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value at specified election dates. SFAS No. 159 was effective for the Company on November 1, 2008. Since the Company has not utilized the fair value option for any allowable items, the adoption of SFAS No. 159 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Accounting and Reporting of Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51,” (codified under ASC 810 “Consolidation”). The objective of SFAS No. 160 is to improve the relevance, comparability and transparency of the financial information that a reporting entity provides in its consolidated financial statements. SFAS No. 160 amends ARB No. 51 to establish accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. SFAS No. 160 also changes the way the consolidated financial statements are presented, establishes a single method of accounting for changes in a parent’s ownership interest in a subsidiary that do not result in deconsolidation, requires that a parent recognize a gain or loss in net income when a subsidiary is deconsolidated and expands disclosures in the consolidated financial statements that clearly identify and distinguish between the parent’s ownership interest and the interest of the noncontrolling owners of a subsidiary. The provisions of SFAS No. 160 are to be applied prospectively as of the beginning of the fiscal year in which SFAS No. 160 is adopted, except for the presentation and disclosure requirements, which are to be applied retrospectively for all periods presented. SFAS No. 160 will be effective for the Company’s financial statements for the fiscal year beginning November 1, 2009. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact that the adoption of SFAS No. 160 may have on its consolidated financial statements. However, the company does not anticipate a material impact on its financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

In December 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position FAS 132(R)-1, “Employers’ Disclosures About Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets” (“FSP FAS 132(R)-1”) (codified under ASC 715 “Compensation — Retirement Benefits”), to provide guidance on employers’ disclosures about assets of a defined benefit pension or other postretirement plan. FSP FAS 132(R)-1 requires employers to disclose information about fair value measurements of plan assets similar to SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements.” The objectives of the disclosures are to provide an understanding of: (a) how investment allocation decisions are made, including the factors that are pertinent to an understanding of investment policies and strategies, (b) the major categories of plan assets, (c) the inputs and valuation techniques used to measure the fair value of plan assets, (d) the effect of fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs on changes in plan assets for the period and (e) significant concentrations of risk within plan assets. The disclosures required by FSP FAS 132(R)-1 will be effective for the Company’s financial statements for the fiscal year beginning November 1, 2009. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact that the adoption of FAS 132(R)-1 may have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures, However, the company does not anticipate a material impact on its financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 166, “Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140” (not yet codified) The Statement amends SFAS No. 140 to improve the information provided in financial statements concerning transfers of financial assets, including the effects of transfers on financial position, financial performance and cash flows, and any continuing involvement of the transferor with the transferred financial assets. The provisions of SFAS 166 are effective for the Company’s financial statements for the fiscal year beginning November 1, 2010. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact that the adoption of SFAS 166 may have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures, However, the Company does not anticipate a material impact on its financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167, “Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)” (not yet codified). SFAS 167 amends FIN 46(R) to require an enterprise to perform an analysis to determine whether the enterprise’s variable interest or interests give it a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity. It also amends FIN 46(R) to require enhanced disclosures that will provide users of financial statements with more transparent information about an enterprise’s involvement in a variable interest entity. The provisions of SFAS 167 are effective for the Company’s financial statements for the fiscal year beginning November 1, 2010. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact that the adoption of SFAS No. 167 may have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. However, Company does not anticipate a material impact on its financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, “The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.” This standard replaces SFAS No. 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles,” and establishes two levels of GAAP, authoritative and non-authoritative. The FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the “Codification” or ASC) will become the source of authoritative, nongovernmental GAAP, except for rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), which are sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. All other non-grandfathered, non-SEC accounting literature not included in the Codification will become non-authoritative. The Company adopted the codification standards which do not have a financial impact other than references to authoritative literature incorporated herein.

NOTE 2 — ACQUISITIONS, DIVESTITURES AND OTHER SIGNIFICANT TRANSACTIONS

During 2009, the Company completed acquisitions of five industrial packaging companies and one paper packaging company and made a contingent purchase price payment related to a 2005 acquisition for an aggregate purchase price of $90.8 million. These six acquisitions consisted of two North American industrial packaging companies in February 2009, the acquisition of a North American industrial packaging company in June 2009, the acquisition of an industrial packaging company in Asia in July 2009, the acquisition of a South American industrial packaging company in October 2009, and the acquisition of a 75% interest in a North American paper packaging company in October 2009. These industrial packaging and paper packaging acquisitions are expected to complement the Company’s existing product lines that together will provide growth opportunities and economies of scale. These acquisitions, included in operating results from the acquisition dates, were accounted for using the purchase method of accounting and, accordingly, the purchase prices were allocated to the assets purchased and liabilities assumed based upon their estimated fair values at the dates of acquisition. The estimated fair values of the net assets acquired were $30.1 million (including $8.4 million of accounts receivable and $4.4 million of inventory) and liabilities assumed were $20.7 million. Identifiable intangible assets, with a combined fair value of $31.5 million, including trade-names, customer relationships, and certain non-compete agreements, have been recorded for these acquisitions. The excess of the purchase prices over the estimated fair values of the net tangible and intangible assets acquired of $49.9 million was recorded as goodwill. The final allocation of the purchase prices may differ due to additional refinements in the fair values of the net assets acquired as well as the execution of consolidation plans to eliminate duplicate operations, in accordance with SFAS No. 141 “Business Combinations.” This is due to the valuation of certain other assets and liabilities that are subject to refinement and therefore the actual fair value may vary from the preliminary estimates. Adjustments to the acquired net assets resulting from final valuations are not expected to be significant. These acquisitions, included in operating results from the acquisition dates, were accounted for using the purchase method of accounting and, accordingly, the purchase prices were allocated to the assets purchased and liabilities assumed based upon their estimated fair values at the dates of acquisition. The Company is finalizing certain closing date adjustments with the sellers, as well as the allocation of income tax adjustments.

As of the completion date of the acquisitions made during 2009, the Company began to formulate various restructuring plans at certain of the acquired businesses discussed above. The Company’s restructuring plans for certain of these newly acquired businesses preliminarily include plans to consolidate locations.

During 2009, the Company sold specific Industrial Packaging segment assets and facilities in North America. The net gain from these sales was $17.2 million and is included in gain on disposal of properties, plants, and equipment, net in the accompanying consolidated statement of income.

During 2008, the Company completed acquisitions of four industrial packaging companies and one paper packaging company and made a contingent purchase price payment related to a 2005 acquisition for an aggregate purchase price of $90.3 million. These five acquisitions consisted of a joint venture in the Middle East in November 2007, acquisition of a 70% interest in a South American company in November 2007, the acquisition of a North American company in December 2007, the acquisition of a company in Asia in May 2008, and the acquisition of a North American paper packaging company in July 2008. These industrial packaging and paper packaging acquisitions complemented the

Company’s existing product lines that together provided growth opportunities and scale. These acquisitions, included in operating results from the acquisition dates, were accounted for using the purchase method of accounting and, accordingly, the purchase prices were allocated to the assets purchased and liabilities assumed based upon their estimated fair values at the dates of acquisition. The estimated fair values of the net assets acquired were $73.6 million (including $12.2 million of accounts receivable and $7.4 million of inventory) and liabilities assumed were $43.2 million. Identifiable intangible assets, with a combined fair value of $19.5 million, including trade-names, customer relationships, and certain non-compete agreements, have been recorded for these acquisitions. The excess of the purchase prices over the estimated fair values of the net tangible and intangible assets acquired of $40.4 million was recorded as goodwill. The Company is finalizing the allocation of income tax adjustments. The Company is required to make a contingent payment in 2010 based on a fixed percentage of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization for one acquisition. This payment is currently being negotiated and is not expected to be material. Furthermore, in December 2010, the Company is required to pay $5.0 million to purchase the land and building that is currently being leased from the seller of one North American industrial packaging acquisition.

During 2008, the Company implemented various restructuring plans at certain of the 2008 acquired businesses discussed above. The Company’s restructuring activities, which were accounted for in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 95-3, “Recognition of Liabilities in Connection with a Purchase Business Combination” and primarily have included reductions in staffing levels, other exit costs associated with the consolidation of certain management or sales and marketing personnel, and the reduction of excess capacity. In connection with these restructuring activities, as part of the cost of the above acquisitions, the Company established reserves, primarily for severance and excess facilities, in the amount of $4.9 million, of which $2.8 million remained in the restructuring reserve at October 31, 2009. These accruals have been recorded as liabilities to the opening balance sheets (increases to goodwill) pursuant to the provisions of the guidance. These charges primarily reflect severance, other exit costs associated with the consolidation of certain sales and marketing personnel, and the reduction of excess capacity.

During 2008, the Company sold a business unit in Australia, a 51% interest in a Zimbabwean operation, three North American paper packaging operations and a North American industrial packaging operation. The net gain from these divestitures was $31.6 million and is included in gain on disposal of properties, plants, and equipment, net in the accompanying consolidated statement of income. Included in the gain calculation for the disposal in Australia was the reclass to net income of a gain of $37.4 million of accumulated foreign currency translation adjustments.

Had the transactions occurred on November 1, 2006, results of operations would not have differed materially from reported results.

NOTE 3 — SALE OF NON-UNITED STATES ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

Pursuant to the terms of a Receivable Purchase Agreement (the “RPA”) dated October 28, 2004 between Greif Coordination Center BVBA, an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Greif, Inc., and a major international bank, the seller agreed to sell trade receivables meeting certain eligibility requirements that seller had purchased from other indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries of Greif, Inc., including Greif Belgium BVBA, Greif Germany GmbH, Greif Nederland BV, Greif Spain SA and Greif UK Ltd, under discounted receivables purchase agreements and from Greif France SAS under a factoring agreement. The RPA was amended on October 28, 2005 to include receivables originated by Greif Portugal Lda, also an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Greif, Inc. In addition, on October 28, 2005, Greif Italia S.P.A., also an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Greif, Inc., entered into the Italian Receivables Purchase Agreement with the Italian branch of the major international bank (the “Italian RPA”) with Greif Italia S.P.A., agreeing to sell trade receivables that meet certain eligibility criteria to the Italian branch of the major international bank. The Italian RPA is similar in structure and terms as the RPA. The RPA was amended April 30, 2007 to include receivables oriented by Greif Packaging Belgium NV, Greif Packaging France SAS and Greif Packaging Spain SA, all wholly-owned subsidiaries of Greif, Inc. The maximum amount of receivables that may be sold under the RPA and the Italian RPA is €115 million ($170.2 million) at October 31, 2009.

In October 2007, Greif Singapore Pte. Ltd., an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Greif Inc., entered into the Singapore Receivable Purchase Agreement (the “Singapore RPA”) with a major international bank. The maximum amount of aggregate receivables that may be sold under the Singapore RPA is 15.0 million Singapore Dollars ($10.7 million) at October 31, 2009.

In October 2008, Greif Embalagens Industriais do Brasil Ltda., an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Greif Inc., entered into agreements (the “Brazil Agreements”) with Brazilian banks. There is no maximum amount of aggregate receivables that may be sold under the Brazil Agreements; however, the sale of individual receivables is subject to approval by the banks.

In May 2009, an indirect wholly-owned Malaysian subsidiary of Greif, Inc., entered into the Malaysian Receivables Purchase Agreement (“the Malaysian Agreements”) with Malaysian Banks. The maximum amount of the aggregate receivables that may be sold under the Malaysian Agreements is 15.0 million Malaysian Ringgits ($4.4 million at October 31, 2009).

The structure of the transactions provide for a legal true sale, on a revolving basis, of the receivables transferred from the various Greif, Inc. subsidiaries to the respective banks. The bank funds an initial purchase price of a certain percentage of eligible receivables based on a formula with the initial purchase price approximating 75% to 90% of eligible receivables. The remaining deferred purchase price is settled upon collection of the receivables. At the balance sheet reporting dates, the Company removes from accounts receivable the amount of proceeds received from the initial purchase price since they meet the applicable criteria of SFAS No. 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities” (codified under ASC 860 “Transfers and Servicing”), and continues to recognize the

deferred purchase price in its accounts receivable. The receivables are sold on a non-recourse basis with the total funds in the servicing collection accounts pledged to the banks between settlement dates. At October 31, 2009 and October 31, 2008, €77.0 million ($114.0 million) and €106.0 million ($137.8 million), respectively, of accounts receivable were sold under the RPA and Italian RPA. At October 31, 2009 and October 31, 2008, 5.6 million Singapore Dollars ($4.0 million) and 7.8 million Singapore Dollars ($5.3 million), respectively, of accounts receivable were sold under the Singapore RPA. At October 31, 2009 and October 31, 2008, 13.3 million Brazilian Reais ($7.6 million) and 9.5 million Brazilian Reais ($4.5 million), respectively, of accounts receivable were sold under the Brazil Agreements. At October 31, 2009, 6.3 million Malaysian Ringgits ($1.8 million) of accounts receivable were sold under the Malaysian Agreements.

At the time the receivables are initially sold, the difference between the carrying amount and the fair value of the assets sold are included as a loss on sale in the consolidated statements of income.

Expenses, primarily related to the loss on sale of receivables, associated with the RPA and Italian RPA totaled €3.7 million ($5.5 million), €5.9 million ($7.9 million), and €3.7 million ($5.0 million) for the year ended October 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively.

Expenses associated with the Singapore RPA totaled 0.3 million Singapore Dollars ($0.2 million) for the year ended October 31, 2009 and were insignificant for the years ended October 31, 2008 and 2007.

Expenses associated with the Brazil Agreements totaled 1.3 million Brazilian Reais ($0.8 million) for the year ended October 31, 2009 and were insignificant for the year ended October 31, 2008. There were no expenses for the year ended October 31, 2007 as the Brazil Agreement did not commence until October 2008.

Expenses associated with the Malaysian Agreements totaled 0.2 million Malaysian Ringgits ($0.1 million) for the year ended October 31, 2009. There were no expenses for the years ended October 31, 2008 and 2007 as the Malaysian Agreement did not commence until May 2009.

Additionally, the Company performs collections and administrative functions on the receivables sold similar to the procedures it uses for collecting all of its receivables, including receivables that are not sold under the RPA, the Italian RPA, the Singapore RPA, the Brazil Agreements, and the Malaysian Agreements. The servicing liability for these receivables is not material to the consolidated financial statements.

NOTE 4 — GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS

The Company annually reviews goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment as required by SFAS No. 142. The Company’s business segments have been identified as reporting units, of which two contain goodwill that is assessed for impairment. A reporting unit is the operating segment, or a business one level below that operating segment (the component level) if discrete financial information is prepared and regularly reviewed by segment management. However, components are aggregated as a single reporting unit if they have similar economic characteristics. The Company has concluded that no impairment exists at this time.

Changes to the carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended October 31, 2009 and 2008 are as follows (Dollars in thousands):

	Industrial			Paper,
	Packaging &			Packaging &
	Services			Services			Total
Balance at October 31, 2007	$	468,132		$	25,120		$	493,252
Goodwill acquired		39,663			7,970			47,633
Goodwill adjustments		(2,237	)		(170	)		(2,407	)
Goodwill disposals		(8,255	)		(259	)		(8,514	)
Currency translation		(16,991	)		—			(16,991	)
Balance at October 31, 2008	$	480,312		$	32,661		$	512,973
Goodwill acquired		20,658			29,250			49,908
Goodwill adjustments		10,634			(511	)		10,123
Currency translation		19,113			—			19,113
Balance at October 31, 2009	$	530,717		$	61,400		$	592,117

The 2009 goodwill acquired of $49.9 million is preliminary since the Company has not finalized the purchase price allocation as of October 31, 2009, as defined under SFAS No. 141. Of the goodwill included in 2009, $20.7 million of goodwill relates to the acquisition of industrial packaging companies in North America, South America, and Asia, and $29.2 million relates to an acquisition of a 75% interest in a paper packaging company in North America. The goodwill adjustments represent a net increase in goodwill of $10.1 million primarily related to finalization of the purchase price allocations of prior year acquisitions.

The 2008 goodwill acquired of $47.6 million related to the acquisition of industrial packaging companies in North and South America, the Middle East and Southeast Asia, and $8.0 million related to an acquisition of a paper packaging company in North America. The goodwill disposals of $8.5 million primarily represented the divestiture of the Australian drum operations and the sale of plants in North America. The goodwill adjustments represented a net decrease in goodwill of $2.4 million primarily related to finalization of the purchase price allocations of prior year acquisitions.

All intangible assets for the periods presented, excluding the goodwill items discussed above and except for $12.5 million, related to the Tri-Sure Trademark, Blagden Express Tradename, Closed-loop Tradename, and Box Board Tradename, are subject to amortization and are being amortized using the straight-line method over periods that range from 5 to 20 years. The details of other intangible assets by class as of October 31, 2009 and October 31, 2008 are as follows (Dollars in thousands):

	Gross
	Intangible		Accumulated		Net Intangible
	Assets		Amortization		Assets
October 31, 2009:
Trademarks and patents	$	35,081	$	15,457	$	19,624
Non-compete agreements		18,842		6,143		12,699
Customer relationships		110,298		17,190		93,108
Other		11,018		5,079		5,939
Total	$	175,239	$	43,869	$	131,370
October 31, 2008:
Trademarks and patents	$	29,996	$	13,066	$	16,930
Non-compete agreements		16,514		3,470		13,044
Customer relationships		80,017		10,741		69,276
Other		9,624		4,450		5,174
Total	$	136,151	$	31,727	$	104,424

During 2009, other intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization, increased by $26.9 million. Gross intangibles increased by $31.5 million due to acquisitions of Industrial Packaging companies in North America, South America and Asia as well as a 75% interest in a Paper Packaging company in North America. Currency translation increased the other intangible assets by $6.3 million. The range of amortization period of the intangibles acquired in 2009 is 5 to 15 years and the weighted average amortization period of the intangibles acquired in 2009 is 13.8 years. Amortization expense was $11.0 million, $9.2 million and $8.3 million for 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Amortization expense for the next five years is expected to be $15.8 million in 2010, $14.9 million in 2011, $14.1 million in 2012, $10.9 million in 2013 and $9.1 million in 2014.

NOTE 5 — RESTRUCTURING CHARGES

The focus for restructuring activities in 2009 was on business realignment to address the adverse impact resulting from the sharp decline in business throughout the economy and further implementation of the Greif Business System and specific contingency actions. During 2009, the Company recorded restructuring charges of $66.6 million, consisting of $28.4 million in employee separation costs, $19.6 million in asset impairments, $0.3 million in professional fees, and $18.3 million in other restructuring costs, primarily consisting of facility consolidation and lease termination costs. In addition, the Company recorded $10.8 million in restructuring-related inventory charges in costs of products sold. Nineteen company-owned plants in the Industrial Packaging segment were closed. There were a total of 1,294 employees severed throughout 2009 as part of our restructuring efforts. Within our Paper Packaging segment, we recorded a reversal of severance expense in the amount of $2.1 million related to the actual costs coming in lower than estimates due to projected severed employees being employed by the acquirer of the closed plants.

For each relevant business segment, costs incurred in 2009 are as follows (Dollars in thousands):

						Amounts
	Amounts		Amounts			remaining
	expected to be		Incurred			to be
	incurred		in 2009			incurred
Industrial Packaging:
Employee separation costs	$	41,268	$	29,113		$	12,155
Asset impairments		19,558		19,558			—
Professional fees		1,504		334			1,170
Inventory adjustments		10,772		10,772			—
Other restructuring costs		28,570		16,737			11,833
		101,672		76,514			25,158
Paper Packaging:
Employee separation costs		1,943		(868	)		2,811
Asset impairments		38		38			—
Other restructuring costs		1,696		1,515			181
		3,677		685			2,992
Timber:
Employee separation costs		163		163			—
	$	105,512	$	77,362		$	28,150

The total amounts expected to be incurred above, some of which have been accrued, are from open restructuring plans which are anticipated to be realized in 2010. Following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending restructuring reserve balances for the years ended October 31, 2009 and 2008 (Dollars in thousands):

	Cash Charges
	Employee						Non-cash Charges
	Separation						Asset			Inventory
	Costs			Other costs			Impairments			Write-down			Total
Balance at October 31, 2007	$	12,296		$	3,480		$	—		$	—		$	15,776
Costs incurred and charged to expense		20,550			10,277			12,375			—			43,202
Reserves established in the purchase price of business combinations		1,111			147			—			—			1,258
Costs paid or otherwise settled		(19,544	)		(13,170	)		(12,375	)		—			(45,089	)
Balance at October 31, 2008	$	14,413		$	734		$	—		$	—		$	15,147
Costs incurred and charged to expense, net*		28,408			18,586			19,596			10,772			77,362
Reserves established in the purchase price of business combinations		971			2,971			3,771			—			7,713
Costs paid or otherwise settled		(34,553	)		(16,215	)		(23,367	)		(10,772	)		(84,907	)
Balance at October 31, 2009	$	9,239		$	6,076		$	—		$	—		$	15,315

* Includes reversal of severance expense of $2.1 million related to the actual costs coming in lower than estimates due to projected severed employees being employed by the acquirer of closed plants

The focus for restructuring activities in 2008 was on the integration of recent acquisitions in the Industrial Packaging segment and on alignment to market focused strategy and on the integration of a recent acquisition and closing of two paper packaging facilities in the Paper Packaging segment. During 2008, the Company recorded restructuring charges of $43.2 million, consisting of $20.6 million in employee separation costs, $12.3 million in asset impairments, $0.4 million in professional fees, and $9.9 million in other restructuring costs, primarily consisting of facility consolidation and lease termination costs. Six company-owned plants in the Industrial Packaging segment and four company-owned plants in the Paper Packaging segment were closed. The total employees severed during 2008 were 630.

The focus for restructuring activities in 2007 was on integration of acquisitions in the Industrial Packaging segment and on alignment to market-focused strategy and implementation of the Greif Business System in the Paper Packaging segment. During 2007, the Company recorded restructuring charges of $21.2 million, consisting of $9.2 million in employee separation costs, $0.9 million in asset impairments, $1.0 million in professional fees, and $10.1 million in other restructuring costs, primarily consisting of facility consolidation and lease termination costs. Two company-owned plants in the Industrial Packaging segment were closed. Additionally, severance costs were incurred due to the elimination of certain operating and administrative positions throughout the world. The total employees severed in 2007 were 303.

NOTE 6 — SIGNIFICANT NONSTRATEGIC TIMBERLAND TRANSACTIONS AND CONSOLIDATION OF VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES

On March 28, 2005, Soterra LLC (a wholly owned subsidiary) entered into two real estate purchase and sale agreements with Plum Creek Timberlands, L.P. (“Plum Creek”) to sell approximately 56,000 acres of timberland and related assets located primarily in Florida for an aggregate sales price of approximately $90 million, subject to closing adjustments. In connection with the closing of one of these agreements, Soterra LLC sold approximately 35,000 acres of timberland and associated assets in Florida, Georgia and Alabama for $51.0 million, resulting in a pretax gain of $42.1 million, on May 23, 2005. The purchase price was paid in the form of cash and a $50.9 million purchase note payable by an indirect subsidiary of Plum Creek (the “Purchase Note”). Soterra LLC contributed the Purchase Note to STA Timber LLC (“STA Timber”), one of the Company’s indirect wholly owned subsidiaries. The Purchase Note is secured by a Deed of Guarantee issued by Bank of America, N.A., London Branch, in an amount not to exceed $52.3 million (the “Deed of Guarantee”), as a guarantee of the due and punctual payment of principal and interest on the Purchase Note.

The Company completed the second phase of these transactions in the first quarter of 2006. In this phase, the Company sold 15,300 acres of timberland holdings in Florida for $29.3 million in cash, resulting in a pre-tax gain of $27.4 million. The final phase of this transaction, approximately 5,700 acres sold for $9.7 million, occurred on April 28, 2006 and the Company recognized additional timberland gains in its consolidated statements of income in the periods that these transactions occurred resulting in a pre-tax gain of $9.0 million.

On May 31, 2005, STA Timber issued in a private placement its 5.20% Senior Secured Notes due August 5, 2020 (the “Monetization Notes”) in the principal amount of $43.3 million. In connection with the sale of the Monetization Notes, STA Timber entered into note purchase agreements with the purchasers of the Monetization Notes (the “Note Purchase Agreements”) and related documentation. The Monetization Notes are secured by a pledge of the Purchase Note and the Deed of Guarantee. The Monetization Notes may be accelerated in the event of a default in payment or a breach of the other obligations set forth therein or in the Note Purchase Agreements or related documents, subject in certain cases to any applicable cure periods, or upon the occurrence of certain insolvency or bankruptcy related events. The Monetization Notes are subject to a mechanism that may cause them, subject to certain conditions, to be extended to November 5, 2020. The proceeds from the sale of the Monetization Notes were primarily used for the repayment of indebtedness.

In addition, Greif, Inc. and its other subsidiaries have not extended any form of guaranty of the principal or interest on the Monetization Notes. Accordingly, Greif, Inc. and its other subsidiaries will not become directly or contingently liable for the payment of the Monetization Notes at any time.

The Company has also consolidated the assets and liabilities of the buyer-sponsored special purpose entity (the “Buyer SPE”) involved in these transactions as the result of FIN 46(R). However, because the Buyer SPE is a separate and distinct legal entity from the Company, the assets of the Buyer SPE are not available to satisfy the liabilities and obligations of the Company and the liabilities of the Buyer SPE are not liabilities or obligations of the Company.

Assets of the Buyer SPE at October 31, 2009 and 2008 consist of restricted bank financial instruments of $50.9 million. STA Timber had long-term debt of $43.3 million as of October 31, 2009 and 2008. STA Timber is exposed to credit-related losses in the event of nonperformance by the issuer of the Deed of Guarantee. The accompanying consolidated income statements for the years ended October 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 includes interest expense on STA Timber debt of $2.3 million per year and interest income on Buyer SPE investments of $2.4 million per year.

NOTE 7 — LONG-TERM DEBT

Long-term debt is summarized as follows (Dollars in thousands):

	October 31,			October 31,
	2009			2008
$700 Million Credit Agreement	$	192,494		$	—
$450 Million Credit Agreement		—			247,597
Senior Notes due 2017		300,000			300,000
Senior Notes due 2019		241,729			—
Trade accounts receivable credit facility		—			120,000
Other long-term debt		4,385			5,574
		738,608			673,171
Less current portion		(17,500	)		—
Other long-term debt	$	721,108		$	673,171

$700 Million Credit Agreement

On February 19, 2009, the Company and Greif International Holding B.V., as borrowers, entered into a $700 million Senior Secured Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with a syndicate of financial institutions. The Credit Agreement provides for a $500 million revolving multicurrency credit facility and a $200 million term loan, both maturing in February 2012, with an option to add $200 million to the facilities with the agreement of the lenders. The $200 million term loan is scheduled to amortize by $2.5 million each quarter-end for the first four quarters, $5.0 million each quarter-end for the next eight quarters and $150.0 million on the maturity date. The Credit Agreement is available to fund ongoing working capital and capital expenditure needs, for general corporate purposes, to finance acquisitions, and to repay amounts outstanding under the previous $450 million credit agreement. Interest is based on a Eurodollar rate or a base rate that resets periodically plus a calculated margin amount. On February 19, 2009, $325.3 million borrowed under the revolving credit facility and term loan was used to prepay the obligations outstanding under the $450 million Credit Agreement and certain costs and expenses incurred in connection with the Credit Agreement. As of October 31, 2009, $192.5 million was outstanding under the Credit Agreement. The current portion of the Credit Agreement is $17.5 million and the long-term portion is $175.0 million. The weighted average interest rate on the Credit Agreement was 3.19% since February 19, 2009. The interest rate was 3.50% at October 31, 2009.

The Credit Agreement contains financial covenants that require the Company to maintain a certain leverage ratio and a fixed charge coverage ratio. At October 31, 2009, the Company was in compliance with these covenants.

$450 Million Credit Agreement

On February 19, 2009, the Company and certain of its international subsidiaries terminated a $450 million credit agreement described in previous filings. As a result of this transaction, a $0.8 million debt extinguishment charge, which includes the write-off of unamortized capitalized debt issuance costs, was recorded.

Senior Notes due 2017

On February 9, 2007, the Company issued $300.0 million of 6.75% Senior Notes due February 1, 2017. Interest on these Senior Notes is payable semi-annually. Proceeds from the issuance of these Senior Notes were principally used to fund the purchase of previously outstanding 8.875% Senior Subordinated Notes in a tender offer and for general corporate purposes.

The fair value of these Senior Notes due 2017 was $291.8 million at October 31, 2009 based upon quoted market prices. The Indenture pursuant to which these Senior Notes were issued contains certain covenants. At October 31, 2009, the Company was in compliance with these covenants.

Senior Notes due 2019

On July 28, 2009, the Company issued $250.0 million of 7.75% Senior Notes due August 1, 2019. Interest on these Senior Notes is payable semi-annually. Proceeds from the issuance of Senior Notes were principally used for general corporate purposes, including the repayment of amounts outstanding under the Company’s revolving multicurrency credit facility, without any permanent reduction of the commitments.

The fair value of these Senior Notes due 2019 was $256.3 million at October 31, 2009 based upon quoted market prices. The Indenture pursuant to which these Senior Notes were issued contains certain covenants. At October 31, 2009, the Company was in compliance with these covenants.

United States Trade Accounts Receivable Credit Facility

On December 8, 2008, the Company entered into a $135.0 million trade accounts receivable credit facility with a financial institution and its affiliate, with a maturity date of December 8, 2013, subject to earlier termination of their purchase commitment on December 6, 2010, or such later date to which the purchase commitment may be extended by agreement of the parties. The credit facility is secured by certain of the Company’s trade accounts receivable in the United States and bears interest at a variable rate based on the applicable commercial paper rate plus a margin or other agreed-upon rate. In addition, the Company can terminate the credit facility at any time upon five days prior written notice. A significant portion of the initial proceeds from this credit facility were used to pay the obligations under the previous trade accounts receivable credit facility (the “Prior Facility”), which was terminated. The remaining proceeds were and will be used to pay certain fees, costs and expenses incurred in connection with the credit facility and for working capital and general corporate purposes. At October 31, 2009, there were no outstanding amounts under the Receivables Facility, and there was $120 million outstanding with the Prior Facility at October 31, 2008, respectively. The agreement for this receivables financing facility contains financial covenants that require the Company to maintain a certain leverage ratio and a fixed chargecoverage ratio. At October 31, 2009, the Company was in compliance with these covenants.

Greif Receivables Funding LLC (“GRF”), an indirect subsidiary of the Company, has participated in the purchase and transfer of receivables in connection with these credit facilities and is included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. However, because GRF is a separate and distinct legal entity from the Company and its other subsidiaries, the assets of GRF are not available to satisfy the liabilities and obligations of the Company and its other subsidiaries, and the liabilities of GRF are not the liabilities or obligations of the Company and its other subsidiaries. This entity purchases and services the Company’s trade accounts receivable that are subject to these credit facilities.

Other

In addition to the amounts borrowed under the Credit Agreement and proceeds from these Senior Notes, at October 31, 2009, we had outstanding other debt of $24.0 million, comprised of $4.4 million in long-term debt and $19.6 million in short-term borrowings, compared to other debt outstanding of $49.9 million, comprised of $5.6 million on long-term debt and $44.3 million in short-term borrowings, at October 31, 2008.

At October 31, 2009, the current portion of the Company’s long-term debt was $17.5 million. Annual maturities of our long-term debt under the Company various financing arrangements were $24.4 million in 2011, $155.0 million in 2012, and $541.7 million thereafter.

At October 31, 2009 and October 31, 2008, the Company had deferred financing fees and debt issuance costs of $14.9 million and $4.6 million, respectively, which are included in other long-term assets.

NOTE 8 — FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, trade accounts receivable, accounts payable, current liabilities and short-term borrowings at October 31, 2009 and 2008 approximate their fair values because of the short-term nature of these items.

The estimated fair values of the Company’s long-term debt were $744.9 million and $619.2 million compared to the carrying amounts of $738.6 million and $673.2 million at October 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The current portion of the long term debt is $17.5 million. The fair values of the Company’s long-term obligations are estimated based on either the quoted market prices for the same or similar issues or the current interest rates offered for debt of the same remaining maturities.

The Company uses derivatives from time to time to partially mitigate the effect of exposure to interest rate movements, exposure to currency fluctuations, and energy cost fluctuations. Under SFAS No. 133 (codified under ASC 815 “Derivatives and Hedging”), all derivatives are to be recognized as assets or liabilities in the balance sheet and measured at fair value. Changes in the fair value of derivatives are recognized in either net income or in other comprehensive income, depending on the designated purpose of the derivative.

SFAS No. 157 (codified under ASC 820 — “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures”) established a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. These tiers include: Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; Level 2, defined as inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable; and Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions. As of October 31, 2009, the Company held certain derivative asset and liability positions that lack level 1 inputs and are thus required to be measured at fair value on a Level 2 basis. The majority of the Company’s derivative instruments related to receive floating-rate, pay fixed-rate interest rate swaps and receive fixed-rate, pay fixed-rate cross-currency interest rate swaps. The fair values of these derivatives have been measured in accordance with Level 2 inputs in the fair value hierarchy, and as of October 31, 2009, are as follows (Dollars in thousands):

			Fair Value			Balance Sheet
	Notional Amount		Adjustment			Location
	October 31, 2009		October 31, 2009			October 31, 2009
Cross-currency interest rate swaps	$	200,000	$	(14,635	)	Other long-term liabilities
Interest rate derivatives		175,000		(2,283	)	Other long-term liabilities
Energy and other derivatives		74,536		(727	)	Other current liabilities
Total	$	449,536	$	(17,645	)

The Company has entered into cross-currency interest rate swaps which are designated as a hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation. Under these agreements, the Company receives interest semi-annually from the counterparties equal to a fixed rate of 6.75% on $300.0 million and pays interest at a fixed rate of 6.25% on €219.9 million. Upon maturity of these swaps on August 1, 2009, August 1, 2010, and August 1, 2012, the Company paid or will be required to pay €73.3 million to the counterparties and receive $100.0 million from the counterparties on each of these dates. The other comprehensive loss on these agreements was $14.6 million and a gain of $24.5 million at October 31, 2009 and October 31, 2008, respectively. On August 1, 2009, the Company paid €73.3 million ($103.6 million) to the counterparties and received $100.0 million from the counterparties.

The Company has interest rate swap agreements with various maturities through 2012. The interest rate swap agreements are used to fix a portion of the interest on the Company’s variable rate debt. Under certain of these agreements, the Company receives interest monthly or quarterly from the counterparties equal to LIBOR and pays interest at a fixed rate (2.71% at October 31, 2009) over the life of the contracts.

At October 31, 2009, the Company had outstanding foreign currency forward contracts in the notional amount of $70.5 million ($174.0 million at October 31, 2008). The purpose of these contracts is to hedge the Company’s exposure to foreign currency transactions and short-term intercompany loan balances in its international businesses. The fair value of these contracts at October 31, 2009 resulted in a loss of $0.1 million recorded in the consolidated statements of income. The fair value of similar contracts at October 31, 2008 resulted in a loss of $1.5 million recorded in other comprehensive income and a loss of an insignificant amount in the consolidated statements of income.

The Company has entered into certain cash flow hedges to mitigate its exposure to cost fluctuations in natural gas prices through October 31, 2010. The fair value of the energy hedges was in an unfavorable position of $0.6 million ($0.4 million net of tax) at October 31, 2009, compared to an unfavorable position of $5.2 million ($3.4 million net of tax) at October 31, 2008. As a result of the high correlation between the hedged instruments and the underlying transactions, ineffectiveness has not had a material impact on the Company’s consolidated statements of income for the quarter ended October 31, 2009.

While the Company may be exposed to credit losses in the event of nonperformance by the counterparties to its derivative financial instrument contracts, its counterparties are established banks and financial institutions with high credit ratings. The Company has no reason to believe that such counterparties will not be able to fully satisfy their obligations under these contracts.

During the next twelve months, the Company expects to reclassify into earnings a net loss from accumulated other comprehensive loss of approximately $8.4 million after tax at the time the underlying hedge transactions are realized.

NOTE 9 — CAPITAL STOCK

Class A Common Stock is entitled to cumulative dividends of one cent a share per year after which Class B Common Stock is entitled to non-cumulative dividends up to a half-cent a share per year. Further distribution in any year must be made in proportion of one cent a share for Class A Common Stock to one and a half cents a share for Class B Common Stock. The Class A Common Stock has no voting rights unless four quarterly cumulative dividends upon the Class A Common Stock are in arrears. The Class B Common Stock has full voting rights. There is no cumulative voting for the election of directors.

The following table summarizes the Company’s capital stock, without par value (shares of Class A and Class B Common Stock), and treasury shares at the specified dates:

					Outstanding		Treasury
Common Stock	Authorized Shares		Issued Shares		Shares		Shares
October 31, 2009
Class A		128,000,000		42,281,920		24,474,773		17,807,147
Class B		69,120,000		34,560,000		22,462,266		12,097,734
October 31, 2008
Class A		128,000,000		42,281,920		24,081,998		18,199,922
Class B		69,120,000		34,560,000		22,562,266		11,997,734

NOTE 10 — STOCK BASED COMPENSATION

In 2001, the Company adopted the 2001 Management Equity Incentive and Compensation Plan (the “2001 Plan”). The provisions of the 2001 Plan allow the awarding of incentive and nonqualified stock options and restricted and performance shares of Class A Common Stock to key employees. The maximum number of shares that may be issued each year is determined by a formula that takes into consideration the total number of shares outstanding and is also subject to certain limits. In addition, the maximum number of incentive stock options that will be issued under the 2001 Plan during its term is 5,000,000 shares.

Prior to 2001, the Company had adopted a Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan (the “2000 Plan”) that provides the discretionary granting of nonstatutory options to key employees, and an Incentive Stock Option Plan (the “Option Plan”) that provides the discretionary granting of incentive stock options to key employees and nonstatutory options for non-employees. The aggregate number of the Company’s Class A Common Stock options that may be granted under the 2000 Plan and Option Plan may not exceed 400,000 shares and 2,000,000 shares, respectively.

Under the terms of the 2001 Plan, the 2000 Plan and the Option Plan, stock options may be granted at exercise prices equal to the market value of the common stock on the date options are granted and become fully vested two years after date of grant. Options expire 10 years after date of grant.

In 2005, the Company adopted the 2005 Outside Directors Equity Award Plan (the “2005 Directors Plan”), which provides the granting of stock options, restricted stock or stock appreciation rights to directors who are not employees of the Company. Prior to 2005, the Directors Stock Option Plan (the “Directors Plan”) provided the granting of stock options to directors who are not employees of the Company. The aggregate number of the Company’s Class A Common Stock options that may be granted may not exceed 200,000 shares under each of these plans. Under the terms of both plans, options are granted at exercise prices equal to the market value of the common stock on the date options are granted and become exercisable immediately. Options expire 10 years after date of grant.

No stock options were granted during 2009, 2008 or 2007.

Stock option activity for the years ended October 31 was as follows (Shares in thousands):

	2009				2008				2007
			Weighted				Weighted				Weighted
			Average				Average				Average
			Exercise				Exercise				Exercise
	Shares		price		Shares		price		Shares		price
Beginning balance		785	$	16.01		1,072	$	15.75		1,633	$	15.62
Granted		—		—		—		—		—		—
Forfeited		1		13.10		2		11.50		2		12.71
Exercised		141		16.50		285		15.03		559		15.38
Ending balance		643	$	15.91		785	$	16.01		1,072	$	15.75

The Company’s results of operations for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2009 and October 31, 2008 include no share based compensation expense for stock options. The Company’s results of operations for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007 include $0.1 million of share based compensation expense for stock options (net of an insignificant tax effect).

As of October 31, 2009, outstanding stock options had exercise prices and contractual lives as follows (Shares in thousands):

			Weighted-
			Average
			Remaining
	Number		Contractual
Range of Exercise Prices	Outstanding		Life
$5 - $15		370		3
$15 - $25		261		3
$25 - $35		12		5

All outstanding options were exercisable at October 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

NOTE 11—INCOME TAXES

The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, various U.S. state and local jurisdictions, and various foreign jurisdictions.

The provision for income taxes consists of the following (Dollars in thousands):

For the years ended October 31,	2009			2008		2007
Current
Federal	$	24,005		$	34,369	$	24,422
State and local		1,268			3,589		3,877
International		11,955			31,167		33,739
		37,228			69,125		62,038
Deferred
Federal		(8,763	)		2,802		(9,827	)
State and local		2,063			380		(1,472	)
International		(6,467	)		5,934		2,860
		(13,167	)		9,116		(8,439	)
	$	24,061		$	78,241	$	53,599

International income before income tax expense was $63.3 million, $213.7 million and $156.4 million in 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively.

The following is a reconciliation of the provision for income taxes based on the federal statutory rate to the Company’s effective income tax rate:

For the years ended October 31,	2009			2008			2007
United States federal tax rate		35.00	%		35.00	%		35.00	%
International tax rates		-12.00	%		-8.30	%		-8.60	%
State and local taxes, net of federal tax benefit		1.90	%		1.20	%		0.90	%
United States tax credits		-4.40	%		-0.90	%		0.00	%
Other non-recurring items		-3.10	%		-2.90	%		-2.00	%
		17.40	%		24.10	%		25.30	%

Significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities at October 31 for the years indicated were as follows (Dollars in thousands):

	2009			2008
Deferred Tax Assets
Net operating loss carryforwards	$	150,234		$	123,112
Minimum pension liabilities		45,360			19,926
Insurance operations		12,898			11,815
Incentives		11,345			10,637
Environmental reserves		9,322			10,666
State income tax		9,482			9,789
Postretirement		7,227			6,956
Other		6,928			4,149
Derivatives instruments		6,132			3,285
Interest		3,190			2,342
Allowance for doubtful accounts		3,093			2,532
Restructuring reserves		2,975			3,156
Deferred compensation		2,367			1,720
Foreign tax credits		1,806			1,936
Vacation accruals		1,345			1,721
Stock options		1,341			3,939
Severance		614			3,128
Workers compensation accruals		608			113
Inventories		—			—
Total Deferred Tax Assets		276,267			220,922
Valuation allowance		(94,408	)		(85,633	)
Net Deferred Tax Assets		181,859			135,289
Deferred Tax Liabilities
Properties, plants and equipment		101,655			107,722
Goodwill and other intangible assets		79,410			53,853
Inventories		8,912			15,393
Timberland transactions		95,497			91,430
Pension		12,039			13,293
Total Deferred Tax Liabilities		(297,513	)		(281,691	)
Net Deferred Tax Asset (Liability)	$	(115,654	)	$	(146,402	)

At October 31, 2009, the Company had tax benefits from international net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $148.0 million and approximately $2.2 million of state net operating loss carryfowards. A majority of the international net operating losses will begin expiring in 2011. At October 31, 2009, valuation allowances of approximately $91.4 million have been provided against the tax benefits from international net operating loss carryforwards.

At October 31, 2009, the Company had undistributed earnings from certain non-U.S. subsidiaries that are intended to be permanently reinvested in non-U.S. operations. Because these earnings are considered permanently reinvested, no U.S. tax provision has been accrued related to the repatriation of these earnings. It is not practicable to determine the additional tax, if any, which would result from the remittance of these amounts.

On November 1, 2007, the Company adopted FIN 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes,” FIN 48 is an interpretation of SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes,” and clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income tax positions (codified under ASC 740 “Income Taxes”). FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement process for recording in the financial statements uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. Additionally, FIN 48 provides guidance regarding uncertain tax positions relating to de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition.

The recognition and measurement guidelines of FIN 48 was applied to all of the Company’s material income tax positions as of the beginning of fiscal year 2008, resulting in an increase in the Company’s tax liabilities of $7.0 million with a corresponding decrease to beginning retained earnings for the cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle.

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:

	2009			2008
Balance at November 1	$	51,715		$	60,476
Increases in tax provisions for prior years		3,335			2,295
Decreases in tax provisions for prior years		(2,992	)		(928	)
Increases in tax positions for current years		2,951			378
Settlement with taxing authorities		—			(186	)
Lapse in statute of limitations		(6,016	)		(3,872	)
Currency translation		(3,534	)		(6,448	)
Balance at October 31	$	45,459		$	51,715

The Company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. As of October 31, 2009 and October 31, 2008, the Company had $10.5 million and $11.9 million, respectively, accrued for the payment of interest and penalties. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Company recognized a benefit of $3.7 million related to interest and penalties in the consolidated statement of income, which was recorded as a reduction of income tax expense. For the year ended October 31, 2008, the Company recognized $1.3 million of interest and penalties in the consolidated statement of income, which was recorded as part of income tax expense.

The Company has estimated the reasonably possible expected net change in unrecognized tax benefits through October 31, 2010 based on lapses of the applicable statutes of limitations of unrecognized tax benefits. The estimated net decrease in unrecognized tax benefits for the next 12 months ranges from $2.2 million to $2.4 million. Actual results may differ materially from this estimate.

The Company paid income taxes of $58.9 million, $57.3 million, and $43.2 million in 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively.

NOTE 12 — RETIREMENT PLANS

In September 2006, the guidance was updated within SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans (codified under ASC 715 “Compensation — Retirement Benefits”). Under SFAS No. 158, employers recognize the funded status of their defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans on the consolidated balance sheet and record as a component of other comprehensive income, net of tax, the gains or losses and prior service costs or credits that have not been recognized as components of the net periodic benefit cost. The Company adopted the recognition and related disclosure provisions of this standard, prospectively, on October 31, 2007. Under SFAS No. 158, companies must change the plan measurement date to the end of the employer’s fiscal year.

During 2009, the Company changed its measurement date from August 31 to October 31 for all of the Company’s defined benefit plans. This was done using the re-measurement method. In accordance with the measurement date transition provisions of this standard, the Company has re-measured benefit obligations and plan assets as of the beginning of the fiscal year using economic assumptions updated as of October 31, 2008.

The Company has certain non-contributory defined benefit pension plans in the United States, Canada, Germany, the Netherlands, South Africa and the United Kingdom. The Company’s Australian defined benefit pension plan was settled in 2008 (which resulted in a settlement loss of $3.4 million). The Company uses a measurement date of October 31 for fair value purposes and for the calculation of shares outstanding related to its pension plans. The salaried plans’ benefits are based primarily on years of service and earnings. The hourly plans’ benefits are based primarily upon years of service. The Company contributes an amount that is not less than the minimum funding or more than the maximum tax-deductible amount to these plans. The plans’ assets consist of large cap, small cap and international equity securities, fixed income investments and the allowable number of shares of the Company’s common stock, which was 247,504 Class A shares and 160,710 Class B shares at October 31, 2009 and 2008.

The components of net periodic pension cost include the following (Dollars in thousands):

For the years ended October 31,	2009			2008			2007
Service cost	$	10,224		$	11,932		$	14,497
Interest cost		31,440			28,410			29,149
Expected return on plan assets		(35,875	)		(33,460	)		(32,941	)
Amortization of prior service cost		1,005			811			1,211
Amortization of initial net asset		29			19			(618	)
Recognized net actuarial (gain) loss		(1,209	)		3,822			5,688
Curtailment, settlement and other		497			3,512			652
	$	6,111		$	15,046		$	17,638

The significant weighted average assumptions used in determining benefit obligations and net periodic pension costs were as follows:

	2009			2008			2007
Discount rate		5.72	%		6.66	%		5.88	%
Expected return on plan assets (1)		7.69	%		7.56	%		7.32	%
Rate of compensation increase		3.25	%		3.91	%		3.71	%

(1) To develop the expected long-term rate of return on assets assumption, the Company considered the historical returns and the future expectations for returns for each asset class, as well as the target asset allocation of the pension portfolio. This rate is gross of any investment or administrative expenses.

The following table sets forth the plans’ change in benefit obligation, change in plan assets and amounts recognized in the consolidated financial statements (Dollars in thousands):

	October 31, 2009			August 31, 2008
Change in benefit obligation:
Benefit obligation at beginning of year	$	470,763		$	546,060
Benefit obligation adjustments due to measurement date change and other		6,583			(2,039	)
Service cost		10,224			11,932
Interest cost		31,440			28,410
Plan participant contributions		604			618
Amendments		—			1,384
Actuarial (gain) loss		36,085			(34,326	)
Foreign currency effect		17,075			(46,822	)
Benefits paid		(30,983	)		(24,952	)
Curtailment/settlement gain		—			(9,502	)
Benefit obligation at end of year	$	541,791		$	470,763
Change in plan assets:
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year	$	458,622		$	528,529
Other adjustments		—			(1,580	)
Settlement gain		—			(11,004	)
Actual return on plan assets		(163	)		(3,695	)
Expenses paid		(856	)		(700	)
Plan participant contributions		604			618
Foreign currency effects		14,377			(52,331	)
Employer contributions		20,445			22,291
Benefits paid		(29,180	)		(23,506	)
Fair value of plan assets at end of year	$	463,849		$	458,622

	October 31, 2009			August 31, 2008
Funded status	$	(77,942	)	$	(12,141	)
Unrecognized net actuarial loss		130,065			48,067
Unrecognized prior service cost		5,169			6,345
Unrecognized initial net obligation		581			404
Additional contributions (September 1 to October 31)		—			4,538
Net amount recognized	$	57,873		$	47,213
Amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets consist of:
Prepaid benefit cost	$	41,953		$	40,621
Accrued benefit liability		(120,586	)		(48,224	)
Accumlated other comprehensive loss		136,506			54,816
Net amount recognized	$	57,873		$	47,213

Aggregated accumulated benefit obligations for all plans were $510.2 million and $440.1 million at October 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The $541.8 million projected benefit obligation consists of $284.7 million related to the United States pension and $257.1 million related to the non-United States pensions. The $463.8 million fair value of pension assets consists of $194.5 million related to the United States pension and $269.3 related to the non-United States pensions. The projected benefit obligation, accumulated benefit obligation and fair value of plan assets

for the pension plans with accumulated benefit obligations in excess of plan assets were $323.3 million, $304.2 million and $202.7 million, respectively, as of October 31, 2009. The projected benefit obligation, accumulated benefit obligation and fair value of plan assets for the international pension plans were $125.2 million, $119.6 million and $87.7 million, respectively, as of October 31, 2008.

Pension plan contributions totaled $15.9 million, $18.7 million, and $27.4 million during 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Contributions during 2010 are expected to be approximately $17.1 million.

The Company’s weighted average asset allocations at the measurement date and the target asset allocations by category are as follows:

Asset Category	2009 Actual			Target
Equity securities		60	%		33	%
Debt securities		32	%		64	%
Other		8	%		3	%
Total		100	%		100	%

The investment policy reflects the long-term nature of the plans’ funding obligations. The assets are invested to provide the opportunity for both income and growth of principal. This objective is pursued as a long-term goal designed to provide required benefits for participants without undue risk. It is expected that this objective can be achieved through a well-diversified asset portfolio. All equity investments are made within the guidelines of quality, marketability and diversification mandated by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act and other relevant statutes. Investment managers are directed to maintain equity portfolios at a risk level approximately equivalent to that of the specific benchmark established for that portfolio.

Future benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate, during the next five years, and in the aggregate for the five fiscal years thereafter, are as follows (Dollars in thousands):

	Expected
	benefit
Year	payments
2010	$	27,554
2011	$	29,332
2012	$	31,429
2013	$	33,210
2014	$	33,300
2015-2019	$	184,876

The Company has several voluntary 401(k) savings plans that cover eligible employees. For certain plans, the Company matches a percentage of each employee’s contribution up to a maximum percentage of base salary. Company contributions to the 401(k) plans were $1.7 million in 2009, $3.3 million in 2008 and $2.2 million in 2007. For 2009 and in response to the current economic slowdown, contributions by the Company for employees accruing benefits in the 401(k) plans were suspended except for those participants not eligible to participate in the defined benefit pension plan or where contractually prohibited. New employees will continue to receive the Company contribution. For 2010, the Company will reinstitute an employer match program..

NOTE 13 — POSTRETIREMENT HEALTH CARE AND LIFE INSURANCE BENEFITS

Under the SFAS No. 158 (codified under ASC 715 “Compensation — Retirement Benefits”), companies must change the plan measurement date to the end of the employer’s fiscal year. During fiscal year 2009, the Company changed its measurement date from August 31 to October 31 for all of the Company’s defined benefit plans. This was done using the re-measurement method. In accordance with the measurement date transition provisions of this standard, the Company has re-measured benefit obligations and plan assets as of the beginning of the fiscal year using economic assumptions updated as of October 31, 2008.

The Company has certain postretirement health and life insurance benefit plans in the United States and South Africa. The Company uses a measurement date of October 31 for its postretirement benefit plans.

In conjunction with a prior acquisition of the industrial containers business from Sonoco Products Company (“Sonoco”) in 1998, the Company assumed an obligation to reimburse Sonoco for its actual costs incurred in providing postretirement health care benefits to certain employees. Contributions by the Company are limited to an aggregate annual payment of $1.4 million for eligible employees at the date of purchase.

Further, the Company is responsible for the cost of certain union hourly employees who were not eligible at the date of closing. The Company intends to fund these benefits from its operations.

The components of net periodic cost for the postretirement benefits include the following (Dollars in thousands):

For the years ended October 31,	2009			2008			2007
Service cost	$	21		$	23		$	46
Interest cost		1,896			1,880			2,141
Amortization of prior service cost		(1,308	)		(1,234	)		(1,336	)
Recognized net actuarial loss (gain)		(195	)		(5	)		228
	$	414		$	664		$	1,079

The following table sets forth the plans’ change in benefit obligation, change in plan assets and amounts recognized in the consolidated financial statements (Dollars in thousands):

	October 31, 2009			August 31, 2008
Change in benefit obligation:
Benefit obligation at beginning of year	$	24,762		$	31,967
Benefit obligation adjustment due to measurement date change and other		288			—
Service cost		21			23
Interest cost		1,896			1,880
Plan participants’ contributions		214			—
Actuarial loss		279			(5,069	)
Foreign currency effect		884			(1,300	)
Benefits paid		(2,948	)		(2,739	)
Benefit obligation at end of year	$	25,396		$	24,762
Funded status	$	(25,405	)	$	(24,762	)
Unrecognized net actuarial loss		(2,178	)		(2,428	)
Unrecognized prior service credit		(12,443	)		(13,200	)
Net amount recognized	$	(40,026	)	$	(40,390	)

The accumulated postretirement health and life insurance benefit obligation and fair value of plan assets for the international plan were $4.2 million and $0, respectively, as of October 31, 2009 compared to $2.9 million and $0, respectively, as of October 31, 2008.

The measurements assume a discount rate of 5.75% in the United States and 10.0% in South Africa. The health care cost trend rates on gross eligible charges are as follows:

	Medical
Current trend rate		8.6	%
Ultimate trend rate		5.2	%
Year ultimate trend rate reached		2017

A one-percentage point change in assumed health care cost trend rates would have the following effects (Dollars in thousands):

	1-Percentage-Point		1-Percentage-Point
	Increase		Decrease
Effect on total of service and interest cost components	$	115	$	(100	)
Effect on postretirement benefit obligation	$	1,276	$	(1,111	)

Future benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate, during the next five years, and in the aggregate for the five fiscal years thereafter, are as follows (Dollars in thousands):

	Expected
	benefit
Year	payments
2010	$	3,405
2011	$	2,562
2012	$	2,466
2013	$	2,403
2014	$	2,323
2015-2019	$	10,344

NOTE 14 — CONTINGENT LIABILITIES

Various lawsuits, claims and proceedings have been or may be instituted or asserted against the Company, including those pertaining to environmental, product liability and safety and health matters. While the amounts claimed may be substantial, the ultimate liability cannot now be determined because of considerable uncertainties that exist. Therefore, it is possible that results of operations or liquidity in a particular period could be materially affected by certain contingencies.

All lawsuits, claims and proceedings are considered by the Company in establishing reserves for contingencies in accordance with SFAS No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies” (codified under ASC 450 “Contingencies”). In accordance with the provisions of this standard, the Company accrues for a litigation-related liability when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Based on currently available information known to the Company, the Company believes that its reserves for these litigation-related liabilities are reasonable and that the ultimate outcome of any pending matters is not likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or results from operations.

The Company is also subject to risk of work stoppages and other labor relations matters because a significant number of the Company’s employees are represented by unions. The Company has experienced work stoppages and strikes in the past, and there may be work stoppages and strikes in the future. Any prolonged work stoppage or strike at any one of the Company’s principal manufacturing facilities could have a negative impact on our business, results of operations or financial condition.

The most significant contingencies of the Company relate to environmental liabilities. Following is additional information with respect to these matters.

At October 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company had recorded liabilities of $33.4 million and $37.2 million, respectively, for estimated environmental remediation costs. The liabilities were recorded on an undiscounted basis and are included in other long-term liabilities. At October 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company had recorded an environmental liability reserves of $17.9 million and $21.5 million, respectively, for its blending facility in Chicago, Illinois; $10.9 million and $9.3 million, respectively, for various European drum facilities acquired in November 2006; and $3.4 million and $3.3 million, respectively, related to our facility in Lier, Belgium. These reserves are principally based on environmental studies and cost estimates provided by third parties, but also take into account management estimates.

The Company had no recorded legal liabilities at October 31, 2009, and $3.1 million at October 31, 2008. The prior period liability represents asserted and unasserted litigation, claims and/or assessments at some of its manufacturing sites and other locations where it believes the outcome of such matters will be unfavorable to the Company. These environmental liabilities were not individually material. The Company only reserves for those unasserted claims that it believes are probable of being asserted at some time in the future. The liabilities recorded are based upon an evaluation of currently available facts with respect to each individual site, including the results of environmental studies and testing, and considering existing technology, presently enacted laws and regulations, and prior experience in remediation of contaminated sites. The Company initially provides for the estimated cost of environmental-related activities when costs can be reasonably estimated. If the best estimate of costs can only be identified as a range and no specific amount within that range can be determined more likely than any other amount within the range, the minimum of the range is accrued.

The estimated liabilities are reduced to reflect the anticipated participation of other potentially responsible parties in those instances where it is probable that such parties are legally responsible and financially capable of paying their respective shares of relevant costs. For sites that involve formal actions subject to joint and several liability, these actions have formal agreements in place to apportion the liability. The Company’s potential future obligations for environmental contingencies related to facilities acquired in the 2001 Van Leer Industrial Packaging acquisition may, under certain circumstances, be reduced by insurance coverage and seller cost sharing provisions. In connection with that acquisition, the Company was issued a 10-year term insurance policy, which insures the Company against environmental contingencies unidentified at the acquisition date, subject to a $50.0 million aggregate self-insured retention. Liability for this first $50.0 million of unidentified environmental contingencies is shared 70% by the seller and 30% by the Company if such contingency is identified within 10 years following the acquisition date. The Company is liable for identified environmental contingencies at the acquisition date up to an aggregate $10.0 million, and thereafter the liability is shared 70% by the Company and 30% by the seller.

The Company anticipates that cash expenditures in future periods for remediation costs at identified sites will be made over an extended period of time. Given the inherent uncertainties in evaluating environmental exposures, actual costs may vary from those estimated at October 31, 2009. The Company’s exposure to adverse developments with respect to any individual site is not expected to be material. Although environmental remediation could have a material effect on results of operations if a series of adverse developments occur in a particular quarter or fiscal year, the Company believes that the chance of a series of adverse developments occurring in the same quarter or fiscal year is remote. Future information and developments will require the Company to continually reassess the expected impact of these environmental matters.

NOTE 15 — BUSINESS SEGMENT INFORMATION

The Company operates in three business segments: Industrial Packaging, Paper Packaging and Land Management.

Operations in the Industrial Packaging segment involve the production and sale of industrial packaging and related services. These products are manufactured and sold in over 45 countries throughout the world.

Operations in the Paper Packaging segment involve the production and sale of containerboard, both semi-chemical and recycled, corrugated sheets, corrugated containers and multiwall bags and related services. These products are manufactured and sold in North America.

Operations in the Land Management segment involve the management and sale of timber and special use properties from approximately 256,700 acres of timber properties in the southeastern United States. The Company also owns approximately 25,050 acres of timber properties in Canada, which are not actively managed at this time. In addition, the Company sells, from time to time, timberland and special use land, which consists of surplus land, higher and better use land, and development land.

The Company’s reportable segments are strategic business units that offer different products. The accounting policies of the reportable segments are substantially the same as those described in the “Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.”

The following segment information is presented for each of the three years in the period ended October 31, 2009, except as to information relating to assets which is at October 31, 2009 and 2008 (Dollars in thousands):

	2009		2008		2007
Net sales:
Industrial Packaging	$	2,266,890	$	3,074,834	$	2,662,949
Paper Packaging		504,687		696,902		653,734
Land Management		20,640		18,795		14,914
Total net sales	$	2,792,217	$	3,790,531	$	3,331,597
Operating profit:
Operating profit before restructuring charges and timberland disposals, net:
Industrial Packaging	$	210,908	$	325,956	$	228,848
Paper Packaging		44,114		78,646		68,382
Land Management		22,237		20,571		14,373
Total operating profit before restructuring charges and timberland disposals, net		277,259		425,173		311,603
Restructuring charges:
Industrial Packaging		65,742		33,971		16,010
Paper Packaging		685		9,155		5,219
Land Management		163		76		—
Total restructuring charges		66,590		43,202		21,229
Restructuring-related inventory charges:
Industrial Packaging		10,772		—		—
Paper Packaging		—		—		—
Timberland disposals, net
Land Management		—		340		(648	)
Operating profit:
Industrial Packaging		134,394		291,985		212,838
Paper Packaging		43,429		69,491		63,163
Land Management		22,074		20,835		13,725
Total operating profit	$	199,897	$	382,311	$	289,726

	2009		2008		2007
Assets:
Industrial Packaging	$	1,783,821	$	1,857,564
Paper Packaging		418,083		380,560
Land Management		254,856		254,771
Total segment		2,456,760		2,492,895
Corporate and other		367,169		299,854
Total assets	$	2,823,929	$	2,792,749
Depreciation, depletion and amortization expense:
Industrial Packaging	$	73,212	$	73,730	$	69,035
Paper Packaging		26,311		28,309		28,751
Land Management		3,104		4,339		4,509
Total depreciation, depletion and amortization expense	$	102,627	$	106,378	$	102,295
Additions to long-lived assets:
Industrial Packaging	$	89,900	$	104,000
Paper Packaging		18,100		30,900
Land Management		1,000		2,500
Total segment		109,000		137,400
Corporate and other		16,671		8,177
Total additions to long-lived assets	$	125,671	$	145,577

The following geographic information is presented for each of the three years in the period ended October 31, 2009, except as to asset information that is at October 31, 2009 and 2008 (Dollars in thousands):

	2009		2008		2007
Net Sales
North America	$	1,530,438	$	2,001,364	$	1,830,024
EMEA		835,117		1,278,363		1,105,889
Other		426,662		510,804		395,684
Total net sales	$	2,792,217	$	3,790,531	$	3,331,597

The following table presents total assets by geographic region (Dollars in thousands):

	2009		2008
Assets:
North America	$	1,826,840	$	1,882,900
EMEA		601,841		625,807
Other		395,248		284,042
Total assets	$	2,823,929	$	2,792,749

NOTE 16 — QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)

The quarterly results of operations for 2009 and 2008 are shown below (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts):

2009	January 31			April 30		July 31		October 31
Net sales (1)	$	666,260		$	647,897	$	717,567	$	760,493
Gross profit	$	94,801		$	96,860	$	139,427	$	168,556
Net income	$	(2,272	)	$	1,553	$	37,811	$	73,554
Earnings per share
Basic:
Class A Common Stock	$	(0.03	)	$	0.03	$	0.65	$	1.26
Class B Common Stock	$	(0.06	)	$	0.04	$	0.98	$	1.90
Diluted:
Class A Common Stock	$	(0.03	)	$	0.03	$	0.65	$	1.26
Class B Common Stock	$	(0.06	)	$	0.04	$	0.98	$	1.90
Earnings per share were calculated using the following number of shares:
Basic:
Class A Common Stock		24,130,385			24,352,826		24,386,195		24,445,491
Class B Common Stock		22,516,029			22,462,266		22,462,266		22,462,266
Diluted:
Class A Common Stock		24,445,725			24,685,932		24,777,110		24,817,878
Class B Common Stock		22,516,029			22,462,266		22,462,266		22,462,266
Market price (Class A Common Stock):
High	$	40.36		$	46.48	$	53.52	$	57.94
Low	$	27.07		$	25.65	$	40.18	$	47.24
Close	$	30.26		$	45.27	$	51.33	$	53.52
Market price (Class B Common Stock):
High	$	35.90		$	42.75	$	48.71	$	53.45
Low	$	22.13		$	25.50	$	37.00	$	44.14
Close	$	30.37		$	42.25	$	47.15	$	48.20

(1) We recorded the following significant transactions during the forth quarter of 2009: (i) $17.2 million pre-tax net gain on the sale of specific Industrial Packaging segment assets and facilities in North America, (ii) $9.3 million in net gains from the sale of surplus and HBU timber properties, and (iii) restructuring charges of $8.8 million, Refer to for 10-Q filings, as previously filed with the SEC, for prior quarter significant transactions or trends.

2008	January 31		April 30		July 31		October 31
Net sales (1)	$	849,730	$	920,874	$	1,038,104	$	981,823
Gross profit	$	149,040	$	160,434	$	196,860	$	198,462
Net income	$	61,127	$	49,432	$	67,050	$	64,139
Earnings per share
Basic:
Class A Common Stock	$	1.05	$	0.85	$	1.15	$	1.11
Class B Common Stock	$	1.57	$	1.27	$	1.73	$	1.66
Diluted:
Class A Common Stock	$	1.04	$	0.84	$	1.14	$	1.09
Class B Common Stock	$	1.57	$	1.27	$	1.73	$	1.66
Earnings per share were calculated using the following number of shares:
Basic:
Class A Common Stock		23,789,223		23,911,860		23,980,226		24,046,872
Class B Common Stock		22,942,913		22,882,611		22,733,619		22,632,158
Diluted:
Class A Common Stock		24,347,407		24,445,365		24,472,030		24,473,111
Class B Common Stock		22,942,913		22,882,611		22,733,619		22,632,158
Market price (Class A Common Stock):
High	$	68.30	$	71.67	$	73.00	$	73.45
Low	$	53.19	$	61.27	$	55.42	$	32.55
Close	$	65.53	$	64.60	$	60.84	$	40.58
Market price (Class B Common Stock):
High	$	64.05	$	70.86	$	67.50	$	62.00
Low	$	49.73	$	55.40	$	49.24	$	27.16
Close	$	61.04	$	56.89	$	54.02	$	33.59

Shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock are listed on the New York Stock Exchange where the symbols are GEF and GEF.B, respectively.

As of December 18, 2009, there were 443 stockholders of record of the Class A Common Stock and 115 stockholders of record of the Class B Common Stock.

NOTE 17 — SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

As required, at the beginning of fiscal 2010, the Company adopted SFAS No. 141(R), “Business Combinations” (codified under ASC 805 “Business Combinations”) which requires the Company to expense acquisition costs in the period they are incurred. Previously, these costs were capitalized as part of the purchase price of an acquisition. Under the new guidance, all costs previously accumulated to the consolidated balance sheet for acquisitions not consummated prior to October 31, 2009 were expensed on November 1, 2009. The amount recorded as an expense on November 1, 2009 was $6.1 million.

On November 13, 2009, the Company acquired Hannells Industrier AB (“Hannells”). Hannells, which sells steel drums, plastic drums and intermediate bulk containers produced at three manufacturing facilities located in Sweden, Norway, and Denmark, has approximately 240 employees.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Shareholders and
Board of Directors of
Greif, Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Greif, Inc. and subsidiaries as of October 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended October 31, 2009. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a)(2). These consolidated financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Greif, Inc. and subsidiaries at October 31, 2009 and 2008, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended October 31, 2009, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for inventory on November 1, 2009. As discussed in Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (codified under ASC 740, “Income Taxes”) in 2008.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Greif, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated December 23, 2009, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Columbus, Ohio
December 23, 2009