Indebtedness And Other Financial Liabilities

3 Months Ended

Jun. 18, 2011

Indebtedness And Other Financial Liabilities

Indebtedness And Other Financial Liabilities

8.   Indebtedness and Other Financial Liabilities

Our debt obligations at June 18, 2011 and February 26, 2011 consisted of the following (in thousands):

	At									At
	June 18, 2011									February 26, 2011
	Indebtedness									Indebtedness
	Prior to			Amounts						Prior to			Amounts
	Financial			Classified as						Financial			Classified as
	Statement			Subject to						Statement			Subject to
	Classification			Compromise1			Indebtedness			Classification			Compromise1			Indebtedness
Debtor-in-Possession Credit Agreement, due June 14, 2012	$	350,000		$	-		$	350,000		$	350,000		$	-		$	350,000
Related Party Promissory Note, due August 18, 2011		10,000			(10,000	)		-			10,000			(10,000	)		-
5.125% Convertible Senior Notes, due June 15, 2011		165,000			(165,000	)		-			165,000			(165,000	)		-
9.125% Senior Notes, due December 15, 2011		12,840			(12,840	)		-			12,840			(12,840	)		-
6.750% Convertible Senior Notes, due December 15, 2012		255,000			(255,000	)		-			255,000			(255,000	)		-
11.375% Senior Secured Notes, due August 1, 2015		260,000			(260,000	)		-			260,000			(260,000	)		-
9.375% Notes, due August 1, 2039		200,000			(200,000	)		-			200,000			(200,000	)		-
Other		2,438			(2,438	)		-			2,544			(2,544	)		-
Subtotal		1,255,278			(905,278	)		350,000			1,255,384			(905,384	)		350,000
Less current portion of long-term debt		(350,000	)		-			(350,000	)		(159	)		159			-
Long-term debt	$	905,278		$	(905,278	)	$	-		$	1,255,225		$	(905,225	)	$	350,000

1Refer to Note 9 – Liabilities subject to compromise for additional information.

DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION CREDIT AGREEMENT

In connection with the Bankruptcy Filing, on December 13, 2010, the Bankruptcy Court entered its interim financing order, among other things, permitting us to enter into a Superpriority Debtor-in-Possession Credit Agreement (as amended and restated in its entirety by that certain Amended and Restated Superpriority Debtor-in-Possession Credit Agreement dated as of December 21, 2010, further amended and restated in its entirety by that certain Second Amended and Restated Superpriority Debtor-in-Possession Credit Agreement dated as of January 10, 2011, further amended and restated in its entirety by that certain Third Amended and Restated Superpriority Debtor-in-Possession Credit Agreement dated as of January 13, 2011, further amended (subsequent to the reporting period) by that certain First Amendment to the Third Amended and Restated Superpriority Debtor-in-Possession Credit Agreement dated as of July 8, 2011 ("the First Amendment to the DIP Credit Agreement"), as may be therefore further amended, amended and restated, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time (the "DIP Credit Agreement") with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent and as collateral agent (in such capacity, the "Agent"), the lenders from time to time party thereto (collectively, the "DIP Lenders") and our Company and certain subsidiaries as borrowers thereunder.  On December 14, 2010, we satisfied all of the conditions to the effectiveness of the DIP Credit Agreement and to the initial closing thereunder and consummated the transactions contemplated thereunder including the refinancing in full of our Company's and its applicable subsidiaries' obligations under the pre-existing first lien credit facility. The Bankruptcy Court entered a final order approving the DIP Credit Agreement on January 11, 2011.  Pursuant to the terms of the DIP Credit Agreement:

• the DIP Lenders agreed to lend up to $800.0 million in the form of a $350.0 million term loan and a $450.0 million revolving credit facility with a $250.0 million sublimit for letters of credit, in each case subject to the terms and conditions therein;

• our Company's and the Subsidiary Borrower's obligations under the DIP Credit Agreement and the other specified loan documents are guaranteed by our Company's certain other subsidiaries that are Debtors ("Subsidiary Guarantors" and, together with our Company and the Subsidiary Borrowers, the "Loan Parties"); and

• the Loan Parties' obligations under the DIP Credit Agreement and such other specified loan documents are secured by a security interest in, and lien upon, substantially all of the Loan Parties' existing and after-acquired personal and real property, having the priority and subject to the terms therein and in the order(s) entered into by the Bankruptcy Court, as applicable.

Our Company will have the option to have interest on the revolving loans under the revolving credit facility provided under the DIP Credit Agreement accrue at an alternate base rate plus 200 basis points or at adjusted LIBOR plus 300 basis points. Our Company will have the option to have interest on the term loan provided under the DIP Credit Agreement accrue at an alternate base rate plus 600 basis points or at adjusted LIBOR (with a floor of 175 basis points) plus 700 basis points. The DIP Credit Agreement limits, among other things, our Company's and the other Loan Parties' ability to (i) incur indebtedness, (ii) incur or create liens, (iii) dispose of assets, (iv) prepay certain indebtedness and make other restricted payments, (v) enter into sale and leaseback transactions and (vi) modify the terms of certain indebtedness and certain material contracts. Notably, however, the DIP Credit Agreement permits our Company to use the proceeds generated from the sale of the Southern Stores in the operation of our business rather than requiring us to use those proceeds to reduce the Loan Parties' outstanding indebtedness under the DIP Credit Agreement.

The DIP Credit Agreement also contains certain financial covenants, including a minimum excess availability covenant of $100.0 million (or $75.0 million at any time after August 13, 2011 but on or before November 5, 2011, or $50.0 million at any time after November 5, 2011), minimum liquidity covenant of $100.0 million and minimum cumulative EBITDA covenant as defined in the DIP Credit Agreement.  Minimum cumulative EBITDA measured beginning on April 24, 2011 is as follows (in millions):

Date	Minimum Cumulative EBITDA
August 13, 2011	$         -
September 10, 2011	10.0
October 8, 2011	20.0
November 5, 2011	35.0
December 3, 2011	50.0
December 31, 2011	65.0
January 28, 2012	90.0
February 25, 2012	100.0
March 24, 2012	110.0
April 21, 2012	125.0
May 19, 2012	150.0
June 16, 2012	175.0

Meeting our EBITDA covenant requires increasing levels of performance throughout the year, including the successful implementation of our business improvement initiatives. As of the balance sheet date, we have entered into a definitive agreement with C&S to provide services and we are in the process of negotiating with union locals to obtain consensual modifications to collective bargaining agreements necessary for our successful reorganization. We may not achieve our minimum cumulative EBITDA covenant. A financial covenant violation could result in termination of the DIP Credit Agreement and/or termination of our access to funding thereunder. If either (or both) of those were to occur, our Company could be without sufficient cash availability to meet our operating needs or satisfy our obligations as they fall due, in which instance we may be unable to successfully reorganize.

The DIP Credit Agreement matures upon the earliest to occur of (a) June 14, 2012, (b) the acceleration of the loans and the termination of the commitment thereunder, and (c) the substantial consummation (as defined in Section 1101(2) of the Bankruptcy Code, which for purposes hereof shall be no later than the effective date thereof) of a plan of reorganization that is confirmed pursuant to an order entered by the Bankruptcy Court.

Warrants

Our Series B warrants issued as part of the acquisition of Pathmark on December 3, 2007, are exercisable at $32.40 and expire on June 9, 2015.  The Tengelmann Warenhandelsgesellschaft KG ("Tengelmann") stockholders have the right to approve any issuance of common stock under these warrants upon exercise (assuming Tengelmann's outstanding interest is at least 25% and subject to liquidity impairments defined within the Tengelmann Stockholder Agreement).  In addition, Tengelmann has the ability to exercise a "Put Right" whereby it has the ability to require our Company to purchase our common stock held by Tengelmann to settle these warrants.  Based on the rights provided to Tengelmann, our Company does not have sole discretion to determine whether the payment upon exercise of these warrants will be settled in cash or through issuance of an equivalent portion of our shares.  Therefore, these warrants are recorded as liabilities and marked-to-market each reporting period based on our Company's current stock price.

The value of the Series B warrants as of June 18, 2011 and February 26, 2011 was $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively, and is included in "Liabilities subject to compromise" in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.  Our "Nonoperating income" for the 16 weeks ended June 18, 2011 and June 19, 2010 was comprised of gains of approximately $0.1 million and $8.3 million, respectively, relating to market value adjustments for Series B warrants.   The following assumptions and estimates were used in the Black-Scholes model used to value the Series B warrants:

	At	At
	June 18, 2011	Feb. 26, 2011
Expected life	3.98 Years	4.29 Years
Volatility	116.7%	111.3%
Dividend yield range	0%	0%
Risk-free interest rate	1.53%	2.16%

Call Option and Financing Warrants

On or about October 3, 2008, Lehman Brothers OTC Derivatives, Inc. or "LBOTC," which accounts for 50% of our call option and financing warrant transactions, filed for bankruptcy protection, which is an event of default under such transactions.  We are monitoring the developments affecting LBOTC, noting the impact of the LBOTC bankruptcy effectively reduced conversion prices for 50% of our convertible senior notes to their stated prices of $36.40 for the 5.125% Notes and $37.80 for the 6.750% Notes.

In the event we terminate these transactions, or they are canceled in the LBOTC bankruptcy, or LBOTC otherwise fails to perform its obligations under such transactions, we would have the right to monetary damages in the form of an unsecured claim against LBOTC in an amount equal to the present value of our cost to replace these transactions with another party for the same period and on the same terms.