XML 36 R23.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.8.0.1
Financial Instruments
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2018
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Financial Instruments
Financial Instruments
Fair Value
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The fair value hierarchy distinguishes between (i) market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from independent sources (observable inputs) and (ii) an entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available in the circumstances (unobservable inputs). The fair value hierarchy consists of three broad levels, which gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:
Level 1 - Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.
Level 2 - Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, including quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (e.g., interest rates); and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.
Level 3 - Inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable.
The carrying values and fair values of Arconic’s financial instruments were as follows: 
 
March 31, 2018
 
December 31, 2017
 
Carrying
value
 
Fair
value
 
Carrying
value
 
Fair
value
Cash and cash equivalents
$
1,205

 
$
1,205

 
$
2,150

 
$
2,150

Restricted cash
3

 
3

 
4

 
4

Derivatives – current asset
37

 
37

 
61

 
61

Noncurrent receivables
20

 
20

 
20

 
20

Derivatives – noncurrent asset
19

 
19

 
33

 
33

Available-for-sale securities
96

 
96

 
106

 
106

Short-term debt
45

 
45

 
38

 
38

Derivatives – current liability
29

 
29

 
45

 
45

Derivatives – noncurrent liability
8

 
8

 
14

 
14

Long-term debt, less amount due within one year
6,309

 
6,631

 
6,806

 
7,443


The following methods were used to estimate the fair values of financial instruments:
Cash and cash equivalents, Restricted cash, Short-term debt. The carrying amounts approximate fair value because of the short maturity of the instruments. The fair value amounts for Cash and cash equivalents and Restricted cash were classified in Level 1, and Short-term debt was classified in Level 2.
Derivatives. The fair value of derivative contracts classified as Level 1 was based on identical unrestricted assets and liabilities. The fair value of derivative contracts classified as Level 2 was based on inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (e.g., interest rates).
Noncurrent receivables. The fair value of noncurrent receivables was based on anticipated cash flows, which approximates carrying value, and was classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Available-for-sale securities. The fair value of such securities was based on quoted market prices. These financial instruments consist of exchange-traded fixed income securities, which are carried at fair value and were classified in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.
Long-term debt, less amount due within one year. The fair value was based on quoted market prices for public debt and on interest rates that are currently available to Arconic for issuance of debt with similar terms and maturities for non-public debt. The fair value amounts for all Long-term debt were classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.