SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the Registrant    X

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ___    

Check the appropriate box:

__ Preliminary Proxy Statement

__ Confidential, for use of the Commission Only

(as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

X Definitive Proxy Statement

__ Definitive Additional Materials

__ Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-11(c) or §240.14a-12

GREIF, INC.

(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

NOT APPLICABLE

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

X    No fee required.

__  Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.

(1)    Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

(2)    Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

(3)    Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11:

(4)    Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

(5)    Total fee paid:

__    Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

__    Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the form or schedule and the date of its filing.

(1)    Amount previously paid:

(2)    Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

(3)    Filing Party:

(4)    Date Filed:

2021 Proxy Statement

                        Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders

NOTICE OF 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

Dear Stockholders:

It is our pleasure to invite you to join our Board of Directors at our 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Greif, Inc. Due to the public health impact of the coronavirus (COVID-19), and to support the health and well-being of our employees and stockholders, this year's Annual Meeting will be held as a "completely virtual meeting." You will be able to attend the virtual Annual Meeting and vote your shares via a live webcast by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/GEF2021.

DATE AND TIME:

Tuesday, February 23, 2021

10:00 a.m. Eastern Time

PLACE:

Webcast at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/GEF2021

ITEMS OF BUSINESS:

1.To elect ten directors to serve for a one-year term, and

2.To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournments.

RECORD DATE:

Only stockholders of record of the Class B Common Stock at the close of business on December 28, 2020 will be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.

VOTING:

We hope that Class B stockholders will promptly vote over the internet, by phone, by mailing their proxy cards in the enclosed envelope or during the virtual meeting.

Vote by internet at www.proxyvote.com

Vote by phone at +1 800 690 6903

Vote by mailing your proxy card

Vote in person during the virtual meeting

On behalf of the Board of Directors, management and employees of Greif, thank you for your continued support.

By Order of the Board of Directors,

	/s/ Gary R. Martz
	Gary R. Martz
	Corporate Secretary
January 12, 2021

Greif - Proxy Statement 2

TABLE OF CONTENTS

	Page
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders	2
Information About the Annual Meeting	4
Proposal 1: Election of Directors	5
Corporate Governance	9
Skills and Attributes of our Board	9
Board Responsibilities	10
Committees of the Board	10
Board Leadership Structure	11
Director Independence	12
Board’s Role in Risk Management Oversight	12
Sustainability and Corporate Governance Highlights	12
Availability of Corporate Governance Documents	13
Director Compensation for Fiscal 2020	14
Executive Officers of the Company	16
Stock Holdings of Certain Owners and Management	18
Compensation Discussion and Analysis	20
Summary of Executive Compensation Governance Practices	20
Compensation Committee	20
Compensation Philosophy and Objectives	21
Elements of Our Compensation Program	22
Base Salary	22
Short-Term Incentive Plan	23
Long-Term Incentive Plan	24
Retirement and Deferred Compensation Plans	27
"Say-on-Pay" Advisory Votes	28
Recoupment Policy	28
2020 Performance Reviews of CEO and Other NEOs	29
Compensation Committee Matters	30
Compensation Committee Report	30
Executive Compensation Tables	31
Pay Ratio	37
Audit Committee Matters	38
Report of the Audit Committee	38
Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy	39
Fees of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	39
Other Matters	40
Stockholder Nominations and Proposals	40
Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions	41

Greif - Proxy Statement 3

PROXY STATEMENT

INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING:

How to Attend the Virtual Annual Meeting?

The Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of Greif, Inc. (the “Company,” “our,” “us” and “we”) will be held on February 23, 2021, at 10:00 a.m., Eastern Time. This year's Annual Meeting will be held as a virtual meeting via a live webcast at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/GEF2021. In order to attend the Annual Meeting, you will need to access the webcast by using your 16-digit control number included on your Notice of Internet Availability or on your proxy card (if you received a printed copy of the proxy materials).

Why am I Receiving these Proxy Materials?

This proxy statement is being furnished to all stockholders of the Company in connection with the Annual Meeting and has been made available to you electronically or by mail. It is anticipated that this proxy statement and proxy will first be sent to the stockholders on or about January 12, 2021.

Who May Vote at the Annual Meeting?

Only holders of Class B Common Stock as of the close of business on December 28, 2020, are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting and any adjournment thereof. Holders of Class A Common Stock are not entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. Therefore, this proxy statement is being furnished to holders of Class A Common Stock for informational purposes only, and no proxy card is being solicited from them. On the record date of December 28, 2020, there were 22,007,725 shares of Class B Common Stock outstanding, with each share entitled to one vote.

How do I Vote?

VOTE IN ADVANCE OF THE MEETING			VOTE DURING THE MEETING
Via the Internet	By Phone	By Mail	In Person
Visit www.proxyvote.com to submit a proxy via computer or your mobile device	Call 1-800-690-6903 24/7 within the United States	Mark, sign and date your proxy card and mail promptly in the enclosed postage-paid envelope.	Attend the Virtual Meeting at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/GEF2021 and vote by ballot.

What Proposals will be Voted on at the Annual Meeting?

At the Annual Meeting, Class B stockholders will vote to elect ten directors to serve for a one-year term. The Class B stockholders will also vote upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment.

How are Votes Counted?

Holders of Class B Common Stock represented by properly executed proxies will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with the choices indicated on the proxy. The ten director nominees receiving the highest number of votes will be elected as directors. Class B stockholders do not have the right to cumulate their votes in the election of directors. Proxies cannot be voted at the Annual Meeting for a number of persons greater than the number of nominees named in this proxy statement. Each share of the Class B Common Stock is entitled to one vote for each director and in respect of any proposal.

Abstentions will be considered as shares of Class B Common Stock present at the Annual Meeting for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum. Abstentions will not be counted in the votes cast for the election of directors and will not have a positive or negative effect on the outcome of that election.

How do I change or revoke my Vote?

Any proxy may be revoked at any time prior to its exercise by delivering to the Company a subsequently dated proxy or by giving notice of revocation to the Company in writing. A Class B stockholder’s presence at the Annual Meeting does not by itself revoke the proxy.

Voting Instructions to Broker:

If your Class B Common Stock is held in street name, you will need to instruct your broker regarding how to vote your Class B Common Stock. Pursuant to the rules of the New York Stock Exchange, your broker does not have discretion to vote your Class B Common Stock without your instructions with respect to certain matters. If you do not provide your broker with voting instructions, your shares of Class B Common Stock will not be considered present at the Annual Meeting for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum or for voting on such matters.

This Proxy Statement, the form of proxy and the Company’s Annual Report are available at www.proxyvote.com.

Greif - Proxy Statement 4

PROPOSAL 1: Election of Directors

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (the “Nominating Committee”) has recommended the ten director nominees named below for election as directors at the Annual Meeting. All of these director nominees are presently serving on our Board of Directors (the “Board”) and each has consented to being named in this proxy statement and to serve if elected for a one-year term. Mr. Patterson was elected to the Board in March 2020 to fill a newly created director seat. Mr. Patterson was identified as a potential director of the Company by a search firm hired by the Nominating Committee, and after a thorough review and interview process, he was elected by the Board as a director. All of these director nominees were identified and proposed as candidates for service on our Board based on their record of service and individual contributions to the overall mission and responsibilities of the Board. Unless otherwise specified, the shares of Class B Common Stock represented by the proxies at the Annual Meeting will be voted to elect the ten director nominees named below. In the event any director nominee is unable to serve (which is not anticipated), the persons named in the proxy may vote for another director nominee of their choice. The names and biographies of each of the director nominees for election to the Board of Directors are set forth below.

Director Nominees

MICHAEL J. GASSER

Age: 69 Director since 1991, Independent Director since November 2015 Chairman of the Board Stock Repurchase (Chair) and Nominating Committee member Mr. Gasser has served as Chairman of the Board of Directors since 1994, including the period from November 2011 until November 2012 in which he served as Executive Chairman. Mr. Gasser served as Chief Executive Officer of the Company from 1994 until October 2011 and as Chief Financial Officer prior to that time. Mr. Gasser was nominated to serve as a director based on his experience and broad leadership ability as a former Chief Executive Officer and Chief Finance Officer of the Company and his significant role in the successful growth of the Company during his 30 years of service. In making its nomination of Mr. Gasser, the Nominating Committee considered his valuable and extensive knowledge and experience in the areas of auditing, finance, manufacturing, risk management, strategic planning, corporate governance, and mergers and acquisitions and his experience serving on private and publicly traded company boards and the board of trustees of a large and complex academic and research university. Other Board Service: •Current - Battelle Memorial Institute (human resources, compensation and governance) •Past - Bob Evans Farms, Inc. (formerly on Nasdaq) (lead independent director; finance; compensation) •Past - The James Cancer Hospital •Past - The Ohio State University (chairman of the board; audit; finance)

PETER G. WATSON

Age: 64 President and Chief Executive Officer Management Director since December 2015 Mr. Watson has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company since November 2015. From January 2014 until October 2015, he served as Chief Operating Officer. From September 2012 until December 2013, Mr. Watson served as Vice President and Group President, Paper Packaging & Services, Global Sourcing and Supply Chain and Greif Business System. From May 2013 until May 2015, Mr. Watson also served as President of Soterra LLC, which operates our Land Management business segment. From January 2010 to September 2012, he served as Vice President and Division President, Paper Packaging & Services. Prior to January 2010, Mr. Watson served in a variety of roles in our Paper Packaging & Services segment including President of CorrChoice (a division of the Company). Mr. Watson was nominated to serve as a director based on his experience and strong leadership as our Chief Executive Officer and previously as our Chief Operating Officer and his deep connection within the organization and his proven track record of growth. In making its nomination of Mr. Watson, the Nominating Committee considered his valuable and extensive experience and knowledge in the areas of manufacturing, business operations, strategic planning, customer service and supply chain. Other Board Service: •Current - Ohio Health Corporation (faith and culture; compensation) •Current - Central Ohio American Heart Association

Greif - Proxy Statement 5

VICKI L. AVRIL-GROVES

Age: 66 Independent Director since 2004 Compensation Committee member Special Subcommittee on Incentive Compensation (Chair) member From June 2008 until her retirement in September 2013, Ms. Avril-Groves served as Chief Executive Officer and President of IPSCO Tubulars, Inc., a manufacturer of steel and tubular products. She had been an executive officer of IPSCO Inc. since 2004, including serving as its Chief Financial Officer. Ms. Avril-Groves was nominated to serve as a director based on her background, experience and judgment as a chief executive and chief financial officer of a major manufacturing company and her hands on management and operations experience in various industries and markets relevant to our products and services. In making its nomination of Ms. Avril-Groves, the Nominating Committee considered her valuable experience and knowledge in the areas of auditing, finance, merger and acquisitions, supply chain, and manufacturing, and her broad leadership ability and experience on several public company boards provides her with valuable regulatory experience and a deep understanding of corporate governance. Other Board Service: •Current - Commercial Metals Company (NYSE) (compensation (chair); nominating and governance) •Current - Finning International, Inc. (TSX) (audit; safety, environmental and social responsibility) •Past - Global Brass and Copper Holdings, Inc. (NYSE) (audit; compensation; governance and nominating)

BRUCE A. EDWARDS

Age: 65 Independent Director since 2006 Audit (Chair) Committee member Audit Committee Financial Expert From March 2008 until his retirement in September 2015, Mr. Edwards served on the Executive Management Board of Deutsche Post DHL, a global provider of mail and logistic services, with responsibility for running the supply chain operating unit of Deutsche Post DHL. From March 2007 until February 2008, Mr. Edwards was Global Chief Executive Officer for DHL Supply Chain, a supply chain services division of a subsidiary of Deutsche Post DHL. Prior to that time, and for more than five years, he was Chief Executive Officer of Exel Americas, a supply chain services subsidiary of Deutsche Post DHL. Mr. Edwards was nominated to serve as a director based on his background, experience and judgment as an executive officer of a global supply chain services company. In making its nomination of Mr. Edwards, the Nominating Committee considered his valuable knowledge and significant experience in the areas of auditing, finance, risk management, strategy, supply chain, corporate governance and mergers and acquisitions and his global board experience on publicly traded companies on the London exchange, which is especially valuable with respect to our international operations and regulatory affairs. Other Board Service: •Current - Gustavus Adophus College (audit) •Current - ODW Logistics •Past - Management Board of Deutsche Post/DHL •Past - Ashtead Group PLC (London exchange) (audit; nomination) •Past - Synergy Health PLC (London exchange) (audit; remuneration; nomination)

Greif - Proxy Statement 6

MARK A. EMKES

Age: 68 Independent Director since 2008 Audit and Compensation Committee member Special Subcommittee on Incentive Compensation member From January 2011 until his retirement in May 2013, Mr. Emkes served as Commissioner of Finance and Administration for the State of Tennessee. Previously, Mr. Emkes was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Bridgestone Americas, Inc. and Bridgestone Americas Holdings, Inc., a tire and rubber manufacturing company for more than five years prior to his retirement from that position in February 2010. He was also President of these companies from January 2009 until his retirement. Mr. Emkes was nominated to serve as a director based on his background, experience and judgment as the chairman and chief executive officer of a major international manufacturing company and as a senior state government official. In making its nomination of Mr. Emkes, the Nominating Committee considered his valuable and extensive knowledge and experience in the areas of auditing, finance, operations, strategy, global markets, mergers and acquisitions, and information technology, and his broad leadership ability and experience in state government and on several public company boards provides him with valuable regulatory experience and a deep understanding of corporate governance. Other Board Service: •Current - CoreCivic Corporation (NYSE) (non-executive chairman of the board; compensation; nominating and governance) •Past - First Horizon National Corporation (NYSE) (audit (chair); compensation; information technology) •Past - Clarcor, Inc. (formerly on the NYSE) (compensation; director affairs/corporate governance)

JOHN F. FINN

Age: 73 Independent Director since 2007 Audit and Nominating Committee member For more than five years, Mr. Finn has been Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Gardner, Inc., a supply chain management company servicing industrial and consumer customers. Mr. Finn was nominated to serve as a director based on his background, experience, and judgment as chief executive officer of a major distribution company. In making its nomination of Mr. Finn, the Nominating Committee considered his valuable experience in the areas of auditing, finance, strategy, risk management, financial investments, supply chain, mergers and acquisitions, and healthcare, and his experience as a former director of a Fortune 20 publicly traded company provides him with valuable regulatory insight and a deep understanding of corporate governance. Other Board Service: •Current - J.P. Morgan Asset Management (registered investment company)(chairman of the board; governance; equity) •Current - Columbus Association for the Performing Arts •Past - Cardinal Health, Inc. (NYSE) (audit (chair); nominating (chair))

DANIEL J. GUNSETT

Age: 72 Independent Director since 1996 Compensation (Chair), Nominating and Stock Repurchase Committee member For more than five years and until his retirement in December 2020, Mr. Gunsett was a partner with the law firm of Baker & Hostetler LLP and held the position of managing partner of the firm’s Columbus, Ohio office for six years. Mr. Gunsett was nominated to serve as a director based on his background, experience and judgment as the managing partner of an office of a major national law firm. In making its nomination of Mr. Gunsett, the Nominating Committee considered his valuable and extensive experience and perspective in the areas of legal and regulatory matters, litigation, energy, environmental, corporate governance, compensation, fiduciary duties, succession planning and strategic planning and his broad leadership ability serving as outside general counsel to numerous companies over his legal career. Other Board Service: •Past - Recreation Unlimited Foundation

Greif - Proxy Statement 7

JUDITH D. HOOK

Age: 67 Independent Director since 2003 Nominating (Chair), Compensation and Stock Repurchase Committee member Special Subcommittee on Incentive Compensation member Ms. Hook has been an investor for more than five years. Ms. Hook has also served as Vice President of the All Life Foundation, a charitable organization for more than five years. Ms. Hook is the aunt of John W. McNamara. Ms. Hook was nominated to serve as a director based on her experience and judgment as an executive of a charitable organization. In making its nomination of Ms. Hook, the Nominating Committee considered her valuable experience in the areas of strategy, corporate governance, risk management, and philanthropy, and her unique knowledge and understanding of our business based on her life-long affiliation with the Company. Other Board Service: •Current - All Life Foundation

JOHN W. MCNAMARA

Age: 56 Independent Director since 2009 Audit Committee member Prior to September 2017 and for more than five years, Mr. McNamara served as President and Owner of Corporate Visions Limited, LLC, a provider of aviation management educational and training programs. Mr. McNamara is the nephew of Judith D. Hook. Mr. McNamara was nominated to serve as a director based on his background, experience and judgment as owner and president of an aviation services company. In making its nomination of Mr. McNamara, the Nominating Committee considered his valuable experience in the areas of auditing, finance, strategic planning, risk management, regulatory affairs and customer service.

ROBERT M. PATTERSON

Age: 48 Independent Director since 2020 Audit Committee member Since May 2014, Mr. Patterson has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Avient Corporation (formerly PolyOne Corporation), a provider of specialty polymer materials, and since May 2016 has also served as its Chairman of the Board. Mr. Patterson has served in various leadership roles with that company, including Chief Financial Officer since May 2008. Prior to that time, Mr. Patterson served in leadership roles at Novelis, Inc., a manufacturer of aluminum-rolled products, and SPX Corporation, a multi-industry manufacturer and developer. Mr. Patterson was nominated to serve as a director based on his leadership, experience and judgment as a current chief executive officer and chairman of a publicly traded manufacturing company and his hands on management and operations experience in various industries and markets relevant to our products and services. In making its nomination of Mr. Patterson, the Nominating Committee considered his valuable and extensive experience and knowledge in the areas of auditing, finance, global markets, operations, strategic planning, risk management, and mergers and acquisitions, and his experience as chairman of the board of a publicly traded company provides experience with corporate governance. Other Board Service: •Current - Avient Corporation (NYSE) (chairman of the board; environmental, health and safety)

Board Recommendation

The Board of Directors recommends that Class B stockholders vote FOR the election of all nominees listed above to the Board of Directors.

Greif - Proxy Statement 8

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Board of Directors

The Board of Directors is currently composed of nine independent directors and one director, Mr. Watson, who as an employee of the Company is not independent under the New York Stock Exchange (the "NYSE") listing rules.

Skills and Attributes of our Board

The Board is committed to identifying directors for nomination with the highest ethical values and integrity, mature judgement, unbiased perspective and the deep expertise necessary to provide proper oversight and counsel to the Company. The Board in collaboration with the Nominating Committee regularly evaluates the skills, qualifications and experiences desirable of our Board to successfully achieve our long-term business strategies and serve the interest of our stockholders, customers, employees and communities.

Our directors bring a balanced mix of skills, qualifications and experiences and we believe their varied backgrounds contribute to an effective and well-balanced Board. Listed below is a summary of the combined skills and attributes of our Board of Directors:

Leadership	Directors with senior leadership experience in complex public, private and government organizations, whether as an officer or board member, are better able to oversee the management of the Company. This experience also brings perspective in analyzing, shaping and overseeing the execution of important operational issues and developing strategy and methods to drive change and growth. Directors with leadership experience generally possess strong abilities to motivate and manage others and to recognize and develop leadership skills in others.
Governance/Board Service	Directors with corporate governance experience gained from service on company boards provide valuable insight into the dynamics and operations of the Board and the impact that governance and compensation decisions have on the Company and stockholders. This supports the Company's goals of strong corporate governance practices through Board and management accountability, transparency, legal and regulatory compliance and protection of stockholder interests.
International	Directors with international or global markets experience bring valuable knowledge and perspective of global industry dynamics to the Company, including exposure to different cultural perspectives and practices and different political and regulatory environments. This provides critical insight into the scope of opportunities and risk related to our international operations.
Manufacturing/Supply Chain	Directors with experience and responsibility for managing or overseeing the manufacturing operations and supply chain logistics of a company gain extensive experience with maximizing operational performance and efficiencies while managing expenses and can provide insight and guidance in connection with strategy to deliver cost savings and fuel growth through sustainable means.
Accounting/Finance	Directors with an understanding of accounting, financial reporting, capital allocation processes and financial markets are essential to ensuring effective oversight of the Company's financial resources and processes and providing valuable advice and insights with respect to establishing a successful capital strategy critical to our ongoing success.
Strategy/ M&A	Directors with strategic planning and merger and acquisition experience are able to provide insight as we identify the best strategic manner in which to expand our business and drive growth either through innovative strategic initiatives or acquisitions and other business ventures. Such individuals can provide valuable guidance on how to develop a strategic plan and oversee the execution of key strategic initiatives and evaluating our progress of those initiatives.
Risk Management	Directors with risk management and compliance oversight experience can provide valuable insight and guide the Board and management in executing its responsibilities to identify, evaluate and understand the various risks and the magnitude of those risks facing the Company and ensure there are appropriate policies and procedures in place to effectively mitigate and manage those risks.
Government/Legal	Directors with government and legal experience have valuable insight into the key issues the Company faces with navigating and complying with legal reporting requirements and governmental and regulatory affairs in a complex global economy.

Greif - Proxy Statement 9

Board Responsibilities

The Board oversees, counsels and directs management in the long-term interest of our stockholders. The primary responsibilities of the Board and committees include:

•Strategy: The Board actively works with management to develop annual and long-term strategies for the Company. The Board evaluates, approves and monitors the achievement of our business, strategic and financial objectives, plans and actions.

•Leadership and Succession Planning: The Board and the Nominating Committee are responsible for the selection and evaluation of our directors for election to the Board of Directors and oversee Board succession planning, and the Board and the Compensation Committee oversee the succession planning process for the Chief Executive Officer and other senior executive officers.

•Operating Performance: The Board regularly monitors our operational execution and financial performance, and discusses improvements and changes when appropriate. The Board holds management accountable for the execution of our strategic plans. The Board and the Audit Committee also work with management in the assessment and mitigation of our major risk factors.

•Governance: The Board and its committees oversee the establishment, implementation and maintenance of policies, practices and procedures to ensure that our business is conducted with the highest standards of ethical conduct and in conformity with applicable laws.

Committees of the Board

The Board has the following committees:

AUDIT COMMITTEE

5 meetings in fiscal 2020

Members: Bruce A. Edwards (Chair/Financial Expert) Mark A. Emkes John F. Finn John W. McNamara Robert M. Patterson

Primary Responsibilities: •Oversees the integrity of our financial reporting and accounting process •Reviews audits of our consolidated financial statements and effectiveness of the internal accounting controls and internal auditing methods •Oversees our enterprise risk management program and cyber risk exposures •Oversees our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements •Monitors and evaluates our internal audit function and reviews the internal audit plan •Appoints and oversees our independent auditors and reviews their qualifications, independence and performance •Meets separately and on a regular basis with Company’s independent auditors and internal audit function to consult and review the scope of their audits •Reviews and approves related party transactions

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE 7 meetings in fiscal 2020
Members: Daniel J. Gunsett (Chair) Vicki L. Avril-Groves Mark A. Emkes Judith D. Hook	Primary Responsibilities: •Oversees the execution of our compensation philosophy and objectives •Reviews and approves annually corporate goals and objectives relating to the Chief Executive Officer’s compensation, evaluates the Chief Executive Officer’s performance and reviews and approves annually the total compensation of the Chief Executive Officer •Reviews and approves annually the total compensation of other executive officers of the Company •Oversees succession planning process for the Chief Executive Officer and other senior executive officers •Reviews at least annually our incentive compensation and equity-based compensation plans, including their design and implementation •Appoints and oversees an independent compensation consultant and reviews its independence and performance •Evaluates and approves non-management director compensation •Reviews and confirms our incentive compensation plans do not encourage unnecessary and excessive risk •Reviews and discusses with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and recommends to the Board its inclusion in the proxy statement
SPECIAL SUBCOMMITTEE ON INCENTIVE COMPENSATION
Members: Vicki L. Avril-Groves (Chair) Mark A. Emkes Judith D. Hook	Primary Responsibilities: •Administers our short-term and long-term incentive plans, which each have received stockholder approval •Approves participants for incentive plans from among our executive officers and key employees •Establishes the performance goals and target award amount to be earned by participants based upon the level of achievement of such performance goals •Certifies the extent to which the performance goals have been achieved and determines the amount of the awards that are payable to participants

Greif - Proxy Statement 10

NOMINATING AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE 4meetings in fiscal 2020

Members: Judith D. Hook (Chair) John F. Finn Michael J. Gasser Daniel J. Gunsett

Primary Responsibilities: •Evaluates and recommends to the Board qualified director nominees for election using the criteria set forth in the Committee’s charter •Evaluates and recommends changes to the size, composition and structure of the Board and its committees •Reviews and recommends Board and committee leadership structure and committee membership •Administers and oversees the annual Board and Committee evaluation process •Oversees Board succession planning •Reviews and recommends to the Board changes to our corporate governance guidelines

STOCK REPURCHASE COMMITTEE 0 meetings in fiscal 2020
Members: Michael J. Gasser (Chair) Daniel J. Gunsett Judith D. Hook	Primary Responsibilities: •Responsible for administering our stock repurchase program

The Board held eleven meetings during fiscal 2020 and all directors attended at least 75 percent of the total number of meetings of the Board of Directors and committees on which he or she served. Under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, directors are expected to attend our Annual Meeting. All of the director nominees, except Mr. Gunsett, attended the 2020 annual meeting.

Board Leadership Structure

Our Board is the ultimate decision-making body of the Company, except for those matters reserved to or shared with the stockholders. The day-to-day business is conducted and managed by the management of the Company under the direction of the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”). Currently, our Board leadership structure consists of an independent Chairman of the Board who is a former CEO (Mr. Gasser), eight additional independent directors and a director who is our current CEO (Mr. Watson).

Our Board believes this leadership structure is appropriate for the Company at this time. This structure permits Mr. Watson to primarily focus his time and attention on the business operations, while Mr. Gasser directs his attention on guiding the Board’s agenda and setting priorities for the Company to address the risks and challenges faced by the Company. Further, our Board believes that it is in the best interests of the stockholders for Mr. Gasser to serve as Chairman of the Board due to his extensive knowledge of the Company based on his 17 years of experience as our former CEO. While this structure has worked particularly well for our Board, it is not a permanent structure. It is the Board’s belief that no single organizational model is best or most effective in all circumstances. Therefore, although the Board has determined that the current structure works best for the Company at this time, the Board may implement another structure if deemed to be appropriate in the future.

We have adopted various policies to provide for a strong and independent Board, including the following.

•The majority of the Board must be independent of management and have no material relationship with the Company, either directly or indirectly as a partner, stockholder or officer of an organization that has such a relationship with the Company, and must meet the standards of independence under the applicable rules of the SEC and NYSE listing standards.

•Only independent directors are members of the Compensation, Audit and Nominating Committees.

•Independent/non-management directors meet at least four times each year, and during at least one of those meetings, the non-management directors schedule an executive session that includes only independent directors.

In addition, the Board and the Nominating Committee have assembled a Board that consists of capable and experienced directors, many of whom are currently or have been leaders of companies, who are independent thinkers and have a wide range of expertise and skills. The Board currently does not have a lead director. However, because of its capable and experienced independent directors, including its Chairman of the Board, and for the reasons described above, along with the above described policies that promote an open discussion among the independent directors, the Chairman of the Board and the CEO, the Board has determined that a lead director is not necessary at this time.

Greif - Proxy Statement 11

Director Independence

Pursuant to NYSE rules, in order for a director to qualify as “independent,” the Board must affirmatively determine that the director has no material relationship with the Company that would impair the director’s independence. The Board has adopted categorical standards to assist it in making its determination of director independence.

The Board has determined that all directors and director nominees have no material relationship with the Company and, therefore, are independent, except for Mr. Watson. Mr. Watson is currently the President and CEO of the Company. The Board has determined that Mr. Gunsett is independent because fees for legal services rendered by Baker & Hostetler LLP, where Mr. Gunsett was a partner during fiscal 2020, were not material to the Company or to that firm (less than $700,000 for fiscal 2020) and the nature of the relationship has been properly disclosed to the Board. Mr. Gunsett retired from Baker & Hostetler LLP in December 2020. The Board has determined that Mr. Gasser is independent because more than five years have passed since he retired as an employee of the Company.

Board’s Role in Risk Management Oversight

The Board takes an active role in the oversight of our most significant risks. The Board executes its risk oversight function at the Board level and through delegation to its Board committees. The Board does not view risk in isolation. Risks are considered in virtually every business decision and as part of our business strategy. The Board recognizes it is neither possible nor prudent to eliminate all risk. Purposeful and appropriate risk-taking is essential for us to be competitive and to achieve our long-term strategic objectives.

Our Board has been and continues to be engaged with management in the oversight of the impact of COVID-19 on the Company and the Company’s actions in response. The Board held many special meetings at the outset of the pandemic and continues to identify and monitor potential risks and ensure effective oversight.

While the Board and its committees oversee risk management, management is responsible for day-to-day management of the various enterprise risks facing the Company. Management has developed and administers a formal enterprise risk management program that is a Company-wide effort involving both the Board and management. Management’s role is to identify, mitigate, guide and review the efforts of our business units with respect to risk, consider whether various risks are acceptable, and approve plans to deal with critical business risks that could prevent achievement of our business goals or plans. The Board receives detailed management reports that assess the material risk to us, including strategic, operational, financial, infrastructure, legal, regulatory and other external risks facing the Company and to be certain that management develops and maintains comprehensive risk management policies and procedures to assess, mitigate and monitor risks. The risk oversight responsibilities of the Board and its committees are summarized below:

Board of Directors	Audit Committee	Compensation Committee	Nominating Committee
Oversees our risk management processes to support the achievement of our long-term strategic objectives Delegates certain risk management oversight responsibilities to its committees and receives regular reports from each committee	Oversees risks related to financial statements, financial reporting and disclosure process, accounting and legal matters Oversees the internal audit function Oversees the enterprise risk management program and cyber risk exposures Oversees risk related to the integrity of our internal controls process Reviews related party transactions	Oversees the risks related to the design and structure of our compensation and benefits program Reviews incentive compensation arrangements to confirm incentive pay does not encourage unnecessary and excessive risk taking	Oversees risks associated with corporate governance policies and procedures and Board performance Oversees risks associated with Board composition and committee structure

Sustainability and Corporate Governance Highlights

Sustainability is one of the principles that guides our business and is critical to supporting the interests of our customers, employees and stockholders. Our sustainability efforts are pursued through an environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) framework and extend to all levels of our organization in support of our ongoing business strategy. The Board of Directors receives regular updates on our sustainability efforts and helps to provide direction to our sustainability steering committee and global sustainability management team.

Our long-term sustainability strategies include product innovation, collaborating with our customers to reduce the impact of their packaging on the environment, and expanding our end-of-life solutions and recycling capabilities to contribute further to the growing circular economy. The Company is also actively advancing programs to create an even safer, more diverse and more inclusive workforce setting where all colleagues can grow and thrive.

Greif - Proxy Statement 12

We published our first sustainability report in 2009 and issued our 11th consecutive sustainability report in April 2020, which was based on our fiscal year performance ending October 31, 2019. The report provides the Company’s 2025 sustainability goals and highlights progress and strategies underway to achieve those goals. Our sustainability report is prepared in accordance with the Global Reporting Initiative Standards. The report is available in full at https://sustainability.greif.com/report-downloads/.

Notable sustainability highlights include the following:

Environmental	Social	Governance
	Highlights
•4.5 million containers reconditioned and recycled in 2019 •Approximately 3.6 million tons of recycled fiber collected, brokered and/or processed in 2020 •11% emissions intensity reduction since 2014 •35+ facilities achieved zero waste to landfill in 2020 •1.18 medical case rate in 2020, down 66 percent since 2007 •Piloted an internal human rights assessment in 48 facilities within 23 countries in 2020 •Rated in the 89th percentile among all manufacturing companies in 2020 (Gallup Q12 Engagement Survey) •20% female representation on the Board of Directors
Awards
•Awarded a Gold recognition from EcoVadis for the third consecutive year in 2020 •ESG rating of “A” by MSCI ESG Research LLC in 2020 •Recognized by Newsweek as one of America’s Most Responsible Companies in 2020 •Received “A-“ 2020 CDP (formerly Carbon Disclosure Project) Score, outperforming North America average score of “D”

Availability of Corporate Governance Documents

The Company has adopted the following corporate governance documents (the “Corporate Governance Documents”):

Corporate Governance Guidelines Code of Conduct for directors, officers and employees (available in several different languages) Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers Independence Standards for Directors Stock Ownership Guidelines applicable to directors, officers and other key employees Audit Committee Charter Nominating Committee Charter Compensation Committee Charter

Each of the Corporate Governance Documents are posted on our website at www.greif.com under “Investors-Corporate Governance-Governance Documents.” Copies of each of the Corporate Governance Documents are also available in print to any stockholder of the Company, without charge, by making a written request to the Company. Requests should be directed to Greif, Inc., Attention: Secretary, 425 Winter Road, Delaware, Ohio 43015.

Greif - Proxy Statement 13

Director Compensation for Fiscal 2020

The following table sets forth the compensation of our directors for fiscal 2020:

Name (1)	Fees ($)	Stock Awards ($) (2)	All Other Compensation ($)	Total ($)
Michael J. Gasser	229,013	134,987	—	364,000
Vicki L. Avril-Groves	97,013	134,987	—	232,000
Bruce A. Edwards	102,013	134,987	—	237,000
Mark A. Emkes	90,013	134,987	—	225,000
John F. Finn	92,013	134,987	—	227,000
Daniel J. Gunsett (3)	110,013	134,987	3,000	248,000
Judith Hook	102,013	134,987	—	237,000
John W. McNamara	87,013	134,987	—	222,000
Robert M. Patterson (4)	43,500	—	—	43,500

(1)As an employee of the Company during fiscal 2020, Mr. Watson was not compensated for his services as a director. See “Executive Compensation Tables - Summary Compensation Table” for information on Mr. Watson’s compensation as CEO.

(2)Amounts in this column represent the dollar amount recognized for financial statement reporting purposes during fiscal 2020 computed in accordance with Accounting Standards Certification (“ASC”) 718 and represents the cash value of the total number of restricted shares of Class A Common Stock awarded to such director during fiscal 2020 under our 2005 Outside Directors Equity Award Plan (3,471 shares per outside director as of the 2020 annual meeting). The amounts reported reflect the closing price of our shares of Class A Common Stock on February 24, 2020 ($38.89), the day preceding the date on which the shares were granted. For a discussion of the relevant ASC 718 valuation assumptions, see Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2020 (the "2020 Form 10-K”).

As of October 31, 2020, each outside director other than Mr. Patterson owned 8,895 shares of Class A Common Stock that had been awarded to him or her under the above plan that were subject to restrictions on transfer. For the aggregate number of restricted and non-restricted shares of Class A and Class B Common Stock beneficially owned by each of the outside directors, see “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.” No stock options have been awarded to any outside director since 2005 and no stock options are outstanding.

(3)All Other Compensation for Mr. Gunsett represents his receipt of $3,000 for administering the annual Board and committee evaluations during fiscal 2020.

(4)Mr. Patterson did not receive a stock award in fiscal 2020 because he joined the Board after the annual stock award date.

Director Compensation Arrangements

The Compensation Committee is responsible for setting the overall compensation strategy and policies for our outside directors. Directors who also serve as employees for the Company or any of its subsidiaries are not compensated for their service as a director. Directors may also receive additional compensation for performing duties assigned by the Board or its committees that are considered beyond the scope of the ordinary responsibilities of a director or committee member.

During fiscal 2020, each outside director except Mr. Patterson received an annual cash retainer of $75,000 as base compensation for services as a director of the Company. Due to the fact that Mr. Patterson served on the Board for only part of the year, he received a pro-rated retainer based upon the amount of time served. The Chairman of the Board also received an additional cash retainer of $140,000. Each outside director also receives $1,500 for each Board meeting attended.

In addition, outside directors serving on Board committees receive additional retainers and meeting attendance fees as follows:

Committee Meeting Compensation	Chair Annual Retainer Fee	Meeting Attendance Fee
Audit	$15,000	$1,500
Compensation	$15,000	$1,500
Nominating and Corporate Governance	$10,000	$1,250
Stock Repurchase	$10,000	$1,250

The Compensation Committee also administers the 2005 Outside Directors Equity Award Plan, which provides annual equity awards to outside directors. Each outside director serving at the time of the 2020 Annual Meeting of stockholders (held on February 25, 2020) received a number of restricted shares of Class A Common Stock under this plan in an amount equal to approximately $135,000 divided by the last reported sale price of a share of Class A Common Stock on the NYSE on February 24, 2020 (the last trading day immediately preceding the date of the 2020 Annual Meeting). None of these shares of Class A Common Stock are subject to any risk of forfeiture; however, such shares are subject to restrictions on transfer for three years. All of such shares are fully vested on the award date with eligibility to participate in the receipt of all dividends declared on our shares of Class A Common Stock.

In addition to the compensation described above, we provide a health and wellness program for our outside directors which includes annual physical exams and we reimburse outside directors for expenses incurred to attend Board and committee meetings. We offer no other perquisites to our outside directors.

Greif - Proxy Statement 14

Stock Ownership Guidelines for Directors

Each outside director is required to own a minimum of five times his or her annual retainer in shares of Company common stock after five years of service as a director. Restricted shares of Class A Common Stock awarded to an outside director under our 2005 Outside Directors Equity Award Plan and the receipt of which has been deferred at the election of such outside director under the terms of the Directors Deferred Compensation Plan are counted as owned by the deferring outside director for purposes of these stock ownership guidelines. The Board evaluates whether exceptions should be made in the case of any outside director who, due to his or her unique financial circumstances, would incur a hardship by complying with these requirements. All outside directors are currently in compliance with our stock ownership guidelines.

Director Participation in Directors Deferred Compensation Plan

Under the Directors Deferred Compensation Plan, outside directors may elect to defer between 25 and 100 percent of their respective retainer fees, regular fees and meeting fees (including committee fees) as well as restricted stock awards granted under the 2005 Outside Directors Equity Award Plan. Once made, any such elections (including without limitation the percentage of Board fees and/or restricted stock to be deferred) are irrevocable for all such amounts earned during the calendar year for which the election is made. The participants are fully vested in the value of their account, including investment returns, at all times.

The plan is considered an “unfunded” arrangement as amounts generally are not set aside or held by the Company in a trust, escrow, or similar account. Notwithstanding the foregoing, deferrals of restricted stock are held in a "rabbi trust" established by the Company. Deferrals of cash compensation under the plan are credited to a participant’s account under the plan as “Phantom Shares.” “Phantom Shares” have a value equal to the market value from time to time of shares of our Class A Common Stock. The number of Phantom Shares credited to a participant’s account is based on the dollar amount of deferral, divided by the then current per share value of our shares of Class A Common Stock. If a dividend is declared and credited on shares of our Class A Common Stock, the Phantom Shares are credited with a corresponding dividend in the form of additional Phantom Shares within sixty days of that date. Dividends paid on shares of restricted stock held in the rabbi trust are contributed to the rabbi trust and are paid from the rabbi trust to the participants and are not accumulated in the rabbi trust.

Generally, the plan provides that each participant will receive his or her cash deferral account value as retirement benefits under the plan upon termination from Board membership in substantially equal monthly payments over a ten year period, and will receive all restricted stock deferrals in a single distribution on the first day of the second month following a participant's termination from Board membership. However, participants may elect to receive:

•Cash compensation deferrals (credited as Phantom Shares) in a single lump sum payment, annual installments over a five-year period or a series of two payments. Depending on the form of payment elected, a participant may choose a fixed date for distribution or the earlier of a fixed date or such participant's termination of Board membership. If a Participant elects to receive a series of two payments, the participant must specify a fixed date for each payment and must specify the percentage of his or her cash compensation deferral to be paid on each specified date.

•Restricted stock deferrals upon: (a) a fixed date that is at least three years after the date the restricted stock is awarded; or (b) the earlier of (i) a fixed date that is at least three years after the date the restricted stock is awarded, or (ii) the participant’s termination from Board membership.

Greif - Proxy Statement 15

Executive Officers of the Company

The following information relates to executive officers of the Company (elected annually):

Name	Age (1)	Positions and Offices	Year first became executive officer
Peter G. Watson	64	President and Chief Executive Officer	2011
Lawrence A. Hilsheimer	63	Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer	2014
Gary R. Martz	62	Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary	2002
Timothy L. Bergwall	56	Senior Vice President and Group President, Paper Packaging & Services and Soterra LLC	2014
Michael Cronin	63	Senior Vice President, Enterprise Strategy and Global Sourcing, and Supply Chain	2015
Ole G. Rosgaard	56	Senior Vice President, Group President, Global Industrial Packaging	2015
Bala V. Sathyanarayanan	50	Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer	2018
Hari K. Kumar	58	Vice President and Division President, Flexible Products & Services and Global Industrial Packaging (APAC)	2016
Douglas W. Lingrel	57	Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer	2010
David C. Lloyd	51	Vice President, Controller and Treasurer	2014

(1)As of February 23, 2021, the date for the 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company.

Peter G. Watson has served as President and Chief Executive Officer since November 2015. From January 2014 to October 2015, Mr. Watson served as Chief Operating Officer. From September 2012 until December 2013, Mr. Watson served as Vice President and Group President, Paper Packaging & Services, Global Sourcing and Supply Chain and Greif Business System. From May 2013 until May 2015, Mr. Watson also served as President of Soterra LLC, which operates our Land Management business segment. From January 2010 to September 2012, he served as Vice President and Division President, Paper Packaging & Services. Prior to January 2010 and for more than five years, Mr. Watson served many roles in our Paper Packaging & Services segment including President of CorrChoice (a division of the Company).

Lawrence A. Hilsheimer has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since May 2014. From April 2013 to April 2014, Mr. Hilsheimer was executive vice president and chief financial officer of The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company. From August 2012 to March 2013, Mr. Hilsheimer was the president and chief operating officer of Nationwide Retirement Plans, a division of Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company. From January 2010 to July 2012, Mr. Hilsheimer was the president and chief operating officer of Nationwide Direct & Customer Solutions, also a division of Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company. For the two years prior to that time, he was executive vice president and chief financial officer of Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company. Prior to joining Nationwide, he was vice chairman and regional managing partner for Deloitte & Touché USA, LLP, which included serving on the board of directors of the Deloitte Foundation. Mr. Hilsheimer is a director and chair of the audit committee and member of the nominating committee of Installed Building Products, Inc., a publicly traded (NYSE) installer of insulation products, and is the lead independent director and chair of the audit committee of Root, Inc., a publicly traded (Nasdaq) technology-based insurance company.

Gary R. Martz has served as Executive Vice President since June 2010 (and prior to that as Senior Vice President) and as General Counsel and Secretary since joining the Company in 2002. From March 2014 until May 2014, Mr. Martz also served as Chief Administrative Officer, and from March 2018 until November 2018, served as acting Chief Human Resources Officer. Since May 2014, Mr. Martz has assumed responsibility for the management of our global real estate services department. From June 2005 until May 2013, Mr. Martz served as President of Soterra LLC. Prior to 2002, he was a partner in the law firm of Baker & Hostetler LLP.

Timothy L. Bergwallhas served as Senior Vice President since February 2019, and as Group President of Paper Packaging & Services and President of Soterra LLC since May 2015. Prior to that and since 2014, Mr. Bergwall had served as Vice President and Division President, Paper Packaging & Services. Prior to that time and for more than five years, Mr. Bergwall served as Vice President, Containerboard Mills.

Michael Cronin has served as Senior Vice President, Enterprise Strategy, Global Sourcing and Supply Chain since September 2019. Prior to that and since May 2015, Mr. Cronin served as Senior Vice President and Group President, Rigid Industrial Packaging & Services - EMEA in addition to the additional responsibilities he assumed for RIPS-APAC, Greif Packaging Accessories and Global Key Accounts in January 2016. From February 2013 to February 2014, Mr. Cronin was chief executive officer of Coveris Packaging, a global manufacturer and distributor of packaging solutions and coated film technologies. From March 2010 to August 2012, Mr. Cronin was the president of the packaging division of SCA Hygiene Products, a Swedish consumer goods company and pulp and paper manufacturer. From January 2003 to January 2010, Mr. Cronin was the president of the European packaging division of Rio Tinto Alcan, a global mining company.

Ole Rosgaard has served as Senior Vice President, Group President of Global Industrial Packaging since September 2020 and prior to that Mr. Rosgaard held responsibility for Global Sustainability from June 2019 until September 2020. Prior to that and since June 2017, Mr. Rosgaard served as Senior Vice President and Group President, RIPS-Americas and Global Sustainability. From August 2015 to June 2017, he had served as Vice President and Division President, RIPS-North America. In January 2016, he assumed additional responsibility for RIPS-Latin America and Container Life Cycle Management LLC, a joint venture which operates our North American

Greif - Proxy Statement 16

reconditioning business. Prior to joining the Company, and for more than five years, he served in various roles of increasing responsibility with Icopal a/s, a designer, manufacturer and installer of high end roofing solutions, including managing director in Denmark, group managing director/chief executive officer of the West European Region and group managing director/chief executive officer of the Central European Region.

Bala V. Sathyanarayananhas served as Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer since joining the Company in November 2018. From January 2017 to October 2018, Mr. Sathyanarayanan served as Executive Vice President, Human Resources, North American Operations, for the Xerox Corporation. From July 2012 to January 2017, Mr. Sathyanarayanan was Vice President, Business Transformation and Human Resources, Xerox Technology. In December 2014, he assumed additional responsibilities as Executive Vice President, Corporate Functions and Human Resources, Xerox Technology. Prior to joining Xerox Corporation, and for more than five years, Mr. Sathyanarayanan served as Senior Director and Head of Americas Human Resources, in addition to other human resource roles at Hewlett-Packard Inc.

Hari Kumarhas served as Division President of Flexible Products and Global Industrial Packaging APAC since September 2020. From May 2016 to August 2020, Mr. Kumar served as Vice President and Division President, Flexible Products & Services. From October 2015 to May 2016, Mr. Kumar served as Vice President, Transformation and Greif Business System. From November 2014 until October 2015, Mr. Kumar served as Vice President, Portfolio Optimization. From January 2012 until November 2014, Mr. Kumar served as a Vice President of Flexible Products & Services with responsibility over the Asia Pacific region.

Douglas W. Lingrel has served as Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer since June 2016. From February 2009 to June 2016, Mr. Lingrel served as Chief Information Officer. From 2005 to 2009, Mr. Lingrel served as Vice President, Global Supply Chain Process and Administration.

David C. Lloydhas served as Vice President, Controller and Treasurer since joining the Company in April 2014, and in that capacity, Mr. Lloyd is the Chief Accounting Officer of the Company. In March 2016, Mr. Lloyd also assumed the role of Treasurer. Prior to that time, and for more than five years, he was a partner in the accounting firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.

Greif - Proxy Statement 17

Stock Holdings of Certain Owners and Management

The following table sets forth the number of shares of each class of Greif securities beneficially owned, as of the close of business on December 28, 2020, by (i) each person known to the Company to be the beneficial owner of more than 5 percent of our Class B Common Stock, our only class of voting securities, (ii) each of the nominees for director, (iii) the executive officers listed in the Summary Compensation Table (the "Named Executive Officers or NEOs”), and (iv) all director nominees, NEOs", and other executive officers as a group.

Name	Title of Class	Shares Beneficially Owned (1)		Percent of Class(2)
Patricia M. Dempsey 12781 NE 72nd Boulevard, Lady Lake, FL 32162	Class B	3,050,502	(3)(4)	13.86%
Shannon J. Diener 200 Civic Center Drive, Suite 1200 Columbus, OH 43215	Class B	3,208,886	(3)(5)	14.58%
Mary T. McAlpin 200 Civic Center Drive, Suite 1200 Columbus, OH 43215	Class B	3,270,676	(3)(6)	14.86%
Virginia D. Ragan 200 Civic Center Drive, Suite 1200 Columbus, OH 43215	Class B	3,578,310	(3)(7)	16.26%
Article 4(c) Trust c/o Shannon Diener 200 Civic Center Drive, Suite 1200 Columbus, OH 43215	Class B	2,127,026	(3)(8)	9.66%
Vicki L. Avril-Groves	Class A	37,323	(9)	*
Michael Cronin	Class A	29,814	(10)	*
Bruce A. Edwards	Class A Class B	44,323 2,000	(9)	*
Mark A. Emkes	Class A	35,003	(9)	*
John F. Finn	Class A	32,813	(9)	*
Michael J. Gasser	Class A Class B	179,921 23,796	(9)	* *
Daniel J. Gunsett	Class A Class B	31,784 4,000	(9)	* *
Lawrence A. Hilsheimer	Class A Class B	94,894 63,949	(10)	* *
Judith D. Hook 200 Civic Center Drive, Suite 1200 Columbus, OH 43215	Class A Class B	44,172 2,482,187	(9)(11) (12)	11.27%
Gary R. Martz	Class A Class B	82,450 1,100	(10)	*
John W. McNamara	Class A Class B	27,784 440,603	(9) (13)	* 2.00%
Robert M. Patterson	Class A	15,600		*
Ole G. Rosgaard	Class A	32,245	(10)	*
Peter G. Watson	Class A Class B	191,702 4,400	(10)	* *
All directors and executive officers as a group (19 persons)	Class A Class B	963,866 3,023,235	(9)(10)	3.62% 13.73%

(1)     A person is considered to beneficially own any shares: (a) over which the person exercises sole or shared voting or investment power, or (b) of which the person has the right to acquire beneficial ownership at any time within 60 days of December 28, 2020 (such as through conversion of securities or exercise of stock options). Unless otherwise indicated, voting and investment power relating to the above shares is exercised solely by the beneficial owner (and their spouses, if applicable).

(2)    * indicates less than 1 percent.

(3)    Only Class B Common Stock (voting stock) was reported for these stockholders.

(4)    All shares held by Ms. Dempsey as trustee under her revocable trust and a family trust.

(5)    All shares held by Ms. Diener as custodian or trustee under her revocable trust and family trusts, including the Article 4(c) Trust described in footnote (8).

(6)    All shares held by Ms. McAlpin as trustee under her revocable trust and a family trust.

Greif - Proxy Statement 18

(7)    Includes shares held by Ms. Ragan as trustee under her revocable trust and a family trust. Also includes shares held by a charitable foundation (525,140 shares) of which Ms. Ragan is the president. Does not include shares held by John W. McNamara, a director of the Company, who is Ms. Ragan’s son. Ms. Ragan disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares held by Mr. McNamara.

(8)    The Article 4(c) Trust held under the Naomi C. Dempsey Declaration of Trust (the “Article 4(c) Trust”).

(9)    This table includes restricted shares of Class A Common Stock that have been awarded to directors under our 2005 Outside Directors Equity Award Plan, including shares the receipt of which has been deferred at the director’s election under the terms of the Directors Deferred Compensation Plan. If deferral is elected, shares are issued to the trustee of a rabbi trust established in connection with the Directors Deferred Compensation Plan. The total number of shares of Class A Common Stock held in the rabbi trust for the benefit of each director as of December 28, 2020, was as follows: Ms. Avril-Groves-16,587 shares; Mr. Edwards-31,617 shares; Mr. Emkes-11,924 shares; Mr. Finn-30,813 shares; Mr. Gasser-10,654 shares; Mr. Gunsett-8,895 shares; Ms. Hook-8,895 shares; and Mr. McNamara-20,917 shares. See also “Corporate Governance - Director Compensation for Fiscal 2020 - Director Participation in Directors Deferred Compensation Plan.”

(10) This table does not include any restricted stock units or performance stock units that have been awarded to executive officers or key employees under our 2020 LTIP, as none of these awards have vested or will vest within 60 days of December 28, 2020. See “- Compensation Discussion and Analysis - Long-Term Incentive Plan" for further information on the 2020 LTIP and awards made thereunder.

(11)    Includes shares of Class A Common Stock held by Ms. Hook (A) as trustee under her revocable trust, and (B) which have been awarded to Ms. Hook under footnote (9) of this table.

(12)    All shares held by Ms. Hook as trustee under her revocable trust and a family trust.

(13)    All shares (other than 3,000) held by Mr. McNamara as trustee of a family trust and a voting trust or as custodian. Does not include shares held by Virginia D. Ragan, who is Mr. McNamara’s mother. Mr. McNamara disclaims beneficial ownership of all shares of Class B Common Stock held by Ms. Ragan.

Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our officers and directors, and persons owning more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities, to file reports of ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Officers, directors and greater than 10% stockholders are required by the Securities and Exchange Commission’s regulations to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. Based solely on a review of the copies of such forms furnished to the Company, the Company believes that during fiscal 2020 all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to its officers, directors and greater than 10% stockholders were complied with by such persons.

Greif - Proxy Statement 19

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Overview and Introduction

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) identifies and describes our compensation philosophy and objectives, summarizes our executive compensation program and discusses and reviews compensation decisions with respect to our NEOs for fiscal 2020. This CD&A should be read in conjunction with the compensation related tables that immediately follow this section, as well as with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2020 (“2020 Form 10-K”). For fiscal 2020, our NEOs were:

Name	Title
Peter G. Watson	President and Chief Executive Officer
Lawrence A. Hilsheimer	Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
Gary R. Martz	Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
Michael Cronin	Senior Vice President, Enterprise Strategy and Global Sourcing and Supply Chain
Ole G. Rosgaard	Senior Vice President, Group President, Global Industrial Packaging

Summary of Executive Compensation Governance Practices

To achieve the objectives of our executive compensation program and emphasize our “pay-for-performance” philosophy, the Compensation Committee has continued to employ strong governance practices, including:

We Do	We Don’t Do
ü Significant portion of executive total compensation “at risk”	û Hedging or short sales by executive officers or directors
ü Objective and different metrics for annual and long-term incentives	û Repricing of options without stockholder approval
ü Caps on annual and long-term incentive pay	û Significant perquisites
ü Stock ownership guidelines and holding requirements	û Tax gross-ups for perquisites
ü Require pre-approval to pledge Greif stock	û Employment contracts or change-in-control arrangements
ü Have an incentive compensation recoupment ("clawback") policy for our executive officers

Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee, whose current members are Daniel J. Gunsett-Chair, Vicki L. Avril-Groves, Mark A. Emkes and Judith D. Hook, has primary oversight for the design and implementation of our executive compensation program. In addition, the Compensation Committee has a Special Subcommittee on Incentive Compensation (the “Special Subcommittee”) that administers our annual cash incentive bonus plan (the “Short-Term Incentive Plan” or “STIP”) and our long-term incentive plan, which consists of our Amended and Restated Long-Term Incentive Plan initially approved by stockholders at the 2006 annual meeting, as amended (the “2006 LTIP”), and our 2020 Long-Term Incentive Plan approved by our stockholders at the 2020 annual meeting (the "2020 LTIP," together with the 2006 LTIP, the "Long-Term Incentive Plan" or "LTIP"). The current members of the Special Subcommittee are Vicki L. Avril-Groves - Chair, Mark A. Emkes and Judith D. Hook. All of the members of the Special Subcommittee are “outside directors” as that term is defined in Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).

The Compensation Committee utilizes an outside compensation consultant, Willis Towers Watson, to provide it with peer group data and market information. Willis Towers Watson also provides other services to the Company. In determining whether Willis Towers Watson has a conflict of interest that would influence its advice to the Compensation Committee, the Compensation Committee considered, among other matters, the six factors set forth in the applicable SEC regulations issued under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, namely: the other services provided by Willis Towers Watson to the Company; the amount of fees payable by the Company to Willis Towers Watson as a percentage of that firm’s total revenues; the policies and procedures maintained by Willis Towers Watson to prevent or mitigate potential conflicts of interest; any business or personal relationship between any member of Willis Towers Watson’s executive compensation team serving the Company and any member of the Compensation Committee; any stock of the Company owned by any member of Willis Towers Watson’s executive compensation team serving the Company; and any business or personal relationship between any member of Willis Towers Watson’s executive compensation team serving the Company and any executive officer of the Company. The Compensation Committee reviewed information provided by Willis Towers Watson addressing each of these factors. These SEC regulations retain the principle that the Compensation Committee should have the final say in

Greif - Proxy Statement 20

determining the independence and objectivity of its advisors. No single factor was considered by the Compensation Committee as more important than any other factor or automatically disqualified Willis Towers Watson from being objective. After completing its review, the Compensation Committee determined that Willis Towers Watson does not have a conflict of interest that would prevent them from providing objective advice to the Compensation Committee.

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

The Compensation Committee’s compensation philosophy and objectives are designed to align our executive compensation with achieving business and financial goals that drive long-term stockholder value. To achieve this “pay for performance” philosophy, the Compensation Committee has the following key objectives:

•Designing a competitive executive compensation program that works to attract, recruit and hire executives from other major manufacturing companies and Fortune 500 companies, in addition to retain, incentivize and reward our current executive officers.

•Offering short-term and long-term incentive bonus plans that work to motivate and incentivize our executive officers by linking compensation to the achievement of targeted financial, business and individual performance goals.

•Emphasizing at-risk components of an executive compensation program to motivate and incentivize our executive officers to drive stockholder value and to align their interests with the interests of our stockholders.

The Compensation Committee attempts to achieve its policies and philosophies by establishing performance objectives for our executive officers and by linking compensation to financial performance goals, which may include, but are not limited to, targets for earnings before interest, tax and depreciation, depletion and amortization, operating profit before special items, operating working capital as a percent of revenue, and total shareholder return relative to the Russell 2000. The Compensation Committee further believes that a portion of each executive’s compensation should be linked to our short-term and long-term performance. In that regard, the Company has the STIP, an annual cash incentive bonus plan that links the annual payment of cash bonuses to the achievement of targeted financial performance goals and an LTIP to link the long-term payment of bonuses to the achievement of targeted financial performance goals. See “- Elements of Our Compensation Program - "Short-Term Incentive Plan" and "Long-Term Incentive Plan.” The 2006 LTIP aligns long-term stockholder value with compensation by providing for a portion of the payouts in restricted shares, as well as cash. The 2020 LTIP further aligns long-term stockholder value with compensation by providing for payouts in restricted shares and performance shares and includes a total shareholder return metric. The LTIP is also intended to facilitate compliance with our stock ownership guidelines. See “- Elements of Our Compensation Program - Stock Ownership Guidelines” below.

Target Compensation Mix

In determining the award levels for each of the elements in our total compensation program, our philosophy is to "pay for performance". As a result, we place relatively greater emphasis on the variable components of compensation (STIP and LTIP) to align the interests of our executive officers with the interests of our stockholders and motivate them to drive stockholder value. These variable components are balanced with retention incentives provided by base salary and restricted stock awards. The 2020 LTIP will provide even stronger retention incentives for our executive officers through the granting of restricted share units at or near the commencement of each performance period that are subject to a vesting period. We look to the experience and judgment of the Compensation Committee to determine what it believes to be the appropriate target compensation mix for each NEO. As shown in the charts below, incentive components at risk accounted for approximately 82% of the CEO's target compensation and approximately 70% of the other NEOs average target compensation in fiscal 2020.

Greif - Proxy Statement 21

Risk Assessment

During fiscal 2020, our management and the Compensation Committee, with the assistance of Willis Towers Watson, performed an assessment of the risks associated with our incentive plans and determined that the risks associated with such plans are not reasonably likely to cause a material adverse effect on the Company.

Peer Group Review

The Compensation Committee, working with Willis Towers Watson, periodically, but at least annually, reviews peer group data and market information for comparable positions in our industry related to our executive officers. The Compensation Committee does not establish targets or benchmarks for executive compensation when assessing peer group data, but rather uses peer group data and other market information to confirm that our compensation targets and awards are comparable and competitive. The information provided by Willis Towers Watson is used by the Compensation Committee and the Special Subcommittee to provide context for their decision making process, but is not used to determine or recommend the amount or form of compensation paid to our executive officers, including our NEOs.

The Compensation Committee, working with its compensation consultant, periodically, but at least annually, also reviews our peer group composition. The selection of peer group companies by the Compensation Committee is based on the nature, composition, geographic scope, complexity and key financial data of potential peer companies in the packaging, paper, manufacturing and industrial businesses. For fiscal 2020, the Company's peer group consisted of the companies listed below.

Aptargroup, Inc.	Domtar Corporation	Sealed Air Corporation
Ashland Global Holdings, Inc.	Fastenal Company	Silgan Holdings, Inc.
Avery Dennison Corporation	Graphic Packaging Holding Company	Sonoco Products Company
Berry Global Group, Inc.	Owens Corning	The Timken Company
Celanese Corporation	Owens-Illinois, Inc.	Universal Forest Products Inc.
Cornerstone Building Brands, Inc.	Packaging Corporation of America	Valmont Industries, Inc.
Crown Holdings, Inc.	Patrick Industries, Inc.

Elements of Our Compensation Program

During fiscal 2020, in support of our compensation philosophy and objectives, the key elements of our compensation package were:

Base salary

Annual performance-based incentive cash bonus under our STIP

Long-term performance-based incentive cash bonus and restricted stock awards under our LTIP

Retirement benefits under our pension, supplemental executive retirement, supplemental deferred compensation and 401(k) plans

Opportunity for deferral of compensation under our deferred compensation plan

The Compensation Committee reviews tally sheets for each NEO prepared by the compensation consultant. The purpose of the tally sheets information is to bring together, in one place, all the elements of compensation for our NEOs to assist the Compensation Committee with making compensation decisions for the next calendar year. These tally sheets typically contain the following information: current base salary; STIP payments for the preceding two fiscal years, and the anticipated payment for the fiscal year just ended; LTIP payments for the preceding two fiscal years, and the anticipated payment to be made for the three-year period just ended; the current value of the applicable supplemental executive retirement or supplemental deferred compensation plans; and the value of our perquisites. See "- Retirement and Deferred Compensation Plans - Supplemental Executive Retirement Plans” for a description of these plans.

The Compensation Committee’s final compensation determination regarding one element of compensation is independent of all other elements of compensation and does not affect decisions regarding those other elements of compensation, other than to the extent that awards under the STIP and the LTIP are calculated by using a percentage of base salary.

Base Salary

Base salaries are primarily designed to provide competitive levels of compensation that attract and retain our executive officers. When determining base salaries for each NEO, the Compensation Committee considers their qualifications, experience, the scope of responsibilities, individual performance and contributions towards our success. Base salaries, which become effective the first pay period of the calendar year, are reviewed annually and are individually determined and may range broadly among our executive officers. The Compensation Committee does not target specific market data for base salaries, but rather compares the compensation levels of other executive officers with equivalent responsibility within our peer group companies and competitive market data to confirm that our base salaries are competitive within the market, as well as to compensation levels of other executive officers within the Company for internal fairness purposes.

Greif - Proxy Statement 22

In December 2020, the Compensation Committee approved the following base salaries for the NEOs for calendar year 2021. See “- 2020 Performance Reviews of CEO and Other NEOs” below for a discussion of the factors considered by the Compensation Committee in its decision to increase the 2021 base salaries, and the amount thereof, for each NEO.

NEOs	2020 Base Salary	2021 Base Salary	Percentage Change
Mr. Watson	$1,060,000	$1,090,000	2.8%
Mr. Hilsheimer	$733,203	$754,466	2.9%
Mr. Martz	$612,321	$630,078	2.9%
Mr. Cronin (1)	$562,446	$608,160	2.3%
Mr. Rosgaard	$550,000	$594,000	8.0%

(1)Mr. Cronin’s base salary is paid in Euros and has been converted to U.S. Dollars using an exchange rate of 1.1112 and 1.1745 for years 2020 and 2021 respectively.

Short-Term Incentive Plan

The STIP is designed to motivate executive officers and reward achievement of specific and objective performance goals that are linked to the profitability of the Company.

In administering the STIP, the Special Subcommittee establishes performance goals, target amounts, and award opportunities at the beginning of each performance period for each executive officer selected to participate by the Special Subcommittee, including our NEOs. The target award is based on a percentage of the executive officer’s base salary (exclusive of any bonus and other benefits) and is payable in cash upon the achievement of the threshold performance level and capped by the maximum performance level. Under the STIP, each NEO can be awarded anywhere from 0% to a maximum of 200% of his or her respective target incentive award, with 100% as payout for achieving the target performance level. After the end of the performance period, the Special Subcommittee certifies the extent to which the performance goals have been achieved and determines the amount of the award that is payable.

No incentive bonus is paid with respect to an applicable metric if the performance calculation for that metric is below the threshold established for that specific performance period. No additional incentive bonus is paid beyond the established applicable maximum metric calculation with respect to each applicable metric for each performance period. The Special Subcommittee establishes the threshold number as being realistic and the maximum as being aggressive for each performance period. Under the STIP, the maximum payment that could be paid to any participant during any twelve-month period is $3.0 million.

For fiscal 2020, the STIP financial performance goals were based upon the metrics of operating profit before special items (“OPBSI”) and operating working capital (“OWC”), subject to such adjustments as the Special Subcommittee determines to be necessary to accurately reflect the OPBSI and OWC of the Company as of the award date. The OWC metric is measured as a percentage of revenues and is calculated by averaging the number calculated as a trailing twelve month average for each of the previous twelve months. The OPBSI and OWC metrics are weighted 80% and 20%, respectively. The Special Subcommittee selected those performance metrics in order to take into consideration the dynamics of the market environment to better align the interests of our executive officers with those of our stockholders and to improve cash generation and the Company's use of working capital. The STIP performance goal achievement threshold was 50% of the target award for the 2020 performance period. For fiscal 2019, the STIP performance metrics were OPBSI and modified free simple cash flow, weighted 80% and 20%, respectively. For fiscal 2018, the STIP performance metric was a targeted measure of return on net assets.

In December 2019, the Special Subcommittee established performance goals for the fiscal 2020 STIP. The table below summarizes the fiscal 2020 STIP performance goals established by the Special Subcommittee. In reviewing the Company's performance against the OPBSI metric, the Special Subcommittee noted that the Company was on a trajectory to achieve target performance levels of OPBSI through the first half of the fiscal year prior to the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. The Special Subcommittee recognized the pandemic as an extremely rare and extraordinary event that broadly and negatively impacted businesses and economies on a global scale. The Special Subcommittee acknowledged that our management took prompt, decisive action that enabled the Company to operate through the pandemic, protect its employees, serve customers and minimize the impact to its supply chain. If not for these actions and with no single action being more important than any other, the Special Subcommittee concluded that the adverse impact of COVID-19 on the Company's stakeholders would have been much worse. Accordingly, for fiscal 2020, the Board awarded the OPBSI metric at the threshold achievement level. Despite the pandemic, the Company performed exceptionally well in managing OWC, recording a metric of 12.7%. This resulted in an aggregate payout to the NEOs of 65.1% of the target award.

Fiscal 2020 STIP Performance Metrics	Threshold (50% Payout)	Target (100% Payout)	Maximum (200% Payout)	Actual Performance	Actual Percentage Payout (1)
80% OPBSI	$424.6 million	$461.5 million	$498.5 million	$398.7 million	50%
20% OWC	13.6%	12.9%	12.2%	12.7%	125.52%

(1)    Prorated for performance between payout levels.

Greif - Proxy Statement 23

The table below summarizes the fiscal 2021 STIP performance goals established by the Special Subcommittee in December 2020 based on its evaluation of our business plan and prospects for the fiscal year. For fiscal 2021, the Committee will continue to use the same STIP performance goal metrics used in fiscal 2020.

Fiscal 2021 STIP Performance Metrics	Threshold (50% Payout)	Target (100% Payout)	Maximum (200% Payout)
80% OPBSI	$359.0 million	$428.6 million	$497.1 million
20% OWC	12.4%	11.8%	11.1%

Each year, the Special Subcommittee reviews the STIP target awards for each NEO based on its judgment of the impact of the position in the Company and what it believes to be competitive against market data while considering internal pay equity for comparable positions. The fiscal 2021 target awards are as follows:

	Fiscal 2020 STIP Target Award		Fiscal 2021 STIP Target Award
NEOs	(% of Base Salary)	($)	(% of Base Salary)	($)
Mr. Watson	125%	$1,325,000	125%	$1,362,500
Mr. Hilsheimer	90%	$659,833	95%	$716,743
Mr. Martz	75%	$459,241	80%	$504,062
Mr. Cronin (1)	65%	$365,590	65%	$395,304
Mr. Rosgaard	75%	$412,500	80%	$475,200

(1)Mr. Cronin's compensation is paid in Euros and has been converted to U.S. Dollars using an exchange rate of 1.1112 and 1.1745 for fiscal 2020 and 2021 respectively.

Long-Term Incentive Plan

The LTIP is intended to focus our executive officers on the key measures that drive superior performance over the longer-term. The Special Subcommittee administers the LTIP and designates "executive officers" and “key employees” to participate in and receive awards under the LTIP. For each three-year performance period, which period commences on the first day of the first fiscal year for that performance period, the Special Subcommittee selects the award opportunity for all executive officers and key employees, including each of our NEOs. The incentive compensation award opportunity is based on the Special Subcommittee’s reasoned business judgment and subjective review of, based in part on the recommendation of our CEO, the key employee’s scope of responsibility and historical performance.

The target award opportunity determined by the Special Subcommittee in December 2017 for each NEO for the three-year period performance period that ended in fiscal 2020 was:

	LTIP Target Award for 2018-2020 Performance Period
NEOs	(% of Average Base Salary)	($)
Mr. Watson	330%	$3,457,646
Mr. Hilsheimer	200%	$1,434,343
Mr. Martz	160%	$958,291
Mr. Cronin (1)	125%	$707,724
Mr. Rosgaard	125%	$636,431

(1)Mr. Cronin’s compensation is paid in Euros and has been converted to U.S. Dollars using an exchange rate of 1.1458.

For each of the three-year performance periods ending in fiscal 2020 and 2021, the performance goals were based on targeted levels of adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, depletion and amortization (“EBITDA”), subject to such adjustments that the Special Subcommittee determines to be necessary to reflect accurately the EBITDA of the Company for the applicable period. This measure was chosen because the Special Subcommittee believed that it was the financial measure most aligned with maximizing stockholder value. For each of these periods, awards to participants are to be paid under the 2006 LTIP. Therefore, the awards are to be paid 50% in cash and 50% in restricted shares of our Class A and/or Class B Common Stock, as determined by the Special Subcommittee, with the number of restricted shares awarded being based on the average closing price of such restricted shares during the 90-day period preceding the day that the performance criteria for the applicable three-year performance period was established. The Special Subcommittee believes that awarding restricted shares in lieu of cash better aligns the interests of the NEOs and other key employees with the interests of our stockholders and facilitates compliance with the stock ownership guidelines by participants. See “- Stock Ownership Guidelines” below. All restricted stock issued pursuant to the 2006 LTIP is fully vested on the date of issuance, with a restriction on the sale or transfer of the restricted shares within a prescribed time period determined by the Special Subcommittee (typically one year and one day from the date of issuance) that is not impacted in any way upon a change in control of the Company.

As a result of the approval by stockholders of the 2020 LTIP, for each of the three-year performance periods ending in fiscal 2022 and 2023, the Special Subcommittee modified the construct of the Company's long-term incentives in order to pay awards solely in restricted shares of our Class A and/or Class B Common Stock, as determined by the Special Subcommittee, except in select countries where

Greif - Proxy Statement 24

impediments exist related to the issuance of our stock. For each of these performance periods, awards to participants are made under the 2020 LTIP and are based on a target percentage of the NEOs base salary (exclusive of any bonus and other benefits) and paid in a combination of restricted stock units ("RSUs") and performance stock units ("PSUs") in a ratio determined by the Special Subcommittee (for the three-year performance periods ending in fiscal 2022 and 2023, 30% RSU/ 70% PSU for Mr. Watson and 40% RSU/ 60% PSU for the other NEOs). The number of RSUs and PSUs are determined using the average closing price of the restricted shares during the 30 and 90 day periods preceding the day that the performance criteria for the applicable three-year performance period was approved by the Special Subcommittee, respectively. RSUs are issued at or near the commencement of such performance period. The RSUs granted are time-based and vest approximately three-years after they are granted.RSUs possess dividend equivalent rights, however, no dividend-equivalents will be paid until the underlying RSUs have vested. RSUs do not have voting rights until the units are converted into shares. The number of performance stock units ("PSUs") ultimately awarded will be determined on the achievement of performance goals that will continue to be based on targeted levels of EBITDA, along with a relative total shareholder return ("TSR") modifier range of +/-20% against the Russell 2000 Index during the performance period to further align performance with stockholder value. Unvested RSUs and PSUs are forfeited upon termination of employment, except in the case of death, disability or retirement in which case the RSUs and PSUs will be reduced on a pro rata basis as provided by the plan to reflect participation prior to termination.

The Special Subcommittee establishes a range of performance goals that, if achieved, will result in an incentive award payment under the 2006 LTIP or of PSUs only, under the 2020 LTIP, respectively, that starts at the threshold performance level and is capped at the maximum performance level. Under the LTIP, our NEOs can be awarded anywhere from 0% to a maximum of 200% of the target incentive award with 100% being the payout for achieving the target performance level. For each three-year performance period, the Special Subcommittee establishes the target incentive award for each participant. Under the 2006 LTIP, the target incentive award is based on a percentage of that participant’s average base salary during the three-year performance period, and under the 2020 LTIP, the target incentive award is based on the starting base salary at the beginning of the three-year performance period). The Special Subcommittee also establishes a threshold level of performance goals, the achievement below which no awards are paid to any participant. For the three-year performance periods ending in fiscal years 2020, 2021, 2022 and 2023, the performance goal achievement threshold is 33% of the target award.

The following table summarizes the principal design elements for the 2018-2020 performance period and the three-year overlapping performance periods currently in cycle.

LTIP Performance Period	2018-2020	2019-2021	2020-2022	2021-2023
Plan Document	2006 LTIP		2020 LTIP
Performance Metrics	EBITDA		EBITDA with a TSR Modifier (+/-20%)
Award Opportunity	50% Cash		30% RSUs / 70% PSUs (CEO only)
	50% Restricted Stock		40% RSUs / 60% PSUs (Other NEOs)
Determination of Payout*	Payout award at end of performance period based upon the percentage of performance metrics achieved		RSUs = three-year vesting
			PSUs = awarded based upon the percentage of performance metrics achieved

(*) If the NEO is not employed by the Company on the vesting date, the awards are forfeited except in the case of death, disability or retirement in which case the RSUs and PSUs will be reduced on a pro rata basis as provided in the 2020 LTIP.

The Special Subcommittee establishes a threshold number that is realistic to achieve and sets a maximum threshold number that is difficult to achieve for the applicable performance period. After the performance goals are established, the Special Subcommittee aligns the achievement of the performance goals with the award opportunities, such that the level of achievement of the pre-established performance goals at the end of the performance period determines the “final awards” (i.e., the actual incentive compensation earned during the performance period by the participant).

For fiscal 2020, NEOs were eligible to receive a 2006 LTIP award payout based on performance targets set in December 2017 covering the fiscal 2018-2020 performance period. In December 2020, the Special Subcommittee determined a payout of 72.54% was earned based on the adjusted EBITDA for the performance period shown in the table below. See “Executive Compensation - Summary Compensation Table” for the amount of the award to the NEOs under the LTIP for fiscal 2020.

2018-2020 LTIP Performance Goals	Threshold (33% Payout)	Target (100% Payout)	Maximum  (200% Payout)	Actual Performance	Actual % Payout(1)
100% EBITDA	$1,739.8 million	$1,918.90 million	$2,042.20 million	$1,829.40 million	72.54%

(1)Prorated for performance between payout levels.

In December 2020, the Special Subcommittee established performance goals and award levels for the 2021-2023 performance period commencing November 1, 2020 and ending October 31, 2023. The table below sets forth the number of RSUs granted to each NEO by the Special Subcommittee (subject to vesting requirements).

Greif - Proxy Statement 25

	LTIP RSU Award for 2021-2023 Performance Period
NEOs	Number of RSUs
Mr. Watson	26,622
Mr. Hilsheimer	13,504
Mr. Martz	9,227
Mr. Cronin (1)	6,069
Mr. Rosgaard	8,288

(1)Mr. Cronin’s RSU award is determined from his base salary, which is paid in Euros and has been converted to U.S. Dollars using an exchange rate of 1.1457.

2021-2023 LTIP Performance Goals - Confidentiality - The EBITDA performance goals established by the Special Compensation Committee for the three-year periods ending in fiscal year 2021, 2022 and 2023, are not included in this CD&A section because we believe that disclosure of this information would cause us substantial competitive harm. In the rigid industrial packaging and the flexible products segments of our business, which accounts for approximately sixty percent of our revenues, our competitors are mostly privately-held companies that generally do not disclose their financial information, executive salaries and other key information to the public, and thus our detailed disclosure of targeted EBITDA would give a competitive advantage to our competitors. Although we provide earnings guidance to investors, we attempt to incentivize our executive officers and key employees at levels above and below this guidance at a higher or lower percentage of their annual base salaries and the public disclosure of such levels could create confusion with investors. In addition, the public disclosure of our EBITDA metrics under the LTIP would cause substantial competitive harm because, among other matters, we would be disclosing to our competitors our anticipated level of earnings for the next three years, which could provide significant insight into our corporate initiatives and activities, including merger and acquisition activities and other growth plans.

For purposes of illustration and to provide context to our stockholders regarding the difficulty our NEOs face in achieving the performance targets under the LTIP, the percent of the target goal achieved for each performance target for each of the three-year periods ending in the last seven fiscal years is set forth below:

* Under the LTIP the target payout is 100% (threshold = 33% and maximum = 200%)

Stock Ownership Guidelines

The Board of Directors has adopted stock ownership guidelines to better align the interests of our executive officers and key employees with the interests of our stockholders. In furtherance of our commitment to sound corporate governance, our executive officers and key employees are required to hold shares of Company stock valued at the following multiple of their annual base salary:

Position	Ownership Level
CEO	5X Base Salary
Executive Officers (other than CEO)	3X Base Salary
Key Employees	1X Base Salary

Our executive officers and key employees have five years after initial participation in the LTIP, or the attainment of a position that requires a higher threshold, as the case may be, to meet these stock ownership guidelines. Our executive officers and key employees are generally required to retain 100% of the shares under the LTIP until they have satisfied the stock ownership threshold associated with their position. Once in compliance with the stock ownership guidelines associated with their position, executive officers and key employees will remain in compliance with these guidelines regardless of decreases in the trading price of our shares, changes to their base salary or immaterial dispositions of shares, until attainment of a position requiring a higher threshold, in which case the five-year compliance period starts again.

Greif - Proxy Statement 26

The Compensation Committee annually reviews compliance by our executive officers and key employees with these stock ownership guidelines. The Compensation Committee has determined that each NEO is in compliance with the stock ownership guidelines or within the five-year compliance period associated with their position. Failure to satisfy the requirements of the guidelines may impact participation by an executive officer or key employee in the LTIP in future years, among other matters.

Retirement and Deferred Compensation Plans

Pension Plans

We have a tax-qualified defined benefit plan that is intended to meet the requirements of Section 401(a) of the Code. This pension plan is designed to provide benefits to those U.S. employees hired prior to November 1, 2007 who have long and continuous service before retirement. Messrs. Watson and Martz are the only NEOs eligible to participate in this pension plan, and both are fully vested in their benefits under this pension plan. Messrs. Hilsheimer and Rosgaard are not eligible to participate in this pension plan.

Mr. Cronin participates in pension plans sponsored by a subsidiary of the Company in the Netherlands, and he is fully vested in his benefits under these pension plans. See "Executive Compensation Tables - Pension Benefits - Pension Plans" for additional information regarding our pension plans.

Supplemental Executive Retirement Plans

We have a defined benefit Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”) that provides benefits for a select group of executive officers, including our NEOs who participate in the pension plan described above. Under the SERP, we accrue an amount equal to a specified percentage of the executive officer's annual compensation. "Compensation" for purposes of the SERP includes base salary and payments under the STIP. This account is also credited annually with interest based on the discount rate used under the U.S pension plan. Vesting under the SERP requires 10 years of service or the attainment of age 65. Vested executive officers are entitled to the payment of a future benefit upon retirement equal to the accrued amounts and credited interest, which is payable in equal installments quarterly over 15 years. Messrs. Watson and Martz are the only NEOs eligible to participate in the SERP, and both are fully vested in their benefits under the SERP. See "Executive Compensation Tables - Pension Benefits - Supplemental Executive Retirement Plans" for additional information regarding our SERP.

Executive officers, including our NEOs who are not eligible to participate in the pension plan may participate in the Defined Contribution Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“DC SERP”). Under the DC SERP, we accrue an amount equal to a specified percentage of the executive officer’s annual compensation. “Compensation” for purposes of the DC SERP includes base salary and payments under the STIP. This account is also credited annually with interest based on the discount rate used under the U.S pension plan. Vesting under the DC SERP requires 10 years of service or the attainment of age 65. Vested executive officers are entitled to the payment of a future benefit upon retirement equal to the accrued amounts and credited interest, which is payable in equal installments quarterly over 15 years. Mr. Hilsheimer is the only NEO currently participating in the DC SERP, but he is not vested in his benefits under the DC SERP.

Nonqualified Supplemental Deferred Compensation Plan

We have a nonqualified supplemental deferred compensation plan ("NQSP") for certain executive officers who do not participate in the SERP or DC SERP described above. This plan credits eligible officers who are employed on December 31 of each calendar year with a contribution equal to the maximum employer contribution rate under the Company's 401(k) Plan, multiplied by the excess, if any, of the sum of the officer's base salary and annual short-term incentive plan bonus payments, over the maximum compensation limit under Code Section 401(a)(17) for the applicable year. This plan also permits discretionary Company contributions, which may vary by eligible officer. The Company does not presently intend to make any discretionary contribution. The plan is compliant with the regulations promulgated by the IRS under Code Section 409A. We distribute the vested deferred balance upon retirement, termination from employment, death or disability based on a schedule selected by the officer. Mr. Rosgaard is the only NEO currently participating in the NQSP. No executive officers, including NEOs received benefits under this plan in fiscal 2020.

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan

We have a Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan ("NQDCP") for our executive officers, including our NEOs, which provides a vehicle for our executive officers to elect to defer their compensation. This plan is intended to meet the requirements of Section 409A of the Code. Mr. Rosgaard is the only NEO that has elected and is currently deferring compensation under this plan. Mr. Hilsheimer had previously elected to defer compensation under this plan. However, upon the discovery of an operational error resulting in a technical 409A violation, the Company distributed Mr. Hilsheimer's entire account balance and closed his account in July 2020. As a result, the Company made a one-time payment to Mr. Hilsheimer to cover the 409A taxes and penalties he will be assessed as a result of the account distribution. See footnote (5) to the "Summary Compensation Table" for information concerning this payment. See “Executive Compensation Tables - Pension Benefits - Nonqualified Deferred Compensation - Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan” for additional information regarding our NQDCP.

Defined Contribution/401(k) Plan

We maintain a tax-qualified defined contribution plan that is intended to meet the requirements of Section 401(k) of the Code, commonly called a 401(k) plan. The 401(k) plan is available on the same terms to substantially all of our U.S. employees, including our U.S.-based NEOs. Each participant can elect to contribute from 0% to 100% of his or her eligible earnings to the 401(k) plan, subject to Internal Revenue Service(“IRS”) and ERISA limitations. The deferred amount is invested in accordance with the election of the participant in a

Greif - Proxy Statement 27

variety of investment choices, including a Company stock fund. Subject to certain limitations, we have the option to match a participant’s contributions to the 401(k) plan, and we currently do match a percentage of a participant's 401(k) contributions. U.S. employees not eligible to participate in the U.S. pension plan are entitled to a company retirement contribution of 3% of the employee's eligible earnings subject to IRS limitations. A participant is fully vested in his or her own salary reduction contributions, but the right to company contributions is subject to vesting as provided by the 401(k) plan. All NEOs other than Mr. Cronin receive company-matching contributions. The only NEOs currently receiving company retirement contributions are Messrs. Hilsheimer and Rosgaard.

Perquisites

In addition to the compensation described above, we provide a health and wellness program for our executive officers, including our NEOs, which includes annual physical exams. We offer no other perquisites to our U.S.-based NEOs. Mr. Cronin, who is based in Europe, is provided in accordance with customary local practice, a pension contribution gap payment, housing allowance and tax preparation services fee reimbursement. See Footnote (5) to the “Summary Compensation Table” for information concerning these perquisites.

“Say-on-Pay” Advisory Votes

At our 2017 annual meeting of stockholders, the holders of Class B Common Stock approved a three-year frequency period for holding advisory votes on executive compensation of our NEOs. At our 2020 annual meeting of stockholders, the holders of Class B Common Stock approved, on an advisory basis, the executive compensation to our NEOs (by an affirmative vote in excess of 99% of shares voted) as disclosed in the CD&A section and compensation tables, as well as the other narrative executive compensation disclosures in the 2020 proxy statement. The next stockholder advisory vote on the frequency period of such votes and an advisory vote on executive compensation of our NEOs will be held during our 2023 annual meeting of stockholders. The Compensation Committee will continue to review the design of our executive compensation program, particularly in light of our “say-on-pay” votes, executive compensation developments and our pay-for-performance philosophy, to align the executive compensation program consistent with the interests our stockholders.

Recoupment Policy

Our Board has adopted a recoupment policy, or clawback policy, which generally provides for the recoupment by the Company of certain incentive based compensation payments and awards paid to certain current or former officers of the Company. Under this policy, in the event that we are required to prepare an accounting restatement of our financial statements due to a material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirements, the Compensation Committee (as the administrator of the recoupment policy) may require recoupment, repayment and/or forfeiture of all or any portion of any incentive compensation paid that exceeds the amount an officer would have received had the incentive compensation paid or awarded been calculated based on our restated financial statements, as determined by the Compensation Committee in its discretion.

Greif - Proxy Statement 28

2020 Performance Reviews of CEO and Other NEOs

The Compensation Committee reviews the performance of our CEO and other NEOs based upon certain pre-established performance categories approved by the Compensation Committee. The performance categories were determined by the Compensation Committee to be aligned with our compensation philosophy and objectives. These categories are as follows:

1. Financial Performance Results

2. Strategic Effectiveness and Innovation

3. Business Management

4. Talent Management

5. Personal Effectiveness

6. Board Relations (CEO only)

In reviewing Mr. Watson’s performance as CEO for fiscal 2020, the Compensation Committee solicited written comments from all members of the Board of Directors based on the above six categories using the following criteria: exceeds expectations; meets expectations; and needs improvement. The Compensation Committee compiled the written comments. In evaluating fiscal 2020 performance of Mr. Watson with respect to each of the categories of his compensation, the Compensation Committee specifically discussed and recognized the following factors of Mr. Watson’s performance during the year:

•His strong leadership and crisis management skills united the Company in the face of a challenging and disruptive environment and guided the Company's response to the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as his intense focus on employee safety;

•His continued commitment on serving the needs of our customers, employees and suppliers to mitigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and supplying high quality products and exceptional customer service, which will place the Company in a good position as the economy recovers;

•His leadership and focus on improving the Company's liquidity through a number of incremental actions resulting in cash preservation and generation, substantial reduction of operating working capital and reduction in net debt and increased free cash flow; and

•His directed efforts and leadership have positioned the Company, in spite of COVID-19, to remain focused on controlling the controllable aspects of the Company’s business, including the capture of synergies as the Caraustar integration continues and further optimizing our manufacturing operations.

Our CEO, Mr. Watson, reviews the performance of each NEO (other than himself) annually based on the first five performance categories set forth above using three criteria - exceeds expectations; meets expectations; and needs improvement - as well as using other subjective assessments of performance. After completing his performance review, Mr. Watson reports his subjective determinations and recommendations to the Compensation Committee and the Special Subcommittee. No single factor is given specific relative weight by Mr. Watson, the Compensation Committee or the Special Committee, but all of the factors are considered in the aggregate in their collective experience and reasoned business judgment. The Compensation Committee and Special Subcommittee then consider any proposed adjustments, to the base salary, STIP and LTIP compensation, and award opportunities for those NEOs and determine whether these compensation components are at appropriate levels in light of the salaries and bonuses of other executive officers in equivalent roles in our peer group and market data provided by Willis Towers Watson.

Mr. Watson noted the following factors for the performance of each of the NEOs during the prior fiscal year:

•Mr. Hilsheimer - His continued guidance in delivering results despite the negative impact of COVID-19 with a focus on managing operating working capital, driving free cash flow and executing on our capital allocation strategies to enable accelerated debt repayment and future growth and his strategic efforts and input in preparing the Company for the maturity of its Senior Notes maturing in 2021.

•Mr. Martz - His leadership of the legal department and ability to navigate the continuously changing legal, safety and compliance obligations resulting from COVID-19 and effectively leading the real estate department in support of the Company's network consolidation and optimization efforts.

•Mr. Cronin - His focus and achievement in successfully maintaining continuity of supply within the global sourcing and supply chain function in the face of the COVID-19 and his continued leadership and guidance on developing an enterprise strategy.

•Mr. Rosgaard - His efforts in leading the transition to a global industrial packaging business by combining multiple geographic regions and developing a global approach and best practices to drive excellent customer service and value for stockholders, his strong leadership and focus on serving our customers, especially in the current challenging business environment and impact of COVID-19.

Greif - Proxy Statement 29

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE MATTERS

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

During fiscal 2020, the Compensation Committee members were Daniel J. Gunsett-Chair, Vicki L. Avril-Groves, Mark A. Emkes and Judith D. Hook. During fiscal 2020, the Company retained the law firm of Baker & Hostetler LLP to perform certain legal services on its behalf, and it anticipates retaining such firm in fiscal 2021. Mr. Gunsett was a partner of Baker & Hostetler LLP during all of fiscal 2020, but he retired from the law firm in December 2020. The Board determined that Mr. Gunsett and the other members of our Compensation Committee met all of the applicable standards of independence for compensation committee members.

No executive officer of the Company served during fiscal 2020 as a member of a compensation committee or as a director of any entity of which any of the Company’s directors served as an executive officer.

Compensation Committee Report

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the CD&A above with our management and, based on this review and discussion, has recommended to the Board that this CD&A be included in this proxy statement and incorporated by reference into the 2020 Form 10-K.

Submitted by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.

Daniel J. Gunsett, Chair

Vicki L. Avril-Groves

Mark A. Emkes

Judith D. Hook

Greif - Proxy Statement 30

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth the compensation for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 for our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and three other most highly compensated executive officers our NEOs.

Name and Principal Position	Year	Salary ($)(1)	Bonus ($)	Stock Awards ($)(2)	Option Awards ($)	Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)(3)	Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)(4)	All Other Compensation ($)(5)	Total ($)
Peter G. Watson President and Chief Executive Officer	2020	1,060,000	—	1,037,783		2,116,727	1,293,936	14,018	5,522,464
	2019	1,055,385	—	1,842,742		3,341,348	1,721,549	13,501	7,974,525
	2018	1,022,323	—	2,735,452	—	4,780,419	1,636,340	12,559	10,187,093
Lawrence A. HilsheimerExecutive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer	2020	731,209	—	430,499	—	949,846	9,015	611,672	2,732,241
	2019	717,431	—	816,462	—	1,538,513	4,038	298,240	3,374,684
	2018	699,560	—	1,285,379	—	2,231,261	11,640	335,766	4,563,606
Gary R. Martz Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary	2020	610,655	—	287,609	—	646,556	777,343	14,018	2,336,181
	2019	599,149	—	545,472	—	1,045,020	1,235,282	13,180	3,438,103
	2018	584,223	75,000	860,395	—	1,513,423	526,890	12,955	3,572,886
Michael Cronin Sr. Vice President, Enterprise Strategy and Global Sourcing and Supply Chain (6)	2020	592,734		182,598		508,264	51,958	140,974	1,476,528
	2019	581,878	—	401,690	—	795,117	62,576	127,689	1,968,950
	2018	538,196	—	631,056	—	1,213,841	33,323	118,812	2,535,228
Ole Rosgaard Sr. Vice President, Group President, Global Industrial Packaging	2020	550,000	—	190,989	—	499,388	—	18,968	1,259,345
	2019	506,628	—	348,826	—	759,907	—	21,580	1,636,941
	2018	460,337	—	452,297	—	954,689	—	21,205	1,888,528

(1)    The amounts of base salary for fiscal 2018, 2019 and 2020 reflect actual amounts paid to the respective NEO for each fiscal year ended October 31. As discussed in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis - Elements of Our Compensation Program - Base Salary” above, we implement base salary increases on a calendar year rather than a fiscal year basis.

(2)Amounts represent the restricted share portion of the 2006 LTIP awards, as described below (see footnote 3 below) and as discussed in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis - Long-Term Incentive Plan” above, based upon the dollar amount recognized for financial statement reporting purposes during fiscal 2020, 2019, and 2018, respectively, computed in accordance with Accounting Standards Certification (“ASC”) 718. For a discussion of the relevant ASC 718 valuation assumptions, see Note 1 in the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of the 2020 Form 10-K. For fiscal 2020, 2019 and 2018, LTIP award payout amounts in this table and not for other purposes were determined by multiplying the closing price of our shares of Class A Common Stock on December 31, 2020 ($46.88), 2019 ($44.20) and 2018 ($37.11), respectively, by the number of shares granted or to be granted.

(3)Amounts represent the cash awards earned under the STIP and 2006 LTIP. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis - Elements of Our Compensation Program - Short-Term Incentive Plan” and “- Long-Term Incentive Plan.” The cash awards earned under the STIP and LTIP for fiscal 2020, 2019 and 2018 are as follows:

Name	Fiscal Year	Short-Term Incentive Plan Awards ($)	Long-Term Incentive Plan Awards ($)	Total Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation Awards ($)
Peter G. Watson	2020	862,628	1,254,099	2,116,727
	2019	1,258,008	2,083,340	3,341,348
	2018	2,334,624	2,445,795	4,780,419
Lawrence A. Hilsheimer	2020	429,610	520,236	949,846
	2019	615,441	923,072	1,538,513
	2018	1,081,978	1,149,283	2,231,261
Gary R. Martz	2020	298,984	347,572	646,556
	2019	428,312	616,708	1,045,020
	2018	744,134	769,289	1,513,423
Michael Cronin	2020	251,572	256,692	508,264
	2019	340,968	454,149	795,117
	2018	649,609	564,232	1,213,841
Ole Rosgaard	2020	268,554	230,834	499,388
	2019	365,534	394,373	759,907
	2018	550,269	404,420	954,689

Greif - Proxy Statement 31

(4)    Amounts represent the change in the pension value for each NEO, including amounts accruing under our pension plans, the SERP, and the DC SERP. None of the NEOs who participate in the NQDCP receive preferential or above market earnings. During fiscal 2020, the Company accrued above market interest with respect to the DC SERP, a nonqualified defined contribution plan, for Mr. Hilsheimer in the amount of $9,015 which equaled the difference between the interest accrued at 2.97% and that which would have accrued at 2.23% (120% of the long-term applicable federal rate for October 2019).

(5)    For NEOs based in the U.S., amounts represent our contributions to the 401(k) plan, subject to Internal Revenue Service and ERISA limitations, premiums paid for life insurance and health insurance premiums, the value of the annual wellness physical and any other perquisites paid by us to or on behalf of such NEO during fiscal years 2020, 2019 and 2018.

Name	Year	401(k) Match and Contribution ($)†	Company paid Life Insurance and other Premiums ($)††	Value of Wellness Physical Exams ($)	DC SERP ($)†††	Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits ($)††††	Total All Other Compensation ($)
Peter G. Watson	2020	8,550	1,868	3,600	—	—	14,018
	2019	8,796	1,905	2,800	—	—	13,501
	2018	7,854	1,905	2,800	—	—	12,559
Lawrence A. Hilsheimer	2020	17,100	1,868	732	240,260	351,712	611,672
	2019	16,800	1,905	—	279,460	75	298,240
	2018	16,500	1,905	727	316,634	—	335,766
Gary R. Martz	2020	8,550	1,868	3,600	—	—	14,018
	2019	8,400	1,905	2,800	—	75	13,180
	2018	8,250	1,905	2,800	—	—	12,955
Michael Cronin	2020	—	43,984	—	—	96,990	140,974
	2019	—	37,898	—	—	89,791	127,689
	2018	—	38,162	—	—	80,650	118,812
Ole Rosgaard	2020	17,100	1,868	—	—	—	18,968
	2019	16,800	1,905	2,800	—	75	21,580
	2018	16,500	1,905	2,800	—	—	21,205

† This column includes an additional retirement contribution for Messrs. Hilsheimer and Rosgaard who are U.S. employees not eligible to participate in the U.S. pension plan. This additional employer contribution is equal to three percent of their eligible compensation subject to IRS limitations.

†† This column includes Company paid life insurance, accidental death and disability, long-term disability and global medical and dental insurance and evacuation premiums.

††† This column includes pay credits and non-above market interest credits accrued with respect to the DC SERP. Mr. Hilsheimer's benefits under the DC SERP as of October 31, 2020 total $1,602,033 in pay credits. Mr. Hilsheimer is not vested in these benefits under the DC SERP. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis - Retirement and Deferred Compensation Plans - Supplemental Executive Retirement Plans” for a description of the DC SERP.

†††† This column typically includes benefits related to expatriate assignments and other miscellaneous benefits. The amount for Mr. Cronin represents perquisites customary to his assignment in Europe, such as a pension contribution gap, tax preparation services and a housing allowance paid by the Company to or on behalf of Mr. Cronin as set forth below. Mr. Hilsheimer's amount represents the amount paid by the Company to cover the 409A taxes and penalties he will be assessed as a result of the Company's operational error and account distribution under the NQDCP, including an amount to reimburse Mr. Hilsheimer for taxes associated with such payment.

	Pension Contribution Gap ($)	Tax Preparation ($)	Housing Allowance ($)	Total ($)
2020	55,882	—	41,108	96,990
2019	50,899	—	38,892	89,791
2018	40,844	—	39,806	80,650

(6) Mr. Cronin’s compensation is paid in Euros and has been converted to U.S. Dollars using an exchange rate of 1.1745, 1.1112 and 1.136097 for fiscal years 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Greif - Proxy Statement 32

Grants of Plan-based Awards in Fiscal 2020

The following table summarizes grants of non-equity and stock-based compensation awards made during fiscal 2020 to the NEOs.

Name	Committee Action Date (1)	Grant Date (2)	Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards (3)			Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards (4)			All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stocks (#)(5)	Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards ($)(6)
			Threshold ($)	Target ($)	Maximum ($)	Threshold (#)	Target (#)	Maximum (#)
Peter G. Watson
STIP	--	12/17/2019	662,500	1,325,000	2,650,000
LTIP - RSUs	12/17/2019	3/16/2020							28,313	1,059,472
LTIP - PSUs	12/17/2019	3/16/2020				23,043	69,827	139,654		2,484,445
Lawrence A. Hilsheimer
STIP	--	12/17/2019	329,917	659,833	1,319,666
LTIP - RSUs	12/17/2019	3/16/2020							14,850	555,687
LTIP - PSUs	12/17/2019	3/16/2020				7,770	23,544	47,088		837,696
Gary R. Martz
STIP	--	12/17/2019	229,621	459,241	918,482
LTIP - RSUs	12/17/2019	3/16/2020							10,147	379,701
LTIP - PSUs	12/17/2019	3/16/2020				5,309	16,088	32,176		572,411
Michael Cronin (7)
STIP	--	12/17/2019	193,208	386,416	772,832
LTIP - RSUs	12/17/2019	3/16/2020							6,646	248,693
LTIP - PSUs	12/17/2019	3/16/2020				3,477	10,537	21,074		374,906
Ole Rosgaard
STIP	--	12/17/2019	206,250	412,500	825,000
LTIP - RSUs	12/17/2019	3/16/2020							7,732	289,331
LTIP - PSUs	12/17/2019	3/16/2020				4,045	12,259	24,518		436,175

(1) The date the Compensation Committee took action to conditionally granted the RSUs and PSUs to participants, including our NEOs under the 2020 LTIP to be presented for approval at the 2020 annual meeting.

(2) The date the Compensation Committee took action to complete the grants of the RSUs and PSUs to participates, including our NEOs following the approval of the 2020 LTIP by stockholders.

(3) In fiscal 2020, each NEO was selected to participate in the STIP. The amounts represent the threshold (50%), target (100%) and maximum (200%) cash award opportunity under the STIP for the performance period beginning November 1, 2019 and ending October 31, 2020. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis - Elements of Our Compensation Program - Short-Term Incentive Plan.” The actual payments earned by each NEO in fiscal 2020 and paid in fiscal 2021 are shown in the Summary Compensation Table in the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column.

(4) In fiscal 2020, each NEO was selected to participate in the LTIP. The amounts represent the threshold (33%), target (100%) and maximum (200%) PSU award opportunity under the 2020 LTIP for the three-year performance period beginning November 1, 2019 and ending October 31, 2022. The PSUs granted may vest depending on performance results achieved during the performance period approximately three-years after the completion of the performance period subject to certain forfeiture events. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis - Elements of Our Compensation Program - Long-Term Incentive Plan.”

(5) In fiscal 2020, each NEO was selected to participate in the LTIP. The amounts represent the RSU awards granted to each NEO under the 2020 LTIP for the performance period beginning November 1, 2019 and ending October 31, 2022. The RSUs granted are time-based and will vest on January 15, 2023 subject to certain forfeiture events. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis - Elements of Our Compensation Program - Long-Term Incentive Plan.”

(6) The grant date fair market value of the RSUs and PSUs granted in fiscal 2020 were calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 (excluding the effect of forfeitures) as of February 25, 2020, the date stockholders approved the 2020 LTIP. For RSUs, the market or payout value has been determined by multiplying the number of RSUs awarded by $37.42, the weighted average fair market value of the RSUs. For PSUs, the market or payout value has been determined by multiplying the number of PSUs awarded at target by $35.58, the weighted average fair market value of the PSUs.

(7) Mr. Cronin's awards are valued in Euros and have been converted to U.S. Dollars using an exchange rate of 1.1745 for STIP and 1.1410 for LTIP - RSUs and PSUs.

Greif - Proxy Statement 33

Equity Compensation Plan Information

Plan Category	Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options	Weighted Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options	Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Security Holders (1)	—	—
2001 Plan (2)	—	—	3,960,000
2005 Outside Directors Equity Award Plan (3)	—	—	90,924
2020 LTIP (4)	—	—	4,646,829
Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Security Holders	—	—	—
Total:	—	—

(1)    Information as of October 31, 2020. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis - Elements of Our Compensation Program - Long-Term Incentive Plan” for a description of the 2020 LTIP and “Director Compensation for Fiscal 2020 - Director Compensation Arrangements” for a description of the 2005 Outside Director Equity Award Plan.

(2)    The 2001 Management Equity Incentive and Compensation Plan (the "2001 Plan") provides for the award of incentive and nonqualified stock options and restricted and performance shares of Class A Common Stock to key employees. The 2001 Plan contains a formula for calculating the number of shares available for future issuance. This formula provides that the maximum number of shares which may be issued each calendar year under the 2001 Plan is equal to the sum of (a) 5.0% of the total outstanding shares as of the last day of our immediately preceding fiscal year, plus (b) any shares related to awards under the 2001 Plan that, in whole or in part, expire or are unexercised, forfeited, or otherwise not issued to a participant or returned to the 2001 Plan, plus (c) any unused portion of the shares available under (a), above, for the immediately preceding two fiscal years as a result of not being made subject to a grant or award in such preceding two fiscal years. The approximate number of shares that may be issued under the 2001 Plan in fiscal 2020 is 3,960,000 shares. The maximum number of shares that may be issued under the 2001 Plan with respect to incentive stock options is 5,000,000 shares, with 1,072,311 shares remaining available for future issuance under this limitation. Stock options have not been issued under the 2001 Plan since 2006.

(3)    Shares of our Class A Common Stock may be issued under the 2005 Outside Directors Equity Award Plan.

(4)    Shares of our Class A and/or B Common Stock may be issued under the 2020 LTIP.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End 2020

The following table summarizes the outstanding stock awards held by each NEO as of October 31, 2020. There are no outstanding stock options.

Name	Stock Awards
	Numbers of Shares or Units of Stock that have not Vested (#) (1)	Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock that have not Vested ($) (2)	Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights that have not Vested (#) (3)	Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares Units or Other Rights that have not Vested ($) (4)
Peter G. Watson	28,313	1,149,225	69,827	2,834,278
Lawrence A. Hilsheimer	14,850	602,762	23,544	955,651
Gary R. Martz	10,147	411,867	16,088	653,012
Michael Cronin (5)	6,646	269,761	10,537	427,697
Ole Rosgaard	7,732	313,842	12,259	497,593

(1)    Represents the number of RSUs granted under the 2020 LTIP for the 2020-2022 performance period. All RSUs vest on January 15, 2023.

(2)    Represents the market or payout value of the RSUs determined by multiplying the closing price of our shares of Class A Common Stock on October 30, 2020 $40.59) by the number of RSUs granted.

(3)    Represents the number PSUs granted at the target performance level under the 2020 LTIP for the 2020-2022 performance period. The PSU vesting date will be specified by the Compensation Committee following the end of the performance period. The vesting date will be no sooner than January 14, 2023 and no later than March 15, 2023.

(4)    Represents the market or payout value of the PSUs determined by multiplying the closing price of our shares of Class A Common Stock on October 30, 2020 ($40.59) by the number of PSUs granted at target performance level.

(5)    Mr. Cronin's awards are valued in Euros and have been converted to U.S. Dollars using an exchange rate of 1.1410.

Greif - Proxy Statement 34

Option Exercises and Stock Vested in Fiscal 2020

No equity-based compensation awards were exercised or vested during fiscal 2020.

Pension Benefits

Pension Plans

We have a tax-qualified defined benefit plan that is intended to meet the requirements of Section 401(a) of the Code for our U.S. employees hired prior to November 1, 2007, who have long and continuous service before retirement. Benefits payable under this pension plan are funded entirely through Company contributions to a trust fund. This pension plan provides for a lump sum payment or a monthly benefit for the participant’s lifetime upon reaching the normal retirement age under this pension plan, which is 65. The monthly benefit is calculated by multiplying the participant’s annual average compensation (calculated using the five highest complete years of the last ten years of compensation or the final sixty months of compensation, whichever is higher, capped at Code limits) by 35% and by the participant’s years of service divided by the years the participant could have worked until his or her normal retirement date divided by 12. “Compensation” for purposes of the pension plan includes base salary and payments under the STIP. Participants are 100% vested in this pension plan once they have been credited with five years of service with the Company. Messrs. Watson and Martz are the only NEOs eligible to participate in this pension plan, and both are fully vested in their benefits under this pension plan. Once a participant is fully vested, the participant will have earned a nonforfeitable right to a benefit under this pension plan. Benefits may commence at the later of age 65 or five years vested in this pension plan. This pension plan offers early retirement benefits at age 55 on a reduced basis with a required 15 years of service. Messrs. Watson and Martz are both eligible for early retirement benefits under this pension plan.

Mr. Cronin participates in pension plans sponsored by a subsidiary of the Company in the Netherlands. Benefits payable under these pension plans are funded entirely through such subsidiary's contributions to a trust fund. These pension plans provide benefits to Mr. Cronin upon his reaching the normal retirement age under Dutch law, which is 68. Benefits accrue at the rate of 1.875% and 1.75%, respectively, per year of service on separate portions of a participant's base salary subject to limitations imposed by Dutch law. Participants under the plans vest in their benefits immediately. Therefore, Mr. Cronin is fully vested in the benefits of these pension plans. Mr. Cronin’s pension plans do not offer early retirement benefits.

Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan

Our SERP provides benefits for a select group of executive officers, including our NEOs, who participate in the above described pension plan. The plan is considered to be an “unfunded” arrangement as amounts generally will not be set aside or held by the Company in a trust, escrow, or similar account. The benefit from the pension plan and the SERP is equal to a target percentage (ranging from 40% to 50% depending on job classification) times the executive officer’s highest three-year average compensation of the last five years worked by the executive officer and reduced for less than 20 years of continuous service and for receiving benefits prior to the executive officer’s normal retirement age. “Compensation” for purposes of the SERP includes base salary and payments under the STIP, and benefits are payable quarterly under the SERP for 15 years. “Normal retirement age” under the SERP is 65. Generally, vesting under the SERP requires 10 years of service or the attainment of the normal retirement age. Messrs. Watson and Martz are the only NEOs eligible to participate in the SERP, and both are fully vested in their benefits under the SERP.

Pension Benefits in Fiscal 2020

The table below sets forth the years of service and present value of the accumulated benefit for each of the eligible NEOs under the pension plans and the SERP described above as of October 31, 2020. Messrs. Hilsheimer and Rosgaard are not eligible to participate in our pension plans or SERP.

Name	Plan Name	Number of Years Credited Service (#)	Present Value of Accumulated Benefit ($) (1)(2)(3)	Payments During Last Fiscal Year ($)
Peter G. Watson	U.S. Pension Plan	21	970,496	—
	SERP	9	6,266,520	—
Gary R. Martz	U.S. Pension Plan	19	846,613	—
	SERP	19	5,125,501	—
Michael Cronin	Netherlands Pension Plan	6	239,889	—
	SERP	—	—	—

Greif - Proxy Statement 35

(1) Assumptions for calculations:

    (A)    Age 65 commencement for Messrs. Watson and Martz and age 67 commencement for Mr. Cronin;

    (B)    No decrements for death nor termination prior to age 65;

    (C)    RP-2014 Projected Mortality for the U.S. pension plan. For the Netherlands pension plans, the AP Prognosetafel 2019 mortality table as of October 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

    (D)    Discount rates for the U.S. pension plan of 3.01%, 3.33% and 4.61% as of October 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively; and discount rates for the SERP of 2.29%, 2.93% and 4.38% as of October 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively; and discount rate for the Netherlands pension plans of .75%, 0.75% and 1.65% as of October 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

(2)    See Note 12 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of the 2020 Form 10-K for a discussion of the valuation method and material assumptions applied in quantifying the present value of the accumulated benefit.

(3)    Mr. Cronin’s Netherlands Pension benefits were calculated in Euros and converted to U.S. Dollars using an exchange rate of 1.1745, 1.1112, and 1.136097 for fiscal years 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan

We have a NQDCP for our executive officers, including our NEOs, which provides a vehicle for our executive officers to elect to defer their compensation. This plan is intended to meet the requirements of Section 409A of the Code. A participant’s base salary, STIP and LTIP cash payments are all eligible for deferral under this plan, and participants may defer up to 100% of their compensation. We do not currently match any compensation deferred by participants or provide any other discretionary contributions under this plan. A participant’s deferred compensation (along with company-match or contributions, if any) is deposited into an account with a rabbi trust to protect and segregate such funds. Deferred funds are invested in a similar range of investment options as are available in our 401(k) plan. The funds in a participant’s account are distributed to a participant upon his or her retirement in a lump sum or in equal annual installments over a five- or ten-year period, as elected by the participant, or in a lump sum upon a participant’s termination of employment, death or disability or a change in control of the Company. Subject to the terms of the plan, participants may also receive a distribution of funds for an “unforeseeable emergency.” A participant is fully vested in his or her own deferral contributions, but the right to Company-matching contributions, if any, is subject to vesting as provided by this plan. Mr. Rosgaard is the only NEO that elected and currently deferring compensation under this plan. Mr. Hilsheimer had previously elected to defer compensation under this plan and upon a discovery of an operational error resulting in a technical 409A violation, the Company distributed Mr. Hilsheimer's entire account balance and closed his account in July 2020. As a result, the Company made a one-time payment to Mr. Hilsheimer to cover the 409A taxes and penalties he will be assessed as a result of the account distribution.

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Benefits in Fiscal 2020

The table below provides information regarding the accounts of our NEOs who have deferred compensation under our nonqualified deferred compensation plan and our nonqualified deferred supplemental compensation plan described above as of October 31, 2020.

Name	Plan Name	Executive Contributions in Last FY ($)(1)(2)	Company Contributions in Last FY ($)	Aggregate Earnings in Last FY ($) (3)	Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions ($)(4)	Aggregate Balance at Last FYE ($)
Lawrence A. Hilsheimer	NQDCP	—	—	1,372	348,130	—
Ole Rosgaard	NQDCP	45,015	—	896	—	189,096

(1)The amounts shown above include base salary, STIP and LTIP cash awards deferred during fiscal 2020.

(2)Mr. Rosgaard's contribution amount of $45,015 is reported in this table and is also included as fiscal 2020 compensation in the Summary Compensation Table of this proxy statement.

(3)The amounts in this column equals the sum of any investment income and capital gains less any capital losses. The amounts are not included as fiscal 2020 compensation in the Summary Compensation Table of this proxy.

(4)Due to an operational error by the Company, Mr. Hilsheimer's account was distributed to him during July 2020.

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

We have no plans, agreements, contracts or other arrangements providing any of our NEOs with severance or change-in-control benefits.

Greif - Proxy Statement 36

Agreements with NEOs

We do not have employment agreements with any of our NEOs. All NEOs, as well as all other participants in the LTIP, have agreed to certain post-employment covenants prohibiting them from becoming involved in any enterprise which competes with any business engaged in by us or our subsidiaries.

Pay Ratio

Pursuant to Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K, for fiscal 2020, the ratio of the total annual compensation of our CEO to the total annual compensation of the median employee was 136 to 1.

To identify the median employee, we first determined our global employee population consisting of full-time, part-time, seasonal and temporary employees as of October 31, 2020. We excluded all employees in Algeria (39), Costa Rica (30), Egypt (41), Guatemala (12), Ukraine (426) and Vietnam (237) under the de minimus exception, as the aggregate number of employees in those countries (785) represents less than 5% of our total global employee population of 15,733. After determining our global employee population, we then used the annual base salary reflected in our internal payroll system, converted into U.S. dollars, as our consistently applied compensation measure. We next annualized the compensation of all permanent employees who joined the Company during the fiscal year.

Once the median employees were identified (we have two due to the fact that our population, excluding our CEO, was an even number), we calculated the median employees' compensation using the same methodology used to calculate the total compensation of our CEO as set forth in the Summary Compensation Table and average the two numbers. The average median employee annual total compensation was $40,515. The annual total compensation of our CEO was $5,522,464 as set forth in the Summary Compensation Table of this proxy statement.

Greif - Proxy Statement 37

AUDIT COMMITTEE MATTERS

Report of the Audit Committee

The Audit Committee is responsible for monitoring and reviewing our financial reporting process on behalf of the Board of Directors. The Audit Committee consists of four independent directors. The Company’s Board of Directors has determined that all Audit Committee members are “financially literate” as defined by the NYSE standards and that Bruce A. Edwards qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by applicable SEC regulations. Management has the primary responsibility for the financial statements and the reporting process, including the system of internal controls and preparation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”). In fulfilling its responsibilities, the Audit Committee reviewed the audited consolidated financial statements in the 2020 Form 10-K with management, including a discussion of the quality, not just the acceptability, of the accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments, and the clarity of disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Throughout the year, the Audit Committee also monitored the results of the testing of internal control over financial reporting pursuant to §404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, reviewed a report from management and internal audit regarding the design, operation and effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and reviewed a report from Deloitte & Touche LLP regarding the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. The Audit Committee reviewed with the independent auditors, who are responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of those audited consolidated financial statements with GAAP, their judgments as to the quality, not just the acceptability, of our accounting principles and such other matters as are required to be discussed with the Audit Committee in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”). In addition, the Audit Committee received written disclosures regarding the independent auditors’ independence from management and the Company, and received a letter confirming that fact from the independent auditors, which included applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence and considered the compatibility of nonaudit services with the auditors’ independence.

The Audit Committee discussed with our internal and independent auditors the overall scope and plans for their respective audits. The Audit Committee meets separately with the internal and independent auditors, with and without management present, and separately with management, to discuss the results of their examinations, their evaluations of our internal controls and the overall quality of our financial reporting.

As discussed above, the Audit Committee is responsible for monitoring and reviewing our financial reporting process. It is not the duty or responsibility of the Audit Committee to conduct auditing or accounting reviews or procedures. Members of the Audit Committee are not employees of the Company. Therefore, the Audit Committee has relied, without independent verification, on management’s representation that the consolidated financial statements have been prepared with integrity and objectivity and in conformity with GAAP and on the representations of the independent auditors included in their report on our consolidated financial statements. The Audit Committee’s review does not provide its members with an independent basis to determine that management has maintained appropriate accounting and financial reporting principles or policies, or appropriate internal controls and procedures designed to assure compliance with accounting standards and applicable laws and regulations. Furthermore, the Audit Committee’s considerations and discussions with management and the independent auditors do not assure that our consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with GAAP, that the audit of our consolidated financial statements has been carried out in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB, or that our independent auditors are in fact “independent.”

The Audit Committee receives regular reports from our General Counsel with respect to matters coming within the scope of our Code of Conduct. The CEO and the principal financial officer have each agreed to be bound by the Code of Conduct and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act mandated Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers. The Company has also implemented and applied the Code of Conduct throughout the Company. It also has in place procedures for the receipt of complaints concerning our accounting, internal accounting controls, or auditing practices, including the confidential, anonymous submission by employees of the Company of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing practices.

In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board (and the Board has approved) that the audited consolidated financial statements be included in the 2020 Form 10-K for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Audit Committee has selected Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent auditors for the 2021 fiscal year.

Submitted by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors.

Bruce A. Edwards, Chair

John F. Finn

Mark A. Emkes

John W. McNamara

Robert M. Patterson

Greif - Proxy Statement 38

Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy

The Audit Committee is responsible for the appointment, compensation and oversight of the work of the independent auditors. As part of this responsibility, the Audit Committee is required to pre-approve the audit and permissible non-audit services performed by the independent auditors in order to assure that such services do not impair the auditors’ independence from the Company. The Securities and Exchange Commission has issued rules specifying the types of services that independent auditors may not provide to their audit client, as well as the audit committee’s administration of the engagement of the independent auditors. Accordingly, the Audit Committee has adopted a Pre-Approval Policy (the “Policy”), which sets forth the procedures and the conditions under which services proposed to be performed by the independent auditors must be pre-approved.

Pursuant to the Policy, certain proposed services may be pre-approved on a periodic basis so long as the services do not exceed certain pre-determined cost levels. If not pre-approved on a periodic basis, proposed services must otherwise be separately pre-approved prior to being performed by the independent auditors. In addition, any proposed services that were pre-approved on a periodic basis, but later exceed the pre-determined cost level would require separate pre-approval of the incremental amounts by the Audit Committee.

The Audit Committee has delegated pre-approval authority to the Chair of the Audit Committee for proposed services to be performed by the independent auditors for up to $100,000 per engagement. Pursuant to such Policy, in the event the Chair pre-approves services, the Chair is required to report decisions to the full Audit Committee at its next regularly-scheduled meeting.

Fees of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Deloitte & Touche LLP served as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2020. It is currently expected that a representative of Deloitte & Touche LLP will attend the Annual Meeting via the live webcast, will have an opportunity to make a statement if such representative so desires and will be available to respond to appropriate questions from stockholders. Our Audit Committee has selected Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the 2021 fiscal year. Deloitte & Touche LLP was initially engaged by the Audit Committee as our independent registered public accounting firm in August 2014.

All services to be provided by our independent auditors are pre-approved by the Audit Committee, including audit services, audit-related services, tax services and certain other services. See “Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy.” Aggregate fees billed to the Company for each of the fiscal years ended October 31, 2019 and October 31, 2020 by Deloitte & Touche LLP were as follows:

Type of Service	2020	2019
Audit Fees (1)	$6,790,000	$7,610,000
Audit-Related Fees (2)	$687,000	$888,000
Tax Fees (3)	$2,647,000	$2,424,000
All Other Fees (4)	$17,000	$23,000
Total	$10,141,000	$10,945,000

(1)Comprises the audits of our annual financial statements and internal controls over financial reporting and reviews of our quarterly financial statements, attest services and consents to SEC filings.

(2)Comprises statutory audits of Company subsidiaries, employee benefit plan audits and consultations regarding financial accounting and reporting.

(3)Comprises services for tax compliance, tax planning and tax advice. Tax compliance includes services for compliance related tax advice, as well as the preparation and review of both original and amended tax returns for the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries. Tax compliance related fees represented $0 and $30,000 of the tax fees for fiscal years 2020 and 2019, respectively. The remaining tax fees primarily include tax planning.

(4)Comprises other miscellaneous services.

None of the services described under the headings “Audit-Related Fees,” “Tax Fees,” or “All Other Fees” above were approved by the Audit Committee pursuant to the waiver procedure set forth in 17 CFR 210.2-01 (c)(7)(i)(C).

Greif - Proxy Statement 39

OTHER MATTERS

Communications with the Board

Our Board believes it is important for stockholders to have a process to send communications to the Board. Accordingly, any stockholder or other interested party who desires to make his or her concerns known to the non-management directors or to the entire Board may do so by communicating with the chair of the Audit Committee by e-mail to audit.committee@greif.com or in writing to Audit Committee Chair, Greif, Inc., 425 Winter Road, Delaware, Ohio 43015. All such communications will be forwarded to the non-management directors or the entire Board as requested in the communication.

Stockholder Recommendations for Director Nominees

The Nominating Committee is responsible for evaluating and recommending candidates to the Board. The Committee’s Charter sets forth certain specific, minimum qualifications that must be met by a Nominating Committee recommended nominee for a position on the Board, as well as qualities and skills that Board members must possess. The Nominating Committee determines, and reviews with the Board on an annual basis, the desired skills and characteristics for directors as well as the composition of the Board as a whole. This assessment considers director’s qualification as independent, as well as diversity, age, skill and experience in the context of the needs of the Board. The Nominating Committee seeks to achieve diversity of occupational and personal backgrounds and considers diversity as a factor in director nominations. The Nominating Committee views diversity in a broad context to include race, gender, ethnicity, geography, diversity of viewpoint, professional and industry experience, skills, education and personal expertise, among others. At a minimum, directors should share the values of the Company and should possess the following characteristics: high personal and professional integrity; the ability to exercise sound business judgment; an inquiring mind; and the time available to devote to Board activities and the willingness to do so. Ultimately, the Nominating Committee will select prospective Board members who the Nominating Committee believes will be effective, in conjunction with the other members of the Board, in collectively serving the long-term interests of the stockholders.

The Nominating Committee identifies potential director candidates through a variety of means, including recommendations from members of the Committee or the Board, suggestions from Company management, and stockholder recommendations. The Committee also may, in its discretion, engage director search firms to identify candidates. Stockholders may recommend director candidates for consideration by the Nominating Committee by submitting a written recommendation to the Secretary of the Company at 425 Winter Road, Delaware, Ohio 43015 (the “Recommendation Notice”). The Recommendation Notice must contain, at a minimum, the following: the name and address, as they appear on our books, and telephone number, of the stockholder making the recommendation, including information on the number of shares and class of stock owned, and if such person is not a stockholder of record or if such shares are owned by an entity, reasonable evidence of such person’s ownership of such shares or such person’s authority to act on behalf of such entity; the full legal name, address and telephone number of the individual being recommended, together with a reasonably detailed description of the background, experience and qualifications of that individual; a written acknowledgement by the individual being recommended that he or she has consented to that recommendation and consents to our undertaking of an investigation into that individual’s background, experience and qualifications in the event that the Nominating Committee desires to do so; the disclosure of any relationship of the individual being recommended with the Company or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates, whether direct or indirect; and, if known to the stockholder, any material interest of such stockholder or individual being recommended in any proposals or other business to be presented at our next annual meeting of stockholders (or a statement to the effect that no material interest is known to such stockholder).

Except for the director nominees recommended by the Nominating Committee to the Board, no person may be nominated for election as a director of the Company during any stockholder meeting unless such person was first recommended by a stockholder for Board membership in accordance with the procedures set forth in the preceding paragraph and the Recommendation Notice was received by us not less than 60 days nor more than 90 days prior to the date of such meeting; provided, however, if less than 75 days’ notice or prior public disclosure of the date of a stockholders’ meeting is given or made to stockholders, then, in order to be timely received, the Recommendation Notice must be received by us no later than the close of business on the 10th day following the day on which such notice of the date of the stockholders’ meeting was mailed or such public disclosure was made.

Stockholder Proposals

Proposals of stockholders intended to be presented at the 2022 annual meeting of stockholders (expected to be March 1, 2022) must be received by us for inclusion in the proxy statement and form of proxy on or prior to 120 days in advance of the first anniversary of the date of this proxy statement. If a stockholder intends to present a proposal at the 2022 annual meeting of stockholders, but does not seek to include such proposal in our proxy statement and form of proxy, such proposal must be received by us on or prior to 45 days in advance of the first anniversary of the date of this proxy statement or the persons named in the form of proxy for the 2022 annual meeting of stockholders will be entitled to use their discretionary voting authority should such proposal then be raised at such meeting, without any discussion of the matter in our proxy statement or form of proxy. Furthermore, stockholders must follow the procedures set forth in Article I, Section 8, of our Second Amended and Restated By-Laws, as amended, in order to present proposals at the 2022 annual meeting of stockholders.

Greif - Proxy Statement 40

Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions

We have a written policy for the approval of a transaction between the Company and one of its directors, executive officers, greater than 5% Class B stockholders, an entity owned or controlled by such persons, or an immediate family member of such persons, which is generally referred to as a related party transaction. This policy provides that the Audit Committee must review, evaluate and approve or disapprove all related party transactions involving an amount equal to or greater than $5,000. This policy also requires that all related party transactions be disclosed in our applicable filings as required by the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and related rules. In addition, the Nominating Committee, which advises the Board of Directors on corporate governance matters, independently reviews and assesses corporate governance issues related to contemplated related party transactions.

During fiscal 2020, we retained the law firm of Baker & Hostetler LLP to perform certain legal services on our behalf. Daniel J. Gunsett, a partner in that firm during fiscal 2020, is a director of the Company and a member of the Compensation, Nominating and Stock Repurchase Committees. We anticipate retaining Baker & Hostetler LLP in the 2021 fiscal year. The fees for legal services rendered in fiscal 2020 were less than $700,000. Mr. Gunsett retired from Baker & Hostetler LLP in December 2020. The Board has affirmatively determined that Mr. Gunsett meets the categorical standards of independence adopted by the Board and is an independent director as defined in the NYSE listing standards. See “Corporate Governance-Director Independence.”

Other Information

The proxy card enclosed with this proxy statement is solicited from Class B stockholders by and on behalf of the Board of Directors of the Company. A person giving the proxy has the power to revoke it.

The expense for soliciting proxies for this Annual Meeting is to be paid by us. Solicitations of proxies also may be made by personal calls upon or telephone or telegraphic communications with stockholders, or their representatives, by not more than five officers or regular employees of the Company who will receive no compensation for doing so other than their regular salaries.

Management knows of no matters to be presented at the Annual Meeting other than the above proposals. However, if any other matters properly come before the Annual Meeting, it is the intention of the persons named in the accompanying form of proxy to vote the proxy in accordance with their judgment on such matters.

	/s/ Gary R. Martz
	Gary R. Martz
	Corporate Secretary
January 12, 2021

Greif - Proxy Statement 41

Greif - Proxy Statement 42

Greif - Proxy Statement 43